57

POLITICAL AGENDA OF NEOCONSERVATISM - Chapter 57- KALKI GAUR 

 

Chapter 57

Political Agenda of Neoconservatism

“MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” Kalki Gaur © 2006 Copyrights. http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/

(00) Chapter 2 Is USA Democracy? NeoCons Constitutional Reforms

(0)(19) 2(1) Neo-Conservative Party is Third Party

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 54. Chapter 2. 2(1)

Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

(19) (1) Neo-Conservative Party is America’s viable Third Party in two-party system

Any two-party system is inherently undemocratic and degenerates into aristocratic duopoly, and both parties neglect the political interests of the women, immigrants and minorities. The Third Party, the Neoconservative Party of the United States shall promote the ideological agenda of Neoconservatism. The Third Party shall be the political balancer in the party system of two dominant political parties, and give more voice to the political interests of the women, immigrants and minorities. The two-dominant party system represented by Republican Party and Democratic Party, represents the same wine in two differently colored bottles. The development of a true Third Party would make United States a true democracy again.

The two-party system has undermined the democratic process in the United States. The ideological clarity of the Neo-Conservative Party of America shall promote the rise of the Third Party as a Balancer in American politics. The Neo-Conservative Party shall promote the ideology of Neo-Conservatism, and advocate the interests of women, immigrants, minorities and Protestants. The 1777 Constitution of USA is too old to be relevant in 21st Century, as 229 years is too long a time for any system or a constitution to remain relevant to the new times. The selection of President Ford, as Masonic Lodge member and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, a billionaire, without any election process exposed the weakness of the US Constitution.

(2) Neo-Conservative Constitutional Reforms

Neo-Conservatism realizes that the 1777 Constitution of the United States is not a real democracy but a Protestant aristocracy that WASPs designed to keep the dominance of WASPs. The constitutional reforms in the United States should reinforce the WASP domination of the United States.

One. Neo-Conservatism is serious about Crusades for Democracy worldwide and that includes United States. Neo-Conservatism realizes that the Constitution of the United States is too old to remain relevant for 21st Century. Neo-Conservatism seeks to develop public consensus to modernize American Constitution to develop Neo-Conservative Constitution of the United States. Neo-Conservatism realizes that the purpose of the US Constitution of 1777 was to establish a democratically elected Aristocracy to mobilize the resources of the Anglo-Saxon colonialists to secede from British Empire.

Two. Neo-Conservatism realizes that the purpose of the President Lincoln during Civil War was to create a democratic society where Blacks do not outnumber the Whites. Israeli Jews realized that the demographic growth of Palestinian Muslims in Israel would make Israel a Muslim majority state. Similarly, United States was a black-majority State at the time of the Civil War and continued importation of black slaves would have made the WASP-led United States into Haiti-type Black United States, if ever majority blacks demanded equality with White colonialists.

Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates the rewriting of the 1777 Constitution to allow for the direct election of the President nationwide, so that the candidate that gets the maximum numbers of votes nationwide is elected the president of the United States.

Four. The Neo-Conservatism advocates the establishment of Federal Election Commission that shall oversee elections and establish election laws for Federal, State and Country elections nationwide.

Five. Neo-Conservatism wants to abolish the present fraud-prone election process where 4000+ Country Canvassing Boards separately control the election process at County level for Federal, State and County level elections.

(3) Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

The constitutional reforms of the United States Constitution of 1777 guided by ideology of Neo-Conservatism and the constitutional need to reinforce the Protestant leadership of the United States, to remake the 229 years old document relevant in the new Millennium. Neo-Conservatism is dominant ideology of the 21st Century. The philosophy of Neo-Conservatism gives to America the hallowed space as the agency of History, and Neo-Conservative Republican Party represents the elitist antecedents of the Theory of the party as a key part it shall play as an agency of History, to mould the world in the image of American-type inclusive democracies.

One. President Bush, in his January 2005, second inaugural address, sounded like Revolutionary determined to export Democratic Utopia worldwide. President Bush’s crusades for democracy with the support of India, is a turning point in world history and a radical approach to foreign affairs. "By our efforts USA has lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power; it burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world," declared Bush. A Neo-Conservative revolutionary "fire in the mind" a radical approach to American foreign affairs, and after Bush’s India Pact is a turning point in world history. President George Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice are true revolutionaries, the revolutionaries for establishing “Democratic Utopia” by making United States and India the agency of history. 

Two. Neo-Conservatism is a revolutionary ideology and an armed ideology that seeks to use the unique position of democratic sole super power America as the hegemon as an agency of History, to export pro-diversity polytheist Democratic Utopia worldwide. Neo-Conservative Republican Party is a revolutionary political party with a manifest destiny to enforce global regime change of extremist fundamentalist tyrannical terrorist regimes. All revolutionary agency of history of the 20th century were armed ideologues.

Three. Revolutionary armed ideologues and agency of History, convinced that they were the vessels of righteousness, the spirit of History emblazoned on their banners, they used overwhelming force and beating their chests, proclaiming their virtuous "idealism" to all who would listen. And millions more followed them unthinkingly, convinced that they were embarking on a holy crusade to save the world, when in reality they were engaged in a cultural and spiritual clash of civilizations.

Four. The 21st Century is the historical battleground for the Clash of Civilizations where on one side Religions of sword and iconoclast patriarchal Murderous Ideologies are at war against revolutionary Religions of Peace and revolutionary polytheist inclusive pro-diversity revolutionary of Democratic Utopia.

Five. The US Constitution should undergo amendments to facilitate Neo-Conservative agenda in American society and polity.

(4) Mighty Sword of Tolerant inclusive Protestantism

Thesis: Neo-Conservatism seeks to amend the US Constitution, to modify the Constitutional wall separating the State and the Church in favor of the State, so that President residing at the White House recognized as the titular Christian King and Head of Western Christianity and Universal Christian Church of all sects and denominations, including Catholic Church, Protestant Church and Non-Denominational Church. The White House should have a final say on all aspects of Christian theology, liturgy, dogmas, canonical Gospels and contents of the Christian Bible.

One. In the 21st Century a global alliance of the swords of inclusive tolerant religions and eclectic ideologies shall break the swords of exclusive intolerant religions and murderous ideologies, to give deathblows to forces of extremism, fundamentalism, murderous intolerance and tyrannies.

Two. In 21st Century the Sword of inclusive tolerant Religions and democratic Ideologies is stronger than the Sword of exclusive intolerant iconoclast religions and murderous ideologies. In the 21st Century the civilizational Sword of diversity inclusion and tolerance namely, the Sword of Protestant America and the Sword of Hindu India in 2006 mightier than the Sword of Papacy as well as the Sword of Islam.

Three. Neo-conservatism advocates that the King of Reformed Christianity residing at the White House must leverage the might of Sword of inclusive tolerant Christianity to enforce reforms in Papacy, Roman Catholic Church, Orthodox Christian Church and Protestant Church to make Christianity inclusive tolerant religion again, as it was during the times of Jesus, Apostles and Gnostic Apostolic Christianity, to avert the specter of Apocalypse and Armageddon in the 21st Century.

Four. Neo-Conservatism wants the Christian hegemon at the White House to enforce that Gnostic Apostolic Gospels, such as Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of Sofia of Jesus Christ and Gospel of Truth are recognized as canonical Gospels in the Universal Christian Holy Bible. The Gospel of Judas resurfaced first time in 1700 years and for the first time the Protestant King is the preponderant Christian King of the world.

Five. The US Constitution should be amended to allow White House leverage the dominace of the United States to engineer the dominance of the Protestant Church over Catholic Church.

(4) 2(2) Talk Points Neocons Reforming American Democracy

First, the United States is not a democracy, because it lacks the Federal Election Commission, and the 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards that control the entire federal and state election process are controlled by the party functionaries, who manipulate the system at will, without any judicial oversight. Every state legislature formulates its election laws. The constitutional amendment to establish the impartial Federal Election Commission would bring about changes in American politics no less radical and revolutionary than the signing of 1964 Bill of Rights into Law by Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson.

Second, the United States Constitution does not provide for a democratic system of the government, because it does not provide for fair and impartial election process for the third parties as the two major parties control the entire election process and they rig the election process to maintain the domination of the two political parties.

Third, without the effective nationwide major third party in USA, critics argue that United States is a political duopoly of two major parties that conspire to deny the rise of the Third party, because of their control over the 4000+ county canvassing boards, who arbitrarily conduct elections at the Federal. State and County levels.

Fourth, there is a distinct need for the Third Party in USA. The Third party should be pro-Women, Pro-immigrants, pro-minorities, and pro-Protestants, albeit the party of WIMPS.

Fifth, the Third party should project the aspirations of the non-denominational Protestant Christians who represent more than 200 million Christians in the United States, far more than the Catholics and Evangelical main denominational Protestants.

Sixth. Neo-Conservatism agrees that the 1777 Constitution of the United States is not a perfect form of democracy and may have become outdated that requires massive revisions that require reconvening the new constitutional assembly to write a new constitution of the United States. The 229 years is too long a period for any Constitution to remain relevant.  The 1777 constitution of the United States has become victim of its success and become outdated in 21st Century.

Seventh. The 1777 US Constitution was adopted to mobilize the Protestant Anglo-Saxons of the 13 colonies defeat the world’s most powerful empire, the Anglo-Saxon British Empire. The goal of 1777 Constitution of USA was secession from British Empire, not the democracy. The goal of 1777 Constitution was to repeal a British proclamation of October 1763 that prohibited American Colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains until treaties with Indians might open up areas there.

Eighth. The Protestant Founding Fathers of the 1777 Constitution wanted to protect the USA from destabilizing designs of the Catholic Papacy and to maintain the White Anglo Saxon Protestant leadership in the USA. The Republican Neo-Conservatism advocates the revision of the US Constitution to reinforce constitutional provisions to reinforce protections against Papal conspiracies and to reinforce the domination of Protestants, by co-opting non-Catholic Asian immigrants, non-European Mestizo Latinos, women and Blacks into the corridors of power at the White House and the Capitol.

Ninth. United States might not be a democracy as it lacked the Federal Election Commission. United States became the core of the Axis of Medieval and undermined the democracies in the Third World, notably, Korea, Indonesia, Pakistan, Congo, etc. United States cannot call itself a democracy, since it lacked independent Federal Election Commission and its entire election process, for the Federal, State and Country elections, dominated by County Canvassing Boards led by the major party political leaders.

Tenth. From 1777 founding of the US Constitution to 1964 Bill of Rights, the United States was not a democracy as it employed Apartheid policies in the United States, not unlike the Apartheid of South Africa. The 2000 Presidential election counting fiasco in Florida declared to the world that the entire election process in the United States is faulty. It is very safe to argue that India, and Canada have more democratic Constitution and better election process than United States. This is the argument author develops in this chapter.

Eleventh. Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 56, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(20) 2(3) American Election Process Unfair & Fraud Prone

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 56, Chapter 2. 2(3)

(20) (1) Defective American Election System

First, United States even in 2003 lacked the free, fair and impartial Federal Election commission, as the entire election process in the United States conducted by canvassing boards, headed by the political party activists and local leaders, who do all whatever they can to subvert the election process to deny any challenge to the incumbents.

Second, the Founding Fathers didn’t set up the democratic system in the US Constitution as it established the representative White Aristocracy, because black slaves outnumbered whites in United States during 1787.

Third, the Founding Fathers of the US Constitution deliberately formulated a constitution different from the Canadian and British constitution, so that the black may not take over the government because blacks outnumbered the whites in 1787. The White founding fathers were scared of the black sovereign state of Haiti, which was the first modern state in the New World and Haiti was richer than the United States. United States could have become black-majority nation like present day South Africa, had the Founding Fathers established democracy.

Fourth, President Abraham Lincoln fought the American Civil War and sought to abolish Slavery not to give rights to blacks, but to stop the practice of slavery, which demographically made United States overwhelmingly black nation. But for the victory of Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War the United States and North Africa would have met the fate present day South Africa. Abraham Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery in the United States, fearing that the practice of slavery would make United States a Black United States in the long run. 

Fifth, the United States had been a functioning Apartheid system in place, which continued till 1965, when democratic president Lyndon b. Johnson signed the 1964 Bill of Rights, which abolished the Apartheid System.

Sixth, the founding Fathers in the US constitution deliberately allowed County Canvassing Boards unfettered control over the entire election process, to provide Whites legal process to undermine the entire election process so that the rights of the blacks could be undermined systematically.

Seventh, the United States continued to lack the free and fair and impartial election process as late as 2002, and the Senate and Congress refused to rectify the fraud prone election process fearing that 90 percent of the incumbent Senators and Congressmen would lose elections under free, impartial and fair election process conducted by the impartial Federal Election Commission.

Eight, if the voting irregularities of Florida during Bush-al Gore Elections 2000 had occurred before the Yugoslav elections, the Slobadan Milosevic would have retained his power in Yugoslavia because voting irregularities in Yugoslavia were much smaller than found in American elections.

Ninth, in the absence of the Federal Election Commission and the nationwide Uniform Election Laws, the United States cannot call itself a democratic nation. American election process is in a mess and required major constitutional overhaul.

Tenth, the problem of American democracy lies not in the technology of voting machines, but in the constitution itself, as United States constitution predates French Revolution.

Eleventh, at the best United States can be called an elected Aristocracy. No nation can call itself a democratic nation, unless impartial constitutionally constituted Federal Election Commission conducts and supervises the entire election process. Unlike India, Canada, Australia, one cannot call United States a democracy in the absence of the constitutionally appointed impartial Federal Election Commission.

Twelfth, after the Civil War the Republicans became champions of the blacks and Democrats championed the cause of the pro-segregation former supporters of the slavery.

Thirteenth, President Lynden B. Johnson signed into law the 1964 Bill of Rights, which made Democratic Party the magnet of the Blacks and it handed the southern states to pro-segregation Republican Party. After 1964, blacks switched their loyalties to Democratic Party and Republican Party became the party of the white conservatives.

Fourteenth, however the whites, whether Republican or Democratic continued to control the canvassing boards and jointly stage managed the entire election process to deny blacks their fair share of political power. Lot of brainpower power has gone to develop the fine mechanism, whereby the white would continue to subvert the election process and deny the development of the free, fair and impartial election system in United States.

Fifteenth, even the presidential election fiasco that made United States the laughing stock of the world in November 2000, failed to reform the fraud-prone American election process.

Sixteenth, could United States join the ranks of the Democratic nations, like India and Canada, so long it lacked free and fair election process conducted managed by impartial Election Commission? Jews, Hindus, native Indians and Hispanic Americans shall join the Clash of Races on the same side of the battle lines. Even the US Election 2004 would be a legitimate battleground to score regional political victories in the Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India should promote the history of the racial discrimination in US history to consolidate the common front of Brown Hispanic Americans, Jews, Chinese Asians and Native Americans to explain to them that they have to form a common front in the United States, to increase their civilization’s relative weight and power in the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations.

(2) Philosophy of History

One. Thinking about history involves both an intellectual consideration of conflicting interpretations, emotions and images of the past. One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of the religion, civilization, culture, nation, race and tribe. Variety of interpretations presented in this book provides the reader with an opportunity to judge past events the past, consumers of history have their own political and social opinions. By engaging in an intellectual dialogue with the historical text, readers should be able to clarify their opinions about Constitution and the relationship of political institution to religious and social events. There is no correct or right interpretation of history. There are no right answers but only differing opinions, about which historical interpretations are correct. Every reader must make the decision based on his or her own social and political values.

Two. The Hispanic Catholics, Black Americans, Native Americans, Yellow Americans and Asian Americans have no choice but to form a new Third Party to politically represent and articulate the aspirations of Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and pro-Women, pro-Choice non-Denominational white Protestants in the United States. Neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party interested in reforming America’s election process to set up the constitutionally constituted impartial US Federal Election Commission, responsible to conduct and supervise the entire election process at the Federal, State and County level elections, as it would erode the Republican and Democratic stronghold over fraud-prone 4,000+ County canvassing Boards.

Three. The author’s goal is to provide a variety of ways of viewing history. Readers might find some of these interpretations personally offensive, but it is good because it will result in critical thinking about history, religion, culture and Constitution. Kalki's framework of interpreting world history includes, along with cultural domination, ideological management, racism, overpopulation, and economic issues. However, the final decision about the meaning of national history and world history belongs to the reader.

(3) America’s Faulty Election Process

The faulty American election process unfairly consolidates the dominance of the two major parties and allows the incumbent Senators and Congressman gets reelected again and again. Can United States join the ranks of the Democratic nations so long it lacks free and fair election process conducted managed by impartial Election Commission? Jews, Hindus, native Indians and Hispanic Americans shall join the Clash of Races on the same side of the battle lines. Even the US Election 2004 would be a legitimate battleground to score regional political victories in the Clash of Civilizations. American people should highlight the history of the racial discrimination in US history to consolidate the common front of Brown Hispanic Americans, Jews, Chinese Asians and Native Americans to explain to them that they have to form a common front in the United States, to increase their civilization’s relative weight and power in the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations.

(4) Faulty US Election Process

The rich candidates get reelected and command more power than their vote-banks and election campaign contributions, because they control the thousands of local County Canvassing Boards that control the US Election Process in the United States for federal, State and Local elections. A large portion of the election expenses goes towards hiring the favored political consultants with known links with the members of the County Canvassing Boards.

There is no Federal Election Commission organized to conduct and supervise entire election process as exists in democratic India, Canada and Australia. The framers of the US Constitution did not provide any provision of the Impartial Federal Election Commission, because they wanted the feudal bosses to institutionally rig the election process in favor of the dominant class of WASPs. It stands to reason, why Framers of US Constitution intentionally created the Election Process open to rigging by the bosses at the County Canvassing Boards level. Technically speaking United States has never had, as of today, free and fair elections conducted by impartial Election Commission. Even Russia has more impartial and fair election process than United States. It explains why incumbent Senators and Congressmen get reelected time and again. Thanks to the constitutionally rigged election process. Framers of the US Constitution in 1787, representing the vested interests of the European Bourbon Aristocracy, intentionally created a rigged election process, rigged at the County Canvassing Board level, because blacks, including black slaves, outnumbered whites in the United State in 1787.

(5) USA Lacks Free & Fair Elections

American election process needs total overhaul. Single Election law should apply to election process for Country, State and Federal elections. No politician should hold any post in County Canvassing Board. Only non-politicians should hold positions in the County Canvassing Boards nationwide.

United States cannot join the ranks of the Democratic nations so long it lacks free and fair election process conducted managed by impartial Election Commission. The election process in the United States rigged the politicians through their control of the County Canvassing Boards, who are independent and not subject to the supervision of the impartial Federal Election Commission or impartial State Election Commission. How can one expect the party politicians to impartially conduct the elections, where the fate of their party is involved? United States election system can improve substantially, if the party activists are prohibited from holding any position in the County Canvassing Boards and the County Canvassing Boards should comprise of non-political Schoolteachers etc.

(6) Federal Election Commission Needed

India is a better democracy than United States, because Indian election process provides better, impartial and fair expression of the will of the voters. Canadian election process is superior to that of United States. American public must study the election process in India, Canada, Australia and Britain to find whether United States has a democracy, where free & fair elections, conducted by impartial officials, decide the winners of the political offices, including those of the President, Federal Senators and Congress. Britain has unwritten Constitution, and yet Britain has enjoyed tradition of parliamentary democracy. United States has undemocratic Constitution still it has functioned as a Democracy due to conventions. The 1787 Constitution of the United States represented the pre-French Revolution feudal system of Bourbon Europe. There is no Federal Election Commission in the United States. There is no Federal Election Law. There is no Judicial review over State Election Process.

The Elections in the United States controlled by 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards, which conduct and supervise the Election process independently. The Country canvassing Boards led by major party officials, who remain parochial and continue to participate in party politics. Except for the innate goodness of the people of the United States, and the culture of the United States, the election system as it exists today in United States the Constitution did not set up the framework for the free and fair election process. The United States Election Process, controlled by the 4000+ County Canvassing Boards cannot be called a Democratic Election Process. It cannot even be called an Election Process at best it can pass through as a fair selection process. If Elections are defined as take place in India, Canada and Britain, then United States never had elections since its framers signed the Declaration of Independence in 1787. United States as of today has not held free and fair elections, conducted by non-partisan officials.

(7) Federal Election Commission in USA

Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy command more power than their vote-banks and election campaign contributions, because they control the thousands of local County Canvassing Boards that control the US Election Process in the United States for federal, State and Local elections.

There is no Federal Election Commission organized to conduct and supervise entire election process as exists in democratic India, Canada and Australia. The framers of the US Constitution did not provide any provision of the Impartial Federal Election Commission, because they wanted the feudal bosses to institutionally rig the election process in favor of the dominant class of WASPs. It stands to reason, why Framers of US Constitution intentionally created the Election Process open to rigging by the bosses at the County Canvassing Boards level. Technically speaking United States has never had, as of today, free and fair elections conducted by impartial Election Commission. Even Russia has more impartial and fair election process than United States. It explains why incumbent Senators and Congressmen get reelected time and again. Thanks to the constitutionally rigged election process. Framers of the US Constitution in 1787, representing the vested interests of the European Bourbon Aristocracy, intentionally created a rigged election process, rigged at the County Canvassing Board level, because blacks, including black slaves, outnumbered whites in the United State in 1787.

(8) USA Lacks Free & Fair Elections

United States cannot join the ranks of the Democratic nations so long it lacks free and fair election process conducted managed by impartial Election Commission. The election process in the United States rigged the politicians through their control of the County Canvassing Boards, who are independent and not subject to the supervision of the impartial Federal Election Commission or impartial State Election Commission. How can one expect the party politicians to impartially conduct the elections, where the fate of their party is involved? United States election system can improve substantially, if the party activists are prohibited from holding any position in the County Canvassing Boards and the County Canvassing Boards should comprise of non-political Schoolteachers etc.

