Gregory Louis Hoover

June 28th, 2009

     I do not profess to possess all the answers to the many puzzling questions raised by the events of September 11, 2001. But what I do know requires I act in best conscience to bring to light that which I see is hidden from most concerning those events, and to bring about whatever positive change may be wrought by peaceful means.     

      I believe that the planning, carrying out of, and cover-up concerning, the tragic events of September 11th, 2001, involve criminal elements of parties within governments, corporate entities, and social structuring groups. I believe them to be linked together worldwide, and though compelled in their actions by sometimes individual interests, to be guided for the most part, by certain powerfully positioned persons. I believe those  powerfully positioned parties to be primarily motivated by the conviction that unless control is soon gained of middle eastern oil reserves, they will soon lose their present ability to direct the course of our world’s development and preserve their and our way of life. As a result, they have misguided themselves into a false sense of justification, truely believing that the events of 9/11 and the ensuing invasion and conquest of these oil laden regions was and remains a necessity for the survival of certain countires,.. America, Britain, etc., Thus, a terrible course has been laid, and we in turn led along it - as "they" believe the oil reserves to be gained are so essensial, that they must be gained by this course, no matter how horrible the sacrifices made of our own citizens.

     Having studied the unfolding events of recent world history, I consider it necessary that certain facts be taken into account in order for the reader to appreciate my present position in these matters. I therefore will provide an abbreviated outline of those facts which have lead to my current views regarding this particular state of world affairs.

     Again, please be mindful that the following is an abbreviated outline, but still essential knowledge for anyone honestly wishing to understand what I believe regarding this subject. If you are instead unwilling to review and consider this information with an open mind, I only ask that you not obstruct my attempt to remedy these concerns.

     With the exception of quotations where attributed and sources when footnoted, the following is provided in my own words.


1.     In 1993, Pakistan and Turkmenistan co-signed an agreement to jointly develop their energy resources and build a pipeline between the two countries. UNOCAL, based in California, signed a protocol with the Turkmen government to explore the feasibility of building this pipeline. The one-year study cost $10 million for a huge energy project worth $18 billion, to transport Turkmen oil and gas by pipeline to the Indian Ocean. This trade and energy would run through Pakistan, America's ally, rather than through Iran, her adversary ever since the overthrow of the Shah in 1979.[i]


2.     Established in the spring of 1997, a “nonprofit, educational organization named “the Project for the New American Century” led by, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, James Woolsey, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, James Bolton, Zalmay M. Khalilzad, William Bennett, Dan Quayle, Jeb Bush, having a stated goal “to promote American global leadership,…” expressed the following within it’s published manifesto “REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES, Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century:


     “A transformation strategy that solely pursued capabilities for projecting force from the United States, for example, and sacrificed forward basing and presence, would be at odds with larger American policy goals and would trouble American allies. Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” [ii] 

3.     On October 27th, 1997, Dick Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, later to become Vice President of the United States of America, announced that the company had obtained an agreement with Turkmenistan for “technical and drilling services.” On the same day, it is announced that a consortium (newly named: CentGas) had been formed among partners Unocal, and Delta Oil of Saudi Arabia, to build an oil and natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan.[iii]


4.     On December 4, 1997, there appeared within the BBC NEWS, an article entitled: “Taliban in Texas for Talks on Gas Pipeline.”

     Within said article the following factual information appeared:


     A senior delegation from the Taliban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan.  A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taliban were expected to spend several days at the company's headquarters in Sugarland, Texas. Unocal says it has agreements both with Turkmenistan to sell its gas and with Pakistan to buy it. [T]he pipeline… would carry gas 1,300 kilometers from Turkmenistan to Pakistan, across Afghanistan.” [iv]

5.     On November 15th, 1999, in a public appearance at the London Institute of Petroleum, Dick Cheney, stated the following:


     “By some estimates there will be an average of two per cent annual growth in global oil demand over the years ahead along with conservatively a three per cent natural decline in production from existing reserves. That means by 2010 we will need on the order of an additional fifty million barrels a day. So where is the oil going to come from? Governments and the national oil companies are obviously controlling about ninety per cent of the assets. Oil remains fundamentally a government business. While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow.” [v]


