18

AMERICAN GLOBAL EMPIRE IN MAKING - Chapter 18- KALKI GAUR

Chapter 18

American Global Empire in Making

Global Crusades of Democracy

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

18(0) Purport

(1) Hegemony or Survival

Noam Chomsky in his book “Hegemony or Survival” argues that the United States is in a campaign to become a global empire through a foreign policy based on the frequent use of military power. Laura Bush’s Crusades for Democracy in Buddhist Myanmar (Burma) while White House refused to condemn military coup in Thailand undermined the moral foundations of the Bush Administration’s Crusades for Democracy in Buddhist Myanmar (Burma) and Hindu Nepal. President Pervez Musharraf’s revelations that Deputy Secretary of State had threatened to bomb Pakistan to stone age, had Pakistan not allowed support to US military operations in Afghanistan, established that American Empire is in the making. President Putin argued that United States is like the arch villain Big bad world that eats and go on eating without listening to anyone. Hindu India loves pax-Americana and Yankee petro-colonialism and would support it militarily for a share of the imperial loot, just as India had supported pax-Britannia. India would support yankee imperial conquests and Crusades for Democracy in the Middle East and American war on Islamic terrorism as an equal partner.

 

(2) Oil Prices Justifies US Petro-Colonialism

The White House wants to develop American Empire in the 21st Century to secure energy security of American economy. Dr. Henry Kissinger in “Diplomacy” argues that the 21st Century would be similar to the colonial 18th and 19th Century and Colonial Empires rather than nation states shall be major actors of the international system. Any crude oil price above $25-a-barrel makes imperialistic invasions of thinly populated oil-producing countries an economic necessity for oil-importing industrial economies.

One. Post-2001 Petro-Imperialism and Oil-seeking Colonial Empires shall take birth, just as post-1500 European Colonialism took birth because of the search for alternate route for Indian spices. The post-1500 European Colonialism was the direct result of European powers to escape from Ottoman price gauging for Indian spices essential for European meat preservation during winter months. The post-2003 new age of Oil Colonialism is the direct result of the price gauging of the Middle Eastern OPEC that artificially manipulated the price for a barrel of crude oil to triple in three years, from $25 in April 2003, to over $72 in April 2006.

Two. The OPEC Oil-cartel created by conspiring American Big Oil to profit by artificial price rise by production manipulation by OPEC oil producers, when Britain gave independence to its colonies in the Arabian Gulf in 1971.

Three. American and British secret services mobilized Bedouin Wahhabi clergy to engineer their secession from Ottoman Caliphate. The CIA supported Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia to engineer the secession of Muslim republics from the Soviet Union. United States engineered Shiite fundamentalism to overthrow Shah of Iran. United States engineered the Taleban rule in Afghanistan with direct help of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan.

Four. The civilized world powers, believe that ever rising oil price rise justifies the return of new age of Oil Colonial Empires in terrorism prone Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. Colonization of thinly populated oil-producing countries in the Middle East and Central Asia by leading oil-consuming nations and industrial powers shall provide for energy security in the populous civilized world, even at the cost of acceptable collateral damage to colonial populations in the oil-producing world.

Five. Unchecked oil-price rise shall cripple the economies of the industrialized world. It would be cheaper for the United States, Germany, France, China and India to invade, occupy and administer as colonies selected oil-producing OPEC nations than paying for the imported oil bill. Thinly populated wealthy oil producing has signed their death warrants by hiking up the oil prices.

Six. The terrorism promoting oil-producing nations has signed their own death warrants failing to stop the terrorist attacks on the United States, Russia, India and China.

Seven. Like the 1885 Partition of Africa, the great powers should negotiate and arrive at Partition of Oil Producing Middle East, Central Asia and Africa among major oil importing industrial powers, namely, United States, China, India, Japan, Germany, France, Britain and South Korea. The colonial occupation of thinly populated oil-producing nations by populous industrialized nations is lesser an evil than the disruption of the industrialized economies that would result, if the oil-producing nations continued to manipulate oil prices. Partition of Oil-Producing Nations into colonies of world powers is a moral imperative otherwise the civilized world shall face the specter of $100-a-barrel oil prices, which could translate into a $6-a-gallon gasoline and heating oil and worldwide Depression and end of the Industrial Civilization as we know it.

Eight. American public will endorse albeit demand American imperialism and oil colonialism provided it brings back the retail price of gasoline and heating oil to below $1-a-gallon for American consumers. American BigOil raping America, American economy and American public to enrich themselves and their OPEC masters, just as Black agents of White slave traders captured blacks in Africa and delivered them to Slave ships. Profits of American BigOil do not promote the national interests of America rather harms it. It is high time that American State should directly own the oil and gas reserves of the Middle East, as then only it would reduce taxes, public debt and trade imbalances.

 

(2) Petro-Colonialism Prevents Apocalypse

American Empire shall use force to disarm the advocates of Apocalypse and Armageddon. American Empire shall establish Oil-colonialism in Iraq, Iran, Syria and Uzbekistan. Christian and Islamic End of Time eschatological teleological doctrines foretells Christian-Islamic Armageddon wars and Apocalypse, which America can prevent by establishing American Colonial Empire throughout Islamic Oil-producing countries. One. Neo-Conservatism advocates that President Bush should establish Petro-Colonial Empire in Iraq, Iran and other parts of the Middle to checkmate the looming specter of Apocalypse and Armageddon in the Middle East, a region that caused rising oil prices, rising Islamic terrorism and presently seeks nukes to undertake preemptive nuclear strikes against Christian targets to win Armageddon Wars in favor of Islam.

 

(3) Sword of tolerant inclusive Protestantism

American Empire shall empower the White House leverage the might of the Hegemon to force intolerant exclusive iconoclast patriarchal religions adopt policies of tolerance inclusion and diversity in the 21st Century. In 21st Century the Sword of inclusive tolerant Religions and democratic Ideologies is stronger than the Sword of exclusive intolerant iconoclast religions and murderous ideologies. In the 21st Century the civilizational Sword of diversity inclusion and tolerance namely, the Sword of Protestant America and the Sword of Hindu India in 2006 mightier than the Sword of Papacy as well as the Sword of Islam.

 

(4) Crusades of Democracy & Tolerance

American Empire seeks to export Democratic Utopia worldwide, especially the Middle East so that under colonial occupation of the Pax Americana the Arab nations shall abandon extremism and fundamentalism and allow freedom to their women. The demise of Communism heralds the victory of Republican Neo-Conservatism and Protestant Reformed Christianity as new Agency of History, to export Democratic Utopia and religious tolerance worldwide to wage wars on extremism fundamentalism and intolerance worldwide, to fruitfully leverage the might of the sole super to create a tolerant inclusive 3rd Millennium. United States as well as India is the new agency of History and Democracy and Neo-Conservatism is the reigning ideology of the 3rd Millennium.

One. The enemies of tolerance inclusion and democracy conspiring to hijack the Presidency of the United States to secretly implant a Papal agent in the White House so that Emperor Theodosius I type president may use the executive powers of the White House to destroy United States itself, as happened to the Soviet Union in 1991 and to the Roman Empire circa 415.

Two. United States and India, the world’s first and third largest economies and military powers must be ever vigilant against the ever-widening global nexus of religious extremism fundamentalism intolerance and murderous ideologies and organized crime.

Three. The Beijing-Mecca-Vatican nexus has waged a war of civilizations against United States-India Axis of democracy diversity tolerance and inclusion. The multi-level clash of civilizations reflected in, clash of political parties in elections, clash of religions, battle for the leadership of religions, clash of ideas, conflict of generations, clash inside civilizations societies and religions.

 

(5) Manifesto of Neo-Conservatism

American Empire seeks to establish the rule of Neo-Conservative political parties in the Middle East, so that Middle Eastern tyrannies accept the virtues of tolerance, inclusion and diversity. Neo-Conservatism is dominant ideology of the 21st Century. The philosophy of Neo-Conservatism gives to America the hallowed space as the agency of History, and Neo-Conservative Republican Party represents the elitist antecedents of the Theory of the party as a key part it shall play as an agency of History, to mould the world in the image of American-type inclusive democracies.

One. President Bush, in his January 2005, second inaugural address, sounded like Revolutionary determined to export Democratic Utopia worldwide. President Bush’s crusades for democracy with the support of India, is a turning point in world history and a radical approach to foreign affairs. "By our efforts USA has lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power; it burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world," declared Bush. A Neo-Conservative revolutionary "fire in the mind" a radical approach to American foreign affairs, and after Bush’s India Pact is a turning point in world history. President George Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice are true revolutionaries, the revolutionaries for establishing “Democratic Utopia” by making United States and India the agency of history.

 

(6) Sustainable Balance of Concert of Asia

American Empire realizes that Europe has declined and would decline futher and European Union has failed to emerge as a viable power. American Empire shall promote American dominance of NATO and Europe. American Empire shall promote China-India-Japan triangular balance of power in Asia with United States in the role of a maritime Balancer. The de Richelieu Raison D’etat Concert of Asia, seeking a sustainable triangular continental Asian Balance of Power, among China, India and Japan with United States as the maritime Balancer shall maintain peace in Asia and realize the dream of Century of Asia. The post-Napoleonic Concert of Europe (1815-1914) maintained peace in Europe between several European powers with Britain as a Balancer.

One. The strategic goal of Bush-Rice foreign policy is to create a sustainable balance of power in Asia, so Asian countries can continue to liberalize, progress and develop in the 21st Century of Asia. If the focus of USA-India strategic ties in Asia is containment of rising China vis-à-vis the United States and India, the historic model is Europe circa 1914, with China in the role of Germany.

Two. If the geopolitical balance of power focus in Asia is widened out to include Hindu India and Buddhist Japan along with Buddhist China, then the more congenial triangular Asian balance of power or Concert of Asia might be Europe circa 1815, with a stable balance of power between several Asian world powers, throughout next 100-years of the 21st Century and the Protestant United States as balancer as Britain was during Concert of Europe (from 1815 to 1914), with very little cost to Christian United States.

Three. The Triangular Balance of power in Asia requires United States should undertake preemptive attacks to demilitarize nuke-seeking Iran. These are the arguments the author makes in this chapter.

 

18(1) Talk Points

IMPENDING DECLINE OF AMERICAN POWER:

American Empire suffers the symptoms of an Empire already at its peak and starting to decline, as happened to Roman Empire, Hapsburg Spain, Dutch Empire and British Empire. The interpenetration of religion and politics not only poses a threat to democratic principles, but may also affect the course of history. Papacy and militant Christian Church helped undo the Roman Empire and Hapsburg Spanish Empire. The Calvinist fundamentalism of the Protestant Dutch Reformed Church helped to block any 18th-century renewal of Dutch Empire. The militant Papacy and the interplay of British imperialism and Protestant evangelicalism led pre-1914 Britain into Catholic-Protestant bloodbath and the secession of Catholic Ireland and the global decline of Pax-Britannia. The hubris-driven America’s national strategic and military overreach in pursuit of abstract international missions that America can no longer afford, economically of politically. British Empire disintegrated after the Second World War primarily because Britain refused to share its influence of the Empire with Indian Empire, even when prior to 1947, Delhi paid for the salaries of British Army in Britain, Australia, Canada and throughout British Empire. British Empire would have remained intact even in the 21st Century had London agreed to share imperial influence with India. President Bush realized that without India firmly with United States in the ongoing clash of civilizations, the American Empire would fail to compete with rising China. However, India-USA pact would allow American Empire grow into Pax-Americana, where world’s largest democracy provides geopolitical depth and military manpower to translate American crusades for democracies worldwide, into a benevolent Pax Americana, where the fruits of freedom and liberty reach to the farthest corner of the American Empire. 

 

BUSH’S PETRO-IMPERIALISM:

President Bush gave a favorable civilian nuclear deal to India to secure India’s participation in the American goals for energy security, especially the Middle East including Iran. The role of oil in defining and distorting American foreign and domestic policy is a broad trend, not new to the Bush years, but exacerbated by Bush administration’s policies. President Bush thinks Iraq as a military base with a very large oil reserve underneath. You can’t ask better than that. Terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, tyranny, democracy and other public rationales were simply ruses to disguise the real motivation for the invasion of Iraq. The pursuit of oil has for at least 30 years after 1971, one of the defining elements of American policy in the world. Bush administration, unusually dominated by the oilmen, has taken the America’s addiction to oil to a new and terrifying levels. The United States has embraced a kind of “Petro-imperialism,” the key aspect of which is the Pentagon’s transformation into a global oil-protection force. The US military puts up a democratic façade, emphasizes freedom of the seas for pipeline routes and seeks to secure and protect, drill and ship oil, not administer everyday affairs.

 

AMERICAN REALISM VS NEOCONSERVATISM: “National Security Strategy of the United States” of 2006 that updated the September 2002 security strategy, correctly lays greater emphasis on promoting democracy around the world. Republican Neoconservatives correctly remain the most vigorous advocates of a muscular American campaign to foster democratic movements. Republican Realists that oppose American crusades for democracy as an exercise of America power for good perhaps do not correctly understand the true nature of realism, raison d’etat in International politics in the unipolar world order where United States is the sole super power and hegemon of the world. Some pragmatic Republican realists are rearing their heads and asking, whether crusades would succeed or fail. Republican Realists correctly worry that antidemocratic extremists will prevail wherever tradition and existing civil institutions are too weak to protect the rights of minorities or to nurture moderates. However, the realist theory of international politics would strongly support the overwhelming use of American power to deter antidemocratic extremists from misusing the freedom of the nascent democracy to destroy the democracy itself. Republican Realists correctly worry that President Bush’s increased emphasis on promoting democracy around the world might come at the expense of protecting other American interests and overextension of American military adventurism might bring about the downfall of New Rome in Washington DC. Both neoconservatives as well as realists are correct in their assessment of the dangers lurking to bring down American Empire or hegemon or super power in the world.

 

INDIA LEGITIMIZES DEMOCRAY CRUSADES: Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice, the first black women secretary, has brilliantly found the solution to the riddle that correctly addresses the aspirations of the Republican neconservatives as well as the concerns of the Republican realists. Secretary Rice believes that nuclear deal with India provides the sole super power of the world, the missing link to recreate Pax Americana to harness the power of the American hegemony and unilateralism for the good and for promoting democracy worldwide. While previously Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Carter and Clinton administrations successively, influenced by Judeo-patriarchy and papal religious right conservatism, harnessed the power of American to overthrow democratically governments in the third world throughout five decades after the second world war, brilliant geopolitician Secretary Condoleezza Rice succeeded in persuading President George Bush to put anti-India and anti-democracy policies of the previous administrations upside down, and herald the new millennium, where United States would nurture, foster, befriend and propagate democracy worldwide, and shall not shirk from using force, including preemptive strikes or covert operations to crusade for democracy. While Secretaries Kissinger, Brzezinski and Albright are universally known as butchers of democracies, the history will honor venerable Secretary Condoleezza Rice as the geopolitician that transformed the direction of American policy. America under President Bush shall no longer be known as the butcher and mortal enemy of democracy in the third world, on the contrary after the nuclear deal with India, America will be respected as the father of the democracy in the third world. President Bush and Secretary rice are leading United States to a right path.

 

THIRD WORLD TRUST BLACK SECRETARY RICE: Third World can see through the eyes of Secretary Rice that America has transformed. “In my lifetime, America transformed. I stand before you as a black secretary of state, something that I think 30 or 40 years ago would have been thought impossible,” said Condoleezza Rice. The leaders and the people of the non-white Third World believe what black secretary Rice says or promotes. Dr. Rice is straightforward and honest, while Dr. Kissinger, Dr. Brzezinski and Madam Albright were not honest and they promoted the interests of Judeo patriarchy and religious right more than the geopolitical national interests of the United States.

 

SECRETARIES RICE VS KISSINGER IS AMERICAN CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS: The clash of pro-India Black Secretary Rice on one side and pro-China, pro-patriarchy Judeo Ashkenazi Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Brzezinski and Secretary Albright on other side, forcefully reflects the ongoing clash of civilizations, clash of races, clash of opposites and clash of ideologies, in the changing multi-ethnic fabric of American society and polity. Secretary Rice represents a turning point in world history and American policy. India welcomes all that new America stands for and supports it with all its assets and power. Welcome to new America that it pro-India and pro-democracy. Amen.

 

CRUSADING FOR DEMOCRACY WORLDWIDE: First. President Bush signed the nuclear deal with India to gain India’s confidence, to provide India’s support, assets and power join the United States in crusading for democracy worldwide. “As a Global Power, India has an historic duty to support democracy around the world,” said Bush.

 

OLD AMERICA AS BUTCHER OF DEMOCRACY: While Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and Clinton Administrations and earlier administrations purposely harnessed the might of the United States and the covert operations of the United States to overthrow the democratically elected governments in the Non-aligned Third World, especially in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, South Vietnam, Chile, Guatemala, Haiti, Panama, Libya, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Congo, Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uganda, Cambodia, Myanmar, South Korea, Thailand and etc., so much so that history records United States as the principal butcher of democracies in the second half of the 20th century. Secretary Henry Kissinger, Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretary Madeleine Albright top the lists as butchers and mortal enemies of democracy and freedom in the Third World.

 

NEW AMERICA AS FATHER OF DEMOCRACY: In the new millennium president Bush and secretary Condoleezza Rice transformed United States from being an enemy of third world democracy to the friends of democracy or better still, the crusader of democracy. Second Bush Administration with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice represents a turning point in the history, and now the White House has decided to use its power for the forces of good. Nuclear deal with India, leads to a path of India-USA participation in the crusades of democracy worldwide. The roadmap of Pax Americana envisioned by President Bush and Secretary Rice may include flourishing capitalist democracies linked with benevolent prosperous capitalist American Empire. President Bush wants to create a benevolent American Empire, in direct contrast to the malevolent American Empire of the previous administrations. United States had always been an Empire after the Second World War in general and after the demise of the Soviet Union in particular. Just as Indian Empire and Indian Army created Pax Britannia of the 18th, 19th and early 20th Century, after the nuclear deal with President Bush, the nuclear democratic India shall help create benevolent pax Americana as a partner. No wonder that the supporters of malevolent empire and butchers of democracies are up in arm against President Bush’s civilian nuclear deal with India.

 

AMERICA IS AN EMPIRE: Second. The Realist Theory of Bush Administration is that America is an Empire now in 2006, and when America acts, America creates its own reality in international politics.  “We (USA) are an Empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality,” thus declared a very wise senior Bush adviser, as quoted by Ron Suskind in, “Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of Geoerge W. Bush.” This profoundly wise analysis disturbed the petty journalist, who perhaps does not understand the meaning of the term “Empire.” The unknown wise adviser contemptuously dismissed the community that most of us live in, “the reality based community, to the chagrin of that petty journalist. The United States of America has been the de facto American Empire after the demise of the Soviet Union, fall of communism in the Eastern Europe and fall of the Berlin Wall. The terms describing the United States as the “Hegemon,” “Unilateralist” and “ Sole Super Power” are synonymous with the terms “American Empire,” “Imperial America.” America is an Empire even when it chooses not to call itself an Empire. The Soviet Union was an Empire and present day Russia continues to be an Empire whether or not it chooses to call it an Empire.

 

PRO-DEMOCRACY PAX AMERICANA IS RISING: Third. America has every right to create an American Empire as it presently enjoys the unchallenged position as the preeminent power of the world. Hindu giant elephant can mate with American giant Eagle, and positively contribute towards Pax Americana for a fair share of the profits. Hindu India can live with the Protestant American Empire and substantially contribute towards the consolidation of Pax Americana. Every world power in the history made its attempt to create an Empire and United States, fortunate enough to be the preeminent power of the world has every right to create an American Empire in the oil-producing world. It is very likely that Hindu India and Protestant America would be on the same side of the battle lines in the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century. America’s war on Islamic terrorism in India’s national interest and India would join its forces to support America’s war on terrorism. America’s invasion of oil-producing countries is in the national interest of India so long as India also gets its fair share of the oil loot. The Christian Crusades against Islamic world not against India’s national interest, so long as Christians do no turn against Hindus and Buddhists in future. What are the imperial national interests of United States? President Bush invaded Iraq and established American colony over Iraq. What is the manifest destiny of the United States in the 21st Century? Would India be an ally or adversary of the imperialistic America? The question is what India can contribute towards the expansion and the consolidation of the American Empire?

 

INDIA AS EXEMPLAR OF POST-NATIONAL GLOBAL STATE: Fourth. India is democratic clone of the United States and vice versa, as both countries are secular, democratic, populous, continental size, multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic, multi-racial and multi-religious. India as well as United States is exemplar of post-national global state and present better alternative than European for the Confederation of Third World nations of Asia, Africa and South America. Pax Americana want to unite the third world into an India-type multiethnic federation rather than European Union type confederation. Pax Americana shall adopt the principles of Roman Empire and reject the principles underlying Holy Roman Empire and its present day version European Union. Secretary Condoleezza Rice realized that only when democratic India is firmly in American camp could this new vision of the sole super power unilateralist hegemon become a diplomatic easy sell. It is this vision of a democratic peaceful world thriving under the benign tutelage of the United States that draws George Bush and Condoleezza Rice to democratic India like a magnet. Following the example of European Union, as globalization continues to knock down the walls of the nation state, the need to find a model of global governance that will enable the world to live in peace becomes steadily more urgent, and democratic India of over 15 percent of world population, with a stable, multi-ethnic, federal democracy seems to provide an ideal model for continental federations or regional groupings. While the European Union is another such model, what makes India unique is its success in engaging its vast Muslim population in the nation building process.

 

SPICES, OIL, MIDDLE EAST & EMPIRES: Fifth. The post-Columbus European colonialism was the byproduct of the desperate European attempt to survive hike of the price of Indian spices by Ottomans of the Middle East. The post-Iraq war oil colonialism shall be the byproduct of the industrialized world’s desperate attempt to survive the hike of OPEC manipulated crude oil prices. Greed of Middle Eastern Ottoman Caliphate destroyed Ottoman Empire and gave birth to post-1500 European Colonial Empires, similarly the greed of Middle Eastern OPEC oil cartel will give birth to new age of oil colonialism and colonial empires in the 21st Century. The artificial hike in oil prices by Middle Eastern OPEC to cross $60 a barrel, justifies the military conquest of oil-producing Middle East. Middle Eastern Ottomans’ increase in the price of Indian spices in transit to Europe, crucial for the preservation of meats, resulted in the rise of European colonial empire. Europe’s economic need for Indian spices to preserve meats for use in winter, resulted in the European colonial empires. European greed for gold had created permanent European settlements throughout European colonial empires. Post-Columbus European colonial empires were the by-product of West European’s economic need for Indian spices and love for gold. Indian spices were very important ingredient for the long-term preservation of meat and other edible perishables. The Ottoman Empire blocked the direct trade of Europe with India in spices. The maritime circumnavigation of the world was the direct result of Middle Eastern Ottoman blocking the direct trade route between Europe and India. Concerns of energy security forces India to support Pax Americana in Iraq, Iran and the Middle East. Both President Bush and Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh agree that the principal goal of diplomacy is to promote national interests defined in terms of energy security. The scramble for colonial occupation of oil-producers shall define the diplomacy in the 21st century.

 

RISE & FALL OF EMPIRES OR GREAT POWERS: The economic factors play important role in the rise and fall of great powers. The empires and world powers face real dangers in becoming financially and militarily overextended. The tremendous profits that American oil companies reaped in global oil markets after the American invasion of Iraq, financially protected the American Empire from becoming financially overextended because of military adventurism in Iraq.

 

WEALTH & POLITICAL DYNASTY IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: Democracy in Capitalist America depends upon the donations of the wealthy, otherwise no politician worth a salt can finance an election to have any serious chance of winning any major election at the federal level. There are three political dynasties in democratic United States, the Kennedy Dynasty, Bush Dynasty and Clinton Dynasty. Catholic Democratic Kennedy dynasty is a spent political force, because of a series of untimely deaths in this illustrious family. Republican Bush Dynasty is backed by the oil incomes that Bush family made in Texas in the past. Bush family’s blatant business cronyism, with ties to big oil, big corporations and the military-industrial complex, defined the worldview of President George W. Bush. The principal objective of Bush administration is to safeguard America’s energy security. If ever United States builds an empire, it shall take the form of an oil colonial empire, which shall not promote any religious agenda, except the capitalist agenda of making profits for American oil companies. President Bush greatly impressed Indian prime minister during their first summit meeting in 2004, by teaching the former professor of economics, the predominant role of oil and energy security in world economy and in the conduct of diplomacy in new world order. Realizing the total dependence of India on foreign imported oil and gas, prime minister Man Mohan Singh, became an ardent advocate of the Bush doctrine of energy security as paramount goal of Indian diplomacy. 

 

AMERICAN THEOCRACY: The Global clash of religion and clash of civilization was evident during President Bush’s visit to India. While overwhelming majority of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Zoroastrians and Protestants supported President Bush’s visit, the Muslims, Catholics and pro-China Communists organized well-funded demonstrations to protest the Bush’s visit. How come that Indian Catholics protested against Christian visitor, when Sonia Gandhi the leader of the ruling party is Italian Catholic? It is rumored that Saudi Arabia, Iran funded the Muslim demonstrators, Papacy funded the Catholic demonstrations and China funded the Communist demonstrations against Bush. Catholics, Muslims, Communists and China opposed President Bush’s visit to India and the nuclear agreement with India, just as they oppose in the United States in American media, senate and the Congress.

 

President Bush faces the clash of civilization in the United States, as the opposition to its nuclear deal with India and the crusades for democracy worldwide faces tough opposition from conservative Catholics, pro-China media, and Muslims. The same groups oppose Bush in India, Europe and USA. President Bush is supporting government funding of religious charities to empower Protestant Church compete with totalitarian Catholic Church. President Bush is a religious man but is not a bigot that Pope might endorse or support. President Bush is a Protestant WASP and a Texan southerner. Secretary Rice is from Birmingham Alabama. The Southernization of American governance during Bush Administration and southernization of American Church is abetting far-reaching geopolitical, ideological, cultural and civilization change in America and eroding the separation of powers between Christian Church and secular American State. The Founding Fathers inserted the separation of power in the Constitution, to preempt any attempt by Papacy to attempt making Catholics more loyal to the foreign potentate than to the President of the United States. Protestant President Bush eroding the strict wall that separates the Church and the State to empower fragmented Protestant Church, with state sponsored charitable grants to ward away the encroaching power of the Papacy in the United States. Protestant Church has gained strength during Bush Administration. 

 

The policies of President Bush and Condoleezza Rice helping Republican party capture many new converts from amongst the core groups of democratic party, namely, blacks, Latinos, Asians and Indians. Republican Party’s base includes Baptists; Eastern rights Catholics, Orthodox Hasidic Jews and Mormons. The indulgence of radical religion, religious fundamentalism and the Papacy inspired pro-Life political movements are threatening America’s future. Pro-papacy pro-life activists had hijacked the political agenda of Republican primaries and eliminated Republican candidates in primaries that dared to oppose any Papal agenda. Republican Party moving toward “a new incarnation as an ecumenical religious party, claiming loyalties from hard-shell Protestant Baptists, Mormons, Eastern rights Catholics and Hasidic Jews, who all define themselves against the common enemy secular American liberalism that separates the American State and the Church. The interpenetration of religion and politics, not only poses a threat to democratic principles, but may also affect the course of American and world history. Militant fundamentalist Papal Catholicism helped undo the Roman Empire and the Spanish Empire. The Protestant Calvinist fundamentalism of the Dutch Reformed Church helped to block any 18th-century Dutch renewal. The interplay of imperialism and Anglican evangelicalism led pre-1914 Britain into a global decline, bloodbath and secession of Catholic Ireland. 

 

Papal Catholic fundamentalists and believers in the end of time teleology, Fatima prophecy and Armageddon, have politically influenced the 30 to 40 percent of American electorate caught up in Scripture, to exert a strong pull on Bush’s White House and the Republican Party, driving the America towards national disenchantment. The crusades for democracy worldwide, to harness the might of the United States to nurture and propagate democracy worldwide, rather than using it to overthrow democratically elected governments as many previous administrations did, helps end this growing national disenchantment in America, and harnesses the power of the sole super power unilateralist hegemon for propagating third world’s democracies rather than to over these democracies by military coups or covert operations, as many previous American administrations did.

 

MANIFEST DESTINY OF USA IN 21ST CENTURY: Sixth. It is the manifest destiny of the United States to permanently eliminate the Islam’s threat to Christianity, and to reestablish Christian rule over North Africa and Arabia, which were Christian lands before Sword of Islam imposed Islam over Christian Egypt, Syria, Libya and Algeria in 7th Century. It is America’s destiny to conquer and colonize oil-producing Islamic nations to assert America’s dominance in the world. The 9/11 was the turning point in history and it would allow Protestant United State to assert its power in the South America and the Middle East. European Union would not be able to keep American in check. First, the 9/11 attacks on twin towers was truly a turning point in history, and caused greater loss to American economy than it lost in all the wars it fought in the history. The Semite Wahhabi terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 exposed the Achilles’ heels of the United States and ended the one superpower world order. President Bush’s declaration of the war on terrorism and subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq heralded the birth of the new age of colonial empires in the 21st Century. The 9/11 exposed the vulnerability of American economic infrastructure in economic warfare and raised the specter of Christianity and Islam’s Clash of Civilizations. The 9/11 would galvanize America to assert America’s Manifest Destiny in South America to impose colonial rule in Venezuela and Colombia and to promote Protestant Church and English language in Hispanic America.

 

9/11 GAVE BIRTH TO OIL COLONIALISM: Seventh. The terrorist attack of 9/11/2001 justified President Bush’s the eastward expansion of American Empire to establish military bases in Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, in the southern belly of Russia. The 9/11 made Covert Operations more effective instruments of policy. America China strategic alliance threatened Russia’s Eastern Siberia. Third, it is suspected that some one, a White Christian or Jewish person non-Muslim might have acted as co-conspirator to the 9/11 attacks, which could have explained that the commission to enquire into 9/11 intelligence failures never took off. Fourth, the European Union might become the reincarnated version of Habsburg Holy Roman Empire to represent the political aspirations of European Catholics and Catholic nations, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Poland. After 9/11 it would impossible for Europeans to accept the entry of Muslim Turkey into the Christian European Union. 

 

DEATH OF MONROE DOCTRINE: Eight. The Monroe Doctrine is dead. The American war on Iraq destroyed the legal basis of Monroe Doctrine and Brazil should take a lead to revitalize South American Common Market with leading nations of the region, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela and Peru. India should develop closer military and economic ties with Brazil, Peru and Venezuela. Haiti’s Black Negro president Toussaint L’Ouverture established the first independent state in the New World before the establishment of United States. The rise of Inca Indian government in Ecuador is a turning point in history.

 

SECESSION OF SHIITES SAUDI AL HASA: Ninth. India should support Aryan Shiite Iran to expedite the secession of Shiite Al Hasa region from Saudi Arabia. India should support the claims of Pakistan, Turkey or Iran as the new Caliph of Islam and new custodian of the Islamic holy cities of Mecca & Medina. Seventh, it is the Manifest Destiny of Protestant United States to spread the English language and Protestant Christianity south of borders to Mexico, Venezuela, Brazil, and Argentina so that Protestant Christianity replaced Roman Catholicism as the dominant religion of South America.

 

INDIA USA TO LEAD COMMONWEALTH: Tenth. Canada would assert its Manifest Destiny as the leader of the Commonwealth of Nations. Canada would organize the Commonwealth Common Market without Britain. Canada would develop closer ties with India and Australia to catapult Canada into the ranks of World powers. Commonwealth might emerge as the New Empire in the 21st Century, without Britain as Britain ahs joined the European Union. Canada would go nuclear and emerge as the Super power by middle of the 21st Century and lead Commonwealth Empire. Canada has greater resources than Britain, France and Germany. Canada has every right to emerge as World Power. Canada can solve its population problem by legislating for unlimited immigration from India and other Commonwealth nations. This the argument the author makes in this chapter.

