The historian of philosophy as a "Portraitmaler": A Brentanian look on Contextualism-Appropriationism Debate

Gabriel Ferreira

A couple months ago, Christia Mercer (2019) has published a paper in which she does a reassessment of the 2015 debate between Garber and Della Rocca on what would be the correct interpretation of Spinoza. Following Mercer, the two philosophers instantiated two main positions regarding the concept and the methodology of doing history of philosophy, namely, contextualism and appropriationism. As Mercer puts it, it is pivoted around the acceptance or rejection of one single principle, i.e. the "Getting Things Right Constraint" (GTRC), which can be rendered as the clause that forbids the attribution of claims or ideas to historical figures without concern for whether or not they are ones the figures would recognize as their own. However, rather than be an undoubtful principle, it conceals a great number of tough questions about the very meaning of what one should understand by "getting things right". Following what Mulligan names the "Austrian approach" to history of philosophy, this paper aims to unfold some aspects of Brentano's "philosophy of history of philosophy" in order to look for his contributions to a problem that was already present at the origins of contemporary philosophy.

Keywords: Brentano, Contextualism, Appropriationism, History of Philosophy