Eyewitness Accounts Of Being Ripped Off By Mary Prantil Astoria New York

http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense http://twitter.com/BestMaryPrantil http://maryprantilripoffreport.blogspot.com/

 http://maryprantilcleancriminalrecord.wordpress.com/ http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/ http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/ http://maryprantilexecutiveassistanttoceo.blogspot.com/ http://www.badslava.com/nyc-open-mics.htm http://twitter.com/BestMaryPrantil http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/ http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/

 http://maryprantilcleancriminalrecord.wordpress.com/ http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=opera-portal&q=correct+the+record+by+mary+prantil&client=opera-portal&channel=portal http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera-portal&hs=xfF&channel=portal&q=mary+prantil+corrects+the+record&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/jan-windglows-aka-janhett-t-windglows-aka-enchantress-places-death-threats-to-mary-prantil-pornography-and-identity-theft-of-mary-prantil-since-oct-2006-200000-false-url’s-and-“28-2/http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/

http://digg.com/news/technology/MARY_PRANTIL_CORRECTS_THE_RECORD_2http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera-portal&hs=FlF&channel=portal&q=scam+mary+prantil&btnG=Search&aq=o&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera-portal&hs=ESa&channel=portal&q=scammaryprantil&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera-portal&hs=m8u&channel=portal&q=Rip+Off+report&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search.aspx

http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/mary-prantil.aspxhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/mary-t_-prantil.aspxhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/Mary-Theresa-Prantil.aspxhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/scammer-mary-pranrtil.aspxhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/cyber-stalker-mary-prantil.aspxhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/Cyber-Terrorist-Mary-Prantil.aspxhttp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=opera-portal&q=Indian+consumer+complaints+Board&client=opera-portal&channel=portalhttp://www.complaintsboard.com/

http://www.complaintsboard.com/?search=mary+prantil&everything=Everythinghttp://www.complaintsboard.com/?search=jim+morgan&everything=Everythinghttp://www.consumercomplaints.in/?search=jim+morganhttp://www.consumercomplaints.in/?search=jan+windglows

http://www.consumercomplaints.in/complaints/scam-jan-windglows-wanted-cyber-stalker-obsessed-with-covering-life-of-crime-c387977.htmlhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=opera-portal&hs=YvF&channel=portal&q=mary+prantil&btnG=Search&aq=o&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense  http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense http://www.google.com/profiles/marylegaldefense http://twitter.com/BestMaryPrantil http://maryprantilripoffreport.blogspot.com/

http://maryprantilcleancriminalrecord.wordpress.com/ http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/ http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/ http://maryprantilexecutiveassistanttoceo.blogspot.com/http://www.badslava.com/nyc-open-mics.htm   http://twitter.com/BestMaryPrantil http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/   http://maryprantilcleancriminalrecord.wordpress.com/

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM/global-hackers  http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM http://www.ripoffreport.com/lists/2/default2568.htm http://www.ripoffreport.com/fortune-tellers/jim-morgan-also-know/jim-morgan-also-known-as-drews-8mam2.htm http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/scams-jan-windglows/scams-jan-windglows-jim-morg-3f686.htm

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=opera-portal&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripoffreport.com%2FSearch%2Fjan-windglows.aspx&client=opera-portal&channel=portal https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2010500197486341252&postID=6050347475885554246


Mary T. Prantil Mary Theresa Prantil Mary Prantil's Criminal And Civil Records. Cyber Stalker And Con Artist That Rips Off On-line Businesses, Charges Backs, Bad Checks, Wire Fraud, Credit Card Fraud. Internet Criminal Mary T. Prantil Attempts To Cover Up Her Crimes Against Several Online Businesses. Cyber Stalker And Habitual Liar Mary Prantil
Eye Witnesses And Evidence

 
Mary Prantil's SOON upcoming October 14th 2010 Criminal Court Trial -she is facing not one but SEVERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES including a FELONY STALKING CHARGE ( 3rd degree stalking )

Log in as a public user, then type in the defendant's name, Mary Prantil to pull up and verify her criminal charges- this is a government public records website, which is the Manhattan New York District Attorney web site, court cases look up information:
 
 

Defendant Search Results

YOU SEARCHED ONDefendantMary Prantil
CountyAll Counties
Modify Search  New Sea
Search Results 1 through 3 of 3Note: To view case details, click the case # link (opens in new window).
Case # Defendant Summons # Appearance Date Court Judge Part
010NY022485 rantil, Mary
0/14/2010 ew York Criminal Court

009NY002655 rantil, Mary T
0/14/2010 ew York Criminal Court

009NY046033 rantil, Mary T
0/14/2010 ew York Criminal Court

 

Case Details - Charges

CASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court
Case #2010NY022485

DefendantPrantil, Mary
This one is for FELONY E STALKING, MORE COUNTS ON AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT:
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
L 240.30 02  Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone

L 120.50 03  Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionStalking - 3rd

L 240.30 01 
**TOP CHARGE**
 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm

Back to top
 

Case Details - Charges

CASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court
Case #2009NY002655

DefendantPrantil, Mary T
THIS ONE IS FOR RESISTING ARREST, AND YET ANOTHER AGGRAVED HARASSMENT CHARGE:
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
L 205.30 00 
**TOP CHARGE**
 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionResisting Arrest

L 240.30 01  Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm

Back to top

Case Details - Charges

CASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court
Case #2009NY046033

DefendantPrantil, Mary T
MORE, AND MORE AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, THESE ARE ARRAIGNMENT CHARGES- ALL OF THEM.
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
L 240.30 02  Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone

L 215.50 03  Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionCrim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt

L 240.30 1A 
**TOP CHARGE**
 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAggravated Harassment-2nd Deg


Be sure to visit this website often for more and current updates on the CRIMINAL that keeps saying "she has a clean criminal record"....."has never been arrested"..........MARY PRANTIL.  

Prantil is all over the Internet trying to cover this information up, blaming innocent others with her OWN CRIMES, telling lies, making up tons of false stories, etc. concerning this.

The information on this website has been taken from public records, and court transcripts with links provided so the public can cross check the information.


Generated image

Mary T. Prantil Caught Slamming & Scamming !


The proof is HERE all about Mary T. Prantil's lies concerning her allegedly getting "ripped off", her lies of being a victim of "identity theft", and the real truth about Mary Prantil charging back with Pay Pal after services were rendered to her the liar criminal Mary T. Prantil's LIAR mouth is on fire as usual.

DOES ANYONE HAVE A BIG FIRE HOSE TO PUT IT OUT, LOL???? Let us begin by viewing Miss Prantil's sites that go on in explaining how she has never and at any time ever had 
a spell cast in her ENTIRE LIFE and that some gypsy scum reader, as she likes to call us, or  some "clairvoyant" that, according to her lies had tried to rip her off for $ 5,000.
 
