58

HEGELIANISM IN NEOCONSERVATISM - Chapter 58- KALKI GAUR 

 

Chapter 58

Hegelianism in Neocnservatism

“MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” Kalki Gaur © 2006 Copyrights. http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/

(0)(35) Clash of Idealistic Hegelianism Vs Materialist Terrorism

(00) Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 92, Chapter 3.

(1) Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism

(Chapter 3. Page 92. 3(1) Abstract: Christian philosophers and scholars should interpret Christian Scripture. The legislators are better suited than priests to decide on doctrinal controversies. The dictatorship of the priests is an evil concept. The sovereign states and sovereign empires have totalitarian powers and exercise political control over religion, religious clergy, religious scriptures and religious dogmas. Christian United States’ President, Senate and Congress should have a final word on Christian dogma creed liturgy and theology. Since White House is the seat of the most powerful Christian Ruler in the world, it should have a final authority over all sects of the Christian Church in the Christian World. President of the United States should have the authority to enforce that Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of Thomas and other Gnostic Gospels recognized as the Christian canonical Gospels in the United States. In 2006 the Gospel of Judas resurfaced first time in 1700 years and in 2006 for the first time the Protestant at the White House is the preponderant Christian King of the world. In the 21st Century a global alliance of the swords of inclusive tolerant religions and eclectic ideologies shall break the swords of exclusive intolerant religions and murderous ideologies, to give deathblows to forces of extremism, fundamentalism, murderous intolerance and tyrannies. This should be the goal of America’s war on global terrorism.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page.

(2) 3(1) Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism

Chapter 3. Page 537. One. Christian philosophers and scholars should interpret Christian Scripture. Christian priests and Christian Church should accept the scriptural interpretation of the laity philosophers and laity scholars. The philosophers are better suited than priests to interpret the Scripture. The Religious Scripture is too important to be left for the discretion of religious priests conspiring for the dictatorships of the priests. The guiding principle of Protestantism Reformation Hegelianism Idealism and Neo-Conservatism is that the philosophers and scholars should interpret the Christian and Islamic Scriptures not the priests.

Two. It is a basic tenet of democracy that the legislatures should have a final say on the Scriptures of the Religions of the Swords, so that Priests may not misinterpret Scripture to promote Apocalypse Armageddon and End of Time eschatological teleology. The legislators are better suited than priests to decide on doctrinal controversies. Since false or conflicting interpretation causes civil wars and communal riots, it is the responsibility of the democratically elected legislature to have a final say on the interpretation of the Christian, Islamic and Judaic Scriptures.

Three. The dictatorship of the priests is an evil concept. The democracies cannot permit the Catholic clergy to develop ambitions of dictatorships of the priests. The priest-ruled states are an anathema for the modernity. The modern democratic states are justified to undertake preemptive attacks to destroy theocratic states.

Four. The nation states are sovereign and independent and they are not subservient to the higher claims of the Papacy. The sovereignty jointly resides in the Legislature and the head of the State and the head of the Government. The sovereign states and sovereign empires have totalitarian powers and exercise political control over religion, religious clergy, religious scriptures and religious dogmas.

Five. Christian United States’ President, Senate and Congress should have a final word on Christian dogma creed liturgy and theology. The political Christian king residing at the White House and the Legislators at the Capitol Hill should lead control and supervise Christian Clergy, Christian Church and decide on issues related to Christian Dogma, Christian Creed, Christian Bible and Christian Gospels.

Neo-Conservatism wants the Christian hegemon at the White House to enforce that Gnostic Apostolic Gospels, such as Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of Sofia of Jesus Christ and Gospel of Truth are recognized as canonical Gospels in the Universal Christian Holy Bible.

Six. The Protestant and Hindu civilizations should not hesitate to use the Sword of idealism tolerance inclusion diversity to blunt the divisive murderous Swords of the Religions of the Swords. In 21st Century the Sword of inclusive tolerant Religions and democratic Ideologies is stronger than the Sword of exclusive intolerant iconoclast religions and murderous ideologies. In the 21st Century the civilizational Sword of diversity inclusion and tolerance namely, the Sword of Protestant America and the Sword of Hindu India in 2006 mightier than the Sword of Papacy as well as the Sword of Islam.

Seven. Since White House is the seat of the most powerful Christian Ruler in the world, it should have a final authority over all sects of the Christian Church in the Christian World. The European Union’s Parliament should have the final authority on all aspects of Catholic Church and Protestant Church in Western Christendom. Neo-conservatism advocates that the King of Reformed Christianity residing at the White House must leverage the might of Sword of inclusive tolerant Christianity to enforce reforms in Papacy, Roman Catholic Church, Orthodox Christian Church and Protestant Church to make Christianity inclusive tolerant religion again, as it was during the times of Jesus, Apostles and Gnostic Apostolic Christianity, to avert the specter of Apocalypse and Armageddon in the 21st Century.

Eight. President of the United States should have the authority to enforce that Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of Thomas and other Gnostic Gospels recognized as the Christian canonical Gospels in the United States. In 2006 the Gospel of Judas resurfaced first time in 1700 years and in 2006 for the first time the Protestant at the White House is the preponderant Christian King of the world.

Nine. Neo-Conservatism seeks to amend the US Constitution, to modify the Constitutional wall separating the State and the Church in favor of the State, so that President residing at the White House recognized as the titular Christian King and Head of Western Christianity and Universal Christian Church of all sects and denominations, including Catholic Church, Protestant Church and Non-Denominational Church. The White House and the Capitol Hill should have a final say on all aspects of Christian theology, liturgy, dogmas, canonical Gospels and contents of the Christian Bible.

Ten. In the 21st Century a global alliance of the swords of inclusive tolerant religions and eclectic ideologies shall break the swords of exclusive intolerant religions and murderous ideologies, to give deathblows to forces of extremism, fundamentalism, murderous intolerance and tyrannies. This should be the goal of America’s war on global terrorism. These are the arguments author develops in this Chapter.

3(2) Talk Points-

(3) What Fuels the Engine of History?

One. Throughout history, the clash of ideas, clash of ideologies and the clash of religions provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of the history that propels the human history to go forward and not remain stagnant. The Clash of Civilization provides the electricity to the engine of the history essential for the human history to move forward and not remain stationary. The theory of Dialectical idealism states that the Ideas and the Mind determines history not the inert material forces. It is the mind and idea that productively harnesses the material economic resources for the propagation of the dominant idea or philosophy or religion. Throughout history Ideology and Religion have determined history more than the economic forces. Economic potential unless led by proper ideas, Ideology and religion remains dormant and under utilized.

(4) Theocracy of Dictatorship of Priests

Two. Throughout history the clash or competition of Head priests with Kings for political power or influence provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of history for human political history to move forward. Religion is the field of philosophy.

(5) Civilization is March of Philosophy

Three. The nineteenth century German Idealism movement in philosophy was clash of philosophy with Papal authoritarian religion. Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel and Protestant German Idealism and Hegelians argued that real Christianity preached by Jesus was unlike Papal Catholicism and Judaism was rationalistic adapted to the reason of all men, notably Hindus and Buddhists, and that true Christianity can be rediscovered by Protestant Christian mystical experiences and philosophical inquiry. Hegel demanded that real Christianity was not an authoritarian religion that Roman Catholicism had become. Hegel argued that philosophers better qualified than priests to reinterpret religion, scriptures, Gospel and Christology. Christianity religion is a valid field of Protestant philosophers and German Idealism took lead in the Reformation of Christianity. German Idealism and Hegel used the weapon of philosophy and mysticism to demand Reformation of Christianity.

(6) Demise of Philosophy Christian Dark Age

Four. God Zeus of Greece and God Jupiter of Rome was none other than the Vedic Hindu king of gods Indra, the god of thunderbolt, who is also worshipped as god by hundreds of millions of Indian Hindus. The seat of God Zeus and Jupiter has shifted to India. Christianity had been a curse on the white European people. Christianity by sword imposed tyrannical Dark Age on White Europeans to force white Hindus of Europe give up their superior pagan Hindu and Buddhist culture, religion and philosophy. Ancient Greece, Romans and Egyptians were Hindus and their philosophers relished Hindu and Buddhist philosophies. Roman Empire imposed the tyranny of Christianity on Greece, Rome and Egypt and ushered in the barbarian Dark Age in Europe. Before Christianity Greek, Roman and Egyptian religion and philosophy flourished on the foundation of Hindu and Buddhist spiritual, religious and philosophic foundations.

(7) Ideal Religion Crafted by Philosophers

Five. All religions and religious scriptures shall undergo reinterpretation under the scrutiny of the philosophers in the 21st Century to remain relevant in the modern age. Ideal or the spiritual has the central role in man’s interpretation of religion. World or reality exists essentially as spirit or consciousness. Abstractions are more fundamental in reality than sensory things. Abstract universals, such as canineness, which expresses the common nature and essence of the members of a class acknowledged by all philosophers. Civilized Civilization and barbarian civilization are also Abstract universals. Thus universality and individuality merge. Influenced by Hinduism the German idealists sought a much wider perspective that embraced civilizations, epochs and eras in the broad sweep of history. Idealist spiritual philosophy transcends the parochialism of a particular culture and religion. Idealisms are found in all of the major cultures and religions of the world. Degree of truth within a system of truths cohere by internal relations And the truth of judgment reflects its place in this system.

(8) Spiritualism is Protestant Idealism

Six. True philosophy is the quest for Truth. Philosopher is the seeker of Truth. Religion is the embodiment of Eternal Truth. The mind of the Philosopher is the vehicle through which the religion is revealed. True Philosopher is a True prophet and his word is the true scripture. Philosophic idealism is friendly to all quests for truth. Idealism seeks the truth in every positive judgment and in its contradictory judgment also. Dialectical method of reasoning removes the contradictions characteristic of human knowledge. Dialectic method leads to a new synthetic judgment that incorporates in a higher truth the degree of truth that was present in each of the two lower judgments. Idealism defends the principle that lower is explained by the higher. Matter can be explained by mind but matter cannot explain mind. The world spirit can be substituted for mind. Spiritualism is a synonym for Idealism. Philosophy of Spiritualism is Religion. By philosophic investigation philosophers of idealism create a new living religion to rival the religion preached by Prophets. Prophets of Christianity, Islam and Judaism were philosophers of their time. True philosopher G.W.F. Hegel was a living Prophet of his time, who in intellectual and spiritual insight rivaled or equaled Zoroaster, Moses, Mohammed and Jesus. Philosophic writings of Hegel are equal to their scriptures, namely, Zend Avestha, Torah, Koran and Bible. True philosopher is a true prophet and he rediscovers the true religion through the intermediacy of his mind.

(9) Idealism led Protestant Reformation

Eight. The German Protestant Reformation demanded by Martin Luther focused on the reform of papacy and was influenced by the philosophies of classical Greek philosophers, and the national interests of the German Princes who wanted independence from Papal interference in political affairs. German Lutheranism of 16th century asserted the right of priests to reinterpret the Bible in terms of Christian theology and opposed Papacy’s claims for monopoly over interpretation of Bible.

(10) Kant & Hegel in Clash of Philosophy

Nine. The death of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in 1804 formally marked the end of the European Age of Enlightenment. The Enlightenment Age led by Kant had accepted certain bounds to the possibility of knowledge, which allowed Kant to accept the primacy of Papacy on certain matters of religion.

Hegel was the philosopher of the Protestant Reformation and asserted that religion is a field of philosophy.

(11) Idealism’s War on Papacy & Judaism

Ten. Philosophers of German idealism studied religion as a valid field of philosophy. In Hinduism and Buddhism most of the philosophic writing had been in the realm of religion. Hegel from 1816-1831 and Hegelians from 1816-1848 waged war on Papacy, intolerant authoritarian religions, Catholic Church and Judaism during 19th Century’s Clash of Civilization. Hegelian system in which Protestant German Idealism reached its fulfillment challenged the right of Pope as well as priests of Protestant churches to claim that religion of Christianity and Judaism cannot be the legitimate field of philosophy. Hegel, Hegelian Right and Hegelian Left asserted the right of Hegel and other philosophers to challenge Pope and top Protestant priests on nature of Christ, Gospel, Christology and true nature of Christianity as taught by Jesus. Christian philosopher like Hegel and Spinoza are intellectually better equipped than Catholic Bishops to have a final say on Christianity as a religion. German idealism extensively dwelt in the realm of religion from rationalist Spinoza’s monism based on Buddhist logic, transcendentalism of Immanuel Kant. Schleiermacher elevated feeling to a place in religion above systematic theology. Rationalist school reduced religion to the modicum compatible with an ordinary worldly mind. In his middle way, Hegel attempted to show that the Christian dogmatic creed is the rational development of what was implicit in religious feeling. To interpret religion to make explicit what was implicit in religious feeling, Hegel made philosophy a superior discipline and the interpreter of religion, and made religion a field of philosophy, where philosopher not the priest reigned supreme. Hegel unleashed the clash of civilization by claiming philosophers have a right to become the final arbitrator on religion, dogma, theology and doctrine.

(12) Philosophers of the World unite

Eleven. Philosophers of the world should unite to foil the conspiracy of priests to rule the world. The dictatorship of the Philosophers would rid the world of the predatory religious intolerance and authoritarian religions in the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations.

(13) Hegelian King Victor Emmanuel II

Twelve. Italian King Victor Emmanuel II was Hegelian and believed in the German Idealism that philosopher should have role in the reinterpretation of Bible and that Pope should not have any secular powers. To implement the Hegelian agenda he imprisoned in 1870 Pope under House arrest in the Vatican, and subsequent Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870-1929.

(14) Hegel is Prophet of Christian Protestant Reformation

The philosophy of Prophet Hegel should again take charge of the 21st Century Clash of Civilization, to represent the interests of Protestant Christianity, Reformation, Apostolic Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism in the their clash against ultra-conservative Papacy, orthodox Judaism and Wahhabi Islamic militant fundamentalism.

Second. Hegel claims that Religion including Christology and Gospel is the field of philosophy. Hegel asserted philosophers are better qualified than priests to inquire into religious controversies because of their better intellect and training than Pope or priests. Hegel supported Protestant Reformation and sought to recreate Apostolic Gnostic Christianity on the basis of rational morality taught by Jesus, which had been the dominant feature of Early Christianity. Hegel and philosophers of Hegelian Right Hermann Hinrichs and Karl Rosenkranz defended Hegel’s support to Evangelical Protestant Christianity and attempts to Reform Christianity on the basis of free rationality of religion. Hegel was eulogistic about the thesis that philosophy and Protestant evangelical orthodoxy are compatible. Hegel solved the Kantian faith-reason problem, which had asserted the identity of content and difference of form, thus aptly defending the free rationality of religion. Hegel and Hegelian Right argued that Catholic authoritarian religion, which imposed on faithful a moral system of arbitrary commands like Judaism, was the negation of Christianity taught by Jesus, which was adapted to the reason of all men unlike Judaism. Hegel and Hegelian Right claimed that Torah And Old Testament should not have been the part of the Christian Bible as the religion taught by Jesus was unlike Judaism in logic, rationality and dogma.

(15) History is Testing Lab of Philosophy

The whole of human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress and advancing to self-knowledge. History has a plot and the philosopher’s task it to discern the plot of the history. Hegel’s outlook was that of a historian. Every one of German idealist philosopher G.W.F. Hegel’s major works was a history.

(16) Christianity of Jesus Rejected Judaism

Hegel believed in the Gnostic Apostolic Christianity and supported the Protestant Reformation against Papal authoritarian religion.

(17) Religion is the Field of Philosophy

That religion should become the legitimate field of study by the philosophers became the top agenda in the clash of civilizations. Islam, Judaism and Catholicism do not accept that religious dogma and arbitrary moral commands should come under the purview of the philosophers, while Hinduism and Buddhists encourages its philosophers to do so. Hindus and Buddhists demand that Islam, Christianity and Judaism should accept the demands of their philosophers to interpret and redefine their religious dogmas. To Hegel religion and the concept of god and concept of Absolute Knowledge was the legitimate field of philosophy. The menace of religious terrorism and predator religious intolerance can be curbed albeit remedied by recognizing that religion is the legitimate field of philosophy and that priests no longer had the monopoly to interpret religion and philosophers could challenge the top religious leadership over religious interpretations.

(18) Hegel’s Philosophy is Spiritual Monism

The translations of Greek literatures from Arabic ushered in the Age of Renaissance and ended the Dark Age in Medieval Western Christian Europe. The translations of Hindu and Buddhist Sanskrit and Pali scriptures in late 18th and 19th Century ushered in the Age of Enlightenment in Europe, which illumined European philosophy from the darkness of the European Dark Age. Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist logic provided the foundation of German idealist philosophy led by Hegel. During Age of Enlightenment European philosophers discovered the influence Jesus owed to Hinduism and Buddhism and that Jesus had preached a version of Hinduism and Buddhism to the Jews. Idealist philosophers of Germany realized that True Christianity preached by Jesus was based on Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist logic and had totally rejected Jewish Law, Torah and Judaism. Hegelianism and German Idealist School of philosophy realized that by adopting Upanishad's and Buddhist logic to suit European Christianity the true Christianity preached by Jesus could be revealed to the Christians. Hegelianism and German Idealism is an attempt to understand Christian God by applying the terminology and intellectual tools and thought process of Hindus and Buddhists.

(19) Wahhabi Terrorism Is Semite Revolution

First, a new social catastrophe more tremendous than that of the advent of Communism was in the making in the Middle East. Semite Wahhabi predator religious intolerance could rival Semite Marxist Communist predator ideological intolerance. The purpose of Semite Marxism and Bolshevism was to engineer the loot of the property of Slav Russians by Bolshevik Jews. Marx didn’t trust any Russian. Bolshevik Jews looted the property of Tsarist Russia after 1917 and also the property of Soviet Union and Russia in 1980s and 90s. The purpose of Semite Wahhabi militant fundamentalism is to engineer the American and Zionist takeover of all Arab oil and gas resources of the Middle East. Semite Marxists, socialists, communists and Bolshevik Jews destroyed Orthodox Russia as well as Communist Soviet Union. Semite Saudi Wahhabi, Israeli Zionists and American Big Oil would destroy civilized Islamic Civilization by imposing over it barbarian Wahhabi intolerance and loot the oil and gas resources of the Middle East and Caspian basin.

(20) Paris Commune Vs Ayatollahs Revolution

Russia fell to Bolshevik Revolution because it failed to realize the menace the Semite doctrine of Communism presented to the Civilization. The civilized moderate Islamic governments could be taken over by the fundamentalist Mullah-rulers, unless the civilized Christian, Hindu and Buddhist world joined forces to militarily crush the evil doctrine of Wahhabi intolerance and dictatorship of the Mullah-rulers.

(21) Revolutionary Students and Peasants

Osama bin laden is a Semite authoritarian and an arrogant Bedouin who wants to establish personal dictatorships over oil-rich Islamic nations by exporting the concept of the Wahhabi dictatorships of the intolerant fundamentalists. Wahhabi terrorists look to the poor Muslim peasantry with its propensities for violence and its uncurbed terrorist instincts, rather than to the effete, civilized moderate educated Muslim youths of the civilized Muslim world. The Muslim Madrasas producing Islamic students as the future soldiers and officers of the Wahhabi revolution.

(22) Hegelianism Superior to Marxism

Dialectical Materialism and Marxist terminology can be effective in explaining the clash of civilization as the historical forces fueled by the materialist forces and Idealist forces. The Marxist analysis of contradictions explains the inner forces that fuel clash of civilizations. In the clash of civilization Marxists joined forces with Fundamentalist Vatican. Because of the larger threat of Hegelian Idealism Catholics and Marxists joined forces to check the common menace of Protestant Hegelianism. Catholics joined forces with anti-Hegelian Karl Marx to undermine Hegelianism because Protestant Hegel had asserted the rights of philosophers to reinterpret Christian Bible, Gospel and Christian dogma and creeds to Reform Christianity.

(23) Papacy Failed to Create Pope’s Empire

Pope failed to create a Pope’s Theocratic Empire and the dictatorship of priests in Europe even during Dark Age and he would fail to do so in the 21st Century. Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca would also fail to create Wahhabi Caliphate with Mullah as Caliph in the Islamic world in the 21st Century. Islamic terrorism is an attempt to create Islamic Papacy in Arab world so that Wahhabi Ulema could acquire the political power to remove the Saudi monarch, just as Pope Gregory VII had claimed. Saudi King would militarily crush the Wahhabi fundamentalism just as Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Charles V in 1527 arrested Pope and King of Italy kept succession of Popes prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929.

Succession of Popes had been nuisance to the secular Kings of Western Europe and never been a serious challenger to their power. Pope had created many wars in Europe but Pope could never threaten the European secular rulers. There is no reason that European rulers would permit Pope to play any significant role in European Union in 21st Century.

(24) Papacy and Protestant USA in Mortal Combat

Papacy promoted the concept of Protestant United States as the Third Rome, after Rome and Byzantium, not to promote the secular American Empire but to bring United States under the fold of the Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, which believes that Catholic Kingdom of God would be established after the end of the last great secular monarchy in the New Millennium. Papal Kingdom of God means the Papal priest-ruled Christian Kingdom of the world.

Pope’s pro-Life anti-Abortion movement has acquired unprecedented power in America and can make and unmake any Republican presidency. The pro-Vatican and pro-Life movements have leveraged their vote bank and campaign funds contribution to hold Republican presidential nomination process at ransom. Pope John Paul II is annoyed with President George W. Bush over Protestant America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

(25) Harmony of Oriental Philosophies

The clash of civilization is the clash of Chinese and Indian, Buddhist and Hindu policy of tolerance and inclusion with those that promote intolerance and exclusion. Indian, Chinese, Japanese philosophers and religious leaders and Mystics developed unique civilization wide policy of tolerance, inclusion and active cultivation of diversity and religious innovation, while maintaining the sanctity of the ancient scriptures.

(26) Dialectic Scrutiny of Religious Truths

The clash of civilization became the specter to civilization because authoritarian occidental religions, do not allow open philosophic debates on religious dogma and theology. Catholic Church throughout history condemned as heresy any innovation in Christian theology. Islam applies blasphemy laws to condemn any criticism of religious dogma and theology. The clash of civilization is the clash of Catholic authoritarian Church with Protestant philosophers and thinkers that find new meanings Christian Bible and interpret it differently, which if Papacy accepted would end the authoritarian character of Catholic Christian religion. Protestant philosopher GWF Hegel tried to introduce the Hindu Buddhist traditions to have open philosophic debates on the religious concepts, dogma and theology. Throughout history Hindu and Buddhist world encouraged open public debates on religious issues and religious controversies. Reinterpretation of Christian, Judaic and Muslim scriptures employing the Hegelian dialectics would resolve many problems of the clash of religions that threatens to descend the new dark age on the world civilizations. These are the arguments author develops in this chapter.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 543.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 97, Chapter 3.

 

 

 

  (0)(36) March of Hegelian Philosophy in History

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 97, Chapter 3.

(1) March of Philosophy,

(Chapter 3. 3(3) Page 543. Abstract: One. Throughout history, the clash of ideas, clash of ideologies and the clash of religions provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of the history that propels the human history to go forward and not remain stagnant. Two. Throughout history the clash or competition of Head priests with Kings for political power or influence provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of history for human political history to move forward. Religion is the field of philosophy. Three. The nineteenth century German Idealism movement in philosophy was clash of philosophy with Papal authoritarian religion. Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel and Protestant German Idealism and Hegelians argued that real Christianity preached by Jesus was unlike Papal Catholicism and Judaism was rationalistic adapted to the reason of all men, notably Hindus and Buddhists, and that true Christianity can be rediscovered by Protestant Christian mystical experiences and philosophical inquiry. Hegel demanded that real Christianity was not an authoritarian religion that Roman Catholicism had become. Hegel argued that philosophers better qualified than priests to reinterpret religion, scriptures, Gospel and Christology. Christianity religion is a valid field of Protestant philosophers and German Idealism took lead in the Reformation of Christianity. German Idealism and Hegel used the weapon of philosophy and mysticism to demand Reformation of Christianity. Four. God Zeus of Greece and God Jupiter of Rome was none other than the Vedic Hindu king of gods Indra, the god of thunderbolt, who is also worshipped as god by hundreds of millions of Indian Hindus. The seat of God Zeus and Jupiter has shifted to India.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(2) What Fuels the Engine of History?

1. One. Throughout history, the clash of ideas, clash of ideologies and the clash of religions provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of the history that propels the human history to go forward and not remain stagnant. The Clash of Civilization provides the electricity to the engine of the history essential for the human history to move forward and not remain stationary. The theory of Dialectical idealism states that the Ideas and the Mind determines history not the inert material forces. It is the mind and idea that productively harnesses the material economic resources for the propagation of the dominant idea or philosophy or religion. Throughout history Ideology and Religion have determined history more than the economic forces. Economic potential unless led by proper ideas, Ideology and religion remains dormant and under utilized. Karl Marx’s Dialectical Materialism and theory of economic interpretation of history is false and less convincing than the Hegel’s Dialectical Idealism and Hegel’s idealistic interpretation of history. Mind and not matter determines history. Man, Mind and Muscle control the Matter, as without the intermediation of man, mind and muscle the matter would remain dormant economically and not become the viable economic force. Matter is inert and on its own can neither become a historical economic force nor a material force. Matter is a servant of Man, Mind and Muscle. Atheist materialist doctrine of Karl Marx is false. Hegelian Idealism is truth and Marxist materialism is false.

2. In the Information Age Mind is more powerful than Muscle in creating new economic goods in the society. In the Information Age Mind’s control over the Matter increases exponentially than Mind’s control over Matter in the Industrial Age. In the Information Age the Hegelian Idealism is far more relevant than Marxist Materialism. The forces of tolerance, inclusion and diversity would emerge victorious in the Clash of Civilization in the present Information Age. The Information Age in the present Aquarius Age is the Age of Mind, Mysticism and Spiritualism. All Shit-philosophies of Karl Marx, Marxism, Communism, Stalinism, Leninism and Maoism would face their respective natural deaths in early 21st Century. Philosophers of the world should unite to meet the threat of the dictatorship of the Priests. The concept of dictatorship of the Philosophers might become relevant to check the specter of the dictatorship of the priests. In the clash of civilization the coalition of Hegelians, Protestants and Hindus and the forces of religious Reformation, tolerance, inclusion, diversity and women’s rights would be on one side of the battle lines and Hegelian dialectical idealism would be their dominant philosophy.

3. The Protestant Reformation movement in Europe established the power of Idea as historical force. The idea of the Reformation of Catholic Christianity and Papacy laid the foundation of Modern Europe. Almost every philosopher of eminence in Europe had been a Protestant and his philosophy argued against the authoritarians of the Papacy. Lutheran churches are, along with Calvinist and Anglican churches, one of the three classical Protestant churches of the Reformation. Lutheranism has contributed to Christianity a distinct philosophy of speculative Idealism (Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel); a distinct theology (Martin Luther, P. Melanchthon, R. Ritschl, P. Tillich); a distinct mysticism (J. Bohme, J.G. Hamann, E. Swedenborg, J.G. Fichte); a distinct philosophy of religion (Rudolf Otto, Lundensian school, Tillich); a method of biblical interpretation (Martin Luther, R. Bultman); historical critical study of Scriptures (J.S. Semler, D.F. Strauss, F.C. Baur, J. Wellhausen, H. Gunkel); a linguistically oriented classical education system (Melauchton); and ecumenical initiatives (Leibniz, N. Soederlblom). The clash of philosophy in post 1500 Europe has been the result of the revolt of the philosophers, scholars and thinkers against the abuses of Papacy and the greed for political and economic power of the Catholic priests. The Clash of Papacy, Counter Reformation Wars and clash of civilization in the post-1500 had been the clash of Catholic priests on one side and Christian laity, philosophers, scholars and thinkers on the other side of the battle lines. While the philosophy of the Catholics and Papacy imposed 1,000-year long barbarian Medieval Dark Age on Western Europe from 415 AD to 1500 AD, armed by the wisdom of the ancient Greeks, Buddhists and Hindus the white European philosophers, scholars and thinkers revolted against the authoritarianism and greed of the Pope’s priests, and succeeded in laying the foundation of the Modern Europe. The quest of Papacy to regain secular Papal States during 20th century after the imprisonment of Pope in Vatican was lifted in 1929 caused the situation similar to the Counter Reformation War (1618-1648) during the Pontificate of Pope John Paul II (1978- ). The assault of the Catholic ultra-conservatives in the United States required the philosophic response of the Protestant philosophers. The Counter Reformation War and Reformation War in the 21st Century shall be waged in the realm of philosophy, where religion as well as politics is a legitimate field of philosophy.

4. The Christian philosophy totally rejected the Judaic philosophy of religious authoritarianism, particularilty and exclusiveness and imbibed Buddhist ideal of world religion. The philosophy of Christianity is totally different from the philosophy of Judaism. The term ‘Christianity’ was first used by Ignatius, the bishop of Antioch (died AD 110), in his Letter to the magnesians. Thus the term Christianity is a rather late Christian neologism used to contrast the beliefs and way of life of the Christians with those of both Jews of the synagogues and sectarian Jewish Christians, who wanted to retain the Mosaic Law. Jesus and 12 Apostles had totally rejected the Mosaic Law. By looking to the Gentile (non-Jewish) world especially Buddhist and Zoroastrian world, and carefully dissociating itself from the Zealots Pharisees, Christianity made possible its ideal of a world religion, at the price of sacrificing Jewish particularity and exclusiveness. The prime sources for knowledge of Jesus of Nazareth are the four canonical gospels in the New Testament. Only a few probably authentic sayings of Jesus were preserved in oral traditions independent of these documents, though many sayings came to be put into his mouth by Judaizers. Judaic Old Testament should not be a part of the Christian Bible.

5. The language of a scripture embodies philosophy of religion and differing philosophic insights results in differing scriptural texts, which results in the clash of religious sects. Clash of scriptures is the clash of philosophy as various religious interpretations incorporate different philosophical insights and terminology. Clash of civilization is the clash between rival Christian philosophies about the nature of Early Christianity that Jesus taught. Radical semi-Gnostic Marcion of Pontus (140-150 AD) taught that the Old Testament came from the inferior vengeful Jewish God of justice and that the New Testament told of the kindly universal Father. As the current text of Christian Gospel and letters presupposed some divine revelation through the Old Testament, Marcion concluded that these Gospels had been corrupted and interpolated by Judaizers. Marcion therefore established a fixed canon of an edited version of Luke’s Gospel and some of the Pauline Letters (expurgated) and no Old Testament at all in the Christian Bible. Martin Luther followed into the footsteps of Marcion 1300 years later and attempted to recreate the pure Christian Bible. Hellenized Jews infilterated into the early Christian Churches and took control over Christian churches and imposed Old Testament over Christian Bible. During first two centuries there were only 100,000 Christians in the world, while there were 6 million Jews. Hellenized Jews joined the Christian Churches to expel the Gentile Christian priests and Judaized Christian Gospels and Bible. Jewish Muslims successfully engineered the theological coup 50 years after the death of Prophet Muhammad when they Judaized the Koran. The Koran was compiled and edited by Jewish scholars and all old written records of Prophets teachings were burnt. Hellenized Jews similarly Hellenized Christian Bible to produce final version of the Christian Bible as demanded by Emperor Constantine. Just as Republican Catholic Patrick Buchanan took over the Perot’s Reform Party and made it into a political vehicle of conservative Papacy during 2000 elections, the Hellenized Jews outnumbered Early Christians 60 to 1 and used their numerical superiority to allow Judaizers take over Early Christian Churches, to convert anti-Judaic Christianity into Judeo-Christianity. Roman Catholicism is Judeo-Christianity and negation of Early Christianity, Apostolic Gnostic Christianity. Clash of civilization between Protestants and Roman Catholics relates to the issue of the influence of Judaism or Buddhism or Hinduism on Early Apostolic Gnostic Christianity, the true Christianity that Jesus preached to his disciples.

6. Protestantism embodies totally different religious philosophy distinct and different from the religious philosophy of Roman Catholicism. Protestantism and Catholicism have been in constant mortal combat since early 16th Century. Protestantism and Catholicism are two separate world religions, are mutually exclusive and hostile to each other. More Protestants have died at hands of Catholics than have died at hands of non-Christians in religious wars during 2nd Millennium. The Roman Catholicism and Papacy is the mortal enemy of Protestantism. Just as Jesus had created a new religion by incorporating the beliefs of the Gentiles (non-Jews) similarly Martin Luther created a totally new religion by rejecting the authoritarian religion of Papacy. Protestant Christianity is as much new religion separate from Roman Catholicism as Christianity was separate from Judaism. Protestantism is totally separate religion from Roman Catholicism. Protestant Christianity is real Christianity as it resurrects the Apostolic Gnostic Arian Christianity of Early Christianity. The essence of Roman Catholicism is Papacy and dictatorship of the Pope and priests, which is totally rejected by Protestants; hence Protestantism is a separate religion totally separate from the Roman Catholicism, just as Christianity was separate religion from Judaism.

7. First. Throughout history mankind’s quest for true religion faced violent onslaught of intolerant false religions that blurred the fine line distinguishing the true and false religions. Throughout history predatory intolerant false religion tried to destroy the true religion by violent terrorist means. The historical clash between true religion and false religion in history is known as the Clash of Civilization. The clash between tolerant inclusive pro-diversity religion and predatory intolerant fundamentalist religions continues in the 21st Century. The Clash of civilizations is the interpretation of the 20th century world affairs from the perspective of the clash of religions. Roman Catholicism is the Judaized Christianity and aptly named Judeo-Christianity, while the real Christianity preached by Jesus and Apostles was a negation of Judaism and rejection of Mosaic Law. Just as Jesus propagated to Jews a new religion based on the wisdom of Gentiles (non-Jews) and Buddhists and Zoroastrians, the Protestant revolution against authoritarian Papacy, based on the Hegelian Buddhist logic and philosophy. The Protestant Christianity, Early Christianity and Apostolic Gnostic Christianity had extensively borrowed religious concepts from Buddhism and Zoroastrianism, more than it borrowed from Judaism. Christianity of Jesus was closer to Buddhism, Hinduism and Zoroastrianism than it was to Judaism. In the global clash of civilization the Protestants and Hindus would be on the same side of the battle lines.

8. Second. Throughout history, the violent clash of tolerant liberal religion with predatory intolerant authoritarian religion provided the necessary petroleum energy for the engine of the human history to move forward. The violent clash between tolerant religion and intolerant authoritarian irreligion results in either higher synthesis of religion or higher synthesis of irreligion, depending upon whether religion or irreligion emerged victories in the clash. Victorious irreligion masquerades as true religion by force of arms and tries to convince the followers of religion that religion is in fact irreligion, because of the fact that it lost the war. The religion after its military defeat reinvigorates itself and becomes better religion and launches counter attacks on irreligion and after some time succeeds in conquering the irreligion, and establishes the higher synthesis of religion. Religion is thesis, Irreligion is antithesis and if Irreligion emerged victorious, the synthesis is higher Irreligion, which exercises predatory control over the civilization and becomes the thesis in the second cycle of the dialectics. The Religion after defeat by Irreligion reorganizes itself and retaliates against entrenched Irreligion as antithesis, and after Religion emerged victorious establishes the synthesis of higher religion and forcibly transforms the civilization of Irreligion into the civilization of Religion, and the cycle starts all over again.