(9) Federal Election Commission Needed

Once must study the election process in India, Canada, Australia and Britain to find whether United States has a democracy, where free & fair elections, conducted by impartial officials, decide the winners of the political offices, including those of the President, Federal Senators and Congress. Britain has unwritten Constitution, and yet Britain has enjoyed tradition of parliamentary democracy. United States has undemocratic Constitution still it has functioned as a Democracy due to conventions. The 1787 Constitution of the United States represented the pre-French Revolution feudal system of Bourbon Europe. There is no Federal Election Commission in the United States. There is no Federal Election Law. There is no Judicial review over State Election Process. The Elections in the United States controlled by 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards, which conduct and supervise the Election process independently. The Country canvassing Boards led by major party officials, who remain parochial and continue to participate in party politics. Except for the innate goodness of the people of the United States, and the culture of the United States, the election system as it exists today in United States the Constitution did not set up the framework for the free and fair election process. The United States Election Process, controlled by the 4000+ County Canvassing Boards cannot be called a Democratic Election Process. It cannot even be called an Election Process at best it can pass through as a fair selection process. If Elections are defined as take place in India, Canada and Britain, then United States never had elections since its framers signed the Declaration of Independence in 1787. United States as of today has not held free and fair elections, conducted by non-partisan officials.

In order to study the role of the United States in the Global Clash of Races one must study the history of the United States, and differentiate between the pretense and reality of American politics. The foundation of American political parties based on the bedrock of Catholic vs. Protestant conflict, White vs. non-White conflict, patriarchal pro-Life vs. matriarchal pro-Choice conflict, Agricultural vs. financial industrialist conflicts. Democrats and Republicans represent the pre-French Revolution political forces, united in their common cause to sabotage the democratic expression of the consent of the electorate. The Third Party, or the third force could galvanize following vote banks in the United States, and it should be pro-Woman, pro-WASPs, pro-Choice, pro-Agriculture, pro-Color, pro-Hispanics, pro-Blacks, pro-Asians and pro-Immigrants. United States had functioning Apartheid system in place as late as 1965, when Democrat President Lynden B. Johnson abolished it.

The three paramount issues, the religious issue, the women issue and the race issue would determine the outcome of the Presidential Election 2004. If Christian Religious Right Conservatives decide to oppose President George W. Bush during Election 2004, then the re-election of President Bush becomes doubtful. However, if Bush Campaign succeeds in implicating Democratic nominee with Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy then majority of registered Democrats would vote for President Bush in 2004. Black Americans would desert Al Gore Campaign if Al Gore gets tainted for its association with Religious Right Conservatism. President Bill Clinton won the 1992 Election with the support of the Religious Right Conservatism, but he took extra care to keep his relationship secret. Whenever Bush Campaign 2004 realizes that Catholic Religious Right Conservatism would dump Bush, then President Bush should develop close ties with anti-Catholic, Protestant Religious Right to usher in the pro-Protestant issues in the national politics. Catholics represent not more than 12 percent of the voters, as Catholics number 35 million in USA, outnumbered by Protestants by 7 to 1. The loss of Catholic votes to Bush ticket 2004, would be balanced by increased Protestants’ votes.

The loss of votes of Catholic Religious Right Conservatism would be duly compensated by the new gains of the votes of the anti-Catholic Protestant Religious Right Conservatives. The opposition of white Catholic Religious Right would result in greater support of the black liberal democrats for the Bush Presidential ticket. The Catholic and Evangelical component of the United States supports the policies of the Christian Religious Right Wing Conservatism. While liberal Protestants oppose the Religious Right Wing Conservatism.

American in 1850s as in 2000 has a functioning two-party system, which monopolizes the election process at the State and local level, to guarantee that only the major two parties emerge dominant players in the elections. The Democratic and Republican control over the election process at the State and local level guarantees that they alone exchange power with each other every few years, denying Third Party challengers to occupy the Oval Office. Every so often an outlandish single-issue third party would spring up, like the Anti Masonic party in 1820s, Know-Nothing Party of 1850s, Populist Party, Independence Party, and Reform Party.

(10) Neoconservatism

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 60. Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(21) 2(4) Bribing Foreign Election Campaigns

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 60, Chapter 2. 2(4)

(21) (1) Bribing Yugoslav Politicians

Had Elections of Fall 2000 in Yugoslavia held after the US Presidential Elections, which were in turmoil, then Slobadan Milosevic would not allowed Vojislav Kostunica take over backed by half a million protesters. US troops based in Kosovo handed over to the protesters guns to defend and fire at police had they intervened in favor of Slobadan Milosevic. Yugoslavia had better election process than United States election system, manipulated by County Canvassing Boards.

Financing foreign political campaigns promotes national interests more efficiently than military campaigns, as instruments of national policy. Democratic elections worldwide funded by foreigners and foreign agencies. United States financed $35 million to overthrow Slobadan Milosevic in Yugoslavia, and succeeded in overthrowing the regime in elections, which 76-day NATO bombing failed to achieve. It highlights that the campaign donations during election campaigns help realize the political and military goals more efficiently than UN authorized economic sanctions, blockade and NATO air war and bombing. It is possible that the $35 million illicit financing of anti-Milosevic political forces in Yugoslav elections might result in the arrest and conviction of Slobadan Milosevic as war criminal, assisted by new President of Yugoslavia.

So successful had been the CIA’s funding of the Election 2000 in Yugoslavia that in Election 2002, that eh forces from the old regime connected with Slobadan Milosevic don’t stand a chance. Bribing foreign election campaigns emerged as the most cost effective measure to gain political influence in democratic nations. What the CIA could accomplish in Yugoslavia can also be achieved in US Elections 2004. Hindu India should invest heavily in US Election process to influence the outcome of the presidential elections.

(2) Bribing American Campaigns

Democratic United States must realize that those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at the glass houses of their neighbors. Foreign governments can influenced the outcome of the US presidential elections as easily as US influenced the outcome of the Yugoslav elections by pumping $35 million in Yugoslav election campaign 2000.

China perfected the art of buying political influence in United States by judiciously arranging Democratic and Republican fundraisers right after Secretary Henry Kissinger’s first trip to Communist China. It is no accident that United States overlooked over Chinese espionage of nuclear weapons secrets from Los Alamos Labs in New Mexico to protect the American politicians who promoted pro-China policies and who might have been funded by the pro-Beijing Chinese campaign donations in successive Administrations in the United States. US Attorney General Janet Reno made history when she apologized for prosecuting Chinese spy Dr. Lee of Los Alamos Labs.

Chinese success in buying political influence by selective political campaign contributions exposed the Achilles Heel of the American Democratic colossus. Selective campaign contributions to third party presidential candidates in United States would influence outcome of the major party presidential elections in United States more effectively than the US campaign contributions in the Yugoslav election campaigns. Democratic nations should learn to respect the will of the people of democratic nations expressed by free and fair elections untainted by illicit foreign funds.

China’s successful roadmap in buying political influence in United States by selective campaign contributions shall be traversed by other democratic nations like India, Taiwan and Japan to buy political influence in United States. Whatever United States accomplishes in influencing the outcome of foreign democratic elections, shall also be achieved by foreign nations in influencing the United States presidential election in 2004. Money talks during democratic elections in United States, as much as it does in Yugoslavia, Russia and India.

(3) CIA leads Coup d’etat Worldwide

United States by engineering the military coups against the democratically elected leadership attacks the very foundation of the democracy in the world. Why President Clinton ordered military Coup against democratically elected Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan? Why United States become the greatest threat to the democracy and freedom of the world?

United States periodically organizes the coup d’etats in the Third World because United States lacks free and fair election process due to the State and County Canvassing Boards’ control over the US election process. The US State Department, CIA and Pentagon feel more comfortable with dictators than with democratically elected leaders. United States gave Judas’ Kiss to numerous democracies in the Third World and emerged as the greatest menace to the Democracy and freedom in the world.

The CIA & United States has perfected the art of engineering the Coup d’etats to install pro-US governments in the Third World. United States and the CIA brought down the legitimately elected governments of Prince Norodom Sihanouk of Cambodia in 1970, President U Nu of Burma, Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (1928-78) of Pakistan in 1977 and Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan in 1998, Prime Minister Kwame Nkrumah (1909-72) of Ghana in 1966, Prime Minister Patrice Emergy Lumumba (1925-61) of Congo in 1966, President Salvador Gossens Allende (1908-73) of Chile in 1973, Emperor Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (1919-80) of Iran in 1979, Emperor Haile Selaissie (1891-1975) of Ethiopia in 1974, King Idris of Libya in 1968, and King Faisal II ibn Ghazi ibn Faisal el Hashim (1935-58) of Iraq in 1958. It is high time that foreign governments pool resources to buy political influence in United States by influencing the outcome of presidential elections by supporting the Third Party presidential candidates win electoral votes. By installing a third party presidential nominee into the Oval Office the democracies of the Third World would become safer.

(4) Neoconservative Coup D’etat

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 61. Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(22) 2(5) 3rd Party in Election 2008

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 61. Chapter 2. 2(5)

(22) (1) Civilization corrupted by their own Success

American History can be explained in terms of Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406) theory of cyclical social developments, enunciated in “Meqaddimah.” It states peoples gain civilization, are corrupted by their (own) successes. Corrupt civilization in turn succumbs to invasions of another ascendant culture and civilization. Moral corruption caused the decline of Roman Empire. The political domination of the Democrats and Republicans in United States could also end, if the third party’s presidential candidate advocates the new moral order of the American polity.

(2) Election of Nov. 1854

The Native American Know Nothing Protestant party succeeded in 1854 & 1855, because the party focused on the Protestant vs. Catholic conflict exacerbated by the growing immigration tidal wave of Catholics into the USA. The election returns of November 1854 and the subsequent 1856 Presidential election established the overwhelming fact that in those two elections the third party made a score that except for the dramatic rise of the Republican Party before the Civil War, no other Third Party in American history ever came close to matching. In their first organized campaign in 1854, with no charismatic national leaders, no trained orators and almost no established political machine, they elected more than a hundred Congressmen, eight (8) governors and thousands of local officials, including the mayors of Boston, Philadelphia and Chicago. They won control of state legislatures in half a dozen states, form New Hampshire to California, and made a strong showing in a dozen more New York to Louisiana. Their most spectacular and most unexpected triumph came in Massachusetts, traditionally regarded as the most staid and stable of states. Protestant Native Americans, Know-Nothing candidates in Massachusetts, got almost two-thirds of the statewide vote, even when most of these candidates had never previously run for the public office. Native Americans Know-Nothing Party's nominees elected governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and Mayors in many cities and towns. It accounted for all 12 of the Massachusetts Representatives in the Congress, all 40 of the state senators and 376 of the 379 members of the State House of Representatives. Massachusetts elected Know-Nothing Protestant Native American Henry Gardner as Governor in 1854. Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party in the Presidential elections of 1856 turned to and outsider Milllard Fillmore, who had been president once. It was a great mistake as he had and signed the compromise of 1850, which it was hoped would put the slavery issue on shelf for a couple of years. However, in 1856 the slavery issue was more important burning than ever. Fillmore had little use for Nativist demagoguery. In the nation as a whole, Fillmore got 21 percent of the vote. Presidential candidate Millard Fillmore destroyed the Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party. Republican Party exploited the cleavage of the Civil War to replace the Whig Party in the Two-party system.

Native American Protestant Know Nothing Party should have stuck to its single issue of Protestant-Catholic rivalry. Had Native American Protestant Know-Nothing nominated its presidential candidate from amongst its loyal workers, and then Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party would have survived. Reform Party's 1992 & 1996 presidential candidate gave the similar Judas Kiss of death to the Reform Party, when he conspired to secure the nomination of Republican Patrick Buchanan as the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000 Elections. Reform party secured 19.5% of the votes in 1992 Elections. Native American Protestant Know-Nothing presidential candidate Millard Fillmore in 1856 got 21 percent of the votes nationwide. Ross Perot intentionally selected a very weak vice presidential candidate so that he could give a kiss of death to Reform Party in the future. Ross Perot secured 19.5 percent of the votes by harping on the single issue of growing National Debt, widening Balance of Trade, and growing Budget Deficit.

(3) Neoconservative Revolutions worldwide

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the German School of Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 62. Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(23) 2(6) Demand for Federal Election Commission For Democracy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 62. Chapter 2. 2(6)

(23) (1) Rise of Third Party

In 2004 presidential Elections the third party shall oppose the Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy’s presidential nominee. The third Force should emphasize Reform of Election System to end the state and local control of the election process, and to rewrite the new Constitution to replace the 1787 Constitution of the USA. The coalition of the single issues could lay the foundation of the vibrant new Third Party. The principal issues that provided the bedrock of the third parties in the past represented by the new Third Party could catapult its presidential nominee to the Oval Office in 2004 elections.

Had Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party stuck to its anti-Papacy roots and developed killer instinct to wipe out the Whig Party then Republican Party would have failed to capture the favored dominant party spot in the two-party system. Democratic and Republican Parties represent single wine packaged in differently colored bottles, united in their conspiracy to fraudulently manipulate the election process, by securing the Democratic & Republican control of the State and County Election Canvassing Boards.

The Third party should demand the Federal Election Commission, which would end the State and county control of the election process. The United States can join the ranks of democratic nation only when consent of the electorate expressed by fair elections supervised by impartial Federal Election Commission. It should be declared unequivocally that United States of 2002 is not a Democracy, because United States does not have impartial Federal Election Commission to supervise and conduct the entire Election process. In the absence of the impartial statutory Election Commission the right to vote is meaningless, as only under impartial Election Commission can election results express the sovereign will of the people.

(2) Crime Politics Nexus

The faulty election process in the United States might embolden the organized crime to buy political influence in the Capitol or the White House by influencing political campaign donations. The third party should attempt break the nexus of organized crime and corridors of power.

(3) Bribes got Mark Rich the Pardon

Political donations influenced president Clinton’s last minute Presidential pardon to Mark Rich. People with ill-gotten wealth increasingly becoming VIPs in fundraisers of the major political parties in USA and worldwide. Clinton’s pardon of Mark Rich exploiting presidential power to pardon declares to all that crime pays in the United States. If you make money, you are welcome to the corridors of power, even if you amass wealth by criminal wrongdoings. Bill Clinton’s pardon of Mark Rich, the largest tax offender in the history of the United States, reflects the growing trend of the global nexus albeit partnership of the leading politicians with the leading white collar organized crime. The rising cost of the election campaign forces politicians to mortgage their political morality to the big-ticket donors who finance politicians to buy political insurance not for their political beliefs. Mark Rich belonged to the Wall Street Mafia who looted thousands of investors and criminally cheated them by exploiting the loopholes of the Chicago’s Commodity Exchanges. White Collar criminals feted and dined in the political fund-raisers, while political activists denied access to corridors of power. It is a bad trend. It is no accident Sant Chatwal, the biggest crook of Indian community claims personal friendship with Senator Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, who are neighbors. Bill Clinton’s presidential pardon signals the growing political influence of the ill-gotten wealth in United States. White Collar criminals hobnob with President’s in United States and European Union no less frequently than they befriend Russian President and Indian Prime Minister. Every politician it appears is naked while befriending criminals for campaign donations.

(4) India’s Gold Smugglers

Prohibition and gold control generated the biggest source of revenue for criminals and police in India. Indian government imposed ban on direct import of gold bullion, to guarantee profit margin in illegal gold smuggling. After independence in 1947, gold smugglers enjoyed close relationship with top Indian politicians and shared incomes of the gold smuggling with politicians. Indian rupee was the official tender in the Indian Rupee Zone comprising of India, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Trucial States, Oman and Yemen. Indian Rupee, British Pound Sterling and American Dollar represented the three international convertible Currencies, as late as 1966. Indian smugglers imported 500 tons of gold annually from 1947 onwards. Muslim gold smugglers operating from Dubai backed by Indian political leaders and Marwari bullion dealers monopolized the gold smuggling to earn billions of dollars annually as kickbacks. It is no accident that more than $10 billion gold billion imported in India during 2000, after the ban on the direct import of gold bullion allowed. Indian government enforced the monopoly of gold by refusing to issue new gold jewelry licenses and by imposing ban on the possession of gold bullion by people, other than licensed gold jewelers. Indian governments have in past pardoned many leading smuggler-turned politicians including Haji Mastan, Yousef Patel, and Family of Dawood Ibrahim, not unlike the Bill Clinton’s pardon of Mark Rich. Ex-prime Minister Morarji Desai was rumored to be the father of organized crime in India, due to the policy of Gold Control Act and Prohibition. Like United States the wealthy ex-criminals enjoy high social status as respectable members of the ruling elite.

(5) Drug Cartels Buy Influence

White Catholic Colombian Cocaine Cartel finances the political campaigns in the United States to buy protection that is why no big drug dealer has ever been arrested in the United States during last 20 years. Like India’s gold Cartel the Colombian drug cartel developed close ties with ruling elite. The ruling elite in United States and European Union patronizes the legitimate Drug Mafia and eliminates non-Cartel drug traffickers to guarantee the profits of White Catholic Cocaine & Heroin Cartel. Global Cocaine and Heroin trade generated more than $700 billion annually for organized crime globally and half of it generated in the United States alone during 1977. The $ 350 billion annual drug income generated by US organized crime finances the US election campaigns of leading politicians and fuels the economic engine of the Wall Street, because United States has successfully sealed the illegal outflow of the incomes of the drug income. American Plan Colombia, anti-narcotic military campaign in Colombia, seeks to maintain the monopoly of White Cocaine Cartel over global drug trade, to destroy the non-Cartel cocaine plantations by aerial spraying of herbicide to deny non-Cartel, non-White brown Mestizo drug traffickers access to raw cocoa.

(6) 2(7) Gerrymandering & Decay of Democracy

Neo-Conservatism demands that all electoral boundaries should replicate the County or local township boundaries. Neo-Conservatism denounces the rampant misuse of the Gerrymandering as it leads to the decay of democracy. Gerrymandering of the House of Representatives has made House of Representatives uncompetitive, sclerotic and immune to the change and less representative of the will of the electorate. If reform is not enacted soon, the democratic choice will be sapped out of the House of Representative altogether. When the US Constitution’s framers created Congress, they imagined that the House of Representatives would be the country’s most popularly responsive national institution. In the US Senate, the slow, deliberative, elite, Senators would serve as a counterweight to the more emotional Congressmen. Senate has become more popularly responsive national institution. House of Representative gerrymandering breaks up the ethnic vote banks of the minorities. In Richmond Hill Queens, where Indians and Guyana-Indians live, the constituency is divided into four city council seats so as to split ethnic Indian vote bank to the detriment of Indian community.

 

The tenor of House politics, divisive and largely resistant to bipartisan compromise, is one consequence of gerrymandering. More competitive House races would attract more voter interest and possibly make the House a body less dominated by partisan motives. There is one solution: control over redistricting must be taken away from politicians whose goal is to minimize competitive democratic elections and maximize the number of safe seats for their party. American voters need to demand an alternative to the party control over redistricting and gerrymandering that has turned the people’s House of Representative into a place where democratic competition doesn’t much exist.

 

Just as the two-party controlled 4000+ canvassing boards make the sham of the American election process. The party politician control over redistricting has made mockery of the House elections. The gerrymandering and the county canvassing boards are the twin curse on American democracy.

2(8) Protestant-Catholic Clash in US Elections

(7) Religious Conflicts in USA

Neo-Conservatism points out that the roots of American politics lie in the ongoing conflicts between WASPs and Irish and East European Catholics from as early as 1850 to present day. The evolution of the politics and political parties in the United States rooted in the Catholic-Protestant conflicts. Pope was to Americans was a symbol of oppression. Clearly, Catholic immigrants lurked at the heart of the vast plot against the United States, owing allegiance to a foreign potentate, the Pope, so asserted the inventor of the telegraph, Samuel F. B. Morse, in "Foreign conspiracy Against the United States." "Popery threatens to swallow up America, springing its shuttle of death across America's shores its pants to be able to water its steed in America's great Mississippi," Ms. Anna Ella Carrol wrote in 1856 in "The Great American Battle."

The older inhabitants of the United States, later known as WASPs, but during 1850s proud to be called "Native Americans." Native American Protestants outraged when from 1845 through 1854 some 2.9 million immigrants, including 1.2 million Catholic Irish and more than a million German immigrants streamed into seaboard cities like Boston and New York. In the 1840s, Boston's population was 100,000 and Bronx & Manhattan's population was about 500,000. In the 1850s, a burgeoning coalition of self-proclaimed Nativists, the Know-Nothings, swept into office and called for radical change. The recent political conflict of pro-Life and pro-Choice supporters ignited the age-old Papacy-Lutheran conflicts, which would give rise to new Third Party in the United States, which might score great election victory in 2004 elections.

(8) Christian Intolerance

Neo-Conservatism agues that Catholic Protestant conflicts and Catholic Orthodoxy conflicts were camouflaged by invoking some of the finest themes: freedom of thought, personal bravery against authority, the power of one man with a grand idea before the crumbling weight of history, and democracy. However, scratch the surface of soaring notions such as "justification by faith," "Civilizing the Pagans,” and "Evangelicalism" become a political tool between Catholics and Protestants. Christians are capable of such glory and such horror.

Anglo-American's genocide of Native Americans, Hitler's Holocaust of 6 million Jews, Bolshevik Jew L.P. Beria's holocaust of 30 million Orthodox Russians, Christian Pol Pot's massacre of 2 million Cambodian Buddhists, Christian Mao Zedong's elimination of 60 million Chinese Buddhists, White Catholic death squads massacre of Colombian Mestizos, and Christian Tutsi's massacre of pagan Rwandan & Burundian Hutus, explains that the democratic West can sponsor new genocidal policies time to time.

(9) Catholic Persecution of Jews

Jews should join forces with Indians in the Global Clash of Races. Catholic Jewish animosity fuels the political process in the United States. Christianity, not just bad Christians, is to blame for persecution of the Jews. Vatican's 1998 apology, "We Remember", expressed regret at Christian mistreatment of Jews over centuries but pinned the fault on some of church's sinful "members" while holding blameless "the church as such." The Pope's apology was "evasive and immoral." Anti-Judaism has been at the very center of Catholic theology at least since the Gospel of John, and the Catholic Church has allowed, encouraged and in case of the Inquisition, chartered the foulest of abuses. Vatican's 1998 apology further contended that the Holocaust was the product not of Christianity but of a "neo-pagan" regime that had renounced the faith. However, Hitler was heir to such Church sanctioned haters as St. John Chrysostom and Torquemada. By tapping into a deep, ever-fresh reservoir of Christian hatred of Jews, the German dictator Hitler made the Catholic Church an accomplice in history's worst crime. Truly Pope Pius XII was the Hitler's Pope and partly responsible for the Jewish Holocaust.

