Download all in a zip file (14,208,193 bytes) - check out readme.html or readme.pdf (9 pages) inside. Please be aware that I am interested only and exclusively onlyin hyperimaginary numbers (see below), which may offer unique solutions to various problems in point-set topology, set theory, and number theory. Therefore, I am unable to address any issue, which is not directly related to hyperimaginary numbers, and will have to ignore it due to the lack of time. Sorry. D. Chakalov August 21, 2017, 21:34 GMT Gravity-Matter DualityD. Chakalovquantum gravity, ensuing from the idea that the phenomenon dubbed ‘gravitational field’ is a new form of reality, known as Res potentia — “just in the middle between possibility and reality” (Heisenberg, Slide 7). The essential similarities and differences between gravity-matter duality and wave-particle duality are briefly examined, with emphasis on the proposed joint solution to exact localization of gravity and “quantum waves” at spacetime points. The latter are endowed with brand new structure and topology due to the fundamental flow of events suggested by Heraclitus — Panta rei conditio sine qua non est.gm_duality.pdf, 8 pages August 18, 2017, 12:00:03 GMT Also viXra:1707.0400v7, 2017-08-18 Panta Rei: The Evolution EquationD. ChakalovIt seems possible to suggest the evolution equation in cosmology, which permits unlimited creatio ex nihilo from the quantum vacuum,without leading to catastrophic events. The physicalized presentationof the Universe is interpreted as 'Brain of the Universe', which gives access to 'God's thoughts' (Albert Einstein) with spacetime engineering performed by the human brain embedded in the Brain of the Universe. Penrose-Norris DiagramD. ChakalovGravitational Holomovement and RotationD. Chakalov
We model the physicalized manifestation of the Universe as bootstrapped ‘Brain of the Universe’ and seek evidence for its brain-like functional organization, resulting from the Holon of the Universe facilitated by space-like correlated gravitational holomovement and rotation. The orthodox model of gravity, based on “tangent vectors” and “curvature of spacetime”, is replaced with the proposal that the physicalized
clocks and rulers are very flexible ‘jackets’ (cf. John’s jackets parable in CEN.pdf), which can slow down or speed up viz. shrink or expand, leading to perfectly correlated Brain of the Universe living in so-called ‘relative scale’ (RS) spacetime. The question of Universal Mind, complementing the Brain of the Universe, pertains to physical theology and the doctrine of trialism, and was examined in previous publications (Sec. 6 in spacetime.pdf).holon.pdf, 6 pages June 25, 2017, 11:20:21 GMT Old version: viXra:1705.0147v3, 6 pages, 2017-05-12 AbstractEnsuing from first principles, the theory of spacetime and its metaphysical axioms are introduced as prerequisites to physical theology and the so-called relative scale spacetime. Comment: Dedicated to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. December 24, 2016, 1,586,148 bytes, 36 pages, 13:13:13 GMT. Also viXra 1601.0209[vF], 36 pages, 2016-12-24 13:32:11 GMT. Notice the new hyperimaginary numbers (see ref. [3] on p. 28). I am interested only and exclusively only in these new numbers,which are expected to provide solutions to various problems in local differential geometry is false. We need totally new global boundary conditions to define a closed and conserved Universe in the past, which is coupled (Sic!) to an evolving Universe in the future (Fig. 7 on p. 8). The non-linear coupling between thepast and the future states of the Universe, corresponding to thephenomenon of transience (Heraclitus), requires hyperimaginarynumbers, and also opens the road to spacetime engineering (p. 34) and to the origin of gravity and inertia.Details in pp. 59-64, p. 67, p. 77, pp. 80-83, p. 85, and pp. 89-105 in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/gravity.pdf (1,188,853 bytes, 14 August 2017) Check out also gravity_rotation.pdf (3 pages, August 3, 2016). What are the basic building blocks of the universe? What are the forces by which they interact with one another? Why is the universe larger than a football ? Dedicated to 138th birthday of Albert Einstein, 14 March 2017 The slides of my talk 'Quantum Spacetime' can be downloaded from this http