homepage-seven

                                                  

                                               Judicial DECEPTION!! 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HybridLab

7-1. Freeman Eco Village - Part 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iamthewitness.com

7-2. Daryl Bradford Smith interviews 1215.org - audio - Part 1Part 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Icke, David

7-3. Freeman-On-The Land forum - HERE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
InflationUS

7-4. Free Man on the Land - Part 3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
InvisibleContracts

7-5. DOCUMENTS MATTER - Read "The creature for Jekyll Island." If the Federal Reserve folks, under Congress' 1:8:17 area of the Constitution, can establish Banks of government(DC) under the I.R.C., then, The People should establish banks of The People under the Founding Documents of our Forefathers in the Republic in states of the Union(USA) part of our States, which is outside of Congress' 1:8:17 area of the Constitution. There is no Law that says The People can't. And the federal notes are D.C.'s jurisdiction extensions.
Banks of real Money, USA. Like most soil grounds, they do not have a Land Patent Document(USA) on it. It's usually a Mortgage(DC), or a Deed(DC) to it and I can tell you, knowing the way law operates as far as not having any conflict in ''Jurisdiction Differences" like US vs. USA, and DC vs. USA Jurisdiction differences, there is NO BANK whatsoever here that has a Land Patent on the lot it is sitting on.
The only safest and lawful way to establish a Bank for The People is for Citizens who are actual Common Law Citizens, Sui Juris People to buy a land lot and get a Land Patent to it when its Paid-Off. A Land Patent puts this land in the Republic Jurisdiction(USA). Why? Because, a Land Patent is a Document that a Citizen of true Common Law/Sui Juris establishment that is under the Founding Documents of their Forefathers (or else it's worthless) fills out this Document and passes it in to D.C. After examination of genuine Sovereign Status (they have Data on you), they mail it back to you and your D.C. public subservient Grants you the Paid-Off Land you own. Then, you live in 'The Bill of Rights' way, and that is just the beginning.
Question : If you think you 'Own' your paid-off property, free and clear, then, why does a Land Patent Document exits?? And, yes, it's possible. The Citizen must 'match' the type of Documents, IDs, Forms & Papers, Affidavits they possess in Jurisdiction, 100%.  See/Google: Carl Miller-know your constitution, supremelaw.org, losthorizons.com, famguardian.org, constitution.org.  More HERE


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iroqua67

7-6. You are a Slave to the Government - HERE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JackieG

7-7.  How to Settle a Mortgage - I have been working for 3 years on a very simple formula for blowing the banks off into the weeds where they belong. I call it my "Offer to Settle". This is the only way I know that works...as long as you fully comprehend what it is you are asking for and stand your ground. Dealing with Bankers…. The following 5 letters have been successfully used by a great many people over the past few years to effectively deal with creditor difficulties. We make no representations to the effectiveness of this strategy and we strongly advise interested parties to seek independent professional or competent advise when utilizing such strategies.

Letter Number 1:
For use with just about any type of financial obligation issued by a licensed financial institution mortgage, credit card, bank loan etc. (Does not work if the loan is from a “private” source.)
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I would like to make arrangements to settle the above referenced matter.
Please provide me with your statement of the amount owing as of ___(pick date 2 weeks out for example)___, together with your assurance that you will accept payment in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Thank you very much.
___________________________
by: authorized party

Letter Number 2A:
For use with adjustments in most cases when you receive the initial response from Letter 1 above, where they confirm an amount owing and provide some comment that the “statements” or some other lame documentation they provide are evidence of the obligation.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
Thank you for your letter of __date______, wherein you confirm my outstanding balance as requested.
Also, you have confirmed that the “statements that _____(name of institution here)____ sends are your evidence of your indebtedness to the Bank”. (This is a quote from actual bank letter and wording may vary slightly, but should where possible be quoted from their letter.)
Accordingly, would you please confirm that the Agreement that exists between us which ratifies this specific application of these “statements” and confirms me as the party obligated to the Bank will be delivered to me as the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form, in exchange for payment in full of my obligation as may be referenced by these “statements”.
Sincerely,
__________________________________________________
by: authorized party

