Creating Meaning With Robot Assistants: The Gap 
Left by Smart Devices    


An Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) such as a smartphone or that tiny smart device that sits on the table reacting to voice command is a basic form of a shared activity between human and an agent. The very warm reception of IPAs into the household is a clear manifestation of human’s interest in collaborating with a digital companion on a shared activity, even with such limited functionality.

The phenomenal success of IPAs shows potential for robot assistants. After all, people have long desired for robot assistants even when the technology was not ready yet. Robots, with their ability to interact with the physical world, have more capabilities than IPAs, thus they can push further the value of a shared activity. However, when it comes to robot assistants, human expectation sets the bar high. Designing them merely as extension to IPAs requires a well-considered adaptation of their physical appearance, e.g., human-like form factor and their cognitive capabilities not to raise expectations from the user which cannot be met. On the other hand, treating the role of the robot assistant like any specialized service robot with interaction-limited personality (e.g. Roomba) puts it in the same category as our appliances. Robot assistants copying the mobility-limited focus of IPAs would be a waste of the emotional potential provided by their agility. Of equal importance as the objective completion of shared activity, robot assistants should enhance meaningful cooperation. For humans to embrace robot assistants, in a household crowded by smart devices and service robots, robot assistants need to at least meet human expectations.

This multidisciplinary workshop will gather researchers, engineers and designers on the crossroad of finding a niche for robot assistants to be relevant. In particular, we want to discuss the design of robot assistants that deliver more added values or features in its assistive task, cultivating trust and comfort that ultimately increases human appreciation of the robot assistant as both engage in a shared activity. Paper contributions with either experimental or theoretical focus are welcome. Moreover, preliminary results and experiments or applications with compelling use cases in the realm of robot assistants are encouraged.

Topics of interest include but not limited to:

·       Multimodal and Spoken Language Understanding

·       Social Cognitive Systems

·       Socially Intelligent Robots

·       Collaborative Robotics

·       Active Perception (Acoustics, Vision, etc.)

·       Human Robot Interaction

·       Human Behavior Modeling

·       Affective Computing

·       Human Intention Recognition

·       Interactive Machine learning 

·       Human-centered reinforcement learning

·       Learning from demonstration

·       Imitation learning

·       Active learning in robotics

·       Mutual shaping of robots and human

·       Performance metrics and benchmarking

·       Applications and challenges in human-centered robot assistant systems

Papers addressing topics related to the workshop should be submitted electronically with two-column format in the IEEE style via EasyChair: length should be up to 6 pages. The templates can be found on the Humanoids conference via the link:


Important dates and notice:

Submission deadline: October 31st, 2017 extended to November 6th, 2017

Notification of Acceptance: November 7th, 2017

Location: Library of Birmingham LoB Room 103 (

A workshop series on "Cooperative Autonomous Robot Experience" (CARE) under Cooperative Intelligence