 

18(2) Post 9/11 Manifest Destiny

 9/11 is a Turning Point

First. World Chess Board of Major Powers was rearranged on September 11, 2001, by first major attack on the citadels of American economic and military power by 19 hijackers, which caused more than $5 trillion damage to American economy, Wall Street and Yankee dollar. Osama bin Laden created multi-polar world order on 9/11/2001 with his attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon, ending the one-superpower system that prevailed after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In response to the barbarian’s invasions, the Protestant Civilization led by President Bush ushered in the new age of Oil Colonial Empires in the 21st century. British Secret Service M1 and spymaster Lawrence of Arabia conceptualized the Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism as a political tool to mobilize illiterate barbarian nomad Bedouin tribes of Mecca and Medina to engineer the secession of Oil-rich Arabia from Ottoman Empire. The poor Wahhabi clergy of Mecca agreed to accept the establishment of Jewish state of Israel and American and British control over Arabian oil resources, in exchange for Wahhabi Clergy’s undisputed control over Mecca & Medina and imposition of Shariah law over Arabia. The 9/11 attacks on twin towers was truly a turning point in history, and caused greater loss to American economy than it lost in all the wars it fought in the history.

 

9/11 Ended Unipolar World

Second. The Semite Wahhabi terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 exposed the Achilles’ heels of the United States and ended the on-superpower world order. Osama Bin Laden disturbed the apple cart and exploited the hidden bonds of the Western secret Services with Islamic terrorism to unleash unprovoked terrorist attacks of 9/11, which caused more than $ 5 trillion economic damages to the United States, and ended the Unipolar One-superpower world order and exposed the sole-superpower United States as the Paper-tiger superpower. United States could no longer claim to be the sole super power of the world, when 19 Wahhabi terrorists could attack American with impunity and America couldn’t impose any punitive punishments to Wahhabi clergy and Al Qaeda terrorists. Wahhabi Arab terrorists raised the doubt that America could be a paper tiger.

 

Wahhabi Sect is Oil-Colonial Conspiracy

Third. Faced with pro-independence movement in Indian Empire, America and Britain hit upon the brilliant scheme to carve out American and British Neo-Colonial Empires, throughout Islamic world and oil-rich and mineral-rich Third World, by allowing the entrenched religious clergy the political control over Islamic religious institutions and Mosques. America and Britain promoted the family of Abdul Aziz as House of Al Saud monarchy of Saudi Arabia. Britain and America thought it wise to enrich a family based in Mecca to acquire ownership rights over oil wealth of Arabia as it had already signed away all these oil rights to American and British Big Oil. Britain imposed the rule of King Faisal in Iraq, while with American blessing King Faisal also ruled in Saudi Arabia. King Faisal of Iraq was a stooge of British Oil Colonialism so the CIA arranged the military coup in Iraq and assassination of King Faisal so that American Oil Colonialism could replace British Oil colonialism in Iraq. Saddam Hussein had been a loyal CIA agent and he served America’s national interests, and the CIA rewarded him with chemical weapons to bolster Iraq’s defenses against Iran, during Iran-Iran wars.

 

Saddam Gaddafi Khomeini All CIA Agents

Fourth. The CIA arranged the military coup in Iraq to reinstate the Monarchy of Mohammed Shah Reza Pahlevi to establish American Oil colony in Iran that replaced British oil colonialism. President Jimmy Carter arranged the downfall of the secular, liberal, nationalistic monarchy of Shah of Iran, by supporting Islamic fundamentalism and Ayatollah Khomeini, to use the power of Iranian clergy to bring down the secular monarchy, just as America had used Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to bring down Ottoman rule in Arabian. President Ronald Reagan continued the pro-Islamic fundamentalism policy by militarily supporting Muslim militants wage political war on Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Osama Bin Laden had been a creation of the CIA and with the consent of the West Afghanistan became the world’s premier center for Opium production. 

 

Bush Legitimized Oil Colonial Empires

Fifth. President George W. Bush expertly exploited the world’s sympathy towards America’s miserly on account of 9/11 attacks, in engineering the eastward expansion of Nato to include East European countries, and the deployment of Nato in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. American Wilsonian ideological foreign policies lost its moral luster and got exposed as naked oil colonialism when American war on Afghanistan failed to arrest or neutralize even a single top al Qaeda terrorist. President Bush ushered in the new age of Neo-imperial Oil-Colonialism by undertaking naked aggression on Iraq.

 

Welcome 21st Century Oil-Colonialism

Sixth. India fully supports America’s invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq as it legitimizes the return of the Age of Colonial empires in the 21st Century, as major world powers, acquired the right to carve out their own colonial empires in the 21st Century. Osama bin Laden released the genie of Islamic Terrorism. President Bush released the genie of Neo-Colonial Empires. Neither the genies of Islamic terrorism nor that of Neo-Colonial Oil Empires could again be put back into the bottles. World would have to live with the advent of Oil-colonial Empires as well as predator Islamic terrorism. Since World civilizations cannot allow intolerant predator religious cults and barbarian religious terrorists undertake first strikes against Civilizations in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the World Civilizations are forced to undertake massive preemptive strikes against the home-base, the home-land breeding grounds of the religious terrorists, to impose the ruled of the civilizations over multitude of smaller nation-states that harbor, or nurture or finance terrorism predator religious cults, ethnic separatism and political extremism. As the result of the barbarian Muslim terrorist attacks of 9/11 on Protestant Christian Civilization and the justified responses of the American Civilization to the Islamic terrorist attacks, more than 50 smaller independent sovereign nations, presently members of the United Nations, may lose their independence and sovereignty to new and older Civilization Empires in the first half of the 21st Century. The colonial empires would be the major actors in the new international system of the 21st Century, and consist of 12 or so independent sovereign entities. The very concept of micro-states, weaker smaller states having population less than 50 million and land area less than 1,000,000 sq. km., became anachronistic in the 21st century. The supra national regional groupings like European Union, represents the future of the nation states. Taking the lead of European Union, the nation states of Africa, Asia and South America should regroup under regional confederations and regional federations, like Asian Union, African Union and South American Union, led by dominant regional powers. The very concept of smaller nation states, ethnic separatism, has lost its raison e’etre in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Civilization-federations should replace multitude of nation states that emerged in the post-colonialism age. Osama Bin Laden signed the death warrant for more than 50 independent, sovereign states, many of them in the oil-producing Islamic world. Like the proverbial gold rush that resulted in the destruction of many indigenous societies, the Neo-Colonial Oil-Empires would establish Oil-Colonies throughout oil-producing world. Neo-Colonial diamond-gold Empires would establish Diamond-Gold Colonies in the mineral-rich Third World. Every one of the eight world powers would have unfettered right to establish Oil-Colonies and Mineral-Colonies throughout the Third World, in the 21st Century.

 

Post 9/11 New World Order

Seventh. The world’s geopolitical chessboard significantly changed after the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001 during the first year of the Bush 43 Administration. The Wahhabi terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon indirectly signed the death warrants on the very legitimacy of the smaller nation states that promotes and harbors religious fundamentalism and terrorism. President Bush changed the course of the world history, by exploiting the world’s compassion after the 9/11 to wage neo-colonial wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to establish American Oil Colonies in the Caspian basin and Iraq and thereby ushered in a New Age of Neo-Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. President Bush legitimized the doctrine of preemptive strikes against terrorists, as civilizations can no longer allow terrorists to attack first in the new age of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. As a chain reaction of the civilization’s response to religious terrorism, the ultimate loser would be the very concept of the smaller nation states, and many smaller weaker nation states may lose their independence and sovereignty in the 21st Century.

 

India & China as World Powers

Eighth. After 2000 Buddhist China and Hindu India started to regain the leadership role what Chinese and Indian civilizations historically played during most of the world history, as late as 1750 AD. For most of human history China and India were world’s largest and second largest economies and most advanced civilizations. In 1750, China produced 32.8 percent of world’s total manufactured goods and India produced 24.5 percent of the world’s total manufactured goods. The total share of the white Western Europe and North America and Western Christendom was 18.7 percent of the world’s total manufactured goods and Japan produced only 3.8 percent of the world’s manufactured goods. India and China stagnated after 1450. China after 1820 utterly collapsed. Indian economy never utterly collapsed even under British rule. India was the world’s sixth largest manufacturing industrial power at the end of the Second World War. Just as China and India at it speak was blindsided by the rise of the West in the 18th Century, the Christian West is likely to be blindsided by the rise of Buddhist China and rise of Hindu India in the 21st Century. The center of global economic, military and political power has shifted from white Christian Europe to Yellow Buddhist and Brown Hindu Asia in 21st Century. 

 

Imperial Ambitions of New NATO

Ninth. NATO Crosses the Rubicon in 2002. NATO heads of government meeting in Prague in 2002 endorsed a new mission for the alliance, stating that it could no longer limit itself to its traditional area of operations and must meet new challenges and threats wherever they emerge. While many NATO members have independently sent military units to Afghanistan, the aid to the peacekeeping forces marks the first role there by the alliance as an organization.” The Rubicon has been crossed, because NATO has been doing critical bits of the planning with Germany and the Netherlands." "The biggest obstacle has been overcome, which was the decision to go at all.” On December 12, 2002 NATO has quietly begun supporting the multinational peacekeeping force in Afghanistan, in the alliance's first mission outside Europe and North America and a possible precursor to engagements in other trouble spots far from its home turf. NATO so far has provided help in military planning to German and Dutch contingents that are part of the International Security Assistance Force. "There won't be any NATO flag or anything, "some countries are a bit nervous about it.” This will be the first NATO operation out of area, but there will be no NATO footprint in Afghanistan." For this initial phase, NATO involvement will be largely behind the scenes, with the Germans and Dutch in control.

 

The two units are scheduled to take over command of the peacekeeping force patrolling Kabul in February 2003. After that, NATO intends to expand its aid to communications, logistics and intelligence gathering and assessment. The German-Dutch command is scheduled to last six months. Some NATO members are pushing for the alliance to take over command of the force at that point. "If it happens, it will be very significant." There is no consensus among the 19 NATO countries for such a step. France opposes any direct NATO role in Afghanistan. NATO's military consists largely of the national armed forces of the member countries. But some military assets, such as surveillance planes, command centers, planning staffs and communications networks, are maintained jointly.

 

The involvement in Afghanistan is a sharp reversal from a year ago, just after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States, when NATO for the first time invoked its Article 5 mutual defense clause and offered to assist the United States only to see that offer largely rebuffed by Washington, which drew support from just a few key allies. Since then, there has an attempt to keep the NATO alliance relevant to the United States. It will be done very discreetly from Brussels.” NATO's involvement came about when the two countries preparing to take over the Kabul force requested military planning help. Also the Dutch army corps being dispatched to Kabul from a base in Germany is already integrated into the NATO structure.

 

NATO Secretary General George Robertson of United States has led an effort to retool the organization, which was created to counter Soviet forces in Europe during the Cold War. NATO is examining taking command of the peacekeepers in Afghanistan chiefly to avoid the disruption of the current system, in which command turns over every six months. Americans argue that though the best option was to turn the mission over to Afghan police and soldiers, but the international force was, at the moment, the best guarantor of stability in the country.

 

EXPANDED NATO IS IMPERIAL COALITION: Tenth. America diplomatically exploited the world’s sympathy on Saudi Wahhabi hijackers’ terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon to weave a global alliance allowing Nato to expand to include Eastern Europe and developed bases in Central Asia and South Asia. What an ingenious diplomatic coup! After Nato’s eastward expansion to include former seven Warsaw Pact members, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria Slovakia, Slovenia, and three states which were former parts of the Soviet Union, namely, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, the new 26-member Nato has become an imperial coalition, seeking Christian domination of the world, especially the oil-reserves of the Islamic World. United States would soon have alliances with 20 non-Nato members of Euro-Atlantic partnership Council (EAPC) to expand into Central Asia and Caucasus as the Nato’s next frontier. United States has military bases in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Diego Garcia, Japan and Korea in Asia.

 

NATO Designs on Russia

Eleventh. The Sino-US strategic alliance completes the maritime noose around the western, southern and eastern periphery of the Heartland land power Russia. The European colonial powers have covered the entire land route from Europe to India, with the network of military alliances, for the first time since Alexander the Great. The European colonial empires expanded to the New World to find maritime route to riches of India, to secure trade in spices, the necessary ingredient for the long-term preservation of meat. The landward expansion of Nato towards India, is done to secure Western control over the Oil resources of Asia. The Maritime Bloc has cornered the wounded Giant Russian Bear in Siberia, and the geopolitical hunt for the secession of Siberia has begun. British Prime Minister Blair advocated the birth of new colonial empires in the 21st century. Dr. Henry Kissinger forecast that 21st century would be geopolitical similar to 18th and 19th century when European colonial empires dominated the world, and balance of power in Europe determined the peace and war in the world.

 

Chinese Designs on Eastern Siberia

Twelveth. Since the warring western coalition poised to support Chinese invasions of Russian Siberia, what options does the cornered nuclear Bear have? Could warring coalition direct its fury against India after or before it attacks Russia? Could 26-member Nato use its military preponderance to disarm Germany or Japan, in the event Germany or Japan decide to develop nuclear weapons? Do the principle of Raison d’etat makes the national interests of Germany, Japan, France, Russia, and India coincide on matters related to the geopolitical impact of preponderance of 26-member Nato? Would United States succeed in conquering the world in 21st century, leveraging its lead in Precision Guided Munitions and worldwide network of military alliances? Would US-supported Chinese invasions of Siberia succeed in the secession of Siberia from Russia? Is United States really so powerful as Bush Doctrine 2002, claims it to be? Can United States really prohibit other rising world powers, namely, Germany, Japan, China, and India, from attempting to equal or surpass America’s military capability?

 

Rebirth of Diplomats in Post Cold War Age

Thirteenth. The art and craft of Diplomacy has revived in the post-Cold War age, which had atrophied during the bipolar Cold War balance of terror. Canada, France, Germany, Japan and India would explore new alliances with one other and with regional powers like Peru, Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina in South America, and Congo, Nigeria and South Africa in Africa, and Vietnam, and Indonesia in Southeast Asia, and Iran, Libya, Algeria, Syria and Yemen, and Post-Saddam Iraq in the Middle East, to tame and neutralize the predominance of the United States, to restore equilibrium in the world order. The post-Cold War age shall be the Golden Age of Diplomacy.

 

End of the Age of Ideology

Fourteenth. The end of Cold War also meant the end of the Age of Ideology and the birth of New Diplomacy. Diplomacy not the ideology would determine international diplomacy in the post 9/11 Age. National interests and balance of power not ideology shall determine the diplomacy in the post-Cold War world order. Ideology shall play less significant influence over the foreign policy making of the great powers in the post-Cold War new world order. The leading eight world powers in the post-Cold War new world order are: United States, Russia, China, India, Germany, Japan, Britain and Canada. The raison d’etat principle would oblige Germany, France, Japan, Canada and India to seek military alliances with second-strongest Power to tame, check and balance the military preponderance of the United States in the world. The diplomacy and statecraft of the post-Cold War new world order shall be in total contrast to the diplomatic conduct practiced during the bipolar world during Cold War. The new world order is a multipolar world, led by two blocs, first Bloc headed by United States and the Second Bloc shall be led by a coalition of world powers, uniting to check the hegemony of the United States. Germany, Japan, France and Canada would determine their national policies towards United States, to promote their respective national interests, not to promote the ideological interests propounded by the Wilsonian foreign policy. The balance of power shall be the guiding principle of the diplomacy among Christian nations, in the post-Cold War age in the 21st Century as it was during 18th and 19th century.

 

Civilization Empire Strikes First

Fifteenth. The 9/11 attacks sounded the death warrant on the legitimacy of smaller nations that misused concept the independence and sovereignty of nation states to harbor terrorists and sponsor religious terrorism and intolerance. The 9/11 attacks eroded the legitimacy of the newly independent states that emerged as a result of the decolonization. President George W. Bush wisely enunciated the new ‘Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First” national security strategy. It justified preemptive strikes against terrorists, because in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the civilizations would be foolish to allow barbarians strike first. The 9/11 terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon exposed the Achilles’ heels of the so called sole superpower of the world, and ushered in the new age of multi-polar world order. President Bush’s attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq to establish American Oil colonies in Caspian basin and Iraq ushered in the new Age of Neo-Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Australia’s Prime Minister John Howard wisely argued that United Nations charter should be changed to allow a country to launch strikes against any threat conventional or terrorist. President Bush’s unilateral invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the doctrine of preemptive strikes against terrorist nations, establishes the precedent under customary international law that allows every one of the eight great powers to launch military strikes against terrorist nations, and terrorist-sponsoring nations.

 

American Media’s 9/11 Sound Bytes

Sixteenth. SOUND BYTES OF 2000: The American media’s main sound bytes of the year 2000 was the competing claims by the principal candidates in the presidential election 2000, Bush, Cheney and Al Gore, that they alone are better Christian and Jesus’ real man on the presidential tickets. The US election 2000 was primarily fought on Christian values and the elections looked like to the election between Pope and American Women. The voting machine fiasco in Florida exposed to the world that America’s entire election process is fraudulent and manipulated by the 4000+ County Canvassing Boards. The whole world realized that United States is not a democracy as it lacks constitutionally guaranteed Federal Election Commission. Prime Minister of India, Atal Behari Vajpayee had made the unprecedented visit to Pakistan to meet his counterpart democratically elected Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief. America was so unnerved that President Bill Clinton ordered the overthrow of the elected regime by the military coup headed by General Pervez Musharraf.

 

SOUND BYTES OF 2001: The main sound bytes of the year 2001 was the Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attack on Twin Towers and Pentagon, the financial and military core of the world’s leading military and economic power, which caused more than $ 2 trillion in economic loss to the United States, more than the loss the entire world suffered in the First World War and the Second World War. The American economy couldn’t find its moorings ever since. It exposed the vulnerability of the America’s homeland and the huge cost of the wars of economic infrastructure. The 9/11 terrorist attacks changed the nature of warfare permanently. The Civilizations would have to learn to decisively respond to the mobile, lethal terrorist attacks on the economic infrastructure of the civilized western Christendom. The Arab terrorists Saudi Arabia finance and the CIA had trained earlier returned to attack United States. President George Bush changed the course of history when he declared America’s War on Global Terrorism during Joint Session of the Congress in the Capitol. The world has never been the same again.

 

SOUND BYTES OF 2002: The main sound bytes of the year 2002 had been President Bush’s attack on Afghanistan and its failure to capture even a single top leader of Al Qaeda terrorist network. No leader of al Qaeda could be brought to justice. Osama bin Laden barked again in the November 2002 to prove he is alive, safe and busy planning new attacks on United States, and reportedly hiding in Mecca, safe from any foreign intervention, protected by the Wahhabi religious leadership. It raises the question: Whether United States lost the war on terrorism in Afghanistan, because it invaded Afghanistan not Saudi Arabia, to retaliate against Saudi hijackers’ terrorist attacks on America? Did America fight the war on Afghanistan to test the Precision Guided Munitions, JDAM-kit equipped smart bombs, which when dropped from 36,000 feet high can change its course in flight to hit the pre-programmed targets? Opium Poppy cultivation has zoomed again in Afghanistan, which was banned during Taliban regime. During 2002 United States promulgated the Bush doctrine, after America’s victory in Afghanistan, just as Soviet Union promulgated the Brezhnev doctrine after the American defeat in the Vietnam.

 

America Exploited 9/11

Seventeenth. United States had exploited the nuclear superiority during Cold War to force West European States accept the bondage of the US-led Nato alliance. Similarly, United States exploited 9/11 attacks to secure American military bases in South Asia and Central Asia and the expansion of Nato in Eastern Europe, to include 10 former members of the Warsaw Pact. United States diplomatically exploited the 9/11 attacks to overcome all doubts and foreign oppositions to secure series of military bases in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan. It appears 9/11 attacks turned out to be bonanza for the untied Stats as rest of the world accepted the expansion of Nato and series of American military bases, without getting anything in return. The Yankee victim of 9/11 attacks appears to aim at world domination in the first decade of the 21st Century, its principal adversary Russia is down and new Challenger China joins America in the hunt of the Russian Bear. America aims for second partition of Russia, by expediting either the secession of Siberia or the Chinese invasions of Siberia. Empty continental-size land of Siberia is the biggest geopolitical prize of the 21st century, which eluded Napoleon Bonaparte, William Kaiser and Adolf Hitler. Would China meet the fate of Adolf Hitler, William Kaiser and Napoleon Bonaparte at the hands of General Russian Winter? What options does Russian have to ward of this grave danger? Would Russia consent for the Nato’s invasions of India to buy time? What are India’s options in the event of Nato-China invasions of Russian Siberia?

 

Nato designs in Central Asia

Eighteenth. United States diplomatically exploited the public sympathy of the world, for developing military bases in Pakistan, Afghanistan and airbases in Uzbekistan. The Nato has expanded in Eastern Europe to become 26-member military organization. Nato declared Central Asia and Caucasus as Nato’s next frontier. European powers have cemented the entire land route from Europe to India through a network of military alliances, first time since Alexander the Great. The 1907 Pamir Settlement between Russian Empire and British Indian Empire sealed the southward frontiers of the Heartland power Russia and the northward frontiers of the Indian Empire at the Amur River. The secession of the Muslim Central Asian Republics from the Soviet Union, and the expansion of Nato to fill in the vacuum opened the geopolitical Pandora box in the Eurasian balance of power. The western powers has tightened the noose around the western, southern, and eastern frontiers of Russia, raising the prospect of geopolitical hunt of sick Russian Bear, to take away its prized possession of thinly populated continental-size Siberia, which boasts of the dwindling population of less than 14 million, but where more than 300 million Chinese could move in to make very decent living. Would China takeover Siberia and Mongolia during the first quarter of the 21st Century, with the direct support of the 26-member Nato and United States?

 

POSSIBLE CHINA’S NATO ALLIANCE: Ninteenth. Chinese occupation of Siberia could be construed as the victory of the yellow race and Buddhists over white race and Christians and thereby makes Chinese occupation of Siberia in the national interest of brown Hindu India. However, atheist iconoclast Judeo-Communist China aligned with iconoclast Judeo-Christians to destroy the Buddhist civilization of China and Asia makes Chinese occupation of Siberia, victory of the atheist iconoclast forces, thereby making it against the national interest of nuclear Hindu India. Chinese invasion of Siberia is against the national and civilization interests of Hindu India, which had been a solid ally of the Soviet Union. India must use all its resources to oppose and repel Chinese invasions of Siberia. However, what should India get in return for defending Russia and Siberia against Chinese and Nato invasions? If Nato and USA-China alliance is powerful enough to attack Siberia, then it is powerful enough to attack India also. What would stop 26-member Nato, supported by US-ally China to invade India to impose Christian solutions on multi-ethnic Hindu India? The moral of the story is that the eastward expansion of the Nato, US-China alliance, and US military bases in Afghanistan and Pakistan harms India’s national interests and requires diplomatic balancing acts to restore the Asia’s balance of power. India should seek military ties with Japan and Germany to restore Eurasian Balance of Power.

 

18(3) USA’s Manifest Destiny

 

SOUTWARD EXPANSION OF PROTESTANTISM: First. The southward propagation of Protestant Christianity and English language is the manifest destiny of the WASPs United States in the 21st Century. The State of the United States shall control and supervise over the Christian Churches of all denominations and sects, within United States, so that Church may not subvert the power of the State. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 21st Century is to expand southward from River Rio Grande at the Mexican border to Cape Horn at the southern tip of the Chile, to propagate English language and Protestant Christianity throughout Hispanic America. Protestant United States created the wall to separate the affairs of the State and Church in the 18th Century, to protect the new country from the ravages of Papacy. However, in the 21st Century, the Protestant super power United States shall bring Church under the supervision of the White House and the Capitol so that seat of the political, economic and military power of the Christian world, also becomes the seat of the Christian Churches.

 

SOUTHWARD EXPANSION OF ENGLISH: Second. Under the leadership of the United States English language shall replace Spanish language, as lingua franca of the Hispanic America and Protestant Christianity shall become the predominant Christian sect in the Hispanic America. The civilizations of Spain and Portugal are no match to the vibrant English-speaking Protestant civilization of the United States. More than 400 million Spanish and Portuguese speaking Catholics shall embrace non-denominational Protestant Christianity in the first half of the 21st Century, to remake Hispanic America the image of United States.

 

AMERICAN CONTROL OVER PAPACY: Third. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 19th Century had been to expand westward from New York to Los Angeles, to occupy the lands of the American Indians. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 20th Century was to make United States a global power and to subjugate the European Colonial powers into the subjugation of the US-led Atlantic Alliance. Habsburg Holy Roman Empire failed because Holy Roman Emperor didn’t want to control the Church, and was happy to remain subordinate to the Church.

 

In the age of Wars of Religious sects, unless White House and the Capitol take control of all Christian Churches-Roman Catholic Church, Major Denominational Protestant Churches, Non-denominational Protestant Churches-United States would lose the historical opportunity it enjoys now, to indefinitely perpetuate its hegemony as the leading super power. Washington should aim to become the Christian Civilization’s principle center of secular and religious power. The entire Christian Church of all sects and denominations must accept the leadership of the White House, Congress and the Senate. The White House and the Capitol should jointly become the Caesar and the Pharaoh, to create the single seat of secular and religious power of the Christian world, by making Church subordinate to the State, to neutralize Church-led conspiracy to subordinate the White House to the Church.

 

In the Medieval Dark Age the Church controlled and influenced the State. In the modern world the State shall control and influence the Church. State shall have the authority to impose democratic elections in the Church, so that laity directly elects the religious leadership of the Church for a fixed period of five years by direct elections. The response of the Non-denominational Protestant Christians and Protestant Religious Right Conservatives to the conspiracy hatched by Catholic Religious Right Conservatives shall be to demand the Protestant State take control of the entire Christian Church of all sects and denominations within the jurisdiction of the United States, to expedite the southward expansion of Americanism, American Culture, English language and Non-denominational Protestant Christianity from River Rio Grande to the Cape Horn.

 

Under the leadership of United States all differences among Christian sects and denominations shall disappear and every Christian Church property shall be available for Christian of every denomination and sect without any discrimination whatsoever. The State shall edit and modernize scriptures to make expunge archaic sections so that the scriptures promote peace and harmony to neutralize the conspiracy religious fundamentalists to cause apocalyptic teleological eschatological end of time catastrophes. The religious fundamentalism is the womb of the Axis of Evil and causes religious terrorism. To safeguard the world from apocalyptic religious fundamentalism every sovereign state take control over the Church within its borders and enforce the reformation of the religion and the church, so that the power and resources of the non-democratic totalitarian church are not used to destabilize the democratic State. Theocratic church not responsible to the laity is anachronistic in the modern age.

 

Every Church of every religion, faith, sect and denomination must provide for the direct elections of its top religious and administrative leadership every five years, by the system of direct elections elected by the laity by the system of one-person one-vote. This is the historical mission liberal secular Protestant United States has in the 21st Century. United States can create Universal Christian Civilization in the image of Americanism if American State rises to meet the challenge of reforming and democratizing the Christian Church, uniting all Christian sects, faiths and denominations under the leadership of Non-denominational universal Christian Church, so that all the church properties are at the disposal for Christian laity of all sects, faiths and denominations without any bias and discrimination, where Christian laity elect the top religious and administrative leadership of the Christian Church by impartial transparent voting system. The clergy and priests, including the top clergy serve at the pleasure of the Christian laity. The laity not the clergy shall own the property of the Church in a democracy, just as the citizens not the politicians own the property of the State and the government in a democracy.

 

AMERICA IS NOT SATELLITE OF EUROPE: Fourth. To better understand America’s destiny, we should first identify what is not America’s destiny. It is not white America’s destiny to be subservient to white European Union. It is America’s destiny to preside over, rule over and dominate Europe, not to be dominated by Europe. The seat of Western Christendom Civilization has shifted to Washington DC, just as after the partition of the Roman Empire, it shifted from Rome to Constantinople, the Second Rome. After the conquest of Constantinople by Ottoman Turks, the seat of the Christendom shifted to the Slav Moscow, the third Rome. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the seat of the Christendom shifted to Washington DC. After the collapse of the European colonial Empires, the seat of the Western Christendom shifted to the Washington DC after the Second World War. The seat of Christianity after the 1929, recognition of the Sovereignty of the Vatican, and the 1917 fall of Orthodox Tsar Monarchy, the seat of the Christianity had shifted to Rome. Washington DC is the new Rome in the 21st Century. The European Union has a dream to make Brussels the new Rome of 21st Century. However, due to the US-leadership over 26-member NATO, the military seat of power of Europe has shifted to Pentagon, Alexandria VA. The center of gravity of the Christian world has shifted from Europe to the New World United States. Western Europe became the satellite of the United States and the expansion of the European Union to include east European States, failed to develop Europe’s independent military capability, as the east European countries have also joined the 26-member US-led NATO. The eastward expansion of NATO to include ten East European States has sabotaged European Union’s dream of developing independent European military capability.

 

The eastward expansion of east European countries in European Union would reduce West European, Irish and Anglo Saxon, Italian and German immigration to the United States. The newer immigration to the United States would come from Slav East Europe, Russia and Asia. The Anglo Saxon character of the United States would get periodically diluted making United Sates less western Christendom. The Europe and United States destined to spread apart. However Canada may move away from the United States and newer ties with European Union. United States no longer needs the military support of Germany and France to undertake military operations in Europe, as East Europeans would be more than willing to support United States with military bases and troops. United States could be heading towards collision course. The national interests of United States could in future conflict.

 

AMERICA IS NOT POPE’S AGENT: Fifth. America’s unique history demands that America’s manifest destiny promotes the interests of the Non-denominational Protestant Christianity. It is not the manifest destiny of the WASPs United States to propagate the religious interests of Roman Catholicism howsoever hard the pro-Life and anti-Abortion Catholic religious right conservatives may try. United States would never permit the Church to control the State. Holy Father Poland-born Pope John Paul II wants to define America’s destiny as ‘American Holy Roman Empire,’ where United States could enjoy the hegemony of the secular world and Papacy could enjoy the hegemony of Christian religious world. Habsburg Holy Roman Empire chose to support Papacy and waged Counter Reformation Thirty Years Wars (1618-1648) to regain Papal control over Protestant Princes’ lands. However, Protestants outnumber Catholics 5 to 1 in the United States. United States would never wage Neo-counter Reformation wars on Protestants, neither in USA nor in Europe. On the contrary, United States could wage wars on neo-Counter Reformation coalition. The WASPs and non-denominational Protestants have seen through the game of the Papacy, which camouflaged the neo-counter Reformation wars in the disguise of anti-abortion and prop-life and religious conservatism. The recent court cases of the pedophile Catholic clergy, outraged Catholic laity and non-denominational Christians. The political activism of the pro-life and anti-abortion political activists had cannibalized the Republican presidential campaign of Bob Dole paving the victory of Bill Clinton, the nominee of the Christian religious right conservative conspiracy. The pro-Life and anti-Abortion and Catholic Christian religious right conservatism is the euphemism for the party of the Pope John Paul II.

