1

GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES - Chapter 1- KALKI GAUR 

 

Chapter 1

Global Clash of Races

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

1(1) Purport

(1) Asia is the Future and Europe is Old

The balance of power of world civilizations determined by the interplay of White Protestant United States, Yellow Buddhist China and Brown Hindu India. The rise of Brown India and Yellow China is a turning point in the history. The 21st Century is an Asian Century and India and China are the leaders of Asia. The trend lines in terms of economic and military power all say “Asia,” Hindu and Buddhist Asia, and the future is happening in Asia, for better or worse. The geopolitical stakes in Asia are much higher than the stakes in Europe. The top world civilizations and top world powers of the 21st Century are: Protestant United States, Buddhist China, Hindu India, Buddhist Japan, Western Christian European Union and Orthodox Russia. Neither any Catholic power nor any Islamic power nor any Judaic power shall ever by Super Power or leading world power in the 21st Century.

 

One. There is neither any Catholic World Power in the world nor likely to be any time in the 21st Century. In geopolitical terms, all of Europe is old. The future used to happen in Europe before the Second World War before 1945. It is understatement to say that Germany and France is Old Europe, while former Soviet colonies the East Europeans or Poland represent New Europe, as the whole Europe is old, with ageing population and declining birth rate. After the decline of Germany and France no Catholic nation could ever aspire to join the ranks of world powers in 21st Century, unless Papacy succeeds to partition Protestant USA to carve out a Catholic United States.

 

Two. There is no Islamic world power in the world. No Islamic nation could possibly join the ranks of world powers in the 21st Century, neither Pakistan nor Iran nor Saudi Arabia nor Indonesia, in spite of all oil-incomes the GNPs of all Islamic nations consign them to the status of a medium powers at the best. No OPEC nation and no Muslim nation can ever be a world power in the 3rd Millennium.

 

Three. The United States, China and India are three predominant nation-civilizations of the world. The clash of civilizations in the 21st Century requires Troika of USA, China and India to lead the world, as by 2050 the GNP of top 4 economies in the world shall be: China, USA, India and Japan, and the GNP of India shall be four times the GNP of Japan. These are the arguments author develops in this chapter.

 

1(2) Talk Points

Civilization’s Point of View

(1) Point of Views of India and USA

The civilizational worldviews of Hindu India and Protestant United States have more in common with one another than they have in common with any one of the other civilizations, namely, Catholic civilization, Islamic Civilization, Judaic civilization or Slav civilization. United States and India are both diverse inclusive tolerant democratic civilizations. The unique feature of the 21st Century is that the Sword of tolerance diversity and inclusion is mightier than the Sword of intolerance uniformity and exclusion. The unique feature of the 21st Century is that no nation representing the Religions of Sword, namely Islam, Judaism and Catholicism, would ever become Super Power or World Power in the 21st Century. Neither any Catholic nation nor any Islamic nation nor any Judaic nation nor any Orthodoxy nation would join the ranks of top three world powers any time in the 21st Century. The top-3 world powers, both in terms of economic and military powers in the 21st Century are, United States, China and India. Communist China does not represent the civilization interests of Buddhist China. Hindu India’s worldview matters in the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century.

 

(2) New Age of Petro-Colonial Empires

One. The 25-member European Union failed to challenge the America’s military dominance of Europe, when Poland and other East European countries joined NATO as full members in 2002, long before their membership to the European Union could become effective in 2004.

Two. The New Age of Oil-Colonialism took a new birth in 2003 during Iraq War. United States Security Council with 14-0 votes recognized United States and Britain as “Occupying Powers” in Iraq and gave birth to the new age of Colonial Empire by legitimizing the American Oil colony in Iraq.

Three. In the 21st Century the leaders and diplomats would formulate their foreign policy in the light of Richelieu’s Raison d’etat and role of Papacy would decline in the world.

Four. United States historically camouflaged its realpolitik national interest under the garb of Wilsonian idealism. President Theodore Roosevelt was the warrior statesman. President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. The statesman and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To prophets the real world is the one they want to bring. 

Five. Zionist Cabal and the Religious right conservative conspiracy joined forces with Neo-conservative to give imperialistic push to American diplomacy in the 2003 that resulted in the American invasions and conquest of Iraq.

Six. Mafia entered into unholy nexus with Roman Catholic Church in Italy to destabilize parliamentary governments in Italy to impose Mafiosi as 7-time Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti of Italy. 

Seven. The humble Coca and Opium influences global diplomacy no less than crude oil and gas.

Eighth, patriarchal religions, Catholics and Muslims waged religious wars on matriarchal Hinduism and Buddhism in Asia.

Nine. United States employed diplomacy of deception Newspeak and doublethink when it camouflaged its war for oil in Afghanistan and Iraq as America’s War on Islamic terrorism and “Operation Iraqi Freedom” respectively. American deception hyped by Jewish controlled American print media outsmarted Nazi Joseph Goebbels.

Ten. The Atlantic partnership and NATO came to a definitive end because of Iraq war and Donald Rumsfeld’s denigration of France and Germany as Old Europe. Germany and France would enter into military and diplomatic alliances with Russia to hold America in check.

Eleven. The 1999 GNP estimates ($8.7 trillion) included value added by financial services to the tune of 72% ($6.2 trillion), which was generated by fraudulent accounting practices of WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, and Arthur Anderson etc. It is very possible that World Bank mistakenly overestimated the GNP of United states by more than 20% and the real GNP should be around $6.5 trillion rather than $8.7 trillion in 1999.

Twelve. American oil interests, British secret service agent Lawrence of Arabia, and Zionists created Wahhabi Sunni doctrine to breakup Ottoman Empire and to establish American and British oil colonies in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Thirteen. The Oil colonial interests of United States conflicted with the diamond and gold colonial interests of De Beers. However, Untied States allowed Britain to exercise its colonial influence over Zimbabwe and Zionist De Beers’ interests in Ivory Coast, Liberia and Angola to repay their support to America’s war on Iraq.

 

(3) Clash of Civilization or Clash of Oil

The “Global Clash of Races” tells the story of the “The Clash of Civilization” by Professor S.P. Huntington from Asian perspective and Hindu and Buddhist perspective, to define the new roles for populous ancient civilizations of India and China in the 21st Century as new Super Powers. The Global Clash of Races evaluates the world politics from the eyeglass of religion, race, civilization, geopolitics, diplomacy and oil. The pagan god of oil arose after 1945 and after 2003 Iraq War majestically asserted its right as the dominant influence in world politics, diplomacy and international economy.

 

(4) Three-Headed Occidental Beast of Clash

Neo-Conservatism deplores the emerging nexus of Priest-Ruler, Predator Intolerance and Drug Cartels. The Priest-Ruler, the murderous ideologies and Drug Cartels are the three heads of the Occidental Beast of Clash. In the 20th Century the religion influenced the beast of the Clash of Civilizations. Throughout the 20th Century the White House, the CIA and the American Big Oil controlled, nurtured the three heads of the Beast of Clash of Civilizations to control Islamic oil resources and to mobilize Islamic terrorists launch attacks on Hinduism, Buddhism, Paganism and Orthodoxy. Before the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 the imperialist Yankee Eagle could keep under tight leash the three-headed Beast of the Islamic Clash of Civilization. America nurtured the 3-heads beast of Clash of Civilization throughout the 20th Century.

 

First. The Occidental Beast of Clash of Civilization has three heads. The first head of the Beast is the head representing the illicit rule of the priest-King or priest-ruler that seeks to criminalize the state-less religious organizations to take over the secular temporal powers. The Papacy is the classical example of the conspiracy hatched by the religious priests to undermine the legitimate powers of the State. The Papacy and the Lawrence of Arabia, British and American Empires conspired with the religious clergy of Mecca to carve out the Wahhabi theocracies, which would empower Wahhabi Muslim clergy with political and social powers, if they agreed to hand over Arab oil resources to Christian Big Oil. Pope betrayed the Roman Empire and helped barbarian conquerors destroy the Roman Empire and Roman Civilization after the conquest of Rome by Alaric the barbarian in 415 AD. Similarly, the Wahhabi Muslim clergy of Mecca agreed to revolt against Ottoman rulers to establish theocracies in Arabian Peninsula and transferred all present and future claims on Arab oil resources to Christian oil companies. American has continued this policy of securing ties of the Muslim clergy in the Islamic world with the CIA to bring the Muslim countries under the control of Christian powers.

 

Second. The second head of the Beast is the illicit intolerance, the barbarian religious and ideological intolerance that advocates policies of ethnic and religious separatism, oppresses women forcing women into servitude to men, and embarks upon the policy of annihilation of the ethnic and religious minorities, political and religious opposition and launches violent terrorist attacks on the civilizations. The Predator Intolerance is the second head of the Beast. Pope John Paul II is the incarnation of the ultra-conservatism and Catholic intolerance. The Vatican-Mecca Axis of Intolerance joined the resources of Papal Conservatism and militant Wahhabi fundamentalism to legitimize the intolerance of the predator religious cults and proselytizing efforts of the monotheist iconoclast Christianity and Islam. The White House and the CIA joined forces the Mujahideen forces of intolerance in Afghanistan to inflict defeat on the Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

 

Third. The third head of the Beast is the illicit drug trade that generates more than $700 billion annually to the organized drug cartels, dominated by white Catholic Colombian Cocaine Cartel and Sunni Muslim Heroin cartel. The militant Wahhabi priest-rulers and the predator intolerant religious fundamentalist terrorists have enriched themselves with the incomes of the Heroin and Opium trade. Muslim organized crime, Muslim religious terrorists and Muslim theocracies created political and religious and economic nexus of Church-Terrorism-Heroin to finance the political aspirations of the priest-rulers and the economic aspirations of the intolerant religious terrorists and social aspirations of the heroin Drug Mafia. Muslim drug Mafia finances the militant Islamic terrorism as well as political takeover of Muslim societies by the Muslim clergy. It is no accident that President Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” and President Bush’s war on Terrorism in Afghanistan, resulted in the unprecedented boom in Coca and Cocaine production in Colombia and unprecedented Opium and Heroin production in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

Fourth. Though the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations has three separate heads, it has one stomach. The results of the activities of the priest-rulers, predator intolerance and conservative organized crime work in unison to become instrument of the American policy, so mush so that one can argue that throughout 20th Century the White House and the CIA controlled and guided the activities of the ferocious three heads of the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations to promote the national interests of the United States. The Clash of Civilization is the plot conceived by the Vatican and the White House to establish America’s control over the oil and gas resources of the Islamic oil-producing nations as well as to combine the resources of iconoclast predator proselytizing intolerant monotheist Christianity and Islam, to undermine pagan civilizations of Africa, Hindu Civilization of India and Nepal, and Buddhist civilizations of Asia. Throughout 20th Century, the Christian American oil interests managed and articulated Papal predatory intolerance to undermine Buddhist nations of China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka. Throughout 20th Century the Christian American oil interests successfully managed the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi heroin drug traffickers to promote the national interests of the United States by engineering the secession of Muslim nations from multi-ethnic Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire.

 

(5) 21st Century Oil-headed Beast of Clash

Neo-Conservatism supports the Oil-headed Beast of Clash as a lesser evil than looming Apocalypse and Armageddon.

One. The single headed oil-fiery Beast of the Clash of Civilization in 21st Century wages wars for promoting the oil-interests. The Oil-head Beast of 21st Century would promote the American oil interests and even maul and damage the 3-headed Religion’s Beast of the 20th Century and could destroy those protected by the priest-rulers and predator intolerance. The Oil Factor diametrically changed the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century, thanks to President Bush’s invasion of oil-rich Iraq to establish American’s first colonial empire in the 21st Century.

 

Two. The unprecedented Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the Protestant Financial capital of the world the World Trade Center, and on the Protestant military capital of the world the Pentagon, brought to an abrupt halt the growing nexus of the United States with the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi predator intolerance and Wahhabi drug cartels. In the 21st Century the Oil God influenced the Beast of the Clash. The omnipotent Oil Beast of the Clash of Civilization has only one head, the Oil Head, and oil interests replaced the religious interests as guiding influence over clash of civilizations in the 21st Century. The 20th Century Clash of Civilization influenced by the Decolonization process and breakup of the colonial empires promoted the interest of the white race by promoting the interests of Christianity. The 21st Century Clash of Civilization is influenced by the return of the age of Colonial empires after the American conquest of Iraq guided only by the oil interests and the Beast has only one head.

 

Three. In the 20th Century American Big Oil joined forces with Wahhabi clergy to gain the control of the Arab oil by demanding the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, British Empire and French Empire, so that as the leader of the Free world United States took over the oil and gas resources of the oil-producers, which were formerly part of these empires. In the 21st Century, after the conquest of Iraq, United States worked to reestablish the colonial empires as units of the international system, so that backed by the military power of the Pentagon, the American Big Oil could continue to exploit Arab and Muslim oil-resources without having to cultivate and toe the line of the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi Drug Mafia. So long as Pentagon could establish direct American colony over oil-producing Iraqi colony, the Protestant White House might cooperate with Hindu India to bring Wahhabi oil-producers under the direct rule of the Pentagon, so that Wahhabi priest-rulers and Wahhabi intolerant terrorists would lose their strategic and diplomatic value for the American Big Oil in the 21st Century. The Oil Beast would destroy the 2-headed Beast of the 20th Century. The military alliances of the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations would be diametrically opposed to the alliances of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant American would fight the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations on the same side of the battle lines to protect their common oil interests, to secure the supplies of the oil and gas energy resources to the oil-importing Industrialized and industrializing world. In 20th Century Delhi and Washington were adversaries in the religion-focused Clash of Civilization, but in the 21st Century India and the United States are allies in the Oil-centered Clash of Civilizations.

 

Four. The rise of the Oil God in the 21st Century has put the 20th Century’s Clash of Civilizations on its head, and new coalition are built on the basis of coinciding interests of oil importers. Hindu India and Christian United States were adversaries in the 20th Century Religion-Beast led Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant United States are allies and Coalition partners in the Oil-Beast led Clash of Civilizations and New Age of colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Throughout the Cold War, the United States undermined Hindu India the successor to the Indian Empire and India-led Non Aligned Nations. Delhi-Washington ties are based on the coinciding oil interests of India and the United States. Pentagon would harness the military assets of Indian Army to take charge of the US-led Oil-Beast of the Clash of civilization of the 21st Century to bring to knees its earlier allies and friends of the 3-headed Beast of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations.

 

Five. The Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, could be jointly conceived by the Vatican-Mecca Axis to undermine the dominant Protestant power of the world. The religious interests of the Vatican Papacy and the Wahhabi Mecca conflicts with the interest of Protestant religious right Neo-Conservatism. The military, political and economic alliance of Hindu India and Protestant United States would undermine old alliance of the United States with the priest-rulers of Catholic Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca. The White House formulated policies towards China, India, Vietnam, Korea and Laos based on the religious proselytizing interests of the Christian missionaries in the 20th Century, and in the 21st Century these ties would be recast in the light of the oil interests. The oil interests would predominate over religious interests, while influencing the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century.

 

Six. The Protestant Neo-Conservatives would join forces with Hindu India and liberal Islam to undermine the sovereignty of Wahhabi Arabia so that America could directly rule over the OPEC nations and own and control the Arab oil and gas resources. If Pentagon and Indian Army could administer and control Iraqi oil colony, then United States would no longer need to accept the idiosyncrasies of the corrupt avaricious Wahhabi royal family in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. The Oil-Beast of the Clash in the 21st Century would bring the barbarian terrorist oil-producing nations under the under the direct military rule of the Pentagon and its coalition partners notably India, so that United States and coalition Occupying Powers would own and control the oil and gas resources of the Middle East. American Protestant Beast of Oil would directly rule over Wahhabi oil-producing nations in the 21st Century Clash of Civilization, and share its oil loot with Hindu India, Buddhist China and Buddhist Japan. The America’s new Oil-based military and political alliances of the 21st Century would put on its head the America’s political religious alliances of the 20th Century. The Protestant United States’ religious-civilization adversaries of the 20th Century might become Oil-Civilization allies of the 21st Century, bound by their common interest in promoting American oil colonialism.

 

Seven. The Protestant Neo-Conservatives have no interest to promote either Catholic Christianity or Wahhabi Islam in the 21st Century. The WASP United States interested in promoting America’s oil interests in the world by establishing direct control by American Big Oil over the oil and gas resources of the oil-producing OPEC nations. Protestant United States would readily welcome the support of Hindu India and Buddhist Japan to consolidate Protestant America’s colonial control over Muslim oil-producers. The new oil-alliances would overturn the obsolete Christianity-Islam Axis of iconoclast monotheism. Hindu-Protestant, India-USA alliance for colonization of the oil-producing nations would influence foreign policy making and international politics in the 21st Century and legitimize India’s status as one of the top-3 super powers of the new world order.

 

(6) Counter Reformation Wars of the Clash

Neo-Conservatism believes that the rise of Protestant United States as the sole super power of the world and the decline of Orthodox Russia and no possibility of the emergence of any Catholic world power, symbolizes the victory of Protestant Reformed Christianity over Roman Catholicism in the ongoing Counter Reformation Wars waged by Papacy.

 

Religious Counter Reformation caused the Clash of Civilization in the 20th Century. The Clash of Civilization is the ongoing clashes between the forces of Reformation of Religion and Religious Counter Reformation. The Papacy and Habsburg Holy Roman jointly unleashed the Counter Reformation Wars on Protestant German Princes to destroy the Protestant Christianity from 1618 to 1648 in Europe, which caused the deaths of more than one-third of all German-speaking peoples in Europe during these 30-years of war. The 28-year long ultra-conservative Pontificate of Poland-born Bolshevik Pope John Paul II would go down as the Neo-Counter Reformation of 20th Century. The post-1980 Saudi Wahhabi expansionism and spread of Militant Islamism after the downfall of Shah of Iran and the soviet invasion of Afghanistan would go down into history as the Wahhabi Islamic Counter Reformation Clash of Civilization in the Islamic world.

 

Neo-Conservatism believes that Wahhabi Mecca and Catholic Vatican are the two wombs of Counter Reformation forces that fueled the Clash of Civilization in the last two decades of the 20th Century and brought into prominence the Vatican-Mecca Axis of iconoclast monotheist predatory intolerance. The Counter Reformation forces unleashed by ultra-Conservative Catholic Vatican and militant fundamentalist Wahhabi Mecca had been the principal causes of the Clash of Civilizations throughout the 20th Century, especially after the Second World War.

 

(7) Reform Islamic Faith & Muslims

Neo-Conservatism advocates that Protestant United States should leverage its hegemony by supporting moderate liberal Islamic nations in the Islamic Counter Reformation Wars. Saudi Wahhabi priest-King, the pretender to the Caliph of Islam, caused the Islamic Clash of Civilization, by unleashing the Wahhabi Counter Reformation wars on moderate liberal Muslim societies that opposed the barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism and militant Islamic terrorism.

 

One. Reformation of Islam would modernize the faith of Islam itself and rid it of the militant fundamentalism imposed by the illiterate Bedouin nomad Wahhabi clergy. It is high time that we have Reformed Islam and Reformed Muslims? Jews have Reform Judaism. Christians have Reformed Christianity, the Protestantism. Hindus have Reformed Hinduism. Buddhists have Reformed Buddhism. Reform Judaism’s central emphasis is on reform of faith, rather than works. Reformed Judaism respects many aspects of traditional Mosaic Law, but it does not attach binding authority to it and regards many religious rituals as merely picturesque. Since the early 1500s, the Christian Protestantism has rejected the authority of the Pope and various Protestant denominations have held differing and evolving Church positions on a wide range of issues.

 

Two. Muslims should begin by celebrating the structure of Islam as a highly decentralized faith-one with no institutionalized Church, no Pope, nor Archbishops, no chief rabbis, no power of excommunication, no mandatory confession, and so on. The non-practicing Muslim, the most fundamentalist Wahhabi, the most conservatively pious Muslim, and the eclectic Muslim mystic can all be considered simply Muslims, without the need of for any qualifying adjectives. Some may consider themselves more Islamic than others, but the basic truth is that they are all Muslims. When this golden rule of community is broken, the result is dangerous fundamentalist Wahhabi extremism.

 

Three. The Wahhabi extremism reveals the defects of misguided Saudi Muslims, and Wahhabi fundamentalist intolerant cult reveals the defects of early Bedouin Islam as a faith. The liberal modern Islam practiced by Turks, Indians, Malaysians and Indonesians is superior Islam than the early Bedouin Islam propagated by Wahhabi pretenders of priest-rulers. Muslims should search for new principles of faith by adopting practices of eclectic Muslim Sufi Mystics, revered by more than half the Muslims in South Asia. Muslim leaders should meet the crisis of modernization by reforming Islam as well as reforming Muslims. The Islamic Reformation there must be, and it should be a Reformation of Muslims as well as the Reformation of Islam itself and Reformation of Islamic Shariah Law. Wahhabi Saudi Arabia after the hike in oil prices in 1971 and after the fall of Shah of Iran in 1979, waged the Wahhabi Counter Reformation Wars on other sects of Islam, as not more than 2% population of the world follow Wahhabi sect.

 

Four. Saudi Wahhabi Counter Reformation Wars financed by the OPEC oil incomes, after 1980 aimed to create Saudi Wahhabi priest-King as the New Caliph of Islam to replace the defunct Ottoman Caliphate to convert Islam into a highly decentralized faith, one with highly institutionalized Church, with totalitarian Caliph determined to rule the entire Islamic world from Mecca.

 

Five. Wahhabi Counter Reformation seeks to transform the present-day highly decentralized faith of Islam, into the highly centralized faith with Institutionalized Church on the pattern of Papacy, Roman Catholic Church or Roman Empire. The Wahhabi Caliph of Mecca led Wahhabi terrorists to wage Counter Reformation Wars on moderate Muslims to make New Caliph similar to the Pope of Catholic Church. The supporters of the Islamic Reformation have rights and responsibility to militarily defeat the Saudi Arabia in the ongoing Wahhabi Counter Reformation Wars and wrest control of Mecca and Medina from Wahhabi fundamentalists. The Thirty Years Counter Reformation Wars (1618-1648) resulted in the death of one-third of the German-speaking population of the Europe. The Wahhabi Counter Reformation waged by Saudi Arabian King and Wahhabi terrorists intend to massacre and intimidate majority of the Muslims of the world.

 

(8) G-4 Summit: USA China Japan India

The world’s Top-4 World Powers are, namely, United States (1st), China (2nd), India (3rd), and Russia (4th). The top 6 largest economies of the world are in terms of 1999 GNP at PPP is: United States ($8.4 trillion), China ($4.1 trillion), Japan ($3 trillion), India ($2.2 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), and France ($1.3 trillion). The top four economies of the world in 2002 included three Asians, two Buddhist nations and one Hindu nation.

 

First. India and China emerged as Super Powers in the post-Iraq War world, due to the precipitous decline of Russia as world power. The G-8 Summit should be expanded to include India and China, as India has larger GNP in purchasing power parity than 6 of the 8 members of the G-8 Summit. India, China Japan Common Market would become world’s largest economic region. The G-4 Summit of USA, China, Japan and India would have larger GNP than G-8 summit Nations. The 3 of the 4 largest economies are also the top 3 military powers of the world. India and China’s place in Top-4 economic and military powers of world is secured. India and China must develop new foreign policy to assert their role as the new super powers of the world. India, China and Japan should lead Asian Common Market and develop Asian Defense Pact on lines of NATO. Hindu India, Buddhist China and Buddhist Japan shall lead Asia and Africa to form Asian Union, just as Germany and France led Europeans to form European Union. Delhi-Beijing Axis could be for Asian Union what Paris-Berlin Axis is for the European Union.

 

Second, in 1750 Indian Subcontinent accounted for 24.5%, Buddhist China for 32.8%, Protestant & Catholic Western Europe for 18.2%, Orthodox Russian Empire for 5.0% and Buddhist Japan for 3.8% of the world’s total manufacturing output. In 1750 India, China & Japan manufactured 61% of world’s total goods. Throughout history, at least for the last 3,000 years India and China led the world in terms of manufactured goods and commodities. It is very likely that by 2100 India, China and Japan would account for over 50% of the world’s total GNP and 50% of the World’s total international trade.

 

Third, in 2001, the combined GNP of China, Japan, and India ($9.3 Trillion), was larger than the combined GNP ($9.1 trillion) of United States and Canada; also larger than the combined GNP ($7.7 trillion) of European Union; and also larger than the combined GNP ($8.6 trillion) of European Union and Russia, Source, World Bank, World Development Report 2000-1. Fourth, the GNPs of World’s largest economies are: United States ($8.4 trillion), China ($4.1 trillion), Japan ($3 trillion), India ($2.2 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), France ($1.3 trillion), and Britain ($1.2 trillion). The EU’s GNP ($7.7 trillion) includes Germany, France, Britain, Italy ($1.196 trillion), Spain ($659 billion), Belgium ($277 billion), Switzerland ($196 billion), Austria ($193 billion), Denmark ($129 billion), Finland ($110 billion), Ireland ($72 billion), Norway ($118 billion), Portugal ($151 billion), and Sweden ($184 billion). Russia ($929 billion), Canada ($726 billion). Fifth, after 2001 the 21st Century became the Century of Asia after the combined GNPs of China, Japan and India exceeded the combined GNPs of USA & Canada and exceeded the combined GNPs of Europe and Russia. Sixth, India, China and Japan have no option but to form Asian Common Market. In Military Capability India, China, Japan & Russia would match United States, NATO & European Union. In 2001 the GNP of India, China & Japan (3-country) surpassed United States & Canada (2-country) and European Union and Russia (26 country). Seventh, India’s GNP exceeded the GNPs of Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Russia and Canada, the six out of 8 members of G-8 industrialized State. The world’s economic policies should be determined by 4 largest economies the “G-4 States” namely, USA, China, Japan and India, which have the combined GNP of $18.4 Trillion, the 47% of the world’s GNP of $38.8 trillion.

 

(9) America Replaced Indian Empire in Oil

India was the world’s sixth largest industrial power in 1945, after the World War II. Before independence in 1945 Indian Empire controlled 100% of Iranian oil and 47.5% of Iraqi oil. Persian Gulf was an Indian Lake in 1945 and for 200 years before. Britain partitioned India by creating the artificial concept of Islam as the basis of state, to blunt India’s intervention in Iranian oil and Iraqi oil Indian Empire Oil imperialism and British Oil Imperialism overshadowed American oil imperialism in control over Middle East oil before the Second World War. Before 1945, the Indian Empire and British Empire controlled 100 per cent of Iranian oil and 47.5 percent of Iraqi oil; the U.S. interest was only 23.75 per cent in Iraq equal to France's interest in Iraq oil. After 1945, the control over Middle East oil has changed radically; in 1959 the U.S. share rose to 50 per cent of all Middle East oil, while that of Britain declined to 18 per cent, and France had 5 per cent, the Netherlands 3 per cent, other, including the local Arab governments, 24 percent. After the end of the Cold War the Western oil imperialism is really United States imperialism. The driving doctrine of US foreign policy since the 1940’s after the Second World War is to control the vast energy resources of the Muslim oil-producing nations of the Gulf region, many of these nations had been under British colonial occupation and influence. Nuclear Hindu India would reestablish India as major oil player by entering into military pact with Shiite Iran.

 

(10) Nations must decide New World Order

Nations Must Decide on World Order. The international community must decide what kind of world order it wants in the wake of the U.S.-led war on Iraq. The Iraqi crisis, oil, money, and credits all this is very important, but what's far more important is something else we must answer the question of what kind of world we plan to build. The world's nations must determine the architecture of international security in the proper way, on the basis of the principles of democracy and equality and taking into account each other's interests. Washington threatening to replace international law with "the law of the fist." There has been a dangerous willingness on the part of the United States to ignore opposition around the world in dealing with international problems. Non Aligned Nations should rebuff efforts by the U.S.-led coalition to secure a swift removal of the U.N. sanctions imposed on Iraq in 1990. The UN sanctions should not be removed until it is clear there is no threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

 

(11) World is Product of Our Thinking

Leader the leading world power can create any new world order of his choice, and this is the privilege President Bush earned, when he occupied the Oval Office in 2001. President Bush created a new world order by ordering invasions of Iraq, and the oil colonial empires became legitimate entities constituting the international system in the 2003. World order had been the product of the dominant thinking of the leading world powers, their elites and diplomats. The leading world powers decided in every century, the nature of the world order and the legitimate conduct of relations among great powers. President Bush changed the thinking of the world leaders at the start of the 21st Century by legitimizing the concept or idea of the oil colonial empires and the right of the great powers to establish oil colonies to secure their supplies of oil and gas resources, so crucial for the survival of their industrial economies. World leaders have accepted this idea as legitimate idea and as a result a new age of Colonial Empires ushered in the first decade of the 21st Century. The world order changed whenever the newer idea underlying the world order replaced the earlier notion of the legitimate world order. If President Bush could succeed in establishing oil colony over Iraq, it would change the world order and oil colonial empires would become the norms of the new world order.

 

(12) 21st Century like 18th & 19th Century

The 18th & 19th centuries witnessed intense rivalries among West European colonial powers, was forcibly curbed by the fact of overwhelming superiority of the United States in the NATO and the constant menace of the expanding Communism and the ever-creeping Soviet Union. The twin menaces of Bolshevism and Soviet Empire induced West European powers become the satellite of the United States in NATO and curb European rivalries. However, after the end of Cold War, disintegration of Soviet Empire, the decline of Russia and the Unification of Germany, the former Great Powers of Western Europe have no need to play second fiddle to the former colony of Britain an upstart, which joined the Aristocratic club of European great powers only after the First World War. There is no reason that Germany and France should feel inferior to United States. In the new world while former adversaries Russia and China may join as allies to the United States, the former Atlantic Allies, may become adversaries and compete headlong in the New World and Southeast Asia. In the post-Cold War new world order United States and China may constitute the First Bloc. The Second Bloc would comprise India, France, Germany, Canada and Japan.

 

(13) Geopolitical Road Map of 2050 AD

Half a Century from now, in 2050 AD, what will the map of the world looks like? The Economist, did a survey of the new Geopolitics, the road to 2050, in July 31,1999 issue. The future world shall comprise solely of seven or eight lumbering- cultural monsters. People are moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The post-modern system, will takeover, and the descendants of the European people who invented nation-state will themselves have invented a new multilingual political entity that covers most of non-Orthodox Europe. In which case that global state-hood tally will come down again, with a bump. Taking the lead from Germany-France leadership of European Union, China and India would unite the nation states in Asia and Africa to form the ‘Union of Asia, Africa & Australia’ acronym UAAA. The Union of Asia Africa & Australia would unite the Black, Brown and yellow worlds, Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu worlds. The Asian conquest of Australia and Siberia would unite Yellow, Brown and Black races.

 

(14) Richelieu’s Raison D’etat (1624-1642)

KISSINGER DIDN’T FOLLOW RAISON D’ETAT: One. Republican Neo-Conservatism rejects former Secretary Dr. Henry Kissinger’s claim that the diplomacy he pursued represented realism as defined by Richelieu’s Raison D’etat, because Secretary Kissinger implemented the hidden religious agenda of amoral iconoclast patriarchy in garb of Realism. While Cardinal Richelieu opposed Papal designs in the 30-year Counter Reformation Wars and subordinated the Papal Catholic interests to the national interests of France, Secretary Kissinger promoted anti-Buddhism Papal interests in Cambodia, Laos and South Vietnam to the detriment of national interests of the United States. Secretary Zbingniew sacrificed national interests of the United States to promote Papal monotheist interests by overthrowing Shah of Iran to impose the theocracy of Ayatollah Khomeini. Secretary Madeleine Albright sacrificed the national interests of the United States when she promoted Papal interests to disintegrate Slave Orthodox Yugoslavia to engineer the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Catholic Croatia from Yugoslavia. The diplomacy of Kissinger-type Realism promotes the national interests of the iconoclast patriarchal Vatican at the cost of the national interests of the United States. Secretary Condoleezza Rice is a true Realist in terms of the Richelieu’s Raison D’etat. Secretary Rice’s Realism rejected the Kissinger-type Realism, because the realism of Raison D’etat requires that Diplomat must not use the foreign policy to promote any hidden iconoclast patriarchal religious agenda. Raison D’etat requires that foreign policy conduct of a Diplomat must only promote the national interests of a nation, and must never use the foreign policy apparatus of a nation for promoting the interests of a Church or Papacy, even when the interests of Papacy may coincide with that of the State. Secretary Kissinger followed the policy of Balance of Power but misinterpreted the Realism. Secretary Kissinger put upside down the Richelieu doctrine of Raison D’etat and used it to promote the religious interests of the Papacy and religious right conservative conspiracy but justified it in terms of the balance of power interests of the United States. In nutshell the foreign policies of Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Brzezinski and secretary Albright used the Richelieu’s doctrine of Realism to promote the religious interests of the Papacy and religious right conservative conspiracy, but used the Richelieu’s doctrine of Balance of Power to justify the implementation of hidden religious agenda through the foreign policy apparatus of the White House. In short Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Brzezinski and Secretary Albright acted as the spies of the Pope inside the White House and caused great harm to the national interests of United States defined in terms of secular power. When policies of Secretaries Kissinger-Brzezinski-Albright judged in terms of secular national interests defined in terms of national power then they might have inadvertently committed high treason against the United States, as they misused the infrastructure of the United States to promote the hidden agenda and interests of the religious right conservative conspiracy and Papacy.

 

RAISON D’ETAT AND BALANCE OF POWER: Two. With the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1624, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. Cardinal de Richelieu was the First Minister of Catholic Kingdom of France from 1624 to 1642, during the period of Counter Reformation Thirty years Wars (1618-1648). Richelieu’s 18-year reign as First Minister of France blunted the Pope and Habsburg Holy Roman Empire’s attempts to destroy Protestant Reformation and Lutheran Movement, during 30-year religious war in Europe, in which more than one-third population of Germans died. The Counter Reformation War was one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of the mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe was divided into two armed camps, namely the Protestant Camp and Catholic Camp. In the crucible of this conflict, Cardinal Richelieu grafted the principle of Raison d’etat on French foreign policy, a principal that the other European states adopted in the century that followed.

 

(15) Hindu Eclectic Vs Vatican’s Purist View

AMERICAN UNIVERSAL CIVILIZATION REJECTS PURIST VIEW: One. Republican Neo-Conservatism rejects Vatican’s purist view and accepts the eclectic view of life and believes that the purist fundamentalism is a curse on American Universal Civilization. Neo-Conservatism rejects Papal belief that passion give validity to ethics that Christians or Christian community cannot be stronger than the strength of their passionate beliefs. Neo-Conservatism advocates liberal religious views and rejects fundamentalist totalitarian purist religious views as latter is not appropriate for the American Universal Civilization in the 21st Century.

