By Jonas E. Alexis on September 11, 2015
NWO agents and Satan worshipers are largely responsible for the refugee crisis and have carefully plotted that coup in Europe by indirection.
“Brothers, let us congratulate each other for creating chaos in Syria and letting Europe and America pay for it. If the world has not figured out who we are, too bad. Michael told them that ‘creative destruction is our middle name,’ and they still has not gotten a clue?”
…by Jonas E. Alexis
Let us cut to the chase. The Syrian refugee crisis, which has already created protracted violence and fraying tensions in Europe and elsewhere, was carefully planned and executed by NWO agents and Satan worshipers to destroy Europe and America.
This is indeed an extraordinary claim. But fasten your seatbelt and put your thinking cap on because we are going to deal with serious geopolitical and metaphysical issues.
First of all, we need to lay out some incontrovertible facts. In 2013, at least 17 countries in Europe and America agreed to accept refugees from Syria and elsewhere. By 2015, countries like Germany, France, Sweden, Hungary, England, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Serbia and Kosovo, Netherlands, Norway, Greece, Poland, Denmark, Bulgaria, Spain, Finland, Italy, etc., have already received more than two million asylum applications from Syria, Iraq, and Eritrea. The U.S. has recently agreed to accept at least 10,000 Syrian refugees. Australia plans to accept at least 12,000.
Moreover, more than four million Syrians have already left Syria. That’s enough to create a country within a country. In fact, there are some countries that have less than 2 million people. It gets even more interesting: “Half of the 23 million population of Syria have been forced from their homes, with four million becoming refugees in other countries.”
European officials, who ought not to be oblivious about the political ramifications, are even urging other nations in Europe to take more refugees. Angela Merkel—bless her heart—has announced that Germany is expecting at least 800,000 refugees this year alone.
Angelina Jolie—who has a history of prostrating before the Dreadful Few for money, power and fame for decades—has recently gotten into the act by saying, “At no time in recent history has there been a greater need for leadership to deal with the consequences and causes of the global refugee crisis.” In a similar vein, Oscar and Academy Award winning celebrity Emma Thomson has insisted that Britain is racist for not accepting more refugees.
European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who was congratulated by members of the Dreadful Few for being the next President of the European Commission, even urged Europe to call for “mandatory refugee quotas.” “We are talking about Human beings,” he said, “we are not talking about numbers.” Not only that, refugees, says Junker, “has the right to work from day one”!
If at least 2 million people have to work from day one, what will happen to the existing order? What will happen to the average man who is trying hard to bring food to his wife and kids? What will happen to the thousands upon thousands of people who still cannot find jobs in an economic bubble in places like Greece? Well, they will have to phase out.
Furthermore, keep in mind that those refugees are not acquainted with the law of the land. And if they have the right to work from day one, then much of Europe will have to go through a swift but steady process known as extinction.
Which brings us again to a central point in our discussion here: NWO agents and Satan worshipers are largely responsible for the refugee crisis and have carefully plotted that coup in Europe by indirection.
Remember the genius of New World Order agent Michael Leeden? As we saw in precious articles, it was Leeden who made this politically frightening statement:
“Creative destruction is our middle name [Obviously he is talking about the Dreadful Few here], both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.
“Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace … We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”
Leeden wanted to take down Iraq, Iran, Syria, and any country that did not like the so-called democracy which the Dreadful Few have forced upon the United States. In order to do that, Leeden proposed the “Leeden doctrine,” which simply states that “every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”
So, Iraq was one of those “small crappy” countries. Ledeen moved on to postulate that the level of casualties in the Iraq War were “secondary. It may sound like an odd thing to say. But all the great scholars who have studied American character have come to the conclusion that we are a warlike people and that we love war.”
If people are to be treated as instruments or subjects, then what is Leeden’s political ontology here? Well, Leeden is unflinching: ideology, lies and fabrications, and indeed perpetual wars at any cost ought to be our intended purposes and guiding principles. In plain language, geopolitical chaos is what Leeden looking for.
Keep in mind that Leeden was one of the people who promoted the falsehood that Saddam Hussein had bought uranium in Niger, though Leeden later denied any involvement in propagating the lie. By 2013, Leeden wrote, “The Putin-Khamenei-Assad alliance has proven durable because it rests on both ideological and strategic objectives, and their main enemy is the United States.” Leeden moved on to perversely and indirectly argue that Russia, Iran and Syria are terrorist states.
