Anders Behring Breivik LINK:http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik

Anders Behring Breivik (Udtalelse: [²ɑnəʂ ²beːɾiŋ ²bɾæɪʋiːk]) (født 13. februar 1979)[1], er en norsk højreekstremistisk mand, som er arresteret for bombningen i Oslo og massakren på Utøya, som fandt sted den 22. juli 2011.[2]

Breiviks far, Jens Breivik, havde tre børn fra hans tidligere ægteskab og Breiviks mor, Wenche Behring, havde en datter. Forældrene blev skilt, da Breivik var et år gammel.[3]

Indholdsfortegnelse

 [skjul

[redigér] Politisk karriere

Breivik var medlem af Fremskrittspartiet (FrP) fra 1999 til 2004. Han var tillige engageret i Fremskrittspartiets Ungdom fra 1997 til 2007.[4]

[redigér] Imod muhamedanisering af vesteuropa

Breivik skrev halvdelen af bogen 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, som handler om kampen mellem kristne og muhamedanere og Breiviks forberedelse til angrebet den 22. juli 2011 mod Arbeiderpartiet, som støtter muhamedanisering af Norge ifølge Breivik.

Anders B. Breivik ytrer nationalistiske holdninger og er stærkt imod multikulturalisme.[2] På sin Facebook-profil beskriver han sig selv som kristen og konservativ. Han går desuden på jagt og udøver ekstremsport.[5] Foruden en Facebook-konto har han også en Twitter-konto, hvor han kun har skrevet en enkelt gang. Den 17. juli skrev han på engelsk: "En person med en tro svarer til kraften af 100.000, som kun har interesser."[6]

Breivik har været aktiv på det indvandringskritiske internetforum document.no, og han har omtalt venstreradikale antiracister som "Stoltenberg jugend" og Gro Harlem Brundtland som "landsmo(r)der".[7] Her har han også kritiseret sit tidligere parti for at være "politisk korrekte karrierepolitikere og ikke på nogen måde idealister, som er villige til at tage risiko eller arbejde for idealistiske mål."[8]

Den 18. maj 2009 oprettede han sit enkeltmandsfirma Breivik Geofarm. Den 9. april 2011 flyttede firmaet adresse fra Hoffsveien i Oslo til Åsta, Rena i Åmot kommune.[9] Firmaet skulle dyrke grønsager, men ifølge naboer har Breivik aldrig dyrket grønsager på gården ved Rena. Jorden er i stedet lejet ud til en bonde.[10] På den gård, som Breivik skal have lejet, var der før 2006 etableret en hashplantage. Tre personer blev idømt lange fængselstraffe i den forbindelse.[11] Han er registreret i våbenregistret og skulle være i besiddelse af en Glock-pistol, et jagtgevær og et haglgevær. Han er medlem af Oslo pistolklub.[2]

[redigér] Identificering

[redigér] Første gisninger

Den 22. juli var gerningsmandens identitet endnu ukendt for offentligheden og forskellige gisninger og øjenvidneberetninger fremkom. Således mente den svenske terrorekspert Magnus Ranstorp, at det sandsynligvis var al-Qaida, der stod bag terrorangrebet i Oslo.[12] Professor Tore Bjørgo ved den norske Politihøjskole mente derimod, at informationerne pegede på, at gerningsmanden havde en baggrund i højreekstreme kredse.[13] På baggrund af skuddramaet i Utøya ændrede Magnus Ranstorp timer senere mening og angav nu, at det kunne være en enkelt galnings værk.[14]

Nogle tidlige rapporter hævdede, at en gruppe ved navn Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami (Hjælpere af den globale jihad) havde taget ansvaret for bombningen. En amerikansk embedsmand sagde at gruppen var ukendt og måske ikke eksisterede.[15]

Ifølge en terrorekspert udtalte en ekstremist ved navn Abu Suleiman til angrebet:

I dag ble Norge et mål for å lære en lekse til resten av nasjonene i Europa. Vi har tidligere truet med operasjoner som det i Stockholm, og vi krevde at europeiske nasjoner trekker tilbake sine styrker

