About Ellen Gould White

Please watch this short you tube video that takes you back in time to Ellen White's shortest vision she had about her missing hairnet, click here.

Question: Will the Almighty send prophets in the last days?

Acts 2:17-18, "And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:  And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy:"

Answer: YES!

There are numerous preachers, pastors, priests, and just plain people, that declare the Lord no longer has need of prophets. They believe that in our day a prophet is not a necessity because of the simple fact that we have the Bible. However, Acts 2:17  & 18 overwhelmingly declare them in error. The other toss of the coin is that many believe that the Lord DOES use prophets in our day, but they feel it would ONLY be men of God that He would use and never a woman. Is this belief biblical?

Luke 2:36,38 "And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity; And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem."

Acts 21:8,9 "And the next day we that were of Paul's company departed, and came unto Caesarea: and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, which was one of the seven; and abode with him. And the same manhad four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy."

Judges 4:4, "And Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth, she judged Israel at that time."

Exodus 15:20, "And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances."

Apparently not. The Lord does in fact use women in prophecy. In fact, just recently He used a woman named Ellen G. White to proclaim numerous facts not only regarding biblical jurisprudence. Ellen White was also a prophetess that spoke of our day with absolute clarity even though she lived well over a hundred years ago. Her books (475 of them) have been dissected by literally millions of scoffers, and to date not one of them have been able to come up with the slightest proof that she was anything but a prophetess. Sure, there are those that will take her out of context to try and make her appear in error, however, these are the very same people that will take Bible Scriptures out of context to preach lies in the first place. All one needs to do is read for your self her writings IN CONTEXT and one can see that they lie about her like they lie about the Scriptures. Fact is, every test the Bible declares should be used to identify a true prophet have been used on her, and she has passed the test with flying colors. Problem is, we ARE living in a time when false prophets will run rampant. Jesus warned us to "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."- Matthew 7:15  So we must be on the look out for these wolves. "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." -Matthew 24:24

So... how do we detect false prophets? 1 Thessalonians 5:20-21 tells us first of all that we should, "Despise not prophesyings.  Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." Even though we see numerous false prophets popping up all over the place, the Word of the Almighty declares we should not despise all prophets. Simple reason is, unless you examine their words and match them up with Scriptural jurisprudence, we truly can never know IF they are false prophets correct? All too often the prophet will declare something we feel is so far off the wall that we feel they must be bogus. Yet when we examine their words in the Light of Scriptures we sometimes may find otherwise. That is the only way to find out if they are sent by the Creator. Besides, the Bible gives us MANY clues on how to detect these false prophets. So, why not utilize them eh?

Deuteronomy 18:21-22, "And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him."

Jeremiah 28:9, "The prophet which prophesieth of peace, when the word of the prophet shall come to pass, then shall the prophet be known, that the LORD hath truly sent him."

Biblical fact is, when the prophet prophecies, the prophecy must be 100% accurate. It has to be 100% because if he is a prophet THE LORD IS THE ONE SPEAKING THROUGH HIM, and the Lord does not share error in the slightest degree!

Read more interesting info on how to determine a true or false prophet here: http://www.remnantofgod.org/falseprophets.htm


Q.: What is a true prophet? How can we be sure? Is there a biblical test? Do we reject all to "play it safe" ??????????? Who encountered more opposition JESUS or Ellen G White? In His time JESUS was called a Devil, but today we have such a popular Jesus because of the faith only doctrine by her myriads of opponents, while Ellen White is being called 'Mrs. Black.'

Martin Luther often quoted from the book of Psalms which states that all men are liars! But the  Christian liar is a contradiction in terms! D. M. Canright and all those who quote his later book of lies are also guilty by not being willing to investigate what Ellen White wrote in her Christian classics.


The work of a prophet/prophetess, is to rebuke and reprove sin in the world and in the church, including those Christians who once rejoiced in the light, but have fallen to the seductive power of sin

Some people play it safe and reject all prophets in order to make sure that they are not fooled by a counterfeit. This is wrong! GOD simply says to test them by His holy Word "hold fast" the genuine 

[1. Thess. 5:9-21]. Acts 2:17

1.] All their predictions must come to pass. If they do not, then they are not of GOD [Deut.18:21,22].

2.] They receive their messages from GOD in the form of visions and dreams [Numbers ch.1-2].

3.] When they are in vision, their eyes are open and they do not blink [Numb.24:4,16].

4.] In vision, he/she, does not breathe [Daniel 10:17]

5.] They receive supernatural strength while in vision [Dan. 10:18].

6.] A true prophet's predictions will be 100% correct [Jer. 28:9].

7.] Does not give his/her own interpretation [2.Peter 1:20].

8.] Only comes in the name of the Lord and does not glorify self [2.Pet. 1:21].

9.] Helps and strengthens  the body of CHRIST, the church [1.Cor.14:3,4].

10.] keeps GOD'S law [Isa.8:20]

11.] Believes in the incarnation of JESUS CHRIST [1.John 4:1-3].

12.] A true prophet/prophetess will manifest good works and produce abundant spiritual fruit.



Joseph Smith, 1805-1844, the prophet of the Mormon church never submitted to medical examiners to see if he was breathing during the visions. Neither was his fruits according to spiritual standards as he died with a gun in his hands. 

He also insisted that the Bible was not GOD'S holy Word and therefore needed his visions and input. The book of Mormon is the result and supplanted the Holy Scriptures.

Hal Lindsey predicted three times that the ancient temple in Jerusalem would be rebuilt. You would think that he'll give up by now, after three failures.

His interpretations keep changing as current events keep changing. That’s what make him a false prophet.

He predicted 30 years ago that the Soviet Union would play the key role – but now that there is no Soviet Union, he says it will be Islamic fundamentalism. He said 30 years ago while Nasser was still alive that Egypt would spearhead a pan-Arabic, Anti- Israeli movement. But now that Egypt has signed a treaty with Israel and they are living in relative peace, he no longer makes that claim. Thirty years ago there was a 10 nation European Union that he predicted would play a major role. Today there are 25 member nations, and yet you still pretend that he knows what he's talking about.

Prophet William Marion Branham died in 1963 and was a Baptist Christian before turning a Oneness Pentecostal prophet. He claimed to be Elijah.