 

ECLECTIC LIBERAL RELIGIONS: Two. The Sword of eclectic liberal religions that is the Sword of Protestant Non-Denominational Christianity and the Sword of Hinduism is mightier than the Sword of Islam, Sword of Catholicism and the Sword of Judaism. Clash of Civilization is the Clash of fundamentalist totalitarian Vs eclectic liberal religions. Hindus, Buddhists and non-denominational Protestants, normally do not hold religious beliefs with unbridled fundamentalist passion, because they value the eclectic view of life and feel that purist fundamentalism is the curse on ‘Our Universal Civilization.’ It explains that United States, India, Canada and Britain positively encourage multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-linguistic, and multi-religious society. Does it make Hinduism, Buddhism, and non-denominational Protestant Christianity lesser a truth than fundamentalist Islam and conservative Catholicism? Are we as a community strong only as much as our beliefs are strong? Is it enough for beliefs or ethical view to be passionately held? Does passion give validity to the ethics?

 

LOOK AT FUTURE WITH AN OPEN MIND: Three. When you are with Hindus, Buddhists and non-denominational Protestants, you realize that you are among people whose identity is not confined to and not contained in their faith and religion, even when they may be very religious and firm believers of their faith. Hindus, Buddhists and non-denominational Protestants do not want to recreate the golden age of the past, but discover the new future. They look at the future with an open mind. Hindus and Buddhists do not want to conquer other countries and do not want to make religious converts.

 

(16) Islamic Axis of Evil

One. Which nation is part of the Axis of Evil? Is Islamic terrorism an evil? Is Islamic Atom Bomb an evil? What nations would join the good nations in the global wars against Islamic terrorism?

 

Two. Neo-conservatism believes that the Clash of Civilization is the Clash of the Good Nations and Evil Nations. Neo-Conservatism believes that Hindu India is a good nation while China is an evil nation. Neo-Conservatism believes that Islamic Atom bomb is an evil, especially the specter of forthcoming Iranian Atom Bomb, which requires remedial preemptive attacks on Iran. Neo-Conservatism believes that United States must take preventive measures to prevent Iran, Saudi Arabia, Libya and Malaysia from acquiring nuclear weapons, even if the remedial measures involve American preemptive nuclear strikes on atom bomb seeking oil-producing Islamic nations.

 

Three. The Wahhabi terrorist attacks of 9/11 an opening move of War of Islamic Jihad on Protestant United States, with an implied consent of Europeans. Church of Rome had rejoiced when Ottoman Muslims launched the cannon attack on Byzantine fort and refused to come to their rescue. Pope’s Catholics in Europe especially in Germany and France deserted Protestants in President Bush’s war on terrorism. Pope John Paul II didn’t condemn Wahhabi Sunni terrorists that attacked on 9/11/2001, but instead advised Christians not to ignite Christian-Islamic wars on account of this wanton attack on the hegemon Christian King of the world. Sunni Wahhabi Arab terrorists attacked on White Protestant WASP America, not on Catholic Europe, because Papacy indirectly supported albeit consented to Muslim terrorists attacks on Protestant United States, just as Roman Catholic Church supported Ottoman Muslim invasion of Byzantine Orthodox Civilization. Roman Catholic Church supported the Sunni Muslim attacks on Christian Egypt and Christian Syria because Egyptians and Syrians followed Mystic Gnostic Christianity. Hindu India should wholeheartedly commit to support Protestant America’s war on Wahhabi Islamic terrorism and Islamic Atom Bomb. Protestant America and Hindu India be on the same side of the battle lines in the Third World War.

 

(17) Military Coups By Axis of Medieval

One. Neo-Conservatism denounces the use of covert operations by United States to engineer regime changes and military coups in the Third World, especially under Secretaries Kissinger, Brzezinski and Albright.

 

Two. The Axis of Medieval al legitimized the West-inspired military coups to overthrow the democratically elected governments after 1945, in Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Philippines, Indonesia, Greece, Congo, Chile, Venezuela, Peru, and Colombia just to name the few in Third World.

 

Three. To promote proselytizing of predator religions, the Axis of Medieval after 1945, destroyed the monarchies in South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Nepal, Tibet, Greece, Iran, and Afghanistan. The Axis of Medieval waging war of religion on the Buddhist world in Japan, North Korea, South Korea, Taiwan, China, Tibet, Nepal, Burma, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan. The Axis of Medieval promoted riots and secession throughout multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-linguistic liberal democratic societies.

 

(18) Theodosius I destroyed Roman Empire

Protestant Neo-Conservatism warns American public not to get seduced by Pope-led Christian religious right conservative conspiracy that seeks to undermine the Protestant secular character of the United States by implanting a Papal agent in the White House as a President. Voting for Republican Neo-Conservative ticket for presidential election 2008 and thereafter provides an insurance against Papal designs against Protestant sole super power of the world. The Catholic religious right conspiracy is in place to destroy the secular character of WASP United States, just what Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395) destroyed the eclectic secular Roman Empire and Roman Civilization. The ongoing Neo-Counter Reformation War threatens to bring down the wall that separates the State & the Church in the United States.

 

(19) Jews-Evangelicals-Papacy Alliance

Jews would be alongside Protestant religious right in the global clash of races. Many Americans claim that United States invaded Iraq and might invade Syria and Iran in future to promote the national interests of Israel. Protestant Evangelicals have entered into alliance with Orthodox Jews to put the power of United States promote the cause of Israel. Pentagon conquered Israel to eliminate Saddam Hussein the principal threat to Israel. Pentagon might also overthrow regimes in Syria and Iran the two remaining irritants to Israel. Israeli prime minister pleased to have the backing of an American constituency more hawkish than most of his Israeli voters. American Jews, including leaders who once wanted nothing to do with the Christian right point to an important new political alliance. With Israel facing a danger to its existence Jews welcome the help of a group that loudly proclaims its love for the Jewish state.

 

(20) Going it Alone Arrogance

A superpower can always defeat its enemies, but it must persuade its friends. The hallmark of the Bush foreign policy since its inception has been in its sense of going it alone, of America being so right that persuasion and consultation are merely a waste of time and breath, of being so big and powerful that even the reluctant friend must also follow blindly without murmur. Bush foreign policy is shortsighted and it has won America a few allies, but not many friends. America acts truly, as if might makes right. Bush administration does not seem to realize that America needs friends more than it needs allies. Over the horizon, in a place that will surprise and bedevil the Goliath, will come another challenge in form of a David, which might prove fatal to even a super power if it didn’t have big friends. It is high time that America should go easy on the arrogance. The arrogant face that America shows to the world vindicated every European’s caricature of the arrogant American. The Europeans and Asians have come to expect a certain take-it-or-leave-it attitude on the part of America. Whatever the case, America’s credibility as the moderate pro-freedom pro-justice Civilization representing the forces of good virtue is in question. In the global clash of races, the coalition of rival civilizations would be in flux. It is possible that in the clash of civilizations the dominant American Civilization would need more friends than even allies lest the rival coalition of civilizations and races might overwhelm one superpower United States. The moral of the story is: Indian Civilization deserves the respect its size as the world’s 2nd largest population and 4th largest economy demands, from fellow American democracy. Indian Hindu Civilization should be friends and allies of the Protestant American Civilization in the looming Clash of Civilizations. The White Anglo Saxon Protestants and Aryan Hindus would be on the same side of the battle lines in the global clash of races.  

 

(21) Civilization has Reservoir of Aggression

Protestant President Bush’s preemptive strikes against barbarian Muslim Iraq, before Iraq could develop WMDs and launch surprise attacks on the United States, was fully justified in terms of right of self-preservation of the Civilizations and the right of Civilizations to launch preemptive military strikes against barbarians. India supports the right of the Protestant Civilization to launch preemptive strikes against Muslim barbarian nations; to preempt barbarian stealth attacks on the Civilizations. To permanently secure the Christian Civilization against the repeat of the Wahhabi 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Christians have all rights to put all Wahhabi nations in chains. The rights of the barbarians do not count, when the Civilization feels threatened by the surprise attacks of the barbarians.

 

Like all animals human beings have a reservoir of aggression just below the surface, and it’s an evolutionary endowment. Like all human beings the human civilizations also have a reservoir of aggression just below the surface, and it is an historical development because of the cyclical barbarian invasions of the Civilizations and the Civilizations’ retaliatory preemptive strikes against the breeding ground of the barbarians. Even if the Civilization that succumbs to the attacks of the barbarians and come under the control of the barbarians, over period of time, that Civilization regroups and mass produces the military technology and defeats the barbarians. The Civilization that periodically undertakes the overwhelming preemptive strikes against the homeland and breeding ground of the barbarians, before the barbarians are able to organize the attacks, succeeds in averting and defeating the attacks of the barbarians. The reservoir of aggression just below the civilized façade makes the civilizations lash out at barbarians from time to time.

 

Muslim nations deserve a thorough beating at the hands of Christians, Hindus and Buddhists. Even Muslim women relished the beating the Muslim nations get at the hands of Christian nations. In years to come barbarian Muslim historians may cite the President Bush’s invasion of Iraq as evidence of American Christian perversity and vulgarity, while they would continue to eulogize the hijacker terrorists of 9/11 as Muslim martyrs. There is something cathartic about shooting, invading and conquering the barbarian nations. Something satisfying about seeing the barbarian leader’s head snap at the moment of impact, a mist of residue wafting into the air. American invasion of Iraq was the only game in the world where an invading power could shoot the sons of Saddam Hussein live and Iraqi couldn’t shoot back. Failure of the Iraqis to retaliate against Americans exposed the military weakness of militant Islam. Perhaps only Americans could plan something so wantonly violent and so apologetically enjoyable as the phantom invasion of Iraq, without any major American casualty. When Civilization like that of America aims at Saddam Hussein and Islamic terrorists, it is really aiming at its own sloth. American Civilization is shooting at Iraq, because Islamic Civilization is a failure. By shooting at Islamic militant Iraq, which became rich because of oil wealth, Americans are shooting at that part of their iconoclast monotheist self, which became rich like hunter-gatherer by virtue of the oil-incomes. After the defeat of Vietnam, the Americans relished the simple thrill of shooting a freak Iraq. Americans felt good to blow sons of Saddam away. Saddam was really annoying Americans. In the coming years barbarian Islamic nations would rue the day when they launched their terrorist attacks on Christian, Hindu and Buddhist civilizations and Civilizations would undertake massive retaliatory strikes against militant Muslim terrorists, as an evidence of Civilization’s perversity and vulgarity. When Civilizations undertake massive retaliatory strikes against the barbarians, they are really aiming at their own reservoir of aggression. Civilizations by shooting at the barbarians are shooting at that part of its own that holds reservoir of aggression. Civilizations have more aggression just below the surface than the most militant barbarian, so it would be prudent for the Islamic terrorists not to awaken the sleeping aggression lying dormant in the Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations, lest Islamic Civilization might become extinct, if it faced the wrath of Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations.

 

(21) Query

How should diplomats investigate the destruction of 5000-year old pagan Hindu religious artifacts in Baghdad Museum in 2003, and the destruction of 2000-year old Bamian Buddha statues in Afghanistan in 2001 by iconoclast monotheist Semite Muslims? How should philosopher investigate the world in the 21st Century? What are the underlying conflicts and issues that would determine the nature and outcome of the major wars in the 21st Century? Are the rules of conflict and war being rewritten? Did President Bush invade Iraq to promote the interests of Israel or Mecca or America or Big Oil or Christianity or Democracy? Should America’s Wars on Afghanistan and Iraq and future wars on Syria, Yemen, and Iran viewed as the “Clash of Civilizations” or “Clash of Continents” or “Clash of Religions” or “Clash of Races” or “Clash of Political Ideologies” or “Clash of Religious Intolerant Cults” or “Clash of Colonial Empires” or “Clash of Oil?” Is the United States’ war on Iraq an “Operation Iraqi Freedom” or “Operation No Nukes” or “Operation Cheap Oil” or “Operation $ as Currency of Oil” or “Operation of Semite conquest of Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Iran” or “Operation No More Islamic Suicide Bombers in Israel” or “Operation Semite Mecca Caliphate” or “Operation Free Oil” or “Operation American Caliphate of Arabia” or “Operation Pax Americana.” Did United States attack Iraq to create “American Oil Colonial Empire” or “Semite Mecca Empire” or “Israeli Empire? Why should United States pay for the Iraqi oil, if victory in the Iraq war established American oil colony in Iraq? Why shouldn’t United States also invade Semite Saudi Arabia and establish oil colony in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE? Why shouldn’t United States also impose American laws and democratic institutions in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE? Would United Sates invade and conquer Syria and Yemen to establish Semite Israeli rule or Semite Saudi rule or Judeo-Christian Catholic rule or Protestant American imperial rule over Arabian Peninsula?

 

1(3) Principal Issues in Clash

(1) 2003 Is Turning Point in History

The Oil replaced Religion as the determining factor for the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century, while religious issued determined the Clash of Civilization in the 20th Century. President Bush’s April 2003 invasion of Iraq is the turning point of history, as it ushered in the new age of colonial empires and oil-interests became the principle determinant of the international diplomacy and wars. The Third Millennium is a new age and 21st Century created a new world order. The Top five world powers in 2003 are: United States, China, India, Russia and European Union. One. In 21st Century great powers would have a legal right to establish colonies in the oil-producing countries and great powers would respect the colonial rights of other colonial powers and rights of great powers in their colonial empires. The year 2003 is a turning point in history and it created a new international system. The world’s Top-4 Great Powers in 2003 are, United States, China, India and Russia. The world’s top four economies in terms of 1999 GNP at purchasing power parity are, United States, China, Japan and India. The world’s Top-3 populous nations are, China, India and United States. India and China should not miss the second age of colonialism as they missed the post-1500 colonialism. Hindu India and Buddhist China should cooperate with Christian United States to carve out Indian and Chinese colonial empires in the 21st Century.

 

First, speaking during his May ‘03 flying visit to Iraq, Tony Blair told British soldiers they were involved in an epic and historic undertaking. "I think that when people look back at this time and this conflict, I honestly believe they will see this as one of the defining moments of our century." Blair is right. In numerous respects, Iraq was indeed a "defining moment", a global event that will crucially influence the conduct of international relations in the 21st century. The UN Security Council’s acceptance of Occupying Powers status for United States and Britain over Iraq, with the tacit consent of Russia, France and Germany heralded a new age of colonial empires in the 21st Century, which discontinued the De-Colonization process that gave birth to numerous new states after the Second World War.

 

Second, Iraq War was a defining moment for Tony Blair's New Labour-New World, as New Labour Party would compete with Conservative Party by harping on the virtues of new age of British colonialism. White Christians in 21st Century determined to recreate the great old White Christian colonial empires that they lost during Cold War. It is possible unless checked more than 100 countries might lose their independence and sovereignty in the first half of 21st Century to become possessions of the great powers led colonial empires. Tony Blair during 2002 visit to Afghanistan spoke about the need to reestablish colonies in the 21st Century. British Prime Minister Harold Wilson, influenced by some foreign agency declared in 1968 that by 1971 Britain would move out of all military bases and colonies east of Suez Canal. British Labor Government gave freedom and independence to Oman, Trucial States and Brunei without their asking for it, as certain foreign powers wanted Britain to surrender its colonial rights over the oil-producing British colonies so that foreign power, namely United States could move in. It logically follows that United Arab Emirates, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait and Brunei would meet the fate of Iraq and become American British oil colony in the first two decades of the 21st Century. Saudi Arabia would become the direct American colonial possession much like Iraq in not so distant future.

 

Third, the Iraq War symbolized that Bush and Blair shared the fundamentally moral view that Britain and United States should act as a force for good in the world. The non-existent opposition to the American invasion by Iraqi people and Iraqi army demonstrated that freedom and democracy are not beyond any nation's reach. Conquest of Iraq served notice on dictators everywhere that their opposition to the United States hegemony may not go unpunished. Iraq war was a "defining moment" and marked the maiden outing of George Bush's new go-anywhere doctrine of pre-emptive war making. Post-9/11 America has assumed a right to attack, not merely to defend itself, whenever it feels threatened. Iraq was an assault by a powerful country on a much weaker but nevertheless independent sovereign state, a symbolic act with very real, destabilizing implications. Iraq was a "defining moment" because the US and Britain were ultimately prepared to bypass the UN security council, ignore their obligations to uphold the UN Charter and blatantly undermine international law.

 

The Iraq War was truly remarkable, as both Anglo Saxon United States and Britain showed themselves ready to break with long-standing friends, namely continental France, Germany and Belgium, as well as risk wrecking strategic alliances Nato that were previously considered sacrosanct and defy the great mass of global opinion. Iraq may have been fought in the name of Iraqi democracy and “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” but democracy itself, in Iraq as well as in United States was one of its great victims.

 

Fourth, whether President Bush and Prime Minister Blair were very great far-seeing statesman or else fool of fools, would depend upon their ability to create a post-war stable new colonial world order, where other great powers that allowed America to conquer Iraq, get their fair share of colonial empires in the 21st Century. The sense of pride in achievement and attitudes of President George Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair suggest that, in similar circumstances, they would do it all again, and again, regardless. They even go so far as to imply, ungraciously, that those who, before and after the war, questioned the wisdom of his actions are wrong-headed or choking on sour grapes. This mistaken confidence that such an epochal political, military and diplomatic reconfiguration, this veritable step-change in global affairs, can be accepted without demur or dissent or even much debate is truly staggering. Either Bush or Blair are very great, far-seeing statesman indeed, or else fool of fools. Whether the Iraq War viewed as triumph or disgrace, as brave new departure or dangerous setback, its watershed nature as epochal turning point in history required full scrutiny and the fullest, informed public discussion.

 

The glory of President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair lied in the fact that they legitimized the very concept of colonialism and oil imperialism by securing 14-0 votes in the UN Security Council for gaining legitimacy as legal Occupying Powers and owners of Iraqi oil. The White Euro-American Christian world united as never before at the onset of the 21st Century to create White Christian colonial empires. Russia would support American colonialism as successor to the imperial Russian Czarist House of Romanov monarchy, President Putin’s Russia would fully cooperate with colonial imperialist United States and Britain to increase Russia’s bargaining position to secure the consent of the United States to expand Russia’s national frontiers. The Iraq War is the turning point because Russia agreed not to oppose American Oil Colonialism in Iraq and OPEC Arabian Gulf.

 

Fifth, the Iraq War is a turning point as it united the First World with the Second World to undermine the integrity and sovereignty of the Non Aligned Third World and reduced the image and power of the United Nations and might have made UNO as irrelevant in 2003 as League of Nations had been before the onset of the WW II. The great powers no longer believed in great power multilateralism or United Nations multilateralism as the basic system to resolve international crisis. Neither President Bush no Prime Minister Blair believe in multilateralism as the basic organizing principle in global affairs. Britain, Spain, Italy and Japan truly prefer a unipolar world run from Washington.

 

Sixth, the Iraq War is a turning point as it represented the clash of American oil interests with French, German and Russian oil interests in Iraq. France, Germany and Russia had signed highly lucrative oil deals with Saddam Hussein that shut out United States and British oil companies. Had president Bush not invaded Iraq, the profits of the future Iraqi oil in post- UN sanctions Iraq, might have eroded or undermined the sole super powers status of the United States?

 

Seventh, the Iraq War was a turning point as it exposed the Free press in United States and Britain as votaries of the falsehood and propaganda that even Joseph Goebbels would envy. It explains why did American and British electronic and print media scapegoat France so shamelessly and shortsightedly? And should they not now take a closer look at a common EU foreign and defense policy to reduce Britain's chronic subservience to the US will?

 

Eighth, in the global clash of races India and China should not miss the second wave of colonial empires that began in 2003 as they had missed the first wave of colonial empires that began with 1500 AD. India and China should learn to assert their newfound status as the members of the Top-3 world powers in the world.

 

Ninth, the Egypt, Syria, Libya and Algeria were Christian nations peopled by non-Semite, non-Arab people when Semite Arab Muslim raiders conquered and imposed Islam by sword. The Sword of Christianity became more powerful than the Sword of Islam after the Christian conquest of Iraq. It is possible that Egypt, Algeria, Libya, Algeria, Turkey and Syria might become Christian nations again in 21st Century, just as Spain and Portugal became Christian nations again after 800 years of Muslim rule, in 15th Century.

 

(2) How Civilized Defend Civilization?

Two. The Civilized Civilizations defend Civilizations against surprise attacks of the predator barbarian invasions by undertaking overwhelming preemptive strikes against the breeding grounds and homelands of the barbarians. Civilized nations, United States, Israel and India should jointly undertake military counter proliferation measures to deny Muslim nations access to nuclear weapon technology. In the Third World War and Clash of Civilization, Hindu India, would be on the same side of the battle lines with Protestant United States. India, United States and Israel agree that Islamic Atom Bomb is the greatest threat to human civilization. It is in the common national interests of India, United States and Israel that Hindu Protestant and Judaic forces should jointly undertake counter-proliferation measures to deny Islamic world access to the nuclear weapon technology, by undertaking preemptive strikes against Muslim nuclear weapons facilities. No Islamic nation, including Saudi Arabia, Iran should ever get hold of nuclear weapons.

 

First. Barbarian Wahhabi Muslim terrorists equipped by low-tech radiation bombs presents the greatest threat to the human race. History of the world is the chronicle of the ongoing clash of barbarians and civilizations. Civilized nations maintain civilization by undertaking decisive overwhelming preemptive strikes against terrorist extremist barbarians. Civilized world powers should declare in advance clear policy through which the civilized seek to maintain civilization in the age of barbarian’s invasions of the civilization. Islamic atom bomb presents the greatest threat to world civilization in the 21st Century. Christian religious right transferred nuclear technology to Pakistan to deter India’s conventional attacks on Pakistan. Wahhabi Saudi Arabia could acquire nuclear weapons and missile capability and lay the foundation for the second round of barbarian invasions of world’s civilizations armed with nukes. Throughout history the barbarians exploited the freedom the civilization to unleash stealth barbarian attacks on the civilization and many times in history succeeded to conquer the civilization and remade the civilization in the image of the barbarians. Civilizations in history succumbed to the attacks of the barbarians because they failed to take preventive measures against barbarians and failed to retaliate against the barbarian home base, the proverbial womb of the barbarism.

 

Second. It matters that diplomats and academics of the Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations concur with much of this proffered language, thereby announcing to all other countries in the Islamic and Christian Civilizations that the Hindu position is not an act of hegemonic bravado, but a framework of policy and diplomacy through which the civilized should seek to maintain civilization. The World Civilization requires the civilization’s worldview to mobilize the resources in its war against barbarian intolerance, fundamentalism, and extremism. Muslim barbarians destroyed the Civilization of ancient Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iran and Byzantine and imposed Islam by sword.

 

Third. The dismal performance of Muslim forces in Iraq and their total capitulation to Christian armies turned the table on Islam. Christian sword is more powerful than Islamic sword in 21st Century. India should support the G-8 Summit Statement that nuclear proliferation is the gravest single threat to the safety of the world. India should join forces with great powers to undertake counter nuclear proliferation measures to forestall the menace of Islamic nuclear weapons.

 

Fourth. India accepts the right to Pakistan to possess nuclear weapons, as Aryan Pakistan is a civilized nation and because the Christian West transferred the nuclear technology to Muslim Pakistan to hold pagan India in check. India should join great powers to undertake counter nuclear proliferation measures against Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Krgyzstan, Azerbaijan, as Arab and Central Asian nuclear weapons undermined the national security of India. India should develop National Missile Shield to shoot down the incoming nuclear missiles jointly with Japan, Germany, France and Russia to defang Islamic Atom Bomb. The national security of the world Civilization and the civilized nations take precedence over the rights of sovereignty and independence of the threatening terrorist, intolerant, extremist, fundamentalist nations that harbor and nurture global terrorism and threaten civilizations. Islamic nations should never gain access to weapons of mass destructions.

 

Fifth, the barbarian terrorist fundamentalist nations commit international crime of piracy when they finance and nurture terrorism across international frontiers, and international law of Piracy at High Seas entitle the aggrieved great powers launch preemptive counter-terrorist measures against the home base of the terrorists to eradicate the menace of international terrorism at its source in its homeland. It is necessary that Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox great powers should join forces with Protestant and Catholic great powers to de-nuke Islamic bomb and to impose blanket ban on the transfer of nuclear technology and weapons of mass destruction and missile technology to the Middle East. America’s naked imperial occupation of oil-rich Iraq could turn out to be a blessing in disguise if it set out series of policies that would keep nuclear and WMD technology out of the reach of the Islamic world.

 

Sixth, no Muslim nation, including Pakistan, can be trusted with an Atom Bomb or Weapons of Mass Destruction, because they are likely to use it guided by their Holy Koran. No oil-rich Islamic country should ever possess develop or deploy nuclear weapons or Weapons of Mass Destruction. Civilized Christian, Buddhist and Hindu great powers should announce to all other countries that ban on Islamic Nukes and Islamic WMDs is not an act of hegemonic bravado, but a policy through which the civilized powers seek to maintain civilization. In the global clash of races the Christian, Buddhist and Hindu world powers would be on the same side of the battle lines to destroy barbarian Islamic terrorism. The followers of Islamic intolerant, extremist terrorist fundamentalists represent the forces of barbarians in the 21st century. The menace of Islamic nukes would promote unity among civilized great powers. India should join the anti-terrorism coalition of world powers, because Islamic terrorism also threatens India. In global clash of races civilized Hindu India should join forces with civilized White Christian world to denuke Islamic Nuclear Weapons and to neutralize barbarian Islamic Wahhabi terrorism.

 

Seventh, President George Bush pursued the Diplomacy of Deception when he invaded oil-rich Iraq for eradicating the WMDs. America hyped the issue of WMDs to war Germany, Japan and Canada to forego any dreams of developing and deploying nuclear weapons, otherwise they would face the wrath of the United States.

 

(3) Role of Overpopulation in Diplomacy

Three. The Almighty Goddess of the matriarchal religions retaliates against the iconoclast monotheist patriarchal religious assaults on the Goddess-worshipping peoples, by sealing the wombs of the women of the patriarchal civilizations and barbarians, which causes their depopulation and eventual extinction. The principal issue of the 21st Century shall be the redistribution of the continents of the world, and it is moral imperative that White race allowed unlimited immigration to the empty continents of Australia and Siberia from the overpopulated Asia. Empty continents of Australia and Siberia can no longer remain white lands in 21st Century. Overpopulation in Asia would determine world diplomacy in 21st Century. Over a billion Asians would resettle in Australia, Siberia, Middle East, Central Asia and Africa in the 21st Century. India and China representing Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations represent billion plus population, and 2nd and 1st largest population in the world respectively. Almighty Goddess punished the followers of monotheist iconoclast anti-Goddess patriarchal religions by closing the wombs of White Christian women that resulted in the steep fall in the birth rates of the European Christian nations. Goddess blessed the women of India, China, Incas and Mayas that enabled their population growth. Population is an instrument of power. China and India represent world’s largest and second largest population in the world. China and India represent world’s 2nd and 4th largest economy of the world in terms of size of GNP at PPP. It is likely that Boris Yeltsin partitioned the Soviet Union to maintain Slav Russian majority in Russian Federation as population of Russia declined on the average in 1990s and 2000s by an average of 750,000 people per year. The decline of the population in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Japan presented great threat to their continued economic growth, which can be offset by massive foreign immigration. The ancient Greece, ancient Rome, and ancient Egypt declined because of the decline of their populations, as the smaller populations couldn’t maintain the imperial and expansionist policies.

 

The decline of Europe and decline of Russia predicated by the decline of their population. World politics is directly influenced by the demographic trends, declining birth rates and the size of the populations. Demographic trends indicate that by 2012 Palestinians will outnumber Jews between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Israel was founded as a democratic Jewish State and must remain democratic as well as Jewish-majority so to fulfill the prime objective of Zionism. Zionists realized that creating a new state of Palestine was in the national interest of Zionism otherwise they would forfeit the prime objective of Zionism if they insisted in controlling the lives of 3.5 million Palestinians. It is imperative that Israelis find a secure way to disengage politically, geographically and demographically from Palestine. Israeli after 2012, could remain either democratic state or Jewish State since Palestinians would outnumber Jews in Israel. Hindu India and Buddhist China guaranteed to play very significant role as world powers, primarily because of the size of their populations and the economy. The continued growth of United States would attract young white people away from Europe, Canada and Australia and add to their shortage of working population base. The non-White Mestizos and unmixed indigenous Mayas, Aztecs and Incas overwhelmingly outnumber the unmixed whites of European descent in Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Belize, and Honduras, which would end the age of white domination in Central America and South America. The Shiites outnumber Sunni Muslims in Arabian Peninsula and it could result in Iran’s taking over Mecca & Medina and the secession of Shiite-majority oil-producing Provinces in Saudi Arabia bordering Arabian Sea.  

 

The principle conflict of the 21st Century is the conflict between overpopulated overcrowded Asia and the empty continents of Australia and Africa. China determined to take over empty lands of Siberia, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Indonesia in the 21st Century, hoping to find new homes for 500 Chinese that would emigrate from Mainland China to these empty lands. India, Pakistan and Bangladesh would jointly conduct diplomacy to find ways to find new homes for 500 million South Asians in Central Asia, Middle East and Africa during 21st Century. The 21st Century would witness the massive emigration from overcrowded Asia to empty lands in Siberia, Australia, New Zealand, Middle East, and Africa. The mass migration of one billion Asians to the empty continents of Australia, Africa and South America would herald a new age of Globalization and true World Civilization would emerge. In the new age of colonial empires in the post-Iraq War International System overcrowded civilizations of Asia would jointly negotiate with White Civilizations to bring about the fair distribution of the continents that white nations illegally occupied in the post-1500 era. If United States acquired the right to invade and occupy Iraq then India and China should also get certain colonial rights to resettle one billion Chinese and Indians in empty lands in the empty continents.

 

The Value added by the total Agricultural sector to the GDP as % of GDP in Australia (3%), Canada (3%) and USA (2%). The Agricultural sector in 1999 contributed only ($ 13 billion) the 3% of $426 billion GNP in Australia, contributed ($22 billion) 3% of $726 billion GNP in Canada, and contributed ($ 167 billion) the 2% of $8.4 trillion GNP of United States. If Canada, Australia and United States were to give all their agricultural lands and plantations to India and China, it would lessen only $202 billion in the combined GNPs of USA, Canada and Australia. The entire agricultural lands of USA, Australia and Canada contribute only $202 billion, which is less than the GNP of Pakistan ($237 billion). United States spends many billions on agricultural subsidy, which it would save if it were to give the agricultural lands to India or China. The diplomats in 21st Century should work out a mechanism to transfer the control of the agricultural lands to the overpopulated nations as the agricultural lands do not contribute much towards the overall GNP and prosperity of Untied States, Canada and Australia.

 

(4) Breakup of Atlantic Partnership

Four. The relations of United States with France can never be repaired. Two hostile poles have emerged in Paris and Washington and G-8 Summit accentuated the differences rather than patching up the ever widening rift. The NATO and Atlantic Partnership died in the rubble of Iraq War. The Atlantic Partnership reversed itself when Germany and France aligned with Russia and China to bloc America’s Resolution on Iraq in UN Security Council before the Iraq War.

 

The basics of their French and United States worldviews didn’t change one iota during and after G-8 Summit. France and United States are engaged in the strategic competition that began earlier in 2003. Both Messrs. Chirac and Bush indicated they have barely moved from the fundamental positions that divided them over Iraq. Each used the G-8 Summit to drive forward his view of how the world should be ordered. President Chirac widened the G-8 Summit to include leaders from non-G8 Powers such as China and India, Brazil and Mexico, in an effort to promote his vision of a multipolar world. In French vision of multipolar world, the US freedom of action should be subject to agreement by the rest of the international community. France said that it was essential the expanded-summit format should have continuity, changing permanently the nature of G8. Tony Blair promised to repeat the expanded Summit format when Britain hosts the G8 in 2005. India and China supported the France’s version of multipolar world. India should seek military ties with France, Germany and Belgium to develop independent European Rapid Deployment Force. India should seek military bases in Germany and France.

 

President Bush set out his own vision of a world divided into those countries prepared to act with the United States to combat “evil,” and those that prefer to sow division. India is in both the camps. India supports the multipolar world envisioned by France. However, India wants to reap the profits of American oil colonialism in Iraq by sending Indian troops as peacekeepers in Kurdish region of Northern Iraq, as Kurds are Aryans much like Indians and Iranians and different from Arabs and Semites. Only United States can induct India as the permanent member of the UN Security Council. Only United States can help India emerge as regional policeman in the Middle East, Southeast Asia and Africa. India hopes to get MFN Status, most favored trading nations status with United States by supporting Pentagons imperialistic colonial policies in the Middle East.

 

The G-8 Summit lost its luster. The economics used to be the focus of G-7 Summits of the past that began in 1975, now augmented by Russia to create the G-8. It became evident sometime in the 1990s that efforts by heads of state to coordinate monetary policies and the like were ineffective or counter-productive. The Gross Domestic product (GDP) in Germany and Italy actually fell in the first quarter 03 from a year before. Germany, with an unemployment rate pushing 11%, is being cited as a candidate to follow Japan into deflation. The 1999 GNP of United States ($8.4 trillion) in was larger than the combined GNP ($7.2 trillion) of 6 members of G-8 Summit, Germany ($1.8 trillion), France ($1.3 trillion), UK ($1.2 trillion), Italy ($1.2 trillion), Russia ($929 billion) and Canada ($726 billion). European Union boldly created a single currency, the Euro, now shared by 12 European countries. The Euro has a sharp run up against US Dollar. It is in the national interest of France, Germany and Russia that China and India invited to join the next G-8 Summit to create G-10. The GNP of China ($4.1 trillion) was larger than the combined 3-country GNP of Germany, UK, & Italy. The GNP of India is larger than every one of the 6 European members of the G-8 Summit. The Top-4 economies of the world are, United States, China, Japan ($3 trillion) and India ($2.2 trillion).

 

(5) American Supremacist & Economic War

Five. The 19th Century was anti-France Century. The 20th Century was anti-Germany Century. The 21st Century shall be anti-American Century. President Bush is a supremacist in the eyes of French and Germans. The fact of diplomacy is that Americans hate Europeans and Europeans hate Americans. Even Canadian and Mexicans hate Americans. United States went to war against European powers in WWI and WWII and US might do it again in WW 3. By 2050 young Europeans and Americans would wonder how could America pretend to have loved West Europe after 1945 WW II. Atlantic Alliance met its definitive end in the Iraq War. France-Russia pact would replace NATO. European nations would develop independent rapid deployment force to deploy troops outside NATO. In the eyes of the Germans Bush and Hitler are alike. In the eyes of the French, the United States practiced Supremacism and waged economic war on Western Europe. United States believed that United States is the only military, economic and financial power in the world. American investors attempting to take control over European defense companies. United States view with exasperation and distrust the multipolar view of the world. American industrialists are pursuing the logic of economic war against Europe. United States wants to be the sole referee of the world. The growing rift between United States and France can never be bridged and it provides great diplomatic opening for Indian, Russian and Chinese diplomats. The reversal or breakup of the Atlantic partnership is in the national interests of India, Russia and China. President Putin would exploit the growing US-France rift to cement diplomatic, economic and military alliance with France to forge European front to Counter-balance American power. India, China and Japan might also join France-Russia entente to neutralize America’s preponderance in the world. United States should make tempting strategic offers to India, to tempt India join the preponderant power. India should superimpose the preponderance of the dominant power, provided India gets a fair share of the spoils of the dominance. United States should make very tempting profitable offer to India to keep India on the American Camp. United States should make India the permanent member of the UN Security Council and offer India the Most Favored Trading Nations (MFN) to India. United States should also work towards the reunification of India, as reward for India providing 3,500,000 soldiers during WW II and 1,500,000 soldiers during WW I. United States would lose the WW III if India joined the Anti-US Camp led by France, Germany, Russia and China.

