33

PETROCOLONIAL WARS FOR PROFITABLE COLONIAL EMPIRES- Chapter 33- KALKI GAUR  

 

Chapter 33

Petro-Colonial Wars for Big Profits

Invasions for Colonial Riches

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

33(1) Purport

(1) Invasions for Colonial Riches

In 21st Century any American preemptive attacks on any oil-producing nation is legitimate provided it results in abundant supply of gasoline at retail prices under $1-a-gallon for American consumers. In the 21st Century the Diplomats wage wars to establish sphere of influence or colonies, only when the colonial riches justifies the initial investments in the conduct of colonial invasions. Profit is the guiding principle for colonial wars and preemptive attacks on oil-producing nations in the 21st Century. Many wars of future would follow the example of American invasion of Iraq to invade richer countries for personal enrichment of the leaders of the great powers in the 21st Century. President Bush’s invasion of Iraq resulted in the loot of the private and state property in Iraq on massive scale. Suddenly the rulers of the Western powers realized the immense personal wealth to be made by invasions of the rich oil-producing nations. Future wars would be fought to serve the personal motives of rulers for personal enrichment by foreign conquests. The tax-free incomes from the loot of the national assets of Iraq would lure many leaders to wage more wars in the future.

(2) Oil Greed Partitioned Soviet Union

American oil imperialists engineered the secession of British oil colonies in Arabian Gulf in 1971 and the secession of Soviet oil colonies in 1991, so that after 2003, these newly independent oil colonies could be brought under the yoke of benevolent American Oil Colonial Empire. Imperialistic foreign policy of great powers in essence a business plan to make ruling elite rich from the oil incomes and colonial riches.

One. The oil-interests prompted the wider conspiracy that resulted in the demise of the Soviet Union and the emergence of oil-rich Caspian and Central Asian Republics as independent countries in 1991. The Big Oil bribed Soviet President Gorbachev, Russian President Boris Yeltsin and Foreign Minister Eduardo Sheverdnadze to partition the Soviet Union and allow the secession of the oil-rich Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Krygyzstan.

 

Two. The Big Oil bribed British Labour Prime Minister to unilaterally withdraw from all British colonies east of Suez in 1971 that gave birth to United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Qatar. Because of the bribes and conspiracy hatched by Big Oil British Empire walked out of Arabian Gulf in 1971. The Big Oil formed the OPEC oil cartel in 1971 to profit by oil price rise.

 

Three. The Big Oil conspiracy caused the petro-imperialist invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and petro-imperialistic invasion of Iraq in 2003. The Big Oil have conspired planned the petro imperialistic invasions of Iran in 2006.

 

Four. The Big Oil conspired to engineer the independence of Arabian oil producing nations and established OPEC in 1971. Twenty years later in 1991, the Big Oil engineered the secession and independence of Caspian oil and gas producers. Twenty years later in 2001 the Big Oil engineered the invasion of Afghanistan to control the pipelines from Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. American Petro-Imperialism bribed British Labour Prime Minister to unilaterally give independence to oil-rich Persian Gulf colonies in 1971. American petro-imperialism bribed Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Sheverdnadze to unilaterally give independence to oil-rich Caspian Republics. American Petro-Imperialism secured unilateral independence of Arabian oil-producers from British Empire in 1971 and secured unilateral independence of Caspian oil-producers from the Soviet Empire in 1991, only to start the process of bringing them under colonial yoke of American petro-colonialism with the invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and invasions of Iraq in 2003 and likely invasions of Iran in 2006.

 

Five. In 2001, some twenty years after the demise of the 1991 Soviet Union, the American Petro-Capitalism embarked upon the conspiracy to undo Protestant United States to replicate the strategy it adopted during the demise of the Soviet Union. Just as black agents worked with Muslim Arab slave traders and Christian European slave traders to invade and put into chains the blacks for sale to slaver traders, similarly the Big Oil including American oil have shifted their allegiance from the United States to the OPEC rulers and working alongside the enemies of the United States to bleed American economy by oil price rise that profits only Arab oil sheikhdoms and oil companies and harms American economy as well as became a threat to the national security of the United States. Unless checked in time by preventive measures, the American Big Oil might undermine or disintegrate the United States itself as it did to the Soviet Union in 1991 and to the Britain in 1971. It is high time that US government should acquire direct ownership interests in American Big Oil and in the foreign oil and gas assets of Big Oil.

 

(3) Oil Prices Justifies Petro-Colonialism

Diplomats justify war as a profitable business only hen wars for petro-imperialism results in the lowered gasoline prices at the retail gas stations for consumers. Invasions and wars for establishing new oil colonies provide an easy way for world leaders to enrich themselves and also help their countries and economies. The New age of Oil colonialism has taken birth and world leaders can make big profits by establishing new oil colonial empires. The 21st Century would be similar to the colonial 18th and 19th Century and Colonial Empires rather than nation states shall be major actors of the international system. Any crude oil price above $25-a-barrel makes imperialistic invasions of thinly populated oil-producing countries an economic necessity for oil-importing industrial economies.

One. Post-2001 Petro-Imperialism and Oil-seeking Colonial Empires shall take birth, just as post-1500 European Colonialism took birth because of the search for alternate route for Indian spices. The post-1500 European Colonialism was the direct result of European powers to escape from Ottoman price gauging for Indian spices essential for European meat preservation during winter months. The post-2003 new age of Oil Colonialism is the direct result of the price gauging of the Middle Eastern OPEC that artificially manipulated the price for a barrel of crude oil to triple in three years, from $25 in April 2003, to over $72 in April 2006.

Two. The civilized world powers, believe that ever rising oil price rise justifies the return of new age of Oil Colonial Empires in terrorism prone Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. Colonization of thinly populated oil-producing countries in the Middle East and Central Asia by leading oil-consuming nations and industrial powers shall provide for energy security in the populous civilized world, even at the cost of acceptable collateral damage to colonial populations in the oil-producing world.

Three. Unchecked oil-price rise shall cripple the economies of the industrialized world. It would be cheaper for the United States, Germany, France, China and India to invade, occupy and administer as colonies selected oil-producing OPEC nations than paying for the imported oil bill. Thinly populated wealthy oil producing has signed their death warrants by hiking up the oil prices.

Four. Like the 1885 Partition of Africa, the great powers should negotiate and arrive at Partition of Oil Producing Middle East, Central Asia and Africa among major oil importing industrial powers, namely, United States, China, India, Japan, Germany, France, Britain and South Korea.

Five. American public will endorse albeit demand American imperialism and oil colonialism provided it brings back the retail price of gasoline and heating oil to below $1-a-gallon for American consumers. American invasions of Iraq provided great profitable opportunities for the friends of President Bush to make money, and allow allowed American Big Oil to earn billions in profits.

Six. In the 21st Century the Diplomats would wage wars only when the wars will bring riches of the colonies in to the personal pockets of the ruling elite and national corporations and also bring new prosperity to the general public because of the increased supply of the cheap colonial commodities and products. Capitalist Diplomats conduct wars and invasions only when the colonial riches justified the initial expenses of the war. These are the argument the author makes in this chapter.

 

33(2) Talk Points

 

 

33(3) Conspiracy or Stupidity

Is Bush Iraq War’s “Useful Idiot”?

One. What was the motive underlying President Bush’s decision to invade Iraq? Did the policy makers decided on Iraq War to promote American national interests, or to promote the interests of Zionist Cabal, or to promote the interests of campaign fund donors? It is not the act of aggression against Iraq, but the motives that influenced the decision and the vested interests of the policy makers that would decide the judgment of the Jury on the Iraq War. Why Iraq War took place in the first place, is far more important than the outcome and consequences of the Iraq War? President Bush is Iraq War’s Useful Idiot, the phrase was coined by Vladimir Lenin to refer to Communist sympathizers who believed what they were told by Bolshevik Jews, and what they were told was mostly lies. It could somewhat be the same with George W. Bush.

 

First, Mr. Bush may well be the last person amongst American sympathizer to believe the Iraq war was waged in self-defense of Protestant Big Oil. As a WASP sympathizer believed what Neo-Conservatives led by Jews told him. What evidence exists suggests, in fact, that the Jewish lobby, Oil lobby and Neo-Republicans were hankering for war, simply to loot the riches of Iraq, and to threaten the perpetrators of the suicide attacks on Iraq.

Second, the real mystery is whether President Bush realized that he was manipulated by Neo-Conservatives, Jewish lobby and Big Oil and their implants amongst his aides, who long had sought an war with Iraq to establish Israel’s domination over OPEC nations.

Third, the 10 of the 18 signatories, are now in Bush Administration, including Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, who in 1998 wrote to then President Bill Clinton arguing that America should abandon containment, and work towards “removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power.” Did Ronald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, misused the 9/11 to further some hidden agenda of the secret Cabal? President Bush is not a fact checker. President might have been an uncritical man who believed what he was told and what he was told was mostly lies. President Richard Nixon, one of the most competent foreign policy experts in history, was impeached for certain improprieties during Watergate scandal.

Fourth, President Bush raised rhetorical danger from Saddam Hussein to one of virtual imminence: Hit Iraq quickly-before Saddam could hit us. That was a bogus argument. The War could have waited, but the Jewish Cabal, Big Oil and Neo-Conservatives could not. Some administration officials were so intent on Iraq War that they were cooking books and cooking intelligence, to promote their hidden Israeli and Big Oil agenda. This has raised questions on his judgment, his competency and his honesty, as well.

 

Fifth, President Bush may not be a liar. However, Senate, Congress and American public must hold him to the same standards they judged President Nixon. Many of the Cabinet members of Nixon Administration served long prison terms. Was the lie or improprieties that resulted in the abdication of President Richard M. Nixon and imprisonment of his Cabinet members, less or more serious than committed by President Bush, Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz? While judging the improprieties of the Chief, the same standards should apply to President Nixon, President Clinton and President Bush, not a penny more and not a penny less.

 

Sixth, now George W. Bush stands abandoned by events in Iraq war. No Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. No Iraqi nuclear program. No Iraqi links to Al Qaeda. With a benefit of the hindsight more links to Al Qaeda and Bush Administration came into open than the Saddam Hussein’s links to Al Qaeda. Was President Bush the Useful Idiot who believed what Jewish Cabal told him, or was he simply returning the favor of his campaign fund contributors? Could Bush Administration be working on a hidden agenda to establish American oil colonial empire throughout the oil-producing world? Could Bush be a puppet manipulated by the perpetrators of big fraud, who have taken control over the big money and big political wheelers and dealers in the Beltway and the Capitol, to escape the retributions of their past misdeeds?

 

Seventh, it is no wonder that US media highlighted a US soldier interviewed saying he has lost faith in his military leaders and thinks that Rumsfeld should resign. Jewish Cabal and Neo-Cons promoted stories that illustrated their feelings. True stories, but it was not news, but simply opinion conveyed by selective anecdote. Observing media coverage of the Iraq War, one felt that hidden censorship transformed American Free Media into propaganda mastermind Goebbels delight. The Jewish lobby and Neo-cons proved that if the lie is repeated in the electronic age all over, it becomes truth. The Jury is out: Whether Bush was the Useful Idiot of the religious Neo-Cons and Jewish Cabal or the puppet of the Big Oil and election campaign fund donors?

 

Eighth, if the Iraq War was a result of Pentagon’s game plan to establish American oil colonies throughout the oil-producing world, then it should be praised as brilliant policy and President Bush has all rights in the world to create American Colonial Empire. India should the support Pentagon imperialism, as this is what Army men gets paid for. President Bush can be pardoned if he unknowingly became the ‘Useful Idiot” exploited by Neo-Cons because he is neither a fact-checker nor a micromanager. However, if President Bush knowingly lied in his address to the Union, and if he knew that evidence was cooked and false and if he invaded Iraq simply to reward his campaign fund donors, then he and his Cabinet should meet the fate of President Nixon and his Cabinet. Justice demands that America should hold President George W. Bush to the same standards it demanded from President Nixon and President Clinton. The idea of justice and idea of the fairness of justice is the cornerstone of the Constitution of the United States. In the lands of the United States, no person, howsoever strong and powerful can be above law, and it includes the President of the United States. The constitutional Separation of Power allows incumbent President unlimited discretion in many cases, tempered by retribution of the American justice after the event. If President Bush did anything wrong, even a penny more than what President Nixon did, knowingly or unknowingly, he must meet the fate the American system would decide for him. President Bush should vindicate himself by going through the grinder President Nixon and president Clinton went through. President Bush cannot possibly take the defense of mental disability that President Ronald Reagan took to escape the due process on Contra Affairs. Let law take its own course. No body is above law. The US Senate and the Congress should hold President Bush to the same high standards of Presidential judgment, competency, integrity and honesty it relied on to judge earlier incumbents President Nixon and President Clinton

 

Financial Fraud is Instrument of Diplomacy

Two. The Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion, discussed the hidden hand of the world leaders that could have focused on WASPs United States to transform and destroy the World Civilization, as we know it. First, could President George W. Bush be a puppet controlled by American Big Money, Big Oil and Big Frauds that conspired and protected the perpetrators of Big Fraud likes of Enron, WorldCom, Arthur Andersen and Global Crossing? The long hands of Big Money and Big Oil created a new age of colonial empire by president Bush’s waging of Iraq War to signal that only under blatant colonial empire could international monopoly capital survive and prosper in the 21st Century. Money controls politics in United States as campaign donations buy media and influence election results and incumbents of the Oval Office and the Capitol. President Bush’s Iraq war that favored American Big Oil could be the result of the financial frauds that were conspired and camouflaged by Big Money and Big Oil in America.

 

Second, the Big Financial Frauds and financial conspiracies lie at the womb of the cataclysmic diplomatic moves in the new world order. Diplomats use financial weapons to pursue national interests. Big financial frauds have international ramifications and influence diplomacy and foreign policy of great powers. The terrorist attacks orchestrated by Saudi Arabian Wahhabi citizens against United States, helped Jewish Silverstein earn $7 billion in insurance claims, improved the finances of the American and British insurance and banking corporations, allowed United States control the southward oil pipeline lines of Turkmenistan through Afghanistan, allowed Pentagon establish military bases in oil-rich Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan and justified President Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Third, the failure of the pentagon to prosecute or neutralize even a single Al Qaeda leader, not to speak of Osama bin Laden, and the release of the Saudi secret services agent allegedly responsible for the hijackings and terrorist attacks, raised doubts whether the 9/11 attacks, Afghanistan War and Iraq War were just tip of the iceberg of global conspiracy planned and orchestrated by perpetrators of the big financial frauds that were unearthed at Wall Street, due to the disclosures of Enron, World Com, Global Crossing and Arthur Andersen.

 

Fourth, in the 1999, the $8.4 trillion GNP of USA the Agriculture sector contributed only 2% ($167 billion), Industry sector contributed 26% ($2.2 trillion), Manufacturing sector contributed 18% ($1.5 trillion) and Services sector contributed 72% ($6 trillion) (Source, World bank, World Development Report 2000/1). The financial frauds, Wall Street frauds, the investment banking frauds and Dot com frauds contributed significantly towards the erroneous estimate of GNP of USA in 1999 at $8.4 trillion. Perhaps President Bush invaded oil-rich Iraq, hoping that the rape of the Iraqi oil would give great Philip to the American Economy and the Wall Street beset by big frauds that might some day bring American economy to its knees. Fifth, the big frauds planned by the Big Money could have been behind President Bush’s war on Iraq. Big Frauds and Big Conspiracy hatched by American Big Money and Big Oil could be using the Oval Office as its tool to engineer its plot for world conquest and world domination. Big Money could be trying to rule the world by controlling the oil and gas resources of the Middle East, Caspian oil basin and Guinea coast. Just as behind every man is a woman, similarly behind every cataclysmic diplomatic initiative or war is a big conspiracy hatched by big money and big oil. Big financial frauds have become the potent instruments of national policy and diplomacy. Financial frauds are Weapons of Mass Destruction that could change the geopolitical balance of power of the world.

 

Sixth. Is President George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq, shepherded by Republican Neo-conservatives, just the first child born out of the Black Hole of the Big Financial Frauds that might some day such the mighty America into its bottomless abyss? Seventh, since foreign ethnic groups outnumber WASPs at the Wall Street, so leaders of the Big Frauds might undermine the WASPs American Empire, just as they undermined Roman Empire in 415 AD. Whether United States would rule the world because of the machinations of Big Frauds or disintegrate would depend on whether the big conspirators are loyal to United States or loyal to its adversaries.

 

Eighth, if the financial Mafia that wrecked Wall Street by financial manipulations extended its tentacles into realm of politics and influenced Capitol and the White House by buying influence by controlling election campaign donations, then it should be treated like racketeering and severely punished. The annual incomes of the global drug trade and organized crimes runs $700 billion annually, and if perpetrators of financial frauds are able to influence cataclysmic foreign policies of major powers, then even the world could come to an end. A commission should be established to identify the role and the extent of the influence the Big Conspirators and Big Frauds enjoyed over policy making in the White House and the Capitol. What is at stake is not the skin of the Financial Mafia but the very survival of the American system of government and American way of life, otherwise with the escalating cost of election campaigns, the Narco-President, narco-Senators, and Mafia-Congressmen might come into power in the Greatest democracy of the world the United States, in not so distant a future in the 21st Century. Dirty Money even from the Big Money should not have access to the corridors of political power and legislative power, if American democracy is to survive for long.

 

33(ii) Talk Points

Rise of Yankee Pax Americana Empire

First, WASPs Oil Pax Americana American Oil Colonialism might be palatable to the other great powers, namely, Russia, India, Germany, France and China, if it did not have any hidden religious agenda, and if America agreed to share its oil colonial loot with them. President Bush could turn out to be the reincarnation of Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395 AD) if he attempted to create religious empire camouflaged as the Capitalist Imperialist Oil Empire, and in the process would destroy the WASP Empire at the altar of Mecca, Jerusalem or Vatican. American Empire is in the making, after America launched its second imperial war in Iraq, first being Afghanistan, en route to establish pax American by controlling the oil and gas resources of Arabian Peninsula and Caspian Central Asia. The question that came in the minds of the military thinkers was what President Bush should do after Iraq war came to an end. What should be the next imperial move of American oil colonialism, once it consolidated its stronghold over Iraq? Shouldn’t America establish direct colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Qatar and intermarry with Arab women? Should George W. Bush become the King of Iraq, after he completed his second term in the White House? Should House of Halliburton Monarchy rule Saudi Arabia after America established direct rule throughout Arabian Peninsula? Should oil-producing territories of Kuwait, Qatar, Abu Dhabi, and Brunei become states of the United States? Why should American Big Oil pay OPEC prices for the Iraqi oil, rather than $2 per barrel royalty to Iraq for the Iraqi oil it would extract from Iraqi oil fields?

 

Rape of Oil in Iraqi Colony

Second, there was no sense in conquering Iraq by force, if colonial ruler intended to pay the OPEC determined market price of oil to the puppet rulers of Iraqi oil colony. The very nature of Oil colonialism meant that oil resources of Iraq available for American oil companies for any price it might choose to pay, say $2 per barrel. Would American oil colonial administration in Iraq mean that Iraq would come under the rule of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate? Should America bring Semite Saudi Arabia under colonial occupation of American oil colonialism and Semite Israel? Why should corrupt House of Al Saud continue to exploit Saudi Arabia, and why should barbarian Semite Wahhabi clergy continue to dehumanize Saudi women, when after occupying oil-rich Iraq, American troops might turn around and establish democratic regime in Saudi Arabia and replace barbarian Wahhabi Shariah laws with modern American laws that guaranteed rights and freedom to women.

 

Return of Christianity in North Africa

Third, the pre-Islamic Christian nations of Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria and Turkey would take a rebirth and Christianity would replace Islam as the dominant religion in Arabian North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia, within few years of the establishment of American oil colony in Iraq. Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Libya, Algeria and Tunisia were Christian nations before Bedouin Moslem tribes imposed Islam over Christians, enslaved Christian men and forcibly married Christian women or made them concubines. Should American troops intermarry Arab women and make them Christians? Would North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia become Christian nations again as it had been before Semite Muslim Bedouin armies financed by Damascus Jews conquered them and imposed Islam over Christian nations?

 

Protestant Oil Colonies

Fourth, great powers would accept secular capitalist American Empire and American Oil Colonial Empire so long as it established Protestant Capitalist Empire but oppose America if it tried to establish the Wahhabi Caliphate or Pope’s Empire or Jews Empire. India would support American Oil Colonialism but oppose Wahhabi colonialism. India would support American oil colonialism, if America wanted to conquer Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and pay to Arabs no more than $2 per barrel for the oil it would extract from Arab oil fields. India would also support America if America wanted to impose Christianity over Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria and Turkey. However, India would not support, albeit oppose America, if after the conquest of Iraq, America attempted to impose rule of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over Syria, Yemen and Iran.

 

Secular Muslims Vs Mecca’s Wahhabi

Fifth, the moderate secular Muslims would wage war on Mecca and Medina to liberate Islam’s holiest cities from the tyranny of fundamentalist Wahhabi cult. The national interests of Syria, Yemen, Iran and India coincide and India should develop military ties with Iran, Syria, Yemen to undermine Semite Mecca Caliphate’s designs to impose Wahhabi fundamentalism over rival Islamic sects as no more than 2 percent of the Muslims follow Wahhabi Cult. There is no need for any Arab OPEC nation to remain independent if America could establish colonial rule over Iraq.

 

US Should Share Oil Loot in Iraq

Sixth, United States should share Iraqi oil loot with fellow world powers, Britain, France, Germany, France, Russia, China and India and allow other great powers freedom to undertake preemptive strikes against other oil-producing nations to establish their oil colonies, to secure their supplies of oil and gas resources. British Prime Minister Atlee adopted the policy of appeasement against Hitler in Czechoslovakia similarly Russian President Boris Yeltsin adopted the policy of appeasement when he consented to the president Bill Clinton’s doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention in Yugoslavia, which resulted in the colonization of Yugoslavia and Serbia.

 

2003 Concert of World Powers

Seventh, the French, German, Belgium, Russian, Chinese and Indian opposition to the American conquest of Iraq represented the start of the Concert of World Powers, similar to the Concert of Europe that began with the 1814 Congress of Vienna. America’s invasion of Iraq geopolitically similar to the invasion of Belgium by Adolf Hitler at the advent of the Second World War, before Hitler invaded France. America’s invasion of Syria, Yemen or Iran, may prove to be the last straw that broke the back of the camel and the world may be engulfed into the Third World War. Other great powers, France, Germany, Russia, China and India might support American oil colonialism if America shared Iraqi oil loot with them on a regular basis, or invaded Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to establish American oil colonies in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Great powers would support United States if America oil companies paid no more than $2 per barrel of oil and shared part of the profits with other great powers.

 

US Control of Arabian Oil by Force

Eight, however, if United States attempted to conquer Iran as a prelude to control the oil and gas resources of Arabian gulf as well as the oil and gas resources of Caspian Central Asia, then the world’s global balance of power would be disturbed and the Third World War could start. To counter the threats of American dreams of world conquest, Russia and India should form military alliances with Iran and Syria and send military troops to the Middle East to redress the world balance of power. Any American moves to invade Syria, Iran and Yemen could start the Third World War, as it would signal American attempt at conquest of the world by controlling the oil and gas resources of Arabian Gulf as well as Caspian Central Asia.

 

Silverstein made Billions in 9/11 Insurance

Ninth, Semite Wahhabi terrorists waged war on New York and principal beneficiary turnout to be Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties that signed the 99-year lease only 14 days before the Sept 11 attacks and walked away with estimated $7 billion insurance claims. The Semite owned Travelers insurance turned out the lead insurance carrier that helped Silverstein properties get payment for two attacks the two claims payments for $3.5 billion each.

 

Fraudulent US GNP Estimates

Tenth, in the US GNP of $8.3 trillion the Services Sector contributed in 1999 72% or $5.9 trillion, and the Financial services represented minimum of 36% of the GNP around $2.9 trillion, which were fraudulently evaluated at much higher level, by the WorldCom, Arthur Andersen, Enron, dotcoms type frauds. In strange manner the Big Frauds allowed United States maintain its global leadership in economy and warfare. The Financial Big Frauds helped American economy by attracting foreign capital to the Wall Street. The financial frauds helped wrongly calculate the American GNP at $8.3 trillion in 1999, which it might have been only $6 trillion. Indirectly big Frauds by Enron and World Com and Arthur Andersen helped America project a much higher power, than what it actually was.

 

Euro Challenging Dollar as Reserve Currency

Eleventh, the Euro helped France Contain the USA. With the Cold War behind, the key question of international politics, as seen by the French political and administrative elite, is this: Now that there is no military threat to Europe from the Soviet Union or anyone else, how to contain the United States? In this logic the Euro Currency must become an alternative, or co-reserve currency alongside the dollar. This would deprive the US of its Soft Power and its free ride in the world economy. After all, the special international role of the dollar permits the US to run staggering trade deficits and to escape the balance of payments discipline that holds all other nations in check. This French believe, boosts America’s ability to finance military and political power beyond its real means. The primary goal of French and European foreign policy is therefore to shift portions of the foreign exchange reserves of the world into Euros. The value of the Euro against the dollar may or may not rise as a result. The Euro is not fundamentally about exchange rates and exports and imports, although they are terribly important. The use of Euro as the co-reserve currency alongside dollar is about the political independence and power that the Euro as co-reserve currency buys. It was the Euro, not the UNSC Veto that enabled France to oppose President Bush on Iraq so boldly. Absent the Euro, it would have been relatively easy for the US to quietly bring the French back into line. A stealth US attack on the French franc, and on French financial markets would do the job, and it did the job more than once before. In 1956, when France and Britain invaded Egypt to retake the Suez Canal, Eisenhower was outraged. Some stern statements by Dwight Eisenhower backed by discreet mutterings about Franc and Pound Sterling currencies and discreet attack on French financial markets did the trick. The French and British promptly retreated from Suez in 1956. The European Union idea is a political not an economic project, though achieved through economic means. The first goal was to create a unified Europe to bring an end to European wars. The means were economic: a Common Market, or free trade zone, to be expanded to include the free movement of capital then the free movement of labor. Behind the agreement was a basic bargain between France and Germany: France would open to German industry and Germany would support French agriculture. In the full Gaullist vision, France in order to stay independent and powerful, France would have to enter a Europe unified behind French political power supported by German economic power.

 

Commodity Prices Manipulated by West

Twelfth. The OPEC Oil cartel like De Beers Diamond Cartel is Semite-led producers cartel that faced with the abundant supply of oil, formed cartel to reduce the supply of oil the world markets by production controls, so that the oil prices could be jacked up artificially, so the oil market and diamond market became the Sellers Market, to the great disadvantage of the oil-importing countries. The Agricultural subsidies of the America, European Union, Japan, Canada and Australia finances the agricultural producers of the industrialized nations so that their agricultural producers could export agricultural goods below cost to create glut in the world markets, so that the agricultural prices might fall, and the commodities became the Buyers Markets to great disadvantage of the Third World commodity producing countries and to the great advantage of commodity importing countries.

 

African leaders say agriculture subsidies in the United States and Europe undermine local farmers. The mayor of this village of mud huts and thatched roofs in Mali says the subsidies don't just hurt they're starving his people. Resentment runs high in Mali, sub-Saharan Africa's largest cotton producer, over agricultural subsidies in the West. A combination of declining profits and drought have caused annual production to drop from half a million tons to just over 200,000 tons in the last two years. "Many Malian farmers have been selling off their food staples to pay basic expenses because of the falling cotton prices caused by agricultural subsidies to American cotton farmers Mali’s colon farmers sold their our cotton at a loss in 2003, Konseguila mayor Tiecoura Kone said in Mali. President Bush during his five-nation African tour in Nigeria has heard directly from African leaders about their concerns. "Absolutely, the subject of American agricultural subsidies came up in Botswana, and it came up in South Africa and it came up in Senegal. It will come up in every country we come to." Kone had a message for Bush, too: "If you in the West continue to subsidize your cotton producers, we here in Mali will continue to harvest to heavy costs. We have no protection at all." Cotton accounts for half of Mali's exports, supporting more than 3 million of the country's 11 million people, according to Abdoulaye Sylla, head of a cotton trade union. "They're just peasant farmers, with small cotton field. "It is very clean and high quality cotton very competitive if the big producers in the rich countries were not selling cheap cotton because they are subsidized." Plummeting world cotton prices and a poor rainy season last year have combined to make this a particularly difficult year in southern Mali, where electricity, telephone lines, water wells and paved roads are scarce. The country of Mali is one of the world's poorest. Mali's finance minister, Bassary Toure says it is "hypocrisy" for developed countries to subsidize their farmers. "The industrialized powers pour five times more money into agricultural subsidies at home than they do into development aid. "Industrialized nations tell Africans we have to play by the rules of the market, and then they break the rules by subsidizing their farmers in industrialized nations. World Bank Vice President Callisto Madavo, on a trip to Mali in April, echoed Toure's concerns, saying the impact of U.S. and European subsidies on world cotton prices is "substantial." We're talking about a crop being grown by some of the poorest farmers. The impact in terms of poverty is severe. Ibrahim Malloum, president of the African Cotton Association, said subsidies to American cotton growers cause losses of hundreds of millions of dollars to African farmers far exceeding the aid that the United States gives the impoverished continent. "The subsidies are killing us all. "The farmers are doing their job, but the more they work, the less they receive. The best way to stop poverty is to stop these subsidies." Bush said in Botswana removing subsidies is not solely America's responsibility. We have proposed a very strong reduction in agricultural subsidies. "However, in order to make that come to be, there needs to be reciprocation from Europe and Japan in order to make the policy effective." This is the argument author makes in this chapter.

 

33(iii) Bush’s Pax Americana?

Is Bush Roman Emperor Theodosius I?

India army created Pax Britannia, where sun never sat in the British Empire. Indian army do the same for Pax Britannia, provided President Bush embarked upon pure imperial policy of American colonial empire and shared part of the spoils of oil colonialism with India for the military services it could provide and the administrators it could provide to establish civil rule in the oil colonies. However India would be on the other side of the battle lines if United States forgoes its imperial oil colonial goals in favor of promoting religious interests of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate. Would President Bush’s war on Iraq that established American oil colony over Iraq, create the Eternal American Empire or result in the demise and collapse of the American Empire in next few decades of the 21st Century? Roman Emperor Constantine removed restrictions on the practice of Christianity in 322 AD. Roman Emperor Theodosius I (died 395 AD) imposed the rule Christianity and banned ancient religions throughout Roman Empire in 393 AD, just two years before his accidental death and barbarian ruler Alaric conquered Rome in 410 AD and destroyed Western Roman Empire. The religious intolerance of Theodosius I destroyed Eternal Roman Empire, just 17 years after the edict of religious intolerance in 393 AD. America after the Second World War found greatness thrust upon United States, Christened as the leading super power that in 1990 succeeded in destroying the rival super power the Evil Empire of Soviet Union and liberated the satellite states of the Evil Empire, who in 2002 readily joined in expanded NATO and supported American wars of oil imperialism in Afghanistan and Iraq, to control the oil resources of Central Asia and Arabia. People believed President Ronald Reagan when he called the Soviet Union the Evil Empire, when Soviet armed forces shot down the Korean Airliner, which later turned out had purposely strayed deep into Soviet airspace to photograph the Soviet secret radar system. Soviet Union disintegrated, when world realized that the Marxism was just the camouflage for Russian colonialism. The Brezhnev doctrine asserted Soviet Union’s right to militarily intervene to preserve Socialist system in the Soviet Camp, the ideological expansionism the fundamentalist socialist imperialism that Soviet Union developed to expand soviet Empire after the defeat of the America in the Vietnam War in 1975. The Soviet Union and the Soviet Empire collapsed due to overextension. The Bush Doctrine 2002, and the Doctrine of Preemptive Strikes represented American Empire’s right to establish oil colonies throughout the oil-producing world and to impose Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism over secular, liberal Islamic world. Protestant Yankee Oil Colonialism militarily promoting the religious interests of Mecca Caliphate in the Middle East, even when Wahhabi sect practiced by no more than 2 percent of the Muslims of the world. America’s Republican Neo-conservatives joined forces with Pro-segregation Whites, and Religious right conservatives to carve out American oil colonies and Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate throughout the Islamic world and the rule of pro-segregation Whites and Protestant religious right conservatives in United States. The presidential form of government and the non-representative nature of election process in the Senate and Congress would allow the totalitarian rule of the fanatic, fundamentalist, intolerant President to implement the religious intolerance agenda in the White House, similar to what Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395) implemented in 393 AD that resulted in the conquest and destruction of the Roman Empire by the barbarians 17 years later in 410 AD. United States would disintegrate like its fellow super power Soviet Union if it adopted the policy of religious and political intolerance and promoted the predator intolerant Semite Wahhabi Sunni religious cult in Islamic world and promoted the interests of Christian religious right conservative conspiracy in the United States.

 

Religious Policy of US Oil Colonialism

What would be the religious policy of American Oil Colonial Empire? American Oil Colonialism would promote the Semite Wahhabi fundamentalist Islam throughout Islamic oil colonies, as Wahhabi clergy agreed to transfer oil rights to America in exchange for rule of Semite Wahhabi Shariah over oil-producing world. American oil imperialism destroyed secular liberal Iraq and threatened secular liberal Syria to toe the Israeli and Saudi policies. America also threatened Iran not to meddle with the interests of Israel and Saudi Arabia. The artificial states of Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan were created based on the novel doctrine of Religion as the basis of the State. America created Semite Saudi Arabia on the basis Wahhabi religion. America supported the secession of Saudi Arabia from Ottoman Empire, based on the concept of Wahhabi religion as the basis of the separate state. America and Britain created Jewish state of Israel on the basis of the Judaism as the basis of Jewish State of Israel. Britain created State of Pakistan by partitioning Indian Empire on the basis of religion. America accepted the idiosyncrasies of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia because United States needed the continued support of Islamic world to conquer and colonize Iraq. America no longer would need Wahhabi Saudi the continued support of Saudi Arabia to maintain its oil colony in Iraq after the victory of the American troops. Why should United States pay market price for the Iraqi oil when it could loot the Iraqi oil at will? American oil colonialism after consolidating its hold over Iraq should invade Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and establish direct colonial rule over these Wahhabi oil-producing countries. Why should American oil colonialism pay to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, and Iraq ore than $2 per barrel in royalties for extracting Arab oil? Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Qatar lost their bargaining chips after American oil colonialism established in Iraq. It is a question of time that regime change in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would result in the confiscation of the assets and property of the royal family assets of Saudi House of Al Saud and Kuwait Al Sabah family. The Wahhabi royal families of Saudi Arbia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar would meet the fate of Pahlavi Monarchy of Iran.

 

Is Bush = Hitler?

The CBS panned a Hitler Miniseries meant to bash Bush. Fear of Semite Marxists gave birth to Nazism in post War Germany and the fear of the Semite Wahhabi terrorism justified American oil colonialism’s war on Afghanistan and Iraq. To vast majority Germans and French people President George W. Bush is the Adolf Hitler of 2003. German minister during German elections 2002 compared Bush to Hitler. By comparing Hitler to Bush, she rehabilitated Adolf Hitler in the eyes of the Germans. By comparing Bush to Hitler, she gave the highest compliment any German could give to Yankee conqueror. Many protesters carried posters with a short brush mustache under the American president's nose and the slogan "Bush = Hitler"? The protestors didn’t represent the irresponsible and reckless wing of the antiwar, anti-Bush movement in Germany, France, Belgium and Britain. The CBS television network just devoted millions of dollars and will devote four hours of prime time to a miniseries dedicated to the "Bush = Hitler" proposition. In an eye-opening article published this week by TV Guide, Mark Lasswell revealed that the CBS creative team behind the upcoming docudrama "Hitler: The Rise of Evil" believed their story is important because it might open American public’s eyes to America's rapid descent into totalitarian terror. "It basically boils down to an entire nation gripped by fear, who ultimately chose to give up their civil rights and plunged the whole world into war. One can't think of a better time to examine this history than 2003. The Hitler-The Rise of Evil’s executive producer is Ed Gernon and who believed that fear fueled both the Bush administration's adoption of a preemptive-strike policy and the public's acceptance of it: American public could stand by and let loss of liberties and freedom happen because of the fear of what would happen if America didn't undertake preemptive strikes to establish American oil colonies in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Iran, etc. etc.

