Flipcharts from April 11

The following is a transcription of the flipcharts from our April 11th meeting.  In examining the comments, a sixth category has emerged that we are calling "Data and Information System."  We have highlighted in red some of the comments that are relevant to data and information systems.


Policies and Procedures

 

Ensuring that data literacy is provided to admin/teachers/staff/students and to understand and what that means.

Redefine AUP and teach appropriate use of technology (i.e. responsible global citizenship)

How can we develop efficient and effective state databases and structures for K-12 learning?

Samples for Bring Your Own Device

If administrators don’t enforce or are not educated in the possibilities then teachers won’t see the need.

Need policy that allows us to leverage the technology “in your pocket.”

How do we manage student-owned tools when allowed to use them at school?

Keeping tools like iPads secure at school; security of hardware

FERPA = FEARPA

Seat time; Carnegie units

Quality control of resources

Certification for Urban Educators

 

 

 

Pedagogy & Instruction

 

Identify what are appropriate resources for what curricular purpose.

Base level of instructional/productivity tools: productivity; collaboration; podcasting

Flexible instructional tools for flexible learning environments (what is the purpose of the tool?)

One place to pull/push all the tools from or to go to get the tools.

Need people who can model effective use of technology 1-1 in “Just in Time” format.

Digital lessons enable students to review content again; if they hear it face to face they don’t ask to have things repeated.

Student centered BLENDED learning.  Instructional strategies linked to Learning Domains.

24/7 tools and resources available for all learners (students, teachers, admin.)

How can we develop an effective 24/7 learning environment for students.

Student motivation improves with good pedagogy.

Technology training vs pedagogy training.

Pedagogy 1st -- what’s your challenge. Technology 2nd.

How to justify new positions when cutting other positions.

Coaches

Teacher buy-in: Motivation -- $, time; Teacher Development *Peer to peer showcase *Faculty development model for blended online.

How do we support student-networked learning both in and out of classroom?

Menu of IT-based teaching organized around expected outcomes.

 

 

 

Infrastructure and Hardware

 

“Unlimited” bandwidth available to all schools and libraries. Don’t set a number; think a little more than what you need.  -- 10 GB to every distric  -- New TEACH wiring loan program for interschool connection and pervasive wi-fi.

Wireless infrastructure inside of our schools to support what we already do

Infrastructure: Must be equity in broadband access to schools and libraries

Statewide iTunes platform

Do not be hardware/tool specific; Allow individual tools to access resources.

Investing in people is as important as tech. infrastructure.

Easiest issue to deal with should set a standard.

County/community partnerships

UW Extension/vocation

Key stakeholders

 


 

Professional Learning

 

Statewide collaborative shared practices

Standing statewide workgroups: -- Operational efficiencies (LEAN) and school improvement -- Professional learning -- Assessment and content

Creating online courses just for administrators to understand online learning

WTCS requires instructors to be certified = competent in key skills and knowledge.

Create a digital teaching certification based on desired KSD

Use of research-proven professional development activities

Appropriate allocation of resources for PD

Need PD with peer leadership

Professional dev. model that includes -- instructional support, -- instructional designers, -- learning technologists

Professional development should model best practices of using technology where the outcome is content-based vs. tech-skilled based.

IT training infrastructure

Need staff that can bridge the gap between IT and student learning/teacher training

All the choices in the world in terms of online learning mean nothing if teachers aren’t given the professional-development to implement

Teachers need more professional development time.

Can we look at face to face requirements again?

Please work with colleges of higher ed/education programs to prepare pre-service teachers: 1)Authentic learning strategies 2) Project-based learning 3)How to select appropriate technologies to support student learning 4)How to deal with different regions/sizes of schools and challenges students face

Professional development leads to better pedagogy which requires attention to policy and robust infrastructure.

Role of higher ed and CESAs in connecting K-12 learning?

Connection between tech infrastructure and people infrastructure – 1/3 tech stuff, 1/3 prof. dev., 1/3 curriculum assessment

Comments