15

AMERICAN WILSONIAN DIPLOMACY OF DECEPTION NEWSPEAK DOUBLETHINK -Chapter 15- KALKI GAUR

Chapter 15

USA’s Diplomacy of Deception Newspeak

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

15(0) Purport

(1) Talk Straight to Indians

One. The United States should not resort to Diplomacy of Deception Newspeak and Doublethink to sell American policies of Petro-Imperialism, Oil-Colonialism and Pax-Americana camouflaged as Christian religious right conservative conspiracy agenda or as wars on Islamic terrorism, because India likes American idea of Petro-Imperialism and opposes hidden agenda of Christian religious right conspiracy.

Two. To Indians Petro-Imperialism and new age of Colonial Empires is a moral imperative for energy security in the age of ever-rising crude oil prices.

Three. To Indians the American Petro-Colonial Empire in the Middle East and Iran is a moral imperative as it alone can prevent the looming specter of Armageddon, Apocalypse and Christian-Islamic Wars.

(2) Wilsonian Doublethink Deception

The Wilsonian approach to American foreign policy camouflages American national interests in idealistic terms. The Rooseveltian approach to foreign policy bluntly promotes American national interests. White House foreign policy apparatus employs diplomacy of deception, doublethink and newspeak to make the foreign policy more palatable to American media and public. British diplomats resort to English understatement in foreign policy discourse. American diplomats resort to language of deception, doublethink and newspeak in foreign policy discourse. The principal drawback of American statecraft of deception, doublethink and newspeak is that world remains skeptic for underlying motives for second Bush administration’s crusades of democracy. The policy of deception, newspeak and doublethink has its roots in Judaism and Judeo-Christianity and cannot be wished away and diplomats should learn to live with the diplomacy of deception, newspeak and doublethink. These are the arguments the author makes in this Chapter.

 

15((1) Talk Points

 

 

 

 

15((2) Diplomacy of Deception

(1) American Riddle

Diplomacy of Deception employs Newspeak and Doublethink to camouflage realpolitik colonial and imperial interests under the deceptive garb of Wilsonian ideologies. American Foreign Policy always had problems with foreign diplomats because of State Departments’ insistence of saying ‘up is down’ and ‘black is white,’ as part of its diplomacy of deception, doublethink and newspeak. The State Department’s Orwellian propensities have long been apparent to anyone following its pronouncements. The State Department’s Orwellian tactics don’t stop with doublethink; they also include newspeak, the redefinition of words to rule out disloyal thoughts. State Department periodically asserts without any opposition by the media that War is peace, Slavery is freedom, and Ignorance is strength and get away with it. American diplomacy of deception employs doublethink and newspeak as essential components of the Western policy of Divide & Rule. America frequently makes ‘chocolate-is-vanilla’ claim and uses its brute force to get it accepted. During nineteenth century the Machiavellian deception, ruse, bribes and murders were legitimate instruments of diplomacy, now they have become legitimate instruments of diplomacy in 21st century. This realization changes the role and practice of diplomacy and the practice of the statecraft.

 

The dilemma philosophers of Diplomacy face: How democratic United States with strict separation of Church and the State ever become the patron of Wahhabi terrorists, military dictatorships, predatory intolerant religious cults that it is, if in fact the American society, culture, system was not intolerant but tolerant, inclusive and liberal democratic. The dilemma German Idealist Protestant philosopher G.W.F. Hegel inquired: How Catholic Christianity had ever become the authoritarian that it was, if in fact the teaching of Jesus was not authoritarian but rationalistic. His philosophical journey from 1816 to 1831 created the German Idealism and ushered in the age of Idealism.

 

The dilemma Indian diplomats face is: Can Hindu India trust the words of Protestant President Bush that America is waging a war against Osama Bin Laden on Islamic terrorism, not waging America’s war for Islamic terrorism on behalf of Osama bin Laden? India is concerned because American Armed forced proved incapable of arresting and neutralizing even single leader of the Al Qaeda network in Afghanistan and Opium Poppy cultivation and Heroin trade has zoomed after the invasion in Afghanistan. All the persons that America killed in Afghanistan were anti-Taliban and anti-Al Qaeda troops of Northern Alliance. Did President Clinton order the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, because he was befriending India? Did Clinton Administration install the pro-terrorism regime of General Pervez to make Pakistan the Albania of South Asia, where the West aligned with the drug dealers and Albanian terrorists to destabilize Yugoslavia? If it could be the conspiracy then what should be India’s response.

 

(2) Wilsonian Ideal’s Deception Newspeak

American Wilsonian foreign policy camouflages the American Realpolitik under the garb of ideological rhetoric. America historically employs the diplomacy of deception, and employs terms in deceptive newspeak manner to clothe baser crude national objectives in the high fashion coverings to sell the policies of the State Department to the Senate and the Congress at the Capitol. Every body understands the deception, including the president, Secretary of State, Senators and the Congressmen. President Theodore Roosevelt defined US foreign policy in terms of national interests and realpolitik. President Woodrow Wilson defined US foreign policy in ideological context, to sell the Roosevelt’s national interests clothed in Wilsonian ideological fashion wear so that Senators, Congressmen and Diplomats may feel good while pursuing hard, harsh national imperial interests of the United States. The diplomacy of deception, Newspeak has deep roots in American history. United States had been functioning Apartheid as late as 1965, where like Apartheid South Africa, Blacks had separate seats in the public transport and separate toilets. However, unlike Apartheid South Africa and Apartheid Rhodesia, no country in the world felt revolted against the wide spread practice of Apartheid in United States. United States is past master in the art of deception and diplomacy of deception and newspeak.

 

United States frequently clothes ugly foreign policy in appealing ideological clothing. While Soviet Union used brute force to overthrow regimes in Hungary, Czechoslovakia and other East European satellite states, and got bad publicity. United States stage-managed military coups to overthrow democratically elected regimes of Salvadore Allende in Chile, Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief in Pakistan, Patrice Lumumba in Congo, Shaikh Mujibur Rahman in Bangladesh, Prime Minister U Nu in Burma, President Sukarno in Indonesia. United States made West European states satellites of United States under control of NATO, all the while arguing that they are safer as satellite of United States because of the threat of the Communism and Soviet Union.  

 

America diplomatically exploited the world’s sympathy on Saudi Wahhabi hijackers’ terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon to weave a global alliance allowing Nato to expand to include Eastern Europe and developed bases in Central Asia and South Asia. What an ingenious diplomatic coup! After Nato’s eastward expansion to include former seven Warsaw Pact members, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria Slovakia, Slovenia, and three states which were former parts of the Soviet Union, namely, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, the new 26-member Nato has become an imperial coalition, seeking Christian domination of the world, especially the oil-reserves of the Islamic World. United States would soon have alliances with 20 non-Nato members of Euro-Atlantic partnership Council (EAPC) to expand into Central Asia and Caucasus as the Nato’s next frontier. United States has military bases in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Diego Garcia, Japan and Korea in Asia. The Sino-US strategic alliance completes the maritime noose around the western, southern and eastern periphery of the Heartland land power Russia.

 

United States waged a war on Islamic terrorism, and attacked Afghanistan, even when only Saudi and Arab Wahhabi were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Those who attacked United States on Sept. 11 have thus far gotten away with it. The vast majority of those who sponsored, planned and implemented the cold blooded murder of more than 3,000 Americans are still at large, still neither located nor apprehended, much less punished and neutralized. Was the President Bush’s declared war on Islamic terrorism just a diplomacy of deception to justify the eastward expansion of NATO, to include East European countries and NATO’s deployment in Afghanistan. How should Hindu India, Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China respond to the American war on Islamic terrorism, it were just the normal Wilsonian diplomacy of deception, which clothed naked national interests in the ideals of anti-terrorism to win the sympathy of unsuspecting India and Russia?

 

(3) Policy of Deception Preemptive actions

United States employed diplomacy of deception, to declare war on Spain on Cuba, and there is no evidence that Spanish Navy sank Maine in Havana harbor. During Mexican War of 1846, Spanish-American War on Cuba and Vietnam War, the United States sought out battle and didn’t wait for it to come to the US, and created false incidents, namely, Mexican attacks, sinking of Maine, and attacks in Gulf of Tonkin to justify the US invasion. United States justified the fabrication of the causus belli incident, as justifiable diplomacy of deception as the war had a large element of moral purpose.

 

President Lyndon B. Johnson employed the diplomacy of deception, to allege two attacks on American warships on Gulf of Tonkin, one of which didn’t ever occur. The purpose of United States to invade North Vietnam was to spread Christianity in Indo-China and to destroy Buddhism, not to contain Communism. President Kennedy and President Lynden waged war on Buddhist Vietnam to empower Christians, who represented less than 10 percent of the population in Vietnam to control political power in North Vietnam and South Vietnam. United States justified the genocide of 2 million Buddhists at hands of Catholics and Evangelical Christians in Cambodia, Laos as legitimate collateral damage.

 

Many US pre-emptive interventions have been undertaken as part of America’s long-standing commitment to act as global policemen. Between 1800 and 1934 US Marines staged 180 landings abroad, and many were launched before any provocation to the US or attacks on US citizens took place. In the 20th Century, these overseas interventions often became quite prolonged. Woodrow Wilson sent marines to occupy Haiti in 1915, and they wound up staying 19 years. President Wilson sent Marines to occupy Dominican Republic in 1916, and they wound up staying 8 years. President Johnson ordered United States Marine landings in Dominican Republic, justifying it as necessary to prevent Communism take root in Dominican Republic. President Ronald Reagan ordered pre-emptive assaults on Grenada in 1983, to prevent Soviet’s from using an airfield being built on Grenada and to protect US medical students.

 

United States implicated Afghanistan by fabricating false facts about Afghan involvement in 9/11, just as it fabricated the Spanish sinking Maine, Vietnamese attacks on American warships in gulf of Tonkin. United States war on Al Qaeda is a war of deception, because US failed to arrest even a single Arab Wahhabi Saudi terrorist in Afghanistan. How could United States justify invasion of Afghanistan, even when 15 of the 19 hijacker-terrorists of 9/11 were Saudi Wahhabi Arabs.

 

(4) America’s Imperial Ambition

The President Bush's “War On Terrorism” must be seen as a façade for much more ambitious strategy of projecting US military power around the world, especially Eurasia, and cutting loose the multilateral bonds that have constrained Washington’s freedom of action and power. For the first time since the dawn of the Cold War, a new grand strategy is taking shape in Washington, and to view the Bush Administration’s policy after Sept. 11 as directed against “Islamic Terrorism” is to miss its much broader purpose and thrust, writes Professor G. John Ikenberry, Georgetown University professor in the 2002 edition of “Foreign Affairs” in the article titled, “America’s Imperial Ambition.” The attacks of Sept. 11 ended a stalemate within the Bush Administration between traditional foreign-policy practitioners, led by Secretary of State Colin Powell, and those who embraced the new paradigm of America’s Imperial Ambition, like Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney.

 

(5) Al Gore Exposed the Deception

Those who attacked United States on Sept. 11 have thus far gotten away with it. The vast majority of those who sponsored, planned and implemented the cold blooded murder of more than 3,000 Americans are still at large, still neither located nor apprehended, much less punished and neutralized. These issues raised by former Vice President Albert Al Gore, said at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, in Sept. 2002, in response to Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism.

 

India’s seem to accept the skepticism of former Vice President Al Gore. India wonders whether American armed forces joined the war in Afghanistan to kill Wahhabi Al Qaeda terrorists, or to save them from sure slaughter at hands of National Alliance soldiers, or to provide safe passage to Osama bin Laden from Afghanistan. India wonders whether former CIA-agent Osama bin Laden rejoined CIA again after defeat at hands of Northern Alliance to plan new terrorist attacks. President Clinton and Secretary Madeleine Albright had rewarded Osama Bin Laden with de facto rule over Afghanistan in 1995, for allegedly bombing US Embassies at Kenya and Tanzania. The American failure to catch even a single Saudi Wahhabi Al Qaeda terrorist in Afghanistan raises doubts about the real nature of President Bush’s declared “War on Terror” after the 9/11. Is it possible that United States may be conspiring to launch a global war for terrorism, in name of waging war on terrorism? The American alliance with Pakistan and Pervez Musharraf raises doubt about the sincerity of the United States in waging war on terror. Is President Bush’s declared War on Terrorism, just a façade and an exercise in the diplomacy of deception and newspeak?

 

(6) Did CIA & FBI know 9/11 Attacks?

The US Congressional investigation about lapses in counter terrorism at CIA & FBI, finds that the CIA & FBI had for years collected information that showed Islamic militants hoped to strike in the United States. There were failures of the Clinton Administration to exercise the political will to act against Al Qaeda because of Saudi Arabian influence. Congress should create an independent Commission to conduct a broader inquiry. Is the war on Islamic terrorism a policy of deception to justify expansion of NATO to Central Asia and South Asia?

