Comment on Paradigm 2
I believe in the general continuity of things but our minds prefer to operate by considering things in discrete units – we split the passing of time for example into discrete units of seconds and minutes etc.
There are periods when the threads of separate things interact to produce emergent properties and behaviours.
In this early part of the 21st century various threads have entangled to produce the paradigm of a flat world of participation, convergence, personalisation and communication at every level – individual, organisational, national and global. Major features are virtualisation and mediation by the Internet. For the sake of a definition I’ll call this “Paradigm 2”.
Paradigm 2 thinking is one of low barrier, self-service, networked, cost-effective, open, decentralised (Dion Hinchcliffe) and in development (beta).
Paradigm 2 is manifested in things like Web 2, Learning 2 and Enterprise 2
One way to think about paradigm 2 is to compare it with what could be termed paradigm 1. Paradigm 1 thinking is characterised by concepts such as hierarchy, “information is power”, control and blame. All this can lead to learned helplessness and alienation in organisations.
Paradigm 1 is an economy of scale, supplier push and personal consumption.
Paradigm 2 is an economy of scope, personal production and pull. The music industry provides a good example of the pains of paradigm change. In paradigm 1, if there was a sufficient market (scale) the music industry would create and sell a product (push, consume) – the typical CD you would find in a record store or even on-line. Within paradigm 2 anyone can create a product (scope, personal production) and people chose what they want (pull).
To be continued ....