Our party's Manifesto is a modified version of that of the Dutch Party for the Animals which was published on July 11, 2005.
Introduction: The Party for the Animals USA's manifesto is presented below. This outlines our vision with respect to animals, nature, the environment and how we treat our living environment. This vision provides the basis for the political perspectives of the Party for the Animals USA.
This respect for life is still insufficiently developed in humans.
This has led to and still continues to lead to a great coarseness and
carelessness in human behavior. As a consequence, natural areas such as the tropical rain forests are
disappearing rapidly, animal species are becoming extinct and the global
ecosystem has become heavily overburdened and disrupted. It is not just on land that this is happening. Large portions of the world's seas, oceans and major inland lakes are being destroyed as habitats and resources by overfishing and pollution.
It is morally unacceptable for human beings to exploit nature so intensively that the living conditions on Earth dramatically change and the biological and chemical environments of humans and other life forms decline, deteriorate or even disappear entirely. Future generations will be even more greatly confronted with the consequences thereof than the present generation. This is why it is crucial for humans to impose significant ecological restrictions on themselves. These should be directed at decreasing the use of space, raw materials, energy, plants and animals.
Not only is it morally unacceptable for humans to engage in the behavior cited above, it is inevitably suicidal. Economic activities and cultural behavior that consume resources that are not replaceable, like water, oil, coal and minerals in general, or destroy ecosystems that support both animal and human life in a given area will ultimately destroy all human life in that area. This is the issue of sustainability that is generally ignored by political and economic leaders and the general public, especially in developed countries which have the knowledge, technology and wealth to solve this existential problem. It is inescapable that if our current world economic system is not sustainable, at some point it will cease to function by self destructing.
The goal of reducing consumption of natural resources by self imposed restraints is elaborated on in the Earth Charter, which stems from a United Nations initiative in 1987 (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development: www.earthcharter.org) and is used as the point of departure for various nature and environmental organizations. In this charter, the protection of the ‘viability, diversity and beauty’ of the Earth is viewed as a ‘sacred trust’ for humanity. Article 15 formulates respect and compassion in interaction with animals as a separate goal. Cruelty to animals kept by humans should be prevented and hunting and fishing methods that ‘cause extreme, prolonged, or avoidable suffering’ should be banned. This charter is strongly focused on the sustainable use of nature by humans. While it is true that life forms other than humans are accorded their own inherent value and respect, and compassion in interactions with animals is prescribed, the Earth Charter does not lay down any explicit restrictions with regard to the use of animals.
After two centuries of animal protection it is high time that far-reaching restrictions are imposed on the use of animals. All too frequently animals are still regarded as objects, which are always subordinate to human interests and may also be used for all those interests. Even if it takes place in a sustainable fashion, the exploitation of animals and their natural environment has unavoidably negative consequences for the animals and almost always ends with their demise. Each kind of interaction with and use of animals should, therefore, be continually subject to a careful weighing-up of the gravity of human interests and the consequences for the animal. The moral justification for compromising their welfare decreases as human interests become less imperative and the consequences for the animal more damaging.
With this approach, the use of animals for non-essential human interests can be reduced and precluded altogether. It is evident that this applies to the production of fur, circuses, bull-fighting, angling and other animal-unfriendly forms of entertainment that involve animals. Religious and cultural traditions that compromise animal welfare should also be modernized in this regard. Indeed, traditions are not unchangeable phenomena, but may be adapted over the course of time in relation to new attitudes and moral norms as they have always have been in the past.
There should also always be an ethical assessment of the different
interests of humans and animals with respect to the use of laboratory
animals and animals bred for human consumption. Due attention should
also be devoted to the use of alternatives to animal testing and animal
produce in this regard. The development and application of these
alternatives can, therefore, also be regarded as an ethical necessity
Finally, a careful, loving interaction with nature and animals also means that people should show respect for the physical and mental integrity of animals in the very broadest sense. The Universal Declaration for Human Rights (1948) offers the most appropriate point of departure for this. This declaration lays down the conditions under which human beings can live and develop themselves in freedom and without repression. Humans must, however, pay heed to their fellow creatures. The Universal Declaration for Human Rights together with the Earth Charter provide a practical starting point for the way in which people should interact with their fellow humans, animals and nature. This departure point is further elaborated in the Party for the Animals’ party platform and determines the political stance of the party with respect to current issues.
Published June 15, 2010