Issue Five: A Research Ethics Policy in the Analytical Study of Religion

posted Sep 5, 2011, 3:15 PM by I Chatterjea   [ updated Jun 20, 2016, 8:47 AM ]

Last year, Jens Kreinath (Witchita State University) observed that neither the AAR nor the SBL have a code of research ethics akin to AAA, APSA or ASA.

Premise for Debate: After discussing or affirming our institutional situation, should we recommend that researchers all the more explicitly pick the AAA, ASA or APSA standard and be explicit about the policy or code of conduct adopted and the integration of these concerns in our research?

The Ethics and Code of Conduct statements for the ASA, AAA, APSA, British Association for the Study of Religions and Oral History Association will be referenced for this discussion and are posted below.

British Association for the Study of  Religions:    http://www.basr.ac.uk/Ethics.html

Oral History Association:     http://www.oralhistory.org/do-oral-history/principles-and-practices/

American Political Science Association:

http://www.apsanet.org/content_2483.cfm  - Proposed Changes

http://www.apsanet.org/content_9350.cfm  - Current Guide.



Ċ
I Chatterjea,
Sep 1, 2012, 10:02 PM
Ċ
I Chatterjea,
Sep 1, 2012, 10:02 PM
Ċ
I Chatterjea,
Sep 1, 2012, 10:02 PM
Comments