URL. Regarding Slides 10 and 15, check out Ivo van Vulpen at this http URL: "Why is the universe larger than a football ?" The idea of hyperimaginary numbers is suggested as the first steptoward the mathematical basis of res potentia (Plato), presented inthe right-hand side of the evolution equation |w|^{2} = |m| + ^{2}|m._{i}|^{2}The real and imaginary (tachyonic) components in the right-hand side are always balanced, leading to |w|^{2} = 0 — the physicalized world is made of positive mass-energy only, |m|, which is always balanced ^{2}(not "conserved") by equal amount of |m, once-at-a-time, ever _{i}|^{2}since The Beginning (John 1:1). God is interpreted as mathematical (hyperimaginary) object residing “inside” the 4D instant here-and-now (Luke 17:21), and conceptual solutions to fundamental problems in point-set topology, set theory, and number theory are briefly described. I will elaborate on the main, and certainly not original, statement made on p. 3 in 'Hyperimaginary Numbers' that the physical world (res extensa) offers only the necessary condition for its existence, while the Platonic matrix of res potentia is the sufficient condition: "It's a bundle." All^{18}this is encapsulated in the so-called Arrow of Space (AoS), because what we call 'time' is not just 'change in space', but 'change of space' as well:it's a bundle. Hence I model the entire physical world as the 'Brain of the along with specific applications of the equation |w|^{2} = |m| + ^{2}|m for_{i}|^{2}Mathematics, quantum gravity and cosmology, and spacetime engineering. D. Chakalov November 12, 2016 September 10, 2016, gw_miracles.pdf, 6 pages. I argue that vacuum spacetime with T is highly exaggerated^{ab} = 0approximation, like the famous 'spherical cow'. If you are a cowboy and wish only to count the number of cows in your herd, you may of course think of them as 'spherical objects'. But imagine the following situation: as you walk in your grassland, you notice that the grass on a loan has been hardly pressed to the ground, as if some heavy object has passed through your grassland. Would you say that some brand new spherical cows have rolled over the grass? That will be just like GW150914, the alleged discovery of gravitational waves and black holes in vacuum spacetime. More below. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/excerpt.jpg GW150914 is a FRAUD supported by at least 1522 fraudsters:"As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic signature. (...) In classical general relativity, a vacuum BBH merger does not produce any EM or particle emission whatsoever." Vacuum spacetime with T ^{ab} = 0 is highly exaggerated approximation,like a 'spherical cow'. If 1522 people claim to have detected the pattern of perfect spherical cows rolling downhill like a football, don't buy it. It is like pink unicorns dancing with red herrings. Proof: a "vacuum" with T ^{ab} = 0 cannot contain any gravitational energy, so the gravitationalfield cannot "do work on matter and vice versa". Yet Kip Thorne claimsthat GW150914 was "by far the most powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big bang", only it did not produce "any EM or particle emission whatsoever." What a stinky nonsense. If you disagree, you'll have to explain the "connection between compact binary mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts" (Valerie Connaughton et al.,arXiv:1602.03920v3 [astro-ph.HE]) and associate GW150914 with the"transient signal at photon energies > 50 keV (Sic! - D.C.) that lasted 1 s and appeared 0.4 s after the GW signal" (Avi Loeb, arXiv:1602.04735v2 [astro-ph.HE]), which INTEGRAL did not detect (Vova Savchenko et al.,arXiv:1602.04180v2 [astro-ph.HE]). All this in vacuum spacetime, T ^{ab} = 0,which means that "the most powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big bang" (Kip Thorne) could be produced and manifested only and exclusively only by Weyl curvature that "governs the propagation of gravitational radiation through regions of space devoid of matter", without "any EM or particle emission whatsoever." What a pathetic nonsense. LISA Pathfinder is €400+ million scam!http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/GW_fake.pdf http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/scam.jpg http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/scam.pdf