Suleiman trak dog senere udtalelsen tilbage. På et Internetforum tilknyttet Al-Qaida skrev en bruger "Amir Grozny" at hvis ikke de norske styrker trak sig ud af Afghanistan "vil se deres blod snart rende i gaderne." [16]

[redigér] Vidners beretning

Manden, der skød på Utøya, blev beskrevet som nordisk af udseende 185-190 cm høj og med blond hår.[17] Simen Brænden Mortensen, der var AUF-vagt på fastlandet, fortalte, at manden kom i en sølvgrå varebil, var iført politiuniform og skudsikker vest, talte østlandsdialekt og måske var i 30'erne eller 40'erne.[18] Et vidne berettede at have set en mistænkelig skikkelse i politiuniform to minutter før bombesprængningen i Oslo.[19]

[redigér] Mediernes identificering

Efter midnat mellem den 22. og 23. juli fik medierne identificeret den formodede gerningsmand som den 32-årige Anders Behring Breivik, og han blev samtidig beskrevet som nationalistisk og højreekstrem. Ud over en mindre trafikforseelse er han ukendt af politiet. Han har heller ikke forbindelse til militæret udover almindelig værnepligt. Han skal være medlem af en frimurerloge.[20]

Politiets usikkerhed bevirkede at de i de kaotiske timer den 22. juli anholdt den uskyldige 17-årige Anzor Djoukaev, der havde været med på AUF's sommerlejr og var blevet jaget rundt af drabsmanden som alle de andre deltagere. Politiet afhørte Djoukaev i flere timer og fængslede ham indtil næste dag. Da de afhørte ham endnu engang den 23. glemte de at tilbyde ham en forsvarsadvokat, men løslod ham dog efter en time. Efterfølgende forklarede politiet den fejlagtige anholdelse med at Djoukaev virkede upåvirket og kold i forhold til de andre AUF-deltagere, og at de frygtede at en gerningsmand havde blandet sig med ofrene.[21]

Politiet anholdt Breivik og ransagede efterfølgende hans lejlighed i Oslo.[22] Han er blevet sigtet efter straffelovens § 147a, der omhandler terrorisme for både bombesprængningen i Oslos centrum, samt den efterfølgende nedskydning på øen Utøya. Strafferammen for denne bestemmelse er op til 21 års fængsel.[23]

Den 23. juli oplyste politiet ved et pressemøde, at det havde sigtet Breivik efter terrorparagrafen i den norske lovgivning (paragraf 147.A, almenfarlig forbrydelse) hvor straframmen er optil 21 års fængsel.[24]

[redigér] Attentatforsøg

Den 25. juli 2011 forsøgte to unge nordmænd med indvandrerbaggrund at angribe den politibil, som Breivik formentlig blev kørt til retten i.[25]

Oslo Tingret

[redigér] Retsag

Geir Lippestad påtog sig hvervet som advokat for den sigtede.

Den terrorsigtede blev fremstillet for varetægtsfængsling ved et retsmøde mandag den 25. juli i tingsretten i Oslo med Kim Heger som dommer. På begæring fra politiet blev dørene lukket.[26] Efter et kort retsmøde bestemte dommeren at den sigtede skulle varetægsfængsles i 8 uger med isolationsfængsling og brev-, besøgs- og medieforbud i 4 uger.[27] Den sigtede erkendte de faktiske forhold men ikke sin straffeskyld.

Ved retsmødet ønskede den sigtede at stille i uniform og udtale sig på engelsk.[28] Før retsmødet foranstaltede politiet en røntgen-skanning af Breivik for at sikre sig at han ikke havde skjult en detonator til en mulig bombe.[29]

[redigér] Breiviks motiv

Ifølge 2083 er Breivik en Justiciar Knight Commander.

[redigér] 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence

Breiviks bog 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence handler om kampen mellem kristne og muhamedanere. Breivik hævder, at muhamedanere er ved at føre en demografisk krig, som kaldes tredje bølge af jihad.[30] Et vrængbillede, iført i en burka, viser sin mave, der er en bombe med en tændt lunte. Den 11. September 2083 vil den tredje jihad bølge have været slået tilbage ... nøjagtigt 400 år efter vi vandt Slaget ved Wien. Sejren skal fejres som uafhængighedsdag for alle vesteuropæere.[31]. I 2083 vil han have at alle europæer er kristne.

