AbstractEnsuing from first principles, the theory of spacetime and its metaphysical axioms are introduced as prerequisites to physical theology and the so-called relative scale spacetime. Comment: Dedicated to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Easter 2016, 1,577,507 bytes, 36 pages. Also from viXra 1601.0209[vE], 36 pages, 2016-04-06 04:33:42. Notice the new hyperimaginary numbers (see ref. [3] on p. 28). I am interested only and exclusively only in these new numbers,which are expected to provide solutions to various problems in local differential geometry is false. We need totally new global boundary conditions to define a closed and conserved Universe in the past, which is coupled (Sic!) to an evolving Universe in the future (Fig. 7 on p. 8). The new coupling between the past and the future states of the Universe, corresponding to thephenomenon of transience (Heraclitus), requires hyperimaginarynumbers, and clears up the road to spacetime engineering (p. 34) and to understanding the notion of 'limit' and the origin of gravity (no "black holes"). More in pp. 59-70 in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/gravity.pdf The idea of hyperimaginary numbers is suggested as the first steptoward the mathematical basis of res potentia (Plato), presented inthe right-hand side of the evolution equation |w|^{2} = |m| + ^{2}|m._{i}|^{2}The real and imaginary (tachyonic) components in the right-hand side are always balanced, leading to |w|^{2} = 0 — the physicalized world is made of positive mass-energy only, |m|, which is always balanced ^{2}(not "conserved") by equal amount of |m, once-at-a-time, ever _{i}|^{2}since The Beginning (John 1:1). God is interpreted as mathematical (hyperimaginary) object residing “inside” the 4D instant here-and-now (Luke 17:21), and conceptual solutions to fundamental problems in point-set topology, set theory, and number theory are briefly described. D. Chakalov October 22, 2016, 13:31 GMT September 10, 2016, gw_miracles.pdf, 6 pages. Check out also gravity_rotation.pdf (3 pages, August 3, 2016). I argue that vacuum spacetime with T is highly exaggerated^{ab} = 0approximation, like the famous 'spherical cow'. If you are a cowboy and wish only to count the number of cows in your herd, you may of course think of them as 'spherical objects'. But imagine the following situation: as you walk in your grassland, you notice that the grass on a loan has been hardly pressed to the ground, as if some heavy object has passed through your grassland. Would you say that some brand new spherical cows have rolled over the grass? That will be just like GW150914, the alleged discovery of gravitational waves and black holes in vacuum spacetime. More below. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/excerpt.jpg GW150914 is a FRAUD supported by at least 1522 fraudsters:"As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic signature. (...) In classical general relativity, a vacuum BBH merger does not produce any EM or particle emission whatsoever." Vacuum spacetime with T ^{ab} = 0 is highly exaggerated approximation,like a 'spherical cow'. If 1522 people claim to have detected the pattern of perfect spherical cows rolling downhill like a football, don't buy it. It is like pink unicorns dancing with red herrings. Proof: a "vacuum" with T ^{ab} = 0 cannot contain any gravitational energy, so the gravitationalfield cannot "do work on matter and vice versa". Yet Kip Thorne claimsthat GW150914 was "by far the most powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big bang", only it did not produce "any EM or particle emission whatsoever." What a stinky nonsense. If you disagree, you'll have to explain the "connection between compact binary mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts" (Valerie Connaughton et al.,arXiv:1602.03920v3 [astro-ph.HE]) and associate GW150914 with the"transient signal at photon energies > 50 keV (Sic! - D.C.) that lasted 1 s and appeared 0.4 s after the GW signal" (Avi Loeb, arXiv:1602.04735v2 [astro-ph.HE]), which INTEGRAL did not detect (Vova Savchenko et al.,arXiv:1602.04180v2 [astro-ph.HE]). All this in vacuum spacetime, T ^{ab} = 0,which means that "the most powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big bang" (Kip Thorne) could be produced and manifested only and exclusively only by Weyl curvature that "governs the propagation of gravitational radiation through regions of space devoid of matter", without "any EM or particle emission whatsoever." What a pathetic nonsense. LISA Pathfinder is €400+ million scam!http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/GW_fake.pdf http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/scam.jpg