6.     In November 2000, Saddam Hussein of Iraq, petitioned the United Nations to allow his country the opportunity to convert the accounting process of their Food for Oil program [a U.N. trading embargo had earlier ceased any other oil sales from Iraq] from conducting all such trade in U.S. Dollars to Euro Dollars. Prior to this, all countries of the world under an agreement with the United Nations had conducted their oil trade in U.S. currency. Without a legal basis to refuse the request, the petition was granted. As a result, other oil producing nations followed suit, requiring their oil to be purchased in Euro rather than U.S. dollars. The United States therefore could no longer purchase oil from other nations with virtually worthless Treasury Bonds serving the place of U.S. dollars, and was forced thereby and henceforth to purchase oil after converting U.S. dollars to Euros (which meant securing the purchases with verifiable funds). Yes, it was Saddam Hussein who had done this.[vi]


7.     On September 10, 2001, then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." [vii] 

8.     On the following day, September 11th, 2001, Flight 77 struck the Pentagon coincidentally at the percise location of the office of  "Resource Services Washington" killing 34 of  its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, were the civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts who had been credited with having discovered the missing $2.3 trillion reported the day before by Rumsefeld, and charged specifically with the task of determining who was responsible for the loss.[viii].


9.     CBS NEWS has publicly reported the following:


     “…barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks.”[viii]


10. Many argue that were the events of 9/11 orchestrated through the efforts of U.S. government entities and others, it would require the participation of hundreds of conspirators and that the evidence of such activities could not possibly occur without being discovered by the world at large.


     I agree. The following verifiable facts support that overwhelming evidence exists to substantiate that (as the preface to this outline contends) “the events of 9/11 involve criminal elements of parties within governments, corporate entities, and social structuring groups,” to an extent that is at present beyond the scope of rational argument to the contrary, and now obvious to “the world at large.”

     As an overwhelming abundance of evidence exists contradicting the findings of the 9/11 Commission, I will detail in my own words with referenced support, only the top three most glaring examples (in my opinion), and refer readers elsewhere toward additional sources supporting these now well established facts.[ix]


     a. During the events of 9/11, as reported by former Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta during his sworn testimony before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, about his experience in the Presidential Emergency Operating Center with Vice President Cheney he stated:


     “There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, 'The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to, 'The plane is 10 miles out,' the young man also said to the vice president, 'Do the orders still stand?' And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?' Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant.”[x]


     [Note by Author/GLH: Most disturbing, is that this testimony emphasizes the fact that in order for the Vice-President’s aide and the Vice-President to have had an ability to count down the approach of one of the hijacked airliners to it’s ultimate destination, they would have to have known it’s ultimate destination in advance - being a fact only the hijackers should have known. Secondly, and as disturbing - because the testimony proves that the Vice-President was aware that the hijacked airliner was approaching it’s ultimate destination (being the Pentagon), and it was not shot down by defense forces, the only other “order” which must have previously been issued and was to “stand,” had to have been an explicit one to not shoot down the airliner in defense of the Pentagon. Being that this proves that the Vice–President knew in advance that the hijacked airliner was on a collision course with the Pentagon and had issued an advance "order" not to defend the Pentagon (even when questioned about such an order moments before the collision) it has been irrefutably established that the former Vice-President of the United States was intimately involved in and guilty of at least the deaths of all 189 persons killed there that day. Presumably this suggests his complicity as to all the events of 9/11.]


     b. Over seven-hundred (700) architectural and engineering professionals have signed a petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation, as to the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.[xi]


     c. Definitive proof exists establishing that pre-set explosives were used in the controlled demolition of the twin towers as set forth in paragraph 9). b. above. Reputable, peer-reviewed reports have scientifically confirmed the existence of active Thermitic explosive material from samples of the dust collected from the World Trade Center catastrophe. It may be reasonably assumed that considering the vast amount of explosive material required to demolish the towers in the fashion observed, extensive open access within the towers would have to have been provided to experts in the field prior to 9/11, and that such could not be accomplished by those the 9/11 commission have concluded were responsible for the events. [xii]


