Chapter 56

Ideology of Neoconservatism

“MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” Kalki Gaur © 2006 Copyrights. http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/




Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/


Chapter 1 Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

Ideology of Neoconservatism for Foreign Democracies

(1) Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

(2) Universal Principles of Neo-Conservatism

(3) Neo-Con Foreign Policy

(4) The Global Order of Neo-Conservatives

(5) Crusades for Democracy

(6) Origin of Neo-Conservatism

(7) Anti-Theocracy Neo-Cons

(8) Neo-Conservatism: Autobiography of an Ideology

(9) Bush’s Democratic Utopia

(10) Anti-Neo-Conservative Axis

(11) Neo-Con Militia Collectives

(12) Neo-Con Social Modernity

(13) Neo-Con Cause of Poverty

(14) Hindu-Buddhist Alliance

(15) Modernizing Economy NeoConservative Way

(16) Agro-Neo-Conservatism

(17) Neo-Con Doctrine of Work

(18) Politico-Neo-Conservatism

Chapter 2 Is USA Democracy? NeoCons Constitutional Reforms

(19) Neo-Conservative Party is Third Party

(20) American Election Process Unfair & Fraud Prone

(21) Bribing Foreign Election Campaigns

(22) The 3rd Party in Election 2008

(23) Demand for Federal Election Commission For Democracy

(24) Cultural Domination as Central theme in US History

(25) US Non European Essence

(26) USA will split like USSR

(27) Why USSR Disintegrated

(28) Isms in US Elections 2004

(29) Looming New Global Dark Age

(30) Republican Dixiecrats

(31) Neo Conservatism

(32) USA Needs Third Party

(33) NeoConservative Third Party Is Viable

(34) Ideas for Reformation of American Democracy

(35) Clash of Idealistic Hegelianism Vs Materialist Terrorism

Chapter 3 Clash of Hegelianism Philosophy

(36) March of Hegelian Philosophy in History

(37) March of Revolutionary Hegelian Neoconservatism

(38) Hegelian Neoconservatism Anti-Papal Reformation

(39) Christianity Religion is the Field of Hegelianism

(40) Buddhist Roots of Hegelian Dialectics

(41) Clash of Catholic Laity & Papal Priests

(42) Wahhabi Cult is Zionist British Plot

(43) Anti-Hegelian Marxism as Counter Reformation Vatican Plot

(44) Universal Contradictions of Civilizations

(45) Papacy is not a Church but a Business Empire

(46) Rise of Anti-Papacy Gnosticism Kabbalah Mysticism

(47) Clash of anti-Monotheism Hegelian Indian Philosophy

(48) Harmony of Every Real Philosophy

(49) Hegelian Dialectical Reformation of Christian Church

(50) The Hegelian Dialectical Process

(51) Clash of True Protestant Hegelianism & Papal Materialism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/




(00) Chapter 1 Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

Ideology of Neoconservatism for Foreign Democracies

(0)(1) 1(1) Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

(1) (1) Page 1, Chapter 1. 1(1) Abstract: Global political parties based on the common principles of democracy, capitalism, freedom and neo-conservatism would contest elections worldwide and compete with Islamic fundamentalist parties, Catholic fundamentalist parties and Communist parties worldwide. Neo-Conservatism is dominant ideology of the 21st Century. The philosophy of Neo-Conservatism gives to America the hallowed space as the agency of History, and Neo-Conservative Republican Party represents the elitist antecedents of the Theory of the party as a key part it shall play as an agency of History, to mould the world in the image of American-type inclusive democracies.

One. President Bush, in his January 2005, second inaugural address, sounded like Revolutionary determined to export Democratic Utopia worldwide. President Bush’s crusades for democracy with the support of India, is a turning point in world history and a radical approach to foreign affairs. "By our efforts USA has lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power; it burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world," declared Bush. A Neo-Conservative revolutionary "fire in the mind" a radical approach to American foreign affairs, and after Bush’s India Pact is a turning point in world history. President George Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice are true revolutionaries, the revolutionaries for establishing “Democratic Utopia” by making United States and India the agency of history. 

Two. Neo-Conservatism is a revolutionary ideology and an armed ideology that seeks to use the unique position of democratic sole super power America as the hegemon as an agency of History, to export pro-diversity polytheist Democratic Utopia worldwide. Neo-Conservative Republican Party is a revolutionary political party with a manifest destiny to enforce global regime change of extremist fundamentalist tyrannical terrorist regimes. All revolutionary agency of history of the 20th century were armed ideologues.

Three. Revolutionary armed ideologues and agency of History, convinced that they were the vessels of righteousness, the spirit of History emblazoned on their banners, they used overwhelming force and beating their chests, proclaiming their virtuous "idealism" to all who would listen. And millions more followed them unthinkingly, convinced that they were embarking on a holy crusade to save the world, when in reality they were engaged in a cultural and spiritual clash of civilizations.

Four. The 21st Century is the historical battleground for the Clash of Civilizations where on one side Religions of sword and iconoclast patriarchal Murderous Ideologies are at war against revolutionary inclusive pro-diversity Democratic Utopia and Religions of Swords.

Five. Political Ideology is a brand name and requires branding and national economies are too small to bear the cost of full scale branding of political ideologies. India and the United States should develop, promote and market the Neo-Conservatism political brand and establish worldwide political party organizations and undertake mentoring of young potential political leaders and provide funding and assistance in fund raising.

Six. Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

(2) Global Democratic Capitalist Parties

The concept of international democratic capitalist political parties is an idea whose time has come. In the age of global media and the rising cost of election campaigns the global network of neo-conservative political parties with a support base of global media and global election campaign organizations shall make a great political impact worldwide and foil the Mecca-Vatican-Beijing axis of political intolerance exclusion and murderous ideologies.

The ideology of Neo-conservatism provides the template for political party ideologies and the global support network of internet-based virtual election campaigns and political call centers shall catapult neo-cons into corridors of power worldwide. Global Neoconservative political parties are an effective instrument of foreign policy for United States and India.

Outsourcing political campaigns and election campaigns to global outsourcing campaign services providers makes great economic sense, as a national political party needs the full force of the campaign organization not more than a few months every election year. Smaller national economies cannot afford savvy political campaign organizations and they are better off by hiring international campaign organizations.

These are the arguments the author makes in this chapter.

1(1) Talking Points- 21(2) Neo-Conservatism Ideology

(2) Anti-Marxism Neo-Conservatism

MARXISM IS A SHIT-PHILOSOPHY: One. Karl Marx was a shit-philosopher and a prostitute-philosopher hired by the Papacy to discredit dialectic idealism of philosopher Friedrich Hegel. Hegel became the philosophical founder of Protestantism by demanding that philosopher should interpret Scripture rather than the Church or the priests, which Papacy saw as a threat to undermine the foundation of Papacy. Papacy hired minions of hired thinkers and writers to camouflage the Marxist-shit by gold-plating and savvy marketing. The philosophies or ideologies of Marxism, Communism and Socialism that we find today is the product of combined labors of the Jewish that pooled its resources to gold-plate the stinking shit of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. When the stink of Communism, Marxism and Bolshevism became unbearable, all those that earlier gold-plated the Marxist-shit including Trotsky as well as his followers in the United States started the movement that culminated in the political phenomenon of American neo-conservatism, which sought to use the power of the United States for universal propagation of American creed and democracy. Leon Trotsky was not less a Prostitute philosopher and peddler of shit Dialectical Materialism than Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin and Mao Tse Tung. With the demise of shit-Communism, the Divine Philosophy of Neo-Conservatism revealed itself to America and to the world as a harbinger of pro-Freedom pro-liberty inclusive Capitalist Democratic Utopia, with America and India as the Agency of History in the 21st Century. Neo-Conservatism is Revolutionary Ideology and pro-Democracy America and pro-Democracy India are revolutionary nations and Agency of Revolutionary History in the 21st Century. Neo-Conservatism has transformed the WASP Conservatism and President Bush has replaced hidden Judeo-Christian patriarchal agenda of certain Neo-Cons with the declared WASP and Petro-Imperialism agendas. Neo-Conservatism, purged of its local agenda transformed India of its socialistic shackles and created India-USA agency of History to export Democratic Utopia worldwide, to unleash Democratic Revolution in the world.


Two. After the demise of shit-philosophy, shit-polity, shit-utopia and shit-economy of Marxism and Communism, the fall of Berlin Wall, fall of Communism in Eastern Europe and the demise of the Soviet Union, the world-class philosophy and ideology of “Neo-Conservatism” emerged as the reigning philosophy and ideology of Neo-Conservatism, shall determine the world history, politics, religions and economy of the United States, India, Israel and rest of the world, including China, the last bastion of shit-Communism, steadily falling into the redeeming fire of Capitalism. The 21st Century is the Century of Neo-Conservatism. The Thesis of Hegel resulted in the Antithesis of Marxism and culminated in the Synthesis of Neo-Conservatism. Hegelian dialectics is at work in America, which is taking the history forward through the instrumentality of Neo-Conservatism. Neo-Conservatism turns the Dialectical Materialism on its head and unleashed the creative regenerative power of Hegelian Dialectical Idealism, to transform American foreign policy from the Kissinger-style Butchers of Democracy to Bush/Rice-style Crusades for Democracy. America allied with India became a new agency of History in the 21st Century to leverage the political economic and military might of sole super power Hegemon to export Democratic Utopia worldwide, including oil-rich Islamic world, so that the Petro-Imperialism could succeed in averting the looming Papal Catholic versus Wahhabi Sunni Islamic Armageddon. History is on the move after President Bush signed the civilian nuclear deal with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in March 2006.


Three. The ideology of Fascism as well as Communism was antithesis to Hegelian Idealism, and Neo-Conservatism is the third more evolved stage of Synthesis. Hegelian dialectic is at work in the United States. American Neo-Conservative “Utopia of Democracy” is a very viable utopia if Neo-Conservative America mobilizes its political, economic and military resources to export Democracy worldwide including oil-rich Middle East and the third world. Neo-Conservatism echoes the revolutionary dynamism and the historicist Messianic zeal, equally common to totalitarian world philosophies that dominated the 20th century, namely, fascism and communism. The "creative destruction" of extremism, fundamentalism, terrorism, and Kissinger-Albright-type amoral realism with hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda is Neo-Conservative America's eternal mission, both at home and abroad. America’s enemies hate President Bush, because they fear that America will succeed in its crusades for democracy once India joins America in exporting democracy worldwide. The reason Neo-conservative America's "enemies" hate America is that tyrannical regimes cannot feel secure so long as America exists, because America’s very existence not America’s policies threatens their legitimacy and continued rule. The extremist fundamentalist Wahhabi terrorists must attack America in order to survive, like the historical barbarians invasions of civilizations, similarly it is a moral imperative for Neo-Conservative America to undertake preemptive attacks on homelands of Islamic terrorism to destroy Islamic terrorism to advance America’s historic mission to export Democratic Utopia worldwide.


Four. The Hegelian Neo-Conservatism has put upside down the evil paradigm of dialectical materialism in order to continue pursuing the war on the dialectical materialism’s devilish eschatological dream, the End of History devoid of God, Armageddon and Apocalypse. The Hegelian Neo-conservatism believes in the progressive theory of history, in which every new stage in history is a progress and development over the stage that preceded it. Hegelian Neo-conservatism believes that American crusades for democracy for export of American-type democracy will expedite the historical role of dialectical idealism and usher in a new age of Democratic Utopia in the world.


Five. The multi-ethnic American philosophy working within Hegelian Dialectic, a progression in which each successive flow of new immigrants results in the corresponding political thought progression in which each successive policy or ideological moment emerges as working-out of the self-contradictions inherent in the preceding movement, forced by the changing electoral reality of changing coalition, because the survival instinct of the elected politicians forces them to gravitate to join the new electoral bandwagon that represents the historical progression rather than regression. If one understands history and philosophical ideas as a progression toward something, then one would perceive the American political thought process is working within a "Dialectic:" a progression in which each successive moment emerges as working-out of the self-contradictions inherent in the preceding moment.


Six. The Neo-conservative dialectic idealism put upside down, the Marxist dialectical materialism and restores the Synthesis of the thesis of Hegelian Idealist Dialectics with the Antithesis Marxist dialectical materialism. Neo-Conservative democratic idealism based upon superior Synthesis of dialectical idealism and dialectical materialism. The ideology of Neo-Conservatism is not an Ideology of Anti-Ideology rather it is a positive thinking ideology to establish Democratic Utopia in the world that replaces Sharia laws by western laws, replaces dictatorships by democratically elected governments and replaces the bondage of Islamic women by equality of women before law and equality of opportunity for women in religion, politics, business and society. What emerged as the hallmarks of this post–Cold War variant of Neo-Conservatism? Unlike their elders, second-generation Neo-Conservatives did not define themselves neither in opposition to Communism nor to the New Left and nor to the anti-Vietnam War politics of the sixties. The Neo-Conservatism of the second-generation Neocons is no longer an "ideology of anti-ideology." NeoConservatism advocates a positive ideological democratic agenda, a theology that brought fully into view the radical implications the "inverted Trotskyism," embedded within the Neo-Conservative insurgency from the outset. The Neo-Conservative dialectic puts the Marxist dialectics and dialectic materialism upside down and restored Hegelian dialectics and dialectic idealism to its historic role as history maker by preemptive attacks for nation building and crusades for democracy worldwide, including the Holy Land and the Middle East the seat of Catholic Crusades of the Medieval Age.


Seven. There is no patron saint in Neo-Conservatism. There is no Official Scripture of Neo-Conservatism. There are no official gatekeepers to the Neo-Conservative inner sacred throne. Neo-Conservatism is not a trademark-patented doctrine. It is simply stupid when Democrats and Liberals attack the Neocons are the new Trilateral Commission. Neocons may have become Bush administration a tightly knit and highly ideological community of Neocons obsessed with unilateralism, military force, preventive wars, crusade for democracy, nation building and social engineering. It is true that neocons have been defined not by themselves but by their critics. It is simply stupid to argue that pro-Israeli conspirators seized control of or "hijacked" the U.S. national security policy by virtue of their zeal and the on-hand nature of their pre- packaged agenda. In viewing neocons as an ideological community invites these critics to treat neocon thinking as a self-contained text, subject to exegesis, as if it were a religious doctrine or a text-driven ideology like Marxism, even when Jews played very significant role in the development, evolution and propagation of the Hegelian philosophy of Neo-Conservatism. The "hijacking" imagery invites critics to oversell neocon influence.


Eight. The political analysis of “The Neo-Conservative Persuasion,” results in the redefinition of the “persuasion” known as Neo-Conservatism as a political ideology with a distinct flavor of Neo-Hegelian philosophy. The Thesis of Hegelian Dialectic Idealism resulted in the Antithesis Marxian Dialectic Materialism that after the demise of faulty antithesis Communism resulted in the Synthesis of Neo-Conservatism, the Kalkian Neo-Hegelian Dialectic Reformism, a form of Polytheism where the power of the Hegemon shall be used for rearranging the world to nurture and promote “right” or “good” and to fight “wrong” or “bad.” Neo-Hegelian Dialectic Reformism reforms the history, unhesitatingly uses preemptive use of force for: Crusades of democracy, Nation building, Women’s rights, Affirmative action for minorities, Religious reforms, and War against Terrorism and religious ideological extremism fundamentalism. 


Nine. Neo-Conservatives are Hegelians of sorts or its American variant, the “Progressive Hegelians.” The post-Iraq War Republican Party has changed with the changing times. Neo-Conservative Republican Party is no longer the same Republican Party so many Americans protested and mobilized against as young activists during Vietnam War.


Ten. Just as Fascism and Communism were the dominant political philosophies and ideologies of the 20th Century, the Neo-Conservatism with exportable democratic revolutions is poised to become the predominant political philosophy or ideology of the world in the 21st Century, albeit in the Third Millennium, once India and the United States pool their national resources towards Crusades for Democracy worldwide. Neo-Conservatism has adopted a modern version of International Imperialism of Fascism. Neo-Conservatism has adopted the democratic version of exportable political systems by nation building and crusades of democracy that shares similarities with Soviet and Chinese policies of supporting foreign revolutions. The Neo-Conservatives reject not only Nazi race-theory but also the most benign understanding of national or ethnic coherence. The Jewish and Trotskyite heritage of Neo-Conservatism rules out that Neo-Conservatism is a flower child of Nazism or Fascism, unless one can find any Jew who loved Holocaust. The Jewish and Trotskyite heritage of Neo-Conservatism rules out that Neo-Conservatism is a flower child of Stalinism or Communism, unless we can find a Russian Jew who loved the Gulag. The Judeo-Trotskyite heritage eliminates the possibility that Republican Neo-Conservatism is a camouflaged version of either Communism or fascism. It is stupid to try to find a Nazi or a Communist lurking under the camouflage of Neo-Conservatism. However, one may find a number of Protestant WASPs trying to achieve what Hitler or Stalin or Mao failed to achieve, and if these WASPs succeed in their endeavor, it would be because of the fact that the philosophy of Democracy is stronger than those of Fascism or Communism, and also because the strength of democratic tolerant inclusive diverse multi-ethnic American Civilization far exceed those of totalitarian, intolerant exclusive national Civilizations of Germany or the Soviet Union.


Neo-Conservatism is a revolutionary movement as it brought mainstream American intelligentsia into policy formation process at the House and represented a turning point in American history. Secretary Henry Kissinger during Nixon and Ford administrations had earlier developed a close-knit secret nexus political forces representing Judaism, Masonic Lodge, Papal extremist conservatism, Protestant Evangelical extremist conservatism to legitimize iconoclast patriarchal amoral realism, which paved the way for the installation of Masonic Lodge member George Ford as the President and the surprise victory of Protestant fundamentalist President Jimmy Carter. A part of the appeal of Neo-Conservatism to American intellectuals has been the Neo-Conservative idea that only a few sophisticated minds can really understand and face the truth about American politics and the manifest destiny of America in the 21st Century. To protect the Neo-Con movement against the ignorant and to be able to influence the powers-that-be, the Neo-Conservative philosophers hid their innermost beliefs and true motives from public, but expressed it tactfully to the rulers in an adulterated form whom they wanted to advise. Neo-Conservative philosophers may have told 'noble lies' that were more palatable than the truth, but those noble lies helped root out an hidden amoral iconoclast patriarchal conspiracy well-entrenched in the White House.


Twelve. Neo-Conservatism is dominant ideology of the 21st Century. The philosophy of Neo-Conservatism gives to America the hallowed space as the agency of History, and Neo-Conservative Republican Party represents the elitist antecedents of the Leninist theory of the party as a key part it shall play as an agency of History, to mould the world in the image of American-type inclusive democracies. Neo-Cons are among the most combative and articulate supporters of the Bush Doctrine. President Bush, in his January 2005, second inaugural address, sounded like the founder of the Red Army addressing the workers and Peasants of Leningrad. President Bush’s crusades for democracy with the support of India, is a turning point in world history and a radical approach to foreign affairs worthy of any Bolshevik of old. "By our efforts we have lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power; it burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world," declared Bush. A Neo-Conservative revolutionary "fire in the mind" a radical approach to American foreign affairs, and after Bush’s India Pact is a turning point in world history. President George Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice are true revolutionaries, the revolutionaries for establishing “Democratic Utopia” by making United States and India the agency of history. 


Thirteen. Neo-Conservatism is a revolutionary ideology and an armed ideology that seeks to use the unique position of democratic sole super power America as the hegemon as an agency of History, to export pro-diversity polytheist Democratic Utopia worldwide. Neo-Conservative Republican Party is a revolutionary political party with a manifest destiny to enforce global regime change of extremist fundamentalist tyrannical terrorist regimes. All revolutionary agency of history of the 20th century were armed ideologues. Revolutionary armed ideologues and agency of History, convinced that they were the vessels of righteousness, the spirit of History emblazoned on their banners, they used overwhelming force and beating their chests, proclaiming their virtuous "idealism" to all who would listen. And millions more followed them unthinkingly, convinced that they were embarking on a holy crusade to save the world, when in reality they were engaged in a cultural and spiritual clash of civilizations. The 21st Century is the historical battleground for the Clash of Civilizations where on one side Religions of sword and iconoclast patriarchal Murderous Ideologies are at war against revolutionary Religions of Peace and revolutionary polytheist inclusive pro-diversity revolutionary of Democratic Utopia.


Fourteen. President Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice are serious about revolutionary ideology of Neo-Conservatism. The pro-Democracy radical Neo-Conservative radical American foreign-policy changes has upset the status quo and raised fears for conspiratorial exegesis. After the Second World War, during Cold War in 1948 the Cold Warriors apparently appropriated the Democratic party from the Henry Wallace wing, and Cold Warriors suffered abuses from the naïve Left who saw them as veritable McCarthyites as well as from the isolationist Right who did not want to continue the sacrifices of internationalism endlessly on into the postwar peace. All the charges that George Bush was brainwashed by Neo-Conservative Jews is not that different from the writ against Lincoln that Black Republicans before the Civil War had hijacked the political agenda of Abraham Lincoln. The "Black Republicans" hijacked the old border-state pragmatism of Abraham Lincoln when candidate Lincoln "came east" to get briefed, even then clever abolitionists from their New England pulpits and snooty colleges saw Lincoln as a suitable and naïve emissary of their radical agenda. It is stupid to argue that either Secretary Condoleezza Rice or President George Bush were brainwashed to accept the agenda of Neo-Conservatives against their wish.


Fifteen. The Republican Neo-Conservatism believes that in the 21st Century America should pursue the policy of Petro-Imperialism or Pax Oil-Americana or Oil Colonialism, which philosophically has roots in Fascist ideology of Lebensraum or International Imperialism. The Manifest destiny of the 19th Century America was to expand from New York to Los Angeles. The Manifest destiny of America is to control the oil and gas reserves of the Middle East to enhance energy security of the United States. After the defeat of Fascist Germany and Communist Soviet Union, it is Democratic America’s turn to expand the political, social, cultural and military reach of America. The Neo-Conservative world outlook has diverged from the Trotskyite world outlook and acquired some similarities with the world outlook of nationalist socialism of Nazism as well as International Imperialism of Stalism. The core Neo-Conservative belief that “society can be managed by the state in both its political and economic life,” is equally at odds with the traditional Conservatism as well as Trotskyism or non-Stalinist Left. The Neo-Conservatism, Stalinism and Nazism


Sixteen. The Republican Neo-Conservatism believes that in the 21st Century America should export American creed of democracy worldwide. The desire to transform the polity, culture and society of second and third world countries including the oil-producing nations makes packaged democracy, controlled by fraternal ties to benevolent Pax-Americana makes a convincing case, even more convincing that Soviet Union used to export Communist Utopia to Eastern Europe. The similarities underlying Petro-Imperialism and Crusades for democracy, with exportable Communist revolutions via nurturing foreign Communist parties, places the ideology and philosophy of Neo-Conservatism with rival world philosophies of Communism and Fascism. The rise of Neo-Conservatism as a new political philosophy of the world in the 21st Century is a turning point in the history, and reflects the liberal inclusive diverse Civilization’s ideological, philosophical and military response to the barbarians invasions of civilizations.


Seventeen. Neo-Conservatism rejected the shit-philosophy of Leon Trotsky and put upside down the Trotskyism and adopted inverted Trotskyism. Neo-Conservative Inverted Trotskyism differs from Trotskyism no less than Marxist Dialectical Materialism differs from Hegels Dialectical Idealism. Neo-Conservatism is a total negation of Trotskyism. Neo-Conservatism is a philosophy of inverted Trotskyism, which seeks to "export democracy," in the same way that Trotsky originally envisaged exporting socialism. The Neo-Conservatives do not draw the kind of rigid distinction between theory and practice that many academics and politicians do. Instead Neo-Conservatism sees theory as a form of political combat and politics as an endeavor that should be informed by theory. Neo-Conservatives see themselves as a cadre in a cause rather than as strictly independent intellectuals and they were willing to use theory as a partisan weapon. The legacy of Trotksyism was important influence on Neo-Conservatives. Older Neo-Conservatives included Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, Sidney Hook and Albert Wohlstetter were either members of or close to the Trotskyist left in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Younger Neo-Conservatives included Penn Kemble, Joshua Muravchik and Carl Gershman that came to Neo-Conservatism through the Socialist Party of former Trotskyist Max Schachtman. Neo-Conservatives’ idealistic concept of internationalism was what both the older Neo-Conservatives and younger Neo-Conservatives absorbed from their Trotskyist socialist past.. Trotskyists believed that Stalin, in trying to build socialism in one country rather than through world revolution, had created a degenerate workers' state instead of a genuine dictatorship of the proletariat. In the framework of international Communism, the Trotskyists were rabid internationalists rather than realists and nationalists. The American Neo-Conservatives who went through the Trotskyist and socialist movements came to see American foreign policy as a crusade, the goal of which was social democracy and finally democratic capitalism and they never saw American foreign policy in terms of national interest or balance of power.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006

Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/

Page 5, Chapter 1.




(0)(2) 1(2) Universal Principles of Neo-Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006

(2) Political Ideology and Philosophy of Neo-Conservatism

Page 5, Chapter 1, 1(2) INDIA & CRUSADES FOR DEMOCRACY: One. Just as no Prophet can reveal a new world religion, without bringing god into that religion, similarly no American crusades for democracy would succeed unless India, the world’s largest democracy is in the crusades for democracy. By purging the Neo-Conservative philosophy of its Jewish iconoclast patriarchal particularity, the philosophy of “Democratic Capitalist Neo-Conservatism” poised to reign as the dominant political ideology of the Second Millennium in general and the 21st Century in particular. Just as a rough diamond shines when polished by skilled diamond cutter and polisher, the neo-conservatism agenda in general and crusades for democracy, suddenly exposed its internal brilliance when nurtured by black woman Secretary Condoleeza Rice and President Bush, who made a paradigm shift in American foreign policy by replacing pro-China and anti-democracy Kissinger-style policies of earlier administrations, by pro-India and pro-democracy policies of second Bush administration, which many believe is the un-first administration. Neo-Conservative Manifesto seeks to outline the march of history and crusades for democracy in the 21st Century under the banner of Neo-Conservatism led world’s largest democracy India and world’s oldest and richest democracy the United States.


Two. The universal principles of American Neo-Conservatism, revealed when purged of its Judeo particularity and iconoclast patriarchy, at the hands of black woman Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and religious Protestant President Bush, enriched the world with its perfume so much that the Sikh Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Muslim President Abdul Kalam agreed to hitch the wagon of India to the rising ideology of Neo-Conservatism by signing civilian nuclear deal, to safeguard energy security of India as well as of the United States and to make a common front against Apocalyptic teleology of barbarian global terrorism and religious fundamentalism and to jointly undertake crusades for democracy worldwide and nation building in the Second World, Third World including the oil-producing Middle East. By purging Neo-Conservatism of the iconoclast patriarchy that Secretary Henry Kissinger inflicted on the world, and by choosing India to join the American crusades for democracy worldwide, has unshackled the Judeo-chained that had earlier tied Neo-Conservatism to local agenda, so that American could lead global crusades for democracy and wars on global terrorism and religious fundamentalism. With India on its side, the United States is ready to direct and lead the world history and judiciously manage its unique position as the sole superpower or hegemon of the world. India and America should aim to establish 100 Democratic Neo-Conservative Parties in the world, nurture and support new democratic leaders in these countries, and help these Neo-Conservative political parties acquire power in their countries so that these new neo-conservative nations could attain an era of peace and prosperity under the protective US-India neo-conservative umbrella.


Three. Why should one give a concise definition to Neo-Conservatism, a new emerging philosophy as ideas undergo constant change in a fast changing world, so that only fools claim that their religion or ideology or philosophy is in final unalterable final form and final stage of evolution? Every world philosophy is a hall of mirrors, as every new idea gets reflected in the ideas that preceded it and changes the images that we see in the hall of mirrors on a continuous basis. Only a shit-philosopher would say that his exposition of ideas is the final exposition of truth for all times to come. But it might be that the inability to define Neo-Conservatism in its finished format is part of what constitutes its power. In a sense the mystification of the irrational, as the rational takes away the power of a rational critique, while at the same proposing itself as pre-eminently rational. Neo-Conservatism is the reigning ideology of 21st Century and like Protestantism or Hinduism believes that every morally “right” philosophy, ideology or belief must undergo constant change and transformation to remain relevant in newly emerging future. Any philosophy that refuses to change to adjust to new realities putrefies and stinks like shit Marxism, Communism, Leninism, Stalinism or Maoism.


Four. The subject of Neo-Conservatism is a label that suggests an ideological rigor that neocons have never demonstrated nor perhaps even sought. From the outset, the Neo-Conservative identification with the post-Vietnam Right was a marriage of convenience rather than a union of kindred spirits. Though the label neocon has increasingly become one of opprobrium, the heat generated by the term “Neo-Conservatism” also stands as a backhanded tribute, an acknowledgement that the Neo-Conservative impact has been substantial, as indeed it has – to the fortune of us all in the democratic world. During last decade, especially since the ascendancy of George W. Bush to the presidency, "Neo-Conservative" has become a term of opprobrium, frequently accompanied by ad hominem attacks and charges of arrogance and hubris. It is today too soon to offer a comprehensive assessment of that impact. One aspect of the Neo-Conservative legacy has been to foster the intellectual climate necessary for the emergence of the new American militarism. As a practical matter, the task of reinventing Neo-Conservatism for a post-Communist world as well as the task of spelling out an "imperial self-definition" of American purpose fell to a new generation and new allies from democratic India. To promote that effort, leading members of that new generation of neo-conservatives should create their own institutions, to efficiently mobilize the resources of India and the United States for undertaking Crusades for Democracy. What India refused to do in 1950, India is willing to do in 2006 that is to provide India’s full moral, political and military support to establish Democratic Pax-Americana worldwide.


Five. Neo-Conservatism has gotten to the point where one would have been happy identifying it as a type of ‘Postmodern Conservatism,’ as an escape route to explain that one can’t tell you what Neo-Conservatism is but one can tell you what Neo-Conservatism is not.” To recognize Trotsky/Hook elements in Neo-Conservatism would display one’s radical Libertarianism. To ignore Neo-Conservatism’s Trotsky/Hook aspects would prove “The State” was seducing one. To identify the hermeneutics of the Neo-Conservative and its Straussian "slow readings" would only imply one was reading too much into it. If there is one thing that is becoming clear, after the intellectual dust settles, it is this: these comrades, the frontrunners on the Republican Neo-Conservative highways are still Republican social democrats. Earlier calling a Republican a “social democrat” used to be a grave insult. Like most social democrats there is a Hegelian brush coloring Neo-Conservatism “persuasion” or ideology


Six. Neo-Conservatives do not feel that kind of alarm or anxiety about the growth of the state in the 20th century, seeing growth of the State as natural, indeed inevitable. Neo-Conservatives tend to be more interested in history than economics or sociology. Neo-Conservatives condemn as a historical eccentricity the 19th-century idea of Statism propounded by Herbert Spencer in his "The Man Versus the State." Neocons are familiar with intellectual history and aware that it is only in 19th and 20th centuries that democracy became a respectable idea among political thinkers. Trotsky viewed democracy as an inherently turbulent political regime, with the "have-nots" and the "haves" engaged in a perpetual and utterly destructive class struggle. For Hook, Democracy was only the prospect of economic growth in which everyone prospered, if not equally or simultaneously, that gave modern democracies their legitimacy and durability. Neo-Conservatives are impatient with the Hayekian notion that we are on "the road to serfdom."


Seven. Neo-Conservatism is not an ideology of iconoclast monotheism but an ideology of polytheist Idealism that has regenerated the post-Renaissance world since the dawn of modernity, and that is the Oriental ideal that men can be like gods by Yoga. Such revolutionary ideal is bound to succeed, sooner or later, and with the accelerated pace of events speeding up before our eyes, world is resigned to the fact that it will be sooner, because neither any single power nor the coalition of murderous ideologies and terrorist powers, can stand against the Allied forces of polytheist multi-ethnic Protestant America and Hindu India. Neo-Conservatism believes that America is an empire now and when America acts, America creates its own reality. And while realists are studying that reality, judiciously if they can, Neo-Con America will act again, creating other new set of international realities, which realists can study too, and that's how things will sort out. Neo-Con America is history's actors or agency of History, and amoral iconoclast patriarchal realists, all of them, will be left to just study what Neo-Con America as agency of History does. Neo-Cons believe that Kissinger-type realists and Roosevelltian realists live in a reality-based community, and these realists believe that solutions emerge from their judicious study of discernible reality, what they call enlightened iconoclast patriarchal principles and empiricism. Neo-Cons believe that is not the way the world really works anymore. Neo-Conservatism provides an inside look into the heart of Bush presidency, more than anything else. Neo-Conservatism as the Ideology is the reason first Bush administration was in Afghanistan and Iraq and shall be in Syria, Iran, or Sudan in the second administration.