 

Germany was fearful after the First World War that given the chance of political takeover the Marxist German Jews would massacre Christian Germans en masses to repeat the horror of Beria’s genocide of 30 million Russians. Germany after World War I was fearful, just like the United States after 9/11/2001. "When an entire country becomes afraid for their safety, they will embrace ideas and strategies and positions that they might not embrace otherwise. Let's examine the parallels between post First World War Germany and post-Cold War United States. Germany, a monarchical dictatorship, lost World War I and in the process was hit with mammoth reparations charges. A weak constitutional democracy was set up in Germany that in 10 years' time rotted away. In the interim, a psychotic new movement took birth dedicated to mystical German nationalism and murderous anti-Semitism arises. In time, Hitler overpowered the weak German democracy and then destroyed it in the name of his Third Reich. William Kaiser had allowed terrorist Lenin and Marxist Jews to slip into imperial Russia to destroy the Czar’s rule. The Judeo Marxists and Bolshevik Jews that owned their rule in Soviet Union to William Kaiser returned in full force in post-War Germany and conspired to set up the Marxist government in Germany. Adolf Hitler played upon the fear rampant among Germans that German Judeo Marxists would inflict on the German Christians the genocide Orthodox Russians suffered at hands of Bolshevik Jew Spymaster Lavrenti Beria. The genocide Bolshevik Jews inflicted on Hungary, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia after the Soviet Union and Lavrenti Beria imposed on Eastern Europe after the Second World War is testimony of the fact that Hitler could be right in raising the bogey of the genocidal tendencies of Jewish race. Bolshevik Jew Lavrenti Beria directly caused the death of over 30 million Orthodox Russians during Stalin’s rule. Germans were sincerely fearful of the genocidal tendencies of the Bolshevik Jews and Marxist German Jews in post War Germany. Mass murderer Beria financed European Jews to hype German holocaust of Jews to overlook the genocide Bolshevik Jews committed in Russia and Eastern Europe by minions of Bolshevik Jew Lavrenti Beria (d. 1955).

 

Like Hitler’s storm troopers the Neo-conservatives, the Catholic anti-Abortionists, Protestant religious right conservatives and pro-segregation whites teamed with Semite Zionist Cabal and Semite Wahhabi fundamentalists and American oil colonialism to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Iran, to protect Israel, and to establish rule of Mecca Caliphate in Arabia in the name of Yankee Oil Colonial Empire. Americans were fearful when Semite Wahhabi Saudi Muslim terrorists, replicated the Muslim invasions of Egypt, by attacking Manhattan and Pentagon, the seats of economic super power and military super power, that caused the losses over $5 trillion to the United States economy. Just as William Kaiser had helped terrorist V. I. Lenin and Bolshevik Jews capture power in Russia, the American President Carter, President Reagan, and President Bill Clinton had armed and financed Semite Wahhabi terrorists to mobilize militant Muslims in Afghanistan to wage wars on Soviet occupation troops in Afghanistan. United States, the sole super power of the world after the end of the Cold War and the demise of the Soviet, the longest-lived republic in world history, having recently won the Yugoslavia War, was suffering through a mild economic turndown when Semite Wahhabi militant Islam struck Protestant world Civilization in the worst terrorist act in history in 2001, except for the Jews financed Semite Muslim Bedouin attacks on Christian Civilizations of Egypt and Syria in 7th Christian Century and first Hijra Century. Egyptian, Syrian, Persian civilizations failed to retaliate with massive military force against the Semite Muslim terrorism and lost their lands, riches and women to the Semite Muslim conquerors. Protestant Americans were fearful that Semite Wahhabi Muslims, enriched by the higher oil prices manipulated by the OPEC cartel could oil-wealth to develop weapons of mass destruction and destroy the Western Christian Civilization, as they knew it. President Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson had promoted the rule of the Wahhabi House of Saud in Saudi Arabia and rule of Wahhabi clergy over Mecca & Medina to establish American oil colony over Saudi Arabia and to exercise American control over Saudi economic, foreign and military policies. Americans were fearful of the Semite Saudi Wahhabi Muslim monster after 9/11. President Bush had to declare the War on Islamic terrorism and waged war on Muslim Afghanistan, because American public wanted retributions against Semite Wahhabi Muslims, and President Bush couldn’t have attacked Saudi Arabia, because it would have undermined the foundation of American oil colonialism. Scared to disturb the Semite Wahhabi foundations of American oil prosperity, President Bush had to employ policy of deception and doublethink to wage the American war for oil colonialism for Turkmenistan oil and gas pipeline camouflaged as the Christian war on Islamic terrorism and Osama bin Laden. Failure of United States to arrest or neutralize Osama Bin Laden or any leader of Al Qaeda exposed the charade of Bush’s war on terrorism.

 

Just as Adolf Hitler abolished freedom in the Third Reich to protect Germans and Germany against the alleged genocidal threats of Semite Marxists, President Bush justified American imperialism, wars on Afghanistan and Iraq to protect Americans from the evil of Semite Wahhabi Islamic terrorism, which like the SARS spread out of is Saudi origin to other Islamic lands. In response to the 9/11, the United States sought to protect its citizens through the application of constitutionally acceptable measures and battles abroad against enemies with weapons of mass destruction. One can see how close the parallels are, and how enlightening it will be to the American public to have them explored. Primarily what CBS wanted to show in the miniseries, is how much Hitler's rise to power in post War Germany resonates in post-9/11 America in 2003.

 

American public has a right to know whether Bush=Hitler, or Saddam=Hitler, or Bush=Saddam, or King Fahd=Osama bin Laden. CBS miniseries director Christian Duguay's commitment to the serious cinematic exploration of ideas could best be understood by multiple viewings of his masterpieces, "Scanners 2: The New Order" and "Scanners 3: The Takeover." In these films, people's heads blow up. It would be pretentious of CBS to focus on President Bush when Saddam Hussein should be examined in the same light. So CBS Hitler miniseries is not just Bush = Hitler, it's Bush = Saddam as well. When CBS first announced Hitler’s miniseries there were substantive protests from American Jewish groups and Holocaust survivors that CBS miniseries might humanize Hitler. CBS took those complaints seriously enough to scrap the first teleplay and commission another. American oil lobby would comment that due to the criticism of Zionist cabal CBS commissioned just an act of slander against the president of the United States and by extension, toward the United States itself. Will CBS President Leslie Moonves some day have to face the whirlwind of American anger at this infamy of Hitler miniseries? Obviously the American oil lobby and the Zionist lobby would do their best to muzzle the freedom of the press and conspire that CBS miniseries "Hitler: The Rise of Evil," never airs at all. Just as Hitler hyped Germany’s fear of genocidal Semite Marxists to attempt world conquest by the Third Reich, President Bush might attempt Pax Americana and American Oil Colonial Empire, by exploiting Americans fear of the Semite Wahhabi Muslim terrorists’ genocidal tendencies.

 

Semite Conspiracy in Iraq

United Stated waged an imperialistic war on Iraq to further the national interests of Semite Israel and Semite Saudi Arabia, so that in the post-Saddam Iraq, the tyrannical rule of Semite Sunni Arabs could continue, even when Shiites represent 65 percent of Iraq’s population and Kurds represented 25 percent of the population. Just as American troops provided safe passage and protection against Afghan retaliation against Pushtun Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan, United States and Saudi Arabia provided safe passage to the Semite supporters of Saddam Hussein so that Saddam’s minions could reincarnate as Semite Saudi minions to protect the Semite interests in post-Saddam Iraq. Neither Semite Israel nor Semite Saudi Arabia would like the political power in oil-rich Iraq taken away from the entrenched Semite Sunni Arabs in post-Saddam Iraq, even when Semite Sunni Arabs had whole heartedly supported the Semite Saddam Hussein. The national interests of American imperialism and American oil colonialism diametrically differed with the national interests of Semite Al Saud Monarchy, Semite Wahhabi clergy, Semite Osama Bin Laden and Semite Israel. The interests of American oil colonialism and American imperialism demanded that political power transferred to ethnic groups other than Semite Arab Sunnis that represented only 16 percent of Iraqi population and solidly backed Saddam Hussein, just as Pushtun tribes solidly backed Al Qaeda and Taliban regime in Afghanistan. However, the interests of Osama bin Laden and Semite King Fahd and Semite Wahhabi clergy demanded that the political power in post-Semite Saddam Hussein remained in the hands of Semite Arab Sunnis, and shared neither with Aryan Kurd Sunnis nor Shiite Arabs. White House planning to hold a "Baghdad Conference" a mere six weeks after the Iraq War ends to determine an interim leadership and to establish a framework for its new government - something that many inside the administration fear could give the Semite House of Saud undue influence in a post-Saddam Iraq and impose Semite Arab rule over Iraq, where Semite Arab Sunni represented only 16 percent of the Iraqi population. But perhaps the greatest threat to the INC and democracy and the greatest boon for the House of Saud, is the proposed Baghdad Conference. If held soon after the smoke clears, only the Semite Arab Ba'athists would be likely to come forward. The plan is modeled after the Bonn Conference, which Zalmay Khalilzad, now U.S. special envoy to Iraq, oversaw to prepare a transitional government that eventually succeeded the Taliban. Bush Administration officials agree that a Baghdad Conference, if it happens, would be simply the latest attempt by State to undermine the umbrella organization of democratic Iraqi opposition groups, the Iraqi National Congress (INC).

 

White House in April ’03 was placing or attempting to place pro-Saudi individuals in important positions in a post-Saddam Iraq: Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Maura Harty recently tapped Beth Payne, who enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Saudis," even though her job had been to recover abducted American children trapped in the desert prison - to take over the consular section at the new Baghdad embassy. White House forced the Pentagon to appoint longtime diplomat Barbara Bodine, who temporarily refused the FBI entry into Yemen to investigate the USS Cole, to be civilian administrator in Baghdad. Barbara Bodine has extensive ties to Iraqis but not the right ones. She only knows the Ba'athists, because that's who she dealt with, and she's never bothered getting to know the democratic opposition very well." With a long career centered mostly in the Middle East, Barbara Bodine is an Arabist who favored traditional, stable Arab regimes, the kind where democracy would not flourish. State Department’s top pick for ambassador to the post-Saddam Iraq is Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ryan Crocker, who shared Bodine's worldview.

 

The Semite House of Saud is openly backing Adnan Pachachi, the former foreign minister, for leadership of free Iraq. State sees Pachachi as the most viable alternative to the INC, and even gave its tacit approval to a conference he organized in London on Sunday as part of a campaign to undermine the staunchly pro-democracy INC. One administration official says that Khalilzad is "so obsessed with Pachachi that he forced Jalal Talibani, leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, an INC member organization] to put Pachachi on the Iraqi opposition leadership council." But Pachachi was not interested, at least not in being part of the same leadership committee as Ahmad Chalabi, the head of the INC. Colin Powell persisted in wooing Pachachi.

 

33(iv) American Oil Colonialism

Nature of Protestant American Colonialism

United States removed indigenous peoples from Diego Garcia and forcibly evicted them to Mauritius and established United States Naval Base at Diego Garcia in 1960s, when Britain transferred colonial rights to United States.

 

Harold Wilson Gave Up colonies in 1968

British Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson unilaterally disbanded British colonial possessions and decided Britain would pull out of all colonial possessions east of Suez before 1968, so that American oil colonialism could establish control and influence over United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Malaysia and Brunei. After establishing direct military rule over Iraq, American oil colonialism would establish American oil colonies and settlements throughout oil and gas producing territories of the Middle East.

 

All Arab Oil Belongs to America

Just as American Indians signed the sale of the Manhattan Islands to Dutch settlers for few trinkets, King Abdul Aziz Al Saud, King Faisal I, and Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca and Medina had signed for perpetuity all rights over oil and resources in Saudi Arabia and Iraq to American and British oil colonialism, in exchange for the recognition of rule of King Abdul Aziz over Saudi Arabia, and rule of King Faisal I over Iraq and rule of Wahhabi clergy over Mecca and Medina. Barbarian Wahhabi terrorist Osama Bin Laden and murderous Saddam Hussein signed the death warrant for the demise of independent, sovereign oil-producing states of Saudi Arabia and Iraq respectively. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE would meet the fate of Iraq in next few years and American oil companies should get sovereign rights over the oil and gas fields in the American oil colonies that would be established throughout Arab OPEC nations. After consolidating its grip over Iraq, United States and other great powers should establish direct American rule over all oil-gas producing regions in the Arabian Peninsula and resettle Muslim Arab settlers around cities and carve out the oil and gas producing territories into separate State controlled, owned and operated by White Americans and White Europeans. Permanent white American oil colonies in Iraq and in Arabian Gulf region should be directly administered by the White House unencumbered by any ties of these colonies to the Wahhabi regimes. Arab rulers should not earn more than $2 per barrel of oil and equivalent gas that American coil companies would extract from the oil and gas fields in the Arabian Peninsula and Arabian Gulf. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE never existed as a nation in the human history and these oil-producing desert lands belonged to any one of these nations, namely, Egypt, Persia, Turkey, Mongol Empire or Indian Empire. American oil colonialism would need the oil and gas resources, not the desert people that inhabit the adjoining desert lands. Americans no longer paid to the Red Indians for the mineral resources they extract from the lands that once belonged to Red Indians they would do the same for the oil and gas they would extract from Arabian Gulf oil and gas fields after it establish permanent oil colony in Iraq. America would remove Arabs from oil and gas producing regions and carve out the oil and gas producing regions into a new sovereign state and make it a part of the United States, like Hawaii. Why should American oil colonialism pay to the Iraqis more than $2 per barrel of oil Americans would extract from the oil fields, after America militarily established American oil colony over Iraq? After consolidating its military grip over Iraq, Pentagon should establish direct American oil colony over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Qatar and assume direct control over economic, oil, military and foreign policies.

 

Arab inhabitants of oil-producing gas and oil fields would meet the fate of American Red Indians and oil-producing territories should secede from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and become a state of the United States. President bush by invading Iraq created new age of oil colonial empires, and white Americans would remove Arab settlers from the oil-producing regions of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and UAE and forcibly relocate the Arab people to the non-oil producing lands of these countries, which would continue to be governed by tyrannical Wahhabi Shariah.

 

Expel Semite Wahhabi Clergy from Mecca

Just as Americans removed native Indians from their lands in North America, American oil colonialism would remove Iraqis from oil-producing lands in Iraq, and remove Wahhabi Saudis from oil-producing lands in Saudi Arabia and remove Kuwaitis from the oil-producing lands in Kuwait, and separate the oil-producing lands from populated regions, and merge oil-producing regions as new colonial territories of United States. Just as white Christian Americans looted the lands of native Indians and made United States into the image of White Europe, American oil colonialism and Zionist Cabal and Christian religious right conservatives and Republican Neo-Conservatives would establish permanent white colonies in the oil and gas producing lands of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and impose the Wahhabi clergy’s tyranny over Iraqi and Arab people. American oil colonialism wants to exercise total control over the oil and gas resources of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE in Arabian Gulf region and has no desire to promote either Christianity or Western style democracy or laws over Arab world including Iraq. American colonialism historically sought the new lands and used force to depopulate the lands to make these new lands part of the white world. American oil colonialism in the Arabian Peninsula sought the control over oil and gas resources and promoted neither Christianity nor Western laws and culture, and instead promoted the Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism and Shariah laws. Anglo-Saxon colonialism removed the indigenous populations and created the White Civilization in United States and Canada.

 

Nature of Hispanic Colonialism

Spanish colonialism intermarried with local people to create the new race of Brown Mestizos and Mulattos that represent the majority in Latino Hispanic America, especially Mexico, Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Honduras, which is totally different from European Civilization. The Monroe Doctrine increased the role of the Vatican in Hispanic America, but severed Hispanic America’s colonial ties with Spain and Portugal. The four centuries of colonialism generated incomes for the European colonial powers, by providing either gold and tax dollars or the empty lands for the European immigrants to settle in. British, Irish and continental European immigrants removed Native Indians from their ancestral lands in North America and made the ancient lands of Red Indians in the image of White Christian Europeans and massacred Red Indians and gave birth to the new great world civilization of America and Canada, the Anglo-Saxon WASP’s Civilization. The indigenous peoples have no role in the American economy and represent less than 1% of the total North American population in Canada and United States. The Latinos, the Spanish and Portuguese people invaded the lands of Incas, Mayas and Aztecs and looted their gold and imposed Christianity on indigenous Indians, but intermarried with the upper class and created the Mullatto and Mestizo Hispanic American Civilization in Andean, Central and South America. The Mestizos the people of mixed Indian and European ancestry and Mulattos the people of mixed black and European ancestry and Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Amerindians represent more than 75% population of Mexico, Latin Central America, and Andean South America. Mulattos represent 60% of the population in Brazil. Just as Hindu Civilization has reemerged intact after centuries of Muslim and British rule over India, the indigenous Inca, Maya and Aztec race, civilization and religion reemerged intact in Mexico, Central and Andean American countries, namely, Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia.

 

Great Power’s Share of Iraqi Oil Loot

Great powers including India would support Pax Americana and American oil colonialism in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, provided all great powers gain a guaranteed share of the incomes of the American oil colonies and Iraqi oil loot. It would be stupid on the part of White House and the Buckingham Palace that other great powers would stand still and not demand their share of the Iraqi oil loot after American invasion troops established American oil colony over Iraq. Delhi during Indian Empire ruled over King Faisal 1’s Iraq and Trucial States the predecessor state of United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Bahrain, Oman and Yemen and India would like to work with American oil imperialism to help establish Pax Americana in exchange for preferred access to the colonial oil and gas resources. India would align with other great powers, France, Germany, Russia, China and Japan and demand from American oil colonialism their fair share of the Iraqi oil loot. Every great power, France, Germany, Russia, China, Japan and India would support the return of the Age of colonial empires, if they all get fair share of the colonial loot and they would not militarily intervene against American oil colonialism.

 

Pay Royalty of $1 Per barrel of Oil

It would be in the national interests of all great powers, if the American oil colonialism paid only $2 per barrel to the ruling families in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and to the interim regime in Iraq and sold one third of colonial oil output to France, Germany, China and India for $8 per barrel. It would in the long-term interest of colonial powers if American oil colony shared its loot of Iraqi oil with France, Germany, Russia, China and India. Failure of the Yankees to share Iraqi oil loot with fellow world powers, would force France, Germany, Russia, China and India to team up against America, Britain, Spain and Italy and militarily support the victims of predator American oil colonialism. American imperialism could meet the fate of Nazi imperialism and Napoleonic imperialism, if the Concert of World Powers, namely, France, Germany, Russia, China and India combined their diplomatic, military and economic assets to hold American imperialism in check. While the defeat of the United States in Iraq would not be in the national interests of other world powers, the American monopoly over colonial exploitation of Iraqi oil would exacerbate international tensions and disturb the global balance of power. While great powers should destabilize the American colonial rule, they should do so only to the extent to force Americans share the Iraqi oil loot with fellow world powers. The Concert of World Powers might agree to indirectly support the American colonial occupation of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, provided Americans agreed to share their Iraqi oil loot and future Saudi and Kuwaiti oil loots with other great powers. The vested interests of the colonial empires precede the interests of the oil-producing nations.

 

Artificial Israel, Saudi Arabia & Pakistan

Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan were artificial states created by the principle of Religion as the basis of state to promote the interests of Western oil colonialism in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran, to dissuade Ottoman Empire and India from challenging America and Britain in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran. After the consolidation of American oil colonialism in Iraq, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey no longer hold any strategic value for American oil colonialism. Islamic Turkey and Islamic Pakistan could become challengers to Christian nation’s rape of Iraqi and Iranian oil. Saudi Arabia, and Iraq had been the former territories of Ottoman Empire. Persian Gulf and Arabian Gulf had been an Indian Lake throughout 18th, 19th and early 20th Century. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, United Arab Emirates and Oman kept their foreign currency reserves in Indian rupees as late as 1965, when stupid Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi devalued Indian currency by 35% without consulting these countries that kept their foreign reserves in Indian rupees. India and Turkey have legitimate claims over oil and gas resources of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Iraq and may go to war to assert their rights over these crucial oil resources. After the American occupation of Iraq, the Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan no longer hold any value for American oil imperialism. It is high time that the artificial states of Israel and Saudi Arabia dissolved and America established direct colony over Arabian Peninsula. Israel and Saudi Arabia became dispensable in the eyes of American oil colonialism. The national interests of United States and American oil colonialism might conflict with rather than coincide with the national interests of Semite Israel and Semite Saudi Arabia and Muslim Pakistan. Jewish state of Israel, Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Muslim state of Pakistan no longer served the Interests of post-Saddam American oil colonialism in Iraq. American national interests would be better served if the artificial states of Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan dissolved and merged with their neighbors. 

 

British and American oil colonialism created three artificial states of Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan based on the concept of religion as the basis of state, to control the oil resources of Arabian Peninsula. Zionist Cabal, American and British colonialism devised the diplomatic usage of the Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism to mobilize the Mecca tribesmen to join forces with Christian colonial powers to carve out separate Wahhabi states of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. The impoverished tribes of Mecca agreed to American control over oil, economic, military and foreign affairs in exchange for America’s acceptance of Wahhabi Shariah laws and rule of the House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia. Delhi during British Indian Empire controlled the economic, military and foreign affairs of Iraq during the regime of King Faisal I. Britain supported the fundamentalist Muslim leaders in Indian Empire and neglected the secular Muslim leaders to impose the demand of the fundamentalist Muslim League leader Mohammad Ali Jinnah to carve out the separate state of Islamic Pakistan by the partition of Indian Empire. Britain created Pakistan, as a buffer state between India and Iran, to disrupt India’s direct land route to oil-rich Iran. Britain hoped that India would no longer threaten British oil interests in Iran after the creation of Pakistan.

 

OPEC Was an American Conspiracy

United States and the CIA goaded the OPEC countries to hike up the oil prices and helped organize OPEC Oil Cartel on the lines of De Beers Diamond Cartel. Just as the De Beers Diamond cartel is the British-Israeli cartel and profited British colonialism in Southern Africa, the OPEC Cartel is the joint Saudi-American oil cartel and served the interests of American oil colonialism and weakened the economies of oil-dependent France, Germany, and Japan. The hike of oil prices allowed American economy overtake European and Japanese economies, as OPEC nations priced the oil in US dollars and kept their reserves in US dollars. The foreign capital continued to flow into American markets even when balance of trade and public debt worsened in America.

 

President Jimmy Carter organized the downfall of Shah of Iran and ruled out military government and undermined the democratically government of Prime Minister Bani Sadr to install the CIA agent Ayatollah Khomeini as ruler of Iran, so that Aryan Iran might not use the Iranian oil incomes to make Iran a great power. President Carter and President Ronald Reagan incited Sadam Hussein to invade Iraq to start the Iraq-Iran War that devastated the economies of Iraq and Iran from 1980 to 1988. America increased its military presence in the Arabian Gulf and secured military bases to secure oil shipments during Iraq Iran War. American Ambassador during 1990 assured President Saddam Hussein that Untied States would not intervene if Iraq invaded Kuwait, and Saddam Hussein fell for the trap. President Bush utilized the pretext of Iraqi invasions of Kuwait to develop permanent military bases in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain and Qatar. President Bush didn’t attack Baghdad in 1991, because United States would have failed to colonize Iraq in 1991, and had Iraqi troops not abruptly abandoned the siege of Kuwait City, American troops would have found it very difficult and very expensive to hunt Iraqi troops out of Kuwait. President Bill Clinton pursued the policy of weakening of the Iraqi regime by UN Sanctions so that future American invasion troops would conquer and colonize the weakened Iraqi regime and establish puppet regime in Iraq. President Clinton refused to support the revolt led by son-in-laws of Saddam Hussein, because it had been the long-term policy of the Pentagon to establish the oil colony over Iraq. United States destroyed the power of Egypt, Iran and Iraq to trumpet the power of Mecca Caliphate. Incidentally Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Syria are and Yugoslavia was Non Aligned Nations. United States undermined the secular, liberal Islamic nations to promote Wahhabi fundamentalist Saudi Arabia as the leader of the Islamic world. It is no wonder that not one of the Al Qaeda terrorists` brought to justice for War crimes.

 

Bush is Most Feared Yankee President

German Minister compared Yankee President George W. Bush to German Fuehrer Adolf Hitler both as a complement to Bush and also to rehabilitate Hitler in post-War German history. President Bush succeeded in making democratic America most feared imperial power in the world. American conquest of secular Non Aligned Iraq is geopolitically similar to Adolf Hitler’s conquest of neutral Belgium. India would support American invasion of Saudi Arabia to control the oil and gas fields of Arabian Peninsula. However, Non Aligned secular Aryan India would oppose the American invasions of secular Non Aligned non-Semite Syria and Non Aligned Aryan Iran.

 

United States is the Most Feared Nation in the World in 2003. George W. Bush is the history-maker and he created history and unleashed the new age of oil colonial empires in 2003 and the genie cannot be put back into the bottle. President George Bush became president in January 2001, and within two years the Bush administration succeeded in making the United States the most feared nation in the world, and the most disliked nation in the world, and the most hated nation in the world. By all means it was quite an achievement.

 

Wahhabi Cult and Saudi Arabia is the Achilles Heel of United States. American oil colonialism rests on the two pillars, the pillar of Wahhabi Mecca and pillar of Pentagon. American oil colonialism based on the twin foundations of Semite Wahhabi fundamentalist Mecca Caliphate represented by Osama Bin Laden and Pentagon’s military might. Conspiracy theorists might conclude that Gen. Tommy Franks and Osama Bin Laden are two sides of the same American coin of Oil Colonialism.

 

Saddam Hussein Former CIA Agent

Saddam Hussein took power with the blessing of the CIA and invaded Iran in 1980 on orders of the White House and invaded Kuwait in 1990 at the inducement of American Ambassador to Iraq, who personally assured Saddam Hussein that United States would not retaliate if Iraq invaded Kuwait, and Saddam fell for this ruse. Saddam Hussein like Ayatollah Khomeini and Colonel Gadhafy took over with the blessings of the CIA to promote the interests of American oil colonialism in Iran, Libya and Iraq, respectively. Saddam Hussein up to 1990 committed his worst crimes, but then he was a friend and ally of the White House. President Ronald Reagan far from seeing him as a threat even provided him with means to develop weapons of mass destruction. The 1991 Gulf War I, and economic sanctions made Iraq into to a weak military force in the Middle East. Even Iran the country Saddam invaded no longer regarded him as a threat, and had tried to reintegrate Iraq into the Middle East, over strong US objections. Only United States regarded Iraq as a threat, either military or terrorist threat. United Nations became a tool in the hands of the United States in starving Iraq to death so that starved thirsty impoverished Iraqi lion could be captured and forced to join the American Oil Circus like fellow Wahhabi circus animals, namely, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and UAE.

 

Evil of Yankee Super Patriotism

American propaganda put Nazi propaganda minister Goebbels to shame. The consolidation of the ownership of major electronic and print media allowed the Neo-conservatives imposed hidden censorship, forcing the entire print media to parrot out the propaganda designed by the hidden hand of the real rulers of the world. When Jews became scared of the Palestinian suicide bombing in Israel, which put the very existence of the Jewish state of Israel into doubt, the Zionist Cabal hyped the need for American occupation of Iraq and Syria and Iran as the common geopolitical interests of American oil colonialism, Protestant Religious Right conservatism, Republican Neo-conservatism, pro-segregation Whites, and Judaic Israel. No major newspaper opposed President Bush’s war on Iraq. The ruling elite of the entire Western Christian world and entire Wahhabi Islamic world and Capitalist oil world worked in unison to establish American oil colony over Iraq, to camouflage the rape Iraq as war for Iraqi freedom. Over zealous Yankee super patriots imposed nation wide censorship in the academic institutions, print and electronic media. Russian media under president Putin enjoyed more freedom than major networks enjoyed during Pentagon’s war on Iraq. Perhaps the vested interests of the Capitalist-owners of the major networks and major newspapers coincided with the interests of American Oil Colonialism and Neo-Conservatism, as a matter of chance. The fact America could impose voluntary censorship over media in a nation of 287 million population, speaks a lot about the power of the state to control and supervise in the digital age. How was it done so effortlessly and so ingeniously that only very discerning observers could observe it, though the glare of the war news hungry media?

 

United States became victim of Super Patriotism, and media’s Ideological Obedience to the White House. Where did this super patriotism come from? The American arrogance and the idea that the United States almost God-like, can do no wrong. Whatever it says or does, no matter how unfair objectively is OK simply because it's the United States that does it? When did it sense of self-righteousness originate, as this had not been the known attribute of the American psyche. Neo-Conservative ruling elite and Zionist Media and propaganda machine promoted this belief in righteousness of American invasions, because Media controlled by Israeli Jews actively and consciously promoted in the righteousness of the American oil imperialism, because due to the spurt in Palestinian suicide bombings the very existence of Jewish state of Israel had come into doubt. Jews and Christian religious right conservative conspiracy created this new attitude of self-righteousness of WASPs, as they feared that any doubt would sabotage American invasions of Iraq. The legacy of super-patriotism runs through the Anglo-Saxon culture, from way back and it is not unusual. The echo of super patriotism of the era when Britannia ruled the seas, and sun never set in the British Empire still reverberates in the present day Anglo-Saxon America. John Stuart Mill’s classic essay on "humanitarian intervention" is a remarkable example of super patriotism, and the same was true of every other conquering power that world has known, even Israel eulogized the mass murders Prophet Joshua chronicled in the Old Testament. The Founders of the United States found some justifications for eliminating the indigenous Indian population and justified black slavery for economic reasons, as the cotton was the oil of the 19th century industrial revolution.

 

Deobandi Darul Uloom Vs. Wahhabi Cult

India and Pakistan should pool military resources to impose Deobandi Islam over Wahhabi cult in Arabia. The Saharanpur, UP based Darul Uloom popularly known as Deobandis should be given the leading position in determining the Islamic theology in Mecca and Medina. Deobandi Aryan Islam would wage wars of Islamic religious sects on Semite Wahhabi Islam for the control over Mecca and Medina during Third World War. Semite Jews and British spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia brushed up the dormant doctrine of Wahhabi Sunni Cult to mobilize uncivilized barbarian nomad Bedouin of Mecca Medina region that enjoyed no influence and power during Islamic Empires of Baghdad Caliphate and Ottoman Caliphate. The impoverished Bedouin Wahhabi tribes signed away all Arab rights to the oil and gas resources of Saudi Arabia to Americans and Iraqi oil rights to British Empire, in exchange for Shariah and Wahhabi clergy’s rule over Mecca and Medina. While Wahhabi Cult would help Jews and Christians rape and loot Arabian oil and gas resources, the Deobandi Sunni Islam would bring the entire Islamic world under the enlightened rule of Neo-Mughal Caliphate. Darul Uloom should take over control of Mecca and Medina to protect Islam from the evil designs of Wahhabi Cult. Semite Wahhabi Islam is bad Islam and Aryan Deobandi Islam is good Islam. Muslims of the Subcontinent, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, representing more than 250 millions, follow the Deobandi Sect of Sunni Islam, which staked its claim against Wahhabi Sunni Sect, followed by less than 50 million Muslims of the world.

 

Darul Uloom, Deoband, located in the Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh, India is one of the oldest religious school of Sunni thoughts in India. Darul Uloom, situated in Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh, had earlier issued the “fatwa” against American companies in the wake of the US-attack on Afghanistan. But it was not immediately verified whether other Muslims in India would also abide by the edict. Maulana Margoobur Rehman, Rector of Darul Uloom reissued a fatwa that was decreed when US had attacked Afghanistan. It condemned the attack on Iraq terming it as “terrorism against humanity. America and Jews are out to destroy the Muslims around the world. United Nations has been only acting as a hub of Israeli interests. The 135 countries including India, China, Russia, France and Germany have voiced their strong opposition against the American attack on Iraq. Iraq was is as a “genocide of innocent Iraqi people. Since America and Britain are out to hit at the Muslim interests, Indian Muslims cannot oppose these forces physically. So Indians in general and Muslims in particular must retaliate by boycotting the consumer products of American and British companies to economically hit these belligerent nations. Darul Uloom, Deoband had also earlier a similar “fatwa” against Americans in protest against American strikes on Afghanistan. Showing solidarity with the war-ravaged Iraq, a prestigious Islamic school of thought has reissued a fatwa calling Muslims and other countrymen to boycott American and British goods. America and Britain promoted Wahhabi Sunni Islam as the dominant Islamic sect of Mecca and Medina, similarly India, Pakistan and Bangladesh should promote Deobandi Sunni Islam as the dominant theology of Mecca as direct challenge to the domination of Wahhabi cult in Saudi Arabia. Deobandi Islam represented the Reformation movement in Islam and Saudi Arabia waged the Counter Reformation Wars on Deobandi Islam followed by majority of the Muslims of the world, while Wahhabi Islam followed by less than 2 percent world’s Muslims. Zionists and Colonel Lawrence develop the Wahhabi doctrine to establish American and British Oil colonies over Arabia and to destroy the power of Islamic Caliphate. The rise of Semite Mecca Caliphate would result in the death of Islam and Islamic power and make Islamic oil-producing nations the oil colonies of America.

 

Deobandi-led Counter Wahhabi Wars

The Aryan Turks, should join forces with Aryan Iran and Aryan Pakistan to regain control over holiest Islamic cities of Mecca and Medina to replace the Wahhabi clergy by the Deobandi clergies trained by the world renowned Darul Uloom of Sahranpur, UP India. While Semite Wahhabi cult would result in the death of Islam and the enslavement of oil-rich Islamic nations, the Deobandi Sect would lead Islamic world to greater glory and prosperity, under the leadership of Islamic Neo-Mughal Caliphate. Like the 30-year Counter Reformation Wars (1618-1648), the Middle East entered into Counter Wahhabi Wars after the invasions of Iraq in 2003, which might continue for many decades and would end only when Aryan Muslims, Turkey, Iran and Pakistan gain total control over Mecca & Medina and the oil-rich Arabian Peninsula. Aryan India would militarily support the military conquest of Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia by Deobandi Aryan Muslim forces.

 

Indian Parliament Condemned US Iraq War

On the day American media claimed the victory in Baghdad, the Indian parliament on 8th April 2003 condemned the US-led war on Iraq and demanded an immediate withdrawal of American and British forces from the war-wracked Iraq. “Expressing national sentiment, this house (Indian Parliament) condemned the war in Iraq by the US-led coalition. This is not acceptable. The innocent people of Iraq, especially the pain of women and children serious humanitarian issue and Indian parliament this house (Indian Parliament) serious anguish and deep sympathy for them. This house also demands the war in Iraq end immediately and the coalition forces should withdraw. The war was being waged beyond the charters of the UN. It insisted that the reconstruction of Iraq be done under the close supervision of the United Nations. India would send one billion rupees (20.4 million dollars) in cash and food to the Iraqi people through the UN.” The unanimous statement came after almost two days of squabbling between the government and opposition parties on its wording, jamming work in parliament since it reopened after a month's vacation. The government had offered a statement "deploring" the war, but the opposition insisted the wording was not strong enough. Media reports had previously speculated that the government's low-key response to the war in Iraq, calling it "unjustified and unavoidable", was aimed at preserving friendly ties with the United States.

 

33(v) US is Banking Super Power

US is World’s Banking Super Power in 2003

The American banks and insurance companies became more profitable after the Sept 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. One of the most remarkable features of the 2000-2003 financial period has been the resilience of the US banking system, which has performed far better over 2002-2002 the past two years than during the recession of 1990-91. It has performed better than it did after previous periods of great stock market weakness. In the last economic slump, there was a big upsurge of bank failures. In 1989, there were 205 bank failures, 160 in 1990 and 109 in 1991. During the present cycle, bank failures have been very rare. There were seven in 2000, four in 2001, 11 in 2002 and two so far this year. In 2001, US bank capital increased by $67 billion, or 12.8 per cent. The main factors that explain why the current cycle has not been accompanied by big bank failures. First, the profitability of American insurance companies and British insurance company Lloyds of London remarkably increased after the 9/11/01 attacks. The Travelers insurance owned by the Citi Group emerged as the lead insurer for the World Trade Center insurance and the big payout to Silverstein Properties resulted in the net transfer of economic resources from continental European and Japanese insurance and banking companies to the New York based beneficiary of insurance claims. It greatly enhanced the profitability of American insurance companies and banks.

 

Second, there was far less margin borrowing in the United States during the recent stock market bubble than during the bubble of the late 1920s. The Dot Com bubble financed the later dot com bust. The paper millionaires didn’t borrow from banks to finance their speculative purchases and equity holdings. The paper-profit of the past holdings paid for this speculative adventurism. At the peak in March 2000, margin debt was less than 2 per cent of gross domestic product. At the peak in late 1929, margin debt was nearly 9 per cent of GDP. Since the decline in the value of the US equity market since March 2000 has exceeded 90 per cent of GDP compared with 60 per cent during 1929-31. A large volume of margin debt would probably have led to a wave of loan defaults by investors with falling equity portfolios. Third, the American banking system did not finance the speculative capital- spending boom that drove the economy's growth during the late 1990s. It was financed instead through a process of securitization that transferred risk from banks to insurance companies, mutual funds, pension funds and retail investors. The banks have suffered some losses from lending to the telecommunications, media and technology companies that powered the boom. But these have been modest compared with those of the investors who purchased TMT shares and bonds.

 

Fourth, US banks restrained themselves from property lending during the recent cycle far more than they did during previous business cycles. As a result, the delinquency rate on property lending was only 1.76 per cent last year, compared with 10.56 per cent in the second quarter of 1992. Fifth, the overall level of loan delinquency was only 3.99 per cent in the most recent quarter - compared with 5.38 per cent in the early 1990s - because of a strong performance by the US corporate sector. Over the last decade in 1990s, the return on assets of the 100 most indebted US companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 has fallen from a peak of 9 per cent to about 6 per cent. In Japan, by contrast, the most indebted companies have rates of return of less than 1 per cent on assets. Sixth, however US could be headed for a protracted downturn comparable to Japan's cannot be brushed aside. US companies allocate assets more efficiently than their Japanese counterparts and the securitization process has encouraged US investors to write off debt far faster than has been the case with Japanese banks.