http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/scam.pdf http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Schutz.pdf Don’t ever claim that you knew nothing about it. Abstract As an epitaph of the project for so-called GW astronomy, I suggest the famous saying by Confucius: “The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat”. Specific examples are drawn from GW150914 and LISA Pathfinder, to explain why GW astronomy was born dead from the outset. Since the issue of energy transport by gravity is crucial to General Relativity, in the second part of the paper I offer a hypothesis about the origin of gravitational radiation in Relative Scale (RS) spacetime, and outline hypothetical applications of spacetime engineering for producing ecologically clean and unlimited energy by polarization of the so-called light vacuum. Comment: Due to the sensitive nature of clean unlimited energy sources from spin-0 gravitational radiation, the full paper is available only upon request (Matthew 7:6). AbstractEnsuing from first principles, a new theory of spacetime has been suggested, called ‘relative scale spacetime’. It denounces the absolute size of objects at different length scales, thanks to which the phenomena known as quantum state (“just in the middle between possibility and reality”, Heisenberg) and Einstein’s “total field of as yet unknown structure” are unified as potential reality of quantum-gravitational origin (dubbed causal field), endowed with relative-scale metric. At macroscopic scale, it produces what is known as gravitation, without any dark matter nor dark energy. Comment: Dedicated to the centenary of Einstein's General Relativity. the question in 13th century ( Summa Theologiae, Part I, Question 85, Article 8): " Punctum non ponitur in definitione lineae communiter sumptae"(‘A point is not included in the definition of a line as commonly assumed’). It's all about Mathematics. I had the impression that have understood the so-called fictitious force in General Relativity only once, in June 1972 at age 20. It was a beautiful feeling, which lasted until the end of 1973 and never came back. How can we understand something that acts like a force and is related to the entire spacetime, but is a force? Perhaps "inertial effects arise from the gravitational field of a moving universe" (Dennis Sciama, 19 August 1952), provided that its "motion" and "rotation" can be defined with respect to the intangible 'Universe as ONE'.notDownload the red herrings known as "event horizon" and "gravitational-wave astronomy" (horizon.pdf, 29 pages and note.pdf, 38 pages), my message to the Human Brain Project (HBP.pdf, 10 pages), the abstract of the first paper introducing the so-called biocausality (January
1990), the final version of Relative Scale Spacetime from viXra:1410.0194 (2015-11-08 18:34:20, 44 pages) and my comments on it (comments.pdf, 77 pages and censorship.pdf, 27 pages), and the PDF copy of the old (now archived) website plus additional papers, Indefinable.pdf (410 pages, 12,607,337 bytes).Forty-four years ago (January 1972), I started this project with the hope to understand the physics of the human brain and learn to harness its tremendous latent abilities (see ref. [ 63] in rs_spacetime.pdf). The reason for seeking new physics was explained on 16 July 1997, 16 July 1998, and 20 December 1998, but nobody showed any interest. I created this website three years ago, on 21 October 2013, but since Maximal Set Theory (see Table 1 on p. 8 in rs_spacetime.pdf) did not attract any attention, I decided to remove the remaining part of my website and archive it on pp. 249-347 in Indefinable.pdf. As Upton Sinclair explained, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”Pity the academic scholars aren't interested in quantum gravity and Mathematics. In fact, they couldn't care less. My Christmas greeting and info about my latest paper were sent on 20 December 2015 to 156 individuals, none of whom replied in any way whatsoever. More in my forthcoming book, entitled: The Brain of The Universe. To paraphrase Johannes Kepler in Harmonices Mundi, it doesn't matter whether my book will be read by my contemporaries or by posterity. Let it await its readers for a hundred years. Has not God (John 1:1) waited an infinite time for an observer?Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com> (last name pronounced tcha-)KA-lovOctober 21, 2013 Latest update: October 22, 2016, 13:33 GMT -- There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Geist (bewußten intelligenten Geist). This Geist is the matrix of all matter. Geheimrat Max Planck on his 158th birthday, 23 April 2016 |