9. Third. Throughout history, the clash of tolerant matriarchal religions of Goddess with intolerant iconoclast patriarchal god as male only religion, provided the fuel energy for the engine of the history that propelled human history to move forward, which resulted in either higher synthesis of Goddess religion or higher synthesis of patriarchal religion. Hinduism, Buddhism and Paganism are matriarchal religions that may venerate the Divine through deity of gods, the idols. The clash of iconoclasts and idolatry in history provided fuel to the engine of history for human history to move forward. Jews followers of Moses and Sunni Wahhabi Muslims are true iconoclasts and totally opposed to any form of idolatry. In the past Jews worshipped the Golden Calf, the Cult of Baal of Phoenician origin, related to Bull Nandi cult of Shaivite Hindus. Shiite Muslims venerates the graves of Sufi saints and venerates the sacred Sufi graves no less fervently the than Hindus worship the idols of their gods. Shiite Sufism is a cross of Islam with Zoroastrianism, Hinduism and Buddhism. Catholic Christianity is primarily a matriarchal religion and worships idols of Jesus, Mary and Saints no different than the Hindus worship the idols of their gods. Technically Catholic Church practices idolatry. The Catholic concept of God as Father, Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and Immaculate Conception of Mary represents the Hindu concept of god and goddess that Catholic Church borrowed and incorporated in the Catholic doctrine. It is inevitable that after some centuries Catholic Christinaity would finds its fulfillment by merging into Hinduism. The ongoing clash between pro-woman forces and anti-woman forces provides the energy fuel to the engine of the history for the human history to propel forward.

10. Fourth. Throughout history the clash of Mystics and Spiritualists with authoritarian priests provided the essential fuel to the engine of history for the human history to move forward. While mystics gave the knowledge of religion free to the people and taught the way to directly worship the Divine without the intermediation of the priests. Mysticism harms the priests business of god and undermines their political power and influence. If the people could directly reach divine then what would be the need of the priests and why should they pay the priests for the religious practices. Throughout history religious reforms took place motivated by the desire to curb the greed of priests for money and power. The Pharisees challenged the Jews Rabbi and demanded that Jews should conduct many religious ceremonies at home by themselves, which were done by the priests at the temple earlier. The Pharisees won the battle with Sadducees and Papacy type couldn’t develop in Judaism. More than 15% of Jews believe in the Kabala mysticism. More than 50% of Muslims, Sunni as well as Shiite, in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh believe in Sufi Mysticism and venerate Sufi Saints. The Mystic Gnostic Christianity was the dominant form of Christianity in the Church of Alexandria during Early Christianity of first three centuries. The human drive for Spiritualism clashes with the priests’ demands for money and power. The forces of Mysticism and Spiritualism in Christianity, Islam and Judaism would clash with the priests and challenge the monopoly of religion and the dictatorship of the priests. Throughout history the ongoing clash of Mysticism and Spiritualism with priests of authoritarian religions provided the energy fuel to the engine of the history to propel human history to move forward. The forces of Mysticism and Spiritualism would emerge triumphant in the 21st Century over authoritarian religions and intolerant priests.

11. Fifth. Throughout history the flow of information across civilizations provided the essential fuel to the engine of history for human history to go forward. In the age of Internet, Globalization, Global Village and interconnected world, the authoritarian religions and intolerant priests would lose their grip over their believers and the mystics, spiritualists and pro-woman movements would emerge victorious. The religious esoteric knowledge, the secrets of religion would become accessible to all those who seek it without the intermediation of the priests. In the Information Age the business of authoritarian religious organizations would suffer and religious organizations would become flat and there would be no need to have a single leader of a religion. Improved means of communication, throughout out history provided the energy fuel to engine of history and human history made fast jump forward. The Clash of Civilization in the Internet Age, Global Village and Globalization would result in the victory of the forces of tolerant inclusive rationalist non-authoritarian religions and the victory of Mysticism and Spiritualism. The Globalization process would result in the decisive victory of the coalition of tolerant inclusive religions led by Hindu India and Protestant United States. The total victory of forces of tolerance, inclusive and diversity is predestined in the 21st Century.

12. Sixth. Throughout history the clash of philosophers and priests, the clash of philosophers and the kings, and the clash of philosophy and religion provided the energy fuel for the engine of the history to propel the human history to go forward. Philosophers of the world should unite to meet the threat of the dictatorship of the Priests. The concept of dictatorship of the Philosophers might become relevant to check the specter of the dictatorship of the priests. Plato’s concept of the Totalitarian Rule of the Philosopher Kings became relevant in the Information age, if election process could be reformed to eliminate the overwhelming advantage the entrenched vested interests in the political and religious process. Philosophy becomes the historical force by its ability to redefine the dominant political ideology and dominant religion of the civilization, time to time. Clash of Civilization in principle is a Clash of rival philosophies that are dominant philosophies of the rival civilizations. Clash of civilization is a clash of ideas, a clash of ideologies, a clash of philosophies, a clash of religions and a clash of differing worldviews.

(3) Theocracy of Dictatorship of Priests

Three. Throughout history the clash or competition of Head priests with Kings for political power or influence provided the essential energy fuel to the engine of history for human political history to move forward. Religion is the field of philosophy.

1. First. The clash of Civilization is the result of the religious revolution underway in the Vatican and Mecca, which unless checked threatens barbarian invasions of the Civilizations on unprecedented scale. The specter of Dictatorship of the Proletariat caused destruction and looting of the private property of Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China in the 20th Century. The specter of Dictatorship of Priests would cause the destruction and looting of the private property of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and other Islamic countries.

2. Second. The Clash of civilization in the 20th Century had been the result of the assault by Vatican Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca to impose the dictatorship of the priests and religious separatism throughout Christian and Islamic world respectively. Papacy and American Big Oil conspired to engineer the rule of Wahhabi clergy in Mecca and monarchy of House of Saud and monopoly of American Big Oil in Saudi Arabia. Papacy and Catholic clergy consistently betrayed Roman Empire and Italy and joined forces with barbarian invaders to keep Italy down and to create Pope’s Empire in the Papal States and the Christian Europe, during last 1400 years. Mecca’s Wahhabi clergy betrayed Ottoman Empire and conspired with foreign invaders United States and Britain to undermine Ottoman rule in the Arabian Peninsula, and bartered all oil and gas resources of Arabian Peninsula, Saudi Arabia and Iraq to American and British Big oil in exchange for Wahhabi clergy’s rule over Mecca & Medina and Wahhabi House of Al Saud monarchy in Saudi Arabia.

3. Third. Throughout history Priests didn’t have any pretension to become the ruler-king in Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Shintoism, Judaism and Islam. Only in Papacy and Catholic Christianity the priests acquired the illegal lust for acquiring political power. The caste system in Hinduism prohibited Brahmin-priests to acquire power. Throughout history the Buddhist monks, Taoist priests, Shinto priests, and Confucian priests never attempted to become the secular ruler-king in China, Korea, Japan and the Vietnam. Never in the Islamic history during Ottoman Caliphate or Mughal India the Muslim clergy attempted to become the Sultan. Protestant Christianity never approved the idea of a Protestant priest as the rule of the Protestant State as the priest-ruler or priest-king. The greed of Papacy and the Catholic priests to directly acquire political power in Italy presented great threat to the European civilization and resulted in the barbarian Medieval Dark Age and evil Inquisitions in Western Europe. Western Catholic Europe during 1000-year long Medieval Dark Age represented the forces of uncivilized barbarian civilization due to the malevolent influence of Roman Catholic Church and Papacy. The ultra-conservative Pontificate of Poland-born Pope John Paul II threatens to descend the new global Dark Age on Christian Europe and North America during 21st Century to cause destruction and social disruption as much as caused during 30-years Counter Reformation Wars (1618-48).

4. Fourth. Wahhabi clergy leadership believes like Pope Gregory VII (1073-85) that only the Pope might use the imperial insignia, only Pope might lawfully depose emperors but Pope himself should not be judged by anyone. Pope Innocent III argued that since Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, he legally transferred the Roman Empire, the throne of the Caesars from the Romans to the Germans and that his successors could transfer it elsewhere if they so wished. King Fahd and House of Al Saud Monarchy in Saudi Arabia and other Wahhabi Sheikhdoms in Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, UAE are in great danger of the usurpation of political power by Wahhabi clergy. The Clash of Civilization is the clash of secular philosophy of the political rulers and kings versus the theocratic philosophy of the rule of the priests and the dictatorship of the priests. The philosophy and doctrine of the Wahhabi dictatorship of the priests presents great political and revolutionary danger to the civilized world, as financed by Wahhabi Heroin Cartels it seeks to control the oilfields of the Islamic oil-producing nations. Mecca’s Wahhabi priests seek to create Islamic Papacy, so that in Wahhabi Islamic Caliphate the Ulema not the secular Sultan would rule the Islamic Ummah and Islamic Empire.

5. Fifth. Civilizations should neither allow Catholic Papacy nor Sunni Wahhabi to misuse the religious freedom in the democratic civilization to destroy the democracy, freedom, tolerance and diversity of the Civilization. Totalitarian Rule of Ayatollahs became the first dictatorship of the Shiite priests, when Ayatollah Khomeini took over Iran. The same fate awaits the Al Saud monarchy in Saudi Arabia.

(4) Civilization History is March of Philosophy

Four. The nineteenth century German Idealism movement in philosophy was clash of philosophy with Papal authoritarian religion. Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel and Protestant German Idealism and Hegelians argued that real Christianity preached by Jesus was unlike Papal Catholicism and Judaism was rationalistic adapted to the reason of all men, notably Hindus and Buddhists, and that true Christianity can be rediscovered by Protestant Christian mystical experiences and philosophical inquiry. Hegel demanded that real Christianity was not an authoritarian religion that Roman Catholicism had become. Hegel argued that philosophers better qualified than priests to reinterpret religion, scriptures, Gospel and Christology. Christianity religion is a valid field of Protestant philosophers and German Idealism took lead in the Reformation of Christianity. German Idealism and Hegel used the weapon of philosophy and mysticism to demand Reformation of Christianity.

2. The Clash of Civilization is the Clash of Philosophy as the rise and fall of civilizations is the result of rise and fall of dominant philosophy. History is the result of the Clash of rival claims of Philosophers and Priests to rule. The Civilization rises when the dominant Religion promotes the ideals of the dominant philosophy of the Civilization articulated by the free philosophers of the civilization. The civilization declines when the dominant Religion denies philosophers the freedom to articulate the philosophy of the civilization. A philosopher can be a priest but a priest cannot be a philosopher unless he through the intellectual process. The intolerant authoritarian religions historically denied non-priest philosophers the freedom to interpret religion and thus succeeded in establishing religious tyranny. Idealist philosophers have historically asserted that religion is a field of philosophy.

3. The world is divided into two camps. First camp of tolerance allows its non-priest philosophers the freedom to interpret and even create scriptures. Second camp of intolerance denies the right of philosophers to interpret religion and religious scriptures, and demand that only priests can interpret religion, dogmas, theology and scriptures. The philosophy of Idealism claims philosophers not priests should have final say regarding interpretation of religious scriptures and the concept of God. For tens of thousands years religious philosophical idealism dominated the philosophy of India and Oriental religions.

4. Protestant philosophers of German Idealism of 19th Century, notably, Immanuel Kant, J.G. Fichte, F.W.J. Shelling, G.W.F. Hegel borrowed the philosophy of Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist logic to directly challenge the right of Catholic Papacy to impose the dictatorship of the priests over religious matters. Protestant Hegel implicitly declared that Papal authoritarian religion is not the rationalistic religion that Jesus taught to the Jews, hence Catholic Christianity not the true form of Christianity. Philosophers of German Idealism sought to recreate the Gnostic Apostolic Christianity as taught by Jesus by philosophic reasoning. In the 19th century G.W. F. Hegel from 1816-1831 and Hegelianism from 1816-1848 fought Papacy on the other side of the battle lines in the clash of civilizations. Philosophy of the Protestants, Sufi Islam, Kabbalah Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, Shintoism, Taoism would declare Hegel their patron Philosopher-warrior to jointly clash with intolerant authoritarian religions, Papacy, Wahhabi Islam and Judaism, in the ongoing clash of civilizations in the 21st century. The clash of civilization in the 21st century is also the clash of Hegelianism idealism versus Papal religious authoritarianism.

5. The thinkers, philosophers and scholars of Germany, France, Spain, and Italy realized that Pope and Roman Catholic Church waging clash of civilization impose the barbarian, Medieval Dark Age on modern world in the 21st Century by developing growing nexus of priests of the Vatican and Mecca, Drug cartels and Military tyrants. The clash of civilization in 2003 like the clash of civilization of 1530 represents the clash of laity led by the laity philosophers and scholars against the greed of the priests for political, economic and social power in the society.

(5) Demise of Philosophy in Christian Dark Age

Four. God Zeus of Greece and God Jupiter of Rome was none other than the Vedic Hindu king of gods Indra, the god of thunderbolt, who is also worshipped as god by hundreds of millions of Indian Hindus. The seat of God Zeus and Jupiter has shifted to India. Christianity had been a curse on the white European people. Christianity by sword imposed tyrannical Dark Age on White Europeans to force white Hindus of Europe give up their superior pagan Hindu and Buddhist culture, religion and philosophy. Ancient Greece, Romans and Egyptians were Hindus and their philosophers relished Hindu and Buddhist philosophies. Roman Empire imposed the tyranny of Christianity on Greece, Rome and Egypt and ushered in the barbarian Dark Age in Europe. Before Christianity Greek, Roman and Egyptian religion and philosophy flourished on the foundation of Hindu and Buddhist spiritual, religious and philosophic foundations.

2. The European Medieval Period was the Dark Age was an insignificant intermezzo between Greco-Roman antiquity and modern times. Hegel put on seven league boots in order to skip over the thousand years between 6th and 17th centuries and having arrived at Descartes he cried like a sailor Land. Middle Age was marked by the symbolic date AD 529, when Christian Roman Emperor Justinian closed the Platonic Academy in Athens and sealed the downfall of the physical establishment of pagan Hindu philosophy. Protestant German Idealism of Hegel from 1816 to 1831 represented the flowering of Hindu and Buddhist philosophy in Germany to challenge Papal authoritarianism in religious matters and to reclaim for German philosophers right to interpret, redefine and evaluate Christology, nature of Christ, God, Gospel, Sacrament, Faith and dogmas.

(6) Rise of Philosophy in Neoconservative Age of Aquarius

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 549

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 103, Chapter 3.

 

 

 

  (0)(37) March of Revolutionary Hegelian Neoconservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 103, Chapter 3.

3(4) Neoconservatism’s March of Hegelian Philosophy, (Chapter 3. Page 549. Abstract: All religions and religious scriptures shall undergo reinterpretation under the scrutiny of the philosophers in the 21st Century to remain relevant in the modern age. True philosophy is the quest for Truth. Philosopher is the seeker of Truth. Religion is the embodiment of Eternal Truth. The mind of the Philosopher is the vehicle through which the religion is revealed. True Philosopher is a True prophet and his word is the true scripture. Philosopher mystics can rediscover true religion by mystical religious experience, similar to the experiences of the prophets of the world religions. Man can mystically make the final leap to the Idea of the good, or to the Idea of the Absolute is made by Socrates, Plato, Hegel. German Lutheranism of 16th century asserted the right of priests to reinterpret the Bible in terms of Christian theology and opposed Papacy’s claims for monopoly over interpretation of Bible. The death of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in 1804 formally marked the end of the European Age of Enlightenment. The 19th Century ushered in new philosophical problems and new conceptions of what philosophy ought to do. Philosophers of German idealism studied religion as a valid field of philosophy. In Hinduism and Buddhism most of the philosophic writing had been in the realm of religion. Hegel from 1816-1831 and Hegelians from 1816-1848 waged war on Papacy, intolerant authoritarian religions, Catholic Church and Judaism during 19th Century’s Clash of Civilization. Philosophers of the world should unite to foil the conspiracy of priests to rule the world. The dictatorship of the Philosophers would rid the world of the predatory religious intolerance and authoritarian religions in the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations. Religion is the field of philosophy. Philosophers not the priests should have the final world on religion, theology, dogma and doctrine. b Italian King Victor Emmanuel II was Hegelian and believed in the German Idealism that philosopher should have role in the reinterpretation of Bible and that Pope should not have any secular powers. To implement the Hegelian agenda he imprisoned in 1870 Pope under House arrest in the Vatican, and subsequent Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870-1929.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Ideal Religion Crafted by Philosophers

Five. All religions and religious scriptures shall undergo reinterpretation under the scrutiny of the philosophers in the 21st Century to remain relevant in the modern age. Ideal or the spiritual has the central role in man’s interpretation of religion. World or reality exists essentially as spirit or consciousness. Abstractions are more fundamental in reality than sensory things. Abstract universals, such as canineness, which expresses the common nature and essence of the members of a class acknowledged by all philosophers. Civilized Civilization and barbarian civilization are also Abstract universals. Thus universality and individuality merge. Influenced by Hinduism the German idealists sought a much wider perspective that embraced civilizations, epochs and eras in the broad sweep of history. Idealist spiritual philosophy transcends the parochialism of a particular culture and religion. Idealisms are found in all of the major cultures and religions of the world. Degree of truth within a system of truths cohere by internal relations And the truth of judgment reflects its place in this system.

(2) Spiritualism is Protestant Idealism

Six. True philosophy is the quest for Truth. Philosopher is the seeker of Truth. Religion is the embodiment of Eternal Truth. The mind of the Philosopher is the vehicle through which the religion is revealed. True Philosopher is a True prophet and his word is the true scripture. Philosophic idealism is friendly to all quests for truth. Idealism seeks the truth in every positive judgment and in its contradictory judgment also. Dialectical method of reasoning removes the contradictions characteristic of human knowledge. Dialectic method leads to a new synthetic judgment that incorporates in a higher truth the degree of truth that was present in each of the two lower judgments. Idealism defends the principle that lower is explained by the higher. Matter can be explained by mind but matter cannot explain mind. The world spirit can be substituted for mind. Spiritualism is a synonym for Idealism. Philosophy of Spiritualism is Religion. By philosophic investigation philosophers of idealism create a new living religion to rival the religion preached by Prophets. Prophets of Christianity, Islam and Judaism were philosophers of their time. True philosopher G.W.F. Hegel was a living Prophet of his time, who in intellectual and spiritual insight rivaled or equaled Zoroaster, Moses, Mohammed and Jesus. Philosophic writings of Hegel are equal to their scriptures, namely, Zend Avestha, Torah, Koran and Bible. True philosopher is a true prophet and he rediscovers the true religion through the intermediacy of his mind.

The greed of priest-rulers and the dictatorship of the priests transmute good into evil. The evils with which man has to deal may become ingredients in a larger whole in priest-ruled states. The philosopher representing the Absolute Mind keeps evil under control as a man might hold a viper under the sole of his boot. The dictatorship of the philosophers would result in the sublimation or transmutation of evil inherent in the authoritarian religions and priest ruled societies.

Reason not only discovers a coherent order in nature but also creates the state and other cultural institutions, which together constitute the cultural order of a civilized society. Idealist political philosophers recognize the primacy of this civilization cultural order over the private order or family order as well as over public order, government agencies and economic institutions. The conservation and enhancement of the values of all three orders, civilization order, private order and public order, is the basic moral objective of every civilized order. Abstract universals such as civilized forces and barbarian forces acknowledged by all philosophers. Philosophers are never in quandary over differentiations between civilizations and barbarians, irrespective of who comes out victorious in the clash of civilizations.

(3) Mysticism discovers True Christianity

Seven. Philosopher mystics can rediscover true religion by mystical religious experience, similar to the experiences of the prophets of the world religions. Man can mystically make the final leap to the Idea of the good, or to the Idea of the Absolute is made by Socrates, Plato, Hegel, Hindu Vedanta philosophy, Sankara’s Monism (9th century), Ramanuja’s Dualism (12th century), Asvagosha (1st century), Asanga 94th century), China’s Hui-neng of Ch’an school in Platform scripture (7th century), Persian Sufi Jalal ad-Din ar-Rumi (13th century), Friedrich Schleiermarcher (1768-1834), Henri Bergson (1859-1941), Maurice Blondel (1861-1949), Martin Buber (1878-1965), James Frederick Ferrier (1808-1864), and William E. Hocking (1873-1966). In man’s most immediate experience, that of his own subjective awareness, the intuitive self can achieve a direct apprehension of ultimate reality, which reveals itself to the man as spiritual experience. The final leap to the Idea of the Good is mystical in nature. Philosophical religious idealism has dominated the philosophy of India, China and Japan for thousands of years. Hegelian dialects can help clarify the Zen Buddhist doctrine of nothingness. Idealism has been one of the most dominant phases of Indian thought in metaphysics, epistemology and dialectics. Idealism has also very largely influenced the growth of Indian ideal. Sri Aurobindo Ghose replaced the Hindu Maya doctrine of illusion, with the concept of religious evolution of mind. Inwardness of the subjectivity of Indian idealism contrasts with the outwardness of Western objective Idealism and synthesis of the tow would create a new world religion a new world civilization.

Philosophic Idealism will result in the mergers of world religions and world civilizations and help usher World Religion, World Scripture, World Philosophy, World Civilization, and World Culture. Then Clash of Religions would wither away and Merge of Civilizations would take place instead.

(4) Idealism led Protestant Reformation

Eight. The German Protestant Reformation demanded by Martin Luther focused on the reform of papacy and was influenced by the philosophies of classical Greek philosophers, and the national interests of the German Princes who wanted independence from Papal interference in political affairs. German Lutheranism of 16th century asserted the right of priests to reinterpret the Bible in terms of Christian theology and opposed Papacy’s claims for monopoly over interpretation of Bible.

Protestant German Idealism led by G.W.F. Hegel in early 19th century asserted the rights of philosophers to reinterpret scriptures, Gospel, nature of Christ, arguing that religion, Christology was a field of philosophy. Protestant Hegel asserted the right of Protestant Philosophers to recreate the rational Christianity that Jesus preached to the Jews, which unlike Judaism was adapted to the reason of all men, including Hindus and Buddhists. Philosopher Hegel asserted the right of philosophers to recreate the rationalistic Christianity. Hegel reinterpreted the Bible’s Gospel on Kantian lines. Hegel enquired into the question: How Christianity has ever become the authoritarian religion that it was, if in fact the teaching of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic?

(5) Kant & Hegel in Clash of Philosophy

Nine. The death of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in 1804 formally marked the end of the European Age of Enlightenment. The 19th Century ushered in new philosophical problems and new conceptions of what philosophy ought to do. In the Renaissance the chief intellectual fact had been the rise of mathematics and natural science. In the Enlightenment attention had been turned to the character of the mind that had so successfully mastered the natural world. The Rationalists and Empiricists had contended for mastery in the age of Enlightenment until Kantian synthesis emerged victorious and made Immanuel Kant the Prophet of the Enlightenment. Politically the 19th century began with the consulate of Napoleon and ended with the Golden jubilee of Queen Victoria. The Revolution of 1848 in Paris, Germany and Vienna symbolized class division. The early 19th century dominated by German school of absolute Idealism led by Johann Frichte, Friedrich Schelling and G.W.F. Hegel.

The Enlightenment Age led by Kant had accepted certain bounds to the possibility of knowledge, which allowed Kant to accept the primacy of Papacy on certain matters of religion. Kantian philosophy’s sole task is to determine what reason can and cannot do and to describe the limits of reason. Kant concluded that reason and philosophy cannot come to conclusion about infinity and God and these should better be left for priests to decide. Hegel developed dialects to argue that religion is a valid field of philosophy and philosophy can inquire into the concept of God. In the age of Idealism the philosophy by employing Hegelian dialectics acquired the necessary philosophic tools to investigate the Absolute Being, Nothingness, Absolute Idea and concept of God.

The early 19th century marked a resurgence of the metaphysical spirit at its most ambitious and extravagant extreme. German Idealism reinstated the speculative pretensions of Leibniz and Spinoza at their height. This turn was the consequence of a new alliance of idealist philosophy with Protestant religion. All Protestant German idealists, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel were university professor whose fathers were Protestant pastors and all these professors had themselves studied theology: Fichte at Jena and Leipzig (1780-84), Schelling and Hegel studied at Tubingen seminary (1788-95). The Protestant heritage gave German idealism intensely serious, its quasi-religious and its dedicated character. Hegel, Fichte and Schelling directly challenged Pope’s monopoly and final say over Christian doctrine, nature of Christ, God, Gospel, and Sacrament. Hegel was the philosopher of the Protestant Reformation and asserted that religion is a field of philosophy.

(6) Idealism’s War on Papacy & Judaism

Ten. Philosophers of German idealism studied religion as a valid field of philosophy. In Hinduism and Buddhism most of the philosophic writing had been in the realm of religion. Hegel from 1816-1831 and Hegelians from 1816-1848 waged war on Papacy, intolerant authoritarian religions, Catholic Church and Judaism during 19th Century’s Clash of Civilization. Hegelian system in which Protestant German Idealism reached its fulfillment challenged the right of Pope as well as priests of Protestant churches to claim that religion of Christianity and Judaism cannot be the legitimate field of philosophy. Hegel, Hegelian Right and Hegelian Left asserted the right of Hegel and other philosophers to challenge Pope and top Protestant priests on nature of Christ, Gospel, Christology and true nature of Christianity as taught by Jesus. Christian philosopher like Hegel and Spinoza are intellectually better equipped than Catholic Bishops to have a final say on Christianity as a religion. German idealism extensively dwelt in the realm of religion from rationalist Spinoza’s monism based on Buddhist logic, transcendentalism of Immanuel Kant. Schleiermacher elevated feeling to a place in religion above systematic theology. Rationalist school reduced religion to the modicum compatible with an ordinary worldly mind. In his middle way, Hegel attempted to show that the Christian dogmatic creed is the rational development of what was implicit in religious feeling. To interpret religion to make explicit what was implicit in religious feeling, Hegel made philosophy a superior discipline and the interpreter of religion, and made religion a field of philosophy, where philosopher not the priest reigned supreme. Hegel unleashed the clash of civilization by claiming philosophers have a right to become the final arbitrator on religion, dogma, theology and doctrine.

(7) Philosophers of the World unite

Eleven. Philosophers of the world should unite to foil the conspiracy of priests to rule the world. The dictatorship of the Philosophers would rid the world of the predatory religious intolerance and authoritarian religions in the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations. Religion is the field of philosophy. Philosophers not the priests should have the final world on religion, theology, dogma and doctrine. Christian philosophers have as much right as Pope to interpret and opine on the concepts as God, nature of Christ, real Christianity preached by Jesus, Trinity, Sacrament and faith. Philosophers of the World should unite to develop a common front against the predatory religious intolerance, authoritarian religions and menace of priest-rulers and priest-kings. Philosophers not the priests should rule. The dictatorship of the proletariat brought about the destruction of the Civilizations of Russia and China. The dictatorship of priest-rulers brought about the destruction of the civilization of Iran and imposed barbarian social system over Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Protestants, Hindus, Buddhists should join forces with Hegelians and German Idealist philosophers to demand that Philosophers of the World should unite and establish the Dictatorship of the Philosophers to give decisive defeat to the conspiracy hatched by the priests of predatory intolerant authoritarian religions to impose the dictatorships of the priests throughout the Catholic, Islamic and Judaic world. The antagonistic contradictions between tolerant inclusive religions and predatory intolerant authoritarian religions can be resolved either by war or by revolution. All contradictions among tolerant inclusive religions can be resolved peacefully. The antagonistic contradictions between democratic tolerant societies and the intolerant priest-ruler and priest-king ruled societies are resolved either by war or revolution. The antagonistic contradictions between pro-Reformation forces and Counter Reformation forces are resolved either by war or revolution. The antagonistic contradiction between Protestant Christianity, which advocates separation of State and Church and the Wahhabi Islam, which advocates the dictatorship of Wahhabi clergy is resolved either by war or revolution.

German Idealist school philosophers believed in the ideologism as the doctrine that Idealism can be carried into the revolutionary camp since it is ideas that make history. Philosophers of the world should unite to carry idealism into the revolutionary camp, to lead the revolutionary forces so that the Ideas may make history once again. The philosophers should lead the army of revolutionaries to take arms to foil the plots of the priests representing the forces of predatory intolerance, and authoritarian religions to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the Islamic, Christian and Judaic worlds.

(8) Hegelian King Victor Emmanuel II

Twelve. Italian King Victor Emmanuel II was Hegelian and believed in the German Idealism that philosopher should have role in the reinterpretation of Bible and that Pope should not have any secular powers. To implement the Hegelian agenda he imprisoned in 1870 Pope under House arrest in the Vatican, and subsequent Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870-1929. Victor Emmanuel II, King of Italy, on Sept. 20, 1870 entered Rome, and stripped Pope of all temporal powers and Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican until Lateral Treaties were signed in 1929. In 1871 Papal States were unified with Italy. Bismarck opposed the doctrine of papal infallibility, and this struggle called Kulturkamph arose from the Bismarck’s determination to strengthen the power of the Austro-Hungarian Empire by weakening the power of the Roman Catholic Church. The pontificate of Pius IX of 32 years is the longest to date, followed by that of Pope John Paul II. Church of Rome had opposed the Unification of Italy, and responsible for the abolition of Italian Monarchy in 1948.

(9) Hegelian NeoConservatism in Aquarius Age

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 553.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 106, Chapter 3.

 

 

 

  (0)(38) Hegelian Neoconservatism Anti-Papal Reformation

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 106, Chapter 3.

3(5) Neoconservatism Hegelianism is Anti-Papacy

(1) (Chapter 3. Page 106. Abstract: Philosophers of Europe have led the charge against the oppression of Papacy in Europe, in the 21st Century American neoconservatism leads the charge against Papal tyranny. Philosopher G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) was truly a Buddhist Prophet and he deployed Buddhist logic and Enlightenment to embolden Protestant Christians demand Reformation of Christianity, Church, dogma and theology. Through Neoconservatism the philosophy of Prophet Hegel would again take charge of the 21st Century Clash of Civilization, to represent the interests of Protestant Christianity and Reformation. Hegelian religious conservative right supported the demands of Protestant Reformation and asserted philosophers right to inquire and opine on the nature of Christ, interpretation and evaluation of Christian Bible. Hegelian religious right conservatism argued that Gospel should not be interpreted in light of Judaism. Philosophers are better qualified than priests and the Pope to interpret and evaluate Gospel, nature of Christ and to recreate True Christianity taught by historical person Jesus. Neoconservatism supports the demands of the Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists that Catholicism, Judaism and Islam should allow their philosophers, thinkers and academicians freedom to inquire into and suggest changes to their respective scriptures, dogmas, theology, which can no longer remain the monopoly of the priests in Occidental authoritarian religions. Marxism and Communism was a plot of Papacy and Judaism to destroy Protestantism, tolerant inclusive religions that challenged the authoritarian rule of priest-rulers. Marxism is a religion of Devil that served the purpose of Judaism and Papacy as destroyer of tolerant religions and religious reformation. Neoconservatism based on the ideology of anti-communism. Hegel gave the key of dialectics to unlock the spiritual mysteries taught by Jesus, Buddha and Upanishads. Hegel had attained the Self-realization and Enlightenment by means of philosophic inquiry. The neoconservatism seeks to lead the forces of Reformation philosophy, reason and tolerance in the Clash of Civilizations to defeat the forces of predatory intolerance and Counter Reformation. Kant argued that Jesus, the founder of Christianity, on the contrary had originally taught a rational morality, reconcilable with the teaching of philosophy of ethics. Christianity of Jesus was adapted to the reason of all men, of all civilizations. Hegel accepted this teaching of Kant. Hegel and Kant agreed that true Christianity preached by Jesus was unlike Judaism and Christianity was based on non-Judaic reasoning and adapted to the reason of all men of all other religions. The idealist philosophy of Kant and Hegel and Hegelian dialectics provides the philosophic terminology to Neoconservatism, Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists in the clash of civilization in 21st Century. American Neoconservatism believes that Vatican and Jews joined forces against Hegel and Hegelian School to create anti-Reformation, anti-Buddhism, anti-Apostolic Christianity Marxism and dialectical materialism to allow the Jews loot the property of Orthodox Russia, Ottoman Caliphate and Buddhist Monarchy of China. Neoconservatism believes that Papacy and Marxism became comrade-in-arms to wage revolutionary wars on religions that challenged the authoritarian religions and the dictatorships of the priests. Neoconservatism believes that Jewish Karl Marx was the prostitute-philosopher hired by the Vatican to undermine Orthodoxy and Oriental Religions as an instrument of iconoclast Judaism and Catholicism. Neoconservatism believes the philosophy of history is also an inquiry into the philosophy of religion and political philosophy. Historian as well as a geopolitician is also a philosopher if he undertakes philosophic inquiry into the rise and fall of civilizations and clash of civilizations. The whole of human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress and advancing to self-knowledge. History has a plot and the philosopher’s task it to discern the plot of the history. Neoconservatism like Hegel supports Gnostic Apostolic Christianity and Protestant Reformation against Papal authoritarian religion. Neoconservatism agrees with Hegel that Catholic Christianity had mutated to become the authoritarian religion, while the teachings of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Neoconservatism believes Catholic Christianity no longer represented the religion and teaching of Jesus, as it became the authoritarian Papacy, while the teachings of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Papacy does not represent the religion preached neither by Prophet Jesus nor Apostle James the elder brother of Jesus.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Hegel is Prophet of Protestant Reformation

One. Philosophers of Europe have led the charge against the oppression of Papacy in Europe. Philosopher G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) was truly a Buddhist Prophet and he deployed Buddhist logic and Enlightenment to embolden Protestant Christians demand Reformation of Christianity, Church, dogma and theology.

First. Through Neoconservatism the philosophy of Prophet Hegel would again take charge of the 21st Century Clash of Civilization, to represent the interests of Protestant Christianity, Reformation, Apostolic Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism in the their clash against ultra-conservative Papacy, orthodox Judaism and Wahhabi Islamic militant fundamentalism. Hegelianism the philosophy of Hegel should lead the Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists in the clash of civilization against Papacy, Islam and Judaism.

Second. Neoconservatism agrees with Hegelian claims that Religion including Christology and Gospel is the field of philosophy. Hegel asserted philosophers are better qualified than priests to inquire into religious controversies because of their better intellect and training than Pope or priests. Hegel supported Protestant Reformation and sought to recreate Apostolic Gnostic Christianity on the basis of rational morality taught by Jesus, which had been the dominant feature of Early Christianity. Hegel and philosophers of Hegelian Right Hermann Hinrichs and Karl Rosenkranz defended Hegel’s support to Evangelical Protestant Christianity and attempts to Reform Christianity on the basis of free rationality of religion. Hegel was eulogistic about the thesis that philosophy and Protestant evangelical orthodoxy are compatible. Hegel solved the Kantian faith-reason problem, which had asserted the identity of content and difference of form, thus aptly defending the free rationality of religion. Hegel and Hegelian Right argued that Catholic authoritarian religion, which imposed on faithful a moral system of arbitrary commands like Judaism, was the negation of Christianity taught by Jesus, which was adapted to the reason of all men unlike Judaism. Hegel and Hegelian Right claimed that Torah And Old Testament should not have been the part of the Christian Bible as the religion taught by Jesus was unlike Judaism in logic, rationality and dogma.

Third. Hegelian religious conservative right supported the demands of Protestant Reformation and asserted philosophers right to inquire and opine on the nature of Christ, interpretation and evaluation of Christian Bible. Hegel and Hegelian Left philosophers like David Friedrich Strauss declared that Pope, Church and Priests had no longer any monopoly for the study of and inquiry into the problem of the nature of Christ, Christology, Gospel, and Christian theology. Christology cannot remain a monopoly issue of denominational dogma.

Fourth. Hegel asserted the right of philosophers to interpret and evaluate Gospel sources, nature of Christ, Christology, even if they differed with the doctrinal approach of Pope or leaders of Protestant churches. Strauss of Hegelian right asserted that Gospel were not the work of individual Apostles but the collective poetic activity of the first Christian community. Gospel is also in part from the memory of the historical figure of Jesus. Gospel myths demonstrate that philosophy and religion are the same in content and philosophers like Hegel from amongst Christian laity have as much right to interpret Christian Bible as Pope. Gospel myths explain the meaning of one truth that Substance is unification of the divine nature and of the human. Christ symbolized the Substance, which is the unification of Divine and human. Christ as Substance is realized in the spirit of all humanity. David Friedrich Strauss (Life of Jesus Christ Critically Examined, 1835, 1846).