When I personally read over her sites it's really hard for me to stomach this boloney for more then five minutes as I know the real truth about this person. After reading some of her so-called "STELLAR REVIEWS", fake résumé and questionable character references on these questionable sites please come back to this report. 

Now that your back and laughing really hard to the point of tears, I'd like you to read the following statements below 
from another spell caster being Mr. Cahill of magic angel spells whom actually performed work for Prantil at one time in the recent past. The same Spell Casting site in whom Miss Prantil attempted to have curses cast on Jan and myself for allegedly ripping her off according to Mr. Cahill.

Please see where Miss Prantil became very angry with Mr. Cahill for not assisting her in cursing us, Again, according to 
Mr. Cahill, then see where Miss Prantil contacted my Ex-wife, Miss Schaub 
after Mr. Cahill apparently dropped Prantil for charging back on him a couple of times for services he rendered to Miss Prantil. 
Again read the statements Celeste Schaub is making concerning her encounter with Prantil in the way that Prantil is asking her to throw curses on not only us in this instance but Mr. Cahill as well for dropping her case. 

Look up the information below if you like as it's all factual and can be confirmed by Mr. Cahill himself or Pay Pal.
I believe Mr. Cahill would welcome your questions at this point regarding this matter as he's tired of Prantil's games along with my Ex, or being pulled up in the games of Miss Prantil regarding ror and prantil other statements on air found on many other gripe sites.

In other words, Prantil is saying one thing to folks and doing another thing in private, stating something completely 
opposite to factual information and truth on the net and carrying out slanderous and harassing deeds in private. Miss Prantil's constant or repeated claims that she was ripped off from various spell sites from behind her numerous fictitious names on ror is in all actually the exact opposite of what had occurred with prantil in real life and this is proven in this post and in other verifiable documentation.

It was Miss Prantil that was carrying out the con games, or rip offs against these magick sites and not the sites ripping her off...

WOW, isn't this a eye opener ?
 
Her pages on her site should be: Mary T. Prantil The Stellar Rip Off Artist lol. So, what I'd like to ask Prantil would be : 

You say that you were never ripped off on your sites and that you alone prevented this, correct ?
yet state the opposite thing by saying that you were in all your belligerent postings and direct telephone calls and nasty emails to not just one, but all of us. We all have all the emails and voice recordings over a three or four year span of time pertaining to these nasty communications.We also have Prantil's statements that not only did she trust us, but was extremely happy with her services from ALL OF US. 

Prantil, how can you state otherwise on your sites by saying that you never had, or engaged in any type of black 
magic spell castings against anyone, how do you explain these hard copy records below ? not to mention the current ones we hold on you ? Wow, there seems to be a little discrepancy in your statements, wouldn't you agree ? In short your telling people one thing on your sites but we can prove otherwise and thus showing that your a liar. 

So, which is it Miss Prantil ? did you get ripped off ? or did you escape the clutches of some nasty Psychic as you go on about on your sites ?. We have recording of Miss Prantil calling us gypsy scum that correlate with her postings on Rip Off Reports not to mention her calling us scams and con artist. 

Are you lying, Prantil ? or did you have spell work performed in your behalf ? What about Your claim of Identity theft ?  
Who would want your identity ? I wouldn't. What is your basis for the claim of identity theft ? would that be you actually signing contracts and making deals for black magic spells to dominate someone else's mind to your own needs ? Well, we have your records and can prove all your dealings with us. You rail on Rip Off Reports while stating that any one can say whatever they want, and that Ed Magedson is a criminal; well you should know Prantil as you've been up there posting enough smut on innocent people. 

Don't bother answering any of these questions above Miss Prantil, as it is 
hugely apparent to everyone at this point in what your really doing up here not to 
mention what you've carried out to innocent businesses along the way in the past 
and recent past. 

You attempted to rip off one site and was successful in ripping off another 
magic site along with a another unrelated Tarot Reader that I know of so far, 
and this is setting the record straight by confirming it with proof. Everyone 
can see how you've jumped from one site or business to another while trying 
to get them to cast negative spells on another including death spells, 
love spells and sexual spells. 

We can see all your begging and threats to slander us along with 
you actually carrying these threats out with your obvious postings on ror and 
other sites, We can see how poorly you lie. We can see quite clearly in how 
you've played these sites against one and the other in the past. It's now quite 
evident that your nothing but a really nasty, two bit scam artist who is pis_ed 
off because you've been EXPOSED for your scams that everyone moreover sees you 
for what you are and knows what you've doing little miss self-proclaimed NY 
stand up comic from corporate America Whanna BEEE. 

You know, we all have 
pages and pages of phone records and harassing phone voice messages connecting 
you to us through your threats, we have canceled checks from you not leaving out 
charge backs in various pay pal accounts and attempted charge backs. We have you 
on tape threatening to turn in every one of us to this state of federal agencies 
with false allegations, charges or police reports. 

You know we do Prantil, Don't 
you ?. It seems to me that you were telling us at one point in your postings how 
much Mr. Cahill had helped you along with the communications we've shown to 
everyone where your making this same positive statement about Jan and myself. So 
why are you posting smut on us now ? Why are you trying to connect us to each 
other in your post when you know were separate rival sites, and or competitors ? 
sounds like some more slamming and scamming going on here on your end, HUH Mary ???


Miss Prantil yells the loudest about being scammed, yet she is the 
biggest scam artist in the world and on the net, Miss Prantil talks about FRAUD 
yet it's on record regarding her attempted and actual credit card fraud through 
Pay Pal to my understanding. Miss Prantil brags about how she can acquire 
services or items, only to use them and return these items back to the store on 
a regular basis. 

Moreover how she obtains services from on-line business 
only to harass and threaten this same business in question until they refund her 
money back just to get rid of her. What does this make Mary T. Prantil ? Let me 
answer this for you : She is a petty two bit CRIMINAL, Thief, scam artist of the 
worst kind and a habitual lire to boot. Please read the Cahill and Schaub 
information below, Again, call them and inquire about this posted information 
and I believe that they will address your questions in a forthright and honest 
way. 



CATCHING 
A LIAR & THIEF IN THE ACT Called Mary


SO I, MARY PRANTIL, AM TELLING 
MY STORY TO CORRECT THE 
RECORD!




My Story: About 3 years ago (Oct 2006) my Father died of cancer and to deal with 
it, I foolishly went to a Psychic for a Psychic Reading who wanted to also scam 
me for thousands of dollars by encouraging me to buy Psychic Love Spells. It was 
this Scam Artist Psychic that retaliated when they realized I could not be 
scammed for thousands of dollars. So for over 3 years now, the Scam Artist 
Psychic posted all the false claims about me on Rip-off Report.com. I originally 
went to the Psychic because I was very devastated by my Dad's untimely death. 
It's not a crime to go to a Psychic or even buy a Psychic Reading. I did not 
Rip-off anyone. I asked the Psychic for my money back when I realized my 
mistake. So the Scam Artist and "so called Psychic" retaliated by posting all of 
these false claims on Ripoff Report.com for over 3 years without my permission. 
Clearly, the Scam Psychic has no life or real business with legitimate clients 
to continue for 3 years to post more false claims with no contact from me. 