So, Leeden wants to see “creative destruction” in the Middle East, but this is not without several detrimental repercussions. What are some of those repercussions? Keep reading.
“Yes, I am telling you to stop killing, even though I enjoy teaching children about killing in my professional life. More importantly, I am honored to have the opportunity to sexualize America and much of the world. That is how I make millions of dollars.”
Now, consider another New World Order agent by the name of Barbara Lerner Spectre, founding director of Paideia, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweeden. In a widely televised program, Spectre declared long before the Syrian war:
“Europe has not learned how to be multicultural, and I think we [the Jews] are going to be part of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century.
“Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make and they are now going to be in a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role, but without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”
If “Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century,” how did Spectre plan to deconstruct Europe’s social fabric? Well, Spectre saw “multiculturalism” as a weapon. So, when the war in Syria ensued a few years ago, Spectre was almost certainly glad. As we all know, one of the indirect consequences of wars is that they force people to migrate to different regions of the world.
Once people are migrated en mass, then it would create serious problems to the existing order precisely because those who try to migrate en mass generally have different sets of values and different ways of living. As British writer Peter Hitchens has recently put it, saving massive refugees means destroying Europe. Even flaming Neo-conservative shill Thomas Sowell did not hesitate to write that
“With refugees, as with all other human beings, the current generation will pass from the scene… All the new [refugee] generation will know is that they are not doing as well as other people in the country where they live. They will also know that the values of their culture clash with the values of the Western culture around them.”
Sowell, however, could not bring himself to the fact that it was New World Order agents and Satan worshipers who carefully constructed and crafted the Syrian war, which created the refugee crisis in the first place.
In fact, “Mossadist philosopher” Henry Bernard Levy—who once boasted that he was “aligned with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist movement” in his lifetime, who crazily postulated that Heinrich Himmler stood trial at Nuremberg, and who passionately believes that “The Talmud is democracy in practice”—was going around the country saying that Assad needed to go.
Sowell could not accept the fact that he was one of the puppets who implicitly chastised President Obama back in 2013 for not taking Assad down. After accepting the complete fabrication that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people, Sowell wrote then:
“I cannot see why even a single American, a single Israeli or a single Syrian civilian should be killed as a result of a token U.S. military action, undertaken simply to spare Barack Obama the embarrassment of doing nothing, after his ill-advised public ultimatum to the Syrian government to not use chemical weapons was ignored.
“Some people say that some military response is necessary, not to spare Obama a personal humiliation, but to spare the American presidency from losing all credibility — and therefore losing the ability to deter future threats to the United States without bloodshed.”
You see, Sowell keeps waking up at night and having nightmare about Syrian refugees in Europe, but he is (deliberately, I dare say) blind to the fact that he and his bosses (the Dreadful Few) are accomplices. In fact, both the Israeli regime and the Zionists/Neo-Bolsheviks/Neo-Conservatives in America fought tooth and nail to have perpetual wars in Syria and other places. How else would they still support the Syrian rebels/terrorists?
As we have discussed in previous articles, NWO agent Daniel Pipes said unapologetically that America needed to support both the Syrian rebels/terrorists and Assad so that both sides would end up killing each other in the process. Who will pay for that perpetual conflict in Syria? Certainly not Daniel Pipes. The average American will. After all, didn’t Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef say that we Goyim are donkeys and were created to serve the Dreadful Few?
Make no mistake about it, Sowell is a clever man, but his ideology does not allow him to see the obvious. For example, it was widely reported that the Israeli regime was supporting ISIS in Syria, but Sowell, as usual, was completely silent.
So, after years of incubation, NWO agents like Spectre got the answers they were looking for: Europe needs to be flooded with massive refugees from Syria and elsewhere. This is certainly a daunting task, and Spectre could not have done it alone. Her brethren needed to get involved. Listen to this headline by the Jewish Daily Forward: “Jewish Groups Lead Push to Crack Open Doors to Syria Refugees.” It stated:
“Of the four million Syrians who have fled their war-torn country in recent years, at least 135,000 of them require immediate resettlement. But America has absorbed fewer than 1,000. For Jewish activists pushing the government to shift gears, that feeble number and the accompanying bottleneck in resettlement of Syrian refugees are troubling reminders of their community’s own experience during World War II.
