Was the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917 inevitable?
1 The Bolshevik Party and its programme became the focus for all opposition to the Provisional Government and support for them grew rapidly during the summer.
2 The frustration of soldiers and workers exploded in the July Days, partly engineered by middle-ranking Bolsheviks. But the Bolshevik leadership was not ready to take power and the uprising fizzled out.
3 The Bolsheviks were not the tightly disciplined, unified body that some have supposed, although its organisation was better than that of other parties.
4 Kerensky tried to use Kornilov to gain control of Petrograd but Kornilov had his own agenda.
5 The Kornilov affair was disastrous for right-wing forces and the Provisional Government but gave the Bolsheviks a boost.
6 Lenin urged his party leadership to stage an immediate uprising but, initially, they were reluctant.
7 Trotsky persuaded Lenin to put off the uprising until the All-Russian Congress of Soviets so that the Bolsheviks could claim to have taken power in the name of the soviets.
8 Kerensky’s inept attempts to ward off the Bolshevik coup played into their hands.
9 During 24–26 October, the Bolshevik take-over was carried out successfully
10 Large numbers of ordinary people supported the idea of the soviets taking power, but not the idea of the Bolsheviks taking power in a one-party state.
Key dates and events in 1917:
1) NOTE: for LONG and MID-TERM causes - Social, Political, Economic - see causes of February Revolution,
as these issues which caused the abdication of the Tsar are still
present in October 1917 and form the foundation for the ongoing crisis
in Russia which Lenin and the Bolsheviks are able to exploit.
Inflation: From 1914-1917 inflation increased by 400 percent
Crisis in cities : Overcrowded + poor housing + poor living and working conditions (created by economic problems in Russia) led to social tension in Cities
2) Continued impact of WW1 (social and economic problems):
The war caused acute distress in the cities, especially Petrograd and Moscow. The war meant that food, goods and raw materials were in short supply and hundreds of factories closed and thousands of workers put out of work. Led to inflation and lack of fuel meant that most were cold as well as hungry- urban workers became were hostile towards the PG. In the countryside, peasants became increasingly angry about the conscription of all young men who seldom returned from the Front.
3) Weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government (political problems, interrelated with social and economic problems):
Political problems, interrelated with social and economic problems
The political failures of the government undermined their power and authority, which created the circumstances for Lenin's RTP:
1) Nature of PG helped Lenin to power. PG was not elected by the people, it saw itself as a temporary body, which could not make any binding long-term decisions for Russia.
2) Divisions in PG helped Lenin to power. In PG there were divisions between socialists + liberals who often blocked each others decisions. This internal weakness of the PG crippled their ability to enforce control over the country.
3) Nature of PG helped Lenin to power. The PG had only power over government affairs, real power lay in the hands of the soviets (worker's unions). Soviets had all the practical power in petrograd such as the control over factories and railways.
4) Government passes legislation that allowed freedom of speech, press as well as the dismantling of the secret police. Now political parties could mobilize publically and attract members more easily. The opposition to the PG got it a lot easier to rebel, and the PG had dismantled the secret police, so they couldnt stop the uprisings.
The four above factors made Lenin's RTP possible, as they made the PG a weak political body, which could not resist any oppostion.
The PG also committed several blunders during the months leading up to the october revolution, which benefitted the Bolsheviks directly.
In June PG launched an all out offensive on Germany to put the country in a better position in the war (WW1). The offensive (called June offensive) ended in disaster and PG was deeply discredited. As a result, the Bolsheviks and other political parties got increased support.
In July a spontaneous uprising occured, which consisted of 500 000 soldiers, workers and sailors rebelled in Kronstadt. They later marched to petrograd to demand overthrow of PG. However, the rebellion was dismantled as PG still retained control of some loyal Russian troops. Even though this affair hurt the reputation of the PG, it also damaged the Bolshevik reputation as the PG blamed them for the whole incident.
Fitzpatrick argues that "the whole affair damged Bolshevik morale and Lenin's credibility as a revolutionary leader"
In August 1917, general Kornilov took his army and marched to Petrograd to overthrow PG. He was discontent with the way PG handled politics and WW1. Alexander Kerensky, leader of PG, panicked and since he was unable to put up an adequate defence by using loyal forces, he armed the Bolsheviks so they could help him. However, Kornilov's army did not reach Petrograd as some of his soldiers mutinied and railway workers sabotaged the railways. Now the PG reputation was shattered and the government started to disintergrate. Meanwhile, the Bolsheviks got more support because they were percieved as the defenders of Petrograd, and they were also armed now compared to other political parties.
4) Ideological appeal of Lenin and Bolshevism, and role of Lenin (appeal of radical alternative, charismatic and dynamic leader, taking advantage of crisis situation in Russia in 1917 with all the problems listed above)
Lenin's political ideas attracted widespread support among the Russian people. On 16th of April 1917, Lenin held a speech called the April Theses. The sppech called for a 1)World wide socialist revolution 2) Land reform to peasants 3) immediate end to WW1 3) immediate end to cooperation with PG 4) Urged Soviets to take power.
The ideas in the speech were made into simple but effective and radical slogans such as "all power to the soviets" or "bread, peace and Land". These slogans attracted a lot of support for the Bolsheviks, as they appealed to the workers. They provided the workers with a radical solution to the problems in Russia.
The speech also made the Bolshevik party unique, since their standpoint about the war issue was unique. No other political party wanted an immediate end to the war. The uniqueness of the Bolshevik party attracted them a lot of support among the workers.
In the April Theses Lenin also revised Karl Marx ideas, which claimed that Russia was not ready for a revolution. Lenin however proclaimed that Russia was in fact ready, and revolution had to happen now because the PG was so weak at this point in time! Lenin succeeded to persuade the party, and in the end of April the revolution was being planned. Without Lenin and his speech, the Bolshevik revolution would never have taken place.
Lenin's leadership also inspired the masses to join the party + revolution. Lenin held many speeches during 1917, and his rhetorical skills attracted enormous amounts of public support. Lenin was also a practical leader and could adapt his policies to the wants and needs of the workers. Thus he gained even more support.
5) Role of Trotsky in executing the revolution (ruthlessly efficient organiser)
Trotsky was elected Chairman of Petrograd Soviets in 1917, which gave him immense practical power over the city (control of bridges, railways etc.), which was a valuable assest to Bolsheviks. Trotsky also used his position as Chairman to claim that the Bolsheviks were seizing power in the name of the Soviets, and hence workers accepted that Bolsheviks conducted the revolution. It was not until Lenin closed down the new parliament that workers realized that they had been fooled.
Trotsky also played a key role in setting up and organizing the red army, as well as the actual take over of power. Trosky also persuaded Lenin to wait until october to conduct the revolution, when Bolsheviks had firmly established their power in the Soviets.
Trotsky was as also an excellent orator and helped to inspire the masses.
Historiography of the October Revolution and Lenin's RTP - minority coup d'etat vs popular revolution?
Communist view Party's view of October revolution:
-Inevitable result of class struggle
-Lenin's leadership was vital
-Popular revolution, inspired + organized by Bolsheviks and in particular Lenin
Liberal view of October revolution (e.g. Robert Conquest, Richard Pipes)
-Coup d'etat, Bolshevik used the weaknesses of th PG to seize power
-Bolsheviks had only limited popular support
-Bolsheviks were successful because of the leadership of Trotsky + Lenin
Revisionist view of October revolution (e.g. Orlando Figes)
-Emphasizes impotance of revolution from below (i.e. popular revolution)
-However, Bolsheviks "hijacked" popular revolution and ruthlessly betrayed the people by imposing a single-party dictatorship, suppressing the Soviets