Kathrin Schlafmann

News

• May '24: paper "Designing Pension Plans According to Consumption-Savings Theory" accepted at RFS!

• October '23: paper "Overpersistence Bias in Individual Income Expectations and its Aggregate Implications" published in AEJ:Macro!

• April '23:  paper "Expectation and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy" is R&R at JPE!

• November '22:  I have been awarded a Sapere Aude Starting Grant from the Independent Research Fund Denmark!

Workshop:  Household Savings and Macroprudential Regulation (Copenhagen 29/30 May 2024)

workshop program

CV

curriculum vitae [pdf]

Research Interests

Household Finance, Macroeconomics, Real Estate

Working Papers

Designing Pension Plans According to  Consumption-Savings Theory (NEW DRAFT!) (with Ofer Setty and Roine Vestman), accepted at Review of Financial Studies, previous version: CEPR Discussion Paper 17489

We derive optimal characteristics of contribution rates into defined-contribution pension plans based on consumption-savings theory. Contribution rates should increase with age and decrease with the balance-to-income ratio. Using registry data from Sweden, we show that on average, individuals save according to those principles. However, almost half of the population behaves hand-to-mouth and does not undo the mandated constant contribution rates. In a quantitative model, designing contribution rates to follow the principles implies a 1.8% welfare gain, and less dispersed replacement rates, while maintaining the same average replacement rate. Results are robust to various sources of model misspecification, including temptation preferences.

Expectation and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy (with Tobias Broer, Alexandre Kohlhas, and Kurt Mitman), R&R at Journal of Political Economy, CEPR Discussion Paper 15934

We document systematic differences in macroeconomic expectations across U.S. households and rationalize our findings with a theory of information choice. We embed this theory into an incomplete-markets model with aggregate risk. Our model is quantitatively consistent with the pattern of expectation heterogeneity in the data. Relative to a full-information counterpart, our model implies substantially increased macroeconomic volatility and inequality. We show through the example of a wealth tax that neglecting the information channel leads to erroneous conclusions about the effects of macroeconomic policies. While in the model without information choice a wealth tax reduces wealth inequality, in our framework it reduces information acquired in the economy, leading to increased volatility and higher top-end wealth inequality in equilibrium.

Work in Progress

Lumpy Durable Purchases and Marginal Propensities to Consume (with Filip Rozsypal)

Household Savings and Macroprudential Regulation (with Matilda Kilstrom, Ofer Setty and Roine Vestman)

Publications

Overpersistence Bias in Individual Income Expectations and its Aggregate Implications (with Filip Rozsypal), American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(4), October 2023, pp.331-371.

Using micro level data, we document systematic forecast errors in household income expectations that are related to the level of income. We show that these errors can be formalized by a modest deviation from rational expectations, where agents overestimate the persistence of their income process. We then investigate the implications of these distortions on consumption and savings behavior and find two effects. First, these distortions allow an otherwise fully optimization-based quantitative model to match the joint distribution of liquid assets and income. Second, the bias alters the distribution of marginal propensities to consume which makes government stimulus policies less effective.

On the Possibility of Krusell-Smith Equilibria (with Tobias Broer, Alexandre Kohlhas, and Kurt Mitman), Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 141,  August 2022, 104391.

Solutions to macroeconomic models with wealth inequality and aggregate shocks often rely on the assumption of limited but common information among households. We show that this assumption is inconsistent with rational information choice for plausible information costs. To do so, we embed information choice into the workhorse heterogeneous-agent model with aggregate risk (Krusell and Smith, 1998). First, we demonstrate that the benefits of acquiring more precise information about the state of the economy depend crucially on household wealth. Second, we show that such heterogeneous incentives to acquire information combine with the strategic substitutability of savings choices to imply that equilibria in which households acquire the same information do not exist for plausible information costs. Finally, we document that a representative-agent equilibrium may not exist even in the absence of exogenous sources of wealth heterogeneity.

Housing, Mortgages, and Self-Control, Review of Financial Studies, 34(5), May 2021, pp.2648–2687.

Using a quantitative theoretical framework this paper analyzes how problems of self-control influence housing and mortgage decisions. The results show that people with stronger problems of self-control are less likely to become homeowners, even though houses serve as commitment for saving. The paper then investigates the welfare effects of regulating mortgage products if people differ in their degree of self-control. Holding house prices fixed, higher down payment requirements and restrictions on refinancing turn out to be beneficial to people with sufficiently strong problems of self-control, even though these policies restrict access to the commitment device.

•  in the media:    podcast "Rig på viden"

Rules of Thumb in Life-Cycle Saving Decisions (with Joachim Winter and Ralf Rodepeter), Economic Journal, 122, May 2012, pp.479–501 (Matlab code)

We analyse life-cycle saving decisions when households use simple heuristics, or rules of thumb, rather than solve the underlying intertemporal optimisation problem. We simulate life-cycle saving decisions using three simple rules and compute utility losses relative to the solution of the optimisation problem. Our simulations suggest that utility losses induced by following simple decision rules are relatively low. Moreover, the two main saving motives reflected by the canonical life-cycle model – long-run consumption smoothing and short-run insurance against income shocks – can be addressed quite well by saving rules that do not require computationally demanding tasks, such as backwards induction.

last updated: 13 September 2024