James Carroll argues in "Constantine's Sword: The Church and Jews) that in 425 AD, 10 years after the barbarian conquest of Rome and destruction of Roman Empire, Christians slaughtered the Jews of Alexandria. Followers of St. Augustine wanted the Jewish people to survive but also to suffer, setting a centuries-long pattern. As Europe was unified under the Cross the Jews preserved, but ghettoized per Augustine's instructions, became the Continent's captive other, slaughtered as a warm-up for slaughter of Muslims in the first Crusade and as scapegoats during Black Death. Spanish Inquisition targeted Jewish converts to Christianity strictly on basis of their impure blood. Protestant Martin Luther was a Jew hater. Anti-Semitism intimately entwined with issues of Catholic power and authority. Convene Vatican Council III pursue such measures as choosing Catholic bishops, cardinals, and Pope by universal popular votes of the Catholic laity. Only then, plausible cures to the anti-Semitism, one of the West's epic plagues found.

(10) Lutheran Persecution of Jews

Martin Luther in 1543 pamphlet titled "On the Jews and Their Lies," recommended either forced deportation of Jews to Palestine or the burning of all synagogues and Jewish books (including Torah) and the restriction of Jews to agrarian pursuits. Martin Luther had originally little animus towards Jews, for he hoped that by eliminating papal abuses, Protestant reforms might lead to their conversion. However when Lutheran hopes of conversion of Jews withered, Luther turned on Jews.

(11) Catholic Protestant conflicts

Neo-Conservatism argues that Catholic Protestant animus defines the American political process in 2000. Martin Luther in January 1521 arrived in Worms under an imperial guarantee of safe conduct form Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, heir of Hapsburg dynasty and appeared before Imperial Diet on April 17 & 18. Edict of Worms on May 8, banned Luther's work, however his detention could not be enforced due to the Frederick the Wise, elector of Saxony. Edict of Worms declared: " We want all of Luther's books to be universally prohibited and forbidden, and we also want them to be burned. We follow the very praiseworthy ordinance and custom of the good Christians of old who had the books of heretics like Arians, Priscillians, Nestorians, Eustachian and others burned and annihilated, and even everything that was contained in these books, whether good or bad. This is well done since if we are not allowed to eat meat containing just one drop of poison because of the danger of bodily infection, then we surely should leave out every doctrine (even if it is good) which has in it the poison of heresy and error, which infects and corrupts and destroys under the cover of charity everything that is good." In 1209, Pope Innocent III urged Crusades against Protestants, and the resulting war destroyed the Provencal civilization of southern France.

(12) Neoconservatism

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 65. Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(24) 2(9) Cultural Domination as Central theme in US History

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 65, Chapter 2. 2(9).

(24) (1) Culture Wars

Neo-Conservatism argues that a major part of the history of US constitution is the attempt to ensure the domination of a Protestant Anglo-American culture in the United States. The struggle over cultural domination in the United States began with the English invasion of North America in the sixteenth century and continued in US Election 2000. The "Culture Wars" is a distinguishing characteristic of American history. English colonists declared their superiority over Native American cultures and attempted to impose Protestant English culture on Native Americans. The hope of the Founding fathers of the United States government was to create a national culture unified around Protestant Anglo-American values. The dominance of the Protestant Anglo-Americans challenged, by Irish Catholics, Mexican Catholics, African Americans and American Indians. The concept of cultural perspective is important for understanding the culture wars. The mixing of cultures in the United States resulted in the necessity of constantly asking: How do other cultures perceive this event?

The culture wars are one aspect of ideological management. Ideological management involves the creation and distribution of knowledge in a society. Schools, teachers, books and media play a central role in the distribution of particular knowledge to a society. Knowledge is not neutral. There has existed a continuing debate about the political, social and economic content of schooling and distribution of knowledge. Recent historical interpretations stress the importance of the influence of differing political and economic groups on the content of knowledge and cultural values distributed by schools, books and media. In the same fashion, political and economic pressures influence the knowledge and culture values distributed by sources other than educational institutions. Ideological management refers to the effect of these political and economic forces on the ideas disseminated to society. Mass media, schools and books are important managers of ideas and cultural values disseminated to children, youth and adult voters. The Catholic attempts to ban the teaching of Darwinian theory of evolution and Vatican control over the academic publications and research presents the greatest threat to the academic freedom. Catholic Church should not control the ideological management and culture values imparted in the American school system. Unless checked Vatican's control over Catholic educational institutions might reduce the academic research of Catholic professors to sheer propaganda.

(2) Role of Racism in U.S. History

United States had functioning Apartheid policy in place throughout United States, as late as 1965 that maintained separate seats and separate toilets for blacks in public transportation system, much like what existed in South Africa under Apartheid system. Apartheid and racial discrimination continues in the Untied States, under subtle camouflage. Neo-Conservatism wants to reform American system to invite Blacks back to the Republican Party of Lincoln.

Certainly, a major trend of American history has been the quest for democracy and equality. However, there is another strand dating from the first arrival of English settlers, characterized by claims of racial and cultural superiority. The most violent and troubled parts of American history were a result of the clash between racism and demands for equality, between WASPs and Catholicism. Violence and racism are a basic part of American history. Americans have preached equality of opportunity and good citizenship, while engaging in acts of religious intolerance, racial segregation, cultural genocide, and discrimination against immigrants and nonwhites. How it is possible to believe in a republican form of government and political equality but still be racist? How it is possible to defenders of democracy, still engage in discriminatory and racist practices? It is important to understand that from colonial times to the present, racism and religious intolerance for many Americans of European descent are part of their beliefs in republicanism, democracy and equality.

Most historians neglect the importance of racist viewpoints in the forming of U.S. laws. United States’ history has a long tradition of discrimination and bigotry. For over 80 percent of U.S. history, American laws declared most people of the world legally ineligible to become U.S. citizens solely because of their race, original nationality, or gender. For at least two-thirds of American history, the majority of domestic adult population was also ineligible for full citizenship for the same reasons. Understanding how republicanism, democracy and quality are compatible with racism and religious intolerance in Americans' minds is key to understanding American violence and often-tragic history of the United States. However, some Americans of European descent primarily non-Denominational Christians, have fought against racism and religious bigotry. For those believing in racial equality, these European non-Denominational American Christians are the real exemplars of democracy and equality in American history.

(3) Latino or Hispanic identity

Neo-Conservatism seeks to woo Latinos and Hispanics to the Republican Party of Lincoln. Brown Latin and Hispanic Americans shall join brown Indians in the Global Clash of Races. The Third Party should represent the aspirations of the Hispanic community in USA. The commemoration of El Dia de la Raza (The Day of the Race) when on October 12, 1492, Columbus landed in the Antilles. This date represents the birth of the Hispanic people as a new hybrid race created from a mixture Europeans, Native Americans and Africans. Within the framework of "La Raza," Hispanic includes most Mexican, Central American, Caribbean, South American peoples, including French-speaking Haitians, Portuguese-speaking Brazilians, and English-speaking Trinidadians and Guyanese. The concept of La Raza includes under the heading "Hispanic" the many U.S. citizens who are descended from enslaved Africans, who have European and Native American ancestors, and brought to the United States.

The concept of La Raza excludes of white European ancestry, who have no African or Native American forbears. The brown-skin Mestizos represent 85% of population in Mexico, and 90% of population in Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia. However the unmixed white Europeans, who represent less than 15% of the population control the economic, political power and Church. Brown Mestizos representing more than 85% of the population demanding the expulsion of the unmixed white Europeans accused of collusion with white Catholic Cartel and white paramilitary death squads.

The term "Hispanic" traced to the early nineteenth century leader Simon Bolivar, the liberator of South America from Spanish rule that dreamt of forming a “Pan-American Republic.” Hispanic Pan America extended from the southern tip of South up the West Coast of North America and California. During the time of Simon Bolivar, California was part of Mexico.

The term "Latin America" coined by Chilean author Francisco Bilbao in 1858 to distinguish between Anglo-Saxons and Latinos. The use of the word "Latin" broke the direct connection with Spain, because the term "Spanish America" represented Spanish cultural imperialism. Portuguese-speaking Brazilians included under the term Latin America. The non-Spanish-speaking peoples covered by Latino term. The terms "Hispanic" and "Latino" are inclusive expressions for widely disparate cultural groups. The quiet Hispanic revolution in United States occurred in 1992, when Hispanic salsa outsold ketchup for the first time.

(4) Protestant Hispanic America

Neo-Conservatism wants to export English language and Protestant Reformed Christianity and Gnostic Mystic Christianity south of the Mexican border towards southern tip of South America. Protestant Hispanics should join brown races in the global Clash of Races. The Third Party should represent the interests of Protestant Evangelicals in South America. WASPs-led Protestant United States in 21st Century would overwhelm South America transforming it to English-speaking Protestant continent. Roman Catholic Church undermining its future by alienating brown Mestizos and joining forces with white paramilitary death-squads. The idea of manifest destiny combined with scorn for La Raza fueled the increasing friction between the United States and Mexico. In the minds of Anglo-Americans, the United States was destined to rule the North and South American continent because of its Protestant culture and republican form of government. In the minds of U.S. citizens, Mexico stood for Catholicism and feudalism.

Popular Anglo-American writers in the nineteenth century argued that the mixture of Spanish conquerors and Native Americans resulted in "wretched hybrids and mongrels (who were) in many respects actually inferior to the inferior itself." At the time, Anglo-Americans did not consider the Spanish as "white" and therefore believed they were an inferior race. Some American leaders hoped that Anglo-Americans and Protestantism would eventually displace all of Hispanics and Catholicism in South America, just as WASPs and Protestantism had displaced great civilization of Native Americans in North America. Representative William Brown envisioned "the Anglo-Saxon race, like a mighty flood spreading over all Mexico. This flood of Anglo-Saxons, William Brown hoped, would eventually cover all of Central and South America, creating republics whose "destinies will be guided by Anglo-Saxon" hands. (Roger Smith "Civic Ideals" New Haven 1997 p. 205)

Mexicans often singled out as the worst of La Raza, perhaps because most Mexicans are either Native American or "Mestizos" (people with a combination of Native American and European ancestry). There has been so much prejudice against both Native Americans and Catholic Mestizos. At the time of the invasion of Mexico in the 1840s, Americans expressed their views that northern Europeans, which they identified as Anglo-Saxon, were the superior racial group. Within the racial ideology of these American leaders, Mexican Mestizo was a substandard racial mixture because they were descended from an inferior race and Native Americans. The Mexican-American War was a race war. The struggle over inclusion of Mexican-Americans and other Hispanic Americans as full citizens of the United States became a serious issue in 1848. Mexican government demanded that Mexicans remaining in their lost territories, which amounted to almost one-half of its total territory, in Texas, New Mexico, California, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Utah become citizens of the United States. In 1897, Texas courts declare Mexican Americans "not white." During 1929-1935, the US government and state governments ignored citizenship rights of Mexican Americans and deported about 400,000 of them back to Mexico. In 1935, California law declares Mexican Americans are foreign-born Indians. In 1935, California law allows segregation of Mexican Americans as Indians. In 1918, Texas makes it a criminal offense to use any language but English in school instruction. The 1790 naturalization Act had excluded Native Americans from U.S. citizenship. Thus, the 1935 California law excluded Mexican Americans from U.S. citizenship, even when they had continued to live in the lands, before the conquest of the United States.

In the southern part of Texas, a different pattern developed for the treatment of the conquered Mexican population. It followed a pattern of a peace structure, with two major components. One component involved bringing the Mexicans under the authority of Anglos in political matters, while the other involved an accommodation between the Mexican and Anglo elite.

The outright racist attitude toward Mexican Americans, school segregation justified by the same argument used to justify isolating southeastern Indians in Indian Territory. Segregation also served the purpose of maintaining white Anglo supremacy. Anglo and Mexican children both knew that segregation intended to separate the superior from the inferior. Those Mexican children attending segregated schools put through a deculturalization program. Similar to that for the American Indians, who were isolated in Indian Territory and boarding schools, the Mexican deculturalization program was designed to strip away Mexican values and culture and replace the use of Spanish with English. Anglos invariably showed greater disdain for Mexican culture than they did for East European cultures. As Anglos did regarding Indian culture and values, Anglos believed that Mexican culture and values discouraged the exercise of economic leadership and cooperation required in an advanced corporate society. Deculturalization and Americanization policies were imposed by Protestants and resisted by Catholic Mexican Americans and Catholic Puerto Ricans.

Dominant Protestant Denominations can overwhelm Catholicism in Hispanic America, if WASPs join forces with brown Mestizos in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua to the detriment of unmixed white Catholics. The brown Mestizos represent 85% of the population in Latin America, and unmixed Whites of European decent represent only 15% of the population. Majority of brown Mestizos of mixed Indian and European ancestry would gladly reject Catholicism and join Reformed Protestant Church and increase the usage of English, to win the support of United States to their clash of races.

(5) Immigrant Asian Indians

Neo-Conservative wants to encourage emigration of non-Christian Indians and Chinese to counter-balance the increased Catholic Mexican immigration to the United States. Asian immigrants should unite to influence the US election process to promote Hindu civilization’s interests in the Global Clash of Races. The Third Party should represent the aspirations of the immigrant Asian Indians. The Naturalization Act of 1790 excluded Native Americans from U.S. citizenship. This was in keeping with the belief that the survival of the republic depended on a homogeneous citizenry of “whites.” At the time, Native Americans were classified as “domestic foreigners.” Consequently, because of the 1790 legislation, they could not seek naturalized citizenship because they were not “white.” In 1867, the congress created the Indian Peace Commission, which effectively made the requirement for U.S. citizenship for Native Americans, the repudiation of native religion and ways of life, and acceptance of American middle-class Christianity with its attended customs. By the end of the nineteenth century, some Native Americans were deculturized and adopted European culture. The so-called Five Civilized Tribes were among the First Native Americans granted citizenship in 1901. The granting of citizenship to all Native Americans did not occur until 1924 Indian citizenship Act passed by Congress. In 1924, Native Americans gained citizenship while immigrant Asians were still being denied naturalized citizenship. The 1790 Naturalization Act denied Native Americans U.S. citizenships. The 1830 Indian Removal Act initiated Trail of Tears for the so-called “Five Civilized Tribes.” Deculturalization is the educational process of destroying a people’s culture and replacing it with a new culture. United States followed the deculturization policy in destroying the ancient Hindu culture in Philippines during conquest of Philippines. United States embarked upon deculturization of Buddhist China, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Bill Clinton encouraged the cultural genocide of pagan Hutus and pagan Congolese by overlooking genocidal policies of Christian Tutsi Gen. Paul Kagame of Rwanda.

In 1853 California court overturned the murder conviction of George Hall by applying a state law that disallowed court testimony from Native Americans, mulattoes and African Americans. California’s chief justice ruled that the law barring the testimony of Native Americans applied to all ‘Asiatic,’ since according to the history, Native Americans were originally Asians who crossed into North America over the Bering Strait, therefore the ban on court testimony from Native Americans applied to the “whole of the Mongolian race.” In denying citizenship to Chan Yang in 1855, California federal court ruled that under the 1790 was restricted to whites only. The naturalization law of 1870 extended U.S. citizenship to alien of African nativity and to persons of African descent while retaining the word “white” which meant the continued exclusion of Asian immigrants and Native Americans from citizenship. In 1864, The U.S. Congress ratified the Burlingame Treaty with China in 1864 allowing unrestricted immigration of Chinese nationals to the United States, while continuing to deny them U.S. citizenship. In 1875, Congress passed ‘Page Law’ which forbade entry into the United States of Chinese, Japanese and Mongolian contract labor. 1882 Chinese Exclusion Law banned all Chinese workers from the U.S. In 1923 U.S. Supreme Court ruled Asian Indians ineligible for naturalized citizenship. Court argued that the intention of the Founding Fathers was to confer the privilege of citizenship upon the class of persons they knew. In 1943 Congress rescinds Chinese Exclusion Law and grants Chinese the right to become naturalized citizens. The 1965 immigration Act ends citizenship discrimination against Asians.

In the 1920s, laws were passed in California, Washington, Arizona, Oregon, Idaho, Nebraska, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, New Mexico, Minnesota and Missouri denying the right to own land to individuals and Asians and Native Americans, who were ineligible for U.S. citizenship.

The concept of skin color as a bar to citizenship was made explicit in 1923 when a group of Asian Indians claimed they were eligible for citizenship because they were Caucasian. Asian Indians argued in 1923 in U.S. Vs Bhagat Singh Thind that they were Caucasian and therefore eligible for citizenship. Supreme Court stated that while Asian Indians were Caucasian, they could not be considered white person, which to the court meant an immigrant from Europe. The Court argued that the intention of the Founding Fathers was to confer the privilege of citizenship upon class of persons they knew as white.

(6) 2(10) Pagan De-Culturalizing Wars

Neo-Conservatism rejects the all forms of iconoclast patriarchal pagan deculturalization policies. Neo-Conservatism rejects the Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright type realism that implemented hidden iconoclast patriarchal religious right conspiracy agenda in American foreign policy. Native Americans should join Hindu Indians in the Global Clash of Races. The Third Party should represent the aspirations of the pagans and indigenous Native American tribes. Australia and United States have excluded indigenous Natives, Aborigines and Native Americans from Australian and U.S. citizenship respectively. While Britain abolished slavery and granted rights to the indigenous peoples throughout the British Empire, the Anglo-Australians, Anglo-Americans, and Anglo-South Africans persecuted indigenous peoples and imposed Apartheid Regime over indigenous peoples. Indians from South Asia similarly mistreated by Anglo-Americans and Anglo-Australians. California classified the children of Asian Indians as Mexican American. While Chinese in Mississippi were required to attend “colored” schools, the children of Asian Indian in California were required to attend segregated schools for Mexican American children.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 excluded Native Americans from U.S. citizenship. This was in keeping with the belief that the survival of the republic depended on a homogeneous citizenry of “whites.” At the time, Native Americans classified as “domestic foreigners.” Consequently, because of the 1790 legislation, they could not seek naturalized citizenship because they were not “white.” In 1867, the congress created the Indian Peace Commission, which effectively made the requirement for U.S. citizenship for Native Americans, the repudiation of native religion and ways of life, and acceptance of American middle-class Christianity with its attended customs. By the end of the nineteenth century, some Native Americans were deculturized and adopted European culture. The so-called Five Civilized Tribes were among the First Native Americans to be granted citizenship in 1901. The granting of citizenship to all Native Americans did not occur until 1924 Indian citizenship Act passed by Congress. In 1924, Native Americans gained citizenship while immigrant Asians were still being denied naturalized citizenship.

The 1790 Naturalization Act denied Native Americans U.S. citizenships. The 1830 Indian Removal Act initiated Trail of Tears for the so-called “Five Civilized Tribes.” Deculturalization is the educational process of destroying a people’s culture and replacing it with a new culture of the dominant group. United States followed the deculturization policy in destroying the ancient Hindu culture in Philippines during conquest of Philippines. United States embarked upon deculturization of Buddhist China, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Bill Clinton encouraged the cultural genocide of pagan Hutus and pagan Congolese by overlooking genocidal policies of Christian Tutsi Paul Kagame of Rwanda.

Between the 1879 founding of the Carlisle Indian School and 1905, twenty-five non-reservation boarding schools were opened throughout the United States. It is important to emphasize the non-reservation location of the boarding schools because of the educational philosophy that Indian children should be removed from family and tribal influences.

Neo-Conservatism opposes the iconoclast patriarchal conspiracies that seek to undermine the oriental culture of India. Roughly around 1879, similar attempts were made in India to deculturalize Hindu Indians, by training selected groups of Indians in boarding schools located at hilly locations away from the family influences.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 65. Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(24B) 2(11) True Nature of USA

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 65. Chapter 2. 2(11)

(24B) Secularism is the True Nature of the USA

Neo-Conservatism want to reinforce the morally good and morally right true nature of the United States to eliminate the influence of religious right conservative conspiracy and eliminate traces of extremism from American society and politics. Hindu India must understand the real nature of the United States to identify what linkages would promote India-USA strategic alliance in the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations. Any misconceived notion about United States would result in the misunderstanding and rupture in relationships. United States is what it is in reality, not what it claims itself to be. India should learn to look into the real nature of United States by disrobing its propaganda about its nature.

(1) US Core of Axis of Medieval

Neo-Conservatism exposes the designs of Axis of Medieval to undermine the Protestant Reformed Christianity character of the United States. The political structure of the United States creates a representative Aristocracy. The United States Media has full freedom to discuss politics and local affairs. However, US Media is restricted and censored for its reports on foreign affairs. US Media can freely criticize the President of the United States, but can’t freely criticize its foreign military operations.

President Kennedy invaded Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and President Clinton invaded Haiti and Yugoslavia, primarily to promote the interests of Catholic Religious Conservative Conspiracy. President Jimmy Carter United States overthrew the liberal secular Monarchy of Shah of Iran, and liberal democratic regime of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, and President Clinton overthrew the government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan, to promote fundamentalist ultra-conservative Muslim militancy in Iran and Pakistan and to destroy democracy and freedom.

United States determined to recreate an Axis of Medieval, in Islamic world to suppress modern liberal Islam and to encourage barbaric feudal Wahhabi fundamentalism. Rather than promoting modernization of Islamic societies and propagation of Western values and Western legal systems throughout Islamic world, United States militarily and financially supports fundamentalist Islamic leadership that would replace existing Western laws with Shariah and force Muslim women into bondage and slavery. The CIA arranged the murder of President Anwar Sadat of Egypt and gave financial support and visas to the killers.

The CIA arranged the murder of Sheikh Mujibur Raman of Bangladesh and gave financial support and visas to the killers. Ayatollah Hominy, General Zima Ulf Has, General Perez Mascara had been the CIA spies. Osaka bin Laden had been may still be the CIA agent.