 

(7) Was 9/11 an Insurance Fraud?

Within a month after Amiri Baraka, a black Muslim, whose original name was LeRoi Jones, became the poet laureate of New Jersey, he recited a poem in Sept 2002, at the renowned Dodge Poetry Festival in Waterloo, NJ. The poem also asks:

“Who knew the World Trade Center was

Gonna get bombed

Who told 4000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers?

To stay home that day

Why did Sharon stay away?

 

Skeptics wonder that whether Silverstein, who signed the 99-year lease on the Twin towers just 14 days before 9/11, and who stands to gain more than $3.5 to $7 billion may have anything to do with it. In these days of insurance frauds and accounting frauds anything could be possible. In the age of rampant insurance fraud it is possible that the lessee may have thought of the crash of the building, by means simpler than the airplane crash. The direct or indirect involvement of the beneficiary of the insurance windfall cannot be ruled out, without proper investigation. In recent years the Lloyds of London went to the brink due to the barrage of large fraudulent insurance claims.

 

15((3) The New Newsspeak

(1) Meaning of term Newspeak

The New Newsspeak means the euphemism that hide the mass destruction and the deceptive terms that hide the true meanings. Watching the news in American one wonder whether there is free press in the United States. The coverage of this war in the American and Canadian press and on television has been disgusting. The US television stations, has been cravenly submissive to the Pentagon and the White House, while it pretended to be run by journalists, yet it dutifully used all the language and interpretations chosen by people in charge of "media relations" at the Pentagon. The voice of Centcom, CNN was more irritating than the gleefully patriotic Fox News channel because CNN has a pretense of objectivity, so argued Russell Smith in article, “The New Newsspeak.” American media used all the language and interpretations chosen by the Pentagon propaganda machine to hide the conventional Weapon of Mass Destruction, the MOAB bombs used by the Pentagon. The terms were, (a) "softening up," (b) “attrited,” (c) “degraded by 70 percent,” (d) “degradation.”

 

(2) Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB)

The American Media failed to point out that the Big Bomb, the Mother of All Bombs the MOAB Bomb, the Massive Ordinance Air Blast is a conventional Weapon of Mass Destruction and it should be banned like Chemical, Biological and Gas weapons. The MOAB sucks the breathable oxygen out of the air in an area two or three times the size of the football stadium. It results in massive death by asphyxia and one found trenches after trenches of dead Iraqis. Some of the Iraqi corpses in the bunkers were hunched over, hands covering their ears, as though they'd been waiting in dread. Many seem to have died not from shrapnel but concussion, and dried, discolored blood gathers around their eyes and noses and mouths.

 

(3) Softening Up- Attrited

American Media described the exploding of Iraqi soldiers in their bunkers as "softening up." American Media described slaughtered Iraqi units as being "degraded. American announcers have even repeated the egregious Pentagon neologism "attrited" to mean, "American troops are slowly killing as many of them as we can." The insidiousness of this euphemism and the absurdity of its grammar, hid the cruel reality that the Daisy Cutters and Massive Ordnance Blast (MOAB) worked like the WMD that sucked the air out of the lungs of the soldiers, much like what chemical and biological weapon would do.

 

(4) Degradation

To recite from a Pentagon press release that an Iraqi division has been "degraded by 70 percent" is an astounding abdication of journalistic responsibility, as it hid the fact that the MOAB Bombs kill like poisonous gases. American media must realize that a journalist these days must not just report the facts, but also explain the news, give it color and significance of the destruction caused by the MOAB. The graphic reality of "degradation" is a large pile of dismembered bodies. Surely some picture or explanation of what the wiping out of an entire division with high explosives actually looks like is called for. Many readers and watchers of the news were baffled as the battle for Baghdad came suddenly upon us without any large-scale engagement with the dreaded Republican Guard. What happened to those three or five divisions that were supposedly ringing the city? The facts of their destruction were grudgingly mentioned almost in passing. They were destroyed from the air. The MOAB Bombs, the Daisy Cutters kills like Chemical weapons and poisonous gases. Iraqi Republican Guards in the trenches puréed by MOAB bombs. The MOAB Bomb worked like the neutron nukes as it killed the soldiers without damaging the property, except a big hole. The MOAB bomb entailed thousands of deaths leading to the rapid collapse of the Iraqi regime and the television and the press simply downsized the story. The mass killing done by the MOAB Bomb did not make a glamorous or even central story to anyone's coverage of this war, because there were no embedded reporters with the Iraqi troops. The MOAB bombs avoided its image become dirty, as it's hard to get a TV camera into a line of trenches that is being puréed by bombs. Instead of reporting that this peripeteia in the war's narrative was happening, and that it entailed thousands of deaths by MOAB Bomb, the conventional WMD that lead to the rapid collapse of the Iraqi regime, the television and the press simply downsized the story. No pictures, no story. This is the real meaning of "degradation."

 

(5) Daisy Cutter (MOAB) in First Gulf War

The journalists failed to highlight the genocidal nature of the Daisy Cutter bombs that killed Iraqi soldiers by sucking the breathable oxygen from air, on the road from Kuwait to Basra that killed 200,000 Iraqi soldiers. The same thing happened in the first Persian Gulf War. Nobody seemed to mind the failure to report the extent of Iraqi casualties then; we don't mind it now. We'd rather have a twelve-hour cycle of interviews with one parent of one rescued POW. The story came out later. Anthony Swofford's memoir, Jarhead, describes coming upon trenches of dead Iraqis. Some of the corpses in the bunkers are hunched over, hands covering their ears, as though they'd been waiting in dread. Many seem to have died not from shrapnel but concussion, and dried, discolored blood gathers around their eyes and noses and mouths. He described the effects of the Daisy Cutter, the smaller version of the Massive Ordnance Air Blast that the US now uses. That language is not degraded. General Franks had just run "one of the most brilliant campaigns in military history." General Franks couldn't possibly have lost. He had complete air superiority, massive technological advantages, a better-trained, better-equipped, better-paid force, and a limitless budget. General Franks was fighting an isolated, impoverished, demoralized conscript Iraqi army, which was already decimated by bombing and if he had not been able to take Baghdad swiftly and decisively he would be regarded as an incompetent. Why are Indian journalists so terrified to contradict or even interpret the Pentagon publicity machine? Are we afraid of bullies at home, are we all so terrified of being accused of "anti-Americanism" that we forget basic journalistic principles? Who are Indians afraid of?

 

(6) Vocabulary of Poisonous Euphemism

The WMD is a Weapons of Mass Distortion. The concept of WMD is dishonest. When WMD are in friendly lands, Americans call them defense forces. Pentagon won the Iraq War not so much by the Precision Guided Munitions, Network Centric Warfare and Smart Bombs, as by the MOAB WMDs, the Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) Bombs, the conventional weaponized WMDs, which like poisonous gases kill by making the air unfit for breathing by sucking oxygen out of the lungs in a stadium size area.

 

(7) Newspeak Damages Language

If the first casualty of war is truth, then language itself sustains the heaviest collateral damage by the Newspeak and by the vocabulary of poisonous euphemism. “Collateral damage” proved the point of George Orwell by entering the vocabulary of poisonous euphemism. Pentagon war media control center produced its own rich crop of Newspeak, but the choicest of all is the phrase “Weapon of Mass Destruction.” Americans, British and Indians are beginning to see they were sold a pup. The very phrase of “weapon of mass destruction” is of recent coinage and important one, as it replaced “ABC weapons” for Atomic, Biological and Chemical weapons. The WMD is empty and dishonest as a concept. By definition atomic and hydrogen bombs cause mass destruction and are WMD weapons. The weapon of mass destruction is a concept defined by the person using it. The old conjunction is “I like a drink, you are a drunk, he is an alcoholic.” The new conjunction is: “We have defense forces, you have dangerous arms, he has weapons of mass destruction.”

 

(8) MOAB is WMD

The Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) Bombs are the conventional weaponized WMDs as like poisonous gases MOAB bombs kill by making the air unfit for breathing by sucking oxygen out of the lungs and victim stops breathing and dies, which is very similar to poisonous gases, which impairs the breathing and victim can no longer breathe. The MOAB Bombs, the mother of all bombs are weaponized weapons of mass destruction and hence illegal and should be banned by the treaty that banned the biological and chemical weapons.

 

(9) Weapons of Mass Distraction

If information is the oxygen of democracy, then Pentagon during Iraq war gassed Americans by a weapon of mass distraction. The Victory of “Operation Iraqi Freedom” was the geopolitical equivalent of the “O.J. Simpson trial on TV” and “Joe Millionaire” wrapped in the American flag. The American land of the free and home of the brave Americans have suddenly become mortally afraid of diverse public opinions on American media. During Reagan Administration the US Federal Communications Commission declared, “the perception of broadcasters as community trustees should be replaced by a view of broadcasters as marketplace participants.” The Fairness doctrine ceased to influence the media leaders. American dissent has not gone away, it has been marginalized by Jewish and Religious right monopoly of the major media in America. In American anyone who can buy the airwaves can buy the Presidency, Governorship and get elected as Senator and Congressman or Mayor in America.

 

(10) Bush’s Empire in Denial

Under President Bush America as an empire-in-denial took over it new oil possessions in Iraq, by hyping the virtue of preemptive strikes against Iraq for unearthing the Weapons of Mass Destruction. Russia opposed the May ’03 American resolution to the UN Security Council to recognize America’s status in Iraq as the Occupying Powers, and argued that Unites States must first certify that there are no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.

 

15((4) Diplomacy of Deception

(1) Deception Doublethink Newspeak

American Foreign Policy always had problems with diplomats because of its insistence of saying ‘up is down’ and ‘black is white,’ as part of its diplomacy of deception, doublethink and newspeak. The State Department’s Orwellian propensities have long been apparent to anyone following its pronouncements. The State Department’s Orwellian tactics don’t stop with doublethink; they also include newspeak, the redefinition of words to rule out disloyal thoughts. American control over world media seems to get away by pronouncing policy of war as policy of peace; policy for slavery as policy for freedom. State Department periodically asserts without any opposition by the media that War is peace, Slavery is freedom, and Ignorance is strength and get away with it. American diplomacy of deception employs doublethink and newspeak as essential components of the Western policy of Divide & Rule. America frequently makes ‘chocolate-is-vanilla’ claim and uses its brute force to get it accepted.

 

(2) Sycophant American Media

American Media is sycophant, and the next time Administration insists that chocolate is vanilla, much of the American media-fearing accusations of the liberal bias or lacking patriotism, won’t report chocolate is chocolate not vanilla, or up is not down, or war is not peace, or slavery is not freedom. American media enjoys total freedom to pass any judgment on domestic issues, but lack freedom to write objectively on foreign policy matters. Geopolitics warns that trouble with the Diplomacy of Deception, Diplomacy of Doublethink, and Diplomacy of Newspeak is that eventually geopolitical reality has a way of asserting itself. And in case you are wondering, ignorance isn’t strength. US State Department deliberately engages in policy of doublethink, policy of newspeak and policy of deception, as a continuation of the typical English policy of Divide & Rule. Falsehood repeated many times acquires the attributes of truth. The repeated acts of deception, doublethink and newspeak broadcast over major networks have the overall effect to make the people numb to something you should become never numb to.

 

(3) Deception Ruse Bribes Murders

During nineteenth century the Machiavellian deception, ruse, bribes and murders were legitimate instruments of diplomacy they have become legitimate instruments of diplomacy in 21st century. It is possible to wage proxy wars and destroy the geopolitical future of great powers, simply by bribing its presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers and diplomats. “The Prince” practiced by Machiavellians is as much relevant now as it was in 18th & 19th century. Somebody bribed the politicians and diplomats and succeeded in destroying or delaying the potential of India, Japan, Britain, Canada and Russia right after the Second World War. Can the damage caused by faulty foreign policies of these countries reversed by applying the lessons of geopolitics. The theory of Civilization’s Geopolitics enunciated in these books helps us identify whether some presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers and diplomats of even large and powerful countries were foreign spies and traitors.

