Moblab Game List

Part 0. Methodology

#A-1 (0929). Introduction, Participating auction exp

西條「招待」Ch. 1

伊藤「データ分析の力」Ch. 1 & 2 現実の世界で「実際に実験をしてしまう」

西山・新谷・川口・奥井「計量経済学」９章 （emz view only, 413-479、回帰非連続を除けば464まで)

*栗山編「環境評価」Ch. 7~9：なぜ実験がよいのか、デザイン、ロジスティクス

*グアラ・川越 Ch. 8

Part 1. Auction in the lab

Kagel, J. H., & Levin, D. (2011). Auctions: A survey of experimental research, 1995-2010. Handbook of experimental economics, 2, 563-637.

#A-1. (1006) Model and Hypothesis

応用ミクロ講義ノート

#A-2 (1013) Data analysis 1

#A-3 (1020) Presentation 1

Part 2. Auction in the field

• Lucking-Reiley, D. (1999). Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1063-1080.

• List, J. A., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Demand reduction in multiunit auctions: Evidence from a sportscard field experiment. American Economic Review, 90(4), 961-972.

Part 3. Voting in the lab

Großer, J. (2012). Voting mechanism design: Modeling institutions in experiments. In Experimental Political Science (pp. 72-91). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Großer, Jens, Voting Game Experiments with Incomplete Information: A Survey (November 9, 2018). Available at SSRN:

#V-1 (1027) Spatial voting exp

Moblab: Two-candidate election Instructions

=Holiday 1103=

#V-2 (1110) Model and Hypothesis

#V-3 (1117) Data analysis 2

#V-4 (1124) Turnout exp

Moblab: Voter Paradox Instructions

#V-5 (1130) Model and Hypothesis

#V-6 (1207) Data analysis 3

=No Class 1215=

#V-7 (1222) Presentation 3

• Hewett, R., Holt, C. A., Kosmopoulou, G., Kymn, C., Long, C. X., Mousavi, S., & Sarangi, S. (2005). A classroom exercise: voting by ballots and feet. Southern Economic Journal, 253-263.

• Großer, Jens, Ernesto Reuben, and Agnieszka Tymula. “Political Quid Pro Quo Agreements: An Experimental Study”. American Journal of Political Science.

• Levine, D. K., & Palfrey, T. R. (2007). The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study. American political science Review, 143-158.

  • LP07 Data

• Battaglini, M., Morton, R. B., & Palfrey, T. R. (2010). The swing voter's curse in the laboratory. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(1), 61-89.

• 浅古泰史（2016）『政治の数理分析入門』木鐸社 Ch 2, 4

• 浅古泰史（2018）ゲーム理論で考える政治学

• 坂井「招待」

• 坂井「多数決」

• 坂井「決め方」

• 肥前洋一 「実験政治学」Ch 6 (Costly participation), 7 (Quorum)

• *加藤「政治学の方法」Ch 5 (request)

• *飯田ほか「政治行動論」(request)

• **田中愛治「政治経済学の新潮流」 Ch 11 デュヴェルジェの法則

• Holt, Ch 19

  • • Two-Candidate Election -

  • • Voter Paradox (1 and 2 Candidate) - LP07

Part 4. Voting in the field

• Fukumoto, K., & Horiuchi, Y. (2011). Making outsiders' votes count: Detecting electoral fraud through a natural experiment. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 586-603.

• Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American political Science review, 33-48.

  • 今井 Ch 2.4 social.csv

• デュフロら なぜランダム化が必要なのか？

• 今井 Ch 3 差の差

• アングリスト Ch 1

Extra. Voting rule design

• 坂井「招待」

• 坂井「多数決」

• 坂井「決め方」

• 肥前洋一 「実験政治学」Ch 6 (request)

Extra. Hidden info and action

#HIA-4 (0112) Moral hazard exp

#HIA-5 (0119) Data analysis 4

#HIA-6 (0126) Presentation 4