Dumitru Duduman July 14,1932-May 5, 1997, from Rumania migrated to the USA and claimed to be a prophet to America.

Also in the early 1800's, a young woman by the name of Miss Margaret MacDonald, received the vision of the two stage return [advent] of Jesus known today as the secret rapture theory. She was part of the Irvingate Advent movement after they sought the gift of tongues. Irving was summoned to court by the English for promoting spiritualism in place of Christianity, but died before he got there.

Ellen G. White, 1825-1915, prophetess of the Seventh day Adventist church. She only had three years of formal education and yet wrote over 50 volumes, 100 000 pages and received more than 2 000 visions. Dr. Harvey Kellogg from Kellogg's breakfast cereals, chief medic at Battle Creek sanatorium at the time, invited other colleagues and scientists to examine her visions by feelings her pulse and holding a mirror in front of her mouth to test that she did not breath for more than two hours during an entire vision.

This type of test cannot be counterfeited by demonic forces. Was Ellen Gould White a black person? no she was not. It is derogative to call Mrs. White black.

The writings of Ellen G. White contain more than 8 thousand references to the Gospel and about 6 thousand references specifically to JESUS CHRIST and His sacrifice on the cross. The CHRIST of the cross and the cross of CHRIST were the focus of her message. She admonished Seventh-day Adventist to uplift JESUS before the world. "Of all professed Christians, Seventh-day Adventists should be foremost in uplifting CHRIST before the world."-Ellen G. White, Gospel workers, p.156

The SDA church consulted Americas foremost specialist on Plagiarism [Plagiarism is literacy-or artistic or musical-theft] , Attorney Vincent L. Ramik of the law firm Diller, Ramik and Wight, Washington D.C. [Ramik was not a Seventh Day Adventist, but Roman Catholic with a prejudiced mind towards SDA'S].

In his 1981 report, spending more than 300 hours researching about 1 000 relevant cases in American legal history, he concluded that "Ellen G. White" was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/privacy.

These false charges were not new to the Seventh Day Adventist church, but because one of the church own Elder/Pastor made the charge public, that the SDA church did something about it, even though it has not silenced the critics with this false charge.

Ramik pointed out that Mrs. White "modified, exalted, and improved" the writings of others in an ethical, as well as legal, manner. Ramik came to his conclusion after many hours of reading Ellen White's books, as well as those used in her writings. Further, he read the material written by critics, from D. M. Canright to the present.

In response to a question concerning the ethics of Mrs. White in using material of others without publicly stating where she got them, Ramik responded, after noting some legal precedents: "Ellen White used the writings of others; but in the way she used them, she made them uniquely her own, ethically, as well as legally. And interestingly, she invariably improved that which she 'selected'!....She stayed well within the legal boundaries of 'fair use' and all the time created something that was substantially greater (and even more beautiful) than the mere sum of the component parts. And I think the ultimate tragedy is that the critics fail to see this, he said.

"It was reading her messages in her writings that changed my mind, he said, I believe that the critics have missed the boat badly by focusing upon Mrs. White's writings, instead on focusing upon the messages in Mrs. White writings.......Mrs. White moved me! I am a Roman Catholic; but, Catholic, Protestant, whatever-she moved me. And I think her writings should move anyone, unless he is permanently biased and is unswayable.

                                                                        When asked what he meant by "message," Ramik replied: "The message is what is crucial. The critic reads a sentence, and receives no meaning from it---he may, and often does, even take it out of context. But read the entire message. What is the authors intent? What is the author really saying? Where the words come from is not that important.

What is the message of this? If you disregard the message, then even the Bible itself is not worth being read, in that sense of the word."---Attorney Vincent L. Ramik

Note: If critics are convinced that most of her writings were stolen [plagiarized] from previous writers who were recognized as good Christian writers, how come that thy want to use this to convince others and themselves that Ellen G. White is a false prophet.

Their main gripe is her book "The Great Controversy" between CHRIST and Satan, which shows the involvement of other churches and reformers throughout the history of Christianity from the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. right down to our time. Most of it comes from history books and the Bible. Satan really hates this book which exposes all his deceptions.


More than 100 years ago Ellen G. White warned:

  *   Tobacco is a malignant poison

  *    Cancer is a germ [virus]

  *    X-rays can be dangerous

  *    Cities will become polluted

  *    Unrest and drug addiction among youth will become world problems

  *    Protestants and Roman Catholics will re-unite

  1869 A.D. I was shown she wrote: "Tobacco is a poison of the most deceitful and malignant kind, having an exciting, then a paralyzing influence upon the nerves of the body. It is all the more dangerous because its effect upon the system are so slow, and at first scarcely perceivable. Multitudes have fallen victims to its poisonous influence. They have surely murdered themselves by this slow poison."

100 years later science catches up: "Warning: Smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and may complicate pregnancy."---Surgeon General's Report.

  1905 A.D. I was shown, she wrote:  "People are continually eating flesh that is filled with tuberculosis  and cancerous germs. Tuberculosis, cancer, and other fatal diseases are thus communicated."

50 years later science catches up:  "Many, if not all, malignant tumors my be caused by viruses [midget germs], thus, a large numbers of malignant of different morphology and in different species of animals could be transmitted from one host to another by filtered extracts."---Ludwig Gross, M.D., 1956,  Journal of the American Medical Association.

 1869 A.D. I was shown, she wrote: "The eating of flesh meats has made a poor quality of blood and flesh. Your systems are in a state of inflammation, prepared to take on disease. You are liable to acute attacks of disease and sudden death because you do not possess the strength of constitution to rally and resist disease. There will come a time when the strength and health you flattered yourself you possessed will prove to be weakness."

 Science catches up in 1961: "A vegetarian diet can prevent 90% of our thrombo-embolic diseases [clots in veins and arteries] and 90% of our coronary occlusions." These two conditions are responsible for more death than all other causes combined in North America."---Dr. W. A. Thomas,M.D., Writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Mrs. White received an award

In 1986, the National Health federation posthumously awarded Ellen White 'The Presidents award' for her uncanny medical insights. The writings of Ellen White contain a treasure house of scientific insights, and leading researchers are discovering it. This includes the fields of health, nutrition, medicine, narcotics, physiology, plant science and geology.

