Composite Quality Organization and Digital Tools Developed for US-89 PDB Project
Item #: 20240067
Item #: 20240067
CONTACTS
Implementing Organization: Region One
Implementation Lead:
Brett Daniel
brettd@horrocks.com
(801) 310-2803
Development Team:
Mike MacArthur, Ralph L Wadsworth Construction; problem statement and steering
Bryan Griffiths, Granite Construction; problem statement and steering
Brett Daniel, Horrocks; CQO author and operations lead
Bret Krebs, UDOT; CQO Director
Tim Rose, WSP; CQO conformance lead/Deputy CQO Director
Article Written By: Brett Daniel
Innovation Team Coordinator: Winston Inoway
STATUS
Implementation Date: July 7, 2024
Adoption Status: Fully Implemented
Adoptability Note: How could your next project incorporate some of these practices?
APPLIES TO
Topic: Construction Practices
Organization(s): Central Construction, Central Materials, Central Preconstruction, Region 1, Region 2, Region 3, Region 4, Structures
Job Role(s): Construction Engineer, Materials Engineer, ROW / Permits
Tags: Active transportation, highway transportation, labor costs, labor productivity, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, personnel development, economic benefits, expenses, expenditures, value of time, , reorganization, contract administration > bids, contracting, solicitations, contracts, ( RFP, FRQ ), governance > auditing, policy making, procedures, compliance, law, ( legal ), logistics > inventory, distribution, purchasing, procurement, warehousing, supply chain management, ( digital delivery ), construction, contracting, inspection, project management,
Big construction projects are complex efforts with many moving parts and players. On many Alternative Delivery projects, design builders hire an Independent Quality Firm (IQF) to perform Quality Assurance (QA) to work with the UDOT Oversight team.
Even with these steps, there can be differences in expectations for quality and conflict between the design builder, the contractor, and the UDOT Oversight team. These differences take time to resolve and may contribute to a poor relationship after the fact. This can result in delays, rework, and non-conforming work being left in place.
On US-89, a Progressive Design-Build project, the Project Managers of the contractor, Oak Hills Constructors (Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction and Granite Construction), contacted the Project Quality Lead of the IQF (Horrocks) asking for a quality program that would be a catalyst for keeping construction quality in check. The desired solution was to give the design builder prompt access to UDOT decision-makers when issues arose without too many items needing to be escalated.
The Independent Quality Firm met with their counterparts of the UDOT Oversight Team (WSP) and came up with a Composite Quality Organization (CQO) - a new merged group composed of members from both teams. The CQO approach was authored by the IQF (Horrocks) and it was reviewed, commented upon, and approved by UDOT, WSP, Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction, and Granite Construction.
UDOT was responsible for interpreting quality and documentation requirements and directing the organization. The Contractor was responsible for implementing and providing real-time evidence of compliance with UDOT’s interpretation. This helped ensure common expectations between all parties.
A “Construction Information Management System (CIMS™)” was configured and integrated with existing tools and processes to give the UDOT Resident Engineer (RE) the visibility needed to confirm that the directions were being adhered to and that the quality standard was being met. Both UDOT and the Contractor were responsible for providing staff, 40% and 60%, respectively, to execute QA activities. Issues were visible and quickly resolved, and the RE was able to focus on departures from the specifications and refinement to direction given.
The merger of the UDOT Oversight and Contractor IQF teams in the CQO resulted in ~$5.3M (1.5% of construction cost) in savings based on a traditional IQF project deploying the same level of QA. The CIMS system cost $1.9M to deploy and manage, but it provided the transparency needed to merge Oversight and IQF staff, which reduced quality staffing costs by ~$7.2M.
The UDOT Management Team on the US-89 project leveraged real time data, Technical Directions, PowerBI reports, Daily Check-ins, Weekly leadership meetings, Monthly and Quarterly Audits, Nonconformances and Deviations, and Engineering Judgement to direct the QA on a $350M construction project.
The UDOT RE directed CQO processes imbued in the CIMS system to give field engineers, inspectors, auditors, and project managers access to the data they needed when they needed it. The tools also provided the ability to take prompt action on information gleaned. Tools and processes were refined based on feedback by all parties upon concurrence of the RE.
Inspectors were able to deliver information, photographs, and recommendations to decision-makers more quickly, thus enabling better control of quality.
NOTE: This innovative approach to quality assurance represents just one way UDOT works with its partners to ensure the quality and efficiency of our projects. Please work with Central Project Development if you are interested in exploring nontraditional approaches.
Cost Avoidance: $5,299,999 over 3.58 years of the project (Jan 1, 2021 - July 7, 2024)
Labor Savings: 16,640 hours saved over the length of the project compared with not using CQO
Benefit/Cost Ratio: 4:1
*Benefits are estimated net of initial and ongoing expenses. Savings are averaged over the expected benefit life of the innovation. See details.