 

Seventh, the superior performance of US banks has profound consequences for the global banking industry. If we compare market capitalization, we find that US banks are far stronger than their Japanese and European counterparts. Citigroup, for example, boasts the largest bank market capitalization in the world - $234 billion. This compares with $135 billion for the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, Britain's biggest, and $72.7 billion for UBS of Switzerland, the largest in continental Europe. The market capitalization of Germany's Deutsche Bank's is only $43 billion. Japan's banks and investment banks once-mighty banks are a shadow of their former selves. American banks tower above their global competitors. American investment banks dominate over German and Japanese investment banks.

 

Eighth, the competitive strength of America's banks was once constrained by laws that banned interstate banking and separated commercial banking from investment banking. Now the wall that separated the commercial banking and investment banking is gone. The failure of Savings & Loans Banks gave rise of the interstate banks. America is a huge economy so the American banks grew in size. The Dot Com bubble generated billions of dollars in revenue for the American Investment banks, though impoverished the hinterland people. There will be no way for Japanese and German banks and investment banking firms to compete with American banks. Ninth, European banks should merge across national borders. Japan's banks have such great problems with non-performing loans that they are unlikely to be a global force again at least until 2012. Japan has demonstrated, that even zero interest rates cannot promote recovery if a country's banking system is riddled with bad debt. However, if the banking system is well capitalized and profitable like that of United States, the monetary policy likely to be more effective.

 

Tenth, the American banks carry a large percentage of derivatives in their portfolio. JP Morgan announced the $100 million profits generated by their proprietary trades in currency futures and interest rate futures. The example of Enron portends a disaster for banks like JP Morgan. Enron rather than being a money make in energy production became profit maker in energy speculation. Eleventh, the Arthur Andersen accounting fiasco of World Com showed billions of dollars in profits when in reality there was a loss. The same could happen to largest American Banks including Citi Group. What is the guarantee that Citi Group not cooking its books? Twelfth, the sector wise value added as % of the GNP in 1999 value added by the agricultural sector (2%), Industry (26%), Manufacturing (18%) and Services (72%). The service sector contributed towards 72% of US GNP in 1999. Any failure of Citi Group could bring down the GNP precipitously.

 

33(vi) Big Fraud as Instrument of American Oil Colonialism

Big Frauds are Financial Services WMDs

The United States 1999 GDP (100%, $8.7 trillion), value added by Agriculture sector was (2%, $174 billion), Industry (26%, $2.3 trillion), Manufacturing (18%, $1.6 trillion), and Services (72%, $6.2 trillion). The financial frauds perpetrated by WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, and Arthur Andersen inflated the market values of these companies and showed profits in billions when there was loss. It helped the overall market capitalization of NYSE and NASDAQ listed companies and helped suck the foreign capital into American capital markets and pushed the exchange rates of US$ vis-à-vis other currencies. But for the rampant financial Big Frauds the GNP of United States might have bee appraised by World Bank no more than $5 trillion in 1999 and no more than $ 6 trillion in 2002, and the Dow Jones Industrial average Index would have hovered around 5000 in April 2003. But for the financial frauds perpetrated by these Big Crooks, the size of China’s economy would overtake US Economy before 2007 in terms of size of GNP. Big Frauds perpetrated by big American companies helped hype America’s image as World’s largest economy, and indirectly soften the opposition of other world powers to the American colonial occupation of Iraq. Had WorldCom, Enron, Arthur Andersen, Global Crossing and hundreds of other similar corporate frauds had not occurred, France, Germany, Russia, China, and India would have militarily intervened to defeat the American invasions of Iraq. The Big Frauds hyped the image of United States as the hyper power that it never was and it helped American loot the oil riches of Iraq. Perhaps Pentagon should recommend these fraudulent CEOs medal of honor for helping American win Iraq war without huge loss of American lives, that would have occurred had any world power sent troops to fight alongside Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The Big financial Frauds are like the weapons of mass destruction, gave American economy the aura of super Nuclear economy, and the illusion of greatness helped America win the enemy in Iraq. Thanks to the perpetrators of the Big Frauds on the Wall Street.

 

Deterrence of Big Semite Conspiracy

Big Conspiracy and Big Fraud inadvertently acquired the freedom of prosecution and successfully deterred the threat of prosecution by threatening to expose the other co-conspirators in the corridors of power. The deterrent of Big Frauds and Big Conspiracy acts much like the nuclear deterrent and wards of the threat of the prosecution by the counter threat of embarrassing exposures. The perpetrators of Big Frauds and Big Conspiracy acquire de facto immunity from prosecution, if they share the loot with the Big shots in the corridors of power. The perpetrators of 9/11 acquired the attributes of big power simply because 9/11 changed the course of history, and great powers simply cannot afford the repeat of the 9/11 attacks.

 

Geopolitics of 9/11 Conspiracy

The Saudi perpetrators of 9/11 escaped retributions at the hand of superpower America, either because America feared retaliation would precipitate repeat terrorist attacks or because Saudi Arabia threatened to release the names of the non-Muslim White co-conspirators and collaborators to the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 attacks was a Big Conspiracy and its ability to conceal its perpetrators gave it a deterrent capability, much like nuclear deterrence. Big conspiracies properly planned could cause havoc more devastating than the use of nuclear weapons on world civilizations. Big conspiracies are beyond the reach of laws of war and war crime tribunal, but could be more destructive than the mass genocides. Warren Buffet the 2nd richest man in United States opined that Derivatives are weapons of mass destruction. The financial futures and commodity futures markets in wrong hands could bring down even the largest economies. President Bill Clinton and Secretary Jack Rubin brought down the wall that separated the asset based insurance and banking industry from speculative financial services, investment banking, broker dealers that gave birth to behemoth Citigroup headed by Sandy Weill and Jack Rubin. Saudi prince Talal has been a big investor in the Citigroup. The Semite Saudi Wahhabi terrorist hijackers attacked Twin Towers, that resulted in $3.5 billion to $7.0 billion profits to Semite Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties that signed the 99-year lease on the World Trade Center just 14 days before the Sept. 11 2001 attacks by investing less than $100 million of his money. The Travelers Insurance owned by the Citigroup turned out to be the lead insurance underwriter on WTC insurance coverage. The end result of the Semite terrorist attacks of 9/11 might result in Citigroup’s takeover of the Swiss Re and other leading European insurance giants. Saudi cabinet minister charged that Jews planned the attack on Twin towers by hiring Saudi Wahhabi terrorists. Israeli Judeo Orthodoxy and Saudi Wahhabi Islamist fundamentalism two sides of the same Semite coin of religious intolerance, and Saudi Wahhabi follow Jewish dietary habits and practice circumcision. Both Semite Jewish Israel and Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia based on the novel principle, designed by British Colonialism that religion could be the basis of a new state, primarily to disintegrate Ottoman Empire. Damascus Jews polished the militant Islam in 7th century to profit by the conquest and rape of Christian Egypt and Libya, by Bedouin Muslim raiding parties financed by Damascus Jews, and it created Islamic Empire. Jews and oil colonialism created the idea of Wahhabi religion as basis of Semite state of Saudi Arabia, which never existed in the history, based on the idea that religious sect can be the basis of a ethnicity based new state, outside the Islamic Caliphate. The interests of fundamentalist Israel and Wahhabi Saudi Arabia coincide, in the destruction of secular and militarist Iraq, the natural Arab challenger to the pretensions of Mecca Caliphate and Israel. The Protestant Neo-conservatives and American oil colonialism seized upon the military opportunity the 9/11 terrorist attacks presented to the Pentagon for the Eastward expansion of NATO to develop bases in Afghanistan and to include East European countries into expanded NATO, and to secure American control over the Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India oil and gas pipeline. American Big Oil seized upon the 9/11 attacks to plan the direct occupation of Iraq, to establish American oil colony over Iraq, the countries having world’s 2nd largest oil reserves. Israel lost its military edge against Muslim suicide attacks and faced with the specter of sovereign Muslim State of Palestine thought it prudent to exploit the 9/11 attacks to lobby for waging wars of American oil colonialism in Afghanistan and Iraq. American Big Oil after establishing permanent oil colony over Iraq, would no longer need the continued support of the Wahhabi House of Al Saud royal family in Saudi Arabia and may give a green signal to its pet dog Osama Bin Laden to overthrow the monarchy of Saudi Arabia so that western banks could loot $500 billion assets and property of the Saudi royal family, to repeat the loot of the Pahlalvi monarchy of Iran after the 1979 takeover by Ayatollah Khomeini. United States provided safe passage to Al Qaeda terrorists and Osama Bin Laden from Afghanistan, either because King Fahd blackmailed America or the CIA wanted Osama under control to use him later for the overthrow of the Saudi royal house. The American conquest of Iraq would result in the Wahhabi rule over Iraq and victory of Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over secular, liberal Islam. However, the democratization of Iraq, might give kiss of death to the Wahhabi monarchy of Saudi Arabia and Wahhabi Sheikhdoms in Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Yemen, Qatar and Bahrain. However, in the unlikely event that Saddam’s Iraq defeated or repelled American aggression would mean death warrant to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. America’s victory in Iraq could mean the downfall of the Mullah’s Iran to reestablish the regime of the son of former Shah of Iran. The masterpiece “Protocol of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion” talked about the proverbial snake and the hidden hand of the real ruler of the world. The cataclysmic 9/11 attacks caused more than $ 2 trillion damages to the American economy, and deterred American retaliation against Saudi Arabian Wahhabi terrorists, to avoid getting the second Wahhabi terrorist strikes against United States. Osama Bin Laden proved that Untied States is powerless against Saudi Arabia. The 9/11 resulted in American conquest of Iraq, and subsequent American colonial conquest of either Iran or Saudi Arabia. Diplomats and policy makes must study the 9/11 terrorist attacks very seriously, to find out who ordered it and who planned it and who profited by it, if they want to avoid the second recurrence of the similar attacks by the same or similar perpetrators against American or other world civilization in near future. Every suspicion should be investigated to its logical conclusion and no body should be exempted from the investigation, because the fate of world civilization depended on the successful prosecution of the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks. It is said that Dr. Henry Kissinger didn’t head the committee to investigate the intelligence failures on 9/11 attacks. The Big Conspiracy that led to 9/11 attacks gave a glimpse of the power of the Big Fraud as the non-military weapons of mass destruction. Unless United States could find out the identities of the real hands and minds of the 9/11 Conspiracy, it would continue to be led by nose under the control of the hidden hand of the real rulers of the world, the proverbial snake that threatened to eat the vitality of the America and the other world civilizations. American ingenuity and Protestant neo-conservatives successfully exploited the great tragedy of 9/11 into great diplomatic opportunity and used 9/11 tragedy to justify America’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. To American Big Oil Colonialism the 9/11 terrorist attacks proved godsend blessing in disguise that allowed United States embark upon American wars of oil colonialism under the disguise of American war on terrorism. May be America would reward Osama Bin Laden by recognizing Osama as King of Saudi Arabia.

 

Global Frauds as Instrument of Diplomacy

Big financial frauds became instruments of foreign policy in developed countries by virtue of their impact on global flow of world capital. The Services sector as percentage of the Gross domestic product represented during 1999 for United States (72%), China (33%), Japan (61%), India (46%), Germany (36%), France (72%), Britain (63% in 1990), and Russia (58%). The United States had in 1999 the GNP ($8.7 trillion) contributed by agricultural sector (2%), Industry (26%), manufacturing (18%) and services (72%). In 1999, sector wise contributions to India’s GNP was, Agriculture (28%), Industry (25%), Manufacturing (16%) and Services (46%). In 1999, the sector wise contributions to China’s GNP was Agriculture (17%), Industry (50%), Manufacturing (24%), and services (33%). The financial services contributed very significant part of the GNP in the services sector’s contribution of (72%) towards the GNP of United States, and the revelations about rampant corporate accounting frauds perpetrated during 1990s raised the doubt whether the estimated $8.7 trillion GNP could be over estimated by $2 trillion or by more than 25% of the total GNP. The leaders of American Big Oil and Big Money are governed by sheer greed not bound by rules of morality and since are self-governed by regulatory agencies, led and governed by representatives of the American corporations, get away with simple reprimands or small fines for Big Frauds and Big conspiracies so long it helped American economy by attracting foreign capital to Untied States. It would not be out of place for the Big Money to plan big conspiracy if it could net billions of dollars profits for any of them. Money talks and bullshit morality walks, in the corporate corridors of Big Money in United States especially Manhattan New York. Every American corporation is ready for the big game, if they could pull it, and the moral issues do not come into consideration. The mantra of the American Big Money is: If you can pull it off and get of the hook, then do it before someone else preempts you and walks away with the loot. The question to discuss is whether someone could have planned the Big Fraud or Big Conspiracy and made money with it? No American Big Money would walk away from any big money making opportunity, if they pull it off, without going to the jail, and the notion of morality doesn’t come into their mind. Successful swindlers like Enron, even when to the extent of providing consulting services to other corporate giants for their fraudulent financial wizardry.

 

Lloyd’s of London Profitable by 9/11 Attacks

The 9/11 terrorist attacks became a windfall for the Lloyd’s of London and it made its first profit in six years, in 2002 the year that followed the 9/11 attacks. Lloyd's of London, the Insurer, Reports First Profit in Six Years in March 2003. The Lloyd's of London, the international insurance market, on 3rd March 2003 reported its first profit in six years, reflecting a surge in insurance prices since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and a sharp decline in the organization's payments for claims. Lloyd's said earnings for 2002 rose to $1.34 billion from a record loss the 2001 year of $4.5 billion. That loss came largely as a result of the attack on the World Trade Center. Revenue from premiums rose 8 percent, to $17.17 billion, while claims costs fell 36 percent, to $10.7 billion. Lloyd's of London’s results for 2002, contrast markedly with rival insurers in Europe and the United States in the commercial insurance business, as German, and Swiss and other European insurers had to pay the brunt of the World Trade Center insurance claim of $3.5 billion that could balloon to $7 billion, payable to Larry Silverstein, of Silverstein Properties, the main lease holder of 99-year WTC lease, signed just 14 days before Sept. 11, ‘01. Lloyd's reported losses of about $8 billion at the World Trade Center by 9/11 attacks, more than any other insurer, but it expected to recoup two-thirds of that from other European insurers. All the insurers have been benefiting from price increases that resulted after the Sept. 11 Wahhabi terrorist attacks. But the earnings of the other insurers, particularly in Europe, have suffered from big declines in their investments. They have also been paying out more in claims than expected, partly because of floods in Central Europe last spring, but also because of under pricing and lenient terms. Part of the explanation for Lloyd's improved results is that it is now turning away some of the riskiest business. If the price is right and the exposure is quantifiable, Lloyd's is still happy to write it. But if the price isn't quite right and it is getting a lot of other insurance business, Lloyd’s going to be taking that before it would look at the stuff that's a little more on the fringe. Lloyd's was forcing into arbitration six big insurers that have refused to pay claims related to the organization's central fund, its reserve against extraordinary losses. Lloyd's reported increasing its reserves as claims from previous years appeared to be moving higher than expected. In its reorganization, Lloyd's is imposing greater controls on the companies under its umbrella. Lloyd’s is encouraging other corporations to finance the insurance at Lloyd's in contrast to the thousands of individuals who traditionally had supplied the bulk of its capital. The Sept. 11 attacks helped Lloyd’s of London and Travelers insurance become more profitable and European insurers felt the brunt of the losses.

 

Corporate Frauds helped USA’s GNP

Corporate accounting frauds helped American economy and the rampant fraudulent practices were widely known to the ruling elite that wise looked the other way because it invariably helped attract foreign capital to the Wall Street and strengthened dollar during the period of growing foreign debt and adverse balance of trade. The corporate accounting frauds at major American corporations immensely helped by artificially pushing Dow Jones Industrial average index by at least 4000 points and increased the valuation of American GNP by at least $2 trillion, out of the estimated $8.3 trillion in 2002. Had accounting frauds and fraudulent evaluation of American corporations not been a norm during 1990s the United States might not have enjoyed during unprecedented prosperity during Clinton Administration. The accounting frauds perpetrated by the major American corporations, namely, Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, with the active connivance of large Accounting firms like Arthur Andersen, didn’t represent the aberration but the norm of Corporate America, and in many ways helped America rather than harm it by artificially pushing the DOW JONES Index and valuation of United States GNP and GDP. The accounting frauds artificially increased United States GNP to $8 trillion otherwise it would have been around $6 trillion only and the Do Jones Industrial Average would have hovered around 6,000 only. The Wall Street, American Banks and US Treasury profited by the accounting frauds perpetrated by the major American corporations that allowed World com show profits of billions, when it reality it suffered losses. The fact that these large scale frauds could be openly executed with the involvement of thousands of employees over many years, gives birth to the doubt that some one might have conspired the 9/11 terrorist attacks, to justify the eastward expansion of NATO and to establish American oil colony over Iraq. Whatever harms the Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing and Arthur Andersen caused to the economy would get reimbursed with the incomes of the loot of the Iraqi oil in the decades to come, once American oil colony is established in Iraq. American continued to sweep up the world’s capital, aided by the artificial valuation of the fraudulent WorldCom, Enron etc. and America could justify the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq because of 9/1 terrorist attacks. Perhaps US Senate award the honorary medal to the genius that planned and implemented the 9/11 terrorist attacks, simply to entice that villain genius to come out in open with the hope of gaining recognition as hero genius, so that he may not do it again without others knowing about it.

 

33(vii) Larry Silverstein’s $ 7 Billion WTC Insurance Claim

The Semite Wahhabi terrorists launched the terrorist attacks on the recently leased Semite property in New York that resulted in the profits of $7 billion for Semite beneficiary of WTC insurance claims, who had inked the lease only 14 days before the Sept. 11, 2001. The Semite owned Travelers Insurance emerged as the lead underwriter for the WTC insurance, which might turn out to be crucial for Larry Silverstein get the $3.5 billion claims two times to total $7 billion. It might make the Semite owned Citigroup the owners of Travelers Insurance happier, as this big award might make American insurance giants taller than their Swiss, Austrian and German rivals, incidentally the countries that perpetrated Holocaust. The Britain is happy as the increase in the insurance premiums made Lloyd’s of London profitable for the first time in 6 years. Does it matter that Semite Prince Talal of Saudi Arabia is the leading investor in the Citigroup. Muslims wonder why 4000 Jews stayed at home on Sept. 11 ’01. Black Congressmen wonder that Jewish controlled media hyped the America’s war on Iraq to enhance the security of Israel faced by Palestine suicide bombers.

 

Was 9/11 a Zionist Insurance Fraud?

Within a month after Amiri Baraka, a black Muslim, whose original name was LeRoi Jones, became the poet laureate of New Jersey, he recited a poem in Sept 2002, at the renowned Dodge Poetry Festival in Waterloo, NJ. The poem also asks:

“Who knew the World Trade Center was

Gonna get bombed

Who told 4000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers?

To stay home that day

Why did Sharon stay away?

 

On 9/11 Semite Saudi terrorists attacked Semite-owned property in New York and made its Semite owners richer by $ 7 billion. If WorldCom, Enron, Global Crossing could pull off multi-billion dollar accounting frauds with the direct consent of Accountants, the Arthur Andersen, it is not beyond the realm of possibility that Larry Silverstein could have been part of the conspiracy that tempted the Semite Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks of 9/11. Semite Silverstein, Sandy Weill and Semite Osama Bin Laden emerged as principle players in the events that followed 9/11 and the subsequent events enhanced the power and security of Semite Israel and Semite Saudi Arabia and Big Oil. Semite Larry Silverstein invested less than $100 million just 14 days before the 9/11 attacks and he stood to gain $7 billion in insurance claims windfall, and the Semite-owned lead insurance carrier Travelers supported Silverstein’s claim that he is entitled to two claims of $3.5 billion each. Skeptics wonder that whether Semite Larry Silverstein, who signed the 99-year lease on the Twin Towers just 14 days before 9/11, and who stands to gain more than $3.5 to $7 billion may have anything to do with the Semite Wahhabi hijackers attacks on World Trade Center. In these days of insurance frauds and accounting frauds anything could be possible. In the age of rampant insurance fraud it is possible that the lessee may have thought of the crash of the building, by means simpler than the airplane crash. The direct or indirect involvement of the beneficiary of the insurance windfall cannot be ruled out, without proper investigation. In recent years the Lloyds of London went to the brink due to the barrage of large fraudulent insurance claims.

 

Insurance fraud is commonplace in New York and many companies make their living by over-insuring property and then arrange accidents that cause fire. Husband becomes a prime suspect in the murder of the wife, if husband had been the beneficiary of the life insurance policy. Larry Silverstein became a prime suspect by the fact that he was the prime beneficiary of the $7 billion claim, when he had invested less than $100 million of his own money, just a few months before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. The emergence of Travelers as the lead insurance company added the spice to the story, especially when the Saudi’s accused Zionists to have a secret hand in the disaster. Investigations for insurance frauds in any murder case works on premises that the violent murders might have been prompted by lure of insurance claims. Larry Silverstein been the only real beneficiary of the Sept. 11 attacks and he could end up reaping a profit of over $7 billion, while he had invested less than $50 million of his own money for securing the 99-year lease of the WTC towers. Larry Silverstein and his attorneys have created a 'post-loss fiction' that a Travelers form was the lead policy form in the placement. The number of claims should not be governed by number of impacts on the buildings but the fact they were part of a single plan to bring down the towers. A large gang of terrorists simultaneously setting off bombs on each level of the World Trade Center" would have allowed "hundreds" of claims, under Silverstein's theory. Insurers Harbor Group and Westfield were unaware of Travelers' emergence as the lead underwriter is not surprising. The Travelers Insurance group owned by Citigroup, and Sandy Weill owns the Citigroup. Larry Silverstein the prime beneficiary of the insurance claims, the lead insurance company’s owner Sandy Weill, and the Saudi perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks all belonged to the Semite race. The 9/11 attacks led to the American invasion of Afghanistan to establish American oil colony, and subsequently to American invasions of Iraq, to establish American oil colony over Afghanistan and Iraq. To provide safe passage to Osama Bin Laden and Wahhabi Taliban fundamentalists was the real motive of America’s war on Afghanistan. The Wahhabi Saudis would become power brokers in the post-Saddam Iraq. The 9/11 attacks resolved the problem of Palestine terror attacks and eliminated the specter of the independent Islamic Palestine state in Israel. Saudi leaders accused Zionists to conspire the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Could there be a conspiracy?

 

Larry Silverstein, developer who controls World Trade Center lease, is portrayed in brief filed by Swiss Re, largest of 23 insurers of trade center, as coldly choosing strategy calculated to reap most money possible from catastrophe while ruins of trade center were still smoldering. Silverstein conferred with battery of lawyers, lobbyists and public relations strategist Howard J Rubenstein before settling on what Swiss Re describes as 'self-motivated hoax' that Silverstein is entitled to insurance coverage for 'two events. Larry A. Silverstein, the developer who controls the World Trade Center lease, has fought for the past 17 months with his insurance companies, argued that there were two terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, requiring a double payment, nearly $7 billion, for the rebuilding effort.

 

US District Court Judge John S Martin rules multimillion-dollar battle over insurance claims at World Trade Center that would be decided during two separate trials; jury trial scheduled to begin on Nov 4, 2002. It would determine whether attack on trade center represented two separate occurrences, entitling Larry A Silverstein, developer who leased complex, to double payment totaling $7 billion; Silverstein would get only half amount if jury determines that attack was single event; second trial would set damages, although ruling against Silverstein in first trial would make that unnecessary. The multibillion-dollar battle over insurance claims at the World Trade Center will be decided during two separate trials, Judge John S. Martin of United States District Court ruled Thursday. First, a jury trial scheduled to begin on Nov. 4 2002 will determine whether the attack on the trade center last September represented two separate occurrences, entitling Larry A. Silverstein, the developer who had leased the huge complex, to a double payment totaling about $7 billion. Mr. Silverstein would get only half that amount if a jury determines that the attack was a single event.

 

Lloyd's and other London-based insurers joined the legal fight over the insurance of the World Trade Center, adding their weight to the insurers' case that the destruction of the Twin Towers merited only one insurance claim. The filing supports Swiss Re, Travelers Property Casualty Corp. and a group of other insurers in their fight against Trade Center leaseholder, Larry Silverstein. Lloyd’s Underwriters at the 300-year old insurance market, who took on a small portion of the $3.5 billion (2.42 billion pounds) Twin Towers property insurance policy, filed a brief with a federal US appeals court, saying the attack could only be interpreted as one event as a matter of law. Silverstein's case for two claims is based on a "result-oriented" interpretation of New York insurance law, relying on third-party liability insurance, rather than first-party property insurance. The number of claims should not be governed by number of impacts on the buildings but the fact they were part of a single plan to bring down the towers. A large gang of terrorists simultaneously setting off bombs on each level of the World Trade Center" would have allowed "hundreds" of claims, under Silverstein's theory. Silverstein's approach would yield "absurd results" if adopted as law. The parties cannot have intended that the caprice of the hijackers would control the insurance consequences of the loss. The attacks on the Twin Towers on the morning of September 11, 2001, were near enough in time, place and intent to be considered only one event for insurance purposes, the brief concluded.

 

World Trade Center leaseholder, Larry Silverstein claimed twice on his $3.5 billion policy, saying the two hijacked jets hitting the two towers were two separate events. The matter was heard by a federal appeals court after a federal judge in New York refused Silverstein's motion for a summary judgment. Silverstein parties valued the full replacement cost of the insured location at approximately $3.945 billion," the Lloyd's brief said. "At the same time, they chose to insure the entire property as one insured location for $3.546 billion. Larry Silverstein hired litigation experts and developed a legal theory designed to create coverage for twice that amount against a single, coordinated terrorist attack destroying that single insured location."

 

Silverstein did not underinsure the WTC complex. Silverstein purchased coverage on the four WTC buildings in the amount of $3.5468 billion "per occurrence." This may well represent the largest amount of insurance coverage ever purchased on a multi-building real estate complex. By contrast, the Port Authority carried only $1.5 billion "per occurrence" on all of its properties (including the four WTC buildings) before leasing these buildings to Silverstein for 99 years. Recovery of two policy limits would not be a "windfall" for Silverstein. The insurance companies sold Silverstein "per occurrence" coverage. In doing so, they took the risk that two separate "occurrences" might result in the destruction of the Twin Towers - thereby subjecting them to liability for two "per occurrence" limits. That's simply the way "per occurrence" coverage works, as these sophisticated insurance companies well understood. Having taken that risk and lost, the insurance companies are now scrambling to find ways to convince the courts and the public that what the whole world saw on Sept. 11, 2001, two separate planes hitting two separate buildings causing two separate fires that led to two separate building collapses, was somehow only one "occurrence" and they should only pay one-half of the coverage for which they contracted. New York insurance law provides that, in determining the number of occurrences, courts are to look to the immediate event that caused the insured's injury, and not some earlier event in the causal chain. Thus, under New York law, there were two separate occurrences on Sept. 11, claimed Silverstein.

 

Silverstein’s risk manager Robert Strachen had filed for only one claim and didn’t mention the need for second claim. Perhaps the lead insurer Travelers could be favorable to Silverstein’s idea that he should get two claims. Silverstein's risk manager, Robert Strachan, reportedly was simply mistaken when, on Sept. 12, he faxed the WilProp occurrence definition to the Port Authority's counsel with a note referring to it as the "Willis policy that we are working with." The reasons for Strachan's mistake can be found in the circumstances. Strachan had no part in the actual negotiations, which were left entirely to Willis. Moreover, because he had been out for surgery for a period of some ten days at the end of August, Strachan had lost touch with the state of negotiations between Willis and Travelers. And along with the rest of the nation, Mr. Strachan experienced the events of Sept. 11 with horror and shock. He suffered the loss of four of his co-workers the day before at the World Trade Center. Distraught relatives besieged the Silverstein offices seeking information about their loved ones. In this context, Mr. Strachan's error is understandable.

 

The Port Authority reportedly concurs in Silverstein's position that Travelers is the lead policy form and that, under that form, the insured are entitled to recover for two occurrences. That Harbor Group and Westfield were apparently unaware of Travelers' emergence as the lead underwriter is not surprising. They, too, were not involved in the policy negotiations and left this detail to Willis. Swiss Re once again makes the baseless accusation that Silverstein and his attorneys have created a 'post-loss fiction' that a Travelers form was the lead policy form in the placement.

 

33(viii) Breakup Citigroup

BREAKUP CITIGROUP CARTEL: The system of checks and balances and system of separation of power guarantees the freedom and democracy in the United States. The wall that separated the Insurance Industry, Retail Banking Industry, and Broker Dealer Investment Banking Industry protected the United States from the crash of the Stock Markets. Robert Rubin had used his campaign raising capabilities to become the Treasury Secretary in Clinton Administration, and thereafter used his political position to change laws to allow the merger of Retail Banking Industry giants with giants in Investment Banking and Insurance industry. Mr. Rubin became the person to profit by this new law and joined the Citigroup in top slot as Co-Chairman. This is a clear case of conflict of interest. This resulted in the crash of stock markets in 2001 and 2002. The 1920’s stock market crash resulted when, banks converted bad loans into bonds, paper and stocks of the new companies they promoted, which became worthless in the crash. The owners of major privately owned top Wall Street firms sold their stakes in the firms to public entities and cashed out, to avoid liabilities of investors’ claims from DotCom bust. In the age when WorldCom could declare profits in billions, which never existed, then similar epidemic of bad loans, concealed by bad accountants likes of Andersen fame, could result in trillion dollar bad loans, which may cause Japanese bank type crash in the American economy, to force America bend on its knees. The resignation of Co-Chairman John Reed, former Chairman of Citicorp, in February 2000, a Protestant by belief signals the decline of the power of Protestants in the WASPs’ United States and consolidation of the Semite grip over Wall Street. Citigroup should be broken up, because what is the guarantee that it may not meet the fate of Enron, World Com and Andersen. It would be sad if the banking group Citigroup meltdown comes during the second Bush Administration, to repeat the $200 billion bailout of failed Saving & Loans banks during his father President Bush’s earlier Administration. The principle of Separation of Power should apply to breakup the Citigroup financial monopoly in Banking, Insurance and broker Dealer industry. The prosecution of Martha Stewart’s for insider trading, while serving as Governor of NYSE, suggests the policy of self-regulation in the financial industry shows signs of cracks. Citigroup cartel has the financial capability to conspire $1 trillion fraud, and its consequence could bankrupt American economy.

 

Break-up Citigroup To Save USA

The Citigroup conglomerate result of merger of large Insurance company Travelers Group, large bank the Citi Corp and large Investment Banking and Securities Broker Dealer could threaten the national interests of United States, if it fell in the hands of the crooks, like those who defrauded WorldCom, Enron, Andersen, etc. The system of Separation of Power and Checks and Balances defines the polity of the United States, and similar Separation of economic power of Insurance, Banking, Broker-Dealers and Accounting alone could restore the faith in the US economy. The legislation passed by Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin becomes suspect, since he became the sole beneficiary of these legislative horse trading. The resignation of Co-Chairman John Reed, former Chairman of Citicorp, necessitates the need to breakup Citigroup. If WorldCom could show profits in billions of dollars, which never existed, then how can we be sure of the Citigroup’s financial Statements? Only Separation of Economic Power of Insurance, Banking, Broker-Dealer and Accounting industries would function as the capitalist Checks and Balance in the Free Enterprise world. If the control of the Citigroup were to fell under the some Hidden Hand of the Unknown World Ruler then it can manipulate the capital markets to force United States to bend on its knees, in spite of its being the sole super power of the world. Why should 200 million non-denominational Protestant Christians allow a select group of individuals, so much economic power and leverage, which could threaten the financial future of the WASPs United States?

 

In the days of global economic interdependence and the free flow of capital, the consolidation of Insurance, Retail Banking, Investment Banking, and Securities Broker Dealers under any single corporate entity, such as Citigroup presents unprecedented dangers to the United States and to the American economy. The Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin during Clinton Administration passed the necessary legislation to break the wall that separated the Insurance industry, Banking industry and the Broker Dealer Industry. The motives of Secretary Treasury Robert Rubin are suspect as he arranged the necessary legislation and then left his job in Clinton Administration to join Sanford Weill in the Citigroup.

 

The resignation of Co-Chairman John Reed, former Chairman of Citicorp, in February 2000, a Protestant by belief signals the decline of the power of Protestants in the WASPs’ United States. Protestants are losing the grip over financial levers of power in the United States. Protestants are losing tug of war to Jews in the financial world. Employees from Travelers Group, which merged with Citicorp in 1998 to from Citigroup, had taken the most important jobs and the control of the global organization had been thoroughly concentrated in New York. A handful of the individual senior managers, with multiple responsibilities have become more powerful and almost all of them are trusted aides of Chairman Sanford I. Weill from long before Citigroup. The former Protestant employees, especially those from the former Citicorp, have a perception that the highest echelons of the Citigroup are now closed to them because of the dominance of the Jews in Citigroup, who are systematically engineering the exit of the Protestants from top echelons.

 

The financial monopoly of the Citigroup threatens the well being of the United States, more than the monopolies of the Microsoft operating system. Judge Jackson did a yeoman’s job in ordering the breakup of the Microsoft. The breakup of the Citigroup would help the Wall Street. Co-Chairman Robert Rubin, former investment banker, misused his fiduciary powers when he encouraged the passage of legislation that allowed the mergers of large banking, securities and insurance companies. People accepted the merger as Citigroup was to be managed jointly by Jewish-Protestant co-Chairman. Hoping to cash his political favor, Robert Rubin, former U.S. Treasury Secretary, joined Citigroup in 1999 as Co-Chairman. Until February 2000, Jewish Sanford I. Weill ran the Citigroup conglomerate jointly with Protestant John Reed. The elimination of the power-sharing arrangement that originally existed at the very top of the Citigroup organization ended when Protestant John Reed, the former chief of the Citicorp forced to retire, due to conspiracy hatched by Mr. Weill. The fiduciary separation of banking from speculative Securities industries, and insurance got undermined; Chairman Sanford I. Weill monopolized the moment corporate powers. It is the proverbial case of foxes guarding sheep and chicken.

 

Protestant Bill Gates should not be singled out for punishment for Microsoft Monopoly, when Semite-led financial monopoly of Citigroup, Semite-led diamond cartel of De Beers, and Semite-led OPEC Oil Cartel are given free hand to exploit the world and enrich the ruling political elite of the Western world. The Citigroup has acquired the power to bring down the economy of the United States. It is dangerous for any single company to have so much financial power, in Insurance, Retail Banking, Investment banking and Broker Dealer industry. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The Travel Insurance group, and the Citi Corp group should be separated from the Investment banking division. The System of Separation of Power and the System of Checks and Balances that defines American political process must also define the American capitalist economy.

 

The Soviet Union collapsed, financially because Russian Mafia, Bolshevik Jews and American Russian Jews transferred more than $200 billion capital from Russia to Western banks, causing liquidity crisis in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Why should white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, allow one financial cartel hold financial nuclear weapon, which theoretically can bring American economy to its knees. When crooks could cooks books at Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing with the active connivance of the world’s top six accounting firm Arthur Andersen, there could be no guarantee that similar conspiracy may not occur sometime in future in the Citigroup. Why should the financial fate of the United States tied up with the morality of the select person controlling the Citigroup, especially after the forced departure, and the resignation of Protestant Co-Chairman John Reed, former Chairman of Citicorp? The management of the top financial cartel of the United States, Citigroup should undergo managerial changes to put in place the system of checks and balances. The breakup of Citigroup into separate companies out of Insurance division, banking division and broker-dealer Investment banking division, would put in place the separation of financial power of Insurance, Banking and Investment Banking industries. During President George Herbert Walker Bush Administration (1989-1993) the $200 billion bail out of failed S&L Banks shook the economy, and unless the Citigroup is broken up then President George W. Bush Administration perhaps $1 trillion financial scandal may take place to undermine the very foundation of the America’s economic dominance. Why should certain select group of people have so much power giving them resources, which if misused could destroy American stock markets and American financial markets? Even if the present owners have good intentions, does it guarantee the motives of their successor? If the breakup of the Rockefellers and AT&T served public good, then the breakup of Citigroup would serve greater national interests.

 

The Hidden hand of the Elders mentioned in the Protocols could be conspiring to militarily disturb the existing social and cultural system and destroy the old order in India, Peru, Colombia, Congo, Uganda, Sudan and South Africa. The hidden hand destroyed Russian monarchy, Ethiopian monarchy and Tibetan theocracy. It destroyed Buddhism in Burma, Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam, and China. Four Cartels-Diamond, Cocaine, Oil, and Religion- have emerged as the four beasts threatening the future of multi-ethnic United States, in the coming elections, during to the escalating costs of the media in elections, which forces politicians to sell their soul for campaign donations and vote banks. Would rising cost of elections, doom the idea of democracy itself? The economic collapse resulted in the collapse of Communism in Soviet Bloc.