 

Had President Bush not joined the St. Petersburg Celebrations and Evian G-8 Summit both these events would have lost the luster and Russia and France would have lost the great leverage that these two events provided to the hosts. The temporary truce offered by France and Germany to make the St. Petersburg celebrations and Evian G-8 Summit success realized their diplomatic purpose and the diplomacy is back to the normal state of US-France rivalry. France's defense minister Michele Alliot-Marie accused in June ’03 Donald Rumsfeld of American supremacism and U.S. industry of waging "economic war" on Europe. The American Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld believes the United States is the only military, economic and financial power in the world. France does not share this vision. In January ‘03, Rumsfeld had dismissed France and Germany as "old Europe" in contrast to a "new Europe" of mostly eastern European countries more supportive of Washington. Alliot-Marie said military and intelligence co-operation between Paris and Washington had been unaffected by the split over Iraq. The Pentagon said in May ’03 that France would not be invited to a major military exercise in Nevada in 2004. Top U.S. military and aerospace figures boycotted the opening of the Paris Air Show a prestigious event held every two years to the noise of American fly-pasts. This time, the Pentagon banned the traditional flying displays by its military pilots and scaled down its presence at the Le Bourget show in what is widely seen as a deliberate snub. European firms to stand together to resist an American "economic war." "American industrialists are pursuing a logic of economic war. This attitude is not connected to the Iraq episode. Faced with this, European industry must regroup in order to be in a better position to resist. Alliot-Marie was worried by what she sees as moves by U.S. investors to attempt to take control of firms involved in European defense and had ordered a study into the issue. Economics apart, France and the United States remained far apart on the role to be played by Washington in shaping world affairs. France used the Group of Eight summit in Evian two weeks ago to promote a "multipolar" view of the world that Bush administration, including Rumsfeld, are said to view with exasperation and distrust. It reflects a widely held view in France that Washington wants to be the sole referee on the world stage. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has even questioned why France wants to counterbalance U.S. power.

 

The June 2003 public opinion poll reconfirmed that Iraq War resulted in the permanent alienation of the Europe from America. The diplomatic pleasantries at Evian G-8 Summit and St. Petersburg didn’t dilute or undermine the resolve of France, Germany and Russia to cement European ties to hold America in check. The June 2003 public opinion poll by Pew Research Center finds Iraq war has deepened international skepticism toward US, American global policies and President Bush, with even military allies voicing disappointment or suspicion. Iraq war has widened rift between Americans and Western Europeans, further inflamed Muslim world, softened support for war against terrorism and weakened global backing for UN and NATO. The war in Iraq may have been a military success, but it has only deepened international skepticism toward the United States, its global policies and President Bush, with even military allies voicing growing disappointment or suspicion.

 

The Iraq War has rattled much of the Muslim world, prodding majorities in most countries to worry about the future of Islam and American military ambitions within their borders. India should cement its military ties with Christian nations, United States as well as France and Germany to help Christian nations colonize oil-producing Arab world in exchange for guaranteed share of the oil profits. Hindu India should hitch its wagon to the American star or European star. 

 

(6) Concert of World Powers

Six. The G-8 Summit at Evian France inadvertently laid the foundation for the Concert of World Powers when President Chirac invited leaders of non-G8 powers, China and India, Brazil and Mexico to Evian Summit. It promoted France’s vision of a multipolar world, where leaders of 12 world powers would subject the freedom of the preeminent power United States to the agreement by rest of the great powers. The six-power Concert of the World, India, France, Germany, Russia, China and Japan should set up the 21st Century version of Concert of Europe, which was led by 5-powers, namely Austria, Prussia, France, Russia, and Great Britain. While Napoleon was enduring his first exile at Elba, the victors of the Napoleonic Wars assembled at Vienna in September 1814 to plan the post war world. The Congress of Vienna continued to meet all during Napoleon’s escape from Elba and his final defeat at Waterloo. The 1814 Congress of Vienna established Congress System of diplomacy, among leaders of Austria, Prussia, France, Russia, and Great Britain that maintained peace in Europe for over 100 years till 1914. The negotiators of the 1814 Congress of Vienna were, Prince von Metternich represented Austrian Emperor, Prince von Hardenberg represented King of Prussia, Talleyrand represented King Louis XVII of France, Tsar Alexander I represented Russia, Lord Castlereagh represented Great Britain. Prince von Metternich presaged President Woodrow Wilson and President Jacques Chirac. President Chirac’s worldview of the multipolar world provides the shared concept of the international order, which to Metternich was a prerequisite of the success of the Congress System and the Concert of Europe. The Concert of World Powers would conduct diplomacy to hold in check the preeminent power of the world, by subjecting it to the agreement by the rest of the 12-great powers. The principal world powers that would determine the concert of the World shall be, United States, Russia, France, China, India, and Britain, while the second group of 6 powers, namely, Germany, Japan, Canada, Brazil, Italy, Mexico would play secondary role.

 

President Chirac at 2003 Evian Summit attempted to imbibe the legacy of legendary Prince von Metternich of 1814 Congress of Vienna, when he sought to create stable international order in the name of balance of power, by combining the diplomatic assists of France, Germany, Russia, China and India to balance the hegemony of the Untied States. Chirac like Metternich believes that leaders from new powers should join the old powers to limit and check the freedom of action of the preeminent power. France wants India and China to play leading role in the multipolar world so that the freedom of action of the Untied States could be subject to agreement by the rest of the international community. The Expanded summit format introduced in the Evian should have continuity, changing permanently the nature of the G-8. The France’s concept of the Multipolar world provides the shared concept of international order the prerequisite of the success of the Concert of World Powers.

 

The demise of the Soviet Union in 1991 was similar to the breakup and abolition of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806. In 1806, the vestigial Holy Roman Empire was abolished, and Austria still saw itself as first among equal and was determined to keep every other German state especially Prussia, from assuming Austria’s historic leadership role. In 1991, the Soviet union was abolished, and Russia still saw itself as first among equals and is determined to keep every other white Christian power especially United States, from assuming Russia’s historic leadership role in oil-rich Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan and in Slav States of Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus. Great Powers of the World should form the Concert of World Powers, which should include, United States, China, India, Japan, France, Germany, Britain, Russia, Brazil, Italy, Canada, and Mexico, total of 12 powers. It is likely that the President Chirac’s initiative to invite China and India, Brazil and Mexico to the G-8 Summit result into the Concert of World, just as the 1914 Congress of Vienna established the Concert of Europe, which was led by Austria, Prussia, Russia, Great Britain and France. The concert of World Powers led by France, Russia, China and India would hold United States in check and subject United States’ freedom of diplomatic action to the agreement by rest of the great powers. The Top-6 powers of the world that would play leading role in the Concert of World Powers are United States, China, India, Russia, France and Britain.

 

India could emerge as the Balancer in the Concert of World Powers and it should join either support United States or Europe, depending upon what would promote India’s national interests more. India should maintain closer ties with United States as well as Germany and France to assert its diplomatic independence. Since the combined GNP ($7.2 trillion) 6 country of Germany, France, Britain, Italy Spain, and Russia less than that of United States, there is little likelihood that Europe could play any important role in global politics. It matters that diplomats and academics of the Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations concur with much of this proffered language, thereby announcing to all other countries in the Islamic and Christian Civilizations the position is not an act of hegemonic bravado, but a policy through which the civilized should seek to maintain civilization.  

 

(7) Clash of Religions

Seven. The alliance of Jews and Protestant right would challenge Papacy and Protestant Churches would promote Protestantism and Americanism in South as 21st Century version of Reformation Wars. During 2nd Millennium more Protestants have died at hands of Catholics and Catholic Church than at hands of non-Christians. Protestant Great Britain forced to allow the secession of Catholic Ireland 1919 due to the conspiracy hatched by Pope. Pope John Paul II refused    to openly support President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. Catholic-Protestant clash is the principal religious conflict of the 21st Century. The four principal religious conflicts are, Catholic-Protestant Clash, Sunni-Shiite Clash, Christian-Muslim Clash and Christian-Buddhist Clash. Hindu India should support the Protestant United States in the Catholic-Protestant Clash. Hindu India should Christians in Christian-Muslim Clash. Hindu India should support Shiite Iran in Sunni-Shiite Clash. Hindu India should support Buddhists in Christian-Buddhist Clash. Hindu India should support Orthodoxy in Catholic-Orthodoxy Clash.

 

There is no Catholic world power in the world. Western Christianity is led by Protestant United States. The French German opposition to United States had its roots in the Catholic-Protestant rivalry. The Founding principle of the United States based on the Protestant principles that rejected Pope’s claim for interference in matters of State. The strict separation of State and Church defined United States and promoted the concept of nationalism and patriotism. On the other hand under the influence of Papacy the very foundation of the European Union had been the negation of the concept of nationalism and patriotism, which in the eyes of the Vatican represented a step towards Universal State under the guidance of Universal Church. Papacy conspired to disintegrate Great Britain to engineer the secession of Catholic Ireland in 1919 and continuously supported insurgency in Northern Ireland. The pro-life versus pro-choice controversy might result in the secession of the Catholic-majority southern counties from United States. It would be in the national interest of the Vatican State, if the Catholic-majority counties in Canada, United States joined in confederation with Catholic Mexico, to create a Catholic Super Power in North America. The consolidation of European Union into a single unified State, would cause split loyalties of the Catholic Americans of Germany, French, Polish, Spanish and Italian ancestry. The Counter Reformation Wars and Reformation Wars continued unabated throughout American history in political campaigns.

 

Jews and Protestant Americans and British developed theological and political ties with fundamentalist Wahhabi Sunni Clergy to breakup the multi-ethnic Ottoman Islamic Caliphate so that Protestant Oil colonialism could control the oil and gas resources of Arabian Peninsula. Conservative Papacy cemented theological ties with fundamentalist Wahhabi Sunnis to create an Axis of Monotheism and to impose Wahhabi Shariah throughout pagan Africa to force pagans choose either Islam or Christianity. Protestant President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism caused irreparable strains in the Vatican-Mecca ties and greatly undermined the Axis of Monotheism. Papacy didn’t recognize the Jewish State of Israel as late as 1995 and Papacy demanded the created the Islamic State of Palestine in the Holy Land, hoping that Muslim Palestine would transfer the control over ancient Christian Holy properties to the Vatican, which are presently under the control of Orthodox Church. Republican Neo-conservatism cemented theological ties between Protestant Evangelicals, the Protestant Right with Jewish Orthodoxy to neutralize the electoral gains of Catholic religious right conservatism in the United States.

 

United States policy towards China determined by the interests of Christian missionaries in China, Burma, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and South Korea. United States supported the Communist Mao tse tung in Chinese Civil War and forced Chiang kai sheik to call off the final conquest of Communist stronghold in Manchuria and United States forced the KMT Commander to surrender to the Communist forces in Yunnan Province in South China because US thought that Judeo-Marxist Mao tse tung would harm Buddhism in China more than Christian Chiang kai sheik. President Kennedy, President Johnson, President Nixon, President Ford and Secretary Kissinger’s policies towards South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Burma primarily directed towards destruction of the Buddhist culture in Indo-China. The Vietnam War was the Christianity’s war on Buddhism. America’s policies towards Burma and South Korea primarily focused to promote Christianity at the cost of Buddhism. Hindu India should support Buddhist nations under assault of the Christianity and Christian nations. India should work towards restoration of Buddhist governments in South Korea, China, Taiwan, Burma, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Catholic Church and Orthodox Church joined forces with Western Catholic nations to overthrow Communist governments in Poland, Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Similarly, the Buddhist Monks and Buddhist believers in China, South Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Burma and Vietnam would work alongside Hindu-Buddhist India to reestablish Buddhist governments throughout Asia.

 

The principal religious conflict of the 21st Century is between religions and beliefs that believe Almighty God is a Man and those that believe that Almighty God is a woman. The ancient religions of Goddess would stage a comeback in the 21st Century. The ancient religions of Ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, Incas and Mayas were religions of Goddess and they all are poised to stage a come back in the 21st Century. When Jews could return to Israel in Holy Land after 2,000-years Diaspora, then it is very possible that ancient religion of Pharaohs would stage a comeback in Egypt after the foreign rule of 1300 years. The religion of Incas and Mayas would stage a comeback after the foreign rule of 400 years. The religion of ancient Greeks and ancient Rome would stage a comeback after the foreign rule of 1500 years. The Gods and Goddesses of ancient religions have not died and ancient religions are alive and survived through Hinduism. The entire world was Hindu 3000 years ago. It is moral imperative for Hindu India to wage wars to help resurrect ancient religions, ancient Gods and ancient Goddesses.

 

The role priests play as an intermediate between individuals and the God is the second most important cause of the religious wars and religious strife. Catholic Church and Sunni Muslims attempt to establish the priest-rule and theocracy to secure political and economic rewards for the priest class for their intermediation between individual and the God. Hindus and Buddhists on the other hand believe that individuals by means of Yoga, Bhakti and Meditations can directly attain the Divine without any need of the intermediation by the priest class. The Sufi Mystic Muslims support the direct approach to Almighty without any need of the intermediate Maulavi clergy. The Mystic Christians, the Apostolic Gnostic Arius Christianity the dominant form of Christianity in the first three centuries of Early Christianity emphasized the Mystic agnostic approach to reach God. The Jews imposed the leadership role of priest class in Judaism, Islam and Christianity. Hindu India should support the Sufi Mystic Islam, Mystic Christianity and Kabbalah Judaism.

 

The Islamic terrorist fundamentalism and Catholic conservatism promote fundamentalism and conservatism by undermining the freedom of women. Islam and Catholicism waged religious wars by curtailing the freedom and role of women in the society. Taliban, Wahhabi Islam imposed barbarian Shariah laws and customs on Muslim women. Catholic conservatism propagates the inferior status of women to man. Catholic Inquisition burnt millions of women to impose patriarchy over Europeans who previously practiced the mix of Hinduism and ancient religions of Greeks, Rome and Egypt. Hindu India should come to the defense of women in Islamic and Christian worlds. The Clash of Religions in the 21st Century shall wage in name of securing the rights for the women or in name of denial of the rights of the women.

 

India should lead the “Organization of Buddhist States” (OBS) the inter-government organization of Buddhist and Hindu nations, including, Japan, China, India, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan, Mongolia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand. Hindu India cannot accept the Christian rule in Myanmar (Burma), South Korea and Taiwan.

 

1(4) Principal Arguments

(1) India & China As World Powers

First, in the post-Saddam world, the major world powers that would formulate the independent policies regarding the Middle East would be United States, France, India, and Russia. While United States, Britain, France, Germany and Russia protect the interests of common white Christian civilization and have consensus on the future of the white Christendom and Russia would soon become of the European Union consensus. As of today, United States represents and protects the interests of the white Christian world that included Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox world, representing around 1 billion plus people. China and India separately and independently represent the interests of Buddhist and Hindu worlds, each representing 1 billion plus people. Islamic world is as subset of Christian world. Neither Hindu India not Buddhist China, accidentally represented by secular socialist leadership should not feel shy for violently protecting the interests of Hindu and Buddhist civilizations, religions and races respectively. India and China have the moral responsibility to represent the interests of brown and yellow races, Hindu and Buddhist civilizations representing half of the world’s populations, to create a stable world order among, Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu Civilizations. India should count as must as the total influence of the entire Islamic world, and it is also true for China. World’s four largest economies are United States ($8.4 trillion), China ($4.1 trillion), Japan ($3 trillion) and India ($2.2 trillion). The largest Muslim economy Indonesia (GNP $505 billion) ranks 15th in the world and the GNP of Saudi Arabia is only $129 billion.

 

The main event of the 1990s had been the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. The four major civilization powers in 2003 are, white American Civilization, yellow East Asian Chinese Civilization, and brown Aryan Southern Asian Indian Civilization, represented by the United States, China and India, and fourth Civilization of white European Christians represented by Western Christian France-Germany jointly and Slav Russia. Britain most likely would become the satellite power of the United States. Germany and France would federate and become a major power in European Union. Germans and French historically enjoyed closed diplomatic, social and cultural ties with Russia than with Britain and United States. Russia would most likely join the European Union after 2005. France, Germany and Europe would jointly lead European Union in form of a troika and consolidate white Christian Europe as the European pole, the Second Pole in the new world order. Britain, Canada and United States would consolidate the Anglo Saxon pole, the First pole of the new world order. Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Burma, Nepal, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Iran would consolidate into Aryan bloc to make South Asia third Pole of the new world order. China, Mongolia, Korea, Japan, Taiwan and perhaps Eastern Siberia would form the yellow common market and the yellow Buddhist pole, the fourth pole of the new world order. Because of the financial problem of Russia and the British opposition to the France and Germany, the Christian Europe failed to hold America in check, albeit Christian Europe allowed Christian America to takeover Arab oil producing world. Technically, the Christian European Union and Russia and Christian United States secured the support of the Semite Muslim world to establish American Empire in Iraq, Afghanistan, Middle East and Central Asia. There is no Islamic nation that could ever become the major world power in the 21st Century. India, China, Russia, France, and United States lead the Hindu, Buddhist, Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant world respectively, and shall formulate their foreign policies to promote and safeguard the interest of their civilizations, religions and races during global clash of races and clash of civilizations. India and China representing 1+ billion people, more than the total population of North America, South America, Europe, Russia and Australia, have the responsibility to assert and protect the interests of their civilizations, in the new age of colonial empires that President Bush ushered in with the invasion of oil rich Iraq in 2003.

 

India & China are leading World Powers

The top eight world powers in 2003 in the declining order are: United States, Russia, India, China, France, Britain, Germany and Japan. The world’s top five economies in declining order are: United States, China, Japan, India and Germany. By 2050 the top three economic and military and political powers in the world shall be: United States, India and China, representing White Christian, Brown Hindu and Yellow Buddhist Civilizations. There shall never be a Muslim great power in the top 20 ranks. The top five world powers shall be: United States, China, India, Russia, and France. In the year 2000, India’s population crossed one billion. India had been the richest nation in the world. India produced one fourth of the world’s manufactured output in 1750, one-fifth in 1800 and one-sixth in 1830. It is only when India came under British crown in 1857 that India’s share fell precipitously. England is responsible for India’s poverty.

 

(2) New Age of Oil Colonial Empires

Second, President Bush ushered in the new Age of Colonial Empires, when America, Britain, Spain, Italy and Poland, with the consent of Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and most of the Semite Wahhabi world, most of the Christian Protestant and Catholic world, invaded Iraq to establish American Oil Colony in March 2003. Dr. Henry Kissinger forecasts that 21st Century new world order shall be strikingly similar to the European colonial international system of the 18th and 19th centuries.

 

(3) National Vs Religious Interests

Third, the Richelieu’s principle of Raison d’etat obliged diplomats to pursue the national interests of the secular state, even at the cost of the interests of Papacy, Clergy and Church. Should statesman and diplomats conduct diplomacy and formulate foreign policies to promote the religious interests of their dominant national Religion or promote the national interests of the State defined in terms of national Power? Would United Germany promote the national interest of Protestant Germany or the religious interests of former Holy Roman Empire and Roman Catholic Church? Would Catholic France join forces with Protestant Europeans to contain the possible rise of Catholic hegemony in Europe? Would European Union promote the interests of the Reformation or Counter Reformation?  

 

(4) Woodrow Wilson Vs Theodore Roosevelt

President Theodore Roosevelt was the warrior-statesman; President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. Statesmen and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To Prophets the real world is the one they want to bring into being. Woodrow Wilson transformed what had started our as a reaffirmation of American neutrality into a set of prepositions laying the foundations of the Wilsonian foreign policy for the global crusade of the United States. In spite of the moral pretensions of Woodrow Wilson, Wilsonian foreign policy was simply a ruse, which camouflaged the Roosevelt’s Realpolitik in the make believe garb of the moralistic idealistic pretensions. President George W. Bush did the similar Wilsonian diplomatic coup, when he exploited the world sympathy for 9/11 Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks on America, to bring about the unprecedented expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South Asia, without hurting even a single Saudi Wahhabi Taliban terrorist leader. Secretary Colin Powell successfully brought about this ingenious diplomatic Coup d'etat during first term of the Bush administration, without losing a beat.

 

(5) Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy

The Semite Jewish Orthodoxy, Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism, Papal fundamentalism, have joined forces to capture the policy making of the Protestant WASPs Oval Office to sabotage religious Reformation agenda in the Judaic, Islamic and Christian worlds. Pope Paul II cemented Vatican-Mecca Axis of Iconoclast Monotheism to harness the power of Wahhabi Islam and Catholic Christianity to undermine Idolatry and paganism in Africa and Asia. American oil colonialism and British spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia developed the concept of Mecca-led Wahhabi fundamentalism to catapult Mecca Caliphate as successors to Ottoman Caliphate in exchange for American monopoly over Arabian oil and gas reserves. Zionist Cabal conspired with Mecca’s Semite Wahhabi Bedouin to militarily impose Wahhabi Cult over secular, liberal Muslim states, namely, Iraq, Syria, Aden, Iran, Libya, Algeria to loot the oil wealth of the progressive, secular, liberal Muslim nations. Damascus Jews had financed the Arab raiding parties to profit by the loot of Christian Egypt, Syria, Libya and Algeria. Semite Israelis teamed up with Semite Saudi Arabians and American Big Oil to jointly loot the riches of non-Semite liberal secular Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Iran.

 

(6) Mafia Church Politicians Unholy Nexus

Fifth, the unholy nexus between Mafia, Church and Legislators threatened the descent of the looming New Global Dark Age on the world. Italy became the first country in the world to jail seven-time Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti and crime boss Gaetano Badalmenti for 24 years, in the same trial for the same crime. The unholy nexus of Mafia and Church has destabilized post-War governments in Italy and imposed a Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti, head of Christian Democrats seven times prime minister of Italy. Christian Democrats was a party of Mafia, Church and Crook politicians.

 

(7) Cocaine Influences Diplomacy like Oil

Sixth, the humble Coca and Opium influences diplomacy and world politics no less than the Crude Oil and Gas. Cocaine and Heroin historically financed international covert operations of foreign secret services and consolidated the stronghold of American Oil Colonialism throughout oil-producing nations. Global drug trade strengthens the stronghold of American Oil colonialism worldwide.

 

(8) Role of Women in Religion

Seventh, the question whether God is a Man or a Woman, and whether male God or female Goddess is the Almighty influenced the query whether woman can lead the world religions or whether Patriarchal religions of God superior to Matriarchal religion of Goddess. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are patriarchal Monotheistic iconoclastic religions and do not accept woman’s leadership role as priest, and consider woman inferior to man, and abhor idolatry and paganism. Hinduism and Buddhism are matriarchal religions, they accept the concept of Goddess and believe that God is a Man as well as a woman, and accept equality of man and woman and tolerate paganism and idolatry. Vatican-Mecca Axis of Iconoclastic Monotheism and Semite Judeo-Wahhabi Axis of religious intolerance mobilized Occidental religions to wage wars on Oriental Religions of Goddess, namely, Buddhism, Hinduism and Paganism.

 

(9) Resurrection of Ancient Religions

Eighth, Christian ancient religions of Pharaoh’s Egypt, Persia, Classical Greece, Roman Empire, Inca, Maya, and Aztec Civilizations were similar to Hindu religion and all these ancient religions would stage a come back in the 21st Century in their traditional habitat. Just as Jews returned to Israel to reclaim Holy Land for Jews, the Goddess Isis would reclaim Egypt. God Zeus would reclaim Greece. God Jupiter would reclaim Rome. Communism would fall in China and China would become Buddhist and Taoist Civilization and join forces with Hindu India to propagate matriarchal Hinduism and Buddhism worldwide and challenge the domination of patriarchal Christianity and Islam. Inca, Maya and Aztec religions would stage a comeback in Andean and Latin America during 21st Century.

 

(10) Power of Big Conspiracy

Ninth, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. One must investigate, who are the real rulers in the world. The ‘Hidden Hand of the Proverbial Snake’ described in the ‘The Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion.’ Big Financial Frauds have the destructive capacity of Weapons of Mass destruction. Big conspiracy presents the greatest menace to the Civilization.

 

(11) Big Frauds as Financial Services WMD

Tenth, the United States 1999 GDP ($8.7 trillion), value added by Services (72%, $6.2 trillion). The financial frauds perpetrated by WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, and Arthur Andersen inflated the market values of these companies and showed profits in billions when there was loss. It helped the overall market capitalization of NYSE and NASDAQ listed companies and helped suck the foreign capital into American capital markets and pushed the exchange rates of US$ vis-à-vis other currencies. But for the rampant financial Big Frauds the GNP of United States might have bee appraised by World Bank no more than $5 trillion in 1999 and no more than $ 6 trillion in 2002, and the Dow Jones Industrial average Index would have hovered around 5000 in April 2003.

 

(12) Deception Doublethink & Newspeak Policy

First, American Foreign Policy always had problems with diplomats because of its insistence of saying ‘up is down’ and ‘black is white,’ as part of its diplomacy of deception, doublethink and newspeak. The State Department’s Orwellian propensities have long been apparent to anyone following its pronouncements. The State Department’s Orwellian tactics don’t stop with doublethink; they also include newspeak, the redefinition of words rule out disloyal thoughts. American control over world media seems to get away by pronouncing policy of war as policy of peace; policy for slavery as policy for freedom. State Department periodically asserts without any opposition by the media that War is peace, Slavery is freedom, and Ignorance is strength and get away with it. American diplomacy of deception employs doublethink and newspeak as essential components of the Western policy of Divide & Rule. America frequently makes ‘chocolate-is-vanilla’ claim and uses its brute force to get it accepted.

 

(13) No Religious Agenda in Oil Colonialism

Second, world powers, France, Germany, Russia, India would accept secular capitalist American Empire and American Oil Colonial Empire so long as it established Protestant Capitalist Empire but oppose American oil imperialism if it tried to establish the Wahhabi Caliphate or Pope’s Empire or Jews Empire. India would support American Oil Colonialism but oppose Wahhabi colonialism. India would support American oil colonialism, if America wanted to conquer Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and pay to Arabs no more than $2 per barrel for the oil it would extract from Arab oil fields. India would also support America if America wanted to impose Christianity over Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria and Turkey. However, India would not support, albeit oppose America, if after the conquest of Iraq, America attempted to impose rule of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over Syria, Yemen and Iran.

 

(14) World We Create is Product of Our Thinking

Third, the world we have created is the product of our thinking and it cannot be changed without changing our thinking. However, when the dominant thinking of the leading power changed, the world and the world order also changed. Without passing moral judgment of President Bush’s actions, the dominant thinking of the Bush Administration has the power to create a new world, a new world order, where Colonial Empires, not the smaller independent sovereign states would be the actors and entities of the international system. President Bush’s America has the moral authority and military power to impose a new order and once it becomes a stable world order, it would acquire a legitimacy of its own.

 

(15) End of NATO

Fourth, United States historically pursued the policy of Geopolitical dominance in Europe, Middle East, Americas and Africa. The historic purpose of the NATO had been to Chaperon Western Europe, especially France, Germany and Italy. United States should adopt the new Diplomacy of Offshore Balancing which would recognize the rise and fall of nations and allow regional powers to maintain peace and security in their regions, where they would be allowed to exercise regional dominance, in exchange for their consent and acceptance of American oil colonies over oil-producing OPEC countries. When the American invasion of Iraq ended in the victory of American and British colonialism, America realized that the diplomatic divide that opened up between the United States and continental Europe, brought the NATO Atlantic alliance to a definitive end.

 

(16) Americans Created Semite Wahhabi Cult

Fifth, British M1 and American secret services nurtured, designed and propagated the concept of Semite Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism to mobilize the support of illiterate, semi-civilized nomad Bedouin tribes to Arabia to wage secessionist movements in erstwhile Ottoman Empire, so that America could control Saudi Arabia oil and Britain could control Iraqi oil.

 

(17) Oil Colonialism is Death to De Beers

Sixth, only one sword can fit in one sheath and Africa is not big enough for American Oil Colonialism to coexist with De Beers Diamond Colonialism. In exchange for American oil monopoly, United States may agree for the nationalization of the assets, property, mines and industries controlled by De Beers Cartel and its myriads of front companies. Advent of American Oil Colonialism means the end of the De Beers Diamond-Gold-Mining Colonialism throughout Black Africa.

 

(18) The 25-member European Union

Seventh, The enlarged Europe would rival United States as world player and Nato would become the first casualty. A wonderful dream is coming true. For nearly 50 years, the heart of Europe was split between the democracy and dictatorship in a balance of terror. The fracture that started in Europe spread across the entire planet. It was a debt that destiny is paying back to the East Europeans that United States forced into the bondage of the Soviet Union at the Yalta Conference. The present rotating six-month presidency of the EU should be abolished in favor of a more permanent position, or by the Joint presidency shared by France and Germany. Germany and France would lead the European Union. Britain has better future with Canada and NAFTA than with European Union.

 

During a momentous ceremony in Athens, the cradle of democracy, on April 16, ’03 the leaders of 10 countries signed treaties to join the 15-member European Union, extending its reach to a broad swath of Europe once allied with the Soviet Union. The 10 future members-Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia-will formally join the European Union in May 2004.

 

The political fall out of the expanded European Union would make decisive impact on the role United States, Papacy and Jews would play in the 21st Century. The expanded European Union would be more anti-Semitic than the present, because Hungary had undergone the same cycle of Marxist Jews oppression as its neighbors, since 1940 was ruled by Matyas Rakosi, an Orthodox Stalinist, a protégé of Lavrenti Beria, to set up a system of repression that was considered severe even by Stalinist standards. The European Union would not be a pawn in the hands of Pope. Though 25-member European Union represented the Roman Empire of 21st Century, it would be governed by French Richelieu’s Raison d’etat not by the dictates of Papacy. With the entry of numerous Orthodox Christian nations, united for the first time the Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Europe. European Union would never again target an Orthodox nation as a war coalition of Western Christendom. European Union would be friendlier to Russia than it had been in the past. It is possible that Russia may join European Union as the associate member to break European Union’s ties with United States. The principal policy of the European Union would be to hold United States in check. The European Union would employ Richelieu’s principle of Raison d’etat, Balance of Power, and Concert of Europe Congress System to tame and neutralize the preponderance of United States by aligning with rival world powers, namely, Russia, China, India and Japan. The continental-type states will probably represent the basic units of the new world order. The four leading basic units of the new world order shall be United States, Europe, China and India, and rest of the world would have to follow one of these four principle players in the world politics.

 

The US-led Nato would be the first casualty of expanded EU. The demise of Nato is in the cards. The political stand European Union and Papacy would take on the destruction of the pagan artifacts at Baghdad Museum would determine the religious dimension of European diplomacy. India should also apply for membership of the European Union as it shared principles of democracy and freedom and wider knowledge of English language. India should become the 26th member of the European Union. Maritime Anglo-Saxon Britain has no future in European Union. Britain should secede from European Union and join the NAFTA along with Anglo-Saxon United States, Canada and Mexico. The term North Atlantic Free Trade Association makes sense only when it has Britain as the member of NAFTA. Britain is a misfit in Europe and it should stop being the Trojan Horse in European Union.

 

The impact of the Enlarged European Union shall be: exit of Britain from the EU, the demise of Nato, decline of Papal influence over EU affairs, greater EU role in the oil-rich Middle East, and closer ties with Russia, India, and Japan to hold America in check. Britain would realize that it should seek political union or confederation with Canada and apply for membership in NAFTA and severe its ties with European Union. The diplomatic stand European Union would take on the question of War Crime trials of the Semite iconoclast monotheist thugs that burnt the Baghdad Museum, would determine the role Christian European Union would play in the looming clash of divination and clash of races.

 

Continental-type states, will probably represent the basic units of the new world order. (Kissinger, diplomacy, p. 807) The basic units of Great power interaction in the 21st Century would be: United States, Europe including Russia and European Union, China and India. America, Europe, China and India would be four independent world powers and decide the future of the world and rest of the world would have to follow their lead. India and China would count equal to the Europe separately in 21st Century. All countries from Iran to Indonesia including Pakistan would join Great Indian Federation to assert the role of brown races in the world. The continental size states representing continent and a race would represent the basic unit of the new world order. India (Population 1.1 billion, GNP $2.2 trillion), China (1.25 billion, $4.1 trillion), Europe (750 million, and America (401 million, $9.8 trillion) would determine the new world order.

 

(19) Semite Arab Barbarians Invaded non-Semite Iraq

Eighth, at the beginning of the 21st Century the Semite Jews, Semite Wahhabi Muslims, and American Judeo-Christians joined the ranks of uncivilized barbarians when they burnt the Baghdad Museum. Barbarian Julius Caesar had burnt the library of Alexandria, when he invaded Alexandria. At the end of 4th Century Semite Hellenic Jews burnt the pagan Hindu temples of ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome along with fundamentalist Christians that took control over Rome during Theodosius I, when in 393 by Roman Royal Edict Christianity became the sole official religion of Roman Empire. Then 300 years later during 7th Century the Damascus Jews joined forces with fellow Semite Muslim Bedouin to loot and burn the Christian temples of Egypt, Syria and Libya, Tunisia and Algeria.

 

Did Semite Israeli, Semite American Jews, Semite Saudis and iconoclast religious right conservative conspiracy renewed the global axis of iconoclast monotheism to burn the pagan artifacts that established the Babylon was advance modern Civilization at least 5,000 years before Jews, Semite race and the Judeo Christians became civilized and moved out of their animal like living in the caves? Damage in Baghdad as "truly a world heritage loss. But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed? Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final chapter of the sacking of Baghdad on 14 April 2003. It was the final chapter in the sacking of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives, a priceless treasure of Ottoman historical documents, including the old royal archives of Iraq, were turned to ashes in 3,000 degrees of heat. Then the library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze.

 

Semite barbarian looters took or destroyed 170,000 items from Iraq's National Museum, which had housed a priceless collection of masterpieces and memorabilia dating back across human history from the time of the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, the Medes, the Greeks and the Persians. Marble carvings, stone tablets, clay pots and tablets containing some of the earliest known examples of writing were destroyed or stolen. The pillaging of the Baghdad museum represented far more than an Iraqi loss. It was a blow to "the world's human history. Noting that the museum's collection included some of the earliest examples of mathematics and some of the first legal codes ever written. It was a truly a world heritage loss.

 

Items that survived 7,000 years of human history were lost on April 2003 in a city controlled by forces under the direction of Donald Rumsfeld. Yet Rumsfeld refused to take any responsibility. "We didn't allow it," he said. "It happened." But did it have to happen? Thousands of the finest soldiers in the world were in and around Baghdad. "Stuff happens," and then, when pressed, put a happy face on the looting by saying, "It's untidy. And freedom's untidy. And free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes."