Eight. Neo- is a prefix that derives from the Greek adjective ‘veos’ that means "new" or "fresh" and in theory Republican ‘Neo-Conservatism’ is used inexactly for those Conservatives who once were not, or for those who have reinterpreted American Conservatism in terms of a more idealistic American foreign policy that eschewed both Cold War Real-Politik and the hallowed traditions of American Republican isolationism. But the accepted definition of Republican Neo-Conservatism has given way in practice to refer to the more particular proponents of the use of military action to remove threatening governments, and to replace them with democratic systems, hence the occasional sobriquets of "Neo-Wilsonian."


Nine. What is an Israeli Neo-Conservatism? The pro-Israel officials in the State Department do not enjoy the kind of dominance they enjoy in the Department of Defense of the White House, so any fear that Secretary Rice might be misled by any pro-Israel official is totally misplaced. The dual loyalty of officials of Bush officials towards Israel does not present any threat to American national interests, on the contrary the Neo-Conservative ideal of American Empire may find ready acceptance by American public, if it is reluctantly accomplished as if under the influence of pro-Israel lobby. Neo-Conservatism emerged as a force in America in the 1980s. The father of Neo-Conservatism was a Jewish philosopher named Leo Strauss (1899-1973), who immigrated to America from Germany in 1938. It is significant that most of the well-known, modern-day followers of Strauss are also Jewish. Strauss himself once publicly admitted that his ideology of neo-conservatism was around the Jews. If described in political terms only, Neo-Conservatism is a moderate movement. However, Neo-Conservatism, despite its name, is not a political movement per se, but is instead a racial, i.e., Jewish, movement. Granted, a few non-Jews advocate Neo-Conservative ideas as well. The Neo-Conservatism is a proactive, not a reactive, movement. Jews conceptualized the philosophy of neo-Conservatism and due to the Jewish efforts the ideology of Neo-Conservatism emerged as the dominant political ideology of the 21st Century.


Ten. The Armageddon that Judeo-Christians religious right or Prophetic Christians actively promote has found willing allies amongst Israeli loyalists inside the administration that have tactically allied themselves with Prophetic Christians raises the horrifying but very real prospect of an apocalyptic Christian-Islamic war. Arch-conservative Pope John Paul II believed in Armageddon, Apocalyptic eschatology and Fatima Prophecy, which declares that Jesus will return and the Holy Land of the Middle East will become Christian lands again, as was the case before Arab Muslim invaders financed by Damascus Jews invaded and conquered Christian lands of Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya and Algeria. The Prophetic Christians implicitly believe that Christianity shall replace Islam in the Middle East. More than 30 percent Americans believe in the End of time eschatology doctrines, Apocalypse and Armageddon. The neo-cons seem unconcerned, and Bush's occasional pro forma remonstrations against blaming all Islam for the sins of Islamic extremists do nothing to make this prospect less likely. WASP-led Petro-colonial American Empire presents the only military solution to avoid the Pope-led Apocalypse or Armageddon in the oil-rich Islamic Middle East. Only the Protestant colonial oil empire in the Middle East would avert the Armageddon of Catholic fundamentalism against Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism. If the Christian Scriptures are true then Islamic Middle East shall become Christian lands after the Second Coming of the Jesus Christ, means that Islam as a religion would die in the Middle East. To avert the imminent Catholic-Sunni Armageddon, the Protestant American must use preemptive force to establish Middle East wide Oil-Colonialism. American Petro-Imperialism alone can prevent imminent Apocalypse and Armageddon.


Eleven. The separate strains of Jewish, Catholic and Protestant Christian fundamentalism have dovetailed into an Petro-Imperialistic American agenda for a vast imperial project to restructure the Middle East, all further reinforced by the happy coincidence of great oil resources up for grabs and a president and vice president heavily invested in oil. Neither President Bush nor Secretary Condoleezza Rice belongs to the Christian religious right conspiracy, even when Bush administration frequently enters into tactical political ties with the vested interests of Jewish and Christian fundamentalists. All of these factors ­ (i) the dual loyalties of an extensive network of policymakers allied with Israel, (ii) the influence of a fanatical wing of Catholic and Protestant Christian fundamentalists, and (iii) influence of Big-Oil funded Petro-Imperialism of Pax-Americana probably factor in more or less equally to the Bush administration's calculations on Iraq, Iran, Sudan, war on terror, and crusades for democracy in the Middle East.


Twelve. Many of the Republican Neo-Conservatives former Trotskyites who have morphed into a new, closely related life form, which makes anti-Communism and anti-China the article of faith for Neo-Conservatism. Many early neocons, including Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, Sidney Hook, and Albert Wohlstetter belonged to the anti-Stalinist far left in the late 1930s and early 1940s, and their successors, including Joshua Muravchik and Carl Gershman came to Neo-Conservatism through the Socialist Party at a time when it was Trotskyite in outlook and politics. As early as 1963 there was a continuous progression of many ex-Communists from the paranoid left to the paranoid right, clinging all the while to the fundamentally Manichean psychology that underlies both. Four decades later in the Bush administration, the dominant strain of Neo-Conservatism is declared to be a mixture of geopolitical militarism and "inverted socialist internationalism." So long as Jews controlled the Neo-Conservatism, the Neo-Conservatives may have been redesigned Trotskyites, though this view needs to be corrected in favor of a more nuanced analysis. Some form of gradual but irreversible and desirable withering away of the state is a key tenet of the Trotskyite theoretical outlook. The Neo-Conservatives, by contrast are statists par excellence. Most followers of the Trotskyite Left are internationalists and one-world globalists, whereas all Neo-Conservatives are unabashed imperialists.


Thirteen. “The call of history has come to the right country, we exercise power without conquest, and sacrifice for the liberty of strangers, we know that freedom is the right of every person and the future of every nation: "The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity," declared President Bush in 2005 State of the Union address. Republican Neo-Conservatism is committed to fulfill the Messianic destiny of its ideology, which emerged as the dominant philosophy and ideology of the 21st Century. Neo-Conservatism believes in a psychotic quest for power and dominance is the driving force, and the "nationalist" discourse its justification.


Fourteen. Driven by the same impulse, Neo-Conservatives’ "national greatness" psychosis seeks to sweep away the old localized, decentralized America of bingo parlors and little league games, and channels the great energy of the American people to realize America’s Manifest Destiny in 21st Century to export democracy, democratic institutions, open and inclusive culture and the civilization worldwide, so that the evil of theocracy, religious fundamentalism, totalitarian communism is eradicated from the face of the world. The Neo-Conservative urge for uninhibited physical control of oil-reserves may resemble Hitler-led New European Order of 1940s, or to the Stalin-led "Socialist Community" that succeeded it in Eastern Europe.


Fifteen. Neo-Conservative mind-set is Utopian. Neo-Conservative mind-set is neither eschatological nor teleological nor apocalyptic. On the contrary Neo-conservatism believes that the future world will have more prosperity than the present world, especially after the worldwide export of America-type democracy, capitalism, institutions and freedom. Neo-Conservatism advocates prudent use of force to export American-type democracy, liberty, freedom, culture, and civilization world wide, including the Middle East and Non-Aligned Third World. If Hitler’s Germany, Hirohito’s Japan, Mussolini’s Italy and Stalin’s Soviet Union could be replaced by democratic political systems in Germany, Japan, Italy and Russia respectively, there is no reason to doubt that Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait or China can also become democratic nations that grants democratic elections, religious freedoms, liberty for all their men and women. The Republican Neo-Conservative mindset is not apocalyptic, which is a Nazi and Stalinist trait, but utopian, which characterizes the Trotskyite Left. President Bush replaced the Soviet Communist threat of the Cold War with the more amorphous global Islamic "terrorism" does not reflect a doomsday revolutionary mentality that can never rest, because America has the military capability to enforce by use of arms democratic regime changes, and modernization of Islamic societies in the oil-producing Islamic world. New missions of Neo-Conservatives are: the propagation of democracy, democratic institution building and imposition of American system of liberty and freedom in the Middle East and the third world. Neo-Conservatism advocates new wars to wage crusades for democracy to engineer democratic nation building and to defeat Islamic terrorism. Neo-Cons need not manufacture any pretexts for preemptive attacks, as world accepted these measures because of 9/11 attacks on America.


Sixteen. In the Neo-Conservative mindset, the great nations those who are fit to change history and take the history forward are those who realize there is no international morality that limits the exercise of military and political power that the sole super power or hegemon of the world may exercise, so long it is used for securing morally “right” or morally “good” objectives, such as crusades for democracy, nation building to export India-USA-type democracy, institutions, freedom, liberty and capitalism. In a unipolar world order there is no international morality that limits the judicious exercise of power by sole super power and that there is only one natural right, the right of the superior world powers to rule over the inferior powers to modify and create a new world based on the reigning ideology of the reigning hegemon of the world. This Neo-Con mindset is America's greatest friend and greatest strength. Neo-Conservative mindset legitimizes the preemptive attacks by the reigning hegemon for exporting America-type democracy, institutions, freedom and liberty; is the greatest protection of the international constitutional order, identity, and way of life of the civilized world in existence today, and protects the world civilizations from the unprovoked invasions of barbarians, terrorists, extremists and fundamentalists.


Seventeen. One of the chief characteristics of a classic Messianic political ideology is that there are two sets of ideological ideals that hold the political idealists in thrall, Exoteric Neo-Con ideals and Esoteric Neo-Con ideals, are two entirely separate and often contradictory ideologies that are held simultaneously by followers of Neo-Conservatism. Every world ideology has two sets of differing and distinctive creeds: the exoteric ideals and the esoteric ideals. The Neo-Cons exoteric creed is the official, public doctrine, the creed that attracts the acolyte in the first place and brings him into the neocon movement as a rank-and-file member and a voter for neocon candidates in democratic elections. The esoteric Neo-Con ideology is a quite different creed and represents the unknown, hidden agenda, esoteric creed that is only known to its full extent by the top leadership, the 'high priests' of the Messianic ideology. The leaders of the Esoteric Neo-con ideology are the keepers of the Mysteries of the Messianic democratic ideology.


Eighteen. The Exoteric Neo-Conservative agenda is to promote Petro-Americana and crusades for democracies worldwide. The Esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda is to establish Capitalist Democratic Utopia in the oil-rich Islamic Middle East, so that the Christian-Islamic Armageddon results in the demise of Wahhabi Islamic religious fundamentalism as well as that of Papal extremism and fundamentalism. Neither President Bush nor Secretary rice belong to Christian religious right conspiracy, while President Ford, President Carter, President Clinton, Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Brzezinski and Secretary Albright openly declared their allegiance to Christian religious right conspiracy and they all misused their constitutional position to implement their hidden iconoclastic patriarchal anti-paganism agenda.


Nineteen. Messianic political ideologies become particularly fascinating when the esoteric and exoteric creeds are not only different, but totally and glaringly in mutual contradiction. This fundamental contradiction plays havoc in the minds and lives of the voters and adversaries. The Judeo-Marxist-Leninist-Maoist-Communist ideologies are, officially, champions of Science, and fanatically atheistic, and yet impart a quasi-mystical infallibility to "the party" that has about it a distinctly religious air. Judeo-Marxist Communist has a hidden iconoclast, patriarchal, anti-Hinduism, anti-Buddhism and anti-polytheism agenda that lends credibility to the argument that Karl Marx was a prostitute-philosopher hired by Papacy to destroy Slav Orthodox Christianity and Buddhism. It is no accident that all Bolshevik Jews that proclaimed their atheism and secularity apparently knew torah well and joined the Orthodox Judaism whenever they landed in any Western countries as refugees from the godless Soviet Union.


Twenty. The Esoteric Neo-Conservatism does not believe in Armageddon or Christian-Islamic apocalyptic wars, even when Exoteric Neo-conservatism courts and cultivate Christian religious right conservatives and even advocate government funding for Church-led charitable initiatives. President Bush entered into a tactical alliance with Christian extremism and fundamentalism even when he does not belong to Christian religious right conspiracy. The esoteric Neo-Conservatism or inner doctrine of Neo-Conservatism is in many ways the exact opposite of the official creed. While "liberty" and "freedom" are the bywords of the Neo-Conservatism, esoteric Neo-conservatism believes in the rule by an elite. The ignorant masses are kept in thrall by various delusions, such as Prophetic Christians, believers of apocalyptic Armageddon that keeps American Christian society together and that it is the duty of the neo-conservative philosophers to uphold, since more than 30 percent American Christians believe in Scriptures, Armageddon or Apocalypse. While Exoteric neo-Conservatism entered into tactical electoral alliance with Papal extremism and Catholic fundamentalism and Protestant Evangelical extremism, the “Esoteric Neo-Conservatism rejects alliance with Christian extremism as the real motive of the Neo-conservatism is to create as secular capitalist American oil colonialism or the Petro-imperialism. Neither President Bush, nor Secretary Rice would allow the misuse of American hegemony for establishing any variant of Papal Holy Empire.


Twenty-one. The exoteric guff about "democracy" was for the benefit of a Western audience, while, on the ground in Iraq, the administration had hidden agenda of a civil war, the multiple partitioning of Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia, Shiite-Sunni civil wars and Iran-Saudi Arabia wars, regional religious conflict that will tear apart the Wahhabi Muslim world asunder and install secular liberal democratic governments throughout the Islamic world.


Twenty-two. The exoteric goals, namely, the liberation of Iraq, the elections, and all the accompanying rhetoric about "self-determination," were only a cover for the real, esoteric objectives: a cynical geopolitical manipulation that can only lead to perpetual war in the Middle East and the pulverization of the existing Arab and Muslim states, all of it lorded over by a rising American Empire. The Esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda may include the abolition of Papacy, the democratizing the Vatican and Papacy. The Esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda may include the multiple partitioning of Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran, along ethnic boundaries and Shiite-Sunni conflicts. The Esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda may include crusades for democracy in Communist China and regime change in China to install a democratic capitalist Buddhist government in China. The Esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda may include the liberation of Arab Muslim women by imposing Western freedom and liberty and democratic institutions throughout the Arab world. The esoteric Neo-Con agenda may include expulsion of Wahhabi extremists and terrorists from Mecca and Medina and to declare Holy cities of Mecca and Medina as sovereign International cities governed by elected leaders of the Muslim believers of the world. The illusory hardliner face of exoteric Neo-Conservatism becomes morally good when viewed from the hidden esoteric Neo-Conservative agenda. Relatively speaking the hidden esoteric agenda of Neo-Conservatism is morally “right” and “good” when compared with declared exoteric Neo-Conservative agenda.


Twenty-three. The ideology of Neo-Conservatism believes in the inevitable march of “Democratic Utopia” based on America as the Exemplar Democratic State, which could determine the curse of history in the 21st Century if judiciously backed by military power of the American hegemon. Russia is no longer socialist at all, but represented a new kind of society called bureaucratic collectivism. China has adopted capitalism in foreign trade zones. The threat represented by the Rise of China to the United States, European Union and India cannot be overestimated. Communist China is mutant Communist-Capitalist monster of enormous strength that would soon overcome the United States, unless the "Third Camp," represented by global alliance of capitalist democracies led by the United States and India somehow prevailed. The Trotskyits had a huge influence on the so-called "New York intellectuals" and Social Democrats, who eventually evolved into Republican Neo-Conservatives, and its intellectual legacy lives on in the form of the fascination with capital-D Democracy that is the chief ideological capstone of the Neo-Conservative foreign policy revolution. Neo-Conservatives worship the abstract Democracy. The "Third Camp" finally came to the conclusion that, in a war, one must choose sides, and they chose the democratic capitalist United States as the embodiment of Democracy and the American military Democratic Utopia’s righteous instrument.


Twenty-four. Neo-Conservatives stress the centrality of ideology and culture, as ideology and culture are two sides of the same coin that determines the course that American society shall ultimately follow. Neo-Conservatives believe it is this New Left critique of the United States that is more nefarious and that demands pointed opposition. All Neo-Conservative writing is inspired by this perceived need to protect American culture and the forces that support it. Neo-Conservatives believe that politics is about morality, and that morality should infuse political behavior and that Religion is the source of the moral virtues that animate both individuals and the society in which they live. Because of the constitutional separation of the State and the Church, the practice of religion within public institutions has become illegal on the grounds of separation of church and state. Neo-Conservatives, Jewish and Christian alike, respond that this is too broad a reading of the concept. They note that the Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state religion but does not say that religion has no place as a motivating force in politics.


Twenty-five. Neo-Conservatism came into it’s own during the 1960s and 1970s and became a political force that would oppose the pro-Communism Left far more than the anti-Communism Right. For Neo-Conservatism the cultural sphere was very important as it is a sphere from which economics and politics draws its’ meaning. For Neo-Conservatism, a battle over the definition of American culture is one that Neo-Conservatives view as the battle for the American soul. Neo-Conservatism rejected the post-1960 Democratic New Left agenda that opposed the use of American military power overseas on the grounds that the United States lacked the moral legitimacy to act as a global force. Neo-Conservatives joined the New Left in opposing the Vietnam War, but on the narrower grounds that the war, as defined by the Pentagon, was not winnable, and that the overall strategic interest of the United States in Southeast Asia was questionable. Neo-Conservatives also supported the civil rights movement, in that it offered the potential for African Americans to join the American mainstream in the same way that their own grandparents did. Neo-Conservatives, sympathetic to individual achievement without regard to membership in a social or racial group, opposed affirmative action for both ideological and Jewish self-interest reasons. Neo-Cons believed that the true path to success in the United States was the one taken by Jewish families. Neo-Cons were resentful that the discrimination faced by immigrant Jewish families was repeated, this time as reverse discrimination, by Democratic polity of affirmation action that helped Blacks, women, minorities and immigrants.


Twenty-six. Neo-Conservatism seeks to introduce morality in Capitalism, which may be termed “Moral Capitalism” to blunt the ruthlessness of Capitalist economy. Neo-Conservatives have displayed a religious fervor in their defense of capitalism. Religion and capitalism together create what Neo-Conservatives view as the ideal social order. While paleo-conservatives praise capitalism for promoting economic growth and personal freedom, Neo-Conservatives view the market as an ideal mechanism of moral restraint. Libertarian arguments for capitalism point out that the market efficiently translates individual demand into social outcomes. Neo-Conservatives respond that capitalism, having no values of its own, requires some form of morality to maintain its humanity, a morality support structure found in religion. Neo-Conservatism argues with the infusion of religious morality, influences the consumer demand. Neo-Conservative suggest that all participants in the capitalist economy, if economy is to thrive, must acknowledge the need of religious morality in the economy. While economics cannot pollute culture, a corrupt culture can be propagated by ruthlessly efficient capitalist market. Neo-Conservatives fret over issues of selfishness and greed less than they fret over moral failures of capitalism that religion, not socialism or government regulation of the market will cure. The Neo-Conservative theologians put forward a novel moral defense of capitalism that apparently influenced even Pope John Paul II. Keeping in mind that the support that Neo-Conservatives offer to capitalism is more for moral than economic reasons raises fear that amoral capitalism may undermine the Judeo-Christian ethic, just as it had sustained it in the past. For this reason, capitalism deserves only two cheers instead of the traditional three. It supports the production of material wealth, and it is the most efficient of economic systems, but it also has the potential to undermine religion and morality by doing nothing to combat a nihilistic ethic of self-indulgence and greed. While Neo-Conservatives are pro-capitalism, they are anything but libertarians.


Twenty-seven. Neo-Conservatives view that neither democracy as well as freedom is an end in itself nor is a good in itself. In Neo-Conservatism freedom and democracy are acceptable only to the extent that they are consistent with the Conservative virtues. While Neo-Conservatism opposes totalitarian regimes on the grounds that they impose an all-encompassing ideology upon society, the Neo-conservative virtues seem to take on the same kind of global role for the crusades of democracy. While castigating pro-China Democratic New Left intellectuals for lacking touch with common American people, Neo-Conservative intellectuals complain that the United States is too democratic in the propagation of its ideology, that allows foreign nations to reject the wise advice that Neo-Conservative America offers them. Neo-Conservatives believe that freedom is inherently subject to abuse and liberty may degenerate into license, in the terminology of John Locke. Neo-Conservatives dwell upon the consequences of ideas, arguing that intellectual debates dictate the shape of society decades down the road. Neo-Conservatism encourages inventive intellectual suggestions as vital to the vibrant capitalist democratic political system, and democratic give and take of politics, and the inherent democratic need to compromise, smoothens the most unrealistic edges of intellectuals' prescriptions.


Twenty-eight. Religion played an important role in the formation of Neo-Conservative thought. However, Neo-Conservatives do not subscribe to Catholic and Evangelical religious right conspiracy. Neo-Conservatism is a unique alliance of Jewish and Catholic Christian intellectuals making a common defense of the Judeo-Christian ethic. Neo-Conservatism started as a Jewish movement that only begrudgingly tolerated a Catholic presence in Neo-Conservatism. Jewish Neo-Conservatives welcomed Catholic Christian allies when politically useful, such as Jews’ courting of the Christian Right, but on other occasions Jewish Neo-Conservatives depicts Catholic Neo-Conservatives as a threat to Judaism in the United States, such as Jews heated opposition to religious intermarriage.


Twenty-nine. Neo-Conservatism separates a liberal political tradition of Locke and the Enlightenment from its embedding in the historical evolution of democratic institutions. The Locke’s ideology is then battered and destroyed by means of Enlightenment. Neo-Conservative concept of the state remains democratic in its formal aspect as a legalistic republic, there is an imposed interest in state enforcement of theoretically dominant cultural values and religious traditions. This separation of a liberal tradition from concepts of democracy opens Neo-Conservative doctrine of State to the Christian fundamentalists, giving the flavor of a theocratic state. And it allows for a thorough going Neocon attacks on any form of counter-cultural expression. To Neocons there are only friends and enemies.


Thirty. Neo-Conservatives also create a separation between nationalism and patriotism. Patriotism means public displays of support, adulation, and expressions of loyalty toward various political figures. Neo-conservatism opposes nationalism in the abstract sense of love of country or love of national spirit. This Neocon separation pf nationalism and patriotism leads to the idea for example that it is patriotic to cut down old growth redwoods for the lumber industry and for jobs, while the nationalism basis of the environmental movement to preserve national forests is somehow unpatriotic. The domestic world can be neatly divided between the patriots and the traitors, friends and enemies, where patriots are of course the Neo-Conservatives, Christian bigots and capitalist supporters. To Neocons the traitors include the liberal intellectual elites who support government regulation, central planning, and controlled development. Neo-Conservatives claim to represent a populist base against an established liberal intellectual elite. In the Neo-Conservative mind, neocons represent common sense and therefore the broadest reach of the public polity. By linking claims to a populist cause to restore common sense to government and public policy, the Neo-Conservatives pit their view of democracy against their view of liberalism. Neo-conservative democracy is conceived as populism and common sense, while liberalism is conceived as the imposition of equality where there is none and tolerance for moral lassitude where there shouldn't be any.


Thirty-one. The Bush administration is the classical age of Neo-Conservatism and represents a new age of Neocons. Neo-Conservative intellectuals have fashioned a new ideology for the Republican Party in the arena of foreign policy in the Bush administration. Neo-Con’s agenda is to greatly enhance American military might and to use American military power to reshape the world in the image of capitalist democracy. Republican Neo-Conservatism is a truly revolutionary doctrine in the 21st Century and may succeed in making the United States the agency of History, in case the Republican president wins the 2008 elections.


Thirty-two. By 1973, the Neo-Conservatives label stuck. The Republican Neocon agenda appealed to southern whites and to others unhappy with the Black Power, Feminist and Gay Liberation movements. Neocons joined racist southern WASP Conservatives and disguised their anger at equality movements by talking about "small government". Neo-Conservatives instead of opposing equality and Bill of Rights directly, called for the shrinking of the state's regulatory powers to create equality. Since the private sector has little interest in equality, the reduced government meant the abandonment of social justice. Neocons emphasized the strong individualistic tradition within American social life that favors liberty more than equality.


Thirty-three. The democratic United States, the sole super power of the world, in the Neo-Conservative philosophy is an agency of History, and the manifest destiny of America is to export Democratic Utopia worldwide, just as Judeo-Marxists wanted to export Communism. Neo-Conservatives want to export American Democracy across the planet, including China and the Islamic world, if required by preemptive attacks on tyrannies and dictatorships. The philosophy Neo-Conservatism drew its universal philosophical moorings from much from Leon Trotsky, who had a first hand knowledge of the great evil that lurked in the Judeo-Communism and Marxism. Just as Marxists wrote of "exporting Communism", Neo-Conservatism advocated in 1991 of "exporting democracy", where "democracy in one country" is insufficient, since it has to be exported around the world if it is to be sustained. To Neo-Cons, the Patriotism springs from love of the nation's past; nationalism arises out of the hope for the nation's future. Neo-Conservatism advocates that the goals of American foreign policy must go beyond a narrow, too literal definition of `national security', and it is the national interest of a world power, as this is defined by a sense of national destiny, not a myopic national security. Trotsky wanted to export Communism around the planet. Neo-Conservatism is a revolutionary philosophy as it advocates the use of forced to export Democratic Utopia worldwide.


Thirty-four. For Neo-Conservatism the Democracy, does not mean social equality. Neo-Conservative Democracy is the rule of law, the protection of property, the rights of individuals and the rights of private enterprises and rights of big corporations. "Real freedom is the freedom for a person or a nation to make a living," said Neo-Conservative President Bush. Bush defined the states that had to be opposed, "Governments that still fear and repress independent thought and creativity, and private enterprise, the human qualities that make for strong and successful societies." For neo-conservatives a "tyrant" is someone who does not adopt capitalist democracy. The ideological justification for Bush's evangelical imperialism is driven by Neocon assumptions.


Thirty-five. The Democratic Utopia vision of the Neo-Conservative entails strengthening the nation by means of nourishing conditions favorable to the triumph of the individual and triumph of democratic institutions worldwide. Neo-Conservatism is a political philosophy, which bridges social and economic conservatives. Those who are not Conservatives view Neocons as threatening to their political agenda. American individualism is an underlying tenet of Neo-Conservatism and individualism is anathema to European-style socialism remains an obstacle to the proliferation of Socialism to the United States.


Thirty-six. Three American giants of the twentieth century led America into its three great battles, President Woodrow Wilson into World War I, President Roosevelt into World War II, and President Truman into the Cold War. The Cold War ended with one of the great anticlimaxes in history, without a shot fired, without a revolution, the Soviet Union simply gave up and disappeared. It was the end of everything--the end of Communism, and the end of the Cold War. But the end of everything was also a beginning. On December 26, 1991, the Soviet Union died and something new was born, something utterly new, a unipolar world dominated by a single superpower unchecked by any rival and with decisive reach in every corner of the globe. This is a staggering new development in history, not seen since the fall of Rome. Charlemagne’s empire was merely western European in its reach. The Roman Empire stretched farther a field. There was another great empire in Persia, and a larger Empire in China. There is, therefore, no comparison. Even Rome is no model for what America, the sole super power, the hegemon, is today. America does not have the imperial culture of Rome. The use of the word “empire” in the American context is ridiculous.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Chapter 1, Page 14.




(0)(3) 1(3) Neo-Con Foreign Policy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 14. Chapter 1. 1(3)

(3) (1) Neo-Cons Rejects Kissinger-type Realism


One. The eleventh and final conviction that imparted a distinctive twist to the views of second-generation Neo-Conservatives was their hostility toward Kissinger-type realism, whether manifesting itself as a deficit of democratic ideals and surfeit of hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda as in the case of Henry Kissinger or an excess of caution as in the case of Colin Powell. As long as the Cold War had persisted, Neo-Conservatives and Kissnger-type realists had maintained an uneasy alliance, based on their common antipathy for the Soviet Union. But once the Cold War ended, so too did end any basis for cooperation between the two groups, namely morally “right” Neo-Conservatives and morally “wrong” Kissinger-type realists with hidden patriarchal agenda. From the Neo-Conservative perspective, amoral Kissinger-type realism constituted a problem. Kissinger’s Realism was about defending American national interests, by balancing adversaries, not transforming the global order or to promote American hegemony. Kissinger-type amoral Realists had a marked aversion to India, and crusades for democracy and a marked respect for limits of American power and declared propensity to use covert operations to bring down democratically elected governments in the Non-Aligned World. Neo-Conservatives resented the hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda of Secretaries Kissinger, Brzezinski and Albright.


Two. In the Neo-Conservative lexicon, the very notion of "limits" was anathema. Neo-Cons believed that to the extent that realists after the Cold War retained influence in White House foreign policy circles, they were likely to obstruct Neo-Conservative ambitions. So second-generation Neo-cons trained their gun-sights on Kissinger-type amoral realism and shot to kill. The problem with Kissinger-type amoral realists was that they were professional pessimists and were on the payroll of Communist China. In that regard there had always been "something about realism that runs directly counter to the fundamental principles of American society, democratic secular traditions, which gave Kissinger’s America a nick-name of "Butcher of Democracy,” in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Laos, South Korea and South Vietnam. The essential issue for Neo-Cons is this: "if the United States is founded on universal principles, how can Americans practice amoral indifference when those principles are under siege around the world? And if they do profess indifference, how can they manage to avoid the implication that their principles are not universal?" To Neo-Conservatives the answer is self-evident: indifference to the violation of American ideals abroad is not simply wrong; it is un-American. Worse, such indifference pointed inevitably down a slippery slope leading back toward the 1960s or even the 1930s. An authentically American foreign policy must reject amorality and pessimism; it must refuse altogether to accept the notion of limits or constraints, in crusades for democracy.


Three. Neo-Conservative Jews directing Secretary Rice’s Neo-Conservative foreign policy agenda pay the price of purging the Neo-Conservatism of Judeo iconoclast patriarchy. America is a multi-ethnic, multi-racial and multi-religion idea because the only alternative is plain luck, or Divine Providence. Neo-Cons believe that Americans are a historically unique and chosen people, just as Jews believe that they are unique people. Hardly any Neo-Conservative is not a Jew, but then again, hardly any Jew is a conservative. Neo-Conservative Jews are above all critics of other Jews: they cannot be explained by their Jewishness unless it is Jewishness rightly understood by a very few. The American idea is democracy, a form of government that permits a man, to say that he is a Jew or an Indian before affirming he is an American. Most Jews are liberals, because they think that the secular humanism of liberals will guarantee Jews against anti-Semitism and make America their home. But the price exacted by liberalism is to transform Judaism into secular humanism, is the price is prohibitively high for Jews and for liberals as well, since a Jewish man is essentially a religious or "theotropic" man. Neo-Conservatism, when purged of its Judeo particularity becomes a universal philosophy, also relevant for democratic India. The department of State led by black woman Secretary Condoleezza Rice thinking politically purged the Kissinger-style realism, purged the hidden anti-democracy and anti-pagan agenda of iconoclast patriarchal Judeo-Christian religious right conspiracy, and in the process unshackled the Neo-Conservatism and transformed it into a vibrant world-philosophy that filled the vacuum created by the demise of Communism in the Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, and transformed America into a revolutionary democratic power that seeks to usher in democratic revolution worldwide. Purging American State Department of Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright style amoral “wrong” realism is a turning point in world history that shall define United States foreign policy in decades to come. Though Jews dominate the Department of Defense and the White House, they do not dominate the US Department of State during the second Bush administration.


