首頁 Home‎ > ‎

事件簿 Timeline

This timeline lists out the major events related to the Creationism/ Intelligent Design invasion to science education.
此時間表列出有關創造論/智能設計入侵科學教育的主要事件。
Showing 20 items
日期 Date 事件Event網址 URL
Sort 
 
Sort 
 
Sort 
 
Sort 
 
日期 Date 事件Event網址 URL
7 February 2009 數名港大科學家批評新生物科課程綱要鼓吹神創論在科學課上傳播。南早報導香港至少31間中學已經教授神創論/智慧設計為科學。本群組在不久後成立。 Several HKU scientists criticized the new biology syllabus encourages the dissemination of creationism in science classes. SCMP reported at least 31 Hong Kong secondary schools have been teaching creationism / intelligent design as science. Our group was set up shortly afterwards. Scientists urge excluding God from biology 
12 February 2009 在港台節目Back Chat,港大物理教授Chris Beling批評大學不讓他教智慧設計論。 In RTHK Back Chat, HKU Physicist Chris Beling criticised the University for not letting him to teach students about Intelligent Design. Scientist backs creationism on RTHK show - SCMP (Feb 14, 2009) 
21 February 2009 教育局表示不會審查生物學指引,以解決它鼓勵神創論的問題。 Education Bureau has indicated the biology guidance will not be reviewed to address concerns that it encourages creationism Bureau turns back on creationism concerns 
25 February 2009 國際學術期刊《自然》記述港大理學院不同意偽科學如智慧設計論在學校傳播。 International academic journal Nature described that HKU Faculty of Science is against pseudo-sciences such as Intelligent Design to be spread in schools. Hong Kong evolution curriculum row 
1 March 2009 Facebook 群組「香港科學教育關注組成立」 Facebook group "Hong Kong Concern Group for Science Education" started http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50382348521 
16 April 2009 我們向立法會教育事務委員會作第一次提交,講述了此事的嚴重性。 We submitted for the first time to the Legislative Council Panel on Education, to highlight the seriousness of the matter. Group warns on biology guideline 
22 April 2009 香港科學教育關注組網站啟動 This site was set up and started to operate 香港科學教育關注組 
24 April 2009 教育局在港台節目The Pulse中,說創造論「不被視為達爾文理論外的其他解釋」。節目中中華基督教會方潤華中學校長黃騰達抨擊科學家排斥宗教,思想狹隘。 Education Bureau in RTHK The Pulse, said that creationism is not “considered as an alternative to Darwin’s theory”. CCC Fong Yun Wah Secondary School principal Wong Tang Tat lashed out at the scientists for being narrow-minded by expelling religious ideas. Evolution advice 'confuses' 
8 May 2009 本組會見教育局官員﹐解釋我們的憂慮。我們得悉有一群來自大學和中學的人士同樣提及了意見書。 Our group met with official at the Education Bureau and experssed our concerns. We first learnt of another group comprised of people from the education sector, who also submitted their opinion.  
11 May 2009 一行62人包括教育工作者和科學家簽署了一項聲明,呼籲受爭議的指引予以保留,因為它「刺激思考,平衡,沒有偏見,並一直運作良好。」。這些人,包括港大物理教授Chris Beling、香港中文大學生物化學系徐國榮、聖保羅男女中學校長陳黃麗娟和公開大學科技學院院長何建宗聲稱科學沒有普遍接受的定義,而科學界對達爾文理論仍然有爭論。 62 people, including educators and scientists signed a statement calling on controversial guidelines be maintained, because it is "stimulating, balanced, non-biased and has worked well". These people, including the Open University's dean of science and technology Ho Kin-chung, St Paul's Co-educational College principal Anissa Chan Wong Lai-kuen and HKU physicist Chris Beling, claims there is no universally accepted definition of science, while there is still controversy over Darwinian theory. Creationism row hots up as objectors fight back 
19 May 2009 本組針對那60多位包括大學教授﹑教育界人士和專業人士的信件﹐向立法會教育事務委員會發出第二份意見書﹐嚴厲駁斥裡面的謬誤 Our group issued a second paper to LegCo Panel on Education to rebutt the letter from the 62 educators, scientists and professionals  
