In Depth Analysis

from  hompage:

On Friday March 22, TrentoVision published a series of emails written by leftists/Muslim Jihadis, headed up by
Mr. Habeeb Ahmed, designed to STOP Pamela Geller
from speaking at the Great Neck Synagogue.
Since Friday we discovered an unbelievable "rat's nest" of people related to the ISLAMIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND who are aggressive Jew-haters and die-hard supporters of Muslim terrorists. Some of these terrorists are now dead or in prison due to convictions for committing terrorism against the United States of America.
Whereas the leftists and Jihadis originally were conspiring to deprive
Ms. Geller of her First Amendment right to speak at a Synagogue,
these same apparent conspirators are now the subject of our
terrorism investigation and we want to know the following:
Bob Nuxoll, Dolores Tibbets, Elaine Peter, Faroque Khan, Habeeb Ahmed, Hank Arond, Mark Luken, Marty Melkonia, Paul Auerbach, Claire Deroche,Tom Goodhue, Jay Keller, Beth Lilach


{many more questions to follow}

If you have any information or intelligence on any of the
Geller Conspirators please contact TrentoVision


Mr. Habeeb Ahmed - Claire Deroche
Leaders of the Geller Conspiracy
From:Richard Tibbets
To: Bob Nuxoll ; Dolores Tibbets;; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Habeeb Ahmed ; Hank Arond ;; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian ; Paul Auerbach
Cc: Claire Deroche ; Tom Goodhue; Jay Keller
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:07 PM

Subject: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck

Dear TIA-LI Board Members,
Claire Deroche of UUCSR advised me Pamela Geller, founder of the organization, Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) will speak in Great Neck next month.
Her talk, “Imposition of Sharia in America” will be:
DATE/TIME: Sunday Morning, April 14, at 10:00am
LOCATION: Great Neck Synagogue.
PRESENTED BY: Great Neck Synagogue Men’s Club.

You can check it out at her website: geler-to-address-great-neck-synagogue.html
I also checked out the Synagogue’s website at www.gns.organd found the following by clicking on the Calendar event listed for April_14th:************************************
Men's Club Presents: Pamela Geller @ GNS
When: Sun, April 14, 10am – 11am
Description: The Great Neck Synagogue Men’s Club Presents Pamela Geller
Sunday, April 14, 2013, 10:00 am
“Imposition of Sharia in America”
Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of Atlas and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamizationof America (SIOA). She is
the author of The Post‐American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America, (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton), (Simon& Schuster). Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Daily, the American Thinker, and other publications. The Queens Village Republican Club, the oldest Republican club in America, honored Pamela Geller as the “American Patriot of the
Year” in February 2013. That same month, the Creative Zionist Coalition gave her the Queen Esther Award
Richard Tibbets, Secretary The Interfaith Alliance - Long Island Chapter
From:Habeebudddin Ahmed []
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:41 PM
To: Richard Tibbets; Bob Nuxoll; Dolores Tibbets;; Elaine Peters; Faroque Khan; Hank Arond;; Mark Lukens; Marty Melkonian; Paul Auerbach
Cc: Claire Deroche; Tom Goodhue; Jay Keller; beth lilach
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Dear Friends,

We need to stop her from coming to Great we do a petition on the stationary of council of churches, The Interfaith Alliance and The Holocaust Center?? Her views are well known...she is the personification of an Islamophobe!!!
Brothers and Sisters what do you think??

Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590

Human Rights Commission
Nassau County
516 581 5893

Subject: RE: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:44:26 +0000
The group I was speaking with last night who gave me this information suggested contacting other rabbis in the area who would then contact the Great Neck Synagogue. They also talked about contacting the chief rabbi of the big synagogue in Manhattan and asking him to contact Great Neck Synagogue.

Warm regards,
Claire Deroche
Social Justice Coordinator
48 Shelter Rock Road
Manhasset, NY 11030
516-627-6560, ext. 177, phone
516-627-6596, fax
"Nurture Your Spirit. Help Heal Our World”

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.


From: robert nuxoll
To: Claire DeRoche ; Habeeb Ahmed ; Richard Tibbets ; Dolores Tibbets ; "" ; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Hank Arond ; Dr. Isma H Chaudhry ; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian; Paul Auerbach ; Betty Nuxoll ; Daniel Nuxoll ; Vince Chimenti ; Christine Douglas
Cc: Tom Goodhue ; Jay Keller; beth lilach
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Dear friends,
I have telephoned the Great Neck Synagogue (516-487-6100) and found no one who knew anything about this other than that it was scheduled by their Men's Club. I left a message and asked that someone return my call. I specifically said, "This is the equivalent of a church in the 1930s inviting a representative of the Nazi Party to speak. Pam Geller has been labeled by both
the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center as a leader of a hate group." I mentioned that I am a representative of The Interfaith Alliance of Long Island and a
member of The Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Shelter Rock.
I suggest that, regardless of whatever else we do, each of us calls the Synagogue to protest their inviting a noted hate-monger to a house of worship.
Bob Nuxoll
----- Original Message -----
From: Habeebudddin Ahmed
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:10 pm
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
To: robert nuxoll , Claire DeRoche , Richard Tibbets , Dolores Tibbets , "" , Elaine Peters , Faroque Khan , Hank Arond , "Dr. Isma H Chaudhry" , Mark Lukens , Marty Melkonian , Paul Auerbach , Betty Nuxoll , Daniel Nuxoll , Vince Chimenti , Christine Douglas
Cc: Tom Goodhue , Jay Keller , beth lilach

Hello All,
I think Bob has a wonderful suggestion for now. Let's start calling the Great Neck Synagogue at 516 487 6100 and tell them that it is not befitting a religious organization to invite a bigot and a known Islamophobe. Request that you would like to speak with the Rabbi and if he is not available then leave a message for him. Please do this tomorrow and pass on this message to your friends and family.

Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590

Human Rights Commission
Nassau County

516 581 5893

From: ""
To: Habeebudddin Ahmed
Cc: robert nuxoll ; Claire DeRoche ; Richard Tibbets ; Dolores Tibbets ; "" ; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Hank Arond ; Dr. Isma H Chaudhry ; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian ; Paul Auerbach ; Betty Nuxoll ; Daniel Nuxoll ; Vince Chimenti ; Christine Douglas ; Jay Keller ; beth lilach
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
I called yesterday, introduced myself, and said that before I started organizing protests, I wanted to confirm if what I had heard was true, since it was hard to believe that a synagogue would host somebody who'd been condemned as a bigot and hate-monger by the Anti-Defamation League.
A somewhat perplexed secretary put me through to one of the rabbis yesterday, who said he knew nothing about her coming but apparently the men's club invited her. I told him that I hoped they would reconsider, since this was highly offensive to me and doubtless to many other folks, the equivalent of a church inviting a Nazi who claimed Jews were trying to take over America or a mosque inviting an anti-Semite who claimed that Jews were trying to impose kosher laws on the nation. I also allowed as how the men's club could have done this without his knowledge, telling him how when I worked at Riverside Church, the Men's Club regularly invited right wing fanatics to speak to their "class" on Sunday mornings.
I think that calling is better at this stage than public protests, both because the synagogue's leaders may truly be surprised and embarrassed by what the men's group has done and because we should avoid giving Geller free publicity: I think she gets off on being so offensive that it draws attention to herself.
Tom Goodhue

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:00:20 -0700
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Thanks Tom for making the call. I called today and they did not put me thru to the Rabbi. They just took message and hung up. Tom is right at this point lets all make calls and speak to the Rabbi. Let's tell our friends and family to do the same. Send this to all your email lists. We all can send email to the Rabbi.

Phone number of Great Neck Synagogue: 516 487 6100
Main Rabbi: Rabbi Dale Polakoff
Rabbi's email:

Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590

Human Rights Commission
Nassau County

516 581 5893
Greetings patriots,
Finally some American politicians are taking action about the threat of Ikhwan infiltration into the security apparatus. Among them is Michelle Bachmann, the former presidential candidate. One of her letters can be found here:

Serious question remain:
-the material by Frank Gaffney she bases her letters upon was released April 24, 2012. That means she waited almost a full month with her questioning.
-Bachmann gives the Inspector General 90 days to come up with answers.
It seems to me that Michelle Bachmann had a very slow awakening. Her giving 90 days to respond shows us she still doesn't have grasped the urgency of this national security crisis.
I have asked a member of Geert Wilders' party to demand that the Dutch secret service (AIVD and MID) postpone its relations with the CIA until the US has fixed its security leaks due to Muslim Brotherhood infiltration.



Rome riots and Occupy Wall Street have the same script

Occupy Wall Street has gone global. Or so it seems. Riots in Rome, Italy indicates clearly the direction things will go also here in the US. The global plotters, including Mr. Soros and a hanful of financial powerhouses in different countries want to make billions shorting the global markets, installing fear and creating the conditions for further Government intervention and greater Government control of american citizens and institutions. Just like their communist masters tryed to do in the old Soviet Union. On Saturday in conjunction with the Occupy Wall Street movement there was a “Day of Rage” that coincided with the G20 meetings in Paris. These “Day of Rage” rallies were held all over the world, but nowhere did the tension boil to the point of violence than in Rome. Crowds of violent demonstreators clashed with police and destroyed life and property. 'BURN the banks and the shops'. That is the code words of the so-called protesters that have caused havoc in the Italian Capital city of Rome this evening. This is what the radical left wants, they call it a revolution, but is "class struggle," a civil conflict, a chaotic time when illegals roams your steets, criminals cross our borders and set up shops in the cities and towns, a political, economic and social clash that will supposely eradicate the "old establishment" and set up a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Old folks like me remember this communist language, but the new generations are living it in their colleges, in the streets, even at work, and certainly we all witness it in the media. Is this what we want ???
For years, Italian socialists have plagued the nation with a "liberal" agenda that has caused insecurity, fear and even violence. Italian and European socialists have repeatedly told the media nad the people that government is supposed to fund everything and that all spending is good spending.
As leaders like current Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has tried to implement strict austerity measures to protect the safety of the Italian economy, many in the old MArxist-Leninist guard have put up resistance. The Italian people are tired of wasteful government spending and borrowing. They are tired of illegal immigration of Chinese workers who are ruining the “Made in Italy”brand. Italy with its dynamic economy, including a robust manufacturing sector, should easily be a larger economic power in Europe and, even now, is not a country in need of a bailout, rather a nation that has voted the first european Balanced Budget Amendment.
The grassroots movement in Italy, those supporting the Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, is more like the Tea Party than Occupy Wall Street. That’s why Italy will have a long term sustainable future. The Italian people have a real will to reform its government and make the tough changes that are necessary.
Europe is a good example of what we do NOT want in this nation: we do not need a socialist system, not in health care, not in foreign politics, not in the economy. We need unity and harmony, we need good Judeo-Christian value and principles, we need inspired people to lead by example, we need what made this nation great: liberty with responsibility, freedom and justice, tolerance under the law, just laws and order, a strong military to defend our borders and our traditions, open dialogue with those who shares our values and rules.
As an american citizen I am concerned over the anti Wall Street sentiments and the hate regurgitated by those who attend those protests. They started in Wisconsin, remember ? And soon they will come to a street near you.
As a son of Italy, I would like to share all the knowledge and experience that we have gained in Europe, and in particular in Italy, concerning the tactics and strategies of the extreme left. They are repeating the same scenario here in the USA.
If we continue to be vigilant and brave we will overcome. If not ... it will take just more time and more suffering, but freedom, truth and justice will always win in the end.