Four. Black women Secretary Condoleezza Rice and President Bush's foreign policy in the second Bush Administration, after Bush charmed Indians with nuclear deal is distinctly Neo-Conservative policy and has ejected the hidden patriarchal iconoclast agenda of Kissinger-type amoral realism. In the Bush administration Protestant Neo-Conservatives formulate American foreign policy. The Neocons accomplished this, by selling their idealist ideology to a strong-willed president who does not belong to fundamentalist Christian religious right conspiracy, unlike President Ford, President Carter and President Clinton. Yet, the authors of essay “The Neo-Conservative Convergence,’ argued that none of the president's most influential foreign policy counselors--not Dick Cheney, not Donald Rumsfeld, not Condoleezza Rice--was considered a Neo-Conservative prior to 9/11. Secretary Rice, in fact, is the protégé of Brent Scowcroft, a leading proponent of the opposing foreign policy school known as Rooseveltian Realism." Dick Cheney, too, had been associated with that Rooseveltian Realism School through his key role in the "realist" administration of the first President George H.W. Bush. However, none of the member of the present ruling elite- Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld – was considered a member of the Kissinger-type amoral realism, with hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda. The argument that the strong-willed Cheney and Rumsfeld and Rice were brainwashed by Neo-Conservatives in lower levels of the current administration is too implausible to entertain. Thus, one or both of two things must be true: either they switched to the Neo-Conservative approach in response to the events of 9/11 "mugged by reality," or the second Bush administration's approach is un-first administration and distinctively anti-Kissinger-type amoral realist and distinctly Neo-Conservative.


Five. Anti-Kissingerism is the principal contribution of Neo-Conservatism to American foreign policy. Neo-Conservatives scored their first important triumph challenging Nixon and Kissinger's realism. The Nixon-Kissinger strategy was aimed at drawing the Soviet Union into a new "structure of peace" through the balance of power with China and exchanging trade for diplomatic and military cooperation. The Kissinger had a secret religious right conspiracy agenda that he implemented without the consent of anti-Semite President Richard Nixon. Neo-Conservative foreign policy rested on illusions about the imminent Soviet threat and the window of vulnerability that would open if the United States did not rapidly accelerate its strategic weapons development. Neo-Conservatives also played a role in postponing rather than accelerating the end of the Cold War, which is not to be confused with the end of the Soviet Union itself. Neo-Conservatives focused on their opposition to Senator George McGovern and President Jimmy Carter and opposed the amoral iconoclast policies of Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Brzezinski and secretary Madeleing Albright, which was very important to their development as a vital Republican political force and their impact on American foreign policy.


Six. Neo-Conservatives were against Kissinger-style realism, balance of power and détente that Secretary Kissinger designed to bring about the orderly decline of the United States after its dismal defeat in the Vietnam. In 1973 Neo-Conservatives began a campaign to link trade concessions to the Soviet Union to explicit Soviet concessions on Jewish emigration. Neo-Conservatives were concerned about Jewish emigration, but they were equally, if not more, determined to derail détente, which they thought was based on a false picture of the world and the Soviet Union. Neo-Conservatives rejected Kissinger's realism in the same spirit that Trotskyists had earlier rejected Stalin's nationalism. Neo-Conservatives insisted on passing Jackson-Vanik, and the Soviets then balked at complying with its terms, and détente, from that moment, was dead. Then onwards the United States could seek agreements with the Soviet Union based on mutual interest, but it could not pursue a general strategy aimed at ending the Cold War. Neo-Conservatives argued that the Soviet Union had used détente as a cover for its imperial aims. The Watergate scandal may have made it impossible for Nixon, Kissinger, and Gerald Ford to carry out their end of a détente strategy. By killing détente, the Neo-Conservatives encouraged the Soviet Union to undertake the military buildup and expansion of its influence overseas that the Neo-Conservatives later used as proof of their theories. Neo-Conservatism was a self-fulfilling prophecy, as it helped precipitate the crisis in U.S.-Soviet relations that it then claimed to uncover the Soviet military build-up and response to the end of detente. Nixon-Ford detente with the Soviet Union shortly after American defeat in the Vietnam was a total sell out of American national interests by Secretary Kissinger. Neo-Conservatives should be complimented for their bold initiatives that derailed the Kissinger-led sell out of American national interests.


Seven. Neo-Conservatives have unadulterated contempt and hatred for Ashkenazi Jewish Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright Nexus that misused the White House to promote a hidden extra-constitutional iconoclast patriarchal agenda. The neocons have contempt for dialogue and negotiation - for the minutiae of politics. Henry Kissinger came in for special reproach. Kissinger believed that the United States should ally with anyone if it enhanced the power of the United States after defeat in the Vietnam. Secretary Kissinger harnessed the commonality of Judeo-Communism and iconoclast patriarchy of Judeo-Christianity to bring about the first Sino-US joint venture that resulted in installing Catholic Pol Pot regime in Buddhist Cambodia and caused the genocide of 2 million Buddhists to great delight of those that wanted to Christianize Laos, Cambodia and the Vietnam. Republican Neo-Conservatives hated Secretary Kissinger’s role in the demise of democracy in Chile and Argentina and the subsequent loss of many thousands lives. Democratic Neo-Conservatives were aghast at Evangelical President Jimmy Carter’s ugly role in the overthrowing secular modern Pahlevi Monarchy as well as the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Shahpur Bakhtiar in Iran and replacing it by ultra-conservative regime of Ayatollah Khomeini. Such Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright type amoral realism with hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda is anathema to the Neoconservatives. The Neo-Conservative foreign policy agenda is to enhance America’s military power with lliance with major democratic powers such as India to meet the challenge of Communist China and to use America’s military power to reshape the world in the image of capitalist democracy and to establish liberal democratic governments in the Islamic Middle East to permanently destroy the breeding grounds of barbarian extremist fundamentalist militant Islamic terrorism.

(2) Neo-Cons War on Islamic Terrorrism


One. Conventional War against global Islamic terrorism no longer a practical option by great powers as conventional war on the Islamic world shall not be a plausible way of achieving American national goals, as the cost conventional of war against elusive Islamic terrorists, even for the victor may exceed the benefits of victory. One of the first and foremost pieces of the "old world" and "old thinking" to be tossed on the trash heap of history by Neo-Conservatives is the idealist view of human institution of war. Conventional War as an instrument of foreign policy in the idealistic view was a proper instrument for achieving national interest goals, but not any more in the global war on Islamic terror. Former President Woodrow Wilson was the founder of idealism or Wilsonian Idealist approach to foreign policy. Idealism is also marked by the prominent role played by international law and international organizations in its conception of policy formation.


Two. Neo-Conservatism stands for a global war against Islamic terrorism. Whatever alternatives are proposed to replace the neo-conservative paradigm must effectively address the gritty reality of fighting Wahhabi terrorism on a global scale. All proposed alternatives to Neo-conservative agenda must pass a fundamental litmus test, they must offer a viable plan to solve the Middle East’s Wahhabi problem of religious fundamentalism, extremism and solve it in a permanent fashion, so that never again the barbarians of the Arabia invade and attempt to destroy civilizations. The Middle Eastern problem is quite simply that, the region exports radical Islamic terrorism and religious extremism and fundamentalism that directly threaten the safety of the United States and India. In the post-Cold War world in India and in the post-September 11th world in the United States, the Wahhabi terrorist threat constitutes the single greatest danger to Indian and American national security and to world civilization itself. The prospect of a Saudi Arabian or Iran financed Islamic terrorist nuclear weapon being detonated in an American city is horrifying but it is also not far fetched.


Three. Whereas the Soviet nuclear threat during the Cold War could be effectively contained and deterred through concepts such as "Massive Retaliation" and "Mutual Assured Destruction," the terrorist threat cannot. Men who view suicide bombing as a path to martyrdom are not persuaded through a rational cost-benefit calculus analyzing the destructive power of our arsenals versus their own. Unlike the Soviets, the Islamic terrorists themselves have little to lose. International terrorists provide few targets, other than themselves and the hidden infrastructure that supports them. In the mind of Neo-Conservatives the September 11 attacks made abundantly clear that American must undertake preemptive attacks on homelands of Islamic terrorism to vanquish them and followed by proactive democratic nation-building and society-building of the homelands of the Islamic terrorism in the Middle East that enforced western liberal traditions and equality of women. Successfully engaging and ultimately defeating such terrorists is a multi-faceted long-term endeavor, necessitating full mobilization of resources of democratic civilizations.


Four. The conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War that by implication, Neo-Conservatives were no longer inclined to employ force only after having exhausted all other alternatives. The Neo-Conservatives of the 1990s did not qualify as warmongers, but once having gotten a whiff of gunpowder during the Persian Gulf War of 1990–91, Afghan War of 2002 and Iraq War of 2003, Neo-Cons developed a hankering to repeat the experience. In the 1970s and 1980s, the proximate threat posed by the Soviet Union had obliged the United States to exercise a certain self-restraint. Now, with the absence of any counterweight to American power, the need for self-restraint fell away. Indeed, far from being a scourge for humankind, war itself even, or perhaps especially, preventive war became in Neo-Conservative eyes an efficacious means to serve democratic idealistic ends and morally “right” tasks. The problem with Bill Clinton in the 1990s was not that he was reluctant to use force but that he was insufficiently bloody-minded and that Secretary Madeleine Albright had a hidden anti-pagan, anti-democracy iconoclast patriarchal agenda. In Haiti, in Somalia, and elsewhere" where the United States intervened, President Clinton had the stomach only to be halfway imperialists, and when the heat was on, they Clinton to look for the exits. Such half-heartedness suggested a defective appreciation of what power could accomplish. Neo-Conservatives knew better. "Military conquest has often proved to be an effective means of implanting democracy. The best democracy program ever invented is the U.S. Army." "Peace in this world only follows victory in war."


Five. The Neo-Conservative complaint about Operation Desert Storm (1990-91) was that President George H. W. Bush and his commanders had failed to press the attack. In Neo-Cons’ eyes, the Persian Gulf War demonstrated that the Pentagon was a superb military instrument wielded by excessively timid officers, of whom General Colin Powell was the ultimate embodiment. "One of the Gulf war's important lessons is that America's military leadership is far too cautious. Indeed, promoting the assertive use of American military power became central to the imperial self-definition devised by second-generation Neo-Conservatives.


Six. The tenth conviction animating second-generation Neo-Conservatives was a commitment to sustaining and even enhancing American military supremacy. Using American force to advance the prospects of peace and democracy implied that the United States ought to possess military power to spare. Neo-Con historians even charged that the United States was repeating the folly of Great Britain in the period between the world wars by engaging in de facto unilateral disarmament. With the Cold War now history, it seemed, the world was becoming even more dangerous, and the United States therefore needed more military power than ever before. Whether or not a proximate threat existed, it was incumbent upon the Pentagon to maintain the capability "to intervene decisively in every critical region" of the world. To Neo-Cons, the prospect of conflict without end beckoned, because of the global threat of Islamic terrorism. Surveying the world, Neo-cons concluded in 1999, "America must be able to fight Iraq and North Korea, and also be able to fight genocide in the Balkans and elsewhere without compromising its ability to fight two major regional conflicts. America must be able to contemplate war with China or Russia some considerable (but not infinite) time from now. The peace that followed victory is to be a long time coming.


Seven. As the 1990s unfolded, Neo-Conservatives pressed their case for "an American policy of military strength and moral clarity," emphasizing the use of armed force to promulgate American values and perpetuate American primacy. Most persistently Neo-Conservatives throughout the Clinton years lobbied for decisive American action to rid the world of Saddam Hussein. From a Neo-Conservative perspective, the Iraqi dictator's survival after Desert Storm exposed as nothing else the cynicism and shortsightedness of the realists who had dominated the administration of George H. W. Bush and who had prevented the American army from completing its proper mission, pursuing the defeated Iraqi army all the way to Baghdad. Topping the agenda of the second-generation Neo-Conservatives was a determination to correct that error, preferably by mobilizing America's armed might to destroy the Baathist regime. "Bombing Iraq Isn't Enough." It was time for the gloves to come off, and that means using air power and ground forces, and finishing the job left undone in 1991." Neocons yearned to liberate Iraq, as an end in itself but also as a means to an eminently larger end. "A successful intervention in Iraq would revolutionize the strategic situation in the Middle East, in ways both tangible and intangible, and all to the benefit of American interests." A march on Baghdad was certain to have a huge demonstration effect. Iraq War puts dictators around the world, including Iran’s Ayatollahs on notice either to mend their ways or share Saddam's fate. Neo-Cons should silence doubters who questioned America's ability to export its values, its Creed via crusades for democracy.


Eight. With American power now fully refurbished and vindicated by the outcome of the Cold War, the demise of Communism in the Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union and the capitalist inroads into Communist China, the second generation Neo-Cons went a step further, promulgating the notion that the Neo-Conservative moment was now ripe for the United States to use that power, especially military power, to achieve the final triumph of American ideals and creed, especially the Wilsonian Idealism to promote and propagate democracy worldwide. In this sense, the Neo-Conservatives who gravitated to the Weekly Standard showed themselves to be the most perceptive of all of Woodrow Wilson's disciples. For the real Wilson (in contrast to either the idealized or the demonized Wilson) had also seen military power as an instrument for transforming the international system and cementing American primacy.


Nine. Efforts to promote "a neo-Reaganite foreign policy of military supremacy and moral confidence" found expression in five convictions that together form the foundation of second-generation Neo-Conservative thinking about American statecraft. The first conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War is the certainty that American global dominion is, in fact, benign and that other nations necessarily see it as such. Thus, America is not just any hegemon. America runs a uniquely benign imperium. This is not mere self-congratulation by Neo-cons; it is a fact manifest in the way other nations welcome American power, so long it is used to promote or nurture democracy rather than install military dictators and tyrants. The baby-boomer neocons believe that other nations actually yearn for the United States to lead and to sustain its position as sole superpower. Other nations see American dominance as both compatible with their own national interests and preferable to any remotely plausible alternative such as the Chinese dominance or Islamic dominance.


Ten. The second conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War that any failure on the part of the United States to sustain American Imperium or Pax-Americana or Petro-Imperialism would inevitably result in global disorder and New Global Dark Age may descend on the earth, due to growing nexux of Islamic terrorism fundamentalism and global drug trade. Despite "all bleating about hegemony, no nation really wants genuine multipolarity." "Not only do countries such as France and Russia shy away from the expense of creating and preserving a multipolar world; they rightly fear the geopolitical consequences of destroying American hegemony." The cold hard reality of U.S. supremacy was sure to have "a calming effect on the international environment, inducing other powers to focus their energies and resources elsewhere." Rather than eliciting resistance, American dominance could be counted on to "have a soothing effect on the rest of the world." With the passing of the Cold War, "an ideologically pacified North seeks security and order by aligning its foreign policy behind that of the United States. This is the shape of things to come." Failure on the part of the United States to sustain its imperium or Pax-Americana or Petro-imperialism would inevitably result in global disorder, bloody, bitter, and protracted.


Eleven. The third conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War that as a result, proposals for organizing the world around anything other than American power elicited derision for being woolly-headed and fatuous. Nothing, therefore, could be allowed to inhibit the United States in the use of that power. "The United Nations is guarantor of nothing. Except in a formal sense, it can hardly be said to exist." As a result, "when serious threats arise to American national interests unilateralism is the only alternative to retreat." Or more extreme still, "The alternative to unipolarity is chaos." The incontrovertible fact of unipolarity demanded that the United States face up to its obligations, "unashamedly laying down the rules of world order and being prepared to enforce them."


Twelve. The fourth conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War that on the one hand loomed the prospect of "a decline in U.S. power, a rise in world chaos, and a dangerous twenty-first century"; on the other hand was the promise of safety, achieved through "a reassertion of American power and moral leadership." To the Neo-Cons there existed "no middle ground," either you are with us or with them, either you are with America or against the America. 


Thirteen. The seventh conviction animating second-generation Neo-Conservatives related to military power and its uses. In a nutshell, they concluded that nothing works like force. Europeans, might imagine themselves that with the new constitution of the 25-member European Union, the Europe "entering a post-historical paradise of peace and relative prosperity, the realization of Kant's ‘Perpetual Peace.'" American Neo-Conservatives know better, and in Neo-Con’s judgment, the United States remained "mired in history, exercising power in the anarchic Hobbesian world where international laws are unreliable and where true security and the defense and promotion of a liberal order still depend on the possession and use of military might." In the mind of the Neo-Cons employing America’s military might with sufficient wisdom and determination could bring within reach peace, prosperity, democracy, respect for human rights, and American global primacy in partnership with democratic allies like India, extending to the end of the 21st Century. The operative principle was not to husband power but to put it to work to take a proactive approach. "Military strength alone will not avail," if America does not use it actively to maintain a world order which both supports and rests upon American hegemony."


Fourteen. The conviction animating Neo-Conservatives after the Cold War that for Neo-Conservatives, the purpose of the Defense Department is no longer to defend the United States or to deter would-be aggressors but to transform the international order by transforming its constituent parts. The Neo-Cons and the liberal architects of the Iraq war and Afghan war should be "only too willing to tell other countries exactly how to organize their political and economic institutions," for the good of target country’s society and nation. For the younger generation of Neo-Conservatives, instructing other nations as to how to organize their countries, even by employing coercion if need be, is not evidence of arrogant stupidity; it was America's job or America’s Manifest Destiny in the 21st Century.


Fifteen. Neo-Cons should discredit skeptics who claimed to see lurking behind Neo-Conservative schemes the temptations of empire, the dangers of militarism, and the prospect of exhaustion and overstretch, by openly advocating the benefits Arab society especially Arab women would get under colonial Western legal system. By forcibly overthrowing Saddam Hussein affirmed the irresistibility of American military might. As such, the armed liberation of Iraq transformed American foreign policy, by not preserving the status quo but promoting revolutionary democratic change, which thereafter defined the main purpose of American statecraft. The United States was "the most revolutionary force on earth," its "inescapable mission to fight for the spread of democracy," and the operative word is fight. Mao was precisely correct in stating that revolution springs "from the barrel of a gun." The successful ouster of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, during first Bush administration opened up whole new vistas of revolutionary opportunity in the second Bush administration in Iran and Sudan.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 17, Chapter 1.




(0)(4) 1(3) The Global Order of Neo-Conservatives

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Page 17, Chapter 1. 1(3).


One. What was the outcome of this expenditure of Neo-Cons intellectual energy in American politics? During the decade between the end of the Cold War in 1989 and the onset of the global war on terror in 2001, the political achievements of second-generation Neo-Conservatives compare favorably with those of the anti-Communist liberals who in the immediate aftermath of World War II created the ideological foundation for what became a durable postwar American foreign policy consensus. The Cold War liberals helped to lend respectability to certain propositions that in the 1930s might have seemed outlandish, for example, the decision to invade Korea and Vietnam, the decision to permanently station U.S. troops in Europe and to create the apparatus of the national security state. In short, Cold War liberals fostered a climate congenial to Truman's pursuit of certain hard-line anti-Communist policies and increased the political risks faced by those inclined to question such policies. During the 1990s, the intellectual Neo-Conservatives repeated this trick and by the end of that decade, Neo-Conservatives were no longer insurgents; they had transformed themselves into establishment figures in the first Bush administration. Neo-Conservative views entered the mainstream of American public discourse and became less controversial and acquired legitimacy in the first Bush administration. The Neo-Conservatives warned of the ever-present dangers of isolationism and appeasement, called forever more munificent levels of defense spending, and advocated stern measures to isolate, punish, or overthrow tyrannical regimes and never-do-wells around the world.


Two. The grand vision of second-generation Neo-Conservatives demanded that the United States shatter the status quo in the oil-producing Wahhabi Middle East. New conditions and new unipolar world order absolved Americans from any further requirement to adhere to the norms that had defined the postwar bipolar international order. As a direct consequence of determined political discourse neo-conservative views about the efficacy of American military power and the legitimacy of its use, gained wide currency and the Kissinger-type amoral realism thoroughly discredited. On major foreign policy issues the "rise" of China to the proper response to Islamic terror, Neo-Conservatives recast the American public policy debate about the obligations imposed upon and prerogatives to be claimed by the sole superpower or the hegemon of the world. Neo-Cons kept the focus on the issues that they believed mattered most, namely, an America that was strong, engaged, and even pugnacious. Wilsonian Idealistic Ideas that even in 1980 might have seemed reckless or preposterous came to seem perfectly reasonable in 2000. To persist in the existing status quo in the Middle East and in the Third World course of weakness and drift, the Neo-Conservatives warned ominously, puts American national interests as well as America’s future or democracy’s future at risk.


Three. The principal “theses” guiding neocon foreign policy are: (i) that patriotism is a good thing, (ii) that world government is a bad thing, and (iii) that statesmen should be able to distinguish friends from enemies. The neocon foreign policy states that is, U.S. foreign policy should not be confined to safeguarding the territorial United States, it must be concerned with the entire world.“ A larger nation has more extensive interests. And large nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesteryear and the United States of today, inevitably have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns. Neocon foreign policy applies equally to the Soviet Union and the United States, both of whom have (or had, in the case of the Soviets) “ideological interests” which trump mere territorial concerns. The U.S. “will always feel obliged to defend a democratic nation under attack from non-democratic forces,” the Neocons thus “feel it necessary to defend Israel today.” Neocons demand fair and free holding of elections, and Neocons do not want to impose domestic policy agenda of these elected governments’ policies and even then they’re willing to give some leeway to cooperative dictators. No central principles (other than the one spelled p-o-w-e-r) guide the neocons in their quest for America’s “national greatness.” It’s clear, that Corporate America forcefully joined the bandwagon of the neocons. Neocons celebrate the power of the United States and realize that with power come responsibilities, whether sought or not, whether welcome or not. And it is a fact that if America has the kind of power it now has, either it will find opportunities to use it, or the world will discover them for America. The neocons, of course, are not content to let the world find uses for the American power they’ve worked so hard to achieve. As a matter of fact, Neocons more than happy to “find opportunities to use it, to promote nation building, crusades for democracy and war on global Islamic terrorism. All that matters is that the neocons are the ones finding the opportunities and wielding the power.


Four. There is no doubt that the Bush administration qualifies as Neo-Conservative. Bush and his administration, turn out to be quite at home in Neo-Conservative political environment, although it is clear they did not anticipate this role any more than their party as a whole did. Neo-Cons have won and traditional Republican conservatives never saw it coming and still don’t know what hit them. Many Republican conservatives believe that Bush administration remains fully within the American conservative tradition.


Five. It is wrong to argue that when terrorist attacks of 9/11 drove up "demand," for new policies, a single factor on the supply side, the ruthless zeal of neocon ideologues, caused President Bush to adopt a new foreign policy. President Bush was determined to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein, even without the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 attacks simply delayed the invasion of Iraq as United States forced to invade Afghanistan, before it could invade Iraq. This overlooks the rest of the "supply" situation: the fact that other ideas on offer at the time were unpersuasive.


Six. It is wrong to say that President Bush’s post-9/11 U.S. foreign policy as systematically unilateralist and militaristic, when in fact is has been multifaceted and highly experimental, under Secretary Colin Powell as well as under Secretary Condoleezza Rice. The intellectual roots of Neo-Conservatism can be traced to the people who first earned that label in the 1960s, though it is bad intellectual history. The fact is that the 1960’s group called "neocon" wasn't especially homogeneous. The neocons of 2000s are literally the descendants of those so labeled in the 1960s. The Neo-Cons undergoing constant change is at least as evident as continuity in their assumptions about how the world works and what to do about it.


Seven. The original neocons were heavily concerned with the theoretical assumptions that lay behind government policies. They focused much more on domestic than foreign policy. Like any set of serious people searching for solutions to big problems, the neocons disagreed with each other almost as much as they agreed. Neo-Cons had in common repulsion for Communism and the New Left. But to condemn Neo-Cons as a tightly knit “ism" is like treating "Protestants" that way just because they all left Catholicism for vaguely related reasons. Even worse than homogenizing the first neocons is jointly homogenizing two competing groups both called neocon. This is often done without much intellectual connective tissue ever being identified.


Eight. Donald Rumsfeld is not a Neocon. Condoleezza Rice had not been Neo-Conservative prior to joining the Bush Administration. It is stupid to believe "that strong-minded Protestants like Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Rice could be fooled by a bunch of cunning subordinates. Bush administration adopted key neocon proposals because rival foreign policy approaches did not provide credible alternatives.


Nine. It is wrong to portray Neocons as blind ideologues that collide uncomfortably with international reality. It is wrong to argue that Kissinger-type foreign policy approach is realistic or pragmatic or devoid of hidden agenda. It is wrong to criticize that "the fatal Neo-Conservative flaw includes conceptual overreach and the absence of pragmatism. Treating neocons as an ideological community invites critics to treat their ideas as the product of an ideological heritage instead of as the product of hard-won, real-world experience. It would be better to evaluate the validity of neocon ideas compared to other competing foreign policy proposals of rival foreign policy schools. The neocons should be analyzed as a "political interest group," and American political system usually highlights competition between interest groups. It is wrong to suggest that there wasn't competition between competing foreign policy proposals, and that neocons took over American foreign policy without a fight because they were zealous and well positioned.

(4) America’s Virtuous Quest for Empire


One. Moreover, the litmus test for identifying a Bushian Republican neocon is said to be the belief that the United State is capable of crafting democracies in the Islamic world and must set about that task. This belief would strike, has already struck, several original neocons as utopian and imprudent. Bushian Republican Neocons are labeled on the basis of foreign policy alone, and are not assumed necessarily to share a single domestic policy position. Neocons often find military strength handy. However it does not mean that Neo-Cons see "the use of military force as the first, not the last option of foreign policy."


Two. After the end of the Cold War, the demise of the Communism and the Soviet Union, and the emergence of the Unipolar world order, the White House faced two overarching national security questions: (a) What should U.S. grand strategy be in a "unipolar" world? And (b) how should America deal with violent Islamism and its global ambitions? The ideology of "Neo-Conservatism" provided a consistent foreign policy alternative, on these two matters, to traditional realism and liberal institutionalism. America today stands astride the world as no other country in history. This is not because it is inherently more powerful than everyone else. Other states combined amply possess enough population, money, and technology to check America. America is daunting because, first, it has no close single rival, and second, it mobilizes its capabilities in defense spending at a higher rate than any other great power. America’s hegemony is unlikely to fade anytime soon. In foreign policy the Republican neocons have a lot in common with Rooseveltian realists but differ sharply with liberal institutionalists. Liberal institutionalists say unipolarity cannot last, so America should soften its (inevitable) relative decline by intertwining all countries in international institutions favorable to us, as they insist it did after 1945.


Three. Many scholars in the 1970s to late 1980s proclaimed that U.S. power was in terminal decline" and advocated that the United States should accommodate rather than confront the Soviet Union. Had Reagan administration accepted the above logic, the Cold War might have continued for decades longer. Instead, Reagan avoided American decline "through bold foreign policy choices that overemphasized American superiority. The record simply does not support the belief that America is inevitably declining now any more than then. Thus, Wilsonian Neocons and Rooseveltian realists are basically indistinguishable in proposing to maintain the present level of predominance of American military power. The Rooseveltian realists as well as Wilsonian Neocons agree that international institutions and agreements are not reliable guarantors of security, and it their common response to real-world events. It is foolish to portray neocons as doctrinaire, and to avoid engaging substantively with Neo-Con reasoning. Rooseveltian realists urge caution in a unipolar world by arguing that restraint is the bold choice that can help keep the world unipolar, by avoiding frightening other countries into "balancing" against a threatening hegemon America. It is Rooseveltian realism to believe that most nations do not balance against America as they do against others, because we are oceans away and have a history of benign intentions. So far the Protestant Wilsonian neocons have the open field in the Bush administration. Despite American predominance in power and recent preemptive attacks on Iraq, there is simply no evidence that other countries are even beginning to balance against sole super power America. Neo-Cons correctly reject the advice to tread exceedingly cautiously, proffered by some Kissinger-type realists and isolationists, as this policy advice based on the flawed premise that the most likely source of long-term threats is because of increased American military deployments around the world, as most likely the opposite seems the case.


It is wrong to argue that Neocons are over-reliant on the use of force as instrument of national policy. Like Rooseveltian realists, the Wilsonian Neocon do not advocate a massive American military presence in Latin America, South Asia, or sub-Saharan Africa, because those regions pose no possible strategic challenge to the American hegemony. It is wrong to argue that neocons prefer war as a first resort and eschew other non-war instruments of American foreign policy. Republican Neocons say America should vigorously contain China but America should not invade China. Neo-Con hawks are also uncertain whether it makes sense for America to attack nuclear facilities in North Korea and Iran. On the subject of violent Islamism, neocons are more distinguishable by their emphasis on political reform in the Middle East, while Rooseveltian realists emphasize on the use of American military might. The neocon approach to unipolarity is bold but well within the American mainstream. Neocon views about the actual use of force are utterly conventional. The Neocon take on deterrence is cloudy, but for now so is the evidence.


Five. Neocons distinctively argue that Mideast tyranny is the taproot of radicalism and that democratization will cut it off. The Neo-Con policy for crusades for democracy in the Islamic world strikes liberal institutionalists as needlessly provocative and Kissinger-type realists as recklessly meddling. Kissinger-type Realists and liberal institutionalists have no policies custom-tooled to the novel fact that 9/11 attacks on America was undertaken by Islamic terrorist organizations that were financed and nurtured by pro-American Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait and Wahhabi mosques in the United States.


Six. The priorities and roots of the Republican Neo-Conservative have always been in foreign policy and in global issues and they can always make adjustments with local issues and could co-opt Christian religious right conspiracy within the Republican Party, without allowing it to influence the American foreign policy. The foreign policy of President Bush and Secretary Rice influenced by the religious agenda of neither Catholic fundamentalism nor Protestant fundamentalism, as it is influenced by Petro-Imperialism.


Seven. Unlike Isolationists, the Neo-Conservatism wants to have pro-active American foreign policy so that America may leverage its unique position as the sole super power to export America-type democracy, laws, society, culture and civilization worldwide. Unlike Papacy, the Neo-Conservatism does not want to weaken the State rather they want to strengthen the American State. Neo-Conservatism does not want to abolish the State, but Neo-Conservatives want to control it, especially if the Neo-Conservative State they control is capable of controlling all others nations and states of the world by means of crusades for democracy, exporting American Creed, Culture and Civilization, even with the preemptive use of force. Neo-Conservatism are not "patriotic" in any conventional sense of the term and do not identify themselves with the real and historic America but see the United States merely as the host organism for the exercise of America’s Will to Power and to export of America’s democratic creed and civilization worldwide. Whereas the American Conservative political tradition has long been fixated on the dangers of centralized state power, on the desirability of limited government and non-intervention in foreign affairs, the Neo-Conservatives exalt and worship state power, and want America to become a hyper-state in order to be an effective global hegemon. Even when Neo-Cons support certain foreign governments it is on the expediency grounds that it is more efficient and responsive to the demands of the American Empire, not on Constitutional grounds.


Eight. The Imperialist Neo-Conservatism justify the use of preemptive force to build a secular American colonial empire to secure energy security interests, but would militarily oppose any coalition of nations that conspire in concert with Pope to establish a new Holy Christian Empire in any part of the world. Neo-Conservatism supports the ideal of American Colonial Empire, Petro-Imperialism and Pax-Americana, but totally rejects the ideal of creating a Holy Roman Empire in the United States. Neo-Conservatism rejects the hidden agenda of Christian religious right conservative conspiracy to implement the hidden iconoclast patriarchal anti-Hindu and anti-Pagan agenda through the instrumentality of the White House and the State Department. Neo-Conservatism rejects the Papal idea that America should become a willing agent to create Papal Universal Church in the world. Neo-Conservatism rejects the white racists idea that restricts the non-European immigration and refused to accept the need for accommodating the non-white Asians into the corridors of power. The Neo-Conservative view of the United States is an American dream of a hybrid "imagined" nation where immigrants of all color and races finds it a home to make their own American Dream a reality. Neo-Conservatives’ relentless pursuit of an American Oil-Colonial Empire is coupled by their deliberate domestic transformation of the federal government of the United States into a Leviathan unbound by constitutional restraints of checks and balances by vastly increasing the executive powers of the President. The secular Hindu India has no objection for secular American Colonial Empire but would militarily oppose if America sought to build an iconoclast patriarchal Occidental Holy Christian Empire either in Oriental or Pagan world.