 

(4) Art of Deception Caused Havoc

Saudi Arabia and Osama bin Laden perfected the Art of Deception to launch the invasion on September 11, 2001, which caused more than $5 trillion damage to the stock markets, more than what United States lost in all the major wars it fought in the history. Terrorist Wars of Economic Infrastructure is the new dimension in warfare. The 19 Arab Wahhabi terrorists caused more harm to the United States, than was possible for all the armies of the Arab world. Every single of 19 hijackers caused more than $250 billion in economic damages to the United States and global economy and killed 150 humans. Acts of terrorism, using non-military hardware on high profile economic targets, implemented stealthily by employing Diplomacy of Deception, has opened a Pandora Box of military opportunities. It is a revolution in warfare, as much revolutionary as the deployment of Atom Bomb. NATO legitimized the Wars of Economic Infrastructure during air war on Yugoslavia, when it targeted the utilities and industrial plants. By taking the terrorist war to the very heart of the Capitalism, the barbarians have hit the Bull’s eye of the Civilization, the Achilles’ Heel of the Western Civilization. Muslim terrorists after 640 AD attacked the caravans and the economic centers of Egyptian Civilization, employing the mobility of camels and diplomacy of deception.

 

Would Wahhabi Arab Muslim terrorists succeed in destroying Western Civilization, similar to what they did to the Egyptian Christian Civilization? Arnold Toynbee opined in the Study of History that Barbarians have a knack to improvise on military technologies, which allowed them to invade and conquer much larger Civilized powers. Whosoever first conceptualized the military potential of using fully loaded airline plane as cruise missiles is a military genius. The idea of concealing explosives in shoe, used by shoe bomber is very ingenious. It means that United States faces a very tough fanatic brilliant opponent, bent upon destroying the Western Civilization. It is funny that even after all this, United States believes that Saudi Arabia is a loyal ally. Any talk of Islam Christianity Alliance of Monotheism is bullshit, and it camouflages Wahhabi Jihad against Protestant Civilization.

 

(5) Mecca-Vatican Axis of Monotheism

Wahhabi policy of deception has cemented Sunni-Catholic Monotheism Alliance between Saudi Arabia and the Vatican. It should be noted that Church of Rome supported the conquest of Byzantine Christian Civilization by Sunni Ottoman Turks and the conquest of Apostolic Gnostic Christian Egypt by Arab Muslims. Why did President Bill Clinton declare during a visit of Pope that Holy Father is the representative of God on earth? Did he mean that Catholic Christianity superior to Protestant Christianity? President Jimmy Carter and President Bill Clinton supported the hijacking of the leadership of the Protestant Southern Baptist Church to the pro-Papacy, ultra-conservative, anti-women Christian Religious Right conservative Conspiracy.

 

Germany and Papacy employed a policy of deception to secretly support Wahhabi terrorist cells in Germany involved in terrorist attacks on Protestant United States. The Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were planned and financed from Germany, and German authorities knew about it. Since the Anthrax attack that began right after the Sept. 11 attacks, suggests some white Christians may have collaborated with Wahhabi terrorists. Would renegade Germans join Wahhabi terrorists as revenge for Germany’s defeat at the hands of United States in the Second World War? Germany and Papacy conspired to engineer the secession of Catholic Croatia and Slovenia from Yugoslavia. Germany and Papacy becomes a suspect for their possible complicity in the Sept. 11 attacks. Euro has gained over dollar after the Sept. 11. Newer and deadlier Sunni terrorist attacks on Protestant United States could expedite the exodus of capital from United States to Europe. Any further alienation of American Jews because of United State’s support for independent State of Palestine, would expedite the outflow of capital to Europe. These 19 hijackers caused more economic damage to United States than the entire Nazi Army. Germany and European Union has lots to gain by renewed terrorist attacks on the United States. Why no Wahhabi terrorist ever targeted non-US and non-Israeli targets in Western Europe? Germany and Papacy could be employing Diplomacy of Deception, while giving verbal support to President Bush’s War on terrorism.

 

Catholics engage in diplomacy of deception when they talk about Christian solidarity and need to tame Islamic terrorism. Throughout history Catholics have joined forces with Muslims to undermine Protestant Christianity, in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Muslim nations prefer Catholics to Protestants and in return Catholics turn a blind eye to Muslim persecution to Protestant minorities, so long as Catholics are given better treatment. The very foundation of the US Constitution based on the wall that separates the Church and the State. The framers of the constitution inserted these clauses to check attempts of the Pope to undermine the secular framework of the United States society. Camouflaged by the tranquil surface and deceptive protestations of Christian solidarity, the fierce hostility permeates between Catholics and Protestants in the United States.

 

(7) Policy of Deception to gain entry to USA

Arab Muslim terrorists employ policy of deception to gain entry to the United States. Before the Muslim conquests of Apostolic Christian Egypt and Zoroastrian Persia and Hindu India, Muslim invaders employed the policy of deception and implanted large number of Muslims as settlers and immigrants in Egypt, Persia and India. Similarly, large number of Muslim settlers in the Western world may prove to be foreign collaborators, who may aid and abet terrorists to fulfill Muslim’s obligations under Jihad.

 

(8) Saudi Arabia the Kernel of Evil

The Saudi Arabia is what Laurent Murawiec of Rand Corp. calls “the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent in the terror game.” The perfection in the Diplomacy of Deception allowed Saudi Arabia secure the release of thousands of Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists unharmed in Afghanistan and the resumption of the Heroin production and Opium plantations in Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia provided Bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers of the Sept 11 terrorist attacks on United States. Saudi Arabia caused more harm to the United States than all other enemies put together, still retains the status of the close military ally of the United States. The success of the Saudi diplomacy of deception is the living proof that the diplomats and policy makers and law makers in the United States could be influenced by Campaign donations, lobby funds, bribes as any other democratic nation. Saudi investments in news wire services and campaign contributions have paid of handsomely. Surprisingly, now United States and Vatican also support the demand the creation of the Muslim State of Palestine in the Christian Holy Land. Why no body supports the Christian State of Christine in the Christian Holy Land of Israel?

 

(9) Divide & Rule is Policy of Deception

United States and Britain engaged in policy of deception for creating colonial empires during 21st century. The British made British Indian Empire by policy of deception and divide and rule. In the 1757 Battle of Plassey East India Company, counterpart of present day multinational corporations bribed the general of the enemy Mir Zafar, who stepped aside when the war began, and thus Robert Clive won the war and became rule of the Bengal with the loss of les than 100 men. Spanish adventurer Pizzaro by the policy of deception got invited and then captured the unarmed Inca king. Did President Bush use the policy of deception to gain India’s support and then forced Pakistan to allow military bases to United States? Did United States use policy of deception to use Sept 11, terrorist attacks to gain permanent foothold in the subcontinent?

 

(10) American Policy of Deceptions

America’s declared goal to get Osama bin Laden dead or alive is just a policy of deception. President Bush’s War on Terrorism is just a policy of deception, to justify eastward expansion of NATO. The West could be using diplomacy of deception to entrench NATO in Afghanistan. The West used deception to gain entry into Balkans before they started air war on Yugoslavia? Prime Minister Tony Blair admitted that the West should and would use the policy of deception to further its interests in the region. United States becomes a suspect as President Bush had close financial business ties with Bin Laden family in the United States. What could be the real motive of the United States if the declared war on terrorism is simply the policy of deception, a ruse to justify the eastward expansion of NATO? The CIA might resurrect Osama bin Laden to become the next ruler of Saudi Arabia, just as it handed over the power to Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. The Al Qaeda might rejoin the CIA and work like Albanian terrorists to destabilize Kashmir.

 

(11) Clintonian Diplomacy of Deceptions

It was Clintonian Diplomacy of deception that United States wanted to destroy or curb global drug trade in Cocaine and Heroin, while the net results of its policy had been increased Catholic Cartel’s monopoly over drug trade. The net result of the President Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” had been the consolidation of the Catholic Drug cartels monopoly over global drug trade, as Plan Colombia reduced non-Cartel drug trafficking. The net result of the President Bush’s war on Afghanistan had been that Opium Poppy cultivation has zoomed and Afghanistan again became the major player in Heroin trade. NATO conveniently supported Albanian Muslim drug dealers create civil disturbances in Yugoslavia, similar to the CIA’s hobnobbing with Al Qaeda and Osma bin Laden.

 

President Bill Clinton employed the Diplomacy of Deception during invasion of Haiti which implanted dictator Catholic priest Rev. Aristide as the President of Haiti, to implement the agenda of Catholic Religious right Conservatism to enforce proselytizing of pagan Voodoo Haitians. United States invaded Haiti not to restore democracy in Haiti, but to impose Papal dictatorship over predominantly pagan Haiti. Since when United States did start using military forces to install democratically elected governments?

 

President Clinton employed the Diplomacy of Deception when it supported the military editorships of Tutsi leaders and the UN sanctioned torture of pagan Hutu tribesmen in Rwanda and Burundi, even when Hutu represent more than 85% population in Rwanda ad Burundi. Rather than punishing Tutsi tribesmen for the genocide of 2 million pagan tribesmen in Uganda during Idi Amin regime, United States justifies the ongoing genocide of pagan Hutu tribesmen by Christian Tutsi minority.

 

President Bill Clinton employed the Diplomacy of Deception when his Administration ordered firing of couple of Cruise Missiles in Sudan and Afghanistan. The real motive of the President Clinton was to engineer the takeover of the State of Afghanistan by terrorist Osama bin Laden with the support of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Pakistan. It raises doubt about the real motive of Bush Administration in Afghanistan.

 

President Clinton and NATO employed the Policy of Deception when it got its troops invited in Bosnia, Macedonia and Kosovo, for restraining Albanian terrorists, while its real motive was to carve out Catholic states of Slovenia and Croatia from Yugoslavia and to help Albanian Muslim claim greater Albania comprising Kosovo and parts of Macedonia. Is United States engaged in similar Diplomacy of Deception when it got invited into Afghanistan and Pakistan exploiting the Sept. 11 attacks?

 

It was Clintonian Diplomacy of deception when United States said that it wanted to promote democracy in the world, President Clinton ordered the overthrow of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, replaced it by General Pervez Musharraf, because former had dared to develop closer ties with India. United States allow either Benazir Bhutto or Nawaz Sharief replace General Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan. The failure of President Bush in supporting the democratic demand to have a democratically elected government of Pakistan raises doubt whether United States fighting war on Islamic terrorism against Al Qaeda. The failure to arrest any important Taliban/Al Qaeda leader in Afghanistan raises doubt that United States could be waging war for terrorism to empower Osama bin Laden become next ruler of Saudi Arabia? India is concerned that NATO may use terrorist Osama bin Laden to create disturbances in Kashmir to justify NATO interventions in Kashmir. Clarification is immediately required, otherwise India should prepare for a war against NATO in alliance with Iran, Iraq, North Korea and Russia. Failure of President Bush restore democracy in Pakistan, by asking the CIA spy General Pervez Musharraf step down, would signal that United States is mortal enemy of Democracy and close ally of Islamic terrorism. India is watching the response of the White House on this crucial issue.

 

(12) Kennedy Diplomacy of Deception

President John F. Kennedy employed the Diplomacy of Deception, when it ordered the invasion of Vietnam, ostensibly to contain the southward expansion of Communism. The real motive of President Kennedy’s invasion was to implement Pope’s agenda for proselytizing Buddhist Indo-China. Catholics and Communists are united by their common desire to destroy Buddhism. United States did not expand war in the neutral Cambodia and neutral Laos to contain Viet Cong troops, but to entrench the Communists into power in Cambodia and Laos, to set the stage for the genocide of 2 million Buddhists at hands of Christian Khmer Rouge. United States policies in the Vietnam War had been the classic case of Diplomacy of Deception. While the Communists and Christians were comrade-in-arms in Asia, the successive Administrations camouflaged the Indo-China proselytizing policies under the garb of anti-communist rhetoric to deny the majority Buddhist Vietnamese acquire political power in South Vietnam, even when 90% of the population was Buddhist. United States has used the anti-Communism policy of deception to implant Christian military dictators in South Vietnam, South Korea, and Burma.

 

(13) Carter Diplomacy of Deception

President Jimmy Carter employed the Diplomacy of Deception when it refused to allow Iran’s General takeover power in Iran after the departure of Shah of Iran, in the name of safeguarding interests of democratically elected prime minister Bani Sadr. The real motive of president Carter was to destroy the secular, modern liberal fabric of Iranian society, replacing it by barbaric fundamentalist Islamic society of Ayatollah Khomeini. President Jimmy Carter criticized the lack of freedom under Shah of Iran, to justify the overthrow of Pahlavi Monarchy, only to impose the most fundamentalist regime over Iran.

 

(14) Bush’s Diplomacy of Deception

Bush administration’s stated US policy designed to punish Wahhabi terrorists and root out fundamentalism could simply be a Policy of Deception, while the real purpose of the US policy could be to legitimize Wahhabi Islamic terrorist fundamentalism. It is possible that United States may destroy the secular, liberal society of Iraq, just as it did in Shah’s Iran and replace it with Saudi Wahhabi fundamentalism. United States has consistently supported the fundamentalist Muslim terrorists that destabilize liberal Algeria and Egypt, so much so that the murderers of Anwar Sadat and Mujibur Rahman give visas to visit USA, Canada and Australia.