 

18(4) Canada As World Power

 

CANADA AS RIVAL TO USA: First. Canada, Germany and France lead the world in anti-Americanism. The level of Anti-Aamericanism in Canada is far higher than in Germany and France and it would result in the drastic changes in Canadian foreign policy after American invasions of Iraq. Just as Germany and Russia historically been allies and rivals in the continent of Europe, Canada and United have been the historical allies and rivals in the New World. Canada has the natural resources and the continental-size landmass to lead the Second Bloc to tame and equalize the preponderant United States in the post-Cold War new world order. Canada fears America’s northward colonial expansion, which Canada can deter only by deploying nuclear weapons. Canada may consider a federation with United Kingdom, which would allow Canada access to British nuclear arsenal to deter any unforeseen northward colonial expansionism of the United States. Canada is a world power along with United States, China, Russia, India, Japan, Germany, France and United Kingdom. Canada rightfully claims the right to become the permanent member of the UN Security Council. Canada shall reorganize the Commonwealth of Nations minus Ireland and United Kingdom into Commonwealth Common Market. Australia should federate with Canada to form a larger Anglo Saxon country, to rival United States. Whenever Canadian population reaches the 50 million mark, Canada will become a great power. The Manifest Destiny of the Anglo Saxon Race demands that Canada, Australia and United Kingdom should form a Federation with the central capital at Ottawa, with the Parliament and Prime Minister’s office located at Ottawa. Britain has no future of its own, and rather being junior partner to Yankee President in the NATO and junior partner to German Chancellor in the European Union, it would be befitting that Britain should agree to become a junior partner to Canada in the federation of Canada, Britain and Australia, with the seat of sovereign parliament and Prime Minister’s office located at Ottawa Canada. England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland shall become the provinces of the new Federation and London would become the capital of the Province of England. To help realize the manifest destiny of the Anglo Saxon race, United Kingdom should voluntarily dissolve itself as a sovereign nation and merge into Canada. Canada has great future, while neither United Kingdom nor Australia has any bright future on its own. Rather than losing sovereignty to the European Union, Englishmen are better advised to lose their sovereignty to Canada. It is high time that Canada should lead Britain and Australia to protect the role of the Anglo Saxons in the Western Christendom. United Kingdom should bring its nuclear arsenal under joint British-Canadian Anglo-Saxon control. Canada shall join the ranks of legitimate nuclear weapons powers soon.

 

CANADA TO OVERTAKE GERMANY FRANCE: Second. Canada is predestined to become the second strongest military and nuclear power of the world in the 21st century. Canada would overtake Russia, Japan, Germany, France, Britain as economic, military and nuclear power in the 21st Century, provides its open its borders and allow unimpeded immigration, so that its population increases to around 60 million strong. The increased immigration would dilute the Anglo-Saxon character of Canada but it would allow Canada compete with United States as an equal. Nuclear Canada has all ingredients to become super Power, more than Germany, France, Japan and Russia. New Cold War between Nuclear Canada and United States may be the most distinguishing phenomenon in the post-Cold War new world order. India, Japan, Germany and France would align with Nuclear Canada to consolidate the Second Bloc to balance the predominance of the hegemony of the United States and promote the new equilibrium in the global bipolar balance of power.

 

CANADA PARANOID ABOUT USA: Third. Just as Pakistan is paranoid about India’s regional predominance, Canada is becoming paranoid about the dominant hegemony across its southern frontiers especially after the declaration of the Bush Doctrine, which declared America’s intention to use force to dissuade any power, whether friend or foe, whoever attempts to equal or surpass America’s military capability.

 

CANADA MAY DEVELOP NUKES: Fourth. Geopolitics determines the relations among great powers, and geopolitics shall influence the Canada’s relationship with the preponderant power in the south, especially after the publication of the Bush Doctrine in 2002. There are neither permanent friends nor permanent enemies in the diplomacy there are only permanent interests. The national interests and the geopolitics demand that continental-size Canada should develop and deploy nuclear weapons and enter into series of military alliances with second-strong Powers to balance the predominance of the hegemon America, to restore equilibrium in the post-Cold War new world order. India should explore military and nuclear ties with Canada. The end of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War also ended the raison d’etre of the America-led NATO, especially the rationale of the 26-member Atlantic Alliance to include East European countries and after its eastward expansion for NATO deployment in Afghanistan. To Canada, Germany, France, Japan, India, Russia and China, the 26-member US-led Atlantic alliance has metamorphosed into US-led imperialist Alliance, out to militarily maintain the present-day hegemony of the United States for long time to come. Neither Canada, nor Germany, nor Japan nor India can accept this blatant show of power. Neither Canada nor India nor Germany would let Yankee America take away what destiny has in store for new great powers, namely, Germany, India, China, Japan, France and Canada. Canada may agree to play a second fiddle to United States, if its resources so determine, but Canada would never barter away its right to become Great power, if opportunity so arises in future.

 

Canada has begun to ask: Why should Canada be friendly to its predominant adversary in the south? Why shouldn’t Canada readjust its relationship with United States based upon the time tested principles of the Raison D’etat and Balance of Power, which obligates Canada to seek alliances with second-strongest Power to tame and balance the regional hegemony of its southern neighbor? The End of the Cold War ended the rationale of the Canada’s friendly ties with the United States, on security matters other than economic matters, where Canada’s closer ties with United States would continue. In the post-Cold War world order Canada’s relationship with United States would be similar to that of Germany and Russia’s relationship in continental Europe, which alternated between friendship and enmity. Nuclear Canada would be a real thorn in the eye of United States. Would United States use military force to dissuade Canada from going nuclear? Would Britain come to the aid of Canada, if United States attacks Canada? Canada destined to join the Second Bloc to contain and balance the preponderance of the United States, on the side of Germany, France, Japan and India.

 

Neither Germany and Japan can sit idle while Pakistan continue to develop nuclear weapons with the consent and tacit support of the Western powers, justified in terms of its role as equalizer in the India-Pakistan balance in the Subcontinent. Perhaps Taiwan would also buy nuclear weapon technology and nuclear capable missiles from North Korea. With the spread of nuclear technology in the hands of irresponsible powers like Pakistan and North Korea, the erstwhile great powers Canada, Germany and Japan would reconsider their commitment to the NPT and may decide to exercise the nuclear option. It is possible that United States may threaten Japan and Germany in case they decide to go nuclear. Japan is the world’s third largest economy and deserves to go nuclear. Germany is world’s fifth largest economy and deserves to go nuclear. However, the country that has the greatest potential to emerge as world power is the 12th largest economy of the world, Canada. Canada has the potential to rival United States as nuclear weapon power. Nuclear Canada could acquire parity with United States in nuclear capability. Rise of three new nuclear powers, Germany, Japan and Canada would promote equilibrium in the post-Cold War new world order. Nuclear India should align with nuclear Germany, nuclear Japan and nuclear Canada to develop collective nuclear umbrella and national missile defense system to shoot down the rouge nuclear weapons. With Canada, Germany and Japan joining the nuclear weapon club, the world would become safer place and result in stable new world order.

 

It is the manifest destiny of Canada to develop credible nuclear weapon deterrent and to emerge as World Power. Canada shall also become the permanent member of the UN Security Council. Canada may join independent European Union’s military initiative to become independent of the US-led Atlantic Alliance. Canada shall explore military and economic alliance with Australia and India, to form Canada, Australia and India Bloc, to explore prospects of the Commonwealth Common Market, which may not include United Kingdom as later has joined the European Union.

 

 

18(5) Commonwealth Empire

Can Commonwealth Reemerge as Empire?

First. Patriotic Englishmen were furious that Communist leaders of British Labor Party dismantled British Empire while promoted Soviet Empire in the Eastern Europe. Ultra-nationalists condemn Prime Minister Harold Wilson, of Labor Party that dismantled British Empire East of Suez. Britain should not have given independence to Kuwait, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Brunei. Had Englishmen shared British Empire with Indians, then British Commonwealth in form of British-Indian Empire, or Commonwealth Empire would have remained intact today and continued in 22nd Century. It is insulting that British Monarch treated like Maid of German Chancellor in the European Union. India and England should merge to form a Union and reconvert Commonwealth of Nations into a transnational sovereign Empire, jointly ruled by England, India, Australia and Canada. Commonwealth Union would replace United States as the dominant super Power of the World in 72 hours. Sun never set on the British Empire. British Empire built by Indian soldiers and English generals. The political Union of Commonwealth States shall become the preponderant super power of the world and lead the world in the Third Christian Millennium. India welcomes England, Canada and Australia to transform Commonwealth of Nations into European Union type sovereign, political, and economic union. The Sun will never set again on the Commonwealth Empire, and led by India, England, Canada, and Australia it shall be the pre-dominant military and economic power of the world throughout third Christian Millennium. England, Canada, India and Australia must realize that Commonwealth is more powerful than United States, NAFTA, NATO, OAS, and European Union. Leaders of the Commonwealth nations should outgrow sibling rivalry and politically unite in the Commonwealth Union, to rule the world.

Can British-Indian Empire Reemerge?

Two. Empires and Colonies would stage comeback during early 21st Century. NATO air-war on Serbia signaled the return of the Age of Empires and Colonies. World would witness the Partition of Africa before 2005 AD, to rival the Partition of Africa of 1885. India and Britain should form strategic partnership to secure advantages in the new Colonial Age. India and Britain should prepare to carve out British Empire and Indian Empire during the Second Imperial Age. India and Britain can join forces to create World Empire jointly led by Britain, India, Canada and Australia. Communists and socialists that dominated the ordinary people of British Labor Party conspired to disintegrate British Empire to expedite the rise of Communist Soviet Union. Communist spies in Britain transferred nuclear weapons secrets to Soviet Union. Vatican conspired to expedite the decline of Britain and India after the Second World War. Communist not only scuttled British Imperial traditions, they also sabotaged Indian attempts to inherit the imperial mantle of the British-Indian Empire. Vatican implanted Kemal Pasha Ataturk in Turkey, who disowned Ottoman heritage of Turkey. Being a British Agent, Jawaharlal Nehru as Prime Minister of India, abdicated Indian heritage of British Indian Empire and engineered India's defeat in 1962 War with China. Communist and Socialist agents in Britain misdirected British media to weaken and destroy the imperial traditions among Englishmen. Communists conspired to undermine English sense of pride in the Empire. Soviet Spies infiltrated British Labour Party and imposed anti-nuclear and anti-colonial agenda in British politics. Encouraged by Khrushchev’s exercise of nuclear deterrent against Anglo-French invasion of Suez Canal, the Labour Party worked towards the dismantling of the British Empire, so long as Australia and Canada remained under Anglo-Saxon colonial occupation. The Labour Party dismantled British Empire to perpetuate Anglo-Saxon controls over vast continent size Australia and Canada. Britain worked towards demise of Apartheid in Rhodesia, Namibia, and South Africa to perpetuate White man's control over Australia and Canada. Imperial Britain is in the national interest of India and Russia. India can develop close strategic alliance with imperial Britain. Britain and India should join forces to create Commonwealth Empire to include beside Britain, India, Canada, and Australia some major Commonwealth nations. India supplied 1.5 million soldiers in the First World War and more than 3.5 million soldiers in the Second World War to defeat Axis Powers, even when India was under British rule. Persian Gulf was an Indian Lake. Indian Empire was the dominant power in the Indian Ocean Region. Indian Empire ruled Burma, Sri Lanka, Kuwait, Trucial States, Oman, Yemen and Qatar. Indian Empire controlled the affairs of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Brunei. Nuclear Hindu India would welcome alliance with Britain to recreate British-Indian Empire. It pains Indians to see British Monarch serving as Maid for Yankee President and German Chancellor. Had British Empire used Indian Army to defeat the revolt of 13 colonies of United States, Indians would have inflicted defeat on the United States and Canada would have become the dominant power of the North America? Had Britain shared power with India, British Empire would have been intact even today and remained intact even in 22nd Century? Indian Army made British Empire worldwide. Hindu India seeks strategic alliance with Britain to recreate British-Indian Empire in 21st Century, in the new Age of Empires and Colonies.

Can French Empire Reemerge?

Three. Nuclear Hindu India seeks strategic partnership with France to recreate French Empire in form of Indo-French Empire. Nuclear France realizes that the principal enemy of France is not Russia but United States. United States first colonized Philippines in the first decade of the 20th Century. After the Second World War, United States entered Vietnam War to replace French Colonial influence in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. United States has undermined French influence in Iran, Haiti, Comoro Islands, and French Africa. India and France could develop strategic relationship to develop joint military bases in Madagascar, Congo, Algeria, Tunisia, and Niger. India-French Empire shall focus on Africa and promote French language at the expense of English. India and France should work towards secession of Quebec from Canada. Sovereign, independent Quebec should develop nuclear weapons to deter future American invasions. Independent Quebec shall join France and European Union to secure its independence. French military and nuclear bases in Quebec would redraw the Global Strategic Map. Would United States invade Quebec to crush pro-secessionist movements? United States would not threaten nuclear attack to deter French military and nuclear presence in independent Quebec? France-Quebec Defense pact would bury Monroe Doctrine for ever. Quebec shall be the brightest jewel of the New French Empire.

Would French Quebec Secede?

Four. France will back Quebec in whatever political path it chooses, independence or continued federation with Canada. Referring to the 7.4 million inhabitants of the former French colony, spokeswoman for president Jacques Chirac of France told visiting Quebec's Premier, Lucien Bouchard, "It is up to Quebec to make up its choices." Hindu India supports the secession of Quebec from Canada. Independent Quebec should join European Union and deploy French nuclear weapons to defend Canada from invasions of United States.

Can Russian Orthodox Empire Reemerge?

Five. To maintain peace and stability in Euro-Asian continent the frontiers of Indian and Russian Empires should meet again. Transcontinental railways should directly connect India, Russia, Iran, Egypt, Hong Kong and Singapore. Asian Transcontinental Railways would replace air-transportation for movement of people in Euro-Asian-African continent. Transcontinental Freight Trains would replace ships for movement of cargo in the Euro-Asian Heartland. The menace of Islamic terrorism, justifies increased Russian political, military and economic role in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Iran, Afghanistan and Kurdistan. Recreation of Russian Empire is not against India's national interest, provided Indians gain open immigration rights to Eastern Siberia. Russian domination of the former-Soviet Muslim Republics in Central Asia would be India's national interest. Eastward expansion of NATO is not in India's interest. Russian conquest of former Soviet territories would promote India's national interests, provided it increases Indian presence in these nations. India would seek military base facilities in Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan to project India's power in the Islamic world.

Can Buddhist Mongol Empire Reemerge?

Six. Buddhist Mongols created the largest Buddhist Mongol Empire in the World that stretched from the Pacific Coast of China, to German borders on the Denube to Egypt. Buddhist Mongols brought entire Chinese world, entire Orthodox world, and entire Islamic world under rule of Buddhist Mongols. Hindu South Indian Empires should have aligned with Mongols to consolidate the Buddhist domination of the Christian and Islamic worlds. South Indian Hindu Empires ruled South East Asia, missed an historic opportunity to join military pact with Buddhist Mongol Empire. South Indian Hindu Armies joining Buddhist Mongol Army would have conquered the entire world to bring them under unified Buddhist-Hindu rule. Armies of Hindu South Indian Empires in alliance with Buddhist army of Mongol Empire would have easily conquered whole Islamic, Catholic, Orthodox worlds and Buddhism would have replaced Islam and Christianity in Africa, Asia and Europe around 1240 AD.

 

18(6) Loss of Yankee Hegemony

RISE OF INDIA & CHINA AS WORLD POWERS: First. America is no longer preponderant power it claims it is. The collapse of the Soviet Union the tenth largest economy in the world doesn’t make preponderant power, because it hasn’t increased its lead over the number two, three and fourth largest powers in the world. The population and Gross Domestic Product (GNP at PPP) of ten largest economies are: United States ($8.35 Trillion, 273 million), China ($4.11 Trillion, 1.25 Billion), Japan ($3.04 Trillion, 127 million), India ($2.15 trillion, 1 billion), Germany ($1.84 trillion, 82 million), France (1.29 trillion, 59 million), Britain ($ 1.23 trillion, 59 million), Italy ($1.2 trillion 58 million), Brazil ($1.06 trillion 168 million), and Russia ($929 Billion 147 million). United States and India are the only 2nd World War Allied Power in the top six economic power of the world. Britain has slipped behind Germany and France and has no hope of ever taking them. Among the top nine largest economies there are only three Allied Powers, namely, United States, India, Britain. The Axis Powers Japan, Germany, France, Italy ranks among top eight economic powers of the world. The combined GDPs of China, Japan and India exceed that of United States, and Canada.

 

German nuclear and missile scientists made United States and the Soviet Union, so why German scientists won’t use their ingenuity to make United Germany super power of the 21st Century? United States joined the ranks of the Super Power after 1945, because of the ingenuity of Nazi Germany scientists who switched sides or were captured to work for American and Soviet atom bomb and missiles programs. Germany and Japan have emerged as big challenger to the United States, and the days of American economic dominance could soon be over. United States has increased its lead over Russia, but decreased its lead over China, Japan, India and Germany, the major contenders for the Super Power status in the 21st Century. The military revolution of Precision Guided Munitions harms rather than helps America’s preponderance in the world. The Precision Guided Munitions technology equipped Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles can sink American Aircraft Carrier Battle Group Fleets from 300 miles away. The Bush Doctrine 2002 wrongly claims that America is militarily preponderant and that it can use force to prohibit other major posers from attempting to equal or surpass America’s military capability. Just as buoyed by the Brezhnev’s doctrine after America’s defeat in the Vietnam War, Soviet Union overextended its military and political commitments, which caused its sudden demise, without any hostile foreign intervention. Does similar fate awaits United States? Weakness of Russia doesn’t automatically translate into America’s strength. Weakened Russia might be forced to eat its pride and agree to work as surrogate of nuclear China, or Japan, or Germany, or India just to bring down the America’s preponderance in the world. The collapse of the Soviet Union and Warsaw pact may also result in the collapse of the NATO. The expansion of Nato to become 26-member Atlantic Alliance may result in the loss of purpose and decline of the Protestant & Catholic domination of the Nato. The Nato expansion may result in Germany, France and France getting disenchanted with American Alliance.

 

Raison D’Etat

Second. The principle of Raison d’etat and Balance of Power postulates that diplomats of Germany, France, and Japan should seek closer military ties with less-strong Power Russia to check and balance America’s preponderance in Euro-Asia. Should Germany, France, Japan, India and Russia sign Eurasian Pact to provide continental land powers’ response to the America led Maritime Powers Pact, to create the Second Pole and Second Bloc in the Post-Cold War new world order. The First Bloc would consist of United States, Britain, Nato, and China. The Second Bloc would consist of Germany, Japan, France, India and Russia. German minister compared President Bush to Adolf Hitler during German elections 2002, to symbolize that American menace has replaced the Soviet menace of the Cold War era. Germany would rise and again lead Europe together with France, and sign military ties with India, Japan and Russia to develop independent European military capability. In the absence of Soviet and Communist menace, the age-old rivalries among European powers would resurface, and there is no reason why Germany, France, Italy and Japan even remain friendly to United States. The principle of Raison d’etat, Balance of Power doctrine, and principles of Geopolitics demand that Canada, Mexico, Germany, France, Italy, and Japan explore multiple alliances with numerous regional powers and second-strong Power to contain, check, tame and balance the preponderance of the hegemon United States in North America, Eurasia, and South America. The collapses of the Eastern Bloc, Soviet Union, Berlin War, Communism, turned out to be boon for Europe, may turn out to be great Curse on the United States, because it could unravel the global network of alliances that United States developed during the Cold War to check and tame the non-existent Soviet and Communist menace. Some time God punishes a man by giving him too much. United States could disintegrate by virtue of overextension of its military and economic resources. The Bush Doctrine’s claim of everlasting American hegemony is mirage and could result in overextension and over exhaustion of American power, resulting in the demise of American hegemon, as we know it. Just as Brezhnev Doctrine turned out to be the death wish for the Soviet Union, similarly Bush Doctrine could bring disaster to United States, if Bush Administration loses its focus on War on Islamic Terrorism.

 

ROOSEVELT Vs WOODROW WILSON: Third. President Roosevelt was the warrior-statesman; President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. Statesmen and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To Prophets the real world is the one they want to bring into being. Woodrow Wilson transformed what had started our as a reaffirmation of American neutrality into a set of prepositions laying the foundations of the Wilsonian foreign policy for the global crusade of the United States. In spite of the moral pretensions of Woodrow Wilson, Wilsonian foreign policy was simply a ruse, which camouflaged the Roosevelt’s Realpolitik in the make believe garb of the moralistic idealistic pretensions. President George W. Bush did the similar Wilsonian diplomatic coup, when he exploited the world sympathy for 9/11 Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks on America, to bring about the unprecedented expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South Asia, without hurting even a single Saudi Wahhabi Taliban terrorist leader.

 

GEOPOLITICAL FAILURE TO CAPTURE OSAMA: Fourth. What is the geopolitical implication of America’s failure to capture Osama bin Laden, in spite of the full use of American military power in Afghanistan? Saudi Wahhabi terrorist Osama bin Laden had a great laugh, in his hiding place in Mecca under the protection of Wahhabi Ulemas, when he declared that he is alive and planning more terrorist attack on America. The military thinkers wonder: Whether United States lost its war on Afghanistan, when it failed to capture Osama Bin Laden and even one top Taliban or Al Qaeda Wahhabi terrorist leader during entire military operations in Afghanistan? Did Pentagon conspire to lose the war on Afghanistan, to meet the diplomatic requirement of the US state Department’s Policy of Deception that Bush Administration orchestrated by declaring war on Islamic terrorism, as a ruse to justify the eastward expansion of Nato, in Central Asia, South Asia and Eastern Europe? Alternatively, did United States lose its war on Afghanistan, because like Vietnam War, white armed forces are incapable of fighting Asians in guerrilla warfare and terrorism? How can United States claim to be the preponderant military power of the world, when it failed to capture any top leader of Al Qaeda terrorist network, including Osama Bin Laden? Either Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy sabotaged President Bush’s War on Islamic Terrorism, or White American armed forces are not good enough to fight Asians, Arabs and Afghans in Asia’s battlefields? Obviously, American is no longer the hegemon it claims it is, especially in its war on Islamic terrorism. How could United States possibly hope to achieve victory over hostile China, Germany, Japan and Russia, when it fails to capture even one top Al Qaeda terrorist in Afghanistan? It stands to reason that coalition of rising world powers, namely, Germany, Japan, India, and China would overtake United States in military prowess and capability in not so distant a future. It would be fool hardy for Pentagon to conceptualize the secession of Siberia, by supporting Chinese invasions of Siberia, when its armed forces failed to capture Osama Bin Laden and other top Al Qaeda terrorist leaders in Afghanistan War. United States lost the war on terrorism in Afghanistan, because it failed to invite Indian Army during Afghanistan War. Without the support of Indian Army, neither Western nor American Armies would succeed in defeating Wahhabi Al Qaeda terrorism. Bush Doctrine’s claim that United States likely to maintain its hegemony for long, is just a mirage. The American greed for Oil reserves and Catholic religious right conservative conspiracy would sabotage Pentagon’s war on Islamic terrorism and war on Islamic weapons of mass destruction. Simply put, without the direct support of either Chinese or Indian armies, all claims of America’s lasting hegemony stands on the shifting quicksand.

 

GERMANY FRANCE & JAPAN: Fifth. America’s pretensions of hegemony would erode whenever Germany, or Japan or Canada, decide to leave Alliances with United States and explore new regional and global alliances with less-strong Powers, guided by the principles Raison d’etat and Balance of Power Diplomacy. Neither Germany nor Japan the Axis Powers have any love for the United States, and after the end of the Cold War may as well lead an anti-America alliance. The public outcry against American military bases in Japan and Germany is growing everyday and with the expansion of Nato, the national interests of Japan and Germany conflicts with that of the 26-member Nato. Canada could become paranoid of United States, just as Pakistan is for India. Would Germany, Japan and Canada explore nuclear option and develop nuclear weapons to deter future American military threat to their countries? Development of nuclear weapons by Germany, Japan and Canada, would precipitously end the American claims as Hegemon of the world. Would United States undertake military actions against Germany, or Japan or Canada, if any of these countries decides to develop nuclear deterrent? Germany, Japan and Canada may develop nuclear weapons to promote equilibrium in the post-Cold War new world order and to balance the hegemon United States, by using the nuclear technology, the great equalizer. Could white Christian United States ever contemplate using nuclear nukes against white Christian Germany, as it did against yellow Buddhist Japan during the Second World War? Nuclear India should seek closer military ties with Japan, Germany, and Canada to bring about the Second bloc to balance the preponderance of First Bloc, USA-China-Britain-Nato Bloc. The likely members of the Second Bloc are Germany, Japan, France, India, and Russia.

 

24(7) Wilsonianism Goes Naked

WILSONIANISM CAMOUFLAGES IMPERIALISM: First. President Woodrow Wilson’s Wilsonianism followed by successive American Administrations, crudely camouflages the national interests of ruthless Roosevelt’s Realpolitik and American imperialism. The Brezhnev Doctrine justified Soviet military intervention to change political regimes in Czechoslovakia, Hungary and other East European satellite states. United States attained similar colonial objectives by perfecting the art of the CIA encouraged military coups to overthrow the allies or adversaries to bring into power the pro-American regimes. During Cold War, the United States proved to be the mortal enemy of democracy and freedom of the democratic politics in the Third World. During Cold War, United States encouraged military coups to install pro-American military regimes in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Congo, Greece, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Chile, Argentina, Peru, Ecuador, Nicaragua, etc. Secretary Henry Kissinger declared that Washington considers covert operations more legitimate than military intervention, to bring about the desired regime changes. (Diplomacy, p. 524) The secret service background of Dr. Kissinger allowed him to plan clean covert operations. Wilsonian pretensions of American foreign policy, no longer hide the American penchant for covert military operations, and the CIA encouraged military coups. American military aid has traditionally been the trap to force the recipient into bondage of America.

 

Terrorism & US Diplomacy of Deception

Second. The dilemma Indian diplomats face is: Can Hindu India trust the words of Protestant President Bush that America is waging a war against Osama Bin Laden on Islamic terrorism, not waging America’s war for Islamic terrorism on behalf of Osama bin Laden? India is concerned because American Armed forced proved incapable of arresting and neutralizing even single leader of the Al Qaeda network in Afghanistan and Opium Poppy cultivation and Heroin trade has zoomed after the invasion in Afghanistan. All the persons that America killed in Afghanistan were anti-Taliban and anti-Al Qaeda troops of Northern Alliance. Did President Clinton order the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, because he was befriending India? Did Clinton Administration install the pro-terrorism regime of General Pervez to make Pakistan the Albania of South Asia, where the West aligned with the drug dealers and Albanian terrorists to destabilize Yugoslavia? If it could be the conspiracy then what should be India’s response.

 

Pakistan transferred uranium enrichment technology to North Korea in exchange for the nuclear-capable missiles. During Clinton Administration ordered government of Nawaj Sharief to be overthrown. During Bush administration the dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf became top ally of the United States, in its war against Islamic terrorism, but failed to capture even a single leader of Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorist network. The pro-terrorism Islamic fundamentalist Prime Minister has acquired power in Pakistan and Pakistan has upped its ante against India by directly encouraging Muslim gangsters create communal riots in India. India wonders whether United States replicating its pro-terrorism diplomatic moves it orchestrated in Yugoslavia? Is president Bush’s war on terrorism just a diplomacy of deception to destabilize secular Muslim regimes and secular Hindu government of India, to harness the power of terrorists and fundamentalist Islamism in support of Western Christendom? If it could be true than what options does India have?

 

Should Hindu India develop closer military ties with Aryan Shiite Iran to reestablish India’s historical domination of the Persian Gulf? India Iran Defense Pact would allow India to destabilize the Arabian Gulf region and to disrupt the oil-supply in the event NATO undertakes hostile actions in the region inimical to the national interests of Hindu India. Should Hindu develop closer military ties with post-Saddam Iraq to develop foothold in the Arab lands? Hindu India could develop closer military ties with the Shiite Iran and Arab Shiites in Iraq and Aryan Sunni Kurds to acquire the military capability to influence events in the Arabian Gulf. India can also develop military ties with and permanent military bases in the Central Asian Muslim states to check any hostile NATO moves in Asia.

 

The pro-Saudi Arabia bias in the American foreign policy based neither on the geopolitics nor Raison d’etat, but influenced by bribe-money that Saudi Arabia paid and continues to pay to the American decision makers, to Democrats and Republicans alike, during Republican as well as Democratic administrations. Saudi bribe-money presently targets towards derailing President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. It is likely that Saudi bribe money could redirect President Bush’s war against fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islamic terrorism, towards reestablishing the fundamentalist Islamic government in post-Saddam Iraq. The second phase of the war on Islamic terrorism, may result into the victory of the militant Islamic fundamentalism in post-Saddam Iraq. Would it be a case of US diplomacy of deception designed to conceal US national interest under the camouflage of Wilsonian rhetoric, or policy of Newspeak devised by corrupt diplomats to cover up their links to the foreign benefactor. Pro-Saudi Arabian foreign policy of the Untied States harms the national interests of the United States, and this policy is the product of the substantial bribe money that Saudi Kingdom pumped into American political system, on both sides of the aisle in the Senate and Congress and into the executive branch, Democratic and Republican administrations alike. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations have suffered at the hands of the US State Departments because they failed to match the bribe-giving culture of the Islamic world. Prime minister Benazeer Bhutto of Pakistan is on record to have offered President Bill Clinton many million dollars to meet his rising legal costs during impeachment proceedings. Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan reportedly officially allowed Pakistan’s secret service ISI to use proceeds of the incomes of the Heroin/Opium trade to finance covert operations, including payment to foreign lobbyists.  

 

Post 9/11 New Golden Age of Diplomacy

Third. The art and craft of Diplomacy has revived in the post-Cold War age, which had atrophied during the bipolar Cold War balance of terror. Canada, France, Germany, Japan and India would explore new alliances with one other and with regional powers like Peru, Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina in South America, and Congo, Nigeria and South Africa in Africa, and Vietnam, and Indonesia in Southeast Asia, and Iran, Libya, Algeria, Syria and Yemen, and Post-Saddam Iraq in the Middle East, to tame and neutralize the predominance of the United States, to restore equilibrium in the world order. The post-Cold War age shall be the Golden Age of Diplomacy.

 

The end of Cold War also meant the end of the Age of Ideology. National interests and balance of power not ideology shall determine the diplomacy in the post-Cold War world order. Ideology shall play less significant influence over the foreign policy making of the great powers in the post-Cold War new world order. The leading eight world powers in the post-Cold War new world order are: United States, Russia, China, India, Germany, Japan, Britain and Canada. The raison d’etat principle would oblige Germany, France, Japan, Canada and India to seek military alliances with second-strongest Power to tame, check and balance the military preponderance of the United States in the world. The diplomacy and statecraft of the post-Cold War new world order shall be in total contrast to the diplomatic conduct practiced during the bipolar world during Cold War. The new world order is a multipolar world, led by two blocs, first Bloc headed by United States and the Second Bloc shall be led by a coalition of world powers, uniting to check the hegemony of the United States. Germany, Japan, France and Canada would determine their national policies towards United States, to promote their respective national interests, not to promote the ideological interests propounded by the Wilsonian foreign policy. The balance of power shall be the guiding principle of the diplomacy among Christian nations, as it was during 18th and 19th century.

