The journey in this course is something I’d describe as unexpectedly interesting. Not only did I learn about audio both as a theory and practice, but I also discovered something new about myself along the way. For the past three blogs I’ve written for this class, I always began by admitting how skeptical I was. The first few weeks of MMS 172 seemed manageable. But as the weeks went on, it became clear to me that audio will be the most challenging of all the production courses I’ve taken so far. More challenging than text and even photography.

For me, audio is the most technical. It demanded a lot of physics concepts that I thought I had left behind when I finished engineering school four years ago. Concepts in analog and digital signals, and acoustics are not just "good-to-know" topics. They are actually necessary to understand if you want to do audio work properly. From recording, to mixing, and finally mastering, knowing your waveforms matters.

On top of that, I didn’t come into this class with much experience. My only real "audio production" background was back in high school when I used to make music remixes for Christmas party dance numbers. Back then, music burned on CDs was still a thing. I would clip and arrange tracks, throw in some effects, and call it a day. I didn’t really care about sound quality. As long as the transitions didn’t sound weird and the cuts fit the mood I was going for, I was satisfied.

Even now in BAMS, when I recorded voice overs for my course requirements, I never gave much thought to audio quality. My mindset was always "if I can be heard and understood, that’s good enough." So going into MMS 172, I really thought audio would be my weakest. Science plus inexperience? A recipe for disaster.

But I was wrong. This course surprised me. It turned out to be not just a learning experience, but also an enlightening one. Aside from learning how audio work, I came away with three important realizations.