 

33(ix) Zionist Cabal & Iraq War

Jewish Cabal and its supporters in Bush Administration were so intent on the Iraq War they cooked their books and intelligence. Jewish Cabal couldn’t wait and wanted immediately Iraq War because of the escalating suicide booming attacks in Israel, which threatened the continued existence of the Jewish State of Israel. Protestant neo-conservatives control the policy making of the Bush administration. From the times of Secretary Henry Kissinger the Christian Religious right conservatives and Neo-conservatives joined forces with the American Oil Colonialism to conspire new American Empire in the aftermath of the 1975 defeat in the Vietnam War and 1964 Bill of Rights. Jewish Orthodoxy convinced the pro-segregation and Christian religious right conservative conspiracy that they are more royalists than the king and would promote the interests of American empire and American oil colonialism more effectively than their Protestant counterparts, because of their control of the financial markets and the media. Neo-conservatives are the political forces in America and Israel that demand the Iron Fist as the answer to all problems. The Neocons are at the highest levels of the American government. No body can argue that US State Department filled with "Arabists" who hated Israel. The top officials and advisors in the Bush Administration are all NeoCons. Some like Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser actually worked for Israeli think tanks, writing papers on how the U.S. and Israel should take apart and reconstruct the Middle East. Extreme Christian religious right wing forces and extreme Jewish right wing forces and their powerful American financial backers and American Big Oil pushing President Bush to invade Iraq and other oil-producing countries to establish American oil colonies. Disarming Iraq is only a start in Middle East. The Arab and Iranian cultures were irrational and that nothing could be done to “improve the collective mental health of Arab societies," to wean them from terrorism. Wahhabi Arab countries should be given a stark choice: they can have sovereignty or jihad in its secular or religious forms, but not both. To tame and neutralize Islamic terrorism, United States can legitimately invoke the right for preemptive strikes on terrorist targets in the Islamic world. President Bush justified in invading the Middle East's most hostile and deranged regimes, Wahhabi fundamentalist regimes, whose citizens launched 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, namely, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen and UAE. Preemptive strikes to establish American Oil Colony in Iraq not justified, because not one Iraqi citizen participated in the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America. Preemptive strikes to establish Oil Colonies not justified, unless United States seeks to set new norms of International law, by allowing all great powers the right to establish oil colonies to guarantee the secured supplies of oil, necessary for their economic and industrial survival. The U.S. ruling class is overwhelmingly Protestant Christian and the Protestant fundamentalism that inspires it is Pat Robertson's evangelism, and Papal fundamentalism not Jewish Orthodoxy. Our argument is angry but precise. When the Left denounces Sharon we mean Sharon. When Congressman Moran assailed an obvious foreign influence he didn’t allege some all-powerful secret plot, as described in the Meetings of the Protocols of the elders of Zion. Neither Protestant neo-conservatives nor American oil colonialism would undermine the economic interests of Big Oil to promote the geopolitical interests of Israel, however it may express its oil interests defined in terms of the survival of Israel.

 

When Congressman Moran and like condemned Israeli apartheid and Jewish domination of American media and financial markets, they denounce the Jewish superiority in controlling the campaign donations to influence the electoral outcomes in Federal and state elections, not the idea of Zionism or that Jews should only live in Israel and should not enjoy every human right, including the right to become the President of the country they settled in, even when they represent only 2 percent of the population of America. Congressman Moran with that owed it to Americans to tell them the whole truth, that part of the President Bush’ war drive against is being fueled by a wacko militarist clique from Jewish Israel and its interlocking bands of American Jewish and Christian supporters. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is not delirious for the war on Iraq, as only after Iraq leveled the Palestinians will give up hope for independent Palestine State. Zionist lobby wants Untied States to destroy the secular liberal regimes of Lebanon, Syria and to destroy the principal challenger to Wahhabi Saudi Arabia the Ayatollah-run Iran. Ariel Sharon forgets that terrorist attacks in Israel won’t stop unless Wahhabi clergy lost their power base in Mecca & Medina and Wahhabi Al Saud monarchy overthrown in Saudi Arabia.

 

Rep. Jim Moran on Jewish Lobby

Rep. Jim Moran and Pat Buchanan should be complimented for their courage and dedication when they pointed out the harm the Zionist Cabal doing to United States. Jews have no right to shut them up. It is insane to hurl the charge of anti-Semitism at them. If Jews start calling patriots like Re. Jim Moran and pat Buchanan as modern day Hitler, then they are doing great service to Hitler, by making him praiseworthy in the United States. It is very true that if it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, United States would not be doing this war on Iraq. One simple glance at any Jews-owned newspaper in United States would prove the argument Jim Moran and Pat Buchanan made against Zionist Cabal. The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough in the United States that they could change the direction of where this war on Iraq is going and US lawmakers think that influencing Jewish community has every right to influence the policy making of the White House over Iraq, and they should exercise their right.

 

Secretary of State Colin Powell told a US House Appropriations Subcommittee that the drive to compel Iraq to disarm stretches back over two administrations and 12 years of United Nations resolutions. It is driven by our own national interest. US policy "is not driven by any small cabal that is buried away somewhere, nor by a small group of individuals. Among the US goals are helping the U.N. to "do its job" and concern for the Iraqi people. The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jim Kolbe wanted to clear up media suggestions that American supporters of Israel and Israel itself were driving US strategy. Rep. Jim Moran apologized for making comments asserting that influential leaders of the Jewish community were pushing the country toward war with Iraq. The northern Virginia Democrat Rep. Jim Moran remarked at a March 3 ’03 forum at a local church that Jewish support for war with Iraq was helping the administration move toward an attack. Moran, 57, told a crowd of about 120 people: "If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq we would not be doing this. The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going and I (Moran) think they (Jews) should."

 

It is true that Jews control the foreign policy of the United States. United States could become a real danger to the world, if a Jewish President gets elected as the president of the predominantly Protestant United States, in the 21st Century.

 

Can Zionist Cabal Rule Oval Office?

An immensely wealthy and powerful American Republic hijacked by a small cabal of individuals. Wherever you look in the Congress there are the telltale signs either of the Zionist lobby, or the right-wing Christian Conspiracy, or the military–industrial complex, three inordinately influential minority groups who share hostility to the pagan world, unbridled support for American Oil Colonialism, Military coup leaders, and an insensate conviction that they are on the side of the angels at war against forces of evil. President Bill Clinton once described the Zionist lobby as stunningly effective and better than anyone else lobbying this town Washington DC. Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker labeled Zionists the most effective general interest group across the entire planet. If the Zionist lobby did not exist, America would have to invent it. Rep. Richard Gephardt believed that if it weren’t for the Zionist lobby fighting on a daily basis, the close relationship between America and Israel would not be. Senator McCain argued that Zionist lobby has long played an instrumental and absolutely vital role in protecting the interests of Israel with the American government. Zionist lobby is like most political conspiracies, a set of concentric circles within circles. The two innermost circles are known as the President’s Cabinet and the Chairman’s Council, whose members take part in special events with members of Congress in elegant Washington locations. President Jacques Chirac agreed that the American Jewish Committee is the most important and powerful Jewish organization in the United States.

 

Congressman Moran argued on March 3, ’03 that the Jewish lobby is encouraging America to seek war with Iraq. Pat Buchanan believed that a cabal of polemicists and American public officials are colluding with Israel to ensure that our country (United States) in a series of wars that are not in America’s interests. It is wrong for Jewish lobby to unite and deny the rights of Rep. Jim Moran to expose the threats Jews pose to the security of the United States, by calling for Jim Moran’s removal from Congress and forcing DNC to marginalize and condemn him. What if Rep. Jim Moran is right, as were many detractors of Secretary Henry Kissinger who suspected the role of certain secret cabal in the genocide of 2 million Buddhists in Cambodia, camouflaged under the name of Khmer Rouge? The Protocols of the Meetings of the elders of Zion outlined the existence of such a Cabal, which may no in final analysis by Jewish, but some other group that used the name of Jews. In the interest of the security of the United States one should study the possible conspiracy, involving small cabal of individuals, representing the inter-mingling and conflicting interests of Zionist lobby, Christian religious right conservatism, Neo-conservatism, Military-industrial complex, Big Oil Colonialism, Diamond & Oil Cartel, and the Papacy. It is morally wrong and undemocratic to condemn Congressman Moran, or Pat Buchanan with anti-Semitism i.e. a hatred of Jews for their faith, heritage, or ancestry. The truth is, those hurling these charges harbor a passionate attachment to Israel a nation different from United States and they act on an assumption that, somehow, what’s good for Israel is good for America. Why should one believe that somehow there is a confluence of national interests between Protestant-majority secular America and Jewish theocratic Israel? Zionist Cabal might have conspired the President Bush’s war on oil-rich Iraq, and the liberation of Iraq would be the first of a series of wars in the Middle East that could ignite the Clash of Civilizations, a war many believe would be a tragedy for Protestant American Republic, and undermine the Axis of Monotheism developed between Vatican and Mecca.

 

Arab Press Accused Jews of 9/11 Attacks

That 4,000 Jews escaped harm Sept. 11. A Canadian "intelligence expert said that U.S. intelligence agencies have found "links" between the attacks and the Mossad. The "reported absence" of Jewish fatalities suggested that "word had come down to them through some mysterious grapevine simply telling them not to go to work that day,"(James Cox, Chicago Sun-Times, Sunday, September 30, 2001, page 6A)" Iranian Parliament Chairman Mahdi Karrubi charged that Zionists in Israel plotted the terror operation in order to blacken the faces of the Muslims. 'Jews were warned to stay home. The claim that Jewish employees were warned not to come to work at the WTC on Sept. 11 was quickly accepted by the Arab media as incontrovertible fact. Syrian ambassador to Tehran Turky Muhammad Saqr said at a conference held at the Iranian Foreign Ministry: "Syria has documented proof of the Zionist regime's involvement in the September 11 terror attacks on the U.S." and that "4,000 Jews employed at the WTC did not show up for work before the attack clearly attests to Zionist involvement in these attacks." The Iranian daily Kayhan also referred to this "fact": "It is known that 4,000 Jews worked at the WTC in New York and that these people did not come to work that day." A comprehensive article in Egypt's Al Ahram by Ahmad Abu Zayid, titled "The Jews Are Behind the Explosions in America," submitted 14 "pieces of evidence" that Israel and the Mossad were involved in the Sept. 11 attacks and it asserted many claims published in other media, including a stock sell-off by Jews two days before the event and that "no Jew was hurt in the incident." Did federal investigators "arrest a group of Jews who set up video cameras on the roof of one of the Israeli companies across from the WTC a little while before the incident, in order to film the moment of the explosions? Arab leaders accused that Zionist elements knew what was about to happen on Sept 11, 2001.

 

Clash of Civilization

Samuel Huntington and Zbigniew Brzezinski joined efforts to promote the "Clash of Civilizations" resulted in a well-thought-out plan, to goad United States to take the leading role in forming a new global imperium, to crush the nation-state system. The two leading architects of this imperial America policy, from the 1930s onward, were William Yandell Elliott, the Harvard mentor of Henry Kissinger, McGeorge Bundy, Huntington, and Brzezinski; and Robert Strausz-Hupe, the Austrian-born geopolitician who founded the FPRI to promote his draft of American empire dogmas. The nexus of think-tanks and tax-exempt foundations that are devoted to the promotion of this American empire policy, particularly the drive for Huntington and Brzezinski's "Clash of Civilizations." The 9/11 attacks failed to provoke the "Clash" on Sept. 11 and forced them to push for a broadening of the Afghan operations into "Phase II" attacks against Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and other targets. The "Phase II" operation took into effect at the start of the American military campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein in Iraq. It could result in the Christianity and Islam religious war in the center of Eurasia? It could break up the emerging Russian-American partnership. It could drive the United States into the arms of "breakaway ally" Sharon's Israel, and against the entire Arab and Islamic world. Arabs are not capable of such long-term strategic planning, such precision, such synchronization, such coordination, such faultless implementation, and such brilliant inventiveness as 9/11 terrorist attacks on United States.

 

33(x) Franks’ Iraq War Doctrine

Pacific War Strategy Applied to Iraq War

Gen. Tommy Frank’s strategy to advance troops via uninhabited areas to launch attacks on the urban centers succeeded in winning the war with limited manpower, but after victory seriously undermined the control and occupation of Iraq by Occupying Powers. Tommy Frank made victory in Iraq so easy that President Bush thought there was no need to share the Oil loot with other great powers. President Bush failed to entice India into Peacekeeping efforts because India want not invited much earlier and didn’t have any role in the conquest. Had President Bush realized the difficulty in post-conquest occupation of Iraq, he might have given India bigger slice of the Iraqi oil loot to persuade India send bigger Peacekeeping troops to Iraq. 

 

Had Iraq exploited the military advantage the sudden desert storm presented to destroy the immobilized water-less and food-short American troops, the American invasions of Baghdad would have met the fate of invasions of Moscow by Hitler’s or napoleon’s armies. Iraqi General Desert Storm would have inflicted defeat to the American troops in the deserts of Iraq, no less spectacular than the defeat Russian General Siberian Winter gave to the Nazi troops and Napoleonic troops during invasions of Moscow. Gen. Tommy Franks got the victory over Baghdad not by his application of Naval strategy adapted to desert warfare, but by adopting time tested primitive desert warfare strategy to surround metropolises to cut of the water and food supplies. American armed forces by forcing surrender of Baghdad by starving it would not prove the might and valor of America, even if they succeeded in the conquest of Baghdad in Iraq, the nation with an population of only 20 million, during Gulf War II. Had Saddam Hussein not removed its troops from Kuwait, during 1991 Gulf War I and forced urban warfare on American troops, America would have failed to retake Kuwait without the loss of numerous American lives and the total destruction of Kuwait city. Iraqi has learnt the lessons of Kuwait war and would fight battle for Baghdad ferociously.

 

American strategy to hop past cities to Baghdad by crisscrossing deserts, applying the naval strategy followed in World War II by Adm. Nimitz strategy in Pacific theater was a wrong military application, even if it resulted in the victory of the American troops. The naval war principles cannot be applied to the desert warfare simply because desert dwellers and holed up guerrilla forces and conventional troops don’t need ships, to sally forth and harass or destroy the enemy supply lines, especially water tankers, oil tankers and food trucks. The vulnerable, water-short and food-short American troops stranded in the vast 300-mile desert route could have died during desert storm had Iraqi troops the courage to attack immobilized American troops during the desert storm. Just because Iraqi generals were stupid enough and Iraqi troops lacked courage to make the frontal attack on the frontlines and the extended supply lines during the desert storms, did not make the wrong application of the Macarthur & Nimitz’s Naval strategy to Iraqi desert the correct strategy. The Second World War lessons of desert warfare in Libya cannot be applied to Baghdad because Baghdad unlike Tripoli lied 300 miles inland from the seaport.

 

American war Commander Gen. Tommy Franks evoking legendary General Macarthur, hopped past cities to Baghdad through uninhabited desert lands lying southward Euphrates between Karbala and Kuwait. Right from the start, the question arose: Should America capture cities that lied en route Kuwait to Baghdad between Euphrates and Tigris, or bypass them by directly waging through uninhabited deserts between Kuwait and Iraq and cross the Euphrates River near Karbala? Gen. Tommy Franks decided that America should not wage wars through the inhabited part of the Iraq, between Euphrates River and Tigris River. Was this Franks’ policy to crisscross deserts akin to Macarthur and Nimitz’s policy to land in only selected Japanese controlled Islands, only where it would have provided bases for air attacks to Japan. American infantry didn’t need to capture selected token cities to provide bases for the air war on Baghdad. The extended supply line through desert could become vulnerable to the guerrilla attacks against water tankers and oil tankers, where a single bullet fired from desert location 2 miles away could burst the oil and water tanker.

 

In 1971 Egyptian Israel War the Egyptian troops exploited the surprise attack of Yom Kippur to cross Suez Canal and thrust deep into the Gaza Peninsula. Israeli General simply used its air force to cut the supply route of the Egyptian army and Egyptians had to surrender with their tongue hanging out, even when their military ammunitions were not destroyed. American expeditionary force had the problem of water shortage and food shortage in their frontlines. The food ration reduced to one packet a day instead of three packets a day. Iraqi troops would have done some major damage had they exploited the food and water shortage in the forward deployed American troops immediately after the desert storms. Saddam Hussein failed to exploit the military advantage the desert storm had provided. Iraqi troops should have attacked American troops while the desert storm raged. Iraq failed to profit by the godsend gift of desert storm.

 

Geopolitics determines the war strategy. Geography is destiny, and military strategy is the child of geography, and geography heavily conditioned the way American forces and their British allies fought their way into Iraq. Most of western and southern Iraq is uninhabited desert, superbly suited to armored and mechanized units, and commanders have taken advantage of that to speed north toward Baghdad. But nearly three-quarters of the Iraqi people live in cities, many of them in the fertile Tigris and Euphrates valleys between the Kuwaiti border and the capital.

 

American Gen. Tommy R. Franks adopted a strategy similar to that followed in World War II by Gen. Douglas Macarthur and Adm. Chester W. Nimitz, who hopped from island to island in the Pacific theater of War on Japan. Those Islands deemed essential of American strategy of securing naval bases, like Saipan, needed as a base from which Japan could be bombed, were attacked and captured at heavy cost of American lives. American Navy bypassed many other Islands in the Pacific Ocean where Japanese were well entrenched, leaving them to "wither on the vine, in Macarthur’s memorable phrase. Gen. Macarthur and Adm. Nimitz strategy of bypassing numerous Islands paid off because Japan had not bothered to invade Australia and New Zealand. Had Japanese Navy occupied Australia and New Zealand after the attack on Pearl Harbor then Japan would have avoided the defeat of Japan in the Second World War. Even after the occupation of Saipan and heavy bombardment of Tokyo and other metropolitan cities, Gen. McArthur and Adm. Nimitz would have failed to land in mainland Japan.

 

Allied troops fought the German Roemmel troops in Libya where Tripoli was a seaport. Baghdad located 300 miles from the Basra port. The desert route of 300 miles away from the cities and inhabitations could make desert supply route vulnerable to desert storms and General Desert Storm could cause discomfort to the American invasions troops, like the discomfort General Siberian Winter gave to the Napoleon and Hitler. General Desert Storms could foil the extended supply line of the Yankee invasion of Baghdad, much like the role General Siberian winter played during the invasions of Moscow. Treating Iraqi cities en route Kuwait to Baghdad like Islands of Pacific, misses the basic point that the Camel riders can disrupt or ambush the smaller groups of supply groups not escorted by mechanized troops. The desert route of the 300-mile long via-desert American supply line could become the graveyard of the American troops, if desert dwellers succeed in destroying the water tankers and oil tankers. Deprived of water, the American soldiers if cut off from escorts could die faster in desert by thirst in the desert stretch between Kuwait and Euphrates than the German and French armies died by Siberian cold and snow retreating from Moscow.

 

The desert cities are not similar to the isolated Pacific Islands. The laws of Naval warfare could be disastrous when applied to land wars especially desert wars. Treating cities like islands and the vast desert like the sea, General Franks' forces have sought to make the empty sands their ally by speeding north toward Baghdad and avoiding pitched urban battles. America avoided fighting in close quarters, which is almost inevitably slow and bloody for the combatants but also because it necessarily involves heavy civilian casualties.

 

If Americans are good fighters then they should enter Baghdad, while allowing food, water and electricity to besieged city of Baghdad. If America had to starve the Baghdad to submission, then it would be known as the victory of Saddam Hussein and defeat of the so called American Army. American victory over Baghdad by long siege of Baghdad, and by cutting off its electricity, water and food supplies would go down in the military annals as the defeat of American arms. Throughout history the besieged city, whether Christian Byzantine or Christian cities of ancient Egypt, Syria of 7th Century, besieged by Muslims who surrounded the city and cut off the food and water supplies, ultimately succeeded in conquering the besieged city. If Gen. Tommy Franks failed to fight urban warfare in Baghdad and instead surrounded Baghdad to starve it into submission, would not translate into the victory of the American arms and valor. United States followed the typical Arab desert warfare tactics to surround the metropolis and cut off its food and water supplies. Even otherwise the United Nations Oil for Food programs supplies food for over 60 percent of the population. America wanted to defeat Saddam Hussein not by engaging Iraqi troops in urban warfare but by starving Baghdad by cutting off electricity, water and food supplies.

 

There is no way Saddam Hussein could have defended vulnerable Baghdad Airport from American troops. With the arrival of lead elements of the Third Infantry Division at Saddam International Airport, American officers warned that no all-out assault on Baghdad was imminent. The initial American goal is to cut the Baghdad city off from the Iraqi countryside so that it becomes "almost irrelevant, said Gen. Richard B. Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. American doesn’t have the stomach for infantry warfare. The tanks and Humvees could become the sitting ducks for Iraqi troops equipped with Russian anti-tank guns and rocket propelled grenade launchers. Iraqi could bring down the legendary Black Hawk, with small arms from their rooftops. America hoped that with the fewer civilian casualties, the greater the chances that large numbers of Iraqi civilians, especially those opposed to Saddam Hussein and Iraqi Shiites opposed to the rule of the Arab Sunnis, will surrender, making street-by-street combat unnecessary in Baghdad.

 

But it is much easier for Iraqi conventional or guerrilla forces holed up in bypassed cities, namely, Basra, Najaf, Karbala, and Al Kut to sally forth and harass the American enemy than for Japanese that were left on a bypassed island. Iraqi wouldn’t need ships to harass the American enemy; the Iraqi guerrilla forces could make good use of the Iraqi buses, trucks, and even pickups to hit the water, food and oil tankers of the extended American military supply line. So the Franks strategy carried risks. The long supply lines stretching back to Kuwait was vulnerable to attack, and this risk to long supply lines intensified by the American decision to begin the invasion of Iraq without the American armored cavalry regiments intended to screen exposed American forces, which are only now on the way to Iraq.

 

It was stupid on part of Saddam Hussein to vacate Kuwait without forcing Americans to lay siege of Kuwait City. Air superiority would have failed to dislodge Iraqis entrenched in Kuwait without destroying Kuwait City. The 1991 Gulf War I might have caused great hardships and loss of American lives had Iraqi dug in for long siege of Kuwait city and challenged American troops for urban warfare combat. Had Iraqi troops not vacated Kuwait during Gulf War I, President Bush would have failed to entrenched Iraqi troops from Kuwait, without causing huge losses for American troops and total destruction of Kuwait. Saddam Hussein made the stupid mistake in vacating Kuwait. It would stupid on the part of Iraqi troops entrenched in Kuwait that they would be able to survive the 100 mile long drive on the Kuwait-Basra Highway. Iraqi can effectively use the cities for urban warfare and guerrilla warfare. Even before the fighting began, Iraq's deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, warned that fighting in the cities would exact a heavy price on American lives. He told the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London: "People say to me you are not the Vietnamese, you have no jungles and swamps to hide in. I reply, `Let our cities be our swamps and our buildings be our jungles." The military strategy to use cities as the jungles ideally suited for urban warfare in Kuwait in 1991 Gulf War I.

 

The American objective of taking over Baghdad, before conquering other Iraqi cities en route, could backfire, if Iraqi troops and Iraqi militia could summon the courage to attack the water and oil supply vehicles en route from Kuwait to Baghdad. The allies have made changes to meet unforeseen problems, but the goal remains the same: get to Baghdad with the fewest possible distractions, destroy Saddam Hussein's regime and count on remaining forces to collapse. If you're looking for a big land push in World War II terms, with artillery pieces lined up wheel to wheel, you're not going to see it. Pressure, nuance, subtle pressure and some very unsubtle pressure were applied at different times to shatter the Saddam regime. At different times America had successes or lack of military successes. So America adjusted its military strategy, but all American actions designed to shatter the Saddam Hussein regime. American Forces diverted where necessary to beat off attacks by Fedayeen and other irregular Iraqi forces on the long American columns snaking across the desert or along highways.

 

Precision Guided Munitions in Iraq War

In land warfare the adversary occupying the higher grounds enjoyed the tactical advantages over the armies operating in the lower grounds. The GPS guided Precision Guided Munitions allowed Air force drop weapons from 36,000 feet high and the GPS signals guided the smart bombs to their targets, usually within yards of its designated target. The PGMs dropped from airplanes flying higher than the range of anti-aircraft guns would drop bombs that would hit the targets with uncanny accuracy. The Orbital power translated into terrestrial might and it is the ultimate high ground in warfare and allowed Air force to negate the advantages infantry enjoyed in regions far away from the seacoast. Before the Russian low-cost GPS jamming devices made their entry into the Iraqi war, and succeeded in misdirecting numerous American Tomahawk cruise missiles and JDAM Smart bombs, the Pentagon thought that America’s lead in PGM’s could translate into American Empire. The Precision guided Munitions made US Air Force highly lethal, though the Russian recent innovation in GPS jamming devices unnerved Pentagon military planners and the dominance of PGM equipped Air force ended before it had the time to translate this innovative military innovation into the creation of American Empire.

 

Advances in electronics and space-aided warfare increased the American military's flexibility, speed and precision. Iraq is the laboratory that will show the depth and effectiveness of the shift. The information revolution has fundamentally changed the nature of combat. To win wars today, you must first win the information war. Orbital power translated into terrestrial might. It's the ultimate high ground. The Persian Gulf War in 1991 drew heavily on spacecraft, since then, the American military's reliance on satellites soared. The expanding fleet of GPS satellites now empowering dozens of new weapons and tactics on the battlefield. And there is more to come. "America had 12 national-security space launches scheduled for 2003, compared to only one conducted in 2002. Before the war in Iraq began, the US Air Force launched into orbit a one-ton, $200 million satellite meant to speed communications between Pentagon defense officials and battlefield commanders. It joined an orbital fleet that is quietly making this war different from all others. Scores of satellites are providing coalition forces in Iraq with an invisible web of communications, guidance, reconnaissance, weather forecasting, missile warning, target acquisition and damage assessment. Orbital power translated into terrestrial might and it is the ultimate high ground in warfare. However, the overwhelming advantage that the United States currently enjoyed in space-aided warfare could lead to detrimental overconfidence. Military Gadgets cannot subdue dust storms or fight door to door. History shows that even outgunned troops can fight back. Overconfidence and over-reliance on military gadgets could precipitate military disasters on the battlefields, while fighting wars with adversaries using less advanced weapons.

 

The navigation satellite also called the GPS Satellite guide the Predator Pilotless Airplanes and the Tomahawk Cruise Missiles. A GPS Satellite, on March 10, 2003 a $200 million part of the information war blasted into space from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The spacecraft, an element of the Defense Satellite Communications System, joined a network of 10 that provide the American military with secure high-speed voice and data transmissions among forces on land, in the air and at sea. The GPS Satellite costing $50 million each made by Lockheed Martin, the craft now orbits above the Indian Ocean. Such satellites, in addition to linking troops and commanders, are performing new missions like relaying signals between ground controllers and Predator Pilotless Drones and Unmanned Aviation Vehicles (UAVs). In Iraq, military commanders used Predators to scout ahead behind Iraqi enemy lines. Military Satellites also proved their value for processing and disseminating surveillance images. During the 1991 gulf war, such images often moved slowly by fax machine that frustrated military planners eager for the fasted and latest reconnaissance surveillance video images. Now surveillance images flies effortlessly in 2002, and in 1991 Gulf War I America couldn't do that. On another front, the satellites of the military's Global Positioning System have nurtured a revolution in exact bombing, and ushered in the new age of Precision Guided Munitions. Each of the system's 24 satellites constantly beams radio signals to the earth and the Receivers on the earth ground compare the signals coming in from three or four different satellites to calculate their geographical position on the earth with great precision, usually within yards. The US Air Force launched one GPS satellite into space in January 2003, and sent up another one in March ‘03, bringing the number of orbital spares and workhorses to 28, each worth $50 million. The navigation satellite is a guiding force behind Tomahawk cruise missiles, which have a range of about 1,000 miles. Tomahawks cruise missiles costing $1,000,000 each have spearheaded waves of bombing in this Iraq War. The Tomahawk missiles, made by Raytheon and launched from ships or submarines, are propelled first by a rocket launcher, then a jet engine. For guidance during the 1991 gulf war, a missile would compare radar ground readings with a stored digital map and make course corrections while zooming toward the target. Now, Tomahawks also have GPS guidance and along the route, the missiles receive signals from as many satellites as possible and adjust their courses to hit the moving target with much higher efficiency.

 

Failure of American Blitzkriegs in Iraq

Pentagon mistakenly believed that Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs), and JDAM smart bombs would transform the volunteer Yankee Army of young Americans with no military experience into the fearsome Mongol Army that had created the world’s largest Empire, the Mongol Empire. The foolhardy military planners embarked upon Iraqi war hoping that it would be an easy win and like the 1258 Mongol conquest of Baghdad, Yankees would easily shock and conquer Iraq and Saddam Hussein and impose regime change over Iraq. The new military innovations allowed American army to defeat adversaries, even when Americans were outnumbered, as military gadgets allowed American army to strike unannounced at any place of it’s choosing. The smart weapons allowed American attack to take place out of nowhere. What were the tactics the Mongols used in the 13th and 14th centuries? Mongols were far ahead of most of their opponents in terms of military technology, training and leadership, and most importantly, the Mongols seemed to come out of everywhere, all of a sudden and took the enemy unaware. Mongols often fought outnumbered and won the wars. Mongols carried extra 3 or 4 horses and tied dummy effigies to give an impression of larger size invading force. The Mongol ruse survived as the PsyOps in American military doctrine. Mongol Psychological warfare worked then and it worked numerous times during World War II, both for and against the Germans and it worked again in Iraq, when pentagon succeeded in projecting the American Army consisting of young kids into a formidable force.

 

No way could American kids fighting their first war could emulate the military skills of fearsome Mongol Warriors that allowed Mongol Army to create the world’s largest Empire that extended from China to Danube River, and included whole of Russia, most of East and Central Europe, Iran, Iraq, Syria and except India most of the civilized world. The 21st century techno-horde expected to use a lot of gadgetry, smart bombs, electronic warfare, and night vision equipment to go after the enemy night and day for weeks. It would take remarkably robust and determined Iraqi defenders to survive shock of American air warfare and heavy bombardment and Iraqi armed forces are not known for being robust or determined, even in the best of times. In order to minimize American casualties in Iraqi war, the American military campaign would be fought over much longer period of time, because Iraqi would not readily surrender. This would give the Iraqis more time to react and it would also enable American ground commanders to advance more methodically.

 

The 2003 Gulf War II would be long drawn out war and very unlike 1991 Gulf War I and 2001 Afghanistan War. Iraq War might not become the Vietnam for Americans it would definitely be the Lebanon. If Russia and Iran agreed to supply weapons and financial support to the Iraqi rebels, just as what the CIA gave to the Mujahideens in Afghanistan, then United States occupation troops in Iraq could meet the fate of Soviet Union’s Afghanistan. During the 1991 "Hundred Hour War," Americans could have marched on Baghdad, and taken it, in a few days, after Americans had slaughtered Iraqi troops on the Kuwait-Basra highway, after Iraqis had foolishly vacated their positions in Kuwait city and jumped into their trucks and raced towards Basra. The tactics to be used in Iraq during 2003 Gulf War II will be somewhat different than what was used in 1991 Gulf War I. Gulf War II will be faster, with a shorter air campaign. The JDAM smart bombs have the ability to hit targets without any help from a ground observer with a laser designator. The JDAM smart bombs do not need any input from the pilot except to drop the bomb close enough to the target so the GPS guidance can guide the bomb directly to the target. In spite of the enhanced JDAM bombs the American air bombing campaign failed to paralyze the Iraqis.

 

Gen. Tommy Franks pushed American troops through the empty desert lands of southern and Western Iraq to push the forward columns towards Karbala to make a frontal attack on Baghdad. Right after the ground attack started American armored columns advanced out of Kuwait, Marines landed from aircraft carrier based helicopters or from the sea via landing craft. Army air-mobile troops couldn’t fly from Turkey in helicopters to seize bases and airfields in northern Iraq. American aircrafts drop Rangers and commandos via parachute on key Iraqi targets. All of this activity was a tricky business, but it's the sort of thing that the American armed forces had been working after 1970s. During 2002 under the garb of UN weapons inspection much information was collected on the state of the Iraqi armed forces, and which Iraqi commander would fight, and who might not fight. America contacted less warlike Iraqi officers with offers to surrender promptly once the war began, but was dismayed to find there had been no surrenders. Even some of the hard core Republican Guards were known to be uneasy about dying for Saddam. With the initial ground attack American troops thought they should have seized as many military targets as possible, and as quickly as possible.

 

Baghdad has suffered the damage more than the damage the Allied bombers inflicted on Dresden in Second World War even then American troops delayed frontal attack on Baghdad fearing colossal American casualties. America attacked Iraqi air bases and wherever Iraqi ground units are stationed. Since American air force the attacked during night, it bombed and destroyed many of the vehicle parks, where Iraqi trucks and armored vehicles are kept. In such an attack, a second wave of bombers dropped cluster bombs, equipped with small anti-personnel mines, to discourage Iraqi soldiers from rushing to save vehicles undamaged in the initial bombing. The "no fly zone" warplanes cranked up their bombing of the Iraqi air defenses, before the big attack, the initial American bombing hit numerous anti-aircraft site. Americans valued surprise so hitting military targets airfields, military vehicle parking lots was done at the same time before the Iraqis could disperse the vehicles to residential areas. Americans wanted to attack only during the second phase the Republican Guard, and any other units still loyal to Saddam, and Baghdad. Americans bombed around the clock, and Special Forces, commandos and CIA teams on the ground constantly searched out new targets (like SCUD launchers and chemical weapons units for the bombers overhead to hit. American thought that the Iraq war would be like easy victory in Afghanistan, where Northern Alliance soldiers did most of the fighting.

 

Israel wanted America to get sucked into war in Iraq so that Iraq and Syria might lose their capability to support Palestinian suicide bombers. Zionist Cabal miss fed information about ground realities in Iraq, in their eagerness to get America involve militarily in Iraq to establish American oil colonies, so that Israel might diffuse its problem of Palestinian suicide bombers. American miscalculated that depending on how many Iraqi units could be convinced to surrender ahead of time, the first phase of the ground war was supposed to end in a few days, with most of the Iraqi armed forces either bombed or prisoners. American deployed thousands of American armored vehicles and hundreds of helicopters prowling around, looking for resistance to crush. Americans miscalculated that Iraqi resistance organizations, including a large Shiite one based in Iran would oppose Saddam Hussein’s regime and betray Muslim Iraq to make Iraq a colony of Christian United States. American planned the whole Iraqi operations as if the Iraqi regime would surrender and the Iraqi people would welcome the foreign invader and even help the occupation troops maintain order in conquered areas. The whole idea of American war strategy was to paralyze the Iraqi ability to resist by destroying key units, the ones most likely to fight and scaring the hell out of the rest. This sort of military fiasco is nothing new as military strategist frequently underestimated the military war fighting capability of its adversaries. .

 

33(xi) Regime Change’s Strategy

Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte’s policy of regime change to impose a puppet regime of his brother Joseph Bonaparte bled French Empire, similarly President Bush’s policy of regime change to impose Wahhabi puppet regime in Iraq to establish American oil colony over Iraq, might destroy the moral foundations of American Empire and bleed American white and result in the ouster of Wahhabi House of Al Saud from Saudi Arabia instead. President Bush might bleed America white in attempting regime change in secular non-aligned oil-rich Iraq to placate American oil colonialism, Zionist cabal and Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate. Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte bled French army white in attempting regime change in Spain by placing his brother Joseph Bonaparte on the throne. The French attempted to siege the complete country of Spain into submission and to accept regime change, much like what President Bush attempting to do in Iraq. President Bush in effect, would establish American oil colonial administration over Iraq after the conquest. However, the Spanish resisted from 1808 to 1813 until Spanish guerrilla's forces and Arthur Wellesley and English and allied forces finally pushed Joseph Bonaparte out of Spain in 1813. Usually a siege is lost once the morale of those besieged runs out - this moral collapse may be brought about by physical and/or psychological means. Invaders might starve the enemy out during the siege or make the enemy feel isolated even if he had sufficient means to hold out for a long time. The Concert of European powers pooled its military resources to boot out the Joseph Bonaparte from Spain.

 

Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu indicated that a siege of a city is one of the worst strategies. President Bush determined to pursue "regime change" in Baghdad to impose the direct American colonial administration over Iraq then American war strategy should include urban warfare in Baghdad and siege type battle. Depending upon the amount and type of resistance Saddam's regime is able to muster to oppose American aggression. Assuming Saddam Hussein is able to get Iraqi armed forces and Iraqi militia to resist an American armed invasion and fight to protect their cities and homes, history has shown that America could be heading for siege warfare in Baghdad. Unlike the first Gulf War of 1991, where Saddam's forces manned fixed positions in the desert allowing the U.S. led coalition to execute a war of air domination and armored mobility, in 2003 Gulf War II America may have to fight a siege type battle against Iraqi forces holed up in Baghdad, a sprawling city of about five million people. Can the Pentagon successfully besiege Baghdad to force regime change? But, American does not have any other choice. Pentagon felt that embargo, and isolation didn’t work since the first 1991 Persian Gulf War. If Saddam adopted a city-siege defense, his soldiers and civilians would fight and many would not surrender as they did during the 1991 first Gulf War in Kuwait, when Iraqi troops vacated Kuwait without any fight.