Nine. The Republican National Strategic Strategy doctrine, September 2005, calls for an indefinite and massive military build-up unconnected to any identifiable military threat to the United States. Neo-Conservatism demands ‘citizen involvement,' in effect, militarization of the American populace but the traditional 'citizen soldier' concept is reversed. The goal of the Neo-Conservatism is to get suitably indoctrinated young Americans to go and risk their lives not only for the honor and security of their own country, but also for the ideological democratic missions that Neo-Conservatives have represented to the public and which American public and many world leaders find politically acceptable. Neo-Conservative foreign policy puts guns before butter and butter always follows guns. Neo-Cons believe that gunboat diplomacy rather than economic carrots policy is the inescapable price of American regional presence abroad. Secretary Rice realized that British Indian Empire’s 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries Gunboat diplomacy in the Persian Gulf is more useful that Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright-type realism in case of Ayatollah-ruled Iran.


Ten. Republican Neo-Conservatives want Siberia to secede from Russia, as Siberia is the land twice the size of the United States but with only 40 million people. While Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright Trio wanted China to takeover Siberia as a prelude to an American-led scramble for Siberia, Neo-Conservative consider rising China to be a greater enemy of the United States than Russia. In the aftermath of the Cold War the Neo-Conservatives regard Moscow as the enemy, enthusiastically supporting Chechen separatists as "freedom fighters" and advocated NATO expansion to include non-Slav Eastern Europe. Secretary Kissinger was obsessed with Siberia and exhorted China to invade Siberia. Their atavism is comparable to Hitler's obsession with Russia, an animosity that was equally unrelated to the nature of its regime. It is only a matter of time before some Kissinger-type realists start advocating a new Drang nach Osten, in the form of an American-led scramble for Siberia. Neo-Conservatives do not want China to takeover Eastern Siberia. Neo-Conservatives fear Chinese invasion of Australia, a continent-size nation with only 25 million people, which Chinese believe can support 800 million Chinese people. Neo-Conservatives will support Russia in case of any Russia-China War in the 21st Century. 


Eleven. Neo-Conservative foreign policy is the product of a colossal insight that fixed its sights on the idea of American global hegemony, an ideology that is more Jacobin than Jeffersonian and one that is particularly well suited to the present day American mindset in the new age of one super power unipolar world order. Republican Neo-Conservatives came to Washington after inauguration of the Bush administration, with a very clear agenda, which they had been working on for over a decade, while Bill Clinton ran the White House. As a matter of fact, Republican Neo-Conservatives had returned to Washington, since Neo-Conservatives had first tasted the fruits of power during the Reagan administration and G.H.W. Bush administration (1980-2002). Neo-Conservative network in Bush government and academia, and the foreign policy agenda of Neo-Conservatism, is distinctly different from that of traditional Conservatism and borders to revolutionary foreign policy agenda and involved a tectonic shift in American foreign policy under Secretary Rice during second Bush administration, which is truly called the un-first term administration.


Twelve. Neo-Republicans gained access to the American ruler after Bush inauguration in 2001, through campaign management, dissimulation, sycophancy and general craftiness. Once entrenched in power they were in a position to whisper in the ruler's ear, making President Bush their willing instrument, because Neo-Conservatism expressed what President Bush had always believed in as a rebel during his father’s administration and after. With dissimulation, sycophancy and general craftiness the Neocons wormed their way into the corridors of power and seized de facto control of the ship of state in a revolutionary manner that no body could oppose and succeeded to purge the iconoclast patriarchal and amoral realist mindset of the White House that Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright had secretly established.


Three. The Rise of Neo-Cons was a turning point in American history and what was in effect a coup d'etat and Bob Woodward in book, “Plan of Attack,” describes the mechanics of how this actually came about. Secretary Collin Powell felt that Vice President Dick Cheney along with I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith, had established what amounted to a separate government," that Powell called Feith's 'Gestapo' office.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 21, Chapter 1.




(0)(5) 1(4) Crusades for Democracy

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Page 21, Chapter 1. 1(14)

(5) (1) Pursuing Democratic Realism


One. Neo-Conservatives claim to represent a populist base against an established liberal intellectual elite. Since the 1960s, after Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson signed the Bill of Rights and President Nixon made a visit to China, it seems the American public has been subject to a top-down revolution of iconoclast patriarchy, pseudo realism and pseudo-liberalism that violated all manner of the American people's common sense, especially by imposing pro-China, pro-dictatorships, anti-India, anti-democracy, iconoclast patriarchal policies on democracy loving people of the United States, by the pro-religious right conspiracy hatched by Secretaries Kissinger, Brzezinski and Albright.


Two. Winning the War on Terror mandates an offensive thrust into the wellspring of Islamic terrorism, the Middle East itself. That strategic reality is effectively put forward in the National Strategy for Combating Terrorism (2003). More commonly known as the "4D" strategy, the plan sets forth four essential elements for attaining victory in the War on Terror. The US must: (a) defeat existing terrorist organizations, (b) deny terrorists the support of nation states, 3) diminish the underlying factors that lead people to embrace rather than shun terrorists like Bin Laden, and 4) defend the US homeland and its interests abroad. The strategy fundamentally recognizes that the unlike the status quo in say Polynesia, Latin America, or Eastern Europe, the status quo in the Middle East poses an unacceptable danger to the United States and the world.


Three. The neo-conservative strategic framework has ascended to the center of US foreign policy during second Bush administration in the capacity of “Pursuing Democratic Realism,” “Crusades for Democracy,” and “Nation-building”. At its most basic level, "neo-conservatism" or "democratic realism,” prescribes a two-part strategy for addressing the problem of Islamic terrorism and energy security. First, selective regime change must eliminate anti-American Islamic tyrants who are likely to ally opportunistically with Islamic terrorists who are at war with the United States. Second, upon the ashes of the deposed tyrants and deposed anti-women religious fundamentalism, the liberal or semi-liberal democracies must be forged in their stead. In essence, such prescriptions are the "deny" and "diminish" elements of the National Strategy. Democratic realism recognizes that the United States must pursue a "realist" strategy of manipulating and managing the international environment to provide security.


Four. The “Neo-Conservative Democratic Realism” puts forth the idea that ultimately, democracy in the oil-producing Islamic world can undermine the Wahhabi terrorist movement better than any propped-up dictator that permitted the continued extremist fundamentalist status quo in the religion and the society. Metaphorically speaking, democracy, regular elections, modern legal system in place of Sharia and guaranteeing rights of women and minorities can heal the patient's deep wounds from within, whereas repressing the fundamentalists via proxy through a friendly strongman military dictator merely applies a band-aid, a band-aid that is liable to fall off at any time in the future. Such democratic construction and nation building in the Islamic world is an ambitious endeavor. However, the neo-conservative vision is a far cry from an idealistic or reckless Wilsonian crusade. In 2004, democratic realism is the most pragmatic form of realism. The massive nature of the task merely reflects the tremendous danger of the threat. Islamic Regime Change will only effectively alter the Middle Eastern status quo against global terrorism, only if preemptive military strikes are bolstered with the permanence of democratic construction, replacing Sharia with Western laws and guaranteeing the status of women. Likewise, defeating Islamic terrorist organizations and defending the US homeland depends upon altering the terrorist-producing status quo of the Wahhabi religious and social infrastructure in the Middle East.


Five. One of the well-known tenets of modern idealist thinking is Democratic Peace Theory, which holds that states with similar modes of democratic governance do not fight one another. Idealism transcends the left-right political spectrum. Idealists can include both human rights campaigners (traditionally, but not always, associated with the left) and American Neo-Conservatism, which is usually associated with the right. On the other hand, it can also be argued that the Neo-Conservative decision to invade Iraq in 2003 can be traced to an idealist impulse to transform the Middle East by removing a brutal dictator and creating the conditions for a long-lasting democracy in Iraq, which would then cause other populations in the region to also clamor for democracy. This process would then bring peace to the turbulent Middle East. Thus, although the invasion of Iraq could be viewed as an aggressive act, it can also be seen as an act of idealism, on the part of the Neo-Conservatives. Neo-conservatives believe that instead of installing pro-American military dictatorships by covert operations and military coups-de-etat in the Non-Aligned Third World, the United States should promote democracy by bringing down military dictatorships, as the reinstalled democratically leadership shall be more friendly towards the United States and more determined to combat Islamic terrorism, fundamentalism and extremism.


Six. One can say that the historical task and political purpose of Neo-Conservatism seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, into a new kind of Conservative politics suitable to governing a modern American democracy, so that America an Exemplar state in the post-nation state world order, prudently uses its power to promote crusades for democracy worldwide, to help plant the seeds of the “Democratic Utopia” worldwide.


Seven. Even when Neo-Conservatism advocates preemptive attacks or wars to export democracy, the term "democracy" is used as an ideological concept to help the barbarian world or less civilized nations realize the Democratic Utopia, which has worked fine in the United States, India and in Eastern Europe. The Neo-Con usage of the term “Democracy” does signify broad participation of informed citizens in the business of governance, but it denotes the desirable social and political content of ostensibly popular decisions. The NeoCon concept of democracy is pro-active democracy so that extremist, fundamentalist totalitarian forces do not misuse the freedom of the democracy to subvert the democracy itself. Just as Muslim theocrats hang as apostate any Muslim that converts to another religion, similarly the democratic freedom should be denied to those extremists that refuse to accept the multi-ethnic liberty and freedom inherent in Democracy.


Eight. Whereas the Trotskyite Left is predominantly anti-militarist but believed in the export of Communism by use of force, the Republican Neo-Conservatives are enthusiastically militarist to promote democratic nation building and crusades for democracy, in a manner reminiscent of enthusiastic militarism of the Soviet totalitarianism to promote Communism worldwide. White Protestant WASPs have purged the Republican Neo-Conservatism of certain hidden patriarchal ideals that Judeo-Trotskyites had secretly inserted in the Republican Neo-Conservatism. 


Nine. Neo-Conservatives are neither in pursuit of Power for its own sake, but for promoting American Democratic creed worldwide, especially in the oil-rich Islamic world, governed by rules that legitimize religious extremism, fundamentalism and. Neo-Conservative agenda will succeed because it aimed to realize political objectives that are morally speaking “right” or “good.” Neo-Con’s America will succeed where Hitler’s Fascist Germany and Gorbachev’s Soviet Union failed, simply because the multi-ethnic inclusive tolerant United States has vibrant capitalist economy and vibrant democracy that guarantees freedom and liberty for all including recent immigrants. Neo-Conservative Pro-religious agenda serves the interests of God and its pro-democracy agenda serves the interests of every man and woman, thus while Nazism and Communism sinned against God as well as man, Neo-Conservatism serves both God, men and women. The tragic end of Fascist Thousand-Year Reich and Communist Empire were doomed to fail as they both failed to harness the power of democratic man and failed to channel the forces of tolerant religions and democratic freedom.


Ten. Traditional WASP Conservatives distrust Neo-Conservatism because, latter is not pure Conservatism and confuses the American public about the virtues of using American preemptive use of force abroad for idealistic purposes including crusades for democracy to export Democratic Utopia worldwide, including the oil-rich Middle East. American Progressives dislike Neo-Conservatives because Neo-Cons’ promotion of democracy can complicate Liberalism, and Neo-Cons argue that it is a fine and noble thing to insist on elections in the former Third World, even if need be through force.


Eleven. The “Democratic Globalism” and “Democratic Realism” are two major strains of Neo-Conservative thinking on foreign policy, not one. Democratic Globalism and democratic realism are both are “democratic” because they advocate the spread of democracy as both an ends and a means of American foreign policy. Neo-Conservative Democratic Globalism defines as ‘democratic globalism’, a kind of muscular Wilsonianism minus international institutions. The democratic globalism advocated by President Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice. The War on Terror is not America’s only problem in the 21st Century, no more than the Cold War was America’s only problem in the second half of the 20th century. There are many others, though they are of a lesser order. The threat from Arab Islamic terror that America faces falls inside the central imperative and Islamic terror needs to be contained, and there is moral imperative for the invasion, overthrow and reconstruction of the Islamic world, by crusades for democracy and democratic nation building in the Islamic world. Neo-Conservative Democratic Globalism seeks to respond to any mortal threat to freedom around the globe, any serious threat to what was once known as the “free world” as a whole is “global,” which in the 1930s and 1940s meant fascism, and in 1945 to 1989 meant communism and after 2001 means Arab Islamic terrorism.


Twelve. “Democratic Realism” rejects the universalistic scope and high idealism of “Democratic Globalism” and always requires geopolitical strategic necessity as a condition for intervention, even for crusades for democracy. Neo-Conservative Democratic Realism argues that while humanitarian considerations are necessary for any American intervention, they are not sufficient. American intervention must always be grounded on strategic and geopolitical reasoning and  in the absence of a strategic imperative, it is better to keep one’s powder dry, precisely because that powder might be necessary to meet some coming strategic threat. Neo-Con Democratic Realism argues that the global spread of democracy is too open-ended and ambitious and as alternative propose to restrain the idealistic universalism with the realist consideration of strategic necessity, which is the central axiom of democratic realism. Neo-Con Democratic Realists support democracy everywhere, but will commit blood and treasure only in places where there is a strategic necessity, at places central to the larger war against the existential enemy, the enemy that poses a global mortal threat to freedom and a threat to America.


Thireen. Neo-Conservative crusades for democracy and Democratic   uglobalism are not Wilsonian realism. The Democratic globalism and crusades for democracy is attractive because it shares Wilsonian realism’s insights about the centrality of power. Democratic Globalism is attractive because it has contempt for the legalisms of liberal internationalism. Neo-Conservative doctrine is Democratic globalism is an improvement over Wilsonian realism. What it can teach Wilsonian realism is that the spread of democracy is not just an end but also a means to an end, an indispensable means for securing American interests by exporting American-type democracies worldwide. The reason is simple. Democracies are: more friendly to the United States, less belligerent to their neighbors, and generally more inclined to peace, than non-democratic regimes. Realists are right that to protect your interests you often have to go around the world bashing bad guys over the head. The danger of democratic globalism is its universalism, America’s open-ended commitment to human freedom and America’s temptation to plant the flag of democracy everywhere. America must learn to say no. And America did say no to demands for military interventions in Liberia, or Congo, or Burma. America countenances alliances with authoritarian rulers in places like Pakistan, it stands accused of hypocrisy.


Fourteen. Neo-Conservatism advocates democratic realism and its axiom is that America will support democracy everywhere, but America will commit blood and treasure only in places where there is a strategic necessity, meaning, places central to the larger war against the existential enemy, the enemy that poses a global mortal threat to freedom and also to America. America should establish civilized, decent, nonbelligerent, pro-Western democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq and ultimately in their key neighbors Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Syria and would like the flipping of Germany and Japan in the 1940s, change the strategic balance in the fight against Arab-Islamic terrorist radicalism.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 26, Chapter 1.




(0)(5B) 1(6) Hegemon’s Democratic Realism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006;


One. There are four schools of American foreign policy: first, Isolationism or Monroe Doctrine; second, Liberal Internationalism or Wilsonian Idealism; third, Rooseveltian Realism or Kissinger-type amoral realism; forth, Neo-Conservatism or Democratic Realism. The first school of America’s foreign policy, Isolationism originally sprang from a view of America as spiritually superior to the Old World. America was too good to be corrupted by its low intrigues, entangled by its cynical alliances. Today isolationism is an ideology of fear. Isolationism is a Fear of trade, a Fear of immigrants, and a Fear of the other. American Isolationists want to cut off trade and immigration, and withdraw from our military and strategic commitments around the world. The geopolitical reality underlying the American policy of Isolationism was the Monroe Doctrine, which sought to keep the European colonial empires from interfering the American predominance in the New World, the North South and Central America. The Manifest destiny of America in the 19th Century had been to take over the lands of Red Indians from Atlantic coast to the Pacific coast, after Napoleon sold to United States the Spanish Empire’s landmass in North America for the mere sum of $15 million, to pay for Napoleonic Wars in Europe, to check the rise of British power in North America. American policy of Isolationism was a prudent realist policy to legitimize the Monroe Doctrine and to ward off any European support to undermine the WASP domination of the United States.


Two. The Wilsonian Idealism and Rooseveltian Realism are two important schools of American foreign policy. American Foreign policy school of Wilsonian Idealism sought to develop American foreign policy as an expression of growing political, military and economic power of the continental-size United States, to promote American Creed and American moral values. Wilsonian Idealism promoted American national interests camouflaged under idealism to make them more palatable to American Conservatism as well as to blunt any move to organize European coalitions to challenge growing power of the United States. The second school of American foreign policy is Liberal Internationalism better known as Wilsonian Idealism. During Clinton Administration in the 1990s, it was liberal internationalism. Liberal internationalism is the foreign policy of the Democratic Party and the religion of the foreign policy elite. Liberal International traces its pedigree to Woodrow Wilson’s utopianism, Harry Truman’s anticommunism, and John Kennedy’s militant universalism. But after the Vietnam War, it was transmuted into an ideology of passivity, acquiescence and almost reflexive anti-interventionism. The Wilsonian Idealism of American invasion of Korea and Vietnam had a hidden iconoclast patriarchal religious agenda to undermine the popular and political support to entrenched Buddhism in Korean Peninsula and Indo-China to make Buddhist lands of Asia vulnerable to Christian consersions.


Three. In the unipolar world whatever stability one enjoys owed to the overwhelming power and deterrent threat of the United States. The land mine that protects civilization from barbarism is not parchment but power. In a unipolar world, American power wielded if necessary unilaterally and if necessary wielded preemptively, protects civilizations from Islamic terrorist barbarian invasions. American foreign policy school of Rooseveltian Realism sought to promote American national interests by bluntly stating the national interests and real-politik. Rooseveltian foreign policy carried the big stick and hyped the might of American big stick to implement foreign policy objectives of the United States. The Kissinger-type realism reflected the Nixon administration policy to accomplish the orderly decline of the United States after humiliating American defeat in the Vietnam. The Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright Realism foreign policy school during Jewish Ashkenazi Secretaries of State carried a hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda to promote the religious interests that of religious right conspiracy, Masonic Lodge, Papacy, Evangelicals and Jews. The hidden foreign policy agenda of administrations of President Ford, Carter and Clinton had been to implement the Christian religious agenda to win over the votes of fundamentalist Christians.


Four. Democratic Globalism is the fourth school that has guided American foreign policy in Bush administration. This conservative alternative to realism is often lazily and invidiously called neo-conservatism. Neo-Conservatism or its acronym Democratic Globalism, a foreign policy that defines the national interest not as power but as values and that identifies one supreme value, “the success of liberty.” “The United States shares a mission in the world beyond the balance of power or the simple pursuit of interest. United States seeks the advance of freedom and the peace that freedom brings.” Beyond power, beyond interests and beyond interest defined as power that is the credo of democratic globalism. America is a nation uniquely built not on blood, race or consanguinity, but on a proposition of liberty, freedom and democracy to which America’s sacred honor has been pledged for two centuries. This American exceptionalism explains why non-Americans find this foreign policy of Democratic Globalism so difficult to credit. Foreigners find American value-driven foreign policy hopelessly and irritatingly moralistic. Democratic globalism sees as the engine of history not the will to power but the will to freedom. And while it has been attacked as a dreamy, idealistic innovation, its inspiration comes from the Truman Doctrine of 1947, the Kennedy inaugural of 1961, and Reagan’s “evil empire” speech of 1983. They all sought to recast a struggle for power between two geopolitical titans into a struggle between freedom and unfreedom, and into a struggle between good and evil.


Five. The Truman Doctrine criticized by realists like Hans Morgenthau and George Kennan. The Reagan’s doctrine of evil empire vilified by the entire foreign policy establishment for the sin of idealizing the Cold War by injecting a moral overlay. “The spread of freedom is our last line of defense and our first line of attack.” President Reagan’s dangerously expansive and aggressive utopian foreign policy was based on Wilsonian realism. This Reagan vision was expansive and perhaps utopian, but it was not Wilsonian realism, because President Woodrow Wilson did not envision the spread of democracies not through the preemptive attacks on tyrannies and dictatorships.


Six. At the dawn of the twenty-first century, America clearly sees the three great geopolitical challenges on the horizon: the inexorable rise of China, the rise of India and the coming demographic collapse of Europe, all three will irrevocably disequilibrate the international system. That is new is what happened on December 26, 1991, the demise of Communist Soviet Union and the emergence of the United States as the world’s unipolar power. What is unique is America’s advantage in this struggle, an advantage America did not have during the World War I, World War II and the Cold War. The question for 21st Century is how to press this advantage of American hegemony, how to exploit America’s unipolar power, how to deploy it to win the war on global Islamic terrorism. The Kissinger-type realism lacks a clear understanding of the new unipolar world order and fails to find the proper use of its sole super power status, and unilateral and preemptive use of force to realize its foreign policy goals to export Democratic Utopia worldwide. But Kissinger-type realism and Wilsonian realism in the end fails because realism offers no vision for the proper usage of America’s predominance. Realism is all about means and does not know to what ends should America use its hegemony. Realism cannot adequately define America’s mission and manifest destiny in the 21st Century.


Seven. The fourth school of American foreign policy is democratic globalism or Neo-Conservatism. Neo-Conservatism has in Bush administration, in the first decade of the 21st Century, rallied the American people to a struggle for American values, American creed and for export of America-type democracies worldwide. Neo-Conservatism and Democratic Globalism seeks to vindicate the American idea by making the spread of democracy, the success of liberty, the ends and means of American foreign policy. Neo-Conservatism and Democratic Globalism must be tempered in its universalistic aspirations and rhetoric from a democratic globalism to a democratic realism. Democratic Globalism tempered with Democratic realism must be targeted, focused and limited. America is friends to all, but America come ashore and crosses the Atlantic or the Pacific only where it really counts. Islamic terrorism expands from Mecca to world over. The rationality of the Islamic terrorist barbarian enemy is something beyond America’s control. But the use of American power is within its control, and if America uses its military power wisely, constrained not by illusions and fictions but only by the limits of our mission, which is to bring a freedom, liberty, modernization and democracy to the breeding grounds of Islamic terrorism in the Islamic Middle east as an antidote to barbarian invasions of the civilization that America can prevail.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/  Page 24, Chapter 1.




(0)(6) 1(5) Origin of Neo-Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Page 24, Chapter 1.

(6) US Foreign Policy Neo-Conservatism


One. The vocal critics of Neo-Conservatism can no longer plausibly claim that Neo-Conservatism merely another form of traditional conservatism, nor can they plausibly insist that Neo-Conservatism has anything at all to do with the American tradition of limited government and avoidance of entangling alliances. Neo-Conservatism had “its origin among disillusioned liberal intellectuals in the 1970s, when the grassroots of the Republican Party, and indeed much of Middle America, was still largely wedded to the ideas of small government at home and a reasonably prudent foreign policy abroad. Ronald Reagan at least espoused relatively conservative ideas even if he didn’t follow through on most of them once in office, was elected president in 1980. The Neocon ideas were not the ideas of the mainstream right at the time, and their prospects weren’t even looking very bright in 1980’s. The historical task and political purpose of Neo-Conservatism was to convert the Republican Party and American Conservatism, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern American democracy.


Two. The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) had been issuing statements, petitions, policy papers, and whatnot, pretty continuously on the subject of American foreign policy and much of the Middle East since its inception. PNAC worked quietly but effectively to mobilize elite opinion makers in academia, media and intelligentsia to support the foreign policy goals of Neo-Conservative revolution in American foreign policy. The first and foremost goal of PNAC has been to demand a huge increase in the Pentagon budget. The PNAC group advocated a massive and fundamental "transformation" of the American military, from a defensive shield into an instrument of petro-imperialistic American Colonial Empire. However, the realists within Neo-Conservative movement had realized, in a report entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published in September of 2000, that massive increase in Pentagon’s budget would not be possible without the occurrence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor." With the victory of George W. Bush several of PNAC's leading lights found themselves on their way to Washington, and when 9/11 rolled around, the "new Pearl Harbor" they had been waiting for, the neocons were more than ready for their moment in the sun.


Three. President Carter established National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which under Reagan dispensed millions of dollars to "pro-democracy" groups throughout the world. The NED became a bastion of Neo-Conservative influence in the Reagan administration, and the neocons entrenched into the Pentagon and held key positions in the foreign policy apparatus. The Republican neocons faced the problem of demise of its principal adversary because by the 1989 the specter of Communism was almost entirely banished from the planet. The demise of Marxism-Leninism could have become the end-all and be-all of Neo-Conservative ideology, since without an enemy to mobilize against, a holy American war to embark on Communism, the Neo-Conservatism, which centered around a militantly aggressive foreign policy against Communism, seemed to wither on the vine.  Neo-Conservatives had become the War Party, but there was no war against Communism after 1989. Good President rely on an inner circle. The person who whispers in the ear of the President is more important than the king. The Neo-conservative coup d'etat in Bush administration was accomplished in the days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when the neocons had become more important than the President by making sure that their whispers and only their whispers reached President Bush's ears. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 revitalized the Republican Neo-Conservative movement and catapulted Neocons to a brief but heady hegemony over the foreign policy of the United States, during first Bush administration.


Four. Republican Neo-Conservatism arose as a reaction to both left-wing revisionism and Neo-Liberalism and as a reaffirmation of Cold War liberalism. The Neo-Conservatives stood for "continued adherence to the Vital Center idea of an activist anticommunist foreign policy." Neo-Conservatives were Cold War liberals who searched for a Truman in the 1970s and found Ronald Reagan. The Republican Neo-Conservatives tried to attract discontented Democrats to the Republican side by portraying Republican Neo-Conservatism as a doctrine as the true heir of Democratic Truman liberalism. Some Neo-Conservatives were unreconstructed Cold War liberals. The dominant ideology of Neo-Conservatism in the 1970s was a mixture of the geopolitical militarism of Nitze's NSC-68 and a kind of inverted Trotskyism or socialist internationalism. Neo-Conservatism owed little to Schlesinger's Vital Center or to memories of the Truman doctrine or to Mutual Assured Destruction nuclear doctrine. A less dominant strain within Republican Neo-Conservatism could be traced back to Niebuhr's realism, but it also bore little resemblance to Schlesinger's liberalism. It was centrist only in the sense that the center of American politics had shifted markedly to the right. From the 1973 Jackson-Vanik amendment until the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty for 14 years, Neo-Conservative intellectuals shaped and sometimes dominated American foreign policy. Neo-Conservatism is the fourth phase in the development of liberal foreign policy. 


Five. The MAD Cold War Nuclear deterrent phase lasted from the end of the Second World War till the President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger’s visit to Mao’s China after the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War. The first phase in foreign was Cold War liberalism, identified with Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., Reinhold Niebuhr, Paul Nitze and Truman administration's hawkish National Security Council report, NSC-68, drafted in 1950. It represented the nuclear doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD).


Six. The "soft utopianism" of liberals like Schlesinger believed that through a long-term struggle of ideas, Communism would crumble and a kind of democratic world government would emerge. Niebuhr was wary of foreign policy becoming a quasi-religious crusade, whether for freedom or communism. The balance of power national interest realism propounded by Walter Lippmann, Hans Morgenthau and George Kennan that sought to continually increase the national interests of the United States, were put upside down by Henry Kissinger, who sought to forego immediate national interests of the United States to promote iconoclast monotheist patriarchal agenda of Papacy and religious right conspiracy, and this policy continued under Secretary Brzezinski and Secretary Albright.


Seven. The Kissinger-type realism represented new foreign policy phase, which was the pro-China left-wing revisionism led by Secretary Henry Kissinger which sought to develop a common Occidental anti-Buddhism iconoclast patriarchal policy convergence between atheist Communist China and pro-Papacy United States, and this policy continued by Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretary Madeleine Albright. Neo-liberal synthesis by Stanley Hoffmann and Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski stressed world order and interdependence over containment and polarization. Just as Bolshevik Jews staged a coup d’etat after 1917 Revolution to expel Mensheviks and ushered in Bolshevik Revolution, similarly Ashkenazi Secretary Henry Kissinger retaliated against the anti-Semite Nixon White House by cementing an iconoclast patriarchal religious right conspiracy with Masonic Lodge, Papal extremism, Prophetic Christians, Evangelicals, Ashkenazi Jews and iconoclast Communism to unleash hidden religious agenda through the foreign policy apparatus of the White House, which was continued by Secretary Brzezinski and Secretary Albright. President Bush and Secretary Rice emphatically rejected the Kissinger-type amoral patriarchal Realism, as morally “Wrong.” No person that supports the Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright type amoral Realism can join the bandwagon of Neo-Conservatism. Republican Neo-Conservatism in Bush administration totally rejected Kisinger-Brzezinski-Albright type realism that sought to propagate fundamentalist religious agenda of religious right conspiracy through American foreign policy. Secretary Kissinger’s realism led to America’s consent for Buddhist genocide in Cambodia, where patriarchal religious interests obliged American policies to replace Buddhist governments in south Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia with anti-pagan Communist regimes. Secretary Kissinger’s anti-democracy realism harnessed the might of the United States to cause the demise of democracy in Chile and Argentina and cause deaths of thousands by incoming military junta.


Eight. Before Kissinger, both Schlesinger and Nitze embraced the struggle with Communism. Schlesinger’s a view toward the independent Yugoslavian communist leader Marshal Tito, portrayed world Communism as beginning to fragment and even hinted a future Sino-Soviet split. Niebuhr's realism led to the Vietnam War and influenced Kissinger-type realism and balance of power doctrines of President Richard Nixon and Secretary Henry Kissinger to achieve détente with the Soviet Union and China. Schlesinger was optimistic about American prospects of eventually toppling communism without another world war. Schlesinger saw the United States engaged in a worldwide political struggle against communism. Nitze saw the Cold War as a real war. Schlesinger argued that if the United States permitted communist expansion anywhere else, it "would raise the possibility that no coalition adequate to confront the Kremlin could be assembled." Schlesinger's logic led to the Alliance for Progress.


Nine. Neo-Conservatives in the 1970s, founded the Committee on the Present Danger, and they were harsh critics of religious right conspiracy agenda of Democratic President Jimmy Carter and supported Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1980, later joining his administration. It was Nitze’s worldview rather than Schlesinger's or Niebuhr's outlook that became the dominant foreign policy theme in Neo-Conservatism. The NSC-68 or 1950 portrayed International Communism as a Soviet-led monolith. Nitze described the United States as being in "mortal danger" and "the deepest peril" from a Soviet Union that was on the verge (even in 1950) of becoming militarily superior. Nitze's logic led to American intervention in Vietnam and to periodic hysteria about missile gaps and windows of vulnerability. Nitze's vision in NSC-68 of 1950 did not envisage spheres of influence or a balance of power and it committed the United States to a crusade against communism everywhere. Nitze's outlook in nsc-68 underlay Neo-Conservative opposition to détente. Nitze’s ideas influenced Neo-Conservatives’ rejection of détente and the second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT II), the conception of the Cold War as a real war, the claim that the United States was on the verge of being or had already been bypassed by the Soviet Union in military might, which led to Neo-Conservatives’ fear of "Finlandization" of Western Europe.


Ten. Neo-Conservatism subscribes neither to Papal belief in Apocalypse nor Armageddon. The Protestant Evangelical and Catholic religious right conspiracy and sought to spiritually reinterpret the Mutual Assured Destruction nuclear doctrines to justify Papacy’s belief in end of time eschatology, teleology, Armageddon and Apocalypse, and Arch-conservative of Pope John Paul II succeeded in converting 30 percent of Christians in America as firm believers of Armageddon, Apocalypse and Rapture. Together, the legacy of NSC-68 of 1950 and Trotskyism contributed to a kind of apocalyptic thinking. The constant reiteration and exaggeration of the Soviet nuclear threat was meant to dramatize and win American converts to Prophetic Apocalyptic Christianity, but it also reflected the doomsday revolutionary mentality that characterized the old left.


Eleven. Neo-Conservatives during the Carter administration warned of the Soviet military buildup and Soviet expansion into Africa and the Mid East, but Neo-cons were prone to exaggerating the Soviet dangers. Neo-Cons saw the Soviet buildup not as an expression of the Soviet military's insatiable appetite for state funds, but as the quest for a first-strike superiority over the United States. Neo-cons laid the basis for the massive and at least partly unnecessary American arms buildup, which may have accelerated the decline of the Soviet Union but also contributed to the decline of the American economy and crippling budget and trade deficits of the 1980s. Neo-Conservatives contributed to anti-Soviet and pro-War psychology in the early 1980s, which was finally put to rest by Reagan's conciliatory 1985 summit with Mikhail Gorbachev at Geneva. The Neo-Conservatives had a decisive effect on American foreign policy.