 

When American journalist Robert Fisk caught sight of the Koranic library burning, flames 100 feet high were bursting from the windows, he raced to the offices of the occupying power, the US Marines' Civil Affairs Bureau, who shouted to a colleague that this guy says some biblical library is on fire. Robert Fisk gave the map location, the precise name in Arabic and English. Journalist said the smoke could be seen from three miles away and it would take only five minutes to drive there. Half an hour later, there wasn't an American at the scene, and the flames were shooting 200 feet into the air. Looters were holding in hands the last Baghdad vestiges of Iraq's written history. But the older files and archives were on the upper floors of the library where petrol must have been used to set fire so expertly to the building. The heat was such that the marble flooring had buckled upwards and the concrete stairs had been cracked.

 

King Faisal of the Hejaz, the ruler of Mecca, whose staff are the authors of many of the letters that were saved, was later deposed by the Saudis. His son Faisel became king of Iraq ­ Winston Churchill gave him Baghdad after the French threw him out of Damascus ­ and his brother Abdullah became the first king of Jordan, the father of King Hussein and the grandfather of the present-day Jordanian monarch, King Abdullah II. For almost a thousand years, Baghdad was the cultural capital of the Arab world, the most literate population in the Middle East. Genghis Khan's grandson burnt the city in the 13th century and, so it was said, the Tigris River ran black with the ink of books. On 4/14/2003, the black ashes of thousands of ancient documents filled the skies of Iraq. Why? 

 

Why the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased? Semite Jews, Semite Saudis and Judeo-Christians burnt the Museum to erase the cultural identity of Iraq. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed? Again, standing in this shroud of blue smoke and embers, Robert Frisk asked the same question: why? The answer is very simple: The barbarians invaded Iraq to destroy the cultural history of Hindu Iraq, which boasted advance rich wealthy Goddess worshipping civilizations at least 20,000 years before the ancestors of nomadic Semite Jews and cave-dwelling Christians became civilized or learnt to speak or write. The America’s war on Iraq is it Clash of Races, the War in which barbarian Semite Saudi Wahhabi Muslims and Semite Israeli tribes joined forces to destroy the Hindu traditions of Iraq, which for thousands of years worshipped Hindu Gods and Goddesses. The Ancient Kingdom Of Mittani worshipped Hindu gods of Varuna and Indra. Kali and Durga were the main reigning goddesses of Babylon revered as Goddess Innanna and Astarte. What should be the military response of Hindu India, Buddhist China and Japan to the Semite destruction of cultural identity of Iraq? What role iconoclast Semite conquest of non-Semite Iraq play in the Global Clash of Races, and Wars of Religions and the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century?

 

Barbarian Semite Saudi Wahhabi iconoclast burnt the Baghdad Museum to burn the proof that Wahhabi cult was created by Jews and spy Lawrence of Arabia to justify the Mecca’s revolt against Ottoman Caliphate. It contained the details of the correspondence of the court of Sharief Hussein of Mecca, who started the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Turks at the advice of Lawrence of Arabia. Lawrence of Arabia promised to make Mecca the seat of future Caliphate of Islam in exchange for their revolt against the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad. Jewish control over American media misled the American WASPs to wage war on oil-rich Iraq to promote the iconoclastic monotheist agenda of Semite Jews, Semite Wahhabi Muslims and Semite Judeo-Christians and Semite Neo-conservatives. The response to the destruction of Baghdad Museum would determine the warring parties in the global clash of civilizations and global clash of religions and races. Would European Union be on the side of the parties that burnt the Baghdad Museum? Wahhabi rulers of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE should pay $300 billion as compensation for the restoration of the loss done to the Baghdad Museum by Semite Wahhabi war criminals. Otherwise future government of Iraq, would gain the right to militarily occupy the lands and oil fields of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and UAE and make them part of Iraq. Better still, the foreign powers should force intolerant Semite Wahhabi rulers of Arabian Gulf to sell their oil for $2 per barrel for next 25 years to atone for the crime of burning the Baghdad Museum. Civilized world powers have the legitimate right to punish Semite Wahhabi nations by expropriating all their oil and gas resources as a punishment for their heinous crime of looting and burning Baghdad Museums. President Bush should take the lead by ordering the military coup in Saudi Arabia, as President Carter did in Iraq and President Clinton did in Pakistan. Is it because Saudi Arabia ruled by Semites that United States would not give the medicine of military coups that it dispensed in Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Korea, Chile, and Egypt?

 

(20) Role of Religion in America’s Wars

Ninth, what was the role of religion in America’s War on Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Haiti? Do the religious interests and foreign policy interests and perspectives of Protestants and Catholics, Semite Israelis and Semite Saudis, Religious right Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives, Republicans and Democrats in America coincide or conflict? Would American Oil Empire be more a Protestant Empire or Catholic Empire? Would America’s wars on Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq promote the global alliance of iconoclast Semite Monotheism fundamentalism? Would America’s victory over Iraq represent the victory or defeat of Semite totalitarian Wahhabi fundamentalism? Would Islamic terrorist attacks on India, Russia and China result in Indian Russian and Chinese Pact to crush Islamic terrorism? What country would become the next target of American aggression: Saudi Arabia or Iran? Would global war between Christian world and the Islamic world help or harm the Hindu and Buddhist worlds? Would Protestant America target Aryan Shiite Iran, or Orthodox Russian Siberia, or Hindu India or Buddhist China after conquering the Islamic oil-producing world? Would American economy collapse if OPEC countries switched US dollar with Euro for fixing OPEC oil price for oil? What role $750 billion incomes of the global drug trade in heroin and cocaine in world economy and world politics?

 

What role India can play in Arabian Gulf, Caspian Central Asia and Oil Colonialism? Are United States, Russia, China and India, the world’s top four world powers? Would 8-world powers, namely, United States, Russia, China, India, Britain, France, Germany and Canada create Concert of World Powers to hold United States in check? Would the religions that expand and propagate by sword die by the sword? Does the American conquest of Iraq signal the decline or rise of Islam? Could pre-Islamic Christian Civilization and religion stage a come-back in Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Algeria and Tunisia in the first half of the 21st Century, as the result of the Christian American conquest of oil-producing OPEC countries in the New Middle East? Would Saudis, Israelis or Christian rule and dominate the New Middle East? Should Hindu India join on the side of Muslims or join on the side of Christians in the looming global war among Christian and Islamic nations? Should brown Hindu and yellow Buddhists join forces to support either Christians or Muslims in the Christianity’s Crusades on Islam? Would Semite Wahhabi Cult enable Mecca conquer and subdue the Arab Islamic world or enable America conquer the Arab OPEC world? Does Wahhabi fundamentalism represent the strength of Islam or weakness of Islam? Would OPEC income make Islam the dominant religion of the world? Or would the oil wealth of militarily weak OPEC nations make Arab nations oil colonies of great powers? Would other great powers, namely, Russia, China, India, France and Germany cooperate with American oil colonialism, if President Bush agreed to share Iraqi oil loot with them? Due to America’s victory over Iraq, would Iraqi women forced into the bondage and servitude by Shariah, or Saudi women would gain freedom and rights under American laws? Is the President Bush’s war on Iraq a victory or defeat of Semite Wahhabi Shariah laws? How should Hindu India and Buddhist China respond to the threats of Semite Wahhabi terrorism? Could Christian Religious Right Conservatives and Republican Neo-Conservatives join forces with Hindu India and secular Turkey to promote Christianity in Arab North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia? Could America’s Clash of Oil Imperialism transform into Clash of Races or Clash of Civilizations or Clash of Religions?

 

The destruction of Baghdad Museum at hands of Semite iconoclast monotheists exposed the role predator intolerant religious cults played in the American wars for Iraqi oil colonialism, because Washington historically supported the intolerant Semite Wahhabi intolerance. French oil interests in Algeria threatened by the predator Wahhabi intolerance, which might influence European Union’s policy demanding the war crime trials of Semite Jews, Semite Muslims and Semite Judeo-Christians that burnt the 170,000 pagan artifacts 5,000-year old to further the religious interests of Semite predator religious intolerant sects. Why should WASPs United States continue to support the Semite War criminals, when Pentagon could easily establish direct American military rule in Saudi Arabia and take all the Saudi oil free. United States no longer needs the continued support of Wahhabi rulers, after the American victory over Iraq. 

 

1(5) Post-Cold War World Order

(1) Return of the Age of Colonial Empires

Which would be World Powers in the Age of Neo-Colonial Empires? Dr. Henry Kissinger forecasts that 21st Century new world order shall be strikingly similar to the European colonial international system of the 18th and 19th centuries, where West European white Christian colonial powers ruthlessly competed with each other in pursuit of colonial expansions. United States went to war against Spain over Cuba, Philippines and Puerto Rico at the turn of the Century during McKinley Administration. Woodrow Wilson warned maritime Britain and claimed America’s domination of the Seas. The Westward expansion of United States was at the expense of England, Canada, France, Spain and Mexico. Maritime Britain replaced Spain and France as the dominant colonial power of the world. Similarly, maritime United States competed with and replaced European colonial powers, namely, Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and Germany as the dominant power of Europe, after the Second World War. The great power rivalry among West European powers, suppressed by United States during Cold War, lied dormant throughout the Cold War to resurface in its fury during the post-Cold War era.

 

(2) Eight Leading World Powers

The leading eight world powers in the post-Cold War new world order are: United States, Russia, China, India, Germany, Japan, and Britain. The raison d’etat principle would oblige Germany, France, Japan, Canada and India to seek military alliances with second-strongest Power to tame, check and balance the military preponderance of the United States in the world. The diplomacy and statecraft of the post-Cold War new world order shall be in total contrast to the diplomatic conduct practiced during the bipolar world during Cold War. The new world order is a multipolar world, led by two blocs, first Bloc headed by United States and the Second Bloc shall be led by a coalition of world powers, uniting to check the hegemony of the United States.

 

(3) Revival of Art of diplomacy & Diplomat

The art and craft of Diplomacy has revived in the post-Cold War age, which had atrophied during the bipolar Cold War balance of terror. Canada, France, Germany, Japan and India would explore new alliances with one other and with regional powers like Peru, Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina in South America, and Congo, Nigeria and South Africa in Africa, and Vietnam, and Indonesia in Southeast Asia, and Iran, Libya, Algeria, Syria and Yemen, and Post-Saddam Iraq in the Middle East, to tame and neutralize the predominance of the United States, to restore equilibrium in the world order. The post-Cold War age shall be the Golden Age of Diplomacy.

 

(4) Turning Point in History

The Semite Wahhabi Saudi terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 on Twin Towers resulted in $7 billion insurance claims bonanza for Semite Larry Silverstein and represented a turning point in history. The space and time continuum broke and the world of 2003 teleported to 1814 of Congress of Vienna fame, after the President Bush’s war on Iraq, which suggested Napoleonic imperial ambitions. With the victory of American arms in Iraq, in April 2003, a new history has begun and heralded the new age of oil colonial empires. However the 21st century will be much like the 18th and 19th Centuries. History took a sharp detour in the 2003 and landed right into 1814. President Chirac, Chancellor Schroeder and President Putin recreated 1814 Congress of Vienna, when faced with the menace of Napoleon the European powers met in the Congress of Vienna and evolved the Congress System that maintained peace for 100 years, from 1814 to 1914. President Bush forced the world to teleport to the world of 1814 after he attained victory over Iraq and established oil colony over Iraq. March of world History takes a cyclical and not linear route. The 21st Century would be the replay of the forces that determined the 19th Century. President Bush invaded Iraq to establish imperial colony, not to promote the religious interests of papacy. The oil interests of Washington-Riyadh Axis and Semite Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis undermined the religious interests of Vatican-Mecca Axis of Iconoclastic fundamentalist Monotheism. Zionists and American oil colonialism waging war on modern liberal secular Iraq to impose the fundamentalist orthodoxy of Semite Wahhabi Shariah to efficiently rape the Islamic oil and gas resources in Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia. Semite King Fahd and Semite Ariel Sharon raising banner of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate to force Islamic oil-producing nations into the bondage of Jews and American oil colonialism.

 

(5) Semite Wahhabi Cult is Zionist Plot

Jews and Christians propagated, nurtured and financed the barbarian Semite Wahhabi fundamentalist Cult to give Islam the stigma of barbarian religion, even when throughout Medieval Dark ages Catholic Western Europe represented Medieval barbarianism and Islamic world represented Civilization. The Semite Israeli and Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabian and American media succeeding in promoting barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism as true form of Islam, meaning that Islam is a barbarian religion good only for uncivilized barbarian terrorists. The Semite Israelis and Semite Wahhabi Saudi’s might succeed in giving the Wahhabi kiss of death to Islam, to force Islamic world under 500-year colonial occupation of Christians under the rule of American Caliphate camouflaged as Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate. Military success of Wahhabi Mecca would mean the death of Religion of Islam, as we know it now. Perhaps it is what Prophet Mohammed had in mind, when he forecast that during 15th century Hijra, the Christian 2003 corresponds to 1428 Hijra, that Islam would suffer great catastrophes. Let by conniving Semite House of Saud the Christians and Jews would succeed in raping Islamic world and establish American colonies throughout oil-producing Islamic world. How should Hindu India, Buddhist China and Japan, Catholic France and Germany, and Orthodox Russia respond to the American dream to conquer the oil and gas fields of Arabia and Caspian Central Asia? Christian American conquest of Baghdad in 2003, similar to Mongol conquest of Baghdad in 1258, and it would result in the American Ottoman Caliphate throughout the Islamic world, which would maintain peace in the Islamic world for next 500 years. Islamic world is doomed for foreign rule for many centuries to come and no Islamic nation would be able to join the rank of world powers in next few centuries.

 

(6) Semite Wahhabi Real Enemy of Islam

Semite Wahhabi terrorists promoted Zionist’s national interests, and made Slav Russia, Hindu India and Buddhist China sworn enemies of Islamic world, when Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalists spread terror in Russia’s Chechnya, India’s Kashmir and China’s Xinjiang Sinkiang province. Unless civilized Pakistan militarily takes control over Mecca and Medina and expel Wahhabi barbarians, the Wahhabi terrorists working for Israel and the CIA would give kiss of death to Islam and force Islamic world into the bondage of American Caliphate. Unless Wahhabi Cult is destroyed, the religion of Islam would self-destruct, to the great pleasure of Semite Saudis, Semite Jews and Protestant America and Anglican Britain. Saudi Semite Wahhabi cult would bring death and bondage to the Islamic world and make Semite Israelis richer and wealthier.

 

(7) America should share Iraqi oil loot

If American oil colonialism shared Iraqi oil loot with France, Germany, Russia, India and China, then India and other great powers might join the war on the side of American oil colonialism. However, If America invaded Iran to capture Caspian Central Asian oil supplies then India and Russia and China would join the third World War on the side of Iran and against American oil colonialism. It should be noted that Indian Army provided 1,000,000 soldiers during First World War and 3,500,000 soldiers during the Second World War for Allied Forces and because of the valor and sacrifices of Indian soldiers and financial contribution of Indian Empire that Britain and France do not speak Deutsch today. Allied forces would have lost the Second World War had as independent nation, the Indian Empire had military joined the war on the side of Germany and Japan in the Second World War. Rather than rewarding Indian Empire for its contributions towards Allied victories during First and Second World War, the slimy British partitioned Indian Empire in 1947. British spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia promoted Wahhabi sect in Mecca to engineer the secession of Saudi Arabia from Ottoman Empire. British secret service M1 promoted Islamic fundamentalism to engineer the secession of Islamic Pakistan so that Indian Empire might not have direct borders with oil-rich Iran. Up to 1964 there were three foreign currency zones in the world, American Dollar Zone, British Pound Sterling Zone, and Indian Rupee Zone. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Yemen kept their foreign exchange reserves in Indian rupees. Persian Gulf and Arabian Gulf had been Indian Lake throughout 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. Nuclear India has the right to assert to secure its place under the sun in the Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia.

 

History would record that World War began with the American invasions of Iraq in April 2003. If Germany and France enter into economic and military pact with India, the tripartite Germany-France-India could create a New Super Power equal to or greater than the United States, to create a rival Oil Colonialism that would compete with American oil colonialism worldwide, but would not use it military capability to liberate oil-producers from American colonial occupation and exploitation. German-French-Indian Oil colonialism could be as bad or as good as the rival American-British-Israeli Oil Colonialism.  

 

(8) World changes when Thinking Changes

The world we have created is a product of our thinking, and it cannot be changed without changing our thinking, argued Albert Einstein. When our thinking changes the world that we have created also changes. The world order that great powers have created is a product of the thinking and perceptions of the world powers. The world order cannot be changed without changing the worldview and the perceptions of the world powers. When the perceptions and the policies of the great powers changed, then the World Order they had created also changed. Whenever the entities constituting the international system changed their character, and the common belief about the appropriate behavior among international entities changed, what had been taken fro granted suddenly became anachronistic. The feudal societies of the 17th centuries, universality of the modern state system based on raison d’etat in the 18th century, multinational states in the 19th Century, colonialism in the 19th Century, decolonization and the birth of numerous new states in the second half of the 20th Century, the abolition of private property in the communist system in the first half of the 20th century, preceded by the changes in the dominant thinking of the diplomats and ruling elite of the leading world powers. The Non Aligned world order challenged the right of the dominant super powers to interfere in the regime changes of the poor, weak Third World nations. The idea of Non Alignment got diluted and prostituted by the influx of the agents of American alliances and it allowed United States President Bush to assert the right of preemptive strikes and the regime change. The Muslim Arab world and the Christian European world accepted the right of America to enforce regime change in Iraq. President Bush succeeded in changing the dominant thinking of the diplomats and elite of the great powers to legitimize the idea of colonial empires in the 21st Century.

 

(9) Philosopher Vs. Prophet

Semite Prophet Joshua gloated over his victory over agricultural cities, similarly Prophet Bush gloated over his victory over Iraq, and proved the morality of his convictions by the proof of victory on the battlefield. The warlike acts of President Bush are as much moral and altruistic as the acts of Prophet Bush. President Bush like Prophet Joshua subjugated the agricultural secular pro-women society of Iraq to bring them under the Semite Wahhabi patriarchy. In some respect President George W. Bush in 2003 acted like the Protestant Prophet when he took the risk and deployed the American arms to redress, what his Christian God told him was wrong and evil in the Middle East. Philosopher declared that the religions that expand and propagate by sword die by the sword. Prophets led their followers to expedite the will of their god by the use of swords. The goal of the philosopher is to explore the query to solve the riddle, to help the leaders of friendly as well as enemy nations make just decisions. The purpose of the prophet is to lead his chosen people to the grandeur path. Philosophy seeks to provide individuals the analytic tools and reasoning for improving their understanding of any issue. Prophecy seeks to declare the future to come or the future to be built, or Kingdom to be conquered, or the description of the golden age of the past or the golden age of the future to be sought. Philosopher, on the contrary, believes that mankind would find its golden age appropriate for every generation and every age. While the Prophet provides the purist solution, the philosopher provides the eclectic solutions of the multifaceted problem. The philosopher believes that only thing constant in the world is change, anything that is stagnant becomes stale and putrid. To an eclectic mind every new generation is advancement over the older generation. To a fundamentalist purist mind, the new generation must adhere to the purist code enacted centuries ago, even if these codes are outdated for the modern age. In general the Oriental mind, Hindu and Buddhist mind and reformed Protestant Christian mind more eclectic than the Occidental mind, Judeo, Islamic, Catholic and Orthodoxy mind.

 

(10) Warrior-Statesman Vs Prophet-Priest

President Theodore Roosevelt was the warrior-statesman; President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. Statesmen and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To Prophets the real world is the one they want to bring into being. Woodrow Wilson transformed what had started our as a reaffirmation of American neutrality into a set of prepositions laying the foundations of the Wilsonian foreign policy for the global crusade of the United States. In spite of the moral pretensions of Woodrow Wilson, Wilsonian foreign policy was simply a ruse, which camouflaged the Roosevelt’s Realpolitik in the make believe garb of the moralistic idealistic pretensions. President George W. Bush did the similar Wilsonian diplomatic coup, when he exploited the world sympathy for 9/11 Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks on America, to bring about the unprecedented expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South Asia, without hurting even a single Saudi Wahhabi Taliban terrorist leader. Secretary Colin Powell successfully brought about this ingenious diplomatic coup d'etat during first term of the Bush administration, without losing a beat. President Bush articulated his beliefs like the Prophet-Priest Woodrow Wilson, and used the military force like Theodore Roosevelt to create American colonial empire.

 

(11) Diplomats Are Not Church’s Servants

Following the principles of Richelieu’s Raison d’etat President Bush rejected the condemnation of Pope John Paul II on Iraq war and implemented American policies to promote the American imperial national interests and economic interests of American oil colonialism and to protect the national security of Semite Israel against Iraq and Syria sponsored suicide bombers. Should statesman and diplomats conduct diplomacy and formulate foreign policies to promote the religious interests of their dominant national Religion or promote the national interests of the State defined in terms of national Power? Would United Germany promote the national interest of Protestant Germany or the religious interests of former Holy Roman Empire and Roman Catholic Church? Would Catholic France join forces with Protestant Europeans to contain the possible rise of Catholic hegemony in Europe? Would European Union promote the interests of the Reformation or Counter Reformation? Would former European colonial powers after the decline of Russia and unification of Germany redefine their national interests and the role of United States in NATO in terms of Raison d’etat and balance of power, which obliges the diplomats to seek alliance with the less strong Power to contain the hegemon power?

 

In the multiple great power system would, every European power would employ Raison D’etat diplomacy to restore balance of power, and seek new alliances with the less-strong Power in the respective balance of power triangles, to check, contain and balance the regional dominant hegemon, which would require constant monitoring, and result in overlapping coalitions and alliances. The rigid fixed static diplomacy of the fixed two-camp Cold War world, would give way to the dynamic, changing diplomatic alliances in the post-Cold War world system. The world powers of the new world order shall be: United States, European Union, China, Russia, India and Japan.

 

(12) France & Germany as NAM Nations

Non Aligned Movement’s diplomacy has more appeal and usefulness for great powers like France and Germany, when they secured temporary alliances on specific issues with Russia and China to tame the Big Bully United States, without joining Russian Camp or Chinese Camp. France, Germany and Belgium became de'facto members of the Non Aligned Nations Movement Bloc, when they opposed United States while seeking the support of Russia and China. This rigidity of the two hostile blocs of the cold War era will be replaced by the “Great Power Non Aligned System” where India, China, Germany, Japan and France would explore new alliances with major regional players in South America, Asia and Africa to tame, check, contain and balance the dominant hegemon United States.

 

(13) Poland Stabbed Germany & France

With the expansion of NATO to include new East European members, NATO expands to 26-member Alliance. United States-led NATO with 26 members, no longer needs the continued support of France and Germany to station troops in Europe. It may be in the interest of Germany and France to leave NATO and to focus on creating and independent European military capability. The military interests of European Union are in direct conflict with the national interests of the United States that leads NATO. European Union wants to use its enhanced economic power to become independent of the United States. However, the expansion of European Union to include East European states harmed military ambitions of the European Union. The East European countries have affinity with Unified Germany, but the fear of the future Russian imperialism would keep them firmly in the USA-led NATO, as they have scant regard for the military capability of the European Union. European Union has committed hara-kiri by allowing expansion of the European Union, and permitting the East European states to join European Union as well as NATO. The solidarity of the Western Christendom under USA-led NATO, NAFTA and Organization of American Unity (OAU) is weakened after the end of the Cold War, simply because France, Germany, Spain, Portugal and Italy would compete rather than cooperate with United States in the New World and Hispanic America. In the new world order France and Germany would seek military alliances with India and Japan to enhance the independent deterrent of Western Europe. France, Germany and Japan would conclude by applying principles of Raison D’etat that only after lowering or severing military ties with United States would they become Great powers in their own right and succeed in carving out specific spheres of influence in certain specific geographic region. So long as Japan and Germany remain tied to the Untied States and American occupation troops remain on their soil, neither Japan nor Germany can become Great Powers. In the eyes of most of Germans and Japanese nationalists the presence of American military bases on their soil symbolizes American colonial troops, stationed to keep Germany and Japan under check, respectively.

 

(14) Maritime Camp Vs Continental Camp

India, Russia, France and Germany have common geopolitical interests to develop common alliance of Eurasian land powers to challenge the regional interventions of the maritime bloc of America, Britain, and Japan. China has maritime mentality and would join the maritime camp of United States, Britain and Japan. The Post Cold War new world order would consolidate into two rival blocs: United States, China, Britain and Australia will be the Maritime First Bloc, and Germany, Japan, France, Russia and India may be the Continental Second Bloc. The purpose of the America-led coalition shall be to further partition Russia and to expedite the secession of Siberia from Russia. France and Germany would realize that the national interests of European Union conflicts with that of USA-led NATO. United Germany has come into age. Germany is no longer willing to play second fiddle to Yankee America. German minister compared the tactics of President Bush to that of Adolf Hitler, to announce that new Cold War has begun, between United States the dominant power of the New World, and the dominant economic power of the European Union. The Atlantic Alliance will also split as a result of the collapse of the Union. After the decline of Russia the NATO has lost its raison d’etre. The expansion of Nato signals to the world that geopolitical hunt to cut up the lame sick Giant Russian Bear has begun. How would the cornered nuclear Russian Bear respond to the American hunting party, which has already captured its 10 cubs? Should India, France and Germany and Japan join the USA-China Bloc to end the white man’s colonial occupation of Asian Siberia? Or should India, Germany, Japan and France come to the rescue of Russia and for reasons and for what benefits?

 

(15) America Wanted Secession of Siberia

Geopolitical Hunt has begun. The maritime Hunter has cornered the sick Giant Bear into the tight corner. The Hunter has got hold of 10 Cubs, who have joined the hunt on the side of the Hunter. The Nato in 1999 admitted Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic. The Nato in November 2002 formally invited Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia the former parts of the Soviet Union, and Slovenia, Romania, and Bulgaria the former members of the Warsaw Pact to join Nato. The former satellites of the Soviet Union, the wounded bear have voluntarily become the new satellites of the adversary United States, the hunter, and may be looking forward for war with Russia to settle old scores. Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic and Slovakia bear grudge against Russia, which may prove costly to Russia in the event of any future Russia’s war with enlarged Nato. Nato has developed bases in the southern frontiers of Russia in Georgia, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan. United States and China may enter into long-term strategic pact in near future. United States, China, and Britain pact would create the First Bloc in Asia and threaten Russia’s hold over Eastern Siberia. Under Mongol Empire Russia and East Europe was part of Mongol Empire. Russia usurped Siberia, which should have gone to China after the collapse of the Mongol Empire. Siberia has the population of 14 million, bordering overpopulated China. Russia’s population is in decline and it would decline from present 147 million to 141 million in ten years. Militarily, short of nuclear war, Russia cannot hold on to Siberia. The land of Siberia can easily become home to more than 300 million Chinese, Koreans, Japanese and Indians. What diplomatic and geopolitical options nuclear but weakened Russia has, in face of the tightening noose in Siberia? Should brown India support the continued white occupation of Asian Siberia? Would liberation of Asian Siberia from the clutches of white Christians, and its subsequent occupation by yellow Buddhists in the religious interests of Hindu India? What would India gain by militarily opposing the Chinese invasions of Siberia? If the West fails to partition Russia to break its hold over Siberia before 2010 AD, then resurgent Russia may embark upon the territorial expansion, and the Siberia would never get the chance again to secede. Chinese invasions of Russia are not in the national interests of India, Japan, Germany and France. In response to the threat posed by the First Bloc

 

(16) Fundamentalists Covet Oval Office

Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Semite Zionist lobby joined forces with Republican Neo-Conservatives to impose Fundamentalism throughout the Middle East. The Western Christendom aims to impose the domination of the Christianity in the post-Cold War age, by hijacking the presidency of the United States. The Theopolitical conspiracy has begun to gain control over the Oval Office, the most powerful center of power in the Western Christendom, rivaling that of the Roman Empire. The Christian Religious Right Conspiracy implanted Emperor Theodosius II (d. 395) as Emperor of Roman Empire, who banned all ancient religions except Christianity, and caused the destruction of the Roman Empire and Roman Civilization and Roman Religion. Christian Religious Right Conservatism has acquired unprecedented political power because of its control over political campaign donation and vote-banks. It had been the great fortune of United States that President George W. Bush was the president on Sept. 11, 2001, when terrorist struck the citadel of Protestant power on earth. President George W. Bush, like President H.W. Bush and President Richard Nixon is not member of the Christian Religious Right conservative Conspiracy. It would be the sad day for the world if the world’s most powerful nation misused the might of America to promote the religious interests of Christianity. What options do the Hindu India, Buddhist Japan and Orthodox Russia have to neutralize the Christianity’s expansionism in the Hindu and Buddhist Asia? Historically Roman Catholic Church has joined forces with Sunni Muslims to support Islamic invasions of ancient Gnostic, Apostolic Arian Christian lands of Egypt, Syria, Libya, Jordan and Lebanon. Church of Rome supported the Ottoman Turk invasions of Byzantine Orthodox Christian Constantinople. Vatican has joined forces with Wahhabi fundamentalists to impose barbaric Shariah Law to replace the modern European colonial law in place in Africa, Pakistan, Iran, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Malaysia. In the post-Cold War era, the anti-women, anti-abortion, pro-life Catholic and evangelical conservative forces have joined hands with the anti-women pro-Shariah Wahhabi forces worldwide, to impose fundamentalist conservative governments in the Christian and Muslim worlds. How should pro-Choice, pro-abortion, and pro-Women Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists respond to the growing nexus of anti-women Catholics, Evangelicals and Wahhabi Muslims? Could the theopoltical ambitions of Catholic conservatism and Wahhabi fundamentalism result in the war of religion in the early 21st Century?

 

(17) Organized Crime- Corrupt Politicians Nexus

Catholic Church joined forces with Italian Mafia to impose corrupt governments in Italy, by buying influence over parliament members and by keeping Italian governments instable. Italy became the first country in the world to jail seven-time Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti and crime boss Gaetano Badalmenti for 24 years, in the same trial for the same crime. Italy in 1870, at the orders of King Victor Emmanuel II, had also become the first country to imprison Pope in the Vatican and divesting him of all temporal and secular powers. What de Richelieu was for France during Thirty Years Wars, the Counter Reformation Wars, King Victor Emmanuel II was for Italy’s unification in the late 19th Century. The unholy nexus of Mafia and Church has destabilized post-War governments in Italy and imposed a Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti, head of Christian Democrats seven times prime minister of Italy. Christian Democrats was a party of Mafia, Church and Crook politicians. Like a bombshell on the political circles, the Appellate court in Italy sentenced in Nov. 2002, former prime minister of Italy Giulio Andreotti to 24 years in prison, over the 1979 murder of Pecorelli. Mafia killed journalist Mino Pecorelli on Adreotti’s orders, because he was about to publish damaging revelations about Giulio Andreotti. The Court also jailed Mafia boss Gaetano Badalmenti for 24 years for the same killing. The global organized crime enriched by global cocaine and heroin drug trade, which generates $700 billion in annual incomes to the organized crime, half of which is generated in America. The rising cost of elections has made politicians of Japan, Italy, Russia, India, America and Britain very corrupt. The rising cost of elections allowed Mafia to buy political influence and huge incomes allowed Mafia-prime Minister become 7-time prime minister of Italy. Japan experiences political instability like that of Italy, because of the evil nexus of organized crime and corrupt Japanese politicians. It is high time that Indian courts should also award 24-year jail terms for corrupt Indian politicians.

 

(18) India is one of Six World Powers

India has overtaken Britain as the world power and it could result in the cunning retaliation by the British, who otherwise are content to be the lap dog of the Yankee president. United States, China and India would be the three tops economic and military and political powers of the world. The six world powers would manage the concert of World to maintain global balance of power. The Leading Six World Powers are: United States, Russia, India, China, France, and Britain. In the 21st Century the classical European nations, namely, Germany, France and Britain do not have the economic and military resources to play traditional role as world powers, outside the European Union framework. “In the post-Cold War world, the traditional European nation-states-the countries which formed the Concert of Europe until the First World War – lack the resources for a global role.” (Kissinger, Diplomacy, p807) World Banks “World Development Report 2000-2001” ranks world’s top Seven largest economies in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GNP at PPP) at 1999 dollars as follows: (1) United States ($8.350 Trillion), (2) China ($ 4.112 Trillion), (3) Japan ($ 3.043 Trillion), (4) India ($ 2.144 Trillion), (5) Germany ($ 1.838 Trillion), (6) France ($ 1.294 Trillion), (7) United Kingdom ($ 1.234 Trillion), (10) Russia ($ 929 Billion). The problem of the 21st Century is: How to integrate China, Japan and India to play legitimate Great Power role commensurate with their economic status as world’s top four economic power in terms of the size of the economy. The principle problem of the diplomacy in the 21st Century is how to integrate India and China into the Super Power Club. Germany, France and United Kingdom would never be able to match India and China in terms of the size of the economy and military capability.

 

India is equal to China economically and militarily. The recent leap China made over India resulted from the Most Favored Nation Status it enjoyed with United States. United States promoted China to meet the challenge of Japan. Unprecedented FDIs foreign direct investments in China and unfettered access to American markets allowed China to pull ahead of India, but India would soon catch up. In 1990 the Goss Domestic Product of China was 109.9% of India’s GDP, and India’s GDP was 91% of that of China. Then China leaped ahead of India, in 1999 the GDP of China was 215.6% of India’s GDP, as China’s GDP increased by 279.5% during 1990-1999 period. India’s GDP in 1999 was 46.38% of China’s GDP in 1999, and India’s GDP increased by 142.5% during 1990-1999 period. In 2002 China’s GDP is 191.8% of India’s GDP, and India’s GDP in 2002 is 52.14% of China’s GDP. China overtook India only because of Most Favored Trading Nation’s (MFN) status with United States and by the merger of Hong Kong into China and that too only during 1990’s. India has all potential to catch up with china to eventually overtake China. Economically and militarily India and China are equal and shall play similar roles and equally important roles in the world politics. 

 

The major Six World Civilizations are Indian Hindu Civilization, Chinese Buddhist Civilization, Western Christendom Civilization, Orthodox Slav Civilization, Persian-Arab Islamic Civilization, Inca/Maya/Aztec Indian Civilization, and Black African Pagan Civilization. It is no accident that India and China are fourth and second largest economies of the world in 2002, respectively. Even in 1750 AD India produced 24.5% of the world’s total manufactured goods, and China produced 31.5% of the world’s total manufactured goods. The Western Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand, the entire Western Christendom in 1750 produced only 18.2 percent of the world’s total manufactured goods. (Paul Bairoch, “International Industrialization Levels from 1750 to 1980,” World Bank Report) India and China have regained what has historically been their status and role in the world. The problem of the diplomacy is how to reform world institutions to recognize the role of China and India.