President Clinton launched Plan Colombia to consolidate the power and monopoly of Colombian White Catholic Cocaine Cartel over drug trade, by helping the elimination of non-cartel drug traffickers.

President Clinton and Secretary Madeleine Albright rewarded terrorist Osama bin Laden for murdering US citizens by attacks on US Embassies in Nairobi and Tanzania by handing over political control of Afghanistan.

Even President Bush’s war on terrorism failed to kill or prosecute any known Al Qaeda or Taliban terrorists and it killed only Northern Alliance soldiers. Rather than prosecuting Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists, United States pursued the prosecution of Northern Alliance soldiers that defeated them in war. Perhaps United States would use Al Qaeda terrorists to create an Axis of Medieval in Arabian Peninsula. As a result of the US invasion of Afghanistan the Heroin production and Opium cultivation has zoomed. The 4,000 tons Heroin, worth more than $20 billion in US streets, supposedly stored in the caves by Taliban leaders has disappeared. The CIA has developed security ties with ISI secret services of Pakistan.

Moral of the issue is that United States prefers barbarian fundamentalist Islamic regimes and supports the militant terrorists’ attempts to overthrow the liberal secular Muslim governments. What Hindu India can offer to United States determined to create Axis of Medieval in the Islamic world?

(2) USA Had Been Enemy of Democracy

Neo-Conservatism overturned the Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright type Realism doctrine that ordered covert operations throughout the Third World to overthrow democratically elected governments that earned United States the nickname “Butcher of Democracy.” The United States and the CIA used assassination and military coups to overthrow the democratically elected governments in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma (Myanmar), Laos, Cambodia, South Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines, Fiji Islands, Venezuela, Chile, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, and Greece, to name the few.

United States arranged the murder of the prime minister of Congo, Patrice Lumumba in Feb 1961, and imposed the 32-years military dictatorship of Joseph Desire Mobutu Sese Sese from Nov 1965 to May 1997. The CIA agents arranged the murder of president Laurent Kabila of Congo, through the hands of his bodyguards. The CIA overthrew the monarchy of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (Sept 1941-Jan 1979), overthrown by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (Feb 1979-3 June 1989). The CIA arranged the murder of president Anwar al-Sadat (‘Sept 1970-Oct 1981). The CIA played a role in the Oct 1984 murder of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in (Jan 1966-March 1977, Jan 1980-Oct 1984), and of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi (Oct 1984-Nov 1989). The CIA arranged the August 1988 murder of President General Mohammed Zia ul-Haq (Sept 1978-August 1988). The CIA arranged the overthrow of President Ahmed Sukarno (August 1945-Feb 1967), and imposed military dictatorship of President Suharto (Feb 1967-May 1998). The CIA arranged the March 1975 murder of King Faisal ibn Abdul Aziz (Nov 1964-March 1975).

(3) USA wants colonial Empire

Neo-Conservatism advocates American Petro-Colonialism and Petro-Pax-Americana to safeguard the energy security of the United States. Unites States is itself an Empire and constantly expanding its geographic landmass. United States would takeover Canada and Australia before 2050 AD. President Truman demanded from Prime Minister Winston Churchill that Britain should hand over half of the British Colonies to United States in exchange of the British war debts. Churchill refused. Hindu India can help Protestant United States create great Colonial Empire. India can help United States create Pax-Americana. The bedrock of India-USA strategic ties would be the use of Indian Army to create American Colonial Empire. What India should demand as its just share, for helping United States create American Colonial Empire? India can become wealthy and advanced nation by undertaking military operations to create American Colonial Empire. Indian soldiers had created British Empire. India has the proven military capability to create American Colonial Empire. India USA strategic relationship should create new world order, where colonial empires would be the norm of the day. Many former colonies should never have become independent. Would Global Clash of Races could result in the subjugation and colonization of defeated races and nations. Should India help United States conquer the world? What would be India’s gains, if it uses its military might to help United States rule the world? Would the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations result n the new Age of Colonial Empires? Should India and China dream to make Indian Empire and Chinese Empire respectively.

(4) WASPs Hate Wahhabi

Neo-Conservatism advocates preemptive attacks on the breeding grounds of Wahhabi terrorism in the heartlands of Arabia. When did WASPs realize the murderous potential of Wahhabi terrorism? For the first time, after the 9/11 attacks, Protestant Americans realized the murderous potential of global terrorism. Americans realized the terrorism is rooted in religion and Wahhabi Islam is the source of global terrorism, which is funded by the growing nexus of Catholic Cocaine Cartel, Wahhabi Heroin Cartel. Just as Karl Marx legitimized the genocide of Bourgeoisie by the comrades, Wahhabi Islam legitimized the suppression of women genocide of infidels by Mujahideens. President Carter opened the Pandora Box by legitimizing the Islamic extreme conservatism and militant fundamentalism in Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Rather than promoting modernization, liberal Western values, United States trained and equipped Muslim terrorists to destabilize civilized world to promote short-term US national interests, and subsequently harm long-term national interests and civilization’s interests of the WASPs United States.

(5) US Touted Fundamentalism

Neo-Conservatism opposed pro-fundamentalism pro-extremism and pro-Wahhabi policies of President Ford, Carter and Clinton administrations. Why does US Support Wahhabi? There is a pattern that United States systematically undermined liberal Islamic regimes, replaced them by fundamentalist Islamic regimes that imposed Shariah Law replacing Western law. United States rather than promoting westernization of Islamic societies, supports groups that imposes fundamentalist Shariah laws. United States undermines liberal Islamic movements and supports terrorist, Wahhabi fundamentalists in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Algeria, Indonesia, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and Egypt. United States after it bring down secular, liberal, modern Iraqi regime, and may impose Wahhabi fundamentalism in Iraq. Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy supports ultra-conservative, fundamentalist Muslim terrorists and opposes and brings down liberal, modern, secular Muslim governments.

During Clinton Administration, al Qaeda targeted Americans as no other terrorist group ever had. In 1996, Americans were killed by in Saudi Arabia by Al Qaeda. Americans and Africans working for the United States were murdered in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998. American sailors were killed abroad USS Cole in 2000. Rather than punish Osama bin Laden for its terrorist role, Secretary Albright and President Clinton consented for the takeover of the State of Afghanistan, by Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.

(6) History of White Slavery:

Neo-Conservatism accepts that white slaves from Western Europe were sold as slaves in the slave markets of Alexandria, Damascus and Byzantium, as late as 715 AD. White Catholics respect Wahhabi Arab Muslims because throughout the Dark Age, caused by Papacy, Islam represented Civilization for the then-barbarian West Europeans. The answer to the riddle may lie in the history of the Rise of the West, from the backwater of the Civilization, when in 4th century it was condemned as the barbarian Germans by Eastern and Western Roman Empire. Even as late as 715 AD, white men and women from lands of Germany, France, sold as slaves in the slave markets of Constantinople, Damascus and Alexandria, to serve the black and brown masters. The white Slave trade banned after 715 AD, only when Byzantine Eastern Roman Empire banned the transport of White European slaves to undermine the economy of Alexandria and Damascus, which had come conquered by Arab Muslims. The white barbarian western Europe were grateful for the civilized Muslim Arab world, throughout the Dark Age that descended on Western Europe due to the fundamentalist conservative policies of Church of Rome. Muslim invaders liberated many white slaves of Damascus and used them to massacre brown and black upper class in Egypt, Syria and Libya.

(7) Legitimization of Wahhabi Genocide

Neo-Conservatism cannot condone the genocide of ancient Egyptians at hands of Arab Bedouins during first decades of Islam. White Catholics condone and legitimize the terrorist, fundamentalist and genocidal acts of Wahhabi Muslims, because Catholic Church after 1500 AD, institutionalized the genocide of conquered pagan races, propagated by Prophet Mohammed in 640 AD. Catholic Pope justified the used of arms and diseases to massacre and commit genocide of defeated Inca, Maya and Aztec Civilizations, as then dominant Islamic Civilization had done the same in Egypt, Syria and Libya. To non-Christian observers there is not much difference of the ultra-Conservatism of Catholic Religious Right and ultra-fundamentalism of Wahhabi Islam. Catholic media and academics legitimizes Wahhabi fundamentalism as a prelude to justify ultra-conservatism of Pope John Paul II, who reversed the modern trend set in the Synod of 1965. Catholic Church launched genocidal policies in Laos and Cambodia during Khmer Rouge and in Uganda under Idi Amin, which were no less acts of terrorism then acts of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan after 1995. Arab Wahhabi fundamentalist theocracy and Catholic Religious Right ultra-Conservative Conspiracy are two sides of the same coin that subjugates women worldwide and eliminates competing religious sects. Sunni Wahhabi Islam conspires to eliminate competing religious sects, namely Mystic Sufism and other schools of Islam, which outnumber Wahhabi Muslims by 50 to 1, as Wahhabi represents no more than 2% of the world’s Muslim population.

Catholics number only 35 million in United States, less than 15% of the total population. Papacy attempts to hijack the presidency of the United States, and repeat what Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395 AD) did to Roman Empire. Remember that due to the Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy, the Roman Empire conquered by German barbarian leader Alaric in 410 AD. Would good WASPs United States meet the fate sometime in 21st Century, similar to that of Roman Empire of 5th Century? Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy seeks the destruction of that United States, where strict constitutional walls separate the State and Church.

INDIA, ISRAEL & USA ARE VICTIMS: Protestant United States, Jewish Israel and Hindu India have become victim of Islamic terrorism. However, Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy continue to defend Muslim terrorists, and consolidating Catholic-Muslim solidarity, even at the cost of undermining the national and religious interests of the Protestants, Jews and Hindus. Protestant United States, Jewish Israel and Hindu India would be on the same side of the battle lines in the War on global terrorism and War of World Religions.

(8) Neoconservatism

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 71, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(25) 2(12) US Non European Essence

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 71. Chapter 2. 2(12)

(25) (1) Pro-WASP Dominance US Polity

Neo-Conservatism emphasizes the non-European character the United States. United States is unlike Europe and very different from Canada, and Britain. United States had been a British colony in the past. Canada and Britain abolished Slavery much earlier than the American Civil War. However, after the Civil War, the institutional Apartheid policy instituted in the United States, not dissimilar to what existed in South Africa, and this Apartheid policy continued as late as 1965, when president Lynden B. Johnson abolished it.

Just after 13 US Colonies declared independence from Britain, the Caribbean State of Haiti, led by ex-slave was the richest independent nation in the New World. At the time of the Civil War, Blacks slaves outnumbered white colonialists in United States. Had United States adopted the liberal laws then in force in Canada and Britain, the United States would have become Black United States. The US Constitution of 1787 was an exercise in duplicity and hypocrisy, as it sought to give freedom and liberty only to the privileged white landlords. The net result of the Civil War was that immigration from Africa stopped and immigration from Europe zoomed.

Because the White Anglo Saxon Protestants could continue to maintain their grip over power, they could open the doors of the United States to all faiths and nationalities of Europe. United States has become the heaven in world for emigrants and WASPs apparently approve the further opening of the borders, because they are confident to maintain their solid grip over power, as the US Election system is rigged in favor of WASPs. If the election process was not rigged, then WASPs would have felt vulnerable and stopped the open gate of immigration, out of the sense of self-preservation, as happened in Canada and Australia. The combined population of Canada and Australia and New Zealand less than 55 million, while that of United States exceeds 287 million mark. Because the WASPs are confident about their grip over power in the United States, even if they are numerically outnumbered now, that non-denominational Protestants in general support open immigration policy more than Catholics and Evangelicals. It would be bad for the world if United States modernizes Federal Election Process, but in the process shuts its borders for new immigration, out of its fear of becoming a minority in the United States and losing its grip over power.

Native American Indians, Blacks, Asians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Asians, Indians and Chinese have more freedom and face much less discrimination, these people face in Western Europe, Australia and Canada. Even when Canada and Australia have better election system and impartial federal election commission, the non-white and non-Christian immigrants face institutional discriminations and all the above peoples would prefer settling in the United States than in Europe. Even when the election process is rigged in United States, it enjoys unprecedented freedom of Press and independence of Judiciary.

The constitutional Separation of Power and system of Checks and Balances provide guarantee that that United States would not suffer from the tyranny of the majority. It protected the United States from the tyranny of French Revolution. The US Constitution of 1787 is the only pre-Revolution Constitution Revolution that continues to govern a major civilization in the 21st Century. The US Constitution of 1787 preserves the rights and privileges and economic interests of the dominant Aristocracy, just as the pre-Revolution constitutions sought to preserve vested interests of the Bourbon Aristocracy in Europe.

United States is a functioning Aristocracy, where Capitalism allows free access to accumulate wealth and the rising cost of elections and 4000+ County Canvassing Boards guarantee that the richest politicians would continue to get reelected, again and again. It has been a boon to the world that the election system in the United States election process fundamentally rigged in favor of rich, otherwise the dominant Aristocracy in the United States, would had adopted closed-door policy like that of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Italy, Britain and European Union. United States welcomes immigrants and its Aristocracy, doesn’t feel threatened as it understands its ability to manipulate the system to perpetuate its stronghold over power. The day the rigged election process reformed in United States, the horrors of closed-frontiers face the future immigrants.

Since the ruling Aristocracy of the United States, confident of maintaining its hegemony in foreseeable future, United States may decide to take independent approach to the crisis of Global Clash of Races, and Clash of Civilizations. Black, Brown, and yellow races should help perpetuate the dominance of the WASPs and Protestants in American polity to gain their support in the Global Clash of Races, Clash of Civilizations and War of Religions. The continued dominance of the Bourbon-type capitalist WASP Aristocracy is essential prerequisite to wean United States from Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 72, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(26) 2(13) USA will split like USSR

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 72, Chapter 2. 2(13)

(26) (1) IMPERIAL DISINTEGRATION:

Neo-Conservatism wants Americans to learn from the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the demise of the Roman Empire, to identify the conspiracies that brought about the demise of the Soviet Union and Roman Empire. Study of History shows that Great Empires fall apart without any hostile foreign intervention, whenever Empire undermines the founding principals of the Empire builders. Roman Empire fell when Roman Senators failed to curb the Ruler of Rome, the Roman Emperor. Soviet Empire fell apart when blue-eyed white Russians realized that the Propaganda jargon of Soviet communism is not just the camouflage to justify Russian occupation. Empires of the United States would fall apart whenever white Anglo ‑Saxon Protestants (WASP) realize that the United States is no longer a Protestant nation but transforming into a Holy Catholic American Empire. Canadian Empire would fall apart whenever the English-speaking Canadians realize that they could no longer rule over diverse ethnic groups comprising English, French and Eskimos. Brazilian Empire would fall apart when Nations more powerful than Portugal would demand their share of Indian Lands.

(2) Apache Novajo States:

RISE OF NATIVE-AMERICAN STATES: Neo-Conservatism argues that Native American Indians should be treated fairly, since they no longer present any threat to the United States. It is inconceivable that virtuous among White races would consent to the continued suppression, enslavement, massacre and genocide of native indigenous American peoples. British Empire disintegrated when a noble Englishman decided that the continued occupation of other nationalities is morally indefensible. Virtuous among the Anglo‑Saxons, who spearheaded the movement against Apartheid rule in South Africa, would also revolt against the continued enslavement of the original native inhabitants of Australia, North America & South America. North America and South America during the next decade would give birth to more than 20 new sovereign Indigenous Native American States. Native American States could comprise 20% landmass of Americas.

(3) Black President of USA:

RISE OF BLACK UNITED STATES: The candidacy of black woman Condoleezza Rice has the support of Republican No-Conservatism. Neo-Conservatism advocates that black candidates should be co-opted as part of the Republican ticket. White race is no longer dominant race on this planet. White race can no longer use brutal force to enslave the Black race. Black pride has galvanized the Black Americans. Blacks have realized that Apartheid System that determined American social life until 1965 continues to hold down Black races in a new form. Black Americans would not rest unless they have an Independent Black United States, which would also be the first Black Nuclear Weapon Power on this planet. Black United States will consist of twenty (20) percent landmasses of the United States.

(4) Catholic USA led By WASC not by WASP:

CATHOLIC UNITED STATES: Neo-Conservatism warns the American public of the dangers of Papal-agent occupying the White House to implement the hidden Papal agenda in the Protestant United States. There is no Catholic Nuclear Super Power in the world, even when the Catholics outnumber the Protestants. The Vatican is conspiring to partition the United States and Canada to create a new Catholic Super Power. Catholic Hispanic, Irish and Anglo‑Saxons in the United States and Canada, would join white Mexicans to create a new Catholic United States of America, a form of the Holy American Empire. It would incite the white Anglo‑Saxon Protestants (WASP), to create a Protestant United States of America. Both would also be Nuclear Super Powers. Catholics and Protestants could each have 30% landmass of the North America.

ETHNIC CLEANSING: Disintegration of Canada and the United States creates severe problem of population exchange and ethnic cleansing. Ethnic Russians had to leave from Ukraine, Lithuania, Estonia, and Moldova even when they had lived there for many centuries. The Canada and the United States should solve the problem of mass transfer of ethnic populations beforehand. The black and white areas in United States should be identified beforehand to avoid bloodshed. The specter of Yugoslavian disintegration should not repeat in America. The Vatican and NATO exacerbated the policy of ethnic cleansing as a diplomatic tool to weaken Orthodoxy.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 73, Chapter 3.

 

 

 

(0)(27) 2(14) Why USSR Disintegrated

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 73. Chapter 2. 2(14)

(27) (1) CAUSE OF USSR DISINTEGRATION:

Neo-Conservatism believes that the loss of WASP leadership in the United States shall result in the disintegration of the United States as the loss of Russian Slav leadership in the Soviet Union resulted in the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Soviet Union disintegrated when its dominant ethnic groups, blue-eyed white Russians had the following sudden realization. White Russians realized that the Soviet System that Russians had developed to rule over non-Russians had mutated and could serve non-Russians and enslave white Russians for the cause of the Soviet Union. The Soviet propaganda had found a life of its own. The Soviet system used by non-Russians challenges Russian monopoly. Empires disintegrate when the ideals of the Empire, essential for the imperial expansion, get life of its own. Then the colonies or descendent of barbarians use the same institutions to deny the privileges of the descendants of the founders and rulers of the Empire. Soviet Army placed under house arrest the Soviet President Gorbachev and surrounded the Russian Parliament in Moscow. Then the blue-eyed white Russians realized that the Soviet Union has outlived its usefulness and should disintegrate. White Russians decided that it is preferable to rule only Russia, than serve under non-Russians in the United Soviet Union. The Soviet Union survived so long as the Soviet system remained a propaganda ploy to enslave non-Russian peoples. The Soviet Union disintegrated the moment the blue-eyed white Russians feared that the Soviet system, headed by non-Russians could also rule over blue-eyed white Russians with impunity.

(2) Propaganda Ideals of United States:

Neo-Conservatism advocates that the continued political domination of White Anglo Saxon Protestants is crucial for the very survival of the Ideal of United States. Neo-Conservatism wants to maintain United States as the bastion of Reformed Christianity and Protestantism and oppose Papal designs on the United States. The dominant ethnic group in the United States is White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASP). The United States would disintegrate whenever American institutions and ideals acquire the life of their own to challenge the dominance of the WASP community. The United States would survive only if American institutions, ideals and system consolidate the WASP dominance, while giving lip service to the idea of equal opportunity, freedom and elective democracy. They designed the American system of Separation of Power to curb the dictatorship of the elected Legislature. Without the Separation of Power, the Executive branch of the government could have become totalitarian. Abraham Lincoln did not fight the Civil War just to abolish slavery; it was to keep the Union united. The purpose of abolition of slavery was to unite Black and whites to massacre Red Indians during the 19th Century. The Apartheid system in the United States was in full operation as late as 1964. President Ben Johnson abolished the apartheid system when he signed the bill in 1965. The American Apartheid System violated the Civil rights of the blacks and enforced segregation in public places. The Blacks could occupy only the seats at the back of the public transportation, and obliged by law to give the seat to the standing white passengers. The United States was also an expanding colonial empire during the 19th century, organized under democratic institutions. The United States would disintegrate whenever any nonwhite or non-Christian leader succeeds in using the United States democratic institutions to win the Presidency of the United States.

(3) American Dreams is USA’s Achilles Heel

AMERICAN DREAMS THE ACHILLES HEEL: Neo-Conservatism wants that the immigration reforms must provide for the American Dreams for every immigrant inside the United States, because once immigrants lose faith in the American Dream than the very ideal of the United States may lose its charm or relevance. The United States is a nation of immigrants and an expanding Empire. People have come from all over the world because it provides everyone the freedom and opportunity to realize ones American Dream. That the United States is the land of opportunities where everyone can realize his own American Dream is the unifying force that binds the disparate nationalities in the United States. United States would disintegrate whenever large number of peoples realized that their American dream would no longer be possible under the current United States. The United States would become illusive and disintegrate whenever the American Dream becomes illusive to most of the people. The prospect of economic prosperity in the future makes the people loyal to the United States. The Americans would rush to immigrate to any other better more prosperous new heavens if that country could provide better opportunity for economic prosperity. Americans would switch loyalty to Canada or Brazil if it could provide better prospect for realizing American Dream. The United States would disintegrate whenever its people realize that the realization of the American Dream is no longer possible in the present day United States.