Fifth. Hegelian religious right conservatism argued that Gospel should not be interpreted in light of Judaism. Philosophers are better qualified than priests and the Pope to interpret and evaluate Gospel, nature of Christ and to recreate True Christianity taught by historical person Jesus. Philosophers have a duty to reinterpret Christian Gospel and Bible without referring to Judaic Old Testament to restore original Apostolic Christianity taught by Jesus throughout the Christian world. The principal goal of Hegel and Hegelians had been to oppose the Papal claims that Pope alone should have a final say on matters related to Christian theology, dogma and nature of Christ. Hegel and Hegelians indirectly argued that Hegel was a greater philosopher than Pope and thereby philosopher Hegel was greater an authority on Christian Bible than Pope, thereby Christian laity could reject many interpretations of Pope and accept that of Hegel.

Sixth. Neoconservatism supports the demands of the Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists that Catholicism, Judaism and Islam should allow their philosophers, thinkers and academicians freedom to inquire into and suggest changes to their respective scriptures, dogmas, theology, which can no longer remain the monopoly of the priests in Occidental authoritarian religions. Hegel from (1816-31) and Hegelian School (1816-48) tried to solve the Clash of Civilizations of 19th Century by arguing that Christian concepts of God, Creator, Christology, Origin of Christianity, Gospel and Christian scriptures are legitimate field of philosophy and philosophers are free to inquire into these religious issues and Papacy and Church cannot deny the right of philosophers to inquire and opine on religious matters.

Seventh. German idealist philosopher G.W.F Hegel shall be the 21st Century Prophet of tolerant religion in its mortal combat with predatory intolerant authoritarian religions. The enemies of Hegelianism would be enemies of the Civilizations in the clash. Hegelian dialectics defines the clash of civilization in the 21st Century. The religions, philosophies, cultures and societies compatible with the Hegelianism would fight on the same side of the battle lines in the clash of civilization in 21st Century. The dialectic Clash of Papacy with the Idealist Philosophies of Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. Hegel generated Clash of Civilization.

Eight. Marxism and Communism was a plot of Papacy and Judaism to destroy Protestantism, tolerant inclusive religions that challenged the authoritarian rule of priest-rulers. Marxism is a religion of Devil that served the purpose of Judaism and Papacy as destroyer of tolerant religions and religious reformation. The Prophet revealed religions and ideologies, Papacy, Judaism, Islam, Marxism, materialist philosophy and religious Counter Reformation, clash with Hegelianism, Idealist philosophy, Religious Reformation, Protestantism, Buddhism and Hinduism. Since Hegel and Hegelianism was anti-Papacy, pro-Reformation and pro-Buddhism and pro-Hinduism, Karl Marx put the Hegelian dialectics upside down and created Marxism as pro-Papacy, pro-Judaism, anti-Protestantism, anti-Reformation, anti-Hinduism and anti-Buddhism doctrine. Marxism was a Vatican and Jewish plot to justify the loot of the property of Orthodox Russia in 1917, Buddhist China 1911 and Ottoman Caliphate in 1920.

Ninth. Hindus and Buddhists should read the philosophic writings of Hegel as a Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist scripture. Hegel gave the key of dialectics to unlock the spiritual mysteries taught by Jesus, Buddha and Upanishads. Hegel had attained the Self-realization and Enlightenment by means of philosophic inquiry. The writings of G.W.F. Hegel can with some editing become a new scripture for Hindus and Buddhists aptly named “Hegel-o-Upanishad. Like Gautam Buddha the Philosopher Hegel rediscovered for Christians the Pure Being to rediscover the True Christianity preached by Jesus. Hegelian dialectics made Buddhist scriptures and Hindu Upanishads readily intelligible. Hegelian dialectics resulted in qualified spiritual monism, and helped man understand the notion of Pure Being, Nothing, Absolute Idea, and Spirit as objective to itself. Influenced by Hindu Upanishads and Buddhist logic, Hegelian dialectics helped man understand the concept of God and how Jesus had taught a rational morality, reconcilable with the teaching of Kant’s ethical works, and true Christianity was the religion that unlike Judaism was adapted to the reason of all men. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels turned the Hegelian dialectics upside down and discovered Materialist Devil and developed the new religion of Marxism and Communism around the worship of Pure Devil and its imps. Karl Marx recognized that he had created the new religion of Devil, when he claimed to have turned the Hegelian dialectics upside down.

Tenth. The neoconservatism seeks to lead the forces of Reformation philosophy, reason and tolerance in the Clash of Civilizations to defeat the forces of predatory intolerance and Counter Reformation. The forces of predatory intolerance and Counter Reformation clash with the forces of Reformation philosophy, reason and tolerance in the Clash of Civilizations. The Clash of Civilizations and the Clash of Races in history has been influenced or determined by Religion’s clash with Philosophy, by intolerant arrogant Prophets’ clash with tolerant, inclusive Philosophers. The intolerant religions revealed by Prophets clash and the religions that encourage individuals to directly seek enlightenment by philosophic understanding and yoga.

Eleventh. The Clash of Civilization is the Clash of Papacy with the Idealist Philosophies of Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. Hegel. The intolerant exclusive tyrannical monolithic organized religion seeking to impose dictatorships of priest-rulers in the society, historically clashed with the Reformation of religious church, and discouraged or even banned the philosophical inquiry into the nature of religious truths.

Twelfth. Philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that Roman Catholic Church, Judaism and Islam, which requires a faith in Biblical historical facts and in Church doctrines that reason and philosophy alone cannot justify, and imposes on the Catholic faithful a moral system of arbitrary commands alleged to be revealed by the Prophet, the Pope and the Priest. Kant argued that Jesus, the founder of Christianity, on the contrary had originally taught a rational morality, reconcilable with the teaching of philosophy of ethics. Christianity of Jesus was adapted to the reason of all men, of all civilizations including Hindu and Buddhist reasoning. Christianity was unlike Judaism.

Thirteenth. Hegel accepted this teaching of Kant. Hegel and Kant agreed that true Christianity preached by Jesus was unlike Judaism and Christianity was based on non-Judaic reasoning and adapted to the reason of all men of all other religions. Kant and Hegel argued that teachings of Jesus were reconcilable with the teaching of Kant’s ethical works. Pro-Reformation and pro-Protestantism philosopher G.W.F. Hegel, influenced by Gnostic, Arian Apostolic Christianity, Buddhism and Vedic Upanishads argued that Jesus Christ had originally taught a rational morality and early Christianity was a religion that unlike Judaism was adapted to the reason of all men, Jews, Gentiles and Orientals. The Age of Enlightenment and the Idealist school dismissed the demand of Papacy, Roman Catholicism, Orthodoxy and Judaism that moral religious systems should be beyond the purview of reason and philosophical enquiry. The principal question for Hegel was: How Catholic Christianity had ever become the authoritarian religion that it was, if in fact the teaching of Jesus was not rationalistic but rationalistic?

Fourteenth. The clash of Kantian-Hegelian German Idealist philosophy with the religious dogmatism and predatory intolerance of Papacy and Judaism and provided the dialectic clash of civilizations. Because Hegel opposed Papal authoritarian Catholic religion and intolerant Judaism, the Jewish Karl Marx condemned Hegel, Hegelianism and Hegelian school as atheist. Hegel condemned Papacy for distorting the rationalistic religion preached by Jesus into authoritarian religion. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels condemned Hegel as atheist because he found fault in Papacy and Judaism.

Fifteenth. Karl Marx put Hegelian dialectics on its head and reincarnated the intolerant materialistic authoritarian religion of Communism. The intolerant authoritarian Communism is the religion of Devil that joined forces with authoritarian Judaism and authoritarian Papacy to eliminate challenges to the authority of intolerant priest-rulers and revolutionary rulers.

Sixteenth. Jewish Karl Marx and his minion ideologues sought to undermine the religious Reformation, tolerant rationalistic religions. Communism is not a philosophy but a negation of philosophy and created a new intolerant religion of Devil controlled by its revolutionary Communist priests.

Seventeenth. In the global clash of civilizations the authoritarian religions of Roman Catholicism, Russian Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism and intolerant ideology of Judeo Marxism are on one side of the battle lines facing Reformed Christianity, Protestantism, Apostolic Christianity, Christian Mysticism, Mystic Islamic Sufism, Kabala Mystic Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Paganism.

Eighteenth. The intolerant Prophets clashed with tolerant Philosophers in the Clash of Civilizations throughout history. Immanuel Kant and G. W. F. Hegel like Jesus used Buddhist and Hindu Upanishad reasoning to oppose intolerant authoritarian religions of Judaism and Roman Catholicism. The Catholic and Jewish philosophers created Marxism and Communism to undermine the influence of Hindu and Buddhist philosophy over German Idealist philosophy.

Nineteenth. The idealist philosophy of Kant and Hegel and Hegelian dialectics provides the philosophic terminology to Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists in the clash of civilization in 21st Century. Because Hegel challenged the Papal and Judaic religious authoritarianism, the Jewish Karl Marx condemned Hegelianism as atheist doctrine. Jews and Catholics condemned Hegelianism as atheism, because Buddhist logic and Hindu Upanishads had unprecedented influence over German idealist philosophers. Pope John Paul II argued that Buddhism is not a religion, because it does not believe in the concept of God. The Soviet Communists refused to recognize Hinduism as a valid religion. The ideal religion for Hegel represented the Monism. Hegel and Buddhism are condemned as atheism, because their concept of true religion differed from the authoritarian religion of Judaism and Catholicism.

Twentieth. Vatican and Jews joined forces against Hegel and Hegelian School to create anti-Reformation, anti-Buddhism, anti-Apostolic Christianity Marxism and dialectical materialism to allow the Jews loot the property of Orthodox Russia, Ottoman Caliphate and Buddhist Monarchy of China. As philosophers the productive periods were for Hegel (1816-1831), Karl Marx (1842-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1842-1895). Hegel from 1816-1831 and Hegelian School from 1831-1839 led frontal assault on Judaism and Papacy as authoritarian religion, argued that Jesus had preached rationalistic religion, and supported Protestant Reformation. Papacy and Jews joined forces and promoted Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to help and Karl Marx’s political debates dominate Hegelian School (1840-1844) to launch Marxism as the anti-dote to anti-Papacy and anti-Judaism Hegelianism. Conservative Catholics and Orthodox Jews joined forces to turn pro-Protestantism, pro-Reformation, anti-Papacy and anti-Judaism Hegelian dialectics upside down to create pro-Papacy, Pro-Judaism, anti-Protestantism, and anti-Reformation Marxism. Marxism was a Jewish and Catholic plot to loot the private property and to destroy the religions of Orthodox Russian Empire in 1917, Islamic Ottoman Caliphate in 1920, and Buddhist Chinese Monarchy 1911.

Twenty-first. Papacy and Marxism became comrade-in-arms to wage revolutionary wars on religions that challenged the authoritarian religions and the dictatorships of the priests. Hegelianism and Protestantism became allies in the Age of Enlightenment to Reform Christianity, to reform Papacy and to promote non-denominational Christianity.

Twenty-second. The interests of Papacy and Marxism coincided in the 1911 overthrow of Chinese Buddhist Monarchy, 1917 overthrow of Russian orthodoxy Monarchy, and 1920 overthrow of Ottoman Islamic Caliphate. Judeo Marxism served the missionary interests of Papacy in Buddhist China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar. Judeo Marxism served the interest of Papacy in Orthodox Russia and Ethiopia. Judeo Marxism served the missionary interests of Papacy in India. By resorting to Hegelianism one could undermine the Papacy-Marxism-Judaism Axis.

Twenty-third. Jewish Karl Marx was the prostitute-philosopher hired by the Vatican to undermine Orthodoxy and Oriental Religions as an instrument of iconoclast Judaism and Catholicism. Secularism, atheism and Communism became Papal proselytizing instrument to promote the interests of iconoclast monotheism. Jewish Karl Marx created the authoritarian intolerant Marxism as the new religion of Devil, to destroy the tolerant and inclusive religions and societies that opposed religious intolerance and the authoritarian rule of the intolerant religion. The doctrine of Marxism was a Jewish and Catholic plot to destroy the inclusive tolerant religions. The followers of Karl Marx joined forces with the followers of intolerant Papacy and intolerant Judaism in the Clash of Civilizations in 19th and 20th century.

(2) Life of G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831)

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was born in Stuttgart on August 27, 1770, and died of cholera in Berlin on November 14, 1831, at the age of 61. In 1811 Hegel married Marie von Tucher (22 years his junior). Hegel became Professor at Heidelberg in 1817. In 1818, Hegel accepted the chair of philosophy at Berlin. At Nuremberg in 1812 published “Science of Logic” in which his system was first presented in what was essentially its ultimate shape. Between 1823 and 1827 Hegel devoted himself entirely to his lectures. In 1831 Hegel received decoration from Frederick William III. The revolution of 1830 was a great blow to Hegel, and the prospect of mob rule almost made him ill. Hegel dominated the intellectual life of Europe from 1816-31, which represented post-Napoleon Europe, when the Congress System established by 1814 Congress of Vienna established the Concert of Europe. English Reform Bill of 1832 occurred immediately after his death. Karl Marx (1819-1883) was born on May 5, 1819 in Prussia of Jewish parents, and was baptized when he was six years old in the (Protestant) Evangelical Established Church. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published Communist Manifesto (1848). Karl Marx died in London on March 14, 1883. Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), the son of a cotton manufacturer was Marx’s closest associate from 1844 and 1883. As philosophers the productive periods were for Hegel (1816-1831), Karl Marx (1842-1883) and Engels (1842-1895), and it covered most of the 19th Century, post Napoleon Europe governed by Concert of Europe via Congress System established by 1814 Congress of Vienna, and the Age of Enlightenment in Europe.

Hegelian School dominated the Protestant Germany’s Idealist School from 1816-1839). Hegel led the philosophic debates during his lifetime (1816-31). The controversies in religious field dominated Hegelianism (1831-1839) and Karl Marx’s political debates dominated Hegelian School (1840-1844). Hegelianism is the name given to the diversified philosophical movement that developed out of Hegel’s monumental system of thought. The term Hegelianism is wrongly constructed to exclude Hegel himself and to include only the ensuing Hegelian movements. The term Hegelianism should include only philosophy of Hegel and pro-Hegel ensuing movement. Just as Christianity as a term should denote the religion preached by Jesus, and Marxism denotes the thought of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the term Hegelianism should include only the thoughts of Hegel and his faithful followers.

No other philosophical system could compete with Hegelianism in the richness of its content or in the rigor of its formulation or challenge its claim to express the total spirit of the culture of its time. Hegelianism destined to take on various articulations in its historical development as it intermingled with contrasting positions. Hegelian School (1816-1844) for more than 30 years brought together the best energies of Protestant German philosophies.

(3) History is Testing Lab of Philosophy

The philosophy of history is also an inquiry into the philosophy of religion and political philosophy. Historian as well as a geopolitician is also a philosopher if he undertakes philosophic inquiry into the rise and fall of civilizations and clash of civilizations. The whole of human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress and advancing to self-knowledge. History has a plot and the philosopher’s task it to discern the plot of the history. Hegel’s outlook was that of a historian. Every one of German idealist philosopher G.W.F. Hegel’s major works was a history. It was among historians and classical scholars rather than among philosophers that Hegel’s work mainly fructified in the 19th century.

It is philosopher’s task to discern the plot of clash of civilizations. It is the philosopher’s task to discern the plot of the rise and fall of civilizations, religions, races, empires, weapon platforms, and ideologies. The philosophic social and political analysis needs valid historical proof to elevate the hypothesis into general laws. The history provides the laboratory to test rival theories and hypothesis. The Clash of civilization is the laboratory to clash the rival theories of the clash of civilization. History is the enactment of God’s purpose and geo-political materialist forces. Civilization influenced by the divine as well as materialist geo-political forces. Human mind navigates and lead the civilization through conflicting demands of divine and geopolitical forces influencing the mankind. The Mind of the leaders makes voluntary choices and it determines the outcome in the history. The Mind determines the outcome of the Clash of Civilizations by taking conscious decisions that could have negative, positive or neutral affect on the outcome of the Clash of Civilization.

In the idealist philosophy history is the enactment of God’s purpose and it is the gradual realization of human freedom determined by free exercise of the Mind. In the materialist philosophy materialist geopolitical forces determine the history, influenced by the Mind’s conscious choices about various materialist outcomes. The Mind of the leadership in a society determines the outcome of the clash of civilization regarding future of world religions as well as the future of world powers. The world civilization is a world religion as well as a world power. The rise and fall of civilizations provide true evaluation of the fate of Religion as well as State. History provides the historic data to help determine whether a particular philosophic hypothesis is plausible or not.

(4) Christianity of Jesus Rejected Judaism

Hegel believed in the Gnostic Apostolic Christianity and supported the Protestant Reformation against Papal authoritarian religion. Hegel’s writings seems to suggest that true Christianity as preached by Jesus was similar to Hindu Bhakti Love based on Buddhist logic. Jesus rejected Judaism and Judaic laws. Jesus taught something totally different from Judaism. Men are not to be the slaves of objective commands. The law is made for man. Men are even to rise above the tension in moral experience between inclination and reason’s law of duty. For Jesus the Law is to be fulfilled in the love of God, wherein all tension ceases and the Christian believer does God’s will wholeheartedly and single-mindedly. A community of such believers is the Christian Kingdom of God. The true Christianity, the religion preached by Jesus was adapted to the reason of all men, all races and all civilizations. Jesus rejected the concept of authoritarian religion that Papal Catholicism became. Hegel’s theological writings contain hard sayings about Catholic Christianity and Church of Rome and he sketched the essence of Judaism, which he painted in the darkest colors. Hindu and Buddhist response to the iconoclast Papal proselytizing should adopt Hegelian terminology to argue that Real Christianity is the Gnostic Apostolic Christianity which rejected Jewish Torah, Jewish Law and presented a new religion for the Jewish people, which based on Hindu and Buddhist theology was a rationalist religion. True Christianity in Hegelianism had nothing in common with authoritarian religion that Roman Catholicism was.

Hegel argued that Catholic Christianity had mutated to become the authoritarian religion, while the teachings of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Catholic Christianity no longer represented the religion and teaching of Jesus, as it became the authoritarian Papacy, while the teachings of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Papacy does not represent the religion preached neither by Prophet Jesus nor Apostle James the elder brother of Jesus.

Judaism as religion is not adapted to the reason of all men. The Jews are slaves to the Mosaic Law, leading a life unlovely in comparison with that of the ancient Greeks and content with the material satisfaction of a land flowing with milk and honey. The Christianity of Jesus was a total break from the Judaic religion. Old testament should not be a part of the Christian Bible.

Jesus Doctrine of Holy Spirit inspired the concept of the spirit of man, which is his reason. The reason is the spirit of man, and spirit of man is the candle of the Lord. The reason is the candle of the lord, which allowed the philosopher dispel the darkness to illuminate the plot of the God in the earth, which is the gradual realization of human freedom. It is wrong for Christians to be slave of Papal Laws, as these are objective commands and law is made for the men, and men are not made for the laws. The imposition of Papal authoritarianism, which made Catholics slave to Papacy is wrong. The Jews are slaves to Mosaic laws and Catholics are slaves to Papal laws and religion of Jews or Catholics is unlovely in comparison with that of the ancient Greeks.

Immanuel Kant didn’t understand the concept of Buddhist Enlightenment and accepted that Religion could demand allegiance to the moral system of arbitrary commands. Kant accepted the right of Papacy to impose on the Catholic faithful a moral system of arbitrary commands alleged to be revealed, even when reason cannot justify this authoritarian moral system, because reason cannot explain infinite and ultimate reality outside the world of appearances. The thinking as a Kantian activity of scientific principles will inevitably result in contradictions, whenever his reason attempts to go beyond the world of appearances and attempts to grapple with the infinite or with ultimate reality. Kant argued that man can have knowledge only of a finite world of appearances and whenever man’s reason attempted to go beyond the world of appearances to grapple with the infinite or ultimate reality, it becomes entangled in insoluble contradictions.

G.W.F. Hegel refused to accept the Papal moral system of arbitrary commands, as he the man’s thinking as an activity of spirit or reason or mind can distill into conceptual form the insights of true religion, which Hindus and Buddhists call enlightenment. In religion finite life rises to infinite life. In Hegelianism the concept of spirit distills into conceptual form the insight of religion. The Love conceived as a union of opposites, is a prefigurement of spirit as the unity in which contradictions, such as infinite and time are embraced and synthesized. Hegelian term “Geist” means ‘spirit’ as well as ‘mind’ and thus has religious overtones. Thinking as an activity of spirit or reason can rise above them to a synthesis in which the contradictions are resolved. The thinking for Hegel is Hindu Buddhist concept of Yoga contemplation and Upanishad reasoning for the understanding of the Absolute. Hegel rejected the Catholic Christianity’s authoritarian religion and advocated the rational Christianity based on Buddhist Upanishadic logic for understanding the infinite and Ultimate Reality. Hegel argued that Jesus concept of Kingdom of God is similar to Hindu Bhakti-Love devotion of God Almighty. Jesus preached to Jews the new religion based on principles of Hinduism and Buddhism. The God of Jesus Christ was a Hindu god not the Judaic god. In Hegelianism the authoritarian religion of Catholic Church is a false religion and didn’t represent the religion that Jesus preached to the Jews. Hegelianism provides the rock solid foundation rock for launching Reformation Wars on Papacy and Judaism. Fundamentalist Hindu and Buddhist leaders should recast their offense and defense against Catholicism and Judaism based on Hegelianism.

(5) Neoconservatism Supports Ideas underlying Da Vinci Code

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 111.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(39) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 111, Chapter 3.

(1) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism

(Chapter 3. Page 112. 3(6) Abstract: One. Protestant Neoconservatives believe that Socrates and Jesus were murdered for preaching rational basis of Religion, or a new rationalistic religion adapted to the reason of all men. How Catholic Christianity became the authoritarian religion when the teaching of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Philosophers must look with a fresh eye on Christology and the origin of Christianity. Plato and Socrates’ concept of Theory of Justice was the exposition of Concept of Dharma the concept of just social and religious order. Socrates was poisoned because he dared to demand that religious social order should meet the scrutiny of reason and justice. Like Socrates, Jesus also preached the rationalistic religion, and met the similar fate. Hegel’s philosophy is philosophy of Upanishad’s spiritual monism in having a single theme: What makes the universe intelligible is to see it as the eternal cyclical process whereby Absolute Spirit comes to knowledge of itself as spirit? Neoconservative Hegelianism believes that the dialectical process results in Hindu or Buddhist conception of Infinite God as well as finite god and rejects Islamic, Judaic and Catholic conception that finite god cannot be part and parcel of the infinite God.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Religion is the Field of Philosophy

That religion should become the legitimate field of study by the philosophers became the top agenda in the clash of civilizations. Islam, Judaism and Catholicism do not accept that religious dogma and arbitrary moral commands should come under the purview of the philosophers, while Hinduism and Buddhists encourages its philosophers to do so. Hindus and Buddhists demand that Islam, Christianity and Judaism should accept the demands of their philosophers to interpret and redefine their religious dogmas. To Hegel religion and the concept of god and concept of Absolute Knowledge was the legitimate field of philosophy. The menace of religious terrorism and predator religious intolerance can be curbed albeit remedied by recognizing that religion is the legitimate field of philosophy and that priests no longer had the monopoly to interpret religion and philosophers could challenge the top religious leadership over religious interpretations. Authoritarian religions would retain their power to impose religious authoritarianism if philosophers are denied the right to challenge religious dogmas and religious principles.

Socrates & Jesus were murdered for preaching rational basis of Religion

Socrates and Jesus were murdered for preaching rational basis of Religion, or a new rationalistic religion adapted to the reason of all men. How Catholic Christianity became the authoritarian religion when the teaching of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. Philosophers must look with a fresh eye on Christology and the origin of Christianity. Plato and Socrates’ concept of Theory of Justice was the exposition of Concept of Dharma the concept of just social and religious order. Socrates was poisoned because he dared to demand that religious social order should meet the scrutiny of reason and justice. Like Socrates, Jesus also preached the rationalistic religion, and met the similar fate.

Hegel rejected the demand of Papacy that Priests not the Philosophers should study the Absolute Knowledge of Spirit or god. Hegel asserted the rights of Christian philosophers to investigate the concepts of God and Absolute Infinite Knowledge. Philosopher should investigate the Absolute Knowledge, which is similar to the concept of Absolute God. It is the field of philosophy to investigate the absolute knowledge of the Spirit knowing itself as spirit. From the moral world the next step is religion. The idea of Godhead has to pass through Nature worship, Tantric Psychic powers, demi-gods (devata), Goddess, King of gods (Indra, Zeus, Jupiter, Maha Asura), almighty God with personality, before it reaches a full utterance in Almighty God without personality. Religion thus approaches the stage of absolute knowledge of the ‘spirit knowing itself as spirit. This absolute knowledge of the Spirit is the field of philosophy.

India rejects the claim of the Wahhabi fundamentalists that Koran and Hadith is sacrosanct and no philosopher or religious expert has any right to demand revision of the laws and social policies ordered in Koran, even when they were written for the nomad Arab people 1400 years ago. Just as Jesus and Socrates were crucified and poisoned respectively, for daring to challenge the religious monopoly rights of authoritarian religions, the Wahhabi fundamentalist terrorists murder anyone who dares to challenge their right to interpret and define Islam and Shariah Law. Islam’s Koran and Shariah Law should also meet the test of the reason, rationality, and justice. Reinterpretation of Islam and Shariah Law is the legitimate field of philosophy.

(2) Hegel’s Philosophy is Spiritual Monism

The translations of Greek literatures from Arabic ushered in the Age of Renaissance and ended the Dark Age in Medieval Western Christian Europe. The translations of Hindu and Buddhist Sanskrit and Pali scriptures in late 18th and 19th Century ushered in the Age of Enlightenment in Europe, which illumined European philosophy from the darkness of the European Dark Age. Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist logic provided the foundation of German idealist philosophy led by Hegel. During Age of Enlightenment European philosophers discovered the influence Jesus owed to Hinduism and Buddhism and that Jesus had preached a version of Hinduism and Buddhism to the Jews. Idealist philosophers of Germany realized that True Christianity preached by Jesus was based on Hindu Upanishad and Buddhist logic and had totally rejected Jewish Law, Torah and Judaism. Hegelianism and German Idealist School of philosophy realized that by adopting Upanishad's and Buddhist logic to suit European Christianity the true Christianity preached by Jesus could be revealed to the Christians. Hegelianism and German Idealism is an attempt to understand Christian God by applying the terminology and intellectual tools and thought process of Hindus and Buddhists.

Hegel’s philosophy is philosophy of Upanishad’s spiritual monism in having a single theme: What makes the universe intelligible is to see it as the eternal cyclical process whereby Absolute Spirit comes to knowledge of itself as spirit? First, Absolute Spirit comes to knowledge of itself as spirit through its own thinking. Second, Absolute Spirit comes to knowledge of itself as spirit through nature. Third, Absolute Spirit comes to knowledge of itself as spirit through finite spirits and their self-expression in history and their self-discovery in religion and in philosophy as one with Absolute Spirit itself.

Hegelianism is the total philosophy, a philosophy of qualified spiritual monism. Total philosophy is an attempt to comprehend the entire universe as a systematic whole. The system of the Total Philosophy is grounded in faith. In Upanishad’s Hindu Religion God has been revealed as truth and spirit. As spirit, man can receive this revelation. In religion the Absolute truth is veiled in imagery; but in philosophy the veil is torn aside, so that man can know the infinite and see all things, the entire Universe in God. The system of Total philosophy is spiritual monism but a monism in which differentiation is essential. Only through an experience of difference can the identity of thought and the object of thought is achieved, an identity in which thinking attains the through-and-through intelligibility that is its goal. God is infinite God because he has assumed the limitations of the finitude and triumphed over them. Spirit, including the Infinite Spirit, knows itself as spirit only by contrast with nature. Hegel argued that Jesus preached the spiritual philosophy of qualified monism, in which differentiation is essential. The Christian man can know the Truth only because error of dualism has been experienced and truth has triumphed and perceived as unity of man and God as spiritual monism, but the differential of man and god is essential. Clash of Civilization is the clash between religion of spiritual monism and religions of dualism. Hegelianism and Protestantism will allies in the clash of civilizations. Protestant Christians who believe that philosophical insight helps a man better understand the Infinite God are engage in clash with Catholics who believe that only by following Pope can a Christian understand God. Hegelians and Protestants would be on the other side of battle lines than Catholics in clash of civilizations.

The Clash of Civilization is the clash between occidental religions that adopted Judaic theology and Oriental religions. Vatican-Marxism axis renewed the Judaic heritage of Catholicism, Judaism and Islam to develop common front of the Abraham’s sons against Oriental religions and pagans. The religions of Catholic Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the spiritual philosophy of dualism. Philosophy of Dualism implies that man and god are two separate being and man can understand the divine being only through revelations of Prophets and faithful must obey the moral system of arbitrary commands alleged to be revealed without any reservations and faithful must accept the leadership of the priests in religious matters and dictatorship of priest-rulers in political matters.

(3) Hegelian Dialectical Process

Thinking always proceeds according to this dialectical pattern: thinking begins by laying down a positive thesis that is at once negated by antithesis. Then antithesis by further thought produces the synthesis. But synthesis in turn generates an antithesis, and the process continues once more. The process is circular, ultimately thinking reaches a synthesis that is identical with its starting point, except that all that was implicit there has now been made explicit. Thinking itself, as a process has negativity as one of its constituent moments. Thinking has positive and negative component, which results in synthesis thinking. The finite is as God’s self-manifestation, part and parcel of the infinite God. The finite god or manifested god is part and parcel of the infinite God.

The dialectical process results in Hindu or Buddhist conception of Infinite God as well as finite god and rejects Islamic, Judaic and Catholic conception that finite god cannot be part and parcel of the infinite God. The dialectic process when applied to the inquiry of religious truths would find highly deficient, the conception of God described in the scriptures of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. No wonder that Jews and Catholics denounced Hegelianism as atheism, since Hegelianism found fault in Judaic, Catholic and Islamic conception of God.

It often happens in a discussion two people who at first present diametrically opposed point of views ultimately agree to reject their own partial views and accept a new and broader view that does justice to the substance of each. Thinking always proceeds according to this pattern. This approach can be used to reconcile the differences of the two opposite camps in the clash of civilization, which might result in the new synthesis, which might unite these two warring camps into a single camp.

In the Hegelian philosophy German Idealism reached its fulfillment, provided a unitary solution to all of the problems of philosophy. The speculative point of view transcends all particular and speculative perspectives must grasp the one truth, bringing back to its proper center all problems of logic, metaphysics, philosophy of nature, history, culture and law. This attitude represents the actual development of the Absolute, of the all-embracing totality of reality, considered as Subject, or Spirit or conscious Agent. This Absolute first posits itself in the immediacy of its own inner consciousness and then negates this positing and finally regains itself through the negation of the former negation that had constituted the finite world. Hegelian dialectics (immediateness-alienation-negation of the negation) accomplished the self-resolution of the Kantian metaphysical problem of man’s inability of comprehending the infinite. Hegelian dialectics could engage philosophy in the consideration of all the problems of history and culture, none of which could any longer be deemed foreign to the competence of philosophy. The religion, the idea of godhead, Infinite and Absolute thus become the legitimate field of philosophy. Hegelian dialects resolved the Kantian dilemma that man cannot comprehend the Infinite, Absolute and God, hence the religion’s moral system of arbitrary commands should be outside the purview of philosophy and better be left for priests, Popes and Prophets.

Hegelian dialectics indirectly proved that Catholic Christianity and Judaism were false religion and real Christianity preached by Jesus could be resurrected by applying Hindu and Buddhist logic to Christian theology. Hegel asserted that philosopher not the Pope and priests should have a final on Christian theology. Philosopher Hegel had conclusively established that Roman Catholic Church had distorted the real Christianity preached by Jesus. Using Hindu and Buddhist logic Hegel proved that concept of God presented in Catholic Church and Judaism was highly deficient. Hegel had indirectly proved the superiority of Hinduism and Buddhism over Catholic Christianity and Judaism. Hegel had shown the way by which the Reformed Protestant Christianity could regain the True Christianity taught by Jesus by developing Christian thought as rationalist religion.

Papacy and Jews go together to put upside down the Hegelian dialectics so that the conclusions contrary to that of Hegel could be arrived at by inverse logic of Hegelian dialectics. After the death of Hegel from 1831-39 the conditions in Germany during Restoration inhibited the liberalization of political discussions, the milieu of Hegelian controversy shifted to the religious realm and became related to religious problems of Immortality, Christology and Origin of Christianity. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had to resort to the very Hindu and Buddhist logic to exploit the inherent negative factor inherent in any logic to develop pro-Papacy conclusions.

Hegelian School continued to challenge Papacy that sought to keep philosophers out of the Christian doctrine and Christian religious issues. It is legitimate for the philosophers and historians to discuss the problem of the nature of Christ. Christology was no longer an issue of denominational dogma, which could be decided only by Pope or priests. Christology was a problem of the interpretation and evaluation of the Christian Gospel sources and the meaning of Gospel in the historical development of Christian civilization. Hence Gospel, Christology and the nature of Christ was the field of philosophy, asserted Hegelian School led by David Friedrich Strauss (The Life of Jesus Critically Examined, 1846).

Anti-Hegelian Catholics sought to undermine the rationalistic Hegelian interpretation of Jesus, by conceiving Christ as incarnation of Logos. There is the necessity to rationalize the Christian Gospel story. Weisse propounded a speculative interpretation of the Christ figure as an incarnation of the Logos (Thought-Word), in contrast to the mystic and pantheistic views of Christ. Weisse (The History of the Gospels, 1838)

Hegelianism in 21st Century would demand the philosophers, thinkers, academicians have full freedom to study, discuss and give opinion on all religious issues, dogmas and theology. Muslim clergy continue to adopt Papal admonitions against philosophers and thinkers to give opinions on religious matters. The fundamentalist Papacy, Jews and Muslims have argued that one could criticize religious dogma, theology and religious laws only on the basis of scriptural authority, without applying any rationalist reasoning. Protestant Christianity can overtake Catholic Christianity if it reinterpreted Christian dogma, theology and Gospels based on Hegelian dialects to recreate the true Christianity preached by Jesus.

(4) Trendelenburg’s Logical Investigations

Hegel had attained intellectual Enlightenment the high stage of understanding in Buddhism and had attained the direct intuitive grasp of the concept of Absolute Being and Nothing and could express it in German language. Hegelian dialectics explained in dialectic terminology the Buddhist doctrine of Nothingness (Zero) as a means of self-realization of the Absolute Being, Nothing and Becoming. Trendelburg’s criticism of Hegelian dialectics is wrong because Hegelian dialectics when applied to understand the concept of God not based on Greek empirical thought but on Eastern Buddhist logic and intuitive development of Mind that results in Enlightenment. After Enlightenment and the realization of the Self the differences between the intrinsically real contraries and abstract opposite contradictories disappears. In Hegel’s view, the passage from Being to Nothing and to Becoming can be posited as a Pure Beginning without presupposition of logic. Trendelenburg in 1840 argued that this passage is vitiated by its spurious dependence upon the surreptitious presupposition of the Empirical movement without which support neither the passage from Being to Nothing and the vice versa from Nothing to Being, nor the recognition of becoming as the truth of this primal opposition of concepts can be justified. Hegel mistakenly treated elements intrinsically real contraries, as though they were abstract opposites contradracitories.

In the fundamental triad of the dialectic, Being and Nothing are not equally static and neutralizing. The real movement does not interpose itself into their relationship because Being is here to be understood as the Being of thought, which to the degree is a thinking of Nothing. Being possesses that dynamic surplus over Nothing that becomes manifest in the moment of Becoming. (Kuno Fischer) Thus thesis Pure Being and antithesis Nothing results in the synthesis of Absolute idea or Spirit as objective to itself, because Being of Thought has that dynamic surplus over thinking of Nothing.