Guido George Lombardi
North Atlantic League
Like in the Vietnam War,
today we are losing the disinformation campaign. The leftist strategy is the same, in European nations, (including friends like England, engulfed in leftist dis-information and islamic hyper-immigration;  and Italy, where, thank God, the conservative movement is repeatedly beating down all socialist attempts to return to power), and here, from Washington D.C. to West Palm Beach to the border towns in south Texas and southern California. The propaganda regurgitated by so-called radical-liberal (socialist) media and politicos, is similar in form and content to that of Islamic extremists, and as bad as the Marxist doctrine forced in the minds and hearts of the anti-Vietnam-war protesters here in the US in the 60’s and 70’s, and repeated by anti-Iraq-war leftists (the similarities: anti-US-establishment content, anti-Christian, anti-Israel, atheist, and always pro-illegal immigration). Two years ago, FOX NEWS reported:"ACORN to Play Role in 2010 Census." Acorn and friends, with their greedy hands on census and health and human services are creating MILLIONS of new voters from illegal immigrants....and when they input their false names in the  system and assign them new social security numbers you will not be able to distinguish them from the legal ones, you will just see "appear" from nothing, hundreds of thousands of new voters... (they did the same in Europe over the last decades ...) be ready. They are coming up again (Marxist and Islamic extremists), and are uniting, their media message is the same, their lies the same, their objectives the same: the destruction of the US and Western Democracies. We must face them, understand their strategy, their number one weapon: LIES (just like that ancient serpent), false propaganda (like that of North Korea, Cuba, Iran, and even in some of our own schools, universities, and mass media, and fight them with the same methods: with TRUTH, truthful propaganda, righteous education, and counter-disinformation. God Bless you.
Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders made a seminal address, March 25, 2011, at the Annual Lecture of the Magna Carta Foundation in Rome, Italy.

NAL Rome, As is his wont, Wilders presentation moved far beyond the timorous platitudes about the most obvious (and dangerous) failures of cultural relativism belatedly echoed by Western European leaders Angela Merkel, Nicholas Sarkozy, and David Cameron. Wilders demands that the West acknowledge the jihad—both cultural and military—being waged against it openly and incessantly by institutional Islam, Muslim nations, and the global umma. The Dutch Parlaimentarian concludes his eloquent and informative speech by insisting that four concrete measures must be taken immediately, quoting Ronald Reagan, so we can “…act today to preserve tomorrow.”

(1)   Defend freedom of speech and religion in ALL nations

(2) End cultural relativism and re-assert our belief in the superiority of Western culture and Judeo-Christian tradition.

(3) Stop the Islamization of the West (Shariah law) and illegal immigration (invasion).

(4) Restore the supremacy and sovereignty of the nation-state, RIGHT TO VOTE ONLY TO CITIZENS.

Wilder’s speech in its entirety, is reproduced below: “The Failure of Multiculturalism and How to Turn the Tide” Signore e signori, ladies and gentlemen, dear friends of the Magna Carta Foundation, molte grazie. Thank you for inviting me to Rome. It is great to be here in this beautiful city which for many centuries was the capital and the centre of Europe’s Judeo-Christian culture.Together with Jerusalem and Athens, Rome is the cradle of our Western civilization – the most advanced and superior civilization the world has ever known.As Westerners, we share the same Judeo-Christian culture. I am from the Netherlands and you are from Italy. Our national cultures are branches of the same tree. We do not belong to multiple cultures, but to different branches of one single culture. This is why when we come to Rome, we all come home in a sense. We belong here, as we also belong in Athens and in Jerusalem.It is important that we know where our roots are. If we lose them we become deracinated. We become men and women without a culture.I am here today to talk about multiculturalism. This term has a number of different meanings. I use the term to refer to a specific political ideology. It advocates that all cultures are equal. If they are equal it follows that the state is not allowed to promote any specific cultural values as central and dominant. In other words: multiculturalism holds that the state should not promote a leitkultur, which immigrants have to accept if they want to live in our midst. It is this ideology of cultural relativism which the German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently referred to when she said that multiculturalism has proved “an absolute failure.” My friends, I dare say that we have known this all along. Indeed, the premise of the multiculturalist ideology is wrong. Cultures are not equal. They are different, because their roots are different. That is why the multiculturalists try to destroy our roots. Rome is a very appropriate place to address these issues. There is an old saying which people of our Western culture are all familiar with. “When in Rome, do as the Romans do,” it says. This is an obvious truth: If you move somewhere, you must adapt to the laws and customs of the land. The multicultural society has undermined this rule of common sense and decency. The multicultural society tells the newcomers who settle in our cities and villages: You are free to behave contrary to our norms and values. Because your norms and values are just as good, perhaps even better, than ours. It is, indeed, appropriate to discuss these matters here in Rome, because the history of Rome also serves as a warning. Will Durant, the famous 20th century American historian, wrote that “A great civilization cannot be destroyed from outside if it has not already destroyed itself from within.” This is exactly what happened here, in Rome, 16 centuries ago. In the 5th century, the Roman Empire fell to the Germanic Barbarians. There is no doubt that the Roman civilization was far superior to that of the Barbarians. And yet, Rome fell. Rome fell because it had suffered a loss of belief in its own civilization. It had lost the will to stand up and fight for survival. Rome did not fall overnight. Rome fell gradually. The Romans scarcely noticed what was happening. They did not perceive the immigration of the Barbarians as a threat until it was too late. For decades, Germanic Barbarians, attracted by the prosperity of the Empire, had been crossing the border. At first, the attraction of the Empire on newcomers could be seen as a sign of the cultural, political and economic superiority of Rome. People came to find a better life which their own culture could not provide. But then, on December 31st in the year 406, the Rhine froze and tens of thousands of Germanic Barbarians, crossed the river, flooded the Empire and went on a rampage, destroying every city they passed. In 410, Rome was sacked. The fall of Rome was a traumatic experience. Numerous books have been written about the cataclysmal event and Europeans were warned not to make the same mistake again. In 1899, in his book ‘The River War,’ Winston Churchill warned that Islam is threatening Europe in the same way as the Barbarians once threatened Rome. “Mohammedanism,” Churchill wrote – I quote – “is a militant and proselytizing faith. No stronger retrograde force exists in the World. […] The civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.” End of quote. Churchill is right. However, if Europe falls, it will fall because, like ancient Rome, it no longer believes in the superiority of its own civilization. It will fall because it foolishly believes that all cultures are equal and that, consequently, there is no reason why we should fight for our own culture in order to preserve it. This failure to defend our own culture has turned immigration into the most dangerous threat that can be used against the West. Multiculturalism has made us so tolerant that we tolerate the intolerant. Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake: Our opponents are keenly aware of our weakness. They realize that the pattern which led to the fall of Rome, is at play today in the West. They are keenly aware of the importance of Rome as a symbol of the West. Over and over again they hint at the fall of Rome. Rome is constantly on their minds.

