Universal Jurisdiction

_Aceves, William J. 2000. Liberalism and International Legal Scholarship: The Pinochet Case and the Move Toward a Universal System of Transnational Law Litigation. Harvard International Law Journal 41 (1):129-184.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1996. International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):63-74.

_Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2002. Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Bianchi, Andrea. 1999. Individual Accountability for Crimes against Humanity: Reckoning with the Past, Thinking of the Future. SAIS Review 19 (2):97-131.

_Black-Branch, Jonathan. 2000. Sovereign Immunity Under International Law: The Case of Pinochet. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Bottini, Gabriel. 2003/04. Universal Jurisdiction after the Creation of the International Criminal Court. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 36 (223):503-562.

_Braude, Claudia, and Derek Spitz. 1997. Memory and the Spectre of International Justice: A Comment on AZAPO. South African Journal on Human Rights 13 (2):269-282.

_Brody, Reed. 2006. The Prosecution of Hisséne Habré: International Accountability, National Impunity. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, edited by N. Roht-Arriaza and J. Mariezcurrena. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

_Burr, Sherri L. 2001. From Noriega to Pinochet: Is there an International Moral and Legal Right to Kidnap Individuals Accused of Gross Human Rights Violations? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 29 (2):101-114.

_Catley, Paul, and Lisa Claydon. 2000. Pinochet, Bias and the European Convention on Human Rights. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Chigara, Ben. 2000. Pinochet and the Administration of International Criminal Justice. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Crawford, James. 2003. The Drafting of the Rome Statute. In From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, edited by P. Sands. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Davis, Madeleine. 2000. The Pinochet Case. London, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.

_Davis, Madeleine, ed. 2003. The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress and Implications. London, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies.

_Davis, Madeleine. 2005. Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes under International Law. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (2):729-735.

_Drinan, Robert F., and Teresa Kuo. 1993. Putting the World's Oppressors on Trial: The Torture Victim Protection Act. Human Rights Quarterly 15 (3):605-624.

_Du Plessis, Max. 2000. The Pinochet Cases and South African Extradition Law. South African Journal on Human Rights 16 (4):669-689.

_Evans, Rebecca. 2006. Pinochet in London-Pinochet in Chile: International and Domestic Politics in Human Rights Policy. Human Rights Quarterly 28 (1):207-244.

_Golob, Stephanie R. 2002. The Pinochet Case: Forced to be Free Abroad and at Home. Democratization 9 (4):22-57.

_Grant, Evadne. 2000. Pinochet 2: The Questions of Jurisdiction and Bias. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Hendrick, Judith. 2000. Pinochet and Issues of Morality and Justice. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Horowitz, Jodi. 1999. Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet: Universal Jurisdiction and Sovereign Immunity for Jus Cogens Violations. Fordham International Law Journal 23 (2):489-527.

_Joyner, Christopher C. 1996. Arresting Impunity: The Case for Universal Jurisdiction in Bringing War Criminals to Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (4):153-172.

_Kamminga, Menno T. 2001. Lessons Learned from the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction in Respect of Gross Human Rights Offenses. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (4):940-974.

_Kissinger, Henry. 2001. The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs 80 (4):86-98.

_Kobrick, Eric S. 1987. The Ex Post-Facto Prohibition and the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes. Columbia Law Review 87 (7):1515-1538.

_Kontorovich, Eugene. 2004. The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction's Hollow Foundation. Harvard International Law Journal 45 (1):183-237.

_Lagos, Ricardo, Heraldo Munoz, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 1999. The Pinochet Dilemma. Foreign Policy 114:26-39.

_Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (1):1-34.

_Macedo, Stephen, ed. 2003. Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crime Under International Law. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

_Magnarella, Paul. 1995. Universal Jurisdiction and Universal Human Rights: A Global Progression. Journal of Third World Studies 7 (2):159-171.

_Meintjes, Garth, and Juan E. Méndez. 2000. Reconciling Amnesties with Universal Jurisdiction. International Law FORUM du Droit International 2 (2):76-97.