(5) Dialectics of India China Civilizations

The clash of civilization is generating historical forces that would result in the consolidation of the five or six leading world civilizations into two broad syntheses of civilizations, into Oriental Civilization and Occidental Civilization. The ongoing global clash of civilizations and clash of races might unite Hindu and Buddhist civilizations into a single Hindu-Buddhist Oriental Civilization. The Sino-Indian détente might result into the collusion of the Indian and Chinese civilizations into a single Hindu-Buddhist Oriental Civilization of Asia. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations shall merge into one another to create a synthesis of Sino-Indian Oriental Civilization. The Sino-Indian Clash or détente would result in the merger of Indian and Chinese civilization into synthesis of Oriental Civilization. The universal contradictions of spiritual India and materialist China would create the synthesis of Oriental Civilization. The non-antagonistic contradictions separate the Indian and Chinese civilizations, as India as well china has been open, tolerant inclusive multi-ethnic societies. The nonantagonistic contradictions between spiritual India and materialistic China can be resolved peacefully.

A civilization must be mature in its philosophic thinking and indeed in its old age before the Civilization becomes conscious of itself and civilization’s own significance and civilization’s own destiny, in realizing the God’s purpose in the History. Every Civilization must become conscious of its role in God’s plan for the human race on the planet earth. The civilizations of Hindu India and Buddhist China are both mature and in old age and both have become conscious of its civilizations and the significance of its civilizations in realizing the God’s purpose in history. The mature civilizations of Hindu India and Buddhist China are in old age and ripe to merge into another to rejuvenate one another by synthesis into a new vibrant expansionist civilization of Hindu-Buddhist oriental Civilization, which would represent more than 50% of the world’s population. In 1750, India produced 24.5% of the world’s manufactured goods and India, China and Japan produced more than 61% of world’s total manufactured goods. Hegelian dialectics mandates that mature civilizations of India and China should merge into one another to create the rejuvenated synthesis of Oriental Civilization of Asia. The dialectic process in the Oriental world will result into the peaceful unification of spiritual Indian and materialist Chinese civilizations to create the synthesis of spiritual-materialist Oriental Civilization.

(6) Neoconservatism is Hegelian Dialectics

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 115

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 115, Chapter 3.

 

 

 

  (0)(40) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 115, Chapter 3.

(1) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics

(Chapter 3. 3(7) Page 115. Abstract: Hegelianism is a philosophic expression of Buddhist logic in European terminology of dialectics. Gautam Buddha said that change is the only certainty. Hegelian dialectics is based on Buddhist logic. Hegel accepted the Buddhist doctrine of emptiness, which described the state of Enlightenment. Spirit is opposite of Nature. The world of spirit is all internally related to one another and they grew out of one another. The finite spirit, the categories or pure form of thought, are the structure of all physical and intellectual life. Nature is opposite of spirit. Nature is a sphere of external relations. In nature, the parts of space and moments of time exclude one another. Thereby everything in nature is in space and time and is thus finite. Two. The dialectical process rejects the separateness of the two concepts of Pure Being and Nothing, and the dialectical process culminates with the Absolute Idea, which is the Spirit as Objective to Itself. Hegelian dialectical process is Buddhist and Upanishad’s logic. Hegelian concept of Pure Being is Buddhist concept of Enlightened Buddha. Hegelian concept of Absolute Idea is the conception of Nirvana, which expressed the self-realization of the Self with the Absolute Idea and realization of the Spirit as objective to itself. Hegelian exposition of the idea of Pure Being, Nothing, Absolute Idea, and Spirit as objective of itself, should become part of a new Hindu scripture, Hegel-Upanishad.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics

Hegelianism is a philosophic expression of Buddhist logic in European terminology of dialectics. Gautam Buddha said that change is the only certainty. Hegelian dialectics is based on Buddhist logic. Hegel accepted the Buddhist doctrine of emptiness, which described the state of Enlightenment. If a man tries to think about the notion of Pure Being, he finds by the process of elimination that Pure being is simply Emptiness, i.e., Nothing. Yet Nothing is and exists. The notion of Pure Being and the notion of Nothing are opposites, and yet each passes over into the other. The dialectical way out of this contradiction is at once to reject both notions separately and to affirm them both together. What becomes both, is and is not at once. The dialectical process rejects the separateness of the two concepts of Pure Being and Nothing, and the dialectical process culminates with the Absolute Idea, which is the Spirit as Objective to Itself. Hegelian dialectical process is Buddhist and Upanishad’s logic. Hegelian concept of Pure Being is Buddhist concept of Enlightened Buddha. Hegelian concept of Absolute Idea is the conception of Nirvana, which expressed the self-realization of the Self with the Absolute Idea and realization of the Spirit as objective to itself. Hegelian exposition of the idea of Pure Being, Nothing, Absolute Idea, and Spirit as objective of itself, should become part of a new Hindu scripture, Hegel-Upanishad. Hegelianism should get the honor as modern Upanishad and G.W.F. Hegel should get the honor he deserved as the Great Hindu-Buddhist saint of 19th Century. Even if G.W.F. Hegel didn’t convert to Buddhism or Hinduism, because of the fear of Catholic Inquisition, Hegel should get the honor as the great saint of Hinduism and Buddhism. India should confer Bharat Ratna on G.W.F. Hegel and Hegelianism should become the official ideology of India. Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations should jointly deploy the philosophy of Hegelianism to wage wars on Roman Catholicism and Judaism in the Clash of Civilizations.

Spirit is opposite of Nature.

The world of spirit is all internally related to one another and they grew out of one another. The finite spirit, the categories or pure form of thought, are the structure of all physical and intellectual life. The pure essentialities, spirit thinking its own essence, and the dialectical process that advances from abstract to concrete, are all internally related to one another, and they grow out of one another. Spirit is a sphere of internal relations. In spirit parts of space and moments of time cannot exclude one another, and thereby everything in nature is outside space and time and not finite. Spirit is not created by the nature. Spirit created the categories or pure form of thought. Guided by spirit, and though the man, the nature rises to self-consciousness.

Nature is opposite of Spirit.

Nature is a sphere of external relations. In nature, the parts of space and moments of time exclude one another. Thereby everything in nature is in space and time and is thus finite. Nature is created by spirit and bears the mark of its creator. Categories appear in nature as its essential structure. It is the task of the philosophy of the nature to detect that structure and its dialectic. Nature as the realm of externality cannot be through and through. The rationality prefigured in Nature by its creator, the spirit, becomes gradually explicit when man appears in the Nature. In man nature rises to self-consciousness. The philosopher inquires into the rationality prefigured in Nature, when God created the nature, and through the man, the nature rises to self-consciousness. Without the intermediacy of man, nature cannot rise to the self-consciousness.

Mind guided by Spirit, not the inert material forces determine history. Human history is the embodiment or objectification of human rational will. The man comes to realize the human mind’s subconscious mind, conscious mind and mind’s rational will. Finally man knows himself as spirit, as one with God and possessed of absolute truth. Man starts to think of his own essence. Man starts to think God’s thinking before the creation of nature and finite spirit, and thus man has finally returned to the starting point of the dialectics, but en route he has made explicit all that was implicit in it and has discovered that nothing but spirit is and spirit is pure activity. The mind of the philosopher makes explicit the rationality prefigured in the nature by the Creator, and only though the intermediacy of human mind can nature rise to self-consciousness. In the final analysis the mind controls the self-conscious nature. The self-consciousness of nature, without the intermediacy of mind, cannot create historical forces and geopolitical forces and cannot influence clash of Civilizations. The Mind guided by Spirit can productively control the self-conscious nature. Human mind objectifies itself in its endeavor to find an object identical with itself. It is the decline or rise of Mind of the leaders of the Civilizations that determined the rise and fall of civilizations, even when the self-conscious nature inherent in the Civilization didn’t change appreciably. The Hegelian system of Protestant German Idealism claimed to provide a unitary solution to all of the problems of history.

(2) Feuerbach’s “Essence of Christianity”

Feuerbach (1841) and Strauss (1840) continued the assault on the intolerance of Papacy and Judaism after the 1840 restoration of King William IV. In 1840 political conditions in Germany changed with the succession of the young Frederick William IV, who was pro-Hegel and he summoned to Berlin in anti-Hegelian capacity both Schelling and F.J. Stahl, the stubborn critics of Hegel. Hegelian Feuerbach declared the humanity needs a new religion, and this “new religion of humanity” should have as its supreme principle that “man is God to man.” Feuerbach criticized the contradiction of Catholic theology that are found in such concepts as God, the Trinity, the Sacraments, and the Faith. The essence of man is reason, will and love. Man must regain the knowledge of the infinity. Christian mysteries are symbols of the alienation of human properties absolutized as divine attributes. (Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, 1841) Pro-Hegel Strauss reaffirmed the opposition of Hegelian philosophical pantheism to Catholic and Judaic religious theism as a means of reunifying the finite and infinite. (Strauss, “The Christian Doctrine of Faith” 1840) Only by rejecting the Catholic and Judaic dogma and by adopting Hegelian dialects could finite and infinite be reunified. The essence of Hegelianism, Hegelian Right, Hegelian Right and German Idealism had been to oppose the religious intolerance and authoritarian religion of Papacy and Judaism. Anti-Papacy and anti-Judaism had been the cardinal principles of philosophy of Hegel, Hegelianism, and German idealism from 1816 to 1848 and beyond.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 117.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(41) Clash of Catholic Laity & Papal Priests

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(41) Priests Vs Laity Clash in Christianity

(Chapter 3. 3(8) Page 117. Abstract: American Neoconservatism advocates direct elections of Christian priests by Christian laity. Philosopher Hegel attempted to dethrone the religious role of the Catholic priests by arguing that the religious truths are discernible by the dialectic process of philosophy. The Papal dream to establish the Pope-ruled kingdom of God in North America after the demise of secular United States is doomed to fail. Catholic states of Italy, France and Spain oppose the ultraconservative policies. The priesthood of the laity was the cardinal principle of the Protestantism since Reformation, and it was more widely recognized in the Anglican Convocations of 1960s. In Roman Catholicism under the influence of the second Vatican Council (1962-65) the priesthood of the laity was recommended. The dictatorship of philosophers is the perfect anti-dote to the virus of dictatorship of the priests. The Vatican’s Catholic clergy and the Mecca’s clergy should be directly elected or selected by the transparent direct elections of the priests and the clergy by the laity.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Hegel Dethroned Priests

Philosopher Hegel attempted to dethrone the religious role of the Catholic priests by arguing that the religious truths are discernible by the dialectic process of philosophy. Christian Clergy lost its privileged position in Protestant Christianity with the advancement in the knowledge of philosophy, just as the advancement of Persian astronomy, undermined religious role of Babylonian astrologers in Babylonian religion.

(2) Holy American Empire Doomed

The Papal dream to establish the Pope-ruled kingdom of God in North America after the demise of secular United States is doomed to fail. Catholic states of Italy, France and Spain oppose the ultraconservative policies adopted during the Pontificate of Pope John Paul II. The Catholic laity would rise in revolt and demand the reformation of Papacy and the direct election of Catholic Bishops, Cardinals and Pope by Catholic laity by means of transparent direct elections. There is no threat of the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian world. However, the specter of the dictatorship of priests looms large throughout Islamic world after the successful totalitarian rule of the Ayatollahs in Iran after 1979. The dialectical process is against the rule of the priests in 21st Century.

(3) Female Priestess & Eunuch Priests

Throughout the history of religion, the official institution that mediates and maintains a state of equilibrium between the sacred and the profane aspects of human society is the priesthood. The term priest is derived etymologically from the Greek word Presbyteros (“elder”) and equated with the Latin word sacerdos (the officiant at the sacrifices and sacred rites). Because priest gains this knowledge from a school of priests, he is differentiated from magician, shaman, diviner, mystic and prophet, who obtain their positions by means of individual efforts. In the ancient world the female priestess rule the temples and controlled the religious ceremonies and male priests came to control the religious temples much later.

(4) Pharaoh Ruled Over Priests

In ancient Egypt the King ruled over priests. In ancient Egypt, King was the high priest of every god. In the ancient Egyptian Nile Valley the occupant of the throne the Pharaoh was regarded as a god incarnate. Pharaoh alone was the intermediary between mankind and the gods. Before the 1st dynasty (3100 BC –2890 BC), the Menes high priest and king Scorpion was considered the incarnation of Horus (the sky god). During priesthood of Heliopolis, the Pharaoh became the sons of the sun god Re, who was identified with god Atum (Atma). During Memphis priesthood god Re-Atum was identified with god Ptah (creator) and Osiris (fertility god and god of the dead). In Egypt the divine origin and status of monarchy was so firmly established that it became the stabilizing force of the civilization in the Nile Valley. In theory, the king of Egypt was the high priest of every god and he alone was depicted in the temple scene as the officiant in important ceremonies. Every Egyptian temple had its high priest who, in addition to his sacred offices, might also be a high judicial official. On priest served simultaneously as multiplicity of cults in the shrine and received a share of the offerings and emoluments. From 18th to 21st dynasties (1567-1085 BC), the Theban priesthood of Amon-Re, the priestly hierarchy was able to create an absolute state within the state in Egypt.

(5) Babylon Priestess Ruled Over King

In ancient Babylonia the head-priestess ruled over the King who was ritually sacrificed. Papacy during Medieval Dark Age sought to recreate the ancient Babylonian cult practice of ritual regicide at hands of priestess by developing the Papal claims for temporal authority and Papal Empire in Papal States. In ancient Babylonia female priestesses controlled the religion and eunuch male priests could only serve as the assistants and servants in the religious ceremonies. In ancient Babylonian religion celebrated the death and resurrection of the god of vegetation, in which the participants in the mourning procession searched for the vanished god represented by the king, who was ritually sacrificed in the regicide. In Babylonia god Domuzi celebrated with the goddess Innanna. In the holy wedding, the king and the head-priestess represented the god and the goddess in the sexual union the forces of growth and fertility in nature were renewed. The priestesses ruled the ancient Babylonia and king was sacrificed in the religious ceremony, and the ritual regicide sought to enforce the rule of the Head-priestess over the king. Later on with the rise of Assyrians and the powerful Kings, the system of ritual regicide ended and the male god Marduk became more powerful than the goddess Innanna and male priests came to dominate the religious ceremonies and role of female priestesses declined and became temple prostitutes and temple maids by the time Christianity became the state religion in Roman Empire in 315 AD. The ancient Assyrian/Babylonian epic Enuma Elish, describes the sun god Marduk’s victory over the power of chaos and resulting creation of the universe, were re-created in the Babylonian New Year festival, in which the male king represented Marduk, the victor and the creator.

(6) Priests of Temple of Ugarit

Under the influence of Persian astronomical scholarship the astrology lost its grip over religion in Babylonia. In ancient Mesopotamia, powerful priesthoods and highly organized temples were firmly established in and after the 4th Millennium. In the middle of the 2nd Millennium BC in northern Syria, the priestly movement was centered in the temple of Ugarit. The god Baal, the weather god, was regarded as the lord of the furrows of the field and agriculture, and he was the dominant god of Syria and Palestine. With the advent of Persian sovereignty in Mesopotamia (6th century BC), the Babylonian priests under Iranian influence made great progress in astronomy and by 3rd century BC dethroned astrology from its exalted position in the religious tradition. During Muslim rule the astrologer and the astronomer became indistinguishable.

(7) Greeks rejected rule by Priests

Ancient Greece did not permit the rule by priests and accepted the dictatorship of the philosophers. The ancient Greeks were devoid of hierarchical priestly institutions composed of men and women through whom the gods were approached. There were Greek priests in the Eleusian mystery, and priests of the temples of the oracle of Delhi. There was no specific distinction between priests in ancient Greece and lay members of the society. When in ancient Rome, the agricultural religion of Numa was transformed into an institutional cult the priesthood became organized as a hierarchy with the rex sacrorum (king of the sacred things) inheriting the office and attributes of the former-priest-king.

(8) Judaism has no institution like Papacy

Judaism has no institution like Papacy, the rule of the Rabbi. The Jewish priesthood had been centralized in the Temple at Jerusalem (destroyed in AD 70) since the 10th century BC. After the 7th century BC, the priesthood was restricted to Levitical house of Aaron (brother of Moses). Before 7th priesthood was drawn from other lines of descent, such as those of other royal, prophetic and priestly families of David, Nathan, Micah and Abinadab. Levites in Jews represented a special fraternity set apart to be guardians of Torahs and Levites engaged in rivalry with rival priestly Kohanim. After the 586 BC Priestly Code the Judaic priesthood was confined exclusively to those claiming succession from Aaron. The rival Zadokite priests claimed priestly descent from Eleazar as an everlasting covenant and claimed ancient Jebusite (Canaanite) royal priesthood. The priestly privileges of the Levites challenged by rabbinical authorities, no priestly Torah scholars, and religious leaders, just as later Hegel and German idealist philosophers challenged the privileges of the Catholic priests during Reformation. Sadducees (deriving their name from Zadokites) were the high priests of Jerusalem and maintained the importance of the letter of the Written Law over against the oral traditions of the rival Pharisees, and Pharisees ultimately won and the Jews no longer have the autocratic priestly class. The revolt of the Protestants for the Reformation was a similar revolt against the de-formation of Catholic Christian Church due to the greed and lust of the Catholic priests for power and wealth.

(9) Christianity as legal Religion of Rome

When Christianity became the legal religion of the Roman Empire after AD 313, the Church of Rome had already inherited from its Jewish background a concept of the organized priesthood. The Medieval Catholic Christianity (6th to 14th century) created Medieval European Christian civilization, by sustaining the deeply laid tradition inherited from the theocracies and priesthoods in the ancient Near East. In the Latin West, the Church and the State became so closely associated that they were virtually identical, as was the case in preliterate societies. The duality of control of Pope as the head of the spiritual aspect and the emperor as the rule of the temporal aspect, did not endure as Catholic Church usurped more and more of civil jurisdiction and the Catholic Church tries to dominate the Kings. The greed of the Papacy backfired when the Catholic Habsburg Emperor Charles V invaded the Rome and made the Pope captive in 1527.

(10) Ban Priests from Kingly Powers

In Hinduism the caste system prohibits priests (Brahmins) to exercise temporal power. Priests could never become the king in India. In Hinduism due to the influence of Upanishads, the priesthood became an aspect of an impersonal divine power (Brahman) of a pantheistic principle and alternating mystical and ascetic priestly sublimation. In Vedic India, the King was subordinate in some respects to the Brahmins, though later many Ksatriya became priests because of their knowledge of Upanishads and functioned as King-priests. Hindu Kings delegated the religious functions to Brahmin priests before the end of 7th century BC, and the Brahmin priests usurped that position previously held by Hindu kings and exercised supreme control over religion and also worked in the service of the kings. Brahmin priests as the twice-born masters of the sacrifice and sacred Vedic knowledge were viewed as holding the universe in their hands. Upanishads (1000-500 BC) introduced as mystical conception of the priesthood in Hinduism and Buddhism, who lived as hermits, mystics. The Upanishad ideal of the priest was the mystic who strove to gain the identification of the inner eternal Self of the man (Atman) with the divine universal Brahman, by means of yoga, asceticism, renunciation, mystical experiences rather than by Brahmin’s sacrifices and religious rituals. The caste system precluded the possibility of Hindu Papacy in India. The caste system of India saved India from the specter of the rule of the priests, and it is the reason that barbarian Medieval Dark Age never descended on India.

(11) Priesthood of the Laity

In Buddhism, Taoism, Shintoism and Confucianism the ‘priesthood of the laity’ has been accepted as the cardinal doctrine. Every member of the laity is free to become the priest and perform priestly functions at home or at a temple. In the second half of the 6th century AD, after Buddhism had acquired official recognition in China, pagodas, temples and monasteries were erected with Buddhist ornamentation. Buddhism adapted itself to Shinto the native religion of Japan and to its shrines, festivals and rites. In the 6th century AD, in imitation of Buddhism, the Taoist celibates lived in monasteries with a patriarch as the head and interchanged facilities with their Buddhist counterparts. When Shinto was restored as the national religion of Japan in the 19th century, the Shinto and Buddhist priests were assigned their respective duties and offices by the State without discrimination. This dual sacerdotal combination lasted only until 1875 and Shrine Shinto became the national faith under the Imperial family, maintaining its divine status, cultic practice and priesthood. New rituals and ceremonies were initiated for use at the Shinto shrines and the duties and grades of Shinto priests were fixed.

(12) Removal of Unnecessary Rituals

Just as Protestant Reformation of Catholic Christianity sublimated the priesthood and priestly indulgences and unnecessary rituals were eliminated, in Buddhism and Jainism the Brahmin priesthood was sublimated and the Vedic caste and ritual sacrifice eliminated. Since in Buddhism the desire was regarded as the fundamental cause of the Dukha (the burden of existence), the Brahmin priestly rites for securing worldly happiness considered to be of no avail in the pursuit of Nirvana. Protestant reformer Martin Luther followed the example of Buddha and challenged the Catholic rites and sale of indulgences to expose the greed of Catholic Bishops. Buddha exposed the greed of Hindu Brahmin priests. Martin Luther adopted the tactics and theology of Buddha 2,000 years later in early 1500’s to demand reformation of the Papacy and Catholic Christianity. Buddhism has never been able to produce a strong and lasting ecclesiastical organization or a hierarchical segmentation as in Hinduism, because Buddhism interpreted unity in terms of becoming, instead of Being. The recitation of ancient Pali sutra and the endless repetition of sacred mantra are believed by Buddhists to transmit the merit inherent in the text, which is not a sacerdotal devotion performed by or requiring the presence of a priest.

(13) Priesthood of Laity in Protestantism

The priesthood of the laity was the cardinal principle of the Protestantism since Reformation, and it was more widely recognized in the Anglican Convocations of 1960s. In Roman Catholicism under the influence of the second Vatican Council (1962-65) the priesthood of the laity was recommended. The clash of civilization caused by the join conspiracy of the Vatican and Mecca to impose the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world in the 21st Century. The Protestant Reformation of Christianity like the Buddhist Reformation of Hinduism undermined the political power of the priests and allowed scholars and laity religious leaders perform the functions of priests in their houses and in Protestant churches and Buddhist pagodas. The dialectical forces of history would establish the rule by philosophers or the dictatorship of the philosophers in many world powers to end the menace of the clash of civilization unleashed by the Papal Vatican and the Wahhabi Mecca in the 21st Century. Dictatorship of the philosophers would end the dual menace of temporal Papal Holy Empire and Mecca’s Wahhabi Islamic Papacy.

(14) Dictatorship of Philosophers

The dictatorship of philosophers is the perfect anti-dote to the virus of dictatorship of the priests. The Vatican’s Catholic clergy and the Mecca’s clergy should be directly elected or selected by the transparent direct elections of the priests and the clergy by the laity. With the increasing modernization and secularization of all areas of life the institution of sacred kingship as well as the institution of priest-rulers will of necessity disappear everywhere and authoritarian religious will undergo democratization process and laity would control and nominate the priests, Bishops and Cardinals by the transparent process of direct election or selection of the clergy by the laity.

(15) Priesthood of Mystics

The Yoga and Bhakti movement in Hinduism and Sufism in Islam gives the mystics the higher status than the Brahmins and Mullahs. The mystic laity can attain the highest level of priesthood, even the status of a Prophet. The Yogis, Bhaktas and Sufis have no desire for worldly powers and are revered by the general public in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 120.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(42) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(42) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot

(Chapter 3. 3(9) Page 120. Abstract: One. The purpose of Semite Marxism and Bolshevism was to engineer the loot of the property of Slav Russians by Bolshevik Jews. Marx didn’t trust any Russian. Bolshevik Jews looted the property of Tsarist Russia after 1917 and also the property of Soviet Union and Russia in 1980s and 90s. The purpose of Semite Wahhabi militant fundamentalism is to engineer the American and Zionist takeover of all Arab oil and gas resources of the Middle East. The Semite Wahhabi ideology is the Jewish plot conceived at the beginning of the 20th Century to loot the oil resources lying in the Ottoman territories of Arabian Peninsula. Two. The dictatorship of the Semite Wahhabi Mullah-rulers sanctioned by the inviolable laws of Koran, is the Semite Islamic counterpart of the Semite Marxist idea of the dictatorship of the proletariats. The Semite Wahhabi purposely used the predator Wahhabi religion as the opium of the Islamic people to impose the dictatorship of the Semite Wahhabi clergy. Three. Wahhabi revolution in the Islamic world financed by the Saudi oil incomes presents great political threat to the civilized world, which required the overwhelming military response of the Civilizations to destroy the predator religious ideology of Wahhabi intolerance, before it becomes powerful enough to destroy the civilizations. Islam does not accept institutionalized clergy and all Mullahs and Ulemas are equal to one another. Islam has no institution like Papacy. All Muslim Mullahs, Ulemas, and Maulavis are equal and Saudi Semite Wahhabi can no longer claim any superior status over Indian Ulema and Mullah. Vatican and Mecca entered into a conspiracy to bring the Arab oil-producing nations under the direct control of the Semite Wahhabi clergy. Four. The Ayatollah’s Khomeini’s revolution in Iran established the first priest-ruler in the Islamic world, the first dictatorship of the priest-rulers. The Muslim Mullahs replaced the Pahlavi Monarchy and established the dictatorship of the Mullahs, supposedly sanctioned by the Koran in Iran. Unlike monarchy of House of Al Saud of Saudi Arabia, the priest-rulers of Iran directly exercised secular political power in Iran and exercised coercion to crush political opposition, arguing that the religious authority more legitimate than the secular democratic authority. Five. The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan with the support of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan represented the dictatorship of religious fundamentalism. The Taliban dictatorship was the first export of the Sunni Wahhabi intolerance outside the confines of Arabia. The dictatorship in Afghanistan was not the dictatorship of the priest-rulers, but the dictatorship of Muslim terrorists. Six. To hasten the advent of modernization of the Wahhabi Islamic societies, the modern civilizations should undertake direct modernizing ventures and encourage the secular Kemalist military dictatorships in the Arab world.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Wahhabi Terrorism Is Semite Revolution

First, a new social catastrophe more tremendous than that of the advent of Communism was in the making in the Middle East. Semite Wahhabi predator religious intolerance could rival Semite Marxist Communist predator ideological intolerance. The purpose of Semite Marxism and Bolshevism was to engineer the loot of the property of Slav Russians by Bolshevik Jews. Marx didn’t trust any Russian. Bolshevik Jews looted the property of Tsarist Russia after 1917 and also the property of Soviet Union and Russia in 1980s and 90s. The purpose of Semite Wahhabi militant fundamentalism is to engineer the American and Zionist takeover of all Arab oil and gas resources of the Middle East. Semite Marxists, socialists, communists and Bolshevik Jews destroyed Orthodox Russia as well as Communist Soviet Union. Semite Saudi Wahhabi, Israeli Zionists and American Big Oil would destroy civilized Islamic Civilization by imposing over it barbarian Wahhabi intolerance and loot the oil and gas resources of the Middle East and Caspian basin.

(2) Wahhabism Jew’s Conspiracy to Loot Oil

Second, the Islamic terrorism is the Jewish conspiracy to loot the resources of the Islamic world. Prostitute-philosopher Semite Karl Marx helped Semite Russian Jews take over political power in Bolshevik Revolution and during genocidal reign of terror of Semite Lavrenti Beria massacred 30 million Orthodox Russians. Semite Wahhabi religious cult intends to destroy the Islamic societies in the 21st Century, just as Semite Marxist Bolshevism destroyed Russian and East European societies in the 20th Century, just as Semite Catholicism destroyed pagan Hindu Roman and Greek civilization in the 5th Century, just as Semite Islam destroyed the Hindu Egypt, Syria and Libya in the 7th Century. The Semite Wahhabi ideology is the Jewish plot conceived at the beginning of the 20th Century to loot the oil resources lying in the Ottoman territories of Arabian Peninsula. Jews produced the barbarian doctrine of Marxism to overthrow the Russian Empire and to enable Russian Jews loot the property of Russia and Eastern Europe. Jews produced the barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism to overthrow the Ottoman Empire and to enable the Semite Arab Bedouin of Mecca loot and control the Ottoman property and to allow Jews and Americans control the oil resources of Arabia.

(3) Dictatorship of Wahhabi Clergy

Third, the religious revolution of Wahhabi Sunni Islamic fundamentalism is a political ideology to establish the dictatorship of Semite Wahhabi clergy in oil-rich Arabia. The dictatorship of the Semite Wahhabi Mullah-rulers sanctioned by the inviolable laws of Koran, is the Semite Islamic counterpart of the Semite Marxist idea of the dictatorship of the proletariats.

(4) Wahhabism is Opium of the Muslims

Fourth, the Semite Marxist idea that religion is the opium of the people meant that religions other than Judaism should be undermined by the power of the atheist state. The Semite Wahhabi purposely used the predator Wahhabi religion as the opium of the Islamic people to impose the dictatorship of the Semite Wahhabi clergy.

(5) Murderours Ideology of Wahhabism

Fifth, the ideas of Wahhabi militants are utterly crude and unintelligent but the brotherhood of Semite brotherhood is no mere phrase with them, but a fact of life and the fraternity of Wahhabi Bedouin dacoits shines upon us from their blood-soaked hands and the wailings of the Arab women that suffered their beatings.

(6) Atheist Marxist Regime in Saudi Arabia

Sixth, the Semite coup-de grace in Saudi Arabia would establish atheist Judeo-Marxist government in Saudi Arabia, which would abolish Islam as religion in Saudi Arabia, abolish private property, abolish House of Al Saud monarchy, and transfer the wealth of Saudi Arabia to the Semite Jewish dictatorship of Saudi Arabia. Wahhabi fundamentalism is the Semite Zionist plot to destroy Islamic Civilization and to make all Arab oil-producers American colonies.

(7) Predator Religious Ideology

Seventh, the Wahhabi revolution in the Islamic world financed by the Saudi oil incomes presents great political threat to the civilized world, which required the overwhelming military response of the Civilizations to destroy the predator religious ideology of Wahhabi intolerance, before it becomes powerful enough to destroy the civilizations. Wahhabi priests deserve no sympathy and must face the decisive retaliation of the civilized world, before the Wahhabi menace attacked these civilizations.

(8) New Social Catastrophe

Eighth. During 1830s Bruno Bauer in University of Berlin taught that “Communism” a new social catastrophe more tremendous than that of the advent of Christianity was in the making. It can be argued that in 2003, Semite Islamic Terrorism, a new social catastrophe more tremendous than that of the advent of Semite-led Bolshevism and Communism was in the making that threatened the oil-rich Islamic world. The Wahhabi terrorism as a tremendous social catastrophe in 21st Century no less political than the Semite Marxism was in the early 20th Century. The Semite Wahhabi intolerance is no less political than the Semite Marxism as they both sought to justify the loot of the property of the Civilizations by the Semite looters.

(9) Demise of Meccan Caliphate

Ninth. Semite conspiracy to establish the Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate based on the rule by the Semite Wahhabi Mullahs of Mecca would fail as throughout Islamic history the Mullahs of Mecca enjoyed no special privilege over other Mullahs from other Islamic countries. Islam does not accept institutionalized clergy and all Mullahs and Ulemas are equal to one another. Islam has no institution like Papacy. All Muslim Mullahs, Ulemas, and Maulavis are equal and Saudi Semite Wahhabi can no longer claim any superior status over Indian Ulema and Mullah. Vatican and Mecca entered into a conspiracy to bring the Arab oil-producing nations under the direct control of the Semite Wahhabi clergy.

(10) Paris Commune Vs Ayatollahs Revolution

Russia fell to Bolshevik Revolution because it failed to realize the menace the Semite doctrine of Communism presented to the Romanov Russian Civilization. The civilized moderate Islamic governments could be taken over by the fundamentalist Mullah-rulers, unless the civilized Christian, Hindu and Buddhist world joined forces to militarily crush the evil doctrine of Wahhabi intolerance and dictatorship of the Mullah-rulers. The Franco-Prussian War broke out in 1870, after the defeat of the French armies, an insurrection broke out in Paris and the Paris Commune was proclaimed. Marx gave Paris Commune his unswerving support. On May 30, 1871 the Paris Commune had been crushed. Paris Commune of 1871 was history’s first example of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Marx’s name, as the leader of the First International became synonymous throughout Europe with the revolutionary spirit symbolized by the Paris Commune. Karl Marx became the icon of Revolution by his support to the Paris Commune. Osama Bin Laden became the icon of Militant Islamic fundamentalism by his leadership of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and its support for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Ayatollah Khomeini became the icon of the Dictatorship of Mullah-Rulers by his takeover of Iran after overthrowing the Pahlavi Monarchy in Iran. The 1871 Paris Commune preceded the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and 1949 Communist takeover of China. The Semite Wahhabi doctrine of the dictatorship of the Mullah-rulers is Islamic version of the Semite Marxist doctrine of the Dictatorship of the Proletariats. The civilized Civilizations should undertake preemptive strikes against the destabilizing doctrine of Mullah-rulers throughout the Islamic world.

(11) Ayatollah’s First Priest Rule in World

The Ayatollah’s Khomeini’s revolution in Iran established the first priest-ruler in the Islamic world, the first dictatorship of the priest-rulers. The Muslim Mullahs replaced the Pahlavi Monarchy and established the dictatorship of the Mullahs, supposedly sanctioned by the Koran in Iran. Unlike monarchy of House of Al Saud of Saudi Arabia, the priest-rulers of Iran directly exercised secular political power in Iran and exercised coercion to crush political opposition, arguing that the religious authority more legitimate than the secular democratic authority. The religious authority of Koran supposedly allowed the priest-rulers to impose religious ideological tyranny over Iran and to impose totalitarian political dictatorship of the Mullahs in Iran. The dictatorship of Ayatollahs in Iran confiscated the property and assets of royal family and the pro-royalty business houses, just as the Bolshevik dictatorship confiscated the property of the Tsars and private property in the Soviet Union after the Bolshevik Revolution. The 1979 revolution of Ayatollahs in Iran revolutionary, in regards to the confiscation of the private property of the previous ruling elite in Iran. The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution confiscated the property of the Russia’s ruling elite and the 1979 Ayatollah’s Revolution confiscated the royal property and the property of the pro-royalty businesses. The dictatorship of the Mullahs in Iran had as much impact on the Iran Royal property as dictatorship of the Proletariat had on the Russian Romanov property in Russia. The political response to the menace of the dictatorship of Mullahs in Iran should be the secular revolution in Iran, which might bring the Shiite Mosques under the direct control of the secular ruler. After destroying the dictatorship of the Mullahs the secular response shall be to confiscate the property of the Ayatollahs and religious trusts in Iran. The secular revolution in Iran might result in the loss of lives of Mullahs in Iran. It would be difficult for the secular forces to co-exist with powerful clergy in Iran. Just as the rise of Ayatollah Khomeini resulted in the expulsion and exile of the pro-Royalty Iranians from Iran, similarly the restoration of the political power in Iran to the secular leadership would result in the mass exodus of the Ayatollahs and Mullahs from Iran, and overnight Iran would become as modern as it used to be during the rule of Shah of Iran.

(12) Dictatorship of Religio-Fundamentalism

The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan with the support of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan represented the dictatorship of religious fundamentalism. The Taliban dictatorship was the first export of the Sunni Wahhabi intolerance outside the confines of Arabia. The dictatorship in Afghanistan was not the dictatorship of the priest-rulers, but the dictatorship of Muslim terrorists. The Muslim terrorists financed by the Heroin drug trade acquired totalitarian political power in Afghanistan in name of Islam. The Taliban regime was the first case that the foreign terrorists gained control over a country, by virtue of their abilities to hype the virtues of Wahhabi fundamentalism, to secure financial ties with heroin traffickers and to win the allegiance of the men folk by their propensity to brutally subjugate women. The Taliban Al Qaeda’s alliance with Opium traffickers and empowerment of the Afghan men folk by subjugation of women, allowed Saudi Arabia and Osama Bin laden establish first Saudi overseas colony in Afghanistan in the name of Sunni Wahhabi Islam. In 1995, Osama bin Laden was still unknown as an Islamic political personality. It was the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan and the Sept 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that made Osama Bin Laden into a well-known international figure and the best calumniated and most menaced men of Saudi Arabia. Taliban colony of Afghanistan was history’s first example of the ‘dictatorship of the Islamic terrorists.’ The Afghan Taliban regime was a model of revolutionary Wahhabi direct action and refutation of Mecca's Wahhabi clergy’s refutation of Saudi Monarchy’s subordination to American oil colonialism. The Taliban Wahhabi dictatorship was the classic gender struggle against the Muslim women. The core principle of Wahhabi fundamentalism is the suppression of Muslim women and the “Dictatorship of the Intolerant Criminals.”

