If you want closed-back isolation and a foldable design for fishing, choose AKG Pro Audio K371; if you need an open, airy presentation for focused listening at home, choose Sennheiser HD 560S.
Neither is an earbud or a purpose-built outdoor fishing headphone, so think about your surroundings and whether you need to hear what is happening around you.
AKG Pro Audio K371 vs Sennheiser HD 560S at a Glance
• AKG Pro Audio K371 strength: Closed-back, over-ear design offers sound isolation; it also folds for easier storage. Trade-off: Its closed design is less suited to the open, spacious listening experience the Sennheiser is built around.
• Sennheiser HD 560S strength: Open-back design and angled drivers are intended to create a wide, articulate listening presentation. Trade-off: It has no noise-control feature and is a poor fit when you want isolation.
• K371 connection: 32-ohm impedance and included 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm connectivity options make it compatible with a range of audio sources.
• HD 560S connection: Its 120-ohm impedance and 6.3 mm jack with a 3.5 mm adapter suit a wired listening setup, but the K371 has the lower listed impedance.
• Choose the K371 if you want a closed-back headphone for travel, studio work, or quieter listening in a busier setting.
• Choose the HD 560S if you mainly listen in a quiet room and value its open-back presentation.
The K371 is the more versatile choice when you want a wired headphone that can move between a studio desk and a bag. Its foldable, notched headband helps with storage, and the closed-back, oval earcups are designed to provide isolation. That makes its design more suitable than the HD 560S for listening in a setting where you do not want an open headphone.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
For a buyer considering headphones for fishing, that distinction matters. The K371’s closed cups may help reduce ambient sound reaching you, but they do not make it a safety device or a weatherproof outdoor product. If you need to stay alert to nearby people, equipment, or changing conditions, wearing either headphone could be the wrong choice.
The K371’s 32-ohm impedance, 50 mm drivers, and included mini-XLR cable with 3.5 mm and 6.3 mm connections give it flexibility across different wired sources. I’d choose it for someone who wants isolation, portability, or a headphone that can serve both studio and everyday listening needs. Skip it if your main priority is an open, ventilated design and a broad-feeling presentation.
The HD 560S is built around an open-back design and a focus on natural, accurate sound. Its angled driver alignment is intended to create a wide, articulate soundstage, and its velour earpads are designed for a soft, ventilated fit. Those characteristics make it a more natural match for extended listening in a quiet space than for outdoor use.
Its open construction is also its biggest practical limitation. Sound can pass through the cups, so it offers no noise-control feature and is not the right choice when you want to block out nearby sound. That makes it a poor match for fishing if you want an isolated listening experience—or if you need headphones that do not let your audio spill into the surrounding environment.
With 120-ohm impedance, a 6.3 mm jack, and a 3.5 mm adapter, the HD 560S is a wired option for compatible listening setups. I’d recommend it to someone who mostly listens at home and values an open presentation over isolation or foldability. If you need a closed-back design for travel or a busier environment, the K371 is the more suitable pick.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• For a closed-back design → AKG Pro Audio K371. Its earcups are designed to provide isolation; the HD 560S has an open-back construction.
• For a more open, spacious presentation → Sennheiser HD 560S. Its angled driver alignment is designed to produce a wide, articulate soundstage.
• For folding and easier storage → AKG Pro Audio K371. Its headband folds, making it more convenient to pack away.
• For fishing, if you want more isolation → AKG Pro Audio K371. Its closed-back design makes it the more plausible of these two, though neither is described as weatherproof or made specifically for fishing.
• For fishing when awareness of your surroundings matters → Neither is an automatic choice. The K371 is designed to isolate, while the HD 560S lets sound pass through; consider whether wearing headphones is appropriate for your location and activity.
• For a lower listed impedance → AKG Pro Audio K371. It is specified at 32 ohms, compared with 120 ohms for the HD 560S.
• For a removable, replaceable-parts detail → AKG Pro Audio K371. Its data lists replaceable ear pads and a mini-XLR connector.
I’d buy the AKG Pro Audio K371 for the broader range of situations it can handle: closed-back isolation, a foldable design, and flexible wired connections.
For fishing, it is the more sensible of these two if you specifically want a closed-back headphone, though I would not treat it as outdoor or weather protection.
I’d choose the HD 560S instead for quiet-room listening where its open presentation is the main attraction.
The K371 is the more suitable choice if you want closed-back isolation. The HD 560S is open-back and offers no noise-control feature. Neither is identified as weatherproof or designed specifically for fishing.
The K371’s closed-back design is intended to provide sound isolation. The HD 560S has an open-back design, so it is not the pick for keeping outside sound out.
The HD 560S is described with velour earpads and a ventilated open-cup design intended to stay cool around the ears. The K371 has an over-ear design with plush pads, but the provided details do not establish that one will feel more comfortable for every listener.
No. Both are wired, over-ear headphones—not open-ear earbuds or in-ear headphones. If you specifically want the best on-ear headphones for fishing, note that neither model is on-ear; consider the fit and your need to hear your surroundings before choosing either.
• Pyle Home Audio vs OneOdio Over Ear Headphones
• NUBWO U3 vs Puiixur Replacement Nova 3
• Amazon Renewed Astro A10 vs Wentronic Y05
• MUSICOZY Headband Sleep Headphones vs TOPOINT Sleep Mask Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.