_Morris, Madeline H. 2002. Lacking a Leviathan: The Quandaries of Peace and Accountability. In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by M. C. Bassiouni. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

_Paust, Jordan. 1989. Universality and the Responsibility to Enforce International Criminal Law: No US Sanctuary for Alleged Nazi War Criminals. Houston Journal of International Law 11 (2):337-344.

_Perez, Antonio F. 2000. The Perils of Pinochet: Problems for Transitional Justice and a Supranational Governance Solution. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 28 (2):175-221.

_Pion-Berlin, David. 2004. The Pinochet Case and Human Rights Progress in Chile: Was Europe a Catalyst, Cause or Inconsequential? Journal of Latin American Studies 36 (3):479-505.

_Powell, CH, and A Pillay. 2001. Revisiting Pinochet: The Development of Customary International Criminal Law. South African Journal on Human Rights 17 (4):477-502.

_Randall, Kenneth C. 1988. Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law. Texas Law Review 66 (4):785-841.

_Robertson, David. 2000. The House of Lords as a Political and Constitutional Court: Lessons from the Pinochet Case. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2001. The Role of International Actors in National Accountability Processes. In The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, edited by A. Barahona de Brito, C. González-Enríquez and P. Aguilar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

_Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2005. The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

_Rothenberg, Daniel. 2002. Let Justice Judge: An Interview with Judge Baltasar Garzón and Analysis of His Ideas. Human Rights Quarterly 24 (4):924-973.

_Sadat, Leila. 2003. Universal Jurisdiction, National Amnesties, and Truth Commissions: Reconciling the Irreconcilable. In Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes, edited by S. Macedo. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

_Sands, Philippe. 2003. After Pinochet: The Role of National Courts. In From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, edited by P. Sands. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

_Sarkin, Jeremy. 2004. Pursuing Private Actors for Reparations for Human Rights Abuses Committed in Africa in the Courts of the United States of America. In To Repair the Irreparable: Reparation and Reconstruction in South Africa, edited by E. Doxtader and C. Villa-Vicencio. Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip.

_Sharp, Dustin. 2003. Prosecutions, Development, and Justice: The Trial of Hissein Habre. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16:147-177.

_Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2003. Revolutions in Accountability: New Approaches to Past Abuses. American University International Law Review 19 (2):310-429.

_Summers, Mark A. 2003. The International Court of Justice's Decision in Congo v. Belgium: How Has It Affected the Development of a Principle of Universal Jurisdiction that Would Obligate All States to Prosecute War Criminals. Boston University International Law Journal 21 (1):63-100.

_Van Elst, Richard. 2000. Implementing Universal Jurisdiction over Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions. Leiden Journal of International Law 13:815-854.

_Von Sternberg, Mark R. 1996. A Comparison of the Yugoslavian and Rwandan War Crimes Tribunals: Universal Jurisdiction and the ム Elementary Dictates of Humanity メ . Brooklyn Journal of International Law 22:111-156.

_Waltz, Susan. 2001. Prosecuting Dictators: International Law and the Pinochet Case. World Policy Journal 18 (1):101-112.

_Wedgwood, Ruth. 2000. International Criminal Law and Augusto Pinochet. Virginia Journal of International Law 40 (3):829-847.

_Wible, Brent. 2002. 'De-Jeopardizing Justice': Domestic Prosecutions for International Crimes and the Need for Transnational Convergence. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31 (2):265-295.

_Wilson, Richard J. 1999. Prosecuting Pinochet: International Crimes in Spanish Domestic Law. Human Rights Quarterly 21 (4):927-979.

_Woodhouse, Diana. 2000. Introduction: The Extradition of Pinochet: A Calendar of Events. In The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis, edited by D. Woodhouse. Oxford, UK: Hart.

_Woodhouse, Diana, ed. 2000. The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis. Oxford, UK: Hart.

Comments