1 June 2009 本組發起簽名運動 The group started a signature campaign http://www.gopetition.com/online/28149.html 
8 June 2009 我們再度向立法會遞交信件,就事件對教育局作出建議,指出62人團體對科學及其教育造成的破壞。同一次會議,港大化學系副教授趙寶貽提交了密件,支持現有的指引,並指現在演化論有「無法解決的弱點」及「教條主義的精神」。提議如何修改指引時,她沒有要求加入「科學解釋」的字眼,也沒有評論智慧設計是否科學。趙寶貽的文件:http://sites.google.com/site/hkscienceeducation/file-archive/edcb2-1565-1-e%5B1%5D.doc We re-submitted a letter to the Legislative Council, to make recommendations to the Education Bureau concerning the incident, and pointed out the damage made to science and its education by the 62 people group. HKU Chemistry Associate Professor Pauline CHIU submitted an undisclosed document in support of the existing guidelines, and said the theory of evolution now has "unresolvable weakness" and "dogmatic spirit". When suggesting how the guideline might be improved, she did not add the phrase "scientific explanation", and also did not comment on whether Intelligent Design is science. Pauline CHIU’s submission: http://sites.google.com/site/hkscienceeducation/file-archive/edcb2-1565-1-e%5B1%5D.doc Panel on Education Meeting on Monday, 8 June 2009 
26 June 2009 教育局回應﹐表示神創論和智慧設計不是生物科課程一部分﹐和不是科學解釋 Education Bureau issued a response that rejects Creationism and Intelligent Design from Biology curriculum and they are not scientific explanations Victory for Darwin 
28 June 2009 無線電視明珠台 Pearl Report 報道智慧設計與進化論之爭 TVB programme The Pearl Report covered the row between Intelligent Design and Evolution TVB Pearl Report aired on 28-June-2009 
1 July 2009 簽名運動結束﹐我們收集了754個簽名其中包括世界各地80多位學者和科學家 Our petition ended. We have 754 signatures, including more than 80 scientists and academians worldwide 保護香港的演化論和科學教育! Protect the education of evolution and real sciences in Hong Kong! 
15 August 2009 本組一行六人﹐向教育局提交我們在全球收集的七百多個簽名﹐重申要求教育局徹底跟進學校教導神創/進化論事件。 The Concern Group submitted the Petition containing over 700 signatures from around the world to Education Bureau, urging them to follow through the issue where schools still teach Creationism/Intelligent Design 請願書 Petition Letter 
9 September 2009 教育局通過電子郵件第一次正式答覆我們。他們終於承認了演化論的科學地位和否認神創論和智慧設計可被視為演化論的「其他解釋」,但又間接拒絕作出任何文件上的更改或向學校公告,因為他們聲稱他們教育教師已經做得夠。 Bureau of Education for the first time pass a formal reply by e-mail to us. They finally recognized the scientific status of evolutionary theory and denied Creationism and Intelligent Design as alternatives to it. But they indirectly refused to make any change to documents or make announcement to school, because they claim they have done enough to teach the teachers. 教育局回覆了我們 Education Bureau has replied us 
23 October 2009 《科學》雜誌報導教育局推薦課本中牛津出版的生物學課本發現神創/智慧設計內容 "Science" Magezine reports that biology book recommended by Education Bureau contains references to Creationism and Intelligent Design  Science Magazine 23-Oct-2009 - Hong Kong's Darwin Defenders Declare Victory in Teaching Fracas 
27 October 2009 太空館館長陳己雄先生回覆我們關於智慧設計的DVD產品的查詢,表示有關的影音產品已經沒有售賣。他們也和太空館禮品店承包商溝通﹐表達對產品科學準確性的關注﹐承諾會小心選擇商品。 Mr. Chan, the manager of Space Museum responded on the intelligent design DVD products, saying the audio and video products are no longer for sale. The Museum communicated their concern about the scientific validity of merchandise sold in the gift shop. The operator of the gift shop said they will be careful in selecting merchandise for sale, and consult the Space Museum where necessary before placing new products for sale. 康樂及文化事務署回覆 Leisure and Cultural Services Department's reply 
Showing 20 items
Comments