Twelve. After Gorbachev's accession and the initiation of serious USA-USSR détente negotiations the Neo-Conservatives entered a period of increased confusion, as these events undermined a Neo-Con political worldview that assumed a "stable malevolent Soviet Union that was immune from drastic change." During 1990s the dominant idealistic strain of Neo-Conservatism of 1970s conflicted with a less visible realist strain that appeared but did not necessarily predominate. Younger Neo-Cons argued that capitalist autocracies were more likely to evolve into democracies than were communist dictatorships. Some Neo-Cons argued that American foreign policy should not be based on the difficult promise of an imminent democratic transformation, whether in Nicaragua or Chile, but this view was ignored in the formulation of American foreign policy and in public debate.


Thirteen. By the mid-1980s, the latent Neo-Conservative realism allowed Neocons to appreciate that the Cold War was ending and that a new American foreign policy was necessary. Republican Neocons allied themselves with refugees from Democrat Liberalism and WASP Conservatism who thought that America’s post-Cold War foreign policy had to be grounded in the venerable concepts of national interest, balance of power, and economic as well as military advantage.


Fourteen. Neo-Conservatism argues that even with the Cold War over, the United States should continue a crusade for global democracy, a new "manifest destiny" of America in the 21st Century. They no longer define their foreign policy primarily in opposition to a Communism, liberal or leftwing alternative, but to a utopian democratic idealism that has no particular political label. Neo-Conservatism existed in the 1990s, during Clinton Administrations preparing for its place under the sun, ready to join the new Republican Bush administration.


Fifteen. Neo-Conservatives believe in using American might to export Democratic Utopia and to promote American ideals abroad. But the Neocons in the Bush administration from 2001 onwards no longer an interest group but the administration itself, especially so in the second term that is un-first term. Neo-Conservatism is not really domestic policy that defines Neo-Conservatism. Neo-Conservatism as an ideology founded on American foreign policy, and it still carries the greatest meaning, even if its original raison d'être, the opposition to communism--has disappeared. Many of the leading neocons aren't Jewish and the support for Israel, a key tenet of Neo-Conservatism, is hardly confined to American Jews and its strongest constituency in America happens to be among Protestant evangelical Christians. Neo-Conservative social policy stands for a broad sympathy with a traditionalist agenda and a rejection of extreme libertarianism. Neocons have led the charge to combat some of the wilder excesses of academia and the arts. But there is hardly an orthodoxy laid down by Neocon Central. Neo-Conservative economic policy is like pretty much all other Republicans, embraces a laissez-faire line, though they are not troubled by the size of the welfare state.


Sixteen. The original Democratic Neocons were a band of liberal intellectuals who rebelled against the Democratic Party's leftward drift on defense issues in the 1970s. At first the Democratic Neocons clustered around Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a Democrat, but then they aligned themselves with Ronald Reagan and the Republicans, who promised to confront Soviet expansionism. Many of the Republican Neocons were former Democratic "liberals mugged by reality." Original Republican Neocons grew up in the days when Democrats derided Republicans and some Republican Neocons registered as Democrats, but always identified with the Grand Old Party. The same might be said of the other Standard-bearers, even those who are the offspring of famous neocons as they, too, have been right from the start.


Seventeen. Patrick Buchanan, for one, claims that his views represent the true faith of the American right and he wants to drive the neocon infidels from the Conservative temple or the church. Unfortunately Buchanan’s Conservatism is nativist, protectionist, isolationist and attracts few followers. Buchananism isn't American conservatism as we understand it today, and Buchananism is paleo-conservatism, a poisonous brew of Conservatism. When Buchananites toss around "Neo-Conservative" it sometimes sounds as if Buchanan really mean is "Jewish Conservatism." Some Conservatives believes that America should use armed force only to defend our vital national interests, narrowly defined and the Neo-con idea of bringing democracy to the Middle East they denounce. This view, which goes under the somewhat self-congratulatory moniker of "realism," championed by foreign-policy mandarins like Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft and James Baker III. Conservatives think, that Kissinger-type "realism" presents far too crabbed a view of American power and responsibility. Conservatives suggest that America needs to promote our values, for the simple reason that liberal democracies rarely fight one another, sponsor terrorism, or use weapons of mass destruction.


Eighteen. Neo-Conservatism is a form of idealistic "hard Wilsonianism." Neo-Conservatism embraces Woodrow Wilson's championing of American ideals but rejected his reliance on international organizations and treaties to accomplish American objectives. Neo-Conservatism rejected the "Soft Wilsonians," acronym of Democratic Liberals, who place their reliance on paper not power. Neo-Conservatives or Hard-Wilsonians like Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan advocate the preemptive use of American might to promote American ideals of Democracy worldwide. Republican Neocons are closer to the mainstream of the Republican Party of Bush administration than any other competing American political faction. The September 2005 National Security Strategy calls for "encouraging free and open societies on every continent," makes George W. Bush a Neocon.


Nineteen. Neo-Conservatism is the driving force behind US foreign policy under George W. Bush. Neo-Conservatism properly understood has been a significant influence on American foreign policy, which has been characterized a new kind of Conservatism. Bush’s foreign policy has been more driven more by nationalist impulses than Neo-Conservative ones. Neo-Conservatism has been the key component shaping the Bush outlook, but one should not underestimate the importance of other key factors that determined Condoleezza Rice’s American policy since 2001.


Twenty. The Neo-Conservative criticism of the Democratic Party related to the radicals who had taken over the Democratic Party had not only eschewed the Democratic Party's traditional support for Israel but also condemned the Jewish state as the aggressor in the Middle East conflict. The Jewish Neo-Conservatives found the rhetoric of the Democratic New Left not unlike the language of the anti-Semitic far right. Neo-Conservatives viewed Israel as a bastion of democracy in the Middle East and the only reliable ally the United States could count on in that troubled area, were appalled by the pro-Islamic fundamentalism of the Carter administrations' attitude towards Ayatollah-led the CIA-supported Islamic revolution in Iran, which brought down the pro-Israel monarchy of Shah of Iran in 1979.


Twenty-one. Democratic Neo-Cons believed that a significant segment of the Democrat black leadership was moving toward an ideological and political alignment with Third World radicalism. Democrat Neo-Cons bolted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 because Reagan was not only known to be a "hawk" in regard to the Soviet Union but also a politician with a record of strong support for Israel. Conservative Republicans did not welcome Democratic Neo-Cons as their new Republican allies with open arms. Republican Conservatives during Reagan administrations were suspicion that much of the Neo-Conservative support for increases in the defense budget and its hard-line toward the Soviets was really a cover for increasing aid to Israel and committing the United States to a more strategic relationship with the Jewish state. The leader of Conservatism claimed "that some eminent Neo-Conservatives mistook Tel Aviv for the capital of the United States." Neo-Conservatives wielded some political influence and tasted power for the first time during the Reagan and Bush administrations (1980-2002).


Twenty-two. The dominant post-Cold War Neo-Conservative position has become narrower and anti-utopian in regard to the national interest. The influence of Neo-Conservatives has been practically nil in the Clinton administration. During Reagan administration, Neo-Conservative approach to American foreign policy fulfilled its critical role as the Cold War came to an end with the demise of Communism and the Soviet Union. Neo-Cons foreign policy role filled with accomplishments includes the Neo-Conservative faith in their anti-Communist crusade at a time when American morale had deteriorated as a result of the Vietnam War and many liberals were ready to forgo America's role as the leader of the free world. Neo-Conservatives’ insistence that the Soviet Union posed a serious threat to American security up to the moment when communism dissolved in Russia enabled Neo-Conservatives to claim that their agitation for strict containment had paid off. Neo-Conservatives too often Neo-Conservatives viewed their enemies as embodiments of evil who must be destroyed rather than as opponents to be debated or persuaded. Bushian Neo-Cons ideologues are realists and while committed to the purity of Neo-Conservative ideas are able to understand American democratic politics and politicians where the art of compromise is the rule rather than the exception.


Twenty-three. The Neo-Conservatism is a new Vital Center. American Neo-Conservatism is a political phenomenon that determines the foreign policy of the Bush administration. American Neo-Conservatism is part of American conservatism; and many Neo-Cons continue to support the Democratic Party, despite their intellectual proximity to the Reagan and Bush administrations of the 1980s and two-term Bush administration. Neo-Conservatives during World War II attacked Democratic Socialists as "fellow travelers" with pro-Soviet intellectuals. The Neo-Conservatives resented this association of Democratic Socialists with Communists and began to see the Democratic radical Left as more of an enemy than the mainstream Right. The Neo-Conservatives began their political lives as New Dealers, originally opposing the extreme laissez-faire individualism embodied by the Republican Party of the 1920s. These Neo-Conservative New Dealers rejected traditional WASP Conservatism not primarily for economic reasons, but for social ones. Traditional WASP Conservatives were white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants who discriminated against all those unlike themselves. The future Neo-Conservatives did not reject the mythology of American life. Rather, as representatives of traditional nineteenth-century immigrant groups like Jews, Polish, Irish, or Slavs, they sought to integrate themselves into American society through the accepted route of hard work and individual achievement, only to find WASPs excluded them from American mainstream due to their non-British stock. Neo-Conservatives are disproportionately Jewish, Roman Catholic and the "assimilated" immigrants. Neo-Conservative intellectuals treat the "anti-anti-Communists" intellectuals, later to become the Democratic New Left, as their chief antagonists. Neo-Conservatives, the liberal anti-Communists argued that it was unprecedented for the intellectuals of a democratic country to fall under the sway of a totalitarian ideology. Neo-Conservatives argued that like barbarian invasions of civilizations, the civilized inclusive open Democracies inherently have difficulties standing up to totalitarian regimes, because Communist ideologies are able to penetrate into democracies and influence internal political debate.


Twenty-four. Neo-Conservative disaffection with the Democrats mounted particularly during the Carter administration after 1976. They saw it as embodying New Left values, and the Iranian hostage crisis and the administration's limp response to it showed that it remained a hostage to the Vietnam syndrome.  Neo-conservatives opposed the Carter-sanctioned overthrow of pro-Israel secular Pahlevi Monarchy of Shah of Iran in 1979. Most Neo-Conservatives including Democratic Neo-Cons supported Republican Ronald Reagan's successful bid for the presidency in 1980. Reagan promised not to be afraid to project American military power and undertook a substantial buildup of American armed forces to send a clear message to the Soviets. Neo-Conservatives influenced Reagan policies that turned Washington away from attempts at economic management in the direction of a less fettered capitalist economy. Neo-Conservatives resented Democratic New Left’s distrust of capitalism and the American way of life that upheld Capitalism.


Twenty-five. The task of Neo-Conservatism is to convert the Republican Party and American Conservatism into a new kind of Conservative politics suitable to governing a modern American democracy and to win American elections. The Neo-Conservatism is the first variant of American conservatism in the 20th century that is in the American grain. Neo-Conservatism is 21st century Americanism. Classical WASP Conservatism never caught on in the United States, mainly because it smacked of White Protestant Anglo-Saxon aristocracy and privilege. The nostalgia of classical WASP Conservatism had no takers in the United States, where every political party had to be yoked to science and economics, to technology and commerce. WASP Conservatism and Tradition may have a good ring, but it does not work well in the elections. The fiasco of Senator Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential run showed the WASP Conservative Republican Party that it had strayed from the mainstream American values. Barry Goldwater's defeat eclipsed the heritage of Conservative heroes such as Douglas MacArthur, Joseph McCarthy, Charles Lindberg and Robert Taft. By 1964, the American Republican Party resembled the contemporary Conservative Party of Britain, as both were out of touch with and electoral reality and ideologically unprepared for the contemporary electoral dynamics.


Twenty-six. Neo-Conservative intellectuals helped fashion a new ideology for the Republican Party, in both the domestic and foreign policy arenas. Republican Richard Nixon's 1968 presidential victory had more to do with the new electoral configuration in the country, but he did adopt many of the Neocon ideas into his domestic agenda. Democratic Party was the dominant party in the southern states of the United States but when the Democratic Party welcomed Civil Rights by the 1960s it lost the support of very large numbers of southern whites. Republican Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy", built on white racist rage against 1964 Bill of Civil Rights, and because of the electoral significance of the Southern States, Nixon’s strategy helped the Republicans build a majority that has lasted for a generation. Even while the Democrats held the White House in the 1990s, during Carter and Clinton administration, the Republicans controlled the Legislature by a considerable margin.


Twenty-seven. Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, Richard Perle, and Neocon’s “Committee on the Present Danger” and the “Committee for the Free World” helped scuttle detente with the Soviet Union in 1974. Once Neo-Conservatives forced the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) off the discussion table, they fought for an astronomical increase in the Pentagon’s budget that fuelled an arms race that crippled the economies of both the USSR and the USA. Neo-Conservative foreign policy does not recognize the validity of concepts like detente, containment and negotiation, and neocons are more interested in an outright war against Communism and for the containment of atheist Communist China.


Twenty-eight. Bush's foreign policy apparatus is staffed with Neocons, many served in the Reagan administration (1980-1988). In the 1990s, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle under “Project for a New American Century,” championed aggressive American leadership in the export of democracy. Neo-cons believe that since America's emergence as a world power roughly a century ago America may have made many errors, but America has been the greatest force for good among the nations of the earth. A diminution of American power or influence bodes ill for America country, America’s friends and American Creed and principles. The thrust of the Neocon argument turns on "greatest force for good," good for Hegemon America. Neocons see themselves as powered by the wisdom of the ancient Greeks and blessed with the privileges of the present, they know what is good for the rest of the world. However, Neo-Conservatism obliges that Neocons, must control the direction of the "democratic spirit." In Afghanistan Neo-cons succeeded in making democratic spirit rising from the remains of a once-failed state that is trying to defy the ravages of decades of war and misrule." Each time the Afghans tried to stray from the Neocon path, such as when the 2002 Loya Jirga wanted to re-appoint Zahir Shah as king or when the 2003 Loya Jirga wanted to create a decentralized state, Neo-Cons stepped in to protect the crusades for democracy agenda of the neocons in the 21st century.


Twenty-nine. The fundamental core of Neo-Conservatism lies in policy of Anti-Communism and containment of Communist China in the 21st Century. The Neo-Conservatism has its roots in the veering of the Democratic Party to the left and the rampant spread of European socialism. The European Socialists in the 1960s wished to resurrect policy of appeasement towards communism, and their political judgment has plagued Europe with stagnating socialism. American Democrats and Liberals during the 1960s and early 1970’s, who learned the historical lessons of confronting tyranny during WWII became growingly disaffected and eventually defected; formed the vanguard of Neo-Conservatism. The second wave of Neocon converts came at the courtesy of Democratic President Jimmy Carter (1976-1980), who as a tool of Catholic-Evangelical religious right conspiracy, consented to Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski implement the hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda of religious right conspiracy through the American foreign policy to the detriment of the national interests of the United States.


Thirty. Jimmy Carter by preaching and practicing the Christian gospel of socialism inspired many Democratic Liberals to find their way into the pews of Republican Neo-Conservatism, who resented the role religious right conspiracy played in Carter administration’s foreign policy. This wave of younger group born of the baby boom of the late ‘50s and unlike their predecessors, were never liberal. These Conservatives who were Neo-Conservative by affiliation were horrified by the hidden religious agenda of Carter Presidency they rallied to the voice of Republican Ronald Reagan. The growth of Neo-Conservatism from 1980 forward was characterized by the entry of new members who never called themselves liberal. The last major influx of Neocons was prompted by the tragedy of 9-11-2001. America in 2001, afflicted by terrorism on its very shores, cast a jaundiced eye upon the inaction of the previous administration of Democrat Bill Clinton (1992-2000) whose Presidency suffered the first terrorist attack on the World Trade Towers, and President Clinton had rejected the offer of Sudan government to arrest and extradite Osama Bin Laden in Sudan, before he moved in to Afghanistan. Nevertheless, Clinton presided over the emasculation of the US Intelligence Agencies leaving America vulnerable to the terrorism perpetrated on September 11, 2001.


Thirty-one. The pro-China, anti-India amoral iconoclast patriarchal appeasement to China Democratic policies of Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright, during (1992-2000) period Clinton administrations made the same mistakes, which had earlier provided the catalyst for Neo-Conservatism in the ‘60s. The subsequent events after 9-11-2001 have prompted many within Democratic Party to manifest what has been a latent pacifism and policy of appeasement of Communist China, caused many Democratic Liberals to share the same political conversion as the Democratic Liberals that defected to Neo-Conservative Ronald Reagan in 1980s and these disillusioned secular Democrats bolted to Bush’s Neo-conservative camp in droves. Neo-Conservatism has become an impetus for reform in America. Neo-Conservatism is visionary and progressive. Neo-Conservatism is pragmatic but at the same time possesses the idealism of the visionary. It is a mistake to narrowly associate the influence of Neo-Conservatism over Bush administration exclusively over foreign policy direction, even when the most familiar ideology of Neo-Conservatism to the American public, is Neocon’s foreign policy doctrine. The paramount principle guiding Neocon foreign policy is the defense of America’s security and the promotion of national interests.


Thirty-two. During Cold War, the Scoop Jackson Democrats militantly expounded the "rolling back" the Communism in the Soviet Union and China by military confrontation. Jackson Democrats constituted the infamous "Team B" that wildly overestimated Soviet military power in the 1970s. Many Neo-Con operatives who created the misimpression about Iraq to goad the American people into supporting the American invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Syria had already executed a run-through of the same strategy in the 1970s for the defeat of the Communist Soviet Union and China. NeoCons succeeded in convincing then-CIA Director, George H.W. Bush, to appoint a now infamous 'Team B' to go through the same material and come up with an answer that would justify a vast increase in U.S. defense spending. During George H.W Bush administration (1988-2002), with the patronage of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz the members of Team B, came up with astronomical numbers for alleged Soviet military spending and capabilities.


Thirty-three. The Neo-Conservatives flourished during the Cold War, and after the demise of the Communism hibernated during two Clinton administrations, returned to power during first Bush administration and developed stronghold in the Department of Defense. The 9/11 terrorist attacks allowed Neo-Cons to replace and replicate its global wars against Communism by equally global war on Islamic terrorism. The ideology of Neo-Conservatism mobilized American public, by launching a new global war on Islamic terror, and unless tempered might become a war of civilizations, pitting the Christian West against Militant Middle Eastern Islam. The specter of Nuclear Iranian Ayatollahs and nuclear Wahhabi Saudi Arabia might raise the fear of imminent Apocalypse and Armageddon among fundamentalist Catholics and fundamentalist Protestants rumored to influence more than 30 percent of the American population. Neo-Conservatives have a new calling: the categorization and explication of the various components of a global Wahhabi Islamist fundamentalist conspiracy against Christian modernity and democratic civilization. It is a new task of Neo-Conservatives to bring modernity to "backward" Wahhabi-led Arabia and Ayatollah-led Iran and effect a long-term transformation of the Islamic world to eradicate the threat of global barbarian Islamic terrorism.


Thirty-four. Neo-Conservatism is the ideology of a War Party that it evolved during the Cold War years. After the collapse of Communism and the Soviet Union in 1989, the philosophy of neo-Conservatism came to resemble a kind of inverted Trotskyism. The Neo-Com United States took over the hallowed place once given over to the Soviet Union as the agency of History, and a ruthless elitism that in many ways reflected the elitist antecedents of the Leninist theory of the party was and is a key part of their methodology. The old Trotskyism’s idea that the national encirclement of the Soviet Union sealed its fate is reflected in an inverted sense, by the Neo-Conservative argument that "democracy in one country" is similarly threatened, by the continued existence of non-democratic tyrannies and dictatorships in the oil-rich Middle East, especially after the sale of nuclear technology to Iran, Saudi Arabia and Libya, by Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr. A. Q. Khan. The neo-conservative agenda to extend American hegemony to every continent, by militarily exporting America-type democracy, owed much to the Trotskyism.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/  Page 31, Chapter 1.




(0)(7) 1(6) Anti-Theocracy Neo-Cons

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 31, Chapter 1.

(7) Neo-Cons Court Christian Extremism


One. The Neo-conservative separation of a liberal tradition from concepts of democracy opens Neo-Conservative doctrine to the Christian fundamentalists, giving the Neo-Conservatism the flavor of a theocratic state. Neo-Conservatives basically separate a liberal political tradition of Locke and the Enlightenment from its embedding in the historical evolution of American democratic institutions. In Neo-Conservatism the tradition of Locke is then battered and destroyed by means of the traditions of the Enlightenment. Liberalism in the context of Neo-conservatism means a combination of secularism and cultural relativism in general, and in particular, liberalism means religious tolerance, equality before law, and public tolerance for a multicultural society. For Neo-Conservatives while the state remains democratic in its formal aspect as a legalistic republic, there is an imposed interest in state enforcement of theoretically dominant cultural values, religious traditions and democratic polity. Neo-Conservatism allows for a thorough going attack on any form of counter-cultural expression or counter-Reformation opposition for that matter. For Neo-Conservatives there are only friends and enemies. Either you are with Neo-conservatives or with them.


Two. Since the Neo-Con led Republican Party during Bush administration has a substantial base among the Protestant as well as Catholic Christian religious traditionalist vote bank, gives Republican Neocons greater influence and power. Because religious conservatism is so feeble in Europe, the Neo-Conservative potential in Europe is correspondingly weak. European press condemns American Republican Neo-Conservatism because of its ties to the Protestant and Catholic religious fundamentalism. Indian press had also questions the secular credentials of the Republican Neo-Conservatism because of its closer ties with Catholic and Protestant religious fundamentalism.


Three. The Neo-Conservative deal with Protestant and Catholic religious fundamentalism seems to reveal the Machiavellian impulses associated with the Republican Neo-Conservative “persuasion.” The philistine and vulgar nature underlying American political culture is met with derision here is derided from all sides of the political spectrum, Democratic as well as Republican. Rupert Murdoch the owner of FOX Television has commented on the decline of democratic culture. Mr. Murdoch is one of the major financial supporters of the Neo-Conservative movement. Mr. Murdoch finances “The Weekly Standard” a publication, which is Neo-Conservative cornerstone. During the 1980’s where many Fundamentalist Christians were sworn mortal enemies of Rupert Murdoch, yet now they march hand in hand with his political allies.


Four. President Bush and Secretary Rice do not belong to the Christian religious right conspiracy. President Ford, President Carter, President Clinton, Secretary Kissinger, secretary Brzezinski and secretary Albright belonged to Christian religious right conspiracy. Christian religious traditionalists have joined forces with Republican Neo-Conservatives, simply because Democratic Party does not believe in religious fundamentalism. There are vast Christian communities and cultures that are spread throughout the United States. It includes Christians who identify with leftist politics, to those who identify themselves as orthodox and/or traditional conservatives and those that are recognized as Christian Libertarians or Christian Reconstructionists. Many types of Protestant and Catholic fundamentalists Christians building coalitions with Republican Neocons. Instead there has been a shift in attitude and position concerning, Apocalyptic Christians also known as Christians awaiting the Second Coming and Dispensationalist. More than 30 percent Americans politically influenced by the ideas and policies of Christian religious fundamentalism.


Five. President Bush, Secretary Rice and majority of Neocons neither believe in apocalyptic end of time eschatology, nor Apocalypse nor Armageddon nor Second Coming of the Jesus Christ nor Rapture. Because of Republican Neo-Conservatives’ true cosmopolitan flavor it is hard to believe Neo-Cons are “quite comfortable” with Apocalyptic Christians. Many of the tactical political alliances the Republican Neo-Conservatives made with Apocalyptic Christians is made on “pragmatic” terms, because due to the arch-conservatism of Pope John Paul II, more than 30 percent of American people came to believe in Catholic or Protestant fundamentalist religious dogma and movements. The Democratic Party didn’t change and didn’t openly support the Catholic and Protestant religious fundamentalism, but President Carter and President Clinton were firmly in the camp of Christian religious right conspiracy. Though the Republican Party courted the vote banks of Catholic or Protestant religious fundamentalism, neither President H.W. Bush (Sr.) nor President George W. Bush belonged to the Christian religious right conspiracy.


Six. Neo-Conservatism cultivates believers, without becoming a hostage to the ideas of Armageddon and Apocalypse. The steady decline in American democratic culture, sinking to new levels of vulgarity, compromised by politicians’ ever-growing dependence on campaign contributions, does unite Republican Neocons with traditional Republican Conservatives, however it does not unite Republican Neo-Cons with those Republican Libertarian Conservatives who are conservative in economics but unmindful of the culture. There is a quite unexpected alliance between Republican Neocons that include a fair proportion of secular intellectuals with Republican Christian religious traditionalists. Republican Neo-cons and Republican Conservatives are united on issues concerning the (i) quality of education, (ii) the relations of church and state, (iii) the regulation of pornography, and the like, all of which Neo-Cons regard as proper candidates for the government's attention, and (iv) recognizing the beneficial role of Christian religious charities.

(2) Neo-Conservatives’ Jewish Connection


One. After 1992, during Democratic Clinton Administration (1992-2000) the pro-Wahhabi Arabists have been steadily replaced by their exact opposites, what some observers are calling Israelists, and policymaking circles throughout government now no longer even make a pretense of exhibiting balance between Israeli and Arab Palestinian, interests. Some of the think tanks that hold sway over Bush administration thinking see no difference between American and Israeli national security interests. The Petro-Imperialists of Bush administration co-exist pro-Wahhabi Arabists in the State Department, as the USA-Wahhabi strategic ties are crucial to the successful implementation of Petro-Imperialism. The Arabists of Bush administration represents the interests of pro-Israel and pro-oil lobbyists.


Two. The problem of dual loyalties has bedeviled every American administration and the Bush administration is no immune to the problem of dual loyalties. American officials face the problem double allegiance beside the government of the United States to, namely, Papacy or China or religious right conservative conspiracy or Israel or Masonic Lodge or Drug cartels or Big Oil or corporate lobbyists or Interest groups. The Bush administration faces the problem of dual loyalties-the double allegiance of those myriad officials at high and middle levels who cannot distinguish American interests from the competing interests of Israel, China, Papacy, religious right conspiracy, Big-Oil and lobbyists. The American Spoils system that allows the incoming President to bring his own slate of public officials, itself promotes albeit encourages the system of dual loyalties. Secretary Kissinger has been on China’s payroll. President George Ford, President Jimmy Carter and President Bill Clinton and their respective Secretaries of State Dr. Kissinger, Dr. Brzezinski and Dr. Albright belonged to religious right wing conspiracy and their administrations encouraged the dual loyalties of their officials to serve the interests of religious right conspiracy. To hold dual loyalties in the White House or in the Capitol is business as usual in the United States. However, the crisis of dual loyalty raises doubts whether their support for or opposition to advancing the Pax Americana Imperium motivated primarily by America-first patriotism or governed by a desire to secure Israel's predominance in the Middle East through the advancement of the American Imperium?


Three. Since Jews do not play any predominant role in the determination of the American foreign during second Bush administration it is wrong to say that Secretary Rice’s Neo-Republican is synonymous with American Jews who seek to alter American foreign policy to the wishes of the right-wing Israel. However, it is true that Secretary Kisisnger had led a coup d’etat during anti-Semite Nixon Administration that created a hidden non-partisan iconoclast patriarchal nexus of Papal Catholic religious fundamentalism, Protestant evangelical fundamentalism, Masonic Lodge and Ashkenazi Jews that under Secretaries Kissinger, Brzezinski and Albright became synonymous with the domination of American Jews in media, policy formulation at the Capitol and the White House that sought to misuse the power of the secular United States to unleash the extra-constitutional fundamentalist Christian religious agenda through American foreign policy. The secular Neo-Conservative agenda of President Bush rejects the use of American foreign policy to implement hidden agenda of ultra-conservative Papal Universal Church. American Jews and the Papacy no longer controls or has the ability to alter American foreign policy in the second Bush administration.


Four. The four most prominent makers of American foreign policy in second Bush administration, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld are not Jewish and are hard-headed and not easily bamboozled by any supposed Jewish or Papal or Masonic Lodge cabal. Neo-Conservatism evolved as a synthesis or a coalescence of once-differing views after September 11 terrorist attacks.

(11) OLD BIBLICAL BEGATS: Five. Beneath the cabinet level, the list of pro-Israel neo-cons who are either policy functionaries themselves or advise policymakers from perches just on the edges of government reads like the old biblical "begats." Neo-cons have not made many inroads at the State Department, except for John Bolton, an American Enterprise Institute hawk and Israeli proponent who have been forced on a reluctant Colin Powell as undersecretary for arms control.


Six. Israeli Neocons in the White House presents no greater a menace than the Papal extremists in the WASP-led White House. The neo-con strategy papers during last decade were dotted with concepts like "redefining Iraq," "redrawing the map of the Middle East," "nurturing alternatives to Arafat," all of which have in recent months become familiar parts of the Bush administration's diplomatic lingo. The pro-Israel fundamentalists may see Israel's domination over all of Palestine as a necessary step toward fulfillment of the biblical Millennium, and consider any Israeli relinquishment of territory in Palestine as a sacrilege, and view warfare between Jews and Arabs as a divinely ordained prelude to Armageddon. These right-wing Christian extremists have a profound influence on Bush administration. The Jewish fundamentalists working for the perpetuation of Israel's domination in Palestine and the Christian fundamentalists working for the Millennium strengthen and reinforce each other's policies in administration councils.


Seven. There is no truth in the allegation that Jewish conspiracy brainwashed President Bush, Secretary Rice, Secretary Rumsfeld or Vice President Dick Cheney. The Jewish analogy of Legions of Mordor cannot apply to black woman Secretary Condoleeza led Department of State no longer dominated by Neo-Con Jews in the second Bush administration, which is un-first administration. Neo-Conservatives came pouring out of the shadows like the legions of Mordor, and they took over the Shire that is Washington, D.C., and the foreign policy apparatus of the White House, quickly and effectively dispatching anti-Necons in the CIA, the Pentagon and the DOD, riding the global war on terrorism by 9/11 attacks. Neo-Cons’ victory in the Bush administration was not an overnight victory, and it is worth delving into the history of the Neo-Con War Party in order to better understand how we got to where Neo-Con are today and where they are going. The Neo-Conservatives are on the Right, and the dominant tendency in the American Conservatism is also on the Right of the political spectrum, but the origins of Neo-Conservatism is on the extreme Left of the political spectrum. Many of the Neo-Con leaders were great Trotskyites of our time and believed in "permanent revolution."


Eight. Neo-Conservatism is a world philosophy because of the thinking prowess of the Jews. Like Marxism, leftism and feminism the Neo-Conservatism is another "-ism" designed by Jews to further a Jewish racial agenda. Jewish converts edited the final version of Holy Koran, 50 years after the death of Prophet Mohammad and burnt all original leather manuscript records. Jewish converts imposed Old Testament over Christian Bible, when Roman Emperor gave a very lucrative order to publish Christian Bible. Throughout history Jews have infiltrated new movements and left their indelible imprint on these new movements, religious or ideological or political.


The standard Israeli Neo-Conservative agenda include:

1. Reshaping the Middle East for Israel's benefit by using American soldiers to wage war in that region, while, at the same time, referring to such war as being in America's best interests and/or referring to such war as a necessary part of a "war on terrorism."

2. Reshaping the political and social spectrum of the Middle East by using various methods other than military force.

3. Referring to any American who doesn't embrace the Neo-Conservative agenda as "anti-American" or "unpatriotic;"

4. Criticizing and even penalizing any country that doesn't support the Neo-Conservative agenda.

5. Advocating American foreign policies that benefit Israel - usually at the expense of other countries.

(3) NeoCons Confronting Islamic Terror


One. From the 1920s roughly to 1990, pro-Wahhabi and pro-Oil Arabists, who had a personal history and an educational background in the Arab world and were biased toward Arab interests, held sway at the State Department. Despite having limited power in the policymaking circles of any administration, the Arabists nurtured Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca and Medina and helped mobilize Arab desert Bedouin terrorists to destabilize Ottoman rule over Arabian Peninsula, including Saudi Arabia and Iraq. The pro-Wahhabi Arabists helped maintain American predominance over oil reserves of Wahhabi oil-producing nations and kept American policy from tipping over totally toward Israel and to balance America’s oil interests with the political interests of Israel. Since the long-forgotten days when the State Department's Middle East policy was run by a group of so-called Arabists, who defined American Oil policies and American dominance of oil-producers, the American policy on Israel and the Arab world has increasingly become the purview of officials well known for tilting toward Israel. The pro-Wahhabi Arabists from 1920s to 1990, till the end of Reagan Administration nurtured Wahhabi Arab fundamentalist terrorists for their support in waging war against Soviet Union in Afghanistan. The pro-Wahhabi Arabists helped create the OPEC Oil cartel to help manipulate global oil-prices to generate new profits for American Big-Oil. The pro-Wahhabi Arabists in Clinton Administration refused the offer of the Sudan government to arrest and extradite to the United States terrorist Osama Bin Laden. The pro-Wahhabi Arabists nurtured, financed and promoted the rise of Wahhabi extremism, fundamentalism and thus gave birth to the Wahhabi terrorists, who turned around and attacked the United States on September 11, 2001.


