Abstract:

This paper investigates the integration of technology into language teaching, particularly vocabulary acquisition, which has garnered significant attention in recent years. While the potential benefits of technology-enhanced learning are undeniable, the rapid pace of technological advancement necessitates continuous research to identify effective tools and strategies. The aim of the paper is to present the current state of technology-based vocabulary teaching, examining its advantages, challenges, and implications for language pedagogy.

A comprehensive analysis of the literature reveals a growing body of research exploring the use of technology in language classrooms. Studies have demonstrated the potential of various tools and platforms, such as online dictionaries, interactive exercises, multimedia resources, and virtual learning environments, to enhance vocabulary acquisition. These technologies offer opportunities for personalized learning, increased learner autonomy, and the development of communicative competence.

However, the effective integration of technology requires careful consideration of several factors. Issues such as digital divide, technical proficiency, and the potential for distraction can hinder the learning process itself. Moreover, the quality of digital resources varies significantly, and teachers must possess the skills to critically evaluate and select appropriate materials. It is essential to strike a balance between technology-mediated instruction and traditional teaching methods in order to optimize learning outcomes.

Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of pedagogical considerations in technologybased vocabulary teaching. Effective vocabulary instruction involves not only the presentation of new words but also the development of word-learning strategies, the creation of rich language contexts, and opportunities for vocabulary practice. Technology can support these processes through providing interactive activities, authentic language input, and opportunities for collaborative learning.

Keywords: advantages and disadvantages, digital tools, online learning, online platforms, online teaching of English vocabulary, technology integration, vocabulary knowledge, vocabulary teaching.

References:

1. Bauer, L., Nation, P. (1993). Sim’yi sliv. [Word families]. Oxford.

2. Bergstrand, K., Savage, S. V. (2013). Klasna doshka proty avatara: porivnyannya efektyvnosti onlaynkursiv i kursiv u klasi. [The chalkboard versus the avatar: Comparing the effectiveness of online and inclass courses].

3. Clark-Ibanez, M., Scott, L. (2008). Navchannya vykladaty onlayn. [Learning to teach online]. Thousand Oaks.

4. Coxhead, A. (2000). Novyy akademichnyy spysok sliv. [A new academic word list]. Alexandraia, USA.

5. Doró, K. (2007). Vykorystannya vysoko ta nyzʹkochastotnykh diyesliv u pysʹmoviy formi studentiv anhliysʹkoyi movy ta dlya neridnykh. [The use of high- and low-frequency verbs in English native and non-native student writing]. Bristol.

6. Garrett, N. (2009). Perehlyanuti tendentsiyi ta problemy kompʺyuternoho navchannya movy: intehratsiya innovatsiy. [Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. Hoboken.

7. Ghanbaran, S., Ketabi, S. (2014). Mulʹtymediyni ihry ta vyvchennya leksyky. [Multimedia games and vocabulary learning]. London.

8. Goulden, R., Nation, P., Read, J. (1990). Naskilʹky velykym mozhe buty retseptyvnyy slovnykovyy zapas? [How large can a receptive vocabulary be?]. Oxford.

9. Harmer, J. (2012). Osnovni znannya vchytelya: osnovni ponyattya u vykladanni anhliysʹkoyi movy. [Essential teacher knowledge: Core concepts in English language teaching]. Harlow.

10. Kiralyi, Cs. (2022). Mulʹtymediyne navchannya leksyky v klasi EFL. [Multimedia assisted vocabulary teaching in the EFL classroom]. Berehove.

11. Laufer, B., Nation, P. (1995). Rozmir slovnykovoho zapasu ta vykorystannya: leksychne bahat·stvo v pysʹmoviy produktsiyi L2. [Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production]. Oxford.

12. Little, C. B., Titarenko, L., Bergelson, M. (2005). Stvorennya uspishnoho mizhnarodnoho klasu dystantsiynoho navchannya. [Creating a successful international distance learning classroom]. Thousand Oaks.

13. Nation I. S. P. (2001). Vyvchennya inshomovnoyi leksyky. [Learning vocabulary in another language]. Cambridge.

14. Parbin, S. (2021). Zmishchennya metodolohiyi navchannya movy z tradytsiynoho klasu na virtualʹnyy klas. [Shifting of language teaching methodology from traditional classroom to virtual classroom]. Bareilly.

15. Polok, K., Starowicz, K. (2022). Korysnistʹ riznomanitnykh tekhnolohichnykh instrumentiv dlya pokrashchennya vyvchennya leksyky sered tykh, khto vyvchaye anhliysʹku polʹsʹku movu. [The usefulness of various technological tools in enhancing vocabulary learning among FL Polish learners of English].

16. Praninskas, J. (1972). Spysok sliv amerykansʹkoho universytetu. [American university word list]. London.

17. Solano, L., Cabrera, P., Ulehlova, E., Espinoza, V. (2017). Doslidzhennya vykorystannya osvitnikh tekhnolohiy u vykladanni EFL: pryklad pochatkovoyi osvity v pivdennomu rehioni Ekvadoru. [Exploring the use of educational technology in EFL teaching: A case study of primary education in the south region of Ecuador]. Nicosia.

18. Tucker, S. (2001). Dystantsiyna osvita: krashche, hirshe chy tak samo dobre, yak tradytsiyna? [Distance education: better, worse, or as good as traditional education? ]. Carrollton.

19. Urtel, M. G. (2008). Otsinka akademichnoyi uspishnosti mizh tradytsiynym i dystantsiynym formatamy kursu navchannya. [Assessing academic performance between traditional and distance education course formats]. Amsterdam.

20. Van Schaik, P., Barker, P., Beckstrand, S. (2003). Porivnyannya metodiv provedennya kursiv na kampusi ta onlayn u Pivdenniy Nevadi. [A comparison of on-campus and online course delivery methods in Southern Nevada]. London.

21. Waschull, S. (2001). Onlayn-kursy z psykholohiyi: vysnazhennya, produktyvnistʹ ta otsinka. [The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance, and evaluation]. Thousand Oaks.

22. West, M. (1953). Zahalʹnyy sluzhbovyy spysok anhliysʹkykh sliv: iz semantychnymy chastotamy ta dodatkovym spyskom sliv dlya napysannya populyarnoyi nauky ta tekhniky (red. red.). [A general service list of English words : With semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology (Rev. ed.)]. London.

23. Zabolotna, O., Zagoruiko, L., Panchenko, I., Plotnikov, Y. (2021). Vykladannya anhliysʹkoyi leksyky onlayn: chy ye ekran pereshkodoyu? [Teaching English vocabulary online: Is the screen a barrier? ]. Kyiv.

24. Zechmeister, E. B., Chronis, A. M., Cull, W. L., D’Anna, C. A., Healy, N. A. (1995). Zrostannya funktsionalʹno vazhlyvoho leksykonu. [Growth of a functionally important lexicon]. Chicago.