  • The former Turkish Prime Minister Erbakan said – I quote: “The whole of Europe will become Islamic. We will conquer Rome”.
  • Yunis al-Astal, a Hamas cleric and member of the Palestinian Parliament said – I quote: “Very soon Rome will be conquered.”
  • Ali Al-Faqir, the former Jordanian Minister of Religion,  stated that – I quote: “Islam will conquer Rome.”
  • Sheikh Muhammad al-Arifi, imam of the mosque of the Saudi Defence Academy, said – I quote: “We will control Rome and introduce Islam in it.”

Our opponents are hoping for an event that is akin to the freezing of the Rhine in 406, when thousands of immigrants will be given an easy opportunity to cross massively into the West.

  • In a 1974 speech to the UN, the Algerian President Houari Boumédienne, said – I quote: “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” End of quote.
  • Libyan dictator Kadhafi said, I quote: “There are tens of millions of Muslims in the European continent today and their number is on the increase. This is the clear indication that the European continent will be converted into Islam. Europe will one day soon be a Muslim continent.” End of quote.

Our opponents are aiming for a repetition of the fall of Rome in the 5th century and want to use exactly the same methods. “The strategy of exporting human beings and having them breed in abundance is the simplest way to take possession of a territory,” warned the famous Italian author Oriana Fallaci.

However, the situation today could be worse than it was when the Roman Empire fell. The Germanic Barbarians who overran Rome were not driven by an ideology. After having sacked Rome, they eventually adopted the Judeo-Christian civilization of Rome. They destroyed Rome because they wanted its riches, but they realized and recognized that Roman civilization was superior to their own Barbaric culture. Having destroyed Rome, the Germanic tribes eventually tried to rebuild it. In 800, the Frankish leader Charlemagne had himself crowned Roman Emperor. Three hundred years later, the Franks and the other Europeans  would go on the Crusades in defence of their Christian culture. The Crusades were as Oriana Fallaci wrote – I quote – a “counter-offensive designed to stem Islamic expansionism in Europe.” Rome had fallen, but like a phoenix it had risen again. Contrary to the Barbarians which confronted Rome, the followers of Muhammad are driven by an ideology which they want to impose on us. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. Islamic Shariah law supervises every detail of life. Islam is not compatible with our Western way of life. Islam is a threat to our values. Respect for people who think otherwise, the equality of men and women, the equality of homosexuals and heterosexuals, respect for Christians, Jews, unbelievers and apostates, the separation of church and state, freedom of speech, they are all under pressure because of islamization. Europe is islamizing at a rapid pace. Many European cities have large islamic concentrations. In some neighburhoods, Islamic regulations are already being enforced. Women’s rights are being trampled. We are confronted with headscarves and burqa’s, polygamy, female genital mutilation, honour-killings. “In each one of our cities” says Oriana Fallaci, “there is a second city, a state within the state, a government within the government. A Muslim city, a city ruled by the Koran.” – End of quote.

Ladies and gentlemen, make no mistake: The multiculturalist Left is facilitating islamization. Leftist multiculturalists are cheering for every new shariah bank, for every new islamic school, for every new mosque. Multiculturalists consider Islam as being equal to our own culture. Shariah law or democracy? Islam or freedom? It doesn’t really matter to them. But it does matter to us. The entire leftist elite is guilty of practising cultural relativism. Universities, churches, trade unions, the media, politicians. They are all betraying our hard-won liberties.