 

(19) Decline of West Europe in 21st Century

Without the support of Indian army neither France nor Germany can play international role. In the 21st Century New World Order the major powers will be- United States, European Union, China, Russia, India and Japan. The purpose of the author is to provide guidelines for Indian statesman to articulate Hindu Indian national interests and worldview to the world powers. “In the post-Cold War world, the traditional European nation-states- the countries which formed the Concert of Europe until the First World War- lack the resources for a global role. United Europe will continue as a Great Power; divided into national states, it will slide into secondary status.” (Kissinger, Diplomacy, p. 807)

 

21st Century Similar to 19th Century

European powers and American would be at war in the 21st Century as they had been during 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. “Victory in the Cold War has propelled America into a world which bears many similarities to the European state system of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The absence of both an overriding ideological or strategic threat freed nations to pursue foreign policies based increasingly on their immediate national interest. In an International system characterized by perhaps five or six major players and a multiplicity of smaller states, order will have to emerge as it did in past centuries from a reconciliation and balancing of competing national interests.” (Kissinger, Diplomacy, p 805) “On the level of the relations among states, the new order will be more like the European state system of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries than the rigid pattern of the Cold War. It will contain at least six major players- the United States, Europe, China, Japan, Russia, and probably India- as well as a multiplicity of medium-sized and smaller countries.” (Kissinger, Diplomacy, p23) “India dabbled in the nonaligned movement during the Cold War. But it has yet to assume a role commensurate with its size on the international political stage.” (Diplomacy, p26)

 

1(6) Ideology & Religion Faded in New Age of Raison d’etat

(1) Raison D’etat Diplomacy Principles

Pope John Paul II would have limited influence over the policies of 25 member European Union, after the inclusion of numerous new Orthodox Christian countries. Enlarged European Union would be a Roman Empire, not the pro-Papacy Holy Roman Empire. Pope John Paul II would be one of the religious leaders that leaders of Europe would consult time to time. Perhaps European Union would advise the abrogation of the sovereignty of the Vatican as it violates the raison d’etat doctrine. United Europe would undermine Papacy and bring Roman Catholic Churches under the control and supervision of the national governments and national church councils, without any interference of the Pope. Never again would European Union target an Orthodox nation like Yugoslavia for dismemberment to engineer the secession of Catholic provinces, namely Slovenia and Croatia.  

 

With the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1524, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. This process, the Counter Reformation, led to Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), which turned into one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe, most of which was part of the Holy Roman Empire, was divided into two-armed camps- the Protestants and the Catholics. By the time the war ended in 1648, Central Europe had been devastated and Germany had lost almost a third of its population. Catholic Cardinal de Richelieu supported the Protestant princes of Germany and opposed the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor in the Counter Reformation War from 1624 to 1648. French First Minister de Richelieu grafted the principle of raison d’etat onto French Policy, a principle that the other European states adopted in the century that flowed, in the 18th Century. After the 1814 Congress of Vienna the Richelieu’s Raison d’etat evolved into the Balance of Power principle. The Congress System employed the diplomacy of Raison d’etat and maintained peace in Europe and established the Concert of Europe, whereby the European leaders met periodically at the Summit level to periodically readjust alliances to hold any emerging dominant power into check.

 

(2) Behind screen Real Rulers of the World

The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. One should attempt to understand the strategies and the mindset of the behind-the-screen rulers, governors and manipulators of the world. Philosophers though not part of the corridors of power use reasoning to understand the mechanics underlying the big picture. Author being an outsider has better view of the big pictures, because even the top diplomats and foreign ministers of the world, lack the intellectual acumen to understand the dynamics of the big picture. Almost 95 percent of the diplomats of the world lack the intellectual capacity to understand the big reality and they concern primarily with the worldly rewards that being in the corridors of power provides them. Most of the diplomats and presidents and prime ministers in the world are merely puppets playing their designated role to safeguard their place in the corridors of power.

 

(3) Balance of Power Checks Hegemony

Germany and France would apply the principles of Balance of power and Raison d’etat to hold America in check. Diplomats should seek alliances with second-strong Power to balance the hegemony of the top strongest power. The Raison d’etat defines the cardinal principal of balance of Power as the diplomats’ moral imperative to seek alliances with the less-dominant power to check, tame, and balance the dominant hegemon in every region. The United States is the dominant hegemon in the world. Bush Doctrine 2002 declares as the principle objective of the Untied States to militarily and otherwise foil the attempt of any power, hostile of friendly, to equal or surpass the military power of the United States. President Bush wants to use force to maintain the present military, social, political and economic preponderance of the United States, which United States achieved simply because its adversary the Soviet Union collapsed. In reality it was not the victory of the United States, rather the defeat of the fellow white Christian Super Power Soviet Union. India accepts that United States has all rights in the world to force fellow West European powers, including European Union to attempt equaling or surpassing the military, economic and cultural might of the United States. The Bush Doctrine 2002, openly challenged European Union that if EU continued to set its goal to become equal or surpass the military and economic capability of the United States, then United States would use military force to force EU back down. Bush Doctrine 2002 declares emphatically that any power, whether friendly or hostile, that dreams to either equal or surpass United States in military and economic, then the military capability of the USA-led NATO which now has 26 members including former members of the Eastern Bloc, then the NATO would use force against it. The Bush doctrine is an advance warning to the European Union, not to dream equality with United States.

 

Ideology shall play less significant influence over the foreign policy making of the great powers. The leading eight world powers in the post-Cold War new world order are: United States, Russia, China, India, Germany, Japan, Britain and Canada. The raison d’etat principle would oblige Germany, France, Japan, Canada and India to seek military alliances with second-strongest Power to tame, check and balance the military preponderance of the United States in the world. The diplomacy and statecraft of the post-Cold War new world order shall be in total contrast to the diplomatic conduct practiced during the bipolar world during Cold War. The new world order is a multipolar world, led by two blocs, first Bloc headed by United States and the Second Bloc shall be led by a coalition of world powers, uniting to check the hegemony of the United States. Germany, Japan, France and Canada would determine their national policies towards United States, to promote their respective national interests, not to promote the ideological interests propounded by the Wilsonian foreign policy. The balance of power shall be the guiding principle of the diplomacy among Christian nations, as it was during 18th and 19th century.

 

India, China and Japan do not accept that United States enjoys such preponderance in military and economic power of the world, as no other country would be able to overtake it in any foreseeable future. While it is true that no white, European Christian European nation would ever be able to match United States or present any serious challenge to the United States, it is not true for China, Japan and India. World Bank Report 2002 lists the world’s top four largest economies by size in terms of GDP (GNP at PPP) as: United States, China, Japan and India. China has set its economic goal of quadrupling its GNP in ten years, to reach the GDP of $16 trillion in 1999 dollars by 2012, which would be double the present day GDP of United States. China is likely to overtake United States as dominant economic power of the world before 2012 AD. Experts of Geopolitics and war do not accept the Pentagon thesis that the American military technology revolution has given unprecedented lead to the American Armed forces, which is not likely to decline or lessen the lead over other potential adversaries. Geopolitics dismisses this claim of Pentagon. The brilliant military technology innovation of Precision Guided Munitions, which resulted in the development of $12,500 JDAM kit that made all Vietnam era dull bombs into smart bombs which guided the flight of the bomb while falling gravity to the changing targets guided by GPS technology. PGMs made US Air Force powerful and it has demoralized ground-based troops, which lack any protection against smart bombs dropped 36,000 feet high. Geopolitical argument is that the military technology of Precision Guided Munitions is a double edged sword, which while enhancing the power of US Air Force has also made US Navy and US Aircraft Carriers highly vulnerable to the Precision Guided Munitions and GPS technology equipped anti-ship cruise missiles, which can track the changing mobile target after its launch. India and Russia jointly mass producing Supersonic Brahmos Anti-Ship Cruise Missile with a range of 300 miles, which can sink aircraft carriers. India does not accept the American assertion that white Christian United States has any just right to use military force against India, China, Japan, France and Germany, if these countries form military, economic or political coalitions seeking to challenge the hegemony of the United States. The very principle of Raison d’etat and balance of power obligates every diplomat of the great powers to seek alliances to check, tame and balance the dominant hegemon, the Untied States, present sole super power of the world. The forcible enactment of the Bush Doctrine to punish nations, which seek to equal United States in terms of military and economic power, would make it more likely that anti-US coalition would form to overthrow the domination of the Untied States.

 

The recent decline of Russia and Unification of Germany makes it the moral imperative of the diplomats of Germany and France to forge a 2nd force, the “Non-Aligned Great Power Bloc,” which is neither aligned to the United States nor to the Soviet Union, the staple definition of the Non-Aligned Movement. Joseph Stalin had sent a Peace Note to the West after the outbreak of the Korean War, which offered the Unification of West and East Germany, provided the rearmed United Germany declares itself to be a Non-Aligned Nation, neither part of the Western bloc nor part of the Eastern bloc. United States, France and Britain rejected this idea, fearing that it Germany as Non-Aligned nation would give great boost to the Non-Alignment. Had United Germany joined the ranks of the Non Aligned Nations in 1950s, the Non-aligned Bloc led by Germany, India, Yugoslavia, Egypt, and Indonesia would have become the major force in world politics.

 

The unchallenged one-superpower system could tempt United States dream world conquest. United States used the bogey of soviet menace and threatening onward march of the Communism to browbeat West Europeans into servitude and bondage of the United States. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, United States may use Bush doctrine to impose American hegemony worldwide, just as Brezhnev Doctrine used by Soviet Union to impose Soviet hegemony throughout Soviet Empire. It is very arrogant for United States to claim that White America is the sole military power of the world, when it had lost the Vietnam War and White Soviet Union lost the Afghanistan War. The failure of the American Armed Forces to capture Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda leadership in Afghanistan casts doubts upon the military capability of the United States. United States buoyed by the Bush doctrine 2002, might overextend itself and disintegrate just as Soviet Union over-extended itself after it declared Brezhnev Doctrine after the America’s defeat in the Vietnam. The principles of Raison d’etat and balance of power requires that great powers, namely, France, Germany, India, and Japan seek military and political ties with regional powers to balance the predominance of the hegemon America, so that United States may no dream world conquest. It is no accident that German minister compared President Bush to Hitler during German elections 2002.

 

It is likely that United States, China, Britain and Australia would formalize long-term security ties to create USA-China bloc. United States wants China to invade Siberia, and this had been the principal goal of Secretary Henry Kissinger. United States wants China to expand northward to avert Chinese invasions of Australia and New Zealand. East European Allies would come solidly behind United States to protect their freedom against future German or Russian expansion. Secretary Kissinger developed strategic ties between Judeo-Communism and Judeo-Christianity, iconoclast Christianity and iconoclast communism to undermine Buddhism in China, and Indo-China and this alliance continues till today, as evidenced by West’s acceptance of the Communist suppression of Falun Gong Buddhist movement in China. The Western Christendom’s Alliance is cemented by common anti-Buddhism objectives.

 

The two Asian giants Japan and India would be forced to take counter-measures to form the anti-China coalition in Asia, which would include besides India and Japan, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and Taiwan. Germany, France and Russia may also join the India-Japan Bloc to check Chinese invasions of Eastern Siberia, and it would form a 2nd Bloc. Germany and Japan would demand that America vacates its military bases from German and Japanese soil. Hindu India and Buddhist Japan would play a leading role in organizing the Buddhist nations of Asia. India and Japan would form the Organization of Buddhist States to include India, Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Taiwan, Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka to create a common Hindu-Buddhist front against iconoclast the West and iconoclast Communism. The main objective of this coalition would be to help Buddhists overthrow the communist regime in Communist China.

 

(4) Geopolitical Road Map of 2050 AD

Half a Century from now, in 2050 AD, what will the map of the world looks like? The Economist, did a survey of the new Geopolitics, the road to 2050, in July 31,1999 issue. The future world shall comprise solely of seven or eight lumbering- cultural monsters. People are moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The post-modern system, will takeover, and the descendants of the European people who invented nation-state will themselves have invented a new multilingual political entity that covers most of non-Orthodox Europe. In which case that global state-hood tally will come down again, with a bump. Taking the lead from Germany-France leadership of European Union, China and India would unite the nation states in Asia and Africa to form the ‘Union of Asia, Africa & Australia’ acronym UAAA. The Union of Asia Africa & Australia would unite the Black, Brown and yellow worlds, Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu worlds. The Asian conquest of Australia and Siberia would unite Yellow, Brown and Black races.

 

The third World War will be first truly intercontinental war and determine whether White race continues to occupy Siberia, Australia, Africa and South America. The gains white Europeans made during the colonial era would be redistributed among more populated nations. Africa belongs to black Africans. Australia belongs to Asians. Siberia belongs to Asians. South America and Latin America belongs to brown Mestizos and Mulattos and unmixed white Spaniards and Portuguese would give up their dominance and hand over the power to Mestizos and Mulattos.

 

Half a century from 2000 the world will be unrecognizably different from the place it is. The new pattern will become known only when the two main questions of the next decade or so are answered. First question is whether the United States and European Union continue their present partnership in NATO? The Atlantic democracies can keep their armed forces working together only if the NATO’s purpose is redefined and Germany recognized as equal to the United States. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the consolidation of European Union make United States the principal threat to Germany and European Union. In exchange for limited-joint control over part of Russian nuclear arsenal, Germany and France would consider expelling United States and inviting weakened Russia into NATO as an equal, to balance overwhelming superiority of the United States.

 

(5) India is Second Super Power

Five major world powers are: United States, China, Europe, India and Russia. The second question waiting for an answer is which of the five or six possible competitors would actually decide to join in the struggle and be first to step on the world stage to compete headlong with the United States? The major world powers are six only, namely, United States (272 million, GDP $7,834 billion), China (1,244 million, $4.1 trillion), India (1,000 million, $2.2 trillion), Russia (148 million, $447 billion), European Union (374 million, $8,091 billion), NATO (718 million, $16,255 billion) and Japan (126 million, $4,190 billion). The major independent world powers are four only, namely, United States, Russia, China and India, because European Union and Japan accept the leadership of United States. The steady decline of Russia’s population and the dysfunctional economy rules out Russia as the major world player and India and Russia would form coalition-world power. China is firmly in the American camp, because so long China remains Communist, the simmering Buddhist threat of Civil War forces China to seek alliance with Western Christendom. India emerges as the principal competitor to the United States. India and United States suffer from sibling rivalry and both are democratic, multi-ethnic, pro-diversity continental size civilizations. Aryan India represents the Oriental religions and Hindu-Buddhist-Pagan civilizations. Anglo Saxon United States represents the Occidental religions and Judeo-Christian Western Christendom. United States and India representing mutually hostile Occidental and Oriental worldviews heading for clash of civilizations during next few decades. Slav Orthodox Russia would rediscover its Asian roots, and its Mongol legacy to give birth to new Asian super power, which would eclipse the glory of Great Mongol Empire. It is worthy to note that during 1200’s Mongol Empire that extended from Chinese coasts to Danube River on borders of Germany and Arabian Sea. Tibet’s Dalai Lama was the spiritual head of the entire Buddhist Mongol Empire that encompassed the entire Orthodox Christian, Shiite Islam and most of Sunni Islamic world. Political and military union of India and Russia would recreate Great Mongol Empire. Military alliance of India, China and Pakistan would create the political union of Asia, Africa and Australia. Military alliance of India, Peru, Venezuela and Guyana would result in the expulsion of unmixed white Spaniards from Latin and South America and install brown Mestizos-led governments throughout Hispanic America. Military alliance of India, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Somalia would result in the expulsion of whites from the continent of Africa. Military alliance of India and United States could create worldwide Pax Americana. Military alliance of India, Britain, Canada and Australia could recreate mighty British Empire, where sun never set. Hindu India’s religious pact with Protestant Christianity would convert 500 million Roman Catholics to Protestant Christianity before 2050.

 

(6) Raison D’etat

With the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1524, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. This process, the Counter Reformation, led to Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), which turned into one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe, most of which was part of the Holy Roman Empire, was divided into two-armed camps- the Protestants and the Catholics. By the time the war ended in 1648, Central Europe had been devastated and Germany had lost almost a third of its population. Catholic Cardinal de Richelieu supported the Protestant princes of Germany and opposed the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor in the Counter Reformation War from 1624 to 1648. French First Minister de Richelieu grafted the principle of raison d’etat onto French Policy, a principle that the other European states adopted in the century that flowed.

 

(7) Triumph of Yankee Oil Colonial Empire

The power distribution between European Union and United States is a zero sum game. Any gains of the United States in terms of national power results in the corresponding decline of the power of the former European colonial powers. In the global balance of power any net gains to the United States results in the net loss to the Europeans. The overall population of the White race is stagnant, so any increase in the white European immigration to United States results in the net decline of the white population in Europe, Central America and South America. If America succeeds in creating American Colonial Empire, it would put brake on any European dream to recreate European Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Any increase of the American influence in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman and Kuwait, came at the expense of historical influence of Britain in the Arabian Gulf, which decline with the rise of American influence. UAE, Bahrain, and Qatar were British colonies before 1971, when British Prime Minister Harold Wilson decided to withdraw its troops from East of Suez, and grant independence to the Trucial States.

 

(8) Canada’s Great Power Potential

Great land of Canada failed to realize its true potential because United States ate into the vitality of Canada leaving only the shell in Canada. The population of white race underwent decline in post-war era and the emigration to United States sealed the fate of even the largest European economies, namely, Germany, France, Britain and Canada. The rise of United States inevitably results in the decline of Western Europe. It is no wonder that European Union resents the colossal power of Hegemon USA. The drive for creating American Colonial Empire will destroy the infant dreams of every Europhile in European Union to recreate European Colonial Empires in 21st Century.

 

(9) American Colonialism in 21st Century

Possible rise of America’s Colonial Empire in the 21st Century would be good for rest of the World. Historically, every white colonial empire that arose caused precipitous decline of one or more white Christian colonial of its time. The American colonial empire in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines, US built during President William McKinley Administration (1897-1901), came at the expense of Spanish Empire. The rise of United States as the Super Power after the Second World War came at the cost of demise of the European colonial empires of Britain, France and Holland. The crowing of United States in 1990 as the sole super power of the world came after the demise of the Soviet Union. Europeans have succinctly realized that any relative gain in the world influence of United States, whether in United Nations or NATO come at the expense of the Europeans, either West Europeans or East Europeans and Russia.

 

United States became a colonial power at the turn of the 20th century. American Imperialists believe that the American history as the history of expansion. The near-simultaneous imperial leaps into the Caribbean Cuba and the Pacific Philippines in 1898, were the logical steps in American expansionism of the 18th century imperialist moves into Tennessee and Ohio. American imperialists led by Theodore Roosevelt and Admiral A.T. Mahan had none of the anti-colonial squeamishness about expansion that religious right conservatives feel today, about President Bush’s preemptive strikes for anti-terrorism and counter-nuclear proliferation purposes. Europeans were never comfortable with the idea of American Colonial Empire. President Truman asked Prime Minister Winston Churchill to hand over half of the British Empire to the United States, in exchange for the British war debts. Winston Churchill refused to cave in and preferred to grant independence to the colonies, rather than hand them over to the United States, as it did in the case the Diego Garcia, which had been a part of Mauritius.

 

The major lessons of the American Colonial War of 1897-1901 are that United States prefers imposing colonial rule in newly seized territories. United States may impose colonial rule in Afghanistan after liberating it from Al Qaeda & Taliban, arguing that imperial takeover of Afghanistan is desirable, otherwise some other power take it over. American imperialism in Afghanistan and Iraq at the beginning of the 21st century, like the American imperialism in Philippines and Cuba at the beginning of the 20th century, was not an accident, a reluctant byproduct of the 9/11 terrorist events. It was there from the beginning. It can even be argued that some one may have planned the terrorist attacks to justify the eastward expansion of NATO to control as a prelude to control the recently discovered oil reserves in Uzbekistan.

 

The national interests of the future American Colonial Empire do not clash with national interests of India as growing world power. Any increase in the global influence of the United States would result in the similar decrease in the influence of the European nations, which is good for India, as it translates into greater influence of India in the world affairs. United States presently control major Muslim oil-producing countries, namely, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Qatar, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei, so any increase in influence over Iraq, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan would weaken Islamic world as a whole, which is good for India. Any war and confrontation between United States and the Muslim world is good for the Hindu world.

 

(10) Yankee Empire Harmed Germany France

The purpose of NATO had been to chaperon Germany, France and Italy. The purpose of NATO inviting east European countries had been to neutralize the role of France and Germany. American invaded Iraq to control oil supplies to France and Germany to blunt their economic competitive advantages over Americans. Europeans realize that any increase in American influence in Iraq, would adversely harm the national interests of oil-hungry Europeans. It explains that France and Germany are opposed to the US invasions of Iraq. The US invasions of Iraq would enhance Indian national interests if it results in the creation of independent or semi-autonomous Shiite Iraq and Sunni Kurdistan. The independence of Shiite Iraq would weaken Wahhabi Arab nations. The independence of Kurdistan is good for India, as Kurds belong to the Aryan race and speak a language similar to Persian and Sanskrit, radically different from Arab language and Arab culture. In exchange for the share of the spoils of the Imperial expansion, India should be willing to provide troops and diplomatic support to create Pax Americana. The emergence of the United States as a world power and imperial power in 1900 and in 1945 and in Afghanistan war of 2002, was a culmination, of imperialist lobby’s game-plan, not the aberration of the unforeseen terrorist attacks of 9/11. American Colonial Empire in the oil-producing Islamic world would be welcome news for Indians and millions of Muslim women suffering from bondage and servitude to men. Any colonial expansion of Christian nations in the Muslim world is not bad for the Hindu world, unless the West trains Muslim terrorists for attacks of iconoclast Hindu India.

 

(11) Infinite Mystic Ways to Reach Divine

The 900 million Hindus and 1400 million Buddhists believe that there are infinite ways to reach divine and every person can contact the divine directly without need of intermediation by clergy, priests, mullah or pujari. Non-denominational Protestant Christians, representing more than 200 million citizens of the United States do not want to proselytize unlike like 15 million Evangelicals and 35 million Catholic Americans. This eclectic worldview and eclectic religious views is held by more than half of the mankind. In terms of economic resources and military power this eclectic half of the world, enjoys overwhelming preponderance over the other half of than mankind, which supports militant intolerant fundamentalism and abhors the tolerant eclectic worldview.

 

In contrast when you are with Wahhabi Arabs, Sunni Muslims, Shiite Muslims, and Catholic Christians, you find yourself among people whose identity is more or less contained in their faith and religion. Islam, Judaism and Conservative Catholic Clergy teach its believers that their communities are as strong only as their beliefs? Fundamentalist religions, Islam, Judaism and Catholicism teach their believers to passionately hold their beliefs and ethical views, including the suppression of women. Fundamentalist religions and militant cults force their believers to passionately hold their beliefs as it allows them accept and validate even archaic ethical view, such as suppression and servitude of women. Islam, Judaism and Catholicism want to recreate the pristine past of the golden age and they want to put the clock back and impose inequalities on their women. Wahhabi Sunni Arabs wants to reenact the 7th century military victories of Prophet Mohammed, when a small group of Arab warriors conquered, massacred and enslaved the black and brown races of Egypt, Syria, Libya and Algeria.

 

(12) Synod of Asia

Pope John Paul II in essence declared during 1999 Synod of Asia in Delhi that Catholic Church would succeed in making Asia a Catholic continent just as it made the New world, South America, North America, and Central America Christian during the 2nd Christian Millennium. This declared unbridled ambitions of Wahhabi Sunni Mecca and Catholic Vatican threatens world’s geopolitical stability and geo-strategic balance of power and the principal cause of the looming Clash of Civilizations, World War of Religions, Global Clash of Races, and White Iconoclasts’ wars on brown, black & yellow idolaters. Fundamentalist militant Wahhabi Sunni Islam and Catholic religious right conservative Church united in their efforts to promote anti-women, anti-abortion fundamentalism throughout Asia and Africa.

 

(13) Iraq Iran N. Korea Axis of Evil

Iraq, Iran and North Korea are parts of the Axis of Evil, said President Bush in 2002. The author offers the explanation that core of the evil in Iraq lies in the domination by Sunni Arab, who represent only 16 percent of the population of predominantly Shiite Iraq. The core of evil in Iran lies neither in Shiite Islam nor in Aryan Iran but in the anti-women Islamic fundamentalism, the political precursor of Wahhabi Sunni anti-women fundamentalism. The core of evil in North Korea lies in the Judeo-Communism, which denies Buddhists to rule North Korea.

 

Incidentally the West imposed the dictatorship of Sunni Arabs in Iraq after the overthrow of the Aryan Ottoman Empire as well as imposed the dictatorship of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. President Jimmy Carter overthrew Shah of Iran and imposed the theocracy of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. President Bill Clinton and Secretary Madeleine Albright imposed the Taliban/ al Qaeda theocracy over Afghanistan. The West also destroyed the political power base of Buddhists in North Korea, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma, which allowed Judeo-Communists into power in the overwhelmingly predominant Buddhist world in general and Kim Jong II in North Korea. President John F. Kennedy invaded Vietnam not to contain Communism, but to annihilate Buddhism in order to proselytize Indo-China. Catholic religious right conservatives and Evangelical religious right conservatives have supported the anti-women Wahhabi Sunni in the Arab world and Ayatollah’s Shiite fundamentalism in Iran, as well as the Judeo-Communism in the Buddhist world.

 

The growing nexus of anti-women Arab Sunni Wahhabi fundamentalism, and anti-women Catholic fundamentalism, and anti-Buddhist Judeo-Communist fundamentalism, and organized crime of Catholic Cocaine & Sunni Heroin cartels, successfully exploiting their control over political campaign donations and vote banks to hijack the political leadership of Protestant WASP United States.

 

(14) Axis of Evil & Oval Office

The question is whether the Axis of Evil succeeds in hijacking the White House, to destroy its WASP character, just as its predecessor Emperor Theodosius II (d. 395) destroyed eclectic Roman Empire after he became the Emperor of Rome? Would United States meet the fate of Roman Empire of 410 AD, where religious leaders supported the conquering barbarian Germans, and after some decades anointed the barbarian leader as the King of Holy Roman Empire? The WASP’s United States is victim of the ongoing Counter Reformation War.

 

(15) Global Axis of Evil in Internet Age

The 20th century revolution in communication, transportation and warfare, which resulted in transforming the planet earth into a ‘Global Village,’ has also exposed the existence of secretive ‘Global Axis of Evil.’ The Six Faces of the Axis of Evil are: (a) Anti-women Religious Fundamentalism, (b) Totalitarian Religious theocracies, (c) Organized Crime & Drug Cartels, (d) Military Coups, (e) Violent Religion backed Terrorism, and (f) Oil & Diamond Cartels. The growing nexus of religious fundamentalism, religious totalitarianism, organized crime, and religion-backed violent terrorism represents the classical invasions of Civilizations by barbarians, and threatens to impose new Global Dark Age on Islamic and Christian worlds in 21st Century. The Wahhabi Mecca, Totalitarian Vatican, Organized Crime, Military Coups, Wahhabi Terrorism, OPEC/DeBeers represents six facets of Axis of Evil in 21st Century.

 

(16) Semite Wahhabi Islam is Barbarian Cult

From 7th Century to the 15th Century, the Mediterranean Islam represented the Civilization, while Christian Continental Europe represented barbarianism. White men and women from German lands and Frank lands sold as slaves in the slave markets of civilized Alexandria, Damascus and Constantinople. Only after 715 AD, the Mediterranean trade in white European slaves banned by Byzantine Navy to cause economic damage to Islamic Alexandria and Damascus. Indian Empire and British Empire before the First World War harnessed the power of the nomad Bedouin in Arabian Peninsula to force secession of Arabian Peninsula from the yoke of Ottoman Empire. President Jimmy Carter harnessed the power of militant Shiite Islamism to bring down the government of liberal Shah of Iran in 1979. The Roman Catholic Church and the West legitimizes Wahhabi barbarian fundamentalism and Shariah as correct form Islam, primarily to brand Islam as barbarian religion in the eyes of the world, so that world may forget that from 7th to 15th Century, Islam represented Civilization, while Western Christianity, Roman Catholic Civilization represented barbarianism during Dark Age of Medieval Europe.

 

(17) Wahhabi Global Axis of Evil

The Global Axis of Evil seeks to forcibly impose barbaric Wahhabi Shariah Law, by replacing the civilized western civil and criminal code, to impose medieval culture, society and customs even on modern and liberal Islamic nations, namely Nigeria, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia, Egypt, Algeria, Libya, Bosnia, and Albania, even when majority of Muslim men and women hate Wahhabi Shariah laws. The Axis of Evil conspires to force women worldwide into servitude to men, just as Semite patriarchal religions destroyed the matriarchal religions of the Occidental world. Arab Wahhabi Islam represents barbarian Islam, while Egyptian, Turkish and Pakistan’s Islam represents Civilized Islam. The minority Wahhabi Arabs, representing less than 2 percent of the Muslims of the world have launched the barbarians’ Wars of Religious Sects on other civilized Muslim sects. Barbarian Wahhabi Arabs are menace to the civilized Islamic world.

 

(18) Pakistan is New Caliph of Islam

Civilized Pakistan has become the “New Caliph of Islam” by virtue of its military prowess as the most powerful Islamic nation in the world. Islamic Mystic Sufi sects as well as Indian Sunni sects are superior to Arab Wahhabi Sunni sect. Pakistan should protect the future of Islam, by taking over the control over Islamic cities of Mecca & Medina lest predator Wahhabi terrorists cause irreparable harm to Islam by their acts of terrorism and fundamentalism. Pakistani men should marry 20 million Arab women to give birth to Arab-Aryan race of Muslims. Civilized Muslim nations, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Indonesia and Turkey should become the custodian of the Islamic Holy cities of Mecca and Medina to allow all sects of Islam equal access and exposure in Islam’s birth place. Mecca and Medina must be declared ‘International Cities’ where every Muslim clergy should have unfettered right of residence.

 

(19) Cults of Predator Religious Intolerance

Predator Asian northern snakehead fish is a nasty-looking fish with a nasty name and a nastier reputation. The voracious snakeheads eats their way through the pond, then walk on their fins on the land, until they chewed their way into another lake, as it can survive more than two days without water. To treat Asian northern snakeheads humanely means the genocide of other peaceful species of fish. Wildlife officials have determined that snakeheads have to die, which can be done, either by explosives, or electricity or by poisoning. Elimination of predator fish Asian northern snakehead, whether by explosives, or by electricity or by poisoning of the lake, would kill many other fish also, even then it would be more humane then allowing predator Asian northern snakehead fish to let live. Like predator Asian northern snakehead fish, the Sunni Wahhabi Cult practices by merely 2% Muslims of the world, about 20 million in Arabian Peninsula, is a ‘Predator Religious Sect,’ which civilized Muslim world’s leaders believe determined to conquer the Islamic world, by forcing its way through the Muslim world by anti-women religious fundamentalism and terrorism Islamism, funded by Heroin drug trade and OPEC oil-incomes.

 

(20) Women’s War on Wahhabi Terrorists

Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Sunni sect followed by less than 2 percent of the Muslims of the world represents barbarian predator religious sect that embarked genocidal attacks on civilized Muslim societies of the world. The Saudi Arabia based Wahhabi terrorists embarked on the genocide of moderate liberal Muslim women worldwide, Including Kashmir India. The barbaric acts of pro-Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Muslim terrorists causing Holocaust of Muslim Women, which is much more barbaric than the Holocaust of Jews by Nazi Germany. Should civilized international community join military forces to invade barbarian Saudi Arabia to militarily neutralize Wahhabi fundamentalists to protect Muslim women from genocide perpetrated by barbarian Wahhabi Muslim fundamentalists. To start with Afghan women should be given legal right to hang all such Wahhabi Taliban fundamentalists in Afghanistan that forced Afghan Muslim women into bondage and servitude during Taliban rule.

 

(21) Terrorists Behead Kashmiri Girls

Three Muslim girls killed by barbarian Wahhabi terrorists for not wearing veil-Burma in Kashmir. On December 19, 2002, pro-Saudi Wahhabi Muslim terrorist militants shot dead three girl students in Rajouri district of Jammu region late on Thursday night. These killings linked to the alleged campaign by Wahhabi militants to enforce the veil (burqa) for Muslim women. The Wahhabi militants swooped on the house of Mohammad Sadiq in Hasyote village of Thannamandi area and shot dead his daughter, Noureen Kousar. Then they barged into the house of Khalil Ahmad in the same village and kidnapped her daughter Tahir Parveen (18), a 12th Class student, and later beheaded her. Continuing their killing spree, Wahhabi Islamists entered the house of Mohammad Rafiq and shot dead his daughter, Shehnaz Akhtar. A little known Wahhabi group, “Lashkar Jabbar” pasted on the walls of two senior secondary schools in Rajouri town and neighboring villages threatening girls to wear "burqa" or face the consequences. The entire civilized society would condemn such inhuman acts of pro-Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Islamist terrorists. Woman beheaded in J-K for not wearing burqa in Jammu, on December 20, 2002, close on the heels of the killing of three girls for not wearing burqa, militants beheaded another woman in Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir on Friday night for the same reason Wahhabi Islamic Militants barged into the house of Jan Begum, 43, in Darhal area and beheaded her. Perhaps the destruction of Wahhabi Sect in Saudi Arabia alone could solve the problem of Islamic terrorism worldwide. Civilized Hindu India should explore joint military operations with civilized Egypt, civilized Turkey, civilized Syria and civilized Afghanistan and civilized Iran against barbarian Wahhabi Saudi Arabia for the permanent eradication of evil Wahhabi fundamentalism from the Arabian Peninsula. The Evil Wahhabi that nurtures in Saudi Arabia represents predator sect that aims at the genocide of the moderate Muslim women worldwide unless checked militarily. Wahhabi Holocaust of Muslim women could be many times more heinous than the Nazi Holocaust of Jews. Like the evil Nazism the evil Wahhabism must be militarily destroyed to save the impending genocide of moderate Muslim women.

 

(22) Non-Denominational Church Is True Christian Religion

The fundamentalist conservative Catholics and Evangelicals impose passionate beliefs, believing the passion give validity to the ethics. The voice of 200 million eclectic non-denominational American Protestant Christians is drowned in the noise caused by 35 million American Catholics and 20 million American Evangelical Protestants. Do the voices of the majority, who represent the eclectic worldview, fail to influence the reigning Clergy in Vatican and Rome, because Islamic and Catholic religious institutions organized as totalitarian dictatorial regimes? Is the recent attempt of the Roman Catholic Church to purify the Catholic theology, customs and practices represent modernization of the Church or making it more backward and archaic.

 

(23) Protestant Eclecticism Vs Pure Catholic Conservatism Divide

It is wrong to recast the Catholic believers, as people whose identity is more or less contained in the conservative Catholic faith, defined by anti-women, anti-abortion and pro-life dogmas. The Church censorship of academic research undertaken at Catholic educational institutions, could make such Catholics people, who have been stripped by their Catholic faith of all that expanding intellectual life, all the varied life of the mind and senses, the expanding cultural and historical knowledge of the world. Protestant Americans would one day find themselves among Catholic people whose identity was more or less contained in their Catholic faith. Soon Protestants would be among Catholic people who wished to be pure, unadulterated by thoughts not sanctioned by the Catholic Church.