 

Iraqi suicide attacks against American civilian administrators and colonial occupation troops would cause more damages to American will to fight than attacks on American armor and tanks. Just as Jews of Israel became mortally scared of Palestinian suicide attacks that the very continued existence of Jewish state of Israel came into doubt. Palestinian uprising mainly carried out by bombing attacks against Israeli civilian targets as a means of breaking the enemy morale and willingness to continue suffering the losses and thus evacuate the contested territory. Iraqi suicide squads would undermine the morale of the civilian American colonial administration and American Big Oil companies.

 

Defenders have a disadvantage over invaders during sieges, as invaders can encircle the city and cut off the water and food supplies. Many sieges have turned out successfully, namely General Grant's siege of Vicksburg during American Civil War, the Roman siege of Masada, Vietnam's siege of the imperial French in Dien Bien Phu. Only when the invaders used superior land forces to impose the sieges, the sieges resulted in the victory of the invaders. The French were besieged within their fire-bases in then French Indo-China in the 1950's and were surrounded by General Giap's Viet-Minh peasant forces that managed to surprise the French by manhandling siege artillery through the jungle to high ground and surrounded them. When the US supporting the French refused to provide additional aid, the request included nuclear forces, the French surrendered.

 

Air superiority failed to establish sieges on the ground. America’s air superiority failed to impose siege of the North Vietnam. Americans had air superiority in Vietnam, yet the North Vietnamese were able to continue using the Ho Chi Minh trail to keep their forces supplied. America’s air superiority would fail to impose siege of Baghdad on the ground. American air superiority would fail to stop Iraq keep Baghdad supplied with basic needs, even if American cut of electricity and water supplies. Nazis had used the night and stealth to supply their armies in Normandy, even when the Allies enjoyed complete control of the skies. The Allied air superiority was so complete yet, the Germans continued to fight on in France until the closing of the Falaise Gap and their headlong retreat northwards into Holland and Belgium. Saddam Hussein would keep Baghdad supplied with essential food and supplies as the American troops would fail to impose the encirclement of Baghdad during the night. However, many sieges have also been withstood and the besieged parties turned out to be the winners. The air superiority historically failed to cut off the food, water and weapon supplies to the besieged cities and the defenders emerged victorious after the siege. Defenders have a disadvantage over invaders during sieges, as invaders can encircle the city and cut off the water and food supplies. America’s claim for victories over Iraq would be hollow and temporary, if Pentagon stole victory by starving Baghdad into submission.

 

American foolhardy allowed Pentagon to hope that the Iraqi people would desert Saddam Hussein and not fight on the behalf of Iraq, but instead welcome the American imperialists as liberators freeing them from a reign of Saddam’s tyranny. It turned out to be an American pipe dream, marketed by Zionist cabal in their desperate need to compel America invade Iraq to protect Israel from the menace of suicide bombers.

The North Vietnamese Communists impressed upon their Buddhist Vietnamese population to resist the Christian American invaders openly and sometimes passively. Adolf Hitler could raise patriotic fervor among Germans to fight even when it became clear that victory was unattainable, simply to uphold the glory of Germany. The Russians were able to motivate their soldiers to attack the Nazi Germans, not always but a good deal of the time, by threatening them with execution from behind by their own sergeants. Although killing your own troops may appear counter-productive it has often proved decisive means "pour encourager les autres". The policy to kill deserters practiced by most armies during the First World War, and, to a lesser degree, in the Second World War.

 

Saddam Hussein apply this tactic to encourage all Iraqis to fight American colonial troops seeking to put Iraq into chains, and to establish American oil colonialism in oil-rich Iraq, to loot Iraqi oil? Iraq's only real option was to force the Pentagon adopt the policy of sieges in Baghdad. Iraqi’s cannot maneuver their armies as Pentagon had complete air superiority even at night, and Iraq didn't have the dense jungles like Vietnam to shield Iraqi supply lines. Iraq’s only option was to hole up within Baghdad and hoped to outlast the sieges while Russia and France negotiated the ceasefire. Iraq’s strategy would be to hold out, tire the American enemy, and then use raids against American troops operating suicide squads from Baghdad and, if possible, from outside, and cause the American enemy to suffer enough casualties that American might realize that the cost to achieve victory was higher then American public was willing to pay for the goal of regime change and imposition of puppet regime and colonial oil administration in Iraq.

 

Baghdad siege could become the Stalingrad for Americans. It would be impossible for Americans to completely seal off the Baghdad city and cut off its food and supplies from adjoining suburbs especially during night. American troops patrolling the large perimeter of Baghdad would be vulnerable to snipers lurking in the shadows. Gen. Tommy Franks wanted to encircle Baghdad and cut it off from rest of Iraq, to make Baghdad irrelevant for the American colonial administration. Iraq would be better adopting a Stalingrad type approach, which would minimize Pentagon's greatest assets in air superiority, and expose their weakest links heavy casualties and loss of American combat soldier lives, to attacks by Iraqi suicide squads. Iraq has a population of approximately 23 million with the majority concentrated into 20 cities with populations of over 124,000, ten of those being greater then 500,000, the largest, Baghdad approximately 5.6 million. By hunkering down within his cities Saddam could absorb American infantry into them, and then, once they've been besieging the city for a long while and complacency has set in, he could try to sally out with his mobile formations - i.e. Republican Guard, or bring up relief forces from outside.

 

The question is: can Iraq withstand a siege? Could its geography, economy and population support a siege-busting strategy? Pentagon was mistaken in its hope is to have a quick, decisive campaign to oust Saddam Hussein, install a 'friendly' regime, and get the American boys and girls out of Iraq without suffering excessive casualties. Perhaps America might win easy victory over Iraq and many American pray that it would happen. However, Saddam's regime will put fierce resistance, because they are going to die if they do not defeat American troops. The plausible case is that Iraqi resistance during siege of Baghdad would become street-to-street fight, and Pentagon would find itself in a bloody war of attrition and loss of lives of American civilians and soldiers during the colonial occupation of Iraq.

 

33(xii) Iraqis Couldn’t Fight

Iraq submitted to American aggression and exposed the military weakness of the Islamic world, and this vulnerability might be exploited by Christian powers to establish the rule of Christians in Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya and Algeria. Failure of Iraq to fight exposed the military weakness of Islamic world. Except Turkey and Pakistan no Islamic country could ever become a military power. Either Turkey or Pakistan should muster courage to conquer oil-producing countries to reestablish Islamic Caliphate either under the leadership of Pakistan or Turkey. The military failure of Iraq exposed that no golden bird could ever fly free and must find the protection of the cage. If Pakistan and Turkey do not join India in establishing an Islamic Caliphate than India must join forces with China and Russia, or Germany and France to establish oil colonies in the oil-rich Islamic world. Military weakness of Iraq exposed the vulnerability of Islam and raised the specter that the religions that expanded by sword might die by the sword.

 

Slobadan Milosevic didn’t retaliate against NATO air war and Yugoslavian troops didn’t attack NATO troops in any sector of war. Iraq war cannot be compared to Yugoslavia. However, NATO air war on Belgrade and American bombing of Baghdad has lots in common. United States would use its political experience in installing pro-American regime in Serbia to install similar pro-American regime in Baghdad. Even if the pro-American Puppet Regime accepted America’s colonial occupation of oil-rich Iraq, the Iraqi rebels would be able to recruit a large number of suicide bombers and Mujahideens to destabilize colonial administration in Iraq. Perhaps Iraqis would hire Northern Alliance soldiers from Afghanistan to fight post-War American administration in Iraq, to make continued colonial occupation of Iraq less enticing and less profitable for the American oil colonialism.

 

Saddam Fedayeen Militia Can Fight.

That Iraqi can fight Americans as men to men came as a big surprise to American public, fed on Zionist propaganda that only capability Arab have is to beat their womenfolk like their fellow Wahhabi Saudi Arabians. Americans policymakers thought that Iraqi would be as coward and weak as Wahhabi Saudi Arabians. America troops had thought the Iraqi Muslims would be weak, cowardly Arabs, who could express their valor by beating their women, like the Wahhabi Saudi Arabians and Kuwaitis. That individual Iraqi militiamen would fight to death against invading American troops came as a big surprise to the American troops and pentagon policy makers fed by the propaganda of the Zionist-controlled American media that realized that unless United States invaded Iraq and Syria, the Palestinian suicide squads would decimate Israel into oblivion. Israel had the first hand knowledge of the ability of non-Wahhabi secular, nationalistic Arabs to fight to death, still they goaded United States into war in Iraq, suggesting that it would be a cake-walk for American troops. The most surprising development of the Iraqi war is the performance of Saddam Fedayeen, the militiamen. Despite their mediocre training, clearly inferior to Saddam Hussein's professional commando forces, they have managed to harass the American soldiers along the route to Baghdad. Performing their hit-and-run operations takes no great training, and certainly no training except courage needed for civilians to kill an allied soldier. Saddam Fedayeen pretended to surrender and became prisoners of war and then turned on their captors and killed them, the tactics Al Qaeda and Taliban POWs developed in Afghanistan. The audacity of Fedayeen troops was surprising, given the general character of this unit, consisting to a large extent of young men from the fringe of Iraqi society. The audacity of Fedayeen stemmed from fear of the consequences of the Saddam regime's collapse, as they are fully aware that if Saddam’s regime collapses, all Saddam Fedayeen are doomed, and they have little choice, then, but to make every imaginable effort to cause damages to American troops in Iraq. Extremely harsh, violent discipline of the Saddam Fedayeen militia made them ferocious soldiers, as during training if militiamen did not contribute, they expected harsh, violent punishment. The Fedayeen militiamen realized that their fate is tied with that of the Saddam regime, and if America won the war the Iraqi people would kill the Fedayeen militiamen. They fought valiantly because they knew that Americans would put them on trial for their crimes against humanity, even if they didn’t commit any war crimes. Fedayeen’s only route of escape seemed to fight America troops en route to Baghdad. The resistance to American forces from the Shiite-majority areas in Southern Iraq indicated that Saddam Hussein did a good job in reorganizing security and Baath Party forces, as well as mobilizing irregular militia forces like the Fedayeen. Saddam Hussein has also been busy indoctrinating the population, preparing his citizens for urban warfare. Saddam recruited a new militia, al Quds. Iraqi students from intermediate school to college are encouraged to join Baath-led paramilitary formations. Textbooks, even at the sixth-grade level, extol military virtues, instill militant patriotic nationalism and define patriotism as being ready to defend the homeland against foreign enemies, specifically the Persians, the Zionists and the United States. America faced a war of public diplomacy as well as a military conflict in Iraq. While virtually all Iraqis deplored the Saddam Hussein regime and wanted to be rid of it, they also wanted independence and were anti-imperialist and anti-American. If Iraqi could prove their war fighting capabilities then whenever they would regain their independence after decades of American colonialism, then might retaliate against Wahhabi Saudi Arabians and destroy evil Wahhabi cult from Arabian Peninsula. The survival of secular Iraq would mean the death of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. After gaining independence from American occupation troops, secular Iraqi would rise again and teach a befitting lesson to the barbarian fundamentalist Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. Unless United States destroyed Iraqi race and civilization, the future of Wahhabi Cult would become uncertain.

 

Americans Feared Suicide Bombers

Israel lost its will to fight faced with the spurt in the suicide bombing. Iraqi guerrilla could test the limit of American patience and valor if they resorted to the suicide bombing of the American occupation troops in post-Saddam Iraq. The explosion of a bomb in a taxi that killed four Army soldiers today at a checkpoint north of the city of Najaf stunned and angered American military commanders, who saw the division's war dead double in the suicide bombing. Americans don't know what motivated this guy to kill himself. To Americans this is not an act of war. It is terrorism: a man in a civilian vehicle killing himself at a checkpoint. It was the first successful suicide attack of the war. The suicide attack, which also killed the taxi's lone occupant was a significant escalation of the guerrilla tactics that Iraqi fighters successfully used to harass the American troops arrayed across central and southern Iraq and slow their advance on the capital, Baghdad. The bombing, which occurred around 11:30 a.m. local time, followed a recent lull in fierce fighting around Najaf, a city of more than 100,000 on the Euphrates River that the division encircled earlier this week to cut off Iraqi attempts to reinforce hundreds of paramilitary fighters there. Within minutes of the bombing, three other taxis tried to bolt through another Army checkpoint on the road into Najaf, but were destroyed by Bradley armored vehicles, which killed an unknown number of Iraqis. The soldiers that died in the suicide attacks part of the Third Infantry Division's First Brigade that quickly advanced deep into Iraq, reaching this flat scrub desert north of Najaf. But they then remained in Najaf since, as fighting continued on their flanks and at their rear. American soldiers voiced a sentiment common among soldiers at Najaf, expressed frustration not only at the tactics of Iraqi fighters, but at the slowdown in the military advance toward Baghdad. Suicide bombing would happen whenever American troops would just sit at one location.

 

It did not appear that those taxis were packed with explosives, but they might have been part of a coordinated strike at the edges of the division's defenses. It certainly happened near simultaneously. The Iraqis, he added, appeared to have adopted new tactics after suffering hundreds of losses in ineffective clashes with the armored units encircling Najaf. It seems like an act of desperation to launch series of suicide bombing attacks against the American army equipped with far better weapons. American soldiers captured many vehicles filled with explosives after rolling into Iraq, though it was unclear whether they were intended to be car bombs. Until now, suicide attacks had not been a tactic of Saddam Hussein's government in either this war or the first gulf war 1991. A paramilitary group called Saddam Fedayeen, however, includes a cell of fighters, shrouded in white, who have publicly declared they would launch suicide attacks against American invaders. The taxi that exploded in Najaf, like the other three was typical of those in Baghdad and other cities: a four-door sedan painted in orange and white checkerboards. At the checkpoint, guarded by armored vehicles and infantry soldiers, the taxi stopped before a barricade with a sign in Arabic ordering vehicles to stop, according to officers' accounts. The taxi's driver beckoned to the soldiers to approach. When four did, the taxi exploded. No other soldiers were injured in the attack. The driver, like many of the fighters encountered here in recent days, appeared to be wearing civilian clothes. Restrictions imposed on journalists traveling with the military prohibit discussing some details of military operations, including in this case the exact location of Najaf's bombing. Although Army forces occupy vast swaths of desert along the Euphrates, they have tried not to cut off all civilian traffic, trying to preserve a delicate balance between demands of military security and letting the Iraqi people get on with their lives. After Najaf’s suicide attack, that changed.

 

American forces had expected to encounter suicide bombers, but only when they moved into Baghdad and other cities, something they have avoided doing. American forces underestimated the determination of some Iraqis to resist. Many more Iraqis had a stake in Mr. Hussein's rule than Americans had anticipated. Regime existence equals their existence. Iraqis were defending their own way of life. After advancing so rapidly in the first three days of the war, the Third Infantry Division has ground to a halt, not only because of the fighting around Najaf, but also because skirmishes at the rear have forced delays in delivering ammunition, fuel and other supplies. At Najaf mail arrived late for the first time since the division left Kuwait, 11 days into the war, and American soldiers were warned that deliveries of bottled water may soon end, forcing them to use towed tankers they call water buffaloes.

 

No matter what kind of military power Americans can roll into Baghdad, if post-War American colonial Administration faced a hostile population, as American troops did in Mogadishu and Lebanon, the political scene could turn into a nightmare. Soldiers would be moving in a 360-degree battlefield with obstructed sight lines trying to pick out rebel targets and suicide squads from the pro-American civilian population determined to hide and shield the enemy.

 

In the battle of Baghdad and in the battle of post-War Iraq, information will be as important as guns and bombs, but only if the truth is what Americans hoped it would be. For Iraqis who distrust the United States, it will be a choice between their own local devil Saddam Hussein and the Great Satan of the World, the America. Each war develops an interior logic. Immediate trauma normally supercedes larger tyrannies, just as the fog of war plays havoc with general’s plans. Every civilian casualties and every death and wounding creates passionate new enemies whose anger eclipses politics. President Bush during 1991 Gulf War I encouraged Kurds and Iraqi Shiites to rebel and left them to alone when Saddam Hussein retaliated. Pentagon gathered all top five leaders of the leading five Kurd factions for meeting with the top American leadership, and that American fighter jets shot that transport helicopter down killing all the top five leaders of the Kurds, obviously to please Turks. In April 2003 friendly fire killed 12 Kurd leaders and the younger brother of the top Kurd leader. Neither Sunni Kurds nor Arab Shiites would trust Americans, fearing that America would dismember Iraq, just as it dismembered Yugoslavia. 

 

When American forces landed in 1992 to enforce United Nations humanitarian effort, Americans were greeted with smiles and gifts from the Somali people. Mohammed Farah Aidid, the most powerful of Mogadishu’s warlord, was not a popular figure, even within his own clan. But then the United States decided to pursue Mohammed Aidid and his forces began attacking and killing UN peacekeepers. Clumsy military attempt to capture warlord Aidid in the summer of 1993 left scores of Somalis dead or wounded and destroyed property. The people of Mogadishu quickly soured on their Western peacekeepers and the warlord Aidid’s repeated escapes transformed him into a local hero, the sly Somali David tilting with Goliath, and thousands of Somalis were ready to fight in the street to protect Aidid. The result was the debacle that left 18 Americans dead and American troops had to abandon Somalia.

 

33(xiii) Regime Change Serbia

The destruction of the Slobodan Milosevic’s Yugoslavia portends the dismal future for Iraq after the regime change in Iraq. White House arranged the cancellation of the elections of Serbia President because only 45.5 per cent of voters turned out, well below the legal minimum of 50 per cent. The results of Serbia’s second round produced a 66.7 per cent win for President Vojislav Kostunica, compared with 31.3 per cent for Miroljub Labus, the nominee of the party of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. Vojislav Kostunica, who defeated his rival in a second round run-off only to have victory snatched from him by the cancellation of the vote.

 

Yugoslavia Consigned to History

Yugoslavia was consigned to history on February 4, 2003 as the Yugoslav federal parliament met to complete the creation of a new Union of Serbia and Montenegro, sponsored by the European Union. The new state of Serbia and Montenegro replaced the rump of the once-proud federation of Yugoslavia, which imploded after the death of marshal Tito, due to the machinations of Pope John Paul II, who wanted the secession of Catholic states of Slovenia and Croatia to secede from the multi-religious Yugoslavia federation. During 1990s, more than a decade of war, atrocities and nationalist secessions that cost at least 300,000 lives. Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia obtained independence from Belgrade. In 1999 Nato bombed Slobodan Milosevic’s regime, which was swept away by a rigged election where the CIA inspired popular uprising October 2000, removed Slobodan Milosevic from power. This is the final act in the creation of the new country, Dragoljub Micunovic, president of the parliament, told deputies from both houses in Belgrade. MPs were expected to approve the final name change, which has been endorsed by the individual parliaments of Serbia, the dominant republic, and Montenegro. These were the last members of a federation that was founded by the Serbian royal family in 1921 out of an expanded kingdom of Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia with the aim of uniting the southern Slavs. After the Second World War the federation consisted of six semi-autonomous republics: Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro. The looser federation set up February 2003, was conceived in part to head off a drive for independence in Montenegro.

 

The CIA Cheated Kostunica Out his Victory

Serbia failed to elect a president on 14 October 2002 in a severe setback to the Yugoslav President, Vojislav Kostunica, who defeated his rival in a second round run-off only to have victory snatched from him by the cancellation of the vote. Observers suspect that the CIA influenced this decision to get Kostunica’s election nullified, because Americans feared that Kostunica was a nationalist and would not hand over indicted war criminals to the War Crime Tribunal. The election was declared invalid because only 45.5 per cent of voters turned out, well below the legal minimum of 50 per cent. Voter apathy, and a boycott call from Serbian nationalists, blamed for the poor figure. The failure could herald a period of instability for former Yugoslavia and the possible election of a protégé of Slobodan Milosevic by December 2002. Vojislav Kostunica failed to obtain the necessary majority for victory in the first round against the Yugoslav Deputy Prime Minister, Miroljub Labus, and nine other candidates two weeks ago. The cautious Vojislav Kostunica was campaigning for a gradual reform program while Mr Labus, who is close to the Serbian Prime Minister, Zoran Djindjic, advocates economic shock therapy. Vojislav Kostunica is looking for a new job because his current post will change when the Yugoslav federation is revamped.

 

Turnout in the first round was also low, with 55 per cent of the 6.5 million voters making it to the ballot boxes. Under existing electoral rules devised by the Milosevic government, polling is only valid if 50 per cent of voters turn out. The results of Serbia’s second round produced a 66.7 per cent win for Vojislav Kostunica, compared with 31.3 per cent for Mr Labus. The person who was likely to gain most from first round’s debacle is the ultranationalist Vojislav Seselj, who ranked third on 29 September. Slobodan Milosevic called on his supporters to vote for Vojislav Seselj from his prison cell in The Hague, where he is on trial before a United Nations tribunal for genocide and crimes against humanity. Meanwhile, Vojislav Seselj called on his supporters and sympathizers of Slobodan Milosevic to boycott the presidential run-off, hoping for stronger results in the re-run, which will have to be held by the end of the year. Fears are mounting that the rise in popularity of Vojislav Seselj could damage Serbia's fragile democracy. Although Slobodan Milosevic no longer runs the country, his shadow still hangs over Serbia because his laws have prevented Serbia from installing a new president for the next five years. The reform-oriented authorities in Serbia, the larger sister of tiny Montenegro in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, will probably have to change Mr Milosevic's electoral laws to align them more with those in Western Europe. The mandate of the current Serbian president, Milan Milutinovic, expires on January 5. Mr Milutinovic is the only inductee of the United Nations war crimes court charged with abuses in Kosovo who is still at large. He is widely expected to join his mentor, Slobodan Milosevic, in detention when he loses his job as the Serbian President.

 

Voters in Serbia went to election in September 2002 to elect a new president Sunday, after a campaign that has become largely a clash between the two leading figures and philosophies of the coalition that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic two years ago. One was Vojislav Kostunica, then president of Yugoslavia, a job that may soon be eliminated by constitutional changes. He is running on a nationalist platform and promises of gradual economic restructuring. The other was Zoran Djindjic, prime minister of Serbia, Yugoslavia's main republic. Zoran Djindjic was not on the ballot, but fellow party member Miroljub Labus, who is promising "sweeping and fast changes," is widely seen as his stand-in. Officials in Washington and other Western capitals watch the Serbian vote closely as a signal of Serbia's recovery from war and the Milosevic years. The outcome could have a significant impact on Serbia's progress toward opening markets and economic restructuring, and on relations with the Western countries on which it depends for financial aid. "Campaigning came to a close with Labus's supporters holding a final rally in central Belgrade, at which Labus declared he was the candidate best qualified to take Serbia closer to the European Union. Actors, academics and a brass band playing Serbian folk music took to the stage ahead of the pro-Western economist, who then tried to make use of Kostunica's nationalist reputation. "I want to be the president for everybody, not for one political party or nationality, but for everybody in the country. Labus was pelted with dirt and eggs at a rally in the town of Cacak. Zoran Djindjic was not on the ballot, but fellow party member Miroljub Labus, who is promising sweeping and fast changes, was widely seen as his stand-in.

 

Some are in a great hurry. Kostunica told supporters at a rally last week, appealing to a public fearful that economic restructuring will bring greater hardship. "Let them be in a hurry, I say. You and I, meanwhile, know the best things come out of patience and hard work. Eleven candidates were running, but interest is firmly focused on Labus and Kostunica. Opinion polls indicated a narrow lead for Kostunica and that a second round of elections two weeks from now will be required.

 

A survey of 1,459 people conducted this month by the Center for Policy Studies, a local polling organization, found Kostunica supported by 35 percent of the respondents in the first round, against 33 percent for Labus. Djindjic and Kostunica formed an anti-Milosevic coalition leading up to elections in September 2000, but the two began feuding almost as soon as Milosevic was pushed out. Their differences go beyond policy, Kostunica is a reserved constitutional lawyer who sometimes seems a reluctant politician; Djindjic was a former businessman who clearly loved the rough and tumble of politics.

 

The continuing hostility was evident as Djindjic appeared on stage at Labus' final rally. Referring to Kostunica, he asked the crowd: "Would you trust him? He's a fat, boring guy! "Djindjic and Kostunica have said they will work with each other if Kostunica wins. But many political analysts predicted that in the Serbian parliament, which Djindjic's party dominates, Kostunica would give priority to constitutional change at the expense of economic restructuring.

 

Kostunica is not an opportunist. Kostunica is a genuine nationalist. Kostunica’s outlook takes precedent over social or economic change. Kostunica’s commitment to Serbian nationalism has caused concern in Washington, said Norman Cigar, professor of strategic studies at the U.S. Marine Corps University said of Kostunica. On Sept. 14, ’02 appearing in a predominantly ethnic Serbian town in neighboring Bosnia, Kostunica made comments that opponents called support for a Greater Serbia, a concept that many analysts say drove the Balkan wars of the 1990s. Kostunica described Republica Srbska, the ethnic Serbs' political unit in Bosnia, as a "part of the family temporarily separated from the Serbian motherland. "Kostunica later said his comments had been misinterpreted and that he was talking of a time when countries of the region would join the European Union and, following general EU policy, open their borders to each other. Kostunica's statement may have been a calculated appeal to hard-core Serbian nationalists. But he said the comments also caused alarm in the U.S. Congress, and could affect deliberations over whether to withdraw international peacekeeping troops from Bosnia.

 

Assassination of Zoran Djindjic

Zoran Djindjic became prime minister in early 2001 after leading the street revolution that deposed Slobodan Milosevic in October 2000. For most of his time in office as the prime minister Zoran Djindjic engaged in a ruthless power struggle with the Yugoslav president, Vojislav Kostunica, which crippled the governance of the country. Zoran Djindjic’s most notable act and biggest gamble was ordering the arrest of Mr Milosevic and handing him over to the tribunal in the Hague. Two assassins gunned down the Serbian prime minister, Zoran Djindjic, in broad daylight in the center of Belgrade on Wednesday March 12, ‘03, leaving Serbia leaderless and plunging the Balkans into a bleak and dangerous period of uncertainty. The murder of the prime minister, only two years after he embarked on the formidable task of remodeling Serbia that became a pariah under Slobodan Milosevic, prompted his government to declare a state of emergency and three days of mourning for the 50-year-old German-educated philosopher. Serb Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic, who was shot dead, had earlier remained defiant despite an alleged assassination attempt in Feb ‘03. Zoran Djindic, who led the popular revolt that toppled Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic in October 2000 and had many enemies because of his pro-reformist and pro-Western stance, said he would not be intimidated.  Zoran Djindjic favored greater cooperation with the U.N. war crimes tribunal, where Milosevic is standing trial on charges of genocide and crimes against humanity.

 

Djindjic was a former businessman who clearly loved the rough and tumble of politics. Zoran Djindjic was a leader of domestic reform in Serbia as well as an advocate of closer Serbian adherence to world standards of government and justice. Zoran Djindjic, 50, distinguished himself in the internal Serbian struggle to get rid of former President Slobodan Milosevic, first to oust him from office and then to turn him over to the international tribunal in The Hague for trial. In doing so, however, Zoran Djindjic sowed some of the seeds that led to his death. Milosevic is gone, but both the criminals and the Serbian ultranationalists that worked with him are still there, armed and dangerous. Then Zoran Djindjic led the way in seeking to clean up the pigsty that constituted government in the Serbia that Milosevic and the country’s various wars since 1991 had left behind. That required international money. The sources of that aid also required the Serbian government as a condition to pursue and hand over other accused war criminals from the Milosevic era. The most noteworthy are former Bosnian Serb leaders Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadjic, both of whom nestle comfortably in the nest of criminals and ultra-nationalists in Serbia and the Serbian part of Bosnia-Herzegovina who probably killed Mr. Djindjic. The fundamental problem of Serbia is that in the absence of solid, politically legitimate government and a functioning legal system, control of its economy and society fell into the hands of thugs with guns.

 

Serbian government also has said that Djindjic's death was politically motivated and aimed at destabilizing the reformist leadership. Djindjic made many enemies by orchestrating Milosevic's extradition to the U.N. war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands, and by announcing a crackdown on organized crime. Police have rounded up thousands of underworld bosses, war profiteers, former paramilitaries and state security chiefs following Djindjic's slaying. Of those, about 2,000 remain in custody. The assassination of Serbia's prime minister orchestrated by a shadowy group that wanted to replace the pro-Western government with allies of Slobodan Milosevic. The group behind Zoran Djindjic's March 12 killing called the "Hague Brotherhood" hoped the assassination would create widespread chaos and planned to follow with a coup against Serbia's government. Serbia, Europe, and the world suffered a major loss when assassins gunned down Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic at the Serbian Parliament building.

 

Serbia military was mobilized and railway stations and airports were closed down in the hunt for the murderers. Government officials said two men had been arrested after Zoran Djindjic was slain by two large-caliber sniper bullets, one in the stomach and one in the back, as he was clambering out of his car to enter the cabinet office in the Belgrade city center at lunchtime. Zoran Djindjic, on crutches after a football injury, was hit twice and slumped against his armor-plated car before being taken to hospital where he was pronounced dead. He was on his way to meet the Swedish foreign minister, Anna Lindh, when he was shot.

 

The assassination stunned the Balkans, including Serbia's enemies in the vicious wars of the 1990s, and sent a wave of apprehension rippling through the western diplomatic community, which is preoccupied with the crisis over Iraq. An act of madness, said neighboring Croatia, which was at war with Serbia in 1991-95. The murder of Djindjic could destabilize the region. The murder could be an act of political extremism aimed at returning Serbia to the chaos and lawlessness of the rule of Slobodan Milosevic, in the dock in the Hague on charges of genocide. Zoran Djindjic had powerful enemies in Milosevic and the Kostunica camps, as well as among the Kosovan Albanians due to his calls for an ethnic partition of the province. But the main finger of suspicion last night pointed to powerful underworld chiefs who helped him overthrow Mr Milosevic but who now feared for their survival because of a crackdown on organized crime. "I am afraid for the future of Serbia," said Slobodan Vucetic, the head of the country's supreme court. Mr Kostunica called the murder "awful" and said it showed how thoroughly criminalized Serbia had become. Only a fortnight ago, also in broad daylight, Zoran Djindjic narrowly survived an attempt on his life in a car crash on a motorway outside Belgrade. A well-known Belgrade gangster who swerved a lorry into the path of the prime minister's vehicle was arrested then released by magistrates. Zoran Djindjic himself indicated that mafia bosses had tried to have him killed.

 

In Serbia, the crackdown of the authorities on organized crime gangs yielded results at an amazing pace, giving rise to the suspicion that the incumbent government had some role in the assassination of Zoran Djindjic. The remains were discovered in Northern Serbia of Ivan Stambolic, the one-time president of Serbia who was kidnapped during the last days of the Milosevic régime in August 2000. Former Serbian President Ivan Stambolic, who had been critical of Slobodan Milosevic, had been abducted from a Belgrade park and later killed by members of the "Red Berets" unit, a dirty-jobs outfit of the Milosevic régime. Two bosses of the Zemun criminal gang- thought to be behind the recent assassination of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic were shot dead during a police attempt to arrest them. Acting Serb President Natasha Micic claimed that organized crime in Serbia had been destroyed, now that the suspected assassin and most of the alleged organizers of the murder are behind bars. The state of emergency in Serbia will nevertheless remain in force for the time being. Whoever tried to resist the police was liquidated."

 

Police arrested more suspects on charges they were involved in the assassination of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. The arrests came as Serbian officials renewed their promise to purge the country of criminal remnants of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic's regime. Police did not specify what roles the latest detainees allegedly played in the assassination. "No one will be spared the responsibility for what has happened in our country," Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Cedomir Jovanovic said. Serbian Authorities have accused an underworld group known as the Zemun Clan of masterminding out the March 12 sniper attack on Djindjic.

 

Zoran Djindjic's Democratic Party quickly named a successor after his death and police cracked down hard, arresting 7,000 people, effectively spoiling the plan. The assassins also may have been caught off-guard by the huge public outpouring of grief over Djindjic's death nearly 1 million people attended his funeral. Police believe a feared paramilitary group known as the Unit for Special Operations, formed during Milosevic's rule, played a large role in the Hague Brotherhood. Its deputy commander, Zvezdan Jovanovic, was arrested soon after Djindjic's slaying on suspicion of being the assassin. Jovanovic told investigators he killed Djindjic because he was told his unit would be handed over to the U.N. war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands. Jovanovic also told interrogators he felt no remorse for killing Djindjic and did so because he was convinced Djindjic was an "unpatriotic" leader. At least four other plans to kill Djindjic failed on the eve of his slaying in downtown Belgrade, the officials said. One plan included firing anti-tank rockets at his armored car. The investigation into Djindjic's death led police to the body of another Milosevic foe, Serbian President Ivan Stambolic, who was slain in 2000, and his death also has been blamed on Milosevic's allies. The pace with which the mystery of murder of Zoran Djindjic was solved and then the investigations went on to link politicians with the murder of Ivan Stambolic, showed the Serbian government wanted to eliminate the political opposition, especially of President Kostunica.

 

Serbian police killed two of the three chief suspects in the assassination of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. Dusan Spasojevic and Mile Lukovic were tracked down in the southern Belgrade district of Barajevo, where they opened fire on police. The two men were shot dead in the ensuing gun battle. Spasojevic and Lukovic, both 34, were leaders of the Zemun clan, a powerful organized crime ring that officials accuse of masterminding Djindjic's slaying. A third major suspect in the case, Milorad Lukovic, better known as "Legija," was still at large. Zoran Djindjic was gunned down on March 12 outside government headquarters in a daring ambush that shocked this war-torn nation. At the time of his death, his government was on the verge of launching a crackdown on organized crime, which remained the scourge of the city of Belgrade and Serbian national politics.

 

33(xiv) Demise of NATO

NATO Alliance’s Definitive End

America’s Iraq War resulted in the rejuvenation of Non Aligned Nations’ Movement and United Nations and brought the NATO Atlantic alliance to a definitive end. President Bush’s military adventurism to establish oil colony, caused the demise of the trans-Atlantic NATO Alliance between United States and Europe and now onwards the diplomatic behavior between United States and Europe would be governed by the Raison d’etat and America-Europe balance of power considerations. Pentagon’s victory in Iraq created the Neo-Concert of Europe, and now onwards Germany, France, Belgium and Russia would pool their diplomatic assets to hold America in check, India most likely would join anti-American coalition led by Germany, France and Russia, if France and Russia remained serious in their opposition to American Oil colonialism in Iraq. The post-World War II Atlantic Alliance, the NATO met with a de facto death on April 10, 2003, the Day after American forces took control over Baghdad Iraq. “Although France, Germany and Russia could not stop the war against Iraq, they ultimately denied Washington the legitimacy of UN backing, making the war in Iraq an especially risky gamble. The diplomatic divide that has opened between the US and continental Europe is bringing the Atlantic alliance to a definitive end. The central question facing European policy-makers and US is thus not how to repair the transatlantic relationship but whether the end of alliance will take the form of an amicable separation or a nasty divorce. The former is far preferable in that it keeps open the possibility of revived co-operation down the road, but it will take a great deal of hard work by Americans and Europeans alike. But now that the Atlantic alliance is expiring, an Atlanticist Europe is no longer an option. France and Germany have realized as much - one of the main reasons they are discussing with Belgium deeper defense co-operation. The European Union is currently in a no-man's-land. It is too strong to be Washington's lackey, but too weak and divided to be either an effective partner or a formidable counterweight. The Atlantic alliance now lies in the rubble of Baghdad. Before it is too late, Washington must rediscover the principles of restraint, multilateralism and alliance. Otherwise, estranged allies will become outright adversaries, and Europe will have no reason even to contemplate working on its end of a new bargain.” The Financial Times (4/10/03, p13, Professor Charles Kupchan, “The Atlantic Alliance Lies in the Rubble” Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University, Washington DC). Iraq war brought NATO to a definitive end. France, Germany and Russia revealed that they are ready for Europe without United States. It is high time that White House should cast aside NATO in spirit as well as in fact, and withdraw its troops from NATO bases in Germany and Belgium. The NATO as we know would no longer survive. If Britain, Spain and Italy continued to support United States and NATO, then it would cause irreparable damage to the European Union. Britain, Spain and Italy would have to choose between continued military Alliance with United States or European Union. The enlarged-NATO could get split into Pro-US Camp and Anti-US Camp and the European members of the anti-France pro-US camp might have to decide whether they should continue being member of the European Union.  