 

AMERICA IS MENACE TO DEMOCRACIES: Fourth. President Bill Clinton encouraged the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan, replacing him by the dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf, because he dared to develop closer political ties with its brotherly neighbor India. Earlier administration had ordered the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto of Pakistan, replacing him by the dictatorship of General Zia Ul Haq. It is no accident that General Zia Ul Haq and General Pervez Musharraf cooperated with the United States to combine the resources of the ISI of Pakistan with the CIA of the United States, to undertake covert operations in South Asia. America also arranged the assassination of Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to replace him by pro-US military dictatorship. Western Secret Services are believed to have played important role in the assassination of Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1984, and assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. Soviet Secret services are believed to have played a role in the assassination by poison, of Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri during Tashkent Summit. Under these circumstances Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee should not visit Pakistan during January 2003 Summit Meeting of the SAARC in Islamabad, for considerations of personal safety. President Jimmy Carter ordered the overthrow of Shah of Iran, Mohammed Riza Pahlevi, and supported fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini, and even arranged the downfall of the democratically elected Prime Minister Bani Sadr, and forbade military generals from taking over power. Is it a coincidence that Ayatollah Khomeini, General Zia Ul Haq, General Pervez Musharraf were or are fundamentalists and allied with the terrorists? Incidentally, had United States encouraged military coup, not overthrown the government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, Pakistan was in the process of arresting Osama Bin Laden, to hand him over to United States, on the orders of Nawaj Sharief. Did President Clinton encourage the coup against Nawaj Sharief, to give a new life to the terrorist Osama Bin Laden?

 

BUSH BETTER THAN BILL CLINTON: Fifth. Thanks God, that George W. Bush happened to be occupant of the Oval Office, when Saudi Muslim hijackers struck on Sept 11, 2001. Had Bill Clinton been the President on that date, his response won’t have been any different than America’s response for terrorist attacks on Destroyer Cole, and attacks on American embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam? Neither Bill Clinton, nor Al Gore, nor Jimmy Carter would have declared America’s War on Global Terrorism, in response to the Sept. 11 attacks. On the other hand Republican President Ronald Reagan, President George H. W. Bush would have declared war on Islamic terrorism, like current President George W. Bush. Republican Administrations are better equipped to handle the menace of Islamic terrorism. It is very likely that President George W. Bush very serious about America’s War on Global terrorism and terrorist nation’s access to weapons of mass destruction. Protestant President Bush handicapped by the conspiracy of Catholic Religious Right Conservatives, which have developed theological ties with the Wahhabi fundamentalists, to impose Shariah in Third World as euphemism to military force pagans convert to either Islam or Christianity. The American Catholic Cardinals have decided that President Bush’s war on Iraq cannot be called a Just War. The recent Anthrax attacks that were unleashed right after the 9/11 terrorist attacks was most likely undertaken by white Christians, more likely Catholic than Protestant, suggest that the Wahhabi Muslim hijackers may have got help from European Catholics. Islamic terrorism raises the demand for making structural changes of Saudi Arabian society and regime. Similarly the spate of cases of pedophile Catholic priests raised persistent demands of the Catholic laity for the structural changes in the Roman Catholic Church. It is likely that Catholic fundamentalists would join forces with Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalists, to impose their anti-women agenda on the Christian and Islamic societies. In response to the attacks of anti-women Catholic and Sunni fundamentalists, the pro-women Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists would join forces to defeat the anti-women coalition of Vatican and Mecca. In the War of Religions the victory of the coalition of Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists is preordained.

 

RETURN OF THE AGE OF NON-ALIGNMENT: Sixth. Nonalignment policy would again become the favored diplomatic tool of the great powers in the post-Cold War new world order. India, Egypt, and Yugoslavia, led by Jawaharlal Nehru, Gamal Abdel Nasser and Marshall Tito, saw no future in identifying with the West, they wanted their volatile publics to perceive them as having wrested not only independence but freedom of maneuver from the former colonial powers and dominant super powers. Nonalignment was for them as much a domestic necessity as a foreign policy choice. They thought of Moscow as a useful lever to ward off Western encroachments, rather than as a threat to their independence. Similarly, Germany, France and Japan may adopt Nonalignment to secure diplomatic freedom in their foreign policy making, independent of their ties to the American alliances. Germany led by Gerhard Schroeder sees no future in being identified as America’s satellite, and he wants the volatile German public to perceive him as having wrested not only unification but also the independence and freedom to formulate German foreign policy dictated by the principles of Raison d’etat, Balance of power and free from super power’s influences. German minister compared President Bush to Hitler during election campaigns, to convey to German people that Germans should no longer be apologetic about the Second World War and Nazism. Germany has come to age. Japan is likely to follow Germany and formulate independent foreign policy of Japan determined by geopolitics and principles of Raison d’etat and Balance of Power. In the new Cold War the two adversaries could be United States and Germany.

 

NEW SECOND POLE IN WORLD ORDER: Seventh. The post-Cold War Bipolar world, with United States as the First Pole and Germany as the Second Pole would radically transform the global network of alliances. United States and United Germany represent two vibrant, modern economies. While United States is the dominant economy of the World, Germany is the dominant economy of the European Union. The size of the European Union economy is likely to overtake the United States and NAFTA economy. Just as Premier Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev (March 1953-Oct 1964) announced that Soviet Union has come to age, by thumping his shoes on the speaker’s desk during his United Nation’s General Assembly speech. Similarly, Germany announced it wants to be recognized as the world power, when a German minister compared President Bush to Adolf Hitler. The rhetoric of the German minister comparing Bush to Hitler, ranks the rhetoric of President Ronald Reagan, when he called Soviet Union the Evil Empire, when Soviet missile the Korean airliner that strayed deep into Soviet territories for espionage. The German minister’s remark comparing President Bush to Hitler started the New Cold War. The fall of the Berlin Wall caused the end of the Cold War and the German minister’s remark on Bush and Hitler started a New Cold War in 2002. World’s diplomacy would never be the same ever again. United Germany led by Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has emerged as the principal adversary of the President Bush led United States. New Cold War has begun, with United Germany at the head of the rival Second Bloc. The national interests of the European Union have started to clash with the national interests of the 26-member Nato. The New Cold War may take the form of clash between Continental Western Europe and the North America. Maritime United Kingdom aided by Canada and Australia may reassert its traditional role as the Balancer between Europe and United States, and also between Germany-led EU and America-led Nato. The Diplomats would again become glamorous and political news would no longer be boring and repetitive. Diplomat’s craft, ruses, deceptions and bribes would again become the normal way of diplomatic life in Europe and in the world.

 

AMERICA LIKES ONLY WEAK ALLIES: Eighth. President Bush has been known to say that he gets along a lot better with the little countries of Europe than he does with the big ones. Mr. Bush seems to relate to countries in the same way he does to people. He has problems with the leaders of Germany and France, who he senses look down upon him. But he has an emotional embrace for the little guy. The failure of President Bush to relate with the leaders of Germany and France gave birth to the New Cold War, between United States on one side and Germany and France on the other side. It should be noted that the economy of Britain trails behind Germany and France. The expansion of NATO has lowered the military role of Germany and France in the NATO military operations, as East Europeans would love to provide military troops for NATO operations worldwide, as it give better salaries to their servicemen. The expansion of Nato to become 26-member Alliance has enhanced the power and preponderance of the United States, while lowering the influence of Germany and France in expanded Nato.

 

18(8) Pentagon Eyes Siberia

First. The 9/11 incident exploited by President Bush to justify the eastward expansion of NATO to establish military bases in Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, in the southern belly of Russia. The 9/11 made Covert Operations more effective instruments of policy. America China strategic alliance threatened Russia’s Eastern Siberia. President Bush exploited Russian compassion for 9/11 attacks and President Putin’s need and desire to develop closer ties with White House to encircle Russia. America expanded NATO to include all former Warsaw Pact members in Eastern and Central Europe. America established military bases in former Central Asian Republics, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. President Bush goaded China to threaten Russia’s Eastern Siberia. 

 

RUSSIA FACES NEW EUROPEAN INVASION: Two. Sick weakened nuclear giant Russian Bear has been cornered into the cave. The Yankee hunters have captured its 10 Cubs and brainwashed the Baby Bears to join the hunters and hounds in the chase of the wounded Bear. The Big Prize is the continental-size Siberia. Once Russia loses the Siberia, then Russia one among the equals in the Europe. The secession of Siberia would end the Russian menace to West Europe and East Europe forever. The best scenario for the secession of Siberia is the rise of a local Siberian leader, with the guts to take on the Kremlin. Henry Kissinger has prepared the American policy makers that it would be in the interest of United States to help China invade and conquer Siberia, just as it was in the interest of the West that Germany, under Hitler and William Kaiser invaded Russia. Would China be naïve enough to take the American bait to invade Siberia, when it could very easily takeover Malaysia and Indonesia? What options do the cornered Russian Bear has? What choices Communist China would make? What should be the policy of India in the event of Chinese invasions of Siberia? Would Japan support United States or join the war on the side of Russia?

Admiral Kolchak's 1917 Siberian Govt

Three. United States and China would buy allegiance of some powerful Siberian leader and tempt him to lead the secession of Siberia from Russia, with the help of American and Chinese military and financial support. It is possible that had General Lebed not died in helicopter crash he would have opposed President Putin and seceded from Russia. Chinese would have financially supported General Lebed. Would Gen. Lebed have met the fate of Admiral Kolchak? After the Bolsheviks revolution in 1917, the Allies sent an expeditionary force into East Siberia. At the end of 1918 with the Allied support, Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak succeeding in uniting the counter revolutionary groups into an autonomous Russian government with its headquarters at Omsk in Western Siberia. In 1919, the Kolchak government got overthrown. India should support the secession of Eastern Siberia only to guarantee that it would not align with China. India would not oppose the disintegration of Siberia if it promotes Asian emigration to Siberia. India would fight along with Russia to oppose any Chinese invasion of Siberia. Chinese occupation of Siberia would adversely affect the balance of power. India would intervene in Siberia only when the loss of Indian lives in Siberian War would earn for Indians the unlimited right of emigration to Siberia. Chinese invasions of Siberia could turn out to be very messy and may lead to third world War. Once the China-Russia War would be in full swing, the United States could switch sides and join White Russia in Alliance to fight against the invasion by the yellow hordes. The United States could be adopting a modern version of the British Appeasement policy toward Hitler. It happened in the Second World War. India should study its military options carefully in case of Chinese invasions of Siberia and should not let its judgment known to the adversaries before time.

 

RUSSIA GERMANY JAPAN DÉTENTE: Fourth. Russia could cultivate Japan and offer military technology to wean Japan away from the American bloc. Henry Kissinger could drive the wedge in Sino-Soviet Alliance, luring China with the access to big American markets and Most Favored Trading Nations (MFN) status to exploit Sino-Soviet rifts into Sino-US strategic alliance. Similarly, President Putin of Russia could wean United Germany and Japan away from American bloc by offering them access to Soviet military technology, necessary for world power status. President Putin could also provide nuclear umbrella over Germany and Japan, to forestall any American retaliation against Germany and Japan, in the event they decide to walk out of the military alliance with the United States. President Nixon’s nuclear deterrent against Soviet desire to impose Brezhnev Doctrine over China, persuaded China to leave the Soviet Camp to join solidly in the American camp. Similar, nuclear umbrella over Japan and Germany would preclude any American retaliation against Germany and Japan, whenever Japan and Germany decide to develop nuclear weapons. Nuclear Germany and nuclear Japan would have to be friendly to nuclear Russia to keep Rambo America at bay. Without the solid Russian support, United States could contemplate to deploy nukes against nuclear Japan and nuclear Germany, to preempt their dreams of great power status. Nuclear Japan and Nuclear Germany do not harm Russia’s national interests. Alliance of nuclear powers, alliance of Germany, Japan, India and Russia, would create new equilibrium in the Eurasian continent and check the hegemony of the Alliance of USA, China, and 26-member Nato.

 

Rise of Eurasian Continental Bloc

Fifth. The Continental Bloc of Germany, Japan, India and Russia would neutralize the Maritime Bloc of United States, 26-member Nato, and China, and neutralize China’s dream of Siberian conquests. Faced with the stalemate in the north on the Siberian front, due to the Continental Alliance of Germany, Japan, India and Russia, the prudent Chinese leadership may decide to expand southward to claim Malaysia and Indonesia, where sizeable ethnic Chinese population control the national economies. Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei and Philippines would become part of China in the first quarter of the 21st Century. India would bring Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Burma into Indian orbit as these nations had been traditionally part of the Indian Civilization, and have successfully opposed Chinese hegemony and Chinese Civilization throughout history. After taking over Malaysia and Indonesia, more than 300 million Chinese people may emigrate and settle down in Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Under the political leadership of China, the Southeast Asia would experience unprecedented economic growth and prosperity, and prepare China to make the final push for the occupation of Australia and New Zealand, sometime during second quarter of the 21st Century, where more than 400 million Chinese could settle down and live. The Chinese occupation of Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Philippines, Australia and New Zealand would result in the transfer of more than 700 million Chinese people to Southeast Asia and Australia, thereby solving the problem of overpopulation of China.

 

American military support to China for the conquest of Russian Siberia would backfire and the American hardware would help China conquer Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. Chinese occupation of Muslim Malaysia and Muslim Indonesia and Muslim Brunei not against the national interest of Hindu India, as Chinese occupation would erode Muslim influence and restore Hindu and Buddhist character of these countries.

 

18(9) Age of Covert Operations

 

LEGITIMACY OF COVERT OPERATION: First. The acts of Covert Operations do not constitute War and no international treaty outlaws covert operations, including those that result in coup d’etat. In the post 9/11 age the Covert Operations have become very important instrument of policy and essential tool of diplomacy. United States continued to provide Muslim terrorists safe heaven and financial support to destabilize nations. India should be wary of the CIA’s support to Muslim terrorists in Kashmir and should develop India’s Covert Operations capability to retaliate against and to neutralize foreign covert operations. Osama Bin Laden had been loyal operative of the CIA and had served American colonial interests in Afghanistan. The 9/11 attacks showed the increased relevance of the CIA’s Covert Operations. The CIA’s Covert Operations could become as important an instrument of White House policy making as the Pentagon’s military operations.

 

WESTERN EMPIRES & COVERT OPERATIONS: Second. The Western Colonial Empires built by the covert operations of the private companies and daring individuals. Robert Clive built empire in Bengal by the covert operation in the Battle of Plassey, where he used the funds provided by the Millionaire Hindu trader to bribe the Vizier of the ruler, who stepped aside when the war began. Cortez took over the Maya and Aztez Empires in Mexico and Central America. Pizzarro conquered the Incas by deception. Cecil Rhodes created colonies in Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) and Zambia. British Empire built on the stratagem of Divide & Rule and the diplomacy of deception, newspeak and ruse. Prime Minister Blair declared the intention of Britain to recreate empires in the 21st Century, by adopting policy of deception and ruse and bribery.

 

CIA MORE EFFECTIVE THAN PENTAGON: Three. Henry Kissinger argues in Diplomacy that during Cold War United States frequently encouraged military coups to overthrow the democratically elected government, and Washington considered covert operations more legitimate than military intervention. (p. 524) In the age of covert military operations and covert military coups, the America’s CIA became more effective foreign policy enforcer than the Pentagon. During Cold War the United States failed to secure any major military victory in war fronts, and it met inglorious defeat in the Vietnam War. The Nato air war on Yugoslavia, during Clinton Administration inflicted $30 billion in economic damages, but failed to dislodge Slobadan Milosevic. However, the $35 million CIA-led covert operations during Yugoslavian elections resulted in the defeat of the Slobadan Milosevic’s Party. The covert operations allowed the masses to destroy the vote counts and claim victory for its nominee. The CIA could easily bring down the government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief and install pro-USA regime of General Pervez Musharraf. The CIA is more effective in overthrowing the entrenched regimes than Pentagon. Every major power would require acquiring covert operations capability, to be able to encourage military coups, or public demonstrations to bring down the hostile governments. Such countries as lack the capability of covert operations and capability to stage coups and public uprising to bring down the hostile governments would be at great disadvantage over those that have this capability.

 

WILSONIANISM & COVERT OPERATIONS: Four. The Soviet Union used brute force to impose Communist regimes over Hungary, Czechoslovakia and other surrogate powers in the name of Communist Solidarity and Brezhnev’s Doctrine. Wilsonian foreign policy of the United States accomplished the same goal by the covert operations and the CIA encouraged military coups. “The White House considered covert operations more legitimate than military operations.” United States accomplished by covert operations, what the Soviet Union accomplished by brute military intervention. Primary tool during the cold War for the covert operations was the CIA encouraged military coups and the CIA supported public rebellion to bring down the independent regimes and democratically elected governments. United States brought down the democratically elected governments of Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba of Congo, President Salvadore Allende of Chile, Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto of Pakistan, Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan, Prime Minister Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, Emperor Shah of Iran, Prime Minister Norodom Sihanouk of Cambodia, and many more. New world powers should also develop the covert operations capability to bring down the foreign regimes by military coups, election campaign donations and violent public demonstrations. The covert military operations have become the legitimate diplomatic instrument to promote national interests worldwide. The covert military operations do not constitute acts of war, thereby escape condemnation by the world community. India should develop cover operations capability.

 

RAG TAG ARMY OF TERRORISTS GUERRILLAS: Four. In the age of covert operations, rag-tag army of irregulars, private militia and privateers can effectively overthrow the governments. The covert operations of 30,000 rag-tag Christian Tutsi soldiers could take over Congo (Zaire) and install Kabila as the president by overthrowing the regime. The revolution in military technology, allows the private militia, to undertake covert military operations, without the need to undergo regular long-term military training. European colonial powers conquered the traditional armies in India, because the well-trained British troops backed by artillery proved more effective than the armies of the local rulers, which were not well trained. However, in the 21st century, the light weapons allow the privateers or draftees to become an accomplished soldier in very short time. The mobilization period is greatly reduced in modern non-mechanized infantry warfare. The draftees and privateers can easily learn the art of warfare and effectively use anti-tank weapons, mines against regular armies, in guerrilla warfare or terrorism warfare. Every major power should develop private Militia and the rag tag army of privateers to undertake global covert operations to promote national interests.

 

TERRORIST BUILT ISLAMIC EMPIRE: Five. Islamic Empire in Syria, Egypt, Libya, Persia and India was built by terrorism. Bedouin terrorists stealthily attacked the isolated townships of the Egyptian and Syrian Christian Civilizations and conquered and looted them one by one. Bedouin settled down as immigrant nomads in the vicinity of the city they would conquer in future and then stealthily attacked them and looted them. Before the Islamic invasions of Zoroastrian Persia there had been great influx of the Muslims in Persia who settled in Persia seeking employment, much like the Arab terrorists that became residents in the West. Mohammad Bin Kassim cam and attacked India in very small band of troops and. Mohammad Gaznavi came though the uninhabited parts of Gujarat and attacked Somnath Temple and looted it. Mohammed Ghouri attacked India seventeen times and he was always defeated, but released by Prithviraj Chauhan, and when he won the battle he blinded and murdered Prithvi Raj Chauhan. The covert operations and guerrilla operations over the period of time succeed in overthrowing the civilizations. The Civilizations should never underestimate the military threat of the terrorist and guerrilla attacks as repeated attacks saps the morale of the Army.

 

COCAINE FINANCES COVERT OPERATIONS: Six. Global Drug trade finances the covert operations. President General Zia Ul Haq had allowed Pakistan’s Secret Services ISI to use the profits from drug trade to finance the covert operations of Pakistan’s Secret Services. Wahhabi terrorists finance global terrorist operations by heroin drug trade, and the incomes of the Sunni drug trade laundered through the financial institutions based in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. The Wahhabi fundamentalism provides the legitimacy to the Wahhabi drug traffickers, who become respectable leaders in their communities. Global Cocaine & Heroin Drug trade generated for the organized crime more than $700 billion in 1997, half of which generated in the United States. The vast income of the drug cartel fuels the economic engine of the West and finances the covert operations of the western powers.

 

MINI WEAPONS OF TERROR WARFARE: Seven. The modern shoulder carried weapons are light but lethal and it makes terrorists formidable opponents of the regular troops. Modern army units must not underestimate the destructive potential of the weapons carried by the terrorists. The modern weapons do not require long term training and amateurs can easily learn to handle modern weapons. The terrorists may not be good enough to fight the regular wars with the regular troops but can inflict heavy casualties when they attack stealthily. Every major power must develop rapid deployment force of private Militia to undertake anti-terrorism and anti-guerrilla warfare operations in hostile environment, worldwide.

 

VIET KONG & AFGHAN GUERRILLA WARFARE: Eight. United States learnt the prowess of the guerrilla warfare in the Vietnam War. Soviet Union faced the wrath of guerrilla war in Afghanistan. The guerrillas in the Vietnam War motivated by the Communist ideology, and the guerrillas or Mujahideens in Afghanistan war motivated by the Wahhabi militant Islam. The ideological motivation of Communism and Islam transformed the individual guerrillas into well-knit fighting force, without the need of regular pays. The Heroin/Opium drug trade financed the Mujahideen militant Islamic operations. The moral of the story is that regular Army units are handicapped in fighting the guerrillas and terrorists, because morality doesn’t permit their use of excessive force against privately dressed guerrillas and terrorists. The terrorists are destroyed by creating a large anti-terrorism private Militia, authorized to use excessive force against terrorists, without bound the rules of War, which protects non-Combatants certain rights. In the War on terrorism the anti-terrorist Militia would respond by the rules of the terrorists to defeat the global nexus of terrorism, drug trade, and religious fundamentalism.

 

NEW AGE OF PRIVATE MILITIA: Nine. Great powers should legislate compulsory 5-year or 3-year Draft to develop a vast reservoir of well-trained Private Militia to undertake anti-terrorism military operations worldwide, to destroy the home base of the guerrillas and terrorists. The Private Militia should finance its salary by the principle of loot of the property of the supporters of the guerrillas and terrorists. The Private Militia wouldn’t be handicapped by the Rules of the War.

 

CIA & VATICAN COVERT OPERATIONS: Ten. During Reagan Administration President Ronald Reagan and Catholic Bishop of Poland entered into a pact to unite the resources of the Polish Catholic Church and the CIA to bring down the communist government of Poland, and it succeeded in doing so. During the Pontificate of Pope John Paul II the resources of the Vatican and the CIA joined to bring down the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc. The CIA-Vatican Alliance was successfully repeated throughout Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union and it played a significant role in the downfall of the Communist Bloc and the end of the Cold War. The White House also permitted the CIA-Mecca Alliance to finance and train Islamic terrorists to wage wars on the Soviet Union. The CIA entered into alliance with fundamentalist anti-women Papacy as well as with fundamentalist anti-women Wahhabi Sect, which enhanced the political and diplomatic power of the Vatican and Saudi Arabia. Before the Wahhabi terrorist attacks of 9/11 United States turned the blind eye to the terrorist attacks undertaken by the Wahhabi terrorists worldwide. The Protestant United States diplomatically equally respected Wahhabi fundamentalists and Papal fundamentalists, before the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

 

INDIA’S OPTIONS IN COVERT OPERATIONS: Eleven. Islamic militants on Sunday night, 11/24/2002, attacked the famous Raghunath Hindu Temple Complex in Jammu killing at least 10 Hindu worshippers and wounding more than 40. At least 35,000 people, by official estimates have died in the 13-year Islamic militant terrorist attacks in Kashmir. What are the covert operations options for India? What type of covert operations India should undertake worldwide to destroy the global network of Islamic terrorist which finances and fuels terrorist attacks in India? Should India hire 100,000 Northern Alliance Afghan warriors to take the war of Islamic terrorism deep in the Islamic world, to destabilize and overthrow such Islamic nations as finance and support terrorism? Should India develop anti-terrorism covert operations capability to destabilize the Islamic sponsors of Islamic terrorism in Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria to strike at the very home base and the source of terrorism? Should India develop anti-terrorism and anti-fundamentalism covert military operations capability to support modern Islamic regimes threatened by Islamic militancy, namely, Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines? Should India train one million strong anti-terrorism Private Militia to undertake worldwide military operations against Islamic terrorists, from Central Asia, Russia’s Chechnya, North Africa, Southeast Asia and Sub-Sahara Africa? Should India authorize anti-terrorism Private Militia to encourage military coups to replace fundamentalist regimes by secular military dictatorships and to replace Shariah laws with Turkish secular laws? India should not limit its responses to Islamic terrorism only to Pakistan, but retaliate Islamic fundamentalist regimes worldwide in Arabian Peninsula and North Africa and Southeast Asia. Islamic terrorism is a global operation and requires global retaliation against all sponsors of Islamic terrorism. Let the sponsors of Islamic terrorism taste the pain their agents inflicted on other nations.

 

18(10) Pakistan as New Caliph

 

NUCLEAR PAKISTAN AS NEW CALIPH: First. Aryan India should promote either Aryan Iran or Aryan Pakistan as the new Caliph of Islam so that Aryans replace the dominance of Semite Wahhabi clergy in Mecca & Medina. Hindu India can buy peace in the Subcontinent by encouraging Pakistan to exercise its rights as the New Caliph of Islam to create Ottoman Empire-type Pakistani Empire in the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East. India can buy peace in the subcontinent by militarily supporting Pakistan in establishing Islamabad Caliphate. Islam does not believe in separate nation state. Koran extols the most powerful Islamic nation to attempt the conquest of the entire Islamic world, to bring the entire Muslim Ulema under a single rule. Either Turkey or Pakistan has the military capability to unite the entire Islamic world under one rule. Pakistan is the greatest military power in the Islamic world and has inherited the Ottoman Caliphate after it became nuclear power. It is moral imperative for Pakistan to attempt the conquest of Saudi Arabia and other Arab Islamic nations. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Palestine, United Arab Emirates had never been states or nations in the history. Arabian Peninsula had either been part of Egypt, Persia or Turkey.

 

Pakistan has the military capability to conquer every Islamic country from Iran to Morocco. Should Hindu India support the westward expansion of nuclear Pakistan, to encompass the entire Arab world? Muslim Pakistan’s conquest of the Middle East is not against national interest of Hindu India. In the new age of colonial empires, Pakistan would exercise its right as the New Caliph of Islam to take control of Islamic Holy cities of Mecca & Medina. In case Pakistani men take 20 million Arab women as wives, then it would be possible that in a generation Urdu could become the lingua franca of the Middle East.

 

PAKISTANI CONQUEST OF SAUDI ARABIA: Second. Rather than selling nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia for cash, General Pervez Musharraf may decide to takeover Saudi Arabia and establish Al Musharraf Dynasty in Saudi Arabia. Pakistani military leadership may take 4000 Saudi Princesses as wives to legitimize Pakistan’s rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Untied Arab Emirates. What stops Pakistan from conquering Saudi Arabia? Why shouldn’t Pakistan conquer Saudi Arabia and marry 20 million Arab women? Why shouldn’t nuclear Pakistan, the new Caliph of Islam, demand 50% of the oil-incomes of OAPEC nations as tribute to New Caliph of Islam, the Pakistan? The Islamabad Caliphate would bring unprecedented prosperity to the Islamic world. Pakistan’s conquest of Saudi Arabia and Arabian Peninsula, would lead to the exodus of 80 million Pakistanis, 100 million Bangladeshis and 80 million Indian Muslims to the Arabian Peninsula.

 

INDIA-PAKISTAN ALLIANCE FOR CALIPHATE: Third. Billy Brandt decided to directly develop closer ties with Soviet Union, East Germany and Eastern Europe, without the intermediacy of the Western Alliance, because he realized that the Unification of Germany was not in the national interest of United States and Western Alliance, and while it can help Germany in conflict with the Soviet Union, it failed to expedite the process of Unification of Germany. United States, Britain and France had shot down the Peace Note of Joseph Stalin, which offered the Unification of Germany and allowed the armament of Germany, provided United Germany joined the ranks of Non-Aligned nations. Gamal Abdel Nasser expelled Soviet Advisers and improved ties with United States and Israel, when he realized that the Soviet Union can exacerbate the conflict and help Egypt in war against Israel, it cannot help towards Egypt-Israel peace.

 

Similarly, nuclear Pakistan would soon realize that while China and United States and Britain help in militarily supporting Pakistan against India, these nations would not allow Pakistan acquire sphere of influence in the Middle East. Like any major power of the world, nuclear Pakistan, the New Caliph of Islam, the preponderant military power of the Islamic world, has legitimate need to carve out a sphere of influence or colonies in the Middle East to secure its need for crude oil. Muslim Pakistan can militarily conquer every Muslim country from Iran to Morocco, one country at a time, single handedly. Nuclear stalemate prohibits India to conquer militarily weaker Pakistan, so India would have to expand eastward in Southeast Asia. Stalemate in Kashmir, and enmity with Afghanistan would force Pakistan to realize that peace with India, allows Pakistan to conquer one or two oil-producing countries in the Arabian Gulf. Herein lies the rationale for India-Pakistan Defense Pact or India-Pakistan No War Pact.

 

INDIA PAKISTAN DÉTENTE: Fourth. Fearing that the people of Pakistan and the political leadership of Pakistan realizes the gains they would make by India-Pakistan Détente, United States and China got nervous and organized the military coup in Pakistan twice, to overthrow the democratically elected governments of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief. America should welcome Pakistan’s conquest of Saudi Arabia, as it would eradicate the menace of Wahhabi terrorism. Like German Chancellor Willy Brandt and Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, President General Pervez Musharraf would agree with the assessment of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Prime Minister Benajeer Bhutto that only India-Pakistan détente would allow nuclear Pakistan to emerge as the dominant military, political and social power in the Islamic Middle East. General Pervez Musharraf can become the King of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and Iraq with India’s help. Westward expansion of the Islamabad Caliphate is in the national interest of Hindu India. Nuclear Pakistan has the right to demand its rightful place as the New Caliph of Islam, under the Islamic Moon, and rightful custodian of Holiest Islamic cities of Mecca and Medina.

 

The CIA has the covert operations capability to repeat in Saudi Arabia its performance in the overthrow of Shah of Iran. The CIA should encourage the military Coup in Saudi Arabia, followed by the imposition of Kemalist Turkish secular legal system to replace Shariah laws. The real solution of the Islamic terrorism is the imposition of the secular Kemalist military dictatorship over Saudi Arabia and to impose Turkish secular laws throughout Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen. When United States could engineer military coup against Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, why shouldn’t America overthrow the Saudi monarchy? If ever Osama Bin Laden acquires power in Saudi Arabia, he would hang the entire royal family to impose the rule of Bin Laden Dynasty in Saudi Arabia. Would Turkey someday conquer Saudi Arabia and recreate Ottoman Empire? Would new Ottoman Empire greater a threat than Islamic terrorism? The problem of Islamic terrorism would be permanently eradicated if secular Turkey occupies Saudi Arabia to impose secular Turkey’s legal system over Shariah in Saudi Arabia. Westernization and modernization of the Saudi society, guaranteeing full freedom and rights to Saudi women would eradicate the menace of Islamic terrorism. The status of Muslim women is Achilles’ heel of Islam. Empowerment of Saudi women would eradicate Islamic terrorism. Military occupation by Turkey or Pakistan would eradicate the menace of Islamic terrorism.

 

ABSENCE OF LAWS OF PRIMOGENITURE: Fifth. Ottoman Empire lacked the laws of succession and laws of primogeniture. Whenever, any new Emperor was inaugurated, his first act was invariably to murder every male brother. Following this Ottoman tradition the succession disputes in Saudi Arabia could result in the bloodshed in the royal family. Should democracy be militarily imposed on Saudi Arabia to check the menace of Islamic terrorism? Why should America fear that military ruler of Saudi Arabia would be less amenable to the American influences than the Saudi House of Al Saud? The global network of militant Islamic terrorism stands on the bedrock of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. The downfall of Saudi monarchy, replaced by Kemalist military dictatorships would modernize Saudi society and guarantee freedom and equality of opportunity to the Saudi women. If the Saudi House of Al Saud falls like the downfall of the Pahlavi Monarchy of Shah of Iran, menace of Islamic terrorism would disappear from the face of the world. Alternately if Shiite Iran allowed to takeover Saudi Arabia, then Wahhabi menace would also disappear. To permanently eradicate the menace of Islamic terrorism India France and Germany should explore policy options to establish Kemalist secular military dictatorship in Saudi Arabia, which would impose secular western laws over Shariah in Saudi Arabia. If Wahhabi monarchy of Saudi Arabia falls, so would the menace of Islamic terrorism. Hindu India and Israel should explore military options to modernize Saudi Arabian society.