3 years ago, I asked the Scam Artist Psychic for a refund for a pathetic 
Psychic Reading where I was not satisified and made it clear I felt I was ripped 
off. And I stated to the scam Psychic that I did not want to purchase any future 
Psychic Readings or any spells whatsoever. I wanted my money back for the 
Psychic Reading. It's not a crime to get a Psychic Reading. The only thing I was 
guilty of was being foolish to ever contact this Psychic. I believe in God and I 
now realize it was wrong to go to this Psychic. I learned my lesson to rely on 
my faith and not get Psychic Readings from Scam Artist on-line who prey on 
vulnerable innocent people. But again - getting a Psychic Reading is not a 
crime. In retrospect, I was really missing my Dad. I made a mistake to ever 
purchase a Psychic Reading on-line but it is not a crime. Over 3 years ago, I 
asked Ed Magedson to remove the false information about me from Ripoff 
Report.com and he refuses. I even scanned and sent him my Clean Criminal Record. 
Therefore, Ed Magedson is the real Criminal and Ripoff King not to be taken 
seriously. 


Mary T. Prantil's BOGUS Web Sites:

( PRANTIL'S 
COVER UP STORY... BAD MOUTHING ED MAGEDSON OF ROR )
**The links below show how Prantil has changed/ALTERED her cover up story.....**

 
C:\Users\jan\Documents\Downloads\PRANTIL SITE # 1.mht

 
C:\Users\jan\Desktop\CORRECT THE RECORD Mary Prantil2.mht



(PRANTIL'S
EMPLOYER AND PREVIOUS EMPLOYERS )

http://www.linkedin-ech3.com/pub/mary-prantil/a/632/591



(PRANTIL'S LIES TO COVER UP THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WHO AND WHAT SHE IS )

http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/mary-prantil-defends-truth-victim-of-ripoff-reportcom/


MARY PRANTIL'S BLOG PAGE

http://www.blogger.com/profile/02680327863556078460


(REPUTATION
"FAULTLESS")
http://maryprantil.blogspot.com/


(NEWSPAPER AND CO
WORKERS ON JIGSAW )

http://www.jigsaw.com/Mich_Pran_Davi_Prar/contact_information.xhtml
http://www.jigsaw.com/scid7472092/mary_prantil.xhtml



Mike
Cahill & Celeste Schaub Tells All, How To Catch A Theif Named Marry T.
Prantil
----- Original Message -----
From: service@paypal.com
To:
archer926@msn.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:15 AM
Subject: PayPal:
Initial Inquiry: Case ID - PP-467-553-217


Dear stanley cahill,


We recently received a complaint regarding merchandise that was
never
received or received significantly not as described. The details of
this
transaction are as follows:


Buyer's Name: Mary
Prantil
Buyer's Email: prant99@aol.com
Buyer's Transaction ID:
6E967396TD6877542

Transaction Date: Sep 6, 2007
Transaction Amount:
-$1, 500.00 USD
Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542
Case Number:
PP-467-553-217

Seller's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G


Your
Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542
Buyer's Transaction ID:
77E56376XD890860G


We are contacting you to let you know that we will
not be continuing this
investigation because this complaint was filed 45 or
more days after the
original transaction date. However, we reserve the right
for the next 180
days to begin an investigation if we later determine that
this complaint
should be examined.


We are committed to providing
our community a safe environment in which to
transact. As stated in the
PayPal User Agreement, we reserve the right to
close or limit an account in
response to excessive complaints received
about failure to ship merchandise,
non-delivery of services, merchandise
not as described, or problems with
merchandise shipped.

You do not need to contact PayPal at this time,
however, we encourage you
to work directly with the buyer to amicably resolve
this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this
matter.

Sincerely,
PayPal Protection Services
Department

Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not
monitored and you
will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your
PayPal account
and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any
page. If
your inquiry is regarding a claim, log in to your PayPal account and
go to
the Resolution
Center.



PayPal
Email ID
PP822



-----
Original Message -----
From: service@paypal.com
To: archer926@msn.com

Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Notification of
chargeback reversal: Case ID #PP-396-648-789 - PM001


Dear stanley
cahill,

We recently notified you that one of your buyers filed a
chargeback stating
unauthorized use of a credit card.

It is PayPal's
standard practice to dispute unwarranted chargebacks. Using
the information
you provided, we are in the process of disputing this
chargeback with the
buyer's card issuer.

Because the card issuer has reversed this charge,
PayPal is temporarily
holding an amount equal to the disputed funds until
this matter is
resolved. If the card issuer decides the case in your favor,
the funds will
be available in your PayPal account.

The credit card
company has charged PayPal a settlement fee for this
chargeback. In
accordance with the terms of the PayPal User Agreement, we
have debited your
PayPal account to cover this
fee.



Transaction
Details


Buyer's Name:Mary
Prantil
Buyer's Email:prant99@aol.com
Transaction Date:Oct 12,
2007
Your Transaction ID: 9ET7904456341182W
Buyer's Transaction ID:
3617020566305634D
Transaction Amount:-$900.00 USDCase
#:PP-396-648-789


What to Do
Next


To learn more about how to
respond to this chargeback, visit the Resolution
Center and click "Resolution
Center tutorials".

If you have additional information you’d like to
upload or fax to us,
please provide it as soon as possible. Just log in to
your PayPal account,
go to the Resolution Center, and click the “Details”
link next to this
case. For faster processing, choose “Upload
files.”

We understand that you may not have been expecting this
chargeback. If this
chargeback has made your PayPal account balance negative,
please reimburse
us by adding funds to your account or by sending a check to
the following
address:

PayPal
Attn: Accounting Department
P.O.
Box 45950
Omaha, NE 68145-0950
United
States


Due
Dates

Please submit your response
in the next 72 hours. The chargeback dispute
process is subject to strict
timelines. If you are unable to respond within
72 hours, we may be limited in
the ways that we can dispute this
chargeback. After we receive and review any
additional information, we can
determine if we can take any further action.
While we need to you respond
quickly, a final decision about this chargeback
may take up to 75 days.
- If your PayPal account balance has become negative,
please reimburse us
within 60 days of the date of this
email.


Other
Details


This transaction was
reversed for the following reasons(s):

- We did not receive signed proof
of delivery.

For further assistance, please log in to your PayPal account
and click the
Help link located in the top right corner of any page, or email
our
Chargeback Department at the email address below. Be sure to include
your
case ID number in the subject of the email.