“‘Waiting two years for resettlement isn’t really rescue,’ said Melanie Nezer, vice president for policy and advocacy at HIAS, the leading communal group dealing with the admission of refugees. ‘As a Jewish community, we understand what it means to be refugees without getting any help. We would have been in a different place if the world had stepped up then.’
“Experts anticipate that by the time the refugee evaluation process is completed, some 400,000 will be recognized as needing resettlement. This will present America with a request to absorb 200,000 Syrian refugees.
“But U.S. resettlement quotas, which have not been updated in years, now stand at 70,000 people total, from all over the world, per year. HIAS and Jewish groups are asking to increase this quota to 100,000 per year, a level the United States maintained in the 1980s. ‘It’s not a huge number for a country the size of the United States,’ Nezer said.”
This sounds all and good until we realize that the Israeli regime didn’t get along with this Jewish program. What does Benjamin Netanyahu himself have to say about this? Take it from the horse’s own mouth:
“We have already devotedly cared for approximately 1,000 wounded people from the fighting in Syria and we have helped them to rehabilitate their lives. But, Israel is a small country, a very small country, that lacks demographic and geographic depth; therefore, we must control our borders, against both illegal migrants and terrorism.”
Did you catch that? Israel, says Netanyahu, is already supporting the Syrian rebels/terrorists, therefore the country does not have place for people who got caught in a crossfire. Syrian refugees are even called “infiltrators” in Israel, meaning that they are not welcome there.
Last year, when countries such as Iraq, Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan received some refugees from Syria, Israel received none. Yuval Ben-Ami, an Israeli journalist and author based in Jaffa, declared then:
“At this point in its history, Israel seems determined to barricade itself, primarily of its immediate neighborhood.”
So, is Netanyahu implicitly telling people like Angela Merkel that they are stupid for accepting at least 20,000 Syrian refugees in just one week? Is he really saying that countries like Hungary, Poland, etc., are really following the Jewish plan by accepting those refugees? Is he laughing at Republican and Democratic presidential candidates in the U.S. when they follow his ideology here?
Obviously he is. Listen to Batsheva Sobelman of the LA Times:
“For many Israeli Jews, even the smallest number of additional non-Jews is a potential threat, and the Syrian refugee crisis and the debate about Israel’s role has reawakened the country’s most deep-seated fear — that of losing the Jewish majority and subsequently the character of the Jewish state.
“Even those in support of opening the gates to refugees say they mean 10,000 at the most, with some calling for a token action such as that taken by former Prime Minister Menachem Begin, who in 1977 took in about 70 refugees from Vietnam….
“Transportation Minister Israel Katz said it would be a mistake for Israel to get involved in the Syrian civil war by taking in refugees. ‘We are too close, too involved. We are not a European country,’ he said.”
Here is the million-dollar question: where are the Jewish organizations and communities that are currently pushing for massive refugees in America and Europe? Why does the New York Times keep putting the issues at the feet of Europe and never ask Israel to help? Do they mean to tell us that they never heard of what Netanyahu said? Or are they themselves part of the plan? Leslie Baruch Brent, a Jewish professor emeritus in immunology, has recently declared that
“We owe this to mankind to help the unfortunate people who are desperate and whose plight we are to some extent to blame for.”
Nicholas Kristoff of the New York Times has recently made similar claims. After applauding Germany and America for their effort to accept more refugees, Kristof got one concern. He said that by allowing too much migrants, then we probably will have to deal with “human smugglers and skinheads, neo-Nazis and far-right xenophobic politicians.” But if we do not have those neo-Nazis, Kristof seems to think that we should quickly move to help those refugees because they “could be us.” Again, why doesn’t he pass this message to the Israeli regime?
Brent, we are told, “was just a child when his parents sent him to live at a Jewish orphanage in Berlin to escape the unbearable anti-Semitism in the small German town where they lived.” But Brent could never bring his thesis to Netanyahu.