11. On August 31, 2005 it was reported within The Boston Globe that then President George Bush had within a speech the previous day, announced that a primary goal for the invasion and continued military presence within Iraq was to secure existing oil field reserves from “terrorist.”[xiii] The supposed “terrorists” are the same Taliban who had only eight (8) years earlier been the esteemed guests so lavishly entertained by oil company executives in Houston Texas, as an agreement was sought concerning the creation of an oil pipeline which would secure those natural reserves for American use. We have come full circle. Alan Greenspan, retired head of the U.S. Federal Reserve (of 18 years) has stated in his memoirs that… “I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil.”[xiv]


     The preceding outline summarizes the motive, opportunity and means underlying the crimes of September 11, 2001. While I am not particularly focusing my efforts toward halting the continued course of world history as a whole, I am hopeful that my efforts will become the catalyst for such an occurrence.

      During the June 10th, 2009 Fox News Channel broadcast, of the Glenn Beck Show, the paid “analyst” appearing with Mr. Beck was a Mr. Mike Baker who spoke above a banner declaring him to be a “Former CIA Officer.”[xv] During the month of April 2009 the Pulitzer Prize for investigative journalism was awarded to David Barstow of the New York Times in recognition of his series of reports revealing that “former” government employees have been "co-oped by the Pentagon" to make its case for the war in Iraq “…by working as radio and television analysts.” Mr. Barstow’s’ work also revealed that these “analysts” had “undisclosed ties to companies that benefitted from the policies they defended.”[xvi]     

     Mr. Baker is the founder and CEO of Diligence, LLC which is described in Mr. Baker’s own words as follows: “We are able to provide the highest quality information and security work available in Iraq because we have a core staff of more 150 Iraqis with local knowledge, operating as full time project managers, security officers, intelligence officers and security staff. By so doing, we are creating a solid, long lasting, truly Iraqi company with a vested interest in its own success.”[xvii] 

     Mr. Barstow’s Pulitzer Prize winning work exposing the Pentagon puppet analysts includes this interesting quote: “In the words of Robert S. Bevelacqua, a retired Green Beret who was a Fox News military analyst, ‘It was them (the Pentagon) saying, ‘We need to stick our hands up your back and move your mouth for you.” 

     I intend that my litigation shall do more than merely expose those engaged in the defamation of 9/11 truth movement activists - but will indeed in the process leave those pulling Glenn Beck’s strings enventually pointing fingers at one another - while we openly watch. Just as they have so willingly sacrifice us in their chosen course, I believe they will as readily sacrifice one another to perpetuate their plan. Of all this, I fully expect the observer of these proceedings to see more clearly, after my initial filing and as the case develops.

    This attempt of mine to create a positive change through peaceful means, is what I expect will be the tipping point for the world at large to recognize and hold accountable those truly responsible for the tragedy of 9/11 and its aftermath. I believe this litigation to be the event required for this, as otherwise.... “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event.”

[vii] The War On Waste,, 1/29/02; & Vince Gonzales Investigates The Pentagon's War On Waste, CBSNews, .Both @

[x]  National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. 2003.

(Orlando, Fla)  Thursday, June 18th, 2009.
     The latest video has been   released  to  the  public  and   is   a vailable  for  viewing  at:  Hoover vs. Beck 

     9/11 Truth Movement activist, and Orlando WeAreChange    member    Greg   Hoover   is preparing federal litigation against  Glenn  Beck and Fox  New  Channel  seeking  damages  for defamation, as a consequence of Beck’s having characterized those of the 9/11 truth movement as “dangerous” “anarchists”   “out   to   destroy America,”   and   associated   with   the   recent shooting of a security guard at  the  Washington D.C.  Holocaust  Museum.  Hoover  is  seeking among other remedies from the court, a  formal retraction of the previously described statements and an  injunction   prohibiting   Beck  and  Fox News from  engaging  in  any  similar  continued conduct. The official  website  of   his   litigation effort is:




9/11 Activist Gregory Hoover appears on 
The Alex Jones Show         
     9/11 Truth Activist Greg Hoover appeared on the Alex Jones Show on June 16th, 2009 and was interviewed on his proposed federal litigation against Glenn Beck and Fox News.
     The interview may be seen at:

Part I: Hoover Alex Jones Show June 16th, 2009.