(4) Disintegration of USA:

AMERICAN EMPIRE WOULD DISINTEGRATE: Neo-Conservatism warns that United States might disintegrate if it became the seat of iconoclast patriarchal religious extremism. The United States would disintegrate whenever it acquires the characteristics of an Evil Empire. America could transform itself into a Holy Roman American Empire to lead the Christian world. The Salem Witch Trials of 1640s shows that American institutions could overnight become as barbaric as the Catholic Inquisitions that burnt eight (8) millions women on stakes as Witches. The Separation of Power could allow the President to behave irresponsibly during its fixed 4-years term. The irresponsible Independent Counsel Ken Starr investigation reminds observers about Catholic Inquisitions Witch Trials. The American Jury System could easily turn into Lynching mobs and Witch Trials. The days of the United States would be over, when its institutions would degenerate and transform the American Empire into an Evil Empire. As an evil Empire, the United States will fail to survive even four years. Soviet Union became an Evil Empire without realizing it. The United States as the Catholic American Empire, would alienate WASP Protestant Americans, and become an Evil Empire. The Evil Empire of the United States would also mistreat immigrants and nonwhites.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 74, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(28) 2(15) Isms in US Elections 2004

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 74, Chapter 2. 2(15)

(28) (1) US Election 2004 & Clash of Races

CHRISTIAN RIGHT DUMPING BUSH IN 2004: President George Herbert Walker Bush (Jan 1989-Jan 1993) lost his bid for reelection in 1992 to Bill Clinton, because Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy promoted Ross Perot as third party presidential candidate and switched Republican base of Texan Ross Perot to Democratic presidential ticket just on the eve of Democratic Party Convention in New York. Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy also scuttled the second-term Presidential run of President Lynden Ben Johnson (Nov. 1963-Jan 1969), because he signed Civil Rights Acts and abolished South Africa type Apartheid system then in effect in the United States. Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy exploited the Watergate scandal to empower Dr. Henry Kissinger. Religious Right Wing Conservative Conspiracy picked and promoted Southern Baptist Protestant President Jimmy Carter, when it realized that Catholic Presidency ignites Counter Reformation War fears in WASPs USA. President Carter rewarded them by imposing fundamentalist regimes of Ayatollahs in Iran and Zia Ul Haq in Pakistan, who imposed Shariah law. Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy exploited the mental disability after the assassination attempt of President Ronald Reagan to imposed Conservative agenda on Reagan Administration. The Religious Right exploited the political problems of President Clinton and Ken Starr Special Counsel, to empower its nominee Secretary Madeleine Albright hijack the Presidency, just as Secretary Kissinger did after Watergate Crisis in Nixon Administration. The Christian Religious Right Conservatives have unequivocally decided to move against the second-term presidential bid of President George W. Bush during Elections 2004, just what they did to the second-term presidential bid of President George Herbert Walker Bush during Elections 1992. The Christian Right Conservative Conspiracy has won over the allegiance of Secretary Colin Powell, to recruit him as their nominee for future Republican presidential campaigns.

WARS OF CAMPAIGN DONATIONS: NATO air strikes failed to weaken the resolve of Yugoslavia and the political support base of President Slobadan Milosevic. However, the shrewd investment of $35 million by the CIA in financing anti-Milosevic coalition succeeded in getting a pro-US politician elected Vojislav Kostunica as the President of the Yugoslav Federation and Zoran Djindjic as Serbian Prime Minister, who later cooperated to transfer former President Slobadan Milosevic to International Crime Court in the Hague. The $35 million in campaign donations by the CIA succeeded, where billions spent by Pentagon and NATO failed. It exposes the Achilles Heels of the democracies. Foreign agencies can buy elections and force candidates to sell their souls to the hidden hand that controls campaign donations and votes on election-days. Catholic Church and Protestant Southern Baptists exploit their ability to raise campaign donations and deliver votes on the election-days to force incumbents and candidates promote the agenda of the Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. The CIA influenced the outcome of elections Yugoslavia by investing $35 million in election campaigns and political bribes, as result in Elections of 29 Sept 2002, the forces from the old regime the supporters of Slobadan Milosevic don’t stand a chance. The Communist China arranged campaign donations and votes to the presidential campaigns in United States, to gain political favor during Clinton Administration, and perhaps military technology. No wonder that the hidden hand allowed Chinese spy steal top-secret nuclear weapons designs from Los Alamos labs and other military research facilities, and to cap it all, Attorney General Janet Reno had to apologize to the Chinese spy for the inconvenience caused to him by FBI investigations.

Elections in the United States, like democratic campaigns elsewhere in the world, are vulnerable to large campaign donations. What the CIA could do in Yugoslavia elections, Chinese and Catholic Religious Right Conservatism proved happens all the time during Election time in the United States. Unless the patriotic Protestants set their house in order and seek supports of such Protestant factions as oppose Christian Right Conservatism, incumbent President Bush might lose the re-election bid in Election 2004. It is no laughing matter. The election victory of nominee of the Christian Religious Right Conspiracy in Election 2004, would put United States on the wrong side of the battle lines, in the war on global terrorism, albeit on the side of global terrorism and global drug trade.

(2) Ghost of Intolerant Theodosius I

Hindu India, Buddhist China and Orthodox Russia must play active role in US elections to counter-balance Vatican’s influence over campaign donations. The national and civilization’s interests of Hindu and Buddhist and Orthodoxy civilizations would be seriously undermined, in the Global Clash of Races and the War on Terrorism, if Republican presidential nominee loses the Election 2008 and a nominee of Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy occupies the Oval Office in January 2009. The outcome of the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations influenced by the outcome of the results of US presidential Elections 2004, simply because WASPs

United States is the sole super power of the world, just as Roman Empire was up to 4th Century. Catholic Religious Right Wing Conspiracy’s nominee Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395 AD) destroyed the Great Roman Civilization by militarily imposing Christianity throughout Roman Empire. It is no wonder that German Barbarians conquered Rome in 410 AD. Would WASPs let Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy destroy the greatest nation on earth, by hijacking the Elections 2004? The author believes that US presidential Election 2004, is legitimate battlefront for the warring coalitions in the Global Clash of Races, and Clash of Civilizations, simply because the political beliefs of the incumbent Administration directly influences the balance of power among Civilizations and the outcome of the Third World War. Like China and the Vatican, Hindu India and Hindu & Buddhist citizens of the United States, should pump in substantial money in US election campaigns to secure the victory of pro-India, pro-Hinduism, anti-terrorism politician candidates in the Federal Presidential, Senate, and Congress election campaigns. Elections have become very expensive and money talks in election campaigns.

(3) Influencing Election 2008

All politics in United States is local politics and every politician, whether Democrat or Republican, takes a political stand, after taking into consideration its impact on next elections. The Clash of Races, the Clash of Civilizations would be fought on the election front during Election 2008, to induce politicians take a stand on world politics. American politicians would support the side that promises them victory in the Elections. The issue now boils down, how should Hindu and Buddhist nations participate the election process to swing votes in favor of Neo-Conservative Republican President in Election 2008. Neo-Conservative Republican President Bush is the anchor of the America’s War on Islamic terrorism. Hindu, Buddhist, brown and yellow races should mobilize the electoral support base, to swing the electoral fortunes of Republican ticket, even if they oppose certain policies of Republicans. Unless Buddhists, Hindus and Asians mobilize electoral base in favor of President Bush, he may be forced to toe the line of Christian Religious Right Conservatism and abandon the War on Terrorism, to secure his political survival. Former president George H.W. Bush lost presidential election to Bill Clinton, primarily due to the opposition of Christian Religious Right.

(4) Neoconservations

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 75, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(29) 2(16) Looming New Global Dark Age

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 75, Chapter 2. 2(16).

(29) (1) EUROPE’S CHRISTIAN DARK AGE:

Neo-Conservatism warns the American public about the threat of the descent of Global Dark Age because of the growing nexus of Catholic extremism, Islamic fundamentalism, organized crime and drug cartels. Church of Rome caused the 1,000-year long Dark Age in Europe, after the pro-Christianity proclamation of Christian Emperor Theodosius II (d. 395 AD). German barbarian Alaric conquered Rome in 410 AD and the New Dark Age began in Europe. The enlightened land of great Greek and Roman Civilization came under darkness of Dark Age because of Christianity. How come the descendants of civilized Greeks and Romans lived like barbarians during Christian Dark Age for 1,000 years, from 410 AD to the fall of Byzantine Constantinople? Great temples, religious artifacts, libraries in Greece and Rome burnt and destroyed by Christian iconoclasts, throughout Roman Empire in Mediterranean Europe, North Africa and Asia Minor. Catholic Christianity caused the demise of Europe’s Greek Civilization and Roman Civilization. Catholic Church destroyed great Roman Civilization and joined forces with the barbarians and honored barbarian kingdom as “Holy Roman Empire.” Christian barbarians looted the wealth of ancient Hindu temples of Greece, Rome and Egypt after the fall of the Rome.

(2) NEW WORLD’S DARK AGE:

At the time Christopher Columbus arrived in the New World, it was a home of great civilizations of Inca, Maya, Aztec and American Indians. The Inca, Maya and Aztec Civilizations were greater than the Greek Civilization, Roman Civilization and Egyptian Civilization. Barbarian Cortez destroyed the Maya Civilization and Aztec Civilization. Barbarian Pizzarro destroyed the great Inca Civilization. The population of indigenous populations in North America and South America in 1500 AD, estimated at 95 million, more than the entire population of contemporary Western Europe and Eastern Europe including Russia. Catholic Church destroyed the great Inca Civilization, Maya Civilization, and Aztec Civilization. Roman Catholics looted the gold of the temples of Inca, Maya and Aztec Civilizations.

(3) DEMOCRATIZE VATICAN:

Neo-Conservatism demands the democratic institutions in the Papacy. The courts in the United States failed to prosecute pedophile Catholic Clergy and Catholic Church cared little for the violation of the civil laws. It is high time that Secular politicians step in and politically reform the Vatican.

The recent scandal of the Catholic Church, which has consistently shielded the pedophile priests, shows that Pope’s totalitarian powers over Clergy, Church, and Theology not suitable for 21st Century. When the Vatican could defy with impunity the legislature and judiciary of the United States, for the civil crimes committed by pedophile Catholic priests, shows that it is time politicians of the world step in and reforms the Roman Catholic Church. As a military power Vatican is no match to any major power of the world. Even Dalai Lama in 1950, had more political, military, religious and economic power than Pope John Paul II.

On Sept. 20, 1870, Italian King Victor Emmanuel II entered Rome, and stripped Pope of all temporal power. The Pope lived in seclusion in Vatican, as prisoner of Vatican, until 1929.

Secular political authority should supervise the democratic infrastructure of the religious organizations worldwide. Should the secular Italian Parliament through legislation, bring the Vatican under the control and supervision of secular government of Italy? Should Italian Parliament revoke the sovereignty of the Vatican? Should the Catholic laity worldwide elect the Pontiff, Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, and Princes for a term of five years, by direct free and fair election process? The organizational structure of the Roman Catholic Church organized on the pattern of Roman Empire, is unsuitable for the 21st century.

(4) CAMBODIA & ETHIOPIA:

Roman Catholic Church supported Khmer Rouge and encouraged brutal massacres of 2,000,000 Buddhists in Cambodia and Laos, a repeat to what it had done in the past in Inca and Maya Empires. The Orthodox Christian Civilization’s 5,000-year old Monarchy of Emperor Haile Selaisie overthrown by agents of Catholic Church.

(5) EGYPT’S DARK AGE:

The predecessors of Wahhabi fundamentalists, the Arab Muslims destroyed the Civilization of Ancient Egypt, massacred or enslaved the dominant brown race, and took over their women and lands. Arab Muslims destroyed the Zoroastrian Persian Civilization, destroyed Zoroastrian temples and looted their wealth. The Wahhabi Taliban in 2002 destroyed the 2000-year old Bamian Buddha statues in Afghanistan. Before Ayatollah in Iran and before Taliban in Afghanistan, Women in Afghanistan enjoyed many freedoms and the Muslim society was very liberal and secular much like present-day Turkey.

(6) TWIN RELIGIOUS MENACE:

Anti-woman Islamic Wahhabi militant fundamentalism and anti-woman Catholic Religious right conservatism are twin menace facing the mankind today that threatened the very existence of the modern, liberal, secular democratic societies worldwide.

(7) Catholic-Sunni Drug Cartel:

The vast size of the worldwide income of the organized crime and drug cartel influences the policy-making. The gross annual income of the organized crime is estimate at 1,000 billion a year and half of it generates in the United States. The gross income of the drug trafficking was $ 700 billion a year in 1997, and half of it generates in United States.

The white Catholic Cocaine cartel and Wahhabi Heroin cartel support and finance Catholic and Wahhabi fundamentalism to gain social credibility. Drug cartels bankroll religious fundamentalism. Cocaine cartel finances the Catholic ultra-conservatism. Heroin cartel finances Wahhabi fundamentalism. Wahhabi drug cartel finances Wahhabi terrorism worldwide. The religious alliance of Wahhabi fundamentalism and Catholic ultra-conservatism cemented by growing cooperation between Catholic Cocaine cartel and Wahhabi Heroin cartel. The growing drug nexus of growing Catholic & Wahhabi religious fundamentalism and drug cartels presents the greatest threat to the mankind. The global Cocaine and Heroin drug trade generated for the organized crime more than $700 billion per year in 1997, according to the Financial Times of London. Half of this income, $350 billion generates in the United States per year. It is rumored that Catholic and Arab financial institutions launder this mind-boggling sums of money.

(8) NEW DARK AGE OF 21ST CENTURY:

Neo-Conservatism argues that the growing nexus of drug cartels, organized crime, corrupt politicians and religious fundamentalism could result in the New Dark Age to descend on the earth in 21st century. Global Crime Syndicates, Drug Cartels, Terrorists, Mercenaries, Apocalyptic Religions, and Iconoclast fundamentalists represent the threat of barbarians to human civilization. Their role is similar to that of Devil in religion. Worldwide, civilization seems in many respects to be yielding to barbarism, generating the image of an unprecedented phenomenon, a global Dark Age, possibly descending on humanity. The rise of transnational corporations producing economic goods is increasingly matched by the rise of transnational criminal Mafia, drug cartels, and terrorist gangs, violently assaulting civilizations. Law and order the first prerequisite of Civilization appears to be evaporating in many civilizations.

(9) Barbarian Threat to Civilizations:

Neo-Conservatism argues that barbarian terrorists should not expect Civilization’s to give them freedom to destroy Civilization itself. Fundamentalist militant religious sects have no right to the fundamental rights available to the law-abiding citizens of the Civilizations. Wahhabi militant terrorism represents the barbarian threat to civilization in the new century. Wahhabi terrorists want to do to the American civilization, what their forefathers did to the great Egyptian civilization after 640 AD.

Throughout history, the constant battle has been going on between barbarians and civilizations. Mighty Civilizations trample the lands of the barbarians, and expel them and take over their lands and resources. Barbarians attack civilizations and if they succeed they massacre the males in the civilization and take over the lands and resources of the civilizations. Civilizations absorb the barbarian military technology, improvise upon it, and use it to conquer the lands of the barbarians. In the greater clash, the global real clash, between Civilization and barbarism, the world’s great civilizations with their accomplishments will hang together or hang separately. Civilization’s allies should nip the evil of barbarians in the bud. The clash of the world outlook of civilizations and barbarians is the driving force of history. Civilizations should not allow the transfer of military technology to barbarians. The depopulation of barbarian civilizations to protect the civilized civilizations is moral, militarily expedient, and permissible under civilized Laws of Wars.

The sheer chaos paradigm of world affairs may become a reality. The global breakdown of law and order, rule by armed gangsters, failed states and increasing anarchy in many parts of the world. A global crime wave led by transnational Mafia and drug cartels, religious and Civilization’s violence, and rule by gun may prevail in much of the world.

(10) DESPOTIC RELIGIOUS ISMS:

Neo-Conservatism argues that the central moral struggle of the 21st century will be despotic religious isms. The despotic political isms of the 20th century, namely, Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Nazism, Maoism and Marxism were defeated by the forces of democracy and freedom. Evil despotic political isms are now resurrected, legitimized by anti-women ultra-conservative militant religious fundamentalism. When Mein Kamph and Communist Manifesto failed to subjugate men and women of the world, armed with Bible the Catholic religious right conservatives and armed with Koran Wahhabi fundamentalism threatens New Dark Age to descend of the world. Catholic Religious Right Ultra-Conservatism and Sunni Wahhabi militant fundamentalism are the two principal menaces facing the making in the 21st Century.

MILITANT RELIGIOUS ISMS: Totalitarianism and despotism staging a comeback through the backdoor of anti-women militant fundamentalist religious isms. The preeminent moral challenge facing the political leaders of the 21st century is to guarantee religious freedom and to reform religious organizations to purge them of such evil infrastructure that caused the demise of ancient Civilizations of Rome, Egypt, Inca, and Maya, etc. The fundamentalist religions, has been petrified into a slavery of thought and sentiment, as intolerant superiority of on the part of the few and an intolerable burden on the part of the many.

(11) NEOCONSERVATISM IS THE REIGNING IDEOLOGY OF THE 21ST CENTURY:

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 77, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(30) 2(17) Republican Dixiecrats

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 77, Chapter 2. 2(17)

(30) (1) 1964 Civil Rights Acts & Deep South

Neo-Conservatism seeks to bring back such Blacks into the Republican Party of the Lincoln as had gone over the Democratic Party after Democrats signed the 1964 Bill of Rights. President Lyndon Johnson predicted on the evening he signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.” Over the years, the race issue has helped Republicans more than it has hurt them. It was the democrats who paid the price for 1964 Civil Rights Act, signed into law by the Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson, the law that banned discrimination in public accommodations and employment, allowing the federal government to stop aid to programs that discriminated and giving Washington the power to sue to desegregate schools. South states had been central to the Republican Party’s success. But he fact that racial appeals have played very significant role in the success of the modern Republican Party is not under debate. It is irrefutable. As of today, the role racial appeals play in the success of the Republican Party, remains unacknowledged by the Republican Party as a whole. Ever since the Republican Party in the Southern States was reborn by hostility to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Republican national party has increasingly depended on Southern segregationist votes while insisting to Northern moderate Republicans that Republican Party is still the party of Abraham Lincoln, which led the Civil War to end the slavery in the South. These balancing efforts usually work. But occasionally they blow up in the Republican Party’s face, as happened in the aftermath of senator Trent Lott’s comment at Senator Strom Thurmond’s birthday.

The Republican Party made a choice in the 1960’s to “go hunting where the ducks are” – code language for winning over white segregationists who abandoned the Democratic Party in the South. Republican Party continues to benefit from racial prejudice through subtle and not-so-subtle sound bytes that play to the Republican Party’s Protestant far-right base. Republican Party in 2002 is as much the party of Thurmond as it is the party of Lincoln. Strom Thurmond’s Dixiecrat campaign for the presidency in 1948 ran on a segregationist platform. Even as the two Republican leaders with the clearest ties to the segregationist South, Senator Strom Thurmond and Senator Jesse Helms, retire from the senate, but the history of Republican racial appeals won’t go away even if the republicans replace Mr. Lott. The Dixiecrat movement was spurred by President Harry S. Truman administration’s (April 1945-Jan 1953) desegregation of the armed forces and the Democratic convention’s adoption of a strong civil rights plank after Minneapolis Mayor roused the Democratic Party Convention 1948 by saying, “The time has arrived for the Democratic Party to get out of the shadow of states’ rights and walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights.” When Democratic Party rejected the ‘states’ rights’ the euphemism for segregation, then Republican Party in the southern states jumped to grab the floating segregationist Southern democrats under the bandwagon of Dixiecrats. After the Civil War the blacks supported the Republican Party, the Lincoln’s Party. After the 1964 Civil Rights Act, signed by Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson, the blacks joined the Democratic Party en masse and the pro-segregation and anti-desegregation southern whites joined the Republican Party, using the euphemism of Dixiecrats and states’ rights.

(2) Ronald Reagan a Dixiecrat in the Closet

Neo-Conservatism woos and courts Reagan democrats to join Republican Party. In 1980 Ronald Reagan campaign made an unmistakable effort to identify with the people, language and symbols of the South’s segregationist past. The most infamous of these efforts was Ronald Reagan’s advocacy of “states’ rights- the Dixiecrat code word for segregation, at the Neshoba County Fair in Philadelphia, Miss., where in 1964 the murder of three civil rights workers made international headlines. Reagan campaign wanted to fire up the Protestant far-right base of the Republican Party by choosing the right words. Ronald Reagan opened his presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., and purposely used the code words “states rights” euphemism for segregationist policies to appeal to whites. To repair the damage, Ronald Reagan traveled to Detroit in October 1980, and sought to reassure suburban moderate white Republicans that he was not a racist, by obtaining the endorsement of two black civil rights leaders, the Rev. Ralph David Abernathy and the rev. Hosea Williams. Ronald Reagan did it not to seek black votes, but to soothe whites that generally support republicans but do not think of themselves as supporting racism. Ronald Reagan agreed that the use of the term, ‘states’ rights’ created some unpleasant images in some people’s minds. The Bush administration has essentially closed access to President Ronald Reagan’s presidential papers for historical research, making it much harder to examine how race remained a secret part of the American conservative discourse.

(3) Bob Jones University in 2008 Primaries

Neo-Conservatism commended the role Bob Jones University played in safeguarding the WASP leadership of the Protestant United States. George W. Bush himself was embarrassed in the 2000 primaries after courting southerners at Bob Jones University. Governor Bush himself, after losing the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary in 2000 to Senator John McCain of Arizona, reached out to pro-Protestantism anti-Catholic Bob Jones University. When opposition pointed out that Bob Jones University banned interracial dating and that its founder Bob Jones had made many anti-Catholic statements, he disowned his support to Bob Jones University, as he had been trying to cast himself as new kind of conservative Republican. To repair the damage governor Bush wrote a letter to Catholic Cardinal O’Connor, and declared that his younger brother governor Jeb Bush and his wife are practicing Catholic and that his family had very close relationship with Cardinal O’Connor. In the end, Governor George w. Bush won the South Carolina Republican presidential primary, the home state of Dixiecrat Senator Strom Thurmond, though the Catholic issue cost Bush Michigan presidential primary.

President George W. Bush supported the segregationist cause when by executive decision he exempted the religious groups that receive the federal aid for disaster relief from following anti-discrimination rules as regards hiring of the personnel, the crucial point of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. President George W. Bush on 12th December 2002 repudiated Senator Trent Lott as an apostate to the ‘Founding Ideals’ of the Republican Party, while granting the segregationist religious institutions to continue segregation hiring practices while receiving federal aid for disaster relief programs. President Bush beautifully handled the juggling act the Republican Party has maintained on race issue for nearly four decades after 1964.

