homepage-eleven


                                                                  Judicial DECEPTION!! 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Porisky, Russell

11-1. Intro To Your Human Rights -

Part 1,  Part 2,  Part 3,  Part 4,  Part 5,  Part 6,  Part 7,  Part 8,  Part 9,  Part 10,

Part 11,  Part 12,  Part 13,  Part 14,  Part 15, Part 16,  Part 17,  Part 18,  Part 19,  Part 20.


11-2. Reclaiming Our Rights -

Part 1,  Part 2,  Part 3,  Part 4,  Part 5,  Part 6,  Part 7,

Part 8,  Part 9, Part 10,  Part 11,  Part 12,  Part 13  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

psholtz

11-3. I've heard stories that if people "refuse" to be booked (i.e,. sign the paperwork, or have their fingerprints taken), or if they do so only - and obviously - under protest, then they are released within 72 hours.
I don't have any firsthand knowledge of that, but I have been arrested once, and -- instinctively -- I started to sign all the paperwork "under threat, duress, and coercion", since... rather obviously... it WAS under threat, duress and coercion as I had no desire to be there, or to be arrested, and I wanted to make that crystal clear in any "paperwork" they were going use.
When the booking officer saw the "under threat, duress and coercion" next to my signature, she had a nuclear meltdown......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Queen, The

11-4. Coronation Oath, 2 June 1953 - HERE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Racketeering - definition

11-5.  Racketeering is the act of operating an illegal business or scheme in order to make a profit, perpetrated by a structured group. It is a broad category of criminal acts that includes bribery, sexual exploitation of children, and illegal gambling, among many others. Racketeering is closely associated with organized crime, since both are conducted by groups.  Racketeering encompasses many criminal acts. It includes theft and fraud against businesses or individuals. Governments can be victimized by racketeering; examples include counterfeiting money and trading in untaxed alcohol. Racketeering can also take the form of providing illegal services, such as prostitution or drug trafficking. Racketeering also takes place among legitimate businesses or labor unions, where it is sometimes referred to as white-collar crime. Examples include extortion and money laundering.  The criminal organizations who engage in racketeering often have legitimate businesses, for instance licensed gaming establishments or a labor-based business such as garbage collection, in order to provide cover for their rackets. In addition, racketeering is often aided by the bribing, blackmailing, or extortion of public officials or civil servants. Legitimate business owners can be similarly manipulated in order to help criminal groups and their racketeering practices to appear lawful.  More HERE


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RealView

11-6. Establishing sovereignty seems to be a good thing. From there you are in a position to file Negative Averments as counter claims against any claim made against you whether it's a corporation or a policy enforcer. This is done on "the private side" as opposed to the "Public side". In other words you stay out of court except for a judgment that the original claimant is in default on your counter claim. Because they are always in fraud (no contract) they are always going to default. If they answer your claim they have to admit fraud and go to jail. Profiting from the NA can be a different issue.
Sovereignty can help children from being viewed as property of the state. If people really don't understand what's going on, they may have a hard time grasping the idea (in the USA) that "citizens" are property of the government and collateral for debt. The marriage license states that "the product of the union is the property of the state". This allows the child with a birth certificate to be identified as the product of a particular union and therefore eligible to be the property of the state. This is all part of the corporate (fascist) system the uSA has run on since 1871 and its gradual evolution into place. A persons birth certificate is seeded with money and pooled into funds. Lots of people have had debt removed via Accept for Value against the BC account. What you can not do and may go to jail for is using A4V to buy things directly. You can pay off public "debt". Public debt is any debt that results in money being floated as national debt. That includes almost any kind of public debt or bill or claim against a person such as a mortgage, a car loan, a medical bill, a credit card bill, etc.. Those "debts" can be A4Vd. With a credit card, you can get cash, buy things and A4V the cc debt. What you can not do is hand an A4V to a business and trade it for something on their shelf. You are not a transfer agent.
It's generally viewed as a bad idea to challenge authority (enter dishonor) with the criminals justice system of Admiralty. What you do instead is use admiralty to your advantage. You conditionally accept their offer and the condition is proof of claim i.e. contract. They can't prove the claim via a lawful contract so they dismiss the case. You can also NA a counter claim against the people (usually policy enforcers and the DA) involved as they are going to be in fraud. That is separate from the conditional acceptance.
People have to start growing up and realize that there are plenty of people that will gladly do wrong and orchestrate wrong when they know it's wrong. But they are doing it from a perspective of exploiting the innocent and naive. Those who understand the Admiralty process can escape. Perhaps this is also done just for that purpose? So that there is a back door for the NWOs themselves when needed? There is a well established "Justice System" in place that has been there to handle international commerce for hundreds of years. It has moved onto the land and is the law of the land in the uSA and elsewhere. Common Law has been wrapped up into Admiralty. It's all commerce now!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebel Leader