Justiciar Knights beskrives som efterfølgere af tempelridderne (Knights Templar på engelsk). På Breiviks uniform ses et rødt kors formet som et stikvåben, der er stukket igennem en hjerneskål med stjernen og halvmånen, hammer og segl og hagekors på panden. Justiciar knight mærket belyser vores patriotiske kamp/modstrid med alle tre primære had-tankeverdener i vores tid: muhamedanisme, multikulturalisme (kommunisme) og nazime, skriver Breivik.[32]

Ifølge 2083 afgjorde justiciar knights i London i 2002, at 40000 mennesker skulle dræbes, fordi de støtter muhamedanisering af vesteuropa. Nummer et på dødslisten over 100 partier (MA100) er Det norske Arbeiderparti.[33]

[redigér] Kilder, noter og referencer

  1. Oslo Tingret
  2. 2,0 2,1 2,2 Jarle Brenna og andre. "Pågrepet 32-åring kalte seg selv nasjonalistisk", VG, 23. juli 2011.
  3. Fra 2083: My father, Jens Breivik, had three children from a former marriage ...
  4. Kristine Grue Langset. "Terrorsiktet hadde verv i Fpu", rb.no, 23. juli 2011.
  5. "Anders Behring Breivik". http://nb-no.facebook.com/people/Anders-Behring-Breivik/100002651290254. 
  6. twitter
  7. Helge Øgrim. "Skremmende hat", journalisten.no, 23. juli 2011.
  8. nettavisen.no
  9. "Breivik Geofarm". Proff. http://www.proff.no/roller/breivik-geofarm/-/-/994089269/. 
  10. Liv Solli Okkenhaug, Christian Nicolaisen. "Dyrket aldri noen grønnsaker her", bt.no, 23. juli 2011.
  11. Erlend Langeland Haugen. "Kjøpte seks tonn kunstgjødsel", bt.no, 23. juli 2011.
  12. "Svensk terrorekspert mener al-Qaida står bak", Aftenposten, 22. juli 2011.
  13. "Ekspert peker mot høyreekstreme miljøer", NRK, 22. juli 2011.
  14. "Terrorekspert: Passer ikke med al-Qaida", VG, 23. juli 2011.
  15. Elisa Mala og J. David Goodman. "At Least 80 Dead in Norway Shooting".
  16. Ida Halvorsen Kemp. "Terrorgruppe hevder å stå bak angrepet", Aftenposten, 22. juli 2011.
  17. Siv Sandvik og andre. "Flere unge skutt på Utøya – mann pågrepet", NRK, 22. juli 2011.
  18. Gjermund Glesnes. "AUF-vakt på Utøya: «Det kommer en sølvgrå varebil. I den sitter en politimann iført politiuniform og skuddsikker vest»", VG, 22. juli 2011.
  19. Robin Reistand Fiske. "Vitne så mistenkelig mann i politiuniform to minutter før bombeangrepet", Dagbladet, 22. juli 2011.
  20. Oddvin Aune (23. juli 2011). "32-åringen skal tilhøre høyreekstremt miljø". NRK. http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/norge/1.7723548. 
  21. Katja Sønder Tuxen. "Utøya-overlevende var mistænkt i 17 timer", DR, 12. august 2011.
  22. aftenbadet.no
  23. tv2.dk
  24. Kristian Jakobsen. "Sigtes efter norsk terrorparagraf", TV 2 Nyhederne.
  25. »Han skal dø« - Globalt | www.b.dk
  26. Eivind Fondenes. "Fengslingsmøtet går for lukkede dører", TV2, 25. juli 2011.
  27. Birthe Steen Hansen. "Breivik fengsles i åtte uker", TV2 (Norge), 25. juli 2011.
  28. (liio). "Breivik ville tale engelsk", TV2, 2. august 2011.
  29. NTB. "Breivik skannet med røntgen", HA, 13. august 2011.
  30. Fra 2083: Europe is under siege by Islam. It is under demographical siege. In order for us, the resistance, to do what is required of us we need to properly analyse and comprehend demographical data. Og: European demographical studies, especially in the Balkans and elsewhere, confirm that the Global Islamic Ummah has deliberately waged a demographic warfare against Eastern Europe since the fall of the Christian Byzantine Empire.
  31. Fra 2083: By September 11th, 2083, the third wave of Jihad will have been repelled and the cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist hegemony in Western Europe will be shattered and lying in ruin, exactly 400 years after we won the battle of Vienna on September 11th, 1683. Og: The Battle of Vienna in 1683 should be celebrated as the Independence Day for all Western Europeans as it was the beginning of the end for the second Islamic wave of Jihads.
  32. Fra 2083: The badge of the Justiciar Knight illustrates out patriotic struggle/opposition against all three primary hate ideologies of out times: Islam, Multiculturalism (Communism) and Nazism.
  33.  Fra 2083: There are approximately 400 000 category A and B traiters in Western Europe og: Punishment is pending awaiting effectuation by Justiciar Knights. anders behring breivik
 