Certainly in the Deep South race has been the driving issue for the Republicans. The Southern Republican campaigns of the 60’s and early 70’s turned heavily on race. In the 1964 presidential campaign of Barry M. Goldwater based on opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, won him five Deep South states, and some House of Representatives congressmen were elected on his coattails. Race was a major factor in Bill Brock’s successful Senate challenge in 1970 against Senator Albert Gore Sr. in Tennessee. Senator Jesse Helm’s campaigns in North Carolina always had a racial component. For some southern Republicans, race may still be the center of their allegiance. Turnout is the one area where democrats argue that Republicans are still playing the race card. In 1991, the emergence of former Ku Klux Klan leader, David Duke as Republican candidate for governor in Louisiana embarrassed the Republican Party. It is wrong to say that the Senator Trent Lott’s pro-segregationist comment is an apostate of the founding ideals of the Republican Party. The equality of whites and blacks had never been part of the founding ideals of the Republican Party. The Constitution of the United States of 1787 did not advocate the concept of equality of whites and blacks and emphatically advocated the racially segregated society, where the freedom enshrined in the Constitution, meant freedom only for the property owning white Christians.

(4) Lott Praises Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond

Neo-Conservatism rejects the extremism of Senator Strom Thurmond and Barry Goldwater. Neo-Conservatism courts WASPs and argues that Protestants should abandon traditional Conservatism, as it has become an ideological liability for WASPs if they want to lead the United States. At a 100th birthday party for Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina Senator Trent Lott said: “I want to say this about my state (South Carolina): When Strom Thurmond ran for the president (as Dixiecrat in 1948) we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years, either.” Senator Trent Lott had been a Dixiecrat and camouflaged segregationist all his political life. In 1980, after a speech by Republican Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina at a Mississippi campaign rally for Ronald Reagan, Trent Lott said, “You know, if we had elected this man 30 years ago, we wouldn’t be in the mess we are today.”

As president of the intra-fraternity council at the University of Mississippi in the early 1960’s, Trent Lott helped lead the opposition to integration of his fraternity, Sigma Nu, and succeeded in keeping the national fraternity Sigma Nu all white. Trent Lott was the leader of his chapter and a very strong voice in the Sigma Nu national fraternity. Trent Lott certainly took a major role in leading the opposition to integration of Sigma Nu. Senator Trent Lott’s voting record includes in 2001: (a) the only negative vote on the nomination of Judge roger Gregory as the first black judge ever seated on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and (b) votes against the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. holiday in 1983, and (c) extension of the Voting Rights act in 1982. When Trent Lott praised Jefferson Davis, he spoke of Davis’s commitment to conservative principles and smaller government and indirectly supported his views on race. Talking positively about Jefferson David’s political philosophy is also ipso facto evidence of racism. Lot of people want to think that being pro-Southern and being pro-confederate is synonymous with being a racist. Trent Lott began in politics as an aide to representative William Colmer; one of Mississippi’s staunchest segregationists and his life has been deeply affected by Mississippi’s transition from a segregated society to an integrated one.

If you take race out of the Dixiecrats, there’s nothing there. Trent Lott’s remark honestly reflects the broader amnesia about race and apartheid and racial discrimination in the way that many Americans and not just Southerners, would like to view the America’s racial past through a soft gauzy lens. It is the willful re-creation of the America’s past history in which one doesn’t want to confront the racial implications of it. 

Republican Party is the party of the WASPs and likely to remain whites-only party for years to come. Democratic party allowed many prominent blacks to rise politically, but never nominated any Black candidate as Vice Presidential running mate of the Democratic presidential ticket. Democratic Party crossed the Rubicon when Democratic presidential nominee Albert Al Gore nominated Orthodox Jew Joseph Lieberman as the vice presidential running mate. Jews find blacks as hindrance in Jewish domination of the Democratic Party. The Jewish lobby controls campaign donations and Jews likely to push black leadership out of the tope echelon of the Democratic Party during first decade of the 21st century. Those who control the conduits of campaign donations control the fortunes of the Democratic Party as well as the fortunes of the Republican Party. Blacks enjoy significant leverage neither in the Democratic Party, nor in the Republican Party in the first decade of the 21st century. Trent Lott’s segregationist policies would strengthen Republican Party’s political base among white Protestant religious right, without alienating the black Republican supporters. During Clinton Administration the blacks had been shut out of the top leadership positions in the Democratic Party and blacks would respond to the president Bush’s courting of black votes as they have no choice but to shift some of their political support to the Republican Party. President Kennedy, President Carter and President Clinton continued to belong to the Christian Religious Right conspiracy without hurting their base among moderates and blacks. President Bush can successfully undertake similar juggling act, if Catholic and Protestant religious right becomes pacified with the Trent Lott’s pro-Dixiecrats statement, and soothes those who felt alienated by President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. Unlike former President Clinton, President Bush does not belong to Christian Religious Right conservative conspiracy, but Trent Lott’s pro-Dixiecrats statement would ensure that religious right continues to rally behind Republican Party. Trent Lott’s pro-segregation statement would help more than harm the electoral base of the Republican Party during presidential Election 2004.

(5) Legacy of Blaine Amendment

Named after James g. Blaine, speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and presidential hopeful in the post-civil war Era, the original Blaine amendment was aimed at altering the U.S. constitution to prohibit aid to religion. Blaine failed on the federal level, won a series of victories in the states, as 36 states, New York among them, either amended their constitutions or sought entry to the union with Blaine prohibitions in their constitutions. House Speaker James G. Blaine wasn’t trying to save students from the corrosive impact of religion in American schools, as he was trying to keep public schools safe for Protestantism, as a wave of nativist, anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic sentiment swept the United States after the Civil War. Speaker James g. Blaine drew strength from the “American Know-Nothing Movement” which promoted the reading of the Bible in the nascent United States public schools (King James version, of course) and favored laws barring Catholics from holding public office and restricting the right of votes of Catholics. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and People for the American Way, and Americans United for the separation of Church and State, have elevated the fruits of Blaine Amendment to constitutional principle, to argue in the Florida state court that it strike down the US Supreme Court’s Cleveland ruling on School voucher system, based on a reading of the Florida’s own constitution, not on a reading of the US federal Constitution.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 80, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(31) 2(18) Neo Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 80, Chapter 2. 2(18).

(31) (1) Compassionate Conservatism, Paleo Conservatism, Traditional Conservatism

The Senator Trent Lott’s pro-segregation fiasco had a clarifying effect on contemporary American conservatism. The four main streams of American conservatism are: (a) Paleo Conservatism, (b) Traditional Conservatism, (c) Neo Conservatism, (d) Compassionate Conservatism, (e) Christian Religious Right Conservatism.

(2) PALEO-CONSERVATISM:

The first strain of Republican conservatives Paleo-Conservatives is the lean, mean circa-1964 Goldwaterites. The Paleo-Conservatives continue to support Senator Trent Lott even after the pro-segregation fiasco. Pat Buchanan represents the Paleo-Conservatism. Defending Trent Lott, Pat Buchanan said, “One of the ugliest mob lynching I’ve seen in my life in Washington.”

(3) WASP TRADITIONAL CONSERVATISM:

The second strain of republican conservatives, the Traditional Conservatives, mainly concern with low taxes, less government and general social quiescence. The traditional conservatives opposed the pro-segregation statement of Trent Lott for reasons of good government and party politics. The ‘National Review’ the mouthpiece of traditional conservatism, in recent editorial declared, “We have long considered Lott a clumsy and ineffective Republican leader, and his remarks are a spectacular confirmation of that judgment.” Therefore traditional conservatives demanded the ouster of Senator Trent Lott as the leader of the Republican Senators, as it was an opportunity to get rid of Trent Lott who should have been deposed for many other reasons long ago. The traditional conservatives are more concerned with the Republican Party’s positioning.

The moderate traditional conservatives correctly view decency on race as a proxy for political decency in general. The Trent Lott issue revived the charge of in-built Republican racism, and it damaged black support to the Republican Party, and he stood in the way of consolidating a Republican majority in the presidential Elections 2004, as al Gore had secured 500,000 more than Bush during elections 2000. Trent Lott had to go, not as a matter of politics but as a matter of principle.

(4) NEO-CONSERVATISM:

The third strain of Republican conservatives is the Neo-Conservatism, are guided by the principle of color-blindness, the bedrock idea enshrined in the 1964 civil rights Act. Neocons, the Neo-Conservatives have been most passionate about the Trent Lott’s pro-segregation comment. Neocons are former liberals. Neocons supported civil rights when it meant equality between the races, and they turned against the civil rights establishments when it began insisting that some races should be more equal than others. Neocons opposed the unfair advantages that Blacks seemingly got versus whites in government contracts due to affirmative action. Neo-conservatives oppose affirmative action in defense of the original version of Civil Rights Movement: judging people by the content of their character and competence and not by the color of their skin. Thurmond’s segregationist is the anti-thesis of the Neo-Conservatism. Neo-Conservatives were appalled by the Trent Lott’s statement in support of Thurmond’s segregationist agenda. Not to denounce Thurmond’s segregationist agenda, on grounds of principle, would be to lose all moral standing on matters of race. Trent Lott has no use, let alone no feel for color blindness has any business of being a leader of the Republican party of the conservatives.

(5) COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM:

The fourth strain of Republican conservatism is the Compassionate Conservative Agenda of President Bush, which blurs the line between the social attitudes supported by the traditional conservative Republican base and those that appeal to moderate voters. The Compassionate Conservative Agenda meets the need of the minority groups but in ways that conservatives assert will be more effective than the longstanding remedies prescribed by liberals. Mr. Bush won only about 8 percent of the black vote in 2000 race, down from the 12 percent for Bob Dole in 1996. Mr. Bush won 31 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2000, compared with Mr. Dole’s 21 percent.

(6) CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS RIGHT CONSERVATISM:

Fifth strain of Republican Conservatism is Christian Religious Right Conservatism. Catholic/Evangelical Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy seeks to promote the political and social interests of Papacy in United States, to break the wall that separates the State and the Church. The Catholic Church and Protestant Southern Baptist Church has joined forces to promote the anti-women agenda of Pope John Paul II. The presidential election 2000 represented the direct election between the anti-women agenda of Pope and the pro-women agenda of American women. Financed by Vatican and supported by President carter and President Clinton the pro-Vatican Conservatives expelled moderates from the leadership of Southern Baptist Convention and imposed anti-women agenda of Pope on the leading Protestant denominational Church and demanded that women should serve men as servant. The Catholic/Evangelical Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy imposed its agenda on US foreign policy during Carter administration, Reagan administration and Clinton administration. Secretary Henry J. Kissinger, Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretary Madeleine Albright had been leading votaries of the Christian Religious Right Conservatism. President Carter became President by successfully wooing pro-segregation white conservatives by promoting religious proselytizing interests of the Vatican and Evangelicals. President Nixon was not the member of the Christian Religious Right Conspiracy, but Dr. Henry Kissinger was. President Carter and President Clinton wooed white segregationist votes by promoting proselytizing interests of Christian religious Right, thereby winning back those white segregationist votes that were lost due to 1964 Civil Rights Act. Catholic Religious Right Conservatism does not support America’s war on Islamic terrorism, as they consider Wahhabi Muslim Fundamentalists comrade-in-arms of Catholic/Evangelical conservatives for proselytizing of pagan Asians and pagan Africans. Neither President George W. Bush nor his father former President George H. W. Bush belong to the Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy.

(7) WASP CONSERVATISM:

The sixth strain of Republican conservatism is Non-Denominational Protestant WASP Religious Right Conservatism. The Non-denominational Protestant Christians number more than 200 million in United States. The Bob Jones University represents the interests of Protestant Religious Right Conservatism, which is organized around the central principle of safeguarding the Protestant character of the United States and to limit the power and influence of the Pope and Roman Catholicism in United States.

President Bush making serious efforts to win over Black and Hispanic voters and attract more white suburban moderates, who are crucial to Mr. Bush’s re-election in 2004. If the republican ticket were to take the same percentages of the Hispanic, black and white vote in 2004 as it did in 2000, it would lose the popular vote by three million ballots and the lose the Electoral College. In 2000, Mr. Bush received 544,000 fewer votes than Al Gore but won the Electoral College. Simple arithmetic showed that the Republican party could not afford to falter in its efforts to win a bigger share of the minority voter, especially among Hispanics, whose numbers are growing far faster than the electorate as a whole.

President Bush talked very effectively about issues tat motivated nontraditional Republican voters, black and Hispanic, to take a first look at the GOP. President Bush is secure in making certain that he is the president of all Americans and making sure that all Americans have a seat at the table. President Bush sincerely believes in the need for racial reconciliation. Since his first race for governor of Texas in 1994, Mr. Bush has sought to reach out to minority voters. Since winning the White House, President Bush has been more aggressive in reaching out to minorities than any previous Republican president, driven by political imperatives. Senator Trent Lott’s approving statements about Strom Thurmond’s run for presidency in 1948 on a segregationist platform have already set back President Bush’s efforts to bring more minority voters to the Republican party without alienating its overwhelmingly white and largely conservative base. The fall out from the Trent Lott’s fiasco could have profound impact on the Republican Party’s efforts to build a broader coalition for years to come. Trent Lott’s pro-segregationist statement could be a plot of the Christian religious right conspiracy to weaken President Bush’s chances in the 2004 elections.

President Bush must strongly condemn segregationists to assure moderate white voters, especially suburban women for whom racial tolerance is an important part of Republican Party identity, that republicans would no longer tolerate racism likes of Strom Thurmond and Trent Lott. The biggest Achilles’ heel of the Trent Lott episode is the damage it could do to Republican suburban women, the soccer mom moderate Republicans and independent women.

Recent Republican presidents have had consistent political trouble navigating racial issues and they had taken steps under the pressure of campaigns that were thinly veiled efforts to play the race card with conservative white voters. Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., and invoked ‘states rights,’ a code world for segregation. Former President George H.W. Bush (1989-1993) in his presidential race against Gov. Michael S. Dukakis of Massachusetts in 1988 had invoked Willie Horton, a black man who raped a woman on a weekend furlough from a murder sentence, to appeal to white voters. President Bush in 2000 had appeared in South Carolina at Bob Jones University. The Trent Lott’s pro-segregation statement was a ploy of the catholic religious right conservative conspiracy to knock out certain paleo-conservative support to President Bush because of his declared war on Islamic terrorism. Paleo-Conservatives do not fully support President Bush in his war on Islamic terrorism. Just as anti-Abortion forces mauled Bob Dole in his presidential 1998 presidential run, the pro-segregationist white conservatives may do the same to President Bush guided by Catholic religious right conservatives.

(8) NEOCONSERVATISM IS THE REIGNING IDEOLOGY OF THE 21ST CENTURY:

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 81, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(32) 2(19) USA Needs Third Party

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 81, Chapter 2. 2(19)

(32) (1) End of Political Duopoly

First. Neo-Conservatism advocates that a Third Party should promote Neo-Conservatism and Neo-Conservative candidates in the Democratic Party as well as Republican Party. Neo-Conservatism argues that United States needs a viable Third Party to articulate special electoral market niche to create a captive vote bank to promote Neo-Conservative Agenda in the Republican Party. Without the effective nationwide major third party in USA, critics argue that United States is a political duopoly of two major parties that conspire to deny the rise of the Third party, because of their control over the 4000+ county canvassing boards, who arbitrarily conduct elections at the Federal. State and County levels.

Second, there is a distinct need for the Third Party in USA. The Third party should be pro-Women, Pro-immigrants, pro-minorities, and pro-Protestants, albeit the party of WIMPS.

Third, the Third party should project the aspirations of the non-denominational Protestant Christians who represent more than 200 million Christians in the United States, far more than the Catholics and Evangelical main denominational Protestants.

What is the prospect of emergence of a new major Third Party in United States? Can the Third Party Presidential candidate get elected in USA? Can American two party system becomes three party system? The purpose of the Third Force in American politics is to mobilize masses to demand the reforms of American Election Process. The arbitrary control of 4000+ County Canvassing Boards over the local, state and Federal election process at the County level undermines American democracy. The party officials of Democratic and Republican parties control the Canvassing Boards at the County level, and they manipulate the entire election process to maintain the hegemony of the Democrats and Republicans over the levers of political power. American elections are more like major League football games, which are primarily entertainment enterprises. The Country Canvassing Boards do not allow the nominees of the Third Party to get on the ballot nationwide, because of arcane state level election rules. It explains why most incumbent Senators and Congressmen get reelected term after term? Only those third party candidates have any chance of winning Senate, and Congressional and Gubernatorial elections are those who can spend millions to buy the favor of County Canvassing Boards. The success of the third party is very important for the very survival of the American democracy.

The phenomenal response of the people to the presidential candidature of billionaire Ross Perot in 1992 proves the point that American people want to participate in the election process, but are denied entry in the election canvassing process, as salaried consultants dominate the entire election process. American election process has made a mockery of the American democracy, as the American elections have become just the media buying with no involvement of the common man and woman. Like the gladiatorial arena of the Rome, American people are glued to the political debate on the TV, while the grass root political moneymen and women who organize the entertainment show of political debates have hijacked canvassing and political promotion process.

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg got elected as the Mayor of New York simply by buying the support of political elite of various pressure groups and media slots. In the absence of the viable grass root Third Party the electoral democratic process in the United States would became just media hentertainment for the masses. Aristocratic nature of the United States Senate makes it no different than the Senate of the Roman Empire. The Constitution of the United States, being pre-French Revolution Constitution did not create a democracy of the masses, it just talked about democracy and freedom, it created the Senate and Congress selected buy the elite and property-owning class. The rising cost of the elections and the cumbersome nomination process allows County Canvassing Boards to manipulate the entire election process to hinder the proper articulation of the will of the American people.

There is no correct or right interpretation of history. There are no right answers but only differing opinions, about which historical interpretations are correct. Every reader must make the decision based on his or her own social and political values.

The author’s goal is to provide a variety of ways of viewing history. Readers might find some of these interpretations personally offensive, but it is good because it will result in critical thinking about history, religion culture and Constitution. Kalki Zeus's framework of interpreting world history includes, along with cultural domination, ideological management, racism, overpopulation, and economic issues. However, the final decision about the meaning of national history and world history belongs to the reader.

(2) No Hidden Agenda of Neoconservative Third Party

Neo-Conservatism argues that a Third Party that focused on Women, Immigrants, Minorities and Protestants would complement Republican Neo-Conservatism. Populist Party is the third party and seeks to become the political voice of WIMPs and WASPs. Populist Media is partisan media and fully committed to promote the interests of WIMPs - Women, Immigrants, Mestizos (Brown Hispanic Catholics), & Protestants. Populist Party also promotes the interests of WASPs- Women, Anglo (English), Saxon (French Quebec), and Protestants. During elections, media can’t afford to be impartial politically. People expect the media leaders to help them elect better leaders. Media during elections cannot stand on the fence during elections. Political journalism must take clear-cut policy stand to help politicians formulate the agenda of their Administration.

Populist Party seeks to reinforce the WASPs dominance of the United States. Populist Party wants to make visible impact on the electorate during Election 2000. Populist Media is not the paid mouthpieces of some hidden hand of underground political movement. Populist Party represents the mainstream politics in the United States and desire that Protestant Christianity should overtake and overwhelm Roman Catholicism in Latin America and South America during the next Protestant president of the United States.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party seeks to help eclectic Protestants and fundamentalist Protestant leaders influence the future President of the United States to truly represent the political aspirations of the White Anglo Saxon Protestants and brown Mestizo Hispanics in the New World. Populist Party seeks to represent the interest of the Protestant Christianity. It is very strange, though Protestants represents more than 60 percent of the population in the United States, yet Protestant Christianity faces danger of becoming politically irrelevant in the USA, due to success of pro-Vatican, pro-Life, anti-Women, anti-Abortion political activists.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party does not have any hidden agenda, as its agenda is for all to know and hear. Populist Party is unashamedly pro-Choice, pro-Abortion, pro-Women, pro-Democratic Party, pro-Hillary Clinton, pro-Al Gore and pro-Lieberman. We represent the electoral interests of moderate Protestants, Mestizo Catholics, Brown/Black Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Native Americans, and Pagans.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party wants to maintain the Protestant character of the WASPs United States and defend it against Papal conspiracies to make transform it into Catholic-led Catholic-majority American Holy Roman Empire.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party advocates the restoration of Savoy Monarchy in Italy, and the restoration of Papacy to 1870-1928 statuses in Italy.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party advocates that United States should become fundamentalist pro-Protestant nation and use its economic and social resources to proselytize Protestant Christianity in South America, to transform Hispanic America into Protestant-majority, Protestant-ruled, English- speaking continent before 2020 AD.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party promotes the idea of Islamic Turkey, Buddhist China, Buddhist Japan, Hindu India, Protestant United States, Protestant Mexico, Protestant Brazil, Protestant Venezuela, Protestant Colombia, Protestant Peru, and Protestant Argentina.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party supports Christian proselytizing movements to bring about the rise of Christian Indonesia, Christian Malaysia, Christian Egypt, Christian Sudan, Christian Lebanon, Christian Syria, Christian Iraq, Christian Libya, Christian Tunisia, and Christian Nigeria. North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia was all Christian and Hindu before it was forced to become Muslim by force of swords. It is likely that Catholics will realize their dreams of regaining North Africa back to the fold of Christianity, as they declared in the 1999 Synod of Asia in New Delhi. Spain and Portugal became Christian nations, after 800 years of Muslim Moorish occupation. Similar resurrection of Christianity is possible in North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party seeks the alliance of Hindu India and Buddhist China join forces with Roman Catholicism to make North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia Christian again.

Neo-Conservative Populist Party supports President Bush because he signals that as president he discontinued the foreign policy of Bill Clinton.

(3) Pro-Right Era in World Politics

One. Neo-Conservatism wants to support political forces that are morally right and morally good to foil the designs of the advocates of Apocalypse and Armageddon. Pro-Right Wing Political Era has begun in world History. The year 2000 is turning point in history, the beginning of the New Millennium, the Holy Jubilee Year, which has great significance for the Catholic Apocalyptic Eschatology as told in the ‘Fatima Prophecy’ and ‘Protocols of the Meetings of the Elder of Zion.’ Roman Catholic Church declared its ecclesiastical goals for the 21st Century in the 1999 Synod of Asia held in Delhi. Pro-Right Protestants fear that Protestants might lose their predominance in the WASPs United States in the elections 2000.

