4...TERRORISM and SUMMARY/ARBITRARY EXECUTION

I am an AMERICAN, who is the VICTIM of, American State, Corporate, Educational, and Sometimes, Citizen Groups'/Citizen Organizations' SPONSORED: Organized Domestic Terrorism, and Organized Domestic Terrorist Activities, being conducted by a Cult like Driven, American Collective Coalition Of the Willing...Domestic Terrorist Organization.

This is What Targeted Individual's are Truly Dealing With!

I will start with California Representative Barbara Lee who was the Lone voice, on September 14, 2001 in voting against giving sole Authority to the President to use Military Force.  It was a prophetic statement, that rings true...today.

Targeted Individual's are suffering the consequences of what has literally spiraled out of control, by the very Agencies, Private Corporations, Educational Institutions, and Citizen Organizations/Groups or Individual's WITHIN; who have literally become the, "EVIL THAT WE DEPLORE."  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf1N-y9Mbo4&feature=related

FULL SPEECH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh_sxilhyV0

The Targeted Individual reacts like any person Traumatized by Organized Terrorism.

They also appear to be the VICTIM 's of Intentional Infliction of Trauma or Non Consenting Experimental Simulations/Protocols in Psycho-Traumatology, which is to bombard and inflict upon unsuspecting people, a wide range of continued traumatic experiences, and then monitor these people, just to see how a Human Subject will rise above such adversity. 

As such, there is nothing wrong with the Targeted Individual who is a victim of Domestic and now International Terrorism, but there is something  Fundamentally Wrong with what is BEING DONE TO THEM!

Which has been to blindside, unsuspecting, law abiding, non violent Targeted Individual's and turn around and bombard and inflict against these Target's a myriad of terrorizing situations, in a myriad of adversarial scenarios, then sit back, take notes, log in their research journals -  as the Terrorized Targeted Individual is fighting for their very human lives. 

Then these Terrorist's turn around, and label the Targeted Individual so that they can be further victimize and discredited, so they have an excuse to continue their illegal human experimentation's - and at NO TIME - do these Terrorist's - bother to step up to the plate and assist these victim's, but hope they will die or kill themselves off, so they can take the computational data - profit from their findings - or program their recognition software - and move on - 

For the Targeted Individual - their lives are completely destroyed, but to these Individual's Within  have no reverence for other people's human lives, so long as it is not them.  Their bottom line is to get what they can, and WHO they sacrifice along the way means nothing to them. 

It is pure and concentrated power, ego, and control based thinking at its worst.  This is why they truly hope Targeted Individual's will simply die off, so they never have to be held to criminal account for mass murder and extermination.  

Therefore, when someone says - "What makes you think you are so important? or "You are not important enough for someone to target you?" - You need to turn around and say - "That's right - because if I was important, I would have enough money to hire like minded Terrorist Assassin's like the Terrorist's I have been forced to deal with, to hunt these motherfucker's down - and give them a Taste of Their Own Medicine" -

And, since I am not, that is why I continue to use the law, the justice system, and write my letters, or speak to those in authority, because that is what you DO, when you live in a civilized society, with the Rule and Color of Law, and a Constitution that dictates it.


What is Terrorism?

http://www.terrorism-research.com/

Excerpt:

The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as “the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” Within this definition, there are three key elements—violence, fear, and intimidationand each element produces terror in its victims. The FBI uses this: "Terrorism is the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." The U.S. Department of State defines "terrorism" to be "premeditated politically-motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.


.... There are three perspectives of terrorism: the terrorist’s, the victim’s, and the general public’s. The phrase “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” is a view terrorists themselves would accept. Terrorists do not see themselves as evil. They believe they are legitimate combatants, fighting for what they believe in, by whatever means possible. A victim of a terrorist act sees the terrorist as a criminal with no regard for human life. The general public’s view is the most unstable. The terrorists take great pains to foster a “Robin Hood” image in hope of swaying the general public’s point of view toward their cause. This sympathetic view of terrorism has become an integral part of their psychological warfare and needs to be countered vigorously.




STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM

http://www.terrorism-research.com/state/

Is there a difference between terrorism and the use of specific tactics that exploit fear and terror by authorities normally considered "legitimate"? Nations and states often resort to violence to influence segments of their population, or rely on coercive aspects of state institutions. Just like the idea of equating any act of military force with terrorism described above, there are those who equate any use of government power or authority versus any part of the population as terrorism. This view also blurs the lines of what is and is not terrorism, as it elevates outcomes over intentions. Suppression of a riot by law enforcement personnel may in fact expose some of the population (the rioters) to violence and fear, but with the intent to protect the larger civil order. On the other hand, abuse of the prerogative of legitimized violence by the authorities is a crime.