 

Anders Behring Breivik in two different attacks on 22 July 2011 became the worst mass murderer in modern Scandinavian history. He killed a total of 77 people, 8 with a car bomb outside a government office building in central Oslo, and the remaining 69 with a massacre of unprecedented scope and brutality when he spent nearly an hour and a half methodically shooting people attending a summer camp of the Workers’ Youth League (AUF) on the island of Utøya outside of Oslo. He also wounded many others, mentally and physically.

ABB has confessed to carrying out these attacks, claiming that his actions were “atrocious but necessary.” There is also plenty of technical evidence, with videos and numerous witnesses. This represents a rather rare case where we can be virtually 100% that the man who is in custody really did commit the crime in question.

Other things remain controversial, however. Due to the great scope of the massacre, many people, myself included, initially wondered whether there were several perpetrators. Norwegian police after conducting months of investigation claim that ABB acted alone and was not part of a wider terror network. Perhaps this made him harder for the security services to detect.

This brings us to the first question: What caused him to carry out these horrible acts? In the long manifesto which he circulated on the Internet to justify his atrocities, he quoted a large number of people — with myself among the most prominent — who are critical of Islam and the current immigration policies supported by Western governments. This triggered a lot of public animosity against this community of writers.

And the second question: Is Breivik sane or insane?

This is the subject I will focus on here.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

After careful examination, a panel of experts confirmed in December 2011 that Breivik is to be considered criminally insane. The head of the panel of experts, Karl Heinrik Melle, said there was “no major objection” to the initial report published by the psychiatrists Synne Sørheim og Torgeir Husby. They found that ABB suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and cannot be held accountable for his actions. The panel’s conclusions were submitted to the Oslo district court. In their 243-page report, Sørheim og Husby painted a picture of a person with “grandiose illusions” who is incapable of living peacefully in a modern society in his present state. I will take a closer look a what their report reveals.

In January 2012, an Oslo court ordered a new psychiatric evaluation of ABB after this earlier, contested report found him insane. “Due to the gravity of this case, the criminal responsibility (of Behring Breivik) must be examined again,” Oslo District Court judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen stated. Two new experts, Agnar Aspaas and Terje Tørrisen, were named to evaluate the 32-year-old’s sanity before the beginning of his trial in April. Breivik refused through his lawyer to cooperate with the probe. “He feels the first report was 80-percent wrong,” his main defense lawyer Geir Lippestad said after informing his client of the judges’ decision.

Verdens Gang (VG), Norway’s largest national newspaper, in mid-January 2012 published on its website the full psychiatric report which had concluded that Breivik is insane, leaving out a few pages that were deemed to reveal too-intimate details about Breivik’s family. This report is confidential, but VG have previously proved that they have access to lots of confidential material related to the Breivik case. The 243-page report published by them looks authentic and is consistent with what was publicly known previously. I have also heard no claims to the contrary from the quoted psychiatrists themselves or from anybody else. For the purposes of this analysis, I will treat it as authentic.

Alongside it the newspaper published some comments from the prison where ABB has been held while awaiting trial. Those who work there can see no evidence that Breivik is currently psychotic, as the psychiatrists claim in their report.