 

The desire of the Catholic religious right conservatives to be pure creating a divide between the ‘pure Catholic conservatism’ and the ‘Protestant eclecticism’, which fast growing into a clash of civilizations, if not the renewed Counter Reformation War. The secession of Catholic Ireland in 1919, when Britain was the leading world power, exposes the Achilles Heels of the Protestant-majority United States. Would the rising tide of political victories of the pro-life and anti-abortion forces result in the Ireland-type pro-secession movements in Catholic-majority Southern areas in the United States. Could the Catholic-majority areas carved out of Canada and United States to join Catholic Mexico to create the new sovereign state of “the Catholic United States” in North America? Like Catholic Ireland, Catholic Czech Republic, Catholic Slovenia, Catholic Croatia, the Catholic United States, could become a political reality in the 21st century, if the Catholic religious right conservative conspiracy succeed in capturing the Oval Office, by virtue of their control over political donations, mass campaigns and vote-banks.

 

(24) Menace of Religious Intolerant Cults

The global clash of predator proselytizing fundamentalist religious sects versus eclectic religions represents the classical barbarian invasions of civilizations. It necessitates the united Civilizations’ response to the terrorism of the predator religious cults, which threatens the war of religious sects, on world religions. The leaders of the world Civilizations must not give up the option to militarily annihilate the barbarian predator religious terrorism worldwide.

 

(25) Secession of Catholic Ireland & Slovenia

Just as Church of Rome spearheaded the Catholic-Protestant riots in Ireland, when Britannia ruled the world, the Vatican supported pro-Life, anti-Abortion movement has subverted the democratic political process in the United States, resulting in the takeover of political bureaucracy of Democratic Party as well as Republican Party by Christian religious right wing conservatives. Just as Catholic Patrick Buchanan hijacked the leadership of the Reform Party, similarly the judicious use of campaign donations and vote banks and political volunteers allowed religious right conservatives hijack the leadership of Democratic Party and Republican Party as well as Southern Baptists Convention. The anti-women Christian movements threaten the wall between the State and the Church in the WASP United States.

 

(26) Theodosius I destroyed Roman Empire

The Catholic religious right conspiracy intend to destroy the secular character of WASP United States, just what Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395) destroyed the eclectic secular Roman Empire and Roman Civilization. The ongoing Neo-Counter Reformation War threatens to bring down the wall that separates the State & the Church in the United States. The multi-ethnic, multi-religion and multi-cultural civilizations like WASP United States and Hindu India must join forces to develop common Civilizations’ response to the barbarian fundamentalist purist religious cults and sects that threaten to impose the fundamentalist theocracies on the free world. Protestant Christianity and Hinduism are on the same side of the battle lines in the growing divide between the clash of civilizations between forces of eclecticism and fundamentalism.

 

(27) Democratize Vatican & Mecca

The non-democratic, totalitarian organized religion presents threat to the democracies of the world. Democratic nations should pass legislation to impose democratic reorganization of the religious Churches and clergy. The Church and Clergy must be accountable to the laity and general public in democracy. People must control the Church and the Clergy and have a final say on the Liturgy, in the democracy. Theocracy has no role in a democracy. Why shouldn’t the religious leadership of Catholic Church of Rome and Muslim Mosque of Mecca, directly elected by the believers? Theocracy is the mortal enemy of democracy. Totalitarian religions seek to undermine democracy to subvert the State to the Church. It is no accident that Church of Rome and Mafia of Sicily joined forces to elect Italy’s Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti, a Mafiosi as the 7-time prime minister of post-war Italy to keep Italy week and submissive to the Church and Mafia.

 

(28) Christianity Curse on Greece and Rome

Italians realize that Church of Rome had been a curse of Rome and caused the destruction of ancient Roman Empire and present-day political instability in Italy. Greeks realize that Orthodox Church has been a curse on Greek Civilization, and hinders the revival of the ancient Greek culture and civilization in the present age. Egyptians realize that Islam has been a curse on the great Egyptian Civilization, and hinders the revival of the ancient Egyptian culture and Civilization.

 

It is no accident that popular House of Savoy, King Victor Emmanuel II in 1870 entered Vatican and succession of Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929. Mussolini paid for his mistake of releasing Pope from captivity by his life.

 

(29) Prince Emanuele Filiberto & Clotilde Courau

Prince Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, grandson of Italy’s last king and French actress Clotilde Courau got married in Sept 2003, in Rome’s Santa Maria degli Angeli Church. Italians are very proud of Prince Emanuele Filiberto and wish that the long-banished heirs would regain Italian throne and recapture Rome, and again imprison Pope to the seclusion of the Vatican. Only in 2002, Italy ended a 56-year exile imposed on the men of the Savoy royal family, and Prince Emanuele Filiberto sat his foot on the Italian soil for the first time. King Vitor Emanuel II had released Pope from imprisonment in the Vatican and granted the sovereignty of the Vatican. Italians imposed exile on the Savoy male heirs after the 1946 referendum abolishing the monarchy due to the influence of the Papacy.

 

(30) Was Islam Curse on Zoroastrian Persia?

Persians realize that Islam had been a curse on Persia and hinders the revival of the ancient Persian Civilization and culture. If Greeks, Italians, Egyptians and Persians given the choice, they would overwhelmingly vote to expel archaic, fundamentalist religious clergy out of their lands and impose State supervision over Religion, religious institutions and religious workers.

 

(31) Theocracy Vs Democracy Clash

The Clash of Theocracy and Democracy is the principal facet of the ongoing Clash of Civilization. Nationalist Italy will subvert the Vatican, Papacy and the Church of Rome. Nationalist Greece will subvert the Orthodox Church. Nationalist Egypt will subvert the Mecca. Nationalist Persia will subvert the Mecca. Perhaps President Bush should appoint Secretary of Religion, who should take over all assets of the Roman Catholic Church and manage them in consultation with Italy’s Minister of Religion. Democracy shall triumph over theocracy during 21st Century. Remnants of fundamentalist religious theocracies are the greatest menace in the modern age.

 

(32) Fundamentalism-Crime Axis

The growing global nexus of totalitarian fundamentalist global religions, global organized crime and global drug trade and global terrorism presents great dangers to multi-ethnic democracies, namely, United States and India. It threatens to descend a new global dark age during 21st Century. The fundamentalist Iconoclast religious sects wages wars on brown, black and yellow idolaters worldwide. United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq to impose democracy on the hitherto totalitarian dictatorships. Should Protestant United States and secular government of Italy join forces to impose democracy on the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church? Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Did the recent incident of pedophile Catholic clergy expose the inherent corrupt practices of the Church? Perhaps the absolute power enjoyed by the Pope and the Cardinals in the affairs of the Church resulted in making the Catholic Church absolutely corrupt? What options do the democratically leaders have to reform the Catholic Church? Should we encourage the return of the House of Savoy as the new ceremonial King of Italy, who is likely to abolish the sovereign status of the Vatican and who may force non-Italian Pope to leave Rome? Majority of Italians love the Ex-King whose forefathers had liberated Italy form the yoke of Popes and united Italy.

 

(33) Menace of Totalitarian theocracy

Totalitarian theocracy has no place in the modern world in 21st Century. Archaic totalitarian religious institutions, organized on pattern that suited 1500 years ago, must under organizational, theological and managerial changes to meet the requirements of the democracy and freedom, equality of women and men and equality of clergy and laity. In the modern age the common man, laity would directly elect, control and supervise the clergy, including the highest religious leaders and hold them responsible to the public opinion. Religious leaders of Protestant Christians, Orthodox Christians, Sunni Muslims, Shiite Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jaina and Zoroastrians should be directly elected. The theocratic dictatorships and religious totalitarianism has no place in the democratic 21st Century. Theocracy has no place in democracy.

 

(34) Power of USA-India Axis of Good

Alliance between Hindu India and Protestant United States would give defeat to Axis of Evil, and Axis of Medieval and Axis of Fundamentalism, and Church-Mafia Axis. The forces of good enjoy overwhelming superiority in terms of economic power, military power and manpower, over forces of evil, represented by the Axis of Evil. Protestant United States, Buddhist China, Buddhist Japan and Hindu India shall determine the outcome of the president Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism and Islamic Atom Bomb. With or without the support of European nations, president Bush and its Asian allies can inflict total defeat on terrorists and denuke Islamic Atom Bomb. United States, India and Japan represent the Axis of Good.

 

(35) India Richest Nation in History

India had been the richest nation in the world. India produced one fourth of the world’s manufactured output in 1750, one-fifth in 1800 and one-sixth in 1830. It is only when India came under British crown in 1857 that India’s share fell precipitously. England is responsible for India’s poverty. India’s share of the world manufacturing output was in 1750 (24.5%), 1800 (19.7%), 1830 (17.6%), 1860 (8.6%), 1880 (2.8%), 1900 (1.7%), 1913 (1.4%), 1928 (1.9%), 1938 (2.4%), 1953 (1.7%), 1963 (1.8%), 1973 (2.1%) and 1980 (2.3%).

 

(36) Rise of Asia & Decline of Europe

The economies of Hindu and Buddhist nations have overtaken the economies of European Christian nations and Muslim nations. The brown Aryan Asians and yellow Buddhist Mongoloid races of China, Korea and Japan would out produce Christian and Islamic world in economic and military production. Asia would dominate the Eurasia and Africa and Australia continent. The World Bank’s World Development Report 2000/2001, lists the world’s top economic powers in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which is the Gross National Product (GNP) measured at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) as follows: (1) White Protestant United States ($8,350 Billion), (2) Yellow Buddhist China ($4,112 Billion), (3) Yellow Buddhist Japan ($3,043 Billion), (4) Brown Hindu India ($2,144 Billion), (5) White Protestant Germany ($1,838 Billion), (6) White Catholic France ($1,294 Billion), (7) White Protestant Britain ($1,234 Billion), (8) White Catholic Italy ($1,196 Billion), (9) White/Mulatto Brown Catholic Brazil (1,062 Billion), (10) White Orthodox Russia ($929 Billion), (11) Mestizo Brown Mexico (752 Billion), (12) White Protestant Canada ($726 Billion), (13) Yellow Buddhist South Korea ($686 Billion), (14) White Catholic Spain ($659 Billion), (15) Brown Muslim Indonesia ($505 Billion), (16) White Protestant Australia ($426 Billion), (17) White Catholic Argentina ($426 Billion), (18) Brown Aryan Muslim Turkey ($394 Billion), (19) White Protestant Netherlands ($364 Billion), (20) Brown Buddhist Thailand ($345 Billion), (21) Black Protestant South Africa ($353 Billion), (22) Brown Shiite Aryan Iran ($325 Billion), (23) White Catholic Poland ($306 Billion), (24) Brown Catholic Philippines ($293 Billion), (25) White Protestant Belgium ($247 Billion), (26) Brown Aryan Muslim Pakistan ($238 Billion), (27) White Catholic Colombia ($237 Billion), (28) Brown Sunni Muslim Arab non-Semite Egypt ($206 Billion), (29) White Protestant Switzerland ($196 Billion), (30) White Protestant Austria ($193 Billion), and (31) Brown Muslim Bangladesh ($188 Billion).

 

It is interesting to note that Protestant United States is the only White nation, and the only Christian nation among top four largest economic powers of the world, which includes two Yellow Buddhist nations China and Japan and Brown Hindu India. There is no Catholic nation among top five largest economies. There is no Muslim nation among top 14 largest economies. There is no Wahhabi Arab nation and no Arab nation among the top 27 largest economies. The ranks of civilized Muslim nations are Indonesia (15th), Pakistan (26th), Egypt (28th), Bangladesh (31st), and all these nations rank higher as economic and military powers than all Wahhabi terrorism supporting nations, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, Yemen and Iraq.

 

The combined GDPs of China, Japan, India and South Korea ($9,985B) exceed the combined GDPs of United States, Canada & Mexico ($9,828B). The combined GDPs of China and India ($6,256B) exceeds the combined GDPs of Germany, France, Britain, Italy, & Spain ($6,222B). India’s GDP ($2,144B) exceeds the combined GDPs of Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Norway, Portugal and Sweden ($2,089B).

 

The 21st Century is clearly the century of Asia and the Century of Buddhist nations. China has inherited the patrimony of the Buddhist Mongol Empire. The Islamist Wahhabi Arab terrorists, maddened by the sudden influx of oil-incomes may expedite the End of Islam, and the demise of the Arab race if Wahhabi terrorists continue to attack Protestant, Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodox civilizations. Bluntly put, the anti-women Wahhabi militant Islamic, and Catholic conservative fundamentalist powers have no chance of victory in the Third World War. Islamic Ottoman Empire had been the world power for centuries after the conquest of Constantinople, till the end of the First World War. However, no Islamic nation is likely to join the ranks of top 10 economic and military powers in the 21st Century. Barbarian Islamic terrorists may be digging the grave of Islam itself, during 21st Christian Century or 15th Islamic Century Hijra, if they continue to undertake terrorist attacks with impunity on targets in civilized Protestant United States, Hindu India, Buddhist China, and Orthodox Russia.

 

(37) Protestant Nations Vs Catholic Nations

The white Christian Protestant nations led by United States surpassed the white Catholic nations in terms of size of their economies and military capabilities. Even when Catholics outnumber Protestants in the world, no Catholic nation is likely to join the ranks of top 5 military and economic powers of the world in 21st Century. In spite of all publicity that the Arab OPEC nations enjoy, no Arab Sunni nation likely to challenge the military capability of Shiites in the Middle East. With the rise of Shiite powers the Shiite Islam would gradually overtake Sunni Islam in the Middle East. With the rise of Protestant powers and the decline of Catholic powers in the world, the Protestant Christianity would gradually overtake Roman Catholic Christianity in Central America, South America and Africa. With the rise of Mahayana Buddhist powers the Mahayana Buddhism would overtake Hinayana or Theravada Buddhism in Thailand, Burma and Sri Lanka. With the rise of English-speaking Protestant United States as the unrivalled super power of the world, the English language will replace Spanish language as lingua franca of Central and South America in 21st Century. Similarly, Protestant Church will replace Roman Catholic Church throughout the Third World as the predominant Christian sect in the 21st Century, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. The rights of women even in the fundamentalist societies would be safeguarded worldwide in near future, and definitely after the third world war, because world’s four largest economies (USA, China, Japan & India) and four largest military powers (USA, Russia, China, India) sincerely believe in the women’s rights and equality of men & women.

 

(38) Treason of British & Indian Diplomats

The diplomats of India, Britain, Japan, and Italy historically betrayed the national interests of the countries they work for and they are paid for promoting the national interests of foreign powers, inimical for the countries they represent. The job of a Diplomat is to promote his nation’s national interests defined as national power, never the orderly management of the decline of national power. Did the Diplomat foreign policy makers of Britain and India, after 1945, promote the secret agenda of the Hidden Hand of some foreign potentate, to harm the national interests of the nations they worked for? Whether Britain and India declined after 1945 due to the treason or incompetence of their diplomats? Why? The decline of Englishman and British Empire has always troubled military thinkers: Why did British Empire disintegrate? Why did Britain join European Union and scuttled Commonwealth of Nations? Why didn’t Britain transform Commonwealth of Nations into Commonwealth Common Market to rival European Union and NAFTA? Why did Britain give independence to United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Brunei, when no leader of these oil-rich Sheikhdoms wanted or sought independence from Britain? Why did British Diplomats make British Monarch the celebrated Head of the Commonwealth of Nations into a Maid of German Chancellor in European Union? Did foreign spies and foreign Church conspire to defeat Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s defeat in the parliamentary elections? Should Britain reorganize its Diplomatic cadre de novo and order new recruitment for its Foreign Office?

 

Did the departing officers of the British Civil Service, known in India as Indian Civil Service (ICS), planted similar spies as foreign secretaries, joint secretaries and ambassadors, whose task was secretly redefined the orderly management of the decline of the “Indian Empire” after the partition of India? Cabinet Secretary William Armstrong revelation about secret task of the British Civil Service as the orderly management of the decline of Britain is an eye-opener, and points toward the web of high treason that permeated throughout British Civil Service, Indian Civil Service (ICS) and Indian Foreign Service (IFS). It is very likely that all Indian Diplomats, members of the Indian Foreign Service (IFS) could also be traitors and foreign spies like their counterparts in British diplomatic cadre.

 

Since when, the task of Diplomats became the orderly management of decline? Was the policy of orderly management of decline, an act of British statesmanship or an act of high treason by British diplomats? Was the Parliament or the public informed that the Exchequer paying top salaries to the elite diplomats, not for promoting British national interests and national power but to undermine British national interests and national power?

 

At the time of Britain’s entry into the European Community in the 1970s, William Armstrong, then Cabinet Secretary described the task of the British Civil Service as the orderly management of the decline, (Financial Times, 10/18/2002, p 13, quoted by John Plender, “Britain no longer requires rescuing, john.plender@ft.com)

 

Who gave the orders to the British Diplomats that their task is not to enhance the national power of Britain, even when in 1971, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Brunei, were colonial possessions of Britain and there was virtually no demand for independence. Why did Prime Minister Harold Wilson in early 1970s declare that Britain would withdraw from possessions east of Suez?

 

Indian Foreign Service has historically formulated Indian foreign policy to scuttle India’s national interests and to promote the national interests of its enemies. Why did India give Tibet to China and why didn’t India fight China on Tibet, as China was involved in Korean War and India would have defeated China in Tibet? Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru gave Tibet to China because Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was imprisoned in China after his plane crash at the end of Second World War? Had China released Netaji Bose, he would have become the Prime Minister of India on his arrival. Indian Foreign Service conspired to destroy the Tibetan Buddhism by destroying the rule of Dalai Lama, the sovereign ruler of Tibet, under advise of the Papacy. Indian Foreign Service engineered the independence of Bhutan, gave Coco Islands to Burma, around the time British Foreign Office gave independence to oil-rich United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Brunei. Did the spies of the same foreign power and foreign potentate jointly worked to engineer the decline of British Empire and Indian Empire respectively?

 

(39) Treason of Communists

Bolshevik Jews knew that Karl Marx was a prostitute philosopher, hired by Vatican to produce a philosophical concoction, which may justify the destruction of Russian Aristocracy and Russian Orthodox Christianity. Bolshevik Jews knew that the ‘Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion (1905)’ represented the secret manual to interpret Marxism and Communism. Bolshevik Jews in alliance with Papacy destroyed Russian Aristocracy, overthrew Mensheviks and established the totalitarian rule of Bolshevik Jews by Bolshevik Revolution, represented by the massacre of 30 million Orthodox Russians at the hands of Bolshevik Jew spymaster L.P. Beria (1898-1953). Bolshevik Jews in alliance with Vatican against engineered the fall of Communism in the Eastern Bloc and the Soviet Union.

 

The political ties of Bolshevik Jews with Papacy and Republican Party provide the basis of pro-China policy of the United States in numerous succeeding US Administrations. Dr. Kissinger had close ties with Bolshevik Jews. Secretary Henry Kissinger succeeding in convincing Chairman Mao Zedong that the US military intervention in South Vietnam did not harm Chinese strategic interests as it was against the national interests of Buddhists, Hindus and India. Christian Mao Zedong, Christian Sun Yat Sen, and Christian Chiang Kai Sheik were all buddies and were picked up and supported by Soviet Union, before United States began supporting Chiang Kai Sheik. The Buddhism had been the common enemy of Christian Mao Zedong, Christian Sun Yat Sen, and Christian Chiang Kai Sheik. Chiang Kai Sheik handed over the power to Communist Mao Zedong a fellow Christian so that Communist Mao could launch anti-right campaign to starve to death 60 million Buddhists. It is high time that the Communists, Marxists, Maoists are brought to trial in Russia, China, India, Britain and Israel for war crimes.

 

(40) US Presidential Elections 2004

President Bush would lose the Presidential elections in 2004 as the Catholics would not vote for him, because of the opposition of Pope John Paul II to the Iraq war. However, if the increased Iraqi oil incomes allowed Catholic Church takeover the Christian religious properties in the Holy Land and improves the status of Christians in the Wahhabi Arab lands, than Catholics would support President Bush. Any failure of President Bush to win the reelection in 2004 would have disastrous impact on America’s war on global terrorism, with cataclysmic impact on global coalition on war on terrorism.

 

It should not be overlooked that President Bill Clinton and Secretary Madeleine Albright had rewarded the terrorist Osama bin Laden, with the Kingdom in Afghanistan in 1995, for carrying out violent terrorist attacks on American Embassies at Nairobi and Dar es Salaam few years earlier in early 1990s. It should not be forgotten that President Clinton ordered the military coup against Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, just 15 days before he was to arrest Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan and to extradite him to USA.

 

It would be in the common interest of ‘Our World Civilization’ that we get President George W. Bush reelected in 2004 presidential elections. It is expected that Christian religious right wing conservatives would not vote for president Bush in Elections 2004. Perhaps WASPs should come out openly in favor of President Bush and harness the political power of the non-denominational Protestant Christians whose number is estimated to exceed 200 millions in the United States. The Christian Religious Right Wing Conservatives represents less than 20 percent of the Christian population in the United States. The Global Clash of Races: White Iconoclasts’ War on Brown Yellow Black Idolaters, wholeheartedly endorses President Bush in 2004 Election.

 

(41) Precision Guided Munitions

Russians have made a serious dent in the invulnerability of precision-guided munitions bombs by GPS satellite jamming devices. United States is likely to lose the military edge. The military revolution of the precision-guided munitions is the most revolutionary radical development in warfare. Precision Guided Bombs have made US Air force very lethal and allowed airpower force dominance over the land power very deep inland far beyond the coastal areas. The PGMs showed its efficacy in Afghanistan War and Yugoslavia War. United States would aggressively deploy PGMs in War on Iraq. Pentagon claims of rewards of PGM technology are valid and have proved its validity in wars. However, the very same Precision-Guided Munitions that allowed the preponderance of US Air Force has also eroded the preponderance of US Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups, because the Anti-Ship missiles equipped with Precision Guided Munitions technology can sink aircraft carriers also. The PGM technology made heavy mechanized army and tanks vulnerable to PGM technology equipped anti-tank missiles. American technology of Precision Guided Munitions technology, which enhanced the power of US Air Force, undermined the US Navy and US Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups.

 

The Bush Doctrine mistakenly believes that United States can maintain its present status as Hegemon of the world indefinitely, because of its lead in the Precision Guided Munitions technology. The American PGM revolution would undermine the hegemony of the American Navy. The PGM technology is good for US Air Force and disastrous for US Navy and bad for heavy tanks and mechanized warfare division of the US Army. The American military technology revolution of Precision Guided Munitions would turn out to be a long-term lethal curse on American Navy. The Precision Guided Munitions have ended the Age of Aircraft Carriers. The Precision Guided Munitions technology has also ended the Age of Tanks and the Age of Mechanized Warfare. Americans would some day regret to have invented the Precision Guided Munitions technology. Without the wholehearted support of Indian Army, United States may fail to maintain its status as World’s Hegemon for long.

 

(42) Malthusian Overpopulation Requires Redistribution of Continents

United States, Canada, Australia and Russia should handover their agricultural lands Indian and Chinese peoples, who would make better use of the Agricultural lands under white man’s control. Even when United States, Australia and Canada transfer all their lands to Indians and Chinese, their economies would not lose much, as the Agricultural sector contributed to their GNPs only 2 to 3 percent and 7 percent to Russian GNP. Canada, Australia, Russia and United States should allow Indians and Chinese to takeover their agricultural lands and pay taxes. The Agricultural sector contributed to total GNP of nations in USA (2%, $167 billion), Canada (3%, $22 billion), Australia (3%, $13 billion), Russia (7%, $65 billion), Argentina (6%, $25 billion), and Brazil (9%, $96 billion). The White race is the descendants of hunters and the patriarchal religions didn’t imbibe the virtues of the goddess worshipping agricultural societies and white patriarchal societies destroyed the farmlands of Egypt, Libya transformed them into deserts. To save the agricultural lands and to increase prosperity of Western World, United States, Canada, Australia and Argentina should transfer all their lands to Indians and Chinese, who shall bring millions of agricultural labors from India and China to farm these agricultural lands and pay taxes in kind.

 

The crucial issue of the 3rd Millennium is: How legitimate is the White Man’s conquest of the continents of Australia and Americas? Indigenous American Indians accounted for more than 20% of world population in AD 1500. At the time of the first European contact, in AD 1500, North America & South America may have been peopled by more than 90 million American Indians: about 10 million in America north of present-day Mexico; 30 million in Mexico; 11 million in Central America; 445,000 in the Caribbean Islands; 30 million in the South American Andean region; and 9 million in the remainder of South America (Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, P. 21). World population totaled about 500 million in AD 1650, and 275 million in AD 1000 (The World Book Encyclopedia, 1987, Vol. 15-P.597).

 

Should White race handover at least the continent of South America to Native Americans in exchange for the lands of the Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Native Americans that European Christians occupied after 1500 AD? The continued occupation of Australia and Eastern Siberia by white race is virtually impossible after 2050 AD. Australia and Siberia could be the cause of the Third World War. The White farmers in Zimbabwe must also vacate their holdings and hand over the lands to the Africans. The issue of the redistribution of the world’s lands in the age of growing world population becomes the most volatile political issue of the 21st century. Dr. Henry J. Kissinger had been advising China to expand northward in Eastern Siberia, hoping China’s expansionist military power will get blunted in the quagmire of the Siberian War, as happened to Napoleon, William Kaiser and Adolf Hitler. Would China be stupid enough to invade Eastern Siberia and meet the fate of Adolf Hitler and Napoleon?

 

Perhaps China may find defenseless Australia’s empty continent with only 25 million people an ideal home to resettle 400 million Chinese immigrants to solve the problem of overpopulation of China, which has crossed 1.2 billion. Would China invade Australia in the first half of the 21st Century or later? What should the role of India be in the event of Chinese invasions of Australia or Eastern Siberia? Would United States support China in the event of China’s invasions of Eastern Siberia?

 

The Australia has the surface area of 7.74 million sq. km. and China with population of 1.25 billion has 9.6 million sq. km and India with population of 1 billion has 3.3 million sq. km surface area. Australia has the population density of 2 persons per km, China (134) and India (336). Obviously the problem of overpopulation of Asia and the very high density of population makes the need of equitable redistribution of the world’s continents the dire need of the 21st century.

 

The principal cause of the poverty of South Asia is the fact that the density of population is world’s highest at 278 persons per sq. km. The population density are India (336), Bangladesh (981), China (134), South Asia (278), East Asia & pacific (115), Europe & Central Asia (20), Middle East & North Africa (26), Sub-Sahara Africa (27), High Income nations (27), Low and Middle Income nations (51), Australia (2), Canada (3), and Russia (9). The problem of overpopulation of Asia, and inequalities in the population densities of nations can be resolved by allowing the unfettered immigration from overpopulated nations to the under populated nations, like Australia, Canada and Russia.

 

(43) Holy State of Christine in Israel

The religious properties in the Holy Land belongs neither to Jews nor to Muslims, it belongs to Orthodox Christians. Jews came back and claimed the land of Israel 2,000 years after evicted from the lands. Then Christians also have a right to return to the Holy Land when during Crusade 1, they had occupied total control over the Holy Land and Jerusalem. The Holy Land belongs neither to the Jews nor to Muslims, but to the Christians. All religious cities and properties associated with Christianity should be brought under control of the sovereign State of Holy Christine, and all Christian denominations and sects should have equal access to the ancient Christian sites.

 

India and Israel should demand the creation of the independent State of Christine, in the Holy Land, Bethlehem and other Holy Christian cities associated with Jesus Christ. Israel should expel Muslims from Christian Holy Land, just as non-Muslims prohibited from entering Muslim Holy cities of Mecca & Medina. Holy Land had been seat of three world religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Orthodox Christians outnumber Catholics in the Holy Land, by 20 to one. Russian Orthodox Church would align with Israel, to engineer the birth of the first Orthodox State of Christine in the Middle East. It would expedite the birth of a Maronites Christian State in Lebanon. There is no need to create the Muslim State of Palestine in Israel and the Palestinian Muslims could be resettled in the empty lands of Saudi Arabia. Palestinian Christians would lead the Holy State of Christine in the Holy Land. When Jews could return in 1948 to create Jewish State of Israel after the Diaspora of 2000 years then the pre-Islamic Goddess religions also have a right to return to the Holy Land as lands of the Goddess Religion was occupied by Arabs only after 640 AD, who occupied the Holy Land 600 years after Jews were expelled from the Holy Land. The restoration of Jewish control over Israel after the loss of control over 2000 years, legitimizes the demand of black followers of the Nubian Religion of God Ossir, God Horus, Goddess Isis, Goddess Innanna to reclaim their temples in Egypt, Syria and Arabia, as lost these lands only 1,600 years ago. Similarly, the believers of the religion of God Zeus, God Jupiter and God Indra, God Mithra, and Goddess Hera that dominated throughout the Roman Empire as late as 7th century also have a right to reclaim their ancient temples. The Mongol Empire that ruled Russia, Central Europe, Central Asia, Iran, Iraq, and Arabia was a Buddhist Empire, and Tibet’s Dalai Lama was the supreme religious leader throughout the Mongol Empire. China has inherited the patrimony of Mongol Empire. The Siberia, Central Asia, Afghanistan had been Buddhists as late as 14th Century. Do the Chinese Buddhists have the right to reestablish Buddhist homelands in Afghanistan, Central Asia? The religion of God Zeus and God Jupiter has survived in the form of Hinduism in South Asia, before it was eradicated by force by Catholic Inquisition in the 2nd Millennium. Do the believers of God Zeus and God Jupiter have a right to set up the temples of Zeus and Jupiter, Mithra, Isis and Hera in Greece and Italy? When Jews could establish Israel after the absence 2,000 years, the Incas, Mayas and Aztecs have the birthright to establish Inca State in Peru and Ecuador, Maya State in Mexico and Aztec State in Central America. Buddhists lost Tibet only in 1950, mere 50 years ago, so Buddhists also have a right to set up the Buddhist State in Tibet.

 

Those who advocate the establishment of sovereign Muslim State of Palestine in the Holy Land must also agree to set up the Shiite State in Shiite-majority Al Hasa region of Saudi Arabia. There is no need to create the Muslim State of Palestine in Israel and only Holy State of Christine should be carved out of the Christian cities in Holy Land. There is so much empty lands in the Arabian Peninsula, so Muslim Palestinians should be give citizenship of Arab nations and resettled in Arabian Peninsula. The military and politically viability of Jewish State of Israel after the absence of 2,000 years, lends support to the dormant demand of other religious minorities that were forced to move out of North Africa and Arabian Peninsula only 1,500 years ago. Just as God Yahweh of Jews returned to the Holy Land after the absence of 2,000 years, the God Zeus, God Jupiter Mithra, and Goddess Isis would return to its favored land in Greece, and Rome after the gap of just 1,200 years. Whatever legitimized the return of God Yahweh also legitimizes the return of God Zeus, God Jupiter in the Old Mediterranean World. The worship of God Zeus, Jupiter, Horus, Ptah, Ossir and worship of Goddess Isis, Hera, Athena by hundreds of millions of Hindus, continues in India under their Sanskrit names even today. Just as religion of God Yahweh survived during the Diaspora of 2,000 years, similarly the religion of God Zeus, Jupiter, and Goddess Hera, Isis, Athena survived during 1,000 years of Diaspora in India. If God Yahweh could return to Israel after long absence, so would God Zeus in Greece, God Jupiter in Rome, God Ossir in Egypt, and God Viraochcha in Peru would return and their temples would again become opulent and centers of pilgrimage during 21st century.

 

1(7) Raison d’etat Tamed Church

(1) Bush not of Religious Right Conspiracy

Neither President George W. Bush nor former President George H. W. Bush ever belonged to the Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. The problem for Bush Administration is to cleanse the bureaucracy of the State Department so that the vestiges of the previous administrations may not internally sabotage the implementation of President Bush’s War on Islamic terrorism. President Bush launched the war on global terrorism, not to promote the religious interests of Christianity, but to promote the national interests of United States by increasing its domestic defenses against acts of terrorism and by undertaking preemptive strikes against foreign countries that harbor and sponsors global terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda. No body should allege that President Bush would promote the religious interests of the Church at the cost of the national interests of the State. President George W. Bush is not Pope’s President, as President John F. Kennedy was. It could be the reason that fundamentalist hijackers targeted the person the President during 9/11 attacks on Washington DC.

 

The secular Bush Administration would tame the Church. It is the reason that America’s Roman Catholic bishops issued a statement that America’s War on Iraq cannot be called a Just War. The problem President Bush faces is how to change the culture of American diplomats that have traditionally promoted Christian religious interests under the garb of Wilsonian ideological foreign policy. President Reagan and Polish Bishop, the present Pope John Paul II, had agreed to unite the resources of the Polish Catholic Church and the CIA to destabilize Communist government in Poland. This policy resulted in considerable Papal influence over foreign policy making in the US State Department. The main problem Colin Powell faces is how to implement secular foreign policy of the United States, when a sizeable part of the Bureaucracy trained for the Wilsonsian Christian foreign policy. United States policy toward India clouded by the American foreign policy baggage of Wilsonian Christian policies. It is high time that President Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice appoint secular officers in charge of India-desk so that WASP’s United States formulates its policy towards India, based on geopolitics, raison d’etat to promote the national interests of the United States, not the religious interests of the Papacy.

 

(2) Laity to Control & Reform Clergy:

Organized religions led by priests exercised political powers in the ancient world. Church of Rome is organized religion, follows the administrative system of the Roman Empire. The Cardinals of the Vatican are Princes. The Church of Rome consolidated its hold over political power by cementing ties with the barbarian German tribes leaders to recognize their kingdom as the Holy Roman Empire, based on German lands as the legitimate successor to the Rome-based Roman Empire, in exchange for the barbarian German tribe’s support for the Papacy in exercising control over the Rome. Papacy built up Papal Empire over the corpse of the Roman Empire. Italy was reunited under the Monarchy of House of Savoy, King of Italy Victor Emmanuel II entered Vatican and divested Pope of all temporal and secular powers and forced Pope to become the prisoner of the Vatican. Successive Popes remained prisoners of Rome from 1870 till 1929, when King Umberto II and Benito Mussolini released the Pope from the captivity and recognized the sovereignty of the Vatican. What Cardinal Richelieu was for France, King of Italy of House of Savoy was for Italy in 1870, when he United Italy. Italy would reinstate the descendants of King Victor Emmanuel II, who was forced to resign and monarchy was abolished. Modern Italy would curb the power of Pope using the principles of Raison d’etat.

 

(3) Oil Colonialism Vs Vatican-Mecca Axis

The economic interests of Semite Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis conflicted with the religious interests of Vatican-Mecca Axis. The interest of the oil colonialism of the Washington-Wahhabi Axis is in conflict with the interest of Monotheism of the Vatican-Mecca Axis. In 2003, the Oval Office is in mortal combat with the Vatican led anti-war coalition. Protestant American Oil colonialism accepted the rule of Wahhabi fundamentalists in Mecca and Riyadh in exchange for American control over Arab oil. Pope John Paul II cemented Vatican-Mecca Axis of Monotheism to force world’s pagans accept either of the Monotheist religions. Pope John Paul II leading the alliance of the Vatican, Italy, France, Germany and Belgium and anti-war coalition to wage frontal attack on America’s war on Islamic terrorism and America’s wars for oil colonialism in Islamic world. American Oil Colonialism led by President George Bush locked into mortal combat with Vatican-Mecca Axis of Monotheism led by Pope John Paul II. Oil imperialist Protestant United States and Britain aligned with Wahhabi fundamentalism to destroy multi-ethnic Ottoman Empire to establish American oil colonies in the Arab world. Pope John Paul II cemented Vatican-Mecca Axis of Monotheism to force pagan Africans convert to either Islam or Christianity.