Sincerely,

PayPal
Chargeback Department
Email:
chargeback-appeal1@paypal.com
Fax:
402-537-5755
CB:PP-396-648-789:R4:USD900.00:01032008:9ET7904456341182W



PayPal
Email ID
PP800


6-15-08
Jim,
I'm sending this in to clear my name with you. I'm sending this as proff that I
no longer have Mary as a client and that she took back several of the payments
made to me through pay pal and that I'm not involved in any kind of plott
conspiracy with Mary or anyone against you and jan - I hope this will put an end
to you thinking I'm part of any kind of attacks on you - we have had a few
disagreements over the years but until now we have always worked them out and
you know that attacking you on the internet is not my style - as always I remain
here willing to discuss any of this with you at any time - sincerely
mike

brief summary
Mary prant came to me in sept of 2007 and stated
that you and jan cheated her and she begged me to take her case and help her - M
agreed to pay me $3200.00 + $ 100.00 for pay pal fees and cost totaling $3300.00
and I was to cast repetitive type love and disruption prayers on her B.F. hani
in sept, oct, nov and dec of 2008 and weekly updated prayers were also cast
every week for M case - the e mail below from mary was her promising to repay
the two charge backs and the amount due if I would continue her case - then a
short while later she again tried charging back the 1st $ 1500.00 made in sept
2007 through pay pal and also on the $300.00 she paid on march 5 2008 through
pay pal which was so I'd do more work for her etc - it's been several times she
promises top pay me if I'd work on her case again after she cheated me by filing
charge backs with pay pal - and I took her back several times based on her
saying she was sorry and that she promised to pay the full balance due plus all
charges added by pay pal and I did more work on her case and then a few weeks
later she'd get mad and try more charge backs all over again and she stopped
payment on a check she sent me omn 4-10-08 - this was the last straw and I have
had no contact with her since - I tried my best to help her but she continued
filing charge backs against me and stopped payment on that check too - also in
sept 2007 when she first came to me I refused to do the curses that she wanted
me to do on you and jan as you know that is not the way I work and I told her we
may not be getting alone now but we were friends for many years - and I
explained that you were within your rights to drop her as she was so obsessive
and clearly abused you and jan and your services - I'm always here to discuss
this with you at any time and I hope you and jan can see that I'm not involved
in any conspiracy with anyone against you - sincerely mike

$2000.00
BALANCE DUE AS OF MARCH 17 2008

THEN SINCE MARCH 17 2008 M FILED MORE
CHARGE BACKS & STOPPED PAYMENT ON A CHECK TO ME
$ 1500.00 CHARGE BACK ON
1ST PAYMENT MADE APROX SEPT 10 2007
$ 300.00 CHARGE BACK 3-5-2008
PAYMENT
$ 200.00 CHECK 4-10-2008 M STOPPED PAYMENT
----- Original Message
-----
From: Stanley Cahill
To: Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Monday, March
17, 2008 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: Payment Plan - What is owed?


mary I
just finished building more dolls for your prayers to be continued - you can
write another handwritten letter of request and request exactly what you want -
and send it when you can send a payment toward the balance due I need to buy
suppliers materials and offering to make up the alchemy's to continue casting
these prayers for you - without these implements they are not very effective - I
will expect and honest effort that you are making payments to me on a regular
bases - also my pay pal account is frozen - all payments must be made by
cashiers check or money order - I'm always here for you mary - sincerely
mike

our original
$3200.00 u.s.d was our original agreement in sept
2007
$ 100.00 u.s.d was added to help cover the fee pay pal charges and you
agreed to that after the first payment
========
$3300.00 u.s.d
-
$1500.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal around sept 10 2007
========
$
1800.00 u.s.d. balance due
- $ 900.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox
oct 10 -15 2007
========
$ 900.00 u.s.d balance due this was originally
promised to be paid by nov 10th 2007
$ 450.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on
aprox noc 10-15 2007
=======
$ 450.00 u.s.d. bal due on or before dec 10
2007
+ $900.00 u.s.d the oct 2007 payment wascharged back by you through pay
pal aprox in nov of 2007
+ $450.00 u.s.d. the nov 2007 payment charged back
aprox late dec 2007 or early jan 2007
========
$1800.00 u.s.d balance past
due
$ 500.00 u.s.d job payer done when you lost your job

========
$2300.00 u.s.d
- $ 300.00 u.s.d paid by you to pay pal aprox
2 weeks ago 3-5-08
========
$ 2000.00 u.s.d balance past due

also
you agreed to pay the fee pay pal charged for the charge backs - there not that
much 80 - 90 bucks
they charged 29-30 bucks on the 450 - I'm blocked from
even viewing that account
in reality other than the $300.00 you just paid to
pay pal considering the charge backs I haven't gotten anything from you since
the first payment - yes I got the other two payments but pay pal is demanding
their money and they have put a report against my credit because I actually owe
them that money being you did the charge backs and the $300.00 did not come to
me it went toward the amount I owe them plus the fees they added

if you
have any questions you can call this evening as I'm doing a ritual most of today
and I won't be able to talk
thanks mike


----- Original Message
-----
From: Prant99@aol.com
To: archer926@msn.com
Sent: Monday,
March 17, 2008 3:12 AM
Subject: Payment Plan - What is owed?


Mike,


I do not wish to cheat you but I also concerned about the case. I want a
reuniting and disruprion on all other people that interfere...for Hani to move
back in and make a commitment to me leading to marriage...honestly where is the
case ???

I need to make monthly payments to you.

You got $300
last week.

So $1800.

What is
owed?

Mary



-----
Original Message -----
From: Celeste Schaub
To: Mike
Sent: Thursday,
October 15, 2009 7:41 PM
Subject: hello


HI Mike,


Just
want to take a few minutes to go over what we talked about the other day, in
reference to M P, your past client. I remember when you were working with her,
and on the phone day and night for hours trying to calm her down, as I witnessed
this more than once when I was down at your place doing spells together and even
blooded on her spell while you were doing it along with my clients
spells.


In November of 2007 she emailed me when she was involved with
you still, and had Pay Pal take back the money she had sent you for these same
spells (prayers) work I already described above. I am not sure of the amount but
believe it was around $1, 800.00 for several different spells. Because the two
of you were involved in the charge back she was doing with Pay Pal, she was
asking me to do spell work for her. I declined doing anything for her for
various reasons; one being she was already your client and I don't work with
clients who are already engaged with another spell caster; two she wanted me to
do spell work against Jim and Janhett (curses), as well as to get her boyfriend
back. I got one more email from her the next day saying she really needed this
work done, almost begging me to take her on as a new client. I again wrote her
back, she wanted me to call her, and stated the same to her again and forwarded
you the emails she sent me, along with my responses. The next thing I knew she
was sending me emails she was sending to Jim and Janhett, that had been cc'd to
you and me, implying you and I were involved in some sort of conspiracy "to get
Jim and Janhett". This never was as you know and I had to finally block her
emails, but I was informed from a client of mine at the time that she was
suppose to have told Jim that she flew down to meet you and I...how
preposterous, I never even talked to this woman, or saw her before in my life,
too much drama for me. I told her Jim and I were having enough problems trying
to work out our divorce with everyone else interfering and I wasn't getting
involved in any of this bs. But yes she definitely did contract you for spell
work, and I was there for at least two of the spells myself. I told her, her
problems with Jim and Janhett were hers to work out and not to involve me. I
told her you were in my opinion, which I still feel today, the best person to
work with her for spell work as you were always completely dedicated to your
clients and do things as Divinity dictates. You always answer the telephone and
emails no matter when they come in. Your honesty and integrity is of the highest
qualifications I know. Hope this further clarifies our discussion the other
night. Take care,

Your friend and fellow magician,

Celeste


Mary Prantil Scamming Yet Another Magick Site She Claims Not To
Know.