I am unhappy with the many media leaks in this case, which combined have reached a point where they undermine the ability of the police to talk to witnesses and conduct a proper investigation. Nevertheless, it is better that the mass media leak a psychiatric report regarding the terrorist himself as opposed to sensitive testimonies from his many victims. I read this report in its entirety, partly out of genuine curiosity and partly due to my own involuntary involvement in this horrible case. The following page references are to the original Norwegian psychiatric evaluation of Breivik as published by VG, with my own English comments and translations.

ABB came off as polite, but emotionally flat, in talks with psychiatrists Synne Sørheim og Torgeir Husby. He cannot properly describe his own emotions. Breivik claims to be a perfect knight worthy of emulation and to have made a lot of money with his many employees, which isn’t factually true. Evidence indicates that he was a failure in his commercial dealings. The psychiatrists interpret this and other factors as enormous psychotic delusions betraying a grossly inflated ego. His extreme narcissism and exceptionally egocentric mental universe with nearly all-encompassing ideas of grandeur dominate his behavior, regardless of context.

ABB is convinced that he is extraordinary, that he leaves a lasting positive impression on everybody around him, that everybody remembers him with awe, that he stands out from the crowd and achieves great success wherever he goes. In real life, he moved back to his mother’s house after his career failed. He did reasonably well in school and is estimated to have at least average and possibly above-average intelligence, yet he still did not complete secondary school. He describes his own actions in intimate, banal and almost embarrassing detail in his manifesto because he believes his personal example will form a template for others to follow and emulate.

He mentions his favorite candy and ranks this as proper rewards for incredibly brave military operators like himself. Breivik is convinced that his personal habits of watching TV, drinking coffee and eating candy are of genuine geopolitical significance due to his own immense importance, and because they strengthen his battle morale as the perfect knight. He is vain, and had plastic surgery on his face.

On page 183 of the psychiatric report, Breivik is asked if he thinks he has any significant weaknesses. “No, I lack nothing, I am a good builder of alliances, I am interesting, have good looks, and no real flaws,” he replies.

Breivik is, according to himself, very modest and a perfect knight. He’s also extremely intelligent and ranks among the intellectual giants of the political Right. ABB calls himself an “attention-seeking whore” (page 162), representing a rare moment of insight.

He also suggests we should take DNA samples of everybody from the political Right in Norway to see who is most closely related to Harald Fairhair, traditionally seen as Norway’s first national king, in order to appoint a new king (page 185). He says that if he promotes himself as the new regent, people will think he is crazy.

Cynical observers might claim that train left the station long ago.

On a darker note, on page 234 the officially appointed psychiatrists conclude that “He thinks he has responsibility for deciding who should live or die in the country.” Breivik claims (page 201) that if nobody wants to work with him or continue his glorious work after his attacks, he has misjudged the overall situation so badly that he may “self-terminate” after the trial. This is among the reasons why the psychiatrists have classified him as potentially suicidal, although he does not presently display any visible signs of depression and is not known to have suffered any episodes of severe depression in the past. Up until now he has never expressed the slightest regret for the many murders he committed, and shows no remorse for what he has done.

Breivik has been widely labeled as “anti-Islamic” in the mass media because, as an excuse for his murderous acts, he quotes writers who warn against Islamic inroads in the West. However, there is another side to that story. As a terrorist himself he actually displays admiration for Islamic militant groups and is even willing to accept a renewed Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East. The latter overlaps directly with the stated goals of large international organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, and can hardly be called “anti-Islamic.”

ABB indicates that he wants to glorify death and martyrdom through his words and deeds. Very similar sentiments that have been voiced on countless occasions by Jihadist operatives from Hamas, Hizbollah or other Muslim groups around the world. Breivik says explicitly, as noted on page 163 of the report, that after his terror attacks, what he calls militant cultural conservatives in Europe can now “live in the same way as the Islamists.”

Thomas Hegghammer, a senior research fellow at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment, wrote in the New York Times that “Breivik goes much further than any counterjihad ideologue has ever done, and his manifesto contains ideas and information that have no precedent in the counterjihad literature. For example, he provides extensive advice on how to build bombs and plan terrorist attacks.” Moreover, “the more belligerent part of Mr. Breivik’s ideology has less in common with counterjihad than with its archenemy, Al Qaeda.”