Ladies and gentlemen, what is happening in Europe today has to some extent been deliberately planned

In October 2009, Andrew Neather, the former advisor of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, confirmed that the British Government had deliberately organized mass immigration as part of a social engineering project. The Blair Government wanted to – I quote – “make the UK truly multicultural.” To achieve this end, 2.3 million foreigners were allowed to enter Britain between 2000 and 2009. Neather says this policy has “enriched” Britain. Ordinary people, however, do not consider the decline of societal cohesion, the rise of crime, the transformation of their old neighborhoods into no-go zones, to be an “enrichment.” Ordinary people are well aware that they are witnessing a population replacement phenomenon. Ordinary people feel attached to the civilization which their ancestors created. They do not want it to be replaced by a multicultural society where the values of the immigrants are considered as good as their own. It is not xenophobia or islamophobia to consider our Western culture as superior to other cultures – it is plain common sense. Fortunately, we are still living in a democracy. The opinion of ordinary people still matters. I am the leader of the Dutch Party of Freedom which aims to halt the Islamization process and defend the traditional values and liberties in the Netherlands. The Party of Freedom is the fastest growing party in the Netherlands. Because the message of my party is so important, I support initiatives to establish similar parties in other countries, such as Germany, France and the United Kingdom, where they do not yet exist. Last month, a poll in Britain showed that a staggering 48 percent of the British would consider supporting a non-fascist and non-violent party that vows to crack down on immigration and Islamic extremists and restrict the building of mosques. In October last year, I was in Berlin where I gave a keynote speech at a meeting of Die Freiheit, a newly established party led by René Stadtkewitz, a former Christian-Democrat. German polls indicate that such a party has a potential of 20 percent of the electorate. My speech, in which I urged the Germans to stop feeling ashamed about their German identity drew a lot of media attention. Two weeks later, German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that multiculturalism is “an absolute failure.” Horst Seehofer, the leader of the Bavarian Christian-Democrats, was even more outspoken. “Multiculturalism is dead,” he said.

Last month, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said: “We have been too concerned about the identity of the immigrant and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.” – End of quote. Five weeks ago, British Prime Minister David Cameron blamed multiculturalism for Islamic extremism. “We have allowed the weakening of our collective identity,” he said. “Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live […] apart from the mainstream.” – End of quote. In his speech, David Cameron still makes a distinction between the Islamist ideology, which he calls extremist and dangerous, and Islam, which he says is peaceful religion. I do not share this view, and neither did Cameron’s great predecessor Winston Churchill. Stating that Islam is peaceful is a multiculturalist dogma which is contrary to the truth. Politicians such as Merkel. Sarkozy and Cameron still do not seem to have understood what the problem really is. Nevertheless, the fact that they feel compelled to distance themselves from multiculturalism is a clear indication that they realize they need to pay lip-service to what the majority of their populations have long understood. Namely that the massive influx of immigrants from Islamic countries is the most negative development that Europe has known in the past 50 years.

Yesterday, a prestigious poll in the Netherlands revealed that 50 percent of the Dutch are of the opinion that Islam and democracy are not compatible, while 42 percent think they are. Even two thirds of the voters of the Liberal Party and of the Christian-Democrat Party are convinced that Islam and democracy are not compatible.

This, then, is the political legacy of multiculturalism. While the parties of the Left have found themselves a new electorate, the establishment parties of the Right still harbour their belief that Islam is a religion of peace on a par with peaceful religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and others. The problem with multiculturalism is a refusal to see reality. The reality that our civilization is superior, and the reality that Islam is a dangerous ideology. Today, we are confronted with political unrest in the Arab countries. Autocratic regimes, such as that of Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak in Egypt, Kadhafi in Libya, the Khalifa dynasty in Bahrain, and others, have been toppled or are under attack. The Arab peoples long for freedom. This is only natural. However, the ideology and culture of Islam is so deeply entrenched in these countries that real freedom is simply impossible. As long as Islam remains dominant there can be no real freedom. Let us face reality. On March 8, the International Women’s Day, 300 women demonstrated on Cairo’s Tahrir Square in post-Mubarak Egypt. Within minutes, the women were charged by a group of bearded men, who beat them up and dragged them away. Some were even sexually assaulted. The police did not interfere. This is the new Egypt: On Monday, people demonstrate for freedom; on Tuesday, the same people beat up women because they, too, demand freedom. I fear that in Islamic countries, democracy will not lead to real freedom. A survey by the American Pew Center found that 59 percent of Egyptians prefer democracy to any other form of government. However, 85 percent say that Islam’s influence on politics is good, 82 percent believe that adulterers should be stoned, 84 percent want the death penalty for apostates, and 77 percent say that thieves should be flogged or have their hands cut off.

Ronald Reagan was right when he called Kadhafi a “mad dog.” However, we should not harbor the illusion that there can be real freedom and real democracy in a country where Islam is dominant. There is no doubt that the results of the Pew survey in Egypt apply in Libya, too. It is not in our interest to bring the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Tripoli and install a khalifate in Libya. Of course, the world has to stop Kadhafi from killing his own people. However, as UN Resolution 1973 stated last week, this is primarily the responsibility of – I quote – “in particular [the] States of the region.” End of quote. Why does a country like the Netherlands have to contribute six F16 fighter jets to enforce the arms embargo in Libya, while Saudi Arabia does not contribute a single plane from its fleet of nearly 300 fighter jets? Arabs are dying, but the Arab countries are shirking their responsibilities. And one of the major threats of the current crisis is not even addressed by our leaders: How are we going to prevent that thousands of economic fugitives and fortune seekers cross the Mediterranean and arrive at place like Lampedusa? Now that Tunisia is liberated, young Tunisians should help to rebuild their country instead of leaving for Lampedusa. Europe cannot afford another influx of thousands of refugees.

Ladies and gentlemen, It is time to wake up. We need to confront reality and we need to speak the truth. The truth is that Islam is evil, and the reality is that Islam is a threat to us.

