Each paper should be assessed for: (1) Technical quality, i.e., correctness and soundness of results, (2) Novelty & significance of the contribution, (3) Clarity in organization, writing quality, and accessibility of the paper, (4) Relevance, i.e., fit to the L4DC community and scope, and (5) Validation, i.e., theoretical rigor and/or empirical evidence.
Please be mindful of good reviewing practices by being: (1) constructive, detailed, and professional in tone, (2) highlighting both strengths and weaknesses, (3) providing specific, actionable feedback for authors, and (4) remaining respectful at all times.Â
All submissions are strictly confidential and must not be shared outside the review process. Make sure to update your conflicts of interest on Openreview.