Breivik believes that he is a perfect example for others to follow, worthy of emulation even down to the most intimate and banal details of his private life. The entire world should revolve around his unique person as a supreme military-political genius and master of life and death. Grandiose delusions of this magnitude are fortunately rare, but not unheard of. If you believe traditional historical sources (not everybody does), an Arab man called Mohammed suffered from comparable delusions in the seventh century of our era.

Author John L. Esposito is widely seen as an apologist for Islam by his critics and ranks as one of the most pro-Islamic writers alive today. In his book Islam: The Straight Path, page 13-14, Esposito reminds his readers that Mohammed serves as the ideal model for Muslim life, providing the pattern that all Islamic believers are to emulate and “guidance in all aspects of life: how to treat friends as well as enemies, what to eat and drink, how to make love and war.” He is the “living Koran” in the sense that practices of the Prophet became a material source of Islamic law alongside the Koran itself:

“His impact on Muslim life cannot be overestimated, since he served as both religious and political head of Medina: prophet of God, ruler, military commander, chief judge, lawgiver. As a result, the practice of the Prophet, his Sunna or example, became the norm for community life. Muslims observed and remembered stories about what the Prophet said and did. These reports or traditions (hadith) were preserved and passed on in oral and written form. The corpus of hadith literature reveals the comprehensive scope of Muhammad’s example; he is the ideal religiopolitical leader as well as the exemplary husband and father. Thus when many Muslims pray five times each day or make the pilgrimage to Mecca, they seek to pray as the Prophet prayed, without adding or subtracting from the way Muhammad is reported to have worshipped. Traditions of the Prophet provide guidance for personal hygiene, dress, eating, marriage, treatment of wives, diplomacy, and warfare.”

Islam is not just a total way of life; it is a totalitarian way of life. Not even Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin, representing the most totalitarian strands of European thought, said that everybody in the entire world should from now on visit the bathroom in the same manner they did. Mohammed did exactly that.

Or, putting it in a more provocative manner, one could say that Islam is a creed stating that those who urinate like Mohammed should wage war against the rest of mankind until they, too, urinate like Mohammed.

Theologically speaking, what I write here is exaggerated, but not incorrect. Muslims are expected to emulate all aspects of Mohammed’s personal example or Sunna, including bathroom etiquette, and spread these manners to the rest of planet by any means necessary.

Based on these examples, one could be tempted to conclude that Anders Behring Breivik, with his extreme narcissism and desire for others to emulate his perfect personal example, represents a Nordic Mohammed.

To be continued shortly…

kommer samtidigt på Snaphanen og Gates of Vienna

For a complete archive of Fjordman’s writings, see the multi-index listing in the Fjordman Files.
 
 
link til hejmmesider om anders behring breivik

Blot få uger efter den ophedede debat om et dansk teaterstykke med massemorderen Anders Behring Breiviks manifest som omdrejningspunkt rasede herhjemme, sætter hollænderne deres eget Breivik-stykke op.

Et hollandsk teatercenter vil nemlig vise et stykke, hvor Breivik skal møde den højreorienterede hollandske politiker Geert Wilders i en lufthavn. Det oplyser TV2.

Kultur-, debat- og teatercentret De Balie oplyser, at det vil forsøge at få svar på spørgsmålet: Hvad har Geert Wilders og Anders Breivik tilfælles - og hvad adskiller dem?

Stykket vil ikke provokere, fortæller direktør Yoeri Albrecht til Kulturen på News. Målet er derimod at diskutere, hvorfor en mand ender som ekstremt udøvende terrorist.

- Hvis man ser på det, der skete på Utøya, så er det så ondt og uforståeligt, at det er godt at gennemarbejde det - at arbejde med det for at forstå og måle dets implikationer, Der har været meget snak i Holland og internationalt om roden til Breiviks idéer, og hvor man kan placere skylden for det, forklarer han.

Forestillingen vil blive opført den 22. og 25. marts i Amsterdam.

