Added: August 5, 2017 – Last updated: August 5, 2017

TITLE INFORMATION


Authors: Karen Knop and Annelise Riles

Title: Space, Time, and Historical Injustice

Subtitle: A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the "Comfort Women" Agreement

Journal: Cornell Law Review

Volume: 102

Issue: 4

Year: May 2017

Pages: 853-927

ISSN: 0010-8847 – Find a Library: WordCat

Language: English

Keywords: Modern History: 20th Century, 21st Century | Asian History: Japanese History, Korean History | Types: Forced Prostitution / "Comfort Women"; Types: Wartime Sexual Violence / Asia-Pacific War



FULL TEXT


Links:

Cornell Law Review (Free Access)

HeinOnline (Restricted Access)

Social Science Research Network (Free Access)



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


Authors:

Karen Knop, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto

Annelise Riles, Law School, Cornell UniversityAcademia.edu, Wikipedia

Abstract: »After more than twenty years of worldwide feminist activism, transnational litigation, and diplomatic stalemate, on December 28, 2015, Japan and South Korea announced a historic agreement intended to provide closure to the so-called “Comfort Women issue”—the issue of what Japan must do to atone for the sexual enslavement of up to 200,000 women from throughout Asia in service to the Japanese troops before and during World War II. Reactions to this landmark agreement continue to be mixed, and the question for many is whether it will hold. One challenge is how to respect the scale and systematicity of the crimes without imposing a single narrative, or without projecting an overdetermined understanding of the gendered past onto the future. We offer an analysis of this question in a wider lens: how to address grave historical injustices when legal claims and advocacy goals spread and metamorphose not only over time, but also across jurisdictions.
Focusing on one high profile and particularly contentious provision of the agreement, concerning a privately erected statue honoring the Comfort Women outside the Japanese embassy in Seoul, we first show that the usual questions about settlements for historical injustices—whether they will achieve closure and what kind—can productively be traded for attention to where and when closure and reopening occur.
Borrowing our analytical lens from conflict of laws, we refine the problem as a manifestation of a pervasive issue for feminist justice in a globalized world that we call “spatio-temporal diffusion.” We argue that a novel response to this diffusion of historical injustices can be grounded in conflict-oflaws techniques. Using the hypothetical of a case brought by Korean Comfort Women in California, we redescribe the field’s techniques for dealing with time across space as a matter of what we term the “sequencing” of different spatio-temporal horizons. This approach resonates with, but also goes a step beyond, the arguments of certain feminist social theorists that feminist politics must be polytemporal. In the mode of an interdisciplinary experiment, we deploy the conflicts technique of sequencing spatio-temporal horizons as a more specified and hopeful approach to a feminist future.« (Source: Cornell Law Review)

Contents:

  Introduction (p. 855)
  I. Controversy over a Statue (p. 862)
    A. What Closure Is Possible? (p. 863)
    B. Not What Closure, but Where and When? (p. 866)
  II. Closure and the Comfort Women Agreement (p. 872)
    A. After World War II: Prosecution and Compensation (p. 872)
    B. The Agreement (p. 876)
    C. Cracks in the Agreement (p. 880)
    D. Feminism and the Future (p. 882)
  III. A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach (p. 885)
    A. Private (p. 888)
    B. Noticing Time Across Space (p. 891)
    C. Relative Time (p. 896)
    D. Mixing and Matching Time (p. 898)
  IV. Spatio-Temporal Diffusion (p. 899)
    A. Noticing Time Across Space: Proliferation, Dispersion, and Undecidability (p. 899)
    B. Mixing and Matching Time: Recognizing Polytemporality and Being Out of Sync (p. 903)
    C. Relative Time: Ghosts (p. 908)
  V. Sequencing (p. 912)
    A. The Private Space-Time of the Wrong (p. 914)
    B. The Present Duration and Ambit of State Interests (p. 914)
    C. The Fictional Time Horizon of Hypothetical Inter-State Relations (p. 917)
    D. The Present Time and Place of the Judgment (p. 919)
    E. The Power of Sequences (p. 920)
  Conclusion (p. 926)

Wikipedia: History of Asia: History of Japan | History of Asia: History of Korea | Prostitution: Forced prostitution / Comfort women | Sex and the law: Wartime sexual violence | War: Pacific War / Japanese war crimes