Abstract:

In the article, the author theoretically substantiates the classifications and provides definitions of the functional characteristics of modern institutions of the socio-cultural industry in Ukraine.

Based on the analysis of scientific literature, it was determined that socio-cultural activity as a specific, socially expedient activity of professional and non-professional subjects (people, social groups, society as a whole), aimed at the creative development of the individual and serving their cultural needs, the production of cultural innovations, the preservation, dissemination, use and further development of cultural values is an integral part of social life.

The analysis of regulatory legal acts proved that modern socio-cultural institutions, whose activities are aimed at the creation, dissemination, preservation, development and mastering of cultural values, function in accordance with current legislation and are classified according to various criteria. The basic network includes institutions of state and municipal ownership, institutions of the national and local levels – municipal institutions.

In connection with the processes of decentralization, cultural service centers are formed in territorial communities. Since 2019, the concept of creative industries has been introduced in Ukraine. In addition, the infrastructure of the socio-cultural sphere is classified by the result of activity, by method or by types of economic activity, etc.

Analysis of scientific literature made it possible to conclude that individual researchers offer their own classifications – subsystems of the socio-cultural sphere (institutional, activity and technological), a set of components (educational-economic and health-economic), zoning of sociocultural space by the historically formed level of socio-economic interests of the population, etc.

The author notes that traditional and innovative approaches are used in socio-cultural institutions. Innovative approaches include project activities and participation in state and non-state grant programs for the purpose of financing and implementing projects, searching for alternative sources of financing for cultural initiatives, as well as the use of remote forms of work involving digital and information and communication technologies– holding events in an online format.

Keywords: socio-cultural activity, socio-cultural industry, creative product, creative industry, project activity, grant activity, management.

References:

1. Bakhur, N. V. (2021). Kraudfandynh ta kraudsordynh yak instrumenty stymulyuvannya rozvytku rehioniv ta hromad. [Crowdfunding and crowdsourcing as tools for stimulating the development of regions and communities].

2. Boyko, V. I. (2015). Rehionalʹnyy mekhanizm pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti funktsionuvannya sotsiokulʹturnoyi sfery: teoriya, metodolohiya, praktyka. [Regional mechanism for increasing the efficiency of the functioning of the socio-cultural sphere: theory, methodology, practice]. Odesa.

3. Hrytsenko, O. (2019). Kulʹturnyy prostir i natsionalʹna kulʹtura: teoretychne osmyslennya ta praktychne reformuvannya: monohrafiya. [Cultural space and national culture: theoretical understanding and practical reformation: monograph]. Kyiv.

4. Davymuka, S. A., Fedulova ,L. I. (2017. Kreatyvnyy sektor ekonomiky: dosvid ta napryamy rozbudovy. [Creative sector of the economy: experience and directions of development]. Lviv.

5. Zakon Ukrayiny «Pro kulʹturu». (2010). [Law of Ukraine «On Culture»]. 

6. Kochubey, N. V. (2015). Sotsiokulʹturna diyalʹnistʹ: navchalʹnyy posibnyk. [Sociocultural activity: a textbook]. Symu.

7. Kuchyn, S. P. (2015). Teoretychni aspekty rozvytku sotsialʹno-kulʹturnoyi sfery yak obʺyekta vplyvu mekhanizmiv derzhavnoho upravlinnya. [Theoretical aspects of the development of the socio-cultural sphere as an object of influence of state governance mechanisms].

8. Lyubarets, V. V. (2019). Teoriya i praktyka profesiynoyi pidhotovky maybutnikh menedzheriv sotsiokulʹturnoyi diyalʹnosti v umovakh informatsiyno-osvitnʹoho seredovyshcha. [Theory and practice of professional training of future managers of socio-cultural activities in the conditions of the information and educational environment]. Kyiv.

9. Postanova Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny «Pro pryynyattya za osnovu proektu Zakonu Ukrayiny pro natsionalʹnyy kulʹturnyy produkt». [Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine «On adoption as a basis the draft Law of Ukraine on National Cultural Product»].

10. Petrova, I. V. (2016). Klasyfikatsiya kulʹturnykh industriy v suchasnomu sviti: metodolohichni zasady. [Classification of cultural industries in the modern world: methodological principles]. Kyiv.

11. Praktykum iz sotsiokulʹturnoyi diyalʹnosti: konspekt lektsiy (2020). [Workshop on sociocultural activities: lecture notes]. Symu.

12. Pro vnesennya zmin do Zakonu Ukrayiny «Pro kulʹturu» shchodo vyznachennya ponyatʹ «kreatyvni industriyi».. [On amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On Culture» regarding the definition of the concepts of «creative industries»].

13. Uryadovyy portal. Uryad zatverdyv perelik vydiv ekonomichnoyi diyalʹnosti, yaki nalezhatʹ do kreatyvnykh industriy. [Government portal. The government has approved a list of types of economic activity that belong to the creative industries].

14. Tsymbalyuk, N. M.(2020). Orhanizatsiya ta metodyka kulʹturno-dozvillyevoyi diyalʹnosti. Chastyna 1. Teoretychni osnovy kulʹturnodozvillyevoyi diyalʹnosti: Monohrafiya. [Organization and methodology of cultural and leisure activities. Part 1. Theoretical foundations of cultural and leisure activities: Monograph.]. Kyiv.