Letter Number 2B:
For use with adjustments in other cases when you receive the initial response from Letter 1 above, where they confirm an amount owing and simply ignore the second part of the request.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:__________
To Whom it may concern:
Thank you for your letter of ________, wherein you confirm my outstanding balance as requested. It is apparent that you have overlooked or ignored my request to confirm that you would accept full payment of the alleged obligation from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Accordingly, unless I receive your written confirmation that you will accept payment from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form on or before ____(pick a date like 15 days from sending the letter)____, I will conclude that you are either unable or unwilling to comply, and I will thereafter consider the matter between us to have been legally and financially settled.
Sincerely,
________________________________________________
by: authorized party

Letter Number 3:
For use with adjustments in other cases when you receive NO response from Letter #1 above.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:__________
To Whom it may concern:
I have sent you my request as of ___(date)___ for you to confirm the balance owing on the above referenced matter and for you to confirm that you would accept full payment of the alleged obligation from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
It is apparent that you have overlooked or ignored my request. Accordingly, unless I receive your written confirmation that you will accept payment from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form on or before ____(pick a date like 15 days from sending the letter)____, I will conclude that you are either unable or unwilling to comply, and I will thereafter consider the matter between us to have been legally and financially settled.
Sincerely,
__________________________________________________ ____
by: authorized party

NOTES:
1. The concepts outlined in these documents will also work for most Court Orders to pay. Simply change the wording such that you are requesting confirmation that the court will accept payment in consideration of their delivery to you of the Original Order, as duly executed by ___(Judge name)___ and in its original form (which is the original instrument of indebtedness).
2. This process will not work with private lenders because in most cases they can and will produce the original instrument of indebtedness.
3. If you receive any communication from a collection agency or lawyer representing the financial institution, you should follow the concepts outlined in the above letters but ONLY in direct correspondence with the financial institution. NEVER respond to a lawyer or collection agency with anything other than the concept outlined in
Letter 4 that follows.

Letter Number 4:
For use with when terminating communication from financial institution’s lawyer or collection agent.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I confirm that I have received a written communication from you dated ___(date)___ wherein you make reference to the above captioned matter.
It is apparent that you are acting on the presumption that some relationship that you may have with ___(name of bank)___ , is in some way related to me. I am not a party to this implied relationship you have with ___(name of bank)___, either directly, indirectly or by means of any tacit consent.
Accordingly, I do not understand how to respond to you inasmuch as I am unaware of any contractual relationship between us.
As a courtesy and because you may find it helpful, I have attached recent correspondence between myself and ___(name of bank)___, wherein I have repeatedly offered to settle the mater between myself and ___(name of bank)___.
Sincerely,
___________________________
by: authorized party
c.c file

Letter Number 5:
Alternate for use with when terminating communication from financial institution’s lawyer or collection agent.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number: __________
To Whom it may concern:
I confirm that I have received a written communication from you addressed to  _____________ and dated ____________ wherein you make reference to the above captioned matter.
It is apparent that either:
i) you are acting on the presumption that some relationship that you may have with __(name of bank)__, is in some way related to me, which if such presumption is the case, I confirm that I am not a party to this implied relationship you have with __(name of bank)__, either directly, indirectly or by means of any tacit consent, and accordingly, I do not understand how to respond to you inasmuch as I am unaware of any contractual relationship between us; or
ii) you have entered into a contractual relationship inclusive of evidence of consideration paid to or agreed to be paid to __(name of bank)__, which contractual relationship has caused you to become the legal holder in due course of an alleged obligation between ____________ and __(name of bank)__.
If indeed you have entered into such a contractual relationship with __(name of bank)__, as set forth in clause ii) above, then I hereby confirm that I accept your offer to reduce the amount of the alleged obligation from $______ to $______; and I confirm that I would like to make arrangements for settlement of the above referenced matter immediately upon you providing me with your written and legally binding assurance that you will accept payment in full settlement of this alleged obligation in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form that you must now be holding pursuant to the aforesaid contractual arrangement between you and __(name of bank)__.
Sincerely,
_____________________________________________
by: authorized party
NOTE: underlined portion in last paragraph may be omitted if not applicable.