World War One Predicted

"But between the time of the Protestant Reformation in the fifteenth century and the rise of the Millerite, or Adventist, movement four centuries later, a new view of the Advent had become popular in Protestant theology. By the opening of the 19th century churchmen were declaring that the millenium would not take place in heaven physically apart from earth, but would be a period resulting from the ever advancing of the triumph of the good in man over the evil. ......

.......Charles Darwin was later to give this idea great impetus with his Theory of Evolution. [Darwin had done two years of theology at Oxford, England]

In 1878, D.M. Canright, the bitter critic of Adventism, recalled an 1849 statement by the leading Adventist writer Ellen G. White: "The Nations are now getting angry." [See D M Canright, opens in new page]

Canright retorted: "That was 39 years ago. It takes a long time for them to get fighting mad! Pshaw!

In 1913 Dr. David Starr Jordan, a great leader of the movement for world peace, declared of the great war of Europe which Adventists predicted: "We shall say that it will never come. It is humanly impossible."  President Woodrow Wilson, in December of that year spoke of "a growing cordiality and sense of community of interest among the nations, foreshadowing an age of settled peace and good will."  Eight month later, when World War I began, Wilson cried, "Incredible!".---pp.262-264,Booton Herdon,The 7th DAY, The Story of the Seventh-Day Adventists, McGraw-Hill,1960 [Note:Herdon is not a Seventh Day Adventist Journalist].

Mrs White wrote:" But if there was one sin above another which called for the

destruction of the race by the flood, it was the base crime of

amalgamation of man and beast which defaced the image of God, and caused

confusion everywhere." {1SP 69.1}

"Every species of animals which God had created was preserved in the

ark. The confused species which God did not create, which were the

result of amalgamation, were destroyed by the flood." {1SP 78.2} [end of quote]

One sin above all other -- mankind tinkering with the very codes of creation to produce "monsters".

Man trying to be God.

All of the genetic engineering articles showing scientist's tinkering

> with amalgamation of man and beast today shows just how desperate

> science has become in their attempt to force an evolutionary step on

> us. Were these scientists permitted to continue, they would

> certainly create monsters on earth, justifying their acts as last-

> ditch efforts to speed up evolution, compressing millions of years

> into months in their laboratories, to create a new mankind after

> their own twisted imaginations. 

Only before the 1990ties, the fact that Amalgamation between different Species through genetic engineering could be done was still pretty much science fiction. People were still scoffing all the way thought that Ellen G. White statements could have any basis in literal fact. The scientific world is now pushing for more legislation to allow them to do more in cloning.

Ellen White said, when America repudiates its Constitutional separation of church and state, and its Protestant character, both separation of church and state as specified in the Constitution, and 

the Protestant Christian character of America would be abolished at the point of the Sunday Law.

And this is what is happening today:

The combination of Dispensationalism on the extreme right, and Ecumenism on the extreme left of Protestantism is squeezing the last dregs of original Apostolic Protestantism out of American Christianity.

Protestantism, after all, has something to protest, against the Papacy in particular. And Dispensationalism has swallowed the Jesuit Counterreformation prophetic scenario of Christ's Second Coming.

So on both the left and the right, the mould of Protestantism is being squeezed out by Jesuit strategy.

America's early Protestants would hardly recognize their spiritual descendants today. So Protestantism has fallen prey to these corruptions.

"When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to

enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with

popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which

has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into

active despotism. --Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 712. {ChS 160.3}

"By the decree of enforcing the institution of the Papacy in violation

of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from

righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf

to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the

abyss to clasp

hands with Spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold

union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution

as a Protestant and Republican government, and shall make provision for

the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that

the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan, and that the end

is near.--Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 451. {ChS 160.4}

It also makes perfect sense in Daniel 11:40-45.

> > The king of the south pushes - The king of the north goes forth in fury to set up his power.

> >

> > The Moslem threat will be the catalyst to swing political Christianity into power for their end time drama (a drama which is more fully revealed in Rev. 13)

> > People wonder how a political Christianity could do the things predicted (the way SDA's understand it)-- but Daniel 11:40-45predicts how it will happen--the king of the south will "push", 

and the king of the north will come with might against him and the king of the north will end up setting up his tabernacles in the holy land. The deception is laid deep -- as all religions are now already focused on the holy land as the focal point of all religion.


Walter Rea called her the White lie and others Mrs. Black. Where Luther had his 95 thesis to defend, Adventists have a 101 Answers to objection.

Responses to criticism

Seventh-day Adventists have long responded to critics with arguments and assertions of their own. Typical responses to these criticisms include:

Mental illness: Seventh-day Adventists reject the charge of mental illness or that she had seizures. Instead they believe that her writings come as the result of divine revelation. In addition to a belief in the existence of spiritual gifts, Adventists point to the "overall ministry of her life" as the best proof of the genuineness of her inspiration. In addition, they believe her visions were often accompanied by supernatural phenomena. One such story relates how on several occasions witnesses recorded her holding a large Bible at arms length for extended periods of time (in one case 20-25 minutes) while she quoted Scriptural passages out loud; she would trace the verses in the Bible with her free hand as she spoke the words, and was apparently unaware of other people in the room. During such incidents, Adventists claim, several skeptics attempted to pull her arm down, as well as double-check the verses she was speaking aloud against the verses she traced with her finger. The story concludes that these unbelievers could not pull her arm down, and the verses were verbatim quotations from the Bible.

Plagiarism: Adventists believe that her use of sources typical for a nineteenth-century writer and that her use of other authors was limited; they generally believe that "she was in control of her sources and that her sources did not control her." Adventists argue that it became increasingly normative to cite sources during her lifetime, and that Ellen G. White subsequently revised her books, changed passages to include quotations from authoritative writers, and at times deleted passages when an author could not be found. When the plagiarism charge ignited a significant debate within the Adventist church during the late 1970s and early 1980s, the General Conference commissioned a major study by Dr. Fred Veltman. The ensuing project became known as the "'Life of Christ' Research Project." The results are available at the General Conference Archives web site. Dr. Roger W. Coon[22], David J. Conklin[23], Dr. Denis Fortin[24][25], among others, undertook the refutation of the accusations of plagiarism.