Brent, who has said that the British treatment of the refugee situation is “horrendously negative and selfish,” could not even approach Jewish organizations and media with this double talk. But Brent unintentionally (the cunning of reason again) destroyed Netanyahu’s point by saying:
“Extremists who want to get into Britain or other countries like France or Germany, will get there anyway. I think 99.9 percent of Syrian refugees are genuine refugees who are trying to escape from the horrendous life in their home countries, whose families have been decimated or left behind. They’re just desperate people and when you have people like that, you have to help them”
So, let’s get them to Israel, Brent. If you are so passionate about those refugees, if they remind you of Nazi Germany, then give Netanyahu a call and ask your leaders to open their borders. Stop playing game and lip service and do something. Perhaps Europe will follow your example? Furthermore, ask super-wealthy countries like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Bahrain why they “have refused to offer sanctuary to a single Syrian refugee.”
What we are seeing here is that NWO agents and Satan worshipers want to destroy Europe, which Benedict built from scratch shortly after the fall of the Roman Empire.
Moreover, NWO agents and Satan worshipers are using the Syrian refugees in the same way that the Dreadful Few used blacks and homosexuals in the United States. In short, Spectre and her brethren will not stop until the essentially Jewish plan becomes a fait accompli. In fact, their intellectual antecedents predicted that this would be the case.
For example, in a speech delivered at the B’nai B’rith in 1902, Solomon Ehrmann, a Viennese Jew, envisioned a future in which “all of mankind will have been jewified and joined in union with the B’nai B’rith.” When that happens, “not only the B’nai B’rith but all of Judaism will have fulfilled its task.”
So, according to Ehermann, Judaism’s task is to take over the world and basically “jewify” virtually everyone, to subdue and usurp the moral and political order. According to historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California, for Ehrmann, “Jewification equaled enlightenment.” So, the logic is pretty clear: the world, according to the political implications of Judaism, is currently in darkness. The world needs to be “enlightened” by accepting a wicked ideology.
In a similar vein, Baruch Levy, one of Karl Marx’s correspondents, declared that
“the Jewish people taken collectively shall be its own Messias…In this new organization of humanity, the sons of Israel now scattered over the whole surface of the globe…shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition…
“The government of the nations forming the Universal or World-Republic shall all thus pass, without any effort, into Jewish hands thanks to the victory of the proletariat…Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, that, when the Messianic epoch shall have arrived, the Jews will control the wealth of all the nations of the earth.”
What Levy was implicitly saying here is that the New World Order is essentially Jewish or Talmudic. This has serious geopolitical implications, and this is one reason why Europe and much of the West have been inundated by massive refugees. As we have already suggested, it is not that those refugees (who can be good, bad, and indifferent) are the source of the problem. Far from it.
We have already seen that NWO agents and Satan worshipers meticulously and deliberately created conflicts in places like Syria in the first place. As Gilad Atzmon has recently put it, the powers that be
“turned the Mediterranean Sea into a death trap… it was Jewish aggressive politics and Zionist global lobbying that brought this colossal refugee crisis about.”
Once this colossal crisis began to manifest itself in numerous places, then Syrian refugees have no other options but to find some kind of exit beyond Syria. People like Stefan Molyneux are incapable of addressing this serious issue because they are not really looking at the root of the problem. In that sense, they are secularized versions of Bill O’Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, people who can make neither heads nor tails of what is really going on in the Middle East.
It should become clear by now that NWO agents cannot escape the fact that they are the key players behind the “death trap” in the Mediterranean Sea. If “creative destruction” is their “middle name,” then it is not farfetched to assert that they seek to destroy the social and political order and substitute an essentially diabolical ideology, which, as Civilta Cattolicapredicted more than one hundred years ago, has already elevated the racist ideology of the Talmud above reason, morality, and even the Goyim.
If you think this is again mumbo jumbo, then consider this. The Guardian reported in an article entitled “Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq” that:
“The war on terror, that campaign without end launched 14 years ago by George Bush, is tying itself up in ever more grotesque contortions. On Monday the trial in London of a Swedish man, Bherlin Gildo, accused of terrorism in Syria, collapsed after it became clear British intelligence had been arming the same rebel groups the defendant was charged with supporting.
“The prosecution abandoned the case, apparently to avoid embarrassing the intelligence services. The defence argued that going ahead with the trial would have been an “affront to justice” when there was plenty of evidence the British state was itself providing “extensive support” to the armed Syrian opposition.