(13) West Supported Muslim Theocracy

The Christian empires nurtured Islamic terrorists and supported the doctrine of the Muslim Mullah-rulers in the Islamic and encouraged the Muslim ulema and Mullah to periodically challenge the secular leadership of their governments. The West conspired to undermine the social and religious role of Hindu priests Brahmins in India. The West also conspired to undermine the role of Buddhist priests in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, South Vietnam, China and Japan. The Christian civilization joined forces with the Muslim Civilization to enhance the religious, political and social role of the Islamic clergy and Priest-class in the Muslim nations. The Christian Civilization joined forces with the secular, atheist communist forces to undermine the role of Buddhist and Hindu priest-class in Buddhist and Hindu societies respectively. In the global clash of Civilizations the Christian Civilization supported the doctrine of priest-rule by Catholic priests and also supported the doctrine of the priest-rule by Muslim priests in the Catholic and Islamic nations respectively. The Christians undermined the political and social role of the Hindu priests and Buddhist monks in Hindu India and Buddhist nations respectively. Christians supported fundamentalist Mullah-rulers and opposed the Hindu priest-rulers and Buddhist priest-rulers in the Clash of Civilizations. Just as Christian nations used Marxism and Communism to destroy Buddhism in many Buddhist societies, India and China should promote atheist Judeo Marxist revolutionary forces in Saudi Arabia to establish atheist Marxist government in Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina. The totalitarian Marxist governments in the Wahhabi states of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE would end the menace of Islamic terrorism in the 21st Century. The Marxist government in Saudi Arabia, guided by the doctrine that Islam is the opium of the masses would radically transform the Saudi society and end the menace of Islamic terrorism.

(14) Revolutions in Wahhaby Theocracies

Chagrined by the failure of its tactics of collaboration with the Wahhabi terrorists and Wahhabi Mullah-rulers, the secular Civilizations should export their Civilized revolution in the fundamentalist theocracies and made the modernization process permanent by avoiding subservience to the Muslim Priest-rulers and by setting up secular governments and Kemalist military regimes alongside any Wahhabi theocratic regimes in the New Middle East. The economic prosperity in the oil-rich world would shortly lead to the revival of modernizing women’s movements in the Islamic world. Empowerment of Muslim women and Catholic women would bring down theocracies and the dictatorships of the priest-rulers in the fundamentalist Islamic nations as well as in the conservative Catholic nations.

(15) Secular Kemalist Dictatorships

To hasten the advent of modernization of the Wahhabi Islamic societies, the modern civilizations should undertake direct modernizing ventures and encourage the secular Kemalist military dictatorships in the Arab world. The Civilizations can expedite the takeover of the barbarian societies by engineering the formation of a bureaucratic absolutist state in the Wahhabi Islamic world, with the support of the liberal middle Class and secular military leadership. The pro-women secular military leadership would be a suitable anti-dote to the anti-women Wahhabi Kingdoms and sheikhdoms. The usurpation of political power by priest-rulers is an act of political revolution and requires overwhelming revolutionary response to transfer power immediately to the pro-women secular civilized leadership.

(16) Revolutionary Students and Peasants

 Osama bin laden is a Semite authoritarian and an arrogant Bedouin who wants to establish personal dictatorships over oil-rich Islamic nations by exporting the concept of the Wahhabi dictatorships of the intolerant fundamentalists. Wahhabi terrorists look to the poor Muslim peasantry with its propensities for violence and its uncurbed terrorist instincts, rather than to the effete, civilized moderate educated Muslim youths of the civilized Muslim world. The Muslim Madrasas producing Islamic students as the future soldiers and officers of the Wahhabi revolution. Osama acquired followers, mostly young men in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen and UAE, and organized secret societies of Al Qaeda Terrorists to challenge the religious leadership of the moderate liberal Muslim clergy representing non-Wahhabi sects of Islam. Al Qaeda became a model of the terrorist direct action and a refutation of the pro-US cohabitation of the Saudi Ruling elite.

(17) Ban Wahhabi Madrasas

The secular response to the Wahhabi terrorism should focus on banning the Wahhabi Madrasas that teach predatory fundamentalism as real face of Islam and condemn the moderate liberal Islam as being false Islam.

(18) Wahhabi targets Peasantry

Russian Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin looked to Russian peasantry rather than to the Russian workers to implement the Semite Marxist agenda. Bukunin hoped students would be the officers of the revolution. Pakistan and Osama Bin Laden mobilized the Pakistani students of Islamic Madrasas into rag-tag fighting force to wage war on Afghanistan to establish first Wahhabi colonial rule over Afghanistan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 123.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(43) Anti-Hegelian Marxism as Counter Reformation Vatican Plot

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(43) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Counter Reformation Vatican Plot

(Chapter 3. 3(10) Page 124. Abstract: One. Fearing the onward march of Hegelian dialectics, Hegelian spiritualism, and Hegelianism, which sought to destroy authoritarian religions, authoritarian Papacy, dictatorship of the priests over religion matters, the Catholics and Jews pooled their intellectual talents to hype shit-philosophy of Marxism as philosophy of the modern age, so that papacy could end the Hegelian challenge and Jews could loot the property of Orthodox Russia. Two. Catholics joined forces with anti-Hegelian Karl Marx to undermine Hegelianism because Protestant Hegel had asserted the rights of philosophers to reinterpret Christian Bible, Gospel and Christian dogma and creeds to Reform Christianity. Three. All history had hitherto been a history of clash of civilizations, barbarian’s invasions of civilization, clash of generations and clash of men and women over role of women. The victory of the Civilizations over barbarian predator religions and breeding grounds of barbarians would be the final struggle, putting an end to the barbarian invasions forever. Four. The populous Civilizations have survived the repeated barbarian invasions and long-term barbarian rule. The Civilized world can permanently eradicate the menace of barbarian invasions of Civilizations by militarily inter-marrying the entire women-folk of the barbarian races with the men folk of the populous Civilizations and vice versa. Five. The purpose of the Civilized Civilization is to make every man and a woman the fully productive and fully contributive member of the Civilization, and to allow him or her the full freedom and knowledge to directly seek his true inner Self by making free choice of any of the multitude of paths available to the individuals to directly seek divine, with or without the intermediacy of the priests. Six. Living in a Capitalist civilization a man is not truly free, as his intellectual faculties forced to become a means of his individual existence, in a competitive Civilization, and his spiritual essence become alien to him and he is unable to devote his energy, concentration, time and resources to seek Self-realization. Seven. The Capitalist Civilization has appropriated the labor power of the worker as well as the means of production. However in the service industry the labor can be outsourced and the highly qualified labor can perform direct services in the United States, which resulted in the flight of high paying jobs from USA to India, which has caused alienation of workers in USA. Thus the labor power of the Third World is used along with that of labor power in the First World, in a combination whose significance workers are ignorant of, both individually and socially. Eight. The mode of production in the civilization determines the general character of the social, political and intellectual processes of life. It is not the spiritual consciousness of men, which determines their existence in a civilization it, is on the contrary their social existence, which determines their consciousness.) Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Papal Counter Reformation Roots of Marxism Communism Socialism

First. Karl Marx (May 5, 1818-March 14, 1883) was born in Germany, baptized when he was six years old, and his was baptized in Evangelical Established Church. The Roman Catholic Church and Jews joined the Karl Marx bandwagon to undermine the growing popularity of philosopher G.W.F. Hegel, who was the foremost critic of Judaism, Roman Catholicism and Papacy. Karl Marx was the shit-philosopher hired by the Pope to undermine the Hegelian dialectical idealism, which Protestant Idealist philosophers used to reinterpret Christology, Gospel and nature of Christ to recreate the rationalistic religion that Jesus preached to Jews. Karl Marx served the interests of Papacy by denouncing the Hegelianism and by developing dialectical materialism to undermine Hegelian dialectics. Second. Jews joined the bandwagon of Karl Marx as they realized that the true purpose of the Marxism was to allow the loot of the property of Orthodox Christian Russia by Jews. Jews saw in the Marxism the ideal plot to justify the loot of Christian property in the name of the revolution. Marxism was a Christian plot to undermine the attempts of idealism to reform the religion of Christianity with the help of philosophical dialectics, idealism and spiritualism. Third. Fearing the onward march of Hegelian dialectics, Hegelian spiritualism, and Hegelianism, which sought to destroy authoritarian religions, authoritarian Papacy, dictatorship of the priests over religion matters, the Catholics and Jews pooled their intellectual talents to hype shit-philosophy of Marxism as philosophy of the modern age, so that papacy could end the Hegelian challenge and Jews could loot the property of Orthodox Russia.

(2) Hegelian Idealism Superior to Marxist Materialism

Dialectical Materialism and Marxist terminology can be effective in explaining the clash of civilization as the historical forces fueled by the materialist forces and Idealist forces. The Marxist analysis of contradictions explains the inner forces that fuel clash of civilizations. In the clash of civilization Marxists joined forces with Fundamentalist Vatican. Because of the larger threat of Hegelian Idealism Catholics and Marxists joined forces to check the common menace of Protestant Hegelianism. Catholics joined forces with anti-Hegelian Karl Marx to undermine Hegelianism because Protestant Hegel had asserted the rights of philosophers to reinterpret Christian Bible, Gospel and Christian dogma and creeds to Reform Christianity. Between 1840 and 1844 emerged Karl Marx, who was destined to guide the experience of this crisis of German Hegelianism toward a revolution of world historical scope. Marx reproached Hegel for having absolutized into an ideal state the Prussian state of the time. Such absolutizing lent itself to generalizations of broad critical scope with respect to idealistic procedure of hypostatizing the Idea. Such absolutizing brought about certain concrete political and social determinations, such as family, classes and the state powers. Hegel proposed the concept of alienation, while describing the dialectic as a movement of the Absolute that wad determined by its alienating and then regaining itself, thus overcoming the self-negation. In Marx’s view, Hegelian dialectic revealed it’s a priori nature, which was mystifying and alienated in as much. Hegel did sanction the alienation of all the concrete historical and human determinations, by a method inverted with respect to real relationship. Friedrich Engels was more tied to the Hegelian conception of the dialectic, particularly regarding the dialectic of nature than Marx was. Marx rejected the ideologism as the illusion that Idealism can be carried into the revolutionary camp since it is ideas that make history.

(3) Civilization’s Philosophy of History

All history had hitherto been a history of clash of civilizations, barbarian’s invasions of civilization, clash of generations and clash of men and women over role of women. The victory of the Civilizations over barbarian predator religions and breeding grounds of barbarians would be the final struggle, putting an end to the barbarian invasions forever. The small experiment in Civilization’s rapprochement with the barbarian civilizations, barbarian intolerant religions and barbarian terrorists deadens the Civilization Vs Barbarianism clash and therefore is appeasement of the terrorist barbarians. When populous civilizations finally decide to annihilate the barbarian terrorism and impose the settlements of Civilizations throughout barbarian homelands, the problem of barbarian invasions of civilizations is solved forever. The populous civilizations of China, India and United States have the manpower and military capability to permanently destroy the home base and breeding grounds of the terrorist barbarians followed by massive inter-marriages with the barbarian boys and girls would permanently eradicate the barbarian societies and bring them into the fold of populous Civilizations. It would permanently eradicate the menace of barbarian invasions of the Civilizations.

(4) Civilizations can eradicate barbarianism

Barbarians improvise the military technology to successfully invade the Civilizations. Barbarians succeed in taking over the Civilization and after they control the Civilizations they protect it from further attacks of other barbarians. Over the period of time the Civilizations improvise upon the military technology of the barbarians and mass-produce the weapons, to overwhelm the barbarian invaders and barbarian rulers of the erstwhile civilizations. Less populous Civilizations succumb to the invasions of the foreign barbarians and lose their cultural and religious identity and forced to adopt the culture and religion of the foreign invaders. The populous Civilizations have survived the repeated barbarian invasions and long-term barbarian rule. The populous Civilization should mass-produce the military technology to overwhelm the entire barbarian lands and subjugate the barbarian men and women, boys and girls and inter-marry them so that entire generation of the barbarian men and women become part and parcel of the Civilizations. The Civilized world can permanently eradicate the menace of barbarian invasions of Civilizations by militarily inter-marrying the entire women-folk of the barbarian races with the men folk of the populous Civilizations and vice versa. Let hundreds of millions of civilized Indians and Chinese and Americans intermarry with the entire unmarried men folk and womenfolk of the barbarian nations worldwide, so that the entire world would become civilized at one go.

The Civilizations have nothing to lose by undertaking overwhelming preemptive strikes against barbarian nations and barbarian civilizations. The Civilizations have nothing to lose but their injuries that civilizations suffer due to the repeated barbarian invasions. The civilizations have a world of barbarians to win and bring into the fold of civilizations, so that no barbarian is left outside the fold of the civilization. Civilizations of the world unite and wage wars on barbarians to bring the entire barbarian lands into the ambit of the Civilizations.

(5) Man is a Civilized being

The civilized man is first of all a member of a Civilization. Even a barbarian craves to become a part of a civilization, and a barbarian is also a member of a barbarian civilization. A Civilization is the basic unit of the humanity. Human activity is essentially a struggle with the earth’s environment that must furnish man the means of satisfying needs as a member of a Civilization. In this undertaking man discovers himself as a productive being that civilizes himself by his labor. Man humanizes the earthly environment by his labor, while he civilizes himself. By his creative activity and by his nature man realizes his identity as a civilized being in the earthly environment that he masters, while at the same time he achieves free consciousness of his true inner Self the soul, his private individuality. Man is a private individual as well as a social being of a Civilization and he plays his role in the history by exploiting the earthly environment. All that is called history is nothing else than the process of creating the civilized man and the self-realized man. Born of nature in a civilization a man becomes a realized individual, when he realizes that as a Self he is beyond civilization and beyond death and decay. The process of civilization is the process to make man the productive member of a Civilization. The highest goal of the Civilization is to give the man the knowledge that as an Individual he is the Self the Soul that is beyond death and eternal, which does not die when the body dies and that Self is reincarnated in other body after the death. The man has the responsibility towards civilization, to contribute towards the welfare of the civilization and make personal gains to make his life on earth a pleasure. The man has also a responsibility to seek self-realization that every man is a separate individual Soul and that very same specific individual Soul-Self has taken rebirths and reincarnations millions of times before and would take millions of more births in the future. The spiritual activity reveals that for man, the Self of man is the Supreme Being. For a man who has realized his true Self, it is vain to speak of God, creation and metaphysical problems, as after Enlightenment and during the process of seeking the Enlightenment the individual attains direct perception of True Reality the True nature of the Almighty. Fully self-realized man is sufficient unto himself, and he has recaptured the fullness of man in his full liberty. The purpose of the Civilized Civilization is to make every man and a woman the fully productive and fully contributive member of the Civilization, and to allow him or her the full freedom and knowledge to directly seek his true inner Self by making free choice of any of the multitude of paths available to the individuals to directly seek divine, with or without the intermediacy of the priests. The civilization provides man the economic and social freedom to pursue his selfish goals, freedom of religion to pursue the search for the Divine by choosing any religious path of his choice, and political freedom to play any leadership role in the Civilization on a level playing ground in a free competitive environment.

(6) Man is an alienated being

Living in a Capitalist civilization a man is not truly free, as his intellectual faculties forced to become a means of his individual existence, in a competitive Civilization, and his spiritual essence become alien to him and he is unable to devote his energy, concentration, time and resources to seek Self-realization. Man is an alienated being he is not at home in this civilized world. Man as alienated bring joins the barbarian world to wreck vengeance at the Civilization. The cause of man’s alienation has increasingly social, economic, racial, religious and political contents and causes. The alienation of labor springs from the fact that equally qualified workers in different societies performing exactly similar work gets paid differently creating regional, national, and racial and civilization disparities. The more the worker in the Third World produces in commodities and services the less industrial goods he gets in exchange of commodities and services to consume and for his personal use. Because of it his product and his labor are estranged from him and his counterparts in the Western civilization exploit him, even though they might be less qualified and less hard working. The life of any worker depends on capital, which has different exchange rates and parity in different nations, and it is not uniformly distributed in the world civilizations, as a result the worker in the Third World creates the capital, but the globalization of capital finds safe heaven abroad, so that instead of finding his rightful existence through his labor he loses it in this world of Globalization that is external to him. Because of the disparities in the work and rewards and disparities of the commodities prices and the prices of industrial and manufactured goods, labor denies the fullness of concrete man. Man is made alien to man. The private property of the man in the West becomes the product of the alienated labor of the man in the East. When the man in the poorer Civilization realizes that the wealth of the richer Civilizations as well as the wealth of the richer man of his own civilization is the product of the stolen rewards that should have gone to him. The disparity in the private incomes and per capital GNP is the mean by which labor alienates itself and realizes the realization of this alienation. The Clash of Civilization is the tangible material expression of alienated human life across different civilizations.

As commodity producers in civilization, men create goods by their labor and use of the earth’s resources and these goods are exchangeable, and price-wise the same commodity gets paid differently in different civilizations. The unjust exchange parity of the various primary commodities and manufactured goods within a civilization and between civilizations causes worker’s alienation and contributes towards Clash of Civilization. The Clash of Civilization become sever whenever workers of poorer civilization realize that the richer civilization have historically exploited them by manipulating the exchange parity of commodities, goods, services and currencies. Clash of Civilization expresses the historical reality more succinctly than the Marxist concept of class conflict. Under these conditions the labor denies the fullness of concrete man. The clash of civilization would subside when the workers in different civilizations gets paid the same rewards for the similar work, services, commodities and goods. The globalization process would reduce the clash of civilization by encouraging specialization, piecework, and setting up of large transnational corporations and free flow of Foreign Direct Investments so that specialist service providers and commodity producers in different civilizations gets fair rewards for their services are paid equitable prices for their goods and commodities.

(7) Expropriation of Labor Power of Worker

The Capitalist Civilization has appropriated the labor power of the worker as well as the means of production. However in the service industry the labor can be outsourced and the highly qualified labor can perform direct services in the United States, which resulted in the flight of high paying jobs from USA to India, which has caused alienation of workers in USA. Thus the labor power of the Third World is used along with that of labor power in the First World, in a combination whose significance workers are ignorant of, both individually and socially. The services that qualified workers provide lose their quality as human products, which are better rewarded in the First World and poorly rewarded in the Third World, and the product of qualified labor become fetishes, the alien and oppressive realities, that qualified workers in both the first and third world submit themselves. The better qualified workers in the First World are scared that their well paying jobs would move to India, where equally qualified Indians would perform the same job with similar proficiency at much lower salaries, which at disparate exchange parity would mean quite a fortune to them in India. The West became prosperous by artificially manipulating the exchange parity of currencies. In the age of globalization of capital and services, the shrinking of the world village and the spread of education threatens the very survival of Western prosperity, as artificial exchange parity would transfer service industry jobs to India. While artificially lower exchange rates of Indian rupee versus dollars makes India poorer in GNP, it would also expedite the flow of jobs to India from USA especially in the IT, which would become a fetter upon economic growth in the USA until finally the knell of capitalist private property sounds. The expropriators are expropriated. In the age of Globalization on a level playing ground, the United States because of its monopoly of capital, could artificially lower Indian rupee’s exchange rate to US Dollar, but the artificially lower rupee-dollar exchange rates would result in the exodus of the high paying jobs to India, until finally the United States expropriators are expropriated. The artificially lower currency exchange rate parity causes alienation of Indian commodity producers and Indian workers, who even when he produces more has less foreign goods to consume. The artificially low rupee exchange parity also causes alienation of United States workers who find to their dismay their high-paying jobs moving to India. In the age of globalization and Internet the older colonial expropriators are expropriated. The flight of higher paying American jobs to India is also an example for Marxist dogma that the development of capitalism is accompanied by increasing competition. The pauperization of India due to the adverse exchange rates also causes pauperization of upper middle class in the United States by the flight of higher paying jobs to India in the Post-industrial service economy of United States, where of the US GNP of $ 8.4 trillion in 1999, value added as % of GDP was Services (72%), Agriculture (2%), Industry (26%) and Manufacturing (18%). The flight of high paying jobs to India would cost more loss to US GNP than what it gains by artificially lowering the prices of the commodity imports from the Third World.

(8) Civilization’s Historical Materialism

The mode of production in the civilization determines the general character of the social, political and intellectual processes of life. It is not the spiritual consciousness of men, which determines their existence in a civilization it, is on the contrary their social existence, which determines their consciousness. In the economic and social production that men carry on, they enter into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their choice or will. The mode of production is dependent on the development of technology and material forces of production in a civilization. The economic infrastructures and super structures of the civilization determine the relationship that men enter into and they have not much choice. Man is merely a cog in the wheel of the Civilization. The civilizations material means of production determines the value system of the man and man has to adjust to the value system of the civilization he lives in. The social consciousness of the Civilization, the legal, political and social superstructure produces definite form of social consciousness. The economic and social superstructures of the Civilization determine the religion and spiritual consciousness of the man, not vice versa. This is the historical law of the Civilization’s historical materialism. Intolerant civilizations produce intolerant religious cults and predator cultures. Tolerant diverse multi-ethnic Civilizations produce tolerant diverse inclusive religion and diverse society. Intolerant Islamic Civilization produced predatory Wahhabi cult. Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations have never produced intolerant predatory cults. Oriental civilizations are tolerant societies.

(9) Primary goods Vs Industrial goods Clash

The Third world primary oil producers control the means of production in the First World in the 21st Century. Oil plays the principal role in the modern industrial economy. Oil interests determine the national interests in the industrial age. The change in mode of production in the economy has direct impact on the Clash of Civilization. The mode of production in material life determines the general character of the social, political and intellectual processes in a Civilization. During 17th, 18th and 19th centuries in the agricultural age, the Clash of Civilization took the form of expropriating the agricultural lands of the original inhabitants of North America, South America, Australia, South Africa and Zimbabwe. During colonial era the colonies served to provide gold, precious metals, raw materials and commodities for colonial powers. During 21st Century oil age, the expropriators merely want to pump out the oil and gas resources and do not want to disturb the local inhabitants religion, culture and politics. In the age of Neo-Colonialism the American monopoly capital wants to control only the underground oil and gas resources and the oil and gas pipelines. Oil is a generic commodity and does not require large manpower to produce. There is no short supply of oil and gas resources of the world. In a way there is lots of oversupply of oil and gas resources. The control over the means of distribution of oil and gas resources determines the means of production in the oil-imports dependent industrial economies. The control over the critical raw material supply, the oil and gas energy resources, would control the means of production in the modern age. The industrial world has become dependent on a simple commodity for its very survival as an industrial civilization. Industrial means of production has become critically dependent on the free supply of a primary commodity, the oil and gas. The primary resource, the oil and gas commodity has acquired the critical control over industrial means of production in the industrial civilizations. The primary producers of oil and gas have tightened the noose over the manufacturers of industrial goods and manufactured goods. In the Neo-Colonial age the colonial occupation of the oil-producing world becomes a historical necessity for the very survival of the industrial economies and post-industrial economies. In the oil age the Marxist dogma that Capitalists exploits the primary goods producers is put upside down, as the OPEC as primary goods producers’ cartel holds the industrial world at ransom and exploits the oil-dependent manufacturing economies of South Korea, Taiwan, China, India and Japan. In the post-industrial economies the primary producers hold at ransom the industrial economies that are dependent on imported oil and gas energy resources.

(10) Perpetual Internal Contradictions

Every aspect of clash of Civilization in themselves contain contradictory elements and imply contradictions and internal contradiction of the civilizations propel the civilization towards progress of the civilization, otherwise the civilization becomes stagnant. All historical processes contain in themselves contradictory elements and imply contradictions, because they all have positive and negative side. Internal Contradictions must be made manifest. Every Civilization faced internal contradictions

1. First. Joseph Stalin employed the Buddhist doctrine of permanent change to adapt Hegelian dialectics. Nature is perpetually in a state of unceasing renewal and development, in which there is always something being born and developing and something disintegrating and disappearing. The dialectic does not regard nature as an accidental accumulation of objects, of isolated and independent phenomena, but as a unified, coherent whole. History is a dialectical development. It proceeds by successive phases, which supersede one another. Neither phase A & B is not separate even if B supercedes A. Though it is true that phase B negates phase A the phase B was already contained in phase A and initiated by it. From dialectic point of view objects and natural phenomena imply internal contradictions, because every phenomena has a positive as well as a negative side. These negative and positive phases and sides of the same natural phenomena are in perpetual struggle. These internal contradictions are in perpetual struggle, it is this struggle that is the internal content of the process of development.

2. Second. The tolerant Civilization that encourages inclusion, diversity and tolerates multiplicity of thoughts has greater chances of survival in the longer term. The intolerant societies that advocate ethnic separatism and propagates exclusion of the diversity would disappear from the face of the earth. Every political ideology and every religion that resolved the problem of internal contradictions by sword though expands by sword but soon after dies by the sword also. Only those religions and civilizations that tolerate factions, encourage factional activities and encourages opposition platforms within the ruling elite would survive in the long term.

3. Third. Joseph Stalin’s law of dialectical materialism states: Contradictions must be made manifest. All phenomena contain in themselves contradictory elements. Dialectic start from the point of view that objects and natural phenomena imply internal contradictions, because they all have a positive and a negative side. These contradictory elements are in perpetual struggle. It is this struggle that is the internal content of the process of the development.

Joseph Stalin adopted intolerant policies. Stalin decided to forbid all factions all factional activity and all opposition political platforms within the Soviet Communist Party. Stalin’s spymaster Lavrenti Beria caused the deaths of more than 30 million Russians. The ideological bigotry of the Stalin and his ruthless use of force to crush opposition caused the demise of the Soviet Union.

4. Fourth. The predatory intolerance of Wahhabi fundamentalism would cause the demise of Islam in the Middle East. Islam as a religion advocated the single rule of the Caliph over the entire Muslim Ummah. American and British Empires and Colonel Lawrence of Arabia incited the Ottoman Sharif of Mecca to encourage the Wahhabi Bedouin tribes to revolt against Ottoman rule to establish the religious rule of Wahhabi clergy over Mecca and political rule of King Abdul Aziz of House of Al Saud over Saudi Arabia and American BigOil’s monopoly over Saudi oil and gas resources. American policy nurtured barbarian Wahhabi religious intolerance, misused the military and economic might of Western Christendom to undermine the democratic, liberal Islamic regimes and promoted Islamic separatism in the Third World. Initially United States profited when Afghan Mujahideens defeated Soviet troops in Afghanistan and it resulted in the secession of the Muslim Central Asian Republics from Soviet Union in 1990. However, the negative side of this policy had the contradiction in form of Osama Bin Laden, who realized that Saudi Arabia could lead the Islamic fundamentalists worldwide and could directly attack even United States. The American policy to support Islamic terrorists to serve the national interests of United States carried the seeds of its inner contradiction, which manifested in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States.

5. Fifth. The 1947 Partition of Indian Empire on the basis of the Two Nation Theory carved out of Muslim-majority regions of Indian Empire the new artificial State of Pakistan on the basis of Islam as the basis of state. The creation of the State of Pakistan on the basis of ethnic separatism and religious fundamentalism carried the inner contradiction, which resulted in the secession of Bangladesh in 1971. Once one accepts the principle of religious separatism and ethnic separatism then secession of Baluchistan and secession of Pushtunistan becomes a possibility and Pakistan might face a second Partition. If Pakistan demands that Muslims of Kashmir Valley should have the freedom to secede from India, then Pakistan cannot deny the rights of Baluchistan province inhabited by Baluch people that have distinct race and Shiite Sufi faith to secede from Pakistan. Hindu India should exploit the inner contradiction inherent in the concept of Pakistan to engineer the Second Partition of Pakistan to eliminate the problem of Pakistan sponsoring terrorists in Kashmir. Pakistan was created to create a buffer state between Hindu Indian Empire and oil-rich Iran. American Big Oil supported the secession of gas-rich Bangladesh after they discovered big gas fields in Bangladesh. The secession of Balochistan from Pakistan would provide direct sea access to the landlocked countries of Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. The Oil interested mandated the 1947 Partition of India to create Pakistan, and 1971 secession of Bangladesh would also mandate the secession of Balochistan from Pakistan to provide sea-access to the Turkmenistan-Balochistan oil-gas pipelines.

6. Sixth. United States policy to transfer nuclear weapon technology to Pakistan to hold India in check carried the negative repercussion and the internal contradiction that resulted in the Pakistan’s Islamic Bomb that could some day vaporize some Western metropolis. Gen. Zia Ul Haq and Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s policy to promote Islamic Shariah Law had the inner contradiction that Islamist Prime Minister of Pakistan might either transform Pakistan’s Atom Bomb into Islamic Atom Bomb or challenge Saudi Arabia for the leadership role in the Islamic world as the new Caliph of Islam. The American policy of promoting Pakistan as the rival to super power India, carries the internal contradiction that nuclear Pakistan might look westward and challenge the leadership of Semite Saudi Arabia for the leadership of the Islamic world as the New Caliph of Islam.

7. Seventh. The Western policy that overthrew the liberal secular monarchy of Shah Mohammed Riza Pahlavi of Iran and imposed the rule of Ayatollah Khomeini served American national interests and eliminated Aryan Iran as rival to Semite Saudi Arabia for the leadership role in the Islamic world. Ayotollah Khomeini’s Mullah-ruler regime of Shiite Iran became the first Islamic theocracy, the first priest-ruler government in Asia. The installation of the Mullah-rule in Iran endangered the House of Al Saud Monarchy in Saudi Arabia, and raised the specter of Osama Bin Laden taking over as Mullah-ruler of Saudi Arabia. United States deployed diplomacy of deception when it invaded Afghanistan to hunt down Osama Bin Laden as part of America’s War on terror, but provided safe passage to Al Qaeda terrorists from Afghanistan. This policy of duplicity over Osama Bin Laden carried the negative side effect and the inner contradiction that Osama Bin Laden might conspire to overthrow the House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia and establish the Bin Laden Dynasty in Saudi Arabia. Oil-rich Saudi Arabia’s dream to lead the Islamic world as the leader of Mecca Caliphate imply internal contradiction that Wahhabi fundamentalism might result in the self-destruction of Islam, as Wahhabi Islam had been practiced only among the uncivilized barbarian nomad Bedouin tribes of Mecca and Medina and they played no leadership role during last 1300 year period of Islamic history during Abbasid Baghdad Caliphate and Ottoman Caliphate. Semite Israel and Semite Saudi Arabia and Anglo-Saxon United States invaded secular Iraq to establish the American colonial rule and bring Iraq under the rule of Wahhabi Arabs. US-Saudi-Israel invasion of Iraq had the inner contradiction that since Arab Shiite represented 65% population of Iraq and Sunni Aryan Kurds represented 25% population the American occupation of Iraq might result in the US-Shiite alliance to undermine Wahhabi OPEC oil producers. The Shiite-Sunni conflict in the Arabian Peninsula would make manifest many internal contradictions in the Arabian Peninsula. American policy to nurture Shiite and Wahhabi fundamentalism to hold super power Hindu India in check would backfire and may make manifest the internal contradictions that may result in Christian Crusades on Islamic Middle East.

8. Eighth. The expansion of the European Union from 15-member group to 25-member group made manifest the internal contradiction that enlarged European Union would no longer accept the economic leadership of Germany and political leadership of France. The expansion of the NATO to include the former members of the Warsaw pact members made manifest the internal contradictions that expanded NATO no longer represented the Western Christendom and it could no longer deny the orthodox Russia’s new role in Europe. Donald Rumsfeld insulted France and Germany by calling they represented Old Europe while pro-US Poland represented New Europe. President Bush’s policy to invade Iraq to establish American oil colony in Iraq, made manifest the internal contradiction in the Atlantic Partnership and the expanded NATO Alliance died in the rubble of Baghdad. President Bush’s policy to browbeat France and Germany into submission resulted in the development of new Paris-Bonn-Moscow Axis to hold Washington in check.

(11) Neoconservatism Resolves Hegelian Contradictions

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 129.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(44) Universal Contradictions of Civilizations

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(44) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions

Chapter 3. 3(11) Page 129. Abstract: One. The nonantagonistic particular contradictions between two rival civilizations result in the results in the inter-exchange of ideas and movement of people and goods between the two civilizations. The antagonistic contradictions between civilizations, the contradictions between enemies are resolved by war. Two. For Mao tse Tung the contradictions are at the same time universal and particular. In their universality, one must seek and discover what constitutes their particularity. Every contradiction displays a particular character, depending on the nature of things and phenomena. Contradictions have alternating aspects, sometime strongly marked and some times blurred. Some of these aspects are primary, others secondary.

Three. The primary universal contradiction in the Indian Civilization is that in 1750 AD India produced 24.5% of the world’s total manufactured goods and India had always been one of the leading world powers throughout history, but India never embarked upon the landward territorial expansion of India. India throughout history never embarked on landward territorial expansion throughout its history. Why? Hindu King Rama conquered Lanka of Rawana, and returned home to Ayodhya, and didn’t allow his younger brother Washman to become the King of Lanka. Indian Empire before 1947, ruled over Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Qatar, Muscat, Oman and Bahrain), Yemen and Malaysia, but after independence India refused to exercise any great power role in the Third World.

Four. The universal contradiction inherent in the Indian Hindu Civilization is that while maritime Hindu South India maintained overseas colonial empires for many centuries in Indonesia, Malaysia, Laos, and Cambodia it was primarily a maritime colonial empire, with landward exposed frontiers vulnerable to the attacks of the land power Mughal Empire then occupying Delhi. When North Indian Mauryan Empire of Ashoka and Mughal Empire of Aurangzeb brought South India under its rule, it refused to venture out to establish either maritime empire in the Greater India in Southeast Asia or landward in West Asia. South Indian Dravidian people are colonial expansionists, while north Indian Aryan people are inward looking nonexpansionist people. It is a social reality in India that south India believes in expansionism while North India abhors expansionism.)

© Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Universal & Particular Contradictions

Every Civilization contains two different types of contradictions. Contradictions inherent in the clash of civilizations are at the same time universal and particular.

1. First. Every universal contradiction in the civilization also displays a particular and local character, depending on the context and issues involved. Every civilization’s worldview includes the Universal contradiction and particular contradiction. Varying aspects of the civilization’s contradictions are sometime strongly marked and sometimes blurred. Civilizations have primary contradictions and secondary contradictions. It is very important the we correctly define for every Civilization its universal as well as particular contradictions, its primary and secondary contradictions, where differences between various contradictions might be either blurred or strongly marked. It is important to clearly define the Civilization’s Universal and particular, primary and secondary contradictions, otherwise the analysis of the social reality of clash of civilizations and the remedial actions that follow from it will be mistaken. The role and nature of contradictions in the clash of civilizations should be diligently studied. The antagonistic contradictions between civilizations, the contradictions between enemies are resolved by war. The nonantagonistic contradictions between civilizations are resolved by geopolitical and diplomatic negotiations and trade offs. The nonantagonistic universal contradictions between two rival civilizations result in the merger of cultures, merger of religions, collusion of civilizations and inter-civilization intercourse. The nonantagonistic particular contradictions between two rival civilizations result in the results in the inter-exchange of ideas and movement of people and goods between the two civilizations.