 

Germany France as Outright Adversaries

NATO Alliance showed its true color to Germany and France that the purpose of Cold War NATO had been to disintegrate French Empire and to keep Germany divided and militarily weak and under control. United States undermined French Empire in Indo-China, Algeria and Syria. President Bush targeted Iraq to undermine the increased influence of German, French and Russian oil companies in Iraq and their fierce competition to American Oil companies in Post-Embargo Iraq. European and American security is no longer indivisible. White House should oblige, and cast aside the NATO alliance in spirit, if not also in fact. It is clear that shifting priorities necessitate a diminished US presence in Europe. Germany, France and Belgium would not endorse the entry of Poland into the European Union. Poland and many of the former Soviet satellites might decide to forego the entry of the European Union to cement their military ties with United States, because Germany and France might agree for the Second Yalta Pact with Russia, which would allow Russia to takeover Eastern Europe. Once Russia developed security ties with Germany and France, the Germany and France could be tempted to sign away the sovereignty to Russia to ward off hostile moves of the United States. It would be prudent for the former Soviet satellites to withdraw their application for Union with European and seek membership of the expanded NAFTA Agreement to increase their immigration prospects in United States and exports to United States. The Warsaw and other like-minded capitals should give primacy to the threat of Russian conquest of Eastern Europe, which only an alliance with United States would neutralize. The political, military and economic interests of extended European Union and conflict with those of the extended NATO. United States should propose the dissolution of the NATO and remove its military bases from Western Europe and replace with a new military pact with Britain and Eastern Europe.

 

The pro-American Central and East European countries should join New NATO and act as the Buffer between Western Europe and Russia, and should give precedence to the national security over economic prosperity. Anti-European European Union led by France and Germany would never be able to deter Soviet military pressures on Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic. India should join the Eurasian Military Pact with France, Germany, and Belgium. France and Germany are discussing deeper defense co-operation with Belgium. India would bring lots of value to the Germany-France Alliance. India, Germany, France and Belgium defense pact would deter Russian adventurism in Europe and neutralize America’s preponderance in Europe. France, Germany and India Alliance would create the Second Pole in the new world order and neutralize America’s preeminence.

 

World Obeyed Uncompromising Bush

The fact that almost the entire Islamic world and Western Christian readily got in line to follow the diktat of uncompromising Bush over America’s war on Iraq, should not be lost sight of just because President Chirac successfully mobilized Germany, Belgium, Russia, China and India to ultimately denied White House the legitimacy of UN backing. The entire Islamic world and the Christian world accepted the raison d’etre of the new age of Oil colonial empires. President Bush operated under the false assumption that the more powerful the US is, and the more uncompromising its leadership, the more readily the Western Europe, Russia and India will get in line. But the opposite has transpired. President Bush's swagger appeared determined at home, but in Western Europe, India, China and Russia it smacked of arrogance, pax Americana and WASPs dream of the world conquest by controlling the oil resources of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia. Far from evoking deference and abject submission to the world’s sole super power, the President Bush’s policy of pre-emption and pre-eminence invited resentment and resistance of France, Germany, Belgium, Russia, China and India. President Bush correctly believed that more powerful the US is, and the more uncompromising its leadership, the Arab world, Islamic world, Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, Britain, Spain, Italy, Central America, Hispanic America and Southeast Asia will get in line. Most of the Islamic world, Catholic world and Protestant world humbly got in line and supported President Bush’s War on Iraq.

 

For the good of the world, president Chirac faced with the political threat of the French Far Right and the rising stature of presidential candidate Le Pen, by proving to the French public that he is good enough to face United States in the eye and lead the world in crusade against America’s invasion of Iraq. President Bush’s strategic misconceptions tore down the NATO and the Atlantic Community, and the Western Christendom split into two hostile Camps.

 

Now Almost Totally Obsolete NATO

Bolshevik menace created NATO and American Oil Colonialism would cause the demise of Atlantic Partnership and NATO. Oil colonial interests would force Germany and France opt out of US-led NATO to promote French Oil colonialism as well as German Oil colonialism. The NATO became Now Almost Totally Obsolete in the age of Oil Colonialism, because the oil interests of France, Germany and Belgium directly conflicts with the oil interests of United States and Britain in the Middle East and coincide with the oil interests of Russia, China, Japan and India. Is NATO “Now Almost Totally Obsolete?”

 

Henry Kissinger declared that the revolt led by France, Germany and Belgium in NATO over Iraq crisis is "the gravest in the Atlantic alliance since it was formed." NATO faces "a crisis of credibility. And there are rumbles in the Pentagon undergrowth suggesting that this could be the beginning of the end for NATO. Will it be? Certainly there is great anger among the other 16 NATO members about the conduct of the three. The internal debates in NATO had been heated.

 

Oil War & NATO Demise

America’s Iraq War resulted in the rejuvenation of Non Aligned Nations’ Movement and United Nations and brought the NATO Atlantic alliance to a definitive end. President Bush’s military adventurism to establish oil colony, caused the demise of the trans-Atlantic NATO Alliance between United States and Europe and now onwards the diplomatic behavior between United States and Europe would be governed by the Raison d’etat and America-Europe balance of power considerations.

 

Pentagon’s victory in Iraq created the Neo-Concert of Europe, and now onwards Germany, France, Belgium and Russia would pool their diplomatic assets to hold America in check, India most likely would join anti-American coalition led by Germany, France and Russia, if France and Russia remained serious in their opposition to American Oil colonialism in Iraq.

 

The post-World War II Atlantic Alliance, the NATO met with a de facto death on April 10, 2003, the Day after American forces took control over Baghdad Iraq. “Although France, Germany and Russia could not stop the war against Iraq, they ultimately denied Washington the legitimacy of UN backing, making the war in Iraq an especially risky gamble. The diplomatic divide that has opened between the US and continental Europe is bringing the Atlantic alliance to a definitive end. The central question that diplomats of US and European Union faced was thus not how to repair the transatlantic relationship but whether the end of alliance would take the form of an amicable separation or a nasty divorce. The former is far preferable in that it keeps open the possibility of revived co-operation down the road, but it will take a great deal of hard work by Americans and Europeans alike. But now that the Atlantic alliance is expiring, an Atlanticist Europe is no longer an option.

 

The Atlantic alliance now lies in the rubble of Baghdad. Before it is too late, Washington must rediscover the principles of restraint, multilateralism and alliance. Otherwise, estranged allies will become outright adversaries, and Europe will have no reason even to contemplate working on its end of a new bargain.” The Financial Times (4/10/03, p13, Professor Charles Kupchan, “The Atlantic Alliance Lies in the Rubble” Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University, Washington DC). Iraq war brought NATO to a definitive end. France, Germany and Russia revealed that they are ready for Europe without United States.

 

NATO became the casualty of the naked American oil colonialism in Iraq. It is high time that US-led NATO is dismantled and European union established European Defense Forces independent of American presence in Europe. Germany would ask America to vacate American military bases from German soil and to remove Pershing nuclear missiles from German soil. Japan may also demand that United States vacate American military bases from Japan. Germany, Japan and France would develop credible nuclear deterrent to deter any hostile American nuclear threats to Germany, France and Japan. It is high time that White House should cast aside NATO in spirit as well as in fact, and withdraw its troops from NATO bases in Germany and Belgium.

 

NATO to promote American Oil Colonialism

The principle military objective of the US-led NATO, after its expansion to include East European countries became the use of military power to establish American oil colonies in direct competition with the rival oil colonialism of German-French Big Oil. In the perception of American Oil Colonialism the scramble for oil colonies made France, Germany, Belgium and Italy greater a threat to the American oil interests than the Soviet threat to America during Cold War. The NATO as it existed at the end of the 2nd Millennium, with Germany and Italy as its anchor in Western Europe became anachronistic after the entry of former Soviet satellite countries into NATO and after the America’s conquest of Iraq to establish American Oil Colony over Iraq. America no longer needs the military bases in Germany and Italy, when Poland, Bulgaria and other East European countries provide better bases and cheaper military personnel to serve in the NATO.

 

France, Germany, Belgium and Italy emerged as the competitor and challengers to the American Oil colonialism, after America waged wars to establish American oil colony over Iraq. In the perception of American Big Oil the oil interests of France, Germany, Belgium and Italy presented greater threat to the American national interests than Russia and China.

 

Global Oil Interests would cement alliance of Eurasian lands powers, namely, France, Germany, Russia, China, India and Japan to tame and neutralize American Oil Colonialism in the Middle East, Caspian Central Asia and Southeast Asia. France, Germany and Belgium have all ingredients to emerge as the oil super Power and establish European oil colonies in the Middle East, and directly confront American Oil Colonialism in the Middle East, provided they gain diplomatic support of Russia, China and Japan.

 

France, Germany, Russia and Japan would form Oil Pact to establish Oil Colonies in competition with American Oil colonialism in the Middle East and worldwide. Scramble for Oil started it all. Germany, Vincy France and Japan started the World War II to secure colonies and colonial market for their manufactured goods.

 

The military alliances for Third World War would resemble the alliances of Second World War. Germany and France would fight war against the United States again. Since Germany no longer in any position to invade Russia, outflanking Eastern Europe, after East Europeans joined NATO, Russian oil interests would join forces with French, German and Japanese oil interests to create the Great Power alliance of France, Germany, and Russia to challenge the march of American Oil Colonialism in the Middle East and Caspian Central Asia. America’s greed for Iraqi oil would lead to the demise of NATO and removal of American military bases from Germany.

 

The 19th Century Anglo-French colonial Wars resurrecting in 21st Century as French German challenge to American Oil Colonialism in the new age of Colonial Empires. The Third World War would witness the coalition of the Second World War. The oil-dependent Germany, France and Japan may join their forces to challenge the onward march of American Oil Colonialism to save the oil-producing world from Yankee Oil Colonialism.

 

France, Germany and Belgium have the oil exploration technology and required capital for establishing oil refineries and oil pipelines and fully prepared to confront American Oil Colonialism in the scramble for Oil Colonies in the 21st Century. France and Germany would work towards the demise of NATO because the US-led NATO promotes the imperial interests of American Oil Colonialism and harms the French colonial interests. NATO has faced crises before and survived, because Germany and France were not prepared to challenge the American Oil colonialism in face of looming soviet Bolshevik threat. And the row over the assistance for Turkey has to be seen in context. The challenge of France and Germany is a matter of sharing the oil loot and timing, not principle of protecting the sovereignty of oil-producing nations. All agree that the conflict in NATO is the crucial issue about sharing the oil loot with fellow European partners in Atlantic alliance. France, Germany and Belgium do not want NATO committed to a mindset of war of oil colonialism, where only American Big Oil makes all the profits, while Germany and France would lose all the lucrative oil deals they signed with Saddam Hussein. They all agree that if Western dominance of the Middle East Oil were to face a real threat Germany and France would be among the first at their fellow NATO member's side.

 

America Oil Colonialism wanted to use NATO to legitimize and camouflage America’s naked oil imperialism in Iraq, under the veneer of respectability, but American Oil Colonies would not share its oil profits with its allies in European Union, especially the former oil powers, namely, France, Belgium and Germany. New fears and challenges emerge. Once again, as George Bush and Tony Blair seek to prod a largely reluctant world into an assault on Saddam Hussein, questions are being raised about what NATO's role should be or whether it really has a meaningful one at all.

 

American Oil Colonialism replaced Bolshevism as the greatest menace facing France, Germany and Belgium and the Third World, in the 21st Century. The economic prosperity of France, Germany and Japan threatened by the American monopoly over Middle East Oil and American colonization of oil-rich Iraq. In the 21st Century the scramble for Oil Colonies determine International politics, not the Capitalism Vs Bolshevism divide of the Cold War. Its problem is that in the new world, the threat to European Union is not the fear of Soviet tanks rolling across Western Europe. It comes instead from American Oil Colonialism, and from Middle East’s insecure borders, ethnic and religious conflicts, Wahhabi terrorism and proliferation of WMDs. Individual NATO members have played their part in the war against al Qaeda and the Taliban since September 11 2001, but they go no shares of the oil loot that American Oil Colonialism takes home, because of America’s control over oil-producing OAPEC nations.

 

France, Germany and Belgium decided to carve out independent diplomacy for European Union in competition with American Oil Colonialism, to directly promote European Oil Colonies in the Middle east and Caspian region, with support of Russia, China and Japan. France and Germany as members of NATO alliance would refuse to support American Oil imperialism without securing any share of the oil incomes that American Oil Colonies would generate after establishing American Oil Colony in Iraq, Venezuela, and Iran. France, Germany and Belgium would not support American Oil Colonialism, when American oil colonialism would use its monopoly over oil resources to undermine French and German economic advantages over America.

 

Expanded NATO after admitting former Soviet satellites became an imperial coalition when it deployed NATO troops in Afghanistan to directly control Turkmenistan oil and gas pipeline. US-led NATO in November 2002 crossed the Rubicon and declared its imperial ambitions to promote American Oil colonialism in Middle East and Caspian region, but failed to offer fellow European powers, their fair share of the oil loot that American Oil companies would make as the result of NATO imperialism. In Prague November 2002 the NATO alliance seemed finally to shed all its old inhibitions about being a defense force confined to a traditional area, and touted its imperial ambitions to patrol and occupy the oil-producing Caspian basin and Middle East. It seemed ready to take on an "out of area" worldwide role to establish American Oil colonies, and fighting terrorists or coping with failed states seeking to acquire weapons of mass destruction. NATO crossed the Rubicon and committed to a role in Afghanistan supporting ISAF, the International Security Assistance Force, to secure American control over Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India Oil-gas pipeline to bring Turkmenistan gas to consumers in India.

 

The United States is becoming increasingly frustrated with European defense spending levels. The Europeans who used to see NATO as a useful means of keeping the United States involved in the defense of Western Europe against Soviet juggernaut, became steadily less enamored of President Bush led American Oil imperialism. France, Germany and Belgium see Bush’s White House as unilateralist and too much inclined to throw its weight around in the world, to establish American oil colonies worldwide, without offering its Atlantic partners a fair share of the Oil Booty.

 

The oil interests of Germany, France, Belgium, Russia and Japan coincide and conflicts with the oil interests of United States. Germany and France the allies of the second World War have now decided that it is high time to break ties with United States, because the oil interests and national interests of France and Germany diametrically conflicts with those of the American Oil colonialism.

 

Main part of the motivation for the row in NATO over Franco-German efforts to postpone a war against Iraq stem from the refusal of "Old Europe" to accept American agenda and timetable of action for expanding American Oil colonialism in the Middle East, which was dictated to Paris and Berlin by Washington. United States goaded ‘New Europe’ the former Soviet colonies in the Eastern Europe, who have decided to choose United States not Germany and France as their new masters, to join forces and undermine German and French leadership of European Union. American wants to become the paramount power in European Union by bringing down the leadership of Germany and France in European Union.

 

In early 1970’s the Sino-Soviet rift was real and was expertly exploited by Dr. Henry Kissinger and President Nixon. Similarly, the clash of Oil interests caused real and permanent rift between America and its Atlantic partners, namely, France, Germany and Belgium. Russian President Putin should replicate the diplomacy of détente and entente that Kissinger and Nixon deployed to widen the Sino-Soviet rift and secure Sino-US strategic alliance, by offering France, Germany and Japan full Russian support for Eurasian Oil Pact to directly confront American Oil Colonial Empire in the Islamic oil-producing world.

 

It is best for Europe that NATO is given ceremonial burial and new alliance should replace NATO. Germany, France, Belgium, India and Japan should formalize Eurasian pact to establish rival Oil colonial empire to check and counter the hegemony of American Oil colonial empire. The NATO is headed for demise and the oil interests and national interests of France, Germany and Belgium conflicts with the national interests and oil interests of American Oil Colonialism.

 

The search for Indian spices and scramble for Inca-Maya gold fueled the expansion of post-1500 European colonial empires. The scramble for black gold, the crude oil and natural gas shall fuel the clash of Oil colonial empires in the 21st Century. France, Germany, Belgium the Old European colonial Powers would resurrect their great power role as Oil Colonial Powers in the 21st century and Russia, China, Japan and India would join their bandwagon to jointly tame and neutralize the American Oil Colonialism, which threatens the return of the New Age of Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. The crude Oil and Natural gas would finance and legitimize the Concert of World Powers and recreate the Congress System that 1814 congress of Vienna Created, and the concert of eight world powers, namely, United States, China, Japan, India, Germany, France, Britain, Russia and Canada would create stable new world order and maintain peace during the clash of Oil Colonial empires in the 21st Century.

 

33(xv) Population Decline Fueled Oil Colonialism

The size of economies and population of China and India guaranteed their secured slot in the top four world powers in the 21st Century. India and China would remain two of the top four world powers in the 21st Century and beyond, primarily because white European population would decline precipitously by 2050 and United States would attract many young Europeans, causing further erosion of European productive population base. The Almighty Goddess, sealed the womb of the White Christians for the crimes against women the patriarchal, monotheist, iconoclast religions inflicted on their women and on the goddess-worshipping peoples. The decline of the birthrate of European white Christian women sealed the fate of Europe. France, Germany and Russia should pool resources and focus on challenging American domination of the world’s oil supplies, if they cared for their status as the world powers. France, Germany and Russia should team with India and China, the nations with large one billion plus people each and large appetite for imported oil and gas supplies. India and China should team with Germany, France, Russia to control the oil and gas producing regions of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Iraq, and Arabian Gulf, to directly compete with American oil colonialism. The inevitable decline of the birthrate per woman and the decline of the population of Russia, France and Germany would force their diplomats to seek accommodation with India and China, the countries with large populations and large economy, to jointly oppose American Oil Colonialism.

 

The population of the white Catholic and white Christian Europe declined even when they nutrition and standard of living rose is the testimony to the fact that patriarchal societies that refuse to accept the equality of women to men, earn the retribution of Almighty Goddess, the Creator and the Ruler of the Womb, and the patriarchal societies and patriarchal religions decline and face demise because Goddess closes their womb. Only when Christians would start worshipping Almighty Goddess in humility that their women would become reproductive and their populations would rise. The Semite patriarchal nomad hunters conquered and destroyed the goddess-worshipping agricultural societies of Jordan Valley, Egypt, Libya, and Syria and imposed their Monotheist male God on the Goddess Civilizations. The ancient religions of Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Mecca were matriarchal religion of Goddess Isis, Innanna, Hera the Great Mother. The Goddess, the ruler of the Womb of women retaliated by closing the womb of the women of the patriarchal religions, because they forced their women into bondage and servitude. The result is for all to see, the patriarchal civilizations of Jews and Christianity failed in their drive for reproduction and it caused the population of Roman Catholics to decline in Europe. Goddess punished the Catholic nations, the nations that instituted Catholic Inquisition to burn at stakes, torture and tear apart more than 9 million women, men and Children as witches during Inquisitions, namely, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, and Italy by making White Catholic women less fertile. No wonder that the birthrate of Catholic European nation is around 1.2 children per woman. The revenge of Goddess would cause the extinction of the White Roman Catholic Church in Italy, Spain, Portugal, France and Germany unless Catholic patriarchy accepts the leadership of matriarchy and accept that God is a woman and Gospel of Mary Magdalene is the true Christian Gospel, and Goddess May is equal to or Superior to Jesus Christ.

 

The power that controlled the oil resources of the Arabian Gulf would control the world economies. The power that controlled the world oil supplies would control the world by controlling the world oil supplies, crucial to the global industrial economy. France, Germany, Russia and Japan could join forces in controlling the Arabian oil supplies by challenging the American hegemony in the Arabian Gulf, and their smaller population base would not adversely affect their ability to establish oil colonies. The aging nations should go all out to establish oil colonies to overcome their demographic restraints to economic growth.

 

Population Decline Threatens France

The study of the populations and demographic trends in Germany, France, Italy and Spain raised the specter of Islamic majorities in the Western European countries, which can be mitigated by allowing open unlimited immigration from India. West European countries must allow millions of immigrants from India, if they want to stop Muslims gaining greater share of their total populations. The U.N. published "State of the World Population 2002." Malthus predicted that population and demography determined the destiny of nations, Europe's collective destiny, for decades to come, will be beyond the choice of its governments, and will be a continuing decrescendo, as would be determined by the declining birthrate of children per woman. United States expediting the demise of Europe by attracting young labor force from Canada and Western Europe. The pro-segregation White racist neo-conservatives expediting the demise of White-ruled continent of Europe by limiting Asian immigration to America and by increasing immigration from Europe to United States. Today Europe's population is 725 million. The population of 14 European nations is declining and the growth rates of the populations of the other European nations are at or near zero. So the European population is projected to be 600 million in 2050. In developed countries, a birthrate of 2.1 children per woman is a replacement rate, producing population stability. Only Albania has that birth rate. Catholic Ireland's birth rate is 2.0 children per woman, but the birth rates of the Catholic nations of Southern Europe are among Europe's lowest birth rates, with the birth rate of 1.2 children per woman. The estimated European average birth rate is 1.34 children per woman. Without emigration or immigration and with a stable birthrate of 1.5 children per woman, a population would be reduced to about half in 100 years, and with a birthrate of 1.2 children per woman to about 25 percent." On those assumptions, Germany's population would shrink from 82 million to fewer than 40 million by the end of the century, and Italy's 57 million to fewer than 20 million. Economic anemia and further military impotence are probable consequences of Europe's population collapse. France and Germany should allow unlimited immigration from India to bolster German and French population, to lower the share of the Turks, Arab and African Muslim populations in the total population of Germany and France. Without unlimited immigration from Hindu India, the increased Muslim populations from Africa and Arabia would threaten the Western Christendom in France, Belgium and Germany. It is moral imperative for Germany and France to allow unlimited immigration from Hindu India to protect these countries become predominantly Muslims before the end of the 21st Century.

 

Population Decline Threatens Europe

The study of the populations and demographic trends in Germany, France, Italy and Spain raised the specter of Islamic majorities in the Western European countries, which can be mitigated by allowing open unlimited immigration from India. West European countries must allow millions of immigrants from India, if they want to stop Muslims gaining greater share of their total populations. The U.N. published "State of the World Population 2002." Malthus predicted that population and demography determined the destiny of nations, Europe's collective destiny, for decades to come, will be beyond the choice of its governments, and will be a continuing decrescendo, as would be determined by the declining birthrate of children per woman. United States expediting the demise of Europe by attracting young labor force from Canada and Western Europe. The pro-segregation White racist neo-conservatives expediting the demise of White-ruled continent of Europe by limiting Asian immigration to America and by increasing immigration from Europe to United States. Today Europe's population is 725 million. The populations of 14 European nations are declining, the growth rates of the populations of the other European nations are at or near zero. So the European population is projected to be 600 million in 2050. In developed countries, a birthrate of 2.1 children per woman is a replacement rate, producing population stability. Only Albania has that birth rate. Catholic Ireland's birth rate is 2.0 children per woman, but the birth rates of the Catholic nations of Southern Europe are among Europe's lowest birth rates, with the birth rate of 1.2 children per woman. The estimated European average birth rate is 1.34 children per woman. Without emigration or immigration and with a stable birthrate of 1.5 children per woman, a population would be reduced to about half in 100 years, and with a birthrate of 1.2 children per woman to about 25 percent." On those assumptions, Germany's population would shrink from 82 million to fewer than 40 million by the end of the century, and Italy's 57 million to fewer than 20 million. Economic anemia and further military impotence are inevitable consequences of Europe's population collapse. France and Germany should allow unlimited immigration from India to bolster German and French population, to lower the share of the Turks, Arab and African Muslim populations in the total population of Germany and France. Without unlimited immigration from Hindu India, the increased Muslim populations from Africa and Arabia would threaten the Western Christendom in France, Belgium and Germany. It is moral imperative for Germany and France to allow unlimited immigration from Hindu India to protect these countries become predominantly Muslims before the end of the 21st Century.

 

Population Decline Demands Colonial Oil Diplomacy for Russia France & Japan

Only by directly confronting American Oil Colonialism to establish rival Oil Colonialism in the Middle East and worldwide that France, Russia and Japan, the nations with declining populations could hope to become world economic powers. The declining population forecast of France and Russia necessitates that France, Germany, Belgium join forces with Russia and India to create Rival Oil Colonial power in the world. The population is not a factor in determining the oil-production and the profits of the oil colonialism. In spite of declining French population base France can emerge as Oil Super Power, because population plays insignificant role in determining the outcomes of the clash of Oil Colonial Empires. France and Germany can emerge as Super Power by focusing on Oil. In Oil Wars Untied States enjoys no special advantages over France and Germany. French President Jacques Chirac realized that France could regain its leadership role in Europe, in spite of its smaller population, because population of a nation does not matter in the Clash of Oil Colonial Empires. Oil Colonial Empires require the oil exploration technology, Oil discovery tools, oil-extraction technology, oil-refinery technology, oil-pipeline technology and the capital to buy oil exploration rights, and to build oil rigs, oil refineries and oil pipelines. France has the necessary technology, capital and the European markets to emerge as the major oil power. Alliance with Russia would give France and Germany the support of the military power to neutralize America’s military superiority. The population of France grew slowly during the nineteenth century, from 28 million in 1800 to 39 million in 1914, while that of Germany rose from 21 to 67 million. During Concert of Europe the population of France declined and France no longer remained the threat to Europe. Almost consistently from the days of Caesar to the late nineteenth century, France was the most populous nation in Western Europe and therefore the French society most likely to risk social experiment within the security, which only superior numbers can provide. Then, relatively suddenly, its population growth stalled and virtually ceased. Aggravated, of course, by the First World War, deaths in France exceeded births during the 1930s. The country which had been almost five times as populous as Spain in the latter's golden age and over twice as peopled as Victorian Britain in the nineteenth century fell behind the Italians, the British and above all the Germans in population, virtually assuring German domination of Europe until 1945. Even today, under many government programs to increase French population, France has twice the territory of West Germany and is in many ways richer, but cannot match German economic performances.  The peasants remained prosperous, but the population of France grew slowly during the nineteenth century, from 28 million in 1800 to 39 million in 1914, while that of Germany rose from 21 to 67 million. Prospering on the land, French peasants were slow to move into towns and factories, so France remained predominantly agricultural, while England and Germany developed industry and technology, excelled in war, and dominated Europe. In 1911, Jacques Bertillon, (La Depopulation de la France, Paris, 1911, p. 1) a great French demographer cried out against France's depopulation and inheritance laws: “Few know it! Hardly anyone thinks of it! The French see their country's suicide without attempting a thing to prevent it. The death of France, which will be one of the major events of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, astonishes foreigners and leaves us indifferent!” President Vladimir Putin voiced concern about decline in Russia’s population. The number of citizens of Russia is reducing every year. For several years population of Russia has been diminishing by an average of 750,000 a year. The population of Russia can dwindle by 22 million in next 15 years before 2015. If the current population trend persists, the Russia’s survival will be threatened. Russia faces a real threat of becoming an aging nation. Japan has also become the nation of aging people, and without foreign immigration Japanese society can’t maintain its industrial leadership. France, Russia and Japan would join forces to pool their economic, political, diplomatic and military resources to assert their rights as the World Powers to demand their rights to establish Oil colonies in direct competition with American Oil Colonialism, as the extraction of oil does not require large manpower. Other than Oil Empire, all other types of economic empires would require large pool of skilled manpower, which France, Japan and Russia with declining populations would not be able to provide. France, Russia and Japan have no option but to pool their economic resources to establish worldwide oil colonies in partnership with India, if they want to remain leading economic powers in times of their population decline.

 

Russia in 21st Century suffers from the same problem of declining populations that post Napoleonic France faced during 19th and 20th Centuries. Russia would join the Neo-Colonial Oil bandwagon of France and Germany, so that France, Germany, Russia Oil colonialism could compete headlong with American oil colonialism in the Middle East and Caspian basin. Post-Napoleonic France, the French cultivated the old arts of family limitation by birth control and abortion because the law mandated that all property must be willed in equal shares to all legitimate and acknowledged illegitimate children. What had happened? In 1793, the French revolutionary legislature, the Convention, abolished primogeniture, the feudal law that directed the estates of persons toward their first-born child. This abolition of a restriction on the hereditary conveyance was consistent with demographic growth and therefore correct, but the Convention did not proclaim the right of all persons to bequeath what they want to whom they want. It replaced the feudal directive with a far more extensive one by mandating that all property must be willed in equal shares to all legitimate and acknowledged illegitimate children. Napoleon incorporated this principle into his Code Civil, and it remained the law throughout the turbulent nineteenth century, blissfully untouched by "liberal" and "conservative" governments alike. The Germans and British had no such law, and generally allowed the freedom to bequeath. A popular historian sums it up concisely: This legislation had important results, moral and economic: reluctant to condemn their heirs to poverty by periodic divisions of the patrimony among many children, the French cultivated the old arts of family limitation. The population of France grew slowly during the nineteenth century, from 28 million in 1800 to 39 million in 1914, while that of Germany rose from 21 to 67 million. France would need to bring in India to join the German and French Oil Colonial Pact to profit by the demographic resources of India of one billion plus people. The declining populations of France and Russia guarantees that French president Jacques Chirac and Russian President Vladimir Putin sign the Oil Pact to profit by imperialism of France-Germany-Russian-Indian Oil Colonialism in direct competition with American Oil Colonialism.

 

Depopulating the Soviet Union would force Russia to join forces with France, Japan and Germany to establish oil colonies in direct competition with American Oil colonialism, because Russians would never be able to compete with the west and America in consumer capitalist production. However, as a Oil colonial power Russia will become wealthy and prosperous. Similarly, France and Germany would become prosperous with the incomes of French and German Oil Colonies. Revolutionary France has not been the only demographic colossus committed to utopian naive restrictions on the freedom to bequeath. Marxist orthodoxy, as we have seen, envisions not merely a restriction on, but a total abolition of private inheritances. Accordingly, Marx and Engel are depopulating (and de-Europeanizing) the Soviet Union just as French revolutionary penalized France. The Great Russian ethnic majority, which had stabilized the identity of tsarist Russia, disappeared under the communists. Russia’s Boris Yeltsin preferred breakup of the Soviet Union so that Slav Russians could control the Russian Federation, even when Russian population decline continued. Georgian Joseph Stalin's and Bolshevik Jew Lavrenti Beria’s genocide of Russians and two World Wars left catastrophic deficits of Russian males; and infant mortality is skyrocketing to such an extent that China can seriously relish the possibility of an end to Soviet population growth in Siberia to the extend that Chinese could move in to occupy empty Eastern Siberia. American demographers concluded that the average Soviet woman has from six to eight abortions in her lifetime. Soviet feminists claim that the figure is closer to ten, with the inevitable probability of uterine damage. Infant mortality is up to the levels of underdeveloped countries and Soviet life expectancy, having risen impressively in the 1950s, is edging down. Western experts were astounded at this "health crisis" and cited alcoholism and health expenditure cutbacks, but these factors were more of an effect than a prime cause of sagging familial morale in the even in Putin’s Russia. Oil colonialism is the preferred economic model for Great Powers’ economic prosperity for world powers faced with the threat of declining populations and threat of aging nations. France, Germany and Belgium can provide the oil technology and capital for infrastructure development, Soviet nuclear deterrent can ward off American nuclear blackmail and Indian army can provide manpower to wage Oil Colonial wars and India can provide manpower for colonial administration in Oil colonies.

 

Malthusian Overpopulation & Redistribution of Continents

The per capita income of the nations is directly correlated to the population density of the nations. The World Bank’s World Development Report 2000/2001 “Attacking Poverty” gives the following figures for the regions of the world. The Low Income Nations population density (73 persons per sq. km), per Capita GDP ($1,790), have the population of 2,417 million, Surface land area (34.227 million sq. km), and had GNP ($988 billion) Per Capital GNP ($410), and the GDP (GNP at PPP) ($4,315 billion).

The Middle Income Nations have the population Density (40), Per capita GDP ($4,880), Population (2,667 million), Land area (67.3 million sq. km), GNP (5,323 Billion), Per Capital GNP (2,000), and GDP ($13,022B). The Lower Middle Income Nations have Population Density (48), Per Capital GDP ($3,960), Population (2,094 million), Surface area (44.8 million sq. km), GNP ($2,513 Billion), Per Capital GNP ($1,200), and GDP ($8,298 Billion). Upper Middle Income Nations have the Population Density (26), Per Capita GDP ($8,320), population (573 million), Surface Area (22.5 million sq. km), GNP ($2,810 Billion), Per Capita GNP ($4,900). South Asia has population density (278), Per capital GDP ($2,030), population (1,329 million), surface Area (5.14 million sq. km), GNP ($581 Billion), Per Capital GNP ($440), GDP ($2,695 billion).

 

The Population Density and Per Capital GNP are directly correlated, for Australia (2 / $20,050), Canada (3 / $19,320), USA (30 / $30,600), Europe & Central Asia (20 / $2,150), Latin America & Caribbean (25 / $3,840), Middle East & North Africa (26 / $2,060), Upper Middle Income Nations (26 / $4,900), Sub Sahara Africa (27 / $500), High Income Nations (29 / $25,730), Middle Income Nations (40 / $2,000), Lower Middle Income Nations (48 / $1,200), Low and Middle Income Nations (51 / $1,240), Low Income Nations (73 / $410), East Asia & Pacific ( 115 /$1,000), China (134 / $780), Pakistan (175 / $470), South Asia (278 /$440), India (336 /$450), Bangladesh (981 / $370). The GDP, Per Capital GDP and Population Density are: China ($4.112 Trillion / $3,291 Per Capital GDP / 134 density) and India ($2.144 Trillion, Per Capita GDP $2,149, Density 336 persons per sq. km).

 

The crucial issue of the 3rd Millennium is: How legitimate is the White Man’s conquest of the continents of Australia and Americas? Indigenous American Indians accounted for more than 20% of world population in AD 1500. At the time of the first European contact, in AD 1500, North America & South America may have been peopled by more than 90 million American Indians: about 10 million in America north of present-day Mexico; 30 million in Mexico; 11 million in Central America; 445,000 in the Caribbean Islands; 30 million in the South American Andean region; and 9 million in the remainder of South America (Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, P. 21). World population totaled about 500 million in AD 1650, and 275 million in AD 1000 (The World Book Encyclopedia, 1987, Vol. 15-P.597).

 

Should White race handover at least the continent of South America to Native Americans in exchange for the lands of the Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Native Americans that European Christians occupied after 1500 AD? The continued occupation of Australia and Eastern Siberia by white race is virtually impossible after 2050 AD. Australia and Siberia could be the cause of the Third World War. The White farmers in Zimbabwe must also vacate their holdings and hand over the lands to the Africans. The issue of the redistribution of the world’s lands in the age of growing world population becomes the most volatile political issue of the 21st century. Dr. Henry J. Kissinger had been advising China to expand northward in Eastern Siberia, hoping China’s expansionist military power will get blunted in the quagmire of the Siberian War, as happened to Napoleon, William Kaiser and Adolf Hitler.

 

Perhaps China may find defenseless Australia’s empty continent with only 25 million people an ideal home to resettle 400 million Chinese immigrants to solve the problem of overpopulation of China, which has crossed 1.2 billion. Would China invade Australia in the first half of the 21st Century or later? What should the role of India be in the event of Chinese invasions of Australia or Eastern Siberia? Would United States support China in the event of China’s invasions of Eastern Siberia? The Australia has the surface area of 7.74 million sq. kms and China with population of 1.25 billion has 9.6 million sq. km and India with population of 1 billion has 3.3 million sq. km surface area. Australia has the population density of 2 persons per km, China (134) and India (336). Obviously the problem of overpopulation of Asia and the very high density of population makes the need of equitable redistribution of the world’s continents the dire need of the 21st century.

 

The principal cause of the poverty of South Asia is the fact that the density of population is world’s highest at 278 persons per sq. km. The population density are India (336), Bangladesh (981), China (134), South Asia (278), East Asia & pacific (115), Europe & Central Asia (20), Middle East & North Africa (26), Sub-Sahara Africa (27), High Income nations (27), Low and Middle Income nations (51), Australia (2), Canada (3), and Russia (9). The problem of overpopulation of Asia, and inequalities in the population densities of nations can be resolved by allowing the unfettered immigration from overpopulated nations to the under populated nations, like Australia, Canada and Russia. The problem of overpopulation could trigger the Clash of Civilization, the Global Clash of Races and the New World Disorder. The people of the world should have the freedom to settle down in any country of their choice without any restriction of immigration. The open borders would secure peace among Civilizations and among world religions.