Before I continue I want to make clear, however, that I do not have a problem with Muslims as such. There are many moderate Muslims. That is why I always make a clear distinction between the people and the ideology, between Muslims and Islam. There are many moderate Muslims, but there is no such thing as a moderate Islam. Islam strives for world domination. The koran commands Muslims to exercise jihad and impose shariah law. Telling the truth about immigration and warning that Islam might not be as benevolent as the ruling elite says, has been made a hate speech crime in several EU member states. As you probably know, I have been brought to court on charges of hate speech. That is the paradox of the multicultural society. It claims to be pluralistic, but allows only one point of view of world affairs, namely that all cultures are equal and that they are all good. The fact that we are treated as criminals for telling the truth must not, however, deter us. The truth that Islam is evil has always been obvious to our ancestors. That is why they fought. It was very clear to them that our civilization was far superior to Islam. It is not difficult to understand why our culture is far better than Islam. We Europeans, whether we be Christians, Jews, agnostics or atheists, believe in reason. We have always known that nothing good could be expected from Islam. While our culture is rooted in Jerusalem, Athens and Rome, Islam’s roots are the desert and the brain of Muhammad. Our ancestors understood the consequences very well. The Koran, wrote the historian Theophanes, who lived in the second half of the 8th century, is based on hallucinations.  “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman,” the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II said in 1391, adding: “God is not pleased by blood – and not acting reasonable is contrary to God’s nature.” For 1,400 years, Westerners have been criticizing Islam and its founder because they recognized evil when they saw it. But then, suddenly, in the last decades of the past century, especially from the 1970s onwards, Western intellectuals stopped doing so.

The moral and cultural relativism of Marxism led the West’s political and intellectual elites to adopt a utopian belief in a universal brotherhood of mankind. Multiculturalism is a culture of repudiation of Europe’s heritage and freedoms. It weakens the West day by day. It leads to the self-censorship of the media and academia, the collapse of the education system, the emasculation of the churches, the subversion of the nation-state, the break-down of our free society. While today – at last – our leaders seem to realize what a disastrous failure multiculturalism has been, multiculturalism is not dead yet. More is needed to defeat multiculturalism than the simple proclamations that it has been an “absolute failure.” What is needed is that we turn the tide of Islamization. There are a few things which we can do in this regard. One thing which we should do is to oppose the introduction of Sharia or Islamic law in our countries. In about a dozen states in the United States, legislation is currently being introduced to prevent the introduction of Sharia. In early May, I will be travelling to the U.S. to express my support to these initiatives. We should consider similar measures in Europe.

Another thing which we should do is support Muslims who want to leave Islam. An International Women’s Day is useless in the Arab world if there is no International Leave Islam Day. I propose the introduction of such a day in which we can honor the courageous men and women who want to leave Islam. Perhaps we can pick a symbolic date for such a day and establish an annual prize for an individual who has turned his back on Islam or an organization which helps people to liberate themselves from Islam. It is very easy to become a Muslim. All one has to do is to pronounce the Shahada, the Islamic creed, which says – I quote “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” It should be equally easy to leave Islam by pronouncing a counter-Shahada, which says “I leave Islam and join humankind.” A third measure to turn the tide of Islamization is to reemphasize the sovereignty of the nation-state. The peoples of the free world will only be able to fight back against Islam if they can rally around a flag with which they can identify. This flag, symbolizing pre-political loyalty, can only be the flag of our nation. In the West, our freedoms are embodied in our nation-states. This is why the multiculturalists are hostile to the nation-state and aim to destroy it. National identity is an inclusive identity: It welcomes everyone, whatever his religion or race, who is willing to assimilate into a nation by sharing the fate and future of a people. It ties the individual to an inheritance, a tradition, a loyalty, and a culture. I want to elaborate a bit on this since we are gathered here today in Rome. Again, it is appropriate that we are in Rome. In this city, in 1957, and – what an ironic coincidence – on this very day, the 25th of March, the Treaty of Rome was signed. This Treaty obliges the member states of the European Union to aim for “an ever closer union.” Unfortunately, this union, like other multinational organizations, has become one of the vehicles for the promotion of multiculturalism. The EU has fallen in the hands of a multiculturalist elite who by undermining national sovereignty destroy the capacity of the peoples of Europe to democratically decide their own future. The new government in my country, which is supported by my party, wants to restrict immigration. That is what our voters want. But we are confronted by the fact that our policies have to a large extent been outsourced to “Europe” and that our voters no longer have a direct say over their own future.

On account of international treaties, EU legislation prevails over national legislation and cannot be reversed by national parliaments. Indeed, in 2008, the European Court of Justice, the highest court in the EU, annulled both Irish and Danish immigration legislation. The Court stated that national law is subordinate to whatever is ruled on the European level. In March 2010, the European Court of Justice annulled Dutch legislation restricting family reunification for immigrants on welfare. The ease with which Europe’s political elite conducts an immigration policy aimed at the deracination of Europe shows the insensitivity of this elite. It willingly sacrifices its own people to its political goal, without any consideration for the people involved. Lower class blue-collar people have been driven from their neighborhoods. There is no respect for their democratic vote. On the contrary, people who do not agree with the multiculturalist schemes are considered to be racists and xenophobes, while the undefined offence of “racism and xenophobia” has been made central to all moral pronouncements by the European Union, the Council of Europe, the United Nations, and other supra-national organizations. This represents a systematic assault by the elite on the ordinary feelings of national loyalty.

In 2008, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe stated that the member-states must – I quote – “condemn and combat Islamophobia” and ensure “that school textbooks do not portray Islam as a hostile or threatening religion.” – end of quote.

In March 2010, the United Nations Human Rights Council passed a resolution criminalizing so-called “defamation of religions.” The resolution, authored by Pakistan, mentions only one religion by name: Islam. With its 57 member states the Organization of the Islamic Conference systematically uses its voting power in the UN to subvert the concept of freedom and human rights. In 1990, the OIC rejected the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and replaced it by the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, which states in articles 24 that – I quote – “All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia.” – end of quote. This “human rights” charade has to stop if Western civilization wants to survive. Human rights exist for the protection of individuals, not religions and ideologies. The EU’s aim, meanwhile, seems to be to destroy the old sovereign nations and replace them by new provincial identities, which are all clones of each other. Britanistan will not differ from Netherlandistan, nor Germanistan from Italiastan, or any other province of the European superstate in the making.

