№ 1-2(11) Зміст
В. П. Федоренко. Пам'яті Віри Олексіївни Мамонтової ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ФАУНА І СИСТЕМАТИКА В. А. Мамонтова. Теоретическое и прикладное значение систематики и ее методологий на примере тлей (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) .............................................. 6
М. Д. Зерова. Переописание и новые данные о распространении Tetramesa eximia (Giraud) (Hymenoptera, Eurytomidae) ................................................................ 24
M. O. Kaliuzhna. First data on aphidiine wasps (Braconidae: Aphidiinae) of the Kaniv nature reserve ......................................................................................................... 29
А. Д. Нужна. Новые и редкие для фауны Украины виды подсемейства Anomaloninae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) ....................................................................... 33
К. Б. Сухомлін, О. П. Зінченко. Таксономічна різноманітність мошок (Diptera, Simuliidae) України ...................................................................................................... 38 Г. В. Сердюк. Сітчастокрилі (Insecta, Neuroptera) Українських Карпат ........................................................................................................................................................ 46 Neuropterida (Insecta, Neuroptera) of the Ukrainian Carpathians. G. V. Serediuk. The research in neuropterans was carried out in the Ukrainian Carpathians and the Transcarpathian Lowland during the last five years. The results of study are stated as a catalogue of species with indication of record localities and brief annotations on species distribution and biology. The general list of neuropteran species from the region has been compiled on the basis of our own records, literature data and collection materials and includes 72 species, belonging to 8 families and 26 genera. Among those, cited in literature, the present occurrence of 50 species has been confirmed by recent records. The citation of Chrysopa dubitans McLachlan, 1887 from the Transcarpathian Lowland we consider as doubtful, because it hasn‘t been confirmed by collected material, and hitherto the species is known from Spain, France and Greece only. For this reason it is excluded from the list. Three species, Mantispa styriaca Poda, Hemerobius atrifrons McLachlan, Euroleon nostras Geoffroy in Fourcroy, have been recorded from the region for the first time. Six species, Chrysoperla lucasina Lacroix, Chrysoperla pallida Henry, Brooks, Duelli & Johnson, Micromus lanosus Zeleny, Sympherobius klapaleki Zeleny, Wesmaelius ravus Withcombe, Wesmaelius tjederi Kimmins, have been recorded as new to Ukraine. A zoogeographical analysis has revealed that the main part of neuropteran fauna in the region consists of European forest species. А. В. Пучков, Т. Ю. Маркина, М. Ю. Скавыш. Предварительный обзор герпетобионтных жуков (Coleoptera) парковых насаждений г. Харькова (Украина) ............. 69 Previously survay of herpetobiont beetles (Coleoptera) of parklands in Kharkov (Ukraine). A. V Puchkov, T. Yu Markina, M. Yu Skavуsh. General overview of herpetobiont beetles in five parks of Kharkov are given. Species composition includes 48 species from seven families. Carabidae (37 species from 9 genera) and Silphidae (5 species from three genera) are dominant groups. The main species are Calosoma inquisitor, Carabus cancellatus, C. nemoralis, Calathus fuscipes, C. ambiguous, Amara aenea, A. similata, Pterostichus melanarius, Pt. niger, Harpalus distinguendus, H. rufipes, H. anxius (Carabidae), Silpha obscura, S. carinata, Phosphuga аtrata (Silphidae). Sometimes other species of Carabidae (Cylindera germanica, Carabus granulatus, Amara familiaris, A. ovata, A. communis, Harpalus affinis, H. rubripes, H. smaragdinus), Silphidae (Thanatophilus rugosus), Dermestidae (D. laniarius) and Tenebrionidae (Opatrum sabulosum) were common too. Species composition and abundance were higher in large, weakly broken parks, where noted 30-35 species of beetles. Index of faunal similarity were higher (0,46-0,54) for this areas too, while this index was less for a typical parks (0,25-0,39). In accordance by the ecology, mezophilous polytopical (Carabus cancellatus Calathus fuscipes, C. ambiguous, Amara aenea, A. similata, Pterostichus melanarius, Harpalus distinguendus, H. rufipes, H. anxius, Silpha obscura) and forest species (Calosoma inquisitor, Pterostichus niger, Silpha carinata, Phosphuga аtrata) were more common in all parks. The species from meadow‘s group (Cylindera germanica, Carabus granulatus, Amara communis, Harpalus affinis, H. rubripes, H. smaragdinus) were presented relatively rarely. According to the trophic specialization – zoophages (mainly ground beetles) and species with mixed feeding (zoophytofagous, zoosaprophagous of some Carabidae and Silphidae) are dominated. Some Dermestidae (D. laniarius) and Silphidae (Thanatophilus rugosus) are typical saprophagous species.