Benefits‎ > ‎

PHP II

Arts and Sciences Preferred Hiring Pool (PHP), Level 2

 

History of PHP 2

In 2011, as a result of our renegotiated adjunct contract, the University agreed to create an opportunity for adjuncts in the Preferred Hiring Pool to be promoted to Preferred Hiring Pool 2 (PHP 2). The opportunity for promotion to PHP 2 requires an application to the dean. Approval is contingent upon evidence of excellent teaching performance and is subject to the sole discretion of the dean and available funding. Upon approval, successful PHP 2 applicants receive a 20% raise.

Determination and Number of Awards

Note that, unlike PHP 1, there are a limited number of slots, and so not all worthy applicants will be awarded PHP 2. The number of awards is contingent upon several factors including funding. The number of awards given in past years is not an indicator of the number of awards in subsequent years. A committee of PTFA leadership and associate deans will make recommendations for the available PHP 2 slots to the Dean, who will have the final decision in the matter.

Eligibility

Applicants must have 80 units of adjunct teaching in the College of Arts and Sciences and be members of the preferred hiring pool.

Pay Scales (These numbers will change, based on the new contract once it's published.)

2013-2014 rates:

Regular:  $1,701

PHP: $2,041

PHP2: $2,477

Application Requirements

On or before February 15, adjunct faculty members may submit a written application to the Dean for placement in PHP 2. The application should include the following materials:

i.  A letter of application (1-2 pages maximum)

ii. A current curriculum vitae

iii. A list of courses taught and the semester in which each was taught

iv. A statement of teaching philosophy (1-2 pages maximum, double-spaced)

v.  SUMMA evaluations for the past 5 years (Please include your entire SUMMA package for the years requested, but   it is recommended that you also include a summary of your unit mean)

vi.  Syllabi, assignments, or other instructional materials that demonstrate teaching excellence (Please limit to 12 items. 1 item = 1 syllabus, 1 assignment, 1 article or book publication, etc).

vii.  Two letters of recommendation (It is recommended that at least one recommendation come from a USF colleague such as department head, program chair, etc).

Criteria

  • Teaching evaluations for the past five years are consistently and significantly above average and/or demonstrate improvement in relationship to the unit mean.
  • Course syllabi and/or accompanying instructional materials show evidence of continuing improvement and engagement in the scholarship of teaching.
  • Statement of teaching philosophy demonstrates thoughtful reflection on the applicant’s teaching for the benefit of student learning and reflects USF’s mission, goals, and objectives.
  • Evidence that teaching materials and methods are continually updated in the light of pedagogical developments in the field.
  • Successful demonstration of engagement with students and commitment to the USF vision and values (http://www.usfca.edu/about/values/) and leadership or initiative in the applicant’s department.

Recommendation to Applicant

    • Submit your strongest material, not everything you do.

    • Keep your application succinct and relevant: quality trumps quantity.

    • Notify your chair or program director that you are submitting an application.

    • Teaching excellence at USF will be given greater emphasis than experience related to other universities or work not related to USF.

Notification by the Dean

On or before July 15, the Dean shall notify each applicant of the decision on PHP 2.

The Dean’s decision shall be in writing.

Adjunct faculty who are granted PHP 2 status will be placed in that category at the beginning of the following fall semester.

Adjunct faculty whose application is denied may continue to teach in the preferred hiring pool.

Decisions of the Dean as set forth in this proposal shall not be subject to the grievance and arbitration provisions of the adjunct faculty contract.


Following is the rubric used by the PHP 2 Peer Review Committee for evaluating each application:  

 

Evaluations

Course Materials

Teaching Philosophy

Additional Materials, incl. recommendations

Level 4

(excellent)

Teaching evaluations for the past five years are consistently and significantly above unit mean for the college to which applicant is applying.

Course syllabi and/or accompanying instructional materials demonstrate outstanding application of current pedagogical methods, approaches, and techniques. Materials include detailed and clearly organized description of course requirements, learning outcomes and/or objectives, and requirements for student expectation.

Statement of teaching philosophy demonstrates thoughtful reflection on the applicant’s teaching for the benefit of student learning and strongly reflects USF’s mission, goals, and objectives.

Strong evidentiary support from colleagues/students of successful leadership or initiative in the applicant’s department and/or program. (Leadership will be given greater emphasis than attendance at conferences, workshops, and other areas of professional development that relate to the subject area, although these areas of advancement will also be considered)

 

Level 3

(very good)

Teaching evals are consistently moderately above unit mean for college

Course syllabi and/or accompanying instructional materials demonstrate strong application of current pedagogical methods, approaches, and techniques. Materials include evidence of clearly organized description of course requirements, learning outcomes and/or objectives, and requirements for student expectation.

Teaching philosophy demonstrates adequate dedication to students and USF’s mission, goals, and objectives.

Recommendations and other supporting materials demonstrate good leadership and/or initiative in the applicant’s department or program.

Level 2

(superficial)

Teaching evals are consistently at unit mean.

Course syllabi and/or accompanying instructional materials demonstrate adequate application of current pedagogical methods, approaches, and techniques. Materials include sufficient description of course requirements, learning outcomes and/or objectives, and requirements for student expectation.

Teaching philosophy demonstrates some dedication to students and USF’s mission, goals, and objectives.

Recommendations and other supporting materials demonstrate some leadership in the applicant’s program or department.

Level 1

(inadequate, nonexistent)

Teaching evals are consistently below unit mean

Course syllabi and/or accompanying instructional materials demonstrate inadequate application of current pedagogical methods, approaches, and techniques. Materials include insufficient description of course requirements, learning outcomes and/or objectives, and requirements for student expectation.

Teaching philosophy demonstrates inadequate dedication to students and does not reflect USF’s mission, goals, and objectives.

Recommendations and other supporting materials suggest minimal leadership in the applicant’s program or department.