We must reclaim Europe. We can only do so by giving political power back to the nation-state. By defending the nation-states which we love, we defend our own identity. By defending our identity, we defend who we are and what we are against those who want to deracinate us. Against those who want to cut us from our roots, so that our culture withers away and dies.

My friends,

Twenty years after the ordinary people, Europe’s mainstream conservative leaders, such as Merkel, Sarkozy and Cameron, have finally – better late than never – come to the obvious conclusion, namely that multiculturalism is a failure. However, they do not have a plan to remedy the situation. Ladies and gentlemen, it is time for change. We must make haste. Time is running out. Ronald Reagan said: “We need to act today, to preserve tomorrow”. That is why I propose the following measures in order to preserve our freedom:  First, we will have to defend freedom of speech. It is the most important of our liberties. If we are free to speak, we will be able to tell people the truth and they will realize what is at stake. Second, we will have to end cultural relativism. To the multiculturalists, we must proudly proclaim: Our Western culture is far superior to the Islamic culture. Only when we are convinced of that, we will be willing to fight for our own identity. Third, we will have to stop Islamization. Because more Islam means less freedom. We must stop immigration from Islamic countries, we must expel criminal immigrants, we must forbid the construction of new mosques. There is enough Islam in Europe already. Immigrants must assimilate and adapt to our values: When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Fourth, we must restore the supremacy and sovereignty of the nation-state. Because we are citizens of these states, we can take pride in them. We love our nation because they are our home, because they are the legacy which our fathers bestowed on us and which we want to bestow on our children. We are not multiculturalists, we are patriots. And because we are patriots, we are willing to fight for freedom.

Let me end with a final – and a positive – remark: Though the situation is bad and multiculturalism is still predominant, we are in better shape than the Roman Empire was before its fall.

The Roman Empire was not a democracy. The Romans did not have freedom of speech. We are the free men of the West. We do not fight for an Empire, we fight for ourselves. We fight for our national republics. You fight for Italy, I fight for the Netherlands, others fight for France, Germany, Britain, the United States of America, Denmark or Spain. Together we stand. Together we represent the nations of Europe.

I am confident that if we can safeguard freedom of speech and democracy, our civilization will be able to survive. Europe will not fall. We, Europe’s patriots, will not allow it.

Thank you very much

Italy : Key to peace in the Middle-East.  
(Italian, Italy page)




Posted by Senator Pat Toomey on Red State

Thursday, March 31st at 10:27AM

As our country faces a fiscal crisis brought on by an unprecedented surge in deficit spending, it is clear that we do not have the luxury of kicking the can down the road and continuing with business as usual in Washington. Over the past two years, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress have tried to convince the American people that we can borrow and spend our way to prosperity. The American people aren’t buying it, and they have made their desire for fiscal restraint loud and clear.

That’s why I am very pleased that today, the Senate Republican Conference will roll out a balanced budget amendment, cosponsored by all 47 Republican senators.

The new, consensus balanced budget amendment is exactly what our country needs. It is the result of hard work on the part of many senators and proof that we can change the way Washington works when we put our minds to it.

The path toward a balanced budget amendment started with two excellent pieces of legislation, one by Senators Mike Lee and Jon Kyl and another by Senators Orrin Hatch and John Cornyn. Over several weeks and many conversations with my colleagues, we discussed ways to merge these two bills into a compromise measure that the entire conference could embrace. We drafted a balanced budget amendment that sets firm restrictions on government spending and insures that future Congresses will not be able to waive these restrictions at their whim. And thanks to the leadership and support of Senator Mitch McConnell, a united Republican conference has thrown its unanimous support behind this measure.

Under our new balanced budget amendment:

  • The budget will have to be balanced every year
  • Federal spending will be limited to 18 percent of GDP
  • Congress can only increase taxes with a two-thirds vote of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate
  • Congress can only waive the 18 percent spending restriction with a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate, unless we are engaged in a military conflict which requires a three-fifths vote by both chambers
  • Only a declaration of war against a nation state allows Congress to waive the requirement with a simple majority
  • Congress requires a three-fifths vote to increase the debt limit

The time for action is now. As our debt approaches the $14.3 trillion statutory limit, the most irresponsible thing we can do is to increase the debt limit with no spending cuts and not spending reforms.

The balanced budget amendment is the first major step this Congress can take to impose a straitjacket on government spending, restore fiscal responsibility and enable our economy to thrive.

The economy needs new values



In 1929 the market crash heralded the great depression.  In 1987 there was the now infamous “Black Monday.” In 1999 there was Allan Greenspan’s famous reference to the “irrational exuberance” of the stock market, which started the wide swings of the Dow and the NASDAQ. In 2008 we witnessed the beginning of the real estate meltdown, and three years later we seems to be getting out of it… slowly. Tomorrow… who knows? Bottom line: nobody can tell us what the future of the economy will be for certain. Even the work of our two Nobel Prize winners, Professors James Heckman and Daniel McFadden, is not sufficient to understand the real forces behind economic development and technological innovation. According to the Royal Swedish Academy of the Sciences, the two Nobel laureates were rewarded for “developing theory and methods that are widely used in the statistical analysis of individuals and households.” Dr. Heckman’s study on the motivation of individuals choosing to respond to opinion polls and other statistical studies, and Dr. McFadden’s work on the economic reasons for individual choices may be investigated by other economists. Suffice to say here that one of the principal assumptions, and in my humble opinion one very unproven assumption, of these and other macroeconomic theories is that “people will always act so as to maximize their self-interest.” As we all know, human needs, desires, wants and aspirations are not driven exclusively by cold and selfish economic considerations, quite the contrary, and economic motivation is not sufficient in itself to explain value theory.   