 

(15) Christian Diplomacy of Deception

Both Protestants and Catholics engage in Diplomacy of Deception when they applaud Protestant-Catholic Monotheism front. In private WASPs never trusted the Catholic Religious Right Conservative conspiracy, despite public protestations to the contrary. The roots of American politics lie in the ongoing conflicts between WASPs and Irish and East European Catholics from as early as 1850 to present day. The evolution of the politics and political parties in the United States rooted in the Catholic-Protestant conflicts. Pope was to WASP Americans was a symbol of oppression. WASPs looked upon German Catholic immigrants as the heart of the vast Papal plot against the Protestant United States, who had allegiance to Pope, a foreign potentate. To the WASPs Popery threatened to swallow up America, springing its shuttle of death across America's shores. Protestant Religious Right nationalists hate Catholics. Catholics in turn hate Protestants, with the fury that has continued since the Counter Reformation Wars.

 

15((5) US Empire by Deception

(1) Expansion By Deception

Even when Osama Bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers of Sept. 11 attacks were Saudi citizens, United States did nothing to contain the Wahhabi Al Qaeda terrorist networks in Saudi Arabia. United States invaded Afghanistan, even when there was no hijacker from Afghanistan. President Clinton helped Osama Bin Laden gain political control over Afghanistan, perhaps as a reward for Al Qaeda’s role in the Bombing of US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam and bombing of the World Trade Center. During invasion of Afghanistan, United States failed to kill and capture any important functionary of Al Qaeda and Taliban and killed many more anti-Taliban Militiamen in friendly fire. United States has encouraged the cultivation of opium poppy in Afghanistan, and Heroin production and distribution has zoomed after the invasion. Recently on August 29, 2002 United States proposed enlarging the “International Security Assistance Force” (ISAF) in Afghanistan and placing its troops outside Kabul. They may include mobile group of peacemakers, which could be whisked from Kabul to troubled spot. They may place peacekeepers in several cities outside Kabul, like Mazar-I-Sharif, where there are tensions between rival lords. Foreign nations have provided relatively little of the $4.5 billion in aid they promised to rebuild the country.

 

It appears that rather than destroying Taliban and Al Qaeda troops, United States appears to secure their survival in Afghanistan and presently planning attacks on Northern Alliance based at Mazar-i-Sharif, the very force that destroyed Taliban troops in the War. It appears that the US and the NATO conspiring long term deployment in Afghanistan, to weaken Northern Alliance and to reestablish the dominance of the pro-Taliban Pashtun tribesmen in Afghanistan. It looks like that the Sept. 11 terrorist attack was conspired by white Christians to justify the eastward expansion of NATO in Central Asia.

 

The CIA has developed close ties with ISI agency of Pakistan. India is not invited to play any role in Afghanistan. Why India is kept out of ISAF in Afghanistan? The presence of NATO and US troops in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Colin Powell’s support to the Kashmir terrorists, signals the “Policy of Deception” by United States and NATO in Afghanistan.

 

(2) Afghanistan Geo-Politics

British Prime Minister Tony Blair has convincingly argued that colonial Empires should be recreated in the 21st Century. The presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan has a great geopolitical significance. For the first time since Alexander the Great, European land forces landed in Afghanistan as a victor. Throughout 19th century, Anglo-Russian rivalry in Afghanistan determined the Cold War of 19th Century between then two great world powers, Indian Empire and Russian Empire. Finally Amur River became a border that separated expanding Russian Empire and expanding British Empire.

 

Chenghis Khan founded Mongol Empire that expanded to conquer Russia and East Europe. Buddhist Mongol Empire had conquered Iran, Iraq, and Arabian Peninsula. For over a Century, the Buddhist Mongol Empire ruled over the Islamic world. Ottoman Turks were a branch of the Central Asian Turks that conquered Christian Byzantine Eastern Roman Empire and ended Christian rule over Africa and Asia. The break-up of the Soviet Union and the independence of the Aryan Central Asian Republics, signals the rise of Aryans in the 21st Century. India should lead the formation of ORGANIZATION OF ARYAN STATES (OAS), comprising of nine (9) Aryan states of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan. The rise of Aryan Muslim states might result in the consolidation of Islamic world under Aryan hegemony. The oil has been discovered in Turkmenistan and it made Afghanistan the Gateway to Central Asia.

 

(3) Secret Services in Policy of Deception

CIA & ISI JOIN FORCES: Since Secret Services are by nature secretive and employ deception and ruse in their normal operations; they are ideally suited to implement policies of deception on world scale. Is it a policy of Deception that United States established bases in Pakistan, ostensibly for the purpose of invading Taliban in Afghanistan, but resulted in the CIA developing ties with the ISI of Pakistan, which created and nurtured Taliban? Is it a policy of deception that the CIA may be planning the destabilization schemes in India, on lines it did elsewhere, in partnership with reformed agents of Al Qaeda and Taliban? The massacre of Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya, by the Muslim mob in the Godhra city was planted by foreign secret services, designed to destabilize democratic India.

 

(4) Overthrowing Monarchy by Deception

BIN LADEN MONARCHY IN SAUDI ARABIA: Is it a policy of deception that United States policy to allegedly hunt Osama bin Laden may be a ruse to position the terrorist Osama bin Laden become the next ruler of Saudi Arabia? Osama bin Laden and can easily massacre the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia. The Bin Laden Group has the financial resources to create Bin Laden Monarchy in Saudi Arabia. President Jimmy Carter undermined the Royal Family of Pahlavi Dynasty in Iran in Feb 1979, which resulted in the large-scale loot of the assets in Iran. Similar overthrow of House of Al Saud would result in the loot of over $200 billion assets. By launching a war on Iraq, the United States might destabilize the Arabian Peninsula and help establish Bin Laden Monarchy in Saudi Arabia. House of Bin Laden may also overthrow Al Sabah Dynasty in Kuwait and Al Maktoum dynasty in Abu Dhabi. Should Hindu India offer military protection to the House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia and other Sheikhdoms? India made a fundamental mistake not coming to the rescue of Shah of Iran, and India should not miss the opportunities presented in oil-rich Gulf.

 

(5) Diplomacy of Narco-War Deception

GLOBAL DRUG TRADE: United States admonished Uzbekistan for violating the Human Rights of Muslim drug dealers, involved in transporting Afghan Heroin to European markets. Heroin production and Opium Poppy cultivation has zoomed up immediately after the fall of Taliban in Afghanistan. The 4,000 tons of pure Heroin allegedly stored by Taliban in caves have disappeared, with market value of over 50 billion dollars. Is the Western policy of drug eradication, just a policy of deception to mobilize drug incomes by secret agencies for covert operations? Pakistan’s President Zia Ul Haq (1978-1988) allowed the Pakistan’s ISI control the drug trade to finance its covert operations. It is possible that Sunni Drug Cartels may have compromised the military operations in Afghanistan. Hindu India cannot sit idle and allow Pakistan amass billions of dollars in drug incomes and use it to finance terrorism in Kashmir. What counter measures India can take, so that the incomes of the drug cartels does not disturb the balance power in Asia?

 

24(6) India’s response to West’s Diplomacy of Deception

(1) India and Diplomacy of Deception

India is concerned about the American hidden Diplomacy of Deception and Newspeak against India. There was some conspiracy that all the three contemporary leaders of the Subcontinent Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Mujibur Rahman and Indira Gandhi were murdered. There is some conspiracy against South Asia that some foreign powers eliminate its leaders. What should be India’s response to the Western policy of deception? Should India support or not support President Bush’s War on Terrorism? Should India sign a defense pact with Iran to protect Iran against US invasions? Should India sign regional security pacts with Iran and Central Asian republics to check NATO’s eastward expansion? Should India hire Northern Alliance soldiers and raise anti-Al Qaeda Militia to hunt Muslim terrorists worldwide?

 

(2) India can help Pax Americana Empire

For a right price, India can help Protestant United States retain leadership of the white Christian world. India can also help United States rule the world for a share in the booty. India can help United States create American Colonial Empire, for a piece of the pie. India can help United States hunt Al Qaeda’s terrorists worldwide. India can provide more manpower than all Muslim nations can provide to the CIA and Pentagon. India can help Protestant Christianity convert Catholics in the Third World.

 

(3) Bush is not Core of Axis of Medieval

India understands United States under Bush Administration would not become the Core of the Global Axis of Medieval. India understands the tug of war going on in the White House. Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy undermining President Bush’s war on global terrorism. Christian Right wants United States to focus on undermining non-Catholic, non-Protestant and non-Islamic societies by harnessing the potential of Muslim Mujahideen terrorists. Christian Right tasted blood of victory in Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Uganda, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Burundi and Angola. Christian Right hopes to conquer the world with their proposed alliance of Catholics, Evangelicals, and Wahhabi Sunni Muslims. Had President Clinton been in power on Sept 11, United States would have done nothing against the Muslim terrorists? If Al Gore becomes the president in 2004, then again under pressure of Christian Right conservatism, Democrat president would scuttle the ongoing war against Islamic terrorism. Christian Right Conservatism would dump Republican presidential ticket in Election 2004. Secretary of State Colin Powell has joined Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy, to secure their support for his future run for Republican nomination in Election 2008.

 

(4) India Soldiers in WW I & WWII

Indian Empire supplied 3,500,000 soldiers to the Allied Power during Second World War and 6,500,000 soldiers during the First World War. What did India get in return? While Syria got Mandate over Lebanon, India was partitioned and Pakistan, Burma, Sri Lanka, Maldives Islands, Mauritius and Diego Garcia were carved out of Indian Empire. Worst still Indian Victoria Cross war veterans not invited on 50-year celebration of Allied Victory in the Second World War in Britain and United States. India would like to be compensated for its contribution towards Allied victories in the First and Second World Wars before it may commit its troops for Allied Powers in the Third World War. But for Indian Army Japan would have conquered China and France remained under German occupation. Aryan Hindu nuclear India, home of 1.1 billion people around one-sixth of the mankind, demands its pound of flesh and its rightful place under the sun.

 

(5) India supported US War on Terrorism

India was one of the first few nations that offered to the United States its lands to wage war on terrorism Afghanistan. But what did India get in return? India has not been invited to play its legitimate anti-terrorism role in Afghanistan. Was it a mistake on part of Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh to have offered India’s support to USA, without first consulting its neighbors, including Pakistan. It goes to the credit of Pakistan that no ruler of Pakistan had allowed United States to use its territory for staging infantry troops. Did India make fundamental strategic error, for legitimizing the entry of white troops in the Subcontinent? Europeans came as traders and sought landing rights to set up trading posts and ultimately ended up ruling India, and they exploited India and partitioned India on the eve of their departure.

 

History may record that Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh was a stupid Foreign Minister that took such a fundamental decision without taking into confidence the nation and the opposition parties. Muslims of Pakistan opposed President Pervez Musharraf’s decision allowing US troops to land in Pakistan. President Musharraf in his televised speech to Pakistan said that just as Prophet Mohammed signed an alliance with Jews, before Mecca had the opportunity to sign pact with Jews, determined the fate of goddess-worshippers of pagan Mecca. The moral of the issue is that if Pakistan wants to destroy Hindu India, just as Prophet Mohammed used alliance with Jews to capture goddess-worshipper’s Mecca, then India should engineer the second partition of Pakistan. India should help create independent Baluchistan and independent Pakhtoonistan, which will give direct sea outlet to Afghanistan and Central Asian Republics. India must ever remain vigilant over the presence of Anglo-Saxon White Troops in brown Aryan Subcontinent. Did someone bribe top Indian diplomats, who formulated the hastily drawn policy offering United States the use of Indian bases for Afghan invasions?

 

If Sunni Muslim Pakistan misuses its anti-terrorism alliance with Christian United States to wage religious war on pagan Hindu India, then Hindu India should align with Shiite Iran to give big blow to Sunni Arab nations. Democratic India should support Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharief to create disturbances and second partition of Pakistan. The 1971 partition of Pakistan resulted in the ouster of military dictator President Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan (March 1969-Dec 1971), and allowed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto become the president (Dec 1971-Aug 1973) and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman became the Prime Minster of India. Similarly, the second partition of Pakistan would oust President General Pervez Musharraf and make Benazir Bhutto the Prime Minister of Sindh-Baluchistan and Nawaz Sharief the Prime Minister of Punjab. India should make serious effort to partition Pakistan.

 

(6) What Counter Measures India can take?

What counter measures India should take to guarantee that NATO troops do not misuse their stay in Afghanistan to create new colonial empires in Asia? The verbal assurance of diplomats does not mean anything, since the West frequently employs the Diplomacy of Deception. This problem is aggravated as Papal Spy Mrs. Sonia Gandhi presides over Congress Party, the main opposition party in India.