2. Second. For Mao tse Tung the contradictions are at the same time universal and particular. In their universality, one must seek and discover what constitutes their particularity. Every contradiction displays a particular character, depending on the nature of things and phenomena. Contradictions have alternating aspects, sometime strongly marked and some times blurred. Some of these aspects are primary, others secondary. It is important to define them well for if one fails to do so, the analysis of the social reality and the actions that follow from it will be mistaken. Every society has two types of contradictions. The antagonistic contradictions are resolved by revolution. The nonantagonistic contradictions are resolved by vigorous fraternal criticism and self-criticism. This is Mao tse Tung’s doctrine of universal contradictions. Maoism represents a peasant type of Marxism, with a principally rural and military outlook. By integrating Mao’s experience into a universal vision of history and clash of civilizations, Maoist perspective could acquire a perspective that could overflow the provincial limits of China. By arguing India’s case in the Clash of civilizations in the light of Maoist doctrine of contradictions, Hindu India might explain Hindu worldview to Chinese leadership, who are toying with the idea of civilization pact of Elephant India and Dragon China.

3. Third. The primary universal contradiction in the Indian Civilization is that in 1750 AD India produced 24.5% of the world’s total manufactured goods and India had always been one of the leading world powers throughout history, but India never embarked upon the landward territorial expansion of India. India throughout history never embarked on landward territorial expansion throughout its history. Why? Hindu King Rama conquered Lanka of Rawana, and returned home to Ayodhya, and didn’t allow his younger brother Washman to become the King of Lanka. Indian Empire before 1947, ruled over Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Qatar, Muscat, Oman and Bahrain), Yemen and Malaysia, but after independence India refused to exercise any great power role in the Third World.

4. Fourth. The universal contradiction inherent in the Indian Hindu Civilization is that while maritime Hindu South India maintained overseas colonial empires for many centuries in Indonesia, Malaysia, Laos, and Cambodia it was primarily a maritime colonial empire, with landward exposed frontiers vulnerable to the attacks of the land power Mughal Empire then occupying Delhi. When North Indian Mauryan Empire of Ashoka and Mughal Empire of Aurangzeb brought South India under its rule, it refused to venture out to establish either maritime empire in the Greater India in Southeast Asia or landward in West Asia. South Indian Dravidian people are colonial expansionists, while north Indian Aryan people are inward looking nonexpansionist people. It is a social reality in India that south India believes in expansionism while North India abhors expansionism. India during 21st Century cannot expand northward since China is our northern border. India cannot expand westward as nuclear Pakistan is our Western border. India can only expand eastward towards Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand by land routes. Indian civilization can expand to Southeast Asia, towards Malaysia and Indonesia from Andaman & Nicobar by sea routes as a maritime sea power. Indian civilization can expand towards East Africa and Southern Africa as a maritime power. India civilization should let south Indian Tamil Kannada and Malabar people lead Indian civilization’s expansion. Tamil language and Tamil culture would act as the spearhead of India’s civilization expansion in Great India, Southeast Asia, East Africa and Southern Africa. India has to emerge as the Sea power to undertake the expansion of Indian Civilization in Southeast Asia and Africa. India is a land power but its future as world power depends upon its ability to emerge as the Sea Power with Deep Sea Navy. The North-South, Aryan-Dravidian contradiction in India is the nonantagonistic contradiction, which can be resolved by allowing Dravidian people take charge of Hindu India’s cultural, linguistic religious and civilization’s expansionism in the ongoing Clash of Civilizations. North India must admit that Hindu India is proud of South Indian history and Dravidian peoples imperial legacy and Indian history should be rewritten with the focus on South Indian Hindu dynasties and North Indian history should become an appendage of the glorious South Indian history. It might be prudent if Indian geographers publish world map with the South Pole at the top, so that while hanging the world map with South Pole on the top and North Pole down, would give a proper focus on South India with proud legacy of Hindu colonial empires, and South India should represent India as the leader of Hindu Indian Civilization.

5. Fifth. The universal contradiction between eclectic Hindu Indian civilization and the Islamic civilization relates to the issue of tolerance, inclusion, diversity, freedom of religion and rights of women. Indian Civilization would never accept the predator religious intolerance of Wahhabi fundamentalism, Islamic militancy and Islamic terrorism. India has historically supported the sovereignty and independence of the Islamic nations and supported Arabs against Israel in the Arab-Israel War. India has very closer ties with secular Muslim countries, namely, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Algeria, which are also Non Aligned Nations. India has very closer ties with Wahhabi Arab countries, namely, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Muscat and Oman where millions of Indian expatriates work and send substantial remittances to India. India had been the only Third World country in the world that stood by the side of Iraq.

6. Sixth. The universal contradiction between Hindu civilization and Catholic Civilization relates to the issue of tolerance, inclusion, diversity and opposition to Christian proselytizing.

7. Seventh. The inner contradictions of the Occidental Civilizations would result in the synthesis of civilization forced by the sword of the dominant civilization. The dialectical process in the civilizations of authoritarian intolerant religions by the total victory of either thesis or antithesis which would result in the total victory of one of the two clashing civilizations and the synthesis will result in the dominance one over other. The Christian, Islamic and Judaic civilizations are united in Occidental civilizations’ war against the Oriental Hindu and Buddhist civilizations of Asia. The Protestant and Catholic Christian civilizations are united in Christianity’s Crusades against Islamic Civilization. The Vatican-led Catholic civilization joined forces with Wahhabi Mecca-led Arab Civilization to undermine the Jewish State of Israel in the Holy Land to create an independent state of Palestine, so that Papacy could take over the Orthodoxy’s Christian religious properties in the Holy Land. The antagonistic contradictions between Wahhabi Islam and Protestant Neo-Colonialism can be resolved only by war, which would result in the conquest of the oil-rich Sunni world by Protestant Crusaders of 21st Century. The antagonistic contradictions between Zionist Orthodox Judaism and militant Wahhabi terrorism can be resolved either by the secular Marxist revolution in Saudi Arabia or by the Israeli-American conquest of Arabia. The antagonistic contradictions between Christianity and Islam can be resolved only by war or violent revolution.

8. Dialectical Materialism and Marxist terminology can be effective in explaining the clash of civilization as the historical forces fueled by the materialist forces and Idealist forces. The Marxist analysis of contradictions explains the inner forces that fuel clash of civilizations. In the clash of civilization Marxists joined forces with Fundamentalist Vatican.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 131.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(45) Papacy is not a Church but a Business Empire

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(45) Papacy Vs Christian Empire

Chapter 3. 3(12) Page 132. Abstract: One. Pope failed to create a Pope’s Theocratic Empire and the dictatorship of priests in Europe even during Dark Age and he would fail to do so in the 21st Century. Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca would also fail to create Wahhabi Caliphate with Mullah as Caliph in the Islamic world in the 21st Century.

Two. Catholic people of Italy should hold a Plebiscite to decide whether the 1929 Concordant declared null and void. People of Italy abolished monarchy by the Jun 1946 Plebiscite. Catholic citizens have the right to abolish Papacy and terminate 1929 Concordant by Plebiscite. Pope John Paul II has exacerbated the Clash of Civilization by his active pursuit of policies of Papal aggrandizement. Papacy has caused Clash of Civilization throughout 2nd Millennium and to disastrous consequences. The 21st Century might witness the repeat of the 1527 and 1870 when the Habsburg Emperor Charles V and Italian King Victor Emmanuel, respectively entered Rome and put Pope under House arrest. Under the orders of the King of Italy, succession of Popes remained prisoner of the Vatican under House Arrest for 59 years (Sept. 20, 1870 to Feb 11, 1929). People of Italy in 1946 voted to abolish Italian monarchy and established a Republic. People of Italy can also by Plebiscite also abolish Papacy and establish non-authoritarian Reformed Christianity instead. Pope has no role in any future Christian Empire. Pope would have no role in President Bush’s Oil Empire.

Three. Protestant Hegel revived the issues of Investiture Controversy that had raged from 1076 to 1122, and asserted that secular authority had authority to invest bishops and abbots with in their domains without consulting Pope and to appoint them and to give them the symbols of their office. Hegel argued that Philosophers have the right to reinterpret Christian scripture, Gospel, Christology, and nature of Christ and to hold and advocate views contrary to that of Papacy and Roman Catholic Church.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;   © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Papacy Failed to Create Pope’s Political or Military Empire

Pope failed to create a Pope’s Theocratic Empire and the dictatorship of priests in Europe even during Dark Age and he would fail to do so in the 21st Century. Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca would also fail to create Wahhabi Caliphate with Mullah as Caliph in the Islamic world in the 21st Century. Islamic terrorism is an attempt to create Islamic Papacy in Arab world so that Wahhabi Ulema could acquire the political power to remove the Saudi monarch, just as Pope Gregory VII had claimed. Saudi King would militarily crush the Wahhabi fundamentalism just as Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Charles V in 1527 arrested Pope and King of Italy kept succession of Popes prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929.

Succession of Popes had been nuisance to the secular Kings of Western Europe and never been a serious challenger to their power. Pope had created many wars in Europe but Pope could never threaten the European secular rulers. There is no reason that European rulers would permit Pope to play any significant role in European Union in 21st Century. Pope would definitely have no role in President Bush’s Empire. The White Christians of Europe could respond to the global clash of civilization unleashed by Pope John Paul II to bring about the leading Christian monarchies in the world to usher the in the clergy-ruled Catholic Kingdom of God on earth, by engineering the victory of Christian Pharisees, Christian Mysticism or Christian Hegelians.

Ultra-conservative Pope realizes that the Enlightened, Idealist and liberal European philosophical tradition is nemesis of Papal absolutism and dictatorship of the priests currently in force in Roman Catholic Church. Vatican-Mecca axis seeks to create Wahhabi Papacy in the Islamic world. Pharisees stand for the democratization of the authoritarian religions. Spiritualists and mystics allow the freedom to laity to directly experience the Divine without the intermediacy of the priests. Monarchies and republics in Italy, France, Spain and Germany would no longer tolerate Papal encroachment of secular affairs. The advocates of Christian Empire would never permit priests or Pope to interfere in their imperial agenda. Papacy has become irrelevant in Italy, Spain, Portugal and France, especially when led by non-Italian and non-West European John Paul II. In the scheme of things, only Wahhabi Mecca is true friend of Papal Vatican as Mecca seeks to create Wahhabi Papacy in the Islamic world, so that Muslim priests could rule the Islamic world.

(2) Roman Question

First. Catholic people of Italy should hold a Plebiscite to decide whether the 1929 Concordant declared null and void. People of Italy abolished monarchy by the Jun 1946 Plebiscite. Catholic citizens have the right to abolish Papacy and terminate 1929 Concordant by Plebiscite. Pope John Paul II has exacerbated the Clash of Civilization by his active pursuit of policies of Papal aggrandizement. Papacy has caused Clash of Civilization throughout 2nd Millennium and to disastrous consequences. The 21st Century might witness the repeat of the 1527 and 1870 when the Habsburg Emperor Charles V and Italian King Victor Emmanuel, respectively entered Rome and put Pope under House arrest. Under the orders of the King of Italy, succession of Popes remained prisoner of the Vatican under House Arrest for 59 years (Sept. 20, 1870 to Feb 11, 1929). People of Italy in 1946 voted to abolish Italian monarchy and established a Republic. People of Italy can also by Plebiscite also abolish Papacy and establish non-authoritarian Reformed Christianity instead.

1. One. Otto I was crowned emperor of Italy in 962 and the Holy Roman Empire abolished by Napoleon in 1806. Habsburg Emperor Charles V captured Rome in 1527 and placed Pope Clement VII (1527) in captivity. In 1815 Congress of Vienna restored Pope in the Papal States. The Revolution of 1848 broke out in Milan And Sicily and the Pope fled from Rome and Italian Republic was proclaimed and Giuseppe Mazzini became president. In 1850, Napoleon III’s French Army restored the Pope and other sovereigns nullifying the 1848 Revolution.

2. Two. Victor Emmanuel II, king of Piedmont, who aided the Italy’s national cause supported by Cavour of Sardinia and Giuseppe Garibaldi. After the defeat of the Austrian armies of Habsburg Empire at the battles of Magenta (June 14, 1859) and struggle ended with the Peace of Villafranca. Victor Emmanuel declared King of Italy by Italian Parliament (February 1861). In 1867 the national party under Garibaldi made an attack upon Rome but was repulsed by the Papal Army. Napoleon III, withdrew his troops from Rome and Victor Emmanuel entered Rome (20 Sept. 1870) and assured the emancipation of Italy. The Pope was given a yearly donation of $622,500 and Pope retained the possession of the Lateran Palace, the Vatican, the Church of Santa Maria Maggiore and the villa of Castel Grandolfo. Victor Emmanuel died in 1878 and his son Humbert I succeeded him, who was assassinated in 1900. Victor Emmanuel III succeeded Humbert I. Italy joined Germany and Austria in the Triple alliance in 1883. In 1911 Italy had a war with Turkey and annexed Tripoli. In 1915 Italy repudiated the Triple Alliance and entered World War I on the side of Entente Allies.

3. Three. Mussolini inherited the Roman Question. On Feb 11, 1929, a treaty, concordant and financial convention were signed by Mussolini and by Cardinal Gasparri for Pope Pius XI. Italy recognized the sovereignty of the Pope over the state known as Vatican City and recognized Catholic religion as the only state religion. The Mussolini’s government agreed to enforce the Catholic cannon law relating to faith, morals and marriage and religious instruction was to be compulsory. The Pope received $91.8 million in settlement of all financial relations with Italy in consequence of the fall of temporal power. In return, the Holy See declared the Roman Question settled and recognized the Kingdom of Italy, with Victor Emmanuel as King.

4. Four. After the fall of Rome (June 4, 1924), King Victor Emmanuel turned over his power, though not his throne to his son, Crown Prince Humbert. On May 9, 1946, King Victor Emmanuel abdicated in favor of Humbert. In the Plebiscite of June 2-3 1946, majority of Italians voted for a republic and on June 13, 1946 Italian Kingdom came to an end.

(3) Idea of Christian Empire

Pope has no role in any future Christian Empire. Pope would have no role in President Bush’s Oil Empire. Even when Charlemagne accepted Catholicism faith, he never allowed Papacy to undermine the King’s power. No Emperor of Europe ever liked Papacy, except when Papacy was useful for the expansion of their empire. The idea of the Christian Empire took shape in the minds of the white barbarian peoples of the Western Europe, which took shape after the conversion of Roman Emperor Constantine to Christianity. After Christian Church became a State Church of Roman Empire, Pope conspired to bring the Roman Empire into the framework of Christian eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Kingdom of God. Pope Leo III conferred by deception the royal imperial title on Charlemagne in 800 to secure the political support of Charlemagne to undermine the influence of Byzantine Emperor over Charlemagne, as Pope was the subject of Byzantine Emperor. Charlemagne during coronation of his placed the tiara with his own hand. Napoleon also during coronation placed the crown with his hands.

(4) Hegel’s Reformation of Papacy

German philosophers of the age of Enlightenment and age of Idealism advocated Reform of Papacy and reform of Christian dogma, practices and beliefs. Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) and Hegelianism (1816-1848) followed the tradition of imperial Frankish theory of the empire, which that emperor’s source of power and authority based on conquest and hegemony not the conferment by Pope. Protestant Hegel revived the issues of Investiture Controversy that had raged from 1076 to 1122, and asserted that secular authority had authority to invest bishops and abbots with in their domains without consulting Pope and to appoint them and to give them the symbols of their office. Hegel argued that Philosophers have the right to reinterpret Christian scripture, Gospel, Christology, and nature of Christ and to hold and advocate views contrary to that of Papacy and Roman Catholic Church.

Italy Suffered under Polish Pope John Paul II

Fourth. Poland-born former Bolshevik Bishop Pope John Paul II exploited the Catholic vote bank in United States to develop closer ties with Protestant President Ronald Reagan to cement ties of Catholic Church and the CIA to bring down Communist governments of Poland and Eastern Europe, aiming to undermine the constitutional wall that separates the State and the Church in the United States. Southern Baptist Protestant President Bill Clinton publicly accepted that Pope John Paul II represented God on the earth during Pope’s visit to United States during Clinton Administration. Pope John Paul II believes in the Fatima Prophecy and Catholic end of time teleological eschatology and could believe that the end of the Protestant Christian United States in the 21st Century like the demise of the Roman Empire in 5th Century would mark the inception of the Catholic Kingdom of God on earth under the leadership of Catholic Pope. Just as Popes had supported the rise of German Empire in form of Holy Roman Empire to the detriment of the interests of Italy the lands of Romans, in the clash of Civilizations the Catholic Papacy would work against the national and civilization interests of English-speaking United States in the 21st Century.

(5) Captivity of Pope Clement VII by Charles V

Fifth. Catholic Pope had neither been darling of the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire nor of Catholic Kingdom of France nor of King of Italy. It is a myth to say the Catholic leaders of Italy, France, Spain and Germany and Austria liked Papacy in history. Just as Cardinal Richelieu employed the diplomacy of the raison d’etat as the First Minister of Catholic Kingdom of France from 1624 to 1642 to oppose the pro-Papacy Catholic German imperialistic policies of Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand, who sought to recreate the imperial ambitions of Habsburg Emperor Charles V declared in 1521 Diet of Worms that Habsburgs wanted to be the single master of the old empire of Rome. Charles V captured Rome and enforced Captivity of Pope Clement VII (1527). Pope thought that Habsburg would enhance power of Papacy by involving Catholic wars of Counter Reformation Wars. Habsburg Emperor Charles V, who while opening the Diet of Worms in 1521, declared that the empire from of old had not many masters, but one and it is our intention to be that one master of the Empire. In 1530 Pope Clement VII, freed after seven months of seclusion, crowned Charles V at Bologna as the King of Lombardy and Emperor of the Romans, the last Papal coronation of a German Emperor. Many times in European history secular rulers imprisoned the Pope, and it could happen again in the 21st Century. Theocracy of Lamaism in Tibet abolished by Communist China, which had exited longer than Papacy. It is possible that the secular rulers of Italy might some day decide to abolish Papacy or impose fundamental restructuring of the Roman Catholic Church. Citizens of Italy have a sovereign right to abolish Papacy. Future democratic government in Saudi Arabia might abolish and ban Wahhabi sect. In the modern age the secular rulers control religion and Church. The White Christian Europeans have never accepted the primacy of Papacy over secular rulers, so why should they accept the Papal aggrandizement in 21st Century. Papacy would be abolished in Italy, sometime in 21st Century, just as the Absolute rule of Dalai Lama and the Lama theocracy was abolished in Tibet in 1955.

(6) Clash of Rival Philosophy in Church

Sixth. The Clash of Civilization is the clash of rival philosophy to oppose the Papal theories and Catholic authoritarian religion and to foil the Pope John Paul II’s attempt to engineer the end of the 21st Century’s Christian American Empire, which in the framework of Catholic Christian eschatology would mark the end of the 2nd Christian Millennium and result in the inception of the Catholic Kingdom of God on earth in the beginning of the 3rd Christian Millennium. By promoting Catholic Pharisees in Christianity the Catholic Sadducees would be forced to yield to Pharisees, and the control of the Catholic priests over rituals would break.

(7) Papal theory Vs Frankish Theory

Seventh. The interests of Papacy clash with those of the Catholic-majority states of Europe, namely, France, Spain and Italy. Majority of the population of Italy, Spain and France would vote for the abolition of the Papacy in 21st Century. Papacy has become irrelevant in the Catholic West Europe. The liberal people of France, Spain and Italy abhor the ultra-conservatism of Poland-born Pope John Paul II, who they accuse to the agent of Anglo Saxon United States. Catholic nations of Europe, France, Italy, and Spain oppose the ultra-conservativism and papal imperialism. Holy Roman Empire (Sacrum Romanum Imperium) is the designation commonly given to the varying complex of lands ruled over first by Frankish and then by German kings for 10 centuries from Charlesmagne’s coronation in 800 until the renunciation of the imperial title in 1806. The precise term Holy Roman Empire (Sacrum Romanum Imperium) dates only from 1254 to 1806. The term Holy Empire reaches back to 1157. The term Roman Empire was used from 1034 to denote the lands under Conrad II’s rule. The term Roman Emperor is older, dating from Otto II (died 983). The title Roman Emperor not used by Otto II’s predecessors from Charlemagne (Charles I) to Otto I, who simply used the title August Emperor (Imperator Augustus). None of the earlier emperors assumed the imperial title until crowned by the Pope in Rome. After Charles V the Pope crowned no emperor. Holy Roman Empire and Papacy were two most important institutions in Europe in the Middle Age. Holy Roman Empire extended to Germany and Northern Italy

According to the Papal Theory the Holy Roman Empire was the secular arm of the Roman Catholic Church, set up by the Papacy for its own purposes and therefore answerable to the Pope and in the last resort to be disposed of by him. The Imperial Theory or Frankish Theory placed greater emphasis on conquest and hegemony as the as the source of emperor’s power and authority. According to Frankish theory emperor was responsible directly to God not Pope. The Popular theory or Roman theory argued that Holy Roman Empire following the tradition of Roman law was the delegation of power by Roman people. The Roman theory as evidently directed against the Pope, whose constitutive role is implicitly denied. The Roman theory was specifically an Italian reaction against the predominance of pope. According to the Universalist conception, the Holy Roman Empire was a universal monarchy a commonwealth of the whole world, and the emperor was entitled to the obedience of Christendom. According to localist conception of the Empire, the emperor had no ambition for universal dominion his policy was limited in same way as that of every other ruler. When emperor made more far-reaching claims his object was to ward off the attacks of either Pope or of the Byzantine emperor.

(8) Kingdom of God

Eighth. To Pope the Christian concept of Kingdom of god means the Pope-ruled Kingdom on earth. Pope might try to disintegrate United States to bring about Pope’s Empire in North America. Why after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476, was there an empire again? After Christian Church became the State Church of Roman Empire, it also brought the Roman Empire into the framework of Christian eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the kingdom of God. The Papacy’s view of the Holy Roman Empire as a vehicle of God’s will for the Christianization of the world became prevalent. The Frankish kingdom expanded until it comprised most of Western Europe and Lombard Kingdom in northern Italy in 774. Frankish King Pepin III the short invaded Italy reduced the Lombard king Aistulf to submission in 754 and then returning in 756 bestowed on the Papacy the territories belonging to Exarcate. Thus was born the both the temporal power of the Papacy and the close alliance between the Papacy and the Frankish monarchy. Pope conferred the title of Patrician in the form (Patricius Romanorum), the title to defend and support Holy See against its foes.

After the expulsion of the Exarch in 751, the Pope himself, in de facto possession hoped to become the Roman Emperor’s successor in the West. Pope forged the Donation of Constantine, in which emperor Constantine I is represented as having conferred on Pope Sylvester I the imperial palace of the Lateran, the imperial insignia and all the provinces, places And cities of Italy and the western regions. Such ambitions proved illusory when Charlemagne became king of the Lombards. From 781 papal documents were no longer being dated by the emperor’s regnal year, the Pope was minting his own coins. Employing the deception On December 25, 800, Pope Leo placed a crown on Charlemagne’s head while assembled Romans acclaimed him as “Augustus and Emperor” and Pope Leo III (795-816) adored Charlemagne after the manner of the emperors of old, accepting the primacy of emperor over Pope. In 812 Byzantine Emperor accepted the Charlemagne’s imperial title. Because of the coronation of 800 began the rivalry with Constantinople that lasted until 1204. Charlemagne’s coronation involved him and his successors ever more deeply in the ecumenical pretensions of the Papacy. As Religious emperors’ ecclesiastical advisers Bishops got powers in Charles I empire. Pope Innocent II argued later on that Pope Leo III had transferred the empire from Greeks to the Germans and his successors could transfer it elsewhere if they so wished. That is why Charlemagne performed coronation ceremony of his son Louis in the imperial chapel at Achen and Pope Leo was not present, and Louis either received the diadem from his father or took it from his own hands from the altar. The contrast with the Roman ceremony of 800 was deliberate. Henceforth the conflict between the Imperial Frankish theory and papal theory of the empire became the dominant theme in Europe.

(9) The Investiture Controversy

Ninth. From 1076 until 1122, the Investiture Controversy, ostensibly entered on the question of whether Emperor or lay overlords had the authority to invest bishops and abbots within their dominions, to appoint bishops and abbots with in their political domains and to formally give bishops and abbots the symbols of their office. The real issue was the place of the emperor in Christian society and emperor’s relations with the papacy. Emperor III (983-1002 crowned 996) promoted the imperial idea; the Rome was to be his capital and Pope his lieutenant in the spread of Christian dominion. From Otto I to Henry III (1039-56, crowed 1046) was a close subordination of pope to emperor. The emperor’s powers meant more to the Germans than to the inhabitants of Burgundy or of Italy, for whom it meant subjection of German rule. Pope Gregory VII (1073-85) asserted that only the Pope might use the imperial insignia and Pope might lawfully depose emperors but Pope himself be judged by none. Popes Alexander III, Pope Innocent III, Pope Innocent IV and Pope Boniface VIII that shook the empire to its foundations.

(10) Holy Empire of Hohestaufen Emperors

Tenth. Emperor Henry VI (1190-97, crowned 1191) based emperor’s right to rule on Roman laws, which resulted in a new and more exalted conception of the Empire. Frederick I Barbarossa in 1157 added the word ‘Sacrum’ (Holy) to the name of empire, which then became Sacrum Imperium (Holy Empire) as a counterblast to the Sancta Ecclesia (Holy Church). Antipope Paschal III in 1165 canonized Charlemagne. Emperor Frederick I asserted his right as Charlemagne’s successor derived from conferment neither by the Pope nor by the Roman noble people but from Frankish conquest. Unlike earlier emperors, who had based their position on their special relation with the Papal Roman Catholic Church, the Hohenstaufen emperors emphasized its secular foundations. The claims for Holy Empire drew protests from England, France, Denmark and Hungary. German emperor seeking to restore the territorial basis of the Holy Empire sought to conquer Northern Italy, where they national reaction of Italians, Lombards League. Henry VI’s son Frederick II (1212-1250, crowned 1220) failed to crush Lombards and was excommunicated in 1239 and deposed in 1245 and died in 1250, which marked the effective end of the medieval Holy Empire. German Emperor Charles IV, a sober realist concluded that “the king is emperor in his kingdom” and he formally abandoned Italy and his coronation took place on April 5, 1355.

(11) Holy Roman Empire

Eleventh. The title “Holy Roman Empire of the German nation (sacrum Romanum Imperium Natioinis Germanicae) appears under Frederick III (king from 1440, emperor from 1452 to 1493). In 1508 Maximilian I with papal consent assumed the title “Elected Emperor” or “Chosen emperor. After Sigismund’s death (1437) with one short intermission for Charles VII from 1742 to 1745, the imperial Holy Roman Empire Crown was hereditary in the Habsburg dynasty of Austria, though in theory elective. Though Emperor Charles V championed the Roman Catholic Church against Reformation, the Holy Roman Empire was neither in spirit nor in fact a revival of the medieval empire. With Germany split into two religious camps, the Habsburg emperor was little more than the head of the catholic religious faction. From 1556 until its end under Francis II in 1806 the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire meant little more than a loose federation of the different princes of Germany, lay princes and ecclesiastical princes, under the presidency of the House of Habsburg. After the Thirty Year’s War (1618-48), the Counter Reformation Wars no Habsburg emperor again attempted as Charles V had done, to reestablish Catholic central authority. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 marked the Habsburg Empire’s final organization on federal structures. The loose Habsburg federal structure suited the cosmopolitan Reformation spirit of the 18th Century Germany, where Kantian transcendentalism and Kantian Enlightenment flourished. The end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, also coincided with the Immanuel Kant’s death in 1804 and formally marked the end of the Age of Enlightenment and ushered in the new age of Idealism of Fichte, Shelling and Hegel (1816-31) and Hegelianism (1816-1848).

(12) Pharisee Vs Sadducees Clash in Judaism

Twelfth. Protestant Reformation would take over papacy in 21st Century and Pharisees of Catholic Church would take over and expel authoritarian priests from Roman Catholic Church. Papacy should be organized like Judaism, which does not have any Pope. Roman Catholic Church needs the Pharisees revolution. Reformation of Judaism emerged success with the triumph of Pharisees over Sadducees. The attempts of Sadducees, which represented the priestly aristocracy failed and Judaism was reformed. Pharisees opposed the aristocracy of the Jewish priests, just as Protestants opposed the authoritarianism of the Pope and Catholic Clergy. There is no Pope among Jews. Reformation of Judaism led by Pharisees succeeded and Judaism became an egalitarian religion and it has remained so. The term “Judaism” was first introduced by Greek speaking Jews to distinguish their civilization from the way of life known as Hellenism practiced by surrounding pagans. Judaism as it has emerged today is the product and result of periodic ideological conflicts between Pharisees and Sadducees, which sought to interpret or alter Jewish traditions in one manner or other. The historic dispute between Pharisees and the Sadducees was essentially the clash of democracy against a priestly autocracy, in which the democratic traditions carried by Pharisees was triumphant.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 136. 

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(46) Rise of Anti-Papacy Gnosticism Kabbalah Mysticism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(46) Papacy Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala

Chapter 3. 3(13) Page 136. One. The rise of Spiritualism as the dominant dogma of Christianity would resolve the problem Clash of Civilization. Roman Catholic Church should adopt the mystic doctrines and practices of Gnostic Christianity of Early Christianity, to reform Catholic Dogma to make it more spiritual. Two. The Catholic citizens of Italy seek the Plebiscite to decide whether to derecognize the sovereignty of the Papacy and the 1929 Concordat. From the very inception after Emperor Constantine made Christianity the State religion of Roman Empire, Church worked incessantly towards the destruction of the Roman Empire to replace it by the Empire of the Papacy, so that Catholic priests rather than Senators rule the Empire. Three. Papacy promoted the concept of Protestant United States as the Third Rome, after Rome and Byzantium, not to promote the secular American Empire but to bring United States under the fold of the Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, which believes that Catholic Kingdom of God would be established after the end of the last great secular monarchy in the New Millennium. Papal Kingdom of God means the Papal priest-ruled Christian Kingdom of the world.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations   © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Catholic Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala

Thirteenth. The rise of Spiritualism as the dominant dogma of Christianity would resolve the problem Clash of Civilization. Roman Catholic Church should adopt the mystic doctrines and practices of Gnostic Christianity of Early Christianity, to reform Catholic Dogma to make it more spiritual. Roman Catholic Church should adopt Judaic Kabala doctrine and the dictatorship of the Catholic priests should give way to the Catholic monks and Catholic mystics. Protestants, Protestant Idealism believed in the Hegelian Spiritualism and believed in the concept of soul. Protestants believe in the concept of soul similar to Jewish Kabala mysticism and spiritualism. Jewish Mysticism inherited the Pharisees belief in Soul. Kabala movement in Judaism believes in Soul. There always existed among Jewish people who leaned heavily on Egyptian and later on Greek civilization and borrowed extensively the concept of Soul. The Jewish reign of 142 BC to 70 AD marked by the establishment of the Pharisees and Sadducees as two rival sects. The Pharisees represented the masses. The Pharisees tried to break the control of the Temple priests and to make the people more independent of priests. Pharisees strove for permission to execute within Jewish home certain rites, which had hitherto fore been executed by priests within the temple. Pharisees believed in the survival of the soul. The concept of soul had taken root in common people. The concept of soul believed by Greeks, Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians. Pharisees fought for high ethical standards. A controversy over the title to the throne led the Pharisees in 63 BC to ask aid of the Roman General Pompey, who made Palestine a Roman province. Mysticism does not recognize the political titles of the priests and the piety and spiritual development differentiate one priest from another. The Orthodox Judaism the Sadducees like the Pope during Counter Reformation Wars, didn’t recognize the doctrine of soul, therefore Pharisees considered by Sadducees as heretics. The aristocratic party of the Sadducees, the official caste of priests, found their followers mainly among the wealthy and the old aristocratic families. The common bond of the Sadducees was more of the social conservatism than one of religious orthodoxy.

(2) Papacy As Enemy of Italian State

Fourteenth. The Catholic citizens of Italy seek the Plebiscite to decide whether to derecognize the sovereignty of the Papacy and the 1929 Concordat. From the very inception after Emperor Constantine made Christianity the State religion of Roman Empire, Church worked incessantly towards the destruction of the Roman Empire to replace it by the Empire of the Papacy, so that Catholic priests rather than Senators rule the Empire. Papacy conspired with Emperor Theodosius I and offered him to make Roman Empire the Dynasty of the Theodosius in exchange for allowing the full use of Roman Sword to destroy all non-Catholic religions in the Roman Empire. With the blessing of the Church son and son in law of Theodosius I subsequently became Emperors of Rome. Papacy engineered the breakup of the Roman Empire into Eastern and Western Empire, hoping that separated Western Empire would be more a puppet of Papacy. After the disintegration of the Western Roman Empire, Papacy sought alliance with Charlemagne to create alternative German Empire in opposition to Byzantium Empire.

The Pope’s Crusades against Islam were plots to take over Byzantium. The purpose of Crusades had been to undermine the defenses of the Eastern Empire. Pope’s Crusaders kept Byzantium under Catholic occupation for more than 50 years during the Crusades. The Pope joined forces with Ottoman invaders and provided crucial help to the invaders that resulted in the Ottoman Islamic conquest of Constantinople and destruction of the Byzantine Christian Empire.

Popes have historically supported German conquest of Northern Italy so that southern Italy could become Papal States. Popes supported German barbarian Alaric during his conquest of Rome and Roman Empire in 415 AD and subsequent conquests of the Roman Empire by German tribes. Pope supported the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire to keep Northern Italy under the Germany’s control.

After the Second World War Popes have aligned with Mafia to destabilize parliamentary Prime Ministers of Italy and imposed Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti the seven times Prime Minister of Italy, believed to be the Sicilian Mafia's main protector in Rome. The organized Crime in Sicily could not have thrived so long without some help from the powers-that-be. Mr. Andreotti was the power broker of the Christian Democratic Party, which governed Italy for almost 50 years. Andreotti remains the personification of a system that disintegrated in the early 90's under the weight of its own corruption. In some ways, Italian society was on trial alongside the former Prime Minister Andreotti.

(3) Papacy as Enemy of Protestant USA

Fifteenth. Papacy promoted the concept of Protestant United States as the Third Rome, after Rome and Byzantium, not to promote the secular American Empire but to bring United States under the fold of the Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, which believes that Catholic Kingdom of God would be established after the end of the last great secular monarchy in the New Millennium. Papal Kingdom of God means the Papal priest-ruled Christian Kingdom of the world.

Pope’s pro-Life anti-Abortion movement has acquired unprecedented power in America and can make and unmake any Republican presidency. The pro-Vatican and pro-Life movements have leveraged their vote bank and campaign funds contribution to hold Republican presidential nomination process at ransom. Pope John Paul II is annoyed with President George W. Bush over Protestant America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

It is not in the national interest of the United States to permit Wahhabi clergy play the role Papacy played in Europe. Just as Habsburg Emperor Charles V imprisoned Pope in 1520s and King of Italy kept succession of Popes imprisoned from 1870 to 1929, it is likely that Protestant Christian Empire might imprison Wahhabi Ulema under check or imprisoned if it threatened America’s control over oil resources or incited Wahhabi Clergy’s dream to take over government of Saudi Arabia. WASP supporters of President Bush realized that Papacy emerged as the principal roadblock on the path of the American oil Empire as it conflicts with the interests of Vatican-Mecca Axis. United States offered Wahhabi Mecca rule over Mecca and rule of Wahhabi Al Saud over Saudi Arabia in exchange for USBigOil’s rule over Arab oil resources. Initially United States found it convenient to support Wahhabi fundamentalism as it allowed unprecedented access to Arab oil. United States from 1920s onwards supported the Mecca’s Wahhabi Clergy to gain control over the oil resources of Arabian Peninsula then part of the Ottoman Empire. Papacy and Roman Catholic Church supported the foreign invaders, the German barbarians and offered them the control over the riches of the Roman Empire in exchange for Pope’s rule in Rome and Papal States. Similarly, the Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca agreed to hand over to United States the control over Arab oil in exchange for Wahhabi House of Al Saud rule over Saudi Arabia and Wahhabi Islam’s rule over the Arab Islamic world.