Failed prophecy: Adventist's state that some prophecy, including Bible prophecy, can be conditional. Some, for instance, have suggested that a passage in "Testimonies" refers to the destruction of buildings at the end of time refers to the terrorist attack on New York City on September 11, 2001. However, the Ellen G. White Estate has rejected this interpretation. Recently a number of apologetic books have been published by the church arguing for the validity of her prophetic gift. Two examples include Don McMahon's book examining the accuracy of Ellen White's medical statements and Graeme Bradford's book: " Prophets are Human."

Denial of the Trinity: Many Adventists argue that, while she never used the terms "Trinity" or "Triune" in her published writings, Ellen White did use the term "trio" (as in Evangelism pp. 613-617) and was Trinitarian in her views.[26] The Seventh-day Adventist Church, in which her writings are influential, is Trinitarian in its theology. -source Wikepedea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_G._White

Many Christians have fallen to the seductive influences and power of sin. We call it fallen Babylon. Just like the fallen Angels suffered a moral fall.

false accusations such as: Mrs. White said that JESUS would return during her lifetime. These are no where found in her books. All her books are mostly visions explained and point forward of the great Tribulation/Persecution for the Christians and especially Adventist Christians. These accusations are most old wife's tales and hearsay, such as a certain Mrs. Burdick

JESUS to come in month----is a very popular misquote from the book early writings pages 64-67. The very title is "The Mark Of The Beast."  We can see by the title alone, that Ellen White did not have a near future in mind. In fact it is not even her speaking there.  She even refers to the seven last plagues in this article. Why can't the critics get it right?

http://www.ellenwhite.org/egw35.htm, for instance insists that Ellen G. White is a false prophet because she predicted slavery at the seven last plagues. Even the Bible say so: "And the kings of the earth.......and every bondman hid themselves...for the great day of His wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?"-Rev.6: 15-17.

Item after item has been taken out of context or proven ignorance of the holy Scriptures by our critics as this one just proved. Our critics and those of Ellen and James White are experts at taken writings out of its content.

They even admit on their website that the prediction of a sick man in Sweden was made by an ex-Adventist. Those who cannot be trusted with truth.Note: Early Writings is a book with an overview to the second coming of JESUS just like the book "The Great Controversy" between CHRIST and Satan, is a book that spans from Jerusalem of old to the new. We are Adventists. We write about the advent or coming of JESUS and not about ourselves.

They also claim she was unchristian and unbiblical that she did not pray for Brother Andrews but rather told him about his character defects. Isn't that the work of a prophet or prophetess? The New Testament showed that Philip had four daughters which prophesied. They who accept reproof from a prophet benefit from it. Consider a character defect as a rotten plank in a ship. Would you want to take sin into heaven? What does it take to get ready for JESUS and heaven?

Dirk Anderson and his website ellenwhite.org also claims that "E.G.White predicted that the rappings of the Fox sisters increased, but spiritualism died out in 1920".

This one is hard to believe. There is today mediums on the steep increase and television is filled with it even in children's programs. Mediums openly advertise in newspapers. Even the christian churches are full of them. Read Rev. W. L. McLeod on "FELLOWSHIP WITH THE FALLEN" and it will surprise you. Babylon is truly fallen.

Opposing critics always use D. M. Canright. Canright claimed that Rome never worshipped the sun [p.239,1978 reprint] but then goes on quoting Emperors Sunday law in which called Sunday the venerable day of the sun. Veneration is worship. You worship GOD on the Sabbath day but you do not worship or venerate the day as the pagans in Rome were accustomed to. What about the Roman Catholic sun monstrance? This most holy replica of the sun with its rays is held up in front of the congregation at every Mess. The waver is in the shape of the sun disc and so is the halo.  This church does worship the sun.

Canright heard of Martin Luther, but apparently not of the Augsburg Lutheran Confession of faith, because he claims in his book against SDA's that Rome does not claim anywhere to have changed the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday!

Now here is what the Lutherans have to say about the Roman Catholics changing the holy day: "Besides, they appeal to the fact that the Sabbath was changed to Sunday-contrary, as they say, to the Ten Commandments. No case is appealed to and urged so insistently as the change of the Sabbath, for thereby they wish to maintain that the power of the church is indeed great because the church has dispensed from and altered part of the Ten Commandments."---Augsburg Confession,1980,p.50 [see also Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologica,II,q.122,a.4 ad 4.

Note: Constantine did not need to make the Sunday law if it was already in existence at that time. Also note that when the Roman Catholic church wanted to show the greatness of her power, it was through changing the Sabbath day of corporate worship. What they do not tell us is, they also removed the second out of the Ten Commandments in order to establish idolatry and image worship. To make up its number ten again, they divided the last into two and than moved up all the numbers, so that in catechism you'll see that the Sabbath has become in place number three in stead of number four and so forth, which was prophesied in Daniel 7:25.

JESUS said: "Verily I say unto You, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in His kingdom."---Matthew 16:28

Mrs. White wrote: Said the angel: 'Some food for worms, some subjects of the seven last plagues, some will be alive and remain upon the earth to be translated at the coming of Jesus.'" Testimonies, Vol. 1, p. 131

Which messenger would you want to shoot? Both JESUS and E.G.W. speaking about the same thing, the return of our Lord when they who have endured to the end receive the crown of life. Are they false prophets?

                   These prophecies were conditional. It depended on how the people responded to the messages of JESUS or Ellen G. White. The prophet Jonah wanted to die because of the fear of being called a false prophet. Ninevah did repent and the city was not destroyed as he had predicted. Is he therefore a false prophet? No.

Prediction #7 The earth to be depopulated soon in 1864 this quote suppose to be from 8Tp.94, but could not be found anywhere. [sorry critics]. We have since located the mis-quote in 1T304 and it says this: "If the Lord should not soon come and destroy his [Satan's] power, the earth would be erelong depopulated." The emphasis is on the little word "if" and does not mean 1864 A.D.

JESUS said in 70 A.D., that is 2000 years ago: "Behold, I come quickly".---Rev.3:11 if this was E.G. White saying or writing this, the messenger really would be shot literally!!!  John the Revelator saw in 70 A.D. that the Devil would only have a short time [Revelation 12:12b].

