more information‎ > ‎


The lobbyists will say you cannot talk about health.  Citizens can talk about health, but legislators cannot act on health issues when setting Zoning laws. When telcoms sue cities, lawyers will try to distract the judge by saying citizens talk of health unduly influenced legislators. For the most part, judges have not been fooled. When giving testimony you should cite peer revealed studies.

"The biological and health effects of electromagnetic field exposures (EMFs) are scientifically established and no longer deniable, and patients and clinicians are increasingly observing and documenting cases of EMF associated illness."

  1. Ramazzini Institute Study
    Fiorella Belpoggi Ph.D., Ramazzini Institute
  2. “Our findings of cancerous tumors in rats exposed to environmental levels of RF are consistent with and reinforce the results of the US NTP studies on cell phone radiation, as both reported increases in the same types of tumors of the brain and heart in Sprague-Dawley rats. Together, these studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to re-evaluate and re-classify their conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans,”

    “I believer irresponsible to implement any new wireless technologies in neighborhoods where people would be continuously exposed before thorough evaluations are made of potential adverse health effects.”

    Ronald Melnick, Ph.D.


  3. National Toxicology Program (NTP)
  4. This studied showed that radiation below the amount needed to cause thermal effects has non-thermal biological effects.

    “Scientific panel advises there is evidence for an association between both heart and brain cancers and cell phone radiation in large-scale animal study (Triangle Park, NC).”  “Scientists concluded there is “clear evidence” linking cell phone radiation to the development of cancers in rats. The U.S. government invited an expert panel to make a majority-rules declaration in response to the $25 million U.S. government National Toxicology Program (NTP) study of cell phone radiation in animals. After a three-day review of the study data, they voted to strengthen the conclusions that cell phone radiation caused health effects in the cell phone radiation exposed rats and mice.”

    NTP Pamphlet explaining the study results.


    Theodora Scarato, EHT, interviews this study's lead scientist.

  5. Debunks FDA comments.
  6. "The NTP studies were conducted to test the widely-held assumption that cell phone radiofrequency radiation could not cause cancers or other adverse health effects (other than by tissue heating) because this type of radiation (non-ionizing) did not have sufficient energy to break chemical bonds. The NTP findings that cell phone radiation caused cancers in the heart and brain, DNA damage in brain cells, heart muscle disease and reduced birth weights clearly demonstrate that the assumption that non-ionizing radiation cannot cause cancer or other health effects is wrong."

    Why rodents are the model animal to study cancer
  7. Study: Mobile phone usage causes brain tumors
    Researchers looked at the statistical findings of 46 different studies from around the world, determining that using a mobile phone for just 17 minutes per day over the course of 10 years increases the risk of brain tumors by a whopping 60 percent.

  8. Dr Devra Davis lecture on cell phone radiation
    "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation: what we know, what we need to find out, and what you can do now"

  9. 2015 Consumer Reports
    Wrote about three studies ( one from Sweden, another from France and a third that combined data from 13 countries—that suggest a connection between heavy cell phone use and gliomas, brain tumors that are often fatal. One of those studies also hinted at a link between cell phones and acoustic neuromas (tumors of the inner ear that are often non-cancerous).
             provided by M.I., Potomac Ridge 

  10. Dr. Ron Powell has posted on  numerous times warning all of us. Why are any of his warnings any less than Dr. Hardis' assurances? outside of radiation concerns... how about simple traffic safety?        
  11.            provided by Aaron Rosenzweig, Westleigh

  12. Microwave Effects on DNA and Proteins
    "For non-ionizing radiation in the power frequency band (~60Hz) and radiofrequency bands heavily used today (900 Mhz-cell phones and 2.45Ghz-WiFi), the biomedical literature is clear. Heavy exposure of humans to this radiation for extended periods of time can be lethal, and exposure of test animals to non-ionizing radiation in isolation can be lethal."Ronald N. Kostoff, Ph.D. is a Research Affiliate in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
            provided by J. G.

  14. In 2013 - wireless company "Orange" pays man $100k USD to settle out of court due to brain cancer
  15. case: customer's lawsuit included a medical opinion linking mobile phone use and his disease, which raises questions about Partner. Was it concerned the opinion would be legally validated if the case when to court? Was it worried about a precedent? Did it prefer to sign the compromise agreement to save face in the media?
            provided by A. R.

  16. Summary of laws and precedent on how FCC blocks health concerns Local Governments Cannot Regulate Environmental Effects of Cellular Telephone Towers.
  17. Forty-four reasons Cell Phones Can Cause Cancer

  18. Richard Blumenthal, United States Senator and Anna G Eshoo, Member of Congress letter to FCC seeking evidence.
          In answering Senator Blumenthal questions wireless industry confesses: "No Studies Show 5G is Safe".

  19. The Chicago Tribune "tested popular cellphones for radiofrequency radiation. Now the FCC is investigating"

  20. Health study

  21. List of studies finding health problems with 5G

  22. There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning
     the biological effects of RF radiation. Here we present some of the most recent.

  23. Abstracts of Wireless Radiation and EMF Studies Published since August, 2016
    Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

  24. How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones are Safe: A Special Investigation

    The disinformation campaign—and massive radiation increase—behind the 5G rollout.

  25. American Cancer Society reports on NTP study. It's from 2016. 

    "The NTP report linking radiofrequency radiation (RFR) to two types of cancer marks a paradigm shift in our understanding of radiation and cancer risk. The findings are unexpected; we wouldn't reasonably expect non-ionizing radiation to cause these tumors. This is a striking example of why serious study is so important in evaluating cancer risk. It’s interesting to note that early studies on the link between lung cancer and smoking had similar resistance, since theoretical arguments at the time suggested that there could not be a link.

    I ran across this info on

  26.  Moskowitz: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want to believe it. And although cellphones are now used by nearly all American adults, considerable research suggests that long-term use poses health risks from the radiation they emit, said Moskowitz.

  27. Source of Funding and Results of Studies of Health Effects of Mobile Phone Use: Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.”

    Percentage of studies that found negative health outcome from radiofrequency exposure, by funding source:
        Industry only: 33%
        Government or NGO: 82%
        Mixed funding: 71%
        Funding not reported: 77%
    Source of Funding and Results of Studies of Health Effects of Mobile Phone Use: Systematic Review of Experimental Studies
            (See Table 2, row 1)