http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Schutz.pdf Don’t ever claim that you knew nothing about it. Abstract As an epitaph of the project for so-called GW astronomy, I suggest the famous saying by Confucius: “The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat”. Specific examples are drawn from GW150914 and LISA Pathfinder, to explain why GW astronomy was born dead from the outset. Since the issue of energy transport by gravity is crucial to General Relativity, in the second part of the paper I offer a hypothesis about the origin of gravitational radiation in Relative Scale (RS) spacetime, and outline hypothetical applications of spacetime engineering for producing ecologically clean and unlimited energy by polarization of the so-called light vacuum. Comment: Due to the sensitive nature of clean unlimited energy sources from spin-0 gravitational radiation, the full paper is available only upon request (Matthew 7:6). AbstractEnsuing from first principles, a new theory of spacetime has been suggested, called ‘relative scale spacetime’. It denounces the absolute size of objects at different length scales, thanks to which the phenomena known as quantum state (“just in the middle between possibility and reality”, Heisenberg) and Einstein’s “total field of as yet unknown structure” are unified as potential reality of quantum-gravitational origin (dubbed causal field), endowed with relative-scale metric. At macroscopic scale, it produces what is known as gravitation, without any dark matter nor dark energy. Comment: Dedicated to the centenary of Einstein's General Relativity. the question in 13th century ( Summa Theologiae, Part I, Question 85, Article 8): " Punctum non ponitur in definitione lineae communiter sumptae"(‘A point is not included in the definition of a line as commonly assumed’). It's all about Mathematics. I had the impression that have understood the so-called fictitious force in General Relativity only once, in June 1972 at age 20. It was a beautiful feeling, which lasted until the end of 1973 and never came back. How can we understand something that acts like a force and is related to the entire spacetime, but is a force? Perhaps "inertial effects arise from the gravitational field of a moving universe" (Dennis Sciama, 19 August 1952), provided that its "motion" and "rotation" can be defined with respect to the Universe as ONE.notDownload the red herrings known as "event horizon" and "gravitational-wave astronomy" (horizon.pdf, 29 pages and note.pdf, 38 pages), my message to the Human Brain Project (HBP.pdf, 10 pages), the abstract of the first paper introducing the so-called biocausality (January
1990), the final version of Relative Scale Spacetime from viXra:1410.0194 (2015-11-08 18:34:20, 44 pages) and my comments on it (comments.pdf, 77 pages and censorship.pdf, 27 pages), and the PDF copy of the old (now archived) website plus additional papers, Indefinable.pdf (413 pages, 12,870,245 bytes, 27 June 2017).Forty-five years ago (January 1972), I started this project with the hope to understand the physics of the human brain and learn to harness its tremendous latent abilities (see ref. [ 63] in rs_spacetime.pdf). The reason for seeking new physics was explained on 16 July 1997, 16 July 1998, and 20 December 1998, but nobody showed any interest. I created this website four years ago, on 21 October 2013, but since Maximal Set Theory (see Table 1 on p. 14 in spacetime.pdf) did not attract any attention, I decided to remove the remaining part of my website and archive it on pp. 252-350 in Indefinable.pdf. As Upton Sinclair explained, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”More in my forthcoming book The Brain of The Universe. To paraphrase Johannes Kepler in Harmonices Mundi, it doesn't matter whether my book will be read by my contemporaries or by posterity. Let it await its readers for a hundred years. Has not God (John 1:1) waited an infinite time for an observer?Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com> (last name pronounced tcha-)KA-lovOctober 21, 2013 Latest update: August 21, 2017, 21:34 GMT There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Geist (bewußten intelligenten Geist). This Geist is the matrix of all matter. Geheimrat Max Planck on his 158th birthday, 23 April 2016 |