The open and shut door theory!


And while they [foolish virgins] went to buy, the Bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with Him to the marriage; and the door was shut. (Matt. 25:10)

This is not the only place that we looked at. Revelation 3:8 also refers to the open door set before a group with little strength or numbers. Had Mrs. White written Matthew 25:10, they would have screamed: 'false prophetess', because no one went in literally.

The second advent was very much opposed in those days as the popular view was Darwinism. Charles Darwin is the inventor of the theory of Evolution. The world was going to be getting better and better so that JESUS could return. No one was expecting the bridegroom back then. So the parable of the 10 virgins cannot apply to today when all Christianity in one form or another is expecting the return of JESUS, the bridegroom.

There was a shut door in Noah's day. GOD Himself gave the shut door message: "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that also he is flesh; yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years."--- Genesis 6:3.

There was a shut door in the days of Abraham. Mercy ceased to plead with the inhabitants of Sodom, and all but Lot, with his wife and two daughters, were consumed by the fire sent down from heaven.

There was a shut door in CHRIST'S day. The Son of GOD declared to the unbelieving Jews of that generation, "Your house is left unto you desolate"Matthew 23:38.

Looking down to the stream of time to he last days, the same infinite power declared through John: "These things said he that is holy, he that is true, he that has the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth, and no man openeth. I know thy works: behold I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it; for thou hast a little strength, and has kept my word, and has not denied my name." Revelation 3:7,8.

The door of Matthew 25:10 was shut to the five foolish virgin and the entrance to the holy place in heaven to those who rejected JESUS in the Sanctuary above. And yet the temple in heaven is open on judgment day showing the ark of his testament containing all of the ten commandments [Revelation 11:19].

D. M. Canright [ex-SDA] and our most aggressive critic, wrote: "The lamb like beast of Revelation 13:11-18 is not the United States at all [note, in the 1800's the US was small on the world stage]........Has the United States ever thus co-operated with the papacy? Emphatically, no. Is any man fanatical enough to believe that it ever will ?   "Church and State must be united. This is against one of the fundamental principles of our government. The constitution expressively forbids it, consequently it must first be changed. ----Seventh Day Adventism Renounced,pp.92-95 [it is really denounced].

At the popes funeral, 4 US Presidents kneeled at the coffin in Rome. This would have been unthinkable back in the 1800's. US and papal relations were established under the Clinton administration. Reagan before him had tried, but was opposed by parliament and so Reagan paid for a delegate privately.

Canright wrote that it was the unsoundness of our position on the covenants, the two laws and the law in Galatians,p.50. For clarity on the law in Galatians and the New Covenant see www.come2jesus.com.au/newcovenant.htm 

Did Ellen White falsely claim to be among the 144 000 living when our Lord returns? False prophecy?

Referring to Early Writings [EW] p.40 critics read into this that Ellen falsely attributed her writings. The truth is, the angel in vision showed her what heaven was like and she wished to remain there, and here is her writing: "I begged my attending angel to let me remain in that place. I could not bear the thought of coming back to this dark world again. Then the angel said, "You must go back, and if you are faithful, you, with the 144 000, shall have the privilege of visiting all the worlds and viewing the handiwork of God."---

    Along with the 144 000 rather than being part of that group is the meaning. There are millions of others being resurrected when JESUS returns that will stand along the 144 000 being the first fruits.


England to Declare War During the U.S. Civil War?

Did Ellen G. White predict that England would declare war against the United States? Here is the context of her comment:

"England is studying whether it is best to take advantage of the present weak condition of our nation, and venture to make war upon her. She is weighing the matter, and trying to sound other nations. She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home, and that other nations would take advantage of her weakness. Other nations are making quiet yet active preparations for war, and are hoping that England will make war with our nation, for then they would improve the opportunity to be revenged on her for the advantage she has taken of them in the past, and the injustice done them. A portion of the Queen's subjects are waiting a favorable opportunity to break their yoke; but if England thinks it will pay, she will not hesitate a moment to improve her opportunities to exercise her power, and humble our nation. When England does declare war, all nations will have an interest of their own to serve, and there will be general war, general confusion" (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, p. 259).

Studying.......weighing the matter.......waiting, does this sound like predicting that England would?

 Death from cosmetics?

In an article describing unhealthful fashions, Ellen G. White included the following statement in an article regarding dangerous fashionable fads:

"Many are ignorantly injuring their health and endangering their life by using cosmetics. They are robbing the cheeks of the glow of health, and then to supply the deficiency use cosmetics. When they become heated in the dance the poison is absorbed by the pores of the skin, and is thrown into the blood. Many lives have been sacrificed by this means alone" (The Health Reformer, October 1871).

Some have wondered how the use of cosmetics alone could prove fatal. In today's world, with government testing and consumer safety guidelines, adverse reactions to cosmetics are essentially limited to skin irritation and allergies. But this was not the case in the 19th century, as noted in this consumer bulletin issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: "The European cosmetic known as ceruse was used faithfully--and fatally, because it was mainly white lead--by wealthy women from the second century until well into the 19th century to make their faces look fashionably pale" (Dori Stehlin, FDA Consumer, November 1991; revised May 1995).

In 1871, when Ellen White prepared the article in question, "enamelling" was the latest cosmetic fad, "which is nothing less than painting the face with lead paint, and for this purpose are used the poisonous salts of lead" (Sara Chase, M.D. in The Health Reformer, October 1871, p. 125). Another deadly concoction was vermilion, made from mercuric sulphide. In such an environment, it is not surprising that Ellen White should alert her readers to the real life and health threats posed by such products.

Did Ellen G. White contradict JESUS? Which is the greatest Commandment out of the Ten Commandments? 

This false accusation stems from the insistence of our Critics that all the laws are one and therefore nailed to the cross.

Is this the case? Lets see:  When the rich young ruler came to JESUS to ask "What must I do to have eternal life?" JESUS answered:  "But if thou wilt enter life, keep the commandments."  ---[Matthew 19:17b,K.J.V.]