 

America’s war on Islamic terrorism and war for oil colonialism in the Arab world, threatens the religious Axis of Monotheism. Bush is not a religious nut, but an oil imperialist. Bush waging war for oil not a war for Christianity. Catholic French wrongly condemn President Bush as a nut on grounds of religion, influenced by the anti-Protestant propaganda of counter Reformation, and fail to realize that Bush did not wage Papal war of crusades against Muslims, but waged war or oil colonialism against Arab oil producers, and thus crossed the path of the imperial designs of Papacy. Bush is not a nut and a very sensible men dreaming to conquer the world. Bush could be a warmonger but he fighting war for oil not for promoting Papal interests.

Catholic Neo-Conservatives condemn George Bush’s Protestant fanaticism. Religious Right Conservatives condemn George Bush’s naked thirst for Oil colonialism. American Neo-conservatism split up into two hostile camps of Catholic neo-conservatism and Protestant neo-conservatism as well as between religious neo-conservatism and oil colonialism neo-conservatism. Protestant neo-conservatism joined forces with pro-segregation and pro-oil colonialism and anti-terrorism rhetoric. Catholic neo-conservatism joined forces with religious neo-conservatism, anti-segregation forces, and anti-war neo-conservatism. The neo-conservatism took birth in the aftermath of the 1964 Bill of Rights and got split into two warring camps, Protestant neo-conservatism favors war on Islamic terrorism to foster American oil colonialism in the oil-producing Muslim world, and president Bush is its cheer leader. Christian neo-conservatism opposed the protestant war on Islamic terrorism and opposed America’s war to establish oil colonies in the Islam world, because oil colonialism threatens the alliance of Monotheism between fundamentalist Vatican and fundamentalist Mecca, and Pope John Paul II is its leader.

 

(4) America supports Mecca Caliphate

United States promoted Mecca and Wahhabi fundamentalism to secure independence of Arab oil producing nations from Ottoman Empire and to secure American colonial control over Arab oil fields in exchange for Wahhabi control over Mecca and Medina. America and Britain promoted Hashemite Kingdoms in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq to secure control over Arab oil fields. Pope John Paul secured Catholic-Wahhabi alliance to force African pagans choose one of the Monotheist religions, either Sunni Islam or Catholicism. Protestant President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism to establish American oil colonies in the Islamic world would derail the Vatican-Mecca Axis for proselytizing pagan world. The Big Oil-Mecca Axis for Oil Colonialism unwittingly entered into a mortal combat with Vatican-Mecca Axis of Fundamentalism for Monotheism. Pope John Paul II has galvanized the vast resources of Roman Catholic Church to undermine the power of America, American Oil Colonialism and President Bush. The multi-state Alliance of Vatican, France, Belgium, Germany and Italy could succeed in removing President Bush from the Oval Office in 2004 elections. Indians like Bush primarily because he waged war for oil not for Christianity.

 

Protestant neo-conservatism and Oil-colonialism locked into mortal combat with anti-war Catholic-Wahhabi religious crusades against paganism. American oil colonialism in Equatorial Guinea could result in the defeat of the Semite Diamond colonialism and De Beers Cartel in neighboring Liberia and Sierra Leone. Washington-Mecca Axis cemented ties between American Oil colonialism and Wahhabi fundamentalism, and its interest conflicts with the interest of the Vatican-Mecca Axis of Monotheism. President Bush would pursue the interest of oil colonial even when it conflicts with the interests of the Vatican and Mecca.

 

(5) Foreign Policy in Medieval Dark Age

During Counter Reformation Thirty Years War (1618-1648) Papacy and Holy Roman Empire joined forces to impose Universal Christian Ideology throughout Europe, which was opposed by Protestant princes of Germany and Catholic Kingdoms of France and Spain. After the Unification of Germany and the expansion of the European Union similar threat to the hegemony of European Union and Papacy exists, if European Union becomes a willing propagator of Papal religious goals worldwide. United States could be hoping to become the New Holy American Roman Empire in alliance with the Universal Catholic Church. President Bill Clinton is on record to have said that Holy Father is the representative of God on earth. It may be the political objective of Christian Religious Right Conservatism to make WASPs United States the bastion of the American Holy Roman Empire to make United States the hegemon of the secular world and Pope the ruler of the religious world. The European balance-of-power system emerged in the 17th century from the final collapse of the Papacy’s medieval aspiration to universality- a concept of world order that represented a blending of the traditions of Roman Empire and the Catholic Church. The world was conceived as mirroring the Heavens. Just as one God ruled in Heaven, so one emperor would rule over the secular world, and one pope over the Universal Catholic Church. In this spirit, the feudal states of Germany and Northern Italy were grouped under the rule of the Holy Roman Emperor. In the 17th Century the Holy Roman Empire had the potential to dominate Europe. France and England were periphery to it. Had Holy Roman Emperor ever succeeded in establishing central control over Germany and Northern Italy, the relations of France and England to it might have been similar to those of China’s neighbors to the Middle Kingdom, with France comparable to Vietnam or Korea, and England to Japan. For most of the medieval period, however, the Holy Roman emperor never achieved that degree of central control over feudal Germany and Northern Italy. (Kissinger, Diplomacy, p. 56-9) At the fringes of Europe, France, England, and Spain did not accept the authority of the Holy Roman Empire and Papacy, though they remained part of the Roman Catholic Church. In the first half of the sixteenth century, emperor Charles V revived the imperial authority to a point, which raised the prospect of a Central European Empire, composed of what is today Germany, Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Eastern France, Belgium, and the Netherlands- a grouping so potentially dominant as to prevent the emergence of anything resembling the European balance of power. However, the Reformation Movement and rise of Protestantism weakened the Papacy and thwarted the prospect of a hegemonic European Empire. It meant the end of the Papal medieval aspiration to universality, a concept of the world order that represented that one Holy Roman Emperor would rule over the secular world, and one Catholic pope would rule over the Roman Catholic Church.

 

(6) Raison D’etat Diplomacy

With the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1524, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. This process, the Counter Reformation, led to Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), which turned into one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe, most of which was part of the Holy Roman Empire, was divided into two-armed camps- the Protestants and the Catholics. By the time the war ended in 1648, Central Europe had been devastated and Germany had lost almost a third of its population. Catholic Cardinal de Richelieu supported the Protestant princes of Germany and opposed the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor in the Counter Reformation War from 1624 to 1648. French First Minister de Richelieu grafted the principle of raison d’etat onto French Policy, a principle that the other European states adopted in the century that flowed.

 

(8) India’s seeks Canada France & Germany

Canada, Germany, and France will not conduct diplomacy to promote the proselytizing religious interests of Christian Church. Their diplomats shall promote secular national interests and develop ties with other nations, without being concerned whether they are Christian or non-Christian nations. Ideology shall play less significant influence over the foreign policy making of the great powers. The leading eight world powers in the post-Cold War new world order are: United States, Russia, China, India, Germany, Japan, Britain and Canada. The raison d’etat principle would oblige Germany, France, Japan, Canada and India to seek military alliances with second-strongest Power to tame, check and balance the military preponderance of the United States in the world. The diplomacy and statecraft of the post-Cold War new world order shall be in total contrast to the diplomatic conduct practiced during the bipolar world during Cold War. The new world order is a multipolar world, led by two blocs, first Bloc headed by United States and the Second Bloc shall be led by a coalition of world powers, uniting to check the hegemony of the United States. Germany, Japan, France and Canada would determine their national policies towards United States, to promote their respective national interests, not to promote the ideological interests propounded by the Wilsonian foreign policy. The balance of power shall be the guiding principle of the diplomacy among Christian nations, as it was during 18th and 19th century. The Catholic states of Italy, France and Spain may work towards curbing the role of Papacy in the formulation of their national foreign policies. Traditionally Catholic nations, namely, Italy, Spain and France have opposed Papal ambitions in the secular affairs of the state, while Protestant-majority nations, namely, Germany has historically supported the political ambitions of the Papacy, because Papacy anointed Germany as the seat of the Holy Roman Empire as the manifestation of universal secular Empire. During administrations of President John F. Kennedy, President Jimmy Carter, President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton, the Vatican appeared to have identified Protestant United States as the American Holy Roman Empire. Papacy has influenced the foreign policy of the Protestant United States, more than it has influenced the diplomacy of Catholic Italy, France and Spain. Why diplomats of Protestant powers influenced more by the Vatican than the diplomats of the Catholic nations?

 

(9) Oil in Manifest Destiny of America

America could attempt the world conquest after it established military control over Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Iran. United States would gain total control over the oil and gas resources of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia after it established military control over Iraq and Iran. President Bush declared Manifest Destiny of America in 21st Century to take control by force the Middle East oil fields, just as America’s Manifest Destiny in the 19th Century had been to take control by force the lands of the Red Indians. Rather than promoting the religious interests of Protestant Christianity in South America, President Bush embarked upon the imperial goal to gain total control over the oil fields of Arabia and Central Asia.

 

(10) Southward Expansion of English

The southward propagation of Protestant Christianity and English language is the manifest destiny of the WASPs United States. The State of the United States shall control and supervise over the Christian Churches of all denominations and sects, within United States, so that Church may not subvert the power of the State. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 21st Century is to expand southward from River Rio Grande at the Mexican border to Cape Horn at the southern tip of the Chile, to propagate English language and Protestant Christianity throughout Hispanic America. Protestant United States created the wall to separate the affairs of the State and Church in the 18th Century, to protect the new country from the ravages of Papacy. However, in the 21st Century, the Protestant super power United States shall bring Church under the supervision of the White House and the Capitol so that seat of the political, economic and military power of the Christian world, also becomes the seat of the Christian Churches. Under the leadership of the United States English language shall replace Spanish language, as lingua franca of the Hispanic America and Protestant Christianity shall become the predominant Christian sect in the Hispanic America. The civilizations of Spain and Portugal are no match to the vibrant English-speaking Protestant civilization of the United States. More than 400 million Spanish and Portuguese speaking Catholics shall embrace non-denominational Protestant Christianity in the first half of the 21st Century, to remake Hispanic America the image of United States. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 19th Century had been to expand westward from New York to Los Angeles, to occupy the lands of the American Indians. The Manifest Destiny of the United States in the 20th Century was to make United States a global power and to subjugate the European Colonial powers into the subjugation of the US-led Atlantic Alliance. Habsburg Holy Roman Empire failed because Holy Roman Emperor didn’t want to control the Church, and was happy to remain subordinate to the Church. In the age of Wars of Religious sects, unless White House and the Capitol take control of all Christian Churches-Roman Catholic Church, Major Denominational Protestant Churches, Non-denominational Protestant Churches-United States would lose the historical opportunity it enjoys now, to indefinitely perpetuate its hegemony as the leading super power. Washington should aim to become the Christian Civilization’s principle center of secular and religious power. The entire Christian Church of all sects and denominations must accept the leadership of the White House, Congress and the Senate. The White House and the Capitol should jointly become the Caesar and the Pharaoh, to create the single seat of secular and religious power of the Christian world, by making Church subordinate to the State, to neutralize Church-led conspiracy to subordinate the White House to the Church. In the Medieval Dark Age the Church controlled and influenced the State. In the modern world the State shall control and influence the Church. State shall have the authority to impose democratic elections in the Church, so that laity directly elects the religious leadership of the Church for a fixed period of five years by direct elections.

 

(11) Rise of Buddhist Civilization

In Clash of Civilizations, India supports the restoration of Buddhist governments of Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, South Korea, Taiwan and China. Buddhist leaders should govern Buddhist Burma (Myanmar) not Christian Mrs. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Catholic Religious Right Conspiracy organized military coup led by Christian troops against Buddhist U Nu and installed anti-Buddhist military regime. Perhaps Burma should be partitioned along religion lines, and Christian tribes secede forming a separate Christian state of South Burma. However, Christianity should be banned in Buddhist Burma. India should militarily support the restoration of the Buddhist government in Burma. Whenever Communist government falls in China, and Buddhist government forms in China, Hindu India, Buddhist China and Buddhist Japan would become great allies and reestablish the primacy of Buddhism in Asia. Christianity has failed to make any inroads in India, China and Japan, as it has failed to cross 3% population mark.

 

(12) Christianity Caused Medieval Dark Age

Christianity destroyed Europe’s Roman Empire and Roman Civilization and the Dark Age descended on Europe. Islam destroyed the great Egyptian and Syrian Civilization. Eternal Rome and Italy could not resurrect itself after the fundamentalist rule of Christian Emperor Theodosius II. The Alexandria and Cairo could not become great again. Aryan Iran and Aryan India has emerged as great powers. No subsequent Christian European nation could rival the glory of ancient Greece and ancient Rome as seat of a civilization. Similarly, no Islamic nation in North Africa and no Arab nation in Arabian Peninsula could again rival the glory of ancient Egypt. Would Europe have been greater today, had Christianity not destroyed the Roman Civilization? Would North Africa and Arabian Peninsula have been greater today had Islamic invasion not destroyed great Egypt? The Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism seeks to destroy the modern, liberal Islam and destroy the modern Islamic civilization, and impose the barbarian Islamic society in the modern age. Similarly, Christian Religious Right Ultra-Conservatives seeks to turn back the clock and impose New Dark Age on Europe. Was Christianity a boon or curse on Roman Civilization? What options do the present day Italians have to restore the glory of ancient Rome? What options do the modern Egyptians have to restore the glory of ancient Egypt? What options do the modern Greeks have to restore the glory of ancient Greece? What options do the modern Iranians have to restore the glory and power of ancient Persia? What options do the modern Indians have to restore the glory and power of ancient India? What options do the modern Peruvian Inca Indians have to restore the glory and power of Inca Empire? What options do the modern Mexicans Maya Indians have to restore the glory and power of the ancient Maya Empire? Would in the 21st Century the God of Greeks Zeus, God of Romans Jupiter, and God of Persia Ahura Mazda, and God Ossir of Egypt resurrect and reclaim their lands lost to Christians and Muslims? Should Hindu India and Buddhist China help the revival and resurrection of ancient gods and ancient religions?

 

(13) US Diplomacy of Deception, Diplomacy of Newspeak & Diplomacy of Doublethink

American Foreign Policy always had problems with diplomats because of its insistence of saying ‘up is down’ and ‘black is white,’ as part of its diplomacy of deception, doublethink and newspeak. The State Department’s Orwellian propensities have long been apparent to anyone following its pronouncements. The State Department’s Orwellian tactics don’t stop with doublethink; they also include newspeak, the redefinition of words rule out disloyal thoughts. American control over world media seems to get away by pronouncing policy of war as policy of peace; policy for slavery as policy for freedom. State Department periodically asserts without any opposition by the media that War is peace, Slavery is freedom, and Ignorance is strength and get away with it. American diplomacy of deception employs doublethink and newspeak as essential components of the Western policy of Divide & Rule. America frequently makes ‘chocolate-is-vanilla’ claim and uses its brute force to get it accepted.

 

(14) Hidden Media Censorship in USA

American Media is sycophant, and the next time Administration insists that chocolate is vanilla, much of the American media-fearing accusations of the liberal bias or lacking patriotism, won’t report chocolate is chocolate not vanilla, or up is not down, or war is not peace, or slavery is not freedom. American media enjoys total freedom to pass any judgment on domestic issues, but lack freedom to write objectively on foreign policy matters. Geopolitics warns that trouble with the Diplomacy of Deception, Diplomacy of Doublethink, and Diplomacy of Newspeak is that eventually geopolitical reality has a way of asserting itself. And in case you are wondering, ignorance isn’t strength. US State Department deliberately engages in policy of doublethink, policy of newspeak and policy of deception, as a continuation of the typical English policy of Divide & Rule.

 

(15) Geopolitical Destiny of India

In spite of all problems the democratic India in 2002 is the fourth largest economy of the world in size, and with second largest population. World Bank recognizes India to be the world’s fourth largest economy, after USA, Japan and China. The World Bank’s “World Development Report 2000/2001” ranks the world’s leading economies in terms of Gross National Product (GNP) measured at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) as follows: (1) United States ($8,350 Billion), (2) China ($4,112 Billion), (3) Japan ($3,042 Billion), (4) India ($2,144 Billion), (5) Germany ($1,838 Billion), (6) France ($1,294 Billion), (7) United Kingdom ($1,234 Billion), (8) Italy ($1,196 Billion), (9) Brazil ($1,062 Billion), (10) Russia ($929 Billion). The leading economies in terms of GNP ranking are: (1) USA ($8351 Billion), (2) Japan ($4,079 Billion), (3) Germany ($2,079 Billion), (4) France ($1,427 Billion), (5) UK ($1,338 Billion), (6) Italy ($1,136 Billion), (7) China ($980 Billion), (8) Brazil ($743 Billion), (9) Canada ($591 Billion), (10) Spain ($506 Billion) India ($442 Billion) is caused by the artificially devalued currency of India. One Indian Rupee valued in terms of US $ valued in 1965 ($0.21), 1975 ($0.12), 1985 ($0.08), 1990 ($0.06), 1991 ($0.03) and in 1999 ($0.023). One US Dollar valued in Indian rupees in 1965 (Rs. 4.70), 1975 (Rs. 8.40), 1985 (Rs. 12.33), 1990 (Rs. 17.49), 1995 (Rs. 32.41), 1999 (Rs. 43.13), 2000 (Rs. 45.00), and 2001 (Rs. 47.04). Indian currency is highly undervalued, and it gets reflected in lower estimation of GNP. The four greatest military powers of the world are: (1) USA, (2) Russia, (3) China, and (4) India. The three largest populous nation of the world are: (1) China (1,250 million), (2) India (1,000 million), and (3) USA (273 million). The population of pre-partition India, South Asia (1,329 million) exceeds that of China. The nuclear weapon powers of the world are ranked as: (1) Russia, (2) USA, (3) China, (4) United Kingdom, (5) France, (6) India, and (7) Pakistan. The leading Civilizations of the world are: (1) Yellow Buddhist Chinese Civilization, (2) Brown Hindu Indian Civilization, (3) White Christian European Civilization, and (4) Brown Arab Muslim Civilization. The major races of the world ranked by population are: (1) Brown race, (2) Yellow race, (3) White race, and (4) Black race.

 

India would reestablish in 21st century India’s historical dominance in the world economy, which it enjoyed until 1750 AD. India had been the richest nation in the world. India produced one fourth of the world’s manufactured output in 1750, one-fifth in 1800 and one-sixth in 1830. It is only when India came under British crown in 1857 that India’s share fell precipitously. England is responsible for India’s poverty. India’s share of the world manufacturing output was in 1750 (24.5%), 1800 (19.7%), 1830 (17.6%), 1860 (8.6%), 1880 (2.8%), 1900 (1.7%), 1913 (1.4%), 1928 (1.9%), 1938 (2.4%), 1953 (1.7%), 1963 (1.8%), 1973 (2.1%) and 1980 (2.3%).

The World’s GNP at PPP in 2001 ($38,805 Billion), and India ($2,144B) represents 5.53% of the world’s GNP at PPP. South Asia’s GNP at PPP ($2,695 Billion) represents 6.95% of world’s GNP. South Asia poised to overtake Japan as the third largest economy of the world during this decade. Of the four largest economies of the world, three are non-white nations of Asia, namely China, Japan and India. The combined GNPs at PPP of China, Japan and India ($9,299 Billion) exceed that of USA ($8,350 Billion). The GNP at PPP of South Asia ($2,695 Billion) exceeds the combined GNPs of Middle East & North Africa ($1,338 Billion) and Sub-Sahara Africa ($929 Billion) as well as that of Europe & Central Asia ($2,654 Billion).

 

The Combined GNPs at PPP for South Asia, China & Japan is $9,850 Billion, more than NAFTA’s GNP $9,828B the combined GNPs of USA ($8,350 Billion), Canada ($726 Billion) and Mexico ($752 Billion). The India’s GNP ($2,144 Billion) exceeds the combined GNPs of 10 European nations ($2089 Billion), of Spain ($659 Billion), Portugal ($151 Billion), Belgium ($277 Billion), Switzerland ($196 Billion), Austria ($193 Billion), Denmark ($129 Billion), Finland ($110 Billion), Norway ($118 Billion ($184 Billion), and Ireland ($72 Billion). The South Asia’s GNP ($2,695 Billion) exceeds the ($2,528 Billion) combined GNPs of France ($1,294 Billion) and United Kingdom ($1,234 Billion), and also ($2,498 Billion) combined GNPs of Germany ($1,839 Billion) and Spain ($659 Billion). Combined GNP ($6,256 Billion) of India ($2,144 Billion) and China ($4,112 Billion) exceeds ($6,222 Billion) combined GNPs of Germany ($1,839 Billion), France ($1,294 Billion), United Kingdom ($1,234 Billion), Italy ($1,196 Billion) and Spain ($659 Billion), the five largest economies in the European Union.

 

No other nation other than India can overtake China in GNP at PPP in first half of the 21st Century, to become the 2nd largest economy in the world. No doubt Hindu India, Brown Aryan India, the multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and multi-religious secular India is the major player in the Global Clash of Races, the Clash of Civilizations and the Clash of World Religions in the 21st Century. In 1990 the GNP of China ($355B) not more than that of India ($323 Billion), and India had higher per capita GNP. However, in 1999 the GNP of China ($991 Billion) leaped over that of India ($460 Billion), primarily because of Most Favored Trading Nation (MFN) Status accorded by United States. India’s GNP in 1999 was 46.4% of China, and 52.1% of China in terms of India’s (2,144 Billion) GNP at PPP. Pre-Partition India, the South Asia’s ($2,695 Billion) GNP at PPP in 1999 was 65.5% of China. The population of South Asia (1.329 Billion) exceeds that of China (1.250 Billion). India is politically stable and would overtake China.

 

(16) India For Right of Preemptive Strikes

India supports Bush Doctrine of Pre-Emptive Strikes, the Right of Self-Defense to deny further sponsorship, support and sanctuary to terrorists by convincing or compelling states to accept their sovereign responsibilities to combat terrorism. India agrees that all acts of terrorism are illegitimate so that terrorism will be viewed in the same light as slavery, piracy, or genocide: behavior that no responsible government can condone or support and all must oppose terrorism. India shall militarily help United States disrupt and destroy terrorist organizations by direct and continuous actions using all the elements of national and international power. India will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise its right of self-defense by acting pre-emotively. India will convince or compel states to accept their sovereign responsibilities to deny further sponsorship, support and sanctuary to terrorists. India will use the full influence of media and political movements to make clear that all acts of terrorism are illegitimate so that the terrorism will be viewed in the same light as slavery, piracy, or genocide. India will convince and compel all state sponsors of terrorism that no respectable government can condone or support terrorism and all Arab states, including Saudi Arabia must oppose Wahhabi terrorism. Arab Wahhabi states must pay sufficient economic reparation for the damage caused by Wahhabi Al-Qaeda terrorists in United States, India and worldwide. According to the Bush doctrine, the nation’s right of sovereignty can be abrogated if any Islamic nation continues to sponsor, support and provide sanctuary to terrorists. India reserves its right to invade the Source of Islamic terrorism in Arabian Peninsula, as Arabian Gulf had been Indian Empire’s Lake during 18th 19th Century and early 20th Century. Kuwait, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar and Oman had been part of the Indian Empire. Indian Rupee had been the official currency in these countries up to 1965. The military occupation of Wahhabi Heartland in Arabian Peninsula, by civilized Turkey, Pakistan or Egypt not against the national interests of secular India. India supports the attempts of Turkey, or Egypt or Pakistan become the custodian of the Holy cities of Mecca & Medina, as a permanent solution to the menace of Al-Qaeda Arab Wahhabi terrorism. India asserts its right to undertake pre-emptive strikes against Arab terrorist nations to protect Hindu India against Wahhabi terrorist attacks. Like United States, India also asserts its right to undertake preemptive strikes against state sponsors of terrorism. There is no other way in this changed world, to deter those who hate India, United States, democratic freedom and everything for which these two largest democracies stands.

 

(17) Preemptive strikes for Nuclear Counter Proliferation

India accepts that Islamic Atom Bomb is the greatest threat for the Christian Civilization. India supports Bush doctrine that shifts American military strategy towards pre-emptive strikes against hostile Arab states developing weapons of mass destruction. The Doctrine of Counter-Proliferation should replace most nonproliferation treaties. India and United States should join forces to forcibly denuke Islamic nations and to forcibly dismantling Islamic nuclear weapons and their components, and nuclear-capable missiles in Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and even Pakistan. India agrees with United States that Islamic Nuclear Weapons threatens the very survival of the human race, as Arabs are not amenable for the logic of deterrence of Mutual Assured Destruction doctrine. United States, India, and Israel should join military forces to undertake pre-emptive military strikes to forcibly dismantle Arab nuclear, biological and chemical weapons or their components, or their precursors. Arab Muslims invaded India in the history and Hindu India cannot sit idle and allow rise of any military power in the Islamic world. India would welcome the subjugation of the Islamic world by Protestant and Catholic powers to ward of the Islamic threats to Hindu world. Hindu India would militarily support Christian Coalition in their war on Islamic terrorism and Islamic Weapons of Mass Destruction. India should join forces with United States to develop National Missile Defense Shield. The military occupation of Iraq by United States, and the subsequent portioning of Iraq to carve out independent Kurdistan, and Shiite Iraq not against the national interests of Hindu India. India supports the looming US invasion of Iraq, so long as Wahhabi fundamentalists do not sneak into power in Iraq, after the ouster of Saddam Hussein. India will support United States to forcibly dismantle Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, if General Pervez Musharraf’s dictatorial regime falls, and if there is any threat of take over of power by fundamentalists in Pakistan. Even at the cost of limited nuclear exchange, India must never allow the political takeover of nuclear Pakistan by Islamic fundamentalists.

 

(18) India’s War on Terrorism

India supports Bush doctrine that outlines that United States will also wage a war of ideas to win the battle against international terrorism. This includes supporting moderate and modern government especially in the Muslim world, to ensure that the conditions and fundamentalist ideologies that promote Islamic terrorism do not find fertile ground in any nation. India like United States reserves the right to wage a war of ideas in the Islamic world to win the battle against international terrorism, which is based on the terrorist subjugation of women under the garb of Wahhabi fundamentalism and Shariah. India will wage a war of ideas to convince or compel Muslim nations to realize that the brutal Wahhabi subjugation of women will be viewed in the same light as slavery, piracy, or genocide, a behavior that all civilized nations must oppose. India accepts that United States has a right under international law to militarily intervene to compel Muslim nations replace Shariah laws with modern secular western civil and criminal law. India and United States may join forces to impose Turkish secular laws in Saudi Arabia, Arabian Peninsula and rest of the Islamic world. Since Christian culture and civilization superior to that of Islamic culture and Arab civilization, it is inevitable that under distinctly American internationalism, American value system, freedom of women and American legal system could be imposed upon semi-civilized Arab societies, to guarantee the freedom of Arab women. Just as the slavery abolished against total opposition of the slave traders and slave owners, similarly the Wahhabi subjugation of Muslim women, should be outlawed in the same light as slavery, piracy, or genocide, a behavior that no respectable nation can condone or support and all must oppose. India and United States should join forces to militarily guarantee the freedom and rights of Arab women, to drive the final nail in the coffin of Wahhabi AlQaeda terrorism. India supports the Bush doctrine that advocates the preemptive strikes to wage a war of ideas to win the war against Islamic terrorism. Representing the religious right conservative conspiracy, President Jimmy Carter legitimized Islamic fundamentalism by engineering the fall of Pahlalvi Monarchy in Iran in 1980’s and accession of arch-fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini into power that dismantled the most modern Persian Islamic society, which had made Tehran the Paris of Asia. The “National Security Strategy of the United States” in 2002 laid the foundation of war of ideas against Islamic fundamentalism, to undo the wrongs perpetrated by President Jimmy Carter and President Bill Clinton.

 

(19) Commonwealth Common Market

Canada and Australia should India to establish the Commonwealth Common Market. India should lead Commonwealth Common Market. The GNP at PPP of members of Commonwealth of Nations (4,609B) exceeds that of China ($4,112B). The GNP of Antigua and Barbuda, Australia ($426 Billion), Bahamas, Bangladesh ($188 Billion), Barbados, Belize ($1.1 Billion), Botswana ($9.6 Billion), Brunei, Cameroon ($21 Billion), Canada ($726 Billion), Cyprus ($14 Billion), Dominica ($0.4 Billion), Fiji ($3.6 Billion), Gambia ($1.9 Billion), Ghana ($34 Billion), Grenada ($0.6 Billion), Guyana ($2.8 Billion), India ($2,144 Billion), Jamaica ($8.5 Billion), Kenya (28.7 Billion), Kiribati ($0.3 Billion), Lesotho ($4.3 Billion), Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives ($0.9 Billion), Malta ($5.7 Billion), Mauritius ($10.1 Billion), Namibia ($9.1 Billion), Nauru, New Zealand ($63.3 Billion), Nigeria ($92.2 Billion), Pakistan ($236.8 Billion), Papua New Guinea ($22.5 Billion), St. Kitts-Nevis ($0.4 Billion), St. Lucia ($0.8 Billion), St. Vincent and the Grenadines ($0.5 Billion), Seychelles, Sierra Leone ($2 Billion), Singapore ($87.1 Billion), Solomon Islands ($0.8 Billion), South Africa ($350 Billion), Sri Lanka ($58 Billion), Swaziland ($4.3 Billion), Tanzania ($15.7 Billion), Trinidad & Tobago ($9.4 Billion), Tuvalu, Uganda ($24.4 Billion), United Kingdom ($1,234 Billion) Vanuatu ($0.5 Billion), Western Samoa, Zambia ($6.8 Billion), and Zimbabwe ($29.4 Billion).

 

(20) Protestant Good Guy Vs Bad Guy USA

Protestant America is a good guy America and Catholic America is a bad guy America, because Protestant America seeks American oil empire not Pope’s empire. Is America a Good-Guy or a Bad-Guy in the eyes of the world? Can America be simultaneously be Good-guy and the Bad-guy, as it is multi-ethnic and multi-religion melting pot? If pro-Abortion be good-guy then should anti-abortion by logic be Bad guy? Are secular WASP Americans better than pro-Papacy Catholic Americans? What is the perception of the world regarding the sole superpower United States? The prevailing common perception of the world about the nature of the United States is that of a super power with two heads that operate independent of each other. One head is that of the Protestant WASPs, which to non-Christian world represents the ‘Good Guy USA.’ The second head of the United States is that of the Evangelical and Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy, which to the world symbolizes the ‘Bad Guy USA.’ To rest of the world, United States represents a two-headed monster, a split personality that switches its personality traits without any warning. Both Good-Guy and Bad-Guy coexist in the American body politik, White House and the Capitol, and only with the benefit of the hindsight can one distinguish one from other.

 

United States formed in 18th century represented the Good-Guy WASP United States. However, especially during the Pontificate of former Bolshevik Polish Bishop, Pope John Paul II, the 2nd longest serving Pope in the History, the ‘Bad-Guy’ image of the United States becoming increasingly vociferous. President Bush represents the interests of the Good-Guy Protestant United States. However, ‘Good-Guy’ USA’s good-policies and good-intentions are sabotaged at the implementation level, by the sleeping agents of the “Bad-Guy USA” implanted during the successive Kennedy, Carter and Clinton Administrations. Secretary Henry Kissinger, Secretary Zbigniew Brzezinski and secretary Madeleine Albright implemented a series of foreign policy measures that fits the description of ‘Bad-Guy’ America. The raging political war between the pro-life anti-abortion forces and pro-women, pro-choice, pro-abortion forces represents the ongoing battle between ‘Good-Guy USA’ and ‘Bad-Guy USA.’ The very foundation of the United States Constitution based on protecting the secular, Protestant character of the United States from the ulterior designs of the Popes and Catholic agents.

 

While Good-Guy Protestants joined the clarion call of the president Abraham Lincoln to join the draft to fight war to abolish Slavery in the South, The Catholics organized draft riots from Monday, July 13, through Wednesday, July 17, 1863, because they supported slavery and opposed the freedom of blacks, as Catholics feared freed blacks would then come and take the jobs of the Irish Catholics. Just as Catholics opposed the national Conscription Act of 1863, the present day pro-life, anti-abortion Catholic Religious Right Conspiracy secretly opposes the Protestant Bush’s war on global terrorism of militant fundamentalist Islamism. Similarly, Catholics oppose the Protestant’s pro-women, pro-choice and pro-abortion policies in the United States. It is no accident that Catholics have strenuously strived to derail the President Bush’s war on terrorism, fearing it would undermine ongoing Papal theological alliance with Wahhabi fundamentalists worldwide. It is no accident that Hindus are willing to work with the ‘Good-Guy WASP USA’ to support president Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. Just as Catholics failed to avert the Protestant’s victory in war on Slavery, their present day descendents would also fail to derail the Protestant’s victories in war on Islamic terrorism. Good-Guy always ultimately wins the war over the Bad-Guy, in all wars whether secular or cosmic.

 

(21) Decline of Russia is Permanent

American mistakenly media gloat that former superpower nuclear Russia is now a third-rate or even fourth-rate power. The Russians are proud people. Russian fleets that once made Russia’s huge navy now sit rusting in ports. It is stupid for America to downplay thousands of thermonuclear warheads that Russia still possesses, arguing that they are more a threat to the Russian environment and a temptation for thieves and terrorists then an instrument of national influence. Russia’s demoralized, underpaid army is short of everything from guns to food. There is steadily widening gap not just between US military and Russia’s military, but also between Chinese military and Russia’s military, and between India’s military and Russia’s military. Nor are things likely to improve, due to the state of Russia’s chaotic economy. Russia’s population (147 million) is aging and shrinking, and may be smaller than those of Iran (63 million) and Vietnam (78 million) in 2050 due to high mortality and low birth rates. President Putin must realize that the shrinking Russian population 147 million, just 2.5% of world population cannot keep control over 17 million square km land area, 12.8% of world total area, especially when China (1.3 billion) and India (1 billion) overtake Russia as military and economic power. President Putin should learn by the liberal immigration experience of United States, which allowed United States overtake Canada and Australia as economic, political and military power, even when Canada and Australia enjoyed similar economic, social and technological resources. President Putin should boldly open Russia’s borders and welcome unlimited immigration from India. Were 50 million Indians immigrate to Russia then it is likely that Russian GNP/GDP at PPP would increase by 300 percent in 10 years. Unlimited open immigration from India is Russia’s only hope to acquire economic, political and military parity with the West and the United States.