 

(7) Vigilant for Religious right Conspiracy

Hindu India should be vigilant of the Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. Pope John Paul II could be conspiring to cause secession of Christian-majority states of Northeast India, just as Pope caused the secession of Catholic Ireland from United Kingdom in 1919. What counter measures India could take to blunt the political offensive of the Vatican? Hindu India could follow China’s lead and de-recognize Papacy and ban the involvement of the Pontiff and the Vatican in the management of the Church property, recruitment, promotion and supervision of Catholic clergy. India could break diplomatic ties with the Vatican. India could contribute campaign donations to influence general elections in Italy to elect anti-Papacy candidates. India could support the restoration of Monarchy in Italy, the House of Savoy, who unified Italy and made Popes the prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929 AD. India could promote half-Italian Rahul Gandhi or Priyanka Gandhi as the Prime Minister of Italy. India could launch worldwide movement demanding the direct elections of the Pontiff, Cardinals, Archbishops and Bishops by the Catholic laity worldwide. India could support Americanism movement in United States demanding that all Catholic Churches in the United States governed by American church leaders without any involvement of the Vatican. India could demand the decolonization of Papal Colonial Empire of Churches. Vatican is a sovereign political entity, so it is possible that in the War of Religions, other nation states may declare war on the Vatican. India could also support Cambodian government for the prosecution of Catholic Clergy for their direct role in the genocide of Buddhists in Cambodia and Laos.

 

(8) India Japan Anti-Axis of Medieval

The geo-politics of Russia, India and Japan influences their common approach to Axis of Medieval. Is high time that Japan pursues an independent foreign policy, not dependent on continued U.S. security umbrella? India can provide Japan the protection of Indian nuclear umbrella to deter threats of Chinese nuclear strikes on Japan. Japan should help rebuild Buddhist pagodas and temples in North Korea and help train Buddhist monks. India should not remain non-involved during America’s invasions of Iraq. India and Iran should immediately sign Defense Pact at the very outset of the outbreak of hostilities in the US-Iraq War. India should engineer the creation of the independent Kurdistan, carved out of the Kurd-majority region of Iraq. India should also encourage the secession of the Shiite Arabs to establish Shiite Iraq. However, India should vehemently oppose any attempt to impose Wahhabi fundamentalist regime in Iraq. If forced choose between Iraq and Iran, India would join the side of Iran, because of common Aryan heritage. Besides Iran has a very large coast line bordering the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea.

 

(9) India supports Protestants against Pope

Hindu India would enter the Third World War on the side of pro-women Protestant Religious Right Nationalists, who fear Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy.

 

(10) India supports Petro-Colonialism

India supports Petro-Colonialism more than War on Islamic terrorism and thereby is not offended by Diplomacy of Deception that camouflaged the Petro-Imperialism under war on terror. US policy to wage wars on global terrorism was merely an exercise in the Diplomacy of Deception to establish Petro-Colonialism in Afghanistan and Iraq and Central Asia. Protestant President George W. Bush’s declared War on global terrorism, should foil the machinations of the Catholic Right Conservative Conspiracy otherwise the War on terror would end up like President Bill Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” policy, merely a Policy of Deception. United States wanted to prosecute Northern Alliance supreme General Abdul Rashid Dostum, the person who secured victory over Taliban in Afghanistan. Rather than prosecuting Taliban terrorists, United States and United Nations may prosecute General Abdul Rashid Dostum for his crime of mistreating terrorists.

 

(11) India supports Protestants

Hindu India understands that both Protestants and Catholics engage in Diplomacy of Deception when they applaud Protestant-Catholic Monotheism front. American Protestants fear Catholic Religious Right Conservative conspiracy, despite public protestations to the contrary. The roots of American politics lie in the ongoing conflicts between WASPs and Irish and East European Catholics from as early as 1850 to present day. The WASPs of United States find Hindu India a natural ally in ongoing Neo-Counter Reformation Wars between Catholic and Protestant Christians worldwide. Protestant Christianity and Hinduism natural Civilization’s ally in the ongoing War of Religions, as they face a common enemy, Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy.

 

Hindu India does not believe that Protestant Religious Right would undermine the national security of the Protestant United States by sabotaging the war on Islamic terrorism, just to promote the proselytizing interests of the Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. Only god can save America if WASPs are willing to undermine the long-term national interests of the Protestant Civilization, by refusing to teach the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 aggression a historic lesson.

 

(12) Indian soldiers for Hire

India can provide soldiers for hire. India can provide Peacekeeping Process Outsourcing services for a fee payable as percentage of total oil output. India can create, operate and manage oil colonies on behalf of Pax Americana as Indian Empire did for Pax-Britannia. However, if WASPs scared to shed their blood in wars, then Hindu India offers to fight their war against Islamic terrorism using Indian soldiers for a fee. Hindu India renews its offer to the United States as follows: For a right price, India can help Protestant United States retain leadership of the white Christian world. India can also help United States rule the world for a share in the booty. India can help United States create American Colonial Empire, for a piece of the pie. India can help United States hunt Al Qaeda’s terrorists worldwide. India can provide more manpower than all Muslim nations can provide to the CIA and Pentagon. India can help Protestant Christianity convert Catholics in the Third World.

 

(13) India Created British Empire

Indian soldiers created British Empire. The salary of all British officers and soldiers stationed worldwide, numbering around 80,000 paid by Indian Empire from Delhi. India supplied 3,500,00 troops to Allied Forces in the Second World War and 6,500,000 troops in the First World War. India can supply around 10,000,000 troops in the Third World War to whichever side it decides to support. India would not support the Axis of Medieval. United States under Bush Administration would never become the Core of the Axis of Medieval. However if President Bush looses the Election 2004, then the outcome could be catastrophic and United States may abandon its war on Islamic terrorism. Hindu nuclear India is ready to play its destined role as the Second Super Power of the world in partnership with Protestant Super Power United States.

 

(14) Global Power India helps Pax Americana

Nuclear India is the home of one-sixth of the mankind, the 1.1 billion people. India is the birthplace of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism the leading world religions. India had been the richest nation in the world throughout history of the mankind before 1750. India produced one fourth of the world’s manufactured output in 1750, one-fifth in 1800 and one-sixth in 1830. It is only when India came under British crown in 1857 that India’s share fell precipitously. England is responsible for India’s poverty.

 

INDIAN CIVILIZATION’S SHARE OF WORLD MANUFACTURING OUTPUT (1750-1980): In 1750 India accounted for 24.5%, China for 32.8%, West for 18.2%, Orthodoxy for 5.0% and Japan for 3.8% of the worlds manufacturing output. In 1800, India accounted for 19.7%, China for 33.3%, West for 23.3%, Russia for 5.6% and Japan for 3.5%. In 1830, India accounted for 17.6%, China for 19.7%, West for 31.1% and Japan 2.8%. In 1860, India accounted for 8.6%, China for 19.7%, West for 53.7%, Russia 7.0% and Japan for 2.6%. (Paul Bairoch, International Industrialization Levels from 1750 to 1980, Journal of European Economic History, (fall 1982), 269-334. India’s share of the world manufacturing output was in 1750 (24.5%), 1800 (19.7%), 1830 (17.6%), and in 1860 (8.6%).

 

The latest World Bank’s Report ranks Indian economy in terms of GDP as the fourth largest economy of the world. The top four economies of the world are United States, China, Japan, and India. Russia, Britain, and France accept India’s right to be the Permanent Member of the UN Security Council.

 

Nuclear India has come of age, and now proudly demands its rightful place under the sun. India is willing to protect its Civilization’s rights with arms if necessary. India is ready to compete with and fight if necessary with any world power on a level playing ground. Hindu India is afraid of no power, no religion and no civilization. Hindu India demands its fair and rightful place under the sun and non-interference in its internal affairs.

 

(15) India to defeat Barbarian Terrorism

Hindu India does not want to proselytize and convert other races to Hinduism, and thereby Hindu India would not allow religious conversion of Hindus. India warns to all those who care to listen, remember do not be arrogant. All those religions that expanded by sword could also die by the sword if they continue religious conversions. Barbarians may conquer the civilization, but ultimately Civilizations reorganizes and modifies military technology to defeat the barbarian invaders and reclaim the lost lands and resurrects the old religion and culture. Hindus do not want to convert others, nor they want to be converted. Let Hindu India live in peace.

 

(16) Allies of India in Clash of Religions

What would be the likely coalition in the War of World Religions? It is likely that anti-women Catholic Conservatism and anti-women Islamic Fundamentalism would be one side of the battle lines. Opposing this Axis of medieval would be pro-Women Protestants, pro-women Hindus and Buddhists. The Communists would oppose Hindus and Buddhists and support Catholics. Jews would most likely be against Catholics and Muslims, and join the war along side Protestants, Hindus and Buddhists. Shiite Iran and Mystic Muslims would enter the war against Sunni Wahhabi fundamentalists. Mystic Muslims would join the war alongside Hindus. Aryan Shiite Iran would join alongside Aryan India.

 

(17) Allies of India in Clash of Races

What would be the likely coalition in the Global Clash of Races? The world would be divided in four major races, White, Yellow, Brown and Black. Brown and Yellow races are united by common Hindu and Buddhist religions. Hispanic Americans, Mestizos consider themselves as belonging to brown race. Brown race solidarity unites people of South Asia, with Southeast Asia, Central America, Latin America and Native Americans. Brown race has overtaken yellow race in population. The Brown race had been the dominant race in the ancient world. The Pharaoh’s Egypt, ancient Greeks, ancient Romans, Persians, Indians, Inca, Maya and Aztec Indians all belonged to brown race. Brown race would become the dominant race in the world in 22nd Century. Hispanic America will soon come under the domination of brown Mestizos and brown Inca Indians. Islamic world would come under the domination of brown Aryan Pakistan. Non-white brown Arabs of mixed Arab and Indian heritage and Muslims of the subcontinent would overtake White Arab Muslims and takeover the leadership of Islam worldwide. Brown Catholics outnumber white Catholics. It is likely that brown Catholics would takeover the leadership of Roman Catholic Church in near future. Brown race, the people of mixed Indian and black rave would dominate the continent of Africa and undermine the dominance of white race in Africa. Brown race shall rule the world some day, because whoever you mix any two races: white & yellow, white& brown, white & black, yellow & brown; the resulting offspring of the mixed marriage would belong to the brown race that would also look somewhat like Indians. In this manner too, Indian race is the final destination of all races of the world. Some day all races of all colors would become the Indian race of brown color. Would all nations also become Indian some day? This simple fact guarantees that India, Indians, Indian race, Indian culture and Hindu religion would never die.

 

(18) Fundamentalism is Core of Terrorism

The author wants to explain to the ruling elite of the world powers in the terminology of Geo-Politics that religious fundamentalism is the core of the global terrorism, and the Core of the Axis of Medieval. The purpose of the Axis of Medieval is to put the clock back, and make 21st Century the beginning of a New Dark Age. Unless world leaders take precautionary steps, the growing nexus of the Cocaine, Crime, Corruption and Conservatism, threatens to engulf the world in a New Dark Age, just as the fundamentalism of Christian Emperor Theodosius I destroyed the Roman Civilization, and the Dark Age descended over Christian Europe, which lasted over 1,000 years. The destruction of the American Civilization becomes a distinct possibility, whenever in future an agent of the religious Ultra-conservatism succeeds in occupying the Oval Office. It happened in Roman Empire, Soviet Empire, and it can also happen in the United States. Just as predator land crawling snakehead fish endangers other species of fish in the pond, similarly predator land-crawling anti-woman fundamentalist cults presents mortal danger to the human race.

 

 

15(7) USA Murders Democracies

(1) CIA Covert Operations in Iran

The CIA involved in coup to topple Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. The Iranian Coup of 1953 was the first successful coup of the CIA's Golden Age. The success of the Iranian coup emboldened CIA to play effective role in covert operations especially in Guatemala, Chile, El Salvador, Panama, Greece, Vietnam, and Pakistan. America murdered democracies in the third world to bring them under the influence of the United States. Secretary Albright acknowledged American errors in past dealings with Iran, including the CIA-led coup in 1953. The 1953 Coup in Iran became a reality on the streets of Tehran, due to the leadership of Ayatollah Abo'l Qasem Kashani and Ayatollah Sayyed Mohammed Behbehani.