What is right and wrong DOES matter in life:
All the money in existence in our monetary systems has been borrowed at interest from a bank. When all currency in the system is borrowed at interest, there is NO MATHEMATICAL WAY to pay one penny of interest without pushing some people off the table via cancellation of their obligations to pay principal through bankruptcy, or through the kind of cancellation programs offered.
Reform must come from the side of dissatisfied customers, because the lenders have NO motivation to move away from their current position of power and influence. If people who favour the customer over the lender are able to use the law to stimulate change, any imbalance created by giving people their real estate for free will best correct itself through a change in banking laws and practice, NOT through perpetuation of the present system of GRAND THEFT of the entire wealth of society by the banking cartels.
Under the present system, someone HAS to get something for NOTHING. There is no other way.
Either the bankers continue to get interest payments for NOTHING at risk, or customers get free real estate after "borrowing" money that was created out of NOTHING and having the "loan" either cancelled for fraud, or discharged in bankruptcy, or the lender gets the real estate from the customer for NOTHING, following a foreclosure on the loan that was created out of NOTHING.
The answer is to stop basing bank lending on NOTHING.
Now lets get something straight...concerning the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form as noted in letter # 1.
A copy is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
Something purported to be signed at a later date is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A copy from a fax is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A certified true copy is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A sworn affidavit claiming lost note does not issue, as the original instrument of indebtedness...
Anything produced that does not contain your DNA is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
When you signed it you had your hands on it, didn't you?
Now...let's move on to clarify just exactly what took place at the bank...
For illustrative purposes...
You walk into a bank and approach the counter with (2) $10.00 bills (notes).
You ask the young lady if she would kindly exchange these for a $20.00 bill (note).
You exchange your two pieces of paper (notes) for her one (note).
Did the bank give you a loan?
Same scenario...
You are seated across from the banker or bankers rep...
You sign a piece of paper (note) worth $130,000.00 and give it to him in exchange for a check (note) for $130,000.00
Did the bank give you a loan?
Neither the check nor the promissory note was legal tender at the time you exchanged notes.
You simply exchanged a note worth $130,000.00 for another note worth $130,000.00.
I fail to see the loan.
All you did was exchange notes.
But you say, Mary, who you bought the house from cashed the check and turned it into legal tender to spend.
Okay...and may I suggest the banker did the exact same thing.
The banker placed the note on his books as an asset and sold a security interest in the note to a third party for more than he paid for it.
So...I still do not see a loan, do you?
Now...lets examine the note the banker took from me in exchange for his check.
I'm going to suggest the banker endorsed the note by stamping the back of it thereby converting the mortgage into a bearer bond.
This is why the bank never brings the original blue-inked signed note to court....it is no longer a mortgage note...by conversion.
It is evidence the banker is no longer the holder in due course.
What banker is going to bring evidence to court showing you do not owe him anything?
No one understands money or the nature of banking and that's why they pull the wool over EVERYONES eyes.
And thats why on November 1, 2007 in Cleveland Ohio 14 people in foreclosure walked out of court in possession of their homes with NO ONE to make their payments to.
The bank could not produce evidence they were indeed in possession of the note at the time they filed the foreclosure.
No bank can.
No note=no standing=case dismissed.
What I suggest to anyone is that they look very closely at letter #1 where all one is seeking is an accounting of the mortgage this is the important part and the banks assurance they will return the note in exchange for payment.
After letter #1 is sent, the bank usually sends you an accounting of the total including any penalties.
But,....99.999999% of the time, the bank never gives you their assurance they will return the note in exchange for payment.
Pursuant to the laws of the Canada/USA/UK that is known as "refusing to accept payment".
Now I don't know about you but, if I owed you $100 and I signed an (iou) note to pay you back and a week later I offered to pay you in exchange for the evidence of indebtedness (iou) whereby you, refused to return the note upon accepting payment then do you think you could come back in a month and demand payment?
Letters 2, 2B and so on deal with anything the bank and their legal counsel can throw at you.
The difficult hump to overcome by anyone attempting to comprehend money and banking is laid bare in the indisputable fact of truth that no financial institution has ever lent a consumer one single $1.00.
O yes...I have heard it all to the point when it comes down to showing the detractors their flimsy arguments to this are based on nothing, but erroneous assumptions, presumptions and of course...red herrings thrown in as a last resort.
Jesus said,
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. (Matthew 5:25)
Example of agreeing with thine adversary along the way...