11-7. English Freeman Standing in Court - by Rebel Leader - HERE

 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Redford, James

11-8. Jesus IS an Anarchist - HERE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reenie

11-9. Automobiles Targetted for Piracy - "Past history shows they have stopped the automobile when my father is behind the wheel due to false and fraudulent information of SUSPENSION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES posted on the police computer."   ...   "In Law, such Commercial defaults stand as Truth, when uncontradicted by counterpoint rebuttal such Commercial Defaults stands as Judgement. In essence the authorities, by their refusal to respond to the questions of JURISDICTION accompanied by their affidavit, accede to the Truth of the position that a man of the Sovereign People, my father and I have the right to travel in his private automobile as the "Travel Conveyance of the Day" without securing permissiion via a license from the STATE."   ...   "Yet they rule with the threat of guns, tasers, handcuffs in committing piracy upon a law-abiding public. Corporate Policies such as Vehicle Code Regulations are merely Policy which rule corporate entities who are subject to the Corporate STATE and COUNTY. They are NOT LAW binding upon the American Sovereign People."  More HERE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Restoring The American Dream




11-10. I have written this book [1979] because I believe, though we are still the greatest and freest country on Earth, that we are moving ever more rapidly in the direction of other liberty-starved nations around the globe. I am concerned that our government, like all governments throughout history, is winning its long-standing tender offer to its citizens: "security" in exchange for freedom.  The people of this country must come to understand that the "free lunch" is a myth. The American Dream was not about government's taking huge sums of money under the label of "taxation" from citizens by force. The American Dream was about individualism and the opportunity to achieve success without interference from others.  It is my sincere hope that this book will motivate you to join with me in helping to restore the American Dream.  My hand in yours, Robert J. Ringer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RickeyPickles

11-11. UCC-1-207 ... Common Law ... Learn Your Rights - HERE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

R.I.C.O. - definition

11-12.  The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) was a groundbreaking piece of legislation passed in the United States in 1970 with the goal of financially crippling the Mafia. In addition to being used against members of the Mafia, RICO can also be used in a variety of other circumstances. Under RICO, the scope of potential prosecution against people who participate in organized crime was expanded, along with the penalties upon conviction. In order for an offender to fall under the RICO rules and be charged with racketeering, he or she must violate two of 35 statutes within 10 years, and the violations must be linked in some way. For example, both rape and murder are included in the RICO rules, but someone who commits a rape and a murder would not necessarily be charged under RICO unless the crimes could be linked to organized crime in some way. Because RICO charges rely on proving a pattern of behavior, rather than specific crimes, they are generally easier to prove in court.  Historically, people brought into court with accusations of participation in organized crime would move to cover up the evidence. Under RICO, the assets of suspects can be frozen, preventing them from hiding their profits until the case can be resolved. If the RICO charge is proved, it can result in up to 20 years imprisonment on each count of racketeering, along with a forfeiture of all racketeering-related assets, including those tied into legitimate businesses. Furthermore, financial damages may also be imposed.  RICO strikes at the financial core of organized crime, by ensuring that legitimate businesses cannot be used as a cover. It also allows civil claims, which means that people who feel that they have been harmed as a result of racketeering can also bring charges, resulting in even more penalties. In order to pursue civil charges under RICO, claimants must be able to fulfill a specific set of criteria.  Because the financial repercussions of a RICO charge can be quite significant, many criminals decide to try to strike a deal. In return for being allowed to keep some of their assets, they may give up other members of a criminal organization, or offer to assist with an investigation. This gives prosecutors a powerful tool to use against organized crime, which can be extremely useful in ongoing investigations where it is difficult to pin down the major players in an organized crime ring.  More HERE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RightsAndWrong.Com.Au

11-13. Trial by Jury by Kenn d'Oudney - "Question: When is a Judge not a Judge? Answer: When 'the Judge' is not a member of the Jury.  Until the word 'juror' was generally adopted, jurors were actually called the judges, in recognition of their Common Law role." ...... "The motive behind, and explanation for, judges' boundless treachery are the same today as they have always been, and they confirm that the indispensibility of Trial by Jury is eternal: the judiciary is responsible, not to the people, but to the government; judges are dependent for careers, salaries and by impeachment, on the legislature: to remain judges, they must reliably enforce unjust legeslation."  More HERE

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ringer, Robert J.