"He saith unto Him, Which?"  [v.18] Here we see that there are more than one. The ruler wanted to know which ones. JESUS  then preceeded with quoting the last 5 of the Ten Commandments and then summed up the second table of the moral law with "Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thyself." [v.19]

In Matthew 22:36 JESUS was tempted like we are here by our Critics and enemies:  "Master, which is the great commandment in the law?"   Notice it says the great and not the 'greatest' commandment in the law, the law of Moses. Our opposition changed this into the greatest of all the Commandments.

JESUS replied: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy GOD with all thy heart and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first [in order, as the first table]and great Commandment. And the second [in order, as the second table] is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." [vv.37-39].

The apostle Paul also confirms the difference between the old law of Moses and the Commandments of our GOD: "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision I nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of GOD."---[1.Cor.7:19]

Looking at the Ten Commandments, nine have all short sentences, but the Sabbath command is the "greatest" in the amount of words it has. It is also the only one command of the ten that speaks of holiness and sanctification and GOD'S ownership. All the other nine could and can belong to any other god or idol.

 Jerusalem Never to Be Rebuilt?

Ellen G. White wrote in 1851 that "old Jerusalem never would be built up." [1] By itself, the statement looks unsustainable. But when the setting is reconstructed, we find Mrs. White counseling the growing Adventist group that both time-setting [2] and the "age-to-come" notion [3] were incompatible with Biblical truth. She emphasized that the Old Testament prophecies regarding the establishment of a Jewish kingdom in Palestine were conditional on obedience and forfeited by disobedience. Unfulfilled prophecies would be fulfilled to "true Israel" as unfolded in the New Testament text.

Thus the popular movement of the 1840s and 1850s to promote a Zionist state in Palestine was not a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy and not a quest in which Adventists should become involved. Her warnings and instruction were designed to turn the interest away from Palestine and toward the work God had opened up before them.

In a September 1850 vision she saw that it was a "great error" to believe that "it is their duty to go to Old Jerusalem, and think they have a work to do there before the Lord comes. . . ; for those who think that they are yet to go to Jerusalem will have their minds there, and their means will be withheld from the cause of present truth to get themselves and others there." [4]

Less than a year later, August 1851, she wrote with greater emphasis "that Old Jerusalem never would be built up; and that Satan was doing his utmost to lead the minds of the children of the Lord into these things now, in the gathering time, to keep them from throwing their whole interest into the present work of the Lord, and to cause them to neglect the necessary preparation for the day of the Lord." [5]

How did Ellen White's readers understand this statement? That there was no light in the popular "age-to-come" teaching, that there is no Biblical significance in the Jews' returning to Palestine, that Jerusalem will never be rebuilt in a future millennial period. She was not talking about a possible political rebuilding of Jerusalem but of a prophetically significant rebuilding of Old Jerusalem. To continue to think that way, she emphasized, was to sink further into Satan's deceptions and away from present duty.

For further study of this topic, see Julia Neuffer, "The Gathering of Israel," in the Reference Library.

NOTE: As a result, all Protestantism today is turning their prophetic attention to the rebuilding of the old temple site in Jerusalem to the very neglect of the heavenly Temple where our high priest and intercessor JESUS CHRIST is ministering for our salvation. What would it take to turn our Critics and Opponents away from this false prophecy? 

 Statements Taken Out of Context

 "Those who accept the Saviour, however sincere their conversion, should never be taught to say or to feel that they are saved."

A closer look at Ellen G. White's cautions regarding this subject reveals that, in context, she is not speaking against the certainty of a believer's present standing with God. She is warning against the presumptuous "once saved, always saved" teaching of eternal security--those who claim "I am saved" while continuing to transgress the law of God. Here is her full statement:

"Peter's fall was not instantaneous, but gradual. Self-confidence led him to the belief that he was saved, and step after step was taken in the downward path, until he could deny his Master. Never can we safely put confidence in self or feel, this side of heaven, that we are secure against temptation. Those who accept the Saviour, however sincere their conversion, should never be taught to say or to feel that they are saved. This is misleading. Everyone should be taught to cherish hope and faith; but even when we give ourselves to Christ and know that He accepts us, we are not beyond the reach of temptation. God's Word declares, 'Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried' (Dan. 12:10). Only he who endures the trial will receive the crown of life (James 1:12)" (Christ's Object Lessons, p. 155, emphasis supplied).

Note: Papal Rome has been in a fallen condition for centuries by adulterating the purity of the truth and altering the Ten Commandments in such a way as to mislead worshippers into idolatry and a transgression of the Ten Commandments. Protestantism now is doing exactly the same and therefore coming closer to Rome step by step until apostasy is complete. In the book of Revelation we see a threefold union enforcing the mark of the beast, fallen Rome, fallen Protestant America aided by the uniting force of Spiritualism such as the babel of false tongues. See our page on PROTESTANTISM opens in a new window.

Ellen G. White contradict the Bible: Adam was deceived Ev.p 598    Bible: Adam was not deceived 1.Timothy 2:14

We have before us what seems a real contradiction. EGW uses this to show that the churches of Christendom are deceiving themselves in thinking that they can freely transgress the holy law of our GOD and still be saved. In order to get rid of GOD'S own Sabbath of the fourth commandment, they lie to the people in calling it "JEWISH".  GOD calls the Sabbath "HIS DAY", and JESUS claims LORDSHIP [Matthew 12:8]. Similar, Adam reasoned that this transgression would be forgiven him seeing that GOD is all loving. GOD is truly all loving, but also just.