 

    Lilleør

Når noget bliver ”stemplet som umenneskeligt”, må teaterchef for Cafe Teatret Christian Lollike undersøge og forstå det. Han mener, at det er kunstens opgave. Intet mindre. Frisk er Christian Lollike derfor sammen med skuespiller Olaf Højgaard gået i gang med at skrive en monolog på baggrund af Anders Behring Breiviks ”Manifest”. Lidt for friskt. Højgaard og Lollike er blevet mødt med beskyldninger om, at de slår plat på en tragedie. For som Per Balch Sørensen, far til Breiviks danske offer, har sagt: ”Det er alt for tæt på. Jeg oplever det, som om nogen forsøger at tjene penge på andres sorg.”

Breivik sendte sit 1500 sider lange ”Manifest” på mail til 10.000 adresser, umiddelbart inden han gik ud for at skyde i flæng. At skabe et teaterstykke alene med replikker, skrevet af Breivik selv, er mere end Breivik kunne drømme om. Teaterchef for Det Norske Teater i Oslo Erik Ulfsby kalder da også Lollike og Højgaard ”nyttige idioter, der danser efter Breiviks pibe”. Højgaard og Lollike har med deres højrøstede lancering af deres manuskriptarbejde opnået at lægge sig i uskøn forlængelse af sensationspressens laveste fællesnævner. Den presse, der vender alle sider af en morders personlighed, og som byder læserne indenfor til et perverst gys, når der svælges i det destruktive menneske.

At Christian Lollike virkelig er på powershopping i den norske tragedie, forråder denne interview-udtalelse: ”Lige så snart noget bliver stemplet som umenneskeligt, føler jeg en stærk trang til at tilegne mig det, forstå det, komme ind i det og finde ud af, hvad det er. Det er det, som i mine øjne er kunstens opgave”. Læs det to gange. Har vi som en fordomsfuld samtid ”stemplet” Breivik eller er hans handlinger nu og til alle tider selve definitionen på umenneskelighed? Den sørgende far Per Balch Sørensen fornemmer intuitivt, hvilken vej teaterstykket kan gå og siger derfor: ”Stykket bliver en slags accept af hans (Breiviks) handlinger”.

 
 
 
ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK I OSLO
 
 

A controversial play based on the manifesto of Norwegian gunman Anders Behring Breivik is to be staged in the city where his attack began.

Following its premiere in Denmark this August, produced by Café Teatret, a second production of Manifesto 2083 will be staged at the Drama House (Dramatikken Hus) in Oslo. The theatre is less than a kilometre away from the car bomb Breivik planted outside Oslo's government buildings on 22 July last year, which killed eight people, before he travelled to Utøya Island and murdered a further 69 people.

Breivik, whose trial begins in April, has confessed to the killings but denies criminal guilt.

The Drama House's artistic director Kai Johnsen told Agence France-Presse: "Naturally, the problems linked to 22 July have been widely discussed in the public debate for months, but the language used has until now been primarily legalese, journalese and, most recently, psychiatric."

He continued: "I think art is an important voice to understand and decipher the problems [raised by the attacks]."

Café Teatret's planned production has already been the subject of criticism, with the father of one of the victims describing the play as "an acceptance of his [Breivik's] acts".

The head of the association of victims, Trond Henry Blattmann, who also lost his son in the attacks, told AFP: "We have nothing against a debate on the views on the extreme right. We know that books, films and why not theatre pieces will see the light of day."

"But we cannot accept the project's format with a monologue based on Breivik's writings."

Johnsen, however, has stressed the wider cultural importance of Manifesto 2083, the title of which refers to the year in which Breivik believed his ideology would come to fruition.

"We have to have the greatest understanding and greatest respect for what the families of the victims and the survivors are going through," he said. "But it was not only an attack against a certain number of people, their families and their friends. It was an attack against society as a whole."

In January, Café Teatret's artistic director Christian Lollike, who will play the rightwing extremist in the Danish production, defended the play in similar terms. "What I'm afraid of is that Breivik's way of thinking will be left alone and will not be probed and reflected on. The reasoning behind his actions are not unique. They express a political and ideological point of view. This can happen again."

 

KILDE: http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/utoya

Anders Behring Breivik begik drab og terror i Oslo og på øen Utøya fredag den 22/7 2011. Den 32-årige nordmand havde forberedt de brutale angreb i mere end ni år.

KILDE:  http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/utoya

 Hvad er det for et menneske, der står bag tragedien i Norge, hvor 76 børn, unge og ældre blev dræbt .

 

 

     

Comments