Scorer's Table
Written by Josh Lapidus | josh.lapidus@uamaker.nyc
Written by Josh Lapidus | josh.lapidus@uamaker.nyc
Problem of Practice
Many students in US History struggle to turn in writing assignments that are completed at home or over multiple days. Many students in US History and APUSH do not consistently use rubrics or follow tasks when completing writing.
Hypothesis
If students complete a scorers table and are expected to complete writing on demand and in a timed environment, then it will increase submission rates and scores as well as preparedness for APUSH exam and USH Regents.
Strategy
Focal strategy: Scorer's Table
Students analyzed sample essays and compared rubrics from the US Regents exam and the APUSH exam.
Target group
My target group included all students in my US History and AP US History classes.
Planning & resources
History department discussed the use of scorers table protocols modeled after our own regents scoring protocols
Student Worksheet for USH Scorer's Table
US History Prep for timed writing
Student-facing slides (starting on slide 5)
Measuring Success
I am not great with data but it looked like this was initially successful. Here is some data:
APUSH timed writing submission rate = 100%
APUSH untimed writing submission rate = 80 - 90%
USH untimed writing submission = 63%
USH timed writing submissions = 78%
APUSH FRQ Pre Scorers Table average score:
P3 FRQ A = 2.64
P3 FRQ B = 2.92
APUSH Post Scorers Table average score:
P4 FRQ A = 3.07
P4 FRQ B = 3.126984127
P5 FRQ A = 3.394736842
Reflection
Teacher reflection:
Both of these types of activities should be done frequently. In fact I would say you should do scorers table for each rubric you assess if there is time. And all writing should be timed and completed in class. In practice this is hard to do but it is a goal.
Student reflection:
No quotes but students generally enjoy scorers table. They like the opportunity to be the grader. In APUSH they have become quite proficient with the process and rely on it as they also to it in AP Lang.
Actionable steps
If you want to use this strategy in your classroom, I recommend …
For scorers table:
If applicable use actual scoring material such as from NYS Regents
If creating your own materials be intentional about having multiple examples that demonstrate different rubric components
Allow students individual time to read and annotate writing examples
Allow students to work in groups and discuss their results and come to consensus
For timed writing:
Collect student work even if not done at the end of the time
Provide timing suggestions as students work (see student facing slides)
At first you will want to allow students time to prepare but the scaffold can be removed as you do this multiple times
Written by Josh Lapidus | josh.lapidus@uamaker.nyc