 

33(xvi) New Great Power Clubs

Non Alignment & UNO Tamed Bush

The Iraq crisis brought the NATO the trans Atlantic Alliance to an definitive end, and exposed the weakness and hypocrisy of the Islamic Organizations and Arab Organizations and reincarnated the dormant Non Alignment Movement and the United Nations. Non Aligned Members of the UN Security Council tamed the Shrew, the Yankee President Bush, by refusing to vote for the British-American Resolution on Iraq. India emerged as the major player in the world, when India led the 114-member Non Aligned Nation’s Movement valiantly opposed the President Bush’s war on Iraq, even when all Islamic nations and all Arab Muslim nations exposed their cowardly face. United Nations and Non Aligned Movement proved its relevance when United States failed to coerce, woo or bribe any Non Aligned Nation’s representative on the UN Security Council, to vote for the United States-Britain Resolution on Iraq. The Islamic and Arab organizations proved to be incompetent gatherings of no political standing in the events leading to the Iraq War. United States had an unexpected revelation when it failed to buy the Security Council votes of the Third World nominees, namely, Cameroon, Angola, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan. It was a very humbling experience for President Bush that the world’s greatest economic and military power failed to coerce, bribe or threaten the tiny nations of Africa to vote for America. What could be greater slap on the face of President Bush, when black African Non Aligned Nations Cameroon, Angola and Guinea jointly spat on the face of America and condemned the proposed American resolution? The opposition to the American war on Iraq remained on the rhetoric stage only and couldn’t move to the second stage of military support to Iraq, should remind Bush Administration that United Nations served a great purpose of becoming a platform of vocal criticism to vent nation’s frustrations, otherwise the anger of France, Germany, Russia and China could have taken the form of military support to Iraq, as had happened in Angola, when China and Soviet union supported a faction in the Civil War. The Bush Administration’s misconception is that a country as strong as the US does not need international institutions, namely, United Nations as they only constrain America's room for maneuvers. Had France rather than voicing its dissent in the UN Security Council, worked towards sending troops to Iraq, in alliance with Russia, China, India and Iran the outcome of the America’s war on Iraq might have been different? United Nations and Non Alignment Movement took a rebirth to lead the Third World to hold American imperialism in check. Non Aligned Nations are proud that President Bush failed to buy, woo, bribe, threaten or coerce the votes of Non Aligned Members of the UN Security Council.

 

India and NAM Tamed America

India has no option but to lead the 114-member Non Aligned Nations Movement to provide constructive leadership to the Third World so that United States might not threaten the independence, sovereignty and economic security of the Third World Nations. President Bush is right that institutions like United Nations and Non Alignment contain US power, but that is precisely why they are so integral to international stability and the post Cold War new world order. By obliging White house to adhere to common rules, the UNO and Non Aligned Movement (NAM) increase confidence in the purpose and predictability of US power. When White House walks away from international institutions, the rest of the world runs for cover and find shelter under the protective umbrella of India-led 114-member Non Aligned Nations Movement, which cut its teeth during Iraq crisis and would be ready to tame and discipline United States in the post-Saddam world. India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru led the Non Aligned World to tame the imperial aspirations of power-mad post Second World America and force the European colonial powers to expedite the de-colonization process, which led to the birth of numerous states in Africa, Asia and Caribbean.

 

Limits of American Power

The Zionist Cabal, Neo-conservatives and Religious Right Conservative conspiracy succeeded in sabotaging America’s declared war on Semite Wahhabi terrorism by fooling the Bush Administration and President Bush to believe that America’s recent preponderance allowed America the freedom to undertake any foreign military adventurism. The Israeli needed United States to invade Iraq and Syria to help Israel survive faced with the menace of Palestine suicide bombers, allegedly financed by Iraq and Syria. The Zionist lobby and American Oil lobby impressed upon President Bush that Bush Doctrine correctly outlined the American dream of eternal preeminence. As a result of Zionist conspiracy President Bush vastly overestimated the autonomy that comes with military supremacy. The Bush Administration has been dismissive of European Allies because White House felt that United States no longer needed the continued support of the Europeans for establishing American oil colony in Iraq, which aimed to scuttle the economic challenge French, Belgium and German oil companies posed to American oil companies in post-Embargo Iraq. Non Alignment Movement would periodically explain to the White House the limits the limited of America’s power and influence over the Non Aligned Third World in the post-Saddam world order. President Bush feels America doesn’t need it does not need Non Alignment Movement and United Nations, it should look again as the war on terrorism requires extensive international co-operation. Afghanistan can be held together only by a broad multinational coalition. Without the continued support of the Non Aligned Nations NATO troops would fail to exercise colonial control over Afghanistan.

 

Maritime Britain in American Camp

Without the involvement of Russia and India the “Old Europe” of Germany and France would fail to hold America in check and fail to assert European Union as the counter-weight to America. The Eurasian Big Four Club of France, Germany, Russia and India would be better alternative to the proposed Club of Big Three, the Club of France, Germany and Britain. Britain, Italy and Spain the world’s 7th, 8th and 14th largest economies, joined forces with United States the largest economy, to undermine the leadership role of Germany and France, the world’s 5th and 6th largest economies. The schism that developed between pro-Bush Britain and anti-Bush France and Germany akin to and no less significant than the proverbial 1000-year Christianity’s Great Schism. In the eyes of France and Germany, the maritime Britain, the Europe’s 3rd largest economy, performed as its suspected role as the Trojan Horse of European Union that purposely undermined the leadership role of Germany and France, Europe’s largest and the second largest by joining forces with Italy the Europe’s 4th largest economy and Spain the Europe’s 5th largest economy. With Britain, France and Germany having taken such widely divergent paths over war with Iraq, it is impossible that they would ever be able to work working together in creating a new world order, because Britain has cast its lot on the side of the United States and Germany and France cast their lot on the opposite side of the battle lines in the global balance of power. More to the point, are the three big powers in the European Union, Germany, France and Germany interested in providing the leadership the expanded European Union would need to effectively become a counter-weight to the American Oil Colonial Empire, if European Union is ever to count for more than the sum of its parts? For this to happen there will need to be a more systematic attempt among the three, Germany, France and Britain to pool strategic judgments, wise up to international reality of American imperial ambitions and formulate European Union’s policies ahead of, rather than in the wake of crisis. Above all, there needs to be an honest reckoning about how best to promote European interest with respect to the US, whether to adopt French perception of America as a wayward hyper-puissance power or to adopt British perception of America as a country with values very close to European and which possesses far more military clout, many times over, than the rest of Europe put together.

 

Club of Big Three Not Viable

The Club of World’s Big Three, the Club of America, China and Japan could become viable, as China and Japan would join forces with United States to share Iraqi oil. The Club of Asiaa’s Big three would become viable, as the Club of China, Japan and India has the potential to overshadow Euroepan Union and NAFTA, whenever the Asian powers become independent of Arabian Gulf Oil. The Club of European Big Three, the Club of Britain, France, and Germany would never become viable because of the Great Schism between maritime Britain and continental France and Germany on Iraq issue. European Union can become a major actor in world affairs led by France and Germany only when Britain is cut to its size. The European Club of ‘Big Three, Britain, France and Germany would fail to take off because maritime Britain is the Trojan Horse of Europe and would sabotage the Continental European unification, and would align with East European and Central European countries, to undermine the leadership role of France and Germany. Britain would sabotage any move that France and Germany may undertake to hold American oil colonial empire in the check. France, Britain and Germany, starting with Iraq but moving to other global issues, should develop a working relationship so that Europe might not become the Lap Dog of the White House. It would be in the interest of Britain to force American oil colonial empire share the oil loot with France and Germany, so that France might not oppose the American invasions of other oil-producing nation in future. The Big three should first make clear that they will only provide EU financial support to a postwar settlement that has been worked out through some form of multilateral process, where French and German companies are guaranteed fair share of the future Iraqi reconstruction contracts and oil contracts signed by Saddam Hussein with French, German and Russian companies are honored. The Big Three should show a maximum of flexibility in the form of United Nations involvement, as they did for the peace settlements in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. French and the Germans would not want to play a leading security role in the first few months, and they know that the Americans will not be able to afford the manpower or the funding to see the process through on their own. The Big Three must seek a new deal with the US for the future handling of global security issues. This should involve a respectful understanding of each other's differing points of view and detailed sharing of the incomes of the Iraqi oil loot and the loot of any other international military operations, perhaps against Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or UAE. However, America should convince France and Germany that White House would not contemplate the conquest of the world by consolidating America’s stronghold over oil and gas resources of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia.

 

Club of Big Four Eurasian Land Powers

The Continental European lands powers, France and Germany would join forces with Russia and China, the Asian land powers, to form the Eurasian Quadrilateral Club, to keep America in check. Neither China nor Japan would join the Quadrilateral Club with India and Russia as their economies dependent on trade with United States. Europe would never accept to be the Lap dog of the White House. France and Germany buy joining forces with Russia and India would project the power of European Union worldwide and effectively hold America in check. The West should reinvent the Quadrilateral in the form of a new Concert of World, and invite Russia, China and India as a way of managing great power relations among eight world powers. At the European level in the post Second World War era, there used to be a way of managing tensions between the US, UK, France and Germany called the Quadrilateral, based on their co-operation over Berlin at the height of the Cold War. The European Quadrilateral should be reinvented as a way to manage European affairs, between Germany, France, UK and Russia. There is no reason not to revive it as an active inter-governmental alliance for peace, including the Russians where possible. It would be informal and would not overlap with the UN Security Council, whose scope would be more legally based and reach more global. The Big three would have to show other EU members that it was not a directoire, like the post-French Revolution Directory, by reporting back regularly through the usual EU channels, so that European Union could assert its independence, without becoming a Lap Dog of the Yankee President. The countries of "new" Europe who supported the US stance on Iraq, such as Spain and Poland, should choosing between the maritime Anglo-Saxons and the continental Franco-Germans of the "old" Europe. Good co-ordination between the British, French and Germans would enhance the national interests of Big Three, as America after the Iraq War brought under American de facto colonial occupation Iraq, UAE, Qatar and Bahrain, which used to be the colonial possession of British Indian Empire.

 

Quadrilateral Club of Big Four

Quadrilateral Club: France, Germany, Russia, and India would help France emerge as the world power. France and Germany should develop long term foreign policies in consultations with Russia, China and India so that the Eurasian Quadrilateral Club of Big Four, Germany, France, Russia and India, could help European Union become the major player at the world arena and jointly hold America in check. There needs to be a new forward-planning unit reporting back to the three heads of government and to their foreign offices that is not rooted in snail's pace. Its explicit aim must be to remove the possibility of a situation like that of the past six months where America embarked upon imperial adventurism without consulting France and without agreeing to split the oil loot and spoils of war. A new planning unit would be informal, compact and discreet and may be called the Quadrilateral Club, which should include France, Germany, Britain and Russia and India. These three proposals aim to bring Europe's evolving foreign policy into line with real relationships among the key member states and across the Atlantic. Britain has no desire to help France and Germany to hold America in check, the principal goal of post-1999 foreign policy of France. Without a new determination at the highest level to work together, the France and Germany would fall out irrevocably with the US, then France and Germany, the so called “old Europe” would also drift away from Britain and from the other East European members, hyped by Donald Rumsfeld as “new" Europe. The very concept of British-Franco-German Club of Big Three doomed when Tony Blair reduced the self-esteem of Britain as the lap dog of President Bush. The Quadrilateral Club of Big Four world powers, namely, Germany, France, Russia and India would combine the resources of the world’s 5th, 6th, 10th and 2nd largest economies and succeed in holding the United States in check, to create new global balance of power based on the Richelieu’s principles of Raison d’etat and Balance of Power. Geopolitical interests of land powers, Germany, France, Russia and India coincide, and these four world powers have a common interest in taming the imperial ambitions of maritime America and Britain, so that le Anglo-Saxons might not embark upon the imperial dream of pax Americana.

 

The US-France Great Schism of 2003

France, Germany and Russia might agree to form a defense pact to hold United States in check. The Trans Atlantic NATO alliance would be split into two Camps, one led by United States and Britain and other led by France and Germany. The East European countries that would join the American Camp, notably Poland might be asked by France and Germany to leave the European Union.  A trio of three world powers, Chirac, Schroeder and Putin met in Moscow to chalk out common diplomatic strategy to hold American oil colonialism in check in Iraq. French President Jacques Chirac, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Axis of non-nein-nyet discussed their powerlessness to save Iraq from the infamous aggression, and they concealed their curses they hurled on America in their anger and their impotence. Chirac and Schroeder have no meaningful futures. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder would mend outward diplomatic relationship with United States, but Americans would say that the German-American breakup was overdue and the present state of affairs could deteriorate to the pre-Second World War level, when Germany and America were at war with each other. Jews want America to terminate its ties with Germany to punish Germans for the Holocaust. American troops would have to leave Germany within a year or two, because German considered American troops in Germany as hostile foreign occupation troops. America might continue to trade goods with Germany, but America will never again trade diplomatic intimacies with Germany, as every American has begun to hate Germany, more than President Bush ever hated Germany, when German Minister compared Bush to Hitler. America might shake hands with Germany in public, but President Bush’s private relationship with Gerhard Schroeder has been permanently shaken. Germany and America most likely would fight as adversaries in the Third World War. America would very likely go to war against France and Germany, so Germans want to force America troops leave American military bases located on German soil. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin is colder and more wary of empty gestures. America would find ways to work with Moscow, although America’s embrace will not be particularly warm as President Putin would always like to restrain the United States, but Russia will never sacrifice Russia’s interests to those of France or Germany.

 

The Great Schism between maritime Anglo-Saxon America and Britain on one side and continental France and Germany on other side had become deeper than Grand Canyon and there is no possibility of NATO alliance to survive this clash of Civilization, national honor, policies and geopolitical perceptions. Further liberating America from its thrall to continental Europe, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld correctly dismissed incompetent "Old Europe" as much diminished in relevance. When next the Germans and French tug at the sleeves of American policymakers, White House would very likely to brush them off, not without a measure of satisfaction, and repay their hatred to American invasion of Iraq in cash and in kind with high interests added to it. America would completely undermine the diplomatic relationship with France, as it pleased American Jews the most, as Jews resented the anti-Semitic political outbursts by Le Pen in France. President Chirac and French Foreign Minister Dominque de Villepin, did France a great honor and greatly enhanced the international status of France through "l'affaire Iraq." President Chirac and Foreign minister de Villepin greatly enhanced France's international influence and authority and world role. President Chirac garnered a solid round of applause with his laudatory performance in opposition to the American imperialism in Iraq. But the end effect of the American imperialism in Iraq, was to bring Charles de Gaulle's legacy to become the solid foundation of the French foreign policy in the 21st Century, which is to hold America in check, by developing closer military, political and diplomatic ties with other great powers, Germany, Russia, China and India.

 

Jews Controlled Media Demonized French

The Jews control American media and Jews have seen to it that France and Germany would never ever become friends again. American Jews took great pleasure in demonizing French and Germans and in the process harming American French relationship beyond repair. Jews controlled American media succeeded in making the post-War close allies into most likely adversaries in the Third World War in the matter of few months. Jews harmed the national interests of the United States by causing irreparable damages to French-American, and German-American relations that it became possible to write about the possible American-German War in the course of the Third World War, that ignited America’s fear of Adolf Hitler when German minister during election campaign compared President Bush to Adolf Hitler. The venom that Jewish owned American media hurled at France, French President Chirac and French Foreign Minister Dominque de Villepin irreparably damaged French-American cultural, religious and diplomatic ties, and it might expedite the secession of French-majority Quebec from Canada, if Canada continued to be friendlier to United States than to France. Since the close of the Second World War, France mistakenly believed that Continental Europeans could work with Yankees, and France chose not to assert its diplomatic voice louder to match what its nuclear stature and permanent member of the US Security Council merited. France would have been great power on the world arena, had France not joined the NATO and instead entered into military Pact with India. India-France pact would have made France the dominant power of Western Europe, and Germany after unification would have readily joined the France-India Pact. France has nothing in common with Britain and United States and much in common with India and Germany. The era of Franc’s subordination to le Anglo-Saxons United States and Britain is over, and new era of the French grandeur is on the horizon, led by President Chirac that would be continued by the next pro-Right President Le Pen and his pro-Right Prime Minister of France.

 

French media and public behaved admirably when they faced the venom hurled by British and American press and diplomats. To French the President Bush was the shoot-from-the-hip cowboy. To Americans Chirac shot his own country in the back, but to French and Germans and to majority of the third World, President Chirac made rest of the world respect and love France, when civilized well-mannered took cowboy Bush to task in the United Nations and Non Aligned Nations honored him by spitting on the face of President Bush, when he attempted to buy, bribe, and coerce votes of the Guinea, Cameroon, Angola, Chile and Pakistan on the British Resolution on Iraq, and America gave up and withdrew its resolution in the UN Security Council. France defied the United States, wisely and too well that put American diplomats on the defensive. French Foreign Minister Dominque de Villepin successfully humiliated Secretary Colin Powell, the Bush Cabinet's most congenial member from a European perspective, which translated to mean that Bush Administration’s foreign policy totally failed in 2003. The astonishing thing is that Chirac genuinely seemed to have believed that France could force a bit into Washington's mouth, then jerk the reins. Never before could France humiliate America in the eyes of the world. French diplomats outsmarted American diplomats. In the United Nations, President Chirac proved that France is greater diplomatic power than United Nations and Britain in the corridors of the United Nations, once India-led 114-member Non Aligned Nations put their support behind France and Germany. France didn’t fell off the horse when the race got underway. America and Britain fell off the horse when the race for UN Security council votes got under way and Bush and Blair chickened out and withdrew their Resolution. The resolve of the Non Aligned Nations, represented by poor Cameroon, Guinea, and Angola made Yankee superpower eat a humble pie in the corridors of the United Nations.

 

The WASPs should look into the matter as why American media leveled personal insults on French leaders and French Civilization, that the Capitol passed the legislation that renamed French Fries to Freedom Fries. Whether WASPs, Catholics or Jews took the lead to take the French diplomatic opposition to American imperialism, to the America’s Civilization’s war on French and German Civilization. America will have handshakes with Paris and hollow hugs and kisses in future, but France will never again be allowed even the illusion of a voice in shaping American policy, and America would never be allowed even an illusion of a voice in shaping French and German and Belgium policies for decades to come. Chirac has thrown away the last rags of influence America and Britain could wear to the diplomatic ball in the Paris and Berlin and Brussels. Consider the situation in which France has been placed by this very impressive outburst of Gallic honor: France's high level of international influence has been advertised to the whole world to the great pleasure of the French. France has an aging population, a troubled economy and a hamstrung government paralyzed by a culture of entitlement, and it realized that by joining forces with fellow great powers, Germany, Russia, China and India, France would effectively tame and hold America in check. France in alliance with India and Russia would put strings on American imperialism surging ahead. France's shrunken military is closer in organization and capabilities to a World War II force than to America's armed forces; the French cannot even manage civil strife in Ivory Coast, but in alliance with India, France would be able to reestablish French colonial influence over former French colonial Empire. France's elite and bourgeois intellectuals have clear vision for the future of France, as a great world power in alliance with democratic India. French nostalgia for the past can be realized with the help of Indian military and massive Indian immigration to France mainland and outlying Islands. France has the most anti-Semitic society in Europe, with rapidly expanding Arab and ethnic African populations unable to integrate, which necessitated French-India defense ties and open immigration from India. France realized that without the massive immigration from Hindu India and military ties with India, the coming social explosions exacerbated by Semite Wahhabi Islamic militants would make America's race riots of the 1960s look like a series of cotillions. India and France and Germany realized that Islamic militants in India and pro-France moderate liberal secular Algeria financed by pro-American Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabian terrorists, who are given full exposure and support by the anti-French Jewish media in United States. Still, fairness is a French, if not an American or Israeli or Wahhabi trait. After all the wartime jokes have been told, the truth is that neither the French people nor President Chirac to blame for the current state of affairs, the main villains in the American-French vituperations had been the Jewish controlled mainstream American media that exploited President Bush’s personal hatred for Gerhard Schroeder into Semite counter attacks on Germans and French for the alleged holocaust Vincy France committed on Jews of France.

 

33(xvii) Demise of Religion as a Basis of State Principle

Demise of Israel Saudi Arabia Pakistan

The geopolitical interests of American oil colonialism in Iraq diametrically conflicts with the religious interests of the theocratic states that took birth based on the principle of religion as the basis of the state, namely, Jewish Israel, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Catholic Vatican and Muslim Pakistan. American oil interests could work towards the demise of the Islamic state of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, because they no longer served the interests of American oil colonialism after the American conquest of Iraq. American oil colonialism propagated the principle that fundamentalist separatist Islam could be the basis for the creation of the State of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to promote American oil interests in the former territories of Ottoman Empire. After the colonial occupation of Iraq, the American oil interests would demand the demise of the Islamic states of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, and agree to dump the very principle that separatist fundamentalist religion or Islam could be the basis of the State. Once, American oil colonialism would reject the very principle that separatist fundamentalist intolerant religion could be the basis of the secession of the state and creation of the religion-based state. This change in the geopolitical perception of the American oil colonialism threatened the continued existence of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait and UAE.

 

The Jewish state of Israel, Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Islamic state of Pakistan, represented the evil products of the predator intolerant fundamentalist ideology that separatist fundamentalist Religion can be the basis of the State. The womb of evil fed on the predator principle that Religion or ethnic separatism could be the basis of the new state. The world civilizations faced the greatest threat for the concept that Religion can be the basis of the new State. Artificial state of Israel created by American oil colonialism based on the principle of that the religion of Judaism shall be the basis of Jewish state of Israel, which had not existed during last 2,000 years. American oil colonialism created the artificial State of Saudi Arabia based on the principle that religion of Wahhabi Sunni Islam shall be the basis of the new Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and named the country after the family name of King Abdul Aziz Al Saud, which had never existed in history. British Empire created the artificial state of Pakistan, on the principle that religion of Islam can be the basis of the new Islamic State of Pakistan, which had never existed in history. American oil colonialism promoted the principle of fundamentalist Judaism as the basis of the State of Israel to carve out Israel out of the territories of Ottoman Caliphate. American oil colonialism promoted the principle of fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam as the basis of the States of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, out of the former territories of the Ottoman Caliphate, and all these artificial states had never existed in the history of the mankind. American oil colonialism and British Empire promoted the principle of fundamentalist separatist Islam as the basis of Pakistan, to create the artificial state of Pakistan, which had never existed in human history. American oil colonialism promoted the principle of Wahhabi Islam, fundamentalist Judaism, and separatist Islam as the guiding principle for creation of Saudi Arabia, Israel and Pakistan out of the Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire. Over time the concept of the Wahhabi Islam as the basis of state evolved into policies towards carving out the Islamic State of Palestine out of the Jewish State of Israel. Thus the concept of Islam as the basis of state came into direct conflict with the concept of Judaism as the basis of Jewish State. In order to protect the legitimacy of Jewish State of Israel, and avert the creation of the independent state of Palestine, the American oil colonialism would have to work hard toward denigrating the concept of Wahhabi Islam as the basis of the State.

 

If America rejected the concept of Islam as the basis of state then the existence of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan came into doubt. If America accepted the concept of Islam as the basis of state then Islamic state of Palestine should be created out of the Jewish State of Israel. If American accepted the Israeli logic that secular liberal Israel has greater legitimacy than the fundamentalist Islamic regimes, then secular, liberal states of Syria and Iraq acquired greater legitimacy than Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and non-democratic Pakistan. If Semite Saudi Arabia and Muslim Pakistan could support with impunity the murderous Wahhabi terrorists in Kashmir, then Iraq and Syria could not be faulted if they financed and supported the Palestinian suicide bombers that threatened the very existence of Israel into doubt.

 

If Americans accepted the imperialistic dogma propagated by Zionist Cabal and Neo-conservatives that American should establish direct American oil colony over Iraq, with world’s second largest oil and gas reserves, then American Empire must invade Semite Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE after it consolidated its rule over Iraq. If Americans accept the Zionist idea that American oil colonialism should pay no more than $2 per barrel for oil that it would extract from Iraqi oil fields, then it must also force Semite Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to accept no more than $2 per barrel for the oil that American Big Oil would extract from Semite Oil fields.

 

The long-term economic, political, military and national interests of Zionist Israel, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and WASPs Oil Colonialism have come into open conflict and resulted in dialectic contradictions. The WASPs Oil Colonialism would demand the demise of Jewish state of Israel and the demise of Wahhabi State of Saudi Arabia so that oil-producing wells of Arabian Peninsula became the de facto territories of the United States, so that Americans could exploit as much oil and gas resources as they need and pay whatever price they deem desirable to the Wahhabi tyrants. After establishing American oil colonies over Iraq, Jewish state of Israel and Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia became expandable and the national interests of Israel and Saudi Arabia no longer coincided with that of the Untied States. The powerful state of Soviet Union collapsed because it was based on the evil concept of Communism and Semite Marxism, the Jewish State of Israel, the Islamic states of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Pakistan would demise during first half of the 21st Century, because they were founded on the evil principle that fundamentalist, separatist religions could be the basis of a new State.

 

American oil interests created the artificial states of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Israel based on the evil principle that fundamentalist religion could be the basis of the secession to create a new independent state, primarily to promote American oil interests in the Arabian Peninsula. After American conquest of oil-rich Iraq, American oil colonialism no longer needed the support of Saudi Arabia as it became hindrance towards American goal to extract oil from Arabia by paying no more than $2 per barrel of oil or its equivalent for the gas to the Arab tyrants.

 

Demise of America’s Alliance With Turkey

America promoted military dictatorships in Turkey and Pakistan but refused to share Iraqi oil loot with them, while it allowed Wahhabi Saudi Arabia to increase its influence over Iraq. American colonial occupation of Iraq rekindled the Ottoman dreams in Erdogan’s Turkey as Iraq and Saudi Arabia had been the part of Ottoman Empire. American oil Colonialism installed the secular spy secular Kemal Pasha Ataturk and the succession of CIA spies the secular conservative military dictators in Turkey, the successor state of the Ottoman Caliphate to protect the interests of American oil colonialism by abandoning all claims ot the Ottoman legacies in the former territories of oil-rich Arabia. The Christian oil colonialism impressed upon Kemalist Turkey the need to impose secular society over Turkey and to abandon any claims over patrimony of the Ottoman Empire in name of secularism. The Islamic prime minister Erdogan realized that secular Turkey gained nothing by virtue of being secular, and Western Europe and the United States promoted arch fundamentalist Wahhabi Saudi Arabia as leader of the Islamic world and expected Muslim Turkey would help Christian America conquer and colonize oil-rich Muslim Iraq, even when American oil colonialism wouldn’t share any part of the Iraqi oil loot with Turkey. Islamic Prime Minister of Turkey Erdogan realized that the national interests of secular, moderate Islamic Turkey conflict with the national interests of American oil colonialism and coincide with the interests of France and Germany. Aryan moderate Islamic Turkey should secure closer military ties with Aryan Shiite Iran and Aryan Hindu India to develop closer ties to play greater role in the oil-rich Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia. American oil colonialism would not allow Turkey increase its influence over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq, as these countries had been colonial possessions of Islamic Ottoman Caliphate.

 

Second Partition of Pakistan

After America’s colonial occupation of Iraq, the nuclear-armed Muslim Pakistan governed by military dictatorship became threat to the geopolitical interests of American oil colonialism in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. Militarist Pakistan would develop imperial ambitions in the Arabian Gulf region as Indian Empire, of which Pakistan was an important part enjoyed paramount powers in Iran, Kuwait, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar and Oman before 1947. Pakistan is important to American oil colonialism as it sits on the Turkmenistan is southward oil and gas pipeline that would link the oil and gas resources of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan to the Baluchistan Sea Port of Gwadar on the Arabian Sea. American oil colonialism engineered the First partition of Pakistan in 1971, with the secession of Bangladesh as Halliburton Company had identified the huge gas reserves in Bay of Bengal basin. American oil colonialism would engineer the secession of Baluchistan to create a new federation of Baluchistan, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan to provide direct Sea outlet to the landlocked oil-rich Caspian Central Asian Islamic republics. India and United States have a common interest in the second partition of Pakistan and engineer the secession of Baluchistan and arrange the Confederation of Baluchistan, with Afghanistan and Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, so that the Central Asia might have direct sea outlet in Arabian Sea at port of Gwadar.

 

33(xviii) Bush’s Reelection 2004

Wolfowitz, Cheney & Neo-Conservatives

The Zionist Cabal led by Paul Wolfowitz, the Oil Cabal led by Dick Cheney, and the Neo-Conservative Cabal convinced President Bush that the conquest of Iraq would promote the security of Israel and stop the suicide bombers, boost the American economy by free Iraqi oil, and iconoclast monotheist agenda would be furthered by destruction of the pagan heritage of Iraq, whose ancestors had expelled Jews from Jerusalem, enslaved Jews and exiled them to servitude in Babylon. President Bush bought the agenda, which can be summed up as, “Crush the enemy whether he creates a threat or not and tell the world to go and sit in the Devil’s lap if it doesn’t like it. Collin Powell chose to go along with Paul Wolfowitz and Dick Cheney. Iraq war’s proponents are Zionists in red-white-and-blue sheepskins bleating patriotic slogans when their actual interest is establishing Israeli oil colonialism in the Middle East by partnering with fellow Semite Saudis.

 

The TV networks sold out to the GOP war agenda, because they didn’t really report the war and the world politics. The TV networks only co-signed the GOP war agenda and drooled over the killing power of the American military machine. The Christian religious right too naively optimistic about an agenda that focuses primarily on oil imperialism, white’s pro-segregation rights, fighting affirmative action, opposing the fall out of the 1964 Bill of Rights, prayer in schools, the right to life, opposition to the right of abortion, and the easy access to guns. America’s problem is the essential problem of the modern age: the responsible use of America’s technological, military and economic power. Will such American power foster freedom in the Third World or maintain oppression by periodically promoting military coups. If American people, especially the WASPs believed that President Bush invaded Iraq to promote the Semite Israeli Jewish interests and Semite Saudi Wahhabi interests, they might not become convinced that they should grant President Bush a repeat performance. The destruction of the Baghdad Museum would cost President Bush his 2004 elections, unless he galvanized the WASPs and put Semite Jews and Semite Muslims responsible for the destruction of Baghdad Museum by prosecuting them to the fullest extent of law. Why should Reformed Christianity take the blood libel of the Semite Jews and Semite Muslims? Why should WASPs allow history to write that American troops that burnt the Baghdad Museum or allow it to be burnt were uncivilized barbarians, like their fellow Semite Jews and Semite Wahhabi Muslims that did the actual burning. The burning of the pagan artifacts by iconoclast monotheist Semite Jews and Semite Muslims would rank as one of the most criminal acts of genocide and war crimes in world history and might outrank Hitler’s Holocaust of Jews and Bolshevik Jew Lavrenti Beria’s genocide of 30 million Orthodox Russians. Bolshevik Jew Beria murdered 30 million Russians to implement Semite Marxist agenda. Semite Jews and Semite Muslims burnt the Baghdad Museum to implement the Semite iconoclast monotheist agenda over non-Semite Iraq. Unless good WASPs take the lead and prosecute all Semite Jews and Semite for the war crime of Burning of Baghdad Museum, the God would punish Semite Israel and Semite Saudi Arabia by destroying their state and exiling them to foreign lands and the Semite Jews and Semite Wahhabi Muslims would start their Second Diaspora away from the Arabian Peninsula for another exile of over 2,000 years. White Protestants and Reformed Christianity should not shield guilty Semite Jews and Semite Muslims from prosecution for the destruction of Baghdad Museum. Americans should not shield guilty Semite Jews and Semite Wahhabi Muslims from prosecution. Otherwise world history would record that coalition of barbarian nations invaded civilized Iraq in 2003 to burn the civilization of Iraq, and rest of the world did nothing? All Semite Jews and Semite Muslims, responsible for the burning of Baghdad Museum must be awarded life imprisonment and all their property should be confiscated.

 

33(xix) Taming Henry Kissinger

War Crimes of Henry Kissinger

United States opposed the International Criminal Court primarily, because it fears that the Court would prosecute former Secretary Henry Kissinger for Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents. "I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist due to the irresponsibility of its people," Kissinger once famously uttered. Attempts to question Henry Kissinger about terrorist crimes and war crimes have put the darker side of his career under the spotlight. He was arguably the second most influential architect of US foreign policy since the Second World War, other than John foster Dulles. Henry Kissinger ran foreign policy over the head of the Secretary of State William Rogers. Kissinger was the man who implemented détente with the Soviet Union. Kissinger opened up the way to Nixon's visit to China. Kissinger assumed almost complete control of foreign affairs during the Nixon years.

 

IS HENRY KISSINGER A WAR CRIMINAL: British writer, Christopher Hitchens, in his recent book The Trial of Henry Kissinger, argues that Kissinger is a war criminal. Hitchens claims Kissinger connived with brutal regimes, allied to the US, most notably Pakistan, Greece and Indonesia, to embark on savage acts of repression.

 

OPERATION CONDOR: The Spanish judge, Baltazar Garzon, pursued the extradition to Spain of General Pinochet while the former Chilean dictator was in London. Now this same judge is trying to question Kissinger about the deaths of Spanish nationals murdered and tortured as part of Operation Condor. A French judge is doing the same in relation to murdered French citizens. Kissinger has admitted that mistakes were "quite possibly" made by the administrations in which he served. But Kissinger has questioned whether, 30 years after the event, "courts are the appropriate means by which determination is made". None of the judges, so far, have suggested that they want to do anything more than question Henry Kissinger.

 

Was Kissinger was actively involved in the establishment of Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents? The CIA's involvement in the coup, which toppled the elected Chilean leader Salvador Allende and brought General Pinochet to power, has been long well documented. But a number of factors have brought these old chestnuts back into public prominence. Chileans demonstrating against the brutality of the Pinochet regime, and the Documents recently released by the CIA, strengthen previously held suspicions that Kissinger was actively involved in the establishment of Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents. Most notably, charges relating to Latin America have returned to haunt Henry Kissinger.

 

Kissinger's complicity in the illegal carpet-bombing of neutral Cambodia, designed to deprive North Vietnam of troops and supplies, but which sowed the seeds for the murderous Pol Pot regime. He was the secret negotiator at the Paris peace talks, which ended the Vietnam War for which he was awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize. Practically Dr. Henry Kissinger got the Nobel Peace prize for Cambodian policy that saw the genocide of 2 million Buddhists.

 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: At the same time, the success of international tribunals in bringing suspected war criminals such as Yugoslavia's former leader Slobodan Milosevic to trial has created a new impetus for righting the serious wrongs of the past. The new International Criminal Court, ratified this month, is a de facto message to tyrants and torturers everywhere that they can run but can't hide.

 

If it ever came to a trial, the prosecution would be hampered by Kissinger's obsession with secrecy. Not only did he execute much of his foreign policy by the back door, when he left office in 1977, he deposited most of his personal papers in the US Library of Congress. They will remain sealed until five years after his death.

 

Henry Kissinger once said, "90% of politicians give the other 10% a bad reputation." Kissinger rose to become a Harvard professor and then assumed control of America's foreign policy under Presidents Nixon and Ford, has bitterly divided opinion over which of these two percentage categories he belongs to. Zbigniew Brzezinski followed Kissinger’s strategy, where he as national Security Adviser, determined President Carter’s policy towards China. Henry Kissinger haunted by his past.

 

He had a hold over President Nixon Kissinger became Richard Nixon's national security adviser in 1969. It was testament to his mastery of political infighting and his increasing hold over the president that, in all but the final year of the Nixon presidency, he ran foreign policy over the head of the Secretary of State, William Rogers. By this policy, he made the world a safer place. He negated the Communist threat in America's back yard, most notably in Chile.

 

With his famous "shuttle diplomacy" after the 1973 Yom Kippur war in the Middle East, he brokered the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel. And he was the man who kept American foreign policy on the rails after the Watergate scandal and maintained its momentum under President Ford. His wisdom is still sought after. Of course when American policy under Kissinger was more motivated by global balance of power and national interest at the expense of human rights. The world was polarized, and fighting communism involved hard choices and messy compromises. This messy business, though, is what has made him a highly controversial figure.

 

Seymour Hersh, in a 1983 biography, Kissinger, the Price of Power, argued that this bombing, moreover, jeopardized America's atomic security. Kissinger sanctioned the illegal bombing of Cambodia.

 

KISSINGER TO HEAD INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: It is possible that Dr. Henry Kissinger would investigate the role of certain European religious organizations that may have cooperated with the Islamic terrorists. President Bush appointed Henry Kissinger in charge of the Independent commission to investigate the lapses during 9/11 terrorist attacks. The commission has a broad mandate, building on the limited joint inquiry conducted by the House and Senate intelligence committees. The independent panel will have 18 months to examine issues such as aviation security and border problems, along with intelligence. Members would report back more quickly than 18 months. Nation needs to know quickly how it can avoid terror attacks in the future. "The sooner we have the commission's conclusions, the sooner we can act on them. He should carefully examine all evidence and follow all facts, wherever they lead. Did not set as a primary goal for the commission to uncover mistakes or lapses of the government that could have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks. It should try to help the administration learn the tactics and motives of the enemy.

 

This commission will help Bush and future presidents to understand the nature of the threats we face. America must uncover every detail and learn every lesson of September the 11th." Bush administration will continue to act on the lessons we've learned so far to better protect the people of this country. It's our most solemn duty. The commission's creation is part of a bill authorizing intelligence activities in the 2003 budget year. It provides the biggest-ever increase in intelligence spending in an attempt to fix some counter-terrorism weaknesses, such as a lack of information-sharing, a shortage of experts in certain key languages and new attention to traditional, human spying.

 

Like the Homeland Security Department, the independent commission was an idea to which Bush's support came late. The White House held that only Congress should investigate, arguing that an independent probe could distract administration officials from anti-terrorism efforts and produce leaks that could compromise intelligence operations. The change of heart came in September, as family members of Sept. 11 victims applied pressure and congressional hearings began to uncover intelligence and law enforcement failures. The White House had concerns about the leadership and subpoena powers of the panel.