(4) Wahhabi Ayatollah’s Rule over Saudi Arabia

Sixteenth. Under the influence of Papacy Southern Baptist President Jimmy Carter installed the dictatorship of the Shiite priests the ayatollahs in Iran. Just as Papacy undermined Roman Empire and established Papal Empire in Papal States, similarly Shiite Clergy Ayatollah’s joined forces with Papacy, Saudi Arabia and United States to establish the Shiite Papacy of Ayatollahs in Iran to establish the dictatorship of the Shiite Priests in Iran. Similarly with the blessing of Papacy, the Wahhabi clergy conspiring to take over the government of Saudi Arabia and might install Osama Bin Laden as the Prophet-Ruler of oil-rich Saudi Arabia. Mecca Wahhabi Ulema attempting to realize the dream of Pope Gregory VII and demand that only the Wahhabi clergy should use imperial insignia in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, and other GCC states. Wahhabi ulema demand the right to lawfully depose the Al Saud Monarch whenever they want. Wahabi clergy demand that no body whatsoever should have any right to judge Wahhabi clergy. Pope Gregory VII (1073-85) asserted that only the Pope might use the imperial insignia, Pope might lawfully depose emperors but Pope should himself be judged by none. These lapidary statements are among the 27 included in the Dictatus Papae of 1075 and were set down in Gregory’s Register. Vatican-Mecca Axis is Pope’s policy to lead Wahhabi Ulema of Mecca become Islamic Papacy or Islamic Caliphate where Wahhabi Ulema Clergy not the Caliph would rule the Islamic world. Wahhabi Mecca is following the footsteps of Papacy to emerge as the Caliph of Islam albeit the Papacy of the Islamic world, by promoting the concept of the dictatorship of the Wahhabi Ulema in the Islam world in the name of Wahhabi Sunni Islam. Christian terrorism allowed Papacy to become all-powerful in Europe after the destruction of Roman Empire similarly Islamic terrorism allowed Muslim Arab Bedouin become all powerful after the destruction of the civilized Egypt and Syria. Pope John Paul II offered the Saudi Wahhabi Ulema a chance to become the rulers of the Islamic oil-producing world by establishing the Wahhabi Dictatorship of the Ulema in the Islamic Caliphate so that the Muslim Ulema Clergy not the Muslim Caliph would rule over the Islamic Caliphate. Wahhabi Mecca with the direct help of Papacy would establish the direct rule of the Wahhabi clergy in the Islamic world to establish the new Clergy-ruled Islamic Caliphate on the pattern of First Mecca Caliphate, where Prophet Mohammed was the Caliph and Prophet, King and the Clergy.

(5) Nuclear Vatican

Seventeenth. It could be possible that some Catholic secret organization got hold of the nuclear weapons designs during the security breach at the Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico during the Clinton Administration. The Papacy might exercise its right to develop and deploy nuclear weapons if it could get hold of nuclear technology as it possess the necessary resources to procure necessary components to do so. The Hard Disc containing the detailed nuclear weapons designs, allegedly taken out of the Los Alamos lab was on subsequent search found behind the Copy machine raised the suspicion that some non-state organization might have got hold of the nuclear weapons designs. If secret Christian societies like Jesuits, could get hold of nuclear designs they possess the network to procure the necessary components to make the miniature nuclear weapons. If the sovereign state of Vatican developed nuclear weapons, it might become a world power in its own right.

(6) Protestantism Opposes Rule By Priests

Eighteenth. The Vatican and Mecca conspiring to create the dictatorship of Islamic Clergy or Islamic Papacy or Ulema ruled Islamic Caliphate in the Islamic world, which is the very negation of the ideals and philosophy of the Protestantism. Protestantism opposes the rule of the priests and the government controlled by the priests. Papacy supports the idea of the rule by the priests. Papacy supported the rule of Ayatollahs in Iran and would support the rule of the Wahhabi clergy over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. The philosophy of the government ruled by priests, clashed with the constitutions of the United States and India. President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism is basically war on the Wahhabi Mullahs determined to take over the governments in the Islamic countries. The Madrasas the Wahhabi Mecca finances seeks to train the body of Islamic priests who might rule the Islamic nations. Neither India nor United States would tolerate the Muslim clergy ruled Islamic States, especially after the successful colonial occupation of oil-rich Iraq.

(7) Papacy Take Over of European Union

Nineteenth. Poland-born Pope John Paul II has made English the de facto official language of the Vatican and undermined the leadership role Italians and French played in the earlier Vatican government. Concerned Italians feel that Vatican became a colony of Poland and United States during the Pontificate of John Paul II. Papacy promoted Germany and France as the leader of the European Union and harnessed the power of the Roman Catholic Church and Jesuits to undermine the concept of nationalism and patriotism in Europe as nationalism and patriotism had been the great enemy of the Papal dream of Pope-ruled Europe. Papacy undermined the role of Italy in the European Union. No wonder that when Italian Prime Minister Mr. Berlusconi became the President of European Union for six-months during 2003, Papacy did every trick to undermine his presidency and even supported the graft charges against Mr. Berlusconi so that he might lose its chance to become the president of European Union. Germany supported Papal policies towards the secession of Catholic Croatia and Catholic Slovenia from multi-ethnic Yugoslavia Federation, hoping that Germany led European Union might allow Germans to play great power role as it played during Habsburgs by supporting the Papal causes. Papal diplomacy helped bring about the united France-Germany front against American invasions of Iraq. Papacy would support the anti-American mood in European Union. Papacy would support the anti-American mood in the Islamic world. Papacy would support the concerted mover of the Catholic religious right conservatives to destroy the constitutional wall that separates State and Church in the United States.

Papacy wants United States to become the Third Rome, the Holy American Christian Empire, so that Catholic Church might become the dominant Church in the United States, so that Protestant United States as American Christian Empire, the Third Rome, could come into the framework of Catholic Christian apocalyptic eschatology and teleology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the kingdom of God on earth. Pope wants to make United States to become American Empire as a vehicle of God’s will for the Christianization of the world. The concept of kingdom of God for Papacy means the Pope and Catholic clergy ruled Catholic Kingdom of God on earth. Following the step of the 1990 demise of the secular Soviet Union, which liberated the Russian Orthodox in Russia, the demise of the secular Protestant United States with strict separation of the State and the Church, would liberate the Catholics of the North America to establish the Catholic Kingdom in North America as the first Catholic super power of the world.

It is not in the interest of the WASPs to allow Papacy engineer the demise of the secular United States to fulfill the New Millennium Catholic apocalyptic eschatology for the establishment of the priest-ruled Catholic Kingdom of God on earth after the demise and end of the last Christian world monarchy, the Protestant United States. The religious forces that seek to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world worked hand in gloves to cause the demise of secular Soviet Union and secular Yugoslavia and presently working towards the disintegration of the democratic secular Protestant United States and democratic secular Hindu India. The Papacy in the Vatican and the Wahhabi clergy of Saudi Arabia hands conspiring to establish the dictatorships of the priests in the Christian and Islamic worlds respectively and it makes Vatican and Mecca the enemies of Washington DC and Delhi. The Papacy while under House arrest in the Vatican at the orders of the Italian King, participated in the disintegration of the Great Britain by engineering the secession of Catholic Ireland from Britain in 1919. The Papacy was instrumental in the declaration of the Dominion status of Canada and Australia to reduce the role of Anglican London over the affairs of Canada and Australia where Catholics have at times become the Prime Ministers. The Papacy was instrumental in the 1917 demise of the Orthodox Russian Monarchy by directly supporting the return of Vladimir V. Lenin with the direct help of the William Kaiser the successor to the Catholic Habsburg rulers. The Papacy was instrumental in the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Catholic Croatia and the disintegration of democratic secular Yugoslavia. Papacy determined to bring WASPs United States into the framework of the Catholic eschatology to bring about its end to create Catholic kingdom of God as the new super power in North America, and very likely to succeed in its conspiracy, unless the patriotic WASPs of the United States undertake decisive counter measures to foil the Papal conspiracy in the United States.

(8) Protestant Reformation’s Countermeasures

Twentieth. The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. Who governs the United States? In the age of rising election campaign costs and increased role of electronic media in elections might allow non-Protestant minority to take over the Oval Office and takeover the Presidency of the United States. It is likely that United States would have Jews and Catholics as President of the United States in near future, and the spate of millionaires getting elected as Governors, Mayors, Senators and Congressmen are indication of this trend and WASP leadership of the United States might be on the verge of losing its grip over political power in the White House. The purpose of the Clash of Civilization, where Catholic conservatism and Islamic fundamentalism, Vatican Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca joined forces to undermine the strict separation of state and the Church in the United States to bring about the dictatorship of Catholic priests in the Christian world and dictatorship of Wahhabi priests in the Islamic world. The tolerant, inclusive, pro-diversity, multi-ethnic Hindu India and Protestant United States face grave threats from the non-state predatory intolerant authoritarian religions that seek to impose the rule of the priests over secular world. The world of intolerant religions, Vatican and Mecca ruled by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. The clash of civilization is the clash of intolerant philosophies of predatory Vatican and Mecca with the tolerant inclusive democratic philosophies of Protestant United States and Hindu India. Papacy has waged Counter Reformation wars on Protestant United States. Wahhabi Mecca waged Counter Reformation Wars on liberal secular modern Islamic nations. Catholic Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca waged wars on secular liberal Hindu India to impose beliefs of predatory religious intolerance over Christians and Muslims to endanger the secular fabric of Indian society. It is high time that secular Hindu India and secular Protestant United States join forces to promote Philosophy of secular, tolerance and inclusion to meet the menace of the philosophy of intolerance, theocracy and exclusion propagated by ultra-conservative Vatican and ultra-fundamentalism Mecca. India should send troops to Iraq to bolster the American colonial occupation of Iraq so that American economy’s critical dependence over oil imports might not force secular tolerant United States support the forces of predatory religious intolerance, exclusion and dictatorship of the priests in the ongoing Clash of Civilizations of the 21st Century. The clash of civilization is the clash of philosophy. It is the clash of philosophy of tolerance, inclusion, secularism, diversity, rationalist religion, women’s rights and religious freedom with the philosophy of intolerance, theocracy, authoritarian religion and suppression of women. The clash of civilization is real and ideological and philosophical clash and would continue till one side emerged victorious over the other. It is very likely that when chips are drawn Protestant United States and Hindu India would join the wars of civilizations on the same side of the battle lines. The 21st Century world will be governed by Oil-people, not by priests of authoritarian religions. The civilization alliance of Protestant United States and Hindu cemented by common oil interests and the dependence of the United States on Indian Army to establish permanent oil colonies over Arab oil producing countries. The present system of America’s support to Wahhabi fundamentalism in exchange for American control over Arab oil no longer worked in the age where Wahhabi Clergy developed the megalomaniac ambitions to directly rule the Arab oil-producing nations by establishing the dictatorships of the Wahhabi priests on the lines of Papal secular empire. United States and India would be forced to establish direct American oil colonies in the Arab world with the help of Pentagon and Indian Army, so that White House no longer needed to placate the Wahhabi fundamentalism to gain preferred access to Arab oil and gas resources. The world is governed by very different interests from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. It is better that world is governed by oil interests rather than the interests of totalitarian theocracy, authoritarian religions, predatory intolerance. The Clash of Civilization is the War of Philosophy over authoritarian Religion.

(9) European Union, United States & Papacy

Twenty-First. After Christianity became the State Church, Papacy brought in Roman Empire into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, and conspired to bring about the end of the Roman Empire, believing that the end of the last world monarchies would lead to the inception of the Pop-ruled kingdom of God. Papacy has consistently aligned with the foreign powers and Germany to keep Italy under check so that the nationalist Italy might not demand the end of Papacy. During last 1500 years Papacy supported German kings and Empires to keep North Italy under German control. Papacy supported Napoleon in his conquest of Italy. It is no wonder that King of Italy kept succession of Pope’s under House arrest in the Vatican for 59 years from 1870 to 1929. Papacy supported the European Union led by Germany and France to undermine the nationalism, sovereignty and independence of European countries. Poland-born Pope John Paul II attempting to bring European Union, the last of world monarchies under the framework of Catholic eschatology. Papacy aligned in the past with German Kings and Empires to keep Northern Italy under their control and occupation, similarly Papacy aligned with Poland and United States to undermine the leadership of Germany and France in European Union as a step towards engineering the end of the European Union. The election of Poland-born Pope John Paul II after the suspicious death of Pope John Paul I in 1978 brought about the revolutionary changes in Papacy as it ended the 500 years monopoly of Italian clergy over Papacy. Pope John Paul II has ensured his succession by nominating large numbers of Cardinals who are personally loyal to him and his brand of ultra-conservatism. The 1978 election of Poland-born Pope John Paul II is a revolutionary political event that has destroyed Italian power over Vatican and brought in United States and European Union into the framework of Catholic eschatology, whose end would result in the inception of the Pope-ruled Kingdom of God. Papacy and Catholic apocalyptic eschatology present great threat to Italy, Germany, France and United States in the early 21st Century. Hoping to profit by the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world, the Vatican Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca secured the full support of the Catholic Cocaine Mafia and Wahhabi Sunni Heroin Mafia, which might succeed in engineering the end of the two last world monarchies, United States and the European Union in the 21st Century, unless of course WASPs takes preemptive counter measures against Papal and Wahhabi threats.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 140.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(47) Clash of anti-Monotheism Hegelian Indian Philosophy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(47) Clash of Indian Philosophy

Chapter 3. 3(14) Page 140. Abstract: One. Hindu Indian philosophy and Protestant German Hegelian Idealism are comrade-in-arms in the 21st century clash of civilization. Hindu Indian perspective to clash of civilization very similar to that of American Non Denominational Christians that support the constitutional Wall that separates the State and the Church. India is able to properly articulate the perspective of the civilizations that believe in tolerance, inclusion, diversity and the separation of the State and the Church.

Two. While discussing the Clash of Civilization, the problems that Indian philosophers and writers raised for consideration, but their Western counterparts never did, include such matters as the origin of the clash of civilization and the apprehension of truth regarding the true cause of the clash of civilization. Hindu Indian writings on Clash of Civilization provide the Christian Western thinkers and writers with a point of view that may supplement that gained from Western thought. A study of Indian perspective on clash of civilization reveals certain inadequacies of Christian Western world view and diplomacy, and makes clear that some concepts and distinctions may not be as inevitable as they may otherwise seem.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Hindu & Protestant Hegelian Idealism

Hindu Indian philosophy and Protestant German Hegelian Idealism are comrade-in-arms in the 21st century clash of civilization. Hindu Indian perspective to clash of civilization very similar to that of American Non Denominational Christians that support the constitutional Wall that separates the State and the Church. India is able to properly articulate the perspective of the civilizations that believe in tolerance, inclusion, diversity and the separation of the State and the Church, which is also the thinking of the secular, liberal, Non Denominational Christians in United States that number more than 150 million.

(2) Indian Way can resolve West’s Conflicts

First. Indian point of view can help the Christian West solve the problem of ongoing clash of religious sects, namely Catholic-Protestant Counter Reformation wars, Muslim Sunni-Shiite conflict, Protestant Christian Crusades on Islam, Islamic Jihad on Christianity, Islamic terrorism and Islamic wars on Israel. In relation to Western perspective, Indian perspective offers both surprising points of affinity and illuminating differences. The differences highlight certain fundamentally new questions that Indian thinkers ask. The similarities reveal that, even when philosophers and thinkers in India and the West grapple with the same problems and sometimes even suggesting similar theories, Indian thinkers and philosophers advance novel formulations and argumentations. While discussing the Clash of Civilization, the problems that Indian philosophers and writers raised for consideration, but their Western counterparts never did, include such matters as the origin of the clash of civilization and the apprehension of truth regarding the true cause of the clash of civilization. Hindu Indian writings on Clash of Civilization provide the Christian Western thinkers and writers with a point of view that may supplement that gained from Western thought. A study of Indian perspective on clash of civilization reveals certain inadequacies of Christian Western world view and diplomacy, and makes clear that some concepts and distinctions may not be as inevitable as they may otherwise seem. In a similar manner, the Knowledge of the iconoclast monotheist Christian Western thinking regarding Clash of Civilization has also been advantageous to Hindu Indians and Buddhist Japanese and Chinese.

(3) Freedom of Thought in India

Second. There is greater freedom of thought in India than in the Catholic West and Islamic Middle East. An Indian thinker writing about religion, history, culture and diplomacy introduces a new and original point of view, but at no stage can he claim originality for himself, as he only systematizes the thought and insights of countless predecessors. Even God Krishna spoke in Holy Gita that was merely narrating the past wisdom of the religion, which got lost due to long passage of time. The development of Hindu Indian philosophical thought has thus been able to combine in an almost unique manner, conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking. Protestant Christianity, Sufi mystic Islam, Kabbalah mystic Judaism imbibed Hindu and Buddhist eclectic philosophy, Mysticism and Tantra and may be join Hindus in the same side of the battle lines in the global clash of civilizations.

(4) Clash of Philosophies

Third. The philosophical question that arises in the inquiry into the clash of civilization is: Should reasoning be allowed freedom only as long as it does not conflict with religious scriptures? Clash of civilization is the result of the clash of the philosophy taught in the Christian, Islamic and Judaic scriptures with the philosophy taught in the scriptures of ancient religions of Egypt, Greece, Rome, Inca and Maya as well as the scriptures of Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, Shintoists, Confucian’s, Taoists and Pagans. The clash of civilization in final analysis becomes clash of the Occidental religions and Oriental religions. Philosophers and mystics should be given freedom of reasoning even if it clashes with religious scriptures, because the clash of civilizations is the clash of scriptures of diverse civilizations. It is the responsibility of philosophers, diplomats, thinkers, political leaders and writers to secure freedom of reasoning to find solution of the intractable clash of civilization, if world is to avoid in 21st Century the replay of the catastrophic 1618-1648 Clash of Protestant and Catholic Civilizations during Counter Reformation Wars of Europe. Hindu leaders accept the wisdom of Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) that religion is the field of philosophy and philosophers should inquire into the conflicts of religion, civilization, culture and society with open mind even it conflict with religious scripture. The clash of civilization is the clash of Hegelian tolerance, inclusion and rationality with the forces representing predatory religious intolerance, exclusion and ethnic separatism.

(5) Wisdom of Zoroaster

Fourth. Hindu approach to clash of civilization accepts the wisdom of Prophet Zoroaster, the patron Prophet of Moses, Jesus and Mohammed, that every civilization creates its specific concept of values, purposely making it different from that of its neighbor, to assert its separate identity as a separate civilization. Every religion creates separate value system to create separate identity of its followers. Pope John Paul II adopted the ultra-conservative Catholic dogma and creed and promoted the apocalyptic end of time doctrine teleological eschatology as part of the Catholic dogma, to create a separate brand identity of Catholic Church, as the Vatican Reforms of 1960s did not arrest the declining observance in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Reforms of 1960s had reduced the differential of the Catholic brand from rival Protestant and Non Denominational brand of Christian Churches. If ultra-conservatism and fundamentalism is in the ascendant in the US and the Islamic world, the lesson is that religious Church cannot buck the market. The United States is the only Western country in which the role of religion in social and political life is increasing. The brand of fundamentalist Christian religion, promoting simple-minded fundamentalism that is driving the growth of Church observance in US barely exists in Europe, especially in Catholic France and Italy. Vatican promoted Catholic religious right ultra-conservatism and Mecca promoted predatory anti-woman intolerant Wahhabi militant fundamentalism to make money in the business of god, to develop fanatic brand loyalty, to gain the support of zealots, and to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the Catholic and Islamic world in 21st Century. Authoritarian religions propagate predatory intolerance and militant fundamentalism to keep control over their believers, so that they may not convert to religions that promote tolerance, inclusion and doctrinal diversity. Neither the Papal ultra-conservatism nor the Wahhabi fundamentalism would unleash apocalyptic eschatological disasters in the world, as Vatican and Mecca purely promoting these doctrines to enrich the Cardinals the princes of the Church and the Wahhabi priest-princes respectively. The End of Time eschatological teleological apocalyptic doctrines are false and simply Pope’s plot to make more money.

(6) Marxism Papacy Wahhabi Plot

Fifth. Marxism was a Semite plot to destroy and loot the property of Orthodox Russia. Papacy is the plot of the Catholic priests to undermine the secular governments of Europe to establish the Pope’s rule over Europe. Wahhabi Sunni sect is a Semite conspiracy to allow American Big Oil loot the oil resources of Arabia in exchange of the Wahhabi priests’ rule over Arabian Peninsula. The salient feature of the clash of civilization is the attempt of Papacy and Wahhabi clergy to establish the dictatorship of the priests, a form of the Papal Caliphate. Just as Dalai Lama was the theocratic ruler of Tibet before 1950 and Ayatollah Khomeini was the undisputed theocratic ruler of Iran in early 1980s, Vatican and Mecca wants to create an empire of their own led by priests. The Wahhabi Islamic terrorism and Vatican apocalyptic eschatology is an attempt to promote the brand identity of the Catholic Church and Wahhabi Mecca, so that Catholics might accept Papal Caliphate and Muslims might accept the Wahhabi Papacy. The Wahhabi clergy of Mecca wants to establish the Papacy-type theocracy in the Islamic world. The Catholic clergy of Vatican wants to establish Caliphate-type Pope-ruled theocratic empire in the Christian world. It is no wonder that Pope opposed Protestant President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism in Afghanistan and Protestant Crusades over Islam in Iraq. Protestant America’s Crusades on Islam and America’s war on Islamic terrorism could undermine the Vatican-Mecca conspiracy to establish the dictatorship of priests in the Christian world and Islamic world respectively. President Bush is the 21st Century version of Habsburg Emperor Charles V, who while opening the Diet of Worms in 1521 declared, “the empire of the old had not many masters but one, and it is our intention to be that one.” Charles VI invaded Rome and made Pope the captive in 1526. President Bush and his Oil Administration declared that United States is the preeminent power of the world and oil and gas interests determine the national interests of the United States. Protestant United States would accept neither the dictates of the Wahhabi priests nor that of Papacy to determine the policy of the United States. United States is the preeminent Christian power in the world. American Big Oil is the preeminent oil monopoly in the Arab world, which controls the oil and gas resources of the OPEC nations. Protestant United States is dead against the Vatican and Mecca dreams of dictatorship of the priests. The Revolution of Ayatollahs in Iran changed the political dynamics of the clash of civilization and gave impetus to the political aspirations of the Vatican and the Mecca.

(7) Religion based Artificial States

Sixth. Three artificial states were created in the 20th century on the basis of religion, out of the former territories of Ottoman Empire and Indian empire, namely, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Success of Jews to establish the Jewish State of Israel after the Diaspora of 2,000 years, gave great hope to the Incas, Mayas and Aztecs who lost their lands, religion and the civilization barely 500 years ago to the Spanish sword. During 21st Century the sovereign State of Inca will get established in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia as unmixed Inca Indians, where unmixed Inca Indians represent more than 50% of the population. Aztec religion, Aztec civilization and Aztec race would reclaim Central America to reestablish sovereign Aztec State. Maya people would establish the sovereign Maya State in Southern Mexico and Chiapas State. The success of Jews to reestablish the Jewish State of Israel in the Holy Land, which resulted in the expulsion of Muslims, raised specter of return of the worshippers of God Ossir and Goddess Isis in Egypt, return of worshippers of God Zeus in Greece and return of worshippers of God Jupiter and goddess Athena in Rome. It is no wonder that Vatican and Mecca opposed the Jewish State of Israel and Jews accused Pope Pius XII of complicity in the Holocaust of Jews. It is likely that Protestants and Jews would join Hindus on the same side of the battle lines in the clash of civilizations. India fully supports the aspirations of civilization of Jews, Incas, Mayas, and Aztecs to establish sovereign states. The establishment of the Jewish State of Israel after the Diaspora of 2,000 years is a revolutionary movement in history that gave new meaning to the clash of civilization and established the rule that ancient civilizations and ancient religions have not died they remain dormant and await their time for resurrection so that ancient religion and civilization could bloom again. Spain emerged as Catholic colonial power right after 800 years of rule of Muslim Moors. India emerged as Hindu super power in 1947 after centuries of Muslim and Christian rule. Those who support the revival of ancient religions and ancient civilizations would join Hindu India on the same side of the battle lines in the clash of civilization. The success of the Jews to reestablish the 2,000 years old civilization of Jews in the Holy Land of Israel, means that the civilization of Egypt, Greece, Rome that were overthrown only 1500 years ago by Muslims and Christians could again resurrect and the religions of God Ossir, God Zeus and God Jupiter could some day resurrect in their ancient glory in Egypt, Greece and Rome respectively. The religions and civilizations of Mayas, Aztecs and Incas that were overthrown only 500 years ago can also resurrect some day in Mexico, Central America and Andean America respectively. The ultimate outcome of the clash of civilization shall be the resurrection of all ancient religions and civilizations that were conquered, destroyed and conquered by sword by iconoclast monotheist Islam and Catholic Christianity during last 2000 years.

(8) Neoconservatism Supports Da Vinci Code & Gospel of Judas and Gnostic Christianity

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations  © 2006 Copyrights Chapter 3. Page 143.

 

 

 

  (0)(48) Harmony of Every Real Philosophy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(48) Harmony of Philosophies

(1) Chapter 3. 3(15) Page 143. Abstract: One. No Real Philosophy can violently clash with any other Real Philosophy, as the purpose of any real Philosophy is to discover the Real Truth. However, the Real Philosophy is in eternal mortal combat with rival False Philosophy. History is the record of the eternal cosmic clash of True Philosophy and False Philosophy as well as the eternal cosmic Clash of True Religion and False Religion. The clash of civilization is the clash of Chinese and Indian, Buddhist and Hindu policy of tolerance and inclusion with those that promote intolerance and exclusion. Indian, Chinese, Japanese philosophers and religious leaders and Mystics developed unique civilization wide policy of tolerance, inclusion and active cultivation of diversity and religious innovation, while maintaining the sanctity of the ancient scriptures. Two. Indian and Chinese philosophic thought has been able to combine in an almost unique manner, conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking. If a Hindu Indian scholar is to be counted as a great master (Acharya), one has to write a commentary (Bashya) on the Sutras of the Darsanas concerned, or one must comment on one of the Bhasyas and write a sub-commentary (Tika). At any stage, a person may introduce a new and original point of view, but at no stage can he claim originality for himself. Three. In ancient China, any new idea or discovery was phrased as “what the old masters really meant.” This ideology or rediscovery allowed the Chinese thought to combine in almost unique manner conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Harmony of Oriental Philosophies

The clash of civilization is the clash of Chinese and Indian, Buddhist and Hindu policy of tolerance and inclusion with those that promote intolerance and exclusion. Indian, Chinese, Japanese philosophers and religious leaders and Mystics developed unique civilization wide policy of tolerance, inclusion and active cultivation of diversity and religious innovation, while maintaining the sanctity of the ancient scriptures.

(2) Don’t Claim Originality in Philosophy

First. Indian and Chinese philosophic thought has been able to combine in an almost unique manner, conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking. If a Hindu Indian scholar is to be counted as a great master (Acharya), one has to write a commentary (Bashya) on the Sutras of the Darsanas concerned, or one must comment on one of the Bhasyas and write a sub-commentary (Tika). At any stage, a person may introduce a new and original point of view, but at no stage can he claim originality for himself. Even god Krishna while delivering Gita, said this is the ancient way (Puratan) which got lost due to the long passage of time. This is the essential reason that unlimited diversity strengthens rather than weaken India’s unity. The practice of not claiming originality in religious thought, allowed Indian philosophers and religious leaders combine in almost unique manner conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking.

(3) What Old Masters Really Meant

Second. In ancient China, any new idea or discovery was phrased as “what the old masters really meant.” This ideology or rediscovery allowed the Chinese thought to combine in almost unique manner conformity to tradition and adventure in thinking. Confucianism is concerned with human society and social responsibilities of its members and Taoism emphasizes nature and what is natural and spontaneous. These two traditions, namely the Confucian tradition of ‘within society’ and Taoist tradition of ‘beyond society,’ balance and complement each other.

(4) Taoism Shintoism is Hinduism

Third. The affinities of Taoism Indian and Japanese religions are numerous. If one distinguishes between universal religions of salvation Buddhism, and the older more culture-bound, such as Japanese Shinto and Hinduism, Taoism belong to the second category, alongside Shinto and Hinduism. Indian Hinduism, Japanese Shinto and Chinese Taoism are almost identical to one another. If Mahayana Buddhism is 85% similar to Hinduism, the Shinto and Taoism are 95% similar to Hinduism. Chinese Buddhism is not a Sinified Indian religion but as flowers on the tree of Chinese religion that blossomed under Indian stimulus and that basically maintained their Chinese character. Indian religion was at first regarded as a foreign variety of Taoism. Early translators of Buddhist scriptures employed Taoist expression as equivalent for Buddhist technical terms. Thus, the Buddha, in achieving enlightenment (Bodhi) was described as having ‘obtained the Tao’, and Taoist ‘non-action’ was used to render Nirvana, the Buddhist state of bliss. A Joint sacrifice to Taoist Lao-tzu and Buddha performed by the China’s Han emperor in AD 166. Taoists believe Lao-tzu after vanishing into the West became the Buddha. By 4th century, there was a distinct Buddhist influence upon the literary form of Taoist scriptures and the philosophical expression of the most eminent Taoist masters. Taoists and Zen Buddhism adopted Buddhist techniques of meditation. The interaction of religion was mutual in China. Because of influence of foreign religion of Buddhism Taoism participated in the widening of Taoist thought. Chinese Buddhism underwent a partial Taoicization as part of its adaptation to Chinese conditions. The ultimate synthesis of Taoism and Buddhism was realized in the Ch’an tradition the Japanese Zen from the 7th century onwards, into which the paradoxes of the ancient Taoist mystics and Buddhism were integrated. The Three Religion movement (Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism) started in the T’ang dynasty and became popular in Sung and Ming China. The Three Religion Movement promoted as mixtures of Confucian ethics, the Taoist system of merits and the Buddhist concept of reincarnation.

(5) All Mystic Religions are One and the Same.

Fourth. The similarity of mysticism in all religions, namely, Hindu Tantra & Yoga, Buddhist Tantra, Taoism, Shintoism, Kabbala Judaic mysticism, Shiite Sufism, Christian mysticism & spiritualism, point to the fact that there is only one Inner Way of Mystics of all religions, though the experience of the mystics is expressed differently in the respective cultural and religious environment. Taoist Lao-tsu’s notion of the “the One,” which is not only primordial unity, but the oneness underlying all phenomena, the point in which all contraries are reconciled, is same a Hindu Upanishad concept of “the Brahman.” Western mystics Greek Plotinus (3rd century), and 15th century French philosopher Nicholas of Cusa spoke about the same Taoist ‘the One.’ The 16th century Spanish mystic Teresa of Avila spoke of the state where ‘soul is fully awake as regards God, but wholly asleep as regards things of this world and in respect to herself.’ Plotinus strove to ‘be deaf to the sound of the senses and keep the soul’s faculty of apprehension one-pointed.’ German mystic Meister Eckeharts described the ‘still desert of the Godhead’ similar to the Taoist ecstatic union with the Tao. Heinrich Suso described the union of the essence of the soul with the essence of Nothingness. Hesychasts, Greek Orthodox mystics of 14th century, used Buddhist respiratory practices and concentration on internal organs to prepare for the mental “Jesus prayer.”

(6) Oriental Response to Predatory Religions

Fifth. The Christian West, Arab Islamic Middle East and Jews should adopt the Hindu-Buddhist, Sino-Indian policy of inclusion, tolerance and acceptance of diversity of thought, actions and values as essential building bloc to check the menace of the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century. Hinduism, Mahayana Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, Shintoism, Jainism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, paganism and animism should join forces to challenge the predatory religious intolerance and religious fundamentalism promoted by authoritarian iconoclast monotheist religions. India and china has shown the true way to escape the specter of the clash of civilizations.

(7) Neoconservatism Adopts Oriental Approach to Harmony of Philosophies

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights Chapter 3. Page 144.

 

 

 

  (0)(49) Hegelian Dialectical Reformation of Christian Church

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(49) Dialectic Reform of Church

Chapter 3. 3(16) Page 144. Abstract: One. The clash of civilization became the specter to civilization because authoritarian occidental religions, do not allow open philosophic debates on religious dogma and theology. Catholic Church throughout history condemned as heresy any innovation in Christian theology. Islam applies blasphemy laws to condemn any criticism of religious dogma and theology. The clash of civilization is the clash of Catholic authoritarian Church with Protestant philosophers and thinkers that find new meanings Christian Bible and interpret it differently. Two. Change is the eternal reality. Every condition, thesis or anti-thesis undergoes change. The clash of thesis and anti-thesis results in higher synthesis, and this synthesis is superior thesis or superior anti-thesis. Every condition or reality arises out of another, which in turn arises out of prior conditions. Three. Every civilization undergoes constant change, whether by the internal stimulus or external stimulus or by the interaction with another civilization, as constant change is the eternal reality. Dialectics of Reciprocal Origination is the law of interdependence or reciprocal conditioning of the phenomena within the totality of material, physical, psychic, and psychosomatic existences.

Four. Hegel borrowed Buddhist philosophy to develop a new western philosophy of spirit that distilled into conceptual form the insights of Christian religion. Hegelian dialectics can help man know the god and he need not depend upon the revelations of the select authoritarian Prophets for his understanding of God. Five. Man’s ignorance is the thesis, and the mind’s mystic yogic quest for illumination is the antithesis and the synthesis the better knowledge of the Soul and Spirit by man through mind. Matter is the thesis and Mind is the anti-thesis and the synthesis is the birth of Energy or better understanding of Spirit. First. In the dialectical triad of Matter, Mind and Energy, the matter in neuter and the mind is male and the energy is female. The energy is released when mind acts upon matter. Without energy mater is inert without life and does not produce any historical forces. In Hinduism and Buddhism Spirit is synonymous with Energy and is feminine. In Hinduism the name of almighty Goddess is Shakti (energy). Hindu scriptures say Purusa (matter) is inert and create creation only after union with the Shakti. Hindu Tantra says god Shiva is shava (corpse) unless he unites with Kali Shakti.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Dialectic Scrutiny of Religious Truths

One. The clash of civilization became the specter to civilization because authoritarian occidental religions, do not allow open philosophic debates on religious dogma and theology. Catholic Church throughout history condemned as heresy any innovation in Christian theology. Islam applies blasphemy laws to condemn any criticism of religious dogma and theology. The clash of civilization is the clash of Catholic authoritarian Church with Protestant philosophers and thinkers that find new meanings Christian Bible and interpret it differently, which if Papacy accepted would end the authoritarian character of Catholic Christian religion. Protestant philosopher GWF Hegel tried to introduce the Hindu Buddhist traditions to have open philosophic debates on the religious concepts, dogma and theology. Throughout history Hindu and Buddhist world encouraged open public debates on religious issues and religious controversies. Reinterpretation of Christian, Judaic and Muslim scriptures employing the Hegelian dialectics would resolve many problems of the clash of religions that threatens to descend the new dark age on the world civilizations.

(2) Dialectic of Dependent Origination

Two. Change is the eternal reality. Every condition, thesis or anti-thesis undergoes change. The clash of thesis and anti-thesis results in higher synthesis, and this synthesis is superior thesis or superior anti-thesis. Every condition or reality arises out of another, which in turn arises out of prior conditions. Every mode of being presupposes another immediately preceding mode from which the subsequent mode derives, in a chain of series of causes. When two diametrically opposite conditions or viewpoints enter into a dialogue or intercourse, there diametrically opposite viewpoints represent Thesis (Ying) and Anti-thesis (Yang) respectively, but after the dialogue and intercourse these diametrically opposite view points and conditions give birth to a new synthesis or new condition that does justice to the substance of the both, and the new birth is neither the defeat of thesis nor the defeat of the anti-thesis, but the birth of a new synthesis. The barbarian invasion of civilization results in victory of either the superior militarist civilization or the superior civilized barbarian. Civilization is the Thesis and barbarian invaders is the Anti-thesis and the resulting synthesis is either the birth of superior civilization that imbibed the barbarian technology or the superior barbarian civilization that barbarians took over and defended its against further attacks of other barbarians. The purpose of the clash of civilization is the enhanced control over material mature by man and mind. The direct result of every clash of civilization has been the wider distribution of the material goods produced by man’s exploitation of the material nature.