Set the record straight, huh ?. Well I will set the record straight
for you in this post ok ?. Ok Viewers, lets look at what Mary T. Prantil
attempted to do to us on top of what she's done to these other sites in
question. Please see the articles below outlining Prantil's negative scam plot
that went horrible wrong with Miss Windglows Pay Pal account, You will further
see the pattern unfolding in the Prantil scam routine.

Here's where Mary
Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was
Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY
PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY
DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER
STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.

Matilda the Psychic writes
to Jan : "I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did
read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said
time she cried, cursed and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't
usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually
people charge 1, 000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High
Magic, not something simple.

Also the first card I got for her situation
was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was
married, she said "No, not my H".

Well she begged me ( begged Matilda the
psychic NOT Jan ) so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all
hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell.
Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo
many bills and could I do it for $500.00.

I did it .It worked
immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug
addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it
was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she "was no angel" with Jan's
service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card
with Paypal and tried to claim that the "merchandise" was not the quality that
she expected. Spell work is NOT merchandise because it is SPIRITUAL in nature
and therefore not tangible.

I said I would reverse the spell if she
didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even
arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I
sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I
performed the service." ( Direct email quote from Psychic Matilda to Jan
)


HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY
QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE
INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL. The invoice was
initially sent to Prantil ( numerous times because her credit card would not go
through for the charge ) and the invoice was never paid by Prantil. She sent a
signed personal check through regular first class mail for her spell services,
then once her castings were completed and she messed up her relationship with
her now ex, she then tried to go into Pay Pal and put money on the open invoice
to which Jan promptly cancelled the invoice before Prantil had a chance.
Everything was explained to Prantil and she clearly understood that there would
be no refunds because once a spell is cast it is a done deal.

Mary
Prantil tried to mess up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own
invoice after her personal check that was written to Jan cleared so that she
could force Jan to give her a refund anyway despite what she had already been
told and had agreed to regarding payment, the casting, no refunds, etc. until
Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent
activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoice.

Again, Jan
caught on to what Prantil was getting ready to do which was to rip Jan off, so
Jan cancelled the invoice from Prantil. Prantil then became so angry she
reported Jim Morgan to Pay Pal and it was not even Mr. Morgan's Pay Pal account.
What Prantil did at the point that she realized that she could not charge back
on the open invoice that Prantil never paid but was getting ready to put funds
on so she COULD charge back and force a refund anyway, Prantil then in anger
wrote a complaint to Pay Pal and placed a claim of Fraud against Jim Morgan on
this account, again which was not even his.

Again, Jim Morgan doesn't
even own the company nor does he have anything to do with the administrative
functions of this company such as receiving monies for anything especially spell
work. Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied
Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also was confused in the way that
she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for running and or owning a
company to which he has no connections to other then helping out with the
counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get paid for.

See
how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get her work
performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her
money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email
originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading.
To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any
doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary
Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

-----Original
Message-----
From: m prantil
To: complaint-response@paypal.com
Cc:
wizardmorgan2@aol.com; passionspells@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12
pm
Subject: Invoice From James Morgan


PayPay,

I wish to
report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice currently on my
PayPal account form this site Love lust and Blood spells.

I will forward
emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will also call directly to
file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by him.

Thanks,


Mary Prantil


HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT
FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE
OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's
claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part. Mary Prantil in her ignorance
thought that just because Jan had sent her an invoice that she had NOT paid,
that she still had money on THAT open invoice, LOL. ( isn't that like thinking
you still have money in the bank as long as you still have checks, LOL????) **
NOTE** if ANYONE would like to see the original invoice record that was
cancelled by Jan, then write and we will forward it to you to show that we are
telling the entire truth about Mary's little Pay Pal temper
tantrum.

Forwarded Message:
Subj: STOP BOTHERING US
Date:
6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To:
Prant99

Mary,

your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And
this is my business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a
derrogatory manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because
of the grace of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along
with H____ as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and
sent him nasty e-mails, etc.

We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly
suggest you back off. I am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the
FBI as I write this. You have, for one thing ( just one of many) already
violated Federal Internet Law.

In addition, I will report you to our cell
phone company immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone
stalking.

In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER
paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail
stating that:


6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From:
Prant99


Reply To:
To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2


I
sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America
check.

-----Original Message-----
From: Passionspells@aol.com
To:
Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm
Subject: Verification
Needed


Dear Mary,


This is Jan writing, dear. Could you
please verify your method of payment with me when you initially came in for your
spell work?

I am going through all of my client records doing
verification, etc. for my records.

Thank you dear, I really appreciate
it.


Sincerely,
Jan


Here is a copy and paste of the pay
pal invoices that you never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of
your abusive e-mails so that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused
us. You have no credence in that matter.

From:
Janhett T. Windglows

To:
Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)




Amount:

$1, 250.54 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 6, 2007




Subject:

Spells Invoice
Invoice
Janhett T. Windglows
passionspells@aol.com

Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount
1 050607 30 Day Spells Package
For Mary 1, 200.00 1, 200.00 T
Subtotal: 1, 200.00
Shipping: 46.80 T

T = 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74
Currency is in U.S. Dollars
(USD) Total: $1, 250.54 USD


Request Sent


From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:
Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)




Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 8, 2007




Subject:

Revised Invoice




Note:

Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one thanks
dear

Request Sent

From:
Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)




Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 8, 2007




Subject:

2nd one

In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I.
for harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed.
You should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for
you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not,
that is no longer our problem.

-----------------------Jan



HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER
ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT
HER LOL.

Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony

Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To:
Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells


Jim, (and Jan)

H - - -
actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- - - - is prob
mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one of the
reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I was
upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by
11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - -
- - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with
me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - -
and the email.

T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3
weeks H- - - - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan
about these 2 spells.

Let me know.

Mary

HERE IS WHERE JAN
REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER
BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED
OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.

Subj: ABUSE
Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific
Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: tosreports@aol.com

I wish
to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her e-mails. We
have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to send us
more mail under different e-mail addresses.

Her name is Mary Prantil, and
she has sent to us via the following e-mail
addresses:

Prant99@aol.com

mary.prantil@email.com

I have
all of her contact information, home address and telephone number.
 I really do need this abuse from her to stop.

My other screen name is
wizardmorgan2@aol.com

in which she has also been blocked
from.

