Optimal Location Review

The CDT Optimal Location Review (OLR) outlines the process of identifying "optimal" trail locations for the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST). 

However, the document reveals significant concerns about land acquisitions, motorized restrictions, and increased federal control—issues that could affect Alaska Long Trail if it follows the same pattern. Below are the key concerns, along with references to specific pages. 

🚨 1. Motorized Use is Phased Out

📄 Pages 4, 6, 7

• CDNST planning prioritizes non-motorized use, excluding ATVs and snowmachines.

• Existing motorized routes are being removed through OLR recommendations.

• If the Alaska Long Trail follows this pattern, motorized users will lose access.

🚨 2. Landowners Face Pressure for Land Acquisitions & Easements

📄 Pages 6-7, 14

• Private land is identified for “optimal” trail locations, regardless of ownership.

• Land acquisition tracking system categorizes private land for future purchases.

• Landowners along the Alaska Long Trail could be pressured to sell or grant easements.

🚨 3. Public Process is Limited & Biased

📄 Pages 7, 9, 10

• Public input is collected but does not impact final decisions.

• Federal agencies & NGOs control the process, not local communities.

• Trail reroutes are often pre-determined before public involvement.

🚨 4. Federal Control Replaces Local Decision-Making

📄 Pages 6, 7, 12

• Forest Service & BLM oversee OLR decisions, working with NGOs.

• National Trails System Act (NTSA) ensures long-term federal oversight.

• Once an NST is designated, local Alaskans lose control over the trail.

🚨 5. Scenic Integrity Takes Priority Over Existing Land Uses

📄 Pages 7, 15

• Resource development, hunting, and motorized access are deprioritized.

• OLRs justify moving trails away from “visible human activity.”

• Federal agencies can expand trail buffers, restricting nearby landowners.