Two. Posterity will not easily forgive the American isolationists, Kissinger-style amoral iconoclast patriarchal realists that allowed the Wahhabi and Maoist perpetrators of terror, horrors and suppression of women, least of all because they are done in the name of realist balance of power by America, which is the one country on earth that has stood fast against the totalitarian temptation and the fatal lure of fanatical ideology. The murders of 2 million Cambodian Buddhists with the benign blessing of Dr. Kissinger and Mao Tse Tung, and imposition of military rule in Chile and Argentina, and numerous other mass murders and only god knows how many, before Neo-Conservative revolution in the White House stopped their stranglehold over American republic and their hidden iconoclast patriarchal agenda to replace it with a decadent and thoroughly corrupt empire. America’s petro-imperialism is not a delusion. Underlying the revolutionary American crusades for democracy is an idea that all people, including those in China as well as in the Islamic world can escape the verdict of Islamic history, Wahhabi morality and acquire common sense. Neo-Conservatives are so thoroughly imbued with the revealed dogmas of their ideology of Neo-Conservatism that they think they have understood the laws of God as well as Man that allowed them the luxury to pursue the Manifest destiny of America in the 21st Century.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 33, Chapter 1.




(0)(8) 1(7) Neo-Conservatism: Autobiography of an Ideology

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Page 34, Chapter 1.

(8) Neo-Cons Idealism and Its Discontents


One. Neo-Conservatives also create a separation between nationalism and patriotism. Patriotism means public displays of support, adulation, and expressions of loyalty toward various reactionary political figures. But so-called patriots oppose nationalism in the abstract sense of love of country, which include figures that had an obvious nationalist spirit. This separation leads to the Neo-Conservative idea that it is patriotic to cut down old growth redwoods for the lumber industry and for jobs, while it is unpatriotic to use nationalism to justify environmental movements to preserve national forests. Politically this separation allows for dismantling whole swathes of national and historical traditions linked with liberalism and multiculturalism under a banner of a populist patriotism. The domestic political arena can be neatly divided between the patriots and the traitors, friends and enemies, where patriots are of course the Neo-Conservatives, religious Christian bigots and their capitalist supporters, while the traitors are predominately the Kissinger-style realists, pseudo Communists, liberal leftist intellectual elites who support iconoclast patriarchy, higher taxes, higher budget deficits, higher trade deficits, higher public debt, increased government regulation, central planning, and controlled development.


Two. In the Neo-Conservative mind, the NeoCons represent common sense and therefore the broadest reach of the public polity. NeoCons realize that it is common sense that not all people are equal, so it is the responsibility of morally “right” leadership to protect the masses from Machiavellian manipulative tactics of scheming morally “wrong” leaders that support foreign religious extremists and terrorists and totalitarian dictatorships. In the Neo-Conservative mind, it is also common sense that poor people that are not very bright become lazy by guaranteed public doles, and they do not particularly deserve the social and economic support since they live off society rather than contribute to it. Guaranteed public dole is the opiate of the masses and increases poverty in the society. In the Neo-Conservative mind, it is common sense that the socio-economic hierarchy reflects a natural order of merit. This is a favorite Neo-Conservative theme for capitalistic capital since it naturalizes and legalizes the self-imposed hierarchy of exploitation or rewards for productive use of capital. In the Neo-Conservative mind, it is also common sense that liberal claims to enforce equality and indeed manufacture that equality where it is completely missing are doomed to failure because such enforced policies are unnatural and against common sense. By linking such claims to a populist cause to restore common sense to government and public policy, the Neo-Conservatives pit their view of democracy against their view of liberalism. Neo-Conservative democracy is conceived as populism and common sense, while liberalism is conceived as the imposition of equality where there is none and tolerance for moral lassitude where there shouldn't be any. To Neo-Conservatives the liberalism is essentially a form of amoral injustice imposed from above by elite intellectuals. This nicely combines a populist anti-intellectualism with a popular will toward common sense, and claimed popular support for hidebound moral codes, while at the same time it justifies the hierarchical order of society as a natural phenomenon. This inversion essentially allows Neo-Cons to co-opt the liberal concept of equality of opportunity, in order to say that the meritorious have already succeeded, and therefore further impositions of equality of opportunity only degrades an already successful social hierarchy based on merit. In effect, the artificial imposition of equality of opportunity leads to inequality in that it denies those who have succeeded on their merits, their full social and economic reward for that merit.


Three. In the Neo-Conservative mind, another distinction that follows a similar logic is the separation between the scope of government in its regulation of private lives and the reach of government regulation of capital through public institutions. While the Neo-Conservative government’s scope can never be too broad to further promote moral rigor among the citizenry, government must stop short its regulatory reach into the natural orders of capital and economic competition. So while government should have an entirely unlimited prurient interest regulating the sex life of its citizens, it should allow capitalist economy to have its natural growth, and it should be a small government and it should focus on investigations and regulation of the egregious public frauds of morally “wrong” capitalist leaders and corporations such as Enron, Arthur Anderson, WorldCom, Global Crossing, et al. In the Neo-Conservative mind, to make it simple, many things in western political history that many wearing patriarchal iconoclast thought-wear thought were good ideas and great development, turned out as a bad ideas and a terrible developments, when tested on the anvil of crusades for democracy, American creed, religious tolerance and multi-ethnic tolerant society.


Four. There are specific differences between Neo-Conservatives and traditional Republicans, as traditional Republicans were too pro-business, not close enough to ordinary Americans, too budget-conscious, and too suspicious of energetic Presidents. Libertarian conservatives were so opposed to the welfare state that they failed to produce a conservative version of it and wasted their fire on an abstract enemy defined as Statism. Neo-Conservatives, being disillusioned liberals, contributed a critique of liberalism as it actually was and from within. Most important, the Neo-Conservatives believed in ideas: "The truth is that ideas are all-important." In contrast the Conservatism believes that for Conservatives the human resistance to ideas and the many parochial comforts of life not to be deduced from our universal nature are the main truth. One can make an idea out of the resistance we offer to ideas, and that might be the substance of conservatism. The Philosophy of American Conservatism is too European, not right for an America that must be a universal idea that can attract and receive all kinds of immigrants including Jews and Hindus. The Philosophy of American Conservatism is too European and too pro-patriarchal religions, and is not right for an India that must be a universal idea that can attract one-sixth of the mankind.


Five. Especially in a democracy, common sense has political power. If one wishes to make wisdom effective, and bring it into politics, one must simplify. Neo-Conservatives are masters of deliberate simplification and have a faculty called "thinking politically." Thinking politically is not oversimplification, because the purpose is not to put across something dubious but rather to tell the truth in such a way that it will be heard. "Rhetoric" is an old name for what it does, though it applies more to a way of telling than to a way of thinking. “Thinking politically” as a way of thinking requires that one see things as a whole, not overlooking the forest for the trees. To do this, one must free oneself from the specialization and from the objectivity of the scholar or the social scientist. "Economic thinking" is as a whole by looking at economics carefully but not as a specialist.


Six. The only genuinely conservative idea in the Neo-Conservatism is an affinity for “cutting tax rates.” The Neo-Cons don’t view tax cuts as a moral imperative. Neo-Cons are interested in tax cuts only insofar as those cuts “stimulate steady economic growth,” presumably so the natives do not become restless when their bread and circuses peter out and start clamoring for the emperor’s head. Neocon “emphasis on economic growth” led to “an attitude toward public finance that is far less risk averse than is the case among more traditional conservatives.” To Neocons the state is their god, and they derive their power from expanding its reach. To Neocons the “19th-century idea” of government as the enemy of human freedom “was a historical eccentricity.” The “foreign policy is the area of American politics where Neo-Conservatism has recently been the focus of media attention.


Seven. That is because Neocon foreign policy is exemplified by precisely the foreign policy that the second Bush administration has implemented, contrary to Bush’s paean to a “humbler” foreign policy while campaigning. Neo-Con foreign policy seeks to dominate the world at any cost, sending troops to far-flung countries (Afghanistan, Iraq) in pursuit of, hegemony, in the guise of bringing liberation and democracy to the oppressed of the world. It is not contrary to the vision of the Founding Fathers and to the American tradition, which was to take away the lands of American Indians, which British rulers wanted to be out of bounds for the colonists, which is why Neo-Con foreign policy has won consent of the American people, the White House and the Capitol. There is no set of Neo-Conservative beliefs concerning foreign policy, only a set of attitudes derived from historical experience.”


Eight. The essential questions to follow are: Has the Republican Party has been synthesized? Has there been working-out or purging of self-contradictions such as Libertarians inherent within the system of the Republican Party? Neo-Conservatism is the first variant of American conservatism in the 20th century that is in the "American grain." Neo-Conservatism like the American Grain is hopeful, not lugubrious; forward-looking, not nostalgic; and its general tone is cheerful, not grim or dyspeptic.


Nine. Neo-Conservatives believe that American people have always preferred strong government to weak government, although they certainly have no liking for anything that smacks of overly intrusive government. The Neo-Con view of the progressive and inevitable growth of the state seems to be a glaring display of the Neo-Conservative attachment to their Trotskyite roots. Ideologues like Hayek and Spencer were albatrosses around the necks of Republican Party bureaucrats, in total denial of their use and utilization of The State. Neo-Conservatives have purged the ideas of Hayek and Spencer, which had become a great liability for the Republican Party. In the internal war of Ideas the likes of Hayek and Spencer lost. The argument and wars in Washington Beltway were never really about the size of The State but instead the priorities of “The State.”


Ten. Republican Neocons feel at home in 21st Century America to a degree that more Republican traditional WASP Conservatism does not. Frequently Neo-Cons find much to be critical about, they tend to seek intellectual guidance in the democratic wisdom of Tocqueville. Tocqueville’s intellectual guidance in democratic wisdom is, in essence, pragmatism.


Eleven. The Republican Neo-Conservatism harbors deep-seated distaste for Communism, extremist fundamentalist Islamic tyrannical societies and regimes, Eastern Orthodoxy of Russia and East European Slavs. Republican Neo-Conservatives do not oppose Orthodoxy Christianity on ground of religion, while democratic secretary Madeleine Albright might have done so under influence of Papacy or Ashkenazi experience in Czechoslovakia. In the 1999 Albright and Clinton’s war against the Serbs and Yugoslavia many Ashkenazi policy makers urged to vicariously "crush Serb skulls" went way beyond the 1914 Viennese slogan "Serbien muss sterbien." The Republican neocons' visceral Russophobia is mush more significant in terms of strategic significance for the United States.


Twelve. Exoteric Neo-Conservatism holds what every Messianic political ideology officially upheld the values of Reason, Individualism, and Self-Esteem, and when it came to the inner workings of the political ideology enforced a ruthless conformism based on worship of the guru, that was founded on blatant emotionalism and the abject self-abnegation of the rank-and-file before the political leaders. The exoteric creed of Neo-Conservatism is fairly straightforward and widely advertised: it consists of: (i) devotion to capital-D Democracy the world over, (ii) the virtues of what it terms "democratic capitalism," (iii) the special mission of the United States and India as Exemplar post-nation state but also the exporter of democracy and crusades for democracy, and (iv) Liberty, Democracy, and the Rule of Law, free markets and other Enlightenment values that embody the doctrine of liberalism in the classical sense of the term.


Thirteen. This new version of Neo-conservatism was predicated on the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Communism and the Soviet Union, at least in Neo-Conservative approach to American foreign policy. Nearly thousands of nukes pointed at the United States, coupled with global Communist-inspired national-liberation movements, did not leave much room for Neo-Cons’ American idealism of exporting Democratic Utopia, or at least it was so felt by the White House. But with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Communism, Neo-Conservatives including former Realist Conservatives deduced that the advocacy of democracy was both practicable and in the long-term interest of the United States, as part of its promotion of international free markets and consensual government.


Fourteen. President Bush’s Iraq War reflects the policy of Petro-Imperialism and is not the sole touchstone of Neo-Conservative thought. Many traditional conservatives, both Democrats and Republicans came to the same conclusion as that of Neo-Conservatives after September 11 that America must invade Afghanistan and Iraq to safeguard America’s energy security.


Fifteen. "We are all Neo-Conservatives Now." The battlefield adjudicates perceptions. The limited military losses by Allied Powers and Pentagon in Afghanistan War and Iraq War, adjudicated the American public perception of Neo-Conservatism. Before the Iraqi invasion and lead lead-up to the war, Neo-Conservatives took a beating in the public perception because of scenarios of thousands of American dead. After the three-week victory in Iraq War with almost no American casualties, even television hosts were boasting, "We are all Neo-Conservatives Now." The successful Afghan and Iraqi elections and a consensual Afghan and Iraqi government won public admiration for Neo-Conservatism, and legitimized Crusades for Democracy. For Neo-Conservatism like most revolutionary ideologies or beliefs, the public media perception and impressions of being judged as smart, successful and cutting-edge, in a constantly changing and amorphous image that is predicated on the 24-hour news cycle, matters as much as the electoral victory or political victory.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 36, Chapter 1.




(0)(9) 1(8) Bush’s Democratic Utopia

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 36, Chapter 1.

(9) Interdependence of World Democracies


One. “The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world,” Bush declared in his second inaugural speech, taking his lead from Natan Sharansky. “Sharansky’s book  (Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror By Natan Sharansky, with Ron Dermer), confirmed what Bush believed, President George W. Bush commented during his February 2005 trip to Europe. Few books have been as immediately influential upon American foreign policy as Israeli cabinet minister Sharansky’s passionate appeal to put democracy at the center of foreign policy. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.” No matter how solid the façade of authoritarianism may appear, any state that denies freedom to its citizens is weak. One must dismiss the idea that the stability of Middle Eastern Islamic dictatorships, which American policymakers have long tolerated, can bring enduring security. The 9-11-2001 attacks were a wake-up call.


Two. Freedom for everyone and the twentieth century rise and fall of totalitarianism in Europe and Japan, proves this argument. With a half-century of hindsight, it seems absurd is that anyone ever doubted that democracy could not take hold in Japan, Germany, Italy, Eastern Europe and Russia. These former strongholds of dictatorships are democracies now, thanks to the strong military muscle of the United States that imposed democracies in Japan, Germany and Italy after the defeat of Fascist dictatorships in these countries. Communist dictatorships were replaced by democracies in Eastern Europe and Russia because of the example and role model of American and European democracies. Those who say that the Arab world is unable to grasp democracy are equally misguided.


Three. American Strategic Culture seeks to create American Empire. America had always been an imperialistic nation. Bush Doctrine did not constitute a radical break from American foreign policy the basic impulses of the Bush Doctrine can be traced throughout much of American history. In reelecting George W. Bush, Americans voted to continue foreign policies often caricatured at home and abroad as militaristic, expansionist, and unilateralist. America’s wars have consistently been shaped by the desire to create a balance of power that favors freedom. By incorporating past enemies such as Japan, Germany and Italy into the ever-growing empire of liberty, the United States fundamentally changed the Old World and proved the enduring strength of American strategic culture but also its fundamental flexibility and adaptability. If asked of empire, the American Founders would not have hesitated to embrace the word. Founding Fathers of the United States believed that a nation of such size and strength was a de facto Empire. Thomas Jefferson conceived the United States as “a Republican Empire” and “an Empire for Liberty” and an American Empire in many respects the most interesting in Empire the world. To Hamilton, the United States was “Hercules in a cradle.”


Four. Quest for the American Empire, has been a more or less consistent purpose to American power and a strategic culture that remains a source of American conduct. American dreams of a pro-Democracy and pro-freedom American Empire are at once “realistic,” in the sense of being a keen calculation of power, especially military power, and at the same time “idealistic,” in the sense of being motivated by a set of transcendental claims about the nature of the good society. The unexpected victory in the Cold War with the demise of Communism and demise of the Soviet Union, without firing a bullet, left American imperialism’s leaders unsure, which disoriented the world’s “sole superpower.”


Five. President George W. Bush wants America to make sacrifices to invade and occupy the Islamic Middle East and impose America-type democracy, institutions and laws to protect the Arabian and Iranian Muslims from sure death in the looming eschatological teleological Armageddon and Apocalypse. Bush administration wants America to create an “Empire of Liberty” because only a democratic regional order in the oil-rich Middle East would deny the Wahhabi terrorists the breeding grounds. The Arabists in the White House and British secret service agents such as Lawrence of Arabia helped unite the barbarian Bedouin tribes and dacoits of Mecca and Medina into a guerrilla insurgency to weaken the rule of Ottoman’s over Arabia after the First World War. To gain control over Arab oil the democratic United States tolerated the Wahhabi extremism. After 9/11 attacks and global threat of Wahhabi terrorist barbarians to the civilized world, the Republican Neo-Conservatives have come to conclusion that only by militarily imposing democracy, democratic institutions, western laws and women’s rights could America and the West secure its energy security and usher in a new age of development and progress in the Middle East and avert looming Armageddon and Apocalypse in the Islamic Middle East. The Catholic and Evangelical eschatological teleological foretells the imminent Christian-Islamic Wars of Armageddon, whish shall result in the Apocalypse and destruction of Islam in the Middle East and the rule of Christianity throughout the Middle East. Only when the Islamic Arab World and Iran is brought under the direct military occupation of American Colonial Empire, could avert the imminent Christian-Muslim Armageddon and Apocalypse in the Islamic Middle East. All liberal Muslims and all Muslim women would readily welcome American Colonial Empire or “Bush’s Empire of Liberty” in the Islamic Middle East as it would guarantee women’s rights and modernize the barbarian Arab culture and society.


Six. The primary task of Pax-Americana must be to find ways to avert the Pope-conspired Christian Armageddon Wars on Muslims or open Christian-Islamic Apocalyptic Wars, which Papacy believes would make the entire Islamic Middle East into Holy Christian lands. The primary task of a Pax Americana must be to find ways to create a new social and political order in the Islamic Middle East, where Islamic religious and cosmological beliefs are preserved, and the prosperity resulting from rising oil-prices results in modernity, freedom of women and leads to the end of jihad. In particular American imperial power is needed for order, modernity and social progress in the Middle East. The need for American Empire in the Islamic Middle East arises because Wahhabi Arab governments are too extremist and too weak to protect their young people and women from internal enemies or outside intrusion or terrorists. Bush administration is particularly concerned with the threat posed by jihadist tendencies in the Muslim world to both the East and the West. Saudi Arabian Wahabbism is spreading turmoil and hatred throughout the Islamic world and Saudi Arabian Monarchy has funded the mosques and madrasas that preach hatred against all infidels, namely, Jews, Christians, and Hindus. This poisoning of the Muslim mind clearly must stop, if there is to be an end to the war on terror.


Seven. The Wahhabi Islamic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 awoke a dormant American strategic culture and set the Neo-Conservatives led Bush administration on a warpath toward an ambitious new expansion of the empire of liberty to oil-rich Islamic Middle East, the homeland of barbarian terrorists that attacked the World Trade Centers. The Bush administration’s policies to create Petro-Imperialistic American Empire is not the result of an evanescent “unipolar moment” but rather a reflection of a deeper strategic culture that guided the America from the earliest days of the republic. Gold created Spanish Empires in the New World. Black Gold shall recreate Petro-imperialistic American colonial empire in the oil-rich Islamic Middle East. Pax-Americana is based on the sound economic principles of profitability of oil-colonies in the energy starved word, and the oil-companies do not depend on Arab labor for producing oil in the Islamic world. Petro-imperialism is sustained not simply by the fact of American power or the extent of its military might, impressive as it may be.


Eight. Neo-Conservatism defends Petro-Imperialistic American Colonial Empire. American Empire is good for Islamic Arab world and Iran. Bush’s America should not shirk American hegemon’s duty to establish American Oil Colonial Empire and also to assume responsibility for guaranteeing the rights and freedom for Muslim women in the Islamic Middle East. Though the concept of Empires have acquired a bad name, not least not in American politics. It is particularly unfortunate that Empires acquired a bad name in the second half of the 20th Century. Empires and colonialism shall stage a comeback in the 21st century, because empires and colonial empires have historically maintained peace, promoted prosperity and promoted social progress and gave freedom and liberty to women. America like other economically and militarily dominant powers in the past, has acquired an American Empire in North America and expanded the reach of Empire from the Atlantic East Coast to the Pacific West Coast and removed original Red Indians from the lands, throughout 19th Century. During second half of the 20th Century, America worked towards disintegration of European Colonial empires because America didn’t have any colonial empire of its own in Africa, Asia or South America. America created a de facto American Oil Empire in the oil-rich Arab world, by controlling the OPEC and the Arab regimes. However, the growing nuclear menace of Wahhabi Sunni terrorism and nuclear Ayatollahs it is moral imperative that United States should leverage its sole super power status to export America-type liberal democracy, democratic institutions and freedom and rights of women, by crusades of democracy in the Islamic Middle East. Earlier American administrations conspired to force Arab women into bondage under Wahhabi rule and Iranian women under Ayatollah’s rule, primarily to secure American oil interests in the Middle East. After 9/11 America must not shirt its responsibility to export democracy in the Middle East and assume the resulting imperial responsibilities.


Nine. Americans that wish the economic need and strategic requirement of American Empire would just go away or dream that Arab Islamic terrorism could be managed by Christian love and compassion, are foolish and seeks to bury Yankee’s head in the sand and promote global disorder and risk future terrorist nuclear attacks on America. The central argument in favor of American Colonial Empire in the oil-rich Islamic Arab world is that American Empire alone can provide the most basic of public goods, freedom from state-sponsored Islamic terrorist attacks, in the anarchical society of Wahhabi Arab states. American Colonial Empire in the Arab world shall also replace Sharia Islamic laws with modern American legal system, which shall grant women equal rights and establish democracy and democratic institutions and a transnational legal system to protect property rights, particularly those of foreigners. American Empire shall quell Shiite-Sunni ethnic conflicts and guarantee Muslim women rights and legal equality to men. American Imperialism is precisely what is needed to restore order in the Islamic Middle East and to bring the world of Islam into the modern world without seeking to “alter its Islamic soul” or to convert Muslims to Evangelical or Catholic Christianity. Secular imperialistic Pax-Americana should not have any hidden Christian religious agenda and must ban all forms of conversions of Muslims to other religions. 


Ten. Seeding of the Democratic Ideals in Islamic world is not only possible but also desirable. President George W. Bush's second inauguration’s clarion call to spread liberty across the globe intuitively expresses foreign policy goals of Neo-Conservatism and is neither overly ambitious nor overly optimistic, and recognizes the ground reality that democracy can take root in any Islamic country, and that democratic nations are largely peaceful. Muslim Mullahs impose servitude on women by brutal use of force and sticks, and once colonial rulers outlaw suppression of Muslim women and enforce equal representation of Muslim women in Judiciary, Police, Bureaucracy and public offices, the Islamic nations would become democratic and peaceful overnight. Islam is a religion of sword and the sword of colonial rulers can transform Islamic Arab society, culture, polity and economy in the image of their Western counterparts.


Eleven. Any study in diplomacy shows that President Bush and Secretary Rice are more realistic than the Kissingler-type "realists." Kissinger-type amoral realists that injected hidden iconoclast patriarchal religious right agenda into the conduct of secular foreign policy are skeptical of injecting issues of freedom, democracy, and human rights into the conduct of foreign policy call themselves "realists," and they accuse their opposite numbers-the so-called idealists of an almost juvenile enthusiasm.


Twelve. Democratic Advances in the world is unstoppable. Neo-Conservative Idealists advocating Crusades for Democracy are right about the inevitability for freedom and democracy to spread across borders and cultures to bring down the remnants of tyrannies and theocracies in the world in the first quarter of 21st century. In 1775 there were no democratic nation in the world. After the American Revolution, the United States became the first democracy in the world, and the total umber of democratic nation in 1775 was raised to one. Some 230 years later, in 2005 there are 117 democratic nations in the world, accounting for 61 percent of the total number of world's governments. This historic transformation in the growth of the number of democratic nations in the world did not occurred at a steady pace, and the rate of growth of number of democratic nations has accelerated.

Just over thirty years ago in 1975, the proportion of democracies as a percentage of total number of states was about half of what it is today. These years of rapid transition can be termed democracy's "third wave." The first wave of democracy began with the American Revolution of 1775 and continued through the peacemaking that followed the end of World War I in 1919, which created many fledgling states with short-lived democratic systems. The second wave of democracy began with decolonization after World War II in 1945 and accelerated after 1960 when many African colonies became independent and member of the Non-aligned movement, and lasted only until the newly independent nations of Africa and Asia lapsed into dictatorship, primarily because of the CIA-sponsored military coups or covert operations. The "third wave" of democracy began in 1974 with the transition of Portugal from military rule that dismantled Portuguese colonial empire in Africa, including Angola and Mozambique. The remaining dictatorships of southern Europe, in Greece and Spain soon disappeared. The fourth wave of democracies began with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the demise of the Communism and the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991. The fourth wave of democracy swept over Latin America and Eastern Europe and lapped the shores of East Asia and Africa. The rest of the tyrannies, theocracies and dictatorships of the world might well go democratic before this tide is spent. There is the factor of example and momentum, as the proportion of democracies rises, it will become harder for the remaining authoritarian regimes, theocracies and tyrannies and military dictatorships to hold out.

In Latin America and the Caribbean 32 out of 35 states have elected governments. In Asia and the Pacific, the 23 states out of 39 states have elected governments. In states of the former Soviet Union and its former satellites in Eastern Europe 17 states out of 27 states are democratic and have elected governments.

In sub-Saharan Black Africa 19 states out of 48 states or 40 percent of total sub-Sahara black African states have democratically elected governments, despite the familiar litany of disabilities, tribalism, and borders drawn artificially by former foreign rulers.


Thirteen. The skeptics ridicule President Bush for declaring his ultimate goal to be the end of tyranny. But in 2005 probably no more than 20 percent of the governments in the world could rightly be called tyrannies, dictatorships, theocracies or totalitarian regimes, and their proportion of world governments was much higher not so long ago. The remaining 20 percent of the governments are destined to go the way of the other tyrannies and become democratic nations once United States and India pool their national, political, economic, media and military resources to bring down non-democratic regimes, dictatorships, theocracies, monarchies and sheikhdoms that exist primarily in the Islamic world now. It is absurd to argue that Islamic cultural differences explain why democracy is absent from the Islamic Middle Eastern even when oil-incomes made these nations economically advanced with their women well educated.


Fourteen. Democratic transformation of the Middle East is a moral imperative. The test of President Bush's sincerity about crusades for democracy is not whether he insists on including Democracy and Freedom consistently among America’s foreign policy priorities. An American foreign policy that makes freedom a touchstone will entail some self-contradictions, hypocrisies and doubts about America’s sincerity. When President Jimmy Carter elevated human rights to a new prominence in American foreign policy priorities, Carter changed the world for the better and advanced America's interests. Historical evidence suggests that democracy can indeed spread further, and America can serve as an agency of History and agent of democracy’s advancement all over the world, and democracy's spread will make the world safer. In the Middle East and North Africa Israel remains the only democracy among eighteen states. In the wake of 9/11 terrorist attacks, President Bush concluded that democracy was uniquely absent in the Middle East, was also the epicenter of global terrorism, that is why he launched his campaign for freedom in his second inaugural address focused on crusades for democracy in the Islamic Middle East.


Fifteen. The 21st Century is a Time of Democratic Revolution and there has never been a more dramatic moment than this one for unleashing the revolution of democracy in the world. The Islamic world specially the Arab Muslim Middle East is boiling politically as Kings, Sheikhs, dictators and tyrants scramble to come to terms with the democratic political tsunami unleashed on the Islamic world from democratic experiments in Afghanistan and Iraq. The power of democratic revolution is evident in every country in the Islamic Middle East. Even the Saudi Al Saud royal family had to stage a farcical election, though this first halting step has fooled no one, as only males could vote, no political parties were permitted, and only the Wahhabi organizations permitted to participant in election process. Very soon Wahhabi Saudi Arabia will have to submit to the freely expressed desires of their people, who shall have the freedom to reject the rule of Al Saud House as well as the control of Wahhabi clergy over Mecca and Medina. This is truly a revolutionary moment for Islamic democracy. America is blessed with a revolutionary Neo-Conservative president that would harness the power of the sole super power to engineer the overthrow the dictatorships including one that claims Divine Right such as Papacy, or claims the workers Utopia such as Communist China, or one that claimed the Mullahs right to rule Muslims such as Ayatollah ruled Iran, or one that claimed that Wahhabi Clergy sanctioned rule of House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia. Revolutionary President Bush shall use the political power of the United States to engineer the democratic revolution in Tehran, Mecca, Vatican and Beijing to bring about democratic revolution in theocratic Iran, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, theocratic Papacy and Communist China.


Sixteen. The democratic world looks to democratic America, the sole super power hegemon in the unipolar world for more determined action, not just brave words to engineer democratic revolution in iconoclast patriarchies of nuke-seeking theocratic Ayatollah’s Iran, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, theocratic Papacy’s Vatican and Communist China. But the revolutionary wheel of history turns, as ever such moments are transient, and if they are not seized to usher in the democratic revolution, these opportunities will pass, leaving the bitter aftertaste of failure to usher in the democracies in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Papacy. Democratic revolutionary leadership, destined to be agency of History must understand both the quality of this pro-democracy moment and the revolutionary strategy Neo-Conservative America and India need to adopt to ensure that the democratic revolution succeeds in iconoclast patriarchal dictatorships in Communist China, Theocratic Iran, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Theocratic Vatican Papacy.


Seventeen. Bush Bids for Greatness by Crusades for Democracy and as revolutionary agency of History for Democracy. Neo-Conservative President George Bush going to be one of the greatest presidents in American history. With his second inaugural address of January 2005, President Bush made certain that his name identified with every movement of liberty and democracy around the world for the rest of 21st century. President said that it is now “the policy of the United States” to stand with those everywhere who long for and seek and sacrifice for liberty, specifically, “in every culture” and every region. If the “fire in the minds of men” is liberty, and that fire spreads among people in Iran, Saudi Arabia, China and Vatican, then 50 years from now men will look back and say that the man who first inspired that new turn in history was George W. Bush. Bush’s speech seemed very largely in tune with Israeli Foreign Minister Natan Sharansky’s new book on democracy as the only real defense against terrorism. It is a noble vision for Israel and America and all nations to embrace including India.


Eighteen. Bold Republican President Ronald Reagan threatened Star Wars to bankrupt Communist Soviet Union and in the process ignited the Russian spirit for freedom, capitalism and private property. Revolutionary President George W. Bush by challenging Communist China could easily ignite the Chinese people’s lust for private property, spiritual need of Buddhism, inherent human desire for freedom liberty to engineer pro-democracy and pro-Buddhism revolution in China. Bush calls forth a “new birth of freedom" meaning an alternative to tyranny, and end to a culture of dependency upon the state. Neo-Conservative President Bush has the greatness of Ronald Reagan, and a boldness of vision of Crusades for Democratic Utopia that may be even larger than the vision of Ronald Reagan that caused the demise of Communism and the Soviet Union. President Bush has the benefit of the great gains America made because of Reagan’s bold action on the Evil Empire. Neo-Conservative’s new vision is to make every citizen an owner, a person of character in charge of his own destiny and responsible not only for his own needs but also for caring for his neighbor. Neo-Conservative individual is neither lonely nor selfish, but a part of family, church or associations compassionate toward the needy and alert to the needs of the common good. Abraham Lincoln called forth a “new birth of freedom,” meaning the end of slavery in the Southern states and a new beginning.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 40, Chapter 1.