Civilization is the thesis, the barbarian invasion is the anti-thesis and the resulting synthesis is either the revitalized militant civilization or new civilization under the leadership of recently civilized barbarians. Only change is eternal reality and the clash of civilization point out that civilizations as well barbarians undergoing constant flux for the better realization of the ideals of civilizations and the barbarians. Without the threat of the clash of civilization, the civilizations become stagnant and decline. The clash of civilization promotes international prosperity by breaking the wall separating the Haves and have-nots and wider distribution of economic goods to the Have-nots. The direct result of any clash of civilization, whether clash between civilizations, or between barbarians and civilizations, has been the wider distribution of material goods among the have-nots. Successful barbarian invaders that conquered civilizations distributed the material goods of the civilizations to the barbarians who belonged to have-nots. Civilizations that repulsed the barbarian invasions also distributed the materials goods of the civilizations to have-nots to buy peace and to win their support in future barbarian invasions. The clash of civilization breaks down the wall that separates the Haves and the Have-nots. Civilization is the Thesis and barbarian invasion the Anti-thesis and it results in the Synthesis of wider distribution of the material goods within civilization as well barbarians besides wider exchange of goods between civilizations and between civilization and barbarians. The dialectics of the clash of civilization and barbarians is as follows: civilization is the thesis and barbarian is the anti-thesis (negation of the civilization) and the result is the synthesis of a new birth, where either civilization or barbarian forces predominate.

(3) Hegelian Dialectics

Three. Philosopher GWF Hegel argued that thinking and the Mind begins by laying down a positive thesis that is at once negated by its antithesis; then further thought produces the synthesis, and the same process continues once more. The dialectical process is circular; ultimately thinking reaches a synthesis that is identical with its starting point, except that all that was implicit there has now been made explicit. Thus thinking itself, as a process has negativity as one of its constituent moments.

(4) Dialectics of Reciprocal Origination

Four. Every civilization undergoes constant change, whether by the internal stimulus or external stimulus or by the interaction with another civilization, as constant change is the eternal reality. Dialectics of Reciprocal Origination is the law of interdependence or reciprocal conditioning of the phenomena within the totality of material, physical, psychic, and psychosomatic existences. Dialectics of reciprocal origination and dialectics of reciprocal conditioning causes the interaction of two civilizations or interaction of two barbarian cultures into the synthesis rejuvenation of both civilizations and both barbarian cultures. Any clash or intercourse between two world civilizations results in the betterment of both civilizations. The clash of civilized thesis A with the civilized anti-thesis B results in the synthesis of rejuvenated civilized thesis A and rejuvenated civilized thesis B. The mutual interaction of two civilizations results in the betterment of both civilizations and both lose their stagnation halt their decline and positively impact both civilizations. It is the reason that in spite of many differences Sino-Indian would greatly profit both the Indian elephant and Chinese dragon. The dialectics of the clash of two world civilizations is as follows: The first civilization is the thesis and the rival second civilization is the anti-thesis (rival thesis) and the result of the clash and intercourse of two civilized civilizations is the synthesis, which is the twin birth of the rejuvenated first civilization and the rejuvenated rival second civilization. The clash of two mature world civilizations results in the destruction of neither and both profit by rejuvenation.

Dialectics helps civilization rejuvenate itself during and after the clash of civilization. The clash of civilizations is mutually beneficial to both the civilizations and improves the quality of both civilizations. The interaction of Thesis One and Thesis Two results in the Synthesis representing the separate births of superior Thesis One and superior Thesis Two. The world civilizations frequently collide, collude, clash and invade which might result in the victory of either civilization, even then the separate identity of both civilizations is maintained and both civilization undergo improvisation and increase their capability to better harness the material nature and the quality of goods produced increases. Thesis is Civilization One and Anti-thesis is Civilization Two and the resulting outcome of the intercourse is the Synthesis, the rejuvenated superior civilization one and superior civilization two.

(5) Dialectic of Absolute Origination

Five. Hegel borrowed Buddhist philosophy to develop a new western philosophy of spirit that distilled into conceptual form the insights of Christian religion. Hegelian dialectics can help man know the god and he need not depend upon the revelations of the select authoritarian Prophets for his understanding of God. Dialectics can help man understand the concept of god and discern false religion from true religion. Hegel argued that men are not to be the slaves of objective commands, as the Law is made for the man and man is not made for the Law. Hegel argued that the Jews were slaves to the Mosaic Law, leading a life unlovely in comparison with that of ancient Greeks. Hegelian dialectics comes to conclusion that the authoritarian religions of Judaism, Catholicism and Islam wrongly impose the tyranny of the Mosaic Law, Papal laws and Shariah on their believers, respectively.

Man’s ignorance is the thesis, and the mind’s mystic yogic quest for illumination is the antithesis and the synthesis the better knowledge of the Soul and Spirit by man through mind. Matter is the thesis and Mind is the anti-thesis and the synthesis is the birth of Energy or better understanding of Spirit. First. In the dialectical triad of Matter, Mind and Energy, the matter in neuter and the mind is male and the energy is female. The energy is released when mind acts upon matter. Without energy mater is inert without life and does not produce any historical forces. In Hinduism and Buddhism Spirit is synonymous with Energy and is feminine. In Hinduism the name of almighty Goddess is Shakti (energy). Hindu scriptures say Purusa (matter) is inert and create creation only after union with the Shakti. Hindu Tantra says god Shiva is shava (corpse) unless he unites with Kali Shakti.

2. Second. The spiritual world can be defined as the remnant from the Infinite after taking out the world of man-mind-ego and the material world. Infinite minus material world minus the world of man-mind-ego equals the spiritual world.

3. Third. Truth is known only because error has been experienced and truth has triumphed. God is infinite only because god has assumed the limitations of finitude and triumphed over them. Spirit, including the Infinite Spirit knows itself as Spirit only by contrast with Nature.

4. Fourth. Material Nature is opposite of Spirit. Everything in Nature is in space and time and thus finite. Nature is a sphere of external relations. Nature is created by Spirit and bears the mark of the Creator. Nature as the realm of externality cannot be rational through and through. It is the task of the philosophy of the nature to understand the categories that appear in it as nature’s essential structure, when it was created the Spirit. The rationality prefigured in the material nature becomes gradually explicit when man appears. In man’s mind nature rises to self-consciousness. Without the intermediacy of the man the nature cannot acquire self-consciousness. Nature needs man to become self-conscious. Nature becomes self-conscious through the intermediacy of Mind of the man.

5. Fifth. Pure Spirit thinking its own essence, in a dialectical process advances from abstract to concrete. The notion of the Pure Being by dialectical process is revealed as simple emptiness, Noting. Yet Nothing is. The notion of Pure Being is the thesis and notion of Nothing is it’s opposite the antithesis, and the synthesis is the notion of the Absolute Idea of the Spirit as objective to itself.

6. Sixth. Protestant Hegel rejected the Catholic concept of the Kingdom of God. Catholic concept of Kingdom of god meant the totalitarian dictatorship of the Pope’s priests. Hegel argued that the Law is to be fulfilled in the love of God, wherein all tensions cease and the believers do god’s will wholeheartedly and single-mindedly. A community of such believers is the Kingdom of God. This is the kingdom that Jesus came to teach. Kingdom of god is founded on a belief in the unity of divine and human. Because man is spirit that he can grasp and comprehend the Spirit of God. The kingdom can never be realized in this world, as man is not spirit alone but flesh also. Church and state, worship and life, piety and virtue, spiritual and worldly action can never dissolve into one, said Hegel. Hegel supported the idea of the constitutional separation of the State and the Church in the US Constitution.

7. Seventh. Protestant Hegel led the clash against Catholic civilization by establishing that philosophers have better understanding of the Christian gospel than Pope’s priests. Kant argued that man could have knowledge only of finite world of appearance. Hegel argued that with man’s love of god conceived as the union of opposites, a pre-figurement of Spirit is the unity, in which contradictions, such as infinite and finite are embraced and synthesized. Dialectic thinking is an activity of spirit and reason and thinking can rise above to higher synthesis in which contradictions are resolved. In religion finite life rises to infinite life. The philosophy based on concept of spirit, distills into conceptual form the insights of religion. This was the philosophy that Hegel expounded and which should provide the theoretical basis of the tolerant civilizations stand in the clash of civilizations.

(6) Dialectical Idealism

Six. 1. The Idea, Mind, Man and Matter all alone by themselves cannot generate powerful historical forces to determine history. Idea becomes a historical force when it influences man and mind to use energy over matter to generate materialist forces in the civilization to determine history. Man becomes a historical force when it controls its mind and backs a right idea to productively employ energy to the matter to generate materialist forces that determines history. Mind becomes a historical force when it can conceive of a new idea and learns to control and exploit the matter and material nature in most productive way to fulfill the mind’s desires, cravings, lust, ego and pleasures. Matter remains inert unless some man with good mind uses the right idea to productively employ energy to harness the matter to generate materialist forces in the civilization.

2. The dialectics of Ideas and dialectical idealism determines history as idea influences man and mind to productively employ energy on matter to generate historical materialist forces that determine history. Matter by itself cannot determine history. Mind by itself without harnessing the power of matter cannot determine history. Ideas allow man and mind to control and exploit matter to generate historical forces. Karl Marx said that materialist forces determine the history and he neglected to give due importance to the role of man and mind in the exploitation of the materialist forces before they cold determine history. If materialist forces were alone determinants of history, then how come that India in 1750 produced 24.5% of world’s manufactured goods and came under British Rule of East India Company in 1787? Matter is inert and only after man and mind modifies matter by use of energy that matter becomes a historical force. Material forces by itself cannot determine the history. The forces of idea, mind or man preside over matter. Energy not the matter determines the history. Energy can productively impact the matter and history only through the intermediation of the mind, man and idea.

3. Dialectic idealism is superior to dialectic materialism. Hegelian dialectics is superior to Marxian dialectics. Matter represents the thesis, Mind is the anti-thesis and Synthesis is the new birth, new creations that man makes by transforming nature and matter to higher entropy. Mind of a man is a historical force and manifests as man’s quest for Selfishness, Ego, Individuality, Desire, Lust, Greed, and Power, and these are all rooted in the Idea. Matter, Nature and Materialist nature are inert and require the input of Mind, Ideas and Desire to become a historical force. Karl Marx was a shit philosopher, who produced the shit philosophy to allow Jews loot the material goods of non-Jews. Hegelian dialectics sought to help better understand the true Christianity by harnessing the Buddhist philosophy as Jesus had spent many years in Asia studying Hindu and Buddhist philosophy and yoga. Karl Marx put Hegelian dialectics upside down and created a new religion of communism, the religion of devil, to loot the property of believers of Orthodoxy and Buddhism. Marxist materialist dialectics failed to enable Soviet and Chinese better control the material economic forces and material resources. Marxist doctrine of Dialectic materialism is shit-philosophy.

4. Every civilization promotes its unique concept of dialectics that determines the thinking of its people and determines its rise or fall. Dialectics influence the rise and fall of civilization. Dialectic philosophy is an attempt to comprehend the entire universe-material and spiritual- as a systematic whole. The system of dialectic philosophy grounded in reason and direct comprehension of reality through enlightened mind. God represent Absolute Truth and Spirit and man can receive and understand god because he also has the spirit as man has a Soul (Atma), the real Self. The religious scriptures the spiritual truth is veiled in imagery, but in philosophy the veil (Maya) is torn aside so that the man can see all things in god and see god in all things. The dialectics removes the camouflage of the political ideology and helps man understand whether a particular political ideology or religion is a correct ideology or religion. Prophet Zoroaster correctly argued that every civilization has its unique system of values and what is perceived as good in one civilization might be called bad in rival civilization. The criteria to judge a political ideology is: Whether it helps the people of the civilization to increase man’s control over matter and material nature to satisfy man’s desires, greed, lust, ego and selfishness? Any political ideology that fails to increase man’s control over material nature is a bad ideology and bad politics. The criteria to judge whether a religion is good or bad is: Whether the religion helps the man better understand the Divine and sprit by direct realization of the Sprit? Any religion that seeks to enrich its priests by denying direct understanding of the spiritual reality, without the intermediation of priests is a false religion.

5. Religion is the philosophy to understand that man is the master over matter and that man can directly worship understand and connect with the Divine and the world of spirit that lies beyond the world of matter and the world of mind. Politics is the philosophy to teach man the best way to control and exploit the matter and material nature. The politics and religion have a common goal to elevate the status of man vis-à-vis material forces and spiritual forces. Politics should control religion as philosophers better equipped than priests to guide man how best to control the nature and matter. Dictatorship of Philosophers preferred over dictatorship of the priests. The purpose of the religion is to make man the master over matter and to progressively enhance the status of man towards attributes of divinity. The authoritarian religions that keep man and woman into bondage and servitude to matter and spirit cannot be true religions or ideologies. The common purpose of political ideologies and religion should be to lead man for progressive higher control over material forces and higher understanding of spiritual forces.

6. The goal of religion is to allow Mind understand the Spirituality and the goal of politics is to allow Mind control the matter. The purpose of religion shall be to develop the Mind of the man so that Mind could better harness the Matter and explore the Spirit. The purpose of politics shall be to mobilize the mind power and muscle power of the man to collectively control the material mature to satisfying the man’s ego, desire, lust, greed, selfishness and need for power. The purpose of religion is to properly harness power of man’s Mind so that man may productively control the matter and nature for the fulfillment of the desires of the Mind and also to better understand the spirit world, as man can enhance his power of mind by following religious practices. Any religion that curtail hamper and deny the Man’s inherent desire to understand Spirit is false religion. Any political ideology that hampers man’s increased control over matter and nature to fulfill the desires of the mind is false or bad ideology.

7. The good religion as well as good politics seeks to enhance the control and understanding of man and mind over matter as well as spirit. Good politics is thesis and good religion is anti-thesis and the synthesis is the new birth and new creation that man makes by harnessing the matter, while enhancing his mind by better understanding the divine. Man’s better understandings of the Matter as well as of the Spirit, results in the synthesis birth of better man and a better civilization where man is free to explore the best way to better understand the Divine spirit as well as better ways to control and harness the matter to better satisfy the man’s desires, greed, lust, ego and selfishness. Good religion as well as good political ideology seeks to enhance rather than control the freedom of man and mind how best to explore the world of divine as well as the world of matter and nature? Man need not sacrifice the worldly enjoyments to better understand the divine.

8. Man is a thesis and religion is the anti-thesis and synthesis is the Mind’s better understanding of Divine reality and spiritual nature. Man is the thesis and politics is the anti-thesis and the synthesis is the Man’s better control over matter and material nature. The doctrines of qualified Dualism or qualified Monism helps man understand his Mind better than either doctrines of dualism and monism. Man and god would always be distinctly separate, even if man and mind has the same spark that God has in form of Atma. Man can overcome the influence of matter by yoga and religion, and attain Moksa and Nirvana but can never become God. Mind and man can control and exploit matter and nature but can’t create matter or nature. Man is the enjoyer of the matter and nature and can never become the creator of matter and nature. Man cannot make gold from other materials, except from the gold ores.

9. Man cannot become the creator. Man would always remain inferior to the Creator, even if he can understand the principles and esoteric secrets of the creation. Man is not god and can never become god, though after enlightenment the philosopher acquires access to many powers that we associate with god. Even extreme monists believe that man differs from god. Even extreme dualist agrees that man has spark of the divine spirit and man can directly comprehend the divine. God can incarnate as a man but man can never become a god, as in final analysis there can be only one God in the entire creation. However, god can manifest in infinite forms to communicate with the man. Monotheist, iconoclast religions are false when they dispute the ability of Almighty god to take many reincarnations to help man understand divine. Prophets are wrong when they declare that there would be no other prophet in future.

10. Every civilization has its own especial system of values, system of god and in principle every religious and spiritual system must have some common ground even if they separated in the diverse never meeting branches. The unity among civilizations can be realized not by analyzing the leaves of the branches only by exploring where branches meet the trunk of the tree, by looking inwards rather outwards.

11. The Matter is the Thesis, the Mind and the individuality of man is the Anti-thesis, and the result is the synthesis of the discovery of the Energy and Spirit. The Mind, Matter and Spirit are three interconnected spheres of the entire reality and the entire creation. The entire creation has three spheres of manifestations, firstly, the sphere of desire, ego and mind, secondly the material manifestation of nature, and thirdly, the spiritual manifestation. If the world of Matter and Nature is (A), and the world of Mind, Ego, Desire, and human is (B), than all that is outside A & B is the world of Spirit and called Infinity. The material nature is inert and by itself cannot influence history. Only under the influence of Mind that material world can influence civilization.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page. 149.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(50) The Hegelian Dialectical Process

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;

(50) The Hegelian Dialectical Process

Chapter 3. 3(17) Page 149. Abstract: One. Indian Buddhism is the thesis and Chinese Taoism is antithesis and the synthesis is Chinese Mahayana Buddhism. Chinese Buddhism is not a Sinified Indian religion but as flowers on the tree of Chinese religion that blossomed under Indian stimulus and that basically maintained their Chinese character. Indian religion was at first regarded as a foreign variety of Taoism. Two. Civilization religion is the thesis and man’s action (Karma) is the antithesis and synthesis is the reincarnation into a new civilization after rebirth in another civilization. The human actions are insubstantial and momentary, disappearing as they have been manifested only to reappear again to give rise to a new aggregate. There is continual motion by virtue of which a person passes from one condition to another. Three. The dialectical process would result in the dictatorship of the philosophers in the world, then the old history will end and new history will begin. According to the Maya calendar the new age will begin in December 2012 AD.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations   © 2006 Copyrights

(1) The Dialectical Process

Seven. 1. Indian Buddhism is the thesis and Chinese Taoism is antithesis and the synthesis is Chinese Mahayana Buddhism. Chinese Buddhism is not a Sinified Indian religion but as flowers on the tree of Chinese religion that blossomed under Indian stimulus and that basically maintained their Chinese character. Indian religion was at first regarded as a foreign variety of Taoism. Early translators of Buddhist scriptures employed Taoist expression as equivalent for Buddhist technical terms. Thus, the Buddha, in achieving enlightenment (Bodhi) was described as having ‘obtained the Tao’, and Taoist ‘non-action’ was used to render Nirvana, the Buddhist state of bliss. A Joint sacrifice to Taoist Lao-tzu and Buddha performed by the China’s Han emperor in AD 166.

2. Civilization religion is the thesis and man’s action (Karma) is the antithesis and synthesis is the reincarnation into a new civilization after rebirth in another civilization. The human actions are insubstantial and momentary, disappearing as they have been manifested only to reappear again to give rise to a new aggregate. There is continual motion by virtue of which a person passes from one condition to another. Thus there exists not only a continuum of psychic states but also the modifications of them, since each series arises at each instant distinct from any other but corresponding to the initial force of the impulse. However, the individual being of the thesis does not exist in a direct sense in the synthesis. Nor does the past or future exist in a direct sense. Between one state and another there exists the same connection that there is between a seed and the fruit, which is manifested by means of the tree. Every thought or act pervaded by a sort of very subtle impregnation, which in turn is capable of impregnating the subconscious so as to generate new correlated psychic situations.

3. The Hegelian Hindu-Buddhist dialectical reasoning should be used to reform Christianity, Islam and Judaism to allow their believers discuss the religious dogma, theology and philosophy openly. King is the Thesis and Priest is the Antithesis and the resulting synthesis could be either king-led King-priest or priest-led Priest-king or philosopher-led king-priest. Papacy is the Thesis, Hegelian philosophy is the Antithesis and the synthesis is the birth of Protestant Christianity. Atheist Communism is the Thesis and Capitalism is the antithesis and the resulting synthesis is the democratic Orthodox Russia. Brahmin Hinduism is the Thesis and Buddha’s Mysticism is the antithesis and the resulting synthesis is the twin birth of Mystic Hinduism and Hinduized Mahayana Buddhism that worships multitude of Chinese gods. The Vatican Papal conservative Catholicism and Meccan fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam created temporary roadblocks to the harmonious progression of the dialectical process in the historical evolution of the religion in the world. The Medieval Dark Age of Catholic West Europe had to end faced by the onslaught of the historical dialectical forces unleashed by Martin Luther, Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. Hegel, empowered by the philosophical insight of Buddhism. Similarly, Hindu India, Protestant United States, Buddhist Japan, Sufi Iran and Kabala mystic Israel would lead the tolerant inclusive world to unleash the mystical philosophical historical dialectical forces that would undermine the joint conspiracy of Catholic Vatican and Wahhabi Mecca to impose the totalitarian dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world by means of clash of civilization. The tide of history and the forces generated by dialectical process would ensure the total victory of Protestant Christianity and force Reformation on Papacy, Roman Catholicism and Vatican in the first quarter of the 21st Century. The dialectical process would ensure the total victory of mystic Shiite Sufism over Wahhabi Mecca in the first quarter of the 21st Century.

4. The dialectical process would result in the dictatorship of the philosophers in the world, then the old history will end and new history will begin. According to the Maya calendar the new age will begin in December 2012 AD. Just as the Jewish State of Israel established itself in the Holy Land after the Diaspora of 2,000 years and pushed the illegal Muslim occupiers of the land, the Incas, Mayas and Aztecs would reestablish the Inca civilization in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia and reestablish Aztec civilization in Mexico and Maya civilization in Central America after the relatively short gap of 500 years. The Hindus of Malaysia and Indonesia would reestablish the Hindu kingdoms in Malaysia and Indonesia and Brunei. The followers of God Zeus, God Jupiter and God Ossir would reestablish the civilization and religion of god Zeus in Greece, and religion of God Jupiter in Rome and religion of God Ossir, Horus, Ptah and Re-Atum in Greece, Rome and Egypt, respectively after the exile of 1500 years. The dialectical Idealism and Idealist dialectical forces of history would put an end to the authoritarian predatory intolerance in the 21st Century. Total victory of Protestant Reformation movement would result in the reestablishment of the true religion of Christianity, the religion preached by Jesus to the Apostles, the Apostolic Gnostic Arian Christianity, which was declared heresy by Church of Rome. The idea do not die and ancient civilizations have not died and the god Zeus, Jupiter, Ossir, Ahura Mazda, Ptah and goddess Isis, Hathor, Innanna, Astarte, Athena and Hera are alive and continued to be worshipped by hundred of millions of Hindus in India in their Hindu version as god Zeus as well as god Jupiter is none other than Vedic Hindu god Indra, the god of thunderbolt and king of gods, who is also worshipped as Atma by Hindus in the 21st century. Nubians in Ethiopia, Sudan and Black Africa continue to worship Pharaoh’s gods and goddesses in 21st Century. The civilizations of India, China and Japan have the military and economic power to reclaim the lands their gods lost due to the invasions of the iconoclast religions.

(2) Neoconservatism adopts Buddhist Hegelian Dialectical Process

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations;  © 2006 Copyrights

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy- Sword of Idealistic Hegelianism of NeoConservatism Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacey Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page 150.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

  (0)(51) Clash of True Protestant Hegelianism & Papal Materialism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

(51) Conclusion Clash of Hegelian Philosophy

Chapter 3. 3(18) Page 150. Abstract: One. Authoritarian religions can be reformed if secular rulers exercise their sovereign rights to appoint top religious clergy, Cardinals, Archbishops, and Abbots and give their symbols of office. Two. Philosophers and scholars not the Bishops should have final say on religious dogma and religious philosophy. Three. To avoid the recurrence of the Thirty years Counter Reformation Wars it is important the Protestant Philosophers drawing upon the German Idealism, Hegel and Hegelianism should join forces with Hindu and Buddhist philosophers to develop a common philosophic counter-action on Papal and Wahhabi predatory religious intolerance, which seek to undermine the secular, liberal modern tolerant societies in Eurasia. Four. The failure of Protestants to undertake suitable countermeasures in alliance with Hindus and Buddhists might allow Catholics and Muslims join forces to bring about the end of the American protestant Christian Empire as a part of the Catholic eschatological teleological end of time Fatima Prophecy. Five. Hegel argued that Jesus had originally taught a rational morality, reconcilable with the teaching of Kant’s ethical works, and Jesus taught a religion that unlike Judaism was adapted to the reason of all men. Religion is the stage of absolute knowledge or the spirit knowing itself as spirit. Religion is thus the field of philosophy.)

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations  © 2006 Copyrights

(1) Investiture Controversy

Authoritarian religions can be reformed if secular rulers exercise their sovereign rights to appoint top religious clergy, Cardinals, Archbishops, and Abbots and give their symbols of office. Secular authorities should have a right to appoint Bishops and Abbots and formally give them symbols of their office without consulting Pope and foreign heads of religious churches. The Investiture Controversy (1076-1122) is equally relevant in the 21st century to diffuse the clash of Civilizations. The secular authorities should have full freedom to appoint Catholic Bishops and Abbots and Protestant clergy and formally give them the symbols of their office so that the local clergy should not have loyalty to the foreign potentate.

(2) Philosophers should Reinterpret Religion

Philosophers and scholars not the Bishops should have final say on religious dogma and religious philosophy. Religion is the field of philosophy. Philosophers have all rights to interpret religious scriptures and propagate religious modernization and transformation of religion. The secular authorities should allow Christian philosophers and scholars make reinterpretation of Christology, Gospel, nature of Christ, to make Christianity a rational religion as was preached by Jesus to his disciples.

(3) Mecca Schemed to become Islamic Papacy

Wahhabi Mecca scheming to develop Mecca Caliphate by developing global networks of Wahhabi ulemas and Mullahs loyal of the Wahhabi clergy at Mecca. Wahhabi Mecca developing to become the Papacy of Islam. To avoid the recurrence of the Thirty years Counter Reformation Wars it is important the Protestant Philosophers drawing upon the German Idealism, Hegel and Hegelianism should join forces with Hindu and Buddhist philosophers to develop a common philosophic counter-action on Papal and Wahhabi predatory religious intolerance, which seek to undermine the secular, liberal modern tolerant societies in Eurasia. Wahhabi Mecca is Papacy in making. The Mecca Clergy with the blessing of Papacy conspired to create Mecca Caliphate, in which Wahhabi clergy not the Sultan would be the Caliph of Islam and Caliph of Mecca Caliphate. Wahhabi clergy wants to directly rule the Islamic world by establishing the Dictatorship of the Priests in the Islamic world, the Pope ruled Papal States counterpart in the Islamic world. The threat the dictatorship of the Priests, Catholic and Wahhabi, is the revolutionary threat and requires overwhelming military response of the secular, tolerant democratic societies. Like the dictatorship of the proletariats, the Dictatorship of the Wahhabi Priests in the Islamic world aims to confiscate the property of the Aristocracy and establish the rule of Wahhabi Ayatollahs in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and USA. King Fahd and House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia should realize that Wahhabi Ulema seeks direct

(4) Protestant-Catholic Clash of Civilizations

Clash of civilization is in essence a clash of tolerant Hindu-Buddhist and Protestant philosophies with those of intolerant Papal conservatism, Wahhabi fundamentalism and intolerance. The failure of Protestants to undertake suitable countermeasures in alliance with Hindus and Buddhists might allow Catholics and Muslims join forces to bring about the end of the American protestant Christian Empire as a part of the Catholic eschatological teleological end of time Fatima Prophecy. Clash of Civilization would determine the outcome of the 2004 Presidential election in the United States. Philosophy of G.W.F. Hegel, Hegelianism, Hegelian Idealism, Hegelian dialectics and Hegelian spiritualism should define the political stand of Protestants in the Clash of Civilizations. Hegelian Idealism would unite Protestant Reformation, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sufism to develop their common approach towards Clash of Civilization, where they would jointly face the menace of authoritarian intolerant Roman Catholicism, Papacy and Wahhabi Islamic militant fundamentalism.

(5) History is Clash of Philosophy & Religion

1. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was the last of the great philosophical system builder of modern times. Hegel’s works, following upon that of Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte and Friedrich Schelling, marks the pinnacle of classical German philosophy, known as German Idealism. As an absolute Idealist inspired by Protestant Christian Reformation and Buddhist philosophical insights and grounded in the mastery of fantastic fund of concrete knowledge, Hegel found a place for everything logical, natural, human and divine, in dialectical scheme that repeatedly swung from thesis to antithesis and back again to a higher and richer synthesis. Hegel wrote an essay using Kantian theology to reinterpret the Gospel of Bible on Kantian lines. Hegel inquired into the question: How Catholic Christianity had ever become the authoritarian religion that it was, if in fact the teaching of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic? Hegel argued that Jesus had originally taught a rational morality, reconcilable with the teaching of Kant’s ethical works, and Jesus taught a religion that unlike Judaism was adapted to the reason of all men. Religion is the stage of absolute knowledge or the spirit knowing itself as spirit. Religion is thus the field of philosophy.

2. Every one of Hegel’s major works was a history. Philosophers enquire into religion and reinterpret religious scriptures and analyze the history from the perspective of a philosopher. Philosophy, religion and history become one in Total philosophy. History is the canvass on which philosophy and religion unfold and give out its secrets and religion’s teleological purpose. Church and state, worship and life, piety and virtue, spiritual and worldly action can never dissolve into one. The wall that separates the State and the Church is the essential perquisite of the progress of the Civilization.

3. History is the enactment of God’s purpose that is the gradual realization of human freedom. Hegel, Jesus, Apostolic Christianity, Hindus and Buddhists believe that God’s purpose and human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress and advancing to self-knowledge. The ultimate knowledge is attained when man has a self-realization of the identity of his own Soul (Self Atman Purusha) with that of the Self of the Absolute God. The believers of this approach represent the global warring coalition of religions on one side of the battle lines in the Clash of Civilizations. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Bahaism, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism, Apostolic Christianity, Pharisees and Kabbalah Judaism, Sufi Islamic Mysticism and majority of Non Denominational Christians believe in the above approach. These people believe in principles of tolerance, inclusion, diversity, women’s rights and man’s ability to direct worship the Divine without the intermediacy of the priests. These people oppose authoritarian religious organizations and reject the concept of the dictatorship of the priests and the do not accept the infallibility of any religious leader.

4. Hindu India is the leader of this coalition in the clash of civilizations and Protestant United States and Non Denominational Christians would be on the same side of the clash of civilizations in the 21st Century. These forces represent the coalition of tolerant, inclusive, rationalistic true religions. Whole of human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress and it involved constant conflicts with the contrary forces that are opposed to mankind’s progress in spiritual and moral progress.

5. Throughout history mankind’s quest for true religion faced violent onslaught of intolerant false religions that blurred the fine line distinguishing the true and false religions. Throughout history predatory intolerant false religion tried to destroy the true religion by violent terrorist means. The historical clash between true religion and false religion in history is known as the Clash of Civilization. The clash between tolerant inclusive pro-diversity religion and predatory intolerant fundamentalist religions continues in the 21st Century. The Clash of civilizations is the interpretation of the 20th century world affairs from the perspective of the clash of religions.

(6) Center of the Culture has moved to the Right

In the perspective of the American publishers the American book buyers have become pro-right than earlier. The Extremists and Conservatives got hip, got cool, got personality. Conservatives have strong points of view and that’s what works, whether it is TV or radio or publishing. American public is voting in the bookstores to express their opinions and inform their opinions. Now the largest and less ideology driven publishers are trying to cash in on the growing number of conservative readers when overall book sales have been flat. Traditional book publishers are making fast calculations in their head and figured it might not be a bad idea to publish both ends of the spectrum.

(7) Political Center of the World has moved towards Populist Neoconservatism

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Diplomat Kalki Gaur, “Diplomacy of Civilizations” (2006 $100). Email: DiplomatKalkiGaur@Yahoo.Com; Blog://360.Yahoo.Com/diplomacyofcivilizations © 2006 Copyrights Chapter 3. Page 163

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelian Philosophy- Sword of Idealist Hegelianism of NeoConservatism & Protestantism, (61) 3(1) Purport - Sword of Tolerance Hegelianism Idealism, (62) 3(3) March of Philosophy, (63) 3(3A) March of Hegelian Philosophy, (64) 3(4) Anti-Papacy Hegelianism, (65) 3(4A) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism, (66) 3(4B) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics, (67) 3(5) Priests Vs Laity Clash, (68) 3(6) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot, (69) 3(7) Anti-Hegelian Marxism was a Vatican Plot, (70) 3(7B) Civilization’s Universal & Particular Contradictions, (71) 3(8) Papacy Vs Christian Empire, (72) 3(9) Papacy Vs Mysticism Gnosticism Kabala, (73) 3(10) Clash of Indian Philosophy, (74) 3(11) Harmony of Philosophies, (75) 3(12) Dialectic Reform of Church, (76) 3(13) The Dialectical Process, (77) 3(14) Conclusion, Chapter 3. Page 164.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENT

MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM

THE NEOCONSERVATIVE MANIFESTO

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

Chapter 1 Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

Ideology of Neoconservatism for Foreign Democracies

(1) Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

(2) Universal Principles of Neo-Conservatism

(3) Neo-Con Foreign Policy

(4) The Global Order of Neo-Conservatives

(5) Crusades for Democracy

(6) Origin of Neo-Conservatism

(7) Anti-Theocracy Neo-Cons

(8) Neo-Conservatism: Autobiography of an Ideology

(9) Bush’s Democratic Utopia

(10) Anti-Neo-Conservative Axis

(11) Neo-Con Militia Collectives

(12) Neo-Con Social Modernity

(13) Neo-Con Cause of Poverty

(14) Hindu-Buddhist Alliance

(15) Modernizing Economy NeoConservative Way

(16) Agro-Neo-Conservatism

(17) Neo-Con Doctrine of Work

(18) Politico-Neo-Conservatism

(19) Neo-Conservative Party is Third Party

(20) American Election Process Unfair & Fraud Prone

(21) Bribing Foreign Election Campaigns

(22) The 3rd Party in Election 2008

(23) Demand for Federal Election Commission For Democracy

(24) Cultural Domination as Central theme in US History

(25) US Non European Essence

(26) USA will split like USSR

(27) Why USSR Disintegrated

(28) Isms in US Elections 2004

(29) Looming New Global Dark Age

(30) Republican Dixiecrats

(31) Neo Conservatism

(32) USA Needs Third Party

(33) NeoConservative Third Party Is Viable

(34) Ideas for Reformation of American Democracy

(35) Clash of Idealistic Hegelianism Vs Materialist Terrorism

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy

(36) March of Hegelian Philosophy in History

(37) March of Revolutionary Hegelian Neoconservatism

(38) Hegelian Neoconservatism Anti-Papal Reformation

(39) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism

(40) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics

(41) Clash of Catholic Laity & Papal Priests

(42) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot

(43) Anti-Hegelian Marxism as Counter Reformation Vatican Plot

(44) Universal Contradictions of Civilizations

(45) Papacy is not a Church but a Business Empire

(46) Rise of Anti-Papacy Gnosticism Kabbalah Mysticism

(47) Clash of anti-Monotheism Hegelian Indian Philosophy

(48) Harmony of Every Real Philosophy

(49) Hegelian Dialectical Reformation of Christian Church

(50) The Hegelian Dialectical Process

(51) Clash of True Protestant Hegelianism & Papal Materialism

 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com

 

 

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com

 

 

KALKI GAUR BLOGS @ GOOGLEPAGES

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/1

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/12

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/13

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/14

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/15

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/16

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/17

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/18

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/19

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/02

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/03

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/04

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/05

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/06

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/07

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/08

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/09

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/10

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/11

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/2

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/21

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/22

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/23

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/24

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/25

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/26

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/27

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/28

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/29

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/30

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/31

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/32

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/33

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/34

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/35

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/36

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/37

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/38

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/02  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/03  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/04  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/05  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/06  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/07  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/08  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/09  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0i  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0ii  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0iii  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0iv  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0v  

KALKI GAUR BLOGS AT GOOGLEPAGES

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/1

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/1

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com