Broadly speaking, my research investigates how masculine attitudes and behaviors encourage harmful health outcomes. My work applies a social psychology lens to understand the strong association between masculinity and violence. I am interested in how gender identity affects the way that men and women engage in, interpret, reconcile with, and heal from violence.
As an NIMH Postdoctoral Fellow at the Rutgers University Institute for Health, I began a mixed-method study of the informal coping mechanisms used by male and female veterans returning from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. This project investigates how the more than two million recently returned soldiers—most of whom choose not to use the VA health care system—cope with adjustment independent of formal health institutions. The project is guided by my interest in the consequences of how the violence of warfare (and the military more generally) demands a disposition of self-reliance and stoicism, while healthful coping afterwards necessitates qualities that are largely the opposite (i.e.: help-seeking, expression, connectivity). I am currently investigating the health experiences of American military veterans who come in contact with the criminal justice system.
My veterans research builds on earlier ethnographic research I conducted on the experience, meanings, and motivations of
men who train and perform in community-level independent pro
wrestling, where most wrestlers receive little-to-no pay. Although professional wrestling is one of the
most popular “sporting events” in the United States, people are seldom
aware of the constellation of independent promotions that operate beyond
the purview of the highly profitable, televised productions. In my book, “Fighting for Recognition” (Duke University Press) I investigate how men are motivated and affected by their acts of
violence. Indy participants’ devotion to their elaborate combat
choreography, which fakes hostility in order to excite a crowd of spectators,
illuminates the management of pain in everyday
life, the intimacy of violence, emotional labor, and the quest for solidarity and community. The analysis
provides new interpretations of the attraction,
ambivalence and pitfalls of “doing” masculinity.
Wrestling, warfare, and military service show how men and women
(largely young and working-class) manage violence, emotions, risk, and gender identity in
an era of neoliberalism—where low wages, insecure employment, and fragmented
social support are all too common. My interest lies in how people cope and
make sense of their physical or mental health in light of their participation in an exhilarating, often promising, endeavor that presents many health risks.
If I'm not doing research or teaching, there is a chance I am on twitter tweeting about sociological things @tyson987654321
-Fighting for Recognition: Identity, Masculinity and the Act of Violence in Professional Wrestling. 2014. Duke University Press.
-"Warring Identities: Identity Conflict and the Mental Distress of American Veterans of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." Society and Mental Health. (With Gala True.) 2014. (see below)
-"Gap Growing between Military and Civilians." Op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer about aspects of the contemporary veteran experience. 10/19/2010.
-“Teaching Beyond the Core: The Hot Topic Alternative to the
Survey-Based Introduction to Sociology Course.” The American Sociologist. 2010. (With Michael Schwartz). .pdf
-“Pain in the Act: The Meanings of Pain among Professional Wrestlers.” Qualitative Sociology. Vol. 31 (2). 2008.
-“Wrestling with Kayfabe.” Contexts. Spring. 5 (2). 2006.
-“Pumping Irony: The Construction of Masculinity in a Post-feminist Advertising Campaign.” Advertising and Society Review. 6 (3). 2005.
-“The ‘Reasonable Woman’ and Unreasonable Men: Gendered Discourses in Sexual Harassment Litigation.” In James Gruber and Phoebe Morgan (eds.) In the Company of Men: Male Dominance and Sexual Harassment. Boston: Northeastern University Press. pp.143-166. 2004. (With Michael Kimmel)