(0)(10) 1(9) Anti-Neo-Conservative Axis

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 40, Chapter 1.

(1) Catholics-Communism-Cocaine Axis


One. Neo-Conservatism rejects Marxist Dialectics of Materialism and adopts Hegelian Dialectics. Marxism is a criminal enterprise organized by amoral iconoclast patriarchy to massacre Oriental culture and civilizations. The growing nexus of iconoclast patriarchy and Communism and Cocaine cartel threatens the descent of new global Dark Age on the world Civilization in the 21st Century. Prostitute-Philosopher Karl Marx hired by the Catholics and Elders of Zion to produce a secular concoction, which could allow Bolshevik Jews and Catholics destroy Russian Aristocracy, Orthodoxy and loot the property of Russians. Catholic Joseph Stalin murdered more Orthodox Russians than died in the First and Second World Wars, even when he had consolidated his political power and no opposition to his political rule existed. Catholic Joseph Stalin massacred Orthodox Russians to implement the secret agenda of Karl Marx revealed in the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. Catholic Mao Zedong murdered 60 million Chinese Buddhists to implement the secret iconoclast religious agenda of Karl Marx partly revealed in the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. Catholic Pol Pot of Khmer Rouge murdered 3 million Buddhist Cambodians to impose Christianizing of Cambodia. Hindu Monarchy and Royal Family of Laos murdered to impose Christianity over Laos. The Catholic Communists destroyed the Orthodox Monarchy of Emperor Haile Selaisie that had rule Ethiopia. Catholics control Global Drug Cartels and global Organized Crime and Italian Mafia. Communists in Golden Triangle monopolize Asian Drug Cartels.


Two. The Neo-Conservative Manifesto seeks to organize Hindu and Buddhist civilizations to develop the common civilization’s front against Catholicism, Communism, Organized Crime, and Cocaine Opium Drug Cartels. Western Christendom has used military coups to overthrow popular national leaders, namely, Patrice Lumumba of Congo, Allende of Chile, Peron of Argentina, Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan. The CIA overthrew the Shah of Iran, King Faisal of Iraq, King Idris of Algeria, Emperor Haile Selaisie of Ethiopia, Prince Sihanouk of Cambodia, King of Laos, and Buddhist Empress of Vietnam. Populism seeks to develop a new political front worldwide.


Three. Neo-Conservatism believes social, political, and religious organizations contribute more towards victory than the regular armed forces in the civilization’s wars and religious wars. Only when the society, polity and religion is overhauled that one can hope to win the civilization’s war. Populist Manifesto provides a blueprint to reorganize the economy, polity, society, and religion, to generate revolutionary forces, necessary to mobilize the society for war efforts.


Four. Neo-Conservatism believes that forces of water more powerful than the forces of fire used by religions and ideologies of the Sword. The Occidental, patriarchal religions propagate by the excessive use of sword and fire. The brute force alone allowed the worldwide expansion of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. The Oriental matriarchal religions expand peacefully, like the vast expanse of water that inundates everything in the way. Christianity and Islam will attack Hinduism seeking to burn the Hindu civilization. Hindu civilization will retaliate by seeking to drown the Catholic and Sunni civilization in the vast spiritual ocean of omnipresent Hinduism. Catholic and Sunni religious army will attack like lions that pursue to kill and eat the herbivorous animals. Hindu and Buddhist religious army will use their brute manpower like an elephant to rampage the enemy frontline. Hindu civilization in the form of a giant octopus will drag the fire wielding Catholic and Sunni civilization and drown them in Deep Ocean of spiritual controversies to swallow them whole. Hindu civilization is like a multi-headed, multi-armed octopus that lacks a centralized leadership of the Catholics.

(2) Neo-Con Wars of Ideas or War of Arms:


One. Neo-Conservatism argus that in 21st Century the Sword of tolerant inclusive Ideas or Ideologies is mightier than the Sword of intolerant exclusive Ideas or murderous Ideologies. It is moral imperative that tolerant and inclusive cultures, nations and civilizations make preemptive strikes against intolerant exclusive cultures, nations and barbarians to defeat the evil of barbarianism and murderous Ideologies and murderous theocracies. The civilization’s wars promote universal political philosophy, designed to transform the social, political, economic fabric of the civilization. The primary purpose of the armed forces in a civilization’s war is to subjugate the political and social leadership of the adversary civilization, rather than the destruction of the military and economic targets. Civilization’s war is not so much the war to conquer new territories, as it is to impose new official religions on the adversary states. The Civilization’s war will not aim to make a single world Empire. Civilization’s wars will aim to bring the whole world under the influence of a single world religion. The civilization’s war does not occupy the lands of the enemy civilization, but seeks to win over the minds of the enemies. The sword compels the conversions of the enemies in a civilization’s war.


Two. Without a robust political philosophy, no civilization can fight a civilization’s war and hope to win it. The Soviet Union lost the civilization’s war against the Capitalist, simply because its political weapon of Communism and Socialism failed to produce economic goods that are the lifeline of any civilization.


Three. Neo-Conservatism argues that the Crusades for Democracy should also include Crusades for Capitalism and Crusades for Freedom and Liberty. On an industrial front one wins or loses the Global Civilization’s war. In Civilization’s war, India and Russia will face the combined arsenal of United States, United Europe and Communist China. Hindu and Orthodox civilizations will face the Catholic, Protestant, and Communist civilizations. The problem facing Hindu political thinkers is to outline a new social and political philosophy that would democratically harness the manpower of nuclear India, and the land resources of weakened Russia, to build, start and operate the economic Juggernaut. The Juggernaut that would feed, equip and support an Indian Army of five million (5,000,000) regular soldiers, two million (2,000,000) Hindu religious missionaries and one million (1,000,000) populist political activists. The economic juggernaut that would produce agricultural, industrial, economic and military goods to support the military operations in the coming Global Civilization’s war that may continue for more than five years. The present political structures in India and Russia are not suitable for waging a civilization’s war. India and Russia should undergo revolutionary transformation to equip their societies for the coming civilization’s wars.


Four. Neo-Conservatism believes that India, Russia and China would progress more, once they are taught that Communism, Marxism, Socialism are alse doctrines of Sword. The failure of Communism and Socialism in the Eastern Bloc led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc. The failure of the American type Capitalism with free flow of capital led to the collapse of the Japanese, Korean, Indonesian, Malaysian, Thai, and the Filipino economies. The economic prosperity of the United States is not so much the result of its robust industrial sector. The economy of the United States is robust simply because United States is becoming the home of world’s black money, the income of the organized crime and drug cartels. No other economy of the world can absorb over one trillion dollars that organized crime earns annually, and sixty (60) percent of that is generated by the drug trade. Half of the world's income of the organized crime and drug trade generated in the United States that comes to $ 500 billion and $300 billion annually. Without the economic activity generated by the investment of the incomes generated by the global drug trade, the economy of the United States will collapse. This is just to argue that the philosophy of Capitalism and Liberalism is not universal panacea. The world needs a new universal political philosophy. New philosophy shall properly harness the resources of the society to produce economic goods. New Philosophy undertakes the mass mobilization of the society to fight the coming Civilization’s war. The New Philosophy strengthens the democratic infrastructure to enable people elect their representatives. Populism is the new ideology of the twenty-first (21st) century. Populist Manifesto outlines the social, politic and economic reorganization that India and Russia must undergo to emerge as the dominant economic and military super power in the world.


Five. The Neo-Conservatism advocates the use of Citizen Militia in the global war on Islamic terrorism and Maoist terrorism. The core objective of the Populist philosophy is to harness the manpower to train and equip the Citizens' Militia to conduct worldwide military operations in the coming Civilization’s war. Every citizen will work five years for compulsory national service, without salary for food shelter and clothing’s. The Agricultural Income Tax will be charge at the rate of one-third of the agricultural produce, and shall be collected in kind. The agricultural income tax will provide food products to feed the youths serving in the compulsory national service. The social, political, legal, religious super-structure of the Populist manifesto designed to develop a just, egalitarian, and democratic society that harnesses the full productive potential of the manpower in the Populist society. Populist Militia organized under the system of collectives and vast network of schools, colleges, and universities. Populist militia will take the challenge of defeating the Islamic fundamentalists that are threatening the liberal societies.


Six. Clinton Administration as outlined in Congressional Cox Report allowed the clandestine transfer of sensitive military, satellite, and radar technologies to China, to influence Chinese northward expansionism. There are five (5) million Chinese in Eastern Siberia, and Russian population is only seven (7) million. China has acquired Neutron bomb technology and it would allow China to occupy Eastern Siberia and Mongolia. The Chinese threats to Siberia will force Russia's president to allow the emigration of ten (10) million Indians in Siberia to check the infiltration and invasions of China. No amount of nuclear weapons can defend Siberia against Chinese invasions. Only Indian soldiers can blunt Chinese invasions of Siberia. The Populist Manifesto seeks to mobilize Indian society, and to provide military training to Indian students. The mass mobilization of students into Populist Army will provide the necessary reservoir of military trained personnel, willing to emigrate abroad at their own risks and rewards, to seek fortunes in the foreign hostile lands. Ten million militias will also conduct their studies and productive employment in Eastern Siberia. The emigration of ten million trained professionals from India to Siberia will transform the sick economy of present-day Russia into world class economy within five years. Russia can overtake the United States as an economic, military and technological power with the help of ten million Indian emigrants. United States has emerged as the sole Super Power of the world, leapfrogging over similarly resources-rich Russia, Canada, Brazil, and Australia simply because it welcomed foreign immigrants and gave them citizenship. Russia should allow open immigration to Indians, and change its nationality laws, if it wants to become prosperous and powerful. Russia is not a part of Europe. Russia is a part of Asia. Russian empire was born out of the ruins of Mongol Empire. Russian civilization is the negation of Western civilization. Russia and Siberia are the northward extension of South Asia. The phenomenon of global warming will provide a Godsend opportunity to develop frozen Siberia for human habitation. As the problem of global warming worsens the frozen lands in Canada and Siberia would bloom and become host to a new civilization each.

Neo-Conservative Populism is a political philosophy that allows the development of the vast land resources of Russia and Siberia by the productive use of vast reservoir of Indian manpower. The India-Russia economic and military alliance allowing for the free flow of people will catapult Russia as the leading economic power of the world before AD 2010.

(3) Karl Marx Prostitute-Philosopher


One. Neo-Conservatism is an anti-Communism philosophy and believes that Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher, and Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism and Communism are all shit-philosophies. Philosopher Karl Marx prostituted his philosophy to include an erroneous theme, 'Religion is an opiate of the masses.' Karl Marx did it to repay the financial support he received from the sources aligned to the Vatican. Vatican bribed Karl Marx to insert iconoclast statements in his writings, to use Marxism in destroying non-Catholic religions. The Vatican supported Stalin and sabotaged the Western criticism of the Catholic Joseph Stalin's murder of over 30 million pious Orthodox Christians. The Vatican also approved the Catholic Mao Tse Tung’s murder by starvation of over 60 million devout Buddhists in China during 1950s and early 1960s. The Vatican supported the Christian Khmer Rouge in Cambodia that killed more than two million Cambodians, more than one-fourth of its Buddhist population especially Buddhist monks. The Vatican and Communist Stalin had a common enemy, the devout Orthodox Christians. The Vatican and Communist Mao had a common enemy, the devout Buddhist Chinese. The Vatican and Communist Khmer Rouge had a common enemy, the devout Buddhist Cambodian. The Vatican and Nehru of the Indian Congress Party had a common enemy, the devout Hindus that killed Gandhi and opposed the partition. It is no wonder that the Communists sponsored a no-confidence motion against the Hindu government in India and against Yeltsin in Russia, immediately after the NATO invasions of Kosovo. It is reasonable to argue that the two principal enemies of Orthodox, Hindu, and Buddhist civilizations are Communism and Papacy. Every Jew that left Soviet Union transforms from a card-holding Communist to a fundamentalist Orthodox Jew. Did every Jew know that Karl Marx was only prostituting when he declared that religion is the opiate of the masses? Did Karl Marx privately tell Russian Jewish congregations, that his iconoclast statements are relevant only for the followers of the Oriental religions, not for the peoples of the book? Iconoclast Karl Marx’s writings led to the massacre of over 90 million devout followers of Eastern Christianity and Buddhism, in the hands of two of his greatest followers, who were Catholics pretending to be Orthodox atheists, Stalin and Mao. Karl Marx was greater an iconoclast than Prophet Moses and Prophet Joshua. Karl Marx was an evil philosopher-prostitute that concealed his primary iconoclastic goals, camouflaging it under the cloak of materialistic philosophical agenda. The goal of Karl Marx was to perfect a materialistic ideology to destroy the non-Judaic and non-Catholic religions. Like the secular staff of the Inquisitors that burnt alive the condemned witches, Karl Marx desired to create secular Inquisitors of the modern age, who would not shirk using lethal force to destroy the devout Orthodox, Buddhist and Hindu believers.


Two. Neo-Conservatism advocates the Crusades for Democracy, Crusades for Capitalism and Crusades for Freedom and Liberty inside Communist China. The main objective of the alliance of the Orthodox and Hindu civilizations is to reestablish a Buddhist government in Communist China, to weaken the current alliance of the Vatican and United States with Communist China. In the civilization’s wars, China will join forces with Hindu and Orthodox civilizations. Only when Chinese Buddhists armed with the philosophical weapon of Populist Manifesto that the evil communist regime would end in China. Populist manifesto would be vehemently anti-Communist to make suitable dent in the Communist stronghold over Chinese psyche. Only a strong anti-Communist philosophy would galvanize Chinese masses to support Buddhist regime in China.

(4) Destroy Islamic Fundamentalism


One. Neo-Conservatism believes that global war on Islamic terrorism can be won, once United States and India use the preponderant power to destroy political power base of extremists and fundamentalists in the Islamic world. It is in India’s national interest to join President Bush’s war on global Islamic terrorism. Foreign invaders invaded India many times in the history from the North entering India via Khyber Pass. Greek Alexander, Saks, Mohammed Ghouri, Babur, Mohammed Gaznavi entered India via Khyber Pass. The army of looters, created Islamic Empire. The spoils of any battle called the loot meticulously divided into five equal parts. One part or 20 percent belonged to the commander. The second part or 20 percent belonged to the society. The last three parts 60 percent equally divided among the soldiers. Islamic Empire built by brigands. Warriors joined the brigands to share in the spoils of war. It is the organizational basis of Afghan Mujahideens. Every Afghan has become a trained mercenary soldier willing to fight in any part of the world. Islamic Mujahideens impose their fundamentalist view on the society, starting with the suppression of the women. Populist Militia will similarly defeat Islamic Mujahideens and impose Populist culture on Islamic civilizations to guarantee unrestricted freedom to their womenfolk. Afghan and Arab Mujahideens have started the civilization’s war against Hindu civilization, by undertaking an unprovoked attack on Kargil in Kashmir. Arab and Afghan Mujahideens have attacked to extend the frontier of Islam to South Asia, so it is logical that Hindus have acquired a right of self-defense to extend the frontier of Hinduism to Afghanistan and Arabia. Hindu Populist Militia will fight the war against Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, Algeria, Somalia, Sudan, and Egypt. Arab Mujahideens have invaded Kashmir to extend the frontiers of fundamentalist Islam; it justifies the Indian retaliation to extend the frontiers of the Secularism, frontier of animist Tribalism, and the frontiers of Goddess into the heartland of Islam.


Two. Hindu India should join Christians in the looming Christian-Islamic Armageddon Wars. Hindu response to the unprovoked aggression of Arab-Afghan Islamic fundamentalist Mujahideens, will take the form of God Rama's war against the civilization of Rakshashas, which was the response to Ravana's abduction of Sita, the wife of Rama. God Rama fought the war in the backyard of the enemy, without the support of the army of his homeland Kingdom of Ayodhya. Rama led a coalition of local partners, who joined forces with Rama to defeat the dominant power of the region. Hindu Militia will fight the Islamic fundamentalists not in India, but in the Islamic heartland, by joining forces with Kurds, tribal animist tribal Africans. Modern Muslim women will support Hindu Army. Hindu militia will support animist tribal, modern Muslim women, and Kurds, to jointly wage war against dominant Islamic nations. God Rama destroyed the power of Rakshasas civilization, and installed his nominee Vibhisana on the throne of Lanka and returned to Ayodhya. Similarly Hindu India will defeat Islamic fundamentalism in the world, and install animist tribal, women and Kurds into positions of political, social, economic and religious power in the Islamic world.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 43, Chapter 1.




(0)(11) 1(10) Neo-Con Militia Collectives

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 43, Chapter 1.


One. Neo-Conservatism advocates that United States war on Islamic terrorism should include preemptive attacks on heartlands and breeding ground of Islamic terrorists in the Middle East, to destroy the breeding grounds of terrorism, by using Citizen Militia. Historically the Khyber Pass has been the invaders' gateway to India. Defeating the foreign invaders east of Khyber Pass does not guarantee that the invasions will not occur in future. Mohammed Ghouri was defeated seventeen (17) times by Prithvi Raj Chauhan, the ruler of Delhi. During Eighteenth attack, Mohammed Ghouri attacked India aided by Jaichand, the cousin of Prithvi, the King of the lands now in Pakistan, and Prithvi Raj was defeated. Mohammed Ghouri was defeated and Muslim era began in India. India cannot allow Pakistan to become the Jai Chand of the 20th century. Worse, India can never allow Pakistan to become the Mohammed Ghouri of 21st century.


Two. India cannot permit the evil designs of Muslim terrorists to extend the frontiers of Islam eastward. Afghan Mujahideens invasions of Kargil Kashmir, are not the extension of Kashmir issue, but the extension of Afghan Syndrome. Arab and Afghan terrorists are conspiring to extend the frontiers of Islam, said Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh in 2001. Nuclear India should seal the Khyber Pass to deny its use for the eastward expansion of the frontiers of Islam. It necessitates that Indian response will be to fight Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan and other Arab hot spots. Regular Army units are not very effective in High Mountain warfare. Light mobile infantry is effective in the high mountain warfare. Afghanistan and NWFP Frontier region of Pakistan is the hotbed of drug trade and political terrorism. Afghanistan unless checked militarily would destabilize the Islamic world. India needs to intervene in Afghan war and develop a large private army of Hindu militia to fight Afghan Mujahideens in Afghanistan. India needs to deploy a private army of 100,000 volunteers in Afghanistan, Armenia, Somalia, Congo, Burma, Cambodia, and Siberia. India needs to develop new types of armed forces that do not burden national exchequer. The system of Populist Militia can effectively mobilize the masses to raise standing army of more than five million Hindu Militias without causing any burden on the Exchequer.


Three. Neo-Conservatism harnesses the military prowess of citizenry and large enterprises to create oil-colonialism without requiring the direct participation of military forces. A small army of Muslim invaders headed by small time brigands, not representing any great Islamic nation, created Muslim empire in India. A small army of Robert Clive established the rule of East India Company in Bengal. Pizarro with a small army conquered Inca civilization. Cortez with a small army conquered the Maya and Aztec Empires. Sir Cecil Rhodes established British rule in Rhodesia and Nyasaland. The expansion of Russians in Siberia accomplished not by Czar Army but by the private bands of Tartars, fur-traders, and adventurers. Large standing armies have failed to create large Empires. The large armies of Napoleon, William Kaiser, Adolph Hitler, and Emperor Hirohito failed to create large empires. Barbarian invaders from the north conquered the mighty Roman Empire within 40 years of Roman Emperor issuing decree banning non-Christian religions. The small army of 30,000 ill trained Rwanda volunteers overthrew the Mobuto's government in Zaire. Rag tag army of Afghan Mountain fighters defeated the Soviet Army. Viet Cong soldiers armed with low-tech weapons defeated United States, the mightiest power on earth. Few thousand well-trained Afghan Mujahideens stealthily occupied the high-mountain heights in Kargil Kashmir, and it took one-fourth of Indian Air force and sizeable part of the Indian Army to flush them out. Large Regular Army are at disadvantage while fighting guerrillas, as latter are not bound by the Laws of War. Large standing Army becomes a great burden on the national economy and results in the collapse of the society. Civilizations should respond to the guerrilla invasions of the barbarians, by mobilizing new Guerrilla Army, to defeat the guerrilla barbarians.


Four. Neo-Conservatism advocates that Draft System should be established in the United States in case the Pentagon’s foreign interventions for requires more military manpower than what can be mobilized by voluntary recruitment. Indian parliament should enact a legislation to establish compulsory five-year draft for national service for every boy and girl. The youths shall live in the Collectives, Communes, and hostels away from the influence of their parents. It will allow India to have a very large reservoir of trained militia. Every boy and the girl shall serve five years in compulsory national service to work in armed forces, missionary services, farms, or industry. The compulsory draft system shall be non-discriminatory, just and far more acceptable than the voluntary draft system. It imposes similar obligations on every person without any discrimination of wealth, status, class, origin or caste. Ten (10) percent of the total population will be working for the compulsory draft at any given time that amounts to around one hundred (100) million draftees. Ten (10) million youths representing one (1) percent of Indian population work full time for the armed forces of the nation.


Five. Neo-Conservatism believes that when agriculture is profitable and when farmers get remunerative prices without governmental agricultural subsidies, the national economy prospers. Agriculture sector should contribute its fair share of gtaxes. The general agricultural income tax at the rate of one-third or thirty-three (33) percent of the agricultural production should be levied in the agricultural sector, to be collected in kind. It will provide the food products to feed the draftees serving the compulsory national service. The government shall increase the procurement prices of the food grains by fifty (50) percent, so that the net income to the farmers will remain unaffected. The food grains brought in as agricultural income tax will create a barter economy that will finance the Populist Militia.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006, Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 44, Chapter 1.




(0)(12) 1(11) Neo-Con Social Modernity

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 44, Chapter 1.


One. The victor in the civilization’s war imposes its culture, literature, language, script, food habits, dress and religion on the defeated civilization. The military objective in a civilization’s war is to impose the dominant civilization, not so much to kill the people. Promote those who willingly convert, or help in the conquest to positions of power and influence after the war. The Neo-Conservative Populist system of social modernization is an instrument of Civilization’s war. The social forces of modernization will meet the threat of Islamic fundamentalism. Fundamentalism perpetuates itself by enforcing upon people traditional norms of social behavior with the threat of social, cultural and economic deprivations. The role of traditional institutions has been to arrest rather than generate social forces. Traditional institutions lead to the stagnation and decline of both culture and the society. Neo-Conservative Populist forces shall use the civilization’s wars to abolish traditional institutions, so that humanity may realize the highest state of culture and progress on the earth.


Two. Neo-Conservative Populist forces shall not remain silent spectators to the exploitation of the women in the Islamic and Catholic cultures. It is possible to create a new modern society in a short time. Social forces alone can create a new culture. One creates a new society neither by military force, nor by naked political force. State need not use force to destroy archaic traditions, as they are already on its deathbed. Archaic traditions are destroyed by politically taking away their power to suppress modernity. On a level playing ground the modernizing forces would defeat and destroy the fundamentalist forces.


Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates freedom of youth, emancipation of women and freedom of sex and interracial marriages for youths without any interference by older generation. The cultural and social history of the mankind is the history of the perennial conflict between the entrenched old generation and the aspiring new generation. It is through this conflict of generations between the old and new generations that eternal time influences the cultural progress of the mankind. Youth realize the conspiratorial nature of these social norms, designed to deny the youths their role in the society, late in their lives when they themselves cease to be youths. Populists will guarantee the freedom of sex and freedom of youth so that they may unleash powerful social forces to overwhelm the enemy civilizations.


Four. State should protect children from fundamentalist cultures that seeks to perpetuate archaic extremism by controlling the minds of young children and young adults. Neo-Conservative Populist States shall be responsible for the education and the upbringing of the children. Youths and children above the age of ten shall stay in school, college hostels, and community houses, without the influence of their parents. The segregation of generation will give economic independence to the youth, and give a deathblow to the archaic traditional social norms. Even a fundamentalist Islamic society will become highly modern within a short time of six months, if all its boys and girls are removed from their parents home and housed in school and university hostels.


Five. Neo-Conservatism advocates Emancipation of Woman. The Achilles heel of all archaic traditions is the suppression and inequality of women. The revolt of the women, shall give a deathblow to all such religions and cultures as imposes the suppression and inequality of women. Populists will destroy the Islamic fundamentalism by guaranteeing freedom to their womenfolk’s freedom from suppression by their men. Populists will empower the Islamic girls and youths to punish their fundamentalist tormentors, whenever they object to the modernization. Muslim girls and modern Muslim youths will beat the shit out of their fundamentalist tormenters. The social fabric of the Islamic fundamentalism will crumble overnight. State shall entrust Muslim womenfolk with police power and military power to over throw the male dominance of the Islamic fundamentalists. Afghan women armed with police power and guns will shoot down male fundamentalists in Afghanistan, to reestablish an egalitarian Islamic society. The permanent solution of the Islamic fundamentalism will be to impose the religion of Goddess Isis, Ishtar, and Inanna, al-Lat on the Islamic world. The male-dominant patriarchal Islamic fundamentalism fears matriarchal, women-dominant religion of Goddess. It will be easier to resurrect the pre-Islamic Goddess religions of Egypt and Arabia to fight Islamic fundamentalism.


Six. Neo-Conservatism advocates that Muslim women in the Middle East should have freedom to marry foreigners and non-Muslims. Marrying the women of the defeated nations is the time tested invincible instrument of the civilization’s wars. Hindus lost the civilization’s war with Muslims, because Hindus refused to marry Muslim women. Nuclear Hindu India will marry Muslim women to defeat Islamic fundamentalism. In a Populist society, the state not the parents, will decide the marriage of the children. The sex is the basic human urge and when politically channeled, unleashes unprecedented modernizing social forces capable of radically transforming cultures in shortest possible time. The freedom of sex and inter-racial marriages will demolish all barriers of racial, religious and national prejudices that have plagued our world. The American way of inter-racial inter-national marriages has made every American family a racial mix of numerous European nations. Millions of Indians should inter-marry with Africans, Southeast Asians, Chinese, Russians, Japanese, Arabs, and Native Americans to spread Indian genes all over the globe. India should supply ten (10) million girls to China to meet the shortage of women in China and in exchange get one million Chinese girls to marry Indians. India should inter-marry with Russians and other Slav nations. Indians should inter-marry ten (10) million Africans to create a brown society in the heart of Africa.


Seven. Neo-Conservatism advocates the linguistic unification of the world’s languages. The language, vocabulary, grammar, and script are an instrument of civilization’s war. Sanskrit and Pali provide the linguistic links between all the languages of India, Bhutan, Nepal, Tibet, Thailand, Bangladesh, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. The speakers of major languages as percentages of world populations in 1992 are as follows: Mandarin (15.2%), English (7.6%), Hindi (6.4%), Bengali (3.2%), Arabic (3.5%), Russian (4.9%), and Spanish (6.1%). Bhasa Indonesia has over thirty- (30) percent vocabulary drawn from Hindi and Sanskrit. It is suggested that a significant percentage of Mandarin vocabulary drawn from Sanskrit, when Buddhist scriptures were translated in China. There are 20 million English speakers in India. The proportion of English speakers in the Indian population has remained relatively stable at about 2 to 4 percent. Hindu India will discontinue the use of English as the official language of India. Indian Education Commission in 1948 argued that the use of English divides the Indian people into two nations. The few who governed and the many who are governed the one unable to talk the language of the other, and mutually uncomprehending. Fifty years later the English-speaking India and politically-conscious India diverge more and more, stimulating tensions between the minority at the top who know English, and the many millions-armed with vote-who do not. A world's lingua franca developed by democratically selecting words of the major Asian languages is possible. An Asian Linguistic Convention should consist of 10,000 representatives from all major Asian languages, and they should vote for an Asian vocabulary for common 10,000 common words and 10,000 technical words. This common vocabulary becomes a part of all the major Asian languages. A common Asian Script should be developed. A common Asian Grammar should be developed. India, China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Bangladesh should join forces to evolve a common Asian language, script, and common vocabulary to expedite inter-Asian communications. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations have common civilization’s roots, based on the common foundations of Pali and Sanskrit. The national languages of Muslim Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia, Bengali and Bhasa Indonesia based on the common foundation of Sanskrit. The linguistic unification is one of the objectives of the coming civilization’s war.


Eight. Neo-Conservatism believes that the common food habits shall promote more harmonious world Civilization. State shall popularize the consumption of modern food products. State shall determine the food habits. The traditional food habits should change as it uses large amount of cereals, is not very nutritious, and consumes larger quantity of fuel and preparation time. The people should switchover to such food products, which grown on fewer acres, feeds more people. India will ban the cow slaughter, because cow-goddess Hathor was the chief deity of ancient Egypt and highly venerated by vegetarian Indians. Increase the deep sea, and coastal fishery catch. Reserve the fifty (50) percent of the labor force in the restaurant industry for women. The change in the food habits changes the civilization itself, and thus food habits become an instrument of civilization’s war.


Nine. Neo-Conservatism advocates the large-scale translations of literatures of the world to create a global market in multi-lingual literature in English, Hindi and Mandarin. Literature is an instrument of civilization’s war. Populists encourage the translations of major literary works in every other major language, so that the people may acquire a common literary culture and common literature. Translations are also a creative literary activity and it brings down the walls of cultural exclusives.


Ten. Neo-Conservatism advocates women’s right to choose Abortion and family planning measures to allow women take control of their bodies. The use of contraceptives and the women's right of abortion is an instrument of civilization’s war. The Vatican has developed mass-based political and social organizations around the issue of 'Right to Life,' and 'Women's Right of Abortion.' Populist civilization will guarantee the women's right for abortion and deny the use of religious institutions to oppose family planning, use of contraceptives, and right of abortion.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 46, Chapter 1.




(0)(13) 1(12) Neo-Con Cause of Poverty

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 46, Chapter 1. 1(12)


One. Neo-Conservatism believes in the supply side of economic theories. Neo-Conservatism advocates abolition of agricultural subsidies by the Western world and Japan. Neo-Conservatism advocates that rise of India and China as global economic super power is good for the world as the vast markets in India and China allows foreign manufacturers gain the economies of scale. Poor nations cannot win the civilization’s war. The eradication of poverty is primary pre-requisite for a decisive victory in the world war. Poverty eradicated only when the supply of the goods in a society increases. Industrialization is the key for increasing the supply of manufactured goods in the society. India's share of the world manufacturing output was in 1750 (24.5%), 1800 (19.7%), 1830 (17.6%), and 1980 (2.3%); and Russia's share was in 1750 (5.0%), 1800 (5.6%), 1830 (5.6%) and 1980 (21.1%). Thus the combined share of India and Russia of world manufacturing output was in 1750 (29.5%), 1800 (25.3%), 1830 (23.2%) and 1980 (23.4%). Thus India and Russia have the installed manufacturing capacity to produce one-fourth of the world manufacturing output of economic and military goods even today. The combined industrial capacity of Hindu and orthodox civilization will be around one-fourth of the world manufacturing output.


Two. Neo-Conservatism believes that economic policy that promotes poverty or increase economic disparities within society makes the government in power a bad government. Neo-Conservatism promotes such capitalist economic policies as create new wealth and wider distribution of prosperity in the society. Socialistic and Communistic policies had been the cause of poverty in Russia and India. Abortive capitalist measures in Russia led to the Jewish sponsored siphoning of capital and hard assets to the Swiss banks. The CIA organized Russian Jews to bankrupt Russian economy. The vast majority of the people that emigrated from the Soviet Union were Jews, and they control the Russian Mafia. In Populist Russia, the Indians will replace Jews as dominant players in the Russian economy. India will help Russia overcome its dependence on overseas Jews.


Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates the abolition of the agricultural subsidies by industrialized nations. Neo-Conservative America does not need agricultural subsidies to export agricultural products to the world. The colonial era manipulation of the prices of the primary commodities, by the colonial industrial consumers of the commodities produced by the colonies, continues unabated in the post-colonial era. The demand for the fair prices for agricultural commodities will fuel civilization’s wars. The agricultural civilizations will encircle and overtake the industrial societies led by Christian leaders. The war between Catholic world and non-Christian world expressed as a war of commodity producers and commodity processors. Since White Catholic drug cartels control the drug trade, the retail and whole sale prices of the contraband drugs kept at high levels to generate maximum profits. The cartel of oil producers has transformed the economy of the oil-producing nations. The use of military force justified in the civilization’s wars, to enforce fair prices of the commodities, which will result in increased prosperity of the agricultural third world. Political issues determine the exchange rate of a manufactured shoe or cycle with the bags of rice or corn.


