Papers - Others‎ > ‎

(Duan 2000)


Being Empathic: The Role of Motivation to Empathize and the Nature of Target Emotions
Division of Counseling Psychology, School of Education, 215 Education University of Missouri Kansas City
Motivation and Emotion: March 2000, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 29–49

Cite
Duan, C. Motivation and Emotion (2000) 24: 29. doi:10.1023/A:1005587525609


Abstract
"The effect of the observer's motivation to empathize and the nature of the target person's emotions on empathy was examined. The study distinguished intellectual empathy, the extent to which the observer takes the target person's perspective, and empathic emotion, the extent to which the observer feels the target emotions. Intellectual empathy was measured via attribution errors that the observer made in attributing the target person's situation, and empathic emotion by the congruence between the emotions of the target person and the observer. 

The first experiment showed that pleasant emotions and sadness elicited more empathic emotion than did shame and anger. 

The second experiment revealed that motivation increased intellectual empathy when the target person was sad, and empathic emotion when the target person was happy.

 Intellectual empathy and empathic emotion appeared to be distinguishable constructs and could correlate under certain conditions."




REFERENCES
  1. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1962). Dimensions of therapy response as causal factors in therapeutic change. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1–33.Google Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D., & Coke, J. (1981). Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping. In J. Rushton & R. Sorrentino (Eds), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 167–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D., Turk, C. L., Shaw, L. L., & Klein, T. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other's welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 300–313.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, S. M. (1962). Conditioning through vicarious instigation. Psychological Review, 69,450–466.Google Scholar
  6. Brehm, S., & Aderman, D. (1977). On the relationship between empathy and the actor versus observer hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 340–346.Google Scholar
  7. Cannon, J. R., & Carkhuff, R. R. (1969). Effects of rater level of functioning and experience upon the discrimination of facilitative conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 189–194.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, M. H. (1979). Individual differences in empathy: A multidimensional approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  9. Duan, C., & Hill, C. (1996). Current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261–274.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Feshbach, N. D., & Roe, K. (1968). Empathy in six-seven-year-olds. Child Development, 34,133–145.Google Scholar
  12. Fish, J. M. (1970). Empathy and the reported emotional experiences of beginning psychotherapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 64–69.Google Scholar
  13. Gladstein, G. A. (1987). The role of empathy in counseling: Theoretical considerations. In G. A. Gladstein & Associates (Eds.), Empathy and Counseling: Explorations in Theory and Research. NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, R., & Sigall, H. (1977). The effect of empathy and outcome on attribution: An examination of the divergent-perspectives hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 480–491.Google Scholar
  15. Houston, D. A. (1990). Empathy and the self: Cognitive and emotional influences on the evaluation of negative affect in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 859–868.Google Scholar
  16. Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 587–609.Google Scholar
  17. Ickes, W., Stinson, L, Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,730–742.Google Scholar
  18. Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Izard, C. E., & Beuchler, S. (1980). Aspects of consciousness and personality in terms of differential emotions theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol. 1. Theories of emotion (pp. 165–187). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jones E., & Nisbett, P. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kiesler, D. J. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110–136.Google Scholar
  22. Knight, G. P., Johnson, L. G., Carlo, G., & Eisenberg, N. (1994). Affective reasoning as a disposition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 178–183.Google Scholar
  23. Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32,1134–1146.Google Scholar
  24. Marangoni, C., Ickes, W., Garcia, S., & Teng, G. (1995). Empathic Accuracy in a Clinically Relevant Setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 854–869.Google Scholar
  25. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.Google Scholar
  27. Olesker, W., & Balter, L. (1972). Sex and empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 559–562.Google Scholar
  28. Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S. Garfield & A. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed., pp. 311–381). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Regan, D., & Totten, J. (1975). Empathy and attribution: Turning observers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 850–856.Google Scholar
  31. Scherer, K. R. (1984). Emotion as multicomponent process: A model and some cross-cultural data. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 37–63). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory studies of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Strongman K. T. (1978). The psychology of emotion (2nd ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. R. (1967). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy: Training and practice. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  35. Weiner, B., & Graham, S. (1984). An attributional approach to emotional development. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 167–191). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comments