But there are times when national governments will become involved in terrorism, or utilize terror to accomplish the objectives of governments or individual rulers. Most often, terrorism is equated with "non-state actors", or groups that are not responsible to a sovereign government. However, internal security forces can use terror to aid in repressing dissent, and intelligence or military organizations perform acts of terror designed to further a state's policy or diplomatic efforts abroad.

A government that is an adversary of the United States may apply terror tactics and terrorism in an effort to add depth to their engagement of U.S. forces. Repression through terror of the indigenous population would take place to prevent internal dissent and insurrection that the U.S. might exploit. Military special operations assets and state intelligence operatives could conduct terrorist operations against U.S. interests both in theater and as far abroad as their capabilities allow. Finally, attacks against the U.S. homeland could be executed by state sponsored terrorist organizations or by paid domestic proxies. Three different ways that states can engage in the use of terror are:

• Governmental or "State" terror
• State involvement in terror
• State sponsorship of terrorism


Governmental or "State" terror: Sometimes referred to as "terror from above", where a government terrorizes its own population to control or repress them. These actions usually constitute the acknowledged policy of the government, and make use of official institutions such as the judiciary, police, military, and other government agencies. Changes to legal codes permit or encourage torture, killing, or property destruction in pursuit of government policy. After assuming power, official Nazi policy was aimed at the deliberate destruction of "state enemies" and the resulting intimidation of the rest of the population. Stalin's "purges" of the 1930s are examples of using the machinery of the state to terrorize a population. The methods he used included such actions as rigged show trials of opponents, punishing family or friends of suspected enemies of the regime, and extra-legal use of police or military force against the population.

Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons on his own Kurdish population without any particular change or expansion of policies regarding the use of force on his own citizens. They were simply used in an act of governmental terror believed to be expedient in accomplishing his goals.

State involvement in terror
: These are activities where government personnel carry out operations using terror tactics. These activities may be directed against other nations' interests, its own population, or private groups or individuals viewed as dangerous to the state. In many cases, these activities are terrorism under official sanction, although such authorization is rarely acknowledged openly. Historical examples include the Soviet and Iranian assassination campaigns against dissidents who had fled abroad, and Libyan and North Korean intelligence operatives downing airliners on international flights.

Another type of these activities is "death squads" or "war veterans":
unofficial actions taken by officials or functionaries of a regime (such as members of police or intelligence organizations) against their own population to repress or intimidate. While these officials will not claim such activities, and disguise their participation, it is often made clear that they are acting for the state. Keeping such activities "unofficial" permits the authorities deniability and avoids the necessity of changing legal and judicial processes to justify oppression. This is different than "pro-state" terror, which is conducted by groups or persons with no official standing and without official encouragement. While pro-state terror may result in positive outcomes for the authorities, their employment of criminal methods and lack of official standing can result in disavowal and punishment of the terrorists, depending on the morality of the regime in question.

State sponsorship of terrorism:
Also known as "state supported" terrorism, when governments provide supplies, training, and other forms of support to non-state terrorist organizations. One of the most valuable types of this support is the provision of safe haven or physical basing for the terrorists' organization. Another crucial service a state sponsor can provide is false documentation, not only for personal identification (passports, internal identification documents), but also for financial transactions and weapons purchases. Other means of support are access to training facilities and expertise not readily available to groups without extensive resources. Finally, the extension of diplomatic protections and services, such as immunity from extradition, diplomatic passports, use of embassies and other protected grounds, and diplomatic pouches to transport weapons or explosives have been significant to some groups.

An example of state sponsorship is the Syrian government's support of Hamas and Hizballah in Lebanon. Syrian resources and protection enable the huge training establishments in the Bek'aa Valley. On a smaller, more discreet scale, the East German Stasi provided support and safe-haven to members of the Red Army Faction (RAF or Baader Meinhof Gang) and neo-fascist groups that operated in West Germany. Wanted members of the RAF were found resident in East Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.


SUMMARY EXECUTIONS, ARBITRARY EXEUCTIONS, EXTRA-LEGAL EXECUTIONS
1. THE CONCEPT OF EXTRAJUDICIAL, SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS
1.1 Definitions
The Economic and Social Council (Ecosoc) resolution 1982/35 which originally gave the Special Rapporteur his mandate contains no definition of what amounts to ‘summary’ or ‘arbitrary’ execution.