          Innovation, change, revolution seem to be the passwords of this age. The modern age, a little less than a century, from the end of World War One in 1918 to the second decade of the third millennium, has certainly witnessed the greatest and fastest changes in human society. Every aspect of our global culture has faced challenges; every underlying value has been put to the test. And that is fine, because at a certain point of their history, all people and all nations feel the need to rediscover their own soul, their proper identity. This leads them to renew some of their traditional values and principles, and to replace others with new ideals, new values and new rules. All of us, both as individuals and as communities, as nations, need ideals, values and a positive vision of the future that can energize and propel us toward better and higher lives. The core of Western Civilization is its Judeo-Christian tradition: the Ten Commandments and the tradition that carries the message of Abraham for four millennia, the huge body of the rule of law formalized by the ancient Roman legal system, including the political structure of the republic, with Senate and House of Tribunes, a separate judiciary, and a limited executive (at least for the first six centuries, before the advent of the dictatorship of the emperors and its subsequent decline), the Message of Christ and the monumental work of moral, ethical and philosophical achievements developed by innumerable authors over the last twenty centuries. These are the essential elements that made our world what it is today. The NAL wants to strengthen, organize, divulge and, where possible, improve our understanding of the values and principles that made us great.    

 Defending Western civilization

Guest post by Marsha Familaro Enright and Gen LaGreca 

    As September 11th approaches, we remember the morning in 2001 when the World Trade Center turned to rubble. It is a fitting time to consider the nature of the civilizations that collided that day—and how to defend ours.     In their quest to establish a worldwide caliphate, radical Islamists invoke morality, claiming they have God’s sanction for performing their barbarous acts.     To defend Western civilization, we, also, need to invoke morality. But although the world envies the prosperity we’ve achieved, it is widely seen as the product of soulless materialism, of unbridled “greed,” of unscrupulous self-indulgence.     What moral claim, then, can we make for our way of life
    To understand the moral values of the West, let’s turn to its beginning. In her prescient 1943 work of political philosophy, The God of the Machine, Isabel Paterson chose as the symbol of Western man a figure from Ancient Greece: Pytheas (right). This enterprising merchant left his homeland to explore Britain and beyond, seeking tin to make bronze. Insatiably curious, Pytheas also discovered the relationship between the moon’s phases and the tides, and was the first to describe the aurora and other phenomena. 
    Pytheas epitomizes the Western spirit: a self-directed man whose free will determines his life’s course, a thinker who employs reason and science to understand the world around him, and a producer who seeks to sell goods in peaceful trade.     From its founding, America was intended to be the country where Pytheas could flourish—the first nation established to protect the life, liberty, and property of the individual. It did so by curbing government power over the peaceful activities of its citizens.     In this, the contrast between America and radical Islam could not be greater. 
    Whereas Thomas Jefferson exhorts us to “question with boldness even the existence of a God,” militant Islam kills people for apostasy.     Whereas James Madison proclaims that man has “a right to his property” and equally “a property in [all of] his rights,” Palestinian Islamists strap suicide belts on five year-olds, seizing their young lives for the sake of ancient vendettas.     Whereas the Declaration of Independence affirms America’s devotion to life, Osama bin Laden declares: We love death. The U.S. loves life. That is the difference between us two.     “The excellence of the West” lies in its “respect for the human being, the recognition of his individuality, the liberty it has granted him,” observes Saudi Shura Council member and Muslim reformist Ibrahim Al-Buleihi.     “Humans are originally individuals,” he continues, “but cultures (including Arab culture) have dissolved the individual in the tribe, sect, or state.” It is only “with the diffusion of philosophical ideas from [Ancient] Greece” that “the human being became an individual of value for himself . . . and not merely a means for others.” (“Profile of Al-Buleihi,” The Aafaq Foundation, July 6, 2010)    Thus, in our civilization, a person is born free to live for his own sake and to pursue happiness. In radical Islam, a person must obey a central authority and sacrifice his life to its aims. Which society is better?  And which would you actually describe as a civilization? 
    Granted the West’s superiority, why is radical Islam advancing? Author Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim, cites “an active propaganda campaign” in which “the Saudis invested at least $2 billion a year over a 30-year period to spread their brand of fundamentalist Islam.” (Wall Street JournalAugust 18, 2010)  Why aren’t we passionately defending our civilization? Certainly, money isn’t the obstacle. Is it because we don’t understand the nobility of our individualist foundation, including the virtue of private advancement and profit? 
    We must never forget that we of the free West are all the country of Pytheas: a people of free will, free minds, and free enterprise. Our spectacular prosperity is not our dishonor, but the glory of our liberty. 
    It is said that Ground Zero is “sacred ground.” In truth, all of America is sacred ground—because it is in America more than anywhere else that the individual is most made sacred. 
    We of the West must assert the moral superiority of our civilization—or lose it to our enemies. 
* * * *
Marsha Familaro Enright is president of the Reason, Individualism, Freedom Institute, the Foundation for the College of the United States
Gen LaGreca is author of
 Noble Vision, an award-winning novel about the struggle for liberty in health care today.

Gov. Christie's Strange Relationship with Radical Islam

Read more at:

Gov. Christie's Strange Relationship with Radical Islam

Read more at:
Gov. Christie's Strange Relationship with Radical Islam

Read more at:

Gov. Christie's Strange Relationship with Radical Islam

Read more at:
Guidogeorge Lombardi,
Feb 1, 2011, 7:00 PM