“That didn’t only include the “non-lethal assistance” boasted of by the government (including body armour and military vehicles), but training, logistical support and the secret supply of “arms on a massive scale”. Reports were cited that MI6 had cooperated with the CIA on a “rat line” of arms transfers from Libyan stockpiles to the Syrian rebels in 2012 after the fall of the Gaddafi regime.”
The war on terror has become so funny that the Guardian said: “terrorism is now squarely in the eye of the beholder. And nowhere is that more so than in the Middle East, where today’s terrorists are tomorrow’s fighters against tyranny – and allies are enemies – often at the bewildering whim of a western policymaker’s conference call.”
As we have seen in many other articles, the racist ideology of the Talmud is the source of the problem, not good or bad DNA. And children learn about this racist ideology as soon as they begin to talk. Just recently, the Independent has reported that “Three-year-old ultra-Orthodox Jewish children told ‘the non-Jews’ are ‘evil’ in worksheet produced by London school.” It stated:
“British three-year-olds have been told ‘the non-Jews’ are ‘evil’ in a Kindergarten worksheet handed out at ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools in north London, it can be revealed.
“Documents seen by The Independent show children are taught about the horrors of the Holocaust when they are still in kindergarten at the Beis Rochel boys’ school in north London… The document refers to Nazis only as ‘goyim’ – a term for non-Jews some people argue is offensive.
“Emily Green, who used to teach at the same Beis Rochel girls’ secondary school, now chairs the Gesher EU organisation which supports ultra-Orthodox Jews who want to leave the community
“‘It’s not uncommon to be taught non-Jewish people are evil in ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools. It is part of the prayers, teaching, their whole ethos,’ she said. Describing it as a form of ‘indoctrination,’ Ms Green added: ‘Psychologically, you become so afraid of the world out there after being taught how dangerous and bad and evil non-Jews are, that it makes it harder to leave.’”
This racist ideology needs to be confronted and deconstructed by practical reason and truth. Israel Shamir would have called this racist ideology “Judaic paranoia,” which has kept the Dreadful Few from coming to the truth for thousands of years. When Shamir got out of that Judaic paranoia, he declared that he is:
“daily grateful to Christ who saved me from the Judaic paranoia of hating and being hated and brought me into the world of loving and being loved.”
For Shamir, every Jew has to come to terms with himself and morally and metaphysically reject the war against the moral and political order “by discovering God’s presence in the world, that is Christ.” And this is “an act of free will,” not an act of DNA molecules as espoused by a number of writers and activists. Shamir argues that Jews must “give up hate” and “accept the love that is Christ. Christian faith is not compatible with Jewish exclusivity.” He continues to say:
“Indeed, the plans of Almighty include the Jews; like the plans of the Ring included the hobbits; but some will play the role of Frodo, while others will take the part of Gollum, some will support Antichrist, and some will stay with Christ.”
Shamir certainly nailed it. It must be emphasized that each man has to choose a side in this cosmic and ideological conflict. If your allegiance is to truth and practical reason, if you uphold the moral and political order, then you are on the right side. You are a light in the world of darkness and chaos. Keep fighting. Do not trade the moral order for financial and political gain, and show the enemy once again that you are not for sale.
 For recent reports, see “Migration crisis: Germany presses Europe into sharing refugees,” Guardian, September 10, 2015 3, 2015; “Syrian crisis: NZ to take in hundreds more refugees,” New Zealand Herald, September 7, 2015; Melissa Eddy, “Migrant Tide Bringing Out Europe’s Best and Worst,” NY Times, September 9, 2015; Michael R. Gordon, “Kerry Favors an American Commitment to Bringing in More Refugees,” NY Times, September 9, 2015; Austin Ramzy, “Tony Abbott Says Australia Will Accept 12,000 More Refugees,” NY Times, September 9, 2015; Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura, “Britain Tries to Deter Migrants, Even as It Lets More In,” NY Times, September 8, 2015; Anemona Hartocollis, “Traveling in Europe’s River of Migrants,” NY Times, September 9, 2015; “Traveling in Europe’s River of Migrants,” NY Times, September 8, 2015; Palko Karasz and Dan Bilefsky, “Migrants Meet Rain, Resistance and Confusion at Border Crossings,”NY Times, September 10, 2015.