Sincerely,

Jan Windglows

THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO
TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY.
AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND FURTHER
REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER
$1, 200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST
OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER SHE
DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU
CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.

Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250
more 2 send T. F last phase...
Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard
Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells



Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again
"reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes.
I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on
me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please !!

I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so
pure and high. I do not want you to send me back any money.

I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with T. F. I also
want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me, , , that he can't stop
thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so sexually
frusterated without me...who ever he fucks or has a one night stand or bi-sexual
3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my love...that he f- -
- - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until he gets me back -
even if it means leaving T.F and the office.

Are you still willing to
help me?

I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you
then I can send the $250 today.

Mary
the needy brat...but lovable and
willing to let go...


THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH
DECIDED AT THE TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL
CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER
AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .

Mary,


OUR RESPONSE BACK TO MARY PRANTIL:


Due to your ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided
counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed
Matilda not to have any further communications with you.
After I send this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not
to have any further contact with you either.

Your spell work with James
and myself has been finished, and Kim is finishing your spell work that you
hired her for. I paid for your counseling with Kim. Since I paid for your
counseling, which I did not have to do, for some reason you think that Kim's
spell work included your counseling, which it did NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR
COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????

I am officially ending all contact with you
right after I send this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point
on. You have exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with
any of us, because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and
constantly continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.

HOW DARE
YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.

JUST SO YOU KNOW
AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID
US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters, and re casts also.


WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.

CONCERNING ANY
FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING
TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF
THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.

GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST
CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN ALL MY YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.


MARY T.
PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Criminal Check for
all Mary T Prantil in the state of CA
Record 1 of 6

IDENTIFICATION
Mary T Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA

OFFENSE DETAILS

CASE NUMBER: M598531 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED:
San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 03/23/1990 OFFENSE
COUNTY: San Diego

Record 2 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa
Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T105836 -
Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO
MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 11/13/1992 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego

Record
3 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T108343 - Confirm Case at the
Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL

OFFENSE DATE: 01/04/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego

Record 4 of 6

IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA

OFFENSE
DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T110326 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY
CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 02/02/1993
OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego

Record 5 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary
Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER:
T120948 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT:
SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 08/09/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego


Record 6 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa
Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: M695524 -
Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO
MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 02/01/1995 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego



MATTER DISBARRMENT FRANK G. PRANTIL

SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES

No. D-787


110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L.
Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351, 1989.SCT.45677



November 27, 1989

IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL

For earlier order herein, see
Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia,
Kennedy

It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of
Fair Oaks, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the
Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having
suspended the said Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and
directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;

It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice of law
in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted
to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Disposition

Disbarrment entered.

19891127

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.


http://wi.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.
%5CSCT%5CSCT2%5C1989%5C19891127_0045677.SCT.htm/qx


Powered
by VersusLaw, Inc.
Home | Advertise | About | Feedback | Terms | Privacy
Policy | FAQ
All contents © Copyright 2008 - 2009 VersusLaw, Inc. Bellevue,
WA, USA. All rights reserved




On
trial before the bar court in San Francisco, FRANK PRANTIL [#35155], 67, of
Sacramento is charged with multiple counts of failing to perform legal services
competently. Prantil was disbarred in 1989, reinstated in 1994 and charged with
misconduct in 2002. The trial on the new charges was ongoing at press time and
although the bar had not formally asked for his disbarment, it is a possible
penalty.

The 1989 disbarment was the result of convictions for forgery
and being an accessory to possess
cocaine.

http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_cbj.jsp?sCategoryPath=/Home/Attorney%20Resources/
California%20Bar%20Journal/June2005&sCatHtmlPath=cbj/2005-06_TH_03_
2nd-disbarments.html&sCatHtmlTitle=Top%20Headlines



In
a case two miles across town at the State Bar offices on Howard Street -- and at
the other end of the world of privilege -- 67-year-old defense attorney Frank
Prantil is facing a task he's already performed numerous times -- defending
himself against accusations that he's acted unethically as an attorney. In 1979,
Prantil was suspended from practicing law after he was accused of improperly
representing a client. While on probation, Prantil was alleged to have
participated in a check-fraud scheme. He was convicted of forgery and disbarred,
according to the California Supreme Court opinion confirming Prantil's
disbarment.

Prantil later took advantage of California rules that allow
disbarred attorneys to ask for reinstatement after five years. Prantil
successfully argued that he had rehabilitated himself, and resumed practice in
1994.

Prantil is now facing State Bar disciplinary charges, which could
potentially get him disbarred again, alleging that he failed to competently
defend a client, then improperly charged the client for his
services.

Prantil's case, along with three cases decided earlier this
year in which California attorneys were disbarred for a second time, has added
steam to a nine-year-old bureaucratic proposal to give judges the option of
disbarring the worst attorneys for life.

In California, there now exists
no legal concept of permanent disbarment. A State Bar committee on Nov. 15 will
consider the possibility of changing that, if only slightly. Rather than making
all disbarments permanent, it would extend from five to seven years the amount
of time disbarred attorneys would have to wait before requesting to be
reinstated, and would give judges the option of forever banishing the worst of
California's worst attorneys.

The fact that it's taken nine years for
such a mild proposal to reach this preliminary step hints at a lack of
seriousness the California legal establishment lobby applies to abuses by its
own
members.

http://www.sfweekly.com/2005-11-09/news/baring-equality/



UNITED
STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank G. PRANTIL,
Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit

June 25, 1985

764 F.2d 548

Charles F. Gorder, Jr.,
Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr.,
Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for
plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for
defendant-appellant.

AMENDED OPINION

Appeal from the United States
District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON
and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.

FERGUSON,
Circuit Judge:

1
The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals
his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the
offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001;
and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. All of the defendant's
convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal
defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day
trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a
fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed the misprision
of a felony count before the trial began. On appeal, the defendant raises a host
of issues which, for the most part, we need not address. Three of the
defendant's challenges, however, require reversal of the defendant's convictions
for the reasons explained herein.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2
The
defendant was retained by Ronald Powell to represent his wife, Betty Lou Powell,
and her son in a federal criminal prosecution on various drug-related charges.1
Mr. Powell had been a previous client of the defendant in unrelated criminal
proceedings. After Mrs. Powell and her son were arrested at the Powell residence
on April 23, 1982 in connection with the narcotics charges, Mr. Powell, who was
also named in the felony arrest warrant, remained a fugitive until his
apprehension on August 10, 1982. On the day of his wife's arrest, Mr. Powell
telephoned the defendant, Frank Prantil, and retained his services for the
criminal proceedings against his immediate family. Throughout Mr. Powell's
fugitive status, the defendant periodically telephoned Mr. Powell and met him on
at least two occasions.