 

The Islamic clerics hired by CIA, who led the Coup of 1953, also led the 1979 Coup against Shah of Iran, aided by the same CIA. It would be nice if United States also recognizes the involvement of the CIA in overthrowing the monarchy of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, which Iranian clerics celebrate as revolution of 1979. United States should release more information on the role of the CIA in the 1979 coup against Shah of Iran. United States brought down Aryan leader Shah of Iran, because he promoted Persian imperial heritage, and challenged the leadership of Semite Saudi Arabia in the Islamic world. Judeo Christian CIA brought down the Aryan Shah to promote the leadership of Semite Saudis over Islamic oil fields. United States and CIA are responsible for the death of democracy throughout the world, especially, Iran, Guatemala, Chile, El Salvador, Panama, Greece, South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Pakistan, Afghanistan, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Congo.

 

(2) CIA installed Pervez Musharraf

For a nation that honors democracy and freedom, the United States has a nasty habit of embracing foreign dictators when they seem to serve short-term American interests and long-term Christian proselytizing interests. It is one of the least appealing traits of American foreign policy. Like their predecessors, President Bush and is Secretary Colin Powell falling for the illusion that tyrants make great allies.

 

It is diplomacy of deception for America to say that only dictator Pervez Musharraf could have allowed United States bases to attack Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. On the contrary, President Clinton helped overthrow the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharief, because he had offered to United States its co-operation to arrest Osama bin Laden. Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharief would have helped, may be far better, to destroy Taliban and Al Qaeda.

 

The blank checks Washington wrote to Gen. Zia ul-Haq of Pakistan in 1980’s helped nurture what later became Al Qaeda. Decades of misguided American support for Gen. Suharto in Indonesia and Mobutu Sese Seko Zaire, now Congo, left both countries a legacy of debt, violent ethnic conflict and weak institutions. Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines was another painful embarrassment.

 

(3) CIA Menace to Democracy in 3rd World

United States used military coups, and secret services to overthrow democratically elected regimes in Pakistan, Greece, Burma, South Korea, Chile, Congo, Rwanda, and Burundi. United States is the greatest enemy of Freedom and Democracy in the Third World. India, Russia and France should join forces to neutralize CIA, to neutralize its capability to engineer military coups in the Third World.

 

United States has murdered more democracies in the post-Second World War era, than any other nation. Is United States the menace to the Freedom and Democracies of the world? Why did CIA and Pentagon periodically recommend the White House to give Judas Kiss of Death to the struggling democracies of the world? What role nuclear India and nuclear Russia could play to protect Freedom and Democracy in the world? It can be argued that Democratic United States that safeguards Freedom for US citizens, murdered overseas democracies to promote Christianizing of Orthodox, Buddhist and Hindu civilizations. United States has historically abandoned its democratic political ideals to pursue its Christian agenda in the Clash of Civilizations and Wars of Religions. For imposing Catholicism and Protestantism over Orthodox, Buddhist, Hindu, pagan and animist civilizations, United States and CIA has repeatedly engineered military coups to destroy peaceful civilizations and democratically elected governments.

 

The United States policy of forced relocation of Native American tribes thousands of miles away from their ancestral lands allowed White Christians loot the property of Red Indians. The policy of forced relocations of the Natives copied by Christian President Diem of South Vietnam, Christian Tutsi military coup leaders in Burundi, Christian Khmer Rouge militia in Cambodia, and Christian Communists in Laos. The forced relocation in United States, South Vietnam, Burundi, Cambodia, and Laos allowed the ruling Christians loot the lands, property, cattle and women of the subjugated non-Christian nationalities. These are selected instances of Crimes against Humanity and Crimes of Genocide perpetrated by dominant Christian rulers in USA, South Vietnam, Burundi, Cambodia, Laos and South Korea against native non-Christian subjects. Spanish, Portuguese, Afrikaans, Dutch and German colonialists encouraged inter-marriages with subjugated nations, Anglo-Saxons especially British and Americans depopulated the continents of North America, Australia and New Zealand, even when they suffered severe labor shortages. Apartheid in United States until 1965 was no less malignant than the Apartheid in South Africa, before the accession of Mandela. Between 1840 and 1900, United States annihilated Native Americans by killing Bison the staple food for the Indians. The wide distribution of plague-infected blankets devastated Indians. State of California as late as 1905, advertised for Indian Scalps, and popular Christian’s sport and profession was to shoot Indians for scalp to sell them to State of California for $ 5 per Indian head. Nuclear Russia led by President Vladimir Putin, and nuclear India led by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee cannot allow it to continue.

(4) Coups-Crime-Cocaine-Communism-Catholicism Nexus

CATHOLIC-COMMUNIST NEXUS: Prostitute-Philosopher Karl Marx hired by the Catholics and Elders of Zion to produce the secular concoction, which could allow Bolshevik Jews and Catholics destroy Russian Aristocracy, Orthodoxy and loot the property of Russians. Catholic Joseph Stalin murdered more Orthodox Russians than died in the First and Second World Wars, even when he had consolidated his political power and no opposition to his political rule existed. Catholic Joseph Stalin massacred Orthodox Russians to implement the secret agenda of Karl Marx revealed in the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. Catholic Mao Zedong murdered 60 million Chinese Buddhists to implement the secret iconoclast religious agenda of Karl Marx partly revealed in, "the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion." Catholic Pol Pot of Khmer Rouge murdered 3 million Buddhist Cambodians to impose Christianizing of Cambodia. Hindu Monarchy and Royal Family of Laos murdered to impose Christianity over Laos. The Catholic Communists destroyed the Orthodox Monarchy of Emperor Haile Selaisie that had rule Ethiopia. Catholics control Global Drug Cartels and global Organized Crime and Italian Mafia. Communists in Golden Triangle monopolize Asian Drug Cartels. The Populist Manifesto seeks to organize Hindu and Buddhist civilizations to develop the common civilization’s front against Catholicism, Communism, Organized Crime, and Cocaine Opium Drug Cartels. Western Christendom has used military coups to overthrow popular national leaders, namely, Patrice Lumumba of Congo, Allende of Chile, Peron of Argentina, and Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief of Pakistan. The CIA overthrew the Shah of Iran, King Faisal of Iraq, King Idris of Algeria, Emperor Haile Selaisie of Ethiopia, Prince Sihanouk of Cambodia, King of Laos, and Buddhist Empress of Vietnam. Populism seeks to develop a new political front worldwide.

(5) Burundi & Rwanda

United States murdered the democracy in Burundi. United States militarily supported Christian Tutsi Tribes that account for 15 percent of Burundi population, to assassinate the elected President and to force the 85 percent pagan Hutu Burundian population into servitude. United States and CIA arranged the assassination of Melchior Ndadaye the Burundi has first directly elected President, by free and fair elections. The bulk of Burundi's Hutu casualties occurred in 1993. The Burundi's first democratically elected leader Melchior Ndadaye a Hutu, was assassinated in a military Coup by Christian officers of Burundi's notorious Christian Tutsi-dominated Army in 1993. The Christian Tutsi led military Coup approved by NATO and Christian Church, destroyed democracy in Burundi and threatens genocide of pagan Burundians. The patriotic Hutu Burundians opposed military coup engineered by Christian Tutsi military leaders. The Christian Tutsi Army supported by Western powers and United States carried out massive reprisal killing that may result in the genocide of Pagan Hutu civilization. Christian Tutsi Army is determined to depopulate pagan Hutu race to impose Christianity over Rwanda and Burundi. United States murdered the democracy in Burundi to impose Christian rule over predominant Pagan Animist Hutu population that worship ancient Pharaoh's Gods and Goddess. The pagan animist religion of Burundians and Rwandans is a form of Hinduism.

 

(6) Congo

United States and CIA engineered the overthrow and assassination of Patrick Lumumba the charismatic freedom fighter and great Non-aligned Leader of Congo in early 1960's.

(7) Chile

United States and CIA engineered the overthrow and assassination of President Allende and installed mass murderer General Augusto Pinochet as President of Chile. The Judge Garzon, in Madrid, Spain is pursuing Pinochet and issued a warrant for the arrest of Pinochet to bring the general to trial in Spain for alleged human-rights abuses during general's 1973-90 dictatorship.

(8) Greece

NATO and CIA engineered the military coup in Greece in 60's to undermine the Greek Orthodox Church in Greece. NATO supported military leaders undermined the economic and military power of Greece, allowing Turkey to dominate Greece. Vatican engineered military coup allowed Catholics to undermine the military, economic, political, spiritual power of the only Orthodox member of NATO.

(9) Burma

United States and CIA engineered the Christian Military officer led military coup in Burma to overthrow in early 1960's, the Buddhist Government of U Nu. The Christian military Coup sought to protect Christian Shan Opium-Heroin Cartels. The Christian military Coup provided a secular cover to destroy the power base of powerful Buddhist monks and pagodas and to enhance the political role of Christian Churches in the Burmese polity. The Christian military coup protects the Christian monopoly over Golden Triangle Drug trade, Opium-Heroin production that undermines the economic base of Buddhists and enriches Christians providing the gold for the forced Christianizing of predominantly Buddhist Burma.

(10) Cambodia & Laos

United States engineered the military Coup that deposed the democratic government in Cambodia, and deposed Prince Sihanouk, the scion of Cambodian monarchy, primarily to destabilize Hindu-Buddhist culture and to enforce Christianity over Hindu-Buddhist Cambodia. Christian Khmer Rouge militia massacred 2 million Buddhists in Cambodia.

 

United States is responsible for the destruction of Hindu-Buddhist Monarchy in Laos. United States engineered the destruction of Laotian Hindu civilization to enforce Christianizing of Laos at gunpoint. Secretary Henry Kissinger and Chairman Mao Zedong conspired to install Christian Khmer Rouge into power in Cambodia and to enforce Western media silence while Khmer Rouge continued their genocidal spree in Cambodia. Western media broke the news after 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists had died at the hands of cannibal Khmer Rouge. Similar, genocide took place in Laos. The present government of Cambodia should put on trial every member and supporter of Khmer Rouge for murders of Buddhists under common law, unless they can convincingly prove that they did not participate in the massacre. Every member of Khmer Rouge Militia is guilty of multiple murders unless he can prove otherwise. It would be a travesty of justice, if even a single Khmer Rouge murderer escapes death sentence.

(11) South Vietnam

Vietnam War was a War of Religions, the Catholic war on Buddhist-Hindu Vietnam, and it was not a war of Capitalism and Democracy against Communism. United States entered Vietnam War, not for promoting national interests of United States, but for promoting the religious interests of the Vatican. Catholic President John F. Kennedy sought to Christianize South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia by means of Vietnam War. United States was at war against Hinduism and Buddhism in Vietnam. United States did not fight Vietnam War to check Chinese expansionism and to avoid the Domino fall-out. United States invaded Philippines to impose Christianity over Philippines at the beginning of the 20th Century that caused more than 400,000 Filipino deaths. Similarly, United States caused blood bath in Vietnam to Christianize Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia that had been under influence of Hindu Indian civilization for more than 2000 years. After engineering Christian-led military coup in Buddhist Burma in 1962, United States sought to Christianize Greater Indian states of Vietnam Laos and Cambodia by entering Vietnam War. Catholic Archbishop Ngo Dinh Thuc, Archbishop of Hue of Vietnam, the elder brother of President Diem could be responsible for the subsequent blood bath in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.

 

Champa Kingdom, the present day South Vietnam, had historically been a part of Hindu Indian civilization. North Vietnam expelled one million Christians, who became refugees in South Vietnam. United States undermined Buddhist leadership in South Vietnam to implant Christian President Diem, to cause massacre of Buddhists in South Vietnam and to destroy Buddhist Temples as a part of conspiracy to Christianize South Vietnam. The enforced resettlement of Buddhists in selected reservations intended to transfer the Buddhist properties to Christians, and destroy Buddhist social fabric, paving the way for Christianizing of South Vietnam at gunpoint.

(12) Indonesia

United States engineered the military coup in Indonesia to overthrow the government of Charismatic leader Sukarno. Sukarno's wife was a Hindu from Bali Islands and Sukarno believed in creating a synthesis of Hindu and Islamic civilizations. United States encouraged Gen. Suharto to massacre 500,000 Chinese Buddhists, to impose Christianity over wealthy Buddhist Chinese community in Indonesia. It is no wonder that no Christian and Western Media demanded War Crime Trials for General Suharto for the army led massacre of 500,000 Chinese Buddhists in 1965. Suharto murdered Chinese Buddhists to warn them convert to Christianity. It is high time that in the new Millennium World War Crime Tribunal prosecute Gen. Suharto and other military leaders for the Crime of Genocide. When genocide promotes Christianizing, and then it is neither a War Crime nor a Crime against Humanity in the eyes of the West dominated War Crimes Tribunal. India would welcome that Chinese national courts establish special tribunal to arrest and prosecute leading Indonesian politicians and military for genocide of Buddhist Chinese in Indonesia in 1965. Indonesian government should hand over to China around 1000 leading Indonesian politicians and top military leaders for trial for genocide of 500,000 Buddhist Chinese in 1965 in Indonesia. India fully supports that Indonesia-born Chinese Buddhist should become the President of Indonesia and Chief of Indonesian Armed forces. The massacre of Chinese Buddhists forced the wealthy Chinese businessmen to convert to Christianity in Indonesia immediately after 1965.