 Somini Sengupta, “Europeans Seek to Use Force Against Smugglers at Sea,” NY Times, September 10, 2015; Griff Witte and Anthony Faiola, “At choke points on the way to Western Europe, chaos and growing frustration,” Washington Post, September 8, 2015; James Kanter, “European Official Calls for Continent to Take In 160,000 Migrants,” NY Times, September 9, 2015; Rick Lyman, Steven Erlanger, and Aurelien Breeden, “A Steady Flow Staggers Into Europe, Outpacing Pledges of Shelter,” NY Times, September 7, 2015; Raziye Akkoc, “Migration crisis: Desperate refugees escape camps and start a 110-mile trek to Austria,” The Telegraph, September 4, 2015. For similar sources in the past, see Suzanne Daley, “Swedes Begin to Question Liberal Migration Tenets,” NY Times, February 26, 2011; Colin Freeman, “Stockholm Riots Leave Sweden’s Dreams of Perfect Society Up in Smoke,” The Telegraph, May 25, 2013; Jennifer Collins, Jabeen Bhatti, and Carolina Jemsby, “Sweden Shaken as Riots Continue in Immigrants Suburbs,” USA Today, May 25, 2013.
“Which Countries Are Under the Most Strain in the European Migration Crisis?,” NY Times, September 3, 2015.
 Gardiner Harris, David E. Sanger, and David M. Herszenhorn, “Obama Increases Number of Syrian Refugees for U.S. Resettlement to 10,000,” NY Times, September 10, 2015; Tom McCarthy, Obama calls on US to resettle ‘at least 10,000’ Syrian refugees in 2016 fiscal year,” Guardian, September 10, 2015.
 Daniel Hurst and Shalailah Medhora, “Australia to accept an extra 12,000 Syrian refugees and will join US-led airstrikes,”Guardian, September 9, 2015.
 “Syria’s civil war is killing refugees,” Toronto Sun, September 3, 2015.
 Patrick Cockburn, “Refugee crisis: Where are all these people coming from and why?,” The Independent, September 8, 2015.
 James Kanter, “European Official Calls for Continent to Take In 160,000 Migrants,” NY Times, September 9, 2015.
 Quoted in Lindsay Kimble, “Angelina Jolie Pitt Writes Emotional Op-Ed About the Syrian Refugee Crisis: Every Country ‘Must Be Part of the Solution,’” People Magazine, September 9, 2015.
 Britain is RACIST for not taking in more refugees, claims Hollywood star Emma Thompson,” Daily Mail, September 3, 2015.
 “AJC Congratulates Jean-Claude Junker,” American Jewish Congress, July 16, 2014.
 Kim Hjelmgaard, “European Union calls for mandatory refugee quotas,” USA Today, September 9, 2015; see also Andrew Marszal, “Juncker calls for ‘compulsory’ redistribution of 160,000 migrants,” The Telegraph, September 9, 2015.
 Matt Chorley, “Give refugees to the right to work from day one, says Juncker as he reveals power-grab for EU-wide migration policy,” Daily Mail, September 9, 2015.
 Matt Chorley, “Give refugees to the right to work from day one, says Juncker as he reveals power-grab for EU-wide migration policy,” Daily Mail, September 9, 2015.
 Nicole Hasham, “Syrian refugees told to read this government book before being resettled in Australia, Sydney Morning Herald, September 10, 2015.
 Mikkel Thorup, An Intellectual History of Terror (New York: Routledge, 2010), 196-197.
 Jonah Goldberg, “Baghdad Delenda Est, Part II: Get On With It,” National Review, April 23, 2002.
 “Iraq: What Lies Ahead,” American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2003.
 Joshua Micah Marshall, Laura Rosen, and Paul Grastris, “Iran-Contra II?,” Washington Monthly, September 2004.
 Philip Giraldi, “Forging the Case for War,” American Conservative, November 21, 2005.
 Michael Leeden, “The Troika: Putin, Khamenei and Assad,” Huffington Post, September 11, 2013.
 Peter Hitchens, “We won’t save refugees by destroying our own country,” Daily Mail, September 5, 2015.
 Thomas Sowell, “The Past and Future of Refugee Crisis,” Jewish World Review, September 9, 2015 8, 2015.
 Gary Wood, “Jew Suis un Superstar,” Guardian, June 15, 2003.