Two. The unprecedented reaction against the tiny Freedom Party and non-entity Jorg Haider of tiny Austria exposed the Achilles Heel of the pro-Left Catholic, Evangelical religious conservatism and Communism. Catholics might take over the leadership of the WASPs United States replacing the dominance of the Protestants, in the Elections 2004. Otherwise, pro-Monarchy, anti-Papacy, anti-Communist, anti-European Union, pro-Right, pro-Jorg Haider political groups would defeat pro-Life, anti-Women, anti-Abortion, anti-Pagan, anti-Orthodoxy coalition in Italy, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, and form stable Monarchy and stable prime ministerial government in Italy. The very threat of pro-Left Papal domination of the United States gives birth to pro-Protestant, pro-Right, pro-Fascist political movements in Europe, Asia, and Americas.

Three. The 21st Century shall be the Century of Asia. Oriental world would dominate the world civilization throughout the Third Christian Millennium. China will become Buddhist. History is on the side of pro-Right and anti-Communist political forces worldwide. The fall of Berlin Wall, the fall of Communism in Poland, Eastern Bloc and Soviet Union, the disintegration of Soviet Union and rise of pro-Right Orthodox Russia, signals the rise of the pro-Right and anti-Left forces worldwide.

Four. People worldwide have realized that Marxism and Communism is the religion of Devil, which demands human sacrifices in millions. Stalin, L.P. Beria, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot sacrificed 102 million pious religious people to worship Communist Devil by human blood.

Five. The deaths of 30 million Russian Orthodox Christians caused by L.P. Beria led secret services, and deaths of 60 million Buddhists caused by Christian Mao Zedong, and deaths of 2 million Buddhists by Christian Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge exposes the ugly face of Communist Religion of Devil. Devilish Communists destroyed the civilization of Orthodox Russia, Buddhist China, Buddhist Laos, Buddhist Cambodia, and Christian Ethiopia. United Nations should convene War Crime Tribunal to investigate Communist Crimes against Humanity worldwide especially Crimes against Eastern Orthodoxy in Russia and Crimes against Buddhists in China, Korea, Burma, Tibet, Cambodia and Laos during 20th Century.

Six. The revolutionary divine swing towards the Right pole of the political fulcrum is now accepted as worldwide phenomenon. Pro-Right political forces would determine world history in the Third Christian Millennium. The world is fast becoming pro-Right. Germany’s far-right ‘National Democratic Party’ becoming popular among youths in former Communist East Germany, who embracing neo-nazi attitudes. The National Democratic Party is one of the three notable far-right parties in Germany and espouses anti-immigrant and strongly nationalistic agenda. The pro-Right Hindu government of Atal Behari Vajpayee rules India, representing one-sixth of the world population. The pro-Right Falun Gong Buddhist Law led by Li Hongzhi has 100+ million followers in China, more than the pro-Communism Chinese. China would become Buddhist nation led by President Dalai Lama and Prime Minister Li Honghzi before 2012 AD. Buddhist revolutionaries would overthrow Communist regime in China. Pro-Right Buddhist-led Democratic Progressive Party led by Buddhist Chen Shui-bian has become the president of Taiwan, ending the 50-year rule by Kuomintang Party. Kuomintang Party now led by non-Sinic, Buddhist native Taiwanese. The party of pro-Hindu Sukarnoputri, daughter of legendary Sukarno and Hindu mother from Bali, won the largest number seats in Indonesian parliament and currently serves as the Prime Minister and de facto Ruler. Pro-Mestizo Vincente Fox became the first non-PRI President of Mexico since 1929, ending the political monopoly of Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). The gubernatorial candidate Pablo Salazar, of Opposition Alliance for Chiapas, representing Sebastian Guillen Vincente-led Zapatistas shows the growing power of Mayas and Aztecs in Mexico.

Seven. The strong electoral performance of Mestizo-Inca leader Alejandro Toledo shows that 30-million Mestizo-Incas would recreate ancient Inca civilization in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. The electoral victory of President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela has reasserted the political power of Mestizos in Latin America. The Mestizos might succeed in overthrowing the pro-paramilitary white squad, white minority government in Colombia. It is likely that in near future, Brown Mestizos of mixed Indian and European ancestry would rule Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia.

Eight. The election of opposition leader Kim Dae Jung as president of South Korea changes the old political equations. The reelection of the President Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe/Rhodesia on the election platform for confiscation of farmlands of pro-Apartheid white farmers is a turning point in history. Blacks in Angola, Namibia, Botswana, and South Africa would follow the lead of Robert Mugabe and demand the confiscation of white-owned agricultural lands, precious stones, diamond and gold mines and oil fields. Eventually African would control and own the oil, diamond, gold, timber, lands in sub Sahara Africa.

Nine. Emerging Organization of Diamond Exporting Countries (ODEC) would confiscate the De Beers owned diamond mines. ODEC diamond cartel like OPEC oil cartel would empower black African nations to control the diamond mining industry, wholesale trade in rough diamonds, polishing industry to polish rough diamonds, and world wide retail diamond jewelry trade, with the help of India and Russia. Robert Mugabe is now more respected than Nelson Mandela. Robert Mugabe is now the most respected black leader in the world.

Ten. The electoral victory of Jorg Haider’s Freedom Party in Austria and its subsequent entry into Austria’s ruling coalition government has changed the political coalition game in European Union. Hungary might rejoin Austria to recreate Austro-Hungarian Union. It is very likely that pro-Right, pro-Monarchy, anti-Communist; pro-Jorg Haider government might form the government in Italy after the new elections. Ethnic overseas Chinese would become the President of Indonesia, President of Philippines and Prime Minister of Malaysia. Super Power Buddhist China would take over Australia and New Zealand, to the great dismay of their strategic ally United States, because china has stolen every known nuclear technology secrets from Los Alamos Labs.

Eleven. State Department in Bush Administration has outgrown the tutelage of Bill Clinton, by jettisoning the foreign policy of Bill Clinton and Secretary Madeline Albright.

Twelve. President Bush should reinvent America’s foreign policy, by adopting pro-India, pro-Zimbabwe, pro-Mestizo, pro-Right foreign policy. President Bush should demand the end of pro-Communist China, pro-white Colombia, and pro-De Beers’s foreign policy of the United States. First Bush Administration should support Sukarnoputri to be new President of Indonesia, Alejandro Toledo to be new President of Peru and help elect brown Mestizo to be next president of Colombia. United States should lend its weight to install Buddhist government in China, headed by Li Honghzi and Dalai Lama.

(4) Support Andean Mestizo leadership

Colored Catholic Hispanics would vote for Bush in 2004, if Bush Administration gives full support to promote Mestizo Presidents of Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Colombia. Mestizos of mixed Indian and European ancestry represent more than 90 percent of the population in the Andes. Brown Hispanic and brown Latino Catholics, predominant voting group in southern States bordering Mexico, would vote for Democratic ticket, if the ticket condemns Colombian paramilitary white death squads, and support brown Mestizo Presidential candidates in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, El Salvador and Nicaragua.

The foreign policy of George Bush is favors pro-Right flow of world history. By riding on pro-Right pro-Protestant foreign policy, President Bush won his rightful place in the Oval Office. Democratic presidential nominee will lose the Elections 2004, if he continued to follow the pro-Left foreign policy of Bill Clinton, because voter would associate him as continuation of Bill Clinton. Foreign policy issues matter more than domestic issues for the brown and black Hispanic Catholic voters from south, and pro-Mestizo foreign policy would make them total supporter of the Democratic Party.

(5) Neoconservative Political Parties

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 85, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(33) 2(20) NeoConservative Third Party Is Viable

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 85, Chapter 2. 2(20)

(33) (1) Populist Party for Rights of Women, WIMPs, WASPs

Neo-Conservatism supports the rise of the Third Force in American politics that politically mobilizes the votes of women, immigrants, minorities, blacks, liberal Reformed Christians, Latino Catholics and non-denominational Christians.

Since the election 2000 became the contest between Papacy and pro-Choice women, it is in the interest of the women voters to launch a new Third Party in the United States, the Populist Party for promoting the political interests of the American women.

The primacy of abortion as political issue in American politics failed to made Republican Party, pro-Pope, pro-white males, pro-Left, pro-extreme religious conservatism and pro-Westernized Ashkenazi Bolshevik Jews, pro-Evangelical, anti-Buddhist, anti-Pagan political party.

The Populist Party is pro-Center, pro-Blacks, pro-Choice, pro-Women, pro-China, pro-Affirmative Action, pro-down trodden, anti-Buddhist, anti-Pagan party. The Third Party, the Populist Party shall be pro-Women, pro-Immigrants, pro-Mestizos and pro-Protestants.

The Third party, the Populist Party shall focus on WIMPs, four ethnic groups namely Women, Immigrants, Mestizos and Protestants. Women represent 50 percent of the voting population. Immigrants provide majority of the low-cost party activists and taxi to carry voters to the voting booth to cast vote on the day of the elections. Mestizo Hispanics represent 85 percent of the Hispanic and Latino votes in the United States. Protestants represents more than 60 percent of the population in United States.

(2) Perot’s Rape of “United We Stand” Party

Neo-Conservatism denounces Ross Perot for sabotaging the Third Party wave in the 1992 elections that brought into power President Bill Clinton. During War of Christian Crusades, the Children’s Crusades failed because Catholic Christian Church leaders wanted it to fail. Similarly Ross Perot conspiring to derail the America’s leading Third Party ‘United We Stand’ and ‘Reform Party.’ Ross Perot wants the ‘Reform Party’ to fail, and it explains that he helped Patrick Buchanan to break up the Reform Party. Reform Party phenomenon took off after Ross Perot gave the call for the political movement to raise political consciousness about growing Budget Deficit.

Like the Crusades of the Poor Children millions of Americans responded to the call. Author was one of the first four people who joined the ‘United We Stand’ and opened the first office of movement at their own cost in the Advertising Agency’s office on the 42nd Street near New York University. Then an office opened in the Lexington Avenue and 40th Street on 13th floor. Volunteers brought their own food and manned the phone lines. The entire Army of volunteers emerged out of nowhere determined to undermine the two-party system. Ross Perot dumped the Reform Party by abandoning his presidential campaign immediately after the Democratic convention in 1992. Ross Perot closed his Lexington office and opened another office at 8th Avenue secretly. Ross wanted to take over the Party organization by denying the legitimate party leaders their share of influence. Ross Perot chose the worst possible running mate, chosen by sole criteria that he would not become the presidential candidate in future elections. Ross Perot acted very dishonestly and denied share of political influence to all those who had built the ‘United We Stand’ from the scratch. Ross Perot brought in Patrick Buchanan to hijack and break the party, fearing that he was losing control over it after the gubernatorial election victory of Ventura in Minnesota.

Ross Perot hijacked the political party without paying for it and without compensating for thousands of the volunteers who made it viable Third Force. Ross Perot deliberately distorted and misled the real leaders and hijacked the party and claimed all glory for himself. People like Ross Perot must not be allowed in US political process. Ross Perot as a politician would rank as one of the most morally dishonest political in the history of United States, because he cheated tens of thousands of political activists, who worked without salary and spent their own money to build the political movement known as “United We Stand.’

The goons and political scoundrels hired by Ross Perot took over the political capital and goodwill, when Ross Perot closed the Lexington Avenue political office and secretly opened another office staffed by his hired goons, who cheated political activists of their share of the political organization. Very few of the voting members of the Reform Party are those who were the original founders of the ‘United We Stand’ movement. Perhaps original supporters of the pro-Ross Perot should file class-action suit against Ross Perot to claim $2 billion damages. Ross Perot becoming the threat to American political process, by his machinations to destroy the leading Third Party, the Reform Party. Ross Perot succeeded in the hostile takeover of the ‘United We Stand,’ without reimbursing thousands of political leaders that gave birth to the unique revolution during 1992. Had any of the original founders, other than Ross Perot taken control of the ‘United We Stand,’ and ‘Reform Party’ after the 1992 elections, then Reform Party candidates could have won in 2000 around 10 State Governors, 10 Senate, and 10 Congress seats.

(3) Third Party is Viable

Neo-Conservatism argues that the Third Party can challenge the domination of the two-party system of the Republican and Democratic parties, only when it identifies specific ethnic support base and ideological basis of the Third Party. Neither Republican nor Democratic Party woos and represents Protestant extreme religious right represented by Bob Jones University. The Third Party should fill the extreme right political fulcrum in the United States. The third party should become the mouthpiece of extreme Protestant religious right represented by Bob Jones University, Protestant WASPs, Christian women, and Mestizo Hispanic Catholics. Third Party should promote Protestant Christianity in Mexico, Latin America and South America. Third party should oppose the white paramilitary forces in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Brazil and Bolivia. Third Party should promote the national and political aspirations of brown Mestizos, the people representing 85 percent of the population in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia.

Third Party should oppose the Catholic takeover of the WASPs United States. Third party should promote the political interests of WASPs, Women, Native Americans, Brown Mestizo Hispanic Catholics, Brown Protestants, and new Immigrants. Third Party should declare support for open border policy and allow unlimited foreign immigration to the United States. There should be no quota limit for immigration into the United States, and these immigrants should not become burden on unemployment benefits. Third Party should reject the professional politicians and nominate young persons. Third party should buy Satellite Television Broadcasting Channels and Satellite Radio Channels to create direct broadcast capability to beam political messages nationwide. Third Party should have regular full time cadre and candidates should be selected out of the party workers. By developing direct political ties with pro-right political movements worldwide it would become a global phenomenon.

(4) Foreign Policy of the Third party

The Neo-Conservatism as well as the Third Party rejects the amoral iconoclast patriarchal Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright type realism that implemented the hidden agenda of Christian religious right conservative conspiracy during Ford, Carter and Clinton administrations. Third Party should declare discontinuation of the foreign policy of the Bill Clinton and the Republican foreign policy formulated on Kissinger’s strategic concepts. Third party should have religious proselytizing role to harness the political support of Protestant zealots and Evangelicals. The Third Party should aim to convert 300 million Roman Catholics to Protestant Christianity in not too distant a future. The Third party shall support the restoration of Monarchy in Italy, and the restoration of the Vatican’s status to what existed during 1870-1928. Third party should demand that Roman Catholic Church should be democratized. Lay Catholics should directly elect all Catholic Clergy, including Pope, Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops and Priests for the 5-year term.

Third Party should demand that Roman Catholics should not misuse the election process of Protestant denominational churches to gain illegal control over the Protestant Churches. The purpose of the Third party should declare that the manifest destiny of the United States demands the propagation of Protestant Christianity, American Culture and English language throughout Latin America and South America. Third Party shall support black African leader Robert Mugabe’s efforts to nationalize farmlands and property owned by the minority pro-Apartheid farmers, who had collaborated with Apartheid leader Ian Smith.

Third Party should demand the abandonment of the pro-white paramilitary death squads in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia. Third party would support Mestizo Alejandro Toledo’s claims to the presidency of Peru, where unmixed whites represent less than 10 percent of the Peru’s population. Maya indigenous Indians should lead the sovereign state of Chiapas. By taking pro-WASP, pro-Mestizo, pro-Women, pro-Right, and pro-Immigrants political stand the Third party could win the presidency of the United States before 2020 AD.

Without the leadership of President Bush the dinosaur of Republican Party would have fell easy victim to pro-Life, anti-Abortion, anti-Women political activists, orchestrated by some hidden hand, which exposed the Achilles Heel of the Republicans.

Democratic Party forced to pick Orthodox Jew to checkmate the Vatican’s declared support to the Bush-Cheney Republican ticket.

United States needs powerful third party movement to protect the political interests of WASPs, Mestizos, Women and Immigrants. Third party would coast to White House by articulating the political interests of WIMPs, representing Women, Immigrants Mestizos and Protestants. Electoral arithmetic would make the pro-WIMPs the dominant political force in the United States. US-born Indians could catapult an Indian into the White House by building pro-WIMPs third political force in the United States. Pro-WIMP political parties would also capture political power in Canada, Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina.

(5) Pro-Women Pro-Immigrants Party

The Neo-Conservatism argues that such a Third Party as mobilizes the votes of women, immigrants and minorities would also support Republican Neo-Conservative presidential ticket. The Third Party shall be pro-WASP, pro-Women, pro-Anglo (English), pro-Saxon (French Quebec), pro-Protestant (Bob Jones University). The Third Party shall be pro-WIMP, pro-Women, pro-Immigrants, pro-Mestizo (brown Hispanic Catholics), and pro-Protestant (Bob Jones University).

The Republican Party represents the pro-Left, pro-China, pro-Vatican, pro-Evangelical, pro-Patriarchy, pro-White, pro-Religious Conservatism political coalition.

The Democratic Party represents the pro-Center, pro-China, pro-Women, pro-Abortion, pro-Diversity, pro-Affirmative Action, pro-Black, pro-moderate Protestant political coalition. The Democratic presidential ticket should, reject Bill Clinton’s foreign policy and promote radically new foreign policy.

The Third Party, the Populist Party seeks new American foreign policy, which should be pro-Protestant Hispanic America, pro-Hindu India, pro-Buddhist Asia, pro-Mestizo America, pro-Chiapas, pro-Pagan Hutu, pro-Christian Biafra, pro-Christian East Timor, pro-Chen Shui-bian, pro-Li Hongzhi, pro-Dalai Lama, pro-Sukarnoputri, pro-Vincente Fox, pro-Hugo Chavez, pro-Alezandro Toledo, pro-Robert Mugabe, and pro-Laurent Kabila policies.

The failure of Democratic presidential ticket 2000, to pursue new foreign policy would legitimized the need for a radically new Third Party in United States to espouse these interests.

(6) Four Factors in Elections 2000

There are four major factors at play during election 2000, namely, Clinton Factor, Bush Factor, Gore Factor and Hillary Factor.

Impeachment proceedings blackmailed Clinton Administration to allow Catholic Religious right Conservatives hijack the foreign policy of United States, during Second term. Watergate crisis during second Nixon Administration, similarly allowed Dr. Henry Kissinger, to implement the agenda of religious conservatism. Due to the Lewinsky Impeachment proceedings against the President Clinton, pro-Vatican foreign policy agenda imposed during Clinton Administration by Madeleine Alright, just as Watergate Impeachment proceedings allowed Henry Kissing to impose pro-Vatican agenda during Nixon Administration. Madeleine Albright is the clone of Henry Kissinger and caused the destruction of Kosovo, Rwanda and East Timor might repeat the destruction of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Republican Bush-Cheney ticket endorsed and hijacked the pro-China foreign policy agenda of Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton represented the changing role of women in the anti-women, patriarchal Christian and Judaic society. Failure of Senator Lieberman to deliver Jewish votes to Senator Hillary Clinton, resulted in women’s backlash against Gore-Lieberman ticket, and cost them the presidency. Democratic ticket can capture the White House only by jettisoning Clinton’s foreign policy, and by harnessing women voters with the help of Hillary Clinton. Jews and Israelis hate Bill Clinton’s pro-Palestine agenda. Hillary Clinton should speak against independent Palestine State, if she wants to win the Senate election. Hilly Clinton would commit political hara-kiri by supporting Clinton Administration’s foreign policy.

Third Party should oppose Clinton’s foreign policy. Hillary Clinton’s entire political base of pro-Women activist could shift over to the Third Party in future elections, if Democratic Party acquires patriarchal tendencies and comes under the control of conservatism.

(7) Buchanan Raped Reform Party

Under the federal law, Democrats and Republicans each received $ 10 million in taxpayer money to fund their conventions. The Reform Party got another $ 2 million for its convention at Long Beach, Calif. Albert Arnold Gore will take in approximately $83.1 million in taxpayer money for his primary and general election campaigns, and George W. Bush $67.6 million for the general election. Reform Party’s nominee is entitled to $12.5 million for the general-election campaign. Neither of the two candidates claiming to head the Reform Party-Pat Buchanan or John Hagelin - was even the member of the Reform Party 12 months ago. Neither has ever held elective office. Through July 31, Pat Buchanan had received approximately $4 million in federal funds for his 2000 campaign, and John Hagelin $389,000. Also receiving taxpayer subsidies to run for office this year have been Bill Bradley ($12.5 million), Senator John McCain ($14.4 million), Alan Keyes ($3.8 million), Dan Quayle ($2.1 million), Ralph Nader ($279,000), Gary Bauer ($4.8 million) and Lyndon Larouche ($1.2 million). The treasury will pay out well over $200 million in 2000 in partisan political subsidies.

(8) Jew’s Factor in US Elections

Jews have become legitimate players in mainstream American politics after the selection of the Joseph Lieberman as the Democratic vice presidential candidate. Jews representing 2 percent of the American population, provide 24 Senate and Congressmen in the Capitol Hill. Indian immigrants in the United States should learn to catch up with the Jews and become major player in American politics. It is nice to watch that Hindu-led Maharishi Yogi University’s professor John Hagelin competing with extreme Christian conservative Pat Buchanan for the third party nomination. Indians are born political animals, and once they develop knack for political office in United States, then Hindus would give tough competition to Jews for elected political offices in United States.

Perhaps some Indian would be nominated for the major party Vice Presidential ticket in 2004 elections. Native Americans would be very pleased to find an US-born Indian on the Democratic Party presidential ticket, because they consider Indians from the Subcontinent their alter ego. Some day Indians will represent that many seats in the Senate and Congress as Jews. Indian shall become part of the established mainstream political process, by systematically articulating the political aspirations of the Protestant WASPs, Mestizo Hispanics and Native Americans in United States Elections. This precisely is the most secret hidden agenda of Kalki Zeus. The day is not far off, when a Hindu Indian born in the United States would be sworn in as the president of the United States, to make Indians proud of America, just as Joe Lieberman made every Jew proud and happy.

(9) Neoconservative Factor in US Elections

Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 88, Chapter 2.

