Health Effects

Many Cancers are caused by Chemicals made on this planet.  At the same time we must ask -why are Autism rates also skyrocketing? 

Many Cancers are caused by newer chemicals.  Some theorize that the reason why we get cancer from these new chemicals is that our bodies have not seen them or have not needed to have an immune system response to these.

Another theory is that some of the chemicals mimic other molecules that are needed in human life, and "trick" our bodies.

Others are hormone mimicking effects discovered by scientists in new high cancer rates of the Breast and Prostrate, as examples.

To summarize, Doctors, Toxicologists data indicate that we are dying from cancer caused by chemicals, but there is a short term benefit those who manufacture and distribute Chemicals.  This is a grave condition that the US is suffering from.  This is insensible, and cold, cruel, and uncompassionate.

SIDE NOTE:  Autism Rates are skyrocketing. Common sense says this is crippling the intellect of our children.  America is essentially commiting self destruction of our youth, our livelyhood, and the potential degratation the future of the US.  We must act to stop and research what is causing this alarming rate in Autism.  My guess is that its coming from a segment of bad actor chemicals, has to be - Autism has gone up by some estimates by 6X in one generation. 

BOTTOM LINE:  Too may bad actor chemicals are implicated in cancer.  We need a better understanding of chemicals before being introduced in products.  We must act agressively to fight off these Chemical Induced Cancers!

SIDENOTE:  Chemicals are causing hormonal inbalance in the womb, and there is data showing reduction in male births (see attached recent article):

04/15/07 Dioxin contributing to drop in male births? The mystery of the missing boys

April 10, 2007

Where are all the missing boys?

It is a question posed by a new study that has found the proportion of boys born over the past three decades has unexpectedly dropped in both the United States and Japan. In all, more than a quarter of a million boys are missing, compared to what would have been expected had the sex ratio existing in 1970 remained unchanged.

The study also says the world's most skewed sex ratio is in Canada, in a native community surrounded by petrochemical plants in Sarnia, Ont., where the number of boys born has plunged since the mid-1990s at a rate never seen.

Although the researchers do not know why boys are taking a hit, they suspect contributing causes could include widespread exposure to hormone-mimicking pollutants by women during pregnancy and by men before they help conceive children.

"We hypothesize that the decline in sex ratio in industrial countries may be due, in part, to prenatal exposure to metalloestrogens and other endocrine disrupting chemicals," said the study, issued this week in Environmental Health Perspectives, a peer reviewed journal of the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

These types of chemicals include some pesticides, dioxin and methylmercury, a pollutant from coal-fired power plants and many industrial sources commonly found in seafood.

The study also flagged a host of other possible factors, including rising obesity rates, older parental age, growing stress levels, and the increasing number of children being conceived using fertility aides. Other research has shown some associations between these factors and a drop in boy births.

The study was conducted by researchers in both the U.S. and Japan, and led by Dr. Devra Lee Davis, a prominent epidemiologist and director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.

In an interview, Davis said that although the cause of the decline isn't known, it could be linked to the increasing number of other male reproductive problems, such as falling sperm counts and rising testicular cancer rates.

She said that males during fetal development may be more sensitive to pollutants that mimic hormones, leading to increased fetal deaths and reproductive problems later for the surviving males.

The situation in Sarnia, where nearly twice as many girls are being born than boys on the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, is internationally significant, according to the study. "To our knowledge, this is a more significantly reduced sex ratio and greater rate of change than has been reported previously anywhere," it said.

The reserve is located in the heart of Sarnia's chemical valley, and the native community, along with researchers at the University of Rochester and the Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, are trying to find the cause of the unusual sex ratio.

Researchers in many countries have been reporting a drop in the ratio of boys to girls being born over the past few decades.

It is considered normal in a large population for the number of baby boys to slightly outnumber girls, by a proportion of about 105 males to 100 females. It is widely thought that more boy births are a way nature compensates for higher rates of male mortality.

But the ratio has not been static in industrialized countries, and researchers suspect that increasing numbers of male fetuses are being miscarried, a kind of sex-based culling in the womb.

In Japan, the sex ratio fluctuated with no trend from 1949 to 1970, but then declined steadily to 1999, the end of the study period there.

The decline in the number of boys in Japan equals 37 out of every 10,000 births.

In the U.S., the sex ratio also declined from 1970 to 2002. The drop in the number of boys equals 17 out of every 10,000 births.

The U.S. change was concentrated among whites. There was almost no change among blacks.