Neither are the
concepts defined in international treaties which are relevant to the topic.1 The first Special Rapporteur, Mr. Amos Wako, therefore attempted to define the concepts and presented the following tentative definitions:
-    Summary executions’ is the arbitrary deprivation of life as a result of a sentence imposed by the means of summary procedure in which the due process of law and in particular the minimum procedural guarantees as set out in Article 14 of the Covenant are either curtailed, distorted or not followed.

-    ‘Arbitrary execution is the arbitrary deprivation of life as a result of the killing of persons carried out by the order of a government of with its complicity or tolerance or acquiescence without any judicial or legal process.
-    ‘Extra legal execution’ refers to killings committed outside the judicial or legal process, and at the same time, illegal under relevant national and international laws. Accordingly, in certain circumstances ‘arbitrary execution’ as defined above can be an ‘extra legal execution’.

Potential Recruits, if you belong to the following

'Strengthening Information Sharing and Collaboration Capabilities.'  In so doing they have enlisted the following Participating Partners:

  • Religious groups
  • Block watches
  • Private security companies
  • Tourism industry
  • Financial groups
  • Utility companies
  • Public health organizations
  • Educational institutions
  • Technology
  • Transportation
  • Community Groups
  • And Many More...
your Government, and/or their Cover Shell Organizations or Companies, Private Security Agencies, contracted for the Government, or Leaders within above Citizen groups, organizations or companies, will be asking you to become Material Support to their Terrorist Activities.

MATERIAL SUPPORT TO TERRORISM
as of February, 2010
http://law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002339---A000-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2339A

§ 2339A. Providing material support to terrorists


(a) Offense.— Whoever provides material support or resources or conceals or disguises the nature, location, source, or ownership of material support or resources, knowing or intending that they are to be used in preparation for, or in carrying out, a violation of section 32, 37, 81, 175, 229, 351, 831, 842 (m) or (n), 844 (f) or (i), 930 (c), 956, 1091, 1114, 1116, 1203, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1366, 1751, 1992, 2155, 2156, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2332f, 2340A, or 2442 of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), section 46502 or 60123 (b) of title 49, or any offense listed in section 2332b (g)(5)(B) (except for sections 2339A and 2339B) or in preparation for, or in carrying out, the concealment of an escape from the commission of any such violation, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in any Federal judicial district in which the underlying offense was committed, or in any other Federal judicial district as provided by law.

(b) Definitions.— As used in this section—
(1) the term “material support or resources” means any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who may be or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials;

(2) the term “training” means instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge; and

(3) the term “expert advice or assistance” means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.


FOR TARGETED INDIVIDUAL'S - THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE ARE APPLICABLE IN TERMS OF THE CRIMINAL TERRORISM INFLICTED UPON AND AGAINST THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL.


175 Prohibited with respect to biological weapons (Note: Synesis Journals Volume 2 - Now considers Nano-Neurotechnologies as Biological-Technological Terrorism due to what they found their capabilities to be.
229 Prohibited Activities
831 Prohibited Transaction involving nuclear material (non ionizing radiation is a consequence of Nuclear weapons, via the Electromagnetic Spectrum)
842 Unlawful Acts
956 Conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim, or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country (this is for the Global Targets, or the US Target's who fled the country in hopes of a reprieve from terrorism and who have came forward to proper authorities in respective other countries.)
1091 Genocide - Since Targeted Individuals are now a GROUP of victims, within the subset described - anything that happens to one, become in part or in whole a Group that has come forward to proper authorities, and continue to be harmed, some to the point of their death - therefore, Targeted Individuals comprise a GROUP -
(a) Basic Offense.— Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;

1203 Hostage Taking
  - This one is questionable, since ALL Targeted Individual's are being forced and basically help prisoner as these non consenting experimental protocols are being forced upon the Target.  There has to be a way to use this in a Technical sense, that in fact - because it is NON CONSENTING - and continued experimenting is taking place - Target's are in fact being held HOSTAGE to those conducting the non consenting human experiments and human effects to these weaponized biometrics, surveillance, cyber/telecom capailities, neurotechnologies, nano-technologies, and non kinetic/non lethal direct energy weapons that ALL HARNESS the ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM -

1362 Communications lines, stations or systems (this applies to Government agencies, but this needs to be reversed to state or if a Government, Private Contractor for the Government or any citizen organization working on behalf of - does the same to an American citizen without proper due cause - or due process - is guilty of the same.