(13) Pakistan

President Jimmy Carter, the arch representative of the Christian Religious Right Conspiracy destroyed the liberal, secular, modern social infrastructure in Iran and Pakistan. President Carter ordered the CIA to overthrow the benevolent regime of Shah of Iran, and scuttled all democratic alternatives in Iran and imposed the fundamentalist regime of Ayatollah Khomeini. President Carter overthrew the democratically elected government of secular, liberal Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and replaced it by arch fundamentalist regime of General Zia Ul Haq who imposed Islamic Shariah throughout Pakistan as dictated by President Carter. President Carter was the archenemy of modern secular Islamic societies.

 

United States and CIA is directly responsible for the military Coups that brought General Ayub Khan, General Zia Ul Haq into power in Pakistan, by overthrowing democratically elected popular governments in Pakistan. Civilized Pakistan could not develop democratic traditions due to the machinations of United States and CIA. United States engineered the overthrow of the democratically elected regime of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, because it feared the strong India-Pakistan military axis developing under the leadership of Atal Behari Vajpayee and Nawaj Sharief. United States CIA and Chinese Secret Services toppled the democratically elected regime of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief.

(14) Shah of Iran

United States imposed CIA Agent Ayatollah Khomeini as the fundamentalist ruler of Iran to destroy modernist, reformist, liberal, and progressive Sufi-Shiite Islamic civilization. Persia under Shah of Iran was the heaven in the Islamic world. United States and Vatican were concerned that Sufi-Zoroastrian Persia under Shah of Iran would snatch from Sunnis the leadership of Islamic world. Sufis believe in the direct communion with Allah, without the intermediacy of Mullahs or Bishops. Persian civilization had always been the greatest civilization of the world. Benevolent rule of Shah of Iran, modern Persian society, resurgent Sufis, and revived Zoroastrians threatened the civilization’s domination of Christianity. Vatican feared that liberal modern Persian society, flushed with oil-wealth, and resurgent Sufis would overthrow Sunni preponderance, and over the period Sufi-Zoroastrian Persian Civilization would undermine Western Christendom's claim for excellence. Vatican feared that West Europeans became civilized only after fifth Century, and is no match to the revived Sufi-Zoroastrian Persian civilizations. United States and Vatican conspired to promote illiterate fanatic fundamentalist anti-women Muslims as the leaders of Islam, to discredit Islam and Islamic civilization by their association with Islam. The association of liberal Sufi-Zoroastrian Shah with Islam threatened to empower Islam as the rising civilization. United States and Vatican imposed illiterate fundamentalist leadership of Islam hoping it would present the decadent image of Islam in the world. With the demise of Shah of Iran, Sufis suffered a severe blow.

 

Shah of Iran was the most loyal military ally of the United States. Why did CIA engineer the downfall of Shah of Iran? Why did CIA scuttle the government of the democratically elected President Shahpur Bakhtiar? Why did CIA veto the Iranian Army General request to lead Persia after Shah? Why CIA imposed fanatic Ayatollah Khomeini as totalitarian ruler of Iran?

 

Emperor Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, Shah of Iran was the greatest Muslim ruler of this Millennium. Islamic world is yet to have a leader, who could be greater than Shah of Iran. Iran was the architect of Oil Price rise and OPEC. Indians are ashamed that stupid illiterate Indira Gandhi did not give asylum to Shah of Iran. Shah of Iran was willing to merge with India and form a new Federation. Indians have held greatest regards for great Persian Civilization. Under the leadership of Shah of Iran, Persia-Hind Confederacy would have recreated glory of the ancient Persian Empire. India and Russia should join forces to reinstall the son of Shah of Iran as the future ruler of Iran. India should be willing to deploy Indian Army to install the Junior Shah as the Emperor of Iran. India should sign a long-term Defense Pact with Iran.

 

In dealing with Iran today, it is important that Americans do not feel too guilty about the American role in the 1953 coup. The CIA was deeply involved in planning the 1953 coup in Iran. Ayatollahs Abo'l Qasem Kashani and Sayyed Mohammed Behbehani, clerics beholden to no foreigner, made the coup against Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, made the coup a reality on the streets of Iran. The events of 1953 have never been a major part of the Islamic revolution's symbolism.

 

The coup against Iranian Prime Minister Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953 was the first successful coup of the CIA's Golden Age. The success of CIA's operations in Iran in 1953, led to CIA's direct involvement in the covert operations and espionage in Guatemala, Chile, El Salvador, Panama, Greece, Vietnam, South Korea, and Pakistan.

(15) South Korea

Pentagon engineered the military coup in 1960's led by Christian military leaders to overthrow the democratically elected Buddhist government of South Korea, expedite the Christianizing of South Korea. Christians accounted fore 3 percent of South Korean population in 1950s. Christians accounted for more than 50 percent of population of South Korea in 1985. Christians account for more than 50% of officers in South Korean Armed forces. The main objective of US troops is not to contain Communism's threat. The US troops were instrumental in the Christianizing of Korean Buddhist women by the twin route of prostitution around military camps and marriages with Yankee soldiers. Christian soldiers of US Army have transformed Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, South Korea and Thailand the nation of prostitutes and Child prostitutes. Buddhist prostitutes have become easy targets for Christian Evangelists. India should support Buddhist monks and promote Buddhist politicians in South Korea.

 

(16) Argentina

On March 24 1976, United States encouraged Argentina’s military to oust the democratically elected government of popular Isabella Martinez de Peron, to establish a repressive dictatorship that remained in power until 1983.

 

(17) Hugo Chavez of Venezuela

If the United States and its self-described democrats continue to destabilize the elected Presidency of Hugo Chavez, who has the mandate to govern till 2007, then Venezuela may face civil wars like its neighbor Colombia. The CIA agents in Venezuela calling for US military intervention in Venezuela, so that the fifth largest producer of oil in the world may become a satellite of the United States. Hug Chavez is not threatening to cut oil supplies to the United States. Why United States doesn’t respect Venezuela the way it respects Saudi Arabia? Hugo Chavez is the elected president of Venezuela, until his terms ends in 2007. Any military intervention or foreign inspired military coup could trigger armed clashes. Neither United States nor Europeans have any right to nudge him out, and indeed should speak up and condemn the loose calls in Venezuela for army intervention.

 

The Organization of American States (OAS) led by Cesar Gaviria representing the international community as a negotiator between two sides has publicly laid much of blame for the crisis on President Chavez in an apparent shove to get him to resign or call early elections. What Latin America needs is stability and respect for electoral office, not what could be interpreted as a bad signal from Organization of American states to people across Latin America: If you think that your president is illegitimate, take to the streets and call for a coup, and then the Organization of American States will arrange a nice compromise. Make no mistake: this is not about Venezuela alone. The larger issue of elected leaders who go wrong has come up in Pakistan, Peru and the Philippines. America encouraged the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief by military coup led by its agent General Pervez Musharraf. The democratically elected President in the Philippines was also overthrown by the violent mob and Catholic Church led by Cardinal Sin. Public polls show that President Hugo Chavez still has the support of more than one-third of the electorate and it’s likely that he would win new elections if they were forced on him, unless the CIA injects bribe money in Venezuela during elections, as it injected $35 million in Yugoslav elections to oust Slobadan Milosevic. The risk of forcibly removing Hugo Chavez immediately is very high and the poor Venezuelans who passionately love him will riot and bring Venezuela down. The risk of violence in the aftermath of military coup in Venezuela is so high that Pentagon may have to get involved to protect oil supply to the United States. Popular president Hugo Chavez is like the Colombia’s populist leader Jorge Caitan who was assassinated in 1948 by the oligarchs. The oligarchs of Colombia never dreamt that Colombia would still be in civil war 54 years later. United States should realize that it is easy to organize the military coups, but once the civil war starts no body could be sure how it would end. United States could set up a destabilizing precedent if it continues to misuse the office of the Organization of American States and the Pentagon’s personal ties with the top Venezuelan military leadership to encourage army officers leave the barracks to launch the military coup against Hugo Chavez. If United States believes that in democracy people have the right to demonstrate and make call for military coups whenever they think their democratically elected Presidents are illegitimate, then history would record democratic United States as the greatest menace to the democracies and antithesis to the concept of democracy and freedom. 

 

15(8) Empires of 21st Century

The colonial empires, military empires, and religious empires would stage a comeback during 21st Century. Leading military powers would wage regional wars to carve out colonial empires. India has inherited the patrimony of the British Empire. Indian rupee zone as late as 1966 included Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, Kuwait and Trucial States. In case Britain gives up its historical role in Commonwealth, then India should reorganize Commonwealth under India's leadership. India has inherited British Indian legacy in the Persian Gulf, which was an Indian like during Indian Empire. This is the argument author would make in this section.

(1) British Indian Empire

Indian Army created British Empire. Britain failed to use Indian Army troops to fight United States in the Wars of Independence, when 13 Colonies declared Independence. Indian Army would have defeated United States Army. Britain chose to lose its territories in North America, instead of using Indian Army to fight United States, fearing that Indian troops would join forces with American Red Indians. Indian Empire provided 1,300,000 soldiers to Allied Forces in the First World War. Indian Empire provided 3,500,000 soldiers to Allied Forces in the Second World War. Without the valor of 3.5 million strong soldiers of Indian Empire, the victory of Allied Forces against Germany was in doubt. Britain succeeded in partitioning Indian into Burma, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Pakistan and India. Otherwise, United India would have emerged as the Super Power after the Second World War. Had Indian Naval Mutiny of 1945 not sabotaged by Mahatma Gandhi, United India would have become independent in 1945, whose frontiers would include Pakistan, Nepal, Tibet, Burma, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Yemen, Oman, Trucial States, Kuwait, and Hong Kong. Navy of Indian Empire controlled the subcontinent, Persian Gulf, Aden, and Hong Kong. Mahatma Gandhi earned the title of most loyal agent of British Empire by successfully sabotaging the Indian Naval Mutiny of 1945. It should be noted that in 1750, India accounted for the one-fourth 24.7 percent of world's total manufactured goods. Historically India meant one-fourth of the world in economic assets. India seeks to capture one-fourth of the world trade and increase its share of GNP to 25 percent of the world GNP. The revolution in Information technology allows Indians to dominate the global economy in the Information Age. The revolution in the Precision Guided Munitions and anti-ship cruise missiles allows India and China destroy 95 percent of civilian merchant marine tonnage. It shall destroy the global ocean based trade. The maritime trade would allow India, China and Russia control the transport of cargo by transcontinental railways in the Euro-Asian-African continent. In the absence of maritime trade and rerouting of global trade cargoes by continental railways, the Indian rupee would appreciate 5,000% to acquire parity with US dollar. As late as 1966, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Trucial States, Oman and Yemen kept in Indian Rupee foreign exchange reserves. Indian Rupee was the legal tender in these nations. There were three international foreign currencies in the world in 1966, Yankee Dollar, British Pound Sterling, and Indian Rupee. India in 1966 devalued Indian currency by 35 percent without consulting the members of Indian Currency Zone. The devaluation of Indian currency, ordered by stupid, illiterate Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1966 forced Arab nations of Indian Currency Zone to print their own national currencies and to peg their currencies to US Dollar.

(2) Commonwealth Super Power

Had Britain agreed to share influence with India in Commonwealth, then Commonwealth would have replaced United States as the dominant Super Power of the world after the Second World War. India as the leader of Commonwealth would have overtaken United States as the dominant super Power of the world after 1945. Even in 2000, whenever the Commonwealth comprising India, Britain, Australia and Canada agree to form a new military alliance, the Commonwealth Pact would overtake NATO, OAS, United Europe, and USA as the dominant Super Power of the world before 2001.

(3) India-USA Defense Pact

United States should realize that Western Europe is militarily vulnerable. USA is a Geopolitical Lion, and as lion do not enhance its power by aligning with sheep and cow and jackals. United States India Defense Pact is good enough to bring the world under Pax Americana. The NATO bombing of Kosovo exposed the strategic vulnerability of Western European Armies. On a level playing ground, on one-to-one War, without any involvement of USA, many Asian powers including India of China could militarily defeat, conquer, and colonize Italy, Spain, Portugal, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Austria and Switzerland, one nation at a time. United States-India Defense Pact would allow United States disband NATO, OAS, and NAFTA and depend on Indian military strength to promote Pax Americana worldwide. Indian Army built British Empire, and it has the military capability to built Pax Americana, for a fee, and for a share of the American Empire.

