Ada Wan

Publications (please note: my perspective on work in the language & computing space has changed a lot since my discoveries from 2019 on. While there is some truth to be abstracted from earlier work, please read those with a grain of salt, i.e. sceptically. There are many more academic assumptions and contexts that need to be taken into consideration. )

• Ada Wan. 2022b. Fairness in Representation for Multilingual Natural Language Processing: Insights from Controlled Experiments on Conditional Language Modeling. Long version. * 

• Ada Wan. 2022a. Fairness in representation for multilingual NLP: Insights from controlled experiments on conditional language modeling. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022. (Code for preprocessing: zipped, all in 1 txt file for viewing)*

• Ada Wan. 2021. Representation and bias in multilingual NLP: Insights from controlled experiments on conditional language modeling. Reviewed version for ICLR 2021. (The last version containing the mention of "DASH" ("data, algorithm, size, and hardware") (p. 49), submitted prior to the final reviewed version, was uploaded on 20201110 at 2050. It can be read here: v202011102050.)*

* Please note that, despite how "[s]ome initial experiments were supported by the computing resources at the Department of Informatics and Computational Linguistics at UZH and the Institute of Neuroinformatics at UZH and ETH Zurich" (Wan 2022a), none of these initial experiments made it to the final publications 'Representation and bias in multilingual NLP' (2021) and 'Fairness in representation for multilingual NLP' (2022a, 2022b). All experiments, the results of which ended up being used and evaluated for these works, were executed on the author's (Ada Wan's) own equipment. 

• Ada Wan. 2019. Towards a computationally relevant typology for polyglot/multilingual NLP. (Poster)

Earlier publications: 

• Ada Wan. 2018. Tel(s)-telle(s)-signs: Highly accurate automatic crosslingual hypernym discovery. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018), Miyazaki, Japan, May 2018. European Languages Resources Association (ELRA). 

• Ada Wan. 2018. Visualizing the “dictionary of regionalisms of France” (DRF). In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan, May 2018. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).  

• Ada Wan. 2016. Leveraging data-driven methods in word-level language identification for a multilingual alpine heritage corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual and Cross-lingual Methods in NLP, pages 45–54, San Diego, California, June 2016. Association for Computational Linguistics. 

• Steven Bird, David Chiang, Friedel Frowein, Andrea L Berez, Mark Eby, Florian Hanke, Ryan Shelby, Ashish Vaswani, and Ada Wan. 2013. The international workshop on language preservation: An experiment in text collection and language technology. Language Documentation & Conservation, 7:155–167. 

"Incomplete" experimental results using the same experimental setup (same UN data in 3 granularities with same preprocessing, Sockeye implementation (version 1.18.85)) as in 'Fairness in representation' (2022) & 'R&B' (2021): 

CNN (Fully Convolutional Model (ConvSeq2Seq) (Gehring et al., 2017)):
runA0: i. CHAR, ii. CHAR by target; iii. BYTE, iv. BYTE by target; v. WORD, vi. WORD by target.

Note from 20260719: in the past years, some data, including my experimental results, logs, and graphs, have gone missing on my Google Drive. I am still in the process of checking and attempting to put things back in order. 

Syllabi, presentation slides, notes/manuscripts, proposals

• 20220822: Syllabus: Foundations of Linguistic Theory. Context: https://twitter.com/chrmanning/status/1555982606260285440. Open for suggestions and comments. 

Remark 20240314/20240430: the syllabus was only intended to be an intermediate solution / temporary syllabus for the past couple of years for linguistics. But beyond/without linguistics (qua linguistics), it can also be good for the next few years or so to help offset certain narratives on language that some might have regarded as popular in the structural linguistics paradigm --- as part of general education in the humanities (e.g. history) and/or the social sciences, if/when/where offered. Learn and unlearn. Technologists: it is useful too to know what is and is not relevant to computing, how, and why.

• 20231204: The Science of Language Modeling & Conditional Language Modeling (and other caveats for tech/policy-makers, academics, & civilians) [modified version]

• 20250204: Notes to "no 'w/s/ls/g/l'". Open for suggestions and comments.

• 20250402: Higher Education: Paradigm Shift Driven by Science and Digitization. [Spreadsheet: open to comments] [PDF] 

Selected posts on Twitter/X

1. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2022. "The point is think of reality as a continuum in some very finest, superhuman-fine, granularity. Some may be able to see and understand the connectedness of everything, while others might just see certain (more disparate) items that catch their attention (they are able to 1/...". Twitter/X, 20220602, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1532335891448057858 (thread with 3+2 posts). (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot] # My theory of everything in a tweet

2. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2023. "Take 'words'/'sentences' as an example: ppl don't express themselves (speak/sign... or even write, most of the time depending on the context) in these units naturally. Reinforcing these units or an idealized 'parse' (which entails an idealized, qualitative interp) in terms of 1/....". Twitter/X, 20230103, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1610377376042467328 (thread with 6 posts). (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot] # "Word" and attitude (or "...m...m...m...my" vs "m(a)-m(a)-m(a)-m(y)")

3. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2023. "When 'words' are NOT the way to go in computational processing and 'meaning' does not suffice...". Twitter/X, 20230324, https://twitter.com/adawan919/status/1639252583440355328. (Last accessed 20240430.) [Chart to variability in word count vs. character count]

4. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2023. "[I'd consider morphology resolved, feel free to write in your objections (in the next 14 days): here, to me, or through the CorporaList. I reply to all emails that don't appear to be spam. If you've sent one to me & I haven't replied, pls feel free to tweet/X@ me here as well.]1/". Twitter/X, 20231018, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1714665016987693144. (Last accessed 20240529.) [Screenshot]
   [Original email thread from the CorporaList containing my communication from 20231018, uploaded as a screenshot in the 2nd post of this X thread: a thought experiment on internal bias wrt morphology] # Open call for objections to the resolution of morphology (no objections received)

5. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "Revisiting Drew Conway's Data Science Venn Diagram ...". Twitter/X, 20240126, https://twitter.com/adawan919/status/1750669250233081989 (thread with 4 posts). (Last accessed 20240314.) [Screenshot] # TLDR: tools, interpretation, evaluation

6. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "Here is another attempt to point out, more succinctly, some implications of FaIR/R&B, esp. wrt 'language': ...". X, 20240420, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1781449436410810500 (thread with 7 posts). (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot]  # Decomposition of "language" (general)

7. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "I have been using the terms 'p-lg' and 'g-lg' ('particular language' and 'general phenomenon of language' from Haspelmath (2019): https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1741). ...". X, 20240501, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1785753718102667641 (thread with 9 posts). (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot] # Decomposition of "p-language", part 1

8. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "... Let's continue with the exercise, the decomposition of "p-lg", from 1/ ...". X, 20240503, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1786399510819697102 (thread with 6 posts). (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot] # Decomposition of "p-language", part 2

9. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "On text analytics & 'meaning': The direct jump from data to meaning is too coarse-grained.Instead,one needs to regard/treat data as information & clarify the diversity in human judgements & reactions towards such.There should be much to bridge/connect & many biases to point out.". X, 20240528, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1795419502429065502. (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot]  # Text and "meaning"

10. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "But in light of (my) recent discoveries in computational generalization capabilities (incl. interpretations!)& to help prevent practitioners from reading too much into text from computational results,it's probably best to use the term 'data analytics' instead of 'text analytics'.". X, 20240528, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1795421264317678055. (Last accessed 20240528.) [Screenshot]  # How "data" (and data) can help broaden scope instead of perpetuating an insistence to seek info/"meaning" from text alone

11. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "I was asked by an undergraduate as to what some of my comments on @X/Twitter have been about and if I had any advice to share on being a transdisciplinarian or from research. This was my reply: ...". X, 20240604, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1797982157220233545. (Last accessed 20240604.) [Screenshot] # To those who aspire to be in research, are new to my initiative/mission in education and research, or are simply wondering what I have been doing on X/Twitter

12. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2024. "... Most usages of the term 'language' can be summarize [recte summarized] as: i. some artefacts/data (e.g. texts, speech, signs, i.e. text/audio/video data --- both in and beyond the context of computing); and ii. some subject[ive] element (sentiments/values/intent/attitude/identity/politics/ideology/anything)...". X, 20241115, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1857537770220146743/photo/1. (Last accessed 20250123.) [Screenshot]  # A simpler reformulation of the decomposition of "language"

13. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2025. """In the post-"word" era, "'language' acquisition" in children also becomes obsolete. Phases such as "one-word stage", "two-word stage", "multi-word stage" --- is the definition of these stages qualified by a notion of "wordhood" in (the minds of) the children or the investigator/researcher? But either way, there must be some content in between these "words", right? How does one address the discarding/disregarding of such information? Same thing in "linguistic fieldwork" (with some additional social dynamics between a usually "higher-ranked" professional linguist and an informant). Often, the idea of a "word" or what corresponds to a "word"-like object results from some covert social pressure to accommodate and/or to conform. ...". X, 20250820,  https://x.com/adawan919/status/1958270080808103954. (Last accessed 20251211.) [Screenshot] # Linguistics overfitted

14. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2025. """[A message of peace and for reflection:] There are about 30 letters in many alphabets ("(perceived) character 'sets'"), yet some only want to nitpick on the few letters/characters that are "different".""" X, 20251116, https://x.com/adawan919/status/1990059141205987781. (Last accessed 20251211.) [Screenshot] # Characters in common

15. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. "History decomposed: i. analogous to what was summarized in post from 20241115 (https://x.com/adawan919/status/1857537770220146743) --- data and subjective elements; ii. there can be data, from/through which one could interpret. The more fine-grained the data is, the more continuous, larger the span, the more complete, more comprehensive an interpretation can be. (Remember to address the assumptions too.)". X, 20260212, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2021984165181432074. (Last accessed 20260212.) [Screenshot] # History decomposed

16. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """Some might think**: "shouldn't statisticians favor your proposal of statistics-centric ML?"
    I thought so. But things didn't turn out as I'd thought. Possibly because:
    i. [funding (and "backing")] many stats departments seem not to be as well-funded as informatics/CS (Computer Science) departments and may rely on them for funding. Many tech firms seemed to have valued and invested in CS (at universities) more --- there is not much of a reason for this, if I were an employer or the dean, I'd require employees/students to be familiar in everything, including materials from both stats and CS; and
    ii. [expertise and "narratives" from arbitrary disciplinary divides] not many universities have statistics departments or ones that are strong in ML (machine learning). Many chime along with the "narrative" "borrowed" from CS. ML (or the hyping thereof) has also been more a thing of the CSers (except when one hears from a statistician "why not just run a random forest (algorithm) on it?"🤪); and
    iii. [academic/scientific novelty, e.g. from my findings, and the realization of everyone being in a state of ignorance/under-education] even statsers have not done enough careful and rigorous (re-)evaluation: https://x.com/adawan919/status/2052783803614068809?s=20.
    These are just my speculations for now.
    **I don't know why I have to be the (only) one anticipating all potential counter-arguments here. Are people not capable of scientific/academic/research/public discourse?
    From yours truly, the #OfficeOfMetaDean (in jest, but not really --- this is the level of discourse necessary right now)""" X, 20260508, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2052789614507708441. (Last accessed 20250512.) [Screenshot] # Statistics (and CSGDS) in the mind of a meta dean

17. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """i. Compared to the post https://x.com/EP_President/status/2052981247412969590 (note also my reply https://x.com/adawan919/status/2053147039249142197), yes, this article offered a more comprehensive perspective on that which used to be referred to as "language". But it'd be more like a counter-narrative, compared to my interpretation.
    ii. It is not the case that "language" is always evolving. It is more the case that, for some, the realisation of how communication happens changes over time. And some professors of "language"/linguistics might have also (intentionally, knowingly) abused their privilege in trying to make their experience "mainstream"/"authoritative", to have their perspectives/narratives "normalised".
    It is alright that professors continue to learn, to broaden their horizons in life (as everyone should). It is not alright that they do so on public (scientific) funding, claim their experience as "authoritative", and exclude/deny/ignore* others' findings (esp. when such findings involve proofs more objective and/or comprehensive). *refute/debate is fine given discourse/communication (in any format)
    Attn.: .@snsf_ch .@fedpol .@Bundesrat_CH .@UN .@INTERPOL_HQ .@INTERPOL_Cyber
    (Law enforcement involved due to WFA (waste, fraud, abuse) for project @NCCR_Language (and many other research activities worldwide in the name of "language" and/or "language science(s)", computational and otherwise, after my findings (re-)solving "language").)""" X, 20260512, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2054129031998472349. (Last accessed 20260512.) [Screenshot] (Post/Article quoted: https://x.com/TheEconomist/status/2053052385023410346) # Not "evolving 'l'", but change in realisation

18. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """There is no "evolution" (when it comes to "species-hood"). There may have been some "in-group observations/assumptions/hypotheses" (these by and about certain "in-groups") that overfitted & need broadening as one learns more about the world (or, as one finds oneself being confronted with "bio-diversity").
    There is time, there can be changes. But there is no need for "evolution".
    "Evolution" generalised. .@UN .@NobelPrize """ X, 20260512, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2054134761992450315. (Last accessed 20260512.) [Screenshot] (Post quoted: https://x.com/adawan919/status/2054129031998472349) # Evolution generalized

19. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """[On no "p-language", to all, esp. .@UN and .@EU_Commission ]
    We all breathe, but none of us claims (or should claim) that we breathe in a particular way that adheres to some national/regional boundary or identity. The same applies, and should apply, to e.g. the sounds we make, the ways we move, how we think, how we express ourselves and communicate with others. (Frankly, labeling one individual's way of behaving as "one way" already involves too many coarse assumptions [i] and constitutes one (coarse assumption) itself.)
    I don't mind if some people, from time to time, choose to hang onto certain fragments of the past (e.g. certain expressions used) or images of some particular figures (or if they even choose to mimic these, assuming legal and appropriate). But to do so AND to (over-)identify oneselves with these impressions, to project oneselves onto to them, or to sustain an addictive relation with them is problematic.
    [i] e.g. one would be assuming that that individual behaves consistently "one way" throughout their life, no matter what the situation is (assuming that there is "one way" to behave in a particular "situation"), and one is assuming that other individuals behave "other ways".... (Scarequotes here are for emphasis and disapproval (of over-generalization/stereotyping).)""" X, 20260711, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2075950207150227851. (Last accessed 20260711.) [Screenshot] # We all breathe

20. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """How linguistics has been wrong: i. [from the more technical/scientific branch(es)] e.g. phonetics: "The sounds of the world's languages" focused on differences; ii. [from the less technical/scientific branch(es)] e.g. typology: e.g. Whatchamacallit "polysynthetic"/"fusional"/"agglutinative"? Nonsense! iii. [i] and [ii] above based on the concept of "language(s)" that relate to names/terms based on "ethnicity"/"race"/"culture"/"region"); iv. equating "grammar" with "language", or connecting them both; v. [iv] and with the attempt to rationalize internalized "grammar"/"well-formedness" (including prescriptive grammar that is not written, or such referred to as "norm") and consider it science (but without realising/stating such), and/or [iv] and considering the study of "I-language" as the study of, or some ways to probe, the internal state of the mind/brain; vi. making claims about "language" without any explicit definition; leading to the fractionalization of one "discipline" (or what could've been just one "discipline") into various sections/schools/specializations, each being very convinced, in their own particular ways, about the truthfulness of their claims. ...""" X, 20260714, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2077011420017783091. (Last accessed 20260714.) [Screenshot] # How linguistics has been wrong

21. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """To those who thought my post on 14Jul2026 regarding "Europe" (cc: .@EU_Commission .@UN .@IntlCrimCourt .@coe ) might have been a bit too harsh on (the "tradition" of) "Europe", please see some of my observations inspired by the quadrivium and trivium as follows:
    Various subjects ("arts"/"artes") are documented as having been taught in ancient Greece and Rome. 4 of these subjects, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music were later referred to as the quadrivium. And thereafter, 3 of these rhetoric, grammar, and dialectic/logic were referred to as the trivium. Quadrivium became the higher division, trivium was the lower.
    i. Was I "attacking" the tradition in "Europe"? No. If one's goal were to strictly uphold "tradition", regardless of scientific, technical, intellectual, and/or academic progress, then why are these subjects not taught now as they were? Curricula have always been open to changes from antiquity on through the Middle Ages to modern times.
    ii. Some refer to primary schools as "grammar schools" (why not "dialectic/logic" or "rhetoric" schools?), and why aren't secondary schools considered "math/science schools"? (Has there been "foul play" on the part of grammarians to insist on dominance? Read on below.)
    iii. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivium (and Marrou, Henri-Irénée (1969) [i]), accessed 16Jul2026:
    "... the term [trivium] was not used until the Carolingian Renaissance, when it was coined in imitation of the earlier quadrivium.".
    I asked myself:
    has the trivium (most notably, grammar, or "language") always been a "copycat" of subjects more scientific/mathematical? (CL/NLP/LangTech/"AI" seems very well to be an imitation of "information technology proper"!)
    If so, that could make my achievement of (re-)solving "language" a solution to some trans-millennial fraud/WFA, too. (Good that there are other novel scientific/statistical/mathematical findings and discoveries to my work...)
    Believe me, for the part of my findings concerning "language", I would've been much happier to have these be recognized for intellectual, academic, and scientific achievements than forensic and criminological ones --- if the "imitation" claim were true AND relevant to current case of WFA. The above (esp. ii. and iii.) is just a hypothesis on my part for now.
    [i] Marrou, Henri-Irénée (1969). "Les arts libéraux dans l'Antiquité classique". pp. 6–27 in Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen Âge. Paris: Vrin; Montréal: Institut d'études médiévales). pp. 18–19.
    Also: .@NobelPrize .@GWR """ X, 20260716, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2077751926964257100. (Last accessed 20260720.) [Screenshot] #quadrivium & trivium

22. Ada Wan [@adawan919]. 2026. """.@UN ... ii. Some Member States equate "AI" with "information technology (IT)" (and/or development of such). BUT "AI" is not just IT. ... iii. ... while others assume their academic assumptions/convictions/"traditions", however erroneous/biased, ought to be implemented. Could/Would any global "AI" initiatives be a disservice to the world at large? I think so, esp. considering:
    a. the assumptions of "intelligence" (and "language", if any) and "cognitive abilities" are obsolete; and
    b. how these are irrelevant (or not completely relevant) to computational modeling (which ought to be statistics-centric*); and
    c. how modeling may not be what everyone, every task needs.
    *Some believe that everything is / can be statistics, others might not --- another difference to address.""" X, 20260717, https://x.com/adawan919/status/2078167597284044955. (Last accessed 20260720.) [Screenshot] # no"AI" (when there's already tech & ML)

Work in progress (WIP)

• Ada Wan. 2024. Microscopes and telescopes: Trading in black boxes for a lens with multitexts, network depths, and statistical comparisons. (What I had intended to submit in fall 2021, but didn't: screenshot) [OpenReview version posted on 20240425, please note CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensing] 

• 20240430: Selected work directly/indirectly supporting no "w/s/ls/g/l" (No "word(s)", no "sentence(s)", no "linguistic structure(s)", no "grammar(s)", no "language(s)"!)

• Ada Wan. A statistical untypology in finer granularity with parallel data --- from text to science. (Earlier proposal to database for re-education & re-evaluation here (Feb2023).) An even earlier version of this work was mentioned in the rebuttal for FaIR here, titled: A statistical typology of (textual) language in finer granularity. 

[20240430] Context to delay in writing up this work and modifying the title/work: I realized the extent of miseducation in and "addiction" towards "language" and how my suggestion to rank varieties would have been or could have become a bad idea when so many seem to be interested in inappropriately divergent directions. It was intended to be an exercise with no determinate solution, but one through which one could experience how language (or how no language) works.

• Ada Wan. A transdisciplinary approach to scientific insights in finer granularity: ML-inspired progress and opportunities. (See "Higher Education: Paradigm Shift Driven by Science and Digitization" under heading Syllabi, presentation slides, notes/manuscripts, proposals above.)

• Ada Wan. 2025-2026. The Last Treatise (on that which used to be known as "language"). [Versions: 202509091848, 202509302250, 202601130429, current doc (sometimes live writing may be observed!)]

Discussions and responses to calls from the "language (and computing) space"  

On the public mailing list CorporaList (https://list.elra.info/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/corpora@list.elra.info/)

• Earlier attempt to persuade the community in the "language space" to adopt more inclusive and scientific terminology: 

20230208-20230216: Correspondences on the reformulation and reinterpretation of "MWEs". 

• Further correspondences/notifications sent to researchers posting calls: 

20231019: From lemmatization to morphology (4 PDFs, 20231010-20231019): https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1f2Bxv9I-JJzjnv7_uv-RQ0FJxT48WLPF?usp=sharing

20231103: Selected 20 threads in PDFs (20230512-20231024): https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1TP5ZBC8IQ0vQzEueq6U9iub2uwbpryZd?usp=sharing

• In the past years up to November 2024*, I have invested much time and effort in personally notifying various (former) colleagues in the "language" space (i.e. those in linguistics, computational linguistics, NLP, digital humanities, computer science...) of my findings by replying to their posts on the CorporaList and/or ML-news mailing lists (may these posts be calls for new positions or event participation). To many, I have suggested various options for task/project reformulation as well as more appropriate/ethical alternatives for professional development. I have come to notice that those who do intend to practise with integrity have already changed course, and those who don't are ones who ought to be dealt with via more official means (as there are safety/ethical/technical/scientific/legal concerns in undertakings related to "language" to which professionals must pay heed). Some of these emails I have spent hours writing and I simply cannot continue the way I have. Besides, researchers have the responsibility to keep themselves updated/informed of new findings. I am not obligated to send out any courtesy notifications/reminders.
  
  *Update 20250828: notifications have resumed in the course of 2025 and it'll be an on-going process to have these be documented here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IPjO4qw8STBwzhTi17BpvbzULO9NsM1gDQDRiAol2YE/edit?usp=sharing

• Academic misconduct and/or waste, fraud, and abuse in form of higher education. A list for the complaint:
  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W0gLjQ9CE-Z3YJjVJHkWGUGV5FVJB0F-cQLlEkchT7w/edit?usp=sharing (note: compilation in progress)

Other "public outreach"

I occasionally take on the unpopular role of calling out bad research or bad conduct in research on Twitter/X @adawan919 (because I have to**). Follow only if you are brave. 😜 (But I'm looking forward to a day when there is no need for such a thankless task!)
Let's practice research integrity with no "w/s/ls/g/l"! (No "word(s)", no "sentence(s)", no "linguistic structure(s)", no "grammar(s)", no "language(s)"!) Note: "no" here could denote the inexistence/absence of something or as part of an imperative (e.g. for ethical reasons).

**My story (and this is how I have been notifying my service providers in the meanwhile):

• 20250415: A general briefing

Relevant to criminal complaint(s) [compilation in progress, but whatever that is here can be acted upon, please feel free to contact should there be any questions]:

• posted on X.com via @adawan919 and on website here on 20251206/20251207: report/complaint submitted to local authorities in Zurich and Switzerland on 20230725: 20230725_kantonspolizei_en.pdf. (Context: https://x.com/adawan919/status/1997440940945121384 (from 20251207) [screenshot].)

• posted on X.com via @adawan919 on 20251009, on website here on 20251204/20251206: post as document.

• posted on X.com via @adawan919 on 20251204, on website here on 20251205/20251206: post as document.

• posted on X.com via @adawan919 and on website here on 20251212: open criminal complaint.

• archive of all posts and replies on X.com (formerly Twitter.com) (while some may not be relevant to criminal complaint(s), some are expressly for such): spreadsheet. [Recompilation / data rescue in progress*, first published on website here on 20260114. Complete record keeping in this spreadsheet since at least 20260115 (last updated: 202602191242).]
  *Please email me if you should have any records (screenshots, weblinks, photos) of my posts to share.

• archive of correspondences (esp. those to administrators) concerning my research findings (first published on website here 20260115): spreadsheet (last updated: 20260213)

• United Nations (UN) Independent International Scientific Panel on AI (IISPAI): member profiles and potential COIs (Conflicts of Interest): spreadsheet (edits allowed), shared via https://x.com/adawan919/status/2072807267775197485 on 20260702. Announced 20260715: https://x.com/adawan919/status/2077513513006755918.

• List of those promoting "w/s/ls/g/l" or "(human-centric) AI" on X.com starting 20260713: spreadsheet. Shared via https://x.com/adawan919/status/2077513513006755918 on 20260715.

• List of those promoting "w/s/ls/g/l" or "(human-centric) AI" on LinkedIn.com starting [DATE]: spreadsheet. (WIP)

If anyone could help with compiling any of the spreadsheets and require access, please contact me.

A comment regarding the content uploaded from the earlier years following my experimental discoveries (2019-2021, or even 2022-2023): my perspectives then were much different from my perspective now. Such includes my choice of vocabulary, my awareness of the research landscape, and which direction(s) research and education ought to continue going forward (e.g. "no 'language'").

Contact: adawanwork at gmail dot com (please see top of page for further contact info and protocol.)

last updated: 20260722 (site), 20260720 (content in linked file(s) on site)