Four. The Capitalist Neo-Conservatism advocates the Farmers of the World unite to allow farmers get remunerative prices for agricultural goods, so that farming remains profitable for farmers so that world’s gross agricultural output increases to meet the demands of population growth. Neo-Conservatism opposes the agricultural subsidies in the West that causes negative pressures on global commodity prices and lowers the gross domestic product and national incomes of the agricultural producing nations. Farmers of the world shall unite to fight the civilization’s war against the Catholic and Protestant industrial society. The farmers of the world will unite and take up arms to force the exploitative industrial conglomerates give fair prices for agricultural goods. The farmers of the world will demand a fair rate of exchange of agricultural goods versus manufactured industrial goods. Even when the cost of production is going down in the manufacturing industrial sector, the cost of production is going up in the agricultural sector. More bags of agricultural goods are needed to buy the same quantify of manufactured industrial goods. The family owned farmers in the state of Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma, and Illinois have a civilization’s interest common with the farmers of India. Both want to overthrow the exploitative western industrial society, to demand a fair price for industrial goods in exchange of agricultural goods. American Farm powers will join the agricultural civilizations in their war against the industrialized West. American industries do not profit by the exploitation of the Midwest farmers. Only blood sucking Wall Street profits by the exploitation of the farmers of the world, including American Midwest farmers. The escalation of oil prices has brought unprecedented prosperity to American oil producers similarly the defeat of the Industrialized West by the agricultural powers of India and Russia will bring prosperity to American farming economy.


Five. Neo-Conservatism is Capitalist Populism and is far superior to Communism and Marxism as it is based upon proven capitalist principles. While Marxism was a response to the early stage of industrialization the Populism is the response to the need of a post-industrial society. Now mind based intellectual activities creates new wealth without the need of raw materials. India and Russia have a vast reservoir of skilled technical manpower, and they are destined to lead in the information age. Populism rejects the Marxist concept of class conflicts. Populist movements invoke the more inclusive name of 'the people'. Marxism has become outdated in the modern age.


Six. Neo-Conservative Crusades for Social Modernization, Liberty, Freedom and Emancipation of Women seeks to reform Islamic society, culture and civilization, as the Bedouin desert lands cannot provide role model for Islamic societies of 21st Century. The Civilizations wage wars for principals of social and political modernization. Islamic fundamentalism imposes Shariah law and force women into servitude. The Civilization’s wars impose the social and political system of the victors. Political stability is the essential prerequisite for the success in the civilization’s wars. Soviet Union collapsed because the Soviet political system failed to realize the aspirations of Russians. Chinese political system will fail, if it cannot channel the democratic aspirations of the people unleashed by the capitalist economic development.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 47, Chapter 1.




(0)(14) 1(13) Hindu-Buddhist Alliance

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 47. Chapter 1. 1(13).


One. Neo-Conservatism advocates a united front of inclusive, tolerant, liberal Reformed Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism to meet the challenge of exclusive, intolerant, iconoclast, patriarchal fundamentalist religions of sword and murderous ideologies. The Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox worlds are heading for collision with the Catholic, Protestant, Communist, and Sunni worlds. Communism is atheist, iconoclastic, Westernization philosophic concoction by prostitute-philosophers Karl Marx and F. Engels, to massacre non-Catholic believers. Communist China will support Catholics in the civilization’s wars. Communism is the archenemy of the Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox civilizations. Hindu India leads the coalition of Hindu, Buddhist, and Orthodox civilizations, since Russian economy is in shambles and Communists rule China. India needs to undertake economic, industrial, political, social and religious reorganization to finance the civilization’s war. India would need to have an annual defense budget of 300 billion dollars and a standing army of more than 3 million to lead the third World War. India will face the wrath of Communist China, United States and Western Europe in the coming civilization’s war. The problem of political philosophy is to develop new social, political and economic programs to transform India into a Super Power in the shortest possible time, even when the foreign capital may not be available. Populist Manifesto is the collection of policy programs to allow large nations with large population to overcome poverty, promote industrialization, and mobilize huge militias. Communism has failed in China, Russia and Eastern Block. Capitalism has failed in Asia. Populism is the only philosophy that can solve the problem of poverty and underdevelopment in the world today. The Populist doctrines will be field-tested in India and in the coming civilization’s war.


Two. Neo-Conservatism reprimands Communist China for its crack down on Buddhist Falun Gong. The Communist China’s crackdown on Falun Gong appears to be a classic clash of ancient Chinese culture with the grim modern reality of Communist Party politics. (New York Times, July 30, 1999.) On the one side is an army of ordinary people yearning for spiritual fulfillment. On the other is an increasingly paranoid crew of Communist Party leaders who feel threatened to their core by a movement aimed at countering the soulnessness that has infected a country whose official ideology has grown stale and pointless. Chinese media blitz included television footage of destruction of some of 1.5 million of the movement’s publications, by crushing or shredding. It was an act redolent of the ancient practice of burning books in a public ceremony when a Chinese emperor wanted both to control information, and to send a message about what was permitted. In the modern version, such repression also includes blocking many Internet sites. Mindful of the explosive role that mystical movements have played in toppling weakened rulers throughout Chinese history, the Communist Government has responded with an iron fist. When the crackdown began in mid July 1999, the authorities called Falun Gong the greatest threat to their security since the Tiananman student movement of 1989. Communists have orchestrated its largest political campaign since that time, revving up the nation’s sprawling Communist Party apparatus to try to stamp out any practice of Falun Gong. Labeling the movement a political operation aimed at overthrowing the Government lays the groundwork for heavy prison sentences for the movement’s organizers. Authorities call Li Hongzhi a charlatan. The police have accused Li Honghzi as indirectly responsible for the deaths of 743 Falun Gong followers. Chinese people, seemingly earnest if politically naïve, offer simple examples of why they think studying Falun Gong is the path to spiritual and physical salvation. Falun Gong followers insist that they members number at least 100 million. The scholars say that a truer figure is probably between 20 million and 60 million. Even Communist authorities agree that there are at least 2 million followers.


Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates the Crusades for Religion and Democracy inside Communist China. The Clash of Civilizations and the Clash of World Religions has begun in China, with unforeseen consequences. The crackdown on Falun Gong is a classic Clash of ancient Chinese Buddhist and Taoist culture and religions with the atheist, iconoclastic, archaic Communist Party politics.


Four. Neo-Conservatism advocates Crusades for Buddhism and democracy inside Communist China. The Chinese President Jiang Zemin, on May 8, 1999 wrote a sharply worded memo to fellow Politburo members identifying Falun Gong as a serious threat to the Communist Party’s existence. He specifically pointed to behind-the-scenes involvement of foreign forces in Falun Gong. On April 25, 1999, around 10,000 followers of Falun Gong had protested at the Communist leadership’s compound in Beijing. China has arrested more than 5,000 followers and 1,200 government officials who are members. In a nationwide political campaign, Communist Party leaders in each province are encouraged to produce the chief local culprits.


Five. Neo-Conservatism denounces Communists massacres of Slav Orthodox Christians in the Soviet Union and massacred of Buddhists in Maoist China and Pol Pot’s Cambodia. Joseph Stalin ordered the death of more than 30 million Orthodox Christians. Chairman Mao caused the death by starvation of more than 60 million Buddhists and Taoists during 1950s and early 1960s. Christian Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge massacred Buddhists, more than one fourth of the Cambodian population. It is remarkable that no Communist leader has caused the death of any Catholic group in the world. Karl Marx was a prostitute-philosopher hired by the Vatican to produce a secular, iconoclastic philosophy used by the agents of the Vatican to destroy non-Catholic religions and civilizations. Joseph Stalin, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Harry Lee Kwan Yew, Solomon Jayawardane, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sun Yatsen, and Mustafa Kemal Ataturk were all either baptized as Catholics or secretly became Catholics. They all used the secular doctrines to destroy and undermine the native religion of their parents. Did Vatican mastermind recent Communist China’s crackdown on Buddhists and Taoists in China, to eliminate the power base of Buddhists, so that Christians may form a government in post-Communist China? Catholics and Communists are strategic allies in China, as they face a common enemy Buddhist and Taoist Religion.


Six. Neo-Conservatism is the reigning ideology of the 21st Century, Marxism and Communism is a shit-Philosophy. The Neo-Conservative Populist philosophy is anti-Communism, pro-Capitalism, pro-Democracy, pro-Modernism, pro-Multiculturalism, Feminist, and Totalitarian. Populism is a proselytizing, apocalyptic, teleological, eschatological doctrine. The goal of the Populist Manifesto is to proselytize India and China, to bring about the civilization’s alliance of Hindu, Buddhist, and Taoist civilizations. The coming civilization’s war is the war between the Populist forces and communist forces. The civilization’s war aims to win over the minds of the people in India and China. The Populist understanding of the ground realities in India is essential to meet India’s need for economic development, representative democracy, and religious fulfillment.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 49, Chapter 1.




(0)(15) 1(14) Modernizing Economy NeoCons Way

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 49, Chapter 1. 1(14).


One. Neo-Conservatism advocates large-scale industrial units to regain economic competitiveness through economics of scale to modernize industries. The Socialistic and Communistic economies have failed to deliver economic goods. Populism advocates monopoly capitalism. The laissez faire economy cannot compete in the global economy. The India shall develop monopoly capitalist infrastructures to give birth to powerful Multi-National Enterprises (MNEs). Indian owned MNEs will actively participate in domestic politics in foreign lands to harness support in the coming civilization’s wars. Industrial giants can be competitive, become world leaders in terms of market share, R &D and new product development. The factories manufacturing similar products should form industrial consortiums, to avoid wasting capital in duplication of efforts. The management of the most efficient and most productive member of the consortium will provide leadership to the consortium.


Two. Neo-Conservatism believes that technology allows the production of highest quality goods at lowest cost to remain competitive in the global economy.  No nation can join the ranks of the major industrialized nations unless it produces largest quantity of quality goods at the lowest cost. The paramount goals of all industries shall be to mass-produce highest quality goods at the lowest cost, and to sell them to customers at the lowest possible price. The Capitalist policies failed in Far East and Southeast Asia, because these countries exported their products to the United States at the ridiculous non-remunerative low prices, just to entice foreign investments. Japan crashed because Japanese Central Bank lent its corporate customers capital at ridiculously low interest rates. Populist Manifesto advocates that the defaulting banks, companies and industries in Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand may go under, so that these industrial assets be acquired by more competent business leaders from China and India.


Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates the rise of super specialized industrial giants that dominate in a selected segment of global economy by economies of scale. The large business houses in India are multi-industry trading and industrial groups, so while they may be giants in terms of turnover and holdings, they fail to lead in any industry. They lack the nationalistic, capitalistic, imperialistic, aggressive, and competitive spirit to dominate the world markets. Instead of conquering world markets, they scheme to monopolize domestic markets, curtail domestic production, creating artificial shortages, to earn windfall profits in the black markets. These businesses have the mentality of black-markets profiteering. These businesses lack the national spirit, social commitment and responsibility to promote the industrial development. All large and medium-size industrial houses shall specialize in a single industry, and divest other holdings. Specialized industrial consortiums so formed shall have professional management.


Four. The Neo-Conservatism advocates setting up overseas ancillary industries in India to mass-produce components required by America’s large enterprises. Neo-Conservatism seeks to develop tolerant democratic India as the factory of the world, especially to mass-produce components required by American industries. The large industrial corporation shall act as the lead industry to help set up a number of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), to manufacture specialized components. Large industries shall outsource their component requirements to outside vendors. The ancillary units shall specialize in selected components to mass-produce highest quality components at the lowest cost. Large corporations due to higher over-head costs cannot manufacture components at lower cost. Specialized component manufacturers shall gain oligopoly in the domestic markets, allowing them to operate their plants at full capacity.


Five. Neo-Conservatism advocates that older technology industries and cheaper industrial units are periodically shifted from metropolis to the rural areas to generate employment in rural communities. Urban industries should be the centers of modern technology, periodically modernize equipment and machinery, and old equipment and manufacturing plants transferred to rural areas. The state shall not allow the production of low quality goods, from old plants in the urban areas. This policy of periodic transferring old urban plants to the rural areas, will initiate a process of continuous rural industrialization, and bridge the urban-rural disparities.


Six. Neo-Conservatism believes that economic of scale makes trading competitive. There has been a massive expansion of shopkeepers in the Third World. The modernization of the means of distribution requires that the numbers of retail shops should be restricted. Shopkeepers do not play a productive manufacturing role. They charge higher prices from the consumers and delay payments to the manufacturers. The shopkeepers do not reinvest trading profits in the industry and rather use trading profits for conspicuous consumption. The proliferation of family owned retail shops, and the profiteering by retailers, hinders the economic growth. There are simply too many shops. Family owned shops do not generate new well paying jobs. State licensing policy shall drastically restrict the smaller shops, to encourage the shop owners to form large chain stores by mergers and acquisitions.


Seven. Neo-Conservatism encourages rather than discourage large super stores as the larger buying power of the larger chains reduces the retail prices of consumer goods and increases the supply of goods in the society. Due to the economies of scale, the large chain stores will continue to dominate the retail sector. The problem of chain stores is the top-heavy management and corruption. The chain stores shall sell franchises to owner-managed specialty stores, to reduce the salary costs, while the centralized purchasing will reduce the procurement costs. The states shall give special incentives to expedite the merger of family owned shops into large chain stores, to combine the frugality of owner-employee with the lower costs of the bulk buying. The Chain stores have an advantage of the lower procurement cost. The Chain stores have the disadvantage of higher cost of the management. Populist Chain stores shall harmonize the economic efficiency of the bulk buying with the frugal management style of the family owned shops.


Eight. American Neo-Conservatism supports newer manufacturing activity in the United States. Neo-Conservatism wants to curtail increased Chinese exports to the United States as China flowing the policy of Mercantilism. Whenever the trading activity becomes more profitable than the manufacturing activity, the industry and the economy declines. Manufacturing activity should remain more profitable than the retail industry, to encourage more investments in plants and machinery. Retailers should invest a percentage of the profits generated by the retail sector in the manufacturing sector. Manufacturers should own a certain percentage of the shares of the shops.


Nine. Neo-Conservatism advocates providing new tools and training to smaller stores to add newer services so that retail stores remains competitive vis-à-vis larger stores. The retail shops should provide value-added services to customers. While large chain stores will distribute the consumer goods, the modernized shops will provide the value-added services to the customers that buy the consumer goods from the chain stores.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 50. Chapter 1.




(0)(16) 1(15) Agro-Neo-Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 50. Chapter 1. 1(15).


One. Neo-Conservatism understands the historic rural-urban conflict and advocates the modernization of the rural America to create more jobs in rural America. Neo-Conservatism advocates the abolition of agricultural subsidies in the United States as it would increase the price of agricultural goods and make rural agricultural production more cost effective than corporate agricultural production. There is a historical conflict of interest between developed cities and underdeveloped villages. The urban-rural conflict of interest generates Populist social forces. The villagers and farmers feel that city dwellers live on the profits exacted from agricultural produce. A significant part of the pre-industrial national economy depends on agricultural production, and most of the urban prosperity is the result of the rural exploitation. There has been a continuous flight of economic resources from rural to urban economy. The rural economy, culture, and society remained stagnant for centuries. The cost of manufactured goods has risen, while the cost of the agricultural goods paid to the farmers has remained stagnant. More agricultural produce is required to buy the same quantity of manufactured goods. This is the root cause of the rural poverty. This is also the root cause of the poverty in the Third World. Even when retailers charge higher prices from the urban consumers, the farmer does not get any higher price for his produce. Reducing the price spread of the commodities paid to the farmers, and charged to the consumers, bridges the urban-rural disparity.


Two. Neo-Conservatism advocates setting up new manufacturing units in rural America. Neo-Conservative Populism is the philosophy of industrialization, and bridges the rural-urban disparity by selective industrialization of the villages. The shifting of the old industrial plants from the urban areas to the rural areas expedites rural industrialization and gives new jobs to the surplus rural labor.


Three. Neo-Conservatism advocates the abolition of agricultural subsidies in the United States, as it would make smaller scale modernization of agriculture by family owned farms, more competitive than corporate agricultural farms. On a level playing ground family owned mechanized agricultural farms have much lower cost of production that corporate farms, because of higher salaries in the latter. The agricultural technology has remained stagnant for thousands of years. The animal powered plow has been a constant feature of rural life all over the Third World. The empires rose and fell, but the life in the villages never changed; it went on as usual. The landlords have viewed agricultural lands as a source of rental income only, never as an industry that requires fresh investment for increased productivity. The population explosion mandates that substantial investment in the agricultural sector alone can defer the menace of wide spread hunger. The modernization of agriculture, increases the agricultural production, productivity of the lands, reclaims less fertile lands, and lowers the cost of production. The high cost of mechanized farming has bankrupted family owned farms in the United States. Mechanization of agriculture creates new technical jobs in the rural sector. Farmers should get remunerative prices of commodities to encourage urban investment in the modernization of agriculture. Remunerative prices of commodities will increase world production of food grains.


Four. Neo-Conservatism believes that agricultural subsidies undermined the competitiveness of American agriculture and unless agricultural subsidies are eliminated, the American agriculture may meet the fate of American manufacturing industry. World is facing the Malthusian threat of over-population, as the world population is exploding and the Catholic and Protestant nations are not loosening their occupation of native Indian lands of Australia, Brazil and Canada. Catholic and Protestant farmers own large tracts of lands and Mechanization allowing them to produce commodities in abundance and to sell commodities at lower prices, driving the global commodity prices downward. India can increase agricultural production by modernization of agriculture, by consolidating family owned farms into large agricultural companies. Allot the shares in agricultural companies in proportion to peasants’ land holdings and sweat labor. The agricultural companies will be the de-facto owners of the lands, but shall have no authority to sell any parcel of the land. The farmer shall remain the owner of the lands. Urban consumers shall invest in particular agricultural companies in return for guaranteed supply of commodities at preferential low rates, without any middlemen. This system shall eliminate the middlemen and efficiently distribute the commodities from the producers directly to the consumers. Urban consumers profit by the lower cost of commodities and farmers profit by increased productivity and guaranteed market for their produce.


Five. Neo-Conservatism believes that only rural agricultural companies should own and operate the larger food stores in the rural areas, so that the profits of the rural food retail sales are invested in the rural regions of America. Neo-Conservatism wants to check the flight of rural capital to metropolitan areas. The urban economy should transfer capital or goods to the rural sector equivalent to the value of the agricultural goods consumed by the urban consumers. The traders and landlords shall bring back to the rural economy the cash earned by exchanging the rural goods in the urban markets. It will increase the circulation of money in the rural economy. Invest the profit earned by the sale of agricultural products to urban consumers in the rural sector only, or exchanged it for urban goods for rural consumption. Farmers owned agro-businesses would market cereals, vegetables, meats and oils directly to urban consumers, and reinvest the profits in agricultural economy. It would promote rural prosperity.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 51. Chapter 1.




(0)(17) 1(16) Neo-Con Doctrine of Work

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 51. Chapter 1. 1(16).


One. The Neo-Conservatism advocates that America should not encourage financial shenanigans and encourage the hard working Americans and American immigrants to produce or manufacture new goods or products. Neo-Conservatism rejects the idea that Untied States can continue to live beyond its means by managing the movement of money rather than by manufacturing new products or producing new goods. To Neo-Conservatism Work is the basis of the state, and the system of work determines the nature of the state. The role of the worker in a society determines whether a state or a society is a primitive, feudal, agricultural, industrial, capitalist, socialist, modern, and a populist society or state. The productive role of the entire adult population, equality of man and woman, and dignity of labor, provides the foundation of the Populist society. The nature of the society and state itself changes, when the role of workers, treatment to women workers, and employer-employee relationship changes.


Two. Neo-Conservatism advocates the draft system for armed services. Every individual, whether rich or poor, has a duty to work 10 hours a day, 6 days a week, 60 hours a week. Every youth has a duty to work five years in compulsory national service. Compulsory duty to work shall create a new egalitarian society. The compulsory duty to work shall solve the problem of class conflicts, as in spite of differences in status and wealth; all people are workers, as every body has to work. No parasite class that eats out of other peoples’ labor shall remain. The people must inculcate the Dignity of labor. Unless poor nations inculcate the spirit of dignity of labor, they cannot break the vicious cycle of poverty and underdevelopment. Only a hard work can lead a nation to prosperity and power. All nations that are now great and prosperous have become so by hard work.


Three. Neo-Conservatism wants to abolish the right to strike and ban trade unions. Neo-Conservatism believes that Marxists have conspired to make American industry non-competitive by increased trade unionism. When China does not allow right of strike and trade unions then why should America allow socialist Trade Unions to undermine the economic competitiveness of American manufacturing sector and services sector. Only disciplined labor force breaks the vicious cycle of poverty and underdevelopment. Labor in-discipline is the result of political manipulation by Communist controlled, politicized trade unions. China promoted industrial unrest in India during 1980s and 1990s, so that India may not compete with China as the favored destination of foreign capital. Communist China began wooing in early 1980s foreign joint ventures guaranteeing them strike free workforce. Simultaneously, Chinese spies controlling Indian trade unions caused industrial unrest in India. India should abolish the right to strike.


Four. Neo-Conservatism advocates that Trade Unions not led by professional politicians. De-politicize and de-link the trade unions from political parties and organized crime. Only qualified workers should contest for trade union elections. The trade union funds should only be used for the workers’ welfare, education, and training. The trade unions should supervise the workers’ pension funds, housing projects, social security, and insurance. Trade unions should be led by hardworking workers to safeguard the pension funds’ financial future and become an integral part of the economy.


Five. Neo-Conservatism seeks to guarantee a right to work for every able bodied person. Every man or woman shall have a right to work. It is the responsibility of the state to create jobs for all people. All unemployed people shall work for the populist collectives, and compulsory national service, where they shall be guaranteed food, shelter, and clothing. The Populist system of collectives is designed to provide total employment for all able body persons in the state. State shall look after the disabled persons.


Six. The Neo-Conservatism believes that educated persons should opt for hard hats jobs rather than seek jobs in the services sector only or white-collar jobs only. The creation of new non-productive white-collar jobs in the bureaucracy does not solve the problem of educated unemployment. Modern industry generates well paying jobs, at technician level. We should eradicate the stigma attached to the hard-hats, manual industrial jobs. Selected heavy industries and high-tech industries should employ educated technicians even for the low non-technical menial jobs, to remove stigma attached to menial industrial jobs. Unlike the West, Indians look down upon the menial industrial jobs, because only poor illiterate low-class people perform these jobs. Once in technology parks and technology cities technicians are paid regular salaries even for menial jobs, the stigma attached to hard-hats jobs will disappear, and hard-hats workers will become more prosperous and more respectable then their counterparts in clerical jobs. It is the case in the United States as a plumber and electrician makes more money than a clerk does.


Seven. Neo-Conservatism seeks to develop well-paid blue-collar jobs for educated youths. In modern high-tech plants even top engineers do manual repair work and operate machines, they are no longer white-collar workers. Even the lowest worker is an operator of machines. In an industrial society, a blue-collar industrial male worker draws higher salary than the white-collar office worker who is often a female does. Female workers should monopolize white-collar office jobs and men should seek blue-collar industrial jobs.


Eight. The Neo-Conservatism advocates that outsourcing IT services and support services to India enhance the economic competitiveness to American economy. The information age generates many white-collar jobs, as services and mind rather than natural resources generates more wealth. India has the second largest reservoir of trained technical manpower in the world, after United States and Russia.


Nine. Neo-Conservatism advocates egalitarian class structure where new immigrants are allowed level playing ground to realize their American Dream. In the early industrial age the profitability of any industry depended upon the exploitation of the workers. In the Third world similar mentality prevails, the majority of industrial workers come from the illiterate peasant class, who are paid low salaries. There is a great class and cultural divide between supervisors and workers in factories, and this gap between white-collar supervisory class and industrial hard-hats is widening. This is not so in the West, as an educated man prefers better-paid factory job over the white-collar clerical job. India should learn the dignity of labor.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 52. Chapter 1.




(0)(18) 1(17) Politico-Neo-Conservatism

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006. Page 52. Chapter 1. 1(17).


One. Populist Neo-Conservatism is a universal philosophy of democracy and capitalism. Neo-Conservatism advocates global crusades for democracy and crusades for freedom and liberty to export Democratic utopia worldwide. Populist Neo-Conservatism seeks to develop democratic and capitalist infrastructure in the Third World without westernizing them. It is no accident that United States supports the dictatorships in the capitalist Third World. It is a fallacy that only dictatorships will protect the interest of International monopoly capitalism. The Capitalism in the First World is sowing its own seed of destruction, by aligning with Third World dictatorships. The dictatorships promote the short-term interests of the western military-industrial complex, but harm the long-term interest of the West, namely democracy, capitalism, freedom, and free-enterprise. The West will lose the civilization’s wars, if it continues to support dictatorships in China, Indonesia, Mexico, etc. Only Populism can promote capitalism as well as democratic institutions.


Two. Neo-Conservatism prefers Presidential system to Parliamentary system. Neo-Conservatism advocates that Prime Minister parliamentary system should include the provision for five-year fixed term for the Prime Minister led government. Parliamentary form of government becomes unstable when no single party is able to win the majority of seats in the parliament. Coalition governments are inherently unstable, e.g. Italian, Israeli and Indian coalition governments. The Presidential form of government leads to dictatorship, e.g. Russia of Boris Yeltsin. The separation of Power limits the power of the state to undertake infrastructure reforms. The electorate will directly elect the Prime Minister for a fixed period of four (4) years. Each of the parliamentary constituency shall be an electoral unit in the prime minister’s electoral college, and he who wins in the maximum number of parliamentary constituencies shall be declared the prime minister for the period of four years. Prime Minister can veto the acts of the Parliament. Prime Minister can advise the President to dissolve the parliament and order a mid-term poll. Prime Minister shall aid and advise the President on federal and central matters and the President shall abide by his advice. Deputy Prime Minister shall be the running mate of the Prime Minister and he shall act as the head of the government in the absence or death of the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister shall appoint the Council of Ministers, consisting of Cabinet Ministers, Deputy Ministers and Ministers of State, who shall not be the members of the Parliament.


Three. Parliamentary acts passed by both houses of the Parliament with two-third majority, endorsed by the prime minister, and signed by the President will have the attribute of the sovereignty. The Judiciary shall not have he right of judicial review of legislative acts, except when they are judicially or legally inconsistent, or self-contradictory then the Judiciary can refer them back to the Parliament for reconsideration. The members of parliament (MPs), elected by direct elections, by simple majority, in a single district system, shall hold office for a period of five (5) years. The parliament shall have two houses. The Lower House, Lok Sabha or House of Commons, shall legislate on federal matters, and supervise the performance of the government. The Separation of Power, between the legislative and executive branches of the government will make the Legislature an effective watchdog of the government.


Four. The philosophy of Neo-Conservatism accepts the doctrine of separation of power. There shall be a separation of legislative branch from the executive branch of the government. The members of the Council of Ministers shall not be the members of the Legislatures. The term of the government shall be a fixed term; it shall be four years for the Central Government, and two years for the State, District, and Local governments. The Prime Minister can dissolve the Lower House of the Parliament. The Upper House, the Senate cannot be dissolved. Legislatures will supervise the governments by means of Legislative Committees.


Five. Neo-Conservatism advocates the reform of Jury system of American justice. Neo-Conservatism opposes the election of Judges. Legislature shall codify and rewrite Law to make it simple, concise and easy to understand. Reduce the cost of litigation to ensure speedy justice at a reasonable cost to the public. Judicial backlog of old cases shall be cleared by appointment of new Judges, and by promoting the Information technology for the electronic filing of petitions, and appeals. Majority of cases should be decided on same day court appearance. Judges should efficiently use Court time to provide expeditious judgments, and dismissal of frivolous cases. Special Courts shall be set up to specialize in certain laws, e.g. family law, divorce law, criminal law, patent law etc. The watchword is speedy justice at a reasonable cost to the public.


Six. The Neo-Consdervatism advocates that lower house and upper house of the Parliament should focus on different types of legislation and supervision of Executive politicies. The idea that upper house of the Parliament should simply be a rubber stamp of the lower house is not acceptable to Neo-Conservatism. The Upper House, Rajya Sabha, Council of States, Senate shall be directly elected by the electorate, for a fixed term of two years. Senate elections held, simultaneously with the elections of the state legislatures by system of simple-majority, single-constituency, district system. Senate, the Upper House will have the authority to pass legislation on all items listed in the State List, and District List. The Senate will promote nationwide uniformity of State legislation, check secessionist tendencies. Senate will protect the powers of the State governments from encroachment by Lower House.


Seven. Neo-Conservatism advocates that Federal government, State government and Municipal governments should have independent jurisdictions and Federal government should have the general powers to enforce uniformity of State and Municipal laws throughout the Federation. The Neo-Conservative Populist Federal system will have three (3) tiers of governments-central, state, and district. It has strong Central government headed by a Prime Minister. It has strong District government headed by a District Minister. It has not so strong State government headed by a Chief Minister (CM) or Governor. The system of weak state governments will check the secessionist tendencies. The system of strong semi-autonomous district governments will check the erosion of state and district authorities. The area and size of the state shall be neither too big nor too small.


Eight. The District Mayor, District Minister shall be the head of the district government. All District Mayors shall also be the Ministers of State in the State Cabinet. District Ministers shall directly supervise the performance of local self-governments, metropolitan, municipal councils, and rural governments.


Nine. Neo-Cons advocate lean and thin government bureaucracy and oppose the idea of big government. The bureaucracy shall be lean and thin, and overstaffing checked. The recruitment and promotion in the civil services and public sector shall be on merit basis only. Specialists, rather than generalists shall occupy senior positions. Performance, merit, and qualifications rather than seniority shall determine promotions. No single cadre shall monopolize the senior positions. There shall be more frequent inter-department, inter-service, and inter-state transfers to provide more diverse job experience to the civil servants. Civil service shall induct more personnel from academics, business and industry for senior management positions.


Ten. Neo-Conservatism advocates term limits for Federal Congress and Senate in the United States. No Senator should serve more than two consecutive terms to allow periodic fresh blood in the Senate and Congress in the United States. Neo-Conservatism advocates that politicians should retire at the age of 55 years. No person shall be eligible to hold the office of the President, Prime Minister, Governor, Chief Minister, Mayor for more than two terms.


Eleven. Neo-Conservatism advocates the educational requirement for politicians. The real cause of poverty in the Third World is that their leaders are less educated and less competent. Mediocrity has monopolized power; to deny the entry into the system educated people, who threaten the political power base of the entrenched incompetents. The minimum educational requirement for President, Prime Minister, Members of Parliament, Senate, State Legislatures, District Ministers and Mayors shall be a bachelors degree, or engineering degree or equivalent.


Hegelian philosopher Kalki Gaur belonging to the school of German Idealism is the patron Saint and philosophical Father to the political ideology and philosophy Neoconservatism. Hegelian Neocoservatism is the Revolutionary Ideology of the 21st Century and shall reign throughout 2000 years of the Aquarius Age. There are three political world philosophies in the world, namely, Neoconservatism, Communism and Fascism. Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher and he produced shit-philosophy of Marxism and Communism, which his tribesmen over 100 years coated the shit Marxism in gold-plated and sugar coated capsules. Neoconservative political parties shall take control of the political power in over 100 countries of the world before 2050 AD. Neoconservatives should join forces to elect a Republican Neoconservative as the President of the United States in elections 2008 and also in India, Britain, Canada, Australia, Ireland, France, Germany and Japan.

Author: Kalki Gaur, “Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism” (2006, $30). © Copyrights 2006; Email: Dilomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com; Weblog:  //360.yahoo.com/NeoconservativeManifesto/ Page 54, Chapter 1.




© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)






Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 




© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com



© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com





























































© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)






Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 




© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com