davidbohmdialogue

 Holographic Dialogue in San Rafael

MEANING FLOWING THROUGH


  A GROUP EVOLVING 

 FROM THE DIALOGUE IDEAS OF DAVID BOHM 

 WORLD-WIDE DIALOGUE

SIGN UP HERE

  If you're not able to attend a DIALOGUE GROUP because of your location...

 Perhaps you'd like to be a part of dialogue by email?

 Join a public list server for email Dialogue for English-speaking writers                                        

     Includes former colleagues of David Bohm, moderated by Donald Factor, co-author of  articles developing Dialogue ideas with David Bohm 

Sign up here

 READ ABOUT AN IN-PERSON

                             DIALOGUE GROUP

HELD IN THE SPIRIT OF 

               DAVID BOHM'S IDEAS

 Bohm Dialogue (often referred to simply as Dialogue by its proponents) is conducted in groups of 10 to 40 people, who sit in a single circle for a few hours during regular ongoing meetings, or for a few days in a workshop environment. Participants "suspend" their thoughts, motives, impulses and judgments – exploring and attempting to "think together" collectively. 

According to the proposal, Dialogue should not be confused with discussion, lecture, discourse or debate, which, says Bohm, all suggest working towards a goal. Meeting without an objective or agenda is advocated to create a "free space" for something new to possibly happen. Dialoguers hope to create a synthesis of new experiences that none of them have ever previously experienced. They hope that Dialogue can transform how people are able to interact socially. They patiently sit with frustration so they can reap the rewards of new perspectives and gain appreciation and the ability to use new thinking styles.


 

Below are some David Bohm quotes, from "On Dialogue" by David Bohm, edited by Lee Nichol, London 1996, Routledge. 

 

We haven't really paid much attention to thought as a process. We have ENGAGED in thoughts, but we have only paid attention to the content, not to the process. 

Why does thought require attention? Everything requires attention, really. If we ran machines withinout paying attention to them, they would break down. Our thought, too, is a process, and it requires attention, otherwise its going to go wrong.

...When one person says something, the other person does not, in general, respond with exactly the same meaning as that seen by the first person. Rather, the meanings are only SIMILAR and not identical. Thus , when the 2nd person replies, the 1st person sees a DIFFERENCE between what he meant to say and what the other person understood. On considering this difference, he may then be able to see something new, which is relevant both to his own views and to those of the other person. And so it can go back and forth, with the continual emergence of a new content that is common to both participants. 

Thus, in a dialogue, each person does not attempt to MAKE COMMON certain ideas or items of information that are already known to him. Rather, it may be said that two people are making something IN COMMON, i.e., creating something new together.

It seems then that the main trouble is that the other person is the one who is prejudiced and not listening. After all, it is easy for each one of us to see that other people are 'blocked' about certain questions, so that without being aware of it, they are avoiding the confrontation of contradictions in certain ideas that may be extremely dear to them. The very nature of such a 'block' is, however, that it is a kind of insensitivity or 'anesthesia' about ones own contradictions. Evidently then, what is crucial is to be aware of the nature of ones own 'blocks'. If one is alert and attentive, he can see for example that whenever certain questions arise, there are fleeting sensations of fear, which push him away from consideration of those questions, and of pleasure, which attract his thoughts and cause them to be occupied with other questions. So, one is able to keep away from whatever it is that he thinks may disturb him. And as a result, he can be subtle at defending his own ideas, when he supposes that he is really listening to what other people have to say. When we come together to talk, or otherwise to act in common, can each one of us be aware of the subtle fear and pleasure sensations that 'block' the ability to listen freely?

(from On Dialogue, by David Bohm)

  


Directions to Open Secret Bookstore  

Join Us! Please call and ask when the "Holographic Dialogue Group" happens in the Temple room at Open Secret Bookstore in San Rafael, CA. Or you can start a local Dialogue group yourself - there's no .org that must approve what happens.