(4) India-Russia Civilization’s Pact

It would not be in national interests of the United States to push English-speaking Hindu India, into military alliance with President Putin led Russia. Once Russia realizes that the strength of the United States lies in its open immigration policy, which allows USA to attract the best brains of the world. Russia should allow the immigration of 20 million educated Indian to develop Eastern Siberia, which has become habitable due to global warming. Massive Indian emigration to Siberia and Russia has the potential of developing Russia into economic, scientific, technological, military and religious Super Power within 5 years. India-Russia Union would overtake NAFTA, EU, NATO, and OAS in near future. Whenever Russia decides to overtake United States it should invite 20 millions Indians to Russia and Siberia. The mass-intermarriages of white Russians with brown Aryan Indians would allow Slav Civilization and Eastern Christianity overtake United States and Western Christendom before 2010. Greek Orthodoxy would overtake Catholic and Protestant Churches and Christian souls in Asia and Africa, by electing an Indian Christian as the Grand Patriarch of Orthodox Christianity worldwide. Russian Jews are loyal to United States, and the Indians should replace Jews in modern Russia under Vladimir Putin. India should discontinue the use of English as medium of educational instruction as well as Official Language. India should promote Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish and French as preferred foreign languages for educational instruction.

 

15(9) US Seeks Colonial Empire

(1) Rise of New American Colonial Empire

The power distribution between European Union and United States is a zero sum game. Any gains of the United States in terms of national power results in the corresponding decline of the power of the former European colonial powers. In the global balance of power any net gains to the United States results in the net loss to the Europeans. The overall population of the White race is stagnant, so any increase in the white European immigration to United States results in the net decline of the white population in Europe, Central America and South America. If America succeeds in creating American Colonial Empire, it would put brake on any European dream to recreate European Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Any increase of the American influence in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman and Kuwait, came at the expense of historical influence of Britain in the Arabian Gulf, which decline with the rise of American influence. UAE, Bahrain, and Qatar were British colonies before 1971, when British Prime Minister Harold Wilson decided to withdraw its troops from East of Suez, and grant independence to the Trucial States.

 

Great land of Canada failed to realize its true potential because United States ate into the vitality of Canada leaving only the shell in Canada. The population of white race underwent decline in post-war era and the emigration to United States sealed the fate of even the largest European economies, namely, Germany, France, Britain and Canada. The rise of United States inevitably results in the decline of Western Europe. It is no wonder that European Union resents the colossal power of Hegemon USA. The drive for creating American Colonial Empire will destroy the infant dreams of every Europhile in European Union to recreate European Colonial Empires in 21st Century.

 

Possible rise of America’s Colonial Empire in the 21st Century would be good for rest of the World. Historically, every white colonial empire that arose caused precipitous decline of one or more white Christian colonial of its time. The American colonial empire in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines, US built during President William McKinley Administration (1897-1901), came at the expense of Spanish Empire. The rise of United States as the Super Power after the Second World War came at the cost of demise of the European colonial empires of Britain, France and Holland. The crowing of United States in 1990 as the sole super power of the world came after the demise of the Soviet Union. Europeans have succinctly realized that any relative gain in the world influence of United States, whether in United Nations or NATO come at the expense of the Europeans, either West Europeans or East Europeans and Russia.

 

United States became a colonial power at the turn of the 20th century. American Imperialists believe that the American history as the history of expansion. The near-simultaneous imperial leaps into the Caribbean Cuba and the Pacific Philippines in 1898, were the logical steps in American expansionism of the 18th century imperialist moves into Tennessee and Ohio. American imperialists led by Theodore Roosevelt and Admiral A.T. Mahan had none of the anti-colonial squeamishness about expansion that religious right conservatives feel today, about President Bush’s preemptive strikes for anti-terrorism and counter-nuclear proliferation purposes. Europeans were never comfortable with the idea of American Colonial Empire. President Truman asked Prime Minister Winston Churchill to hand over half of the British Empire to the United States, in exchange for the British war debts. Winston Churchill refused to cave in and preferred to grant independence to the colonies, rather than hand them over to the United States, as it did in the case the Diego Garcia, which had been a part of Mauritius.

 

The major lessons of the American Colonial War of 1897-1901 are that United States prefers imposing colonial rule in newly seized territories. United States may impose colonial rule in Afghanistan after liberating it from Al Qaeda & Taliban, arguing that imperial takeover of Afghanistan is desirable, otherwise some other power take it over. American imperialism in Afghanistan and Iraq at the beginning of the 21st century, like the American imperialism in Philippines and Cuba at the beginning of the 20th century, was not an accident, a reluctant byproduct of the 9/11 terrorist events. It was there from the beginning. It can even be argued that some one may have planned the terrorist attacks to justify the eastward expansion of NATO to control as a prelude to control the recently discovered oil reserves in Uzbekistan.

 

The national interests of the future American Colonial Empire do not clash with national interests of India as growing world power. Any increase in the global influence of the United States would result in the similar decrease in the influence of the European nations, which is good for India, as it translates into greater influence of India in the world affairs. United States presently control major Muslim oil-producing countries, namely, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Qatar, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei, so any increase in influence over Iraq, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan would weaken Islamic world as a whole, which is good for India. Any war and confrontation between United States and the Muslim world is good for the Hindu world.

 

Europeans realize that any increase in American influence in Iraq, would adversely harm the national interests of oil-hungry Europeans. It explains that France and Germany are opposed to the US invasions of Iraq. The US invasions of Iraq would enhance Indian national interests if it results in the creation of independent or semi-autonomous Shiite Iraq and Sunni Kurdistan. The independence of Shiite Iraq would weaken Wahhabi Arab nations. The independence of Kurdistan is good for India, as Kurds belong to the Aryan race and speak a language similar to Persian and Sanskrit, radically different from Arab language and Arab culture. In exchange for the share of the spoils of the Imperial expansion, India should be willing to provide troops and diplomatic support to create Pax Americana. The emergence of the United States as a world power and imperial power in 1900 and in 1945 and in Afghanistan war of 2002, was a culmination, of imperialist lobby’s game-plan, not the aberration of the unforeseen terrorist attacks of 9/11. American Colonial Empire in the oil-producing Islamic world would be welcome news for Indians and millions of Muslim women suffering from bondage and servitude to men. Any colonial expansion of Christian nations in the Muslim world is not bad for the Hindu world, unless the West trains Muslim terrorists for attacks of iconoclast Hindu India.

 

 

15(10) Conclusion

(1) Doublethink Newspeak is Diplomacy

American diplomacy of deception employs doublethink and newspeak as essential components of the Western policy of Divide & Rule. America frequently makes ‘chocolate-is-vanilla’ claim and uses its brute force to get it accepted. American Wilsonian foreign policy camouflages the American Realpolitik under the garb of ideological rhetoric. America historically employs the diplomacy of deception, and employs terms in deceptive newspeak manner to clothe baser crude national objectives in the high fashion coverings to sell the policies of the State Department to the Senate and the Congress at the Capitol. America diplomatically exploited the world’s sympathy on Saudi Wahhabi hijackers’ terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon to weave a global alliance allowing Nato to expand to include Eastern Europe and developed bases in Central Asia and South Asia. What an ingenious diplomatic coup!

 

(2) Deception of anti-Narcotic Policy

Is it a policy of deception that United States wants to destroy or curb global drug trade in Cocaine and Heroin, while the net results of its policy had been increased Catholic Cartel monopoly over drug trade? The net result of the President Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” had been the consolidation of the Catholic Drug cartels monopoly over global drug trade, as Plan Colombia reduced non-Cartel drug trafficking.

 

(3) Deception in Vietnam War

President John F. Kennedy employed the Policy of Deception, when it ordered the invasion of Vietnam, ostensibly to contain the southward expansion of Communism. The real motive of President Kennedy’s invasion was to implement Pope’s agenda for proselytizing Buddhist Indo-China. Catholics and Communists are united by their common desire to destroy Buddhism. United States did not expand war in the neutral Cambodia and neutral Laos to contain Viet Cong troops, but to entrench the Communists into power in Cambodia and Laos, to set the stage for the genocide of 2 million Buddhists at hands of Christian Khmer Rouge.

 

(4) Deception in Haiti Invasion

President Bill Clinton employed the Diplomacy of Deception during invasion of Haiti which implanted dictator Catholic priest Rev. Aristide as the President of Haiti, to implement the agenda of Catholic Religious right Conservatism to enforce proselytizing of pagan Voodoo Haitians.

 

(5) New Age of Colonial Empires

British Prime Minister Tony Blair has convincingly argued that colonial Empires should be recreated in the 21st Century. The presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan has a great geopolitical significance. For the first time since Alexander the Great, European land forces landed in Afghanistan as a victor.

 

(6) USA not a Core of Axis of Medieval

India understands United States under Bush Administration would not become the Core of the Global Axis of Medieval. India understands the tug of war going on in the White House. Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy undermining President Bush’s war on global terrorism.

 

(7) Perpetrators of 9/11 still at large

Those who attacked United States on Sept. 11 have thus far gotten away with it. The vast majority of those who sponsored, planned and implemented the cold blooded murder of more than 3,000 Americans are still at large, still neither located nor apprehended, much less punished and neutralized. The Saudi Arabia is what Laurent Murawiec of Rand Corp. calls “the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent in the terror game.”

 

(8) NATO troops in Central Asia

India was one of the first few nations that offered to the United States its lands to wage war on terrorism Afghanistan. But what did India get in return? India has not been invited to play its legitimate anti-terrorism role in Afghanistan. Was it a mistake on part of Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh to have offered India’s support to USA, without first consulting its neighbors, including Pakistan. It goes to the credit of Pakistan that no ruler of Pakistan had allowed United States to use its territory for staging infantry troops. India made a fundamental strategic error, for legitimizing the entry of white maritime European American troops in the Subcontinent. Europeans came as traders and sought landing rights to set up trading posts and ultimately ended up ruling India, and they exploited India and partitioned India on the eve of their departure. What counter measures India should take to guarantee that NATO troops do not misuse their stay in Afghanistan to create new colonial empires in Asia?

 

(9) Pro-Democracy USA is a Deception

It is a policy of deception when United States says that it wants to promote democracy in the world. President Clinton ordered the overthrow of Prime Minister Nawaj Sharief, replaced it by General Pervez Musharraf, because former had dared to develop closer ties with India. United States should allow either Benazir Bhutto or Nawaz Sharief replace General Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan. It is diplomacy of deception for America to say that only dictator Pervez Musharraf could have allowed United States bases to attack Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. On the contrary, President Clinton helped overthrow the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharief, because he had offered to United States its co-operation to arrest Osama bin Laden. Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharief would have helped, may be far better, to destroy Taliban and Al Qaeda. Washington considers covert operations like military coups more legitimate than military intervention, said Henry Kissinger, (Diplomacy, p. 524.) For a nation that honors democracy and freedom, the United States has a nasty habit of embracing foreign dictators when they seem to serve short-term American interests and long-term Christian proselytizing interests.

 

(10) Religious Right Conservative

Hindu India should be vigilant of the Catholic Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. Pope John Paul II could be conspiring to cause secession of Christian-majority states of Northeast India, just as Pope caused the secession of Catholic Ireland from United Kingdom in 1919. Moral of the story is that Indian diplomats should also learn the art of the diplomacy of Deception and Newspeak and doublethink.

 

(11) US Media is a Propaganda Machine

American media is a propaganda machine no different than the Soviet and Chinese propaganda machine. The loss of integrity and independent judgment by topmost journalists in mainstream media in the United States especially during the coverage of Iraq War exposed the hidden censorship exercised by the Pentagon over American electronic media. American journalists had less freedom than Chinese and Russian journalists covering the Iraq War. The very concept of American free press is a myth. There is no free press in United States especially in the mainstream electronic media and major television stations. American Electronic Media and Major Television Stations were part and parcel of the Network Centric Warfare waged and controlled by the Pentagon. There was no freedom of press in the United States during Iraq War in April 2003, especially regarding the coverage of the War news. American major Media, Television and major newspapers were all controlled by the Big Censor at the Pentagon and all seamlessly waged war on Iraq to ensure total victory for the American armed forces. Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin would not have done better in controlling the Freedom of the Press.

 

(12) Be Frank with India

Indians love President Bush for the very reasons that Papacy, Europeans and Muslims hate him and hate America. United States should not resort to diplomacy of Deception, Newspeak or Doublethink to camouflage American petro-imperialism and oil-colonialism policies as war on terror. India welcomes American Petro-Imperialism and Oil-Colonialism and Pax-Americana, so long as India profits by supplying troops to American Empire and rewarded a share of the total output of American oil colonies.

 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com