 God has given man precious promises upon conditions of faith and obedience; but they are not to sustain him in any rash act. If men needlessly place themselves in peril, and go where God does not require them to go, and self-confidently expose themselves to danger, disregarding the dictates of reason, God will not work a miracle to relieve them. He will not send His angels to preserve any from being burned if they choose to place themselves in the fire. {Con 85.3} 

Adam was not deceived by the serpent, as was Eve, and it was inexcusable in Adam to rashly transgress God's positive command. Adam was presumptuous because his wife had sinned. He could not see what would become of Eve. He was sad, troubled, and tempted. He listened to Eve's recital of the words of the serpent, and his constancy and integrity began to waver. Doubts arose in his mind in regard to whether God did mean just as He said. He rashly ate the tempting fruit. {Con 86.1}

Angels on probation had been deceived by Satan, and had been led on by him in the great rebellion in Heaven against Christ. They failed to endure the test brought to bear upon them, and they fell. Adam was then created in the image of God and placed upon probation. He had a perfectly developed organism. All his faculties were harmonious. In all his emotions, words, and actions, there was a perfect conformity to the will of his Maker. After God had made every provision for the happiness of man, and had supplied his every want, he tested his loyalty. If the holy pair should be obedient, the race would, after a time, be made equal to the angels. As Adam and Eve failed to bear this test, Christ proposed to become a voluntary offering for man. {2Red 15.2}

Faithfully I endeavour to write out that which is given me from time to time by the divine Counselor. Some portions of that which I write are sent out immediately to meet the present necessities of the work. Other portions are held until the development of circumstances makes it evident to me that the time has come for their use. Sometimes in ministers and physicians bearing responsibilities there has developed a disposition to discard the testimonies, and I have been instructed not to place testimonies in their hands; for having yielded to the spirit that tempted and overcame Adam and Eve, they have opened mind and heart to the control of the enemy. Being on a false track, and laboring under deceptive imaginings, they will read into the testimonies things that are not there, but which are in agreement with the false statements that they have listened to. By reading the testimonies in the light of their own kindling, they are deceived, and will deceive others. {1SM 51.4}

Another Error--Commandments Done Away.-- Christ warns His followers, "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." He exhorts us not to be deceived when false shepherds present their doctrines. These men tell us that the commandments of God were done away at the death of Christ. Shall we believe them, these men who claim to be sanctified, while they refuse to obey God? They say the Lord has told them that they need not keep the Ten Commandments; but has the Lord told them this? No, God does not lie. {Ev 597.3}

Adam quite well understood that his companion had transgressed the only prohibition laid upon them as a test of their fidelity and love. Eve reasoned that the serpent said they should not surely die, and his words must be true, for she felt no signs of God's displeasure, but a pleasant influence, as she imagined the angels felt. {SR 36.1} 

Adam regretted that Eve had left his side, but now the deed was done. He must be separated from her whose society he had loved so well. How could he have it thus? His love for Eve was strong. And in utter discouragement he resolved to share her fate. He reasoned that Eve was a part of himself, and if she must die, he would die with her, for he could not bear the thought of separation from her. He lacked faith in his merciful and benevolent Creator. He did not think that God, who had formed him out of the dust of the ground into a living, beautiful form, and had created Eve to be his companion, could supply her place. After all, might not the words of this wise serpent be correct? Eve was before him, just as lovely and beautiful, and apparently as innocent, as before this act of disobedience. She expressed greater, higher love for him than before her disobedience, as the effects of the fruit she had eaten. He saw in her no signs of death. She had told him of the happy influence of the fruit, of her ardent love for him, and he decided to brave the consequences. He seized the fruit and quickly ate it, and like Eve, felt not immediately its ill effects. {SR 36.2}

The prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me. John 14:30. {AG 162.1}

From the moment that Christ entered the world, the whole confederacy of Satanic agencies was set at work to deceive and overthrow Him as Adam had been deceived and overthrown. . . . {AG 162.2}  Before we sin, we reason with ourselves and then violate the plainest commandment of GOD. Fallen Romanism has done it for centuries and now Protestantism. That is why GOD is sending them a very strong and powerful delusion because they prefer the lie before the truth [2.Thessalonians 2]

Was Ellen White a millionaire? Frequently in her ministry Ellen White was confronted by accusations that she was accumulating great wealth because of her book royalties. Here is her direct response to one detractor, written in 1897 while she lived in Australia:

 "You have made reports in reference to me being rich. How did you know I was? For about ten years I have been working on borrowed property. Should I sell all that I have in my possession, I would not have sufficient to pay my outstanding debts. "Where have I invested this money? You well know where. I have been the bank from which to draw to carry forward the work in this country. . . .

"I have borrowed money to do the work which must be done. Not one shilling of the donations sent me, from the least sum to larger amounts, has been used for myself. Our good Sister Wessels made me a present of a silk dress, and made me promise I would not sell it. But I thought that had she placed in my hands the amount the dress was worth, it would have been used in the cause of God. "I see debts on our meetinghouses and it hurts my soul. I cannot but feel distress over the matter. I have invested money in the Parramatta church, in the Prospect church, in the Napier church, in the Ormondville church, in the Gisborne church, and in the education of students. I have sent persons to America that they might be fitted to return and do work in this country. If this is the way to become rich, I think it would be well for others to try it.

"All the royalty on my foreign books sold in America is sacredly dedicated to God for the education of students, that they may be fitted for the ministry. Thousands of dollars have been thus expended. Is this the way to accumulate money? The old story that Canright and others have circulated, that I was worth thirty thousand dollars, all fiction. It has increased to thirty thousand pounds, by report, since I came to Australia. "I do not know where it is. I am using up my means, just as fast as it comes in, to carry forward the work in this country. If I had thirty thousand pounds, I would not have sent to Africa for the loan of one thousand pounds on which I am paying interest. If I could, I would get a loan of another thousand pounds, so that we might be able to put up the main school building.

"I have not thirty thousand pounds. I only wish I had a million dollars. I would do as I did in Sydney. I would put men in the field to labor, defraying their expenses from my own funds. We need one hundred men where we now have one in the field" (Letter 98a, 1897).

Then, six years later, in a private letter dated October 19, 1903, Ellen White wrote,

 "I have done all I could to help the cause of God with my means. I am paying interest on twenty thousand dollars, all of which I have invested in the work of God. And I shall continue to do all in my power to help to forward His work" (Letter 218, 1903).

Did Ellen White contradict her own teachings by dying in debt?

It is true that Ellen White warned against the dangers of indebtedness, and borrowing beyond one's means to pay the money back at any given time. However, when she died she owed nearly $90,000, while her assets were appraised at a little more than $65,000. This left a deficit of more than $20,000. Did Ellen White handle her finances irresponsibly and in complete disregard to her own counsels? When all the facts of her business affairs are considered, it is clear that Ellen White did not violate the spirit and intent of the counsel she gave concerning freedom from debt. 

If the publishing houses would have paid her the royalties from her books she would have been able to pay all of her debts and help the cause of God tremendously! She was stolen from - is why she could not pay all of her debts as she could have had they paid her the royalties from her books that were due her.