Part II: Hoover Alex Jones Show June 16th, 2009.


      "It was  a distinct  honor  to have been  interviewed  by  Mr. Jones.  His work in the 9/11 movement continues to   be  a   an  inspiration   to   myself and the  hoovervsbeck  cause. He is a true patriot and great American."
Gregory Hoover
******************************************************************************************************************** Interviews                                         
G.L. Hoover                                                                     
(June 20th 2009)
Litigant Hoover discusses the lawsuit; his reasons for filing; the criteria for becoming a Plaintiff, and the motivating factors behind the litigation. 
Hear the broadcast in its entirety at:


9/11 Truth Activist Sues Glenn Beck and Fox News for Defamation

Washington’s Blog
June 12, 2009

An East Coast 9/11 truth activist is preparing to file a defamation lawsuit against TV / radio personality, Glenn Beck, the producers of the Glenn Beck Program, and the Fox News Channel.

Specifically, Greg Hoover will be suing the above-described defendants in Federal Court for Beck’s having repeatedly broadcast statements characterizing those who question the government’s official version of the events of 9/11 as, “anarchists,” “terrorists” and as persons denying the Holocaust.

The complaint will note that - on October 22, 2007 - Beck suggested that those identifying themselves as associated with the 9/11 truth movement are “dangerous” “anarchists” who deny the Holocaust, and are “the kind of group that Timothy McVeigh would come from.”

The suit will also note that during Beck’s June 10th broadcast Beck linked the murder of the Washington D.C. holocaust museum guard with “9/11 truthers.”

As I have previously written, suing people for defamation who falsely claim that 9/11 activists are terrorists could be a good way to stand up to these bullies.

Hoover told me by email:

Copies of my actual initial filings will be available for media distribution within the upcoming week…

I do so having now cast off all other personal concerns. Having chosen sides… I’ll stand with the patriots.

Godspeed, Mr. Hoover.
The Hoover vs. Beck Defamation Litigation Fund
      Your donations through Visa, MasterCard, American Express & Discover will support this legal challenge - without which, "they" win. 
     To donate, simply click on the following address:    
     Checks and cash donations may be made payable to:   
Gregory Hoover
125 East Merritt Island, Cswy.,
Suite 209-303,
Merritt Island, Florida 32952.

Central Florida Street Action — We Are Change Florida                                                                                         
Plaintiff Hoover:  Pictured here during the June  11th, 2009, Orlando 9/11 Truth Rally held    in  Orlando,  Florida (wearing the  tie  behind  the "Building 7" banner).  During this very successful event, thousands of 9/11 truth DVDs were freely distributed.
                                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



GREGORY HOOVER,                                             

____________________,                                                                                                                                                    DRAFT


____________________, et. al.                   



                                                                                                                                                                                     CASE NO.: _________

                                                                                                                                                                                               ORL- _________


vs.                                                                                                                                                                                              JURY DEMAND


GLENN BECK,                                
[individually and as
representative of:
The Glenn Beck Program,
Premiere Radio Networks ,
Fox News Channel,
Mercury Radio Arts Production Company,



                                                                                                        COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES,

                            PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONs

                                                                                                            AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS   



     COMES NOW, the Plaintiffs, GREGORY HOOVER and ____________________, et. al., against the above named Defendants, GLENN BECK;... 



NOTE: The complete final Complaint will be posted after filing]



     For information regarding media interviews, copies of legal pleadings or other inquiries, please... CONTACT: