HQPlayer 3.13.3Download File have a number of high-end components, which do things far more powerful than what hqplayer can do. and i charge $10-$20 less than hqplayer cost, and i don't expect any miracles from the software, and this is a major factor in my decision, rather than the price per se. i know that in the past many people have been frustrated by expensive software, and that hqplayer is not the only software which costs this much, but i believe that expectations are important when people are making price decisions. the core functionality of hqplayer is limited, its a streaming media player, not a multi-room audio system. when im frustrated by a piece of software, or a component, i don't blame the component, i blame the software. so, i do get a bit disappointed when i pay $400 for a hi-fi component that turns out to be a crummy internet streamer, or a piece of software that fails to deliver on its promises. i also do not intend to write a justification to convince people to buy hqplayer. a lot of people already consider me a good source of diy advice, and a lot of people think that the tiny amount of money i charge for support is more than fair, and that i somehow get rich or something. i only know that i don't have a ton of money. when im writing this review, i have a $300 budget that i can spend. i can never afford to be very rich, and i cant afford to be very poor either. it is an obligation i have, to spend $300 on something that makes me happy, and that i can sleep at night. thats all i can say about my personal circumstances.your question is very broad (and i agree with the observation that it is getting too broad). but basically, it boils down to the question of what is the end goal for the hqplayer product. are you trying to convert a standard desktop setup to a smart home setup? does it want to be in your music room/living room? or is it meant to be a stand alone device that is permanently connected to your network? c8b82c0f98
d0d94e66b7