11-14. "Government loves to cloud the issue of needs and desires versus morality with a strange adaptation of the same "mysterious-multiplier" concept it applies to economics. The idea is that needs and desires acquire moral validity if one thinks in terms of large numbers of people. It is this illogical notion that forms the shaky foundation for Majority Rule. If 3 million people vote to steal from 1 million people, proclaiming that the theft is justified because it is their opinion that they need the money for a worthy cause, one is supposed to accept their action as moral.  To demonstrate the absurdity of such a position, eliminate six zeroes from each figure: If a group of 3 people gets together and decides to rob 1 person, insisting that they are a "society" and that what they are doing is in society's (their) best interest, virtually everyone would agree that their claim is ludicrous.  How can the same action be declared morally right just by multiplying by millions? On the contrary, it would be that much more immoral, because the number of people whose rights would be violated would be substantially increased." from Restoring The American Dream

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rino

11-15. Defending Yourself against "Legal Fiction" - "Once the world went off the Gold standard, the people now in effect became dead to the Law.  All courts are courts belonging the central banks, being the creditor in any case. A Judge cannot see the substantive Law in relation to a man or woman's God-given rights anymore under public policy. Public policy refers to the bankruptcy/insolvency of that nation."  More HERE

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rosenwald, Joyce

11-16. Challenge the Law by Demanding Certification - "Peace was never declared after the civil war, and we are still functioning under the war powers. This explains why we don't win in the courts. The national Constitution has been suspended.  The states, as Incs , also had their Constitutions suspended. We lost our law, which is supposed to be certified as constitutional before it can be implemented. NO REMEDY. This explains the Rule of Necessity. You cannot claim to be a citizen of a State or the U.S. because neither exist as de jure governments, they are governments de facto.  However, since our de facto governments won't tell us this, and we are still functioning under the belief that the constitutions are de jure, I still think we can challenge under the "absence of law is the remedy" theory. Just exactly what is this theory? As I said before, all law has to be certified as constitutional by the state supreme court before it can be implemented. When charged with violating a law, one should subpoena the certification of the act by the state supreme court. One should also subpoena the Attorney General of the state to testify to the constitutionality of the act. Because the law will not be certified as constitutional, and the state Attorney will not testify to the constitutionality of the act, nothing remains but for the court to dismiss your case."  More HERE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sermon On The Mount

11-17. HERE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shrout, Winston

 

11-18.  Solutions in Commerce - The truth is... we live in a very complicated commercial world. A world so misunderstood and confusing, it's easy for people to get into trouble without knowing how or why. My goal is to help folks understand how commerce really works, so that they have the knowledge and the confidence to safely navigate through the commercial maze ... The term "Commerce" rightfully defines the interchanges and exchanges between states or nations. However, over a period of many centuries, and since the introduction of what are called bills of exchange, commerce has now infiltrated into trade between individuals. In our modern world, where all nations have surrendered their national sovereignty through the use of fiat currencies, and their governments are operating in bankruptcy, the real power in commerce resides with the issuer of the fiat currency. This has resulted in the implanting of a Receiver into the national bankruptcies by the interested third party intervenor ... Lacking the ability to overcome the rules imposed and enforced by governments, the flesh and blood man on the land has had to adapt by learning the ins and outs of this new commercial system. The man has learned that in a fiat world, it's all about "paper". And, he has had to learn to deal with paper in all aspects of his life. Unfortunately, the educational system has "dumbed-down" the students and adults of the world to the point that they have become practically illiterate. They are barely able to function in a commercial world that deals in bills of exchange, fiat currencies, negotiable instruments, bonds, liens, levies, and a whole host of commercial realities not generally understood by, nor taught to, the public. The private man on the land has had to learn to navigate the world of Admiralty or Maritime jurisdictions via a "vessel", called the strawman ... So, true to this Orwellian trend, men and women have moved away from their landed interests and into the Land of Oz: Cities of commerce where Law Merchant Law prevails and where no true contract dares to tread; where the Uniform Commercial Code, the UCC, is the rule of law ... The mission of Solutions in Commerce is first to encourage men and women to move back to the land, to our mother earth. And, if you feel the need to venture into the world of commerce, then at least we want to present some remedies that may be useful as you navigate through that commercial maze, known as Admiralty jurisdiction. We address such topics as bankruptcy, court room procedures, facts and agreements, failure of consideration, refused for cause, equity practice, attorneys, statute staple, third party intervenors, habeas corpus, bond distress, using the IRS as our third party debt collector, liquidation of a delinquent creditor through the Receiver in the US bankruptcy, voting vs. electing, corporate franchise, benefit privileges, acceptance for value, the difference between legal title and lawful possession... and a great deal more.  More HERE


