Here is one way to support this website .

Address all correspondence to 

Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940 

(do not address to ) Howard Griswold 

  • XXX XXX XXXX bet 10-7pm EST
  • *Gemini Investment Research Group, 
  • POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940

Webmaster information 
infosend2010 at g mail dot com
Phone 206 338 5964  ( no advertising calls) 


"Post Office Box twenty seven, point lookout, missouri 65726 

David H Donovan Supreme Court Case


If you want to get involved and you want to make a difference in the world, please volunteer to assist Gemini Research Group  with research skills, finding a case in a state library, or  where you are skilled . Step up to the plate!  If you have  Research skills, computer skills, writing skills, YouTube or video skills, audio production skills or any other creative talents, Please email your contact info and the word "Creative Volunteer" in the subject line.




The general proposition that freedom of expression upon public questions is secured by the First Amendment has long been settled by our decisions.

The constitutional safeguard, we have said, "was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people."

 Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 484.


 "The maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion

 to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the

people and that changes may be obtained by lawful means, an

opportunity essential to the security of the Republic, is a

fundamental principle of our constitutional system."



Stromberg v. California, 283 U. S. 359, 369.



"[I]t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions," Bridges v. California, 314 U. S. 252, 270, and this opportunity is to be afforded for "vigorous advocacy" no less than "abstract discussion."


N. A. A. C. P. v. Button, 371 U. S. 415, 429.

270*270 The First Amendment, said Judge Learned Hand,

"presupposes that right conclusions are more likely to be gathered

 out of a multitude of tongues, than through any kind of

authoritative selection. To many this is, and always will be, folly;

but we have staked upon it our all."


United States v. Associated Press, 52 F. Supp. 362, 372 (D. C. S. D. N. Y. 1943).

Mr. Justice Brandeis, in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 375-376,

gave the principle its classic formulation:


"Those who won our independence believed . . . that public

discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a


fundamental principle of the American government. They

recognized the risks to which all human institutions are


But they knew that order cannot be secured merely through

fear of punishment for its infraction; that it is hazardous to

discourage thought, hope and imagination; that fear breeds

repression; that repression breeds hate; that hate menaces

stable government; that the path of safety lies in the


opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and

proposed remedies; and that the fitting remedy for evil

counsels is good ones.

Believing in the power of reason as applied through public

discussion, they eschewed silence coerced by law—the

argument of force in its worst form.

Recognizing the occasional tyrannies of governing

majorities, they amended the Constitution so that free

speech and assembly should be guaranteed."



New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 US 254 - Supreme Court 1964

Ozark Mountain Jubilee