2332 Criminal Penalties (murder, manslaughter and Conspiracy to commit)
2332A Use of weapons of mass destruction (from the Synesis Journal Volume 2, in cognitive neuro and nanotechnologies as a Biological-Technological Weapon, which has the capacity to be used for MASS SUBJUGATION)
(a) Offense Against a National of the United States or Within the United States.— A person who, without lawful authority, uses, threatens, or attempts or conspires to use, a weapon of mass destruction—

2332B Acts of terrorism transcending national boundries

2340 Torture
(a) Offense.— Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection
(a) if—
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.
(c) Conspiracy.— A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

2442 Recruitment or use of child soldiers (any recruit under the age of 15 is considered a child soldier)
(a) Offense.— Whoever knowingly—
(1) recruits, enlists, or conscripts a person to serve while such person is under 15 years of age in an armed force or group; or
(2) uses a person under 15 years of age to participate actively in hostilities;
knowing such person is under 15 years of age, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).


















Terrorism is not new, and even though it has been used since the beginning of recorded history it can be relatively hard to define. Terrorism has been described variously as both a tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point of view is being represented. Terrorism has often been an effective tactic for the weaker side in a conflict. As an asymmetric form of conflict, it confers coercive power with many of the advantages of military force at a fraction of the cost. Due to the secretive nature and small size of terrorist organizations, they often offer opponents no clear organization to defend against or to deter.

That is why preemption is being considered to be so important. In some cases, terrorism has been a means to carry on a conflict without the adversary realizing the nature of the threat, mistaking terrorism for criminal activity. Because of these characteristics, terrorism has become increasingly common among those pursuing extreme goals throughout the world. But despite its popularity, terrorism can be a nebulous concept. Even within the U.S. Government, agencies responsible for different functions in the ongoing fight against terrorism use different definitions.

The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as “the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” Within this definition, there are three key elements—violence, fear, and intimidation—and each element produces terror in its victims. The FBI uses this: "Terrorism is the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." The U.S. Department of State defines "terrorism" to be "premeditated politically-motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.

Outside the United States Government, there are greater variations in what features of terrorism are emphasized in definitions. The United Nations produced this definition in 1992; "An anxiety-inspiring method of repeated violent action, employed by (semi-) clandestine individual, group or state actors, for idiosyncratic, criminal or political reasons, whereby - in contrast to assassination - the direct targets of violence are not the main targets." The most commonly accepted academic definition starts with the U.N. definition quoted above, and adds two sentences totaling another 77 words on the end; containing such verbose concepts as "message generators" and 'violence based communication processes." Less specific and considerably less verbose, the British Government definition of 1974 is"…the use of violence for political ends, and includes any use of violence for the purpose of putting the public, or any section of the public, in fear."

Terrorism is a criminal act that influences an audience beyond the immediate victim. The strategy of terrorists is to commit acts of violence that draws the attention of the local populace, the government, and the world to their cause. The terrorists plan their attack to obtain the greatest publicity, choosing targets that symbolize what they oppose. The effectiveness of the terrorist act lies not in the act itself, but in the public’s or government’s reaction to the act. For example, in 1972 at the Munich Olympics, the Black September Organization killed 11 Israelis. The Israelis were the immediate victims. But the true target was the estimated 1 billion people watching the televised event.

The Black September Organization used the high visibility of the Olympics to publicize its views on the plight of the Palestinian refugees. Similarly, in October 1983, Middle Eastern terrorists bombed the Marine Battalion Landing Team Headquarters at Beirut International Airport. Their immediate victims were the 241 U.S. military personnel who were killed and over 100 others who were wounded. Their true target was the American people and the U.S. Congress. Their one act of violence influenced the United States’ decision to withdraw the Marines from Beirut and was therefore considered a terrorist success.

There are three perspectives of terrorism: the terrorist’s, the victim’s, and the general public’s. The phrase “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” is a view terrorists themselves would accept. Terrorists do not see themselves as evil. They believe they are legitimate combatants, fighting for what they believe in, by whatever means possible. A victim of a terrorist act sees the terrorist as a criminal with no regard for human life. The general public’s view is the most unstable. The terrorists take great pains to foster a “Robin Hood” image in hope of swaying the general public’s point of view toward their cause. This sympathetic view of terrorism has become an integral part of their psychological warfare and needs to be countered vigorously.







ċ
SUMMARYEXECUTIONS.zip
(493k)
aldamysteriosa1,
Nov 22, 2011, 6:02 PM