In recent decades, plea bargaining has become the primary way of resolving criminal cases. Individuals are waiving their constitutional right to a trial of their peers in order to avoid the ramifications that come with going to court. Specifically, this makes those of lower socioeconomic status extremely vulnerable to the workings of the legal system, especially to any predatory behavior. 

This study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status and plea bargaining, specifically looking at how and why those of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to accept plea bargains. Data on public defense, prosecutorial discretion, and pretrial detention, were examined to develop an understanding of the decision-making process for those in lower socioeconomic statuses. The findings suggest that defendants with lower socioeconomic status are more likely to accept plea bargains, as they are more vulnerable to the negative consequences that can be inflicted upon them before and during a trial. Due to a lack of quality representation and the effects of prosecutorial discretion, many individuals of lower socioeconomic status have virtually no choice but to accept their offered plea bargains.

To alleviate these inequities in the system, a multifaceted policy is offered that will limit prosecutorial discretion and increase quality defense representation. These results highlight the socioeconomic disparities faced by those in the criminal justice system and how these inequalities can affect the outcomes of criminal cases. It is vital to implement changes, like the proposed policy, to promote equity and improve the fairness of the criminal justice system.