Letter Number 1:
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I would like to make arrangements to settle the above referenced matter.
Please provide me with your statement of the amount owing as of ___(pick date 2 weeks out for example)___, together with your assurance that you will accept payment in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Thank you very much.
___________________________
by: authorized party

Okay...
something else to keep in mind is this...
No bank or financial institution in the UK/Canada/USA has ever shown in court that they suffered harm or loss as a result of someone not paying their mortgage loan.
It simply: DOES NOT EXIST.....ANYWHERE!!!
Isn't that alarming?
Shouldn't the alarm bells be ringing in your head?  More HERE

----------


7-8. Question/Statement by earthicastar: I asked the 'alleged' judge.. "Is the language of the Law so DECEPTIVE that only an attorney or barrister can understand it?"  Response by jackieg: It is unfortunate most people are unaware of this ... I was in the same boat till I got this squared away upstairs. Here is why the judge said you may be found guilty even though you may not be ... Such is the way of the world. On the subject of courts and the prospect that 'He who does not deny - admits'.  They are trying to use contract law.  Now let’s get back to this court scenario. If the defendant does not rebut the unproved assumptions and presumptions then, according to the laws of procedure in an equity court, their failure to rebut them must mean what?  THEY MUST BE TRUE BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T REBUT THEM!! Which under the terms of contract law, you have accepted the proposition. You didn't rebut them which is acceptance, Right? So, when you have offer and acceptance isn't that a contract? Doesn't that supersede any provisions required by formal law and procedure? YES, because the parties are in agreement!! And they can agree to waive remedies and provisions of law anytime they want. Now I said to these people that I knew that are confused as to why in the world the judge found the defendant guilty when the judge knew there was no evidence for the plaintiff in the case. I said he found the defendant guilty because he allowed and agreed that he should be found guilty. You volunteered.
After all, haven't you heard before that everybody in prison is there because they volunteered of their own free will? If you volunteered doesn't that mean you had a contract? Then WHAT'S THAT GOT TO DO WITH LAW?
The end result was there was no evidence to rebut the presumptions. So the defense rested. If the defense didn't rebut the presumptions, did the plaintiff have a duty to bring evidence into the case? OF COURSE NOT!!!
Because, they only have to bring evidence if the defendant rebuts the presumptions.
ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!  Okay? So here is what's going through the judges mind....he's going… “okay, there were charges of wrongdoing, there was no evidence by the state, but the defendants came on and didn’t rebut any of the charges...because they didn't rebut the charges...I, as the judge must weigh...well then, are the charges true as far as this case is concerned...or are the charges wrong?...as far as this case is concerned.”
It has to do with what’s the intent of the parties here...if there's no evidence...we can't rule on evidence...so it's not a law case.  It's a case in equity...we want to know what the intent of the parties are...isn’t everybody out to gain all the news serviture?...because the news never gets to the facts...they just want to know how you feel about the news all the time. There's no facts before the court...there's no evidence before the court...we just want to know how everybody feels about it...do they want to be found guilty or not? And if they want to be found guilty...then we will go ahead and because we have their agreement...we'll find them guilty!  The judge will sit back and he says, “well look...the charges, even though they're not proved...must be true.”

ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!  More HERE


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jackson, Sherry Peel


7-9. IRS vs. Former IRS Agent Sherry Jackson - "In my tenure as an IRS agent, I personally saw marriages broken, families torn apart, homes confiscated and businesses destroyed - all while my colleagues and I were out making unjust demands on the American people - without the proper authority. Now, you be the judge ……  You have learned that the Constitution of the United States of America has been trampled on and ignored through allowing the privately owned Federal Reserve to create paper currency and charge you 47 million dollars in interest per hour - money coming from the mouths of your children and the college education funds of your grandchildren, all the while the children and grandchildren of the owners of the Federal Reserve will never have to work a day in their lives, and that is wrong, on so many different levels."  More HERE


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

johngr


7-10. "The Federal US government doesn't merely have no duty to protect her citizens, they have assumed the power to summarily execute citizens without due process, effectively breaching and voiding any alleged contract."


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JurisDictionary.Com


7-11. How to Win in Court - HERE


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
homepage-one,  homepage-two,  homepage-threehomepage-four, homepage-five,

homepage-six, 
homepage-seven,  homepage-eight,  homepage-nine,  homepage-ten,

homepage-eleven,  homepage-twelve,
  homepage-thirteen,

Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur of the Menard Family,

Tactikal Guy

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unrelated, but also see Moving-World DECEPTION!! - HERE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Comments