Musings Log

posted Jun 12, 2009, 9:03 PM by Matt Burris

Gravity Control or Gravity wave reflection/dissipation.

Just as a mirror reflects light of certain wavelengths so can a special substance called GraviAlter. GA for short hand reference. 

Light substances like hydrogen and helium are not pulled by gravity as much as lead is pulled.

The only difference is one of relative density. Gravity waves can pull on  lead much easier than hydrogen. There is more attraction because of handles/handholds for the gravity wave to attach. 

With the proper gravity mirror substance.....  the ability of a gravity wave to do any pulling is minimized. Just like Edison locating the perfect filiament for the lightbulb so must the present day laboratory look for the perfect substance or alloy to reflect or scatter the gravity wave. There might even be a perfect element yet to be found that will effectively downsize the power of gravity. Since gravity must be a wavelength much like radio frequency then the correct alloy will make the substance or metal on the opposite side  away from the source of gravitational pull appear much less dense or appear to be non-existent completely. Nano channels are just beginning to make their appearance in the common research lab. If a layer of nano channels could capture the gravity wave and turn it in a new direction then thrust could be developed in addition to gravity shielding. The application of this technology could change the whole way of life here on Planet Earth. Travel and transportation would be relatively effortless and prosperous.

Nano Channels could be atomic and molecular sized since properly alloyed metals would effectively repel or absorb gravity waves. Gravity waves must have several types. Long range and short range. The gravity shield must adjust for long range as well as short range pulling.

May 15,2007

Gravity Turbine refers to a device that will drive a standard 24 volt generator. The turbine could use several methods for operation. One is a gravity mat made of extremely small nanotubes that would receive the gravity impulse and dampen it by channeling it into a helpful direction. It could even channel it 180* back to its origin. If it were channeled uniformly into a 90* direction then you would have propulsion along a horizontal direction. This would lend itself to a totally different means of transportation and delivery system. Gasoline and diesel would be an obsolete commodity and go the way of the dinosaur. Antiques would still be operated the same. 

Another method of evading the effects of gravity and thereby enabling the Gravity Turbine is electronically changing the shape of the atoms in a crystal lattice. The flattened atoms would have a distinct effect on the force of gravity creating a unidirectional alignment. Random attraction of gravity would become orderly alignment of the wave and some control of the resulting energy gain. This could be called the ultimate nanotube array on a molecular or atomic level.

October 4, Thursday night 2007

In an earlier discussion/log entry I mentioned short range pull of gravity. This close attraction is demonstrated in one of the space lab experiments. One ounce of water released from a bottle clumped together in a spherical shape. Several smaller droplets all clumped together spherically.
Does this tendency to clump together show an ionic attraction or small scale gravity? It does not really matter to me. All I want to do is control the effects of whatever energy gives rise to the clumping. In another spacelab experiment the astronauts released a long tether in open space. One of the things it did was build up (accumulate) a large voltage difference between the space lab and the opposite end. Did the solar wind cause this? Could it be that gravitational attraction suppressed by the solar wind caused a frictional accumulation of static charge? 
Another more important question is, " Would there be a stronger attraction of gravity at the end of a very long rod or a sphere of the same mass, keeping the diameters equal. I am cautiously suggesting that as an atom vibrates it sends out a signal that is slightly attractive to another atom. When Avogadro's number of atoms are all aligned in a straight line then the attractive signal is amplified slightly. When you line up the atoms in a straight line to equal the distance of the radius of the earth then I am suggesting that with proper observance of similar diameter of test objects the gravitational attraction would be equal to that found on the surface of the earth. 

Just as radio antennas which are aligned north to south will boost the signal northwards and southwards so the atomic signals( gravity) so weak by themselves will amplify and boost the (ionic?) signal. It is not important to know all the ins and outs of atomic signals as long as we can make some assumptions and then experiment with those assumptions until we arrive at a gravity controlling grid.

It is of some interest that spherical shapes accumulate in one of two approximate angles. 110* and 120*. Does it make sense to build a nano sized antenna array with the gravity signal emitter located in the central portion of the tetrahedral configuration. It would look like the pyramid in Egypt but have an antenna bouncing its microwave signal off the sloping four sides of the upper pyramid. This would allow the signal to diverge and cover many more atoms per square micron than a signal sent directly out the tip of the antenna. For first experiments it would be handy as I envision this developing process to build a testing platform with balance scales to sound off when any portion of the transmitter array loses weight. The next trick would be to slowly and carefully increase the frequency of emission of the gravity shield until either a harmonic of the gravity frequency is reached or the exact frequency. Could gravity just be a simple frequency affecting everything here on the planet? Could a simple frequency give us mastery over the pull of gravity? 

Another interesting question is, "What happens at the center of the earth? What happens at the center of the 2 ounce spherical water blob floating in the space lab where there is no apparent gravity effects? At the center, would it all be neutral or does this signal spread out in all directions. At the core of the earth would a cavern there find water floating around  in all directions or would the gravity signal coming from other directions pull the water blob into atomic sized individual pieces. It seems at this point in my learning curve about gravity that the core of the earth would have a very low but recognizable pull of gravity because the pull on every direction of an individual 2 ounce blob of water would be neutralized by the corresponding pull in the opposite direction. Side to side attraction can not be ignored. It would be fun to have a 5,000 gallon tank of water and watch what it does in the zero gravity region of space. If my thinking is correct then it would form a little bit of a bubble shape. There should form a hollow place in the middle proportional to the rotation of the entire mass.
Remember; this is a fluid we are talking about.

Sept.1, 2008

Hurricane Gustav just landed on the west side of Louisiana. For several weeks now the thought of what holds an ounce of water together in the gravity free area of the space station has been held in my uppermost thoughts. I propose that each atom above absolute zero has a vibrational energy that sends out very short wavelengths which have a slight adhesive tendency when they react with another atom. These wave adhesions then account for van der Wals forces. The wave adhesion only works at a distance favorable for the atom characteristics in question. When the repulsion of like charges balances the wave adhesion then there is no longer an attractive quality but a van der wal's "stop sign" so to speak. This accounts for ionic attraction anomalies, and crystallization at extremely high pressures of water. When water is frozen the wave adhesion is lowered thus the crystal we call ice is formed. There could be many experiments designed to better understand the wave length adhesion.

One experiment would involve subjecting water to a frequency that interrupts the wave length adhesion. This would cause water in the space station to disassociate. The water might even separate into individual atoms. Further study of frequency generators could begin the process of understanding science in general. Tempering of metals might be better understood. Gravitation  is just a larger version of wavelength adhesion. Gravity control may just be a frequency yet to be discovered.  

January 11, 2009

Yesterday during the Sabbath as I was listening to the Holy Spirit a unique thought danced in my mind. When doing silk screening in a sign shop with multiple colors we had a frequent problem with unwanted spots in the finished product. Moire patterns were the culprit. It would aid in the interruption of gravity signals if we could transmit the correct frequency to interrupt gravity and match this frequency grid with one or more other frequency grids in order to produce moire look a likes but instead of a visual pattern there would be gravity wave disruption with little effort. A visual description of this will be drawn up soon. 

1-1 of 1