3
During their first meeting after the
incarceration of Mrs. Powell, Mr. Powell presented the defendant with a partial
payment of the retainer agreement and directed the defendant to the whereabouts
of other sources of cash in various bank accounts and at the Powell residence.
Mrs. Powell, unable to make a $750, 000 bond, remained incarcerated until the
completion of her criminal trial. She gave the defendant the power of attorney
to collect the funds from the various bank accounts. The defendant also
retrieved a substantial sum of money from a floor safe at the Powell residence
that had been overlooked at the time of the Powell family arrest. Although
questions over the capacity in which Mr. Prantil retained custody of these
monies (as attorney fees or in bailment for Mrs. Powell) occupied a substantial
portion of the defendant's trial, we need not parse the evidence on this subject
here. Pursuant to the retainer agreement negotiated by Mr. Powell, the defendant
represented Mrs. Powell for the duration of her criminal trial. The case was
prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder.

4
Mr.
Prantil succeeded in obtaining an acquittal on all but four of the fifteen
criminal counts leveled against his client Mrs. Powell. During the course of his
representation of Mrs. Powell, the defendant also sent his sister-in-law,
Malvina Schmidt, to meet the fugitive Ronald Powell for reasons not relevant
here. Within the same time frame, the defendant, on several occasions, acted as
the conduit for negotiations between the fugitive Ronald Powell and Assistant
U.S. Attorney Gorder for Mr. Powell's surrender. During the period when Mr.
Powell was a fugitive, the defendant was summoned before a grand jury and
questioned by Mr. Gorder concerning his contacts and relationship with Mr.
Powell. Three of the defendant's five perjury convictions rest on responses he
made to Mr. Gorder's grand jury examination. The remaining two perjury charges
and the two false statement counts stem from the events surrounding the
defendant's efforts to obtain Mrs. Powell's release on bond pending the appeal
from her criminal conviction. For purposes of this appeal, however, we need only
discuss the evidence presented on one perjury count.

5
One of the
defendant's perjury convictions rests on grand jury testimony the defendant gave
under questioning by Mr. Gorder regarding a trip to Omaha, Nebraska. In his
testimony the defendant stated that he was picked up by a blonde woman at his
hotel in Omaha, Nebraska who took him to meet Mr. Powell and then transported
the defendant to the airport. The defendant further testified that he did not
know the identity of this woman. At trial the government contended that the
defendant committed perjury when he denied knowing the name of this
woman.

6
Under the government's theory, the defendant falsely denied
knowing the identity of this blonde woman in order to protect the woman from the
grand jury's investigation. The government unsuccessfully sought to prove that
the blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel was Malvina Schmidt, the
defendant's sister-in-law. The evidence at trial revealed that although the
defendant had been met and transported to a different airport by a blonde woman
on a different occasion, no one picked up the defendant at his Omaha hotel. The
evidence did demonstrate that the defendant eventually met his sister-in-law at
a restaurant in the Omaha area. Accordingly, on appeal the government has
shifted its perjury allegation by recasting the defendant's denial of knowledge
about the name of the blonde woman who met him at his hotel into a denial of
"knowing who was with [Mr.] Powell in the Omaha area." In response, the
defendant claims his conviction should be reversed because the identity of the
woman whom he incorrectly recalled to have met at his Omaha hotel is immaterial
to any matters then before the grand jury and thus not perjurious.

II.
ISSUES ON APPEAL

7
The defendant has raised several challenges to his
convictions on appeal. We reach only three of his challenges. The defendant's
first allegation of error involves the refusal of the trial court to grant a
pretrial motion to have the prosecutor, Mr. Gorder, recused from the case so
that the defendant could call Mr. Gorder as a witness. The defendant also claims
that the prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper argument during closing
argument and the defendant was thereby prejudiced. The final contention of error
challenges the materiality of the defendant's allegedly perjurious statements
regarding the blonde woman at the Omaha airport.

8
The defendant has
also raised a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as to counts seven and
eight of the indictment which charged the defendant with violations of the false
statement statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001. In essence, the government presented
evidence that the defendant attempted to secure the release of his client Betty
Powell through the submission of an appeal bond form that the defendant knew was
not authorized by the named bond company. Viewing the evidence in the light most
favorable to the prosecution we find the evidence presented sufficient to enable
a rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a
reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789,
61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Nonetheless, for the reasons discussed in the balance of
the opinion, we reverse the defendant's convictions on these and the other
counts of the indictment.

A. The Propriety of a Prosecuting
Witness

9
The prosecutor in this case, Assistant United States
Attorney Charles Gorder, was also the prosecutor in the previous trial of Betty
Powell. Mr. Gorder not only opposed the defendant in that trial but also
conducted the examination of the defendant in both the grand jury and bond
proceedings that are the subject of defendant's perjury convictions in this
case. Mr. Gorder was also involved in the discussions with the bond agency as to
the adequacy of Mrs. Powell's bond collateral which gave rise to the defendant's
false statement convictions. Finally, on several occasions Mr. Gorder negotiated
directly with the defendant for the surrender of Ronald Powell, the fugitive
whom the defendant was accused of harboring and giving aid. Thus, although he
never took the stand, Mr. Gorder was a witness to, and indeed a participant in,
some aspect of all of the events alleged in the indictment.

10
The
defendant was charged and convicted of being an accessory after the fact to Mr.
Powell's criminal offenses in that the defendant did "receive, relieve, comfort
and assist Ronald Lee Powell in order to hinder and prevent his apprehension,
trial and punishment, " in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. During trial the
principal defense asserted by the defendant to this count, and the harboring a
fugitive charge, revolved around the defendant's efforts to successfully
negotiate Mr. Powell's surrender with Mr. Gorder. Rather than harboring or
assisting Mr. Powell, the defendant contended he was actively conducting the
ongoing negotiations for Mr. Powell's timely surrender through direct
communications with both Mr. Gorder and Mr. Powell. Obviously, this defense
hinges substantially on the availability of evidence detailing the defendant's
role in these surrender negotiations.

11
Both before and during the
trial defense counsel unsuccessfully moved the court to recuse the prosecutor to
enable the defense to call him as a witness. After final argument the defendant
moved for a mistrial because the prosecutor's remarks "reaffirm[ed] Mr. Gorder's
role as a witness in the case without cross-examination, because they appeared
to be, in the way that they were framed, assertions of personal knowledge based
on his dealings with Mr. Prantil." At every juncture, the prosecutor refused
either to recuse himself or to testify. The trial court declined to disturb the
prosecutor's decision and denied, without comment, all of the defendant's
motions on this matter.

12
The prosecutor defended his decision, and
the trial court concurred, on the grounds that his testimony was unnecessary and
cumulative to the defendant's case. We recognize that a defendant has an
obligation to exhaust other available sources of evidence before a court should
sustain a defendant's efforts to call a participating prosecutor as a witness.
United States v. West, 680 F.2d 652, 654 (9th Cir.1982). Nonetheless, the
defendant's obligation to resort to alternative means of adducing factual
testimony is not absolute. Both the quality and quantity of the alternate
sources of evidence are proper subjects for comparison with that sought directly
from the participating prosecutor. For example, in this case the prosecutor
contends that his testimony on the defendant's efforts to arrange for the
surrender of the fugitive Ron Powell was unnecessary and cumulative.