Ellen White did not advocate an extreme position on debt--that under no circumstances should one make any moves unless the money is in hand. She said that circumstances altered cases, and recognized the fact that opportunities present themselves where the appropriate response is to move forward in faith, even if it is necessary to "borrow money and pay interest" (Counsels on Stewardship, p. 278).

In her own personal experience, most of Ellen White's borrowing was incurred during the later years of her life when, realizing the shortness of her days, she did some of her heaviest work in preparing new books, both in English and in other languages. There were only two ways in which such expenses of book preparation could be met--either in profits from former publishing (i.e., royalties), or by borrowing against anticipated royalties. Because of Ellen White's past generosity in contributing funds toward the work of the church, she was left to rely upon future earnings (royalties) to liquidate her debt. Part of that generosity consisted in her declining to receive royalties for non-English editions, and donating the royalties of her most popular later works, Christ's Object Lessons (1900) and The Ministry of Healing (1905), for the support of specific church projects. In the years following her death the continued sales of her publications entirely met her obligations, as she had anticipated. For a fuller discussion of Ellen White's indebtedness, see "Mrs. White's Indebtedness."


 Is JESUS also the same as the Archangel called "MICHAEL ? Why is Ellen G White blamed for this interpretation?


"Lo, Michael, one of the chief Princes, came to help me;........and there is none that holds with me in these things, but Michael your prince.[Dan.10:13,21].  For some, it is almost impossible to believe that this could refer to our Lord JESUS CHRIST!  Michael means, One like GOD! He has many, many names and just as Satan is the prince of evil, so JESUS is the prince of life. In Daniel He is also called "Messiah" the prince [9:25].

While Satan always wants to exalt himself, CHRIST is the opposite, He accepts the lowliest names and positions.  in Daniel 11:22 JESUS is also called the prince of the covenant.  In John 12:31 Satan is called the prince of this world.

In Revelation 1:5 it says: "And from JESUS CHRIST, who is the faithful witness, the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth.  Unto Him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in His own blood."  While he humbles Himself into the dust and took our place, He elevates us to Kings and Priests [v.6; 5:10; 1.Peter 2:9].

"Him has GOD exalted with His right hand to be a Prince and a Savior." [Acts 5:31,first part].

"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon His shoulder; and His name shall be called Wonderful, Councilor, The mighty GOD, the everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace." [Isa.9:6].

At east One Apologetic Website we know of, has removed this false accusation against Ellen White and the Seventh Day Adventist Church organization.

 "And from Jesus, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood." (Revelation 1:5).

The expression "first begotten of the dead" has caused much perplexity. Obviously Jesus was not the first one to be resurrected. Besides Moses, at least three others were raised by Jesus Himself.

There are two ways the word "first" may be understood. It can mean either first in point of time or first in pre-eminence. The President's wife is spoken of as the First Lady-not because she is the first Lady who existed, but first in honor and pre-eminence.

Christ was "first begotten of the dead" because that resurrection took the pre-eminence over all resurrections and Jesus has the honor over all resurrected people. Here is also clearly shown that our Lord JESUS is called the "PRINCE."


Jesus Christ is not a created being. This view by the watchtower society is built on a misconception of a text in Revelation 3:14 "the beginning of creation". This is wrongly interpreted to mean that Christ is the first being that God created; that God's creation began with Him. This antagonizes the scriptures which declares that Christ Himself created all things.


The word 'beginning' here is the Greek 'arche', which has two meanings, head or chief, which would really be translated the head of creation or chief creator. same as the word in chief- or archdeacon.

We have this same problem again in Jude 9 where it speaks of Michael the chief or archangel, which does not mean He is an angel but the commander of angels. He cannot be an angel for He is above them (Hebr.1:4).

Jesus Himself said that He is the Alpha and omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. Neither should we imagine that Christ is a creature, because Paul calls Him the first born of every creature, for the very next verse calls Him to be Creator, and not a creature.---Col.1:15,16.

Here is E.G.White's own statement regarding her writings: "The Testimonies of Sister White should not be carried to the front. God's Word is the unerring standard. The Testimonies are not to take the place of the Word of God. . . . Let us prove all our positions from Scripture and substantiate every point they claim from the revealed Word of God" (Evangelism, p. 256).

GOD also said, that if a prophet prophesied things that did come to pass, yet he/she would direct people away  the true GOD to idols or other gods, he had to be killed. That is why so many know that Mrs. E. G. White does direct people to JESUS and so they try hard to find fault with her predictions that have to come 100% true. So they resort to lies and misquoting as we have shown you so far.

 "I saw an immense ball of fire fall among some beautiful mansions, causing their instant destruction..." E.G.White - Testimonies to the Church Vol. 9

False prophet is a label given to a person who is viewed as illegitimately claiming charismatic authority within a religious group. The individual may be seen as one who falsely claims the gift of prophecy, or who uses that gift for demagogy or evil ends.-wikapidea under false prophets in Christianity


Out of ignorance David W. Cloud wrote that Mrs. Ellen G. White interpreted the Bible for Seventh day Adventists.-Avoiding the snare,p.163  That which was left over from the Millerite great disappointment [see Rev.10:9-11] the prophetic little book from Daniel esp. for these last days, saw in Rev.11:1-3,18,19 the heavenly sanctuary on judgment day being good news [Rev.14:6-12] came from all religious background each with a different interpretation would study for month to reach agreements and only when they came to a dead end would they pray together pleading GOD for light when they answer came in form of a vision to Ellen White. hence, Seventh Day Adventists seem to have the sole patent rights to the end-time prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation!

  If you want to know what Ellen G. White thought and wrote about Martin Luther and all other Reformers, ask any Seventh-day Adventist and he or she will be only to happy to loan or give you a copy of her book "The Great Controversy." As a Reformer herself, she welcomed all other Reformers.

Amalgamation of man and beast

When Ellen White  wrote about cloning, genetic engineering was still pretty much science fiction in her days and scoffed at. The scientific world is now pushing for legislation to allow cloning on humans. Back before the flood, man had full use of his brains and lived very long lives. But their skill was used for evil and God only preserved the species He had created and not confused or genetically modified monsters into the ark of Noah.