 

WEST GIFTED PAK NUKE TECHNOLOGY: Sixth. Western powers, Belgium and Germany transferred nuclear technology to Pakistan. United States encouraged Pakistan to go nuclear hoping it would check India’s nuclear weapon programs. Had Pakistan or United States got the hint that India is about to explore nuclear weapons, it is possible that Pakistan may have launched preemptive nuclear strikes against India, possibly with the consent of the western powers. It is no accident that during 1971 war, president Nixon and Secretary Henry Kissinger had threatened to use nuclear weapons against India, had Mrs. Gandhi invaded West Pakistan to liberate Kashmir after the surrender of 110,000 Pakistani troops in Bangladesh. Either Untied States should arrange the federation of India and Pakistan to diffuse the nuclear threat between India and Pakistan, or India should help Pakistan create Islamic Empire in Arabian Peninsula, to divert Pakistan westward.

 

INDIA SUPPORTS PAKISTAN AS CALIPH: Seventh. Nuclear Pakistan’s conquest of Saudi Arabia is in the national interest of Hindu India. As a legitimate nuclear power, Pakistan deserves to have a large Islamic Empire, extending from Iraq to Libya. Muslims of the world would prefer Saudi Arabia ruled by Muslim Pakistan than by Christian United States. Holy Koran does not accept the concept of nation states. It is the moral duty of nuclear Pakistan to conquer Arabian Peninsula to bring Arab world under the civilized rule of Pakistan. The intermingling of Pakistani and Bangladeshi blood with Arab blood would create a new Semite Aryan race. India should retaliate against Islamic terrorist attacks on Kashmir by retaliating on the source of Islamic Wahhabi terrorism in Arabian Peninsula and bring about the structural changes in the governments of the region, to bring these societies to the 21st Century. Hindu India cannot sit idle and let the Wahhabi Islamic terrorists, which originated in Arabian Peninsula, destroyed peace in Kashmir, without Arabian Peninsula tasting the pain it inflicts on other civilized societies. Hindu India should support the anti-monarchy and pro-democracy forces in Saudi Arabia to bring down the oppressive regimes throughout the Arabian Peninsula. Monarchy of Saudi Arabia and Sheikhdoms of Arabian Peninsula should fall like that of the Pahlavi Monarchy of Shah of Iran. Just as United States invades Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein, does other world powers have the right to intervene and overthrow the Wahhabi regime of Saudi Arabia to eradicate the menace of Wahhabi terrorism?

 

SAUDI ARABIA IS AXIS OF EVIL: Eighth. Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, ruled by the House of Saud is the core of the Axis of Evil, which includes Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Wahhabi Saudi Arabia is the part of the Axis of Evil. Saudi Arabia is almost the source or the Evil and womb of the evil Islamic terrorism. Bush administration acted too timidly in confronting Saudi officials about Saudi Arabia’s failure to cooperate with the FBI’s investigation into the Sept. 11 attacks out of fear of offending them. The FBI and may be other parts of the American government have seemed to almost defend the Saudis, or not be as aggressive as they should be about the Saudis. The FBI had investigated the financial contributions from the wife of the Saudi Ambassador in Washington to the family of Osama Bassnan, and his friend Omar al-Bayoumi, who were acquaintances of Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaq Alhazmi, who were among the 15 Saudis in the group of 19 hijackers. They assisted them with opening bank accounts, provided them with small amounts of cash and introduced them to other Saudis in Southern California. The Bassnan and Bayoumi could be the link to directly connect the Saudi Monarchy with the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The FBI officials have complained that Saudis have not cooperated, refusing requests to examine carefully the backgrounds of the Saudis who took part in the hijackings.

 

Saudi Arabia must be held to the same standard as the former Taliban government of Afghanistan or the government of Iraq. Either Saudi Arabia has to change or the relationship America has with Saudi Arabia will change dramatically. For too many generations Saudi Arabia has pacified and accommodated themselves to the most extreme fanatical elements of Islam. Saudi royal family is a fragile regime and it may not be able to survive in the coming years. Washington’s need for Saudi oil had led the Untied States to pull back from criticizing Saudi Arabia’s seeming tolerance for militants. Justice Department’s inspector general should conduct an inquiry to determine whether the FBI had properly investigated Saudi connections to the hijacking. It seems that every time the Saudis are involved the FBI stops. American shouldn’t look at Saudi Arabia as an ally on a par with Canada, Britain or France. Saudi Arabia has got lots of answering to do regarding Saudi financial assistance to charitable groups that the Untied States accuses of financing the terrorists. Saudi Arabia’s bad policy dated back a dozen years. Saudi Arabia has a long pattern of buying of extremism in their country. Saudi Arabia should pay $200 billion in damages to the American victims of the 9/11 attacks.

 

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates never existed as nation in history. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is the private property of the family of King Abdul Aziz, whose only claim to glory was that he killed the Ottoman Governor in Riyadh as his aunt was married to the governor. Saudi House of Al Saud Monarchy can fall if Osama Bin Laden takes over power in Saudi Arabia, like what Ayatollah Khomeini did in Iran to Pahlavi Monarchy of Shah of Iran. House of Al Saud can also fall if young military leaders with western support organize military coup to establish Kemalist military dictatorship in Saudi Arabia and impose Kemalist secular constitution and western laws in Saudi Arabia. The military dictatorship would guarantee the rights of women and ban Burqa and end the inequalities of women. The Saudi Monarchy can fall if with the tacit support of the West, Pakistan as New Caliph of Islam invades and conquers Saudi Arabia and establishes Islamabad Caliphate in the Arabian Peninsula. Saudi Arabian Monarchy is the core, the womb and the source of the ‘Axis of Evil’ that includes Iraq, Iran and North Korea. The Achilles’ Heels of Islamic terrorism is Saudi Arabian monarchy, and with the end of the Saudi monarchy will also end the menace of Islamic terrorism. Just as United States imposed democratic institutions over post-War Japan, similarly United States should impose democratic Constitution and secular western laws on Saudi Arabia.

 

PERSIAN GULF IS INDIAN LAKE: Ninth. Arabian Gulf had been Indian Lake, under control of Indian Empire in 18th and 19th Century. Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Yemen, Iraq and Iran were part of the Indian Rupee zone and they kept their national foreign currency reserves in Indian rupee as late as 1965. Indian Empire’s Gun Boat Diplomacy kept Persia under the control of Indian Empire. Nuclear India is a legitimate world power with regional and global interests and responsibilities. India accepts Bush Doctrine 2002 that Civilizations have the Right of Preemptive Strikes against terrorist nations and terrorist sponsoring nations and against terrorist weapons of mass destruction. Just as United States justified its invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, by the doctrine of Self Defense and doctrine of preemptive strikes, India reserves its right to undertake preemptive military strikes against Middle Eastern Wahhabi Islamic nations guilty of sponsoring Wahhabi terrorist attacks in Kashmir. India reserves the right of covert military operations against Arab terrorism sponsoring nations. India reserves the right to militarily or by covert operations support the moderate modern Muslim societies victim of anti-women Wahhabi terrorism. Wilsonian foreign policy of the United States actively encouraged the abolition of the Monarchies in China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran. There should be no reason, other than the crucial issue of oil, that United States should oppose overthrowing the House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia, provided the new regime guarantees unlimited quantities of subsidized oil to United States. The new rulers of Saudi Arabia could be persuaded to sell unlimited quantity of crude oil to the United States at the subsidized price of say $5.00 per barrel, to repay the debt of gratitude to the United States, for the CIA’s tacit support for the military coup in Saudi Arabia. Why should great powers suffer the menace of Islamic terrorism, when the problem could be resolved by covert operations in Saudi Arabia and other terrorism sponsoring countries? Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Germany and France would accept such a solution, provided the Oil goodies are equitably distributed among great powers. America’s War on Islamic terrorism should result in the military occupation of all such countries as sponsor and finance Islamic terrorism.

 

RIGHT OF PREEMPTIVE STRIKES: Tenth. Civilizations have the Right of Preemptive Strikes against support base and home base of terrorists. Taming Islamic menace is no big deal, once Civilizations realize that Islamic terrorism represents the classical barbarians invasions of the civilizations, which requires decisive and collective response of the world civilizations. Civilizations would lose the war if they fail to use overwhelming force to destroy the home base and resource-base of the barbarian terrorists. The entire home base and support-base of the barbarian terrorists should be brought under direct military control of the civilizations, to permanently eradicate the breeding ground of barbarian terrorism. The Civilizations must join forces to invade and conquer the lands of barbarian terrorists and impose civilized laws and customs over barbarian terrorist societies. The World Civilizations must not stop short of total victory over barbarians. Coalition of Protestant, Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox Civilizations shall join forces to eradicate the menace of barbarian Sunni Waahhabi terrorism from the face of the earth. Civilizations must never accept the slow bleeding inflicted by Wahhabi terrorist barbarians. Hindu India fully supports Bush doctrine’s right of preemptive strikes against Islamic terrorism and against Islamic weapons of mass destruction.

 

18(11) Clash of Religions

 

MECCA-VATICAN AXIS OF TERRORISM: First. In the global clash of races, Protestant Christians, Hindus and Jews shall fight the war of religions on the same side of the battlefronts. The predator religions present greatest menace to the human civilization in the 21st century, and this menace requires the united decisive military response of the liberal, moderate, non-proselytizing religions.

 

WAHHABI ISLAM: Saudi Wahhabi Sunni sect is a predator religion, followed by only 2 percent of the Sunni Muslims, and it seeks to conquer and destroy competing Sunni Muslim sects, followed by 98 percent of the Sunni Muslims. Roman Catholic Church used the alliance with German barbarian tribes to destroy the ancient religion and civilization of Roman Empire. Similarly, Wahhabi Mosque of Mecca uses the military and coercive capability of barbarian fundamentalist Muslim terrorists to destroy the moderate, liberal Sunni sects presently practiced in the civilized Muslim societies of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia and Nigeria, etc. The extreme Catholic fundamentalism and extreme Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism are identical twins, if one takes into account the relative differences of races and civilizations.

 

FUNDAMENTALIST PAPACY: Pope John Paul II no less fundamentalist than the Wahhabi Grand Mufti of Mecca. Wahhabi Sunni militant Islamic fundamentalism and ultra-conservative Catholic fundamentalism are the two sides of the same coin, and have joined forces to destabilize the moderate, liberal, secular Protestant, Muslim and Hindu societies. Mecca and Vatican are comrade-in-arms against the civilized pro-women, liberal, moderate and modern Protestant Christian, Orthodox Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist societies, nations and states. White Catholic Cocaine cartels and white Sunni Heroin cartels have brought about the pro-terrorism, pro-drugs, pro-fundamentalism, anti-women alliance between religious leadership representing Mecca and the Vatican, in the grandeur name of Unity of the forces of Monotheism to defeat Paganism. It is no accident that Anthrax bio-warfare attack on Protestant leadership of the Capitol was not an act of Islamic terrorism but the conspiracy of the white European Christians. European Union, Europe, and Euro currency profited by 9/11 attacks, just as Church of Rome profited by the Sunni Ottoman conquest of the Byzantine Constantinople.

 

MECCA-VATICAN TARGET INDIA: Second. The multi-ethnic and multi-religion democratic societies of Protestant Christian United States and Hindu India have become the target of predator religious sects, namely Wahhabi Sunni Fundamentalist terrorism and Ultra-conservative proselytizing Roman Catholicism. The WASPs of the United States have come under the attack of Neo-Counter Reformation War, throughout eighties and nineties and its religious goals no less revolutionary than that of Counter Reformation Thirty War of 1618-1648. The civilizations of Protestant Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Orthodox Christianity and paganism would join forces to meet the menace of predator religious sects in the 21st century. Non-denominational Protestant United States and Hindu India shall lead the world coalition to meet the threat of predator religious sects.

 

DEMOCRATIZE PAPACY & MECCA: Third. The democratization of the religious institutions based at Mecca, Medina and the Vatican will eradicate the menace of predator sects. The civilized Muslim countries, namely, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia and Nigeria would join forces to meet the menace of predator Arab Wahhabi Sunni sect, and to bring Holy cities of Mecca and Medina under the control of international body of populous and civilized Muslim nations. The Muslims of the world should directly elect the clergy and religious leaders of Mecca and Medina, by the system of one-person one-vote, for a fixed period of five years. The leading Maulanas from Pakistan and Bangladesh should be appointed the Grand Mufti of the Grand Mosque of Mecca and Medina respectively to lead the Islamic clergy worldwide. Since Wahhabi Sunnis represent only 2 percent of the Muslims in the world, only 2 percent of the religious clergy of Mecca and Medina should belong to the Wahhabi sect, and 98 percent of the Mecca & Medina’s clergy and religious leaders should be recruited from other Islamic nations.

 

The European Catholic nations, namely, France, Spain and Italy would join forces to tame, discipline, curb, control and democratize Papacy and impose structural changes in the Roman Catholic Church, to bring Church of Rome, under the control of Catholic laity and the State. Vast majority of Catholic laity in Italy, France and Spain would vote for the abolition of the Papacy, decolonization of Empire of Roman Catholic churches, and periodic direct election of the Pontiff, Cardinals, Bishops and priests, conducted one-person one-vote single constituency system, to elect catholic clergy for one five-year term. Vatican is a sovereign State and it must elect its government by means of direct elections. Theocracy has no future in the 21st century. Pope and Bishops must become answerable to the Catholic laity voters. Catholic laity should have the right to recall Pontiff and Bishops. Democratization of the organizational structure of the Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church would eradicate the menace of predator sects.

 

WAHHABISM & PAPACY WOMB OF TERROR: Fourth. Saudi Al Saud Monarchy is not the victim of Wahhabi Islamic terrorism as the Saudi monarchy is the womb and cause of Islamic terrorism. Only by replacing Saudi monarchy by Kemalist secular military regime or democratically elected government would resolve the menace of Islamic terrorism. President Bush can win the America’s War on Islamic terrorism, only by engineering the Kemalist military coup in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Bedouin nomads are known to have been uncivilized barbarians throughout human history, and they were so as late as 1970, before OPEC’s hike of oil-prices resulted in the progress and development of Arabian Peninsula. Saudi Bedouin nomads have never enjoyed any political and economic power throughout Islamic history, except during the Mecca Caliphate and present House of Al Saud Monarchy of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Bedouin nomad destroyed the great Christian and Hindu Civilizations of ancient Egypt, Syria and Libya. Saudi Bedouin also destroyed the great Zoroastrian Civilization of ancient Persia. The civilized Damascus Jews and Arab traders harnessed the military potential of barbarian Arab Bedouin nomads, motivated by the spirit of Jihad, to destroy and loot the riches of Egypt, Syria and Libya. Similarly, Saudi Al Saud Monarchy using the oil-incomes to harness the military potential of barbarian poor Muslim terrorists to destroy and conquer liberal, moderate civilized Muslim Sunni sects in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, Sudan and Somalia. House of Al Saud made a pact with the Wahhabi Sunni religious leaders that in exchange of Al Saud’s rule over Saudi Arabia the monarchy would use oil-incomes the military power of the State to finance and support Wahhabi Sunni religious leaders capture the religious leadership of the Islamic mosques world wide, even when only 2 percent of the Muslims of the world follow the Wahhabi Sunni sect doctrine.

 

PAPACY DESTROYED ROMAN CIVILIZATION: Sixth. German barbarian tribes were historically known as uncivilized barbarians as late as 5th Century, when German barbarian tribes conquered and destroyed the Roman Empire. Roman Catholic Church of Rome and Papacy harnessed the military power of the barbarian German tribes to destroy the Mediterranean Roman Civilization, Roman Empire, ancient Roman Hindu Religion, ancient Roman Hindu Roman temples of god Zeus, Jupiter, Mithra, and Goddess Hera, Isis, and Athena. In exchange the Church of Rome recognized the legitimacy of the Kingdom of barbarians, the Holy Roman Empire led by former German barbarian tribe leader. Church of Rome misused the religious freedom and tolerance of the Roman Empire to destroy the religious freedom and tolerance and civilized Europe fell under the dark spell of the barbarian Medieval Dark Age.

 

PAPACY IS AN EMPIRE NOT A CHURCH: Seventh. Historian Arnold Toynbee and philosopher Thomas Hobbes have repeatedly argued that Roman Catholic Church is an Empire not a religious organization. Roman Catholic Church is a threat to the world, because it misuses religion of Roman Catholicism to recreate Holy Roman Empire. Pope is the world's largest employer, and they are personally loyal to Pope. Pope is richer than Bill Gates, the richest man in the world. Papacy is the world's largest colonial empire. Vatican recognized under International Law as sovereign state. Vatican treated as normal sovereign independent state. As a sovereign state, Vatican should honor sovereignty of other nations. As sovereign state, Papacy should not conduct any business in other countries, which are sovereign states without the consent of the sovereign states. As sovereign state Vatican cannot own any property overseas, and cannot appoint clergy in foreign churches without the consent of the host nations.

 

All foreign Catholic Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals should be more loyal to their elected Presidents of their state than to the Vatican and Pope. Every nation has the right under international law to regulate the management, control and recruitment of the national Catholic Churches. The writ of Pope cannot override the legislative and administrative authority of host sovereign states. Every sovereign nation has full freedom to ban Vatican's interference, influence over management of Church property, recruitment and promotion of Catholic clergy. Every Catholic Church, Clergy, Bishops, Archbishop, Cardinal should be answerable to legal authorities of the sovereign state where they are located.

 

PRINCIPAL CONFLICTS OF THE WORLD: Eighth. The principle conflicts of the post-Cold War age in the descending order of their ferocity are: (1) Protestant’s war on Islamic terrorism; (2) Western Christendom’s war on Orthodox Christianity; (3) Sunni-Shiite Clash; (4) Neo-Counter Reformation Catholicism Vs Protestantism Clash; (5) Minority Wahhabi Sunni’s wars on majority Sunni sects; (6) Catholic Whites Vs Catholic Brown Mestizo Clash in South America; (7) White Christians Vs Black Pagan Africans clash, (8) Semite Sunni Muslims Vs Semite Jews Clash, (9) Aryan Muslims Vs Aryan Hindus Clash, (10) Aryan Muslims Vs Slav Orthodox Christians Clash.

 

White Europeans may lose its foothold in Andean America, in Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia if the clash of White Catholics and non-white Mestizos the people of mixed Inca Indian and European ancestry no resolved in favor of the Brown Mestizo Christians and Inca Indians as unmixed whites represent less than 8 percent of the population in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia. The clash of Semite Arab Muslims and Semite Israeli Jews not real clash. Neither Israel, nor Palestine, nor Saudi Arabia, nor Kuwait, existed in the Arabian Peninsula last 2,000 years. The Holy Land in Israel and Palestine belongs neither to Jews nor Muslims, but to Orthodox Christians. New sovereign state of Christian state of Holy Christine should be carved out of Israel and Orthodox Christianity’s Apostolic, and Gnostic, Arian Christianity’s state should be created out of Holy Christian properties and lands in the Holy Land.

 

PAKISTAN & INDIA NOT ENEMIES: Ninth. Clash of Aryan Pakistan and Aryan India artificially created by western Christendom, because it fears that India Pakistan federation would become the dominant world power in the world. Democratically elected Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, representing Pakistan’s right wing religious Muslim League Party wanted to sign Defense Pact with Hindu India led by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, representing Hindu India’s fanatical Hindu right wing party Bhartiya Janata Party. United States and China alarmed by the prospect of two nuclear powers signing Defense Pact, worked towards staging the military coup in Pakistan. Whenever Pakistan becomes democratic nation, Nuclear Hindu India and nuclear Muslim Pakistan would enter into Joint defense Pact or federation to catapult United South Asia to super power status. There is no fear of India Pakistan nuclear exchange. India and Pakistan heading towards confederation and federation before 2025 AD.

 

Africa is the theater of real war, the genocidal war waged by white Europeans to depopulate the black African continent of Black race, by using AIDS as biological weapon, just as it used plague and diseases as biological weapon against Native Americans, Mayans, Incans and Aztecs in the New world after the 1500 AD. The AIDS could depopulate the black continent of Africa, which would cause war between Europe and Asia for the control of the African continent. It is possible that black race may become extinct in the sub-Sahara Africa before the end of the 21st century. The global clash of races between Europeans and Asians would flare up in the event of the depopulation of Africa due to AIDS.

 

18(12) Mecca-Vatican Axis

 

WAHHABI CATHOLIC CONSPIRACY: One. It is suspected that some White organization might have helped, or White Christian or Jewish individual might have acted as co-conspirator to the 9/11 attacks, which could have explained that the commission to enquire into 9/11 intelligence failures never took off. Besides the Anthrax attacks that followed the 9/11 attacks were definitely not the work of a Muslim or Arab conspirator. The anthrax attack had the white Christian signature.

 

PAPACY’S ALLIANCE WITH MECCA: Two. In historical terms the Rise of Papacy coincided with the Rise of Mecca and Expansion of Islam. The temporal power of the Catholic Pope was partly established in 754, when Pepin, King of Franks recognized such authority. In 774, Charlemagne confirmed the temporal power of Pope. In 1076, Princess Matilda, daughter of Duke of Boniface of Tuscany, made the Holy See heir to her possessions. Sunni Islam and Roman Catholicism are siblings and took birth in the seventh century and followed similar strategy in the propagation of their respective sects. Both sough the support of Jews in their expansion phase. Arab traders of Damascus joined forces with the Jewish traders of Damascus to finance the Muslim raiding parties, for a share of the loot and for profits from the sale of the looted merchandise. Hellenized Jews joined early Christian Church in Rome and hijacked the leadership of the Early Christian Church and imposed Old Testament on the New Testament in the Christian Bible. The Gnostic, Arian, apostolic Christianity didn’t allow Jews to influence the Christian dogma, which were derived from Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina, Zoroastrian, and Maggi theologies. Catholic Church didn’t give any support to the Apostolic Gnostic Arian Church of Damascus, Alexandria and elsewhere when Muslims attacked them. Catholics are a minority among Christians of Holy Land, and Papacy hopes that once Christian Holy properties are in the control of the Palestine Muslims, the Muslims would support Catholic takeover of the Orthodox religious properties in the Holy Land.

 

Wahhabi Mecca and Catholic Vatican joined forces to destroy and disintegrate Orthodox-majority Yugoslavia to carve out Catholic Slovenia, Catholic Croatia, Muslim Bosnia and Muslim Kosovo. Just as in the 1990s Church of Rome aligned with Muslims to destroy the Christian Yugoslavia, it aligned with Ottoman Turks to destroy the Byzantine Christian Civilization of Constantinople. Catholic and Evangelical fundamentalists seek fundamentalist Wahhabi Sunni as natural allies in Black Africa and it encourages the Wahhabi Sunni to impose Shariah Law replacing the Western laws, to coerce pagans chose either Islam or Christianity. Catholic fundamentalists and Protestant Evangelicals have traditionally aligned with fundamentalist Muslims to undermine non-Semite religions, namely, paganism, Hinduism and Buddhism. Catholics and Wahhabi use Shariah to undermine Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh, and to undermine Buddhists in Malaysia and Indonesia. Catholics and Muslim minorities have joined forces against Hindus in India. Catholics and Wahhabi fundamentalists have joined forces against black pagans in black Africa. This ongoing alliance of the Vatican with Mecca came under scrutiny after Protestant United States declared war on Islamic terrorism. However, Catholic religious right conservative conspiracy worked overtime to sabotage Protestant president Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism, as a result America failed to capture even one leader of Al Qaeda terrorist network, in spite of large deployment of the Armed forces and materials to the Afghan theater of war.

 

WAHHABIS ARE ONLY 2% OF MUSLIMS: Three. Less than 2 percent of the world’s Muslims follow Wahhabi Sunni sect. Just as Vatican waged Thirty Years War of Counter Reformation (1618-1648), the present-day Mecca based Wahhabi sect waging wars on the Muslims sects of the world, conspiring to take over the leadership of the Muslim clergy worldwide. Just as Counter Reformation Wars resulted in the loss of more than one third population of Germans, similarly the Wahhabi Sect’s war on other Muslim sects may result in the loss of the half of the Arab population in the first half of the 21st Century. Once we take into account the difference of the civilizations and cultures and societies, the anti-women Catholic conservatism, hardly differs from the anti-women Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism. Thirty Years War was between Catholics and Protestants, similarly in the new wars of Islamic sects waged by Wahhabi Sunni clergy on other Muslim religious sects followed by the rest 98% of the Muslim population, would pit moderate Muslims against fundamentalist Muslims, Persian Shiite Muslims against Arab Wahhabi Sunni Muslims. Wahhabi Sunni terrorism would cause great bloodshed among Muslims in the resulting wars among Islamic religious sects.

 

POPULOUS MUSLIM NATION TO LEAD MECCA: Four. In the Counter Reformation Thirty Years Wars (1618-1648) the Catholic states of France and Spain joined the war on the sides of the Protestants against Papacy and Holy Roman Empire. Similarly, populous Muslim states of Turkey, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan would wars against Saudi Arabia to take custodial control of Islamic Holy cities of Mecca and Medina and to expel Wahhabi fundamentalists. Iran and Iraq would militarily support Shiite uprisings in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and UAE, which would cause great turmoil and instability in the Arabian Peninsula. Islamic world heading to bloody war of Islamic sects due to the religious terrorism of Wahhabi sect, which is based only in Arabian Peninsula and has les than 40 million adherents in the world, where there are more than a billion Muslims in the world.

 

NO ISLAMIC POWER IS A WORLD POWER: No Five. Islamic power is a world power. No Islamic nation is among leading economic powers of the world. Never in the history of Islam, Islamic nations had been militarily so vulnerable as they are now, except when they were conquered by the Buddhist Mongol Empire. Islamic Ottoman Empire had been a great world power as late as the First World War. Pakistan can conquer every Islamic nation from Iran to Morocco. Even Pakistan agrees that India can take over Pakistan, whenever it so desires. It means that Hindu India can invade and conquer every Islamic country from Morocco to Indonesia single-handedly. Should Hindu India and Christian NATO join forces to impose Christianity throughout the Islamic world from Morocco to Iran? Muslim invaders imposed Islam by sword over Christian Egypt, Christian Syria, Christian Jordan, Christian Turkey, Christian Libya and Christian Algeria. Should Christian Crusaders of 21st Century use Christian sword to impose Christianity over Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Turkey, Libya, and Algeria? Religions that expanded by sword would die by the sword.

 

The total Gross Domestic product of all Muslim nations including Israel is just $1.34 trillion, just equal to that of France and 62.4 percent that of India. Obviously Islamic world does not have the economic and military power to launch defensive measures if the major powers decide to invade and conquer the Middle East and North Africa to stamp out the evil of Wahhabi terrorism from the face of the earth. The population and GDP (GNP at PPP) 1999 dollars figures for 2002, of selected Islamic countries is as follows: Total Middle East and North Africa (Population 291 million, Surface Area 11,024,000 sq. km, Population Density 26 people per sq. km, GNP per capita $2,060, GDP (GNP at PPP $1.338 Trillion), India (Population 1 billion, Surface area 3,288,000 sq. kms, Population density 336, GDP $2.144 trillion), Albania (3 million, $9.8 billion), Algeria (30 million, $142 billion), Azerbaijan (8 million, $18.5 billion), Afghanistan ( 26 million), Bangladesh (128 million, $188 billion), Egypt (62 million, $206 billion), Eritrea (4 million, $4 billion), Indonesia (207 million, $505 billion), Kyrgyz Republic (5 million, $2 billion), Pakistan (135 million, $237 billion), Saudi Arabia (21 million, $129 billion), Syria (16 million, $43 billion), Turkey (64 million, $394 billion), Yemen (17 million, $12 billion), Kuwait (2 million, $30 billion) UAE (2.8 million) and Iran (63 million, $325 billion). All Muslim countries from Iran to Morocco, the Middle East and North Africa have population 291 million, 29 percent of India’s population, GDP of $1337 billion, just 62.4 percent of India’s GDP, and almost equal to that of France. It would be in the interest of the Islam, if the leaders of Islam make realistic assessment of their military capability before they wage war of Islamic terrorism on the civilized nations. A determined response of the civilizations to the barbarian Islamic terrorist attacks could result in the enslavement of the Islamic world. Islamic terrorism exposes the weakness of the Islamic nations not their strength. An ant develops wings on the last day of its life, and it flies allover and then dies that day. Could the Wahhabi terrorism, its last act of bravado before if would meet its end at the end of the day. The Saudi Arabia is what Laurent Murawiec of Rand Corp. calls “the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent in the terror game.”

 

18(13) Shiite Control of Arabia

 

DOWNFALL OF WAHHABI SUNNI ISLAM: First. The Sunni-Shiite conflicts can be exploited to destabilize Saudi Arabia after America established colonial rule in Iraq. Sunni-Shiite Civil War would make Arabian Gulf highly unstable. India should develop closer ties with Iran to promote Shiite conquest of Saudi Arabia. Would the Shiite control over Mecca and Medina solve the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism? Should United States help transfer of power in Iraq and Saudi Arabia to Arab Shiite Muslims? Could non-Muslim nations employ the diplomacy of Divide and Rule to support Shiite Arabs to tame the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism? Saudi Arabia historically had either been part of Egypt or Persia. The Arab Shiites in Iraq represent 65 percent of Iraq, while Sunni Arabs represent only 15 percent of the Iraq’s population. In the oil-producing Al Hasa province on the Gulf Coast of Saudi Arabia, the Shiites are in majority. By transferring the political power in the Arabian Peninsula to Arab Shiites, the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism can be tamed, albeit eradicated. In terms of military capability Shiites could easily takeover Sunnis in the Arabian Peninsula. Sunni Kurds would also join alongside Shiites to wage wars on Sunni Wahhabi Arabs. The grand coalition of Shiites, Kurds, Turks and Afghans could overthrow the oppressive pro-terrorism Wahhabi regimes in the Arabian Peninsula.

 

AMERICAN ALLIANCE WITH SHIITES: Bush administration promotes Shiite cleric Ayatollah Muhammad Bakir al-Hakim as the likely ally in the post-Saddam regime of Iraq, who has been living in Tehran for more than two decades and is backed by the Iranian government. His father once gave sanctuary to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the fiery anti-American cleric who later rose to supreme power in Iran’s 1979 coup. United States and the Shiite cleric are in the process of forging a political alliance of convenience. It is an arrangement that is strongly supported by Kuwait, America’s staunchest Arab ally in Bush’s campaign to dislodge President Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Kuwait, for its part, has encouraged the Bush administration to work with Ayatollah Hakim, who is a regular visitor to Kuwait.

 

The USA-Ayatollah Hakim alliance is also quietly backed by Iran, a subtle signal that Tehran seems prepared to offer a modicum of cooperation to America’s war efforts, if the Bush administration mounts a military campaign in Iraq. The Iranian Navy has moved to close its territorial waters to smugglers going to and from Iraq. Ayatollah Hakim’s Iran connection has a benefit. It gives Iran a stake in the future Iraqi government and helps encourage its neutrality or even cooperation if the Untied States attacks Iraq.

 

The reason the Bush administration wants Shiites at that meeting was that while Iraq was politically dominated by Arab Sunni Muslim minority, representing 16 percent of the population, an estimated 55 percent of the Iraqis are Shiites. Bush administration wants new governing structure in Iraq: a system in which Shiites would be represented but in which fundamentalist Islam would not become the dominant religious or political ideology of Iraq. Much of Baghdad is populated by Shiites, and they also dominate southern Iraq, the principal invasion route that America troops would take if they moved on the capital.