Previous address Locations & Criminal Records Of Mary T. Prantil:


3285 33rd St, Astoria, NY 11106
Reported:12/01/2002

251 32nd St, New York, NY 10016
Reported:07/18/2001

3285 33 Wusd # 69, Astoria, NY 11106
Reported:06/01/2001

3044 1st Ave, San Diego, CA 92103
Reported:11/13/2000

1352 PO Box, New York, NY 10150
Reported:06/18/1997

3044 Juniper St # 2, San Diego, CA 92104
Reported:10/01/1995

1154 22nd # 2, San Diego, CA 92102
Reported:12/01/1993

319 Gravilla St, La Jolla, CA 92037
Reported:08/01/1992

Criminal Court Records Of Mary T. Prantil :

Criminal Profile
Subject Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Date:
12/8/2007 3:45:39 PM

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
M695524

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T105836

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T108343

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T110326

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T120948

Criminal Court Records

Name: PRANTIL, MARY T
Case Number: M598531
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 03/23/1990

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number: M695524
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 02/01/1995

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number: T105836
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 11/13/1992

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number: T108343
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 01/04/1993

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number: T110326
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 02/02/1993

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number: T120948
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 08/09/1993

Bankruptcies, Tax Liens & Judgments by Name for:
Name: PRANTIL,MARY T
Address:
PO BOX 1352, NEW YORK NY 10150

Action:
STATE TAX LIEN
Court:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY COURT (RD)
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case:
9706100302 (06/10/1997)
Liability/Assests:
$1,310.00/NA

Name:
PRANTIL,MARY T
Address:
251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016

Action:
BANKRUPTCY
Court:
NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County)
Case:
9640110 (01/11/1996)
Liability/Assests:
NA/NA

Name:
PRANTIL,MARY T
Address:
251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016

Action:
BANKRUPTCY
Court:
NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County)
Plaintiff:
PRO SE
Case:
9640110 (01/11/1996)
Liability/Assests:
NA/NA

Judgement Against
Name: PRANTIL,MARY T
Address: 3038 DICKENS ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92106
Action: SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT
Court: KEARNEY MESA MUNI - SAN DIEGO CO
Plaintiff: LIBS CHIROPRACTOR CENTER
Case: 570215 (12/19/1991)
Liability/Assests: $2,198.00/NA
 
Mary T. Prantil's Contact Information:
WARNING !!! DO NOT GIVE HER YOUR PHONE # OR EMAIL ADDRESS !!!
( you will REGRET it !!!! )


Mary Prantil

917-224-6605 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              917-224-6605      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

mprantil@aol.com

32-85 33rd Strret, C2
Astoria, New York  11106

Mary Prantil
43 US Rte 1

P: 917-224-6605 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              917-224-6605      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Email:
mprantil@aol.com

MARY T. PRANTIL'S TWITTER PAGE : 
( Go to Twitter and read tweets written by a real TWIT, LOL )
http://twitter.com/search?q=bestmaryprantil



From: Michael Jenkins <spells@extremeblackmagic.com>
To: passionspells@aol.com; wizardmorgan2@yahoo.com; wizardmorgan2@aol.com
Sent: Mon, August 23, 2010 3:18:01 PM
Subject: Information for Mary Prantel

To whom this may concern;

This letter concerns Ms. Mary T Prantil of Astoria New York.

My name is Michael Jenkins owner of www.lovespells-magicspells.com and
www.extremeblackmagic.com. My contact information is as follows: 801 W.
Bay Drive Suite 471 Largo, Florida 33770 phone number is 1-727-216-9750 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              1-727-216-9750      end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I
will be more than happy to assist anyone that may be reading this in any
kind of questions that he/she may have.

Please forgive me lack of specific dates as I deal with many people and
this situation with her has been going on for quite some time. Ms. Prantil
first contacted me for spell work in 2007 I believe, but it may have been
2006, as I am not for sure. During her first contact she made with me she
had asked me to do a spell for her and at the time I was rather busy and
told her that it would be quite some time before I would be able to help
her. Because of this she did not call me back about the spell. She did in
fact go with another spell caster, Jan Windglows.

A few months later I noticed reports on rip off report about myself, Mrs. Windglows
and Mr. Morgan. I am unsure of what this was about as I personally had
done nothing to her and have had no dealings with her. I went on the site
to defend this point and she constantly kept putting more and more reports
about myself, Mr. and Mrs. Morgan.

Later she started to e-mail me MANY, and when I say many I mean 10 to 15
e-mails a day. In these e-mails she would say that I was a scam, Jim was a
scam, and Janett was a scam, ect. She would also go on to say how she was
going to call the feds and put them in jail and she was going to put me in
jail. She also would go on to slander us continually for no reason on ror. Next
she started calling my phone continually. At first I did not answer the
phone calls and I had saw what she had done and did not want to speak with
her as I figured her as a crazy person. Because of this I didn't care to
have any dealings of any kind. After about the 130th call in a row I
finally had to answer as she was disrupting my business because no one
else could call in. In the conversation she stated that she had wanted me
to perform a spell against Jim and Janet and that I would be taken care
of. I took this to mean that she would not be posting any more false
reports about me. Basically extortion and black mail. Of course I told her
"NO" and that I would be contacting Mr. and Mrs. Morgan about the phone
conversation. I hung up and the calls kept coming. It was months before
she finally stopped calling. I kept the phone conversations that she would
leave on my voice mail and gave them to Mr. and Mrs. Morgan for their
records. Once the conversations were posted on the net she finally quit
calling because she realized that I was given the recording to them.

I have also noticed on Rip Off Report that she has posted under many
different names tring to make it look like she is someone else. She's
deceiving people and tricking them into believing their are many
dissatisfied customers from my services. That is not the only site that
she is posting on either.

Through the course of the last few years I have suffered because of her
negative slander and libel she has on the net. The most important part is
that she will not quit. She keeps going up on different sites and posting
more and more reports. Let me first remind you that I NEVER DID ANY WORK
FOR HER WHAT SO EVER! So this type of abuse she has posted is absolutely
uncalled for.

She has also made talk about in conversations about Janet dyeing. She
doesn't mention exactly how, but the conversation is lead to believe that
she would do something to harm Janet her self.

My experience with Ms. Prantel has been a horrifying one not only to
myself and the stress she has put on my business and person life, but the
stress she has placed on myself personally because of these negative
reports that she keeps posting. In all honesty all you need do is read the
reports that she has online and you will see the things for yourself. Its
very clear what her intentions are as she states them. She wants to kill
our business and in some statements ourselves.

Ms. Prantel has a very violent history and also a history of doing this to
many other people that have had the displeasure to meet her. Please do
something to stop this individual that is personally a menace to society!


Thanks,
Michael Jenkins
1-727-216-9750
Comments