 

Only a bipartisan group should be able to compel testimony and documents, fearing that one-party subpoenas would lead to ineffective finger-pointing and allow the panel to be used merely to score political points. The 10-member commission will be evenly divided between Republican and Democratic appointees. The president will name the chairman and it will take at least six members, in most cases, to approve subpoenas. Bush does not envision testifying before the panel. The bill requires a database of known or suspected international terrorists. Two of the Sept. 11 hijackers were placed on a State Department watch list in the weeks before the attacks, but other agencies were not notified. The bill also establishes a new center to help intelligence agencies quickly translate foreign languages; provides millions for the study of languages key to national security; and calls for a standard way for all agencies to spell names from other alphabets.

 

The Commission should study whether the pact of President Reagan with the Polish Bishop the present Pope John Paul II, which united the resources of the Polish Church with that of the CIA, to undermine the Polish government and Communism in Eastern Europe, remained in effect long after the end of the Cold War, and which compromised the ability of the CIA to overlook any involvement of the anti-women, fundamentalist organizations in the 9/11 attacks.

 

Power-Money Nexus in Executive Branch

US politicians, diplomats, flag officers and lobbyists have enjoyed a cozy relationship with their counterparts on the Saudi and Chinese side. The tie is promised on Americans- Democrats and Republicans alike- accommodating the Saudi Kingdom’s and Communist China’s wishes and in return, being plied with substantial sums of money, either at the time or after they leave government service. “The culture of corruption, in other words, pervades the upper reaches of the White House and several departments,” says Daniel Pipes (www Daniel Pipes org, author of “Militant Islam Reaches America,” and Director of the Middle East Forum, quoted in “Govt. for Sale, Post Opinion, Nov. 20, 2002)

 

Bush administration officials and leading US Senators responded very differently to the news that Princess Haifa al-Faisal, wife of the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, had given thousands of dollars to a person connected to two of the 9/11 suicide hijackers. Their difference highlights a problem that needs addressing through congressional legislation; ways to prevent undue Saudi and Chinese influence through the spread of their money. Bush administration offered excuses for the couple and glossed over the problem of law enforcement. Colin Powell said that it is unlikely that Prince Bandar or Her Royal Highness would do anything that would support terrorist activity. President’s press secretary, Ari Fleischer, promoted the self-serving Saudi line that Osama bin Laden specifically recruited Saudi hijackers for the 9/11 attacks to drive a wedge between the United States and Saudi Arabia. This idea is palpably false: that 15 out of 19 hijackers were Saudi was not a political ploy but the result of the fact that Saudis are the largest national contingent by far in al Qaeda.

 

33(xx) Grand Semite Conspiracy

Did Jewish Cabal induce United States to invade Iraq, as continuation of its global conspiracies to control the mineral resources of the world? Was the invasion of Iraq a continuation of the plan to bring all Arab oil producers under the control of Semite Saudi Arabia?

 

De Beers Semite Conspiracy in Black Africa

Indians controlled the economy of East Africa, before Idi Amin expelled Indians from Uganda. The Semite De Beers Cartel in alliance with British colonial interests conspired to depopulate Black Africa South of Sahara to reestablish White Neo-Colonialism, so that the Africa’s agricultural lands, plantations, mines, diamond and gold mines remained under white ownership, even while the political power transferred to the black stooges. De Beers promoted the Civil War in Angola, Liberia and Ivory Coast by supporting rebels to buy diamonds cheaply from the rebels, then De Beers shifted sides and destroyed the rebels it had historically supported, to make a direct deals with the governments that agreed to award De Beers monopoly over deep diamond mines, and the diamond mining rights in the rebel controlled areas. De Beers financed terrorists and rebels to destabilize the legitimate governments in Angola, Liberia, and Ivory Coast, and for decades bought the rebel diamonds at throwaway prices. Then it forced the governments in Angola, Liberia and Ivory Coast to grant diamond monopoly over rebel-controlled diamond mines, and then De Beers destroyed the rebels and killed rebel leaders. De beers financing the Tutsi, Ugandan, and Rwandan troops in Congo to force Congo into servitude to De Beers. Semite De Beers opposed Robert Mugabe’s plans to nationalize the agricultural holdings of the pro-Apartheid white settlers in Zimbabwe. De Beers undermined the efforts to check spread of AIDS in Africa, hoping that the depopulation of black Africa, would expedite the Semite Colonialism of Africa. Israel and Britain supported the America’s oil colonialism in Iraq, even when American didn’t guarantee Britain and Israel share in the Iraqi oil loot, because Israel and Britain reasoned that American would honor Israeli and British colonial interests in Africa in return for their support to American colonialism in Iraq. Just as United Stated imposed UN embargo on Iraq, to weaken it so that Untied States could occupy it without much loss of lives, similarly De Beers Cartel managed to impose embargo on the exports of African diamonds, under the camouflage of Blood Diamonds. Semite De Beers financed the Semite Neo-Conservatives to secure the interests of De Beers Israeli-British colonial interests in South Africa and Southern Africa, in exchange for its support to American oil colonialism in Iraq.  

 

Winnie Mandela Exposed South Africa

Nelsen Mandela was a white man’s stooge implanted to guarantee that pro-Apartheid white companies would remain under White ownership even during black rule. Winnie Madikzela-Mandela ended the Apartheid in South Africa, and ungrateful black rulers of South Africa, fearing that Winnie Mandela could become the next popular President of South Africa slapped a 4-year jail sentence on her. On April 24, so-called Black regime of South Africa stood exposed as the pro-Apartheid pro-White regime headed by the stooges of white imperialists. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, the fiery anti-apartheid leader and ex-wife of former President Nelson Mandela, was sentenced to four years in prison Friday for her conviction on fraud and theft charges. She was convicted on April 24, 2003, Thursday of 43 counts of fraud and 25 of theft of money from a women's political league. The judge handed down a five-year sentence on April 25th, Friday but suspended one year of that term. Magistrate Peet Johnson said she could be released on parole after eight months and required to perform community service for the remainder of her term. Madikizela-Mandela had pleaded innocent to 60 charges of fraud and 25 of theft involving $120,000 at the African National Congress Women's League, which Madikizela-Mandela leads. Outside the courtroom, Madikizela-Mandela declined to discuss the case. However, she said she had resigned her seat in Parliament, her membership in the executive committee of the governing African National Congress (news - web sites), and the head of the ANC Women's League. "I will remain a dedicated, committed and loyal member of the ANC," she said. "I intend to spend my time henceforth to do the work that I started in my early life and to bind my destiny with everyone with whom I share the ideals of a just South Africa." Madikizela-Mandela was convicted in 1991 for kidnapping and assault. Her six-year jail sentence was reduced on appeal to a fine. Madikizela-Mandela also faces a public reprimand in Parliament for failure to disclose some of her income. In Cape Town on Friday, the High Court dismissed with costs her bid to stop the reprimand. India should demand that all charges on Winnie Mandela, the Mother of South Africa’s freedom should be unconditionally dropped, and India should support the election of Winnie Mandela as the future President of South Africa.

 

Semite Conspiracy in the Middle East

Israel a nation of 6 million people and GNP of $99 billion is a 2nd rate military power, but major regional military power in the Middle East. Israel lost its military edge faced with the Palestinian suicide bombing and oil-income financed Saudi lobbyists. The Palestine suicide bombers scared the Jewish people of and the very existence of Israel came into doubt, when the suicide bombing resulted in the mass exodus of Israelis from Israel to United States and Europe. American Jews joined Republican Neo-Conservatives and secured alliance with American Big Oil to plan the direct invasions of Iraq to establish the American oil colony over Iraq. Jews want American troops to invade Syria and Yemen so that the entire Arabian Peninsula could be brought under the control of pro-Saudi Wahhabi regimes that agreed to transfer control over their oil and gas resources to American Big Oil.

 

Wahhabi Diplomacy is Zionist Conspiracy

Bedouin tribes of Mecca never enjoyed any prosperity and power after Baghdad Caliphate established in mid eighth century. Jews, Americans, British and Indian Empire gave the idea to the Sharif of Mecca to create new State in the Arabian Peninsula based on the principle of Wahhabi religion.  Wahhabi clergy transferred to Americans the control over Arab oil resources, in exchange for the religious rule of Wahhabi clergy in Mecca and Medina and rule of House of Al Saud over Saudi Arabia.  British spymaster Colonel Lawrence of Arabia is the Father of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. American and British colonialism and Zionists promoted the idea of Wahhabi fundamentalism and Mecca Caliphate as the future Caliphate, to make American colonies in the oil-producing Islamic world. It also served the tribal interests of the nomad Bedouin of Mecca & Medina, as it gave royalty tiles to the poor, impoverished dacoits. The tribes of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE made incomes by looting the Haj pilgrims and the traders that flocked to Mecca during Hajj pilgrimage.

 

33(xxi) Conclusion

WASPs Oil Pax Americana Is OK

One. WASPs Oil Pax Americana American Oil Colonialism might be palatable to the other great powers, namely, Russia, India, Germany, France and China, if it did not have any hidden religious agenda, whether Wahhabi, Jewish or Papal religious agenda, and if America agreed to share its oil colonial loot with other great powers.

 

Pay $2 per barrel Royalty to Arab Tyrants

Two. The purpose of American oil colonialism should be to pay no more than $2 per barrel of oil and equivalent for gas, for extracting oil and gas from oil fields located in any American oil colony. The cost of extraction and deliver came to $2 per barrel of oil. American economy would profit if American oil companies would exploit colonial oil and pay to the colonial puppet rulers no more than $ 2 per barrel of oil and keep the profits for the economic development of the homeland of the colonial power, namely United States in Iraq. After consolidating colonial occupation rule over Iraq, the American oil colonialism should use military force to impose direct American rule over Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and UAE and pay no more than $2 per barrel of oil as royalty to the tyrant Wahhabi rulers for the privilege of extracting oil. 

 

Impose American Laws and Customs

Three. The essential attribute of the policy of New Middle East shall be to recreate barbarian uncivilized Wahhabi Arabian Peninsula in the image of America, where American laws would replace Shariah and Arab women would enjoy total freedom and equality with Arab men. American oil colonialism should establish direct American colonial administrations in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and UAE and replace Shariah laws with American laws and guarantee full freedom to Arab women, including the unrestricted right to marry Americans and Christians. American cultures, society, freedom and customs should be imposed on Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and rest of the Arab world.

 

Bush Not Emperor Theodosius I

Four. United States might become the “Evil Empire” if it promoted either Christian religious agenda or Semite Wahhabi Islamic agenda. American imperial armies seeking to establish American oil colonies should not carry any stowaway religious agenda. Roman Emperor Constantine in 322 AD removed all restrictions on the practice and propagation of Christianity as a religion. Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I in 393 AD imposed by Royal decree Christianity as the official religion throughout Roman Empire in 393 AD and ordered the destruction of pagan temples. Theodosius I died in 395 AD and in 410 AD barbarians invaded and conquered Roman in 410 and the Roman Empire came to an end just 17 years after mad Christian Theodosius I declared Christianity as the sole religion of Roman Empire. President Bush could also cause permanent damage to United States if he promoted the religious agenda of Christian religious right conservative conspiracy, or the religious agenda of Orthodox Jews or the religious agenda of Semite Wahhabi Mecca camouflaged as the American Wars of Oil colonialism. Other world powers would gang up against United States if President Bush inadvertently pushed the religious agenda of its political supporters and campaign fund donors, camouflaged as the wars of American oil imperialism. World might accept the American oil imperialism but would oppose any war of religions. United States would disintegrate like the Soviet Union if President Bush promoted any form of wars for promoting any hidden religious agenda. 

 

America Replaced British Empire

Five. British Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson unilaterally disbanded British colonial possessions and decided Britain would pull out of all colonial possessions east of Suez before 1968, so that American oil colonialism could establish control and influence over United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Malaysia and Brunei. After establishing direct military rule over Iraq, American oil colonialism would establish American oil colonies and settlements throughout oil and gas producing territories of the Middle East.

 

All Arab Oil Belongs to America

Six. Just as American Indians signed the sale of the Manhattan Islands to Dutch settlers for few trinkets, King Abdul Aziz Al Saud, King Faisal I, and Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca and Medina had signed for perpetuity all rights over oil and resources in Saudi Arabia and Iraq to American and British oil colonialism, in exchange for the recognition of rule of King Abdul Aziz over Saudi Arabia, and rule of King Faisal I over Iraq and rule of Wahhabi clergy over Mecca and Medina. Barbarian Wahhabi terrorist Osama Bin Laden and murderous Saddam Hussein signed the death warrant for the demise of independent, sovereign oil-producing states of Saudi Arabia and Iraq respectively. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE would meet the fate of Iraq in next few years and American oil companies should get sovereign rights over the oil and gas fields in the American oil colonies that would be established throughout Arab OPEC nations.

 

Great Power’s Share of Iraqi Oil Loot

Great powers including India would support Pax Americana and American oil colonialism in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, provided all great powers gain a guaranteed share of the incomes of the American oil colonies and Iraqi oil loot. It would be stupid on the part of White House and the Buckingham Palace that other great powers would stand still and not demand their share of the Iraqi oil loot after American invasion troops established American oil colony over Iraq. Delhi during Indian Empire ruled over King Faisal 1’s Iraq and Trucial States the predecessor state of United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Bahrain, Oman and Yemen and India would like to work with American oil imperialism to help establish Pax Americana in exchange for preferred access to the colonial oil and gas resources. India would align with other great powers, France, Germany, Russia, China and Japan and demand from American oil colonialism their fair share of the Iraqi oil loot. Every great power, France, Germany, Russia, China, Japan and India would support the return of the Age of colonial empires, if they all get fair share of the colonial loot and they would not militarily intervene against American oil colonialism.

 

Artificial Israel, Saudi Arabia & Pakistan

Semite Jews and Semite Muslims that burnt the Baghdad Museum might have signed the death warrant of the Jewish State of Israel and the Semite Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. If the perpetrators of the crime not publicly prosecuted, the very existence of the State of Israel and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia might come to an end in 21st Century. Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan were artificial states created by the principle of Religion as the basis of state to promote the interests of Western oil colonialism in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran, to dissuade Ottoman Empire and India from challenging America and Britain in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran. After the consolidation of American oil colonialism in Iraq, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey no longer hold any strategic value for American oil colonialism. Islamic Turkey and Islamic Pakistan could become challengers to Christian nation’s rape of Iraqi and Iranian oil. Saudi Arabia, and Iraq had been the former territories of Ottoman Empire.

 

OPEC Was an American Conspiracy

United States and the CIA goaded the OPEC countries to hike up the oil prices and helped organize OPEC Oil Cartel on the lines of De Beers Diamond Cartel. Just as the De Beers Diamond cartel is the British-Israeli cartel and profited British colonialism in Southern Africa, the OPEC Cartel is the joint Saudi-American oil cartel and served the interests of American oil colonialism and weakened the economies of oil-dependent France, Germany, and Japan. The hike of oil prices allowed American economy overtake European and Japanese economies, as OPEC nations priced the oil in US dollars and kept their reserves in US dollars. The foreign capital continued to flow into American markets even when balance of trade and public debt worsened in America.

 

Saddam Hussein Former CIA Agent

Saddam Hussein took power with the blessing of the CIA and invaded Iran in 1980 on orders of the White House and invaded Kuwait in 1990 at the inducement of American Ambassador to Iraq, who personally assured Saddam Hussein that United States would not retaliate if Iraq invaded Kuwait, and Saddam fell for this ruse. Saddam Hussein like Ayatollah Khomeini and Colonel Gadhafy took over with the blessings of the CIA to promote the interests of American oil colonialism in Iran, Libya and Iraq, respectively. Saddam Hussein up to 1990 committed his worst crimes, but then he was a friend and ally of the White House. President Ronald Reagan far from seeing him as a threat even provided him with means to develop weapons of mass destruction.

 

Evil of Yankee Super Patriotism

American propaganda put Nazi propaganda minister Goebbels to shame. The consolidation of the ownership of major electronic and print media allowed the Neo-conservatives imposed hidden censorship, forcing the entire print media to parrot out the propaganda designed by the hidden hand of the real rulers of the world. When Jews became scared of the Palestinian suicide bombing in Israel, which put the very existence of the Jewish state of Israel into doubt, the Zionist Cabal hyped the need for American occupation of Iraq and Syria and Iran as the common geopolitical interests of American oil colonialism, Protestant Religious Right conservatism, Republican Neo-conservatism, pro-segregation Whites, and Judaic Israel. No major newspaper opposed President Bush’s war on Iraq.

 

Deobandi Darul Uloom Vs. Wahhabi Cult

India and Pakistan should pool military resources to impose Deobandi Islam over Wahhabi cult in Arabia. The Saharanpur, UP based Darul Uloom popularly known as Deobandis should be given the leading position in determining the Islamic theology in Mecca and Medina. Deobandi Aryan Islam would wage wars of Islamic religious sects on Semite Wahhabi Islam for the control over Mecca and Medina during Third World War. Semite Jews and British spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia brushed up the dormant doctrine of Wahhabi Sunni Cult to mobilize uncivilized barbarian nomad Bedouin of Mecca Medina region that enjoyed no influence and power during Islamic Empires of Baghdad Caliphate and Ottoman Caliphate. The impoverished Bedouin Wahhabi tribes signed away all Arab rights to the oil and gas resources of Saudi Arabia to Americans and Iraqi oil rights to British Empire, in exchange for Shariah and Wahhabi clergy’s rule over Mecca and Medina. While Wahhabi Cult would help Jews and Christians rape and loot Arabian oil and gas resources, the Deobandi Sunni Islam would bring the entire Islamic world under the enlightened rule of Neo-Mughal Caliphate. Darul Uloom should take over control of Mecca and Medina to protect Islam from the evil designs of Wahhabi Cult. Semite Wahhabi Islam is bad Islam and Aryan Deobandi Islam is good Islam.

 

Big Frauds are Financial Atom Bombs

Armed by the financial weapons of mass destructions, the financial Big frauds America touted its ailing economy as the super economy to beat down the great power aspirations of China, Japan and India. Financial Big Frauds perpetrated by WorldCom, Enron, Global Crossing and Arthur Andersen showed billions of dollars in profits when in reality they were loosing hundreds of millions dollars, and it fooled World Bank economists to calculate the 1999 GNP of USA at $8.35 trillion, when it should have been no more than $6 trillion, only 50% more than the GDP of China ($4.1 trillion) and only double the GNP of Japan ($3 trillion) and only triple the GDP of India ($2.2 trillion). The United States 1999 GDP (100%, $8.7 trillion), value added by Agriculture sector was (2%, $174 billion), Industry (26%, $2.3 trillion), Manufacturing (18%, $1.6 trillion), and Services (72%, $6.2 trillion). The financial frauds perpetrated by WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, and Arthur Andersen inflated the market values of these companies and showed profits in billions when there was loss. It helped the overall market capitalization of NYSE and NASDAQ listed companies and helped suck the foreign capital into American capital markets and pushed the exchange rates of US$ vis-à-vis other currencies. But for the rampant financial Big Frauds the GNP of United States might have bee appraised by World Bank no more than $5 trillion in 1999 and no more than $ 6 trillion in 2002, and the Dow Jones Industrial average Index would have hovered around 5000 in April 2003. But for the financial frauds perpetrated by these Big Crooks, the size of China’s economy would overtake US Economy before 2007 in terms of size of GNP. Big Frauds perpetrated by big American companies helped hype America’s image as World’s largest economy, and indirectly soften the opposition of other world powers to the American colonial occupation of Iraq. Had WorldCom, Enron, Arthur Andersen, Global Crossing and hundreds of other similar corporate frauds had not occurred, France, Germany, Russia, China, and India would have militarily intervened to defeat the American invasions of Iraq. The Big Frauds hyped the image of United States as the hyper power that it never was and it helped American loot the oil riches of Iraq. Perhaps Pentagon should recommend these fraudulent CEOs medal of honor for helping American win Iraq war without huge loss of American lives, that would have occurred had any world power sent troops to fight alongside Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The Big financial Frauds like the weapons of mass destruction, gave American economy the aura of super Fraud charged Super Economy, and the illusion of greatness helped America win the enemy in Iraq. Thanks to the perpetrators of the Big Frauds on the Wall Street. The financial prosperity of the Wall Street depended on the investments of the laundered $750 billion incomes of the global drug cartels and the Big Frauds perpetrated by Wall street firms and large NYSE firms that inflated the balance sheet with non-existent incomes that made these companies attractive for foreign investors. The global drug cartels and the Big Frauds gave the hidden strength to the ailing American economy suffering from adverse Balance of Trade and Budget Deficit. The Big Frauds has kept the Dollar at its artificially high level against major currencies. Big financial Frauds contributed towards making American Hyper power more than the Pentagon.

 

Deterrence of Big Semite Conspiracy

Big Conspiracy and Big Fraud inadvertently acquired the freedom of prosecution and successfully deterred the threat of prosecution by threatening to expose the other co-conspirators in the corridors of power. The deterrent of Big Frauds and Big Conspiracy acts much like the nuclear deterrent and wards of the threat of the prosecution by the counter threat of embarrassing exposures. The perpetrators of Big Frauds and Big Conspiracy acquire de facto immunity from prosecution, if they share the loot with the Big Guys in the corridors of power in the Capitol. The perpetrators of 9/11 acquired the attributes of big power simply because 9/11 changed the course of history, and great powers simply cannot afford the repeat of the 9/11 attacks.

 

Lloyd’s of London Profitable by 9/11 Attacks

The 9/11 terrorist attacks became a windfall for the Lloyd’s of London and it made its first profit in six years, in 2002 the year that followed the 9/11 attacks. Lloyd's of London, the Insurer, Reports First Profit in Six Years in March 2003. The Lloyd's of London, the international insurance market, on 3rd March 2003 reported its first profit in six years, reflecting a surge in insurance prices since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and a sharp decline in the organization's payments for claims. Lloyd's said earnings for 2002 rose to $1.34 billion from a record loss the 2001 year of $4.5 billion. That loss came largely as a result of the attack on the World Trade Center. Revenue from premiums rose 8 percent, to $17.17 billion, while claims costs fell 36 percent, to $10.7 billion, for Lloyd's of London’s in 2002.

 

$7 Billion WTC Insurance Windfall

The Semite Wahhabi terrorists launched the terrorist attacks on the recently leased Semite property in New York that resulted in the profits of $7 billion for Semite beneficiary of WTC insurance claims, who had inked the lease only 14 days before the Sept. 11, 2001. The Semite owned Travelers Insurance emerged as the lead underwriter for the WTC insurance, which might turn out to be crucial for Larry Silverstein get the $3.5 billion claims two times to total $7 billion. It might make the Semite owned Citigroup the owners of Travelers Insurance happier, as this big award might make American insurance giants taller than their Swiss, Austrian and German rivals, incidentally the countries that perpetrated Holocaust. The Britain is happy as the increase in the insurance premiums made Lloyd’s of London profitable for the first time in 6 years. Does it matter that Semite Prince Talal of Saudi Arabia is the leading investor in the Citigroup. Muslims wonder why 4000 Jews stayed at home on Sept. 11 ’01. Black Congressmen wonder that Jewish controlled media hyped the America’s war on Iraq to enhance the security of Israel faced by Palestine suicide bombers.

 

Was 9/11 a Zionist Insurance Fraud?

Within a month after Amiri Baraka, a black Muslim, whose original name was LeRoi Jones, became the poet laureate of New Jersey, he recited a poem in Sept 2002, at the renowned Dodge Poetry Festival in Waterloo, NJ. The poem also asks:

“Who knew the World Trade Center was

Gonna get bombed

Who told 4000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers?

To stay home that day

Why did Sharon stay away?

 

Zionist Cabal led Bush’s Invasion of Iraq

Protestant neo-conservatives control the policy making of the Bush administration. From the times of Secretary Henry Kissinger the Christian Religious right conservatives and Neo-conservatives joined forces with the American Oil Colonialism to conspire new American Empire in the aftermath of the 1975 defeat in the Vietnam War and 1964 Bill of Rights. Jewish Orthodoxy convinced the pro-segregation and Christian religious right conservative conspiracy that they are more royalists than the king and would promote the interests of American empire and American oil colonialism more effectively than their Protestant counterparts, because of their control of the financial markets and the media. Neo-conservatives are the political forces in America and Israel that demand the Iron Fist as the answer to all problems. The Neocons are at the highest levels of the American government. No body can argue that US State Department filled with "Arabists" who hated Israel. The top officials and advisors in the Bush Administration are all NeoCons. Some like Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser actually worked for Israeli think tanks, writing papers on how the U.S. and Israel should take apart and reconstruct the Middle East. Extreme Christian religious right wing forces and extreme Jewish right wing forces and their powerful American financial backers and American Big Oil pushing President Bush to invade Iraq and other oil-producing countries to establish American oil colonies. Disarming Iraq is only a start in Middle East.

 

Rep. Jim Moran on Jewish Lobby

Rep. Jim Moran and Pat Buchanan should be complimented for their courage and dedication when they pointed out the harm the Zionist Cabal doing to United States. Jews have no right to shut them up. It is insane to hurl the charge of anti-Semitism at them. If Jews start calling patriots like Re. Jim Moran and pat Buchanan as modern day Hitler, then they are doing great service to Hitler, by making him praiseworthy in the United States. It is very true that if it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, United States would not be doing this war on Iraq. One simple glance at any Jews-owned newspaper in United States would prove the argument Jim Moran and Pat Buchanan made against Zionist Cabal. The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough in the United States that they could change the direction of where this war on Iraq is going and US lawmakers think that influencing Jewish community has every right to influence the policy making of the White House over Iraq, and they should exercise their right. The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jim Kolbe wanted to clear up media suggestions that American supporters of Israel and Israel itself were driving US strategy. It is true that Jews control the foreign policy of the United States. United States could become a real danger to the world, if a Jewish President gets elected as the president of the predominantly Protestant United States, in the 21st Century.

 

Can Zionist Cabal Rule Oval Office?

An immensely wealthy and powerful American Republic hijacked by a small cabal of individuals. Wherever you look in the Congress there are the telltale signs either of the Zionist lobby, or the right-wing Christian Conspiracy, or the military–industrial complex, three inordinately influential minority groups who share hostility to the pagan world, unbridled support for American Oil Colonialism, Military coup leaders, and an insensate conviction that they are on the side of the angels at war against forces of evil. Zionist lobby is stunningly effective and better than anyone else lobbying Washington DC (Bill Clinton). Zionist is the most effective general Interest Group across the entire planet (Newt Gingrich). If the Zionist lobby did not exist, America would have to invent it. If it weren’t for the Zionist lobby fighting on a daily basis, the close relationship between America and Israel would not be (Rep. Richard Gephardt). Zionist lobby has long played an instrumental and absolutely vital role in protecting the interests of Israel with the American government (Senator McCain).

 

Congressman Moran argued on March 3, ’03 that the Jewish lobby is encouraging America to seek war with Iraq. A cabal of polemicists and American public officials are colluding with Israel to ensure that our country (United States) in a series of wars that are not in America’s interests (Pat Buchanan). It is wrong for Jewish lobby to unite and deny the rights of Rep. Jim Moran to expose the threats Jews pose to the security of the United States, by calling for Jim Moran’s removal from Congress and forcing DNC to marginalize and condemn him. What if Rep. Jim Moran is right, as were many detractors of Secretary Henry Kissinger who suspected the role of certain secret cabal in the genocide of 2 million Buddhists in Cambodia, camouflaged under the name of Khmer Rouge? The Protocols of the Meetings of the elders of Zion outlined the existence of such a Cabal, which may no in final analysis by Jewish, but some other group that used the name of Jews. In the interest of the security of the United States one should study the possible conspiracy, involving small cabal of individuals, representing the inter-mingling and conflicting interests of Zionist lobby, Christian religious right conservatism, Neo-conservatism, Military-industrial complex, Big Oil Colonialism, Diamond & Oil Cartel, and the Papacy. It is morally wrong and undemocratic to condemn Congressman Moran, or Pat Buchanan with anti-Semitism i.e. a hatred of Jews for their faith, heritage, or ancestry. The truth is, those hurling these charges harbor a passionate attachment to Israel a nation different from United States and they act on an assumption that, somehow, what’s good for Israel is good for America. Why should one believe that somehow there is a confluence of national interests between Protestant-majority secular America and Jewish theocratic Israel? Zionist Cabal might have conspired the President Bush’s war on oil-rich Iraq, and the liberation of Iraq would be the first of a series of wars in the Middle East that could ignite the Clash of Civilizations, a war many believe would be a tragedy for Protestant American Republic, and undermine the Axis of Monotheism developed between Vatican and Mecca.

 

India Supports Yankee Oil Colonialism

India would support Yankee Oil colonialism in the Middle East only when Arab OPEC countries brought under direct control of American oil colonies and American oil companies pay no more than $2 per barrel of oil as royalty to the Wahhabi tyrants of the Middle East. WASPs Oil Pax Americana American Oil Colonialism might be palatable to the other great powers, namely, Russia, India, Germany, France and China, if it did not have any hidden religious agenda, whether Wahhabi, Jewish or Papal religious agenda, and if America agreed to share its oil colonial loot with other great powers. The tyrants of Saddam Hussein staged the vanishing trick like Osama Bin Laden and the terrorists of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. United States might allow Osama Bin Laden overthrow the royal House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia so that American companies could loot the $500 billion assets of the Saudi princes, then the secular Iraqis of Saddam Hussein regime should come out of hiding and wearing the CIA caps and working the CIA supervision overthrow the barbarian uncivilized Semite Wahhabi cult from Mecca and Medina and replace the with the moderate Islamic sects followed by hundreds of million Muslims in Turkey, India, Pakistan and Indonesia. It is high time the boys and girls of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait should be able to bars discotheques in Kuwait, Qatar, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Jeddah, Mecca and Medina as they do in Baghdad, Basra and Karbala. After Iraq, Pentagon should move troops into Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and replace Shariah by American laws and impose democratic constitution and institutions on Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and UAE. Saudi Arabia’s 4000 royal princes should no longer loot and exploit the riches of Saudi Arabia, and the Wahhabi clergy and Saudi religious policy should no longer force Saudi women into bondage and servitude. Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia is the core of the Web of Evil.

 

Semite Barbarians Burnt Baghdad Museum

At the beginning of the 21st Century the Semite Jews, Semite Wahhabi Muslims, and American Judeo-Christians joined the ranks of uncivilized barbarians when they burnt the Baghdad Museum. Barbarian Julius Caesar had burnt the library of Alexandria, when he invaded Alexandria. At the end of 4th Century Semite Hellenic Jews burnt the pagan Hindu temples of ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome along with fundamentalist Christians that took control over Rome during Theodosius I, when in 393 by Roman Royal Edict Christianity became the sole official religion of Roman Empire. Then 300 years later during 7th Century the Damascus Jews joined forces with fellow Semite Muslim Bedouin to loot and burn the Christian temples of Egypt, Syria and Libya, Tunisia and Algeria.

 

Semite Israeli, Semite American Jews, Semite Saudis and iconoclast religious right conservative conspiracy renewed the global axis of iconoclast monotheism to burn the pagan artifacts that established the Babylon was advance modern Civilization at least 5,000 years before Jews, Semite race and the Judeo Christians became civilized and moved out of their animal like living in the caves. Damage in Baghdad as "truly a world heritage loss. But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?

 

Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final act in the sacking of Baghdad on 14 April 2003. It was the final act in the sacking of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives, a priceless treasure of Ottoman historical documents, including the old royal archives of Iraq, were turned to ashes in 3,000 degrees of heat. Then the library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze.

 

Semite barbarian looters took or destroyed 170,000 items from Iraq's National Museum, which had housed a priceless collection of masterpieces and memorabilia dating back across human history from the time of the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, the Medes, the Greeks and the Persians. Marble carvings, stone tablets, clay pots and tablets containing some of the earliest known examples of writing were destroyed or stolen.

 

Why the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased? Semite Jews, Semite Saudis and Judeo-Christians burnt the Museum to erase the cultural identity of Iraq. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed? Again, standing in this shroud of blue smoke and embers, Robert Frisk asked the same question: why? The answer is very simple: The barbarians invaded Iraq to destroy the cultural history of Hindu Iraq, which boasted advance rich wealthy Goddess worshipping civilizations at least 20,000 years before the ancestors of nomadic Semite Jews and cave-dwelling Christians became civilized or learnt to speak or write. The America’s war on Iraq is it Clash of Races, the War in which barbarian Semite Saudi Wahhabi Muslims and Semite Israeli tribes joined forces to destroy the Hindu traditions of Iraq, which for thousands of years worshipped Hindu Gods and Goddesses. The Ancient Kingdom Of Mittani worshipped Hindu gods of Varuna and Indra. Kali and Durga were the main reigning goddesses of Babylon revered as Goddess Innanna and Astarte. What should be the military response of Hindu India, Buddhist China and Japan to the Semite destruction of cultural identity of Iraq? What role iconoclast Semite conquest of non-Semite Iraq play in the Global Clash of Races, and Wars of Religions and the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century?

 

Semite Jews and Semite Wahhabi Muslims burnt the Baghdad Museum, because it contained written proof that Wahhabi Cult designed by Zionists and American to engineer the death of Islam and the conquest of the Islamic world by Jews and Christians. Barbarian Semite Saudi Wahhabi iconoclast burnt the Baghdad Museum to burn the proof that Wahhabi cult was created by Jews and spy Lawrence of Arabia to justify the Mecca’s revolt against Ottoman Caliphate. It contained the details of the correspondence of the court of Sharif Hussein of Mecca, who started the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Turks at the advice of Lawrence of Arabia. Lawrence of Arabia promised to make Mecca the seat of future Caliphate of Islam in exchange for their revolt against the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad. Jewish control over American media misled the American WASPs to wage war on oil-rich Iraq to promote the iconoclastic monotheist agenda of Semite Jews, Semite Wahhabi Muslims and Semite Judeo-Christians and Semite Rightists. The Burning of Baghdad Museum opened the eyes of the civilized Muslims of the world and proved that Saudi Arabia is the womb of Devil and Wahhabi cult is the Zionist conspiracy to destroy Islam, to loot Islamic oil and lands and to enslave the Islamic world. The civilized Muslims would rise and expel Semite Wahhabi Muslims from Arabian Peninsula and gain custody of Mecca & Medina. Civilized Muslims should militarily intervene and destroy Semite Wahhabi cult and expel Semite Wahhabi Muslims from Arabia and bring Mecca and Medina under the control of

 

Deobandi Darul Uloom Vs. Wahhabi Cult

India and Pakistan should pool military resources to impose Deobandi Islam over Wahhabi cult in Arabia. The Saharanpur, UP based Darul Uloom popularly known as Deobandis should be given the leading position in determining the Islamic theology in Mecca and Medina. Deobandi Aryan Islam would wage wars of Islamic religious sects on Semite Wahhabi Islam for the control over Mecca and Medina during Third World War. While Wahhabi Cult would help Jews and Christians rape and loot Arabian oil and gas resources, the Deobandi Sunni Islam would bring the entire Islamic world under the enlightened rule of Neo-Mughal Caliphate. Darul Uloom should take over control of Mecca and Medina to protect Islam from the evil designs of Wahhabi Cult. Semite Wahhabi Islam is bad Islam and Aryan Deobandi Islam is good Islam. Muslims of the Subcontinent, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, representing more than 250 millions, follow the Deobandi Sect of Sunni Islam, which staked its claim against Wahhabi Sunni Sect, followed by less than 50 million Muslims of the world. Darul Uloom, Deoband is one of the oldest religious school of Sunni thoughts in India.

 

India, Pakistan and Bangladesh would promote Deobandi Sunni Islam as the dominant theology of Mecca as direct challenge to the domination of Wahhabi cult in Saudi Arabia. Deobandi Islam represented the Reformation movement in Islam and Saudi Arabia waged the Counter Reformation Wars on Deobandi Islam followed by majority of the Muslims of the world, while Wahhabi Islam followed by less than 2 percent world’s Muslims. Zionists and Colonel Lawrence develop the Wahhabi doctrine to establish American and British Oil colonies over Arabia and to destroy the power of Islamic Caliphate. The rise of Semite Mecca Caliphate would result in the death of Islam and Islamic power and make Islamic oil-producing nations the oil colonies of America.

 

Deobandi-led Counter Wahhabi Wars

The Aryan Turks, should join forces with Aryan Iran and Aryan Pakistan to regain control over holiest Islamic cities of Mecca and Medina to replace the Wahhabi clergy by the Deobandi clergies trained by the world renowned Darul Uloom of Sahranpur, UP India. While Semite Wahhabi cult would result in the death of Islam and the enslavement of oil-rich Islamic nations, the Deobandi Sect would lead Islamic world to greater glory and prosperity, under the leadership of Islamic Neo-Mughal Caliphate.  Like the 30-year Counter Reformation Wars (1618-1648), the Middle East entered into Counter Wahhabi Wars after the invasions of Iraq in 2003, which might continue for many decades and would end only when Aryan Muslims, Turkey, Iran and Pakistan gain total control over Mecca & Medina and the oil-rich Arabian Peninsula. Aryan India would militarily support the military conquest of Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia by Deobandi Aryan Muslim forces.

 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com