 

Shiite Iraqis are suspicious of American motives, and see it as a dark conspiracy to keep Shiites in their place in Iraq. President H. W. Bush didn’t come to the aid of the Iraqi Shiites after the 1991 Persian Gulf War. When the Iraqi Army was routed, the Shiites in the south Iraq rebelled, but the president Bush decided not to intervene. Difficult situation became worse when, as part of the cease-fire arrangements, Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf acceded to the Iraqi military’s request that their pilots be allowed to operate helicopters. The Iraqi military later used helicopters to attack and kill Shiites. Washington did not impose no-flight zone in southern Iraq for more than a year after 1991 war. Americans helped Saddam Hussein regime wage war on Shiites after the 1991 war. Bush administration has also invited Mr. Chalabi, head of the ‘Iraqi National Accord’ an organization that includes former Baath Party members, a group that wants to restore the monarchy in Iraq. The two leading Kurdish groups, the organizations that represent the Turkoman and Assyrian minorities in Iraq are also invited to the Dec. 10, 2002 Meeting of the Iraqi opposition leaders in London.

 

KHOMEINI WAS CARTER’S IMPLANT: President Bush has no desire to reinstate, Prince Riza Pahlevi, son of the deposed Shah of Iran Shah Mohammed Riza Pahlevi, into power in Iran, by overthrowing the theocratic government in Iran, which is also a part of the Axis of Evil. On the contrary, Bush administration may replace the secular, modern regime of Saddam Hussein not by any democratic government but by a coalition of fundamentalist Wahhabi and Shiite regime, where clergy not democratic leaders would play important political role. Since Bush administration has started negotiations with fundamentalist Shiite leaders and Iranian government for cooperation or neutrality in the event of the America’s war on Iraq, India should also develop closer military ties with Aryan Shiite Iran to develop Hindu-Shiite Front to meet the Wahhabi menace and to unravel and neutralize the Catholic religious right conservative conspiracy which lobby for pro-Sunni Wahhabi and anti-Shiite policies in the Capitol and White House. Judeo-Christianity prefers Semite Wahhabi Sunni Saudi Arabia to Aryan Shiite Iran. Representing the religious interests of Christian religious right conservatism, President Jimmy Carter overthrew the liberal regime of Shah of Iran and scuttled the democratic regime of Prime Minister Bani Sadr and forbade military coup in Iran to install arch fundamentalist Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in power in Iran and thereby legitimized Islamic militant fundamentalism. Southern Baptist President Jimmy Carter may be called the ‘Father of Islamic Fundamentalism.’ President Ronald Reagan continued cooperation with Ayatollah’s Iran ofr covert operations in Nicaragua Contra affairs. Imprisonment of American embassy personnel was just a sham act to hide the CIA-Ayatollah Khomeini ties. Since United States would not topple the Ayatollah’s regime in Iran, replacing it with democratically elected government in Iran, it is high time that Hindu Aryan India develops closer military ties with Aryan Iran.

 

INDIAN INTERESTS IN CENTRAL ASIA: The eastward expansion of Nato to military bases in Afghanistan and Uzbekistan and America’s military bases in Pakistan and Afghanistan presents great security threat to India, Iran and Russia. India and Iran should develop solid military ties to develop permanent military ties and to develop joint rapid deployment brigades to undertake military operations in the Gulf region. Hindu democratic India should overcome its inhibition of conducting closer diplomatic and military ties with the fundamentalist theocratic regime in Iran, because irrespective of the character of the political regime of Iran, the geopolitics of Iran, determines that the national interests of Iran and India coincide in the age of the predominance of the coalition of 26-member Nato alliance, US-China, US-Pakistan and US-Afghanistan in Southern Asia and the Middle East. The principles of Raison d’etat and Balance of Power requires that India and Iran should develop military alliance to ward off potential Nato’s invasions of Iran or India or Russia. Maritime alliance of India and Iran will in geopolitical terms control the Arabian Gulf, making it a Persian Lake or Indian Lake. Proven capability of Indian and Iranian Navy’s capability to close Arabian Gulf shipment of Gulf crude would effectively deter any hostile NATO invasions of the Subcontinent. Nuclear Aryan Hindu India should formalize a defense Pact with Aryan Shiite Iran, based on geopolitical and racial and religious realities, and formalize common anti-Arab military Pact to enhance the roles of Indian and Iranian Navy in the Arabian Gulf. India, Iran and Russia triangle would neutralize the threat posed by the USA, Nato and Pakistan triangle. In spite of the friendly gestures of the United States, India Iran and Russia should form alliance to ward of the destabilizing role of the USA, Nato and Pakistan Alliance and Sino-US Alliances. Since there is no possibility of either the restoration of Pahlevi Monarchy or democracy in Iran, Hindu India must finalize closer military ties with Aryan Shiite Iran, before it is too late. Hindu India and Shiite Iran face the common enemy Wahhabi Arab terrorism, financed by Saudi Arabia and legitimized by Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca. Iranian control over Arabian Peninsula would not be against India’s national interest. Iranian control over Arabian Peninsula would not be against national interest of Pakistan either.

 

18(14) Mercosur Market

 

MONROE DOCTRINE IS DEAD: First. The American war on Iraq destroyed the legal basis of Monroe Doctrine and Brazil should take a lead to revitalize South American Common Market with leading nations of the region, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela and Peru. India should develop closer military and economic ties with Brazil, Peru and Venezuela.

 

South American Common Market

Second. South America would sever its dependence on United States and forge closer military and economic ties with European Union and other world powers. The Monroe doctrine is dead in the post-Cold War new world order and major powers of Latin America free to develop regional and overseas military and economic alliances to promote their respective national interests based on the principles of Raison d’etat and balance of power. The ‘Washington Consensus’ in the Latin America, promoted by Clinton administrations during the 1990’s brought suffering rather than prosperity to the Latin America. Led by left-leaning President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil will promote Mercosur and South American Common Market and oppose Free Trade Area of the Americas. American proposal for a Free Trade Area of the Americas, would lead to the ‘annexation’ of Latin America by the United States. Previous governments in Brazil, Argentina and Peru had been submissive to the United States and encouraged the annexation of Latin America by the United States. The national interests of Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela and Peru conflicts with those of the United States in South American Common Market.

 

Brazil’s Lula made an emphatic call in Argentina and Chile to develop a new regional strategic relationship to allow Latin America retake control of its own destiny and build its own future. Brazil favors the creation of a Common South American currency and Common South America Parliament. Brazil seeks true integration following the example of the European Union. Brazil’s top priority is to bolster the regional trade group known as Mercosur. Lula expressed the will of the Brazil to give a decisive impetus to the reconstruction of Mercosur together with its partners in South America. Brazil urged other member nations to deepen a common foreign policy, which is essential for negotiations with the United States and European Union.

 

MERCOSUR GDP: Third. Mercosur with the GDP at PPP of $1.669 trillion in 1999 dollars, joint production of over $1 trillion and a combined population of 250 million founded by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, are full members of Mercosur, which is also called South American Common Market. Bolivia and Chile joined later and are associate members. The GDP, population and surface area of these countries are: Argentina (population 37 million, GDP $414 billion, Per Capita $11,3243, area 2.78 million sq. km), Brazil (population 168 million, GDP $ 1,062 billion, Per capita $6,317, area 8.567 million sq. km), Paraguay (population 5 million, GDP $ $22.5 Billion, Per capita $4,193, area 407,000 sq. km), Uruguay (population 3 million, GDP $27 billion, per capita $8,280, area 177,000 sq. km), Bolivia (population 8 million, GDP 17.8 billion, per capita $2,193, area 1.099 million sq. km), and Chile (population 15 million, GDP 125.7 billion, per capita $8,370, are 757,000 sq. km). The Mercosur total population in 1999 figures is 236 million, total Gross Domestic Product at purchasing power parity PPP is $1.669 trillion, and total surface area is 13.787 million sq. km. The Mercosur has 10.32 percent of the world’s total surface area, and 3.94 percent of the world’s population.

 

The Brazil’s president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Argentina’s president Eduardo Duhalde, Chile’s president Ricardo Lagos, and Mexican president Vincente Fox shall join forces to strike a new regional strategic relationship and retake control of South America’s own destiny and build its own future, applying principles of Raison d’etat and balance of power, which obliges their diplomats to develop closer economic and military ties with the less strong powers to redress the preponderance of the United States in the South America. The Monroe doctrine is dead in the post-Cold War age.

 

18(15) Toussaint L’Ouverture

Voodoo Legacy of Haiti

The first nation to gain independence in the New World was not the United States but the black state of Haiti. Haiti was richer than contemporary United States. Toussaint L’Ouverture had more money at his disposal than President George Washington. The treasury of the Haiti had more money than the treasury of the contemporary United States. United States was poorer than Haiti so long as Toussaint L’Ouveture ruled Haiti. Toussaint L’Ouverture is the scion of the black race. Haiti’s official religion was Voodoo religion. Toussaint fought on the side of France against United States. However French tricked Toussaint for a meeting onboard the ship and took him to France, where he was starved to death. Perhaps Napoleon Bonaparte deserved to die in captivity, because of the mistreatment he gave to the Head of State of Haiti, the first country to become independent in the New World. A slave revolt erupted in the Haiti, then the richest colony of the world, owing to its sugar production. A slave leader, son of the black slave, follower of Voodoo tribal religion, Toussaint L'Ouverture (1743-1803) defeated Mulattos and French soldiers and became the ruler of Haiti.

 

Napoleon attempted to suppress the revolt and failed. France's financial loss was America's diplomatic gain. Idiot Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, short of cash and having lost Haiti, the pearl of the French Empire in America, hoodwinked by his Vatican advisers to sell United States most of the rest of French American Empire in form Louisiana Purchase.

 

As an administrator and ruler Toussaint L’Overture was as great as George Washington, if not greater. Had Toussaint L’Ouverture not tricked into captivity, Black ruled Haiti might have rivaled white ruled United States as the premier center of Civilization in the New World. As a historical person black Toussaint L’Ouverture was greater than Napoleon Bonaparte and greater than George Washington, and it is sad that such a brilliant leader was starved to death in French jails on orders of Napoleon Bonaparte. In 1800 blacks outnumbered whites in the United States. Had Toussaint L’Ouverture lived full life as the ruler of Haiti, blacks in the United States would have revolted and formed Black United States under the leadership of Toussaint L’Ouverture and the history of the United States would have attained Black destiny. In the history of the Black Civilization the name of Toussaint L’Ouverture shall be honored in golden ink. Kalki Zeus salutes Toussaint L’Ouverture.

 

President Bill Clinton invaded Haiti to impose Papal rule over Haiti to suppress Voodoo religion of Haiti. President Bill Clinton employed the Diplomacy of Deception during invasion of Haiti which implanted dictator Catholic priest Rev. Aristide as the President of Haiti, to implement the agenda of Catholic Religious right Conservatism to enforce proselytizing of pagan Voodoo Haitians. United States invaded Haiti not to restore democracy in Haiti, but to impose Papal dictatorship over predominantly pagan Haiti.

 

18(16) Rise of Incan Ecuador

Inca Indian Government of Ecuador

Just as Jews returned and claimed the land of Jews in Israel in 1948, the Inca Indians in Ecuador reclaimed Ecuador for Inca Indians in 2002. Ecuador became the first country in the world to have an elected Inca Indian government in the end of 2002. Mr. Antonio Vargas (CINE-Indian) announced the formation of a three-man new governing Junta composed of Mr. Antonio Vargas, Colonel Lucio Gutierrez, and Carlos Solorzano, a former Supreme Court Chief Justice. "Triumvirate" three-man military-led Junta consisted of Gen. Carlos Mendoza, Mr. Antonio Vargas, and Justice Carlos Solorzano.

 

Lucio Edwin Gutierrez, a former army colonel who on January 21, 2000 briefly took power in coup backed by native Inca Indians, was the clear winner of the Ecuador’s presidential elections in November 2002. Mr. Gutierrez, 45, had 54 percent of the vote to 46 percent for his adversary, Alvaro Noboa, 52, a banana tycoon. Mr. Gutierrez was part of the three-man Junta that lasted only a few hours before being dissolved and the vice president, Gustavo Naboa, took over, many in Ecuador believe under pressure from the United States. Mr. Gutierrez was promptly jailed, but on his release a few months later formed a political party, ‘the Jan. 21 Patriotic Society,’ named after the date of Mr. Mahuad’s overthrow. Mr. Gutierrez’s statements particularly since finishing first among 11 candidates in the first round of voting on Oct. 20, 2002, had shifted to the political center. The next Ecuadorian government will not be an Indian government or a government of the left. The challenge is to make a government that can govern and have accords with the Congress, and to make deals with the Congress.

 

In Brazil, a former labor leader, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, won election for Presidency of Brazil in October 2002. In Peru and Bolivia Inca backed populists movements surged in recent elections. In the Latin American countries that followed the free-market prescriptions pushed by the United States and the multinational lending agencies World Bank, saw little tangible benefits from these steps, with poverty rising and living standards falling.

21st Jan 2000 History's Turning Point

January 21, 2000 shall be enshrined as the most important day of the post-1500 AD in the New World. Ecuador's indigenous Indian protestors marched on the National Congress in Quito, demanding the ouster of President Mahuad. The military unit assigned to guard the legislative building stepped aside. It allowed Mr. Antonio Vargas, president of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador, the country's principal Indian group, to enter and seize control of the offices there. It allowed him to proclaim the overthrow of Mr. Mahuad and the dissolution of Congress and the Supreme Court and their replacement by a "People's Parliament." With the television cameras broadcasting the takeover, Mr. Antonio Vargas (CINE-Indian) announced the formation of a three-man new governing Junta composed of Mr. Antonio Vargas, Colonel Lucio Gutierrez, and Carlos Solorzano, a former Supreme Court Chief Justice. Gen. Carlos Mendoza, flanked by Army commander Gen. Telmo, and Ecuador's navy chief, declared on Friday night that Ecuador shall be governed by "Triumvirate" three-man military-led Junta, which consisting of Gen. Carlos Mendoza, Mr. Antonio Vargas, and Justice Carlos Solorzano. However, before dawn on Sunday Gen. Mendoza had moved to undercut his two partners in the three-man Triumvirate, and engineered to make Vice President Gustavo Noboa Bejarano, the Ecuador's president. One-day rebellion in Ecuador, led by Ecuador's Indians, resulted in the ouster of Ecuador's President, Mr. Mahuad. It led to the formation of Triumvirate where the General Mendoza agreed to share political power with Indian leader Antonio Vargas, the president of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador, the country's principal Indian group.

 

The Ecuador’s coup, of 21st January 2000, represents the History's Turning Point in the New World, Which was occupied by Spaniards after 1500 AD. The main significance is that the Ecuador's Coup was not planned and engineered by Ecuador military's top brass. The lower level military officers joined forces with Indians to overthrow the President. Gen. Carlos Mendoza supported the coup only when it had become the reality. Gen. Carlos Mendoza, the armed forces commander briefly led a three-man junta, before stepping aside for Vice President Gustavo Noboa, sacrificing a brilliant career so the world would be spared the spectacle of a disoriented and destroyed Ecuador. More than a dozen colonels are in custody, awaiting trial on charges of sedition and conspiring against the constitutional order. Estimated 300 junior officers are under investigation. Gen. Telmo Sandoval, who supported the coup, has been promoted to commander of the armed forces, the position earlier occupied by Gen. Carlos Mendoza, who has now retired. Gen. Carlos Moncayo, who permitted Indians to seize the Congress building by withdrawing his troops, is still free. Rival military group encouraged by United staged a counter-coup to force Gen. Mendoza to disband the three-man Military Junta after 18 hours. Gen. Mendoza yielded because he feared that United States and Colombia might intervene militarily to defeat the three-man Junta. The moral of the story is that the Mestizo people of mixed Inca Indian and Spanish ancestry have a vested interest in restoring the Inca Religion, Inca language and Inca Civilization in the Andean Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. Inca Empire would stage a comeback in Andean America, because the brown Meztizos of mixed Inca and European ancestry associate themselves with Inca Indian roots than with Spanish ancestry. Brown Hindu India has a vested interest in rejuvenating the Inca Civilization, Inca Religion and Inca Culture in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. Just as Hindu India became independent after 700 years of Muslim rule and 200 years of Christian British rule, the Inca Ecuadorians and Peruvians and Bolivians would resurrect the glory of Inca civilization, which lost its poser only 500 years ago. The religion of God Virachocha and temples dedicated for his worship would become common and prominent throughout the erstwhile Inca Empire in Andean America. Just as 2,000 years after Jews were expelled from Jerusalem, Jews returned triumphantly in 1948 to Israel to reclaim their land for Judaism, the Inca Ecuadorians and Peruvians and Bolivians worked to reclaim the Ecuador for Inca civilization. It is truly a historical movement. It establishes that Inca civilization is alive and Inca God Virachocha would reclaim Andean America from iconoclast Roman Catholic Church in 21st Century. The Mestizos representing 85 percent of the population in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Honduras should form the government, by ending the monopoly of white Catholics over economic, military and political power.

 

18(17) Enigma of Dr. Kissinger

The 90% of the politicians give the other 10% a bad reputation. Similarly 99.9% of the incompetent Diplomats give the other 0.1% a bad reputation. Without doubt Diplomat Henry Kissinger belongs to the select 0.1%, one in 1000 of the brilliant, qualified, real Diplomats, who have studied the art and science of diplomacy. Like his ideal, Bismarck, Diplomat Henry Kissinger was the class by himself. It is the dream of the author to negotiate with a Diplomat of his stature as a Diplomat from India. This book is a salute to the brilliance of Diplomat Kissinger, even when he had been a sworn enemy of India, the nation the author seeks to represent as a Diplomat some day. One wonders why they don’t make any more Diplomats like Dr. Henry J. Kissinger. It is the arrogance of the author to believe that had he been the diplomat of India, he would have convinced the adversary Diplomat Kissinger that the national interests of United States are better served by raison d’etat, which necessitates closer USA-India ties to check the menace of China, and in the process the 2 million Buddhist lives in Cambodia would have escaped slaughter at the hands of Judeo-Communist Christian Pol Pot. President Bush has appointed Dr. Henry Kissinger the Chairman of the 10-member Independent Panel/Commission to investigate US intelligence failures before Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Former Senator George Mitchell is the Vice Chairman of the Commission.

 

United States opposed the International Criminal Court primarily, because it fears that the Court would prosecute former Secretary Henry Kissinger for Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents. "I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist due to the irresponsibility of its people," Kissinger once famously uttered. Attempts to question Henry Kissinger about terrorist crimes and war crimes have put the darker side of his career under the spotlight. He was arguably the second most influential architect of US foreign policy since the Second World War, other than John foster Dulles. Henry Kissinger ran foreign policy over the head of the Secretary of State William Rogers. Kissinger was the man who implemented détente with the Soviet Union. Kissinger opened up the way to Nixon's visit to China. Kissinger assumed almost complete control of foreign affairs during the Nixon years.

 

IS HENRY KISSINGER A WAR CRIMINAL: British writer, Christopher Hitchens, in his recent book The Trial of Henry Kissinger, argues that Kissinger is a war criminal. Hitchens claims Kissinger connived with brutal regimes, allied to the US, most notably Pakistan, Greece and Indonesia, to embark on savage acts of repression.

 

OPERATION CONDOR: The Spanish judge, Baltazar Garzon, pursued the extradition to Spain of General Pinochet while the former Chilean dictator was in London. Now this same judge is trying to question Kissinger about the deaths of Spanish nationals murdered and tortured as part of Operation Condor. A French judge is doing the same in relation to murdered French citizens. Kissinger has admitted that mistakes were "quite possibly" made by the administrations in which he served. But Kissinger has questioned whether, 30 years after the event, "courts are the appropriate means by which determination is made". None of the judges, so far, have suggested that they want to do anything more than question Henry Kissinger.

 

Was Kissinger was actively involved in the establishment of Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents? The CIA's involvement in the coup, which toppled the elected Chilean leader Salvador Allende and brought General Pinochet to power, has been long well documented. But a number of factors have brought these old chestnuts back into public prominence. Chileans demonstrating against the brutality of the Pinochet regime, and the Documents recently released by the CIA, strengthen previously held suspicions that Kissinger was actively involved in the establishment of Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents. Most notably, charges relating to Latin America have returned to haunt Henry Kissinger.

 

Dr. Kissinger saw the illegal, secret bombing of Cambodia and acquiesced to Indonesia’s 1975 invasion of East Timor. In 1973, the democratically elected government of Salvadore Allende in Chile was overthrown by military coup led by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, a goal Mr. Kissinger had long supported. Dr. Kissinger spent his entire public career protecting the executive branch from public scrutiny of its actions. Kissinger's complicity in the illegal carpet-bombing of neutral Cambodia, designed to deprive North Vietnam of troops and supplies, but which sowed the seeds for the murderous Pol Pot regime. He was the secret negotiator at the Paris peace talks, which ended the Vietnam War for which he was awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize. Practically Dr. Henry Kissinger got the Nobel Peace prize for Cambodian policy that saw the genocide of 2 million Buddhists.

 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: At the same time, the success of international tribunals in bringing suspected war criminals such as Yugoslavia's former leader Slobodan Milosevic to trial has created a new impetus for righting the serious wrongs of the past. The new International Criminal Court, ratified this month, is a de facto message to tyrants and torturers everywhere that they can run but can't hide.

 

Henry Kissinger once said, "90% of politicians give the other 10% a bad reputation." Kissinger rose to become a Harvard professor and then assumed control of America's foreign policy under Presidents Nixon and Ford, has bitterly divided opinion over which of these two percentage categories he belongs to. Zbigniew Brzezinski adopted Kissinger’s strategy, diplomatic style and patriarchal worldview, where he as national Security Adviser, determined President Carter’s policy towards China. Henry Kissinger haunted by his past.

 

Kissinger had a hold over President Nixon Kissinger became Richard Nixon's national security adviser in 1969. It was testament to his mastery of political infighting and his increasing hold over the president Nixon that, in all but the final year of the Nixon presidency, he ran foreign policy over the head of the Secretary of State, William Rogers. By this policy, he made the world a safer place. He negated the Communist threat in America's back yard, most notably in Chile, though it cost lots of lives during the tyranny of Pinochet. Kissinger overthrew Salvadore Allende in Chile, but implanted Pol Pot over Cambodia. However, the end result was the same, lots of people died in Chile as well as in Cambodia.

 

With his famous "Shuttle Diplomacy" after the 1973 Yom Kippur war in the Middle East, Kissinger brokered the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel. And he was the man who kept American foreign policy on the rails after the Watergate scandal and maintained its momentum under President Ford. His wisdom is still sought after. American policy under Kissinger was more motivated by global balance of power and national interest at the expense of human rights. The world was polarized, and fighting Communism involved hard choices and messy compromises. This messy business is what made Diplomat Kissinger a highly controversial figure. The Joseph Stalin’s regime brings to mind the slaughter of 30 million Orthodox Russians at the hand of Lavrenti Beria. Similarly the Kissinger’s diplomacy brings to mind the slaughter of 2 million Buddhists at the hands of Judeo-Communist Pol Pot, forced into power by the policies of Kissinger and Mao.

 

18(18) Commission on 9/11 Intelligence Failures

Would Dr. Henry Kissinger investigate the role of certain European religious organizations that may have cooperated with the Islamic terrorists? President Bush appointed Henry Kissinger in charge of the Independent commission to investigate the lapses during 9/11 terrorist attacks. The commission has a broad mandate, building on the limited joint inquiry conducted by the House and Senate intelligence committees. The independent panel will have 18 months to examine issues such as aviation security and border problems, along with intelligence. Members would report back more quickly than 18 months. Nation needs to know quickly how it can avoid terror attacks in the future. The sooner America has the Commission's conclusions, the sooner it can act on them. Commission should carefully examine all evidence and follow all facts, wherever they lead. There is no primary goal for the commission to uncover mistakes or lapses of the government that could have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks.

 

TACTICS & MOTIVES OF TERRORISTS: Commission should try to help the administration learn the tactics and motives of the enemy. This book Global Clash of Races is an exercise to assist the Independent Commission on terrorist attacks, to develop a conceptual framework to map out the wider linkages among extremist religious organizations, which may have aligned with extremist political organizations and criminal terrorist groups to conceptualize, global terrorist network to bring down the dominant economic, political, social, cultural and military power of the world, namely the WASPs United States of America. Open societies like United Sates and India are vulnerable to the terrorist attacks, because the terrorists are able to misuse the democratic freedom to undermine the freedom itself in the open societies. The law enforcement agencies stymied by the law to properly apprehend the terrorists, even when they had raised sufficient suspicions. The American practice to allow the CIA hire, recruit and finance the terrorists to undertake pro-US terrorist acts against adversaries of the United States, seems to have backfired, because organized crime and the adversaries are able to pay higher price to hire the CIA-trained terrorists to cause damage to the United States.

 

TACTICS: The tactics of the Islamic terrorists is to use the non-military commercially available goods as improvised weapons of war, to destroy the economic infrastructure of the Civilization from within, as was done to the Egyptian, Syrian, Inca, Maya and Aztec civilizations in the past. The tactics of the Terrorists is to launch attacks on American economic infrastructure, as they realize that attacks on American military is futile and fatal. Terrorist attacks on sensitive economic infra structure of the open society cause damages 1,000 times the cost of the attack. The total cost of organizing the Sept. 11 attacks could be around $50 million, a peanut for the Wahhabi Heroin Drug dealers, and it caused economic damage over $1 trillion, around 20,000 times the cost incurred by terrorists. In the age of infrastructure warfare, the trained terrorists, even without uniforms are as effective as the regular military troops. The non-uniform trained terrorists are enemy combatants.

 

MOTIVES: The motive of the fundamentalist terrorists is to destroy the pro-women, liberal democratic Christian United States. Series of 9/11 type attacks on American economic infrastructure could expedite the exodus of foreign capital from US markets and result in the permanent decline of American Civilization. The motive of the Islamic terrorists is clear, it is to destroy the United States as we know it, and they know it as Great Satan. The motive of the terrorists is to launch Islamic Jihad on Christian Citadel to bring about the decline of the New World and the rise of the Old World.

 

Terrorist attacks have historically been the favored form of warfare by invaders seeking to conquer the civilizations by deception and ruse. Spanish Pizzarro and Cortez were terrorists and succeeded in destroying the Inca and Maya empires. All the damage suffered by United States in all wars it has fought in history, the 19 Wahhabi hijacker-terrorists caused more economic damage to the United States. Hitler, William Kaiser and Imperial Japan could inflict less damage to United States, than 9/11 attacks.

 

The motive of the terrorists, fueled by religious zeal or ideological fervor is the total downfall of the civilization, and the only suitable response could be the total annihilation of the home base of the terrorist ideology or terrorist cult. Whichever religious or ideological or political organizations organized these Sept. 11 attacks must be identified and neutralized, if the Civilization serious about avoiding the repeat of these attacks, in this country or in other countries. The hard reality is that technologically advanced society is highly vulnerable to the terrorist attacks. The advance Civilization may punish the perpetrators after the event, but it cannot stop the attacks from happening.

 

EXPENSE OF DEFENSE OF THE HOMELAND:

Counter terrorism defensive measures of Homeland security would increase the cost to the Civilizations, and fails to make them fool proof. Counter terrorism offensive measures are better solution for the terrorism problem. The large Battleships of the 19th century became obsolete because it became too expensive. The cost of developing offensive weapons is much less than the cost of increasing the defensive capability of the weapon platforms. The aircraft carriers become obsolete as and highly vulnerable to the Precision-Guided-Munitions technology equipped anti-ship cruise missiles. Similarly, the increased Budget of the Homeland Security could bring about the similar economic bind to the US economy. It would be cheaper to conquer and destroy the home base of the terrorists and support-base of the terrorists than to spend billions in creating fortress America, which would fail to check and neutralize terrorists. Historically barbarian terrorists made ingenious military improvisation to use current technology for military purposes. The 9/11 hijackers conceived of using commercial airliner as cruise missiles, transforms the nature of war in the 21st century. The terrorists need not import weapons as they can improvise the commercially available products to cause destructions. Rather than increasing the bureaucracy of Homeland security, which can never be full proof, the better alternative shall be to undertake pre-emptive strikes against the home base and support base of the terrorists worldwide. Just customary international law of piracy allows, the prosecution and execution of the Pirates, its extension to include acts of terrorism should allow any civilized nation to undertake preemptive military strikes to punish every terrorist nation and every nation that sponsors terrorism. Wahhabi hijackers caused economic damage of at least $1 trillion to the American economy and people. Like German people were forced to pay War Reparation for the First World War, the terrorism sponsoring nations must pay at least $1 trillion in Terrorism Reparation to the victims of the Terrorism worldwide. The customary international Law allows preemptive strikes to force the terrorism sponsoring nations pay the Terrorism Reparation. Against Islamic terrorism the offensive terrorism reparation is the best defense. Very large expenses for Homeland security would make the cost of governance very high and may make American economy less competitive.

 

JUST WAR ON IRAQI TERRORISM: President Bush’s War on Iraq, the preemptive strikes against Iraq is a Just War, because Civilizations cannot wait for the terrorists to attack first before retaliation. Convention of American Catholic Bishop’s recently decided that president Bush’s war on Iraq is not justified as Just War. Would the independent commission investigate: whether any European Christian religious organization played any role in the organization and planning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent Anthrax attacks on the Capitol? The Independent Commission may conclude after 18 months that the 9/11 attacks were just the first salvo of attacks as a part of wider conspiracy, a form of Counter Reformation War underway to bring down the greatest Protestant Civilization of the world and to undermine the WASPs control over the United States. The Independent Commission may conclude that in the Clash of Civilization, and War or Religions and Global Clash of Races, Brown Hindu India and White Protestant United States would be on the same side of the battle lines. Ironically Dr. Henry Kissinger may have to conclude as the Chairman of the Independent Commission just reverse of all what he preached and did all his life as the foreign policy maker of the United States, during Nixon and Ford Administration. The Independent panel should not rule out at the very outset, without thorough investigation, of the possibility, how so ever remote it may be, of the direct or indirect possible role of Saudi Arabia and Mecca, Vatican and the Papacy in the Wahhabi terrorist attacks of Sept. 11.

 

18(19) EU Holy Roman Empire

The European Union might become the reincarnated version of Habsburg Holy Roman Empire to represent the political aspirations of European Catholics and Catholic nations, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Poland. After 9/11 it would impossible for Europeans to accept the entry of Muslim Turkey into the Christian European Union. The Vatican played an important role in the birth of European Union and to denigrate the concept of the national sovereignty. The concept of supra national state of European Union fits perfectly with the concept of Universal Church headed by Pope and Universal Christian Empire headed by the elected head of the Christian laity. The European Union was tailor made to become the Holy Roman Empire of the 21st Century. Pope John Paul II took leadership role in mobilizing public opinion in France and Germany to oppose Protestant President Bush’s war on Iraq, as it might sabotage Pope’s dream to control the Christian holy properties in the Palestine controlled Holy Land. Pope John Paul II blessed President Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder, when they led world opposition against President Bush’s war on Iraq. Germany, Belgium and European Union took the lead to engineer the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Catholic Croatia from Yugoslavia. India would oppose European Union if it became a tool of the Vatican. India would support European Union if it followed French Richeliu’s ideal to keep Papacy under check. It is no accident that Italy rebuffed Pope John Paul II and openly supported President Bus’s War on Iraq. European Union could become a monster if it became a willing tool in the hands of the conservative Pope.