11-19.  Accepted for Value (AFV) is one of the most important primary building blocks of the Commercial Redemption Process. Unfortunately, it's often poorly understood, and as a result, it is frequently misused or even totally ignored. Part One of this "Accepted for Value" Trilogy provides a strong foundation for the AFV process. Part Two and Part Three continue building on that foundation with more important details and strategies ... On these DVD's you'll learn the concept that when someone requests funds from you, and you Accept for Value, your signature creates the funds to pay the liability. Why? Because in commerce, whoever creates the liability also has to bring the remedy. This fundamental, yet powerful, information is an important addition to your Winston Shrout library.  More HERE


11-20.  Trusts - We see the word “Trust“ used often and in many different contexts. Everything from trusting a teenager to do what they said they would do, to trusting that the President of the United States will not involve us in a war without just cause. Sometimes we create a formal trust situation with the signing of trust documents, or we might even find ourselves involved in an implied trust which we had not contemplated or expected. And, since the public operates in bankruptcy, everything that goes on is based on trust. Trust is what makes the world go around. So, understanding what a trust is, how it operates, and specifically, how to successfully become the Beneficiary to a trust is explained ... Since the public operates in bankruptcy (in admiralty), everything that goes on in the public is based on trusts. When we operate in the public trust, we are either operating as a trustee or a beneficiary. Winston demonstrates how to operate in either capacity, but emphasis will be on operating as the beneficiary, the only contributing beneficiary, and beneficial interest holder. He will also be discussing how to maintain your position as well as how to succeed in court.  More HERE


11-21. COMMERCIAL LIEN - A FIRM FOUNDATION - There has been some confusion about the "whys and wherefores" of this process ... an attempt is made to explain why a commercial lien might be appropriate in some instances ...A commercial lien is a "for real" thing. It is not fictional in nature as it comes from a real man, not a strawman. It is addressed to a real man, not a fiction ...Truth is paramount in commerce, and truth in commerce is expressed in the form of an affidavit. So, you see the commercial lien is actually an Affidavit of Liability. We use normal administrative due process with the use of this lien. Hopefully, as a result of close study of the lien process, students may become proficient in its use.  More HERE

11-22. In London - "Banks are Agencies of Debt."  - HERE


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shuftin

11-23. There are two types of Rules of Court, both work in conjunction with each other. 1) Substantive Rules are the statutory or written laws that governs rights and obligations of those who are subject to it. 2) Procedural Rules are the rules by which a court hears and determines what happens in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings. The judicial branch of Government writes the Rules of Court. I see this as a problem if Rules of Court have the force and effect of statutes. There is no due process of congress nor an enabling act. Sometimes the legislature will enact a Rule of Court. Owing to the separation of powers, the judicial reserves the Right to reject the new Rule of Court passed by the legislature. Occasionally, in the spirit of partnership, the judicial will abide by a new Rule of Court passed by the legislature, but only if it is "Substantive" in nature.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spiritualeconomicsnow

11-24.  Ecclesiastical Deed Poll -This is from Frank O’Collins, in Australia: The history of the RC Church, the Pope, and Canon Law is fascinating. Specifically, go to: http://one-heaven.org/canons_positive_law/article_1330.htm in order to write an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll for your particular situation. It is time for people to stand up and stop being frightened. We are not slaves, we are not damned, we are not condemned. Each man and woman must make the choice to stop being fearful, to stop being sick, to stop their suffering. We must give public notice about who we are. When each of us does this, there IS a cure and remedy. The Day of Divine Agreement–– the 7 Writs of the Apocalypse–– was Dec. 21, 2009. Dec. 21, 2010 will be the Day of Divine Protest and Dishonor which each of us can issue when each of us stands and proclaims, “We are a Divine Immortal Spirit”. Dec. 21, 2011 will be the Day of Divine Judgment - Dec. 21, 2012 will be the Day of Redemption - The end of world as we know it, technically, is Dec. 21, 2011 - The beginning of the new world is Dec. 21. 2012 - These 4 dates make up perfect Divine Notarial Procedure - The Ecclesiastical Deed Poll appears to be having very positive results.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spooner, Lysander

11-25. No Treason - The Constitution of No Authority - HERE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
homepage-one,  homepage-two,  homepage-threehomepage-four, homepage-five,

homepage-six, 
homepage-seven,  homepage-eight,  homepage-nine,  homepage-ten,

homepage-eleven,  homepage-twelve,
  homepage-thirteen,

Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur of the Menard Family,

Tactikal Guy

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unrelated, but also see Moving-World DECEPTION!! - HERE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Comments