А. Н. Дрогваленко. Мицетофильные чернотелки (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) фауны Украины .................................................................................................................... 77 О. Г. Шатровський. Зональність в номенклатурі ареалів жуків родини водолюбів (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) ........................................................................................ 85 Д. В. Вовк, П. Н. Шешурак, Н. В. Назаров. Пластинчатоусые жуки (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) Черниговской области (Украина) .......................................................... 91
В. О. Махина, З. Ф. Ключко, К. К. Голобородько. Современные находки совок (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) описанных из степной зоны Украины ................................... 99
І. А. Akimov, О. V. Zhovnerchuk. Current status andtendencies in diversity and trophic specialization of Tetranychidae mites (Acari, Tetranychidae) of the steppe zone of Ukraine ............. 105
Л. А. Колодочка, В. Ю. Бондарев. Видовой состав клещей-фитосейид (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) Луганского природного заповедника ............................................ 110
Я. Р. Оксентюк. Акаридієві кліщі (Acariformes, Astigmata) у вуликах медоносної бджоли (Apis mellifera) в Житомирському Поліссі...................................................... 115
ЕКОЛОГІЯ Л. І. Фали. Особливості внутрішньопопуляційної мінливості імаго Paederus littoralis Gravenhorst, 1802 (Coleoptera, Staphilinidae) ...................................................... 121
С. Н. Шумов. Американская белая бабочка (Hyphantria cunea Drury, 1773) (Arctidae, Lepidoptera) на Украине и вероятность ее вымерзания ...................................... 126
Т. М. Єфіменко, О. М. Ярошко, М. С. Галата, В. В. Шепелевич, Л. Г. Степура, Л. М. Гриценко, Н. В. Яворська, В. М. Святецька, С. І. Войчук, Г. В. Односум. Мікробіота стільників з бджолиних сімей, уражених гнильцем ....................... 133 В. Л. Мєшкова. Оцінювання шкідливості комах у незімкнених соснових культурах .................................................................................................................................. 140 Evaluation of insect injuriousness in unclosed pine plantations. V. L. Meshkova. The aim of research was the development of rating scales for insect injuriousness in unclosed pine plantations and for impact of damage of certain pine organs by insects on plants mortality, increment and stem quality. Impact of pine plants damage in unclosed plantations by insects is suggested to evaluate on the base of determination of damaging insect species, damage prevalence and intensity. Prevalence of particular type of damage was calculated as the proportion of plants with such type of damage (in percents), and while summarizing the results it was converted into scores on a four-point scale, where points 1, 2, 3 and 4 correspond to low, medium, large and high intensity of damage of different pine organs (foliage, buds and shoots, stem and branches, root collar and roots). Rating scale of damage intensity takes into account damage assessment by direct and indirect symptoms (defoliation, discoloration, needle length, sanitary condition of the plants). By peer review weighting factors of impact of insect damage of certain organs on pine vitality, increment and stem quality were evaluated. Assessment of pine damage impact confirmed the highest injuriousness of Hylobius abietis Linnaeus, 1758, Hylastes ater Paykull, 1800, Hylastes opacus Erichson, 1836, Hylastes angustatus Herbst, 1793, Hylurgus ligniperda Fabricius, 1792. The species Pissodes castaneus De Geer, 1775, Acantholyda (=Lyda) hieroglyphica Christ. 1791, Evetria duplana Hb. 1826, Archips piceana Linnaeus, 1758 and Cinara pini Linnaeus, 1758 were less dangerous. Quantification algorithm for insect injuriousness in unclosed pine plantations has been developed and tested. В. П. Федоренко, П. Я. Чумак, О. О. Сыкало, Я. В. Шейко, С. М. Вигера, В. П. Ковальчук. Идентификация табачной белокрылки Bemisiatabaci Genn. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) в теплицах г. Киева .............................................. 147
ЮВІЛЕЇ М. В. Круть. До 70-річчя Інституту захисту рослин НААН України. Розвиток ентомологічних досліджень .......................................................................................... 152 . ПОДІЇ О. В. Пучков, В. О. Мірутенко. Перша міжнародна конференція українських ентомологів ..................................................................................................................... 159 ПРАВИЛА ДЛЯ АВТОРІВ ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 162 |