 

Expanded European Union is the 21st Century incarnation of Habsburg Holy Roman Empire that launched anti-Protestant Counter Reformation Thirty Years Wars (1618-1648). The expanded European Union in 2002 looks like the Charles V’s Habsburg Central European empire, composed of what is today Germany, Austria, Northern Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Eastern France, Belgium and Netherlands. The eastward expansion of European Union and NATO to include East European countries has revived the possibility of Pope-led European Union Holy Roman Empire. If the expanded European Union and 26-member NATO succeed in establishing central control over all counties in the alliance, non-Christian world, Hindu, Buddhist, Orthodox and Islamic world, would become perilously weak in relation to the Protestant-Catholic Western Christendom. The European Union like the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire aligned with Vatican to realize the Medieval aspiration of universality, so that one Western Christendom’s Empire, called European Union would rule over the secular world and one Pope over the Universal Christian Church. The 26-member NATO is an imperial coalition out to conquer the Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu world for Western Christendom, in the 21st Century. Militarily the Western Christian Crusades can takeover and convert the entire Islamic world in the 21st Century. The Western Christendom can militarily restore the former Christian lands of Libya, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey to the folds of Christian Civilization. Middle East, North Africa and Arabia belonged to Gnostic, Arian Apostolic Christian Civilization before the Muslim invaders imposed Islam by sword on these lands. Christian sword is mightier than Islamic sword and Crusades of 21st Century could militarily eradicate Islam from the Middle East in the 21st Century. Should Hindu India, Buddhist China and Orthodox Russia join forces with Western Christian European Holy Roman Empire to restore Christianity to North Africa, Arabia and the Middle East? 

 

STATE SOVEREIGNTY UNDERMINED: The concept of sovereignty, nation states was systematically undermined in the Western Europe in the name of the new internationalism of Europeanism, by Eurocrats and universal Catholic Church, to weaken the forces of patriotism, nationalism, so that Papacy by controlling the European Union could control the European states. The ideal of Single Universal State led by European Union, and the Single Universal Church led by Pope is almost realized, without rest of the world ever realizing its significance. The Pontificate of Pope John Paul II could go down in the history as the Thirty Years Cold War (1978- ). Papal forces successfully partitioned Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia in recent years, and had earlier engineered the secession of Ireland from Britain. President Ronald Reagan and Polish Bishop had agreed to unite the resources of the Polish Catholic Church and the CIA to destabilize Polish government, and this alliance of the CIA and the Church continued unabated when Polish Bishop became the Pope. The Vatican secret services have harnessed the power of the CIA to undermine sovereignty of the European states and expedited the unification of Europe by judicious use of campaign donation and vote banks to defeat anti-European candidates throughout Western Europe. Pope John Paul II beginning to look like Super Emperor of European Union, the goal that Papacy sought for during Medieval Dark Age is within grasp for Pope John Paul II in the 21st Century. Would Pope someday rule European Union Holy Roman Empire, as Super Emperor, with the blessing of the Protestant United States?

 

SPAIN FRANCE ITALY SHALL TAME PAPACY: The diplomats of Italy, Spain and France would undermine the power of the Papacy during first half of the 21st Century, as the rise of the Papacy is against the national interest of France, Spain and Italy. In the past, the Papal dream of the Universal State and the Universal Church were undermined by the determined opposition of the Catholic Kingdoms of France and Spain during Counter Reformation (1618-1648). A prince of the Church, Armand Jean du Plessis, Cardinal de Richelieu, First Minister of France from 1624 to 1642, realized that the progressive weakness of the Holy Roman Empire and Papacy, even more its disintegration, would enhance France’s security and with good fortune, enable it to expand eastward in Germany. At the fringe of Europe, France, Spain and England did not accept the authority of the Holy Roman Empire and the political authority of the Papacy. On July 18, 1870, The Vatican Council, in the Papal Bull "Pastor Aeternus" decreed that the Pope has supreme power in all matters of faith and discipline pertaining to pastors and the faithful and proclaimed that Pope has infallibility by divine assistance when in his apostolic office, i.e. speaking ex cathedra, he defines a doctrine of faith. On September 20, 1870, Italian King Victor Emmanuel II, entered Rome, and stripped Pope of all temporal power. The succession of Popes remained a prisoner of the Vatican until 1929, when Pope Pius XI, signed a treaty with Italy. The issue is whether Pope John Paul II would lead Papacy become Emperor Pope or result in the taming of the Papacy, similar to the 1870-1929 when Pope was the prisoner of the Vatican. What de Richelieu was for France during Thirty Years Wars, the Counter Reformation Wars, King Victor Emmanuel II was for Italy’s unification in the late 19th Century. The unholy nexus of Mafia and Church has destabilized post-War governments in Italy and imposed a Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti, head of Christian Democrats seven times prime minister of Italy. Christian Democrats was a party of Mafia, Church and Crook politicians. After 1945, the Church of Rome demonstrated its capability to rule and undermine secular state of Italy, by policy of continuous political instability, which saw Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti become seven-time prime minister of Italy. Italy in November 2002 became the first country in the world to jail seven-time Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti and crime boss Gaetano Badalmenti for 24 years, in the same trial for the same crime. Papacy has undermined Spanish influences in Hispanic America, under the protection of the Monroe doctrine to consolidate the stronghold of Catholic Church throughout Hispanic America. Catholic Church has joined forces with white Catholic paramilitary death squads and white Catholic Cocaine cartels to consolidate the power of the Catholic Church in Hispanic America. Spain, France, and Italy would formulate their foreign policy based on the principle of Raison D’etat and enforce the State supervision of the Church and the modernization of the organizational structure of the Roman Catholic Church. Incidentally only Protestant-majority states Germany and United States accept and promote the concept of Universal Catholic Church, because Vatican promoted the concept of Germany-led European Union as German Holy Empire and USA-led NAFTA, OAS and NATO as American Holy Empire. However, Protestant George W. Bush would not accept the concept of Papal influence over American Empire. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder would conclude that dreams of German nationalism and German national interests conflicts with the Papal influence over European Union. As regards Papal dreams of grandeur, France, Spain, Italy, Germany and America would vehemently oppose Vatican’s diplomatic adventurism. Spain, France, Italy, Germany and United States would oppose the Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. The ultra-conservative Pontificate of Pope John Paul II would fail due to the overextension of resources of the Church in the secular and diplomatic arena. It is possible in response to the overextension of the Church, the secular government of Italy, with the consent of Spain and France, may abolish the sovereignty of the Vatican and order the decolonization of the Papal overseas Empire of Churches. Could China undertake military and diplomatic retaliation against the sovereign state of the Vatican, in response to the excessive involvement of the Vatican in non-religious, secular and diplomatic affairs. Could non-Christian states undertake military action against sovereign state of Vatican, as they would against other sovereign states?

 

NATO AS ADVERSARY OF EUROPEAN UNION: Expanded European Union led by United Germany and disgruntled France is on the collision course with 26-member NATO. The national interests of Germany and France led European Union, conflicts with the national interests of America led NATO, especially after its eastward expansion to include Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic in 1999, and agreeing to officially invite Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 2002, it became 26-member Alliance. Germany has begun to view the American military bases in Germany as foreign occupation forces, the reminder of Germany’s defeat in the Second World War. Japan also views American military bases on Japanese soil as foreign occupation forces. France views USA-UK led NATO as the assault on the political leadership of European Union. The purpose of the USA Britain alliance is to neutralize the economic and political dominance of Germany and France. The triple Alliance of United States, Britain and the Vatican undermines the power of Germany and France in the European Union, which could transform the expanded European Union and NATO become instrument for the subjugation of Western Europe, rather than the vehicle for the development of independent European military deterrent. American wants European Union, France and Germany to remain military weak and vulnerable. Under the leadership of Pope John Paul II the Counter Reformation War has begun, determined to smother the nationalistic and patriotic aspirations of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Austria. United Stats and Papacy have joined forces to promote Universal American Holy Roman Empire in the Americas and the Europe, in return Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy would anoint Pope as the Ruler of all Christian Churches-Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Churches. 

 

The basic premise of the European Union had been the political leadership of France in the European Union, and the economic leadership of Germany in the European Union and United States military leadership in the NATO. However, with the expansion of USA-led NATO to include ten East European states, to become 26-member Alliance, has eroded the economic, military relevance and role of France and Germany in the expanded NATO. After the demise of the Soviet Union, decline of Russia, and the Unification of Germany, European wanted to become an autonomous military power independent of United States. Expansion of NATO to include 10 East European countries allowed United States become independent of the continued support of the West Europe. Technically the 26-member US-led NATO could use the resources of the NATO to wage war on Germany and France, in the event Germany deploys nuclear weapons and charts out an independent policy. Unless Spain and Portugal allowed develop military ties with Hispanic America and Brazil independently, Spain and Portugal would consider United States a major adversary. Unless France allowed develop closer military ties with Canada, Quebec, Algeria and French Africa, the France would consider United States adversary. The extension of NATO to include 10 East European countries has dramatically enhanced the military preponderance of the United States in Europe to the detriment of the national security of Germany and France. It is very likely that the economic union of European Union would devise measures to develop independent military capability, technically even to oppose the aggressive designs of the expanded NATO. In the absence of the Russian threat, the 26-member NATO became imperial coalition of the Christendom. The extension of NATO to Central Asia and Afghanistan raises the specter of 21st Century version of Alexander’s imperial armies, reaching towards Hindu India landward. The 26-member NATO and 20-member Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council if enter into alliance, would bring the former colonial powers the direct land access from English Channel to India. It threatens the national interests of Eurasian continental land powers, namely, France, Germany, Russia, China, and India. Expanded US-led NATO presents grave security threats to Germany, France, Russia, China and India. Eastward expansion of NATO presents Western Christendom-led imperial coalition’s great threat to Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox Civilizations. The eastward expansion of NATO requires diplomatic and geopolitical counter measures to restore the equilibrium in the post-Cold War new world order.

 

Boris Yeltsin led the revolt of the constituent states of the Soviet Union to secure the independence of Russia and the removal of Gorbachev and in the process brought about the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Similarly, France and Germany may decide that US-led NATO is hindrance than asset towards making Germany and France world powers in the post-Cold War new world order. Germany and France may leave NATO to create independent European military capability. France under Charles de Gaulle had left NATO. Germany and France aligned with India can develop credible military capability. Germany and France would leave NATO and develop closer military ties with India, Japan, Russia and Canada. Germany, Japan and Canada would also develop nuclear weapon capability to tame the hegemony of the United States. European Union and NATO would die the natural death due to the unwise decision of Eastward over-extension. Nuclear India should double its efforts to develop military ties with Germany, France, and Japan. Germany, France, Russia, Japan and India coalition would become the Second Bloc and the Second Pole in the new world order.

 

Christian EU Excluded Muslim Turkey

Whenever Turkey joins European Union, it would result in the decline of the France, Germany and Britain in the European Union. France would no longer remain the political leader of the EU, Britain no longer the military leader of the EU and Germany no longer the largest country in the EU. Overextension of European Union would hasten the decline of Western Europe, especially France and Germany. The entry of Muslim Turkey could choke European Union to death. The Vatican and United States encouraging the senseless expansion of European Union, to eliminate France and unified Germany as the leaders of European Union. After the extension of the European Union and NATO, the European Union would economically choke to death, while America-led NATO would become militarily stronger and Germany and France would become marginal players in NATO.

 

United States in an unusually direct move into the politics of European integration, is campaigning vigorously to advance turkey’s prospects for entering the European Union, so that European Union could die a natural death by admitting a large Muslim state, which would soon overtake Germany as the most populous state in the European Union. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz urged European Union nations to set a date fro initiating negotiations on Turkey’s eventual membership. “The decision on E.U. members is of course Europe’s to make, but history suggests that a European Union that welcomes Turkey will be even stronger, safer and more richly diverse than it is today. The alternative, exclusionary choice is surely unthinkable,” said Paul D. Wolfowitz. America indirectly criticized that European Union is less richly diverse today and the alternative to the Turkey’s inclusion shall be an exclusionary choice, which is surely unthinkable.

 

American wants the European Union to expand so that NATO is able to expand Europe–wide and eastward towards Central Asia. However, after the inclusion of Eastern Europe the leadership role of former colonial powers would get diluted. The new comers would look forward leadership of United States rather than that of Germany and France. The new comers would prefer joining NATO to protect them against Soviet aggression and also against German aggression. The East European new comers would erode the economic and military potential of Western Europe. Enlarged European union would fail to become independent military power, independent of the United States-led NATO. Whenever turkey becomes a full-fledged member of the European Union, the Ottoman’s would be getting a direct access to the center of Europe and Ottomans would not longer be stopped at the gates of Vienna. Expansion of European Union would enhance the military role of United States in Europe and undermine the military potential of France and Germany. It is very likely that whenever Germany or France opt out of the NATO, the new member states of Eastern Europe would love to use American Arms to browbeat Germany and France into submission in the Third World War.

 

“If Turkey is allowed to join the European Union, it would mark the end of the Union as we know it,” said former president of France, Valery Giscard d’Estaing, Chair, Convention on the Future of Europe. Mr. Giscard d’Estaing deserves credit as he has brought a debate into the open that is often avoided. French views on Turkey undoubtedly shared by many political leaders in Europe. Europeans fear that Turkey is too big and too alien to join the European Union. European Union is founded on Christian values and it would be destabilizing to admit a Muslim state, even a secular one. Turkey is too big, it will soon have a larger population than Germany, and too economically backward to be accommodated. The enlargement of the European Union is going to transform the nature of the West European bloc. The new member states admitted at the Copenhagen Summit in December 2002 are not as big as Turkey, but they are closer to Turkey economically. A 25-member EU will be more fluid and varied than the present club of 15. New members should become easier to absorb.

 

18(20) Bush’s Idea of Oil Empire

REALITY OF AMERICAN IMPERIALISM: The reality of the contemporary world order or the international community where the mankind live in, in “the reality-based community” is the hard reality that democratic capitalist liberal United States is also an “American Empire” where Imperial agents operating out of the White House are free to implement with impunity the wishes and policies of the President, and when these imperial agents of the White House acts, it creates its own reality and the action become legitimate in the new world order. The fundamental reality of the reality-based international community or world order is that when American Empire, the hegemon, the sole super power acts, America creates its own reality. The United States in 2006, as the sole super power of the world, with continental-size land mass and more than 287 million population, and GNP of more than $12 trillion, is undoubtedly is the “legitimate Roman Empire” of the world. The Washington DC is the Rome of the world. The theory of International realism states that diplomacy in International politics seeks to enhance the power of the State. It is an undeniable fact that United States became the de facto sole super power of the world after the decline of the Soviet Union and became the de jure sole super power of the world after the collapse of the fall of the Berlin Wall, or the fall of the communist regimes in the Eastern Europe, or demise of the Soviet Union. United States is the undisputed Hegemon of the world, and writ of the White House runs around the world. The terms, “Sole Super Power,” “Hegemon,” “Unilateralist Power,” are synonymous and interchangeable with “Imperial America,” or “American Empire.” The cardinal principle of American foreign policy in successive American administrations of President Reagan, President Bush (Sr.), President Bill Clinton, and present President George W. Bush Administration has been, “America is an Empire now. When America acts, America creates its own reality in international politics.”  

 

AMERICAN EMPIRES CREATES REALITY: The key to understanding the Bush administration and its policies is George Bush’s concept of international reality in contemporary world order. George Bush understands the role international reality plays in the post-Soviet Union, where United States is the sole super power of the world, where United States is the hegemon of the world, where United States is free to pursue American Unilateralism. The reality of the “the reality-based community” in the present new world order is that United States can afford to if it chooses to contemptuously dismiss the international community that most of nations of the world live in, “the reality-based community.” The times have changed after the demise of the Soviet Union, after the call of the Communism in the Eastern Europe and the rise of America as the sole super power of the world, and the present day reality isn’t what it used to be, during the Cold War. American policy makers can declare for the world to hear, “We are an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.”

 

US EMPIRE’S COVERT OPERATIONS: President Dwight Eisenhower worked hard to end European colonialism, because United States didn’t have colonies of its own, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill refused to hand over half of the British Empire to United States in exchange for the British War Debt. After the CIA learnt the art of engineering military coups in Iran in 50’s, the American Empire after the Second World War, took the form of military coups against rulers or implanting American agents as Presidents, Prime Ministers or Kings by covert operations. The CIA became the principal instrument of American Empire in the Bipolar world and during the Cold War.  

 

NEW AGE OF OIL-COLONIALISM: While decolonization process characterized the post-second world war world order, the 21st century heralded the new age of colonialism, in form of oil-colonialism. The age of colonialism would by no means go away. The colonial empires shall stage a come back during the first quarter of the 21st Century. President Bush has opened the genie of oil colonialism during the American invasion of Iraq. The terrorist attack of 9/11/2001 was a turning point in history and it resulted in the naked American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. American imperial invasion of Iraq, though justified on grounds of terrorism, was in fact the first attempt by American Empire to create American Oil Colonialism, which leveraged America’s unique position as the sole super power of the world in the post-Soviet Union and post-Cold War international system. The first reality that defined the 21st Century, is that when President Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq overruling rest of the world, including so-called great powers, namely, China, Russia, Germany, France and Japan, not a single nation came out militarily in support of Iraq. The second reality that defines the 21st Century is that United States could invade and conquer Iraq with the loss of no more than 100 casualties of American and allied forces throughout invasion of Iraq. President George Bush is a historical person and he understands that as the leader of the world’s sole super power, he has the power, resources, will and military capability to change the course of history. President Bush has decided to exercise his executive Presidential powers to usher in a new age of oil colonial empires in the 21st century.

 

SPICES & OIL & MIDDLE EAST CAUSED WARS: Middle Eastern Ottomans’ increase in the price of Indian spices in transit to Europe, crucial for the preservation of meats, resulted in the rise of European colonial empire. Europe’s economic need for Indian spices to preserve meats for use in winter, resulted in the European colonial empires. European greed for gold had created permanent European settlements throughout European colonial empires. Post-Columbus European colonial empires were the by-product of West European’s economic need for Indian spices and love for gold. Indian spices were very important ingredient for the long-term preservation of meat and other edible perishables. The Ottoman Empire blocked the direct trade of Europe with India in spices. The maritime circumnavigation of the world was the direct result of Middle Eastern Ottoman blocking the direct trade route between Europe and India.

 

OIL PRICES JUSTIFIES OIL COLONIALISM: Middle Eastern OPEC increase in the price of crude oil, crucial for the survival of world economy, used by the industrial economies of Europe, Asia and North America has caused the rise of a new age of oil colonialism. President Bush invaded Iraq and created a de facto American colonial empire in Iraq and has ushered in a new age of oil colonialism and the world shall witness the rise of many oil colonial empires during 21st century. President Bush invaded Iraq to protect American energy security. President Bush may again invade Iran to further strengthen America’s energy security.

 

US INVASION OF IRAN IS WISE ACT: President Bush was wise in invading Iraq, before Iraq could have acquired Atom Bombs. Israel wisely bombed the nuclear reactor of Iraq, which could have helped Iraq develop nuclear weapons. President Bush has full right, albeit to invade Iran to prohibit Iraq from acquiring nuclear weapons and to forcibly destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment plants. Throughout world history, whenever barbarians gain access to new military technologies, they have misused it to invade, conquer and destroy civilizations. Ottomans used the cannon technology to invade, conquer and destroy Christian Orthodox Byzantine Empire, to murder or convert Christian men and forcibly married Christian women of the Byzantine Empire and destroyed Eastern Roman Empire and converted it into a Sunni Muslim empire, hereafter called Ottoman Caliphate. Just as Roman Empire came under attack of barbarians from north and ultimately Roman Empire disintegrated when the Pope made a secret pact with the barbarian king, similarly barbarian attack of 9/11/2001, replicates the threat Roman Empire faced when barbarians attacked Rome.

 

INVASION OF IRAN IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE: Since sole super power United States is an American Empire now, it must act to undertake preemptive strikes and invasion of Iran to ensure that Iran is permanently barred from acquiring nuclear weapons. As a leader of American Empire, President Bush would be failing in his duty and responsibility as an Imperial leader if United States develops cold feet and fail to invade Iran, in case intransigent Iran continues to defy Non Proliferation Treaty. India has a moral obligation albeit duty to militarily support any Pentagon’s plan for the invasion of Iran, in case Iran continues with its nuclear weapon program. Iranian Nuclear weapons present dire geopolitical threat to India as well as the United States. Iranian nuclear program is against India’s national interests and also against the national interest of the United States and rest of the civilized world. The civilized world has the moral duty to support the preemptive strikes against Iran to keep nuclear technology out of the hands of Iranians.

 

OIL CARTEL JUSTIFIES OIL COLONIALISM: The new imperial power of the 21st century may acquire legitimate rights over the oil-lands, since Semite Arabs were not the original inhabitants of these lands, before the rise of Islam, and the original inhabitants, belonging to brown and black races were slaughtered by camel riding Arab Muslim invaders, who forcibly married brown and black womenfolk. The oil-rich lands of the Middle East did not belong to Arabs or Muslims. Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Libya and Algeria were Hindu nations and they worshipped Hindu gods and goddesses. Some of them became Christians in the 4th Century. Roman Empire, Mediterranean Europe and North Africa and Asia Minor worshipped Hindu pagan gods and sun god. After the birth of Islam, camel riding Arab Bedouin armies, funded by Jews of Damascus, invaded and defeated the armies of Egypt, Syria, Libya, and Algeria and conquered these lands and massacred the brown peoples that lived and owned these lands and forcibly married brown and black women of North Africa. Iran is an Aryan nation and practiced Zoroastrianism, the sun worshippers, where Zoroastrian scripture Zed Avestha is very similar to Hindu scripture Rig Veda. Arab race has occupied the lands of pagans and Hindus by sword. Arabs are not the original inhabitants of Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya and Algeria, and the original inhabitants of these lands in North Africa were brown and black people mostly with non-curly hair.

 

18(21) Conclusions

Rise of India & China as World Powers

The world’s geopolitical chessboard significantly changed after the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001 during the first year of the President Bush 43 Administration. China and India have regained the historical leadership role Chinese and Indian civilizations have historically played in the world history. For most of humanity China and India were world’s largest and second largest economies and most advanced civilizations. In 1750, China produced 32.8 percent of world’s total manufactured goods and India produced 24.5 percent of the world’s total manufactured goods. The total share of the white Western Europe and North America and Western Christendom was 18.7 percent of the world’s total manufactured goods and Japan produced only 3.8 percent of the world’s manufactured goods. India and China stagnated after 1450.

 

Nato’s Imperial Dreams in Asia

NATO crosed the Rubicon and signaled its intention to emerge as imperial coalition in Afghanistan. NATO heads of government meeting in Prague in 2002 endorsed a new mission for the alliance, stating that it could no longer limit itself to its traditional area of operations and must meet new challenges and threats wherever they emerge. While many NATO members have independently sent military units to Afghanistan, the aid to the peacekeeping forces marks the first role there by the alliance as an organization.” The Rubicon has been crossed.

 

The end of Cold War also meant the end of the Age of Ideology and the birth of New Diplomacy. Diplomacy not the ideology would determine international diplomacy in the post 9/11 Age. National interests and balance of power not ideology shall determine the diplomacy in the post-Cold War world order.

 

The 9/11 attacks sounded the death warrant on the legitimacy of smaller nations that misused concept the independence and sovereignty of nation states to harbor terrorists and sponsor religious terrorism and intolerance. The 9/11 attacks eroded the legitimacy of the newly independent states that emerged as a result of the decolonization. President George W. Bush wisely enunciated the new ‘Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First” national security strategy. It justified preemptive strikes against terrorists, because in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the civilizations would be foolish to allow barbarians strike first. The main sound bytes of the year 2002 had been President Bush’s attack on Afghanistan and its failure to capture even a single top leader of Al Qaeda terrorist network.

 

USA No Longer Hegemon

America is no longer preponderant power in the post 9/11 world as it claims it is. The collapse of the Soviet Union the tenth largest economy in the world doesn’t make preponderant power, because it hasn’t increased its lead over the number two, three and fourth largest powers in the world. The population and Gross Domestic Product (GNP at PPP) of ten largest economies are: United States ($8.35 Trillion, 273 million), China ($4.11 Trillion, 1.25 Billion), Japan ($3.04 Trillion, 127 million), India ($2.15 trillion, 1 billion), and Germany ($1.84 trillion, 82 million).

 

Wislonianism Ideological Camouflage

President Woodrow Wilson’s Wilsonianism followed by successive Amrican Administrations, crudely camouflages the national interests of ruthless Roosevelt’s Realpolitik and American imperialism. The Brezhnev Doctrine justified Soviet military intervention to change political regimes in Czechoslavakia, Hungary and other East European satellite states. United States attained similar colonial objectives by perfecting the art of the CIA encouraged military coups to overthrow the allies or adversaries to bring into power the pro-American regimes. During Cold War, the United States proved to be the mortal enemy of democracy and freedom of the democratic politics in the Thrid World. During Cold War, United States encouraged military coups to install pro-American military regimes in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Inddonesia, Philippines, Congo, Greece, Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Chile, Argentina, Peru, Ecuador, Nicaragua, etc. Secretary Henry Kissinger declared that Washington considers covert operations more legitimate than military intervention, to bring about the desired regime changes. (Diplomacy, p. 524)

 

Would Russia Lose Eastern Siberia?

Only India can save Russia from Nato-China joint invasions for the secession of Eastern Siberia. Demography is the cause of the decline of Russia. Russian population would decline by 22 million in next 15 years. Only by expediting the immigration of 10 million Indians to Siberia could Russia ward off the Chinese invasions of Siberia, short of nuclear retaliation. Sick weakened nuclear giant Russian Bear has been cornered into the cave. The Yankee hunters have captured its 10 Cubs and brainwashed the Baby Bears to join the hunters and hounds in the chase of the wounded Bear. The Big Prize is the continental-size Siberia. Once Russia loses the Siberia, then Russia one among the equals in the Europe. The secession of Siberia would end the Russian menace to West Europe and East Europe forever. The best scenario for the secession of Siberia is the rise of a local Siberian leader, with the guts to take on the Kremlin. Henry Kissinger has prepared the American policy makers that it would be in the interest of United States to help China invade and conquer Siberia, just as it was in the interest of the West that Germany, under Hitler and William Kaiser invaded Russia. Would China be naïve enough to take the American bait to invade Siberia, when it could very easily takeover Malaysia and Indonesia? What options do the cornered Russian Bear has? What choices Communist China would make? What should be the policy of India in the event of Chinese invasions of Siberia? Would Japan support United States or join the war on the side of Russia?

 

New Age of Covert Operations

Covert Operations became the preferred instrument of foreign policy in the 21st Century. The Western Colonial Empires built by the covert operations of the private companies and daring individuals. Robert Clive built empire in Bengal by the covert operation in the Battle of Plassey, where he used the funds provided by the Millionaire Hindu trader to bribe the Vizier of the ruler, who stepped aside when the war began. Cortez took over the Maya and Aztez Empires in Mexico and Central America. Pizzarro conquered the Incas by deception. Cecil Rhodes created colonies in Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) and Zambia. British Empire built on the stratagem of Divide & Rule and the diplomacy of deception, newspeak and ruse. Prime Minister Blair declared the intention of Britain to recreate empires in the 21st Century, by adopting policy of deception and ruse and bribery. Henry Kissinger argues in Diplomacy that during Cold War United States frequently encouraged military coups to overthrow the democratically elected government, and Washington considered covert operations more legitimate than military intervention. (Diplomacy, p. 524) In the age of covert military operations and covert military coups, the America’s CIA became more effective foreign policy enforcer than the Pentagon.

 

Pakistan is New Caliph of Islam

Hindu India can buy peace in the Subcontinent by encouraging Pakistan to exercise its rights as the New Caliph of Islam to create Ottoman Empire-type Pakistani Empire in the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East. India can buy peace in the subcontinent by militarily supporting Pakistan in establishing Islamabad Caliphate. Islam does not believe in separate nation state. Koran extols the most powerful Islamic nation to attempt the conquest of the entire Islamic world, to bring the entire Muslim Ulema under a single rule. Either Turkey or Pakistan has the military capability to unite the entire Islamic world under one rule. Pakistan is the greatest military power in the Islamic world and has inherited the Ottoman Caliphate after it became nuclear power. It is moral imperative for Pakistan to attempt the conquest of Saudi Arabia and other Arab Islamic nations. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Palestine, United Arab Emirates had never been states or nations in the history. Arabian Peninsula had either been part of Egypt, Persia or Turkey.

 

Should Pakistan Conquer Saudi Arabia?

India should support Aryan Shiite Iran to expedite the secession of Shiite Al Hasa region from Saudi Arabia. India should support the claims of Pakistan, Turkey or Iran as the new Caliph of Islam and new custodian of the Islamic holy cities of Mecca & Medina. Nuclear Pakistan would soon realize that while China and United States and Britain help in militarily supporting Pakistan against India, these nations would not allow Pakistan acquire sphere of influence in the Middle East. Like any major power of the world, nuclear Pakistan, the New Caliph of Islam, the preponderant military power of the Islamic world, has legitimate need to carve out a sphere of influence or colonies in the Middle East to secure its need for crude oil. Muslim Pakistan can militarily conquer every Muslim country from Iran to Morocco, one country at a time, single handedly. Nuclear stalemate prohibits India to conquer militarily weaker Pakistan, so India would have to expand eastward in Southeast Asia. Stalemate in Kashmir, and enmity with Afghanistan would force Pakistan to realize that peace with India, allows Pakistan to conquer one or two oil-producing countries in the Arabian Gulf. Herein lies the rationale for India-Pakistan Defense Pact or India-Pakistan No War Pact.

 

Shiite Control over Mecca & Medina

India should support Aryan Shiite Iran to expedite the secession of Shiite Al Hasa region from Saudi Arabia. Shiite control over Mecca and Medina would solve the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism. United States and India should transfer power in Iraq and Saudi Arabia to Arab Shiite Muslims. Non-Muslim nations should employ the diplomacy of Divide and Rule to support Shiite Arabs to tame the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism. Saudi Arabia historically had either been part of Egypt or Persia. The Arab Shiites in Iraq represent 65 percent of Iraq, while Sunni Arabs represent only 15 percent of the Iraq’s population. In the oil-producing Al Hasa province on the Gulf Coast of Saudi Arabia, the Shiites are in majority. By transferring the political power in the Arabian Peninsula to Arab Shiites, the menace of Sunni Wahhabi terrorism can be tamed, albeit eradicated. In terms of military capability Shiites could easily takeover Sunnis in the Arabian Peninsula. Sunni Kurds would also join alongside Shiites to wage wars on Sunni Wahhabi Arabs. The grand coalition of Shiites, Kurds, Turks and Afghans could overthrow the oppressive pro-terrorism Wahhabi regimes in the Arabian Peninsula.

 

India Iran Defense Pact

Since United States would not topple the Ayatollah’s regime in Iran, replacing it with democratically elected government in Iran, it is high time that Hindu Aryan India develops closer military ties with Aryan Iran. Representing the religious interests of Christian religious right conservatism, President Jimmy Carter overthrew the liberal regime of Shah of Iran and scuttled the democratic regime of Prime Minister Bani Sadr and forbade military coup in Iran to install arch fundamentalist Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in power in Iran and thereby legitimized Islamic militant fundamentalism. Southern Baptist President Jimmy Carter may be called the ‘Father of Islamic Fundamentalism.’ President Ronald Reagan continued cooperation with Ayatollah’s Iran ofr covert operations in Nicaragua Contra affairs. Imprisonment of American embassy personnel was just a sham act to hide the CIA-Ayatollah Khomeini ties.