 

 

 

(0)(34) 2(21) Ideas for Reformation of American Democracy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 88, Chapter 2. 2(21)

(34) (1) One. Neo-Conservatism demands a Federal Election Commission that would supervise all Federal, State and County elections. United States lacks Federal Election Commission responsible to hold and conduct nation wide elections. The County Canvassing Boards control the elections in USA. United States should adopt Canadian Election system and appoint Federal Election Commission. There is a dire need for the viable major Third Party in the United States. A new third party should focus on representing the interests of (a) Women, (b) Immigrants, (c) Minorities, and (d) Protestants.

The religious conflicts, Protestants Vs Catholics has been underlying political reality in the United States. The racial conflicts have existed in the American politics from the beginning.

(2) Two. The Hispanic Catholics, Black Americans, Native Americans, Yellow Americans and Asian Americans have no choice but to form a new Third Party to politically represent and articulate the aspirations of Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and pro-Women, pro-Choice non-Denominational white Protestants in the United States. Neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party interested in reforming America’s election process to set up the constitutionally constituted impartial US Federal Election Commission, responsible to conduct and supervise the entire election process at the Federal, State and County level elections, as it would erode the Republican and Democratic stronghold over fraud-prone 4,000+ County canvassing Boards.

(3) Three. The 1787 Constitution of the United States did not create a Democratic form of the Government, as we understand the term in 21st century, as it failed to create Federal Election Commission, free from the manipulations of the politicians. United States is not a democracy and the US Constitution didn’t create one. Unless a new Constituent assembly is convened to draft a new Constitution of the United States and the 50 States, it would not become a democracy. United States is a system of elected Aristocracy much like the Senate of the Roman Empire. The elections of the US Senate and US House of representatives are rigged in favor of the incumbents. The election of the Presidency more fair and less manipulated because the stakes are too high for the County Canvassing Boards to manipulate.

(4) Four. United States has free Press, but its election process is fraud-prone because full-time party politicians control the 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards. The election process in the United States at the Federal, State and County level is fraud-prone and not free, fair and impartial as the US Constitution didn’t provide for the Federal Election Commission, and allowed 4,000+ County Canvassing total control over the entire election process at the County, State and Federal level election process.

(5) Five. The allegations of voting irregularities that allegedly took place in Yugoslav Elections that United States exploited to push out Slobadan Milosevic from power in Yugoslavia were minor, when compared to the major structural defects pervading throughout the United States election process that were revealed in the presidential elections 2000 during Florida recounts. Yugoslavia and even Russia have better election process where constitution provides for fair and free elections, which in practice may be prone to fraud and manipulations at the booth level. However, the Constitution of the United States drafted during pre-French Revolution 18th Century, provides for constitutionally rigged election process which in the absence of the Federal Election Commission allows 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards legally manipulate the entire election process, which may in practice be fair and impartial due to the power of free press. The Founding Fathers didn’t create democracy and even toyed with the idea of Monarchy. Founding Fathers wanted at best to create the elected Aristocracy more suitable for Bourbon Monarchy than the 21st Century democratic society. The 1787 Constitution of the United States and the Constitutions of the States that joined the Union, require through amendments if the United States Constitution were to provide for the free and fair elections conducted and supervised by the US Federal Election Commission. The election process in democratic India, Canada, and Germany are far better and more open and fair than the election process in the United States. The election process for the presidential elections are rigged at the presidential nomination process, while the nation-wide presidential elections are less prone to fraud and manipulations than the elections to the US Senate and House of Representatives and of State Governors.

(6) Six. The constitutional freedom and the rise of modern states in Western Europe resulted out of the conflict and struggles of the Catholic states of Europe against the unabated Papal dreams of political power and influence. Similarly, Founding Fathers of the 1787 US Constitution created a wall between the State and the Church to curb Papal threats to the freedom and liberty of the United States. The roots of American politics lie in the ongoing conflicts between WASPs and Irish and East European Catholics from as early as 1850 to present day. The evolution of the politics and political parties in the United States rooted in the Catholic-Protestant conflicts. Pope was to Americans was a symbol of oppression. The ongoing conflict between white Catholics and white Protestants overshadows the White Vs Black conflicts or Christians Vs Muslims conflicts in the United States. The ongoing battle between the pro-Life, anti-Women and anti-Abortion movements versus pro-Choice, pro-women and pro-Abortion movements reflects the underground Catholicism Vs Protestantism Neo-Counter Reformation War of the 21st Century. The presidential Election 2000 propagated as if it were primarily as the electoral choice between Papal conservatism and freedom of women, and between Vatican and Bob Jones University. The Election 2000 failed to articulate political aspirations of America’s Non-Denominational Protestant Christians, who represent more than 200 million American citizens, and gave preponderant exposure to the political aspirations of 35 million Catholics and 35 million major denominational Protestants.

(7) Seven. Cultural domination of the white Anglo Saxons has been the central theme in US History. A major part of the history of U.S. constitution is the attempt to ensure the domination of a Protestant Anglo-American culture in the United States. The struggle over cultural domination in the United States began with the English invasion of North America in the sixteenth century and continued in US Election 2000. The "Culture Wars" is a distinguishing characteristic of American history. English colonists declared their superiority over Native American cultures and attempted to impose Protestant English culture on Native Americans. The hope of the Founding fathers of the United States government was to create a national culture unified around Protestant Anglo-American values. The dominance of the Protestant Anglo-Americans challenged, by Irish Catholics, Mexican Catholics, African Americans and American Indians. The concept of cultural perspective is important for understanding the culture wars. The mixing of cultures in the United States resulted in the necessity of constantly asking: How do other cultures perceive this event?

(8) Eight. The Naturalization Act of 1790 excluded Native Americans from U.S. citizenship. This was in keeping with the belief that the survival of the republic depended on a homogeneous citizenry of “whites.” At the time, Native Americans classified as “domestic foreigners.” Consequently, because of the 1790 legislation, they could not seek naturalized citizenship because they were not “white.” In 1867, the congress created the Indian Peace Commission, which effectively made the requirement for U.S. citizenship for Native Americans, the repudiation of native religion and ways of life, and acceptance of American middle-class Christianity with its attended customs. By the end of the nineteenth century, some Native Americans were deculturized and adopted European culture. The so-called Five Civilized Tribes were among the First Native Americans to be granted citizenship in 1901. The granting of citizenship to all Native Americans did not occur until 1924 Indian citizenship Act passed by Congress. In 1924, Native Americans gained citizenship while immigrant Asians were still being denied naturalized citizenship.

(9) Nine. President Bush has been the first Republican president that has gone out of the way to woo votes of Black Americans, after Blacks were shut out the top political positions in the Democratic Party during Clinton Administration, after Clinton managed to transfer all top positions in the Democratic Party to those who have the ability to raise political donations away from black leaders who had the ability to get the Voters to the voting booth on the election day. The Hispanic Americans no longer support Democratic Party’s candidates as they had done in the past, as revealed during the recent New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Governor Pataki’s elections. The ascendancy of Jewish politicians after the nomination of Joseph Lieberman as the Vice Presidential running mate by Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore encouraged Jewish politicians pushed Black democratic leadership out of the top echelon of the Democratic Party as Jews can dramatically influence political campaign donations. Black Americans after losing their privileged political position in the Democratic Party to Jews, Catholic Hispanics and fund-raisers have no option but to court President Bush, even when Senator Trent Lott’s pro-segregation and pro-Dixiecrats statement galvanized pro-segregation white votes behind the Republican Party.

(10) Ten. The race and Catholicism would continue to influence American politics. The pro-segregation pro-Dixiecrats posture of the Senator Trent Lott may consolidate the support of the Catholic Christian Religious Right Conservatism as well that of Protestant Religious Right in favor of the Republican Party. President Bush issued executive Order to exempt the Charities escape the provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act after receiving the Federal aid for disaster relief and other relief projects. President Bush distanced himself from Senator Trent Lott by declaring that Lott’s statements do not reflect the spirit of our country (United States). Mr. Bush’s repudiation of Senator Trent Lott as an apostate to the ‘Founding Ideals’ of the Lincoln’s Republican Party underlined the juggling act the Republican Party has maintained for nearly four decades after 1964 Civil Rights Acts.   

(11) Eleven. Political donations influenced president Clinton’s last minute Presidential pardon to Mark Rich. People with ill-gotten wealth increasingly becoming VIPs in fundraisers of the major political parties in USA and worldwide. Clinton’s pardon of Mark Rich exploiting presidential power to pardon declares to all that crime pays in the United States. If you make money, you are welcome to the corridors of power, even if you amass wealth by criminal wrongdoings. Bill Clinton’s pardon of Mark Rich, the largest tax offender in the history of the United States, reflects the growing trend of the global nexus albeit partnership of the leading politicians with the leading white collar organized crime. The rising cost of the election campaign forces politicians to mortgage their political morality to the big-ticket donors who finance politicians to buy political insurance not for their political beliefs. Mark Rich belonged to the Wall Street Mafia who looted thousands of investors and criminally cheated them by exploiting the loopholes of the Chicago’s Commodity Exchanges. White Collar criminals feted and dined in the political fund-raisers, while political activists denied access to corridors of power. It is a bad trend. It is no accident Sant Chatwal, the biggest crook of Indian community claims personal friendship with Senator Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, who are neighbors. Bill Clinton’s presidential pardon signals the growing political influence of the ill-gotten wealth in United States. White Collar criminals hobnob with President’s in United States and European Union no less frequently than they befriend Russian President and Indian Prime Minister. Every politician it appears is naked while befriending criminals for campaign donations.

(12) Twelve. China perfected the art of buying political influence in United States by judiciously arranging Democratic and Republican fundraisers right after Secretary Henry Kissinger’s first trip to Communist China. It is no accident that United States overlooked over Chinese espionage of nuclear weapons secrets from Los Alamos Labs in New Mexico to protect the American politicians who promoted pro-China policies and who might have been funded by the pro-Beijing Chinese campaign donations in successive Administrations in the United States. US Attorney General Janet Reno made history when she apologized for prosecuting Chinese spy Dr. Lee of Los Alamos Labs. Chinese success in buying political influence by selective political campaign contributions exposed the Achilles Heel of the American Democratic colossus. Selective campaign contributions to third party presidential candidates in United States would influence outcome of the major party presidential elections in United States more effectively than the US campaign contributions in the Yugoslav election campaigns. Democratic nations should learn to respect the will of the people of democratic nations expressed by free and fair elections untainted by illicit foreign funds. China’s successful roadmap in buying political influence in United States by selective campaign contributions shall be traversed by other democratic nations like India, Taiwan and Japan to buy political influence in United States. Whatever United States accomplishes in influencing the outcome of foreign democratic elections, shall also be achieved by foreign nations in influencing the United States presidential election in 2004. Money talks during democratic elections in United States, as much as it does in Yugoslavia, Russia and India.

(13) Thirteen. During Elections of Nov. 1854, the No-Nothing Party made impressive gains for the Third Party in United States. The Native American Know Nothing Protestant party succeeded in 1854 & 1855, because the party focused on the Protestant vs. Catholic conflict exacerbated by the growing immigration tidal wave of Catholics into the USA. The election returns of November 1854 and the subsequent 1856 Presidential election established the overwhelming fact that in those two elections the third party made a score that except for the dramatic rise of the Republican Party before the Civil War, no other Third Party in American history ever came close to matching. In their first organized campaign in 1854, with no charismatic national leaders, no trained orators and almost no established political machine, they elected more than a hundred Congressmen, eight (8) governors and thousands of local officials, including the mayors of Boston, Philadelphia and Chicago. They won control of state legislatures in half a dozen states, form New Hampshire to California, and made a strong showing in a dozen more New York to Louisiana. Their most spectacular and most unexpected triumph came in Massachusetts, traditionally regarded as the most staid and stable of states. Protestant Native Americans, Know-Nothing candidates in Massachusetts, got almost two-thirds of the statewide vote, even when most of these candidates had never previously run for the public office. Native Americans Know-Nothing Party's nominees elected governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and Mayors in many cities and towns. It accounted for all 12 of the Massachusetts Representatives in the Congress, all 40 of the state senators and 376 of the 379 members of the State House of Representatives. Massachusetts elected Know-Nothing Protestant Native American Henry Gardner as Governor in 1854. Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party in the Presidential elections of 1856 turned to and outsider Milllard Fillmore, who had been president once. It was a great mistake as he had and signed the compromise of 1850, which it was hoped would put the slavery issue on shelf for a couple of years. However, in 1856 the slavery issue was more important burning than ever. Fillmore had little use for Nativist demagoguery. In the nation as a whole, Fillmore got 21 percent of the vote. Presidential candidate Millard Fillmore destroyed the Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party. Republican Party exploited the cleavage of the Civil War to replace the Whig Party in the Two-party system.

(14) Fourteen. Native American Protestant Know Nothing Party should have stuck to its single issue of Protestant-Catholic rivalry. Had Native American Protestant Know-Nothing nominated its presidential candidate from amongst its loyal workers, and then Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party would have survived. Reform Party's 1992 & 1996 presidential candidate gave the similar Judas Kiss of death to the Reform Party, when he conspired to secure the nomination of Republican Patrick Buchanan as the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000 Elections. Reform party secured 19.5% of the votes in 1992 Elections. Native American Protestant Know-Nothing presidential candidate Millard Fillmore in 1856 got 21 percent of the votes nationwide. Ross Perot intentionally selected a very weak vice presidential candidate so that he could give a kiss of death to Reform Party in the future. Ross Perot secured 19.5 percent of the votes by harping on the single issue of growing National Debt, widening Balance of Trade, and growing Budget Deficit.

(15) Fifteen. Had Native American Protestant Know-Nothing Party stuck to its anti-Papacy roots and developed killer instinct to wipe out the Whig Party then Republican Party would have failed to capture the favored dominant party spot in the two-party system. Democratic and Republican Parties represent single wine packaged in differently colored bottles, united in their conspiracy to fraudulently manipulate the election process, by securing the Democratic & Republican control of the State and County Election Canvassing Boards.

(16) Sixteen. Hindu India must understand the real nature of the United States to identify what linkages would promote India-USA strategic alliance in the Global Clash of Races and Clash of Civilizations. Any misconceived notion about United States would result in the misunderstanding and rupture in relationships. United States is what it is in reality, not what it claims itself to be. India should learn to look into the real nature of United States by disrobing its propaganda about its nature.

(17) Seventeen. United States is unlike Europe and very different from Canada, and Britain. United States had been a British colony in the past. Canada and Britain abolished Slavery much earlier than the American Civil War. However, after the Civil War, the institutional Apartheid policy instituted in the United States, not dissimilar to what existed in South Africa, and this Apartheid policy continued as late as 1965, when president Lynden B. Johnson abolished it.

(18) Eighteen. President George Herbert Walker Bush (Jan 1989-Jan 1993) lost his bid for reelection in 1992 to Bill Clinton, because Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy promoted Ross Perot as third party presidential candidate and switched Republican base of Texan Ross Perot to Democratic presidential ticket just on the eve of Democratic Party Convention in New York. Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy also scuttled the second-term Presidential run of President Lynden Ben Johnson (Nov. 1963-Jan 1969), because he signed Civil Rights Acts and abolished South Africa type Apartheid system then in effect in the United States. Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy exploited the Watergate scandal to empower Dr. Henry Kissinger. Religious Right Wing Conservative Conspiracy picked and promoted Southern Baptist Protestant President Jimmy Carter, when it realized that Catholic Presidency ignites Counter Reformation War fears in WASPs USA. President Carter rewarded them by imposing fundamentalist regimes of Ayatollahs in Iran and Zia Ul Haq in Pakistan, who imposed Shariah law. Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy exploited the mental disability after the assassination attempt of President Ronald Reagan to imposed Conservative agenda on Reagan Administration. The Religious Right exploited the political problems of President Clinton and Ken Starr Special Counsel, to empower its nominee Secretary Madeleine Albright hijack the Presidency, just as Secretary Kissinger did after Watergate Crisis in Nixon Administration. The Christian Religious Right Conservatives have unequivocally decided to move against the second-term presidential bid of President George W. Bush during Elections 2004, just what they did to the second-term presidential bid of President George Herbert Walker Bush during Elections 1992. The Christian Right Conservative Conspiracy has won over the allegiance of Secretary Colin Powell, to recruit him as their nominee for future Republican presidential campaigns.

(19) Nineteen. Gerrymandering of the House of Representatives has made House of Representatives uncompetitive, sclerotic and immune to the change and less representative of the will of the electorate. If reform is not enacted soon, the democratic choice will be sapped out of the House of Representative altogether. When the US Constitution’s framers created Congress, they imagined that the House of Representatives would be the country’s most popularly responsive national institution. In the US Senate, the slow, deliberative, elite, Senators would serve as a counterweight to the more emotional Congressmen. Senate has become more popularly responsive national institution. House of Representative gerrymandering breaks up the ethnic vote banks of the minorities. In Richmond Hill Queens, where Indians and Guyana-Indians live, the constituency is divided into four city council seats so as to split ethnic Indian vote bank to the detriment of Indian community.

(20) Twenty. President Lyndon Johnson predicted on the evening he signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.” Over the years, the race issue has helped Republicans more than it has hurt them. It was the democrats who paid the price for 1964 Civil Rights Act, signed into law by the Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson, the law that banned discrimination in public accommodations and employment, allowing the federal government to stop aid to programs that discriminated and giving Washington the power to sue to desegregate schools. South states had been central to the Republican Party’s success. But he fact that racial appeals have played very significant role in the success of the modern Republican Party is not under debate. It is irrefutable. As of today, the role racial appeals play in the success of the Republican Party, remains unacknowledged by the Republican Party as a whole. Ever since the Republican Party in the Southern States was reborn by hostility to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Republican national party has increasingly depended on Southern segregationist votes while insisting to Northern moderate Republicans that Republican Party is still the party of Abraham Lincoln, which led the Civil War to end the slavery in the South. These balancing efforts usually work. But occasionally they blow up in the Republican Party’s face, as happened in the aftermath of senator Trent Lott’s comment at Senator Strom Thurmond’s birthday.

(21) Twenty-one. Ronald Reagan opened his presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., and purposely used the code words “states rights” euphemism for segregationist policies to appeal to whites. At a 100th birthday party for Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina Senator Trent Lott said: “I want to say this about my state (South Carolina): When Strom Thurmond ran for the president (as Dixiecrat in 1948) we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years, either.” Senator Trent Lott had been a Dixiecrat and camouflaged segregationist all his political life. If you take race out of the Dixiecrats, there’s nothing there. Trent Lott’s remark honestly reflects the broader amnesia about race and apartheid and racial discrimination in the way that many Americans and not just Southerners, would like to view the America’s racial past through a soft gauzy lens.

(22) Twenty-two. The Hispanic Catholics, Black Americans, Native Americans, Yellow Americans and Asian Americans have no choice but to form a new Third Party to politically represent and articulate the aspirations of Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and pro-Women, pro-Choice non-Denominational white Protestants in the United States. Neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party interested in reforming America’s election process to set up the constitutionally constituted impartial US Federal Election Commission, responsible to conduct and supervise the entire election process at the Federal, State and County level elections, as it would erode the Republican and Democratic stronghold over fraud-prone 4,000+ County canvassing Boards. United States can join the ranks of democratic nations of the world, which includes India, Canada, Germany and Japan and others, only when the US Constitution is amended to set up the US Federal Election Commission, which shall be responsible for the entire election process in the United States and which shall abolish the 4,000+ Country Canvassing Boards, which are fraud-prone as they are controlled by the office bearers of the Democratic and republican parties. The power of free media has put some restraints on the fraudulent practices in the US elections. The elections of the US presidency are more fair and free than the elections of the US Senate and US House of Representatives. The deeply entrenched lawmakers at the Capitol have purposely rigged the entire Federal election process to ensure that incumbent Senators and Congressmen are elected time and again, for as long as they desire. Gerrymandering of the House of Representatives has made House of Representatives uncompetitive, sclerotic and immune to the change and less representative of the will of the electorate.

(23) Twenty-three. Indians and Canadians value the freedom of choice that periodic elections in India gives to Indians and Canadians respectively, and hope that some day United States would join the ranks of the democratic nations of the world, after it fundamentally restructures its election process and appoints US Federal Election Commission. The pre-French Revolution US Constitution of 1787 should be amended to include the election process and the Election Commission borrowing the respective provisions of the Canadian and Indian Constitutions. The Constitutions of India and Canada are more democratic and guarantee free and impartial elections, much more what is guaranteed under the 1787 Constitution of the United States. The 1787 Constitution of the United States, established the democracy of the Roman Senate and the aristocracy suitable for the contemporary Bourbon court, because it failed to establish the US Federal Election Commission and allowed the major two parties rig the entire election process by controlling the 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards. The chief Justice of the US Supreme Court opined that the founding Principles of the 1787 US Constitution couldn’t be changed by legislative amendments. The problem for the constitutional law experts is: How to establish the US Federal Election Commission, without having to convene new Constitutional assembly to rewrite the New Constitution of the United States suitable for the 21st Century, so that United States may become a democratic state, representing the will of the electorate which is not sabotaged by fraud-prone 4,000+ County Canvassing Boards? Aristocratic United States has much to learn for the democratic Constitutions of India and Canada. American public dream that some day, American electorate would also have free, fair and impartial elections in United States, supervised by the Federal Election Commission as they have in India and Canada.

(24) Twenty-four. Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the philosophical school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 92, Chapter 2.

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com

 

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com

 

 

KALKI GAUR BLOGS @ GOOGLEPAGES

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/1

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/12

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/13

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/14

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/15

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/16

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/17

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/18

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/19

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/02

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/03

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/04

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/05

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/06

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/07

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/08

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/09

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/10

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/11

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/2

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/21

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/22

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/23

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/24

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/25

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/26

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/27

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/28

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/29

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/30

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/31

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/32

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/33

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/34

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/35

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/36

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/37

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/38

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/01  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/02  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/03  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/04  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/05  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/06  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/07  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/08  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/09  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0i  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0ii  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0iii  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0iv  

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/0v  

KALKI GAUR BLOGS AT GOOGLEPAGES

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/1

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/1

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com