 Attila Somfalvi, “Bernard-Henri Levy: Israel Secular Miracle,” Y-Net News, May 31, 2010.
 Henry-Bernard Levy, “Stop Assad’s Slaughter in Syria!,” Newsweek, August 20, 2012; Bernard-Henry Levy, “The Syria Deal Has a Hint of Munich,” Wall Street Journal, September 18, 2013; Bernard-Henry Levy, “Bernard-Henri Lévy on Obama, Syria, Putin, the G20, and a Week’s Wait,” Daily Beast, September 2, 2013.
 Thomas Sowell, “Serious About Syria?,” National Review, September 4, 2013.
 Thomas Sowell, “Syria and Obama,” Townhall.com, September 10, 2013.
 Nathan Guttman, “Jewish Groups Lead Push To Crack Open Doors to Syria Refugees,” Forward, June 25, 2015.
 Ibid; see also Batsheva Sobelman, “One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel,” LA Times, September 6, 2015.
 Shahar Shoham, “What Syrian Refugees Have To Say About Coexistence With Israel,” Forward, September 8, 2015 6, 2015; “Netanyahu says Israel not indifferent, but too small to host refugees,” Russia Today, September 6, 2015.
 Ben Winsor, “Here’s Which Countries Are Helping Syria’s Refugee Crisis — And Which Ones Are Refusing,”Business Insider, September 11, 2014.
 “Germany’s Merkel says record refugee influx ‘will change’ nation,” AFP, September 7, 2015.
 Laura King and Henry Chu, “After standoff in Hungary, thousands of Syrians arrive in Austria,” LA Times, September 5, 2015; Laura King, “Inside the train to Germany: Wonder, fatigue and, for a moment, fear,” LA Times, September 6, 2015.
 “Candidates Address the Growing Refugee Crisis,” NY Times, September 9, 2015.
 Batsheva Sobelman, “One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel,” LA Times, September 6, 2015.
 “Italy’s Jewish Leadership Calls for Aid for Refugees,” Forward, September 6, 2015.
 Noemi Szecsi, “How Europe’s Other Half Lives,” NY Times, September 9, 2015.
 Quoted in Michelle Malka Grossman, “Holocaust refugee: We owe it to mankind to allow Syrian refugees into Europe,”Jerusalem Post, September 7, 2015.
 Nicholas Kristof, “Compassion for Refugees Isn’t Enough,” NY Times, September 10, 2015.
 Nicholas Kristof, “Refugees Who Could Be Us,” NY Times, September 4, 2015.
 Grossman, “Holocaust refugee: We owe it to mankind to allow Syrian refugees into Europe,” Jerusalem Post, September 7, 2015
 Jay Akbar, “Revealed: How the five wealthiest Gulf Nations have so far refused to take a single Syrian refugee,” Daily Mail, September 4, 2015; see also Ben Hubbard, “Wealthy Gulf Nations Are Criticized for Tepid Response to Syrian Refugee Crisis,” NY Times, September 5, 2015.
 For a short but reasonable introduction on this, see E. Michael Jones, Benedict’s Rule: The Rise of Ethnicity and the Fall of Rome (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2012); for other sources, see for example Thomas E. Woods, How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization (Washington: Regenery Publishing, 2005); Diane Moczar, Seven Lies About Catholic History: Infamous Myths About the Church’s Past and How to Answer Them (Charlotte, NC: TAN Books, 2010).
 See for example E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).
 Albert S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 331.
 Quoted in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1066.
 Molyneux actually believes that morality “cannot be subjected to a rigorous rational or empirical analysis,” but he is imposing an indirect morality on the Syrian refugees! He needs to thank goodness that he never met Emmanuel Kant. Stefan Molyneux, Universally Preferable Behaviour: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics (Amazon Digital Service, Inc., 2013), kindle edition.
 See E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1175-1177.
 Seumas Milne, “Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq,” Guardian, June 3, 2015.
 Adam Withnall and Dina Rickman, “Three-year-old ultra-Orthodox Jewish children told ‘the non-Jews’ are ‘evil’ in worksheet produced by London school,” The Independent, September 2, 2015.
 Israel Shamir, Cabbala of Power (Charleston: BookSurge, 2008), 310.
 Ibid., 311.
 Ibid., 312.