 

(22) Saudi Arabia is Axis of Evil

President Bush’s characterization of North Korea, Iran and Iraq as three Axis of Evil is not very correct. Neither North Korea, nor Iran, nor Iraq provided any of the 19 Arab Wahhabi hijackers that launched 9/11 attacks. Saudi Arabia provided and financed 15 of the 19 hijackers of 9/11, including the leader of terror, Osama bin Laden. The foundation of Saudi Arabian monarchy and Saudi society based on the Wahhabi doctrine, which advocates terrorist attacks to bring down modern, civil, liberal Islamic regimes. Just as Roman Catholic Church waged incessant wars on Orthodoxy Church and Protestant Church and Apostolic Gnostic Arian Church throughout the history of Christianity, the Wahhabi sect representing only 2% of Muslims of the world, wages terrorist attacks on Muslim leaders of other sects worldwide.

 

The foundation of Saudi Arabia, the Wahhabi sect is the womb of terrorism. The Arab Bedouin of Arabian Peninsula at the time of Prophet Mohammed were uncivilized barbarians, jealous of the advance civilizations of Egypt, Syria, Baghdad and Persia. The barbarian Arab Bedouin warriors attacked the Civilizations and after conquest either slaughtered the men or enslaved them, and took over all their women and wealth. Wahhabi Bedouin as late as 1965, were uncivilized barbarians and terrorists.

 

Arnold Toynbee in Study of History describes that barbarians succeed in destroying Civilization, whenever Civilization does not prepare for the counter offensive against barbarians in the very heartland of the barbarians’ den. Wahhabi cult and Saudi Arabia is the “womb of Wahhabi’ and ‘womb of barbarian terrorism’ and the civilization’s response to the barbarian terrorism that originated in Heartland of Arabian Peninsula, should be to invade and destroy the breeding ground of the terrorists so that successive waves of terrorists do not rise from the breeding ground of terrorism to attack the civilizations, in the succession of barbarian attacks. Civilizations’ have the inherent right of pre-emptive strikes against the ‘womb of wahhabi terrorism’ the Saudi Arabian Peninsula to hunt and neutralize Wahhabi fundamentalists to deny the social, economic, religious support to Wahhabi terrorists.

 

(23) Dominance of USA-India Axis of Good

Protestant President Bush should not worry about the opposition of the Muslim nations as well as opposition of the Catholic nations, as neither Catholic nations nor Muslim nations possess any significant economic and military power in the world. Future of the world and the outcome of the war on Islamic terrorism and Islamic WMDs would be determined by the leaders of the Protestant world, Buddhist world and Hindu world. English-speaking Protestant world, namely United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and English-speaking Hindu India should deploy military forces worldwide to dismantle global networks developed by the Axis of Evil. The alliance of English-speaking United States and the Commonwealth of Nations overwhelmingly favored to win the Third World War. The emerging geo-political strategic alliance between Washington and New Delhi represents the Axis of Good in the world. British Empire made by Indian soldiers and India’s support to the Protestant United States makes USA-India Axis of Good the Hegemon of the world, and it would be good for the world civilization.

 

(24) Papacy is Roman Empire Not Religion

Historian Arnold Toynbee and philosopher Thomas Hobbes have repeatedly argued that Roman Catholic Church is an Empire not a religious organization. Pope is the world's largest employer, and they are personally loyal to Pope. Pope is richer than Bill Gates, the richest man in the world. Papacy is the world's largest colonial empire. Vatican recognized under International Law as sovereign state. Vatican treated as normal sovereign independent state. As a sovereign state, Vatican should honor sovereignty of other nations. As sovereign state, Papacy cannot conduct any business in other sovereign states without the consent of the sovereign states. As sovereign state Vatican cannot own any property overseas, and cannot appoint clergy in foreign churches without the consent of the host nations. No foreign Catholic Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals could be more loyal to Pope than to the President of their nation. Every nation has the right under international law to regulate the management, control and recruitment of the national Catholic Churches. The writ of Pope cannot override the legislative and administrative authority of host sovereign states. Every sovereign nation has full freedom to ban Vatican's interference, influence over management of Church property, recruitment and promotion of Catholic clergy. Every Catholic Church, Clergy, Bishops, Archbishop, Cardinal should be answerable to legal authorities of the sovereign state where they are located. Pope as head of the Vatican has no right to claim as the supreme leader of the Catholic Church worldwide. China correctly rejects the role of Vatican in Chinese Catholic Churches. Catholic Church leadership committed high treason when they aligned with CIA to overthrow the Communist regime in Poland. Polish Communist leadership could have hanged Polish Catholic Clergy for high treason. Indian and Chinese governments have legitimate constitutional rights to expel the entire Catholic clergy, if these governments find that CIA had links with Catholic Church.

 

Since Vatican recognized as sovereign independent state, so it is imperative that the political leadership of Vatican should seek mandate of the Catholic laity by means of free and fair elections. The Catholic laity should directly elect Pope, Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops and Priests for fixed term of five years. Female Pope should serve five-year term, after every 5-year term of male-Pope. Failure to the Vatican to directly elect the head of the Catholic Church by Catholic laity worldwide, give weight to the Protestant propaganda that Catholic Pope is more the ‘Godfather’ of the Catholics, rather than the ‘Representative of the God on Earth.’

 

Anti-Catholic animus rooted in the theological polemics of the 16th-century Reformation still exists in the United States. However, the anti-Catholic animus rooted in the political polemics of the 18th-century Enlightenment and the cultural polemics of the 19th-century American Nativism have long since taken over all the traditional themes. These are, (1) The Catholic Church is an authoritarian monolith. (2) Catholic doctrines are hopelessly pre-Modern. (3) Catholic rites are colorful but mindless. (4) Catholic congregation are anti-Semitic and racists. (5) Catholic priests are harsh and predatory. (6) Catholic grip on the minds of believers is numbing.

 

The support to Catholic Americanism and Catholic Nativism would reform Catholic Church. Catholic Nativism and Catholic Americanism is an attempt to adopt Catholic Church doctrines to modern American culture. Native Catholicism and American Catholicism developed after 1920. During 1900’s American Catholic Church came of age. American Catholic Bishops formed Catholic National conference in 1917, 1919, 1922 and 1966. Many native-born American Catholics subjected many Catholic immigrants from Germany, Poland, Austria, and Hungary to a form of prejudice called Nativism. Native-born Anglo Saxon Catholics questioned the patriotism, morals and religion of pro-Pope Catholic immigrants from Poland, Austria, Hungary and Germany, fearing that their loyalty to Pope overrides America’s support to the Reformation. India and China should learn from the experience of American Native Catholicism to form independent Native Catholic Churches in India and China, free from the control, influence and discipline of Pope.

 

(25) Priests’ Privileges Lost in Mysticism

The history is the record of ongoing conflict between Barbarian forces and the forces of Civilizations. Barbarians invaded and destroyed the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, and Rome. The destruction of Isis civilization of Egypt in 100’s, Mithra-Jupiter civilization of Rome in 400’s, and destruction of Gnostic Arian Apostolic Christian civilization in Egypt, Libya and Syria in 640’s represented the destruction caused by barbarian forces. Pharaoh belonged to a brown race with straight hair, currently found in South India as Dravidians and Malayans who traded by maritime coastal routes. Ancient Egyptians and South Indian Dravidians were of same racial stock. Ancient Greeks, Babylonians, Assyrians belonged to the Aryan nomad tribes belonging to Iranian and Punjab racial stocks, whose lines of communications were across lands by war chariots. Ancient Egyptians, ancient Babylonians were Hindus and followed Hindu matriarchal religion of Goddess. Ancient Assyrians, Greeks, and Romans were Hindus and followed the patriarchal Hindu Aryan Vedic male Gods. The whole world was Hindu at the beginning of the First Christian Millennium, except 5 million Jews.

 

Overthrowing the rule of Pharaohs by Romans after the death of Cleopatra represented the victory of barbarians over Civilization. On the eve of Cleopatra’s death Alexandria was the greatest and the most prosperous city in the Western world. Athens and Rome could never compete with the glory and splendor of Alexandria. Macedonian Greek Emperor Alexander the Great made Alexandria the center of Greek Empire. Roman rulers Julius Caesar and Mark Antony preferred the civilization of Alexandria, to civilization of Rome. After the death of Queen Cleopatra, the last Pharaoh Emperor of Egypt, the Roman Emperors sought to destroy the Egyptian civilization, fearing that Rome could not compete with Alexandria as premier center of Western Civilization. Eastern Roman Empire established Constantinople (Byzantium), now Istanbul the capital of Eastern Roman Empire, realizing that only Asian city could compete with African Alexandria for the coveted glory of the premier center of civilization. Alexandria, Antioch, Byzantium, and Rome were four premier centers of Christianity. Church of Alexandria and Church of Jerusalem propagated Mystic, Gnostic, Apostolic and Arian Christianity, and rejected Judaic Law and Old Testament. To early Christians, the Resurrection justified the Divinity of Jesus, as the continuation of Isis-Ossiris religion of Pharaohs. The African Christians outnumbered the Christians in Turkey, Asia Minor represented by Church of Constantinople and Christians in Syria represented by Church of Antioch. The Christians of Church of Rome represented very small percentage of Christians in the world. Prophet Jesus was a Hindu Yogi who preached Hindu system to directly connect with Divine without the intermediacy of the Jewish Rabbi.

 

Early Christianity, Gnostic Apostolic Christianity, African Christianity of Church of Alexandria represented the forces of Civilization, and it was overthrown by the join barbarian invasions by Arab Bedouin and Damascus Jews. Hellenized Jews, who numbered around 6 million, hijacked the leadership of Church of Rome and Church of Constantinople and imposed the Old Testament over Apostolic, Gnostic, and Arian Christianity, which had expunged Old Testament from Christian Bible. The conflict between Semite Christians and non-Semite Gentile Christians resulted in the takeover of the Christian Church leadership in Rome and Constantinople, by Hellenized Jews. Just as Catholic Patrick J. Buchanan hijacked the leadership of the pro-Abortion, pro-Choice, pro-Women, anti-Pope Reform Party and imposed pro-Life, anti-abortion, anti-Women, and pro-Vatican agenda over the Reform party, he was not even the member even a year earlier. Christians represented Egyptian population’s 18 percent in 313 AD, when it was granted freedom of religion in Rome by the Eastern Roman Empire. Christianity was an urban movement. Gospel of Matthew was composed in Antioch. Early Christians were drawn from urban circles of well-situated Gentile artisans, merchants and members of liberal professions, and they adopted many customs of the Isis religion into Christianity, while rejecting Judaic Law and Old Testament. The ecclesiastical History of Christianity during first 700 years explained as attempts by Church of Rome and Church of Constantinople to snatch the leadership of Christianity by declaring the religious practices of Church of Alexandria as heresies, to undermine the Gentile Christians of Africa. Roman Catholic Church supported the conquest of African Christian nations in North Africa by coalition of Semite Arab Bedouin, Damascus Jews and Semite Christians. The animosity shown to African Apostolic Gnostic Christianity by Constantinople's Eastern Orthodoxy and Rome’s Roman Catholicism reflects the historical animosity of Athens, Rome and Constantinople to the glory and splendor of Alexandria, the Capital of the world.

 

(26) Did Christians lose the Original Bible

Koran declares that Christians lost the original Bible revealed by Prophet Jesus (Isa). The term Isa (Jesus) means the son of Goddess Isis. Islamic Holy Book Koran documents the loss of the original Bible of Apostolic Gnostic Christians by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians. Jews Rabbi agrees with Koran, that Christians lost the original Bible of Christian Apostles, thereby Christianity could not be the true religion that Prophet Jesus revealed. Koran declares the superiority of Islam over Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Koran declares neither the Bible of Roman Catholics nor of Eastern Orthodox Christians is true Bible, which has been lost. This argument of Koran does not apply to Protestant Bible, which aim to return to the Apostolic Christian Bible taught by Christian Apostles. That Protestant Christianity is superior to Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy can be documented by references to Koran. Damascus Jews and urban Arabs had first hand knowledge about the manner Hellenized Jews hijacked the leadership of Christian Church. Similarly, Catholic Patrick J. Buchanan hijacked the anti-Pope Reform Party, imposing Catholic political agenda over Reform Party. Just as the agenda of Buchanan does not represent the ideals of “United We Stand,” similarly Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy is the religion of ‘Christ-killers’ and ‘Apostle-killers.’ Protestant victory over Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy would reestablish the religion of Jesus Christ. Hindus, Buddhists and Pagans agree with Protestants and Muslims that Roman Catholic Bible and Eastern Orthodox Bible, not the ‘Original Bible’ preached by Jesus and 12 Christian Apostles. Thereby, only Protestant Christianity should use the brand name of Jesus Christ and Virgin Mary. Protestant Christian world power in alliance shall reestablish Apostolic Gnostic Protestant Christian Civilization in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Sudan and Ethiopia. Apostolic Gnostic Protestant Christianity, Shiite Sufi Islam, Kabbalah Mystic Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism represent the forces of Civilizations in world history.

 

(27) Hinduism is world’s largest Religion

Hindus identify themselves as Hindus, and do not identify themselves by sects, and every Hindu can worship his God at any Hindu temple, or Buddhist temple, or Sikh temple of any sect. As a result Hindus outnumber Catholics and Sunnis in the world. Chinese Mahayana Buddhism and Hinduism are the two sides of the same coin. Before 2100, Hinduism and Mahayana Buddhism would merge into one other and form the greatest religion of the mankind, representing half of the world population. There are more Hindus in the world than Catholic Christians, and the population of Hindus growing faster than that of Catholics.

 

(28) Hindus to support Islam or Christianity?

Whichever Christian and Muslim sect Hindus support would emerge victorious in the Christian wars of Sects and Islamic wars of Sects. If Hindus support Russian Orthodoxy, or American Protestant Christianity, then 600 million Roman Catholics could convert to embrace Protestant and Orthodox Christianity in 21st Century. If Hindus support Islam against Catholicism, then 200 million Catholics would convert to Islam in Africa and Asia, before 2100 AD. If Hindus support Iranian Sufi Shiite Islam, then 200 million Sunni Muslims would embrace Shiite Islam in Asia and Africa, and Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan would rule the Islamic world from Rabat to Islamabad.

 

If Hindus support Roman Catholicism, then before 2100 Indonesia, Malaysia, Borneo, Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Algeria and Tunisia would become Catholic Christian nations. If Hindus support Russian Orthodoxy then these Mediterranean African and Arabian countries could become Orthodox Christian nations before 2100. If Hindus support mystic Kabbalah (Cabala) Judaism, then 200 million Christians would convert and embrace Judaism before 2100.

 

If Hindu India supports eternal Religion of Incas, Mayas and Aztecs then 60 million Mestizos, Mulattos, Amerindians, Incas, Mayas, Native Americans and Australian Aborigines would reject Christianity and embrace Inca Religion to worship God Viracocha, before 2025 AD. It is a political decision that the political leadership of Hindu India would make time to time, as Hindu India has no permanent friends and no permanent enemies in the wars of civilizations, it has permanent Hindu Civilization’s interests. Hindu India would not directly intervene in the Christian religious wars among Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians. Hindu India would not militarily intervene in the Islamic religious wars between Sunnis and Shiites. However, Hindu India and Buddhist China would provide military, material, political and proselytizing support to one or more warring Christian and Muslim Sects, to promote Hindu, Pagan and Buddhist Civilization’s interests, from time to time.

 

(29) Indian Produced 1/4 of World in 1750

Moderate Protestants and Mestizo Catholics should support the presidential candidate that treats India as equal to China. In the year 2000, India’s population crossed one billion. India had been the richest nation in the world. India produced one fourth of the world’s manufactured output in 1750, one-fifth in 1800 and one-sixth in 1830. It is only when India came under British crown in 1857 that India’s share fell precipitously. England is responsible for India’s poverty. India’s share of the world manufacturing output was in 1750 (24.5%), 1800 (19.7%), 1830 (17.6%), 1860 (8.6%), 1880 (2.8%), 1900 (1.7%), 1913 (1.4%), 1928 (1.9%), 1938 (2.4%), 1953 (1.7%), 1963 (1.8%), 1973 (2.1%) and 1980 (2.3%). The West Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand comprising Western Christendom’s share of world manufacturing output was in 1750 (18.2%), 1800 (23.3%), 1830 (31.1%), 1880 (68.8%), 1900 (77.4%), 1913 (81.6%), 1938 (78.6%), 1953 (74.6%), 1963 (65.4%), 1973 (61.2%), and 1980 (57.8%). (Source Paul Bairoch, “International Industrialization levels from 1750 to 1980.)

 

Indian civilization during Roman Empire represented around 40 percent of the world’s arable fertile agricultural lands. India supports 16 percent of the world population in less than 2.5 percent of the world’s landmass, and it the principal cause of India’s poverty. Throughout history, India has never used military forces to conquer wealthier nations to promote Hinduism or to occupy their lands. Even when Indian Empire’s 3,600,000 Indian troops, were instrumental in Allied Victory in the Second World War, the British rulers separated Burma, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Bangladesh from India. Indian population is more than one billion. Indian Subcontinent’s population is more than that of China.

 

The redistribution of the world’s continent would become the principal issue in the World War Three. Australia and South America would cease to be white man’s continent in the early 21st Century. Hindu India should undertake necessary economic and political measures so that India’s GDP/GNP again represent 24 percent of the world’s GNP before the end of the 21st Century. India and China should represent 50 percent of the world’s GDP in foreseeable future.

 

(30) Islam would die as Religion If India Attacked by Nukes

There is no fear of India Pakistan nuclear war, because Pakistan realizes that attack on Hindu India would mean the end of Islam as religion, and Pakistan conspiring to take over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates in the pretense of leading Islamic Jihad. It is very likely that Musharraf Dynasty would replace Al Saud dynasty of Saudi Arabia, and Al Sabah dynasty of Kuwait and Wahhabi Emirates of UAE.

 

Sunni Arab Race and Sunni Islam Religion would cease to exist if Muslim Sunni Pakistan undertakes preemptive nuclear strikes against Hindu India. Muslim nuclear attack one billion Hindu India would result in the destruction of Sunni Islam and Wahhabi Arab race. In retaliation of preemptive nuclear strike, Indian second strike nuclear, and biological retaliation would nuke Mecca, Medina, Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Bahrain, Rabat, Tunis, Islamabad, and Lahore. India would not nuke Karachi, land of Sindhis and Mohajirs.

 

Post-nuclear attack India would be forced to resettle 400 million Indians in Arabian Peninsula and North Africa. Muslim nuclear attack on one billion-strong Hindu India would result in annihilation of Islam in North Africa and Arabian Peninsula and eradication of Wahhabi Sunni Islam in North Africa and Arabian Peninsula. India would partition Pakistan into separate sovereign states of Sindh, Baluchistan, and Pakhtoonistan. India can easily absorb destruction of 25 million Hindu lives by 25 Muslim nukes, but in retaliation would be legally entitled to hang 250 million Sunnis and Wahhabis and supporters of AlQaeda and Taliban. Prophet Mohammed had forecast the End of Islam in 15th Century Hijra, the present Islamic century. The Source of evil is not in Pakistani race, who are of Aryan descent, but Evil Wahhabi Sunni cult of Saudi Arabian origin, to which terrorist Osama bin Laden belongs. Perhaps Afghans, Pathans, Shiite Iranians and Shiite Saudi Arabians would join forces with Hindu India to eradicate the evil Wahhabi Sunni cult from North Africa and Arabian Peninsula.

 

Pakistan is a civilized nation, and brothers of Indians, so the civilized Pakistani leadership would overthrow Musharraf and reinstall the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief. President Pervez Musharraf would be executed by firing squad by patriotic Sindhis, Baluchis and Pathans. There is no fear of India Pakistan nuclear war. Islamic nuclear weapons would be used against Catholic Rome, as a prelude to recreation of Islamic Ottoman Empire under the leadership of nuclear Pakistan. Pakistani Ottoman Empire would extend from Morocco to Islamabad. Pakistan would control the Islamic Holy sites in Mecca and Medina. Pakistan has emerged as leader of Islamic world, and hence the Saudi provinces of Mecca and Medina should be handed over to Pakistan and half of oil incomes of OPEC nations reserved for Pakistan as tribute. Pakistan has inherited the Islamic Ottoman Empire, and all the oil wealth of OPEC nations, North Africa and Arabian Peninsula belongs to Pakistan as a matter of right of the Caliph of Islam. India supports the Pakistani conquest of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE, as a bargaining chip to avert nuclear Holocaust. India supports the Chinese conquest of Indonesia, Malaysia and Australia as a bargaining chip to gain Chinese support in case of India-Pakistan War.

 

There is no fear of India Pakistan nuclear exchange, even if India attacks Pakistan and conquers Pakistan. After conquering Pakistan India would make Pakistan the Caliph of Islam and help create Pakistani Ottoman Empire, extending from Morocco to Islamabad.

 

(31) Philosophers Responsibility

Philosophers in the 21st Century should not stand on the fence and allow political leaders adopt wrong policies. Philosophers must rise and speak up at the top of their voice and should say what they believe. Ignorance, carelessness and election opportunism are no excuses for world leaders. ‘Hidden hand of the Protocols’ might conspire to pick a dumb politician to lead the world, hoping he would be the willing tool in their hands to implement their World Plot. Our sane advice to potential world leaders: If you don’t know, please study and listen to the World Philosophers. It is the social responsibility of World Philosophers to teach world leaders, the proper way to rule the world. World Philosophers are readily available to serve world leaders, if they would just have the courtesy and patience to listen to them and study their writings. Knowledge is exploding at exponential rate, the leadership of the United States must not be handed over to less educated persons. Western Christendom would collapse if the political power of the most powerful Christian nation in the world falls in the laps of the political leaders with less competent brainpower. Educated electorate of the United States should cast their vote in favor of more competent, and more educated presidential, senatorial, and gubernatorial candidates in next elections in the countries of your residence and do not let the religious orthodoxy and predator religious intolerance force you to lose your sense of proportion and balance of mind. Do not waste your precious vote, but do not shirk to take up arms to give befitting defeat to the terrorists whether in Iraq, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. No religion and no religious practice can by itself be evil, if its adherents allowed freedom to choose any religious path of their choice and volition without the intermediacy of priests. Priests, whether Rabbi, Priests, or Mullahs condemn mysticism and mystic religious practices of their religions as well as that of other religions evil simply because it take away the incomes of the middle men the priests, and harms the business of Church. Jesus Christ talked about the Kingdom of God within each one of us, as Jesus had practiced Hindu, Jaina and Buddhist yoga in India and had revealed the true religion of Goddess to the patriarchal Jews, and that is why Jews murdered him and other Apostles and imposed Old Testament on Early Christianity. Hellenic Jews imposed Old Testament in Christian Bible when due to time restraint they had to come up with a Bible scripture on orders of the Roman Emperor. Damascus Jews had similarly help draft Muslim Koran 50 years after the death of the Prophet during Mecca Caliphate making it more pro-Judaism than it was during Medina Caliphate. Zionists developed the doctrine of Semite Wahhabi Sunni sect as the tool to loot the oil and gas resources of Arabia in partnership with the British spymaster Lawrence of Arabia. American oil colonialism and Zionists developed, nurtured and propagated the Semite Wahhabi Sunni Cult doctrine to mobilize the Semite Bedouin tribes of Mecca, so that in exchange for Semite Wahhabi Clergy’s rule over Mecca and imposition of Shariah laws, the American oil colonialism would exercise monopoly control over Saudi Arabian oil, economic, military, and foreign affairs. Nomad Jews looted and destroyed the prosperous agricultural cities of fertile Jordan valley by imposing their brand of patriarchy monotheism. Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism is the ingenious diplomatic innovation of Semite Zionists and Protestant American oil imperialism to destroy the glorious Ottoman’s Islamic Caliphate and to bring Islamic nations of Arabia under the military, political and economic control of Christians and Jews. The imposition of Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism over liberal, secular modern Islamic nations would destroy Islam as a Civilization and allow Yankees and Jews rape and loot the oil and gas resources of Arabia the former territories of the revered Ottoman Empire, the envy of Christian Europe. Jews, British Empire and American oil colonialism developed, nurtured, supported and propagated and imposed barbarian Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism to militarily impose barbarian customs and traditions on civilized Islamic world, so that Christian Europe may remove the stigma of barbarianism leveled to Catholic Europe of Medieval Middle Ages of Inquisition fame. Islam would cease to exist as a Civilization and as a religion, if the Zionists and American oil colonialism succeeded in imposing barbarian Semite Wahhabi cult, customs and Shariah laws over civilized Islamic nations. Jews and Christians giving Kiss of death to Islam by propagating Semite Wahhabi fundamentalist Cult over secular, liberal modern civilized Islamic nations.     

 

(32) Looming New Global Dark Age

Concerned philosophers have explained to the ruling elite of the world powers in the terminology of Geo-Politics that religious fundamentalism is the core of the global terrorism, and the Core of the Axis of Medieval. The purpose of the Axis of Medieval is to put the clock back, and make 21st Century the beginning of a New Dark Age. Unless world leaders take precautionary steps, the growing nexus of the Cocaine, Crime, Corruption and Conservatism, threatens to engulf the world in a New Dark Age, just as the fundamentalism of Christian Emperor Theodosius I destroyed the Roman Civilization, and the Dark Age descended over Christian Europe, which lasted over 1,000 years. The destruction of the American Civilization becomes a distinct possibility, whenever in future an agent of the religious Ultra-conservatism succeeds in occupying the Oval Office. It happened in Roman Empire, Soviet Empire, and it can also happen in the United States.

 

(33) Semite American Caliphate of Islam

The predator land crawling snakehead fish is a danger to the other species of fish, similarly predator land crawling anti-woman fundamentalist cults presents mortal danger to the human race. Semite King Fahd of Saudi Arabia and Semite Ariel Sharon of Israel are two sides of the same Semite sword that raped and looted the wealth of 7th Century Christian Damascus, Egypt, and Baghdad, by Semite Bedouin Muslim raiders financed by Damascus Jews for a share of the loot. Semite Ariel Sharon and Semite King Fahd held the Wahhabi sword on the American oil tanks to loot the riches of Baghdad and looted and destroyed the 5000-year old pagan artifacts of the Baghdad Museum of Antiquities, just as they destroyed the 2000-year old Afghan Bamian Buddha deity just before the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Armed by the barbarian Semite Wahhabi doctrine the Semite Israelis and Protestants would succeed in raping and looting the Arab oil wealth and destroy the Islam in the process. It is possible that Syria, Egypt, Libya, Algeria and Turkey might become Christian again as Islam was imposed by sword on these traditionally Christian lands. Just as Semite Jews reclaimed the Holy Land for Jews after 2000 years of Diaspora and Hindu Indians reclaimed India for Hinduism after 700 years of Muslim and 200 years of Christian rule, it is very likely that Christians of the Middle East would rise in revolt and join forces with Christian occupation forces to establish Christian governments in Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Egypt, Libya and Algeria before 2050. Hindu India and Buddhist China would militarily support the Protestant Christian and Zionist goals to establish Christian Civilization and Christian governments in New Middle East. The rule of Semite Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over Iraq, Syria and Iran would mean the rule by phantom Islamic regime. Ottomans the descendants of Mongols and Central Asian Turks established the Muslim Caliphate and ruled over entire Arab world for centuries, similarly American Caliphate would rule over the Islamic world for next 300 years, and Washington DC would become the seat of Islamic Caliphate, as Istanbul had been during Ottoman Caliphate. Semite Bedouin imposed Islam by sword on Zoroastrian Persia, Hindu Mecca, Christian Egypt, Christian Syria and Christian Turkey, and the victory of Christians established the power of Christian sword, so like the Christian Inquisition of Spain and Portugal, the North Africa and Arabia would be forced by Christian Sword to convert to Christianity. Muslim women in the Middle East should have freedom to marry Christians without any restrictions whatsoever. The New Middle East would become Christian lands in not so distant future and world powers should support the religious conversions to Christianity in the New Middle East. The religions that expand and propagate by sword die by the sword. Ancient religions would stage a comeback in the 21st Century, just as Jews returned after 2,000 years of Diaspora to reclaim the Holy Land for Jews.

 

(34) End of History in the Age of Emails

In the age of emails the historians would require the philosophical inquiry into the conduct of diplomacy to understand the real forces that influenced the crucial epoch-making decisions. The electronic data keeping and the increased use of e-mails in the White House decision-making would allow the secret Cabal to create false records for the posterity and delete the e-mails that influenced the crucial decisions that resulted in the world shattering events. The magnum opus like Global Clash of Races serves the purpose of presenting a worldview in the age of electronic data keeping where the descendants of Joseph Goebbels might rewrite the history to suit their benefactor and the future generations may not be able to discern truth from falsehood. The future writers would find it difficult to unearth diplomatic conspiracies, as e-mail records are not normally kept. The absence of the written documents and absence of the verifiable signatures on the e-mails would allow the evil to paint itself as virtue in the electronic records for the future historians to wrongly venerate the evil leader as the virtuous leader. The e-mails and the electronic media could mean the end of the History writing, as written records are not kept. Numerous versions of the electronic data keeping would fail to decipher the fake from the real email that the leaders sent to their team of decision makers. In the modern age of electronic media the written documents do not exist and many of the crucial decisions made by the leaders may not be saved in the written format. The future historians may develop faulty perspective of the present day events as the print media and electronic news bytes presented the distorted images of the reality.

 

History writing could be distorted in the age of electronic record keeping for the decision making process. The leaders could order to doctor the electronic record keeping or delete the

When tomorrow's military historians go to write the chronicles of decision-making that led to 2003 Gulf War II, 1991 Gulf War I, or 1999 Kosovo War they may be startled to find there's not much history to be written. The same is true of President Bill Clinton's war over Kosovo, and president George W Bush Sr.'s Desert Storm, and a host of other major episodes of US national security policy. Many of the kinds of documents that historians of prior wars, and of the Cold War, have taken for granted memoranda, minutes, and the routine back-and-forth among assistant secretaries of state and defense or among colonels and generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff simply no longer exist. The problem is not some deliberate plot to conceal or destroy evidence. However, the electronic record keeping would forgers to hide the tracks and false history could be created electronically for future historians.

 

The e-mail records can be altered and the wrong dates and times can be inserted. The e-mail records can be backdated. The electronic data keeping might allow the malevolent policies presented as the benevolent policies for the future historians, without anyone realizing the charade under way. The problem is in an online publication is the advent of e-mail. In United States before the mid-to-late 1980s, as late as Carter Administration, Cabinet officials and their assistants and deputy assistants wrote memos on paper, and then handed them to a secretary in a typing pool. The secretary would type it on a sheet of paper backed by two or three carbon sheets, and then file the carbons. Periodically, someone from the national archive would stop by with a cart and haul away the carbons for posterity. Beginning with the Reagan Administration, nobody does this today. There are no typing pools to speak of. There are few written memos. At a flick of a button the entire libraries of data could be erased and false records inserted in the hard discs and storage devices.

 

The select group of Cabal can takeover the policy making of even large nations and impose their policies on the nation and then clean their tracks so that future historians would not be able to highlight the secret role they played in important epoch making diplomatic events. Understanding the mind of the top policy makers and political leadership become more important in the age of electronic data keeping. An enterprising historian writing about World Wars I or II can draw on the vast military records at the National Archive, as well as letters from Churchill, Roosevelt, de Gaulle, and others. Those chronicling the Cold War or the Vietnam War can plumb the presidential libraries of Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Ford and find plenty of illuminating memos written to and from not just Cabinet officers, such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, John Foster Dulles, Robert McNamara, and Dean Rusk, but the crucial sub-Cabinet officials and security advisers. In 2020 AD, if someone went looking for similar memos by Colin Powel, Condoleeza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Richard Armitage, and Elliott Abrams on, say, the Bush administration's 2003 Iraq War, not many memos would be found because Memos they don't exist in paper any more as they exist only in the electronic format and deleted frequently. Officials today e-mail their thoughts and proposals. The author of the revealingly massive and detailed biographies often advised aspiring historians, "Turn every page." What to do, though, if there aren't any pages to turn? Almost all Air Force documents today, for example, are presented as PowerPoint briefings. They are almost never printed and rarely stored. When they are saved, they are often unaccompanied by any text. As a result, in many cases, the briefings are incomprehensible. The new, paperless world has encouraged a general carelessness in official record keeping. Pentagon’s J5, the planning department of the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not as a rule save anything. It is very important for the sake of History writing that the electronic records are kept safe in multiple formats including PDF format to make records temper proof. History is the record of may sudden deaths of Civilizations and historians couldn’t decipher the cause of the demise of the prosperous civilizations. Throughout history victors took pains to destroy the monuments of the past and order the adulatory history to be written. In the age of electronic data keeping and the absence of written memos the false paper trail can be created with ease and real history replaced by false history, for future historians and no one would even know that switch did take place, except by the Cabal that perpetrated the switch of records.

 

(35) Berlusconi Raised European Clash Issues

Berlusconi hyped pre-Christian Roman Civilization. First, the nationalist leaders of Rome would resurrect the Eternal Rome of God Zeus. Brilliant diplomat billionaire Berlusconi rightly pointed out to President Putin of Russia that Italy was great in per-Christian era, at the time of Romulus and Romus, to indicate that Catholic Christianity had been a Curse on Eternal Rome and Eternal Roman Civilization. Mr. Berlusconi also hinted that Rome was great even 3,000 years ago, while Russia's Muscovy was the colony of Buddhist Mongol Empire in the 13th Century. Mr. Berlusconi is right in claiming that the Civilization of Eternal Rome is superior to any other Christian European Nations and Civilization. Second, the Christianity is superior to Islam. Berlusconi correctly pointed out that Christian Civilization is superior to Islamic civilization, as Islamic civilization is 1,400 years behind time. The Western Christian civilization would continue to conquer Islamic Civilization so that its people may adopt Christian values. Christians have right to conquer Islamic world and impose Christianity on Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey as these countries were thriving Christian nations before they were conquered by Islamic sword and forced to become Muslim by sword. Since after the conquest of Muslim Iraq by Christian America, the Christian Sword proved to be mightier than Islamic sword, it means that Christian god mightier than Islamic god, hence Christian nations have very right to impose Christianity on former Christian lands in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, in the 21st Century.  Third, the European Union is the replica of the secular Roman Empire. European Union is not the replica of the pro-Papacy Habsburg Holy Roman Empire. Patriotic Berlusconi indirectly asserted that under his Presidency the European Union and the Draft Constitution of Europe would look upon Civilized pre-Christian Roman Empire and Roman Civilization as the ideal, and European Union should not look towards Christian Holy Roman Empire as the ideal for New Europe. In 415 AD with the connivance of Pope, the German barbarian leader Alaric conquered Rome and destroyed the Roman Empire. Mr. Berlusconi wants Great Rome should project the Civilization and religion of God Jupiter/Zeus, Goddess Isis as the embodiment of Civilized Europe not the Civilization that produced Inquisitions, Dark Age and Medievalism in Europe. Mr. Berlusconi is absolutely right in promoting the contribution of Rome, Roman Empire and Roman Civilization to Civilization of Europe. The greatness of Europe lies in relishing the greatness of pre-Christian Rome and ancient Roman Civilization.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com