Kairong Xiao

Curriculum Vitae

Research Statement

Google Scholar Profile

Roger F. Murray Associate Professor of Business

Columbia Business School & NBER

741 Kravis

New York, NY, 10027, U.S.

Email: kairong.xiao@gsb.columbia.edu

Biography

Kairong Xiao is Roger F. Murray Associate Professor of Business at Columbia Business School and a Faculty Research Fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). His research interests span financial intermediation, corporate finance, monetary economics, industrial organization, and political economy. His research papers have been published in top finance and economics journals, including the Journal of Finance, the Review of Financial Studies, the  Journal of Financial Economics, Econometrica, the Journal of Monetary Economics, and Management Science. He received numerous awards for research excellence, including the Review of Financial Studies Rising Scholar Award, the Journal of Finance Dimensional Fund Advisors Prize for Distinguished Paper, and the Review of Financial Studies Best Paper Award runner-up.

Research

Published and accepted papers

10. Regulatory Costs of Being Public: Evidence from Bunching Estimation, With Michael Ewens and Ting Xu

Journal of Financial Economics, accepted 

Best Paper Award at the Utah Winter Finance Conference 2022

Best Paper Award at the CICF 2021

Featured in Columbia Law School Blue Sky Blog

Public float data

We explore the connection between regulatory costs and the number of listed firms by exploiting a regulatory quirk: many rules trigger when a firm's public float exceeds a threshold.


Journal of Financial Economics, accepted

A quantity-based liquidity regulation may crowd out bank lending and lead to the migration of liquidity risks. A price-based mechanism can alleviate such distortions.

Under the surface of the Chinese Communist Party, there are rules that govern power sharing among rival factions and keep high-ranking individuals moving up the ladder.

7. Watch what they do, not what they say: Estimating regulatory costs from revealed preferences, With Adrien Alvero and Sakai Ando

Review of Financial Studies, 2023

Regulation costs inferred from banks' actions are significantly lower than self-reported estimates in surveys on banks.

The increased reliance on bond mutual funds for liquidity transformation has contributed to the disruptions in the liquid asset markets in the COVID-19 crisis.

 Journal of Finance, 2022

Winner of the XiYue Award for Best Paper at CICF 2019

How is monetary policy transmitted through the banking system? We quantify competing theories of monetary transmission by estimating a dynamic banking model.

Utah Winter Finance Conference presentation video


Winner of the SummerHaven Investment Management Prize for Best Paper at the Wharton--Rodney L. White Center 2019 conference

Featured in March 2019 NBER Digest, "Retail Investors Reach for Income when Interest Rates Fall".

Investors flow into income-generating assets such as high-dividend stocks and high-yield bonds when rates are low. This reaching for income behavior constitutes a transmission channel of monetary policy.

Utah Winter Finance Conference presentation video

3. Monetary Transmission through Shadow Banks previously titled "Shadow Banks, Deposit Competition, and Monetary Policy"

Review of Financial Studies, 2020, Lead Article, Editor's Choice

The RFS Rising Scholar Award

Runner up of the RFS Best Paper Award

the WFA Cubist Award for Outstanding Ph.D. Research

The conventional wisdom of monetary policy suggests that bank deposits shrink when monetary policy tightens. The opposite happens in the shadow banking sector. 

Utah Winter Finance Conference presentation video

The interaction between interest rates and banks’ market power affects their risk-taking by lowering bank value.

Against the popular claim that post-crisis regulations hurt liquidity, no evidence of liquidity deterioration is found during periods of regulatory intervention. 

Working papers

The Shadow Cost of Collateral, With Guangqian Pan and Zheyao Pan

Review of Financial Studies, Conditionally Accepted

Best Paper Award at the FMA 2022

Contrary to the conventional wisdom that collateral is a low-cost mechanism to mitigate financial frictions, we estimate that the shadow cost of pledging collateral is equivalent to an interest rate of 6%-9% for small businesses.

Closing the Revolving Door,  with Joseph Kalmenovitz and Siddharth Vij

Best Paper Award at the Financial Markets and Corporate Governance Conference

Journal of Finance, R&R 

Using granular payroll data on 23 million federal employees and the wage thresholds that trigger post-employment restrictions, we uncover the systematic evidence of revolving door incentives. 

The conventional wisdom is that the only way that financial intermediaries can create liquidity is to issue claims with stable value. We show this is not true. 

How would CBDC affect the banking system? We shed light on this question using a dynamic banking model with imperfect competition and financial frictions.

Fuzzy Bunching, With Adrien Alvero

By using the area of the bunching bulge in the cumulative distribution function, it is possible to uncover the underlying bunching incentive in the presence of optimization and measurement errors.

Unintended Consequences of Post-Crisis Liquidity Regulation, with Suresh Sundaresan

FMA Conference Best Paper Awards: semi-finalist 

Post-crisis liquidity regulations have led to a new realignment among banks, government-sponsored enterprises, and money market funds. 

The Value of Big Data in a Pandemic

The Pioneer Award from the Peak Initiative of FinTech Research

Featured in MarketWatch

Exploiting the staggered adoption of a contact-tracing app in 322 Chinese cities, this paper finds that this big data technology created an economic value of 0.5% of GDP and saved 200,000 lives during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.

We develop a two-layer asset pricing framework to analyze the fragility of the corporate bond market. We use the estimated model to quantify the equilibrium effects of unconventional monetary and liquidity policies on bond prices.

Working in progress

Why does monetary policy move asset prices so much? This paper sheds light on this question by linking the movements in asset prices to the aggregate investor fund flows influenced by monetary policy.

Miscellaneous