 

Eastward Expansion of NATO

The 9/11 incident exploited by President Bush to justify the eastward expansion of NATO to establish military bases in Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, in the southern belly of Russia. The 9/11 made Covert Operations more effective instruments of policy. America China strategic alliance threatened Russia’s Eastern Siberia. The eastward expansion of Nato to military bases in Afghanistan and Uzbekistan and America’s military bases in Pakistan and Afghanistan presents great security threat to India, Iran and Russia. India and Iran should develop solid military ties to develop permanent military ties and to develop joint rapid deployment brigades to undertake military operations in the Gulf region. Hindu democratic India should overcome its inhibition of conducting closer diplomatic and military ties with the fundamentalist theocratic regime in Iran, because irrespective of the character of the political regime of Iran, the geopolitics of Iran, determines that the national interests of Iran and India coincide in the age of the predominance of the coalition of 26-member Nato alliance, US-China, US-Pakistan and US-Afghanistan in Southern Asia and the Middle East. The principles of Raison d’etat and Balance of Power requires that India and Iran should develop military alliance to ward off potential Nato’s invasions of Iran or India or Russia. Maritime alliance of India and Iran will in geopolitical terms control the Arabian Gulf, making it a Persian Lake or Indian Lake. Proven capability of Indian and Iranian Navy’s capability to close Arabian Gulf shipment of Gulf crude would effectively deter any hostile NATO invasions of the Subcontinent. Nuclear Aryan Hindu India should formalize a defense Pact with Aryan Shiite Iran, based on geopolitical and racial and religious realities, and formalize common anti-Arab military Pact to enhance the roles of Indian and Iranian Navy in the Arabian Gulf. India, Iran and Russia triangle would neutralize the threat posed by the USA, Nato and Pakistan triangle. In spite of the friendly gestures of the United States, India Iran and Russia should form alliance to ward of the destabilizing role of the USA, Nato and Pakistan Alliance and Sino-US Alliances. Since there is no possibility of either the restoration of Pahlevi Monarchy or democracy in Iran, Hindu India must finalize closer military ties with Aryan Shiite Iran, before it is too late. Hindu India and Shiite Iran face the common enemy Wahhabi Arab terrorism, financed by Saudi Arabia and legitimized by Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca. Iranian control over Arabian Peninsula would not be against India’s national interest. Iranian control over Arabian Peninsula would not be against national interest of Pakistan either.

 

Revival of Inca Civilization in Ecuador

The rise of Inca Indian government in Ecuador is a turning point in history. Just as Jews returned and claimed the land of Jews in Israel in 1948, the Inca Indians in Ecuador reclaimed Ecuador for Inca Indians in 2002. Ecuador became the first country in the world to have an elected Inca Indian government in the end of 2002. Mr. Antonio Vargas (CINE-Indian) announced the formation of a three-man new governing Junta composed of Mr. Antonio Vargas, Colonel Lucio Gutierrez, and Carlos Solorzano, a former Supreme Court Chief Justice. "Triumvirate" three-man military-led Junta consisted of Gen. Carlos Mendoza, Mr. Antonio Vargas, and Justice Carlos Solorzano.

 

Ecuadorean Coup of 21s Jan 2000

The Ecuador’s coup, of 21st January 2000, represents the History's Turning Point in the New World, Which was occupied by Spaniards after 1500 AD. The main significance is that the Ecuador's Coup was not planned and engineered by Ecuador military's top brass. The lower level military officers joined forces with Indians to overthrow the President. Gen. Carlos Mendoza supported the coup only when it had become the reality. Gen. Carlos Mendoza, the armed forces commander briefly led a three-man junta, before stepping aside for Vice President Gustavo Noboa, sacrificing a brilliant career so the world would be spared the spectacle of a disoriented and destroyed Ecuador. More than a dozen colonels are in custody, awaiting trial on charges of sedition and conspiring against the constitutional order. Estimated 300 junior officers are under investigation. Gen. Telmo Sandoval, who supported the coup, has been promoted to commander of the armed forces, the position earlier occupied by Gen. Carlos Mendoza, who has now retired. Gen. Carlos Moncayo, who permitted Indians to seize the Congress building by withdrawing his troops, is still free. Rival military group encouraged by United staged a counter-coup to force Gen. Mendoza to disband the three-man Military Junta after 18 hours. Gen. Mendoza yielded because he feared that United States and Colombia might intervene militarily to defeat the three-man Junta. The moral of the story is that the Mestizo people of mixed Inca Indian and Spanish ancestry have a vested interest in restoring the Inca Religion, Inca language and Inca Civilization in the Andean Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. Inca Empire would stage a comeback in Andean America, because the brown Meztizos of mixed Inca and European ancestry associate themselves with Inca Indian roots than with Spanish ancestry. Brown Hindu India has a vested interest in rejuvenating the Inca Civilization, Inca Religion and Inca Culture in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. Just as Hindu India became independent after 700 years of Muslim rule and 200 years of Christian British rule, the Inca Ecuadorians and Peruvians and Bolivians would resurrect the glory of Inca civilization, which lost its poser only 500 years ago. The religion of God Virachocha and temples dedicated for his worship would become common and prominent throughout the erstwhile Inca Empire in Andean America. Just as 2,000 years after Jews were expelled from Jerusalem, Jews returned triumphantly in 1948 to Israel to reclaim their land for Judaism, the Inca Ecuadorians and Peruvians and Bolivians worked to reclaim the Ecuador for Inca civilization. It is truly a historical movement. It establishes that Inca civilization is alive and Inca God Virachocha would reclaim Andean America from iconoclast Roman Catholic Church in 21st Century. The Mestizos representing 85 percent of the population in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Honduras should form the government, by ending the monopoly of white Catholics over economic, military and political power.

 

Dr. Henry J. Kissinger

Secretary Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretary Madeleine Albright left indelible mark on America’s foreign policy no less than the impact Bolshevik Jew spymaster Lavrenti Beria left on Stalin’s regime in Soviet Union. The 90% of the politicians give the other 10% a bad reputation. Similarly 99.9% of the incompetent Diplomats give the other 0.1% a bad reputation. Without doubt Diplomat Henry Kissinger belongs to the select 0.1%, one in 1000 of the brilliant, qualified, real Diplomats, who have studied the art and science of diplomacy. Like his ideal, Bismarck, Diplomat Henry Kissinger was the class by himself. It is the dream of the author to negotiate with a Diplomat of his stature as a Diplomat from India. This book is a salute to the brilliance of Diplomat Kissinger, even when he had been a sworn enemy of India, the nation the author seeks to represent as a Diplomat some day. One wonders why they don’t make any more Diplomats like Dr. Henry J. Kissinger. Kissinger was actively involved in the establishment of Operation Condor, a covert plan involving six Latin American countries including Chile, to assassinate thousands of political opponents.

 

Dr. Kissinger saw the illegal, secret bombing of Cambodia and acquiesced to Indonesia’s 1975 invasion of East Timor. In 1973, the democratically elected government of Salvadore Allende in Chile was overthrown by military coup led by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, a goal Mr. Kissinger had long supported. Kissinger negated the Communist threat in America's back yard, most notably in Chile, though it cost lots of lives during the tyranny of Pinochet. Kissinger overthrew Salvadore Allende in Chile, but implanted Pol Pot over Cambodia. However, the end result was the same, lots of people died in Chile as well as in Cambodia.

 

EU is Holy Roman Empire

Expanded European Union is the 21st Century incarnation of Habsburg Holy Roman Empire that launched anti-Protestant Counter Reformation Thirty Years Wars (1618-1648). The expanded European Union in 2002 looks like the Charles V’s Habsburg Central European empire, composed of what is today Germany, Austria, Northern Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Eastern France, Belgium and Netherlands. The eastward expansion of European Union and NATO to include East European countries has revived the possibility of Pope-led European Union Holy Roman Empire. If the expanded European Union and 26-member NATO succeed in establishing central control over all counties in the alliance, non-Christian world, Hindu, Buddhist, Orthodox and Islamic world, would become perilously weak in relation to the Protestant-Catholic Western Christendom. The European Union like the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire aligned with Vatican to realize the Medieval aspiration of universality, so that one Western Christendom’s Empire, called European Union would rule over the secular world and one Pope over the Universal Christian Church. The 26-member NATO is an imperial coalition out to conquer the Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu world for Western Christendom, in the 21st Century. Militarily the Western Christian Crusades can takeover and convert the entire Islamic world in the 21st Century. The Western Christendom can militarily restore the former Christian lands of Libya, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey to the folds of Christian Civilization. Middle East, North Africa and Arabia belonged to Gnostic, Arian Apostolic Christian Civilization before the Muslim invaders imposed Islam by sword on these lands. Christian sword is mightier than Islamic sword and Crusades of 21st Century could militarily eradicate Islam from the Middle East in the 21st Century. Should Hindu India, Buddhist China and Orthodox Russia join forces with Western Christian European Holy Roman Empire to restore Christianity to North Africa, Arabia and the Middle East? 

 

Vatican-Mecca Axis of Fundamentalism

In historical terms the Rise of Papacy coincided with the Rise of Mecca and Expansion of Islam. The temporal power of the Catholic Pope was partly established in 754, when Pepin, King of Franks recognized such authority. In 774, Charlemagne confirmed the temporal power of Pope. In 1076, Princess Matilda, daughter of Duke of Boniface of Tuscany, made the Holy See heir to her possessions. Sunni Islam and Roman Catholicism are siblings and took birth in the seventh century and followed similar strategy in the propagation of their respective sects. Both sough the support of Jews in their expansion phase. Arab traders of Damascus joined forces with the Jewish traders of Damascus to finance the Muslim raiding parties, for a share of the loot and for profits from the sale of the looted merchandise. Hellenized Jews joined early Christian Church in Rome and hijacked the leadership of the Early Christian Church and imposed Old Testament on the New Testament in the Christian Bible. The Gnostic, Arian, apostolic Christianity didn’t allow Jews to influence the Christian dogma, which were derived from Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina, Zoroastrian, and Maggi theologies. Catholic Church didn’t give any support to the Apostolic Gnostic Arian Church of Damascus, Alexandria and elsewhere when Muslims attacked them. Catholics are a minority among Christians of Holy Land, and Papacy hopes that once Christian Holy properties are in the control of the Palestine Muslims, the Muslims would support Catholic takeover of the Orthodox religious properties in the Holy Land.

 

Wahhabi Mecca and Catholic Vatican joined forces to destroy and disintegrate Orthodox-majority Yugoslavia to carve out Catholic Slovenia, Catholic Croatia, Muslim Bosnia and Muslim Kosovo. Just as in the 1990s Church of Rome aligned with Muslims to destroy the Christian Yugoslavia, it aligned with Ottoman Turks to destroy the Byzantine Christian Civilization of Constantinople. Catholic and Evangelical fundamentalists seek fundamentalist Wahhabi Sunni as natural allies in Black Africa and it encourages the Wahhabi Sunni to impose Shariah Law replacing the Western laws, to coerce pagans chose either Islam or Christianity. Catholic fundamentalists and Protestant Evangelicals have traditionally aligned with fundamentalist Muslims to undermine non-Semite religions, namely, paganism, Hinduism and Buddhism. Catholics and Wahhabi use Shariah to undermine Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh, and to undermine Buddhists in Malaysia and Indonesia. Catholics and Muslim minorities have joined forces against Hindus in India. Catholics and Wahhabi fundamentalists have joined forces against black pagans in black Africa. This ongoing alliance of the Vatican with Mecca came under scrutiny after Protestant United States declared war on Islamic terrorism. However, Catholic religious right conservative conspiracy worked overtime to sabotage Protestant president Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism, as a result America failed to capture even one leader of Al Qaeda terrorist network, in spite of large deployment of the Armed forces and materials to the Afghan theater of war.

 

Decline of Islamic Military Power

No Islamic power is a world power. No Islamic nation is among leading economic powers of the world. Never in the history of Islam, Islamic nations had been militarily so vulnerable as they are now, except when they were conquered by the Buddhist Mongol Empire. Islamic Ottoman Empire had been a great world power as late as the First World War. Pakistan can conquer every Islamic nation from Iran to Morocco. Even Pakistan agrees that India can take over Pakistan, whenever it so desires. It means that Hindu India can invade and conquer every Islamic country from Morocco to Indonesia single-handedly. Should Hindu India and Christian NATO join forces to impose Christianity throughout the Islamic world from Morocco to Iran? Muslim invaders imposed Islam by sword over Christian Egypt, Christian Syria, Christian Jordan, Christian Turkey, Christian Libya and Christian Algeria. Should Christian Crusaders of 21st Century use Christian sword to impose Christianity over Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Turkey, Libya, and Algeria? Religions that expanded by sword would die by the sword.

 

Black Haitian Toussaint L’Ouverture

Haiti’s Black Negro president Toussaint L’Ouverture established the first independent state in the New World before the establishment of United States. The first nation to gain independence in the New World was not the United States but the black state of Haiti. Haiti was richer than contemporary United States. Toussaint L’Ouverture had more money at his disposal than President George Washington. The treasury of the Haiti had more money than the treasury of the contemporary United States. United States was poorer than Haiti so long as Toussaint L’Ouveture ruled Haiti. Toussaint L’Ouverture is the scion of the black race. Haiti’s official religion was Voodoo religion. Toussaint fought on the side of France against United States. However French tricked Toussaint for a meeting onboard the ship and took him to France, where he was starved to death. Perhaps Napoleon Bonaparte deserved to die in captivity, because of the mistreatment he gave to the Head of State of Haiti, the first country to become independent in the New World. A slave revolt erupted in the Haiti, then the richest colony of the world, owing to its sugar production. A slave leader, son of the black slave, follower of Voodoo tribal religion, Toussaint L'Ouverture (1743-1803) defeated Mulattos and French soldiers and became the ruler of Haiti. Napoleon attempted to suppress the revolt and failed. France's financial loss was America's diplomatic gain. Idiot Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, short of cash and having lost Haiti, the pearl of the French Empire in America, hoodwinked by his Vatican advisers to sell United States most of the rest of French American Empire in form Louisiana Purchase.

 

Should Canada develop Nuclear Weapons

Just as Germany and Russia historically been allies and rivals in the continent of Europe, Canada and United have been the historical allies and rivals in the New World. Canada has the natural resources and the continental-size landmass to lead the Second Bloc to tame and equalize the preponderant United States in the post-Cold War new world order. Canada fears America’s northward colonial expansion, which Canada can deter only by deploying nuclear weapons. Canada may consider a federation with United Kingdom, which would allow Canada access to British nuclear arsenal to deter any unforeseen northward colonial expansionism of the United States. Canada is a world power along with United States, China, Russia, India, Japan, Germany, France and United Kingdom. Canada rightfully claims the right to become the permanent member of the UN Security Council. Canada shall reorganize the Commonwealth of Nations minus Ireland and United Kingdom into Commonwealth Common Market. Australia should federate with Canada to form a larger Anglo Saxon country, to rival United States. Whenever Canadian population reaches the 50 million mark, Canada will become a great power. The Manifest Destiny of the Anglo Saxon Race demands that Canada, Australia and United Kingdom should form a Federation with the central capital at Ottawa, with the Parliament and Prime Minister’s office located at Ottawa. Britain has no future of its own, and rather being junior partner to Yankee President in the NATO and junior partner to German Chancellor in the European Union, it would be befitting that Britain should agree to become a junior partner to Canada in the federation of Canada, Britain and Australia, with the seat of sovereign parliament and Prime Minister’s office located at Ottawa Canada. England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland shall become the provinces of the new Federation and London would become the capital of the Province of England. To help realize the manifest destiny of the Anglo Saxon race, United Kingdom should voluntarily dissolve itself as a sovereign nation and merge into Canada. Canada has great future, while neither United Kingdom nor Australia has any bright future on its own. Rather than losing sovereignty to the European Union, Englishmen are better advised to lose their sovereignty to Canada. It is high time that Canada should lead Britain and Australia to protect the role of the Anglo Saxons in the Western Christendom. United Kingdom should bring its nuclear arsenal under joint British-Canadian Anglo-Saxon control. Canada shall join the ranks of legitimate nuclear weapons powers soon.

 

Canada to Lead Commonwealth Market

Canda would assert its Manifest Destiny as the leader of the Commonwealth of Nations. Canada would organize the Commonwelath Common Market without Britain. Canada would develop closer ties with India and Australia to catapult Canda into the ranks of World powers. Commonwealth might emerge as the New Empire in the 21st Century, without Britain as Britain ahs joined the European Union. Canada would go nuclear and emerge as the Super power by middle of the 21st Century and lead Commonwealth Empire. Canada has greater resources than Britain, France and Germany. Canada has every right to emerge as World Power. Canada can solve its population problem by legislating for unlimited immigration from India and other Commonwealth nations.

 

Protestant America’s Manifest Destiny

The 9/11 would galvanize America to assert America’s Manifest Destiny in South America to impose colonial rule in Venezuela and Colombia and to promote Protestant Church and English language in Hispanic America. The southward propagation of Protestant Christianity and English language is the manifest destiny of the WASPs United States in the 21st Century. The State of the United States shall control and supervise over the Christian Churches of all denominations and sects, within United States, so that Church may not subvert the power of the State. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 21st Century is to expand southward from River Rio Grande at the Mexican border to Cape Horn at the southern tip of the Chile, to propagate English language and Protestant Christianity throughout Hispanic America. Protestant United States created the wall to separate the affairs of the State and Church in the 18th Century, to protect the new country from the ravages of Papacy. However, in the 21st Century, the Protestant super power United States shall bring Church under the supervision of the White House and the Capitol so that seat of the political, economic and military power of the Christian world, also becomes the seat of the Christian Churches.

 

Under the leadership of the United States English language shall replace Spanish language, as lingua franca of the Hispanic America and Protestant Christianity shall become the predominant Christian sect in the Hispanic America. The civilizations of Spain and Portugal are no match to the vibrant English-speaking Protestant civilization of the United States. More than 400 million Spanish and Portuguese speaking Catholics shall embrace non-denominational Protestant Christianity in the first half of the 21st Century, to remake Hispanic America the image of United States.

 

The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 19th Century had been to expand westward from New York to Los Angeles, to occupy the lands of the American Indians. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 20th Century was to make United States a global power and to subjugate the European Colonial powers into the subjugation of the US-led Atlantic Alliance. Habsburg Holy Roman Empire failed because Holy Roman Emperor didn’t want to control the Church, and was happy to remain subordinate to the Church.

 

In the age of Wars of Religious sects, unless White House and the Capitol take control of all Christian Churches-Roman Catholic Church, Major Denominational Protestant Churches, Non-denominational Protestant Churches-United States would lose the historical opportunity it enjoys now, to indefinitely perpetuate its hegemony as the leading super power. Washington should aim to become the Christian Civilization’s principle center of secular and religious power.

 

Saudi Arabia Bribes American Politicians

The pro-Saudi Arabia bias in the American foreign policy based neither on the geopolitics nor Raison d’etat, but influenced by bribe-money that Saudi Arabia paid and continues to pay to the American decision makers, to Democrats and Republicans alike, during Republican as well as Democratic administrations. Saudi bribe-money presently targets towards derailing President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. It is likely that Saudi bribe money could redirect President Bush’s war against fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islamic terrorism, towards reestablishing the fundamentalist Islamic government in post-Saddam Iraq. The second phase of the war on Islamic terrorism, may result into the victory of the militant Islamic fundamentalism in post-Saddam Iraq. Would it be a case of US diplomacy of deception designed to conceal US national interest under the camouflage of Wilsonian rhetoric, or policy of Newspeak devised by corrupt diplomats to cover up their links to the foreign benefactor. Pro-Saudi Arabian foreign policy of the Untied States harms the national interests of the United States, and this policy is the product of the substantial bribe money that Saudi Kingdom pumped into American political system, on both sides of the aisle in the Senate and Congress and into the executive branch, Democratic and Republican administrations alike. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations have suffered at the hands of the US State Departments because they failed to match the bribe-giving culture of the Islamic world. Prime minister Benazeer Bhutto of Pakistan is on record to have offered President Bill Clinton many million dollars to meet his rising legal costs during impeachment proceedings. Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan reportedly officially allowed Pakistan’s secret service ISI to use proceeds of the incomes of the Heroin/Opium trade to finance covert operations, including payment to foreign lobbyists.  

 

Decline of European Union By Expansion

European Union might become the reincarnated version of Habsburg Holy Roman Empire to represent the political aspirations of European Catholics and Catholic nations, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Poland. After 9/11 it would impossible for Europeans to accept the entry of Muslim Turkey into the Christian European Union.

 

Whenever Turkey joins European Union, it would result in the decline of the France, Germany and Britain in the European Union. France would no longer remain the political leader of the EU, Britain no longer the military leader of the EU and Germany no longer the largest country in the EU. Overextension of European Union would hasten the decline of Western Europe, especially France and Germany. The entry of Muslim Turkey could choke European Union to death. The Vatican and United States encouraging the senseless expansion of European Union, to eliminate France and unified Germany as the leaders of European Union. After the extension of the European Union and NATO, the European Union would economically choke to death, while America-led NATO would become militarily stronger and Germany and France would become marginal players in NATO.

 

American wants the European Union to expand so that NATO is able to expand Europe–wide and eastward towards Central Asia. However, after the inclusion of Eastern Europe the leadership role of former colonial powers would get diluted. The new comers would look forward leadership of United States rather than that of Germany and France. The new comers would prefer joining NATO to protect them against Soviet aggression and also against German aggression. The East European new comers would erode the economic and military potential of Western Europe. Enlarged European union would fail to become independent military power, independent of the United States-led NATO. Whenever turkey becomes a full-fledged member of the European Union, the Ottoman’s would be getting a direct access to the center of Europe and Ottomans would not longer be stopped at the gates of Vienna. Expansion of European Union would enhance the military role of United States in Europe and undermine the military potential of France and Germany. It is very likely that whenever Germany or France opt out of the NATO, the new member states of Eastern Europe would love to use American Arms to browbeat Germany and France into submission in the Third World War.

 

Mercosur South American Common Market

South America would sever its dependence on United States and forge closer military and economic ties with European Union and other world powers. The Monroe doctrine is dead in the post-Cold War new world order and major powers of Latin America free to develop regional and overseas military and economic alliances to promote their respective national interests based on the principles of Raison d’etat and balance of power. The ‘Washington Consensus’ in the Latin America, promoted by Clinton administrations during the 1990’s brought suffering rather than prosperity to the Latin America. Led by left-leaning President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil will promote Mercosur and South American Common Market and oppose Free Trade Area of the Americas. American proposal for a Free Trade Area of the Americas, would lead to the ‘annexation’ of Latin America by the United States. Previous governments in Brazil, Argentina and Peru had been submissive to the United States and encouraged the annexation of Latin America by the United States. The national interests of Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela and Peru conflicts with those of the United States in South American Common Market.

 

Brazil’s Lula made an emphatic call in Argentina and Chile to develop a new regional strategic relationship to allow Latin America retake control of its own destiny and build its own future. Brazil favors the creation of a Common South American currency and Common South America Parliament. Brazil seeks true integration following the example of the European Union. Brazil’s top priority is to bolster the regional trade group known as Mercosur. Lula expressed the will of the Brazil to give a decisive impetus to the reconstruction of Mercosur together with its partners in South America. Brazil urged other member nations to deepen a common foreign policy, which is essential for negotiations with the United States and European Union.

 

Protestant Hindu Front in 3rd World War

The 9/11 would galvanize America to assert America’s Manifest Destiny in South America to impose colonial rule in Venezuela and Colombia and to promote Protestant Church and English language in Hispanic America. In the global clash of races, Protestant Christians, Hindus and Jews shall fight the war of religions on the same side of the battlefronts. The predator religions present greatest menace to the human civilization in the 21st century, and this menace requires the united decisive military response of the liberal, moderate, non-proselytizing religions. It is the Manifest Destiny of Protestant United States to spread the English language and Protestant Christianity south of borders to Mexico, Venezuela, Brazil, and Argentina so that Protestant Christianity replaced Roman Catholicism as the dominant religion of South America. By joining forces with Protestant fundamentalism for propagation of Protestant Church in Hispanic America and spread of English language, Hindu India would effectively checkmate the designs of Papacy in India.

 

Wahhabi as Predator Religon

Saudi Wahhabi Sunni sect is a predator religion, followed by only 2 percent of the Sunni Muslims, and it seeks to conquer and destroy competing Sunni Muslim sects, followed by 98 percent of the Sunni Muslims. Roman Catholic Church used the alliance with German barbarian tribes to destroy the ancient religion and civilization of Roman Empire. Similarly, Wahhabi Mosque of Mecca uses the military and coercive capability of barbarian fundamentalist Muslim terrorists to destroy the moderate, liberal Sunni sects presently practiced in the civilized Muslim societies of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia and Nigeria, etc. The extreme Catholic fundamentalism and extreme Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism are identical twins, if one takes into account the relative differences of races and civilizations.

 

Pakistan as Custodian of Mecca & Medina

The democratization of the religious institutions based at Mecca, Medina and the Vatican will eradicate the menace of predator sects. The civilized Muslim countries, namely, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia and Nigeria would join forces to meet the menace of predator Arab Wahhabi Sunni sect, and to bring Holy cities of Mecca and Medina under the control of international body of populous and civilized Muslim nations. The Muslims of the world should directly elect the clergy and religious leaders of Mecca and Medina, by the system of one-person one-vote, for a fixed period of five years. The leading Maulanas from Pakistan and Bangladesh should be appointed the Grand Mufti of the Grand Mosque of Mecca and Medina respectively to lead the Islamic clergy worldwide. Since Wahhabi Sunnis represent only 2 percent of the Muslims in the world, only 2 percent of the religious clergy of Mecca and Medina should belong to the Wahhabi sect, and 98 percent of the Mecca & Medina’s clergy and religious leaders should be recruited from other Islamic nations.

 

Democratization of Papacy

The European Catholic nations, namely, France, Spain and Italy would join forces to tame, discipline, curb, control and democratize Papacy and impose structural changes in the Roman Catholic Church, to bring Church of Rome, under the control of Catholic laity and the State. Vast majority of Catholic laity in Italy, France and Spain would vote for the abolition of the Papacy, decolonization of Empire of Roman Catholic churches, and periodic direct election of the Pontiff, Cardinals, Bishops and priests, conducted one-person one-vote single constituency system, to elect catholic clergy for one five-year term. Vatican is a sovereign State and it must elect its government by means of direct elections. Theocracy has no future in the 21st century. Pope and Bishops must become answerable to the Catholic laity voters. Catholic laity should have the right to recall Pontiff and Bishops. Democratization of the organizational structure of the Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church would eradicate the menace of predator sects.

 

Oil Colonial Empires of 21st Century

Empires and Colonies would stage comeback during early 21st Century. NATO air-war on Serbia signaled the return of the Age of Empires and Colonies. World would witness the Partition of Africa before 2005 AD, to rival the Partition of Africa of 1885. India and Britain should form strategic partnership to secure advantages in the new Colonial Age. India and Britain should prepare to carve out British Empire and Indian Empire during the Second Imperial Age. India and Britain can join forces to create World Empire jointly led by Britain, India, Canada and Australia. Communists and socialists that dominated the ordinary people of British Labor Party conspired to disintegrate British Empire to expedite the rise of Communist Soviet Union. Communist spies in Britain transferred nuclear weapons secrets to Soviet Union. Vatican conspired to expedite the decline of Britain and India after the Second World War. Communist not only scuttled British Imperial traditions, they also sabotaged Indian attempts to inherit the imperial mantle of the British-Indian Empire. Vatican implanted Kemal Pasha Ataturk in Turkey, who disowned Ottoman heritage of Turkey. Being a British Agent, Jawaharlal Nehru as Prime Minister of India, abdicated Indian heritage of British Indian Empire and engineered India's defeat in 1962 War with China. Communist and Socialist agents in Britain misdirected British media to weaken and destroy the imperial traditions among Englishmen. Communists conspired to undermine English sense of pride in the Empire. Soviet Spies infiltrated British Labour Party and imposed anti-nuclear and anti-colonial agenda in British politics. Encouraged by Khrushchev’s exercise of nuclear deterrent against Anglo-French invasion of Suez Canal, the Labour Party worked towards the dismantling of the British Empire, so long as Australia and Canada remained under Anglo-Saxon colonial occupation. The Labour Party dismantled British Empire to perpetuate Anglo-Saxon controls over vast continent size Australia and Canada. Britain worked towards demise of Apartheid in Rhodesia, Namibia, and South Africa to perpetuate White man's control over Australia and Canada. Imperial Britain is in the national interest of India and Russia. India can develop close strategic alliance with imperial Britain. Britain and India should join forces to create Commonwealth Empire to include beside Britain, India, Canada, and Australia some major Commonwealth nations. India supplied 1.5 million soldiers in the First World War and more than 3.5 million soldiers in the Second World War to defeat Axis Powers, even when India was under British rule. Persian Gulf was an Indian Lake. Indian Empire was the dominant power in the Indian Ocean Region. Indian Empire ruled Burma, Sri Lanka, Kuwait, Trucial States, Oman, Yemen and Qatar. Indian Empire controlled the affairs of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Brunei. Nuclear Hindu India would welcome alliance with Britain to recreate British-Indian Empire. Indians feel great pain when they see British Monarch serving as Maid for Yankee President as well as German Chancellor. Had British Empire used Indian Army to defeat the revolt of 13 colonies of United States, Indians would have inflicted defeat on the United States and Canada would have become the dominant power of the North America? Had Britain shared power with India, British Empire would have been intact even today and remained intact even in 22nd Century? Indian Army made British Empire worldwide. Hindu India seeks strategic alliance with Britain to recreate British-Indian Empire in 21st Century, in the new Age of Empires and Colonies.

 

Would Mongol China Conquer Arabia?

Buddhist Mongols created the largest Buddhist Mongol Empire in the World that stretched from the Pacific Coast of China, to German borders on the Denube to Egypt. Buddhist Mongols brought entire Chinese world, entire Orthodox world, and entire Islamic world under rule of Buddhist Mongols. Hindu South Indian Empires should have aligned with Mongols to consolidate the Buddhist domination of the Christian and Islamic worlds. South Indian Hindu Empires ruled South East Asia, missed an historic opportunity to join military pact with Buddhist Mongol Empire. South Indian Hindu Armies joining Buddhist Mongol Army would have conquered the entire world to bring them under unified Buddhist-Hindu rule. Armies of Hindu South Indian Empires in alliance with Buddhist army of Mongol Empire would have easily conquered whole Islamic, Catholic, Orthodox worlds and Buddhism would have replaced Islam and Christianity in Africa, Asia and Europe around 1240 AD.

 

Global Coalition For War on Terrorism

The 9/11 created the bipolar world in the sense that either a nation is for the war on terrorism or for terrorism, and there is no option to sit on the sidelines. President Bush clearly declared: Either you are with America for war on terrorism or with the terrorists and terrorist sponsoring nations. On the global coalition for war on terrorism, Protestant United States got the unflinching support of Hindu India. It is likely that in the global war on terrorism, Protestant United States, Hindu India, Muslim Pakistan and Orthodox Russia would be on the same side of the battle lines. Catholic Europe may support the cause of Wahhabi Arabs. Communist China may find it convenient to fish in the troubled Middle East trying to establish Chinese Oil Colonies in the oil-producing Arab world. Chin and Russia would oppose American Oil Colonialism. American Oil Colonialism in the oil-producing Arab world would not harm Hindu India’s national interests, because American colonial empire in the oil-producing Arab world guranteed that Arab rulers would not openly fund the